Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Private snap photo. No obvious educational purpose, so outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, personal images without description.
- File:- panoramio (498).jpg
- File:- panoramio (500).jpg
- File:- panoramio (501).jpg
- File:- panoramio (502).jpg
- File:- panoramio (503).jpg
- File:- panoramio (505).jpg
- File:- panoramio (506).jpg
- File:- panoramio (507).jpg
- File:- panoramio (509).jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/PRR_K4_3768_Streamliner_Train_Springfield_1946.jpg Leeferr (talk) 03:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work due to appearance of image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claims of own work on this gallery of one actor.
- File:Ameriqua jack.jpg
- File:Jack in nero.jpg
- File:The fall of marciano family 2.jpg
- File:Jack per wikipedia.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Logo Massoud.png
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 10:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
no otrs permission granted Hannolans (talk) 10:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: See ticket:2016030310015014. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
no otrs permission granted Hannolans (talk) 10:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: See ticket:2016030310015014. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
no otrs permission granted Hannolans (talk) 10:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: See ticket:2016030310015014. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Text document, questionable notability Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis Antonio Mãonsta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some guy doing cartoon stuff to himself. Out of scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 01:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amtlicher Stimmzettel 2016 Dritter Wahlgang (II).jpg
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 01:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Reinhard Kraasch: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:EAMONNISLANDS.jpg
i am not owner of this file i found on youtube (fixing DR from Bnikhald (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)) Scoopfinder(d) 14:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Files uploaded by Jonniesdough (talk · contribs)
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in South Korea. Therefore, the images of sculptures and the map listed here all infringe on copyrights and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from their creators.
- File:Wolmyeong Dong Park Trail 2.png
- File:Wolmyeong Dong Park Map.png
- File:Wolmyeong Dong Park 2.png
- File:Wolmyeong Dong Park 1.png
- File:Wolmyeongdong Twin Boulder.jpg
- File:Wolmyeongdong Ambition Masterpiece.jpg
- File:Wolmyeongdong Lake Pavilion 2.jpg
- File:Wolmyeongdong Holy Son Statue.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
I thought this image was in the public domain when I uploaded it, but it actually isn't. This is a scan of a drawing published in 1938. Margalob (talk) 23:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 20:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused low quality personal photo. Mhhossein talk 06:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
In this photo is shown JoJo Siwa, a very famous dancer who was known for participating in the reality show, Dance Moms, I posted this photo because I will create an article about the same in the Brazilian Wikipedia, and also to illustrate her articles in wikipedia around the World, this was the only photo I found of it about free license and at the moment it is without use because I have not yet created the article, but it was in the American article, but it was withdrawn. Yasméssica (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yasméssica: Even in that case, the author is certainly not Sarah Ackerman sitting at the right side of the pic. This selfie picture is taken by Siwa herself and hence she's the author. In order to keep the pic we need a written permission letter from Siwa. Otherwise the pic has to be deleted. --Mhhossein talk 12:56, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 20:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete
Keep Commons hosts old and outdated photos also to show history. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 30 August 2016 (UTC)- Keepno reason for deletion. @Taivo: do you really mean vote-delete?--Wdwd (talk) 07:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake, sorry. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request.
Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per consensus, no need to continue this. ★ Poké95 07:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
This image shows a wrong image of the museum. It transmitted, especially in Google search without any description a wrong impression. (It is more than 4 years old). The employees are hoping for a deletion, because it's such a wrong picture of their work. (You can see non historic stuff) Mors certa (talk) 09:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept, and no newer and stronger reasons provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see my comment there (related DR). Holger1959 (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR by a suspected sockpuppet of Eygenart, and per keep consensus above.
I am going to rollback this troll's edits.Not for now --★ Poké95 11:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Kept, anybody, who nominates the file for deletion again without new arguments, should be blocked. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
no image 0x0 Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmedaljabiry142 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 02:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted official portrait, owned by the State of New Jersey, which does not release their material into the public domain, MB298 (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. Source = RCA Records. Highly unlikely that it was with permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I just created user on wikipedia, tried image upload, but I didn't know it cannot be deleted - and this is not an image I want to share online. Gyurgy (talk) 08:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. EXIF info shows that this image may come from Picasa. Its description mentioned "三立", which is a Taiwanese media. Techyan（Talk） 11:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
User is unlikely to be the author or copyright holder.
- File:Vestido-de-the-name-y-sandalias-de-cuple.-c-luis-alvarez.jpg
- File:UrsuGoya.jpg
- File:UrsulaCorberoGoya.jpg
- File:Ursula Corbero.jpg
- File:UrsuMine.jpg
- File:UrsuVogue.jpg
- File:UrsuHola.jpg
- File:UrsuCorbero1.jpg
- File:UrsuCorbero2.jpg
- File:UrsulaCorbero1.jpg
Quibik (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Image contains multiple copyrighted artworks by Electronic Arts Inc. Lordtobi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
grabbed form the web ( http://aquadoc.typepad.com/waterwired/2007/06/snakecolumbia_w.html ) and not in Albania Albinfo (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
is it ok to publish book covers here without permission of the publishing house? Albinfo (talk) 15:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted book cover. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
grabbed from the web like all the other contributions of this user: http://www.crystalinks.com/PhiladelphiaExperiment.html (even file name is the same) Albinfo (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
grabbed from the web: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?80033-Albania-Premier-Berisha-inaugurated-two-hydroelectric-power-plants-on-the-Jackson-River // Even file name is the same … I assume that the original file is from http://www.devollhydropower.al/ , they still use the same map (in an updated version) on http://www.devollhydropower.al/new/?page_id=7419 Albinfo (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused uncategorized poster, seems out of scope even if the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: DW. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Photo was given to my by Bruce Pavitt for creation of his Wiki page. I thought Bruce owned the photo, but Charles Peterson owns the rights. Philiphw (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work, found elsewhere on net, https://www.google.com/search?q=alianza+lima+jersey+2015&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJroYb8I8_1Jh8aiQELEKjU2AQaBAgBCAoMCxCwjKcIGmAKXggDEiY6iALeAbwC_1wZDuAaHAu0G3QHTIJAniDPPIPQjhCCvK7Ar6i2GLxowdp905b6vF7YYcbhSyv7JkDFI9n-tmPwaFYXnjKMKQhgq7804qt87Qjb_1MDxz_1mH2IAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRYDJx4DA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwii3MGW3a3QAhWCw1QKHaf0AVkQ2A4IGygB&biw=1074&bih=1051&dpr=0.9 Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Facebook sized and all over the internet] image of musical group. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Capture2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on this topic gallery. Notice lack of cameras, variable (and facebook sizes), different styles, balances, etc... COM:PRP.
- File:Robinson & Wayne Kublalsingh outside the High Court.jpg
- File:Fs 2009 11 15 DSC00755.jpg
- File:Shrikrishenmandir.jpg
- File:Scarlet41 on the set of TV6 Morning Edition.jpg
- File:Trsfront.jpg
- File:Ravensbourne School.jpg
- File:PNMA - Eye on Democracy.jpg
- File:Robinson greets THA Chief Secretary London at Inauguration.jpg
- File:Robinson at the Diplomatic Centre.jpg
- File:Pearce Robinson meets Brian McFarlene.jpg
- File:Historic protests in front of TT High Comm.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvios. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo photos. For example, could be found on http://www.hutech.edu.vn/imgnews/tuyensinh/Quantrikinhdoanh_HUTECH2.jpg.
- File:Nganh-ngon-ngu-anh-hoc-o-dau-1.jpg
- File:Totnghiep1.1.jpg
- File:Quocte1.jpg
- File:Lincoln.2-1.jpg
- File:Co nen hoc nganh ngon ngu anh 2.jpg
- File:Hoạt động sv.jpg
- File:Hoạt động giao lưu sv.jpg
- File:Thay-Viet-danh-trong-khai-giang-1.jpg
- File:Giảng viên giàu kinh nghiệm.jpg
- File:Hệ thống phòng học.jpg
- File:Giá trị cốt lỗi.jpg
- File:Viện công nghệ Việt Nhật2.jpg
- File:KI-KET-VOI-KS-MAJESTIC.jpg
- File:1- QTKS.jpg
- File:Phòng bóng rổ.jpg
- File:Phòng bóng chuyền.jpg
- File:Phòng võ thuật.jpg
- File:Phòng âm nhạc.jpg
- File:Hội trường.jpg
- File:Phòng máy Hutech.jpg
- File:Lớp học qtks.jpg
- File:Hutech - nganh - QTKS (1)(1).jpg
- File:Kien truc.jpg
- File:Co nen hoc nganh kien truc 2.jpg
- File:Môi trường.jpg
- File:Sinh học.jpg
- File:Cơ điện tử.jpg
- File:Phòng học.jpg
- File:Xây dựng.jpg
- File:Dịch vụ ăn uống.jpg
- File:Sinh viên.jpg
- File:Hồ sơ.jpg
- File:Sảnh b.jpg
- File:Tiếng hát sinh viên.jpg
- File:Mùa hè xanh HUTECH.jpg
- File:Nckh.jpg
- File:TruSoHUTECH (4).jpg
- File:Csa hutech.jpg
- File:NCKH4.jpg
- File:NCKH3.jpg
- File:NCKH2.jpg
- File:NCKH.jpg
- File:Thư viện.jpg
- File:Gym Hutech.jpg
- File:Cơ sở UVK.jpg
- File:Sảnh B.jpg
- File:Phòng thí nghiệm.jpg
- File:Dịch vụ nhà hàng - ăn uống.jpg
- File:Cơ sở A.jpg
- File:Ngày hội việc làm.jpg
- File:Đường đua Hutech.jpg
- File:Nha tai thon Son Ha, xa Nam Xuan (2).jpg
- File:Bóng rỗ.jpg
- File:Hiến máu.jpg
- File:VIETNAM FASHION WEEK THIET KE HOANG MINH HA.jpg
- File:Gala âm nhạc.jpg
- File:Giải nhất đồng đội Olympic Cơ học toàn quốc năm 2013.jpg
- File:Huan-chuong-lao-dong-hang-nhi.jpg
- File:Quản trị khách sạn.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (from at least nine different cameras), previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history. It seems like the uploader either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "Own work", "author" or "copyright holder" mean. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have deleted the small, EXIF-less photos for now. The rest have a high resolution and are made with just two different camera model (Canon EOS 6D and Canon EOS 60D), so they might be genuine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Srittau: No, that is incorrect. There are, as I said, at least nine different cameras involved. I didn't just make that claim up. For the remaining ones we have:
- Canon EOS REBEL T2i: File:Mùa hè xanh HUTECH.jpg
- Nikon D5100: File:Nckh.jpg
- Sony HDR-SR7E: File:Cơ sở UVK.jpg
- Canon PowerShot A3100 IS: File:Nha tai thon Son Ha, xa Nam Xuan (2).jpg
- Canon IXUS 115 HS: File:Giải nhất đồng đội Olympic Cơ học toàn quốc năm 2013.jpg
- Among the files you deleted, there were several with metadata from at least two other cameras, including File:Viện công nghệ Việt Nhật2.jpg (taken with an iPhone 5). File:Huan-chuong-lao-dong-hang-nhi.jpg also had metadata indicating that it was taken with a Canon EOS 6D.
- The point is: we obviously can't trust the claims made by this uploader. The fact that a few of their uploads come from the same camera probably just means they were grabbed from the same source (or that those are popular cameras). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- You are not wrong. Unless a very good explanation comes forward in the next few days, I will delete the remaining photos. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Instead of commenting here, the uploader has chosen to continue to charge ahead with even more blatant copyright violations with demonstrably false authorship claims. Time to block and nuke. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- You are not wrong. Unless a very good explanation comes forward in the next few days, I will delete the remaining photos. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Srittau: No, that is incorrect. There are, as I said, at least nine different cameras involved. I didn't just make that claim up. For the remaining ones we have:
- I have deleted the small, EXIF-less photos for now. The rest have a high resolution and are made with just two different camera model (Canon EOS 6D and Canon EOS 60D), so they might be genuine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
All copyright images taken from other websites.
- File:Tài liệu tham khảo phong phú.jpg
- File:Học tập với giảng viên nước ngoài.jpg
- File:Hutech - nganh - DPH (2).jpg
- File:Copy (2) of IMG 5417.jpg
- File:Oum6.jpg
- File:Sinh viên chương trình BBA của ĐH Lincoln học tập năm cuối tại Hoa Kỳ.jpg
DAJF (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
The file is copyrighted. http://www.idcsevilla.org/recursos/mapas/map.htm. the user claims to be the autor of the file, but is obviously a copy of an image of the previous link. Check the copyright notice at the bottom of the website, is from 2001-2005 and the file was uploaded to Wikimedia in 2007. This is evident suplantation of copyright. G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 04:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Too small to be used 78.82.114.52 00:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Potential privacy issue, unsed picture of no notable person, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hajar el qochi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Homework, out of scope.
- File:Exercice analyse.pdf
- File:Execice algébre.pdf
- File:Cours-algebre.pdf
- File:COURS ANALYSE.pdf
- File:Analyse cours.pdf
- File:Algébre cours.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Calacasfilms (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text document,out of scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Not sure if it doesn't meet any threshold of originality. Seems complex. Texniths (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
I would think the work photographed here has to be copyrighted by Tàpies. Jmabel ! talk 00:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Do note that this is used in 3 Wikipedias, so if it is to be deleted, they should probably be given a chance to save it locally on a fair-use basis. - Jmabel ! talk 00:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I made the photograph in loco with the permit of Museum Direction. --Mika58 (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not questioning the legality of taking the photograph, or even of publishing it in an educational context. I'm asking how this could possibly be compatible with our rules on only taking PD or free-licensed work. I don't see how you (or the museum) can be in a position to grant a license to this. It would seem to me that only Tàpies or his representative can grant such a license. - Jmabel ! talk 23:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I made the photograph in loco with the permit of Museum Direction. --Mika58 (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Complex logo. It can't be below the threshold of originality, there is a flower. Texniths (talk) 00:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Should never have been copied here. The source, en:File:Labour Party Ireland.svg, is clearly marked as non-free. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Earvyearv92 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Earvin Eugene 4.jpg
- File:Earvin Eugene 3.jpg
- File:Earvin Eugene 1.jpg
- File:Earvin Eugene 2.jpg
- File:Earvin Eugene.jpg
INeverCry 02:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
bad photo of unknown location. I think this is out of scope. Jarekt (talk) 02:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
I strongly doubt that the uploader ever had the permission to relicense this photograph. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BrendaPodversich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Seems to be some kind of school homework.
- File:Trabajo de fiscica agus urneri y tomy bustos1.jpg
- File:Joaquin y gabriel1.jpg
- File:InfografiaIsabelayLuisina.jpg
- File:Danilo y ignacio1.jpg
- File:CamilayLourdes.jpg
- File:AngelL.jpg
- File:Aaronymayra.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
advertisement Syced (talk) 03:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image taken from here. We cannot determine whether this image is donated by himself. Darklanlan (talk) 03:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
selfie not used on user page Syced (talk) 03:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
selfie not use on user page Syced (talk) 03:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image or logo taken from here. I can't find any other source and who/what this image is licensed by. Darklanlan (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Imaging source (SDSS) is not the author's own work, and is exclusively non-commercial. Exoplanetaryscience (talk) 04:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 04:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Artwork by recent artist without COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Also no indication that uploader took any of the photos.
- File:J Devilliers 06.jpg
- File:J Devilliers 05.jpg
- File:J Devilliers 04.jpg
- File:Jack Devilliers 03.jpg
- File:Jack Devilliers 02.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. This is a personal holiday picture and has no educational value. We have hundreds of better pictures of Berlin central station. Code (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Teens Band filmând Teen Beats.jpg
- File:Teens Band la Târgul HandMade.jpg
- File:Teens Band - Grand Arena Mall.jpg
- File:Teens Band.jpg
- File:Edi Ciurea.jpg
- File:Ianis.jpg
- File:Oana.jpg
- File:Dana Bazac.jpg
INeverCry 05:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
The source is insufficient to verify the licensing claim or that under "other information". Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
While the flickr license was reviewed it's unlikely the flickr photographer has the rights to license the street art banner depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient information at source to justify license. Credited to another person by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
unused uncategorized personal image Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
No sources on this four photo collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of being published before 1946. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT... includes contact info. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J.P.Gadhiya Export-Import Pvt.Ltd (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these small, overcolored photos and complex logo art.
- File:Dehadration And Sorting.jpg
- File:J.P.Gadhiya Company Manufacturing.jpg
- File:J.P.Gadhiya Fruits And Vegetables Logo.jpg
- File:J.P Commodity Logo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 05:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giancanamedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 05:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
personal image out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Possible advertisement? Text only file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Taken aboard a British Navy ship, unknown photographer. No indication of being published. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medijski Partner (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these small promotional images.
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e7.jpeg
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e5.jpeg
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e6.jpeg
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e3.jpeg
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e4.jpeg
- File:Izsel-je-novi-mm-6b7b8e2727782b25e6e1bf4dec1523e2.jpeg
- File:MM logo-big.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Marking one image below TOO an in use as Kept. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- .pdf files are out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete While I don't agree with that blanket statement, in this particular case of a picture-less file without any proper description, apparently about boats or so, I agree. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
No source, and no indication of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Very small diagrams that are not categorized nor in use.
- File:M108Farmy.GIF
- File:M107Farmy.GIF
- File:M106Farmy.GIF
- File:M105Farmy.GIF
- File:M104Farmy.GIF
- File:M103Farmy.GIF
- File:M101Farmy.GIF
- File:M102Farmy.GIF
- File:M1Farmy.GIF
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- .pdf files are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete pure text of undetermined purpose, possibly PDF printout of a web page. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- .pdf files are out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly a print-to-PDF of a web page, an essay of some kind. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 06:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo and magazine cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lilalocksley (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:1917 Riverdale School For Boys, faculty and students.jpg
- File:1948 foreign students at Riverdale Country School.jpg
- File:1930 JOHN-F-KENNEDY 7TH-GRADE-CLASS.jpg
- File:John F. Kennedy class photo at Riverdale Country School.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
These are historical photos owned by Riverdale Country School. The school has granted permission for these photos to be shared publicly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilalocksley (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Small unused, uncategorized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- pdf files are out of scope, this one has the additional difficulty of containing images and text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- pdf file of images and words, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Лицензия CC BY-ND-NC 4.0, см. https://www.hse.ru/copyright Dogad75 (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination они поменяли лицензию, см. архив страницы в 2014 году https://web.archive.org/web/20140627160230/http://www.hse.ru/copyright. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope anyway. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 22:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 22:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this tiny image with no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Source Provided to me by e-mail Author Ken Sterner .. would require COM:OTRS from Mr. Sterner to be kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized photo of advertising material including website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charlieowen1994 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The claims of own work on these three images and one coat of arms are unlikely. Proper source is needed for images - even historic ones.
- File:Components, Ltd.jpg
- File:Charles Thomas Brock Sangster.jpg
- File:Sangster coat of arms.gif
- File:Jack sangster.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Engel-art~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Three images of an art installation, but without COM:OTRS from the artist.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
unused uncategorized personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient source information to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
small size, unused, uncategorized and unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of smaller photographs. With overprinting, it may be copied from web. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ellin Belltz, this book is a part of my own book collection. I've got the book from mr. Berkhout himself. The pictures in the book are black and white, very old fashioned and do not come from internet. Carla Oldenburger.
Deleted: per nomination - to own a copy of a book does not make you the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IXC BY INOXCROM INTL (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:ADVERT or promotion by a pen company.
- File:Inoxcrom internacional boligrafo publicitario promocional personalizado.jpg
- File:Ixc by inoxcrom internacional 4 seasons pluma.jpg
- File:Ixc by inoxcrom internacional lucia be boligrafo pluma escritura.jpg
- File:Pandilla javirroyo ixc by inoxcrom internacional boligrafo pluma.jpg
- File:Ixc by inoxcrom internacional naked boligrafo pluma escritura.jpg
- File:Ixc by inoxcrom internacional fashion week boligrafo roller escritura sahara geometrico.jpg
- File:B.Zeppelin Rojo con libreta.jpg
- File:Ixc by inoxcrom internacional fashion week boligrafo roller escritura azul dibujos.jpg
- File:IXC BY INOXCROM INTERNACIONAL BOLIGRAFO PEN WRITING.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 06:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 06:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 06:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
some kind of personal image or joke, or hoax, but not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Internorm International (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images look like catalog or corporate images promoting some kind of manufacturing company. There are composite images of company directors and buildings, images of product and so on. Unlikely to be "own work", needs COM:OTRS to retain and if retained, please categorize.
- File:Itec lueftung 01.jpg
- File:I-tec Lüftung.PNG
- File:I-tec Verglasung FIX-O-ROUND.jpg
- File:I-tec Verriegelung.jpg
- File:Chronologie 980x350 3te generation.jpg
- File:Chronologie 980x350 1steGeneration.jpg
- File:2te Generation Internorm.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Blurry unused image of some office, uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 1995.[1][2] Godot13 (talk) 04:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 2005.[3] Godot13 (talk) 04:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 2005.[4] Godot13 (talk) 04:31, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 1995.[5][6][7] Godot13 (talk) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 1997.[8][9][10] Godot13 (talk) 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 1995.[11][12][13][14] Godot13 (talk) 04:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted is the reverse of a coin that was introduced into circulation in or after 2003.[15][16] Godot13 (talk) 04:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
According to Costa Rica’s intellectual property law, the Banco Central de Costa Rica retains copyright of their national currency for a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 50 years. The image depicted a banknote that was introduced into circulation in or after 2009. Godot13 (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
No indicication of US-gov work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Paid for with donation by the African American Students Foundations. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unknown photographer, no indication of publishing. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The DNC is not a federal agency. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:JackieLarsen1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Could be made by WH or federal photographer. Proof is needed. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This was given a source of picasaweb, however the image is not found at that location. It is small , not in use and not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused image of apparently non-notable, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Scott for list of possibles, none is an author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Okay for this to be deleted - was part of anentry on Jack Scott Author which was (surprisngly!) not accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Expatauthors (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized screenshot from a movie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also affected File:Father Mapple.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Certainly German photographer, no indication of ever been published. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Looks more like an unofficial snapshot. Unlikely to have been published in Germany before 1945. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
The object embedded needs to be licensed. Mhhossein talk 06:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – I've cropped the image to remove the portrait. MB298 (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn: The photo is cropped. --Mhhossein talk 06:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Info: I relisted this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peggy Noonan (30333026835).jpg#More files affected; in my understanding of our guidelines we cannot keep unfree material in a restorable history. --SI 13:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- S: Can you please refer to the related guideline? --Mhhossein talk 16:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- That's pretty clear in Commons:Derivative works, Commons:License laundering: "All works on Wikimedia Commons are required to be released under a free license by their copyright holder.", Commons:Copyright rules, ... There is (afaik) no exception for uploading non-free works, cropping and keeping the non-free content in the upload history so that anyone can restore it anytime. Especially, the original artist hasn't even been mentioned in the upload. We can also speedy them all as COM:COPYVIO. See Commons:Deletion requests/South Korean motages with non free content for example. --SI 22:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Said that, the files need to be deleted and should be replaced by the cropped versions. The uploader may upload the cropped files as new files instead of rewriting the older ones. --Mhhossein talk 05:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- That's pretty clear in Commons:Derivative works, Commons:License laundering: "All works on Wikimedia Commons are required to be released under a free license by their copyright holder.", Commons:Copyright rules, ... There is (afaik) no exception for uploading non-free works, cropping and keeping the non-free content in the upload history so that anyone can restore it anytime. Especially, the original artist hasn't even been mentioned in the upload. We can also speedy them all as COM:COPYVIO. See Commons:Deletion requests/South Korean motages with non free content for example. --SI 22:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I've hidden the old copyvio original revision. --lNeverCry 01:00, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: I don't think that Jack Armstrong is not notable. However, bad quality picture. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Kept for now, since it seems to be the only image we have of the announcer. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The object embedded needs to be licensed. Affected:
- File:Peggy Noonan (30332975335).jpg
- File:Barry Goldwater, Jr. (29702225033).jpg
- File:Peggy Noonan (30217170202).jpg
Mhhossein talk 06:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – I've cropped the image to remove the portrait. MB298 (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- MB298: Then do the same for the affected files. --Mhhossein talk 08:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein:
Done MB298 (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. But I'm still doubtful about this one. Let's see what admins say. Said that, the others are OK to my eyes. --Mhhossein talk 09:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
More files affected
[edit]- File:Peggy Noonan (29703237954).jpg
- File:Peggy Noonan (29703278834).jpg
- File:Peggy Noonan (30217161602).jpg
- File:Peggy Noonan (30298367016).jpg
- File:Peggy Noonan (30332983995).jpg
- File:Barry Goldwater, Jr. (29702223083).jpg
- File:Barry Goldwater, Jr. (30036733410).jpg
- File:Barry Goldwater, Jr. (30217282132).jpg
All pictures contain artwork of Randall Hedden at least in the first full size upload. Afaik we cannot keep those in the file history, even if the non-free parts were later cropped out. Also, in some of the pictures in Category:Goldwater Institute Annual Dinner 2016 there's a photo of the milky way of unknown authorship in the background. Perhaps the photographer could help us here? --SI 08:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (speedy) all for COM:COPYVIO. After waiting if the uploader helped in any way with getting this fixed I think we need to speedy delete now. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barry Goldwater, Jr. (30217282132).jpg --SI 16:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Schmarrnintelligenz: I've cropped them all. However, I do agree that the previous versions should be deleted. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. MB298 (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- And, also, on the milky way painting, I think minimal use qualifies as it is semi-blurred and in the background and is obviously not a major focus of the photograph. MB298 (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Schmarrnintelligenz: I've cropped them all. However, I do agree that the previous versions should be deleted. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. MB298 (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: all old revisions hidden. --lNeverCry 01:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Map of unclear copyright statut, a source should be provided
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:Propylhex 3d.png by same uploader, except has large margins. DMacks (talk) 06:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
I agree, this file should be deleted, took mwe awhile to get it right and the image connected to "propylhexadrine.png" are the various attempts I made in getting it as close to correct as I could. I ran into an issue where I could no longer upload under the name "propylhexadrine.png", which is why the current version has a new name.
Thanks! Nerdking2015 (talk) 13:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:ITunes 12.2 logo.png with lower quality and visible artefacts. –Totie (talk) 07:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
1987 picture with iPhone. OTRS ? Dacoucou (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, probable DW. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:37, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
doublon avec 20161115-Poitiers-WP-02 Als33120 (talk) 09:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Cabayi (talk) 09:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
The picture doesn't show the actual status of the museum right now. Everything has developed since the making of this pic. It hurts the image of the museum drastically and destroys it's appearance to visitors. (members of the museum will upload new pictures soon if the old ones are deleted.) Thanks for helping us on this issue! Eygenart (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep trolling or vandalism mass deletion request. Info Requesting User was blocked indefinitely. --Foreign Species (talk) 14:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
This image shows a wrong image of the museum. It transmitted, especially in Google search without any description a wrong impression. (It is more than 4 years old). The employees are hoping for a deletion, because it's such a wrong picture of their work. Mors certa (talk) 09:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept, and no newer and stronger reasons provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment @Mors certa: the images, which you want to remove, have no real descriptions at the moment (only the name "Ukranenland"), this likely influences their positions in search engines (note: if you primarly want that your own images show up at better positions, you should think about better filenames on your own website, but please don't expect others to delete their images). Please read Commons:Help_desk/Archive/2016/09#Deletion_of_Pictures_.22Ukranenland.22 and especially Prosfilaes's hint there. Contextualizing the images by improving their descriptions is the best: you could add something more exact like {{de|Flutschäden im Ukranenland-Museum im Jahr …}}or{{de|Haus im Ukranenland-Museum während Renovierungsarbeiten 2012}}. Please understand that we generally do not delete images only because they show an old status of something. It is well within our scope to document history. Or, in other words, should we delete every old image of demolished or renovated buildings? Would you really want that Wikipedia has no images like this because the church looks different today? I hope not. Holger1959 (talk) 10:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR by a suspected sockpuppet of Eygenart, and per keep consensus above.
I am going to rollback this troll's edits.Not for now --★ Poké95 11:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
YouTube is not author. Real source and real author are needed and evidence for free license. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Not in use by any Wikiproject KDS4444 (talk) 09:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose high quality image that if possible should remain. --LT910001 (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Good diagram, ewducational value is quite obvious. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Let me reiterate: this image is not in use by any Wikiproject. It is not in use, and while maybe someday the interest in that might change for some reason, there is currently no reason to believe that is true. Hosting unused files is against policy, and we are not here to retain images for the sake of retaining them. This one has been deemed unsuitable for the only article for which it would have been appropriate, and therefore I stand by my request, as artist, to have it removed as superfluous. Thank you. KDS4444 (talk) 09:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: ffs it’s a quality diagram I don’t see why it’s not being used or why we should be so eager to delete it 🙄—♥ Kelvinsong talk 02:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
image failed to upload correctly KDS4444 (talk) 09:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
self promotion, previously deleted Cabayi (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Very low quality / unidentifiable / unusable LamBoet (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, a shame, since this seems very well made. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. A version of Club Ferrocarril Midland emblem with watermarks that is not used by the club. (see Club's official Facebook). Beyond that, the logo is above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Possibly above COM:TOO Argentina which is a bit hard to interpret. Previous DR closure didn't say anything about possible copyvio, only out of scope issue. Jonteemil (talk) 22:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, TOO uncertain, license claim dubious. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
mispelling, the correct spelling is Tinnitus, though a file with the name De-Tinnitus.ogg already exists Jeuwre (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: renamed to File:De-Tinnitus.oga. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no source (No source since)
The file is predated by http://www.geheugenvanzeist.nl/wiki/Bestand:08-Chris_Schut_1975_Beek_en_R.jpg where it is available for non-commercial use. There is no evidence that the artist has released the image. Fæ (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Fae. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 13:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 13:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Most of files with low resolution and without metadata. When metadata is exist (photos of buildings), it says author is Denis ZHabkin (djhooligantk.livejournal.com), so no permission for this files. Some old photos was taken nearly in 1910-1920, doubtful that uploader is so old and can be author/owner of such files; maybe they can be used as "fair-use" in local projects or as PD, but we don't know authentically who was a real author and when he died. So, probably all these are copyvio.
- File:6345636dsfvsgbdhf63463.jpg
- File:89294325fgdrtyh65467.jpg
- File:5235gfds56324mj6454786.jpg
- File:89296717 large YEBorel5232.jpg
- File:54235 fgsvtgbsh 53425.tif
- File:Fsdgvdesg654743f cas644.jpg
- File:0 cf685 d782503d orig.jpg
- File:4354 dfvgdf.jpg
- File:Dfghyhrcdfjyrt 3453456.jpg
- File:Designall 005.jpg
- File:342142 3453 fsscvgfetgbv.jpg
- File:Dvfascf4524.jpg
- File:0 fa80b 758a9bcfdasfgs.jpg
- File:Borel foto.jpg
- File:532vfvgbgsebstybse.jpg
- File:756767334REW6FEWG.jpg
- File:62533623FGWGH5HG.jpg
- File:563456232FASDGFSG.jpg
- File:536426ZSGREW.jpg
- File:Особняк Бореля в Саратове.jpg
- File:Borel 02.jpg
- File:Вид колонии Бальцер.jpg
- File:Э.И. Борель.jpg
Dmitry89 (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While some of those photos might have been PD, it is too hard to say without any proper sources. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems likely to be out of our project's scope —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I am the photographer and uploader. Please delete this for No-FoP Japan as in description
, so that I can re-upload on local jawp. Thank you for your time. Sincerely,--Tokorokoko 14:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
the map is incorrect Bnikhald (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ــــا as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: this file is copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran-Ethnic_map_2014.PNG. Not an exact copy. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- delete,the map is incorrect and there is ready is several copies of the file --ــــا (talk) 04:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran-Ethnic_map_2014.PNG (*)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran-Ethnic_map.PNG (the original file)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran-Ethnicity-2004.PNG
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iran-Ethnicmap.PNG
- Delete Uploader request, not in use anymore. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted trophy -- no indication of permission from the creator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted trophy -- no indication of permission from the creator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.
- File looks pretty old so it could be PD. Any opinions? Natuur12 (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Image is from cover of this journal: https://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/428/files/2015/10/Gros_ed_CEA_23-1.pdf. Unfortunately, the photo attribution isn't in the front matter, and I don't have access to the back matter. Imedeiros (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per the PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Natuur12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.teamwork.com/story
- Above or below com:TOO? Natuur12 (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I'd say (slightly) above, because it contains design consideration etc. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
License seems unclear, commerical re-use is not explicitly stated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- See also discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sustainable_Development_Goals - maybe somebody knows solution. Thank you.--Jirka Dl (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: the UN logo is {{PD-US-no notice-UN}}, the rest is just {{PD-text}}. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
don't think this PD rule applies here. document was not published before 1987. Can't see any public domain statement on the page quoted as source. And the document Download SDG Guidelines is very restrictive regarding usage of the documents. Very sad to initiate this request, but UN is not helpful here Albinfo (talk) 15:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I haven't seen that this issue was already discussed. Would be great if we could keep it. But please check once again in regards to this UN unsage policy. --Albinfo (talk) 15:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: UN logo (PD) + Text. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Lower quality version of File:UN SDG Logo.png. Louperivois Ψ @ 18:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Louperivois: Could you replace the pics in the diffrent wikis before we delete it?--Sanandros (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously out of scope. Berlin never looked like that. Code (talk) 06:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Did you miss the day of the green sun? Seriously though, very bad quality with many better quality photos available -> Delete --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Quiero eliminar mi empresa ARFISA Representaciones, SCP (talk) 09:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this file by mistake. I cannot afford posting my picture in public. Please remove this immediately. Dsameen (talk) 10:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader can demand deletion of own uploads during first week after uploading. Here almost 2 months have passed. In my opinion the photo has educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Even if it would be a shame to lose this very good image, I'd vote to follow the author's wishes. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and COM:SCOPE - with the presence of the woman in the center of the image, COM:EDUSE is questionable at very best. --lNeverCry 01:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems unlikely to me that the uploader is the rightful copyright owner of this campaign poster. Additional proof through OTRS would be required I'd thnk. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I can't see any valid reason to think this map is in the public domain. Ownership of the actual map (as a copy was purchased) does not mean authorship Discasto talk 14:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
No context, likely a test edit. Lordtobi (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused profile photo of non-notable person, formerly active on Wikipedia, now globally locked. Out of scope. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
bad quality. There are many better images Adam majewski (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused profile photo of non-notable person, formerly active on Wikipedia, now globally locked. Out of scope. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Unlicensed derivative. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Probably below TOO. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Sebari. --lNeverCry 01:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation - unlicensed derivative. Unused. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation - unlicensed derivative of letter written by someone who is not the uploader and no evidence of permission. Unused. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/possibly out of COM:SCOPE as well. --lNeverCry 01:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Inappropriate, unsourced and not used anywhereLeonardo (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Inappropriate, unsourced and not used anywhere Leonardo (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: doesn't look like it will be useful for the project. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 18:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Julo (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Image is of low quality and not likely to be useful for any purpose. Species of two lichen genera are present in this photo–Teloschistes and Usnea; neither can be identified to species due to the poor image quality and better images of both genera exist on Wikimedia Imedeiros (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling', and/or potentially copyright issues, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Freddy2001 talk 20:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep certainly within scope Category:Caricatures of Donald Trump, Category:Internet memes, ... --SI 23:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Sl. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I can't contact the admin who kept this the last time, he's globally banned from the projects. This image has no source of the base image, thus is a Derivative Work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
*Based on the appearance and description, this is out of scope and is presumably an attack image against Donald Trump. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 05:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oh wait, this is a duplicate nomination, closing. (non-admin closure) LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is not eligible for non-administrative closure. This is a Derivative Work, not a duplicate nomination. Did you read the 2 year difference in the dates? Did you read my nomination? Please do not close things if you don't understand them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the file is in scope, but copyright violation. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Image is of very poor quality and is unlikely to be useful for any purpose. Impossible to discern the subject of the photograph, or even to determine whether it is, in fact, a lichen. Imedeiros (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random upload of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random upload of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Category and description added. Seems to be within scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Category and description added. Seems to be within scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Category and description added. Seems to be within scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho mass-upload of wrong-named files missing serious descriptions, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Category and description added. Seems to be within scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Image is of poor quality and is unlikely to be useful for any reason. Impossible to determine species. Microscope images without scale are of limited use, and a microscope image that does not illustrate any morphological features is of no use. Imedeiros (talk) 21:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I did not know that I could not use this image by copyright. Excuse me. GusRibeiro (talk) 21:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, althoug a good one, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ... your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'posing' and advertisements ("...a feature of xxx company..."), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:K.RISHI SIRUNKAR.jpg, but here obviousuly a nice family album related shot, nevertheless, out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Image is of poor quality and is unlikely to be used for any purpose. Impossible to identify species present (or to group it with photographs of similar unidentified mushrooms) because the image is too blurry. Imedeiros (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 21:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, rather poor quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 21:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, rather poor quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, bad quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, rather bad file file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once again, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams and showing the same care, again and gain, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once again, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams and showing the same care, again and gain, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once again, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams and showing the same care, again and gain, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, rather bad quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:00, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 22:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 22:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted design. It doesn't meet Commons:Licensing#Simple design guidelines. That threatening and ominous goat isn't simple enough. And it doesn't meet Commons:De minimis, bottle's design is a central part of the composition. Discasto talk 22:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho potentially copyright issues as missing any verification for 'own work', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence imho rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
From Facebook. Yann (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams showing his car again, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of flickr streams, missing any serious description, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
although an imho good pic, once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ... your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 22:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, missing EXIF data to verify origin, rather bad quality file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho bad quality random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file missing any helpful ("...train was 4 hours too late...") description, not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, not bad, indee, but file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ... your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
once more, random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: potentially copyright issues as being imho a scanned media of 2007 as claimed by uploader - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'profiling' and/or advertisements ("...LP ICON PHOTOS..."), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ... your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho 'family album' or 'profiling' (see description) related content, or/and potentially copyright issues, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. Your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I posted this picture unware that Museums do not allow that visitors take pictures of their collections for commercial purposes. Considering that the license selected on Wikimedia Commons for this picture enables third parties to use it commercially, i request the deletion of this file. Bxistos (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as a courtesy to keep the upload out of potential legal trouble. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 01:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indy beetle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown photographer, no proof of being published.
- File:Force Publique dispatch rider.jpg
- File:Force Publique trucks.jpg
- File:Matadi port.jpg
- File:Saio heights in Ethiopia.jpg
- File:Leopoldville view.jpg
- File:Kisantu.jpg
- File:Belgian Congo Katanga mining district.jpg
- File:Belgian Congo Katanga copper mine.jpg
- File:Kangu.jpg
- File:Italian East Africa airfield under Belgian control.jpg
- File:Isiro.jpg
- File:Belgian Field Radio Station in Ethiopia.jpg
- File:Force Publique trek 1941.jpg
- File:Belgian Congo Bank.jpg
- File:Bolenge church.jpg
- File:Belgian forces with captured Italian artillery.jpg
- File:Belgian officers in Saio.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - No proof of being published? Could someone please clarify? Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Governor-General Pierre Ryckmans.jpg, where I've already had to defend a photo from this same collection. Indy beetle (talk) 05:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- That's only the cover. Where did you get the information that the photographs are in that book? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- The closest library having this book seems to be +250 miles away from me.
- Here is a digital copy of the book uploaded onto the internet: [17]. I believe I included it in the source section for most, if not all, my uploads. It has all the photos. - Indy beetle (talk) 02:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- I did see this website, doesn't really help. :( --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Could you please clarify? Are you saying that that is not sufficient enough proof? Indy beetle (talk) 10:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- I did see this website, doesn't really help. :( --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Here is a digital copy of the book uploaded onto the internet: [17]. I believe I included it in the source section for most, if not all, my uploads. It has all the photos. - Indy beetle (talk) 02:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Levenslang_Zitten._1974..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
port.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_of_IMG_5417.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Levenslang_Zitten._1974..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Levenslang_Zitten._1974..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Levenslang_Zitten._1974..jpg){kind=link}
._Levenslang_Zitten._1974..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg#More_files_affected){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
port.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
port.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
port.jpg){kind=link}
port.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- The Author field says clearly Unknown, so no reason to use Unknown photographer as part of the deletion rationale. The description and the source page contains enough information about the source and age of these photos. In doubt, go to the physical location where found and ask for the publication instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- The website is not a copy of the book, just some text with photographs inserted. That is no proof. Where's the proof that the photographs have been published in the book? Amitie, keep those half-wit suggestion to yourself, just blowing up the discussion by adding nonsense is disruptive. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- The webpage is transcribed from the book. ibiblio.org follows this pattern with other uploaded books. See those page numbers? They match up with those in the real book, including pages with pictures on them. - Indy beetle (talk) 04:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- The website is not a copy of the book, just some text with photographs inserted. That is no proof. Where's the proof that the photographs have been published in the book? Amitie, keep those half-wit suggestion to yourself, just blowing up the discussion by adding nonsense is disruptive. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:24, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see here for a version where those images are in context of the book. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like an official document from an Belgian colony from the 30s. It would be good to know the copyright status of official works in Belgium. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation - unlicensed derivative of letter written by someone who is not the uploader and no evidence of permission. Unused.
Also:
- File:CharlesMackenzie40.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie39.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie38.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie37.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie36.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie35.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie34.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie33.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie32.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie31.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie30.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie29.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie28.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie26.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie25.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie24.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie23.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie22.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie21.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie20.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie19.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie18.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie17.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie16.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie15.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie14.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie13.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie12.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie10.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie09.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie08.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie07.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie06.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie05.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie04.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie03.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie02.jpg
- File:CharlesMackenzie01.jpg
- GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/scope. --lNeverCry 02:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlicensed derivative and copyright violation. Unused. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlicensed derivative and copyright violation. Unused. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlicensed derivative and copyright violation. Unused. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Privacy violation. Uploader has scanned a birth certificate for someone who is not himself. No evidence of permission. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
REASON (mandatory) Liubavas.lt (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
it is not a public domain. The photograph was taken from our web page www.liubavas.lt The copywrited photo of artwork was given for us for limited use, so we are not in the position to let it reuse as public domain Liubavas.lt (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
It is not a public domain. The photograph was taken from our web page www.liubavas.lt The copyrighted photo of artwork was given for us for limited use, so we are not in the position to let it to reuse as a public domain. Liubavas.lt (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of a pin button on a scanner plate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized large scan of an unknown button. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Picture published on other websites (for example). No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Photo présente sur d'autres sites web (exemple). Pas d'autorisation explicite visible de la part du photographe.--Titlutin (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GEdwardBryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused duplicates of File:Graham and Sue Bagshaw at dual Sigma 6 Console HSE 1976 v2.jpg which as 1976 v2 would seem to be the latest and most accurate image.
- File:Graham and Sue Bagshaw at dual Sigma 6 Console HSE 1976.jpg
- File:Graham and Sue Bagshaw at HSE dual Sigma 6 1974.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this warhol-ish poster art. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of artworks on a fence without permission from the artists, also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
While this passed flickr review, I do not think the flickr photographer has the rights to license this poster/advertisement image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused animated banner, seems out of scope Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized apparent catelog picture, no indication of user's own work, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of a bunch of people sitting on an empty stage, one speaking on a mic... Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Small size, not used, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Blurry personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
From a movie still is unlikely to be own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, description says it was previously published. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused uncategorized personal image with dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image with dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I keep as the author. This file has been replaced in the article. Кальницкий Михаил (talk) 17:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on this image, it looks like it was cut out of a background and was a professional image in the 1970s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, uncategorized small personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, uncategorized logo of no apparent utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This has a source, but it is insufficient to know if the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image of a musical band. Facebook sized! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan.(source is JAPAN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE） --Kanko3131 (talk) 17:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, unused uncategorized artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
These appear to be show characters and can't be licensed by photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a catalog image and has promotional text... not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Catalog or promotional images, two are duplicates, one duplicates another nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:RiderScan dedicated blind spot mirror.jpg.
- File:RiderScan fitted to Honda Pan European.jpg
- File:RiderScan on Honda.jpg
- File:RiderScan on Suzuki.jpg
- File:RiderScan CAD.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
There is a final fantasy type character on this screen which can't be licensed by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
As a mural, clearly labeled (C), it's unlikely that the photographer has the rights to license the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Artwork in a gallery without permission from artist/s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized low quality image of a wall made of bricks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lara Walker (talk · contribs)
[edit]modern artwork , no permission (see OTRS)
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This image is out of scope because it is not in use, not categorized and a photo of the moon, labeled sun. It is also blurry, and small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of common subject. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused uncategorized LOGO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, tiny low quality group shot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot from a documentary, would need permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized, small group shot Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
It is not a public domain. The photograph was taken from web page www.liubavas.lt which market © The copyrighted photo of artwork was given for us for limited use, so we are not in the position to let it to reuse as a public domain. Liubavas.lt (talk) 17:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Artwork without artist's permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized small low quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
It is not a public domain. The photograph was taken from web page www.liubavas.lt which market © The copyrighted photo of artwork was given for us for limited use, so we are not in the position to let it to reuse as a public domain. Liubavas.lt (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Personal unused image, plus great shot of photographs on tee-shirts! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Small sized unused group shot of some people, is out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This file is imperfect and does not render properly. TNhealthwebmast (talk) 17:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Something is at least weird with this file. MediaWiki's thumbnailer obviously has problems, so has Inkscape, but Chrome's SVG renderer displays it correctly. As such Keep and repair. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Sebari. --lNeverCry 02:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. 1. Scan from a polychrome print (type of pixels in full resolution) 2. Wrong date. The original photo was taken around 1985 - 1990 (type of cars and number plates) 3. Used on webpage http://www.radio-austria.at/standorte.htm ("Club der Angestellten der Radio Austria AG") Wdwd (talk) 18:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Very unlikely that this is an 'own' work of the uploader. Looks like a magazine scan. —Vensatry (Ping me) 18:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
this photo is from an indian magazine from 1980 that is owned by me
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Watermark, that seems not to be properly licensed (Murcia Turistica is a public institution website) Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 18:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
screenshot from the 1939 french film en:Le Jour Se Lève. Not own work by uploader. GeorgHH • talk 18:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho random mass-upload of panoramio streams, 2007-file with large timestamp, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted material TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
parce que il n'est pas convenable pour moi abd moslime 19:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
although a nice picture, imho once more random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and - as there are missing location and descriptions - doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ... your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment see also File talk:Flora Fountain (16743195212).jpg as of November 16, i.e. if that location is the right one, DR may imho declined, Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: While this does not look like Flora Fountain, it seems to be an easily identifiable place for someone local. And it is a good quality image (despite the sepia tones). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Interfase as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|Antiazerbaijani propagandic map with falsificated information lNeverCry 21:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original claim seems to boil down to typical POV disputes. But Delete as derivative work and so most likely not own work. ---Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Accjrding to the map the territory of Nakhichevan, which is in Azerbaijan, is shown as part of Armenia. And the names of Azerbaijan and Baku were falsificated. Baku never was "Bakunakert" as it shown in this image and its name. This may result false view of readers and bring the reputation of Commons down as well. That is why we should delete this image first of all. --Interfase (talk) 20:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per myself. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Изображения на марках — объект авторского права. См. http://www.garant.ru/consult/civil_law/589750/ Vladis13 (talk) 06:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep По указанной Вами ссылке, в комментариях «Гаранта» к статье 1259 ГК РФ, можно прочесть следующее: «Почтовая марка является государственным знаком почтовой оплаты (ст. 2 Федерального закона от 17.07.1999 N 176-ФЗ "О почтовой связи"), следовательно, в силу пп. 2 п. 6 ст. 1259 ГК РФ объектом авторского права не является <...> Таким образом, организация вправе разместить в печатном издании изображение почтовой марки. Иначе обстоит дело при использовании отдельно изображения, содержащегося на почтовой марке. <...> ...использование отдельно изображения (курсив мой — Д.И.), находящегося на почтовой марке, может являться нарушением авторского права.»
- Статья 1259 запрещает использование вырезок из марок, но использование марок целиком (т.е. изображений марок, содержащих обязательные элементы марок, такие как наименование страны и номинал) — возможно. Английская версия шаблона лицензии PD-RU-exempt, говорит о том же самом: «This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps».
- С уважtнием, Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC). (P.S. Удалять шаблон лицензии PD-RU-exempt со страницы описания марки не надо было, даже если Вы решили номинировать марку на удаление.)
Итог
[edit]
Нашёл Commons:Почтовые марки/Общественное достояние. Номинацию снимаю. --Vladis13 (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Our summary of the law, cited above, is clear that these are OK -- the stamps are PD, but the art remains copyrighted and the stamp cannot be cropped without infringing on the copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)