Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 29th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original image may be copyrighted. Incomplete credits. Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 01:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PADEEP KUMAR (SHAJI) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License status to be confirmed : The eagle seems to be a taken from the internet, see [1]. I suspect a copyvio. Kathisma (talk) 02:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (also deleted the other upload by the same user, in a similar situation). -- Darwin Ahoy! 04:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Arachne3 logo.gif MCMLXXXIX 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FILE-NAME.JPG

[edit]

WRITE REASON - 커뷰 (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary people, nothing interesting. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 01:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bad album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bad album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An other album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I feel it is inappropriate for Commons to host a gallery largely consisting of documents whose copyright belongs to others (i.e. they should go). That would leave only one image of Murphy, which is already adequately represented in Category:Jon Murphy. The documents themselves do not contribute to his en:WP article Jon Murphy. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nominate the files for deletion first. As soon as only one image is left at the gallery, it can be nominated for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image in gallery is already covered by Category:Jon Murphy as copyright-violating documents have been deleted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information on the original picture in 1985. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Author is here [2], so write to him...puritans...--Rottweiler (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no indication or statement that this user took the original picture, back in 1985. And the place where a file was first uploaded to one of our projects is not a valid source of course. Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But it's true...delete it anyway, i don't care about such stupid thing, i hope you'll be feel better...--Rottweiler (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm it is my OWN work. My age was 17 when i took this picture.--PetrS. (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! This will do. Jcb (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at jonathancohler.com/HeadShots, specifically this one. No compatible license on the page. The uploader User:Cohler is claiming "own work" but the metadata says otherwise: ©2009 Jon Chomitz Photography. Voceditenore (talk) 11:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please, be aware of the upload of File:Jonathan Cohler.jpg, same image with modified Exif: The copyright holder has been edited, the copyright status hasn't. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE First, the photo you reference is NOT the exact same file and the exact same file is NOT, in fact, published at http://jonathancohler.com/HeadShots which is my website. Although some different versions of the same photograph are published there, I own all the rights to ALL of the images and data on http://jonathancohler.com and ALL the photographs published there were created as works for hire by me. The meta data in the file(s) is incorrect and left over from before the material was purchased. Photographer systems automatically put those copyright notices into files and they have no simple way of removing them from thousands of files after the fact when photo rights are purchased outright as I have done throughout my career. The fact is very simply as I stated when I uploaded the file: I own the copyrights to the file I uploaded. Please remove your deletion request. --Jonathan Cohler Jonathan Cohler User:Cohler User talk:Cohler 08:43, 29 Dec 2016 (EST)


Deleted: As the image was published elsewhere before upload to the Commons, COM:OTRS requires additional evidence of permission to be submitted using the process on that page. As the subject, Cohler is not the author; accordingly, Cohler would only hold copyrights, and thus the ability to license the image, if formally conveyed to him from the photographer. Correspondence to OTRS must therefore include a copy of this conveyance (e.g., the aforementioned work-for-hire agreement, employment contract, etc.). --Эlcobbola talk 02:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonathan Cohler.jpg restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuzzy picture. Only advertising. Out of scope. Outlookxp (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unusable blurry photo, P 1 9 9   21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created and placed on hoax article (since deleted) on en.wiki ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: The right part is copyvio of Luis Quiles' artwork. Already deleted as File:One Batty Pic.jpg.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations given the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the fact that all of the user's other uploads have been blatant copyright violations with false authorship claims.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. Possibly screenshots from a video or television broadcast (the height being typical for that, while the width may have been selected to crop out channel logos or watermarks).

LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shunshine Always (talk · contribs)

[edit]

...and instead of commenting on the existing deletion nomination, Shunshine Always continues to charge ahead with more low-resolution images without metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 07:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, grabbed from http://www.cabellavista.com.uy/futbol/primera-profesional/306-resembrado-del-estadio-jose-nasazzi-el-cesped-mas-verde-que-nunca. --Achim (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 01:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://familyplastics.com/ does not precise a CC BY-SA 4.0 license for this logo, only "COPYRIGHT © 2016 FAMILY PLASTICS" for the whole site. If it's not below the threshold of originality then it's a permission is needed or it's a copyright violation. Why a PDF? Maybe COM:GOODFAITH and the uploader is genuinely the copyright holder. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I request not delete this logo as this is our company's official logo and it is the original file saved in pdf format. If pdf format is not allowed, I can upload the low resolution file from our website itself. Guide me. I have also updated the license cc-by-sa-4.0 DennyKuriakose (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DennyKuriakose: Could you please follow COM:OTRS instructions and send an evidence that you got the permission to place this company logo under a free-to-use-even-commercially license such as CC BY-SA 4.0?
You also could have uploaded your logo directly on en.wikipedia.org where faire use is allowed and keep it copyrighted.
Sincerely, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lacrymocéphale, may I know the step you have asked for? Could you please tell me more about the evidence/permission you are looking for. Am I suppose to send an email from my ID to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org agreeing to publish content under free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International??DennyKuriakose (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DennyKuriakose: That's it --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: magazine cover, no evidence of permission http://www.vtg.mod.gov.rs/about-journal.html#.WGTWgPnhC70 Yann (talk) 09:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: magazine cover, no evidence of permission http://www.vtg.mod.gov.rs/about-journal.html#.WGTWgPnhC70 Yann (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: magazine cover, no evidence of permission http://www.vtg.mod.gov.rs/about-journal.html#.WGTWgPnhC70 Yann (talk) 09:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Randykitty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: magazine cover, no indication of any permission. http://www.vtg.mod.gov.rs/about-journal.html#.WGTWgPnhC70 Yann (talk) 09:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the permission information has been added to this and 7 other images from the same batch. Can you please remove the deletion templates from the images? --Filip (§) 20:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Anthere: Out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ouaglog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 16:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yaquipore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG and with correct names if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yaquipore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Also misleading file names.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Yaquipore is a hoax-only user. I'll delete all his/her contribution as hoaxes. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fabrizio Nigro uploads

[edit]

every file is copyrighted as stated in their description.--fringio · α†Ω 14:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License information unclear; image is copyrighted. – Rhain 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see original image) ZiaLater (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. ZiaLater (talk) 15:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see original image) ZiaLater (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see original image) ZiaLater (talk) 16:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see original image) ZiaLater (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see original image) ZiaLater (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) at source, Tafila Technical University 2016 me I see a CC BY-SA 3.0 license Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: I went back to the pages and found that my browser was putting a dark bar over the license, but that Firefox browser did not do that. I've now replaced the old browser with Firefox permanently because this can't happen again. I withdraw this and all the others of the same situation. Please close all these as keep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as no permission (No permission since), I reviewed this and I remember it, the source was ok, and such a licensing is irrevocable even if the source have been changed, I think maybe Ellin Beltz can remember too. For me the licensing is ok, in the extend the file is in scope of course. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" but obviously a screenshot from Google Maps, even includes their copyright mark. Antepenultimate (talk) 21:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW - Big Mouth Billy Bass is copyrighted to Gemmy Industries Corporation, see VA0001015293 dated 2000-09-22 (previously registered as VA 983-291) at copyright.gov.

Эlcobbola talk 22:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW; Mickey is not in the public domain. (I checked) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW; Mickey is not in the public domain. (I checked) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW; Mickey is not in the public domain. (I checked) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW; Mickey is not in the public domain. (I checked) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Payam22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Payam22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of organization of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Payam22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

lNeverCry 23:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yahno TuneGee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

lNeverCry 01:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image lNeverCry 01:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinguinogallego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photo of non relevant person Stego (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 01:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old photo of me that I wish to delete Ibby93 (talk) 01:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 01:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 01:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful lNeverCry 01:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AHMEDslimanGLAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bad album photo. Out of scope Jos1950 (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lahlali Ammar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS - low quality/bad lighting lNeverCry 02:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS - tiny, blurred, very low quality thumb lNeverCry 02:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising material, not in scope. Reventtalk 07:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCREENSHOT of Windows XP. Reventtalk 07:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft allows publications of such type screenshots, check Non-free_Microsoft_screenshot -- Kuzdo (»msg) 07:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
@Kuzdo: Yes, they do. What they do not allow is for them to be published under the terms of a CC-BY-SA license. Upload it locally on Wikipedia. Reventtalk 12:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Apollo Global Management logo.png MCMLXXXIX 07:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [3] MCMLXXXIX 07:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo abot TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, maybe aboce TOO too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, maybe above TOO too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 08:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 08:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the used base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 09:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lacks of source to determine copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 09:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per FBMD. Previously published in facebook

Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, these images have been already published, in this case we require a permission from the copyright holder. Some of the images are also likely out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 01:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG file used as a test. 151.20.223.208 01:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinotxo1337 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chanjun3074 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Similar (if not exact) images can be found in numerous places all over the Internet. Add in the watermarks that exist on some of them and the lack of EXIF data on any of them and it is highly unlikely that these are own work.

Majora (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 02:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not an amateur porn site. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernandofotosprint1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; Personal image(s).

MCMLXXXIX 04:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is very unlikely to be own work of the uploader, as claimed. It is Shutterstock ID #2925698 by Shapiso. (tJosve05a (c) 04:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use {{Copyvio}} next time for files coming from Shutterstock. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Post-closure comment) @Thibaut120094: I would have, if it wasn't such an old file, which was also a derivative of the copyvio. (tJosve05a (c) 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of the newspaper Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work/out of scope Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster, unlikely to be own work Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF, unlikely to be own work Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large file size for a png? Out of scope? (tJosve05a (c) 06:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 07:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quality suggests this is a video screengrab. User has previously uploaded screengrabs of TV broadcast. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:57, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete --KAPour les intimes 22:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Jcb (talk) 09:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Figkmutnb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanazabbasi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 01:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mia Medina-Schmidt/sandbox. MER-C 03:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no context given so maybe out of scope. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 08:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 09:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless diagram, out of scope Jcb (talk) 09:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanilson Rodrigues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused image of unknown people

Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, badly cropped Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content, advertisment for user of game in question. Lordtobi () 12:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content, non-free screenshot of commercial game Lordtobi () 12:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hot Photo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-project-scope unused images from an hard-to-trust user.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for Commons, image is not at all useful. Novakreo (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie; personal image; out of scope Takeaway (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ASC.png

[edit]

How are these ineligible for copyright? The uploader just threw a tag on them (as s/he did with other images, often falsely); I don't see any evidence them being free of copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. --XXN, 20:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 20:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   21:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Los reivers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

lNeverCry 22:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Context-less personal gallery content Lordtobi () 12:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused advertisment Lordtobi () 12:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Context-less personal gallery content Lordtobi () 12:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Context-less personaly gallery content/retouched screenshot of non-free media Lordtobi () 12:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 14:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, COM:NOTHOST Épico (talk)/(contribs) 15:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be some trees and grass, not a village. Very small size, unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appear to be a personal image of a project and a guy crashed out on the sofa. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Najafzadeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Najafzadeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is extremely similar, to the point of being almost identical, to the non-free on-screen intertitle shown in each episode of the television series. It doesn't seem to fall into a free category AussieLegend () 16:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cr8709 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, no educational value, out of scope. More importantly, these images are likely uploaded to shame or discredit the woman, judging by the description and categories.

P 1 9 9   15:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cr8709 (talk 1

[edit]

Unused personal images, no educational value, out of scope. More importantly, these images are likely uploaded to shame or discredit the woman, see also previous batch deletion by this uploader.

P 1 9 9   15:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I decided to speedy delete them as "Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack". P 1 9 9   15:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ABDO RAJAWi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 17:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how a black square with white letters is "promotional" in any way, but if it isn't being used and the company has been determined to be non-notable, by all means, please delete. I'm fairly positive that I uploaded this per a request on en.wp. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of no apparent educational utility Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused doodle art by uploader maybe. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 18:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no indicaiton of notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a building somewhere. Probably not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a ten year attendee of San Diego Comic Con, where this photo was taken, I can very easily tell that this photo was taken of one of the video screens, which is copyrighted by San Diego Comic-Con International. The photo is slightly distorted due to the angle of the screen when the photo was originally taken, rather than of the person actually sitting at the table as the photo is trying to portray. It's also straight on, which is usual for the SDCC camera to show on the big screen for the whole audience. I'm not sure if this same user has had other photos uploaded, but if there are others I would suggest that the same issue would exist with those photos as well. -Gage (talk) 12:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I briefly looked at the user's Flickr page immediately after posting this, and the original photo shows the edge of the screen, which was cropped in this photo. They did however take photos up closer to the front of the room of the actual people on stage, rather than of the screen, so I would be very careful of bringing up any further photos for deletion unless it is very obvious. Gage (talk) 12:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:DW, as per nomination. —RP88 (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

collage of unattributed images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship - these map fragments look like as screenshots from navigation program.

Art-top (talk) 04:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

Unused private photos - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very low resolution photos without original exif - doubtful authorship. Almost the entire contribution of the user is removed as copivio.

Art-top (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 09:54, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TuanUt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screenshots from the project are not needed, they can be recreated by history

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized modern art with no clear proof who created it and if that person is notable or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file which doesn't seem to be in scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, blurry image of a rosewindow in an unidentified location. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:John Allsebrook Simon, Vanity Fair, 1911-10-18.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:John Allsebrook Simon, Vanity Fair, 1911-10-18.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, other version is far superior and includes orginianl text at top and bottom. Rcbutcher (talk) 01:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 19:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 20:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Sir Harold John Tennant. Colour lithograph by Sir L. Ward (S Wellcome V0005756.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:Sir Harold John Tennant. Colour lithograph by Sir L. Ward (S Wellcome V0005756.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Charles Thomson Ritchie.png The Traditionalist (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:Charles Thomson Ritchie.png The Traditionalist (talk) 00:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Richard Assheton Cross Vanity Fair 16 May 1874.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:Richard Assheton Cross Vanity Fair 16 May 1874.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image for living person --Alaa Najjar :)..! 00:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alaa Najjar , why do you say it is non-free? It is true that it is relatively small and has no EXIF, but it does not show up in a Google search and we generally assume good faith when a user claims "Own Work". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward: sorry I forgot to close this request after the end of discussion in arabic wikipedia about the picture and person and his notability, so after the discussion we confirm that the person who uploaded the picture take it, sorry again and you can close the request, thanks alot--Alaa Najjar :)..! 14:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Matthew White Ridley Vanity Fair 23 July 1881.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:Matthew White Ridley Vanity Fair 23 July 1881.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:The Earl of Harrowby Vanity Fair 1885-11-28.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphan low resolution duplicate of File:The Earl of Harrowby Vanity Fair 1885-11-28.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution duplicate of File:Leonard Henry Courtney, Vanity Fair, 1880-09-25.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not exact duplicates - this version is in use. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Globally orphaned low resolution duplicate of File:Leonard Henry Courtney, Vanity Fair, 1880-09-25.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it is truly globally orphaned, then, yes, delete it. Its replacement at w:Leonard Courtney, 1st Baron Courtney of Penwith is good. DavidBrooks (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото 1975 года, скорее всего , студийной работы Dogad75 (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Я автор этой фотографии и это мой дед. Фото из моего личного альбома. Я заполнил все в соответствии с правилами. This is a photo from my family album and I am the owner of this photo. This man, who in the picture, he's my grandfather.

--Aydın Əlizadə (talk) 05:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вы сами сфотографировали его? --Dogad75 (talk) 22:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Это фото сделано и проявлено лично мной на моем советском фотоаппарате Зенит. Поэтому авторские права принадлежат только мне. --Aydın Əlizadə (talk) 08:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Aydın Əlizadə. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a portrait of Rowland. Instead, it is a non-notable person and there is no reason for the picture to be kept. The Traditionalist (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Rowland to me. Circa 1945. Rcbutcher (talk) 02:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Rcbutcher: From the description: "Accordng to correspondence between Ian Rose and the Australian War Memorial on 18 July 2012, this portrait is not of Flight Lieutenant James Anthony Rowland DFC, RAAF, later Chief of the Air Staff and Governor of New South Wales."--The Traditionalist (talk) 19:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, when I originally uploaded a copy of the AWM file, it was labelled as being Rowland but later I requested confirmation and they came back and said no it isn't him, hence the note above. No need to take my word for it though -- the latest version of the file at AWM states that the subject is "unidentified", so there's really no reason to retain this on Commons, certainly not under its current name. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although these circumstances make it strange, this image is in use and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, cannot identify educational purpose nor even the intended subject of the image. Gauss (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I did not quite understand the questioning of the lack of usefulness for this picture. Sturm (talk) 04:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The picture shows several blurry hands in front of a blurry fence. The only object that might be of interest is near the right edge but it's probably no more than a bag containing a sand-coloured item (hard to tell because of some blurry red-white stuff in the foreground. Please, what usefulness can you see possibly in this picture? And what connection to "Dawn in the Church of Saint George" (=translation of the title/description)? -- Gauss (talk) 03:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files in this category were uploaded by the Latvian Culture sock group. The images use a variety of cameras and are of varying quality, so it's unlikely they are from the same author. Potentially the user names were an attempt to identify the respective authors, but since in the creation of the articles on the German Wikipedia and en:the English Wikipedia sockpuppets were also used, I deem this unlikely. We would need COM:OTRS permission anyway, and I doubt most those institutions would give permission to release their images under a CC license. The precautionary principle applies.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by LatvianCulture.


List of 610 Files
* File:01. Conductor and pianist Matthias Manasi in rehearsal.JPG

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musicdirector Matthias Manasi.02.jpg has "Julia Baier" as author in the EXIF data, which is a professional photographer. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: Thank you Jim! Two files from the list above are still left:
Can you take care of them? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weird -- I used VFC for the deletion and selected all of them (with "Invert All"), but for some reason it missed three -- one that I fixed earlier and these two. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be a government work, looks rather like a press photo. Jcb (talk) 11:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be a government work, looks rather like a press photo. Jcb (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 12:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on WP:PL -- cannot be deleted for this reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (personal gallery content). ed: Image has no relevance to the topic in question, Grand Theft Auto Online, and does not seem to refer to an existing crew. Assisting editor on Polish Wikipedia identified the image as hoax or personal promotion, removing the image's only usage. Lordtobi () 12:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Lordtobi () 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File is in use in a good way. This is a repetitive DR with no new information or reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason has been updated. Lordtobi () 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lordtobi, you removed the logo from Wikipedia addeed by Jameslwoodward (a Commons Admin). That removal violates WP:POINT, as you removed contents from Wikipedia just to keep your point (where at least two users disagree). I reverted your edition at Wikipedia, so  Keep, as the file is still in use. If you revert my edition again, this will be considered an Edit war (since you removed it several times), and I'll consider that as vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I had discussed the issue with the editor who originally added the image to the Polish Wikipedia, and he agreed with he and remove it again himself. Jim, who apparently disagrees with the editor who made him close my DR in the first place, and added it again (edit warring), to stand his point. I was aware of WP:POINT (even if it is not a Commons guideline), and so I can't figure why he is allowed to make his opinion correct but I am blamed for clearing up the violation. Makes no sense to me, and invalidates your reasoning. Lordtobi () 22:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Lordtobi and Amitie 10g's. There are two main issues with regard to the logo: first of all, permission. If that's really one of the teams' logo, proper permission must be provided. Exactly in the same way as any other image uploaded to commons from other place. The second one relates to Amitie's. What's actually pointy is to use a personal logo to illustrate a wikipedia article. It fails to meet relevance and secondary source policies. To sum up, the image lacks proper permission and cannot be used to illustrate wikipedia articles. Best regards --Discasto talk 17:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Since this purports to be the logo of a "team", which is almost certainly not formally organized in the sense that a football club or other organization is, I am perfectly willing to assume good faith on the claim of "own work". Since teams are apparently an important aspect of the subject game, I also think that the logo is an appropriate illustration for a WP article.
Bender claims that the logo is bogus. That may be, but given his point of view here, I am reluctant to simply accept his assertion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope, personal logo, unused at this point. Adding this logo to the game's page is a bit like adding the logo of a small, non-notable sports team to the article "Football". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The company has never existed, and is just another example of citogenesis. Therefore, this image should be deleted as well to kick off the deletion of the entity on all Wikipedias. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockstar Japan for reference. Lordtobi () 12:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, because the file is in use and in my opinion simple enough to be below COM:TOO.--Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that it is not about copyright violation, TOO has no impact on either keep or delete. Please re-read the nomination: The problem is that the company "Rockstar Japan" has never existed, only citogenesis spread the name and alleged information, including this image. You can call it a hoax if you wish. Lordtobi () 10:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is "own work". Yann (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete. I own the copyright. Thank you. SurvivingID (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mal nommé (manque un 's') et non utilisé, le fichier utile est : File:Blason commune CH Rossenges (Vaud).svg Aiwe (talk) 13:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User:Aiwe -- uploading an image twice because the name is bad is a waste of Admin time and computer resources. Next time, please use {{Rename}} to request a name change. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Keep With this general argument, we would need to delete all commercial packagings here ... I was involved in making this bottle label. I therefore can upload it here, can't I? GeoTrinity (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We do not keep images of copyrighted commercial packaging. In order to restore this, the copyright owner must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Friedrichs Apple Tonic.jpg

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation ZiaLater (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. ZiaLater (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jcb why is notification on my Talk page, i dont remember that i upload this. Whatever, since mortality rate among Serbian soliders was biggest in 1st world war, yes biggest, i suppose camerman, if he had some 25 years had to survive and live for 30 more years (for best situtation if this was shot 1st WW). That time, very low possibility, even for life expectancy. If he survived the war. --Mile (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. These notifications are being placed automatically by the nomination script. Could it be possible that you did the transfer from EN-wiki to Commons back in 2009? Jcb (talk) 17:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that wasnt my work, but maybe Boki did it. No matter. --Mile (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information regarding this picture of the 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dirtily watermarked "Recta". (Could have been nicely cropped from File:Tullio salvatore quinzio, autoritratto, 1900-10 ca.jpg instead.) Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 17:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P.tamburrini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two files need proper information from uploader as to who actually created them. If they were by the artist, then the artist's name needs to be on the "author" line and a correct license applied. The other uploads by this user have "no source", "copyvio" and one "Deletion Nomination" Tag.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Υ.Γ. as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: my mistake: author unknown
According to the file history, author may be "Irmgard Heilemann (1910-1985)". However, no permission. Wdwd (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Υ.Γ. as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: my mistake: author unknown
According to the history, author may be "Irmgard Heilemann (1910-1985)". No permission. Wdwd (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from Zoé Fisher. Jcb (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SRaisin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free software screenshots.

MCMLXXXIX 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


AFAIK, the files could be deleted

[edit]

These files are uploaded by me in the time when I worked for Eleco Software.
AFAIK, the files are not used anymore anywhere else. To be sure, could you please refer to ELECO Software (which seems to be used now to add/edit at wikipeadia), if these files are still used? Thanks.
SRaisin 19:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be own work, nonsensical description and category, probably a test image uploaded by a user who tried to upload images with embedded data. jdx Re: 09:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uncertain copyright. --Yann (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted video game character; dubious self-work claim FastilyClone (talk) 11:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax or else personal gallery content Lordtobi () 12:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio, see watermark Jcb (talk) 13:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


im his media manager, his page was taken down prior saying that his old pic was copyrighted. this new one was uploaded by me and the watermark is my initials. i give all rights for it to be used anywhere! thanks.

Could you upload the original version from your camera over it, with original resolution and original camera data? Jcb (talk) 11:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License information unclear; image is copyrighted. – Rhain 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from http://www.ahlbergekroswall.se/om-oss/ not uploaded by photographer Yger (talk) 13:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsely claims to be "Own Work" of the subject of the image, when copyright actually rests with the Photographer. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image, and all images taken on this shoot are owned by me. I paid for the photos and all rights and agreed always to credit the photographer when using the image.


Deleted: per nomination. The copyright owner needs to send a permission, see COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS: doesn't add something useful to the collection. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Against deleting this one. This photo is special because of the clear focus on the penis and angle in which it was taken. Alice2Alice (talk) 16:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human Penis Glans.jpg Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/29#File:Human_Penis_Glans.jpg GnocchiFan (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is not the same photo as the previous of the same name, so previous deletion is not relevant. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has a history of copyright violations. Claim of own work is not credible. Whpq (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False "own work on 2016-12-29" - one is obviously scanned or re-photoed from old photo of 1943 or earlier, another is taken e.g. from [6] (year 1940). There's a chance of {{PD-Russia}} but it is determined by actual authorship or anonymity.

Tatewaki (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Packaging is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent educational utility, looks like a screencap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A pdf with images uncredited, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grantwoodham (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These three images are "historic" images of "The old Rectory in Little Bookham". The uploader took several modern images, and uploaded these older ones as "self" which they do not appear to be.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A nice photo of a whatzit, unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updated categories — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgrasmus (talk • contribs)

Deleted: badly out of focus -- not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mostafa7208 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last uploads of a blocked user, these look like perhaps homework, and several copies of an apparent taxi logo, and one other logo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: claimed user page image, but is not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'family album' content, thumbnail-size file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure how this was ever undeleted; FoP is not the big issue here. Pikachu is a copyrighted character, making this a derivative work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glasgow. Clyde Walkway. Clyde Street. Graffiti.jpg where the deleting admin noted counterexamples were liable for deletion. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UribeStudios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of art work by en:Federico Uribe. Permission via OTRS is required to store this files on commons.

GeorgHHtalk   20:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Probably a random test file uploaded by one of the guys who upload files with embedded data. --jdx Re: 22:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

little encyclopedic value; article is likely to be deleted; the account that uploaded the image is associated with spiteful edits about the brand shown, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McKenzie_(clothing)&diff=prev&oldid=708676830 Fayenatic london (talk) 21:19, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite, without any identification as to where the images were obtained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, this is obviously not own work. It is an historical identity card and photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-old. --Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality (Ericsson K800i), imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality (Ericsson K800i), imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 19:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 20:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at request by original uploader Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no authorship information, unknown copyright situation. We also have a far better picture of this person on our servers File:RADM Joseph Strauss in 1919.jpg Jcb (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The transfer from a 2007 en-wiki image did not format it well. But the source is quite clear if you follow the link to http://www.ussjosephstrauss.org/commissioning_program_one.htm. But I agree the quality is not great, and it's unused. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that link, but that page is not a government website and as far as I can see it does not provide the missing authorship information. Jcb (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reopening as agreed by Yann after a second opinion by Jim, see here. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim wrote: "I agree with Jcb. I think this is a family photo that was probably unpublished until the commissioning of USS Joseph Strauss in 1963. He has his hands in his pockets, so this cannot possibly be an official portrait from before 1919. They were much more formal then. It would not have been published then. If there was reason to show a photo of him in a publication, it would have been one that was more formal." - Jcb (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Inappropriate previous closure. COM:L says "The information given on the description page should be sufficient to allow others to verify the license status," a notion repeated by COM:EVID. The source, "information given," collaborates neither the PD-USGov claim nor the pre-1923 publication claim (which are mutually exclusive licenses to begin with). Merely appearing in a military uniform is no reason to assume government authorship, and a photograph of Strauss reliably dated to 1919 shows a much older uniform variant, and far fewer service bars, suggesting this image is from many years later, likely well past 1923. A moot point, as those dates are creation, not publication - we must know the latter. Эlcobbola talk 22:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are several reasons this picture could be in the public domain: 1. published before 1923, as seen by the age of the person depicted; 2. taken by a US government official; 3. published without a copyright notice; 4. copyright not renewed. All in all there are much more chances to be in the public domain than not. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Yann, you surely know that "more chances to be in the public domain than not" is far short of our standard of "proof beyond a significant doubt".
Of course, Admirals can do most anything they want, but the WWI era was far more formal than now and the Navy has always been the most formal of the services. As I said in the quote above, I can't imagine the 1910s Navy publishing a portrait of one of its officers with his hands in his pockets. I doubt very much that it was published until after his death. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Date is likely to be too close to 1923 to call. File:RADM Joseph Strauss in 1919.jpg is 1919, I think he definitely a few years older here - more stripes on sleeve and more medal bands. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Good catch by Carl -- we all missed this. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background according to this discussion: These photos were uploaded from Europeana to Commons in good faith, as they used to be marked with CC0 (according to User:4ing). However, the CC0 marking on Europeana was later changed to "Rights Reserved - Free Access", and explicitly "No Re-use". I assume not a license retraction (which we wouldn't accept) but a correction (no base for CC0 to start with), therefore this deletion request. Still, some old photos might qualify as {{PD-Norway50}}. 4ing made a list consisting of two parts: Listed under PD-Norway are photos taken in Norway more than 50 years ago, and where more than 15 years have passed since the photographer's death or the photographer is unknown. In these cases, the template was changed from CC0 to PD-Norway50. Under Free access - no reuse are the photos discussed here. Some, like File:Altair ( NSM.2100-365).jpg, are old but might still be protected if not taken in Norway, some are recent and PD-Norway50 certainly isn't applicable, such as File:H.J. Bull whale catcher model (NSM.04337).jpg. As per the previous discussion, individual decisions need to be made.

Gestumblindi (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several of the photographs have been credited to Per Erik Johnsen, also pre WWII photographs. Erik Jacobsen & Per Erik Johnsen issued a book in 1999, named "Skipsfarten på Oslo - bilder gjennom 50 år" (Shipping in Oslo - pictures during 50 years), showing some of Johnsen's 10000+ photographs he had taken of ships since 1950. Johnsen was awarded a mark of distiniction in 2008 from "Norsk skipsfarthistorisk selskap" (The Norwegian society of shipping history). I don't know when he was born, but photographs taken before 1950 are probably not taken by him. Affected files: File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-823).jpg and File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-824).jpg (lost 1942), File:Bañaderos (NSM 2101 417).jpg (prob. 1930), File:Bello (NSM.2101-973).jpg (lost 1942), File:Bill (NSM.2104-109).jpg (1939), File:Boreas (NSM.2105-050).jpg (bef. 1933, but in UK), File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-078).jpg (lost 1941), File:Brott (NSM.2105-552).jpg (lost 1943), File:California Express ( NSM.2105-812).jpg (prob. 1934), File:Christian Krohg (NSM.2106-091).jpg (lost 1941). - 4ing (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I'm doing photo by photo comments annotating the likely dates when these were taken. The names of the ships are based on the original descriptions by the time these were taken. In some cases the first name is mentioned, but none of those were later renamed mention it. So the dates cited by me are highly probable. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 08:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - {{PD-Norway50}} cannot savely be applied, because we don't know whether the authors died before 2001. Most pictures have a named author, but without date of death, so we cannot call the author 'unknown' either. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a follow-up to the previous request. The same as for the pictures deleted there applies for these remaining files: Originally uploaded from Europeana to Commons in good faith, as they used to be marked with CC0. However, the CC0 marking on Europeana was later changed to "Rights Reserved - Free Access", and explicitly "No Re-use". I assume not a license retraction (which we wouldn't accept) but a correction (no base for CC0 to start with). Note: This request is only for the files listed under "Free access - no reuse" on the Sandkasse page; the "PD-Norway" images should be fine. For more information, see also the previous request.

Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abd1986~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The pictures are from many different cameras, so probably not own work.

Jcb (talk) 22:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope 178.197.224.169 22:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is certainly in scope, but since the author died in 1996, it is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Joe Kingsbury was a bombardier, not a photographer, see here, so the picture has not been taken 'as a part of that person's official duties'. Jcb (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this picture was made by a government employee 'as a part of that person's official duties'. Jcb (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

affected File:Infopark Campus, Kochi, Kerala 682042, India - panoramio.jpg and File:Infopark Campus, Kochi, Kerala 682042, India - panoramio (1).jpg: random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

affected File:Infopark Campus, Kochi, Kerala 682042, India - panoramio.jpg and File:Infopark Campus, Kochi, Kerala 682042, India - panoramio (1).jpg: random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 20:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Request to delete is denied. The logo posted is the official logo for ASARCO LLC, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfedoruk (talk • contribs)

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This file was emailed to me directly from the Robin & Lucienne Day Foundation for use on Wikipedia"

(a), the Foundation is unlikely to own the copyright -- that belongs to the photographer.
(b) "for use on Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Images here and on WP must be free for any use by anyone anywhere.

In order to keep this, we will need a free license from the photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not show anything of value, the description is obscure and not helpful at all Braveheart (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Not all of Panoramio is good for Wikipedia or Wikimedia. This one is taken to have fun in the Panoramio-Community, not for here. --Häferl (talk) 12:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't it derivated from a copyrighted aerial image? Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture drawn by a child as illustration of sexual behaviour Michał Sobkowski (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Michał Sobkowski: However the illustration isn't illegal nor doesn't offend anyone. Are there any more serious reasons to delete the picture besides the reason described above? Moreover conclusions about drawer's age shouldn't be based on the technic of drawing. Each kind of expression is proper if it shows the sense and refers to subject of such article. Superjurek (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In this way I'm against deleting this illustration. Superjurek (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The child is not the uploader. The work was uploaded as "own work". Besides that, we don't keep artworks by non-notable artists. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing author 178.197.235.239 22:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope 178.197.225.29 22:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope 178.197.224.169 22:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope 178.197.224.169 22:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I looked around and don't see this on any of the obvious sites. I'm certain it was navy work but its not worth fighting the issue for such a mundane image. Feel free to delete it. Reguyla (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW; several of these characters are not PD. (Mickey, Marvin the Martian, Lion King, etc) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep De minimis (unsigned2|14:45, 1 January 2017‎| Patrice78500 }}
COM:DM uses a small graffito of Mario on a public artwork as an example. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clearly not DM -- most of what's there is DW. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also out of scope. Jcb (talk) 23:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems a cropped screenshot from the Italian TV show Le Iene: in this case, the licence tag is wrong, because it's a copyrighted image. Fabyrav (talk) 23:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped screenshots

[edit]

Like this (nominated for deletion), these files seem cropped screenshots from the Italian TV show Le Iene: in this case, the licence tags are wrong, because they're copyrighted images. --Fabyrav (talk) 23:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I could not find this picture at the August 2007 version of kevinmccarthy.house.gov. Jcb (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Seriesphile (talk) 04:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seriesphile, why do you say it is not own work? It is true that it has no EXIF, but it is medium sized and does not show up in a Google search. We generally assume good faith when a user claims "Own Work". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. I searched and found that this is an official picture from the Miss World publicity entity, see http://embed.scribblelive.com/Embed/v7.aspx?Id=2439640&Page=1&overlay=false & http://embed.scribblelive.com/Embed/v7.aspx?Id=2439640&Page=1&overlay=false, from which this one was cropped. The "giveaway" is the fine lines and the colored dots over the picture, that is their particular visual "signature". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 07:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 08:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)  Delete Fair use image. --~AntanO4task (talk) 05:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [7] MCMLXXXIX 08:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 09:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, no permission. Jcb (talk) 09:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 09:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. As with all these "no authorship information" nominations, I ran a google search and found the image in less that 0.003 seconds. I then went to the source page, copied that information here to Commons along with a better description, and thus as there is no valid reason to delete, it's kept. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial picture not taken by uploader https://www.okq8.se/om-okq8/ Yger (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & also found even larger at http://news.cision.com/se/rippler/i/pressbild-okq8trelleborg-station,c1756273. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The publication is from 1890. Our category page reads "English: Ravnen (The Raven). Danish magazine published from 2 April 1876 to 7 January 1877 and again from 6 October 1878 until 15 July 1921. Published by the labour movement in Denmark. One of the first editors was Harald Brix.". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Depicted person traveled (e.g. getting a PhD in France), so this picture may have been taken outside Iran. Jcb (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Brunei has the PMA+50 rule. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1966. Jcb (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: IMHO below TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 08:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

other version File:Stuttgart-Staatsgallerie-Modigliani-Frauenakt1305-Artwork.jpg with correct description Wuselig (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

other version File:Stuttgart-Staatsgallerie-Modigliani-Frauenakt1305-Artwork.jpg with correct description Wuselig (talk) 11:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 17:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 17:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 18:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW [8] MCMLXXXIX 18:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + probably out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich habe sie nicht richtig bearbeitet Caminus (talk) 18:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isnt a shoot of Maracaibo... this is a complete diferent city 181.49.93.209 23:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue "Leikki II /Aallottaria" by sculptor Viktor Jansson (died 1958), not in PD yet. No FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 23:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment De minimis may apply to this one. ––Apalsola tc 13:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: The statue is borderline DM. I agree with Apalsola. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве; в метаданных указан P Kozionov. Dogad75 (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This medal is not "Risti Valla Teeneterist", this medal is "Risti Vapimärk". I like rename this file name to - Risti Vapimärk Kopo25 (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trophies are not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is apparently from a blacklisted account. I was about to pass it until I got this warning. Leoboudv (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this image apparently uploaded as part of obituary process. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Shown operson died 2000. COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a rephotograph of an older image, not actual own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work of original work, (source UPJŠ), no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The object may or may not out of copyright, but the picture of this 3D object is obviously not old enough to be PD-old-100 as claimed. Jcb (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, First uploaded to English Wikipedia with apparently the same source information and by a user who has not made any edits in six years. Thuresson (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this photo of a photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no meta and small size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain in more detail on what rationale should the photographer have died before 1946? -- Asclepias (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See en:List_of_countries'_copyright_lengths, Serbia has the PMA+70 rule. Note that it's 2017 in the mean time, so please read the nomination reason with '1947' instead of '1946'. Jcb (talk) 19:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Next step: should that apply to this photograph? Although the upload is certainly lacking in information, it seems more likely that this photograph was published before 1973 than later. Would it not seem reasonable to keep it with PD-1923 and PD-Serbia? -- Asclepias (talk) 20:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no indication that author was anonymous or died before 1954 (per PD-Serbia). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per PD-Serbia. I missed the part about photographs only having a 25 year term in that license template. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

also affectected File:PUTHALATH DINESHAN2016.jpg: DR started to verify claimed 'own work', scan as per metadata, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one other upload of user was a copyvio, other uploads are differing in quality, like scanned copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

also affectected File:OFFFICE INAUG. (14).jpg: DR started to verify claimed 'own work', missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:OFFFICE INAUG. (14).jpg was scanned from a paper source (either a magazine or an analog photograph). This one has no exif. Likely two copyvio. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 15:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: can be found elsewhere, eg here: [9], dates before this upload. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one other upload of user was a copyvio, other uploads are differing in quality, like scanned copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content, and one-file-upload that is not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France for architectural works. The bridge is the main subject. 68.193.210.74 21:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Bridges are not architecture and do not have copyrights in the USA. Do they have copyrights in France? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That bridges are not architecture sounds ... special. I don't think we can assume this for countries other than the US. COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the description, the statue of Sun Yat-sen as a 13-year-old boy was dedicated in Hawaii on 12 November 2007 by the Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation. I found the article as proof of its authorship to the statue. We shall assume that the copyright of the statue belongs to the Foundation. Due to no FOP on sculptures and no proof of permission, the photo taken in Hawaii shall be deleted. George Ho (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 2016-12-29, I sent an email to contact@sunyatsenhawaii.org apologizing for uploading an image that I did not realize violated copyright laws as per w:Freedom of panorama#United States. I asked permission for its continued use or a better photo, including instructions on emailing permissions-commons@wikimedia.org & using toollabs:relgen. I did encounter a problem with their spam filter (probably due to embedded links: "Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation") that required a human response, which I did. I have not heard back from them yet. Today, I will send a follow-up email, as I had forgotten to include a link to the email template for OTRS. Peaceray (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, Peaceray. I forgive you. Let's wait for OTRS then. --George Ho (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Got a response just after noon PST:

Thank you for your inquiry and thank you for helping us spread the word about Dr. Sun and the help that he received from the people of Hawaii.

In 2007 the Dr. Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation commissioned the making of the statue and prior to its instillation in the park, donated the statue to the City and County of Honolulu. When you took the picture of the statue in the park it was owned by the City and County of Honolulu thus I believe that the statue would be considered “Public Art”. The City Council of the City and County of Honolulu passed a resolution accepting the gift from the Foundation which was done in conjunction with the renaming of the “Chinatown Gateway Park” to the “Dr. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Park”. More information on the ownership of the statue may be available from the Mayor’s Office of Culture and Arts or City Council Records.

I hope that this answers some of your questions.

Warren Luke
Chairman,
Dr. Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation

So, I guess the City and County of Honolulu is my next stop.
Peaceray (talk) 21:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just sent an email to moca-info@honolulu.gov, the contact email address for the Mayor's Office of Culture and the Arts, City and County of Honolulu. I also left a voice mail earlier.
Please keep in mind that in the US we are starting a three day weekend, so it is likely that the email will not be viewed until Tuesday.
Peaceray (talk) 22:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I received communication from the Mayor's Office of Culture and the Arts, City and County of Honolulu. I have to do some write-ups & inclusion of the information requested by C&C of Honolulu MOCA in the image's description (tomorrow's tasks) & send some info to OTRS to see it passes muster. From the email's Image Usage Permission Considerations attachment (with my comments in italics):

1) The City does not own copyright to all the works in the collection (it does in this case)

2) The City can grant usage permission for works in the collection
3) The City does not charge a usage fee for works in the collection
4) The work must be credited

[...]

  • For publication, the artist’s name, title, date created, donor information if applicable (it is applicable), and a courtesy to the Honolulu Mayor’s Office of Culture and the Arts

For publication, the Mayor’s Office of Culture and the Arts requests a copy of the published material for the record.

Peaceray (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Peaceray, you assert above:

"The City does not own copyright to all the works in the collection (it does in this case)"

What evidence do you have that the city owns the copyright? As a general rule, commissioning a work does not result in the commissioning party owning the copyright or having the right to freely license the work. I see nothing in the correspondence above that suggests that the Dr. Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation had that right or could give the right to the city. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Request Requesting time to sort this out. I was initially operating under George Ho's assertion that this article was proof of Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation's authorship to the statue & authorship to the statue & assumption that the copyright of the statue belonged to the Foundation. In his email to me, the Chairman of the Dr. Sun Yat-sen Hawaii Foundation seemed to imply that the Foundation had the rights & had assigned it to the C&C of Honolulu.
According to the Honolulu Mayor’s Office of Culture and the Arts Image Usage Permission Considerations document that they sent me:

The collection database either on-line or in hard copy is to be used to determine the required credit information.

Image use permission shall be granted and conditioned on a case-by-case by MOCA, or referred to the copyright holder.

I will be writing to MOCA today (the office is yet to open today at the that I am writing this) to ask them to supply the information as to holds the copyright. (✓ Done, for my part, 19:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)) As per the document "The City does not own copyright to all the works in the collection"; that certainly implies that it does own some copyrights, so I think that an assumption that the creator owns the rights to this work could well turn out to be inaccurate. In any case, I am doing due diligence to determine the ownership. I believe that the C&C of Honolulu will supply this information from their database & will either confirm me of my belief or disabuse me of the notion.
P.S. I will be packaging up all of my correspondence with some context & forwarding it to OTRS.
Peaceray (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Request Also requesting some education on how the right of panorama & copyrights work when someone has created a work in another country & (copy of) that work has been brought into the United States.
The sculptor of Sun Yat-sen as A School Boy In Hawaii, age 13 resides in Hong Kong. His name, depending upon transliteration, is 朱達誠 / Chu Tat-shing / Zhu Dacheng. His category on Commons is Category:Zhu Dacheng; Chinese language Wikipedia articles on him are at w:zh:朱達誠 & w:zh-yue:朱達誠. Another of his Sun Yat-sen statues, File:孫中山銅像.jpg, depicting him as a slightly older scholar, is also used on en.wikipedia.
My understanding from File:Freedom of Panorama world map.svg is that for China including Hong Kong, the Freedom of Panorama is "OK, with permanently placed sculptures / 3D art". My question is: does this have any effect upon the FoP / copyrights for works imported into the U.S.?
Does anyone reading this thread correspond in Chinese? I don't, & I am asking for resources in case I need to contact the sculptor.
Peaceray (talk) 18:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Peaceray, four comments:
(1) The FOP rule that applies is that where the sculpture is located. Thus we keep images of Alexander Calder sculptures permanently located in Germany even though they were created in the USA and do not keep images of Henry Moore that are in the USA even though they were created in the UK. Both Germany and the UK have FOP for sculpture.
(2) If the city asserts that it has the right to freely license the sculpture, the OTRS volunteer will need to see the written agreement from the sculptor. Cities are rarely expert on copyright and often make claims that are incorrect.
(3) Forwarding correspondence to OTRS will not be helpful. Unfortunately we have had enough bad actors (forgers) here so that policy requires that licenses come directly to OTRS from the source.
(4) The Sun Yat-sen Foundation comment "I believe that the statue would be considered “Public Art”." strongly suggests that the writer does not understand the issues. "Public Art" is not a relevant concept in US copyright law. Virtually all art in US public places becomes free for general use only when the copyright expires. The fact tat it is in a public place is irrelevant. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted for now (no FOP in the US). This can be restored if the necessary permission is acquired via OTRS. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for this representation of the COA. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be an official representation, a google search shows different versions. If this is not the official version, then the PD license does not apply. Jcb (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the license text links to [10], which does not recognize this either. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]