Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
IMG_915750x70.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Saudi Arabia 90.148.5.251 08:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep: No valid reason for deletion. Deletion requests like this are rather disruptive. 80.221.159.67 12:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by НоуФрост as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Victoria Blinder on foto, Victoria Blinder - autor. Not possible Yann (talk) 11:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Dupl. File:Blinder.jpg. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg-1){kind=link}
COM:DW, OTRS permission from the copyright holder of the artwork needed. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Files uploaded by FrederikBormans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images from other sources, including Google. No evidence of permission.
ErikvanB (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Yann (talk) 14:45, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
not necessary Frze > talk 00:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad name, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Found elsewhere on the internet eg Twitter and LinkedIn but also EXIF gives copyright holder: emre yunusoglu. Green Giant (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
A Jacob Pronk is mentioned as the author, but without a date of death. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Jacob Pronk died in 1838 (Dutch location, then, very likely to be done by a dutch artist). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The Jacob Pronk who died in 1838 does not seem to be an artist at all. It's very unlikely that this Jacob Pronk is the author. Jcb (talk) 00:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- So, is there another Jacob Pronk from Netherlands who meets the age of the drawing? --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The age of the drawing is not provided, but there may have been hundreds of people with that name in the Netherlands for the past few centuries. It's not a rare name, I know several people with this surname. Jcb (talk) 02:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- So, is there another Jacob Pronk from Netherlands who meets the age of the drawing? --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: resolved, thanks to LX. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF data. The picture seems to be taken from here. It cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 22:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 03:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF data. The picture seems to be taken from here.It cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- But User:פרננדו claim he took the photo isn't he? Sokuya (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted: Obvious copyvio. -- Geagea (talk) 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
not necessary Frze > talk 00:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no longer empty, will be renamed. --Achim (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The file is claimed to be a selfie, but I doubt. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
How Are You. This File Is Not Copyright Violation It Is A Public Professional Photo Of Actor/Model Phillip Allen Hall III Also Seen Here On IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6376322/mediaviewer/rm2397962496 Done By Bartholomew Photography Seen Here https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54ee6b54e4b094722873774d/54f536d5e4b0f594d2613497/55863535e4b0792d45a9222f/1480192300924/64.jpg?format=750w Also At http://www.bartholomewphotography.com. This Is A Valid Photo And Should Not Be Taken Down. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.167.73.125 (talk • contribs)
Deleted, thank you for links. IMDB link says: "© Bartholomew Photography". Bartholomew site (your photo is number 33) says: "All images copyright Bob Bartholomew. All rights reserved." On that ground I delete the photo speedily. If Bob Bartholomew sends OTRS-permission, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Obviously posed publicity photo found all over the internet. https://mobile.twitter.com/dadababa415 Whpq (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image lNeverCry 01:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image - also possible copyvio - could be a scan of a school portrait ratherth an "own work" lNeverCry 01:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by L0o0w0c0maple (talk · contribs)
[edit]I question whether these images are the uploader's own work, because they are all in web resolution and contains no camera info in EXIF. Some images even contain "FBMD" in EXIF which suggests that they are obtained from Facebook. The uploader has no other contribution to Commons.
- File:大台北都會公園景觀.jpg
- File:Sanchong02.png
- File:Sanchong03.png
- File:Sanchong.png
- File:行政中心大樓外觀.jpg
- File:重新路街景.jpg
- File:重新路一段街景.jpg
- File:重新路三段與藝術公園.jpg
- File:正義重新路口.jpg
Wcam (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation (see here) Andycyca (talk) 03:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imranalikhan651 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images found on Internet prior to upload date, most without metadata
- File:Crescent Monument Islamabadd.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosqueee.jpg
- File:Crescent Monument Islamabad.jpg
- File:Crescent Monument Islamabad Night.jpg
- File:Pak Monument Islamabad.jpg
- File:Crescent Monument Islaamabad.jpg
- File:Badshahi Mosquee.jpg
- File:Wazir khan Mosquee.jpg
- File:Monument Islamabad Crescent.jpg
- File:Tomb of Jehangir.jpg
- File:@Fort@LAhore.jpg
- File:Minara-e-Pakistan.jpg
- File:Noor Mahall.jpg
- File:Lahore-Fort.jpg
- File:Tomb of Dai Angaa.jpg
- File:UCH Sharif.jpg
- File:Mazae-e-Quaid.jpg
UAwiki (talk) 04:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Images found on Internet prior to upload date
- File:Roman-reigns-campeon-estados-unidos-wwe.jpg
- File:Dean-ambrose.jpg
- File:Heath-slater-rhyno.jpg
- File:Roman-reigns-campeon-estados-unidos-wwe (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
UAwiki (talk) 04:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
it's my picture and i don't want to appear in google search Bilalbentoumi (talk) 10:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: invalid deletion reason, but out of scope anyway. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pancyadams (talk · contribs)
[edit]The copyright to letters is held by the sender, not the recipient. Similarly, the copyright to course certificates is held by the grantor, not the grantee. There is no evidence that the uploader has any right to freely license these.
- File:Himalayan University CII Membership Certificate.jpg
- File:Himalayan University ISO Certificate.jpg
- File:Himalayan University BCI Approval.pdf
- File:Himalayan University PCI Approval.pdf
- File:Himalayan University RCI Approval.pdf
- File:AIMA.jpg
- File:HU PHD Certificate.JPG
- File:HU AIMA Certificate.JPG
- File:Prabodh Mehta Officer in de Kroonorde Award.JPG
- File:Prabodh Mehta Order of Leopold II Award.JPG
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Jim. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Blatant copy from newspaper - not "own work" as claimed - subject doed in 1953 in South Africa Arjayay (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos, videos and sound recording. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Hungarian Peoples Army Honor Guards.jpg
- File:Valko Chervenkov Portrait.jpg
- File:Belarusian SSR anthem 1989.ogg
- File:May Day in Eastern Bloc 1982.webm
- File:Bulgarian Changing of the guard 1983.webm
- File:Soldiers of the BNA during a parade in 1981.png
- File:The Soviet Anthem October Revolution Parade.webm
- File:Red Square on Revolution Day.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Could not validate license. There are no valid archived versions of the source - https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/en/photogallery/gallery?galleryId=10239074
- File:Celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the Liberation of Ukraine1.jpg
- File:Celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the Liberation of Ukraine2.jpg
- File:Celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the Liberation of Ukraine3.jpg
- File:Celebrations of the 60th anniversary of the Liberation of Ukraine4.jpg
- File:Kuchma delivering an address on Liberation Day.jpg
- File:Children embracing veterans.jpg
Gikü (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
The two first belong to the archives of the family of the French user Entremont.
The third one represents my grand-father. The picture belongs to me.
Aymeric78 (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C. richter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Dictamen Motivado CE.pdf
- File:Breve historia HCH 22-noviembre-2016.pdf
- File:PAG 75. E.C.L. (Plan de emergencia celda Lindano).pdf
- File:Jaume Matas VS Azcarraga.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope GY Fan★ 15:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
advertising... out of scope Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 16:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
advertising, out of scope, copyvio Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra talk 16:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a publicity shot, highly dubious this is actually their "own work", uploaded by single-edit account earlier this year Antepenultimate (talk) 16:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Clearly non-free trom website Acroterion (talk) 03:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Useless. Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic image depicting an unidentified person. Out of scope. XXN, 16:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shamimrezapp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos. Out of project scope. COM:NOTHOST
- File:Shamim Reza (Shamim Ibn Noor).jpg
- File:Shamim Reza .jpg
- File:Shamim reza (shamim Ibn Noor).jpg
- File:Shamim Reza (Shamim Inb Noor).jpg
- File:Shamim Reza(Shamim Ibn Noor).jpg
- File:Shamim Reza.jpg
- File:Shamim Reza birthday picture 2015.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rrburke (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atef toujani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of a non-notable company. May be non-free and above COM:TOO. Out of scope.
XXN, 16:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional upload, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only document, out of scope. Commons is not for publishing own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image. MCMLXXXIX 21:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Low quality upload, no EXIF information. Huge doubt if uploader is the author. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image. MCMLXXXIX 21:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image. MCMLXXXIX 21:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Found in Google Images, but it's square size. Unlikely own work. MCMLXXXIX 21:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Yann (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Personal portrait of non relevant person Stego (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by UAwiki as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, unused low quality personal image lNeverCry 05:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, but scope-related deletions are almost always dealt with by DR rather than speedy deletion, except in cases of blatant spamming or cross-wiki abuse. lNeverCry 05:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ROCKDEEPAK (talk · contribs)
[edit]usued personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edivaldo freitas (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Andres Parra Robles (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion the photo is out of project scope. Group of unidentified, probably non-notable people. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion the photo is too dark for any educational value. Taivo (talk) 22:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
- File:Mauricio Muniz.png
- File:Patrick And His Razer Headset.jpg
- File:Too Much Swag.jpg
- File:Patrick Wiszowaty.jpg
Gauss (talk) 22:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic image. Out of scope. XXN, 23:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 46.147.136.169 08:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic images; out of scope. Some of them may be or may contain non-free content.
- File:Logolibro.png
- File:Satellite.jpg 897148269.jpg
- File:Web tv aas3.jpg 1901684659.jpg
- File:Passi.jpg 551026277.jpg
- File:NPL.jpg 190759469.jpg
- File:Spilladespar.png
XXN, 12:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Infringement (Captured of naver map street view)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)
Raising to a DR. As there can be no copyright on this signature, I am unclear what the case for deletion would be. Fæ (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Clearly {{PD-signature}}, but, are the sighatures uncopyrightable in the Vatican City? --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Margaritabryksina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free images from http://www.followmyeyes.co.uk/ Copyvios or Promotional upload campaign.
- File:Goldridge Taupe Gray.jpg
- File:Screenshot-website.png
- File:FollowMyEyeslogo1.jpg.png
- File:FollowMyEyeslogo.jpg
XXN, 17:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
저작권 침해 및 반달에 사용. copyright violations. and using for crosswiki abuse. 헌법재판소 -- 메이 `토론 17:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Logo of the Constitutional Court of Korea.svg original file link add. -- 메이 `토론 17:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
bad looking, replaced by File:Force de mortalité en France en 2010.svg Aremund (talk) 09:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Just rubbish. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Foto de la serie con copyright sacada de internet. Geom (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Plaque from 2014 with no indication of being released under any free license. With no FOP in the US, the file is unfortunately non-free. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I took this photo, and released it under CC. Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- You own the copyright for your photograph and the artistic originality of it. "Native Sons of the Golden West" owns the copyright of the plaque itself, as the text is long enough to qualify for copyright, and they have not released it under any free license. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
It has been superceded by File:LZ logo 2015 rgb.svg LucasOne (talk) 03:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Reverse image search on Google here gives several very similar images Andycyca (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Because it is no longer needed Ostarisk (talk) 05:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No longer needed Ostarisk (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Japan has no freedom of panorama for works of art. Lymantria (talk) 06:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Japan has no freedom of panorama for works of art. Lymantria (talk) 06:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
저작권 침해. copyright violations. DSP Media. https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&q=%EC%97%90%EC%9D%B4%ED%94%84%EB%A6%B4&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJ3rBiQoP21_1waiQELEKjU2AQaAghDDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIothvQH9Efzx_1iHKwQzh-2HLEerx6YO5UwyC-KLJksnCyrMdcvtzC7OxowVGiCnNYJYlCvP40iOYK9mgOeeh9DXugWaVfaEkDrYStf9JKox9belW6wG_1WSgCw0IAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgT_1T3TwDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwib9eqy68DQAhVKerwKHf_TB7oQ2A4IISgB&biw=1400&bih=935#imgrc=N6U7vd2ID-ffdM%3A -- 메이 `토론 07:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
저작권 침해. Copyright violations. DSP media. https://www.google.co.uk/search?sa=G&hl=en-GB&q=April&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJixNB1yqLDzcaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgACEMMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiitG_1YQiBuKG4wbuxDQHKobrBuHG7Ewyiz1Mbw7gTD7O84vsDD3MbY5GjAQCTnV628_1MS33rmbvkJbq8mjDrcjKXitrIvFmofTt_1TLjNnr84R-jJ6t9yyIeO70gBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBHFCVuYM&ved=0ahUKEwjCiOzq68DQAhUFErwKHRCdDskQ2A4IISgB&biw=1400&bih=935#imgrc=fPAzgQsVqevsjM%3A -- 메이 `토론 07:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
I confess to uploading this file on the wrong site. Please delete this file for me. GoAnimateFan199Pro (talk) 07:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
According to the notice at the bottom of the source page, the page contents are actually copyrighted by the Vilnius City Municipality and there is no reason to believe the logo itself was released under CC license as stated in the description. No longer a penguin (talk) 08:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Wrong upload Guidieri (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation PixmaniaFR (talk) 09:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: {{PD-textlogo}}. See Commons:Threshold of originality#France. 80.221.159.67 11:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Commercial image, copyright protected. Christian Bolz (talk) 09:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Missing license information for background photograph. CC BY-SA 4.0 license may also be incorrect, if Brave web browser is licensed under the MPL2 license. This screenshot may be more likely self-photographed than own work. 80.221.159.67 10:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Image from municipality project for new tram line, non-free. Papuass (talk) 10:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The pictured plaque is clearly copyrighted and there is no evidence the uploader has the right to reproduce it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ismailkaleri (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF data, small, inconsistent sizes and quality, likely copyvios, one image already deleted. Also, doubtful educational use.
_Baloch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Baloch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Do we need this apparently personal photo? Mhhossein talk 10:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The file is very very similar to this one. In the latter, the woman at the very right has hold her left hand in different positions and the rest is unchanged. Should be deleted per COM:Redundant. Mhhossein talk 10:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Image Copyright violation. 122.176.178.132 10:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment: No evidence provided why this image would be a copyright violation. I couldn't find this image in reverse image search results to suggest any copyright violation to have occurred. Uploader has asserted this to be own work
. Delete: I am still going to vote to delete, because this image seems to be out of Commons:Project scope with no realistically useful educational value. Not in use. 80.221.159.67 11:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
It's some sort of a derivative of another work. The depicted painting is a protected work and needs to be licensed. Mhhossein talk 10:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- If the photo is of a wider scene, then copyrightable elements which simply happened to be there do not cause the photo to be derivative. They are "incidental", which while not strictly the legal definition of de minimis, since it's a separate legal concept which avoids derivative work conclusions, is subsumed in our de minimis policy. On the other hand, it looks like this photo was taken from Facebook, and it may need OTRS permission to begin with, so Delete on those grounds. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- also crop file:DuprontCircle.png
Smaller older version (since 2012) exists in https://introduccionalahistoriajvg.wordpress.com/2012/08/28/%E2%90%A5-alphonse-dupront-1905-1990/ Depicted person died in 1990. I think, that OTRS-permission from photographer (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Jose Manuel Da Camara isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope. Small unused personal photo and the user's only upload, maybe copyright violation too. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source, no actual description, no clear usage, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Alfredo Nica Oliva Guerrero is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Very blurry landscape photo, no educational use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Very blurry image on a random street at night. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Low-resolution photo, no EXIF details. May be copyvio. Also is an unused image with an unidentified subject. XXN, 12:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Random photo of a sidewalk. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Random photo of a sidewalk. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Blurry, very bad quality photo of a night sky. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality photo of a street. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo. It's unused (image already exists as fair-use on local wikipedias). XXN, 12:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama. — TBhagat (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama. — TBhagat (talk) 13:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the original creator of all of these people's images. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Edited version of a photo published previously elsewhere, no evidence that uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - its clearly a copyvio. --Saqib (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [1]), no evidence that the uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [2]), no evidence that the uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Was nominated for speedy deletion but a regular DR is required so we can decide if this logo is above or below com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [3]), no evidence that the uploader is the author as claimed. HaeB (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Published elsewhere on the web [4], no evidence that the uploader (see also the deletion nominations for some of his other uploads) is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g., in different form, at [5]); no evidence that uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
author request, no usage Dvorapa (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing camera metadata, and the uploader's history. Previously published since 2006-12-15 at http://www.diputaciondezamora.es/index.asp?MP=7&MS=12&MN=2&accion=si&texto=&letra=&pag=20&id=32. The metadata seems to have been altered. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 14:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unfree book cover Sporti (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
not useful - print screen from sl wikipedia Sporti (talk) 14:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as no permission (No permission since)
- Above or below com:TOO? A DR could go both ways. The logo is from Chile. @Amitie 10g: wheren't you familiar with Chilian copyright law? Natuur12 (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- IMHO above the TOO in Argentina. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Was tagged as no permission but is it PD-textlogo or not? Natuur12 (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mys 721tx as no permission (No permission since)
- Above or below com:TOO? Natuur12 (talk) 14:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Chinese copyright law protects calligraphy. I think it is slightly above the threshold. -Mys_721tx (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Montgomery as no permission (No permission since)
- Above or below com:TOO. Logo is from Argentina. Care to comment @Amitie 10g: ? Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Explicit as no permission (No permission since)
- Above or below com:TOO? Natuur12 (talk) 14:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I'd argue that, the combination of elements, in addition to the gloss effect, pushes this logo above the threshold of originality. This is likely non-free and subject to copyright. — ξxplicit 23:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Cover of a 2016 book,see [6]. Ganímedes (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Efectivamente aquí había un error, pues se había subido una versión de prueba que no era la que efectivamente se usó en el libro, habiéndose dado como referencia un sitio web de un usuario circunstancial, que no era quien tiene los derechos. Ahora, al cambiar la imagen y cambiar la referencia, se ha subsanado este problema.
- Speedy Delete Obvious copyvio. --Discasto talk 22:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Meaningless description, but file title says that [probably] it's a screen capture. No EXIF data. The date from summary it's false or irrelevant. Most probably this is not own work by uploader, as he stated, but a derivative work, and original image source it's needed to be sure that this file it's free. XXN, 16:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Borderline vandalism, out of project scope DatGuy (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No evidece that every photo in this collage is elligible under a CC license. COM:DW. XXN, 16:42, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulosilvatv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of some non-notable companies.
XXN, 16:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
erreur d'orthographe, au lieu de gUimbarde dans le nom du fichier ! je viens de télécharger un nouveau fichier pour le remplacer. merci Cquoi (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Freedom of panorama does not exist in France. So, even if the photograph was published under a free licence, the drawings are non-free and may not be depicted without permission. De728631 (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
and:
Maps are identical to those of the naming convention File:Or01 109.gif. These maps are from the 110th United States Congress, which convened in 2007; the existing maps are from the 109th US Congress, which convened in 2005. But the districts were the same from 2003 to 2013. (Districts are redrawn every 10 years, and Congress has 5 sessions in each decade.) Pete F (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Promotional upload. XXN, 17:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Mislicensed, non-free logo, above COM:TOO. XXN, 17:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free film poster. XXN, 17:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot to me. Low resolution, no EXIF. XXN, 17:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo of an unidentified entity. XXN, 18:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hoax . XXN, 18:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katamerlas (talk · contribs)
[edit]
XXN, 18:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that Athos Burez (mentioned in the description) and the uploader are the same person or that Burez has given permission. The image was published here, for instance. ErikvanB (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused non-free logo. May be above COM:TOO. XXN, 18:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo, above COM:TOO. XXN, 18:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J.MALAMADRE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free content and derivative works. Unused, out of scope.
- File:CAMPUSTOBARRA2015.jpg.png
- File:Patrocinadoresdelclub.jpg
- File:LaCercacom.jpg.png
- File:CartelSemanaBasketFemenino.jpg
- File:LOGOCAFESCAMALITAZA.jpg.png
- File:Logotipocafescamali.jpg.png
- File:Patrocinadorescbuca.jpg
XXN, 18:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The audio pronunciation example is misspelled and no longer needed. The correct-spelled-form De-skurril.ogg is already uploaded. Jeuwre (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Misspelled. The correct spelled form De-Fälschung.ogg is already uploaded, the pronunciation example is no longer needed Jeuwre (talk) 18:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LarissaWillig2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]One version is enough: File:Logofcc.jpg (used).
XXN, 18:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logos.
XXN, 18:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, non-free logo, probably uploaded as part of a promotional upload campaign. May be above COM:TOO. XXN, 18:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The author changes his mind, not satisfied with the license's terms. Guise (talk) 19:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
licence à vérifier : si la photographe est Kasia Kozinski une autorisation explicite est nécessaire Habertix (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
doublon de :file:Dominique Lecourt par Kasia kozinski-avril2013.jpg Habertix (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only table, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only newspaper scan, out of scope. Likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused text-only newspaper scan, out of scope. Likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation from http://www.itv.com/imacelebrity/celebrities Class455 (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
restricted by non-freedom of panorama for monuments rubin16 (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Pronunciatui example is futile due to 2 alternatives: DE-Richter.ogg, De-Richter.ogg. Please delete Jeuwre (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 20:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unused photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unused file, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
unused file, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio book cover Sakhalinio (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio book cover Sakhalinio (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Personal logo, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poster, COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Recent publicity photograph widely used on the Internet, unlikely to be own work of uploader. Animalparty (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission, EXIF states: "2001 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" Jcb (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not in use logo of an Israeli company. This design cannot be considered too simple to stay in the Commons without getting an OTRS release permission from the company. Ldorfman (talk) 22:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not the uploader's own work - this has been produced by Crossrail. Cloudbound (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Picture is everywhere on the web. Jcb (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source, apparently scanned from somewhere. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Apparently scanned from somewhere. Jcb (talk) 23:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source, no information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Did the author die before 1946? Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Did the author die before 1946? Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Did the author die before 1946? Jcb (talk) 23:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
IMG_915750x70.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IMG_915750x70.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Meaningless title and description. Unidentified person. XXN, 23:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
IMG_915750x70.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
IMG_915750x70.jpg){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation Jcb (talk) 23:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
it is NOT his wife in the photo, I was given incorrect information when I uploaded it. Webworkx64 (talk) 23:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No permission. See EXIF. Jcb (talk) 23:59, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A derivative of another work. The depicted picture on the boat needs to be licensed. Mhhossein talk 10:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The focus of the image is the boat, not the drawing. Never heard of De minimis or in this case Freedom of Panorama? Tm (talk) 11:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Of course I heard of that. Clearly this is not a case of De minimis. The protected object is large enough and the photograpger meant to show this on purpose. --Mhhossein talk 15:06, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Interesting situation: Even though this is a case of artwork painted on a vehicle and photographed outdoors, which would make it okay with Portugal’s FoP laws, the paint job itself was a ripoff of Milo Manara, which is not PD. On the other hand, this is de minimis, in the sense that this photo with the artwork in question blurred off would still be useful for reusers — details of the rudder, rigging, the stance of the oarsman, etc. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, if blurred. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- if blurred!?! and if not blurred? --Mhhossein talk 17:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - If the boat artwork is a rip off then delete - Blurring it would only make the image useless to everyone (Is someone gonna use an image of a partial blurred boat or one with pretty artwork ? ... I know where I'd put my money!). –Davey2010Talk 23:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per the PRP, also the image is not very useful without the artwork (part of a boat and a boy). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
hello this picture were taken from my blog i demand to delete it, i posted this picture on my blog in 12 february 2012 and the uploader didn't ask my permission for use it on wikimedia--potlatch raumzeit (talk) 06:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Info: I've fixed your deletion request. Voting to keep: The web page you linked has a CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported license. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. If the information on Commons is incorrect and this is your photograph, then I'd suggest contacting Commons:OTRS for permission and/or fixing the description on the file. 80.221.159.67 11:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I assure that I personally made this picture during my visit of the exhibition "Roads of Arabia" at the date mentioned in the description. -- Xenophon (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Weird case. The images seem practically identical (although this is the most likely way to photograph this statue). Our version has a higher resolution than the image on the blog post, but is more tightly cropped. There is a CC-BY-SA license on the claimed source site anyway. Also no reason not to trust User:Xenophon. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC) P.S.: Our image has EXIF data, the "source" image not.
This is a plagiarized and simplified version of my work posted at Columbia University (at http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/maps/MidEast_Cultural_Historical_Zones_lg.png 2604:2000:C686:B00:223:12FF:FE20:7BC7 18:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Our version is different from Gulf2000 map. their map used for make my file. for example There are no rivers, cities, details and... also, my map has many different point, some of which relate to Gulf2000's update, changed or other problems and I've also added some points... Totally Gulf2000 do not have any copy of my file, or vice versa. --Ταπυροι (گپ) 20:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: It's quite possible that the source map was used as reference for the data. But artistically it is clearly a very different map. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by НоуФрост as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Victoria Blinder on foto, Victoria Blinder - autor. Not possible Yann (talk) 11:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Gamaliel as no source (No source since)
18th century portrait. A poor reproduction, but deletion because no source seems inappropriate. Fæ (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: portrait in PD. Ruthven (msg) 14:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously uploaded with a lower resolution, probably due to a limitation with Flickr Upload Bot or that the original uploader on Flickr has uploaded a larger version of the image at a later time than the original transfer to Commons. I have gone through and reuploaded the larger version to the oldest uploads to Commons. I will be adding 23 files from this category. TommyG (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Fylkesarkivet_i_Sogn_og_Fjordane).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Fylkesarkivet_i_Sogn_og_Fjordane).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. I neglected to redirect the meaningless names as they were recently uploaded. A couple were already done by JuTa. Thank you, TommyG for the effort you took to make this DR clear, it certainly made my job easier. --Storkk (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) The license doesn't seem to apply to this picture. Yann (talk) 21:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no license attached to the photo nor to the online album, so copyrighted has to be assumed. Ruthven (msg) 15:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Do you personally know Mr. Sergio? I know him! Missing the EXIF meta data because I retouched the photo in GIMP free software before I publish it. If you want, in private, I can send you his telephone number and you can verify the copyright. Giornalismoespettacolo (talk) 12:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, nor to suspect that it isn't own work of the uploader. Ruthven (msg) 15:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR appears pointy. Uploaded 2005, grandfathered. --Fæ (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- A few hours after his vote here, Fae admitted that the grandfather guideline cannot be used to keep apparent copyright violations on our servers. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't be pointy. Provide evidence that this is a copyright violation and I would support deletion, otherwise, as nominated, it is grandfathered. --Fæ (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- A few hours after his vote here, Fae admitted that the grandfather guideline cannot be used to keep apparent copyright violations on our servers. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baracudas44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source is just a previously streamed video of a skyline going from dark to light. Until the proper source is found by the uploader, the source provided is not valid.
- File:Cardinal Ribat.jpg -
Donesource found - File:Cardinal Retes.jpg
- File:Cardinal D'rozario.jpg
- File:Cardinal Piat.jpg - DoneSource found
- File:Cardinal Fernandez.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 20:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- The problem with the stream is that it is very large, much larger than the time allowed by Youtube (12 hours), therefore, the relevant part of the streaming is lost. Finding in the uploaded videos, these specific captures were not found.
- Then, if the uploader have the whole screenshots with the logo of the Centro Televisivo Vaticano, should be enough proof that the capture was found at the stream? --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- In fact there is an other solution, the channel Vatican expose the replay of the streaming, but doesn't indicate The creative licence, but the file don't havec some modification between the both, I've verified it many times. So this link is enough ? Olivier LPB (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- It should be enough. The streaming comes from the Centro Televisivo Vaticano channel, but the archived video (that even contains the logo of the Centro Televisivo Vaticano) is available at the vatican channel. As both channels belongs to the same same entity (the Vatican City/Holy See), I, personally, will just ignore the Youtube Standard license at the archived video, considering that all the videos provided by the Centro Televisivo Vaticano are available under the Youtube CC-BY license, and it comes originally from a Centro Televisivo Vaticano stream. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Info: I watched the whole video, but at 2x speed. I found at least two moments that matches the screenshots, but I pay no much attentiomn in the rest. So, as these screenshots belongs to the same event, I believe that everything is properly sourced, thefefore, Strong keep (if anyone prefer to find the sources anyway, just watch the whole video and spend the time required). Also, the stream (at original source) is not longer available, but the page is still there, and the license there is Youtube CC-BY license. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: streaming released under Creative Commons CC BY license. Ruthven (msg) 16:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Android Studio is licensed under the Apache license, and the graphics in the test app comes from the OpenClipart. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Amitie 10g. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was originally uploaded to the official website of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, license "Copyright © 2016 Big Hit Entertainment All Right Reserved". This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was originally uploaded to the official website and Facebook of group BTS here and here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
This file, which has a request for license review, has a source in which the article is removed. I tried to see if I could recover it, but I am unable too. I don't know if this image should be kept or not. MCMLXXXIX 20:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)
Appears from http://www.edubcn.cat/ca/noticies/detall?46002. The photograph has been taken from archives. Under Spanish law, the 80-year rule applies, so PD if the author appears unknown. Fæ (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Since we have no source stating anything about the author, we can not assume an anonymous author. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NikNaks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is far too complex to fall under the threshold for PD-textlogo Yann (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Oh TOO, you and I disagree once again. I'll gladly move it to enwiki if a few more people agree it is non-free. I had asked in IRC and the person who responded said it was probably too simple, but borderline. -- AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Simple lines, bellow the TOO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I would consider this logo's on the same level as the Best Western one, they actually have a few similarities. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
