Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![58 File:Маршрут кругосветного путешествия "В кругосветку как в Турцию".jpg](#File:Маршрут_кругосветного_путешествия_"В_кругосветку_как_в_Турцию".jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo_(2).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Luxembourg_PP1272434884.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![238 File:Paris-La Defence 2- "Le pouce" (Kciuk) - panoramio.jpg](#File:Paris-La_Defence_2-_"Le_pouce"_(Kciuk)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Switzerland_PP1279980340.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. User created his/her own biography page. — TBhagat (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted as per CSD#GA3. --jdx Re: 01:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
no source for images MB298 (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work - Using VisualFileChange.
Duplicate of File:7-eleven-brand.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 15:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate file, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Reproduction of 2-dimensional publication/image of unidentified source.
Wcam (talk) 18:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Taiwan for artistic works.
- File:名人塑像區.jpg
- File:夏日噴水池.jpg
- File:園區4.jpg
- File:園區2.jpg
- File:吶喊.jpg
- File:英國雕像大師亨利摩爾人像.jpg
- File:創紀元.jpg
- File:Wang02.jpg
Wcam (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Facebook size, no useful metadata of an artist and his sculpture. Unlikely own work, check out the black base line. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
please delete this user history and contribs he is sock of 3 account and already blocked 119.160.64.76 11:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Azurri13579 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Can be found earlier on web. Most likely uploaded since 22.02.2016 by an "all-he-can-get" grabber
- File:2014-05-12.08.56.27-a1.jpg
- File:9-du-lich-pho-cang-hai-phong-mytour-9.jpg
- File:Images1115471 do thi xanh.jpg
- File:Duong-bach-dang.jpg
- File:Ban Co 4.jpg
- File:Bai-bien-my-khe-542bc385b04c3.jpg
- File:Mỳ Quảng.jpg
- File:Cungthethao twbm.jpg
- File:Anh-3-1039.jpg
- File:Cầu tình yêu.jpg
- File:Vòng quay mặt trời, cao 115m.jpg
- File:SVD CHI LĂNG.jpg
- File:Đà Nẵng 2016.jpg
- File:Trung tâm hội chợ triển lãm Đà Nẵng.jpg
- File:Du-lich-da-nang-ivivu.jpg
- File:The InterContinental Da Nang Sun Peninsula Resort.jpg
- File:Cáp treo bà nà.jpg
- File:Du-lich-da-nang-cau-thuan-phuoc(1).jpg
- File:Đà Nẵng.jpg
- File:Sông hồng.jpg
- File:Nha tho lớn.jpg
- File:BTHN.jpg
- File:Bv bach mai.jpg
- File:Toàn cảnh Hà Nội.jpg
- File:Banner-trangchu4-1436246088959.jpg
- File:Bao tàng ha noi.jpg
- File:Duong vanh dai 3.jpg
- File:Svd my dinh.jpg
- File:Trang-tien-new-nh-37813922-1367841462 500x0.jpg
- File:Nhat tan.jpg
- File:Nội bài airport.jpg
- File:Tắc đường Hà Nội.jpg
- File:Lăng bác.jpg
- File:Hoang-thanh-thang-long-4.jpg
- File:Hà Nội Skyline 2016.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Azurri13579 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these photos are doubtful own work. The Su-30 photo has TTVN Online watermark. The others are low resolution. One of the photos has another copyright holder in the EXIF.
- File:Dieu-binh-2-9-2015-9.jpg
- File:Chiến sĩ quân y QĐNDVN.jpg
- File:SU-27 Không quân Việt Nam.jpg
- File:Su-30 MKV2.jpg
PK-LMN (talk) 23:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 23:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Rihanna images taken from web, some examples: http://www.hawtcelebs.com/rihanna-performs-at-robin-hood-foundation-benefit-in-new-york/, http://www.gettyimages.fi/event/riri-by-rihanna-fragrance-unveiling-at-macys-downtown-brooklyn-574104777
- File:120922-galleryimg-i-heart-radio-rihanna.jpg
- File:Rihana 7.jpg
- File:Photos-Rihanna-Justin-Bieber-Playing-Super-Bowl-Show-2010-02-05-100026.jpg
- File:Singer-Rihanna-attends-the-RiRi-by-Rihanna-fragrance.jpg
- File:Rihanna-album-cover.jpg
- File:Rihanna8.jpg
- File:Rihanna-last-girl-on-earth-tour-2010-at-palais-omnisports-in-paris-04-980x651.jpg
- File:Wenn5526551.jpg
- File:RIHANNA-Performs-at-Robin-Hood-Foundation-Benefit-in-New-York-1.jpg
- File:Article-1337085800828-1318085d000005dc-765937 636x364.jpg
- File:RiRi-e1470363868445.jpg
- File:VCtnWpO.png
- File:410B8164-640x960.jpg
MKFI (talk) 17:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:11, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
this translation in khowar is incorrect and this file must be delete Mission Kashmir III (talk) 17:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Copyright violation - the actual author of this document is a blocked sock on en.wiki, Rachitrali. The uploader, Mirajbibi is also a blocked sock/meatpuppet from same crew and they have screwed up attribution here. Additionally, the newspaper to which it is being affiliated is being investigated as a hoax.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 16:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please note the edit summary about multiple copyvios here on the one account and the other account has the same issue here. This involves multiple socks/meatpuppets with a COI which may be seen here. Category:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali may need scrutiny for additional copyvios. I see Hedwig in Washington has dealt with these before and may be interested in the COIN and SPI case listed above. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 16:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low res duplicate of File:Gulfstream Aerospace G-550 Bank of Utah Trustee N556TT - MSN 5056 (5589978268).jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep Process as {{Duplicate}} in order to preserve any external usage. PK-LMN (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Comment Hedwig in Washington has processed this as a duplicate, so this DR can be closed. PK-LMN (talk) 09:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
this file is not orignal and must be delete DMAAAKAAAZZZ (talk) 04:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Italy. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Wrong sign, please kill this. Here ist the correct sign:Verbot für Radfahrer, Kleinkrafträder und Fahrräder mit Hilfsmotor, StVO 1970.svg Mediatus (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant spam of well known pattern. --Achim (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant spam of well-known pattern. --Achim (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant spam of well-known pattern. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lmyers8965 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence that these files were published under a free [Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0] license by their author or copyright holder.
XXN, 22:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, source website (http://www.ofdk-kogl.at/2015-2/nggallery/page/4) contains copyright notice, no proof of CC-license. MKFI (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
possibly copyrighted, found in wallpaper sites with google image search Marc Lacoste (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Presumed copyright violation as same kind of image as found here on their site. Furthermore it is essentially an advertisement. Beevil (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
This chemical structure is currently only used on de.wikipedia.org, where chemical structures resembling swastikas should be avoided if possible. 84.61.131.17 21:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
And the user, who uploaded this file, is actually from Germany. --84.61.131.17 21:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- One must have a bad imagination to see here a swastika. Its a common painting of a triethylsilyl-residue often find in books and in books of german origin too. The angles are more then 90 degree and one residue isn't like a hook. The IP must be bored. --Codc (talk) 21:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- The IP who nominated the file is actually from Germany, too. So what? --Leyo 23:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Leyo. And also, the Swastika is a very ancient symbol, and the Nazi variant is very different from this. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per over-active imagination. The arms aren't even spiraling the "Nazi Swastika" direction. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orthocarbonic-acid-Spartan-MP2-3D-balls-B.png as molecular precedent that is even more a "pure swastika" (and likewise backwards). DMacks (talk) 04:07, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. The nomination is ridiculous and of course no reason to delete, but is the chemical structure correct? As a reagent for organic synthesis, TES-OTf refers to triethylsilyl triflate, not triethylsilyl trifluoroacetate. Ed (Edgar181) 13:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problems Nonander (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, google search found it in use older & credited: "Zdjęcia: Bogdan Gancarz /Foto Gość" at http://krakow.gosc.pl/gal/pokaz/3279291.Wystawa-obrazow-Czeslawa-Dzwigaja/19#gt. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright problems, http://historia.upjp2.edu.pl/instytut/pracownicy/ks-prof-dr-hab-jozef-marecki Nonander (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
From Getty Images: http://www.zimbio.com/Irina+Ektova
- File:15th+IAAF+World+Athletics+Championships+Beijing+aI7Szavsfqkx.jpg
- File:Ольга Рыпакова и Ирина Эктова.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 00:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping 4 December 2016 Ronhjones (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:15th+IAAF+World+Athletics+Championships+Beijing+aI7Szavsfqkx.jpg (Copyright violation: From Getty Images: http://www.zimbio.com/Irina+Ektova). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm very sorry for upload this file. I upload this for mw trouble report, but it seems that it working. Would you please delete it? I'm sorry again. Dick6809 (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio w:File:Photoarrange.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio. These are from https://www.tyroola.com.au/supercharger-vs-turbo/, where they're marked as copyright. No indication that the claimed licence is valid. Also appplies to File:Turbocharger animation by Tyroola.gif Andy Dingley (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
copyvio - see here http://www.letempsdetruittout.net/biography?lightbox=dataItem-iif478p9 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Mirrored (derivate) version of widespread Internet image/video. There is no information about the author, license and true source. Some examples - img, video. --Kaganer (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Obvious vandalism Jugydmort (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of project scope. --Randykitty (talk) 13:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted for self- promotion, image is unused at present Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55e886e0e4b09880734e2854/t/55e901b4e4b011aed10d6e23/1441333689122/designer. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/people/stubbs-richard/@@images/image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ballyboyns.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/1/4/37149331/1415615126.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author fotograf: Jesper Rais/AU Kommunikation (jbra@adm.au.dk)", smaller resolution version has been published before: http://forensic.au.dk/om-institut-for-retsmedicin/pressen/retspatologisk/. MKFI (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder Petteri Mäntysaari / Kappas valokuvaamo", cropped version has been published before: http://www.y-lehti.fi/uutiset/nayta/13761 (http://www.y-lehti.fi/uutiset_kuvat/3519_haulerman.jpg). MKFI (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Haulerman ja hitsauskone.jpg
small size image without EXIF; uploaded as a joke Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Building in background, which fills a large part of the image, is a privately owned hotel. Picture seems like an advertisement. There are already better pictures of this site available on Commons. Idoshkedi (talk) 13:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
personal photo. Lemon tart (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дмитрий Мисюк (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
unclear (c) status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 16:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Hevel Cava thinking.jpg
- File:Liebe dich.jpg
- File:Staring at you.jpg
- File:Hugging at you neck.jpg
- File:Watching you.jpg
- File:Smiling with joy.jpg
- File:Waiting for the snaks.jpg
- File:Traveling around.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 08:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ContactAmmar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Dr. Ammar Ahmed.jpg
- File:Dr. Allah rakha.jpg
- File:Ammar Ahmed Narowal.jpg
- File:Ammar Ahmed Ghota Fateh Garh.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. More or less a copy of his Facebook stream.
- File:LUIS ARRÚA 03.jpg
- File:LUIS ARRÚA 01.jpg
- File:LUIS ARRÚA 02.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 15.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 14.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 13.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 11.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 12.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 10.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 09.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 08.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 07.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 06.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 05.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 04.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 01.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 02.jpg
- File:921096 10207368012991925 5847956366756296289 o 03.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. ~riley (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personam images : out of scope
- File:Luis Arrúa cantautor uruguayo.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa Montevideo.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa Río Branco.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa pintura escuela nueve Tupambaé.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa AUREA 2016 Montevideo.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa premios ARCO de Córdoba 2016.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa Trovador Uruguayo.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa Cantautor Uruguayo.jpg
- File:Luis Arrúa.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete clearly out of scope.Kathisma (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis-Arrúa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the project scope. Self promotion. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Luis Arrúa Trovador Uruguayo.
Edslov (talk) 00:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyanleeminghui1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused low quality pictures of unknown persons. (copyrighted stock photos?)
- File:Hyeran1.jpg
- File:Ethan Lee1.jpg
- File:Roy111.jpg
- File:Jaeyoon1.jpg
- File:Skye12.jpg
- File:Siti1.jpg
- File:Gey Youn1.jpg
- File:Clara12.jpg - This one had been nominated separately and I deleted it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mark Wesley Shane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Nyaope.jpg
- File:Mark Wesley Shane 4.png
- File:Mark Wesley Shane 2.jpg
- File:Mark Wesley Shane 3.jpg
- File:Mark Wesley Shane.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Image looks like a reproduction of a printed photo. (Shot is said to be from 1993) Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
I want to upload a new profile picture instead Stubsy88 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stubsy88: You could do that by using "Upload a new version of this file". This link is to be found under the upload history on the bottom half of the file page - as long as you're actually the copyright holder to the picture. Otherwise, use another filename! I'd rather say that a deletion won't be executed in order to save the licensing history. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea why there is such a discussion about my picture. I don't even know User:Denniss replaced my picture with his credits. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Lokomotive74: If you check the page logs, you'll see a version deletion. User Denniss reverted the file to the actual version that you uploaded, no replace did take place. I don't know what you mean with "his credits"... Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc: Sorry my fault. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have no idea why there is such a discussion about my picture. I don't even know User:Denniss replaced my picture with his credits. --Lokomotive74 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
non removable watermark, sadly Marc Lacoste (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not of itself a reason to delete. --Fæ (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As per Fae. The photographer could be contacted to provide an unwatermarked version. There may be external re-users of this photo who would be affected by deletion. PK-LMN (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 16:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete low quality, out of focus image is unlikely to have any educational value. Ww2censor (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Honestly, this looks like a screenshot of a webcam. Elisfkc (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. A private travel map George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Relevant article was deleted George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bukti.khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]This collection of images includes, old photo, collage, newspaper, facebook sized pictures, an illustration and no indication of own work on any of them.
- File:Obaidullah.jan.jpg
- File:Obaid,kandahari.jpg
- File:Kabul city 2016.jpg
- File:Baloch.jpg
- File:Pomegranate from kandahar,Afghanistan.jpg
- File:Mirwais-Hotak,jpg.jpg
- File:British+Prime+Minister+David+Cameron+Visits+4Ivf1Pl18ERx.jpg
- File:دامان ولسوالۍ.jpg
- File:ارغسان ولسوالۍ.jpg
- File:ژېړۍ.jpg
- File:Hamayoon.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. File:British+Prime+Minister+David+Cameron+Visits+4Ivf1Pl18ERx.jpg is http://gty.im/118171279 by Lefteris Pitarakis/Getty Images. The uploader obviously either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "Own work", "author" or "copyright holder" mean. And since the uploader just continued uploading low-resolution content with no metadata instead of participating in this discussion, you can also go ahead and delete this:
- —LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Sealle (talk) 16:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 20:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Private images. Unused, out of project scope.
GeorgHH • talk 21:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope / no educational value Novarupta (talk) 23:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Campobahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images without meaningful categories, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense. Out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 13:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Relyn Ragpala Espanol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Selfies by non-notable student whose Facebook-style autobio pages have been repeatedly deleted from en:wp.
JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Nfluencia del valor de pH en la presencia de Cyclidium glaucoma en los Pantanos de Villa en el año 2016.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Looks suspiciously professional, no metadata. Nelp has uploaded three different versions of this file over the years. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Metadata says author and copyright holder is the subject. No evidence subject is the uploader. Note that this is the same photo which was deleted above. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- What evidence do you need from me? The picture looks professional, because it's my official photo. I added the metadata, because I'm the owner of the rights. -Gelbfisch (talk) 21:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Mr Veit, I apologise for the problems here. Please understand what we have here - we have a professional photo of someone notable, which had in fact previously been deleted, uploaded by an account with no previous contributions. We see this sort of thing a lot - people often find photos on Google and upload them, claiming to hold the rights. For that reason we generally request some form of confirmation, via COM:OTRS, that you are in fact who you claim to be. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Willing to assume good faith on the part of the uploader... OTRS strongly recomended Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, image was previously deleted, no OTRS received. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Habimana theogene Researcher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:DECENTRALIZED TAX SYSTEM AND PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN RWANDA.pdf
- File:Community empowerment and poverty alleviation in Gicumbi District by habimana theogene.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frappemousier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muktabarvefan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable event, out of project scope due to lack of educational value. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's original work Ytoyoda (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope; photo of uploader IagoQnsi (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused group selfie out of project scope. Rrburke (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & noting the additional difficulty that it was copied from Instagram with no permissions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Small unused icon George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Promotional screenshot, no educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Promotional only, no educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Selfies of user without other contribution.
- File:AG9hsTecikk.jpg
- File:Хёна в 2016 году.jpg
- File:Хён А.jpg
- File:DJ2Di7H1irs.jpg
- File:ХёнА .jpg
- File:НаХён в 2016 году.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused uncredited downscale of File:FedEx MD-11F(N526FE) (3382499520).jpg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
_(3382499520).jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
_.jpg){kind=link}
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
No encyclopedic use, size makes me concerned they may not be original.
- File:Mmb.png
- File:Msms.png
- File:Mm bg.png
- File:Lalalalalala.png
- File:Spam no.png
- File:No spame here.png
- File:No spam png.png
- File:Read more button greenhh.gif
- File:Cooltext557486719.png
- File:Nospam.jpg
JesseW (talk) 06:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Refferal to DR, as the equivalent file at English Wikipedia is non-free with different licensing information. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The main page at the source assets all rights. I do not see any exemption for this file mentioned anywhere. At the least, we required OTRS permissions. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep nonsense nomination. Radio 538 is a well known Dutch radio station. We even have a separate cat for their logo's. Natuur12 (talk) 13:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laslamedas40 (talk · contribs)
[edit]lacks of source to determine the copyright statut
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Work created in 1976 is not PD. Wcam (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Low res profession photo, likely copyvio. Uploaded by user with history of copyvios. ed g2s • talk 13:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Attributed to someone other than uploader and look old, user's talk page does not inspire confidence Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The file description says, "Mangla Rai's legal heir (grandson) has given his consent to upload the pic." That would be OK only if the grandson were an heir of the actual photographer. Many photographs in family albums were taken by persons outside the family and the heirs have no right to freely license them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Marked as "unofficial" flag, but I couldn't find anything on this, so it's more likely a personal fantasy, misleading and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Attributed to "Hulu Langat FC", and there's no obvious connection suggested in the metadata. OTRS recomended. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- "FBMD" (Face Book Member Data)... shows it was uploaded to Facebook at some time in the past and that this copy came through that one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from posters.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ademburakyazar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Idriss Ghazali.jpg
- File:آدم الحر عضو مجموعة جهاد ميديا.jpg
- File:Jihad media group.jpg
- File:The Adam.jpg
- File:أدم الحر.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
The "well known socialist leader" is not mentioned in en.wiki. I think, that the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Not a free content!. Copyrighted by UEFA Benoît Prieur (d) 16:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Arutha Studio is not mentioned in en.wiki. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Doubtful "own work" claim, artists conception image. MKFI (talk) 16:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1979. Considering, that uploader looks like file:Jainy Joy.jpg, it is not own work. Real photographer and publication data is needed to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition, here is a scope problem (you may look en:SDCO). Taivo (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
_Logo_(2).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo_(2).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Digital Seis Pontos isn't mentioned in pt.wiki and en:DSP does not confirm existence of the thing. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
_Logo_(2).png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
_Logo_(2).png){kind=link}
Unauthorized Wltr hsnbrg wyte (talk) 18:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
It wasn't properly authorized. Arvarma (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
no evidence of permission (image contains no camera EXIF data) 2003:D2:1BDE:F311:E421:783F:AE8B:21 18:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I feel unsure about this media. First, uploading something to illustrate a trademark is weird. Second, I challenge the authorship declaration, I think that some OTRS documentation is needed by today's standards - I'd say that eastern european publicity media is not to be trusted upon newbie uploads, too much hassle with copyright ignoring russian etc. folks... Lastly, I challenge the educational usability of this image. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
In sum, dubious image: small, no meaningful EXIF (challenged copyright status due to source: crosswiki from ES-WP). Bad quality, not useful (size, lighting). Grand-Duc (talk) 19:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tobinjones1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Unused private logo
George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Unused private logo
George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Complicated logo unlikely to be own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom : complex logo. Kathisma (talk) 01:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sassaladin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Unused private logos
- File:CHEF EMIR LILOU.M.png
- File:LE GRAND PRINCE ALI DES E.A.U. ALIAS LILOU MANY.png
- File:Emblème société de lilou Many.png
- File:LILOU MANY.png
- File:Lilou Many.png
- File:Emblem of Qatar.svg.png
George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, see "FMDB" in metadata and file size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
copyright is not clear it says it is supplied by Philip Glassborow who is in the photograph Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I will seek to clarify this shortly.
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
says "Supplied by Philip Glassborow" but he is not the copyright holder? Theroadislong (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I will seek to clarify this shortly.
- Theroadislong, I have double checked and I can now clarify that Philip Glassborow is the copyright holder. Apologies for the confusion Rowena360 (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Lileky a scan or photograph of a picture postcard. Images from 1944 aren't PD for sure, and the selection of them could be copyrighted too. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable magician; out of project scope IagoQnsi (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
If it is a photo of an event that occured in 1973, its author can't be dead more than 50 or 70 years ago, so it isn't on the public domain. Stego (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information. No evidence that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 23:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Таймер.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep 適切に使えば良い素材となるでしょう。It will amount good material if it used appropriately.--Kkairri (talk) 12:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Not particularly good image, but totally usable. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It's a countdown timer application. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s). Ralth Galth (talk) 02:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I think it corresponds to “Packaging which carries only a printed design which is so simple as to be ineligible for copyright protection.”--Kkairri (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, the packaging seems to be only a short printed text. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I think so too.
Ref request - Commons:Deletion requests/File:Randoseru.jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Only used on the Enligsh Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted as an unsourced BLP in May. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 02:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
and File:शरीफा ( Custard Apple - Annona Squamosa ) Lice Killer.pdf
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Own work claim doubtful, too many uploads with the same tag have been deleted.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very low resolution Djadjko (talk) 03:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ralth Galth as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted content. Please see http://www.lisagas.jp/ Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- It's said that there is a problem. There is also no material which overturns comment, so it may be eliminated.--Ogiyoshisan (talk) 08:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dooscoop32 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Trash upload, see COM:PENIS.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright in many countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Because I'm not using this file Crabx123 (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 20:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete File:Arecibo Observatory Tower 1,JPG for me, please, because i'm not use to having a file Crabx123 (talk) 04:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation, it's an unused file and nothing else, changed to speedy deletion request. Crabx123 (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Own work is doubtful. There are watermarks on the image which would indicate has been taken off the net PK-LMN (talk) 05:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Award comes from external agency. Unlikely that uploader is a representative of the group authorized to relicense as cc-by-sa-3.0. czar 05:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme Dalla Rosa (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images : out of scope
- File:Segunda Formação da banda.png
- File:Memphis na segunda formação.jpg
- File:Memphis em ensaio acústico.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE fail and possible bogus sourcing. Apparently a logo of...something...but no clue what and not used anywhere (no obvious educational/encyclopediac use; COM is not a random image-host). And if it's the official logo of...whatever...it's not selfcreated. DMacks (talk) 07:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No source for images, so possible copyright violation. May also be out of scope. --ghouston (talk) 08:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
personal image, out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 14:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project's scope. Rapsar (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Teenage prank Olybrius (talk) 09:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Third party logo, which is above threshold of originality, Non-free at English Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete The source on en.wiki shows a fair use tag. Kathisma (talk) 01:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
probable copyvio: screenshot of film/TV, not in use Imedeiros (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
non free logo XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 00:19, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete complex logo. Kathisma (talk) 01:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This file was uploaded as "own work". But it is not "own work". It is a picture from the guide board. Please see the photo in this page. Ralth Galth (talk) 00:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This file was uploaded as "own work", but it obviously is not. This is a old photo, so author is not this user. Ralth Galth (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This file was uploaded as "own work", but it obviously is not. This is a old photo, so author is not this user. Ralth Galth (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This file was uploaded as "own work", but this picture is not drawn by this user. Ralth Galth (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This file was uploaded as "own work", but it obviously is not. This is a old photo, so author is not this user. Ralth Galth (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Unclear source. The description says "source: FPÖ", but it's also given as "own work" by someone with no other contributions. It looks like a studio shot, and a Google image search finds both sites that also simply source it from the "FPÖ", and sites that source it from Commons, but I'm not able to find any kind of original source (e.g. on fpoe.at or norberthofer.at or the like). darkweasel94 01:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. This file is a shot of TV broadcasting. Ralth Galth (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment TV broadcasting program is "part"(only upper-left), not whole. But there is a possibility, Just as you say. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep I don't think part of “でんき予報”(electricity usage forecast in Kyūshū Region) is copyrighted. And if I take on “でんき予報”, TV show should turn on. So I think it may be regarded as De Minimis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkairri (talk • contribs)
- Delete, copyrighted screenshot of TV-program. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Main subject of this file is a shot of broadcasting in train. not De minimis. Ralth Galth (talk) 01:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I think, people (Ryoko Tani) photo part is De minimis. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Comment - This user wrote "谷亮子" (Ryoko Tani, name of people in this photo) in description. This user understand that it is not De minimis. --Ralth Galth (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment ↑ Is it double voting ? --Benzoyl (talk) 07:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It is a declaration of intention, not a vote. Sorry. --Ralth Galth (talk) 07:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Narita Express.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It's a tentatively file name. Do you want moore meaningful file name?
My impression have no relation in the discussion. Absolutely, photographer Francisco Restivo --Benzoyl (talk) 07:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Copyright violation is not permitted. That's all.--Ralth Galth (talk) 07:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The news sentence in the broadcasting may not be copyrighted because of lack of creativity. But, the left route-map and the image adjacent to the news sentence are likely enough to be copyrighted. These are not De minimis obviously. --Yapparina (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with Yapparina's opinion. (In Japanese from here) 左の路線図ではすべての駅を示すのではなく、主要な駅のみに絞ることで閲覧者への理解度を向上させる創意工夫がされており、著作物性を有すると考えます。--Kkairri (talk) 14:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, somehow I do not feel comfortable with the photo. Seems like out of scope. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment A kind of fashion photo (Description) in 2009. But, Perhaps, There is a problem with her Facial expressions... --Benzoyl (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request: Photographie personnelle. Absence de but éducatif. -Laubel (talk) 04:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Photos of Category:Clip-on sunglasses are few. --Benzoyl (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It is not important whether it is a few or not. --Ralth Galth (talk) 07:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, good illustration about clip-on sunglasses. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Photographs of identifiable people Quark Logo (talk) 08:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Subject's consent to have his photo taken is fairly clear from the circumstances. No defamation or intrusion as well. See COM:IDENT. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Just simple, I'm trying to find Clip-on sunglasses picturess.
- But if, there is a wikipedia-particle "Clip-on sunglass", I think this photo may be not appropriate in the particle. Because of "looking at viewer"? I think maybe, side-view-shot or mannequin, or glasses-itself is suitable better picture.
- About this time, I'll request deletion request of the file. Last word, Thanks to Taivo and 朝彦. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Just now, I requested {{SpeedyDelete}}. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment changed my voting. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I declined speedy request. I do not understand, what's wrong with the picture. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Consenting for a photo and consenting to have a photo published on the Internet are two different things, particularly in a country that restricts even the taking of such photos. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep High-Kicking images is few in Category:Kicking.
(example:That is Middle-Kicking) --Benzoyl (talk) 02:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:ハイキックの応酬 (8034384527).jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Comment It is not important whether it is a few or not. This photo is an unused personal image. --Ralth Galth (talk) 04:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment ↑ Double voting ? --Benzoyl (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It is a declaration of intention, not a vote. Sorry. --Ralth Galth (talk) 07:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I think, "Posture and angle" is important. personal or not. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Pidata (corpu).--Ralth Galth (talk) 07:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, File:ハイキックの応酬 (8034384527).jpg has better quality. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Didym (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep High-Kicking images is few in Category:Kicking.
(example:That is Middle-Kicking) --Benzoyl (talk) 02:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:ハイキックの応酬 (8023538032).jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 06:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Comment It is not important whether it is a few or not. This photo is an unused personal image. --Ralth Galth (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment ↑ Double voting ? --Benzoyl (talk) 06:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It is a declaration of intention, not a vote. Sorry. --Ralth Galth (talk) 07:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I think, "Posture and angle" are important. personal or not. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Interesting shot, I like it. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. Do you Know Field trip??
Also, Main(or sub) subject is Bag's design, Red torii --Benzoyl (talk) 02:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC) - Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Backpack.--Ralth Galth (talk) 07:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, good illustration for backpacks. Taivo (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Interesting photo. I like it. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep One of humorous challenge, also with no discomfort. I think no problem. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Category:Fashion in 2016 (Hair, clothing). --Benzoyl (talk) 06:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete 2016年におけるトレンドとかそういうレベルでないと、当該カテゴリにカテゴライズされていることを以って有用とはみなせないと考えます。I think this is not regarded as useful even if it is categorized to “2016 fashion” as far as it is not 2016's trend. --Kkairri (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Storkk (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Storkk (talk) 12:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, probably non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Storkk (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. "People with soroban in Japan" "Sales counters in Japan" -Benzoyl (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Shop is semi-public space, not personal. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC) - Comment Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:パリオ学習帳 算数 2016 (29622312164).jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment I do not think those categories you created are necessary. --Ralth Galth (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete 色々と被写体が多く、使いづらい画像だと考えます。This image is photographed of many thing (various categorization is proof of it) and hard to be used. --Kkairri (talk) 13:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Looks like a reasonable-quality image of an abacus in daily use in Japan, so it serves an educational purpose even if it is not currently used in any other projects. --DAJF (talk) 12:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per DAJF. --Storkk (talk) 12:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Balotolé.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not Out of scope. Shop is semi-public, not personal. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Also Commons:Deletion requests/File:そろばん会計 2016 (30496069756).jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 22:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader edited at pms:Balotolé to use this image, but it is out of the question. How much person can understand that it shows soroban!--Kkairri (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment これは酷い。削除を防ぐためにpms:Balotoléに画像を掲載したのでしょうが、一個上の明瞭な画像と異なり、そろばんの存在なんか見えやしません。削除阻止のために画像を貼り付けるのは結構ですが、適切なところに貼りましょうよ……。--Kkairri (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- むしろ逆で、Cropped（拡大や切抜き）は後からでもできるわけで、広めで全体感を表現するほうが、説明力が高いと考えます。 --Benzoyl (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- これだけ荒い画像だとクロップしたら余計ひどくなりますよ。This is so much low resolution image, so cropping makes a image worse. --Kkairri (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- むしろ逆で、Cropped（拡大や切抜き）は後からでもできるわけで、広めで全体感を表現するほうが、説明力が高いと考えます。 --Benzoyl (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, educational value seems rather weak. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Poor-quality image. The abacus is not clearly visible in the picture, so it's hard to see what possible educational value it could serve. --DAJF (talk) 12:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. Drinkware for child --Benzoyl (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Comment I do not think that it is a suitable photograph to represent "Drinkware for child". This photo is an unused personal image. --Ralth Galth (talk) 05:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on 水樽.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This image is photographed of a drinkware and a table number stand, so it is confused. In addition, “雨宿り、ワッフルショコラを待つふたり。”, the original flickr title is “sheltering from a shower, two people waiting for chocolate waffle” for Japanese language, so it is absolutely personnel image.--Kkairri (talk) 10:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment この件に限らず、Benzoylさんは人物が写った画像は教育的に（＝ウィキペディアで）利用しづらいという点を認識するべきです。--Kkairri (talk) 10:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, educational value seems rather weak. Taivo (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Poor-quality private photo. Serves no obvious educational purpose, even if it has been forcibly added to a Wikipedia article by the uploader. --DAJF (talk) 12:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s). Ralth Galth (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I think it corresponds to “Packaging which carries only a printed design which is so simple as to be ineligible for copyright protection.”--Kkairri (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree: packaging seems quite simple. Taivo (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Almost, It is characterized, Private labels in Japan use very simple packaging and design.
And See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Randoseru.jpg. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: simple packaging. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Comment I do not think that it is a suitable photograph to represent "Ensoku" and "School uniforms of Japan". This photo is an unused personal image. --Ralth Galth (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Reppu. --Ralth Galth (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- And then, Benzoyl stuck it on Ensoku (a new article created by Benzoyl). --Ralth Galth (talk) 08:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment (in Japanese) これは遠足 (Ensoku) の画像ですか？ 私は修学旅行 (Shūgaku ryokou) のような気がするのですが…… 何れにせよ、修学旅行か遠足かわからない画像の使用はやめるべきだと考えます。英語版のことですから英語版ウィキペディアンにすべてを任せますが、英語では遠足 (Ensoku) も修学旅行 (Shūgaku ryokou) もほとんど同じ単語を使いますが、日本では明らかにわけられて考えられています。--Kkairri (talk) 11:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, good illustration of school uniforms in Japan, especially because faces are not visible. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Agree with Taivo above. It's a good-quality photo that serves a useful purpose (i.e. illustrating Japanese school uniforms without potential privacy issues). --DAJF (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion above. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. I think main Cat are Reading people, Open books. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Ikaskuntza and 學習. --Ralth Galth (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep これは学習を表す画像として十分すぎるでしょう。削除の必要はないと考えます。--Kkairri (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- This is good enough to show studying image. I think not necessary for deletion this.--Kkairri (talk) 11:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I like it. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use, per discussion above. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Antlion Pits 24.185.79.87 21:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Because I'm not using my picture of Antlion Pits.JPG Crabx123 (talk) 01:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 20:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
please delete the antlion picture for me, because I'm no use to have a file Crabx123 (talk) 03:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Crabx123: , please, refrain for continuously asking to delete the file without a valid reason. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Original shot, it was the user's upload, the file is not in use, likely it's not the user's own work. Crabx123 (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Because I'm not using it Crabx123 (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 20:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm no use to having a image/file, please delete it for me Crabx123 (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
because I'm not to having a file, please delete it Crabx123 (talk) 04:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Despite the prior closes as kept, this appears to be a toy car, which would be covered by COM:TOYS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: it's just a model of a (utilitarian) Volkswagen, no creativity has been added that would not fall under DM. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio it:File:Pescara-Gonfalone.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: fair use. Not admissible on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I believe the depicted work ("Black Sun" by Isamu Noguchi) is copyrighted, and there is no FOP for sculpture in the US. If I'm wrong, just let me know, and I'll go take a good picture of it for Commons myself! Jmabel ! talk 05:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work. The poster is not exhibited in a permanent way and therefore is not covered by FoP exception (Spain) Discasto talk 08:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted work. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama reads, "This permission does not extend to: photographs of non-Indian events". Kailash29792 (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 16:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I assure you it is. I took the picture, I am the artist's son. Rtheze
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
,_Luxembourg_PP1272434884.jpg){kind=link}
,_Luxembourg_PP1272434884.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Gulfstream G550, Private JP6837786.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Process as {{Duplicate}} in order not to break any external usage of the photo. PK-LMN (talk) 09:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Hedwig. --Storkk (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lionel Le Falher
[edit]Artist Lionel Le Falher died in 2008. (2008+70+1=2079) Undelete in 2079.
- File:Abbaye de thelene.JPG
- File:Abbaye de Thélène, huile (55x46), 1996.JPG
- File:Abbaye nouaillemaupertuis.JPG
- File:Agonie de Bagnac.JPG
- File:Commandant Hussard 1er empire.JPG
- File:Cosaque du Tsar.JPG
- File:Délires et délices 1993 huile (61X46).JPG
- This photo was first uploaded by a member of the family of the painter after his death... We should contact her to confirm the proper OTRS authorization (not sure if she's granted exclusive rights on the successsion as she said she's a step-daughter, not a direct daughter, but may be there's no direct descendant, and her rights on the painting may be partly owned by other successors. However we've not received any complaint from other successors about this low-resolution photo). On other photos by the same uploader, it is said the uploader was not a step-daughter but the brother of the painter. Not clear... verdy_p (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Just want to point out that "we've not received any complaint" is not an argument in a DR per COM:PRP. But, if we can get OTRS-prmission for {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-heirs}} that would be great. Josve05a (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- This photo was first uploaded by a member of the family of the painter after his death... We should contact her to confirm the proper OTRS authorization (not sure if she's granted exclusive rights on the successsion as she said she's a step-daughter, not a direct daughter, but may be there's no direct descendant, and her rights on the painting may be partly owned by other successors. However we've not received any complaint from other successors about this low-resolution photo). On other photos by the same uploader, it is said the uploader was not a step-daughter but the brother of the painter. Not clear... verdy_p (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Etalon.JPG
- File:Foretpetrifiee.JPG
- File:Hussard.JPG
- File:La Charge 1993.JPG
- File:La conscience.JPG
- File:La mélée.JPG
- File:Le cuirassier.JPG
- File:Les dames de Morthemer.jpg
- File:Lionel Le Falher et Arnaud d'Hauterives.jpg
- Is a photo, but is missing OTRS-permission. Josve05a (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Naufrage.JPG
- File:Passage du gué (1996).JPG
- File:Vanity.JPG
- File:L'abreuvoir 1990.JPG
- File:Le divin Marquis (Sade).JPG
- File:Manoir imaginaire.JPG
- File:Partie d'une fresque.JPG
,_1996.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment PD review via Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review. Josve05a (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I believe the neice/stepdaughter/brother confusion mentioned above is likely who the photographer was, rather than the uploader. In any case, to keep/restore the files, we will need someone who represents the heirs to the copyrights of the painter to verify the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: heir(s) of the artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS, except for the photograph of the artist, where we will need the photographer's confirmation via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded again on 10 March 2016 (7 days after their deletion)
Several of the photos (in fact most of them) have been reuploaded again, by User:Amispatrimoinelussac (new user created 2016 March 12 09:00, contributions) and are visible in Category:Lionel Le Falher, under different (non descriptive and deceptive) file names such as
- File:Oeuvre 1.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 2.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 3.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 4.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 5.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 6.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 7.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 8.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 9.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 10.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 11.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 12.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 13.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 14.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 15.JPG (former File:Délires et délices 1993 huile (61X46).JPG), or
- File:Oeuvre 16.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 17.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 18.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 19.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 20.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 21.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 22.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 23.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 24.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 25.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 30.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 31.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 32.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 33.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 35.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 36.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 37.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 38.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 39.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 40.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 41.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 42.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 43.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 44.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 45.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 46.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 48.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 49.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 50.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 51.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 52.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 53.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 54.JPG
- File:Son dernier tableau.JPG.
See also (same uploader, in the same batch the same day, not all categorized):
- File:Remise du prix Gustave Courtois à Lionel Le Falher par l académicien A. d'Hauterives.jpg
- File:Lionel Le Falher devant une oeuvre.JPG
- File:Plafond peint par Puvis de Chabanne.JPG
I'm not convinced that you've received any OTRS permission to authorize again these new uploads... I suppose that the new uploading user was in fact the same initial user (see User_talk:Mlefal here, or on Wikipedia fr:Spécial:Contributions/Mlefal, previously also fr:Spécial:Contributions/Plefal) that uploaded the previously deleted files (an admin with "whois" rights could confirm that).
Some of these files are showing again as thumbnails illustrating the same Wikipedia articles to replace the formerly deleted images (notably in fr:Lionel Le Falher where the same User:Amispatrimoinelussac modified this article between 10-17 March 2016 to insert these alternate files, with the same descriptions, and adding some additional new images from this batch).
Several of these files are also posted on external personal websites (owned by the same user and advertized by external URLs such as the former personal web page "http://pascal.lefalher.neuf.fr/" posted in several related Wikipedia articles about that painter, and about Château de Lussac). I'm now convinced that this is just an amateur living near Lussac-les-Châteaux, and that wants to promote that painter without any authorization for these photos (and probably not even by an official local association that would manage the heirs rights).
Once again, if that user ("Pascal Le Falher"? according to his personal page hosted by the French SFR/Neuf ISP, and advertized by him on the Wikipedia article about the painter and the castle) is effectively representing such an association (or is a legal heir), and that association (or he) effectively has an legal right of publication, and is ready to endorse the legal responsability of claiming such rights against other third parties, we still need a signed OTRS certification (with some proof an identity), and not new uploads for the same protected contents.
verdy_p (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero
[edit]Although claimed as "own work", all the logos uploaded are clear copyvios, above the TOO. Missing permissions in all cases.
Files affected:
- File:Liga Boliviana.jpg
- File:NZF White Ribbon Cup (cutted).jpg
- File:Copa América Uruguay 1995 logo.png
- File:Copa América Uruguay 1995 mascota Torito.png
- File:Copa América Uruguay 1995 mascota Torito.svg
- File:Escudo AUF actual.svg
- File:Escudo_AUF_actual.png
- File:CA Fénix abstracto.svg
- File:CA Fénix abstracto.png
- File:Americas Champions League logo abstracto.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fma12 (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dozens of logos from a serial copyright violator. None have proper sources, some are obvious copyvios. Some might be {{PD-textlogo}} in their home countries, many not.
- File:Logo Force India F1.png
- File:Logo Partido Comunista de Uruguay.png
- File:Bandera Partido Comunista de Uruguay.png
- File:Bandera Partido Pirata Uruguay.png
- File:Logo Copa Coca-Cola.png
- File:Logo Copa Uruguaya Coca-Cola.png
- File:Logo JAC Motors.png
- File:Bandera Partido Uruguayo.png
- File:Escudo Peñarol plastificado.png
- File:Logo Tercera División de Uruguay.png
- File:Logo Segunda División de Uruguay.png
- File:Logo Primera División de Uruguay.png
- File:Escudo Club Atlético Power.png
- File:Escudo Central.png
- File:Escudo Club Sportivo Miramar.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Misiones Football Club.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 22:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Club Atlético Platense 2015.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Antiguo Rampla Juniors Fútbol Club.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo CSyD Villa Española.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Uruguay Montevideo FC.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bandera Uruguay Ficticia.png
- File:Escudo La Luz FC.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Racing Club de Montevideo.png
- File:Escudo Club Atlético Torque.png
- File:Escudo Club Deportivo Maldonado.png
- File:Nuevo escudo Club Plaza Colonia de Deportes.png - Keep, fixed --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Banderuzco Huracán Football Club.png
- File:Escudo Huracán Football Club.png
File:Escudo Danubio Fútbol Club.png– Keep, originally uploaded by another user; is OK. --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)- File:Bandera-defensor-sporting.png
- File:Bandera del Club Nacional de Football.png - Keep, is OK. --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bandera-central-uruguay-railway-cricket-club.png - Keep, is OK. --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo-club-atletico-penarol.png - Keep, is OK. --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Bandera-club-atletico-penarol.png - Keep, is OK. --XXN, 10:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Escudo Club Oriental de Football.png
- File:Escudo Colón Fútbol Club.png
- File:Escudo Club Atlético River Plate.png
- File:Escudo 2014 FVF.png - Keep, was/is ok --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Polo Riodike FC 1.JPG
- File:Polo Riodike FC 3.JPG
- File:Uruguay Montevideo Icon.png
- File:Sud América Icon.png
- File:Tacuarembó Icon.png
- File:Salus Icon.png
- File:River Plate Icon.png
- File:River Plate FC Icon.png
- File:Rentistas Icon.png
- File:Racing Icon.png
- File:Progreso Icon.png
- File:Potencia Icon.png
- File:Plaza Colonia Icon.png
- File:Platense Icon.png
- File:Paysandú Bella Vista Icon.png
- File:Oriental Icon.png
- File:Montevideo Wanderers Icon.png
- File:Mar de Fondo Icon.png
- File:Miramar Misiones Icon.png
- File:Lito Icon.png
- File:La Luz Icon.png
- File:Juventud Icon.png
- File:Huracán Icon.png
- File:Frontera Icon.png
- File:Durazno Icon.png
- File:Deportivo Maldonado Icon.png
- File:Danubio Icon.png
- File:CURCC Icon.png
- File:Colón Icon.png
- File:Cerro Largo Icon.png
- File:Cerro Icon.png
- File:Cerrito Icon.png
- File:Central Español Icon.png
- File:Boston River Icon.png
- File:Bella Vista Icon.png
- File:Basáñez Icon.png
- File:Atenas Icon.png
- File:Artigas Icon.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I fixed description and licensing info for some of them. Keep those.
- Around 36 logos (grouped at the end of list) are very small, in icon resolution. For most of them probably exist a higher version; many of them (if not all) are unused. I didn't even tried to fix their details. Delete --XXN, 11:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree with XXN. Kathisma (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Bandera Partido Pirata Uruguay text.png
- File:Partido Pirata Uruguay text logo.jpg
- File:Estadio Peñarol logo negro.png
- File:Estadio Peñarol logo amarillo.png
- File:Logo ficticio San Lorenzo.png
- File:Logo ficticio Rosario Central.png
- File:Logo ficticio River Plate ARG.png
- File:Logo ficticio Racing ARG.png
- File:Logo ficticio CBF.png
- File:Logo ficticio Independiente.png
- File:Logo ficticio Newell's Old Boys.png
- File:Logo ficticio Montevideo Wanderers.png
- File:Logo ficticio Villa Teresa.png
- File:Logo ficticio Villa Española.png
- File:Logo ficticio AUF.png
- File:Logo ficticio Tacuarembó.png
- File:Logo ficticio Salus.png
- File:Logo ficticio River Plate.png
- File:Logo ficticio Rampla Juniors.png
- File:Logo ficticio Rentistas.png
- File:Logo ficticio Potencia.png
- File:Logo ficticio Progreso.png
- File:Logo ficticio Racing.png
- File:Logo ficticio Platense.png
- File:Logo ficticio Plaza Colonia.png
- File:Logo ficticio Peñarol.png
- File:Logo ficticio Oriental.png
- File:Logo ficticio Nacional.png
- File:Logo ficticio Miramar Misiones.png
- File:Logo ficticio Mar de Fondo.png
- File:Logo ficticio La Luz.png
- File:Logo ficticio Los Halcones.png
- File:Logo ficticio Liverpool.png
- File:Logo ficticio Juventud.png
- File:Logo ficticio Sud América.png
- File:Logo ficticio El Tanque Sisley.png
- File:Logo ficticio Deportivo Maldonado.png
- File:Logo ficticio Danubio.png
- File:Logo ficticio Cerro.png
- File:Logo ficticio Cerro Largo.png
- File:Logo ficticio Cerrito.png
- File:Logo ficticio Canadian.png
- File:Logo ficticio Central Español.png
- File:Logo ficticio Boston River.png
- File:Logo ficticio Boca Juniors.png
- File:Logo ficticio Atenas.png
- File:Logo ficticio Basáñez.png
- File:Logo ficticio Alto Perú.png
- File:Logo Partido de la Concertación.png
- File:Bandera Partido de la Concertación.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Team group shots, not own work.
- File:Mar de fondo principal 2011.jpg
- File:Mar de fondo alternativo 2018.jpg
- File:Logo Supercopa Uruguaya simplificado.png
- File:Recuerdo La Luz FC 1992.jpg
- File:Recuerdo Mar de Fondo 1969.jpg
- File:Antiguo plantel Mar de Fondo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juanchocarbonero (talk · contribs)
[edit]files with incorrect licenses (like PD-Old with 50 years from publishing required for a file of 1976), bad or absent sources.
- File:Defensor 1976.jpg
- File:Plantel CURCC 1900.jpg
- File:Percy Segfield.jpg
- File:Caricatura AUF 1900.jpg
- File:1900 Inauguración GPC.png
- File:Camiseta CURCC.jpg
- File:Mapa urbano, suburbano y rural del Departamento de Montevideo.jpg
- File:Escudo Rampla Juniors 2.png
rubin16 (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, I went and found a slightly more correct source for the first one. However, I am unsure if this ia anonymous work or not. Reardless even if it is anonymous, then the template says 50 years, and only 42 years have passed. Most likely we should Delete, but it would be nice to figure out when to undelete. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep If you are sure, We should delete many files of Category:Aloha shirts. --Benzoyl (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This is not a place to discuss other files. This is a place to discuss whether this photo is to be deleted.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. One of Category:Amusement rides --Benzoyl (talk) 02:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep 後ろから撮られていることから、同定不能です。遊具の使用風景として有用だと考えます。ただ、マイナーな遊具なため使い所が難しいのが難点ですが…… Two persons cannot be identified, because of photographing from back. I think it is useful for showing scene of using playground equipment.--Kkairri (talk) 12:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep All Photo of Category:Couples in Japan are Deletion requests? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This is not a place to discuss other files. This is a place to discuss whether this photo is to be deleted. --Ralth Galth (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment ↑ Double voting ? --Benzoyl (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It is a declaration of intention, not a vote. Sorry.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, photo with bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 02:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Not Out of scope. I think main Cat are Women writing, Reading people, Open books --Benzoyl (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Comment If so, why is the file name "Not upskirt"? --Ralth Galth (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment When I submitted a deletion request, this picture was an unused picture. Then Benzoyl stuck it on Pagbaro.--Ralth Galth (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment It's a "tentatively" file name. Do you want more meaningful file name? --Benzoyl (talk) 07:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think it may violate right to privacy, because it is taken in non-public space and it is unknown whether it have been got agreement for photograph.--Kkairri (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep What kind of privacy? She is doing nothing strange here, nothing what cannot be done publicly. I like the photo. But filename should be changed. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, per Taivo and Benzoyl. The creepy filename should be changed ASAP (and the word "upskirt", among others like such, should totally be added to some kind of auto-monitored list — @Fæ: ?). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Comment Point of view of privacy, The photographer sit opposite near positionally. Not sneak photography.
And, You're right, filename should be changed.--Benzoyl (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)--Benzoyl (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Benzoyl, you cannot vote more than once. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, mistake. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Benzoyl, you cannot vote more than once. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ralth Galth: @Benzoyl: @Kkairri: @Taivo: @Tuvalkin: I've renamed the file and the DR page and relisted this DR on the December 5th DR listing. This way both the file redirect and DR redirect can be deleted. Pinging all voters and commenters to make sure you don't lose track of this page. lNeverCry 02:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Much better. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone for Rename finished. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Not upskirt (6823366665).jpg to this Commons:Deletion requests/File:School is a hard working time that we will never forget (6823366665).jpg
And, I will be happy if you let me know More good file-name. I leave this matter to you. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image of an identifiable minor (legal child) taken in a non-public place. Also, according to the GPS information in the image, it was actually taken in a tea house in Shanghai, so the whole fiel description is not reliable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
shaky, unusable Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Chithambaram
[edit]- File:Chithaambaram 1.JPG
- File:Chithaambaram 3.JPG
- File:Chithaambaram 7.JPG
- File:Chithaambaram 8.JPG
- File:Chithaambaram.JPG
I have excluded File:Chithambaram.JPG which I added to en:Digital watermarking as an example of a timestamped image. The rest are just low res watermarked images whose quality is so low they don't seem to meet our scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ilasun. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 06:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm certain you can find an image with a timestamp that is actually good quailty -- one we would want to keep for a good reason. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: THis image is so poor that I can't see anything with a copyright. However, that same poor quality makes it useless. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Given source for license seems to imply that no derivative works are allowed. Kelly (talk) 09:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." Commons images must be free for any use, which includes parody and misleading contexts. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Third party logo, which is borderline for threshold of originality, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Same rules as in file:Coca-Cola Zero logo.svg and many other logos should apply here. If there's a borderline for threshold of originality, the logo should be on the good side of it. --Superbass (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Coca-cola is a USA company. There is no copyright for type faces in the USA, so the Coke Zero logo has no copyright. This is an Irish logo. "If there's a borderline for threshold of originality, the logo should be on the good side of it" is backwards -- if something is borderline, we delete it. Since we have no specific knowledge of the ToO in Ireland, and this would be above it in most countries, it must be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 11:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It is in scope, see RTL7, but there is a better version of the logo already there. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: in scope, but have a PNG and an SVG. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In scope, but we have an svg. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Although the Wanted List might have been put together by the Chinese government, it is very unlikely that the Chinese goverment took the photo. {{PD-PRC-exempt}} does not apply here. Wcam (talk) 13:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per com:derivative. More files:
- File:Lisbon Portugal (3016881909).jpg
- File:Lisbon Portugal (3017715638).jpg
- File:Lisbon Portugal (3016882811).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mhhossein talk 13:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Have you ever heard of Freedom of Panorama Mhhossein? Funny little concept! This are images of graffiti in public areas in Lisbon, Portugal and per {{FoP-Portugal}} and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Portugal, as this work of art is permanently situated in public places. The portuguese Freedom of Panorama provides to 2d and 3d works of art. Please refer to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Salgueiro Maia graffiti.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Metro station Aeroporto (Lisboa) and Commons:Deletion requests/File:LIS - 201606 S1 - 32 (28514279781).jpgTm (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Per article 76 of the Portugal copyright law, the author needs to be attributed. --Mhhossein talk 16:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- And how is this related to Freedom of Panorama? You dont need to answer. It is not related with Freedom of Panorama! And so either your blantly and knowingly lying and pretending to know how to read portuguese language and understand the portuguese law or your using automatic translation. To speak of portuguese law at least make an effort to read and speak the portuguese language, even if not like an native speaker as me.
- Per article 76 of the Portugal copyright law, the author needs to be attributed. --Mhhossein talk 16:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- For starters the §76 is related to atribution of work, not with Freedom of Panorama, as you can see on the headers, so there is no a copyright violation, per related deletion requests and Commons policies linked above. Even more Commons policy related to Freedom of Panorama doesnt mention the requirement of atribution as being related to Freedom of Panorama.
- Second instead of cherry picking what suits you more and throw away what is not, at least quote the entire piece of the law (in this case §76(1)a and not the whole article 76 as you pretended). as it says: "ARTIGO 76º Requisitos; 1 – A utilização livre a que se refere o artigo anterior deve ser acompanhada:; a) Da indicação, sempre que possível, do nome do autor e do editor, do título da obra e demais circunstâncias que os identifiquem;" that translates to "ARTICLE 76 Requirements 1 - The free use refered to in the previous article must be accompanied by: (A) Of the indication, wherever possible, of the name of the author and publisher, the title of the work and other circumstances that identify them;".
- What you, knowingly, left out is "Wherever possible" and as you can see this graffitis arent signed, and as such arent identified, even if they are all in the same place in a very public place in Lisbon. Even if there is a requirement in portuguese law to atribute to the authors this is not related to freedom of panorama and in the portuguese copyright law. And how do you quote an author of a work depicted in image? See why
- So dont try to subvert what is required and as stated before this photos are freely licensed and the depiction of the works are according to portuguese Freedom of Panorama, and so are legally uploaded to Commons. Tm (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Be polite please. The English version of Portuguese copyright law is available and you could just be more polite by removing that bad faith language. As you see in the link the attribution requirement is exactly in the case of FOP.--Mhhossein talk 07:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- No, i wont be polite and have have good faith when your making this dr as a revenge to this. If one analyzes your last contributions its clear what i´am saying in what you spend half of your contributions.
- Be polite please. The English version of Portuguese copyright law is available and you could just be more polite by removing that bad faith language. As you see in the link the attribution requirement is exactly in the case of FOP.--Mhhossein talk 07:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- So dont try to subvert what is required and as stated before this photos are freely licensed and the depiction of the works are according to portuguese Freedom of Panorama, and so are legally uploaded to Commons. Tm (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- About FOP, did you read the whole text you cite? No, as always. If you had read the "Main legal provision" it says that "Freedom of panorama exception is foreseen in article 75.º, paragraph 2, point q) of Chapter II (On Free Uses) of Title II (On Uses of the Work) of the Portuguese Code." and not a mention of the right of attribution. That the right of attribution that you quote is in "Other relevant legal provisions".
- The right of attribution as i said above is coded in §76(1)a. This is in a separate article as this a requirement is not part of the Freedom of Panorama as mentioned in §75(2)q. Article 75, is much more vast as in the use of quotations, the right of private copy, the right of public communication, the right of use in court cases, etx.
- But even if their were part of the freedom of panorama provisions, i ask you again, as you seem to only cherry pick what is convenient to you and unsanswer what is not convenient to you. This attribution is required "wherever possible" but as i said before, how do you attribute this graffitis that as you can see this arent signed, and as such arent identified, even if they are all in the same place in a very public place in Lisbon? Answer how do you attribute the unidentified authors of this works? Why do you think that the right of attribution has a caveat in "wherever possible", specifically to cases like that? Tm (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Tm: Cool down please. You had some problematic photos and probably have some more. Anyway, yes! Graffiti says that " in many cases the artist is unknown, proof of authorship of the art is problematic...". --Mhhossein talk 17:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- But even if their were part of the freedom of panorama provisions, i ask you again, as you seem to only cherry pick what is convenient to you and unsanswer what is not convenient to you. This attribution is required "wherever possible" but as i said before, how do you attribute this graffitis that as you can see this arent signed, and as such arent identified, even if they are all in the same place in a very public place in Lisbon? Answer how do you attribute the unidentified authors of this works? Why do you think that the right of attribution has a caveat in "wherever possible", specifically to cases like that? Tm (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted above, article 76 applies explicitly to the FOP set forth in Article 75 and says "wherever possible". It does not say "wherever easy" or "wherever the work is signed". "Wherever possible" requires serious effort to find the name of the artist. There is no evidence here that any effort has been made. I also not that the various ad hominem comments by UserTm are entirely unacceptable and if he or she makes any more similar comments, he or she will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The image is blurry / out of focus. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also no useful description or category. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This map is missing too much data in the middle to be of any use, the SVG view window isn't set properly, and the labels are very strangely selected (villages, but not towns). The OpenStreetMap data is also about two years old now. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
(To the closing administrator: The OSM data is also not properly attributed after almost two weeks' notice and an email from the OSM Foundation, and the file is not currently in use except on a bot-generated page.) Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
It seems you, Jc86035, have nothing to do. And I am still waiting for apologies. We will post our maps again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilya Shrayber (talk • contribs) 19:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please sign your comments with four tildes
~~~~. - If you've resolved your license/attribution problems (which doesn't seem to be the case yet, given that you're still using OSM data without attribution
and your website still says "all rights forever"Website was updated. Thanks. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)) I apologize for causing you inconvenience in adding your images to Commons. However, it does nothing to solve the problem I've raised with this particular map, which is mainly that it's basically unusable because most of the data is missing. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{ping|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 06:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unusable per nom. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sick Spiny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works claimed as own ones.
- File:Семейное голосование.jpg
- File:Биографии кандидатов в президенты.png
- File:Билборд Хотамжона Кетмонова.jpg
- File:Билборд Сарвара Отамуратова.jpg
- File:Билборд Шавката Мирзиёева.jpg
- File:Билборд Наримона Умарова.jpg
- File:Плакат выборов-2016.jpg
- File:Стенд Ислама Каримова.jpg
- File:Программы кандидатов в президенты на выборах 2015 года.jpg
- File:Кандидаты по 128 округу.jpg
Sealle (talk) 15:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Доведение до абсурда. Чем лицензирование моих фотографий отличается, например, от File:Vybory-chechen2.jpg?--Sick Spiny (talk) 07:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The deleted works all of a copyright and are not "own work" as claimed. The cited work may or may not have a copyright. Read WP:Other stuff exists. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
completely wrong cat Frze > talk 17:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- You'll have to do better than that!! State your case, I'm all ears.--Petebutt (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Logically VEB Flugzeugwerke Dresden refers to the factory and not its products!!--Petebutt (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- The Publicly Owned Operation (German: Volkseigener Betrieb; abbreviated VEB) was the main legal form of industrial enterprise in East Germany. There were thousands of VEBs, has nothing to do with the aircrafts of VEB Flugzeugwerke Dresden. --Frze > talk 23:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC) [1]
- Logically VEB Flugzeugwerke Dresden refers to the factory and not its products!!--Petebutt (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
completely wrong cat Frze > talk 17:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- State your case!! You are trying to delete a category which is proper. The aircraft built at Dresden were designated VEB 14!!--Petebutt (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- This category is senseless. The Publicly Owned Operation (German: Volkseigener Betrieb; abbreviated VEB) was the main legal form of industrial enterprise in East Germany. There were thousands of VEBs, has nothing to do with this aircraft. --Frze > talk 23:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC) [2]
- What you have done here is very close to Vandalism! Never do such things again! What is the correct name of this aircraft? --Frze > talk 00:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- This category is senseless. The Publicly Owned Operation (German: Volkseigener Betrieb; abbreviated VEB) was the main legal form of industrial enterprise in East Germany. There were thousands of VEBs, has nothing to do with this aircraft. --Frze > talk 23:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC) [2]
Deleted: empty category. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This image is probably ripped from KCET website. Also, the Los Angeles Public Library is credited as the photo author. Actually, the author may be anonymous. The uploader has not yet proven prior publication of the photo. Also, the research is insufficient. George Ho (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – Found the link: http://jpg1.lapl.org/00004/00004152.jpg. Also, the order number is 00004152; filing info #S-006-290 120; note #LAPL00004152. --George Ho (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I have updated the licensing template. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Illegitimate Barrister, {{PD-CAGov}} is meant for state governmental works. The sources didn't say the state government created the photo. --George Ho (talk) 18:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the image shall be presumed as unpublished, even without a notice. LAPL is not the original author the photo; it merely collected the photo. --George Ho (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – "PD-CAGov" applies to local and municipal governments as well. It states it clearly on the licensing template. I hereby quote verbatim (with extra emphasis added): "prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency". – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Not according to what the note from LAPL says: Shades of L.A. is an archive of photographs representing the contemporary and historic diversity of families in Los Angeles. Images were chosen from family albums and include daily life, social organizations, work, personal and holiday celebrations, and migration and immigration activities. Made possible and accessible through the generous support of the Security Pacific National Bank, Sunlaw Cogeneration Partners, Photo Friends, California Council for the Humanities, the Ralph M. Parsons Foundation, and the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation. In other words, Illegitimate Barrister, LAPL is not the copyright claimant; the photo was given to LAPL as part of photo collection. Either the family owns this photo, or an anonymous photographer is the copyright claimant. --George Ho (talk) 02:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly "owned... by any state of local agency"" must refer to the copyright and not simply to a paper print of a photograph. It would be vast overreaching for the State of California to assert that, for example, any book owned by a California library is PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Main object of the photo is logo. The logo was decided not a simple one in Commons:Deletion requests/File:ESO logotype.png. There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The building is also copyrighted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Acc. to the link given this is "Copyright 1999-2016 © StatCounter, All rights reserved" HeWhoMowedTheLawn (talk) 18:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Statcounter GlobalStats:
At StatCounter Global Stats we license our work under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. This means that you are welcome to use any information provided by StatCounter Global Stats, but please ensure to credit us (with a link) anywhere you use our stats/data/graphs.
- ----User:Ne0Freedom
Kept: added license review. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Acc. to the link given this is "Copyright 1999-2016 © StatCounter, All rights reserved" HeWhoMowedTheLawn (talk) 18:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Statcounter GlobalStats:
At StatCounter Global Stats we license our work under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. This means that you are welcome to use any information provided by StatCounter Global Stats, but please ensure to credit us (with a link) anywhere you use our stats/data/graphs.
- ----User:Ne0Freedom
- Thanks User:Ne0Freedom for looking into this. For me the deletion request can be closed. (The above quoted license info differs from the license displayed as footer on the diagram, but apparently applies. The quote by Ne0Freedom is located at http://gs.statcounter.com/faq#credit-license ) --HeWhoMowedTheLawn (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: added license review. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows & Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miranda 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg Elisfkc (talk) 19:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Neutral This story is about an attempt to eliminate Trujillo. It is edicatief but might fit better in Wikipedia. However, it does fit in the category Dictators. --Jos1950 (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The words may be useful, but the image is not. We don't keep non-useful images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Layout akin of a (scanned or photographed) picture postcard. This would not be up to the Panoramio user to make a free licensing. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: license laundering. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possibly copyrighted 3D art object in No-FOP-France. A possible but not really likely de minimis exception is to be discussed. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Zbędna podkategoria Gungir1983 (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty gallery. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Third party logo - Failing to see how this is CC based on which is non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. There is even © on the logo! Taivo (talk) 10:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This was apparently previously deleted, owing to a concern over the llcensing. Third party logo above TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in France: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#France. -.- Grand-Duc (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
![21:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/05#c-Grand-Duc-2016-12-05T21:56:00.000Z-File:Paris-La_Defence_2-_"Le_pouce"_(Kciuk)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
- FYI: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sculptures in la Défense includes this image as well. Grand-Duc (talk) 23:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
![15:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/05#c-Jameslwoodward-2016-12-12T15:47:00.000Z-File:Paris-La_Defence_2-_"Le_pouce"_(Kciuk)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyrighted 3D object of art or toy, no FOP in France. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Romania, the statue was finished in 2004 so under copyright till 2074. Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Same for all the images listed in Category:Decebalus rock sculpture.Ionutzmovie (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Deletion log:
- File:Statuia lui Decebal.JPG
- File:RO MH Dubova 5.jpg
- File:Orşova ,Statue Decalibus Rex.jpg
- File:Orşova ,Statue Decalibus Rex (2).jpg
- File:DonauEisernesTorSkulptur.JPG
- File:Decébalo Danubio.jpg
- File:Decebalus Rex.jpg
- File:Decebalus Rex (close up).jpg
- File:Decebalus Rex, Dragan fecit.JPG
- File:Decebal treteen3.jpg
- File:Decebal treteen1.jpg
- File:Capul lui Decebal.jpg
- File:Chipul lui Decebal sculptat în stâncă la Cazanele Dunarii.jpg
- File:Carved face, Iron Gates (2477739153).jpg
- File:Decebal treteen.jpg
- File:Chipul lui Decebal.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Photo was taken off of flickr and the page clearly states All RIghts Reserved. Zackmann08 (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The user on Flickr has listed the photo under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ and has posted the verified link on the photo. The Verified Facebook page for StrykerandMFT has listed the photo available for public and promotional use — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) 21:39, 6 December 2016 Johny5000 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Added Flickrreview. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Vandalism. 95.27.200.169 17:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No vandalism here except this DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Websize, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 12:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This file is an exact duplicate and inferior version of: File:Flag of Arzgirsky raion.png and File:Flag of Arzgirsky rayon.svg. Александр Танчугин (talk) 13:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in Commons collection of explicit materials? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright issues. The material is about an italian artist who's dead long enough for every 70 years p.m.a. country. But the authorship and copyright status of illustrations, photographs and modern texts aren't declared at all, there's only a bogus claim of "own work", obviously related to some scanning allegedly executed by the uploader. As long as there's no clarification about the true authorship and copyright status, those files warrant deletion.
- File:Copertina Alassino.jpg
- File:Molo3.jpg
- File:Ritratto di donna ligure.jpg Keep PD-ineligible
- File:Nelson 2.jpg
- File:La vita e la morte del capitano Renaud.jpg
- File:I racconti del nostromo.jpg
- File:Grandi corsari.jpg Keep PD-ineligible
- File:Fiorindo e Chiarastella.jpg
- File:Poesia - L'albero.jpg
- File:Alassino - Pagina 5.jpg
- File:Alassino - Pagina 4.jpg
- File:Alassino - Pagina 3.jpg
- File:Alassino - Pagina 2.jpg
- File:Alassino - Pagina 1.jpg
- File:Arrigo3.jpg
- File:Genitori di Arrigo.jpg
- File:Tessera di Riconoscimento.jpg
- File:Amabile Maria.jpg Keep PD-Italy
- File:Foto gruppo.jpg
- File:Arrigo Fugassa 2.jpg
- File:Casa di Alassio.jpg
- File:Arrigo Fugassa.jpg
- File:Zavanone.jpg
Grand-Duc (talk) 18:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Several photographs are just copyviols or scans of some work that has to be proven to be own work of the uploader; for those files a OTRS permission should have been given by the author. Thus, I marked the images that I think can be kept (accordingly changing the license), and removed the evident copyviols. --Ruthven (msg) 17:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except for those marked PD by Ruthven. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Llikely copyrighted drawing, no FOP in France. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 12 December 2016 Jameslwoodward (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Chateau Breuil - panoramio - marek7400.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation.\ Jcb (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
See COM:TOO#Netherlands Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: come now, certainly no "own original character or personal mark of the maker". P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:3M_wordmark.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 15:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- File is in use. Please use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: this file is widely used on other wikis; a redirect is necessary if will be decided to delete it. --XXN, 11:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Gulfstream V International Jet Management, ZRH Zurich (Zurich-Kloten), Switzerland PP1279980340.jpg
[edit],_Switzerland_PP1279980340.jpg){kind=link}
,_Switzerland_PP1279980340.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
dupe of File:Gulfstream G-V, International Jet Management JP6900513.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 15:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep And process as {{Duplicate}} so as to not affect any external re-users. PK-LMN (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted file uploaded from http://www.absl.pl/web/guest/home Pnapora (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The file was uploaded with permission from ABSL Poland in order to illustrate the page about the Association --Drakart (talk) 08:31, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- in my opinion below COM:TOO and file is in use -> Keep--Wdwd (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Wdwd. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Per http://www.lapl.org/collections-resources/photo-order-info, all images from the library are "intended for personal use only." This image (http://photos.lapl.org/carlweb/jsp/FullRecord?databaseID=968&record=9&controlNumber=52929) is from the website. DatGuy (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
If the link expired, I'll say the info. The photo was part of Herald-Examiner Collection, HE box 963. Order #00048891. Note #LAPL00048891. --George Ho (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: +This is a 1940 image, from the Los Angeles Herald, which has renewed its copyrights.. Therefore, if it was published in the newspaper, its copyright will run until 2035. If it has not been published until recently, then its copyright will also run until 2035. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Kone.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 17:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: widely used. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicat of File:Micronas.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 17:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We rarely delete pre-existing raster images in favor of a vector version. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Nuon_logo.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 17:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Xiaomi_logo.svg Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 17:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: widely used. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused duplicate (but with wrong colours) of File:Xiaomi_logo_new.png. — kashmīrī 20:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
An improved update is available by Kerr trajectory with two projections.jpg B wik (talk) 22:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: When requesting a deletion on these grounds, you must give a link to the replacement. Note also that policy is to be careful about replacing images, so even with the link, this may be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
An improved update is available by Kerr trajectory with two projections.jpg B wik (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: When requesting a deletion on these grounds, you must give a link to the replacement. Note also that policy is to be careful about replacing images, so even with the link, this may be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
An improved update is available by Kerr trajectory with two projections.jpg B wik (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: When requesting a deletion on these grounds, you must give a link to the replacement. Note also that policy is to be careful about replacing images, so even with the link, this may be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Niet door de uploader gefotografeerd, zonder toestemming of rechten gepubliceerd Jasper K (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep What evidence do you have that it is not "own work" as claimed?
- Only upload from this user
- Does not appear on a Google image search
- Is good sized - 1,560 × 910 pixels.
- Does not have EXIF.
I am inclined to assume good faith unless Jasper can give us a better reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- The reason I report this photo for deletion is because I am 100% sure that the person who uploaded this picture, isn't the owner/photographer. I am an employee of the company that owns the train in the picture and a colleague made that photo. Jasper K (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s). Ralth Galth (talk) 02:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Only Simple logo. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Randoseru.jpg --Benzoyl (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Benzoyl. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously deleted for no permission, this one is claimed as own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
As beeing an oficial representative - The Press-service of the Head of Almetyevsk, the man on the picture, I have all rights to use this pic, because, firstly, the photo was made by me, secondly, earlier I've sent the letter to make Wikipedia sure that I have the rights to use this picture from the oficial e-mail of Press-service: Pr-almet@yandex.ru. Even so, it was deleted. Therefore Im trying this way to load a pic, coz there is no other way to load it (no permission for loading the file, which was deleted, with the same name).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Almet (talk • contribs)
- I would strongly suggest you put the above explanation on the file description page, and send in some sort of confirmation from the press service in an official capacity.
Wikimedia Commons, takes copyrights seriously, and this is why this image got queried.
Withdrawn : Pending update of file page by uploader, and possible OTRS confirmation by them in their official capacity (noted above). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This stained-glass window looks too modern to be PD due to age. As there's no FOP in France, it could be a copyvio. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: This comes from fr:Collégiale Saint-Martin de Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. It seems the stained glass windows are by an unknown artist from the end of the 19th century. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Threshold of originality unclear in Lithuania; this may be copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Actually, radio and television logos are all clearly in scope. --141.138.146.132 08:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No interior FOP in Poland (hopefully given that I deduced correctly the provenance of teh image out of the description). Likely a stained-glass artwork that is not old enough to be in the PD. Grand-Duc (talk) 21:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo football ✎kovox90 21:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not the usual camera (Canon PowerShot A75) of this Panoramio user (instead an Olympus E-300), image published elsewhere without watermark likely predating the Panoramio upload by several years: https://www.nimbustier.net/photos/2005/08/normandie.html . Licence laundering? Grand-Duc (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No evidence that the author died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Again, PD-anon. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted files uploaded from Norges Skiskytterforbund
[edit]- File:Olsbu09032016cm102.jpg
- File:Gulljentene.jpg
- File:Kaia Nicolaisen.jpg
- File:Erlend NM rulleskiskyting.jpg
No permission from creator. User:Ssu uploaded these images in good faith: the Norges Skiskytterforbund website lists them as CC-BY-3.0. However, in correspondence with Manzoni/NordicFocus, the copyright holders of three of these images, I have found out that Manzoni/NordicFocus has not given Norges Skiskytterforbund permission to publish these images under a free license and considers their uploading to both Norges Skiskytterforbund and Commons to infringe its copyright. The fourth image, File:Erlend NM rulleskiskyting.jpg, lists its copyright holder as "LILLEHAMMER 2016", presumably referring to the 2016 Winter Youth Olympics, in which case the copyright holder is probably the International Olympic Committee. I think this one should be deleted as well in accordance with the precautionary principle. --Rrburke (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- If the mail correspondance shows that the three top images is copyrighted, it seems correct to delete them. The 'Erlend NM rulleskiskyting' photo seems to be legitimate to keep. The text following the image says that the image is from the 2016 Norwegian roller-ski biathlon championship, and the date corresponds with this championship. Ssu (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the first three images have clearly never been released as CC images (two have had their license fixed on the source site), for the fourth image we have no reason to doubt the CC assignment (so far). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vladimir Butenko (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Боровск - Пожарная команда.jpg
- File:Боровск - Морячка.jpg
- File:Боровск - Лавки 2.jpg
- File:Боровск - Лавки.jpg
- File:Боровск - Кошка в окошке.jpg
- File:Боровск - Дом на дороге.jpg
- File:Боровск - Летопись ратных имён и деяний.jpg
- File:Боровск - Циолковский 2.jpg
- File:Боровск - Дом на дороге 3.jpg
- File:Боровск - Дом на дороге 2.jpg
- File:Боровск - Глобус Боровска.jpg
- File:Боровск - Ворота гаража.jpg
- File:Боровск - Ведёрко.jpg
- File:Боровск - Боярыня в окошке.jpg
- File:Боровск - Адмирал Сенявин.jpg
- File:Боровск - Во молодец наш огурец.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
snippet from talk page: ----
- Уважаемый Hedwig in Washington. Объясните, пожалуйста, в чём нарушение авторских прав. Эти изображения не противоречат законодательству "в России установлена свобода панорамы для произведений архитектуры, градостроительства", к которым относятся данные изображения. Vladimir Butenko (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- В дополнение к вышеизложенному ru:Овчинников, Владимир Александрович при личной встрече с ним в 2011 году подтвердил использование всех своих настенных рисунков в соответствии с лицензиями Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC-BY-SA). С уважением Vladimir Butenko (talk) 07:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
snap ----
- Irrelevant. IF there ever has been a permission, it needs to be documented. And yes, murals are not covered by FOP-RU. If you have contact with the artist, have him send permission to OTRS. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Graffiti is not included in the prohibition. Vladimir Butenko (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- I have contact with the artist en:Vladimir Ovchinnikov (graffiti artist). I would be grateful if you give the sample resolution for him, which he should send to OTRS Vladimir Butenko (talk) 16:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- Artwork is artwork, it doesn't make a difference if it is made on canvas or concrete. Here's a link to the OTRS page Hope it helps. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Hedwig in Washington. Please do not delete these files as well as the author of works of Vladimir Ovchinnikov has prepared a letter to be sent in the coming days to OTRS. Eraevsky (talk) 05:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment OTRS pending(?) Give it a week extra and check OTRS queue pretty please. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- В OTRS поступило разрешение от правообладателя рисунков на публикацию под лицензией {{FAL}}, Ticket#2016121310006186. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: files now have OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Although uploaded in Archive.org, most of episodes are considered "unpublished", despite initial broadcast. The website explains the difference between "published" and "unpublished" portions. Also, the "published" episodes were renewed for copyright protection per Copyright.gov. George Ho (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Found the source discussing Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Leslie Rubinowitz, et al and other cases about television broadcasting. --George Ho (talk) 10:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: “[N]othing in this Act shall be construed to annul or limit the right of the author or proprietor of an unpublished work, at common law or in equity, to prevent the copying, publication, or use of such unpublished work without his consent, and to obtain damages therefor.” (1909 Act, §2; almost verbatim in 1947 Act.). Ruthven (msg) 08:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Not so sure this isn't abov threhsold of originality given the Enghllish Wikipedia equivalent [:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Billiards_Logo.jpg]] is non-free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- As the license says, it just contains simple geometric shapes and text. So it should be OK. See others. I don't know why the uploader on en:WP put it under non free. Before deletion, move it to de:WP, please. --LezFraniak (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the UK has a low bar for TOO. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Official county flag in Taiwan, no source, not "own work" Wcam (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Wcam: Source and license were corrected. This flag belongs to Yilan County in Taiwan. Based on Copyright Act of the Republic of China, this flag shall not be the subject matter of copyright, and is in the public domain in Taiwan administered by the Republic of China. That is, this file never violates any Wiki Common's copyright rules.--Akira123 (talk) 15:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- The source you added are not where the flag image is directly from. If this image is a remake of the official flag, it should be explicitly stated in the description page. Also, I don't see which item in {{PD-ROC-exempt}} this image fits in. Prior discussions in deletion requests have determined that "official document" only covers textual information, not images (see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Chen_Shui-bian). --Wcam (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I added a remake info in the description. BTW, I read the discussion you cited. I noted that all the cases were about photograph, but in this case, it's about an official flag open for public domain. Moreover, I think it better to mail to ask ROC's authorities concerned that if the images affiliated to official documents are included in Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act. In other words, if the subdivisional official flags aren't PD, why could the national flag be PD?--Akira123 (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I agree that an authoritative response regarding whether an official flag is PD in the ROC Copyright Act is necessary. However, before that is done, based on the information we have, there is significant doubt about this image's PD status. Per COM:PRP Commons should not host this file. It may be uploaded to Wikipedia as a fair use image. --Wcam (talk) 17:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I added a remake info in the description. BTW, I read the discussion you cited. I noted that all the cases were about photograph, but in this case, it's about an official flag open for public domain. Moreover, I think it better to mail to ask ROC's authorities concerned that if the images affiliated to official documents are included in Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act. In other words, if the subdivisional official flags aren't PD, why could the national flag be PD?--Akira123 (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- The source you added are not where the flag image is directly from. If this image is a remake of the official flag, it should be explicitly stated in the description page. Also, I don't see which item in {{PD-ROC-exempt}} this image fits in. Prior discussions in deletion requests have determined that "official document" only covers textual information, not images (see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Chen_Shui-bian). --Wcam (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I read Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Chen_Shui-bian one more time, and I found people there only focused on 1st section of Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act so that you think this exempt only covers textual information, not images. Based on 2nd section of the mentioned article, it says "Translations or compilations by central or local government agencies of works referred to in the preceding subparagraph." Thus, this flag undoubtedly fits in {{PD-ROC-exempt}} and Commons should host this file.--Akira123 (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- "The preceding subparagraph" meaning section 1. Because it does not fit section 1, it does not fit in section 2 either. It is still not definitive whether this non-textual image is PD so again, per COM:PRP we should not keep this file here. --Wcam (talk) 01:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree that "it does not fit section 1, it does not fit in section 2 either." These two sections are not in causal relationship. On contrary, 2nd section definitively specifies non-textual image "referred to" section 1 is PD, so again, we should keep this file here.--Akira123 (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- According to http://www.collinsdictionary.com, "compilation" and "compile" do not restrictively mean for "textual" information.--Akira123 (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree that "it does not fit section 1, it does not fit in section 2 either." These two sections are not in causal relationship. On contrary, 2nd section definitively specifies non-textual image "referred to" section 1 is PD, so again, we should keep this file here.--Akira123 (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- "The preceding subparagraph" meaning section 1. Because it does not fit section 1, it does not fit in section 2 either. It is still not definitive whether this non-textual image is PD so again, per COM:PRP we should not keep this file here. --Wcam (talk) 01:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I just got the answer from ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs, the authorities for copyright in Taiwan, to this nomination. It said that all the images referred to Section 1 of Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act are exempted from copyright. Thus, this flag is PD and should be kept in Wiki Commons.--Akira123 (talk) 03:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sources listed do not contain this particular image.
- Previous DRs have indicated that {{PD-ROC-exempt}} only covers textual documents, or at least whether it covers photographs/images or not is in significant doubt. e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chen Shui-bian, Commons:Deletion requests/File:1976Oct6-FangChihPreparesDisasterRelief.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yen Chia-kan.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:General Fan Hanjie.jpg.
Wcam (talk) 13:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- KEPT: First, the 2 photos listed as the sources do show this image. Second, the circumstances surrounding this file have not changed at all in a notable manner after last deletion debate on 20 August 2016. Thus, this file should be kept undoubtedly and the reasons refer to last debate. Thanks. --Akira123 (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- To this nomination, ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs, the authorities for copyright in Taiwan, said that all the images referred to Section 1 of Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act are exempted from copyright. Thus, this flag is PD and should be kept in Wiki Commons. --Akira123 (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Can you provide any proof for such communication? Given that Commons has determined many times that the ROC copyright exemption only covers textual documents, I believe it is necessary that you provide such statement from the authority. --Wcam (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- I wonder in Wiki Commons where and how I can upload the official reply to my E-mail box. BTW, all of you can ask this issue via "Contact Us" at ROC MOEA official website whether you can read and write in Chinese or not.--Akira123 (talk) 13:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- If there is no way to keep the mentioned reply in Wiki Commons, I don't think it a better way to upload to an external website temporarily than you ask the authority by yourselves, because after the reply gets removed, there will probably be another user to nominate the same deletion request. Of course, if Wiki Commons provide me a permanent space to upload, I will show the message to all users here.--Akira123 (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- I believe you can send it to COM:OTRS and post the ticket number here so the closing admin can evaluate. --Wcam (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- If there is no way to keep the mentioned reply in Wiki Commons, I don't think it a better way to upload to an external website temporarily than you ask the authority by yourselves, because after the reply gets removed, there will probably be another user to nominate the same deletion request. Of course, if Wiki Commons provide me a permanent space to upload, I will show the message to all users here.--Akira123 (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- I wonder in Wiki Commons where and how I can upload the official reply to my E-mail box. BTW, all of you can ask this issue via "Contact Us" at ROC MOEA official website whether you can read and write in Chinese or not.--Akira123 (talk) 13:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Can you provide any proof for such communication? Given that Commons has determined many times that the ROC copyright exemption only covers textual documents, I believe it is necessary that you provide such statement from the authority. --Wcam (talk) 15:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- To this nomination, ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs, the authorities for copyright in Taiwan, said that all the images referred to Section 1 of Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act are exempted from copyright. Thus, this flag is PD and should be kept in Wiki Commons. --Akira123 (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
COM:OTRS is not proper in this case. It means to get licensed from the owner of copyright, but ROC MOEA is not the owner of this image. Moreover, reply form the authority is not case by case, but valid to common cases.--Akira123 (talk) 15:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- If you can't show proof of what you claim, I'm afraid there is no reason to deviate from the decision made many times here on Commons that {{PD-ROC-exempt}} only covers textual documents. --Wcam (talk) 05:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently, flags of Taiwan are usually kept by PD-ROC-exempt; check Category:Flags of municipalities of Taiwan. --Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think your w:WP:OTHERSTUFF argument is a reason to keep this file here. Those files in the category you mentioned exist only because nobody has questioned their validity. The only case a municipal flag was kept in a DR, File:Flag_of_Taipei_City.svg, was because of a law of that specifit municipality regarding their city flag, whereas this case is a complete different situation. --Wcam (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently, flags of Taiwan are usually kept by PD-ROC-exempt; check Category:Flags of municipalities of Taiwan. --Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per PD-ROC-exempt. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)