Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 31st, 2016

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geothermal well.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image used in spam on en.wp, probably not a free image. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image used in spam on en.wp, probably not a free image. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, maybe speedily. According to EXIF copyright holder is "Shaun Ferraloro" we have no evidence that Andy Aeroboard is Shaun Ferraloro. Ankry (talk) 14:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moulalisaheb.g (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False own work claims.

Savhñ 12:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am however unsure about certain of these files. This forum post explicitly states " anyone place this picture in Narayanadri Express Wikipedia page" (File:Rayalaseema_Express_near_Tpty.jpg listed above), but the source isn't indicated on the commons page nor does the author give a valid license here. Others are however blatant copyvios. Savhñ 18:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Mass copyrigth violations. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Wilbysuffolk

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Benoît Philippe, the person I photographed, considered the pic not convenient for him and his work and proposed another one to me Susomoinhos (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

will be recorded in this page 110.81.176.96 01:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 15:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

check messages 110.81.176.96 11:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 15:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free comic book character Épico (talk)/(contribs) 01:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. File marked as copyvio. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 01:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Hedwig in Washington 31 December 2016. --Achim (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Superseded}} RStehn (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Rüdiger, soll die ganze Gallery gelöscht werden oder ist das {{Delete}} vielleicht falsch plaziert? --Achim (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just found User:RStehn/Gallery/Archaeological excavations in Schlossquartier, Kiel Altstadt 2016. --Achim (talk) 20:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User requested deletion in own userspace: Bad name. --Achim (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image not in use Imedeiros (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal image not in use Imedeiros (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 07:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a load more of this stuff uploaded by this user at the same time. Acabashi (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariaivnna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two covers of books, other - no metadata, small width, seems like copyvio from web.

Dmitry89 (talk) 08:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 06:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 13:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Proper info and license added. --Sealle (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/ancien/images/carrere.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Même remarque que pour les autres fichiers:
Je ne comprends pas où est le problème vous avez reçu deux mails d'Athanase Vantchev de Thracy le 31 décembre dont voici la copie:
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.institutcultureldesolenzara.org/ancien/solav3.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos5/photos5_043.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos5/photos5_046.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos5/photos5_055.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne comprends pas où est le problème vous avez reçu deux mails d'Athanase Vantchev de Thracy le 31 décembre dont voici la copie:
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos/athanaseorg.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)© Christian de Brosses/Studio Le Beaukal[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos/ath.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
N'empêche que je trouve bizarre d'avoir effacé mes arguments(voir historique, idem pour tous les fichiers d'Athanase)--Amage9 (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos/picture-07.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.athanase.org/images/stories/photos3/17032011.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS received but incomplete. Template:OTRS ticket kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS 2016123110007294 is unsucessful. Please delete these files. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 06:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the airline's Facebook page. Note lack of EXIF data. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Could've been taken from here. Note difference between author name and EXIF data. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the image states, "copyright by Skyliner" — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the airline's Facebook pageSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from this newspaper article from July 2015. Note lack of EXIF data. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from this blog published in December 2013. Note lack of EXIF data. — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the airline's Facebook pageSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the airline's Facebook pageSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo with non-geometric features — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from this person's personal report on flight-report.com, published in June 2014 — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from here as it says on the photo itself — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo with non geometric features — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot in some video game — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 19:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PLC-ICI-EAI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, no permission.

Yann (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 07:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PLC-ICI-EAI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused graphics with little context, little educational use, out of scope. And judging from the wide variety of graphic styles, many if not most are likely not own work.

P 1 9 9   17:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mesias809 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 22:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, use of Commons for hosting personal promotional pics. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 23:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abolyc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promo images

lNeverCry 23:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, use of Commons for hosting personal pics. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 23:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, use of Commons for hosting personal pics. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 23:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, use of Commons for hosting personal promotional pics. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 23:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, use of Commons for hosting personal promotional pics. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 23:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per ticket:2016101310012039, the photograph itself does not have valid permission and appears to be from an unknown creator. The photograph will become PD in the Ukraine on January 1, 2024 and in the United States on January 1, 2048 unless copyright law changes. Original publication was in 1953. ~ Rob13Talk 00:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 01:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tuerenwahl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete

A. As stated by Magog, we do not keep PDF biographies here.
B. The document is completely out of scope as the subject has no obvious notability. Not only is there no WP article, but there are no Google hits.
C. The document contains many images. It is unlikely that they, and the text, are all the work of the uploader as claimed.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:ETUDE DU CONTENTIEUX DE LA FONCTION PUBLIQUE INTERNATIONALE ET DES CONTRATS DE STATUT LOCAL.pdf

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User page image of an inactive user. Not in use. GeorgHHtalk   12:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagem desatualizada Danvicmar15 (talk) 00:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uloader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 01:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity selfie, only use was on now-deleted user subpage on en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity image, only use was on now deleted user subpage on en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO#Common law countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ladyhawk Events (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photo. I did not upload it and it is under copyright, not creative commons. Someone else uploaded it and is taking credit for the photo. 2602:306:30B5:CAA0:5495:3F59:77FF:70F9 18:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, small size, no EXIF data, the complaining IP could very well be right. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO in Japan? Amitie 10g (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per original nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christine pierre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    20:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user image. out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZeeshanLuv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artwork; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope TherasTaneel (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope TherasTaneel (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, apparently out of scope Tabercil (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality picture of unidentified person. Educational value unclear. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WeberbankBich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duplicates of File:Weberbank Logo.jpg with white borders.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is probably a copyright violation (derivative work), unless someone can explain otherwise. (Auto-translation: இது யாரோ இல்லையெனில் விளக்க முடியும் வரை, அநேகமாக ஒரு காப்புரிமை மீறல் (வழித்தோன்றல் வேலை) உள்ளது.) Ubcule (talk) 14:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe um ficheiro com esse mesmo nome. King Durant (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 07:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright reason. None of the reasons at PD-Russia seems to apply. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. File is called 'Yin Fu'; desciption is: 'Yin Fu lovely photo'. This one purports to come from notoriously unreliable Facebook. Acabashi (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Reverted vandal removal of notice by uploader. Acabashi (talk) 07:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update note: The uploader has today decided to remove the Facebook link and change source and author... the original uploaded link can be found in the file history. I've found the picture on the Facebook page, so one of two things: a. possible copyvio as Facebook pics are nororiously unreliable, or b. If it is kosher on Facebook it is obviously a personal selfie image of a nonentity and out of scope. Acabashi (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid license - no evidense of US.Gov. - Image page says Trois-Rivières Église paroissiale vers 1906. (Site web: photojrad.shost.ca | Photo source: Ville de Trois-Rivières | Photo: Don de John Argall) Photo restaurée par Alain Dupuis | photojrad.shost.ca. Looks like a Canadian photographer called Don de John Argall - need a death date, needs to have died 1966 or earlier (Canada copyright lasts 50 pma) Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: Actually we don't need a date of dead, photo taken before 1949 in Canada are automatically on the public domain, and this church was destroyed in 1908. So we know the photograph was John Argall and it was taken before 1908. I suggest we put {{PD-Canada}} and {{PD-US-1923}} as licences. --Fralambert (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fralambert: license tags updated. Ruthven (msg) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Better quality image already exists:
Desyman (talk) 18:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not bad quality, see COM:Redundant. Ruthven (msg) 14:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diagram does not make sense (it is mixing up various things) and is highly misleading. OS and applications are erroneously shown on same level of abstraction. Assembler is no abstraction layer at all, but a tool to translate assembly language into machine language. OS and applications are software as well. Firmware is a weak term, as it may include programmable logic. By other definitions it includes all software as well. What might have been meant might be an hardware abstraction layer like a HAL or BIOS, but this does not become clear at all. All in all, no matter how this diagram is interpreted, it is never correct and only confuses readers. Therefore, there's no point in keeping it. Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an encyclopedia we have a responsibility not to spread false information. It is better to create a new diagram (or a set of new specifically tailored diagrams) than spreading fundamentally false information.
This diagram is so confused, it is not like comparing apples and oranges, or apples and trees, but like comparing apples and cars.
As I explained above, an "assembler" (in the context of computing) is a tool used in software development to translate assembly language programs into machine language. The term has nothing to do with abstraction levels.
Perhaps the creator of the diagram actually meant "assembly language" (rather than "assembler"), which could at least make sense in a diagram comparing it with "machine language", and "higher level languages" like compiled or interpreted languages. But terms like "firmware", "applications", "OS", or "kernel" would not make sense to be included in such a diagram on programming languages.
Alternatively, perhaps the creator meant that the lower-level software between the application and the hardware is often written in assembly language, whereas higher-level components are often written in higher-level languages, but this is not what the diagram shows, and it would be using false terms, anyway. In this case, the creator might have meant a HAL (hardware abstraction layer) or a BIOS (Basic Input/Output System).
Further, the term "firmware" typically includes all system software in an embedded system, including the operating system, and typically often even including the application (if fixed). It is not something below an operating system, hence the diagram is misleading again.
A "kernel" is a part of an operating system, so it does not make sense to show it on a different layer than the "operating system".
And so on... This diagram is totally confused. We can only gain by deleting it.
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Amitie. Ruthven (msg) 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 01:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a company logo. Standing to release the copyright must be shown John from Idegon (talk) 02:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ©, out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What website? The one on the linked en.wikipedia.org article is parked. I really don't know what the appropriate policy is, but posting an unverified signature of a minor cannot be a good idea John from Idegon (talk) 02:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not fair use. Duplicate of image found at http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2016/sep/01/ewu-new-quarterback-coach-troy-taylor-likes-depth-/ Zackmann08 (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

facebook source without permission Dacoucou (talk) 06:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CD civer without permission Dacoucou (talk) 06:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere without permission Dacoucou (talk) 06:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

совпадает с файлом File:Jeep US Army 14062015 (Foto Hilarmont) (1).jpg Barbariandeagle (talk) 06:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use the duplicate template. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems unlikely that this image from the 1980s is actuallyown work as claimed. Since the subject is not named. it is also not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1983 team portrait is almost certainly not "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF data, found elsewhere on the web Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any mention of CC0 on the site Dudek1337 (talk) 15:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to this file: File:Alvez_BSC_(cropped).jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AP photo, copyrighted since 1963 - taken by Lawrence Schiller, link to interview re: photo here Winkelvi (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No value whatsoever. Other good images of the same subject. Oyoyoy (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the book text or image is free to use. Probable copyvio. Possibly Out of scope too. Acabashi (talk) 15:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Low quality picture used for advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kasse4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, massive mal-exposure Joschi71 (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TGSK-YSNB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.ens.fr/recherche/portraits/article/michel-espagne § cf "mentions légales" http://www.ens.fr/l-ecole-1/l-ecole/article/mentions-legales Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image ("Ist das Kunst oder kann das weg?" ) Joschi71 (talk) 17:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that uploader created this picture. Subject is photographer with webpage http://www.murvegetalpatrickblanc.com/patrick-blanc/portraits?page=21 from which this most likely was taken. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work; other uploads were from webpage of subject. This one appears to be a scan, notice the blue line at left side. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better image already exists here. Desyman (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 18:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected not own work, found here as "Foto: ©Lars Aarø, Fokus la@fokus-foto.dk www.fokus-foto.dk " TherasTaneel (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) Yann (talk) 23:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is used on the artists own website and claims copyright. See http://djprizm.com/newsite/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noq (talk • contribs) 2016-12-26T09:22:59‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not ownwork. Machine information is a digital camera and there is a suspicion of infringement of portrait rights. アルトクール (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, scope questionable without any inforamtion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ultraman characters

[edit]

Commons:Derivative work. They contain copyrighted characters. Not free use.--禁樹なずな (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTHERSHITEXISTS is not a valid rationale. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful name or description, no cats, therefore not useful. Probably not "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD per FOP in Finland Stryn (talk) 11:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from Alejandra Arce. Jcb (talk) 13:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ALso file:Sergio-IMG 0078.jpg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Originally uploaded at EN wiki as Fair Use. Jcb (talk) 13:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:I Got it Yesterday - Senator Ted Stevens.ogg - Jcb (talk) 17:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no permission. Description states: 'created by a friend'. Jcb (talk) 22:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce logo m'appartient et va devenir une marque déposée dans quelques jours. Je l'ai mis en ligne par erreur. Je ne souhaite plus qu'il soit en libre accès. Merci d'avance La Claque au Cuir (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence for publication without a copyright notice. Jcb (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No authorship information for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Adding a red dot does not make one the new copyright holder. Jcb (talk) 13:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded claims to be the copyright owner of the work, but it appears to be a transcript from a newsletter. So either they created it themselves which would have no real historical value on an encyclopedia, or they are the creator of the mailing list, which there is no real suggestion of here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Text above TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:45, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aperçu de Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vue Générale.jpg Sauvegarder Résumé :


En enregistrant ces modifications, vous acceptez les Conditions d'Utilisation et acceptez de livrer votre contribution sous la licenses CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL .

Exclam icon.svg

Keep tidy ask.svg Cette page du projet a été proposé(e) à la suppression depuis le 31 décembre 2016. Pour en discuter, merci d’aller sur la page de la demande. Ne retirez pas ce message tant que la demande de suppression n’est pas close.

Raison pour la demande de suppression : image of a naval base forbidden Cette page fait partie des demandes de suppression incomplètes parce qu'elle est incomplète (vous n’avez pas créé de sous-page). Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vue Générale.jpg. VEUILLEZ renseigner l’ensemble des cinq paramètres et créer la sous-page !

La syntaxe complète est rappelée ici, au cas où vous auriez fait une erreur :

image of a naval base forbidden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matethieu (talk • contribs) 2016-12-31T09:37:37‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Assinatura Maria Cavaco Silva.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by RickMorais (talk • contribs) 2016-12-20T22:31:44‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not the same signature. svg available doesn' mean we delete raster graphic. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has Getty Images watermark, and appears to require licensing that the uploader, a repeat problem editor, has not obtained. Licensing page here. Uploader claims as own work, while the licensing page states it is a photo of a 19th-century woodcut from the Hulton Archive. --Eric my en.wp talk page 14:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Plainly not "own work", but equally not something Getty has any right to license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have concerns about this image that Hedwig in Washington deleted yesterday when the Flickr license was non-free. The license has now been changed but it has no metadata and the exif data gives no useful details but I also found the image, in uncropped version and different resolution, here linked from this webpage (click on last image on right below the main illustration to see this image) which is a Colombian architect's website. That image has exif data which attributes Photoshop work on the image to Carlos Tobon and indicate dates 17 and 24 May 2016 not as stated on Flickr. Probably the image belongs to the organisation or the photographer commissioned by them and maybe the Flickr user, whose wiki name is very similar, works for them, but personally I think we should have an OTRS verification for this one. Ww2censor (talk) 14:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS seems to be advisable. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of the Lego figure. King of 15:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question: If this upload is a copyright violation, why aren't these also copyvios:
File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto4.JPG
File:Visitor Services Specialist by Carey Edwards.jpg
File:Light Green Lego Brick.jpg
or for that matter all members of Category:Lego and its subcategories? —Bruce1eetalk 10:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, those are copyvios as well with the following caveats: 1) if the Lego sculpture is in a country that allows COM:FOP for 3D art in public places and the place it was taken from is considered a public place under that country's laws; 2) I don't think a single Lego brick can meet COM:TOO, especially given the high threshold required in Denmark. -- King of 14:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The first of the three in the question is covered by Canadian FOP. The last is below the ToO. The second is probably a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small resolution, no EXIF, no own work claim. Probably not own work, unknown copyright situation.

Jcb (talk) 22:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Istnieją dwa prawie takie same zdjęcia: File:Obelisk Lędziny 3.JPG ETR (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The one I kept is a slightly better exposure. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zdjęcie rozmyte, złej jakości ETR (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is also DW of almost everything in the image -- this is not on permanent display. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es erroneo, no se corresponde con el escudo oficial Bouces (talk) 13:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photographs depict stained glass windows by Carl Crodel (see here) who died in 1973. The depicted artwork is still copyrighted and there is no freedom of panorama for interior photographs in Germany. These pictures can be undeleted in 2044.

AFBorchert (talk) 07:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reproduktion oder neues Design? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Die Frage verstehe ich jetzt nicht wirklich. Was für eine Reproduktion? Diese Fenster wurden wie gesagt von Carl Crodel neu geschaffen. Zitat aus dem Kirchenführer Hauptkirche St. Jacobi Hamburg, der in der Kirche verkauft wird, auf S. 16: „Sie entstanden 1957–1961, nachdem die farbigen Fenster des 19. Jh. im 2. Weltkrieg zerstört wurden.“--AFBorchert (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, neues Design ist laut Kirchenführer und Aussehen anzunehmen. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of date and not in use anywhere. Replaceable by SVG version, which is mostly identical. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
13:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that this would come from Open Clip Art, this license was later added by someone who was not the uploader. Jcb (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Yes, the circuit probably is ©, anyway. I believe the uploader created the image using stuff from OCA. Should have been sourced, tho. I go with Com:AGF and assume own work for the design. The symbols used are not copyrightable by themself. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright reason. None of the reasons at PD-Russia seems to apply. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 13:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2006 file, pinged the uploader on homewiki. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No proof of publication and far too recent to assume the author died before 1947. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject died 1899 in what was then the Ottoman Empire. If it was first published there, it never had a copyright. Otherwise it might. I think we are safe in keeping it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No readable date. No indication that this would be a pre-1923 publication. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source, no date. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]