Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 2nd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Although I don't think a 12th century work (as stated in the description field) needs source information to be kept, another user insists to have it in the 'images without source' problem category.

Note to closing admin: Please make sure the 'source' field is not empty if you keep-close this, e.g. by adding {{unknown|source}} to the field. Jcb (talk) 06:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Speedy keep. This DR was created after reverting a user who has been doing their best to repair the mess created by Jcb's inappropriate use of blanking text in templates (diff). This DR is pointless and disruptive as the object is a famous manuscript over 800 years old. I suggest the closing admin ignore Jcb's request in the nomination, it's inappropriate as it uses a DR to "win" an argument. -- (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I am not an admin. But COM:DR says that Non-admins may close a deletion request as keep if they have a good understanding of the process, and provided the closure is not controversial, and this closure is absolutely uncontroversial. The source has already been added in the file description by , so that's why this DR has no sense now to be continued for 7 days. Well, even though this file has a source problem, this manuscript is over 800 years old as said by Fæ above. So there is no copyright problem for this innocent image to be deleted. I suggest Jcb to use common sense sometimes so that we don't need to have to discuss deletion over an obviously innocent image. If any admin disagree with my action, I am open and I would let them reopen this DR and convert my closure to a keep vote. Thanks, Poké95 10:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kiki1001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyrighted images. See image Watermark.

Wikicology (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These all come from web sites with explicit copyright notices and are, therefore, {{Speedy}} deletes. They are also pure spam, violating COM:ADVERT. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this picture. The licence holder, Andreas E. Nygjerd, does not accept to share the picture on Wikimedia Commons. Robert Haugen (talk) 10:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low resolution, likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 08:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture of underage person, not useful for educational purposes L736E (talk) 17:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy close with deletion; uploader/author requested deletion. Huntster (t @ c) 19:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a non-notable person to me, therefore the image should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 17:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:Shizhao. --Rosenzweig τ 21:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The obvious halftoning in this picture shows it was taken from a printed source and is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: https://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2012/01/31/momo-founder-giampiero-moretti-dies-at-age-71/

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this black and white image from 1991. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: http://www.itkc.it/HTML/2015/English/Who_we_are_Gianpiero_Moretti.html

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is in slideshow at http://www.joest-racing.de/en/index.php/history/year-by-year-single/1980-triumph-in-daytona, apparently no own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: http://www.itkc.it/HTML/2015/English/Who_we_are_Gianpiero_Moretty_Story_Teammates.html

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random upload of a 2008 file of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Philippines. Wikicology (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Already DRed here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mall of Asia Arena. Once is enough. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei ist ein Duplikat von : Alte Auerbacher Straße 9.jpg . Ich bin der Ersteller dieser Datei und wünsche, dass sie gelöscht wird. Wewalther (talk) 13:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redir. --Wdwd (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei ist ein Duplikat von : "Alte Auerbacher Straße 11 und 13.jpg. Ich bin der Ersteller und wünsche, dass diese Datei gelöscht wird. Wewalther (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redir. --Wdwd (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as merely an advertisement. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Service Spam - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be Flickr Washing Elisfkc (talk) 21:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the talk page "Found it on creative commons, so should be free to use amongst the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saoh (talk • contribs) 21:49, 02 November 2016 (UTC)"[reply]
First off, that's not possible, because "search.creativecommons.org is not a search engine". Second, see Commons:License laundering. Elisfkc (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plik: Katarzyna Gajewska Miss Warmii i Mazur 2014.jpg powinien zostać skasowany. Nadałem jemu błędną nazwę i źle oznaczyłem licencję. Wgrałem zdjęcie ponownie pod nazwą Katarzyna Gajewska.png. BartArt (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:10, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soccerfreaksandgeeks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Bromley vs Adelaide.jpg was previously published on Zimbio nearly a year before the Commons upload date. Several other appear to be personal photos taken from the subject's Instagram account. The EXIF data of File:Bromley with Newcastle Jets fans.jpg indicates that it was lifted from an unidentified Facebook page. With these considerations, it's unlikely that the uploader owns the copyright to all these photos, and should be deleted under the precautionary principle.

ξxplicit 01:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunder Konar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of personal images and promotional images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dagmarkh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files missing Commons:Permission from copyright holders.

Takeaway (talk) 19:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Kindly let me know what further information you need about the photos. I have all the rights I need to publish the photos of the artworks on all pages Regina Baumhauer, Dieter Sieger and Gerrit Benner. Many thanks. --Dagmarkh (talk) 21:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2017013110011324. Yann (talk) 13:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sisteladsas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sisteladsas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work: all different sizes and qualities, no EXIF, some promo photos and band logos.

P 1 9 9   20:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted game artwork.

MKFI (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikadiou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-created artwork. Out of scope.

Takeaway (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikoFilppula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This new user has made a number of attempts to SPAM us and everything he has uploaded so far has been deleted as both copyvios and violating COM:ADVERT, save for two pages of pure text that were out of scope. I think these copyright certificates are also out of scope, but I do not think they qualify for {{Speedy}}.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to educate you of the 45 year discovery to Dr. Shubik's dollar auction game.

 The Formal precommitment mechanism aka. "2 or more precommitted bidders" auction initiation criteria has been     ingnored for 45 years.
 Dr Shubik: "There are technical requirement in producing alogically consistent and complete mathematical model. These include thr formal definition of what happens swhen you have 0 ar1 persons..the formal (and commonsensical) answer is that nothing happens" 

It didn't make sense to initiate bidding until 2 players with bids were present in 1971, and it doesn't make sense to open bidding phase until 2 players with bids are present in 2016. This fact hasn't changed and will not change.

You can keep deleting me all day you want, but this won't change anything, me and Dr. Martin Shubik are here to educate you etards.

Current Wikipedia pages Dollar auction, Bidding Fee, All-pay-auction are only outdated for 45 years.

 USPTO Patent Examiner Yogesh C. Garg, Art Unit 3625, "Filppula teaches a pre-capitalization interface".

You wanna-be home lawyers have deleted my bidder-gallery avatar images unlawfully, I am the owner of Copyrights for these images and noone else. You guys are all over the map with your illegal harrassment.

I have seen all the rediculous auction related images on your site, and I can't learn anything from those images, pure garbage, stop spamming the world with your outdated info.

I have informed you that I have entered the discrimination-free-zone and etards can't do anything about it. --MikoFilppula (talk) 07:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lupdelhi

[edit]

Files uploaded to promote YouTube videos, apparently. There's nothing about it on a Google search except Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion With Dates, where a Wikipedia article about it was deleted as spam/advertising. So these files are probably promotional and have no potential educational value. Some have photographs in derivative works, and there are no credits for any photographers. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, the user's only contribution; the file is not in use and has no potential value of any kind. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states this is a "screenshot", its poor quality agrees with that, and there is a version of it on the person's website; it is a professional photo and the uploader is not likely the photographer or owner of its license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot / webgrab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed Ostarisk (talk) 00:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Request by uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed Ostarisk (talk) 00:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Request by uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed Ostarisk (talk) 00:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Request by uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where its article submission was declined in October 2012 and deleted in December 2013 for being abandoned. Out of project scopeξxplicit 01:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - non-notable person lNeverCry 02:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused selfie. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kpdntc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spammy, out of scope; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed gomaa123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not appear to have a source, nor to be own work of uploader. Looks like it was cut from a background. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing essential information for +7 days. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING INeverCry (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I thought that I had gotten them all. Jasonanaggie (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 13:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rights to the image belongs to Getty Images/AFP. EBC's Creative Commons license does not apply to photographs from other sources. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination image from "Fifa/Divulgação" according to the site, license does not apply. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

芸能事務所協会団体のポリシーに違反する写真 58.138.60.12 23:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The expression (in this case, the photograph) is reasonably a matter of interest within the society.
It is of interest to society to have a public figure's likeness shown in Wikipedia.
  • The content and method of expression is not unjust.
Photos were taken in public of an official event, neither of which is unjust. --Puramyun31 (talk) 00:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • 日本タレントの写真をWebで使いたいなら事務所の許可を得るべき。それが日本芸能事務所のルールである。健全にネットを使う人はみんな、このルールを守ってる。

日本芸能事務所のポリシー「タレント、声優は肖像権を持っています(他人に顔写真などを勝手に公開されない権利)。 肖像権は、通常専属契約している所属事務所が委託管理をしています。 芸能事務所の協会団体に於いても、現在、タレントのファンサイトでの写真の公開を一切認めておりません。 タレント固有の肖像は「商品」であるためです。 ホームページなどでタレント写真を扱う場合は、必ず所属事務所に許可を取らなければなりません。」--118.157.74.169 20:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An infringement on the right of publicity. Kana7531 (talk) 01:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(肖像の利用に関しては、ja:wikipedia:井戸端/subj/人物画像の掲載について (再)ページの裁判所のウェブサイトで検索した判例からの引用を参照。法的な根拠のない主張です) --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per discussion. --P 1 9 9   17:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

シグマ・セブンから著作権侵害のため削除してほしいとの依頼が来ているようですので(参考)、削除依頼をさせていただきます。

  •  Keep The deletion nomination states that the subject's management agency has requested deletion because the image constitutes a copyright violation, but as the Flickr account from which the image was transferred has a whole bunch of photos that were all clearly taken at the same event by an amateur photographer with the same camera, I see no reason at all to doubt that these images were indeed taken by the Flickr user and published under a free license. --DAJF (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

事務所(シグマ・セブン)からの依頼 (a request from the office she belongs to) ticket:2016011310010978 --Waiesu (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

シグマ・セブンから著作権侵害のため削除してほしいとの依頼が来ているようですので(参考)、削除依頼をさせていただきます。


Kept: still no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:44, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see this link. This is asuka nishi (ja:西明日香) official twitter. She said that Ishe wanted to delete this file. I think this file violates her portrait right. please delete. Mirinano (talk) 03:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think this photo does not infringe the right of publicity? Like a link that Waiesu showed ([3]), the use of celebrity photos of the person without permission is a violation of the right of publicity.--Mirinano (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused personal photo. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 03:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work due to age, but not old enough to be public domain. --ghouston (talk) 04:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Photo of Fausto Cabrera

[edit]

This photo was takes by my grandfather when my uncle Fausto was in Bogotá (Colombia) in 1940's. Rodisc (talk) 07:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then I took a picture of this photo of my family album, when he passed away. Rodisc (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My grandfather gave me the albums and his rights, he has Alzheimer and with 93 years old he does not understand about copyrights. He agreed that I own his photos and albums, he said "Yes, yes, yes, all the photos are yours". What else can I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodisc (talk • contribs)


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizan faiz khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 04:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizan faiz khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like photographed by Joachim Raab without author's permission. Krochoman (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like photographed by Joachim Raab without author's permission. Krochoman (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like photographed by Joachim Raab without author's permission. Krochoman (talk) 04:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 04:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted image. License not valid. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 05:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinoyhoops (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image of non notable person (article deleted :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caleb_Punzalan) : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic and also per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT. Mhhossein talk 08:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/e7/18/2e/e7182e0223d0800b37c597c198ff65de.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation. Although the source site claims a CC licence, this is clearly an amateur fan site and not anything approaching a professional product. However, the majority of the photos are clearly professional promotional shots, or otherwise not the work of the site creator. Pyrope (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Russia, statue created after 1959 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no copyright info on the music that's used in this video INeverCry (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep music is Rob Gasser & Laura Brehm - Vertigo, taken from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CQHm0jvgkw and is copyright free, part of nocopyrightsounds project. MZaplotnik (edits) 07:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded only video, without audio. --Sporti (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 00:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mangelnde Qualität, ersetzt durch: File:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild.tif.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mangelnde Qualität, ersetzt durch: File:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild.tif.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 06:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mangelnde Qualität, ersetzt durch: File:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild.tif.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mangelnde Qualität, ersetzt durch: File:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild.tif.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie; not important not in use Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie not important not in use Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An uncategorized image, the only one from this uploader, which appears to be a self-aggrandized and, for the project, an unwarranted selfie Acabashi (talk) 00:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

water mark file not in used Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains the city's (former) logo which is copyrighted and not "own work". See also the deleted images File:Flag of Cape Town.png and . Zaian (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Lin Biao, die 1971, not PD shizhao (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image shows a very brief text quote only; not a piece of art. Who can help determining what is the correct "license" applicable for such short quotations ? Olnnu (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This is calligraphy, and calligraphy is art. BabelStone (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too much tilt, better version is File:(1)Ebenezer.jpg in same category. Sardaka (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Mao Zedong, die 1976, not PD shizhao (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:毛泽东致许德珩夫妇感谢信.jpg BabelStone (talk) 16:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Mao Zedong, die 1976, not PD shizhao (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is an example of Mao's calligraphy, and calligraphy is art, and therefore still under copyright. BabelStone (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Mao Zedong, die 1976, not PD shizhao (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is an example of Mao's calligraphy, and calligraphy is art, and therefore still under copyright. BabelStone (talk) 16:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Mao Zedong, die 1976, not PD shizhao (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:毛泽东致许德珩夫妇感谢信.jpg BabelStone (talk) 16:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Mao Zedong, die 1976, not PD shizhao (talk) 08:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding following two examples of Mao's hand-writing to this DR, which were separately nominated for deletion, because the same arguments apply to all three files, and they should be deleted or kept together. BabelStone (talk) 16:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These three files are all examples of hand-written letters by Mao Zedong. The text written by Mao is still under copyright, and the hand-writing itself can be considered to be calligraphy and therefore a work of art which is also under copyright. Therefore, the letters are still under copyright both as text and as art, and are not appropriate for Commons. BabelStone (talk) 16:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs by Ralf Prokop. --Leyo 08:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This DR includes File:PokerKarteF.jpg and potentially other images. --Leyo 08:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry (talk) 09:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - severe lens flare - nothing special about the location INeverCry (talk) 09:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeelan dadagari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. One of these is in use on his WP:EN user page, but he has no other contributions there or here. Therefor these are out of scope.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeelan dadagari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios of Bollywood images. --Yann (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explizite Freigabe von Monsieur Peter (COM:OTRS) ausgelaufen Kashionyxia (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explizite Freigabe von Monsieur Peter (COM:OTRS) ausgelaufen Kashionyxia (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explizite Freigabe von Monsieur Peter (COM:OTRS) ausgelaufen Kashionyxia (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, com:IDENT and com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not de minimis here. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old photo but likely not enough (it says only "before 1973"), taken from a blog as stated, we need data about original publication, to verify if "anonymous authorship" is a credible claim Strakhov (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, low-resolution jpg, user with a bad track record Strakhov (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actress Aneta Łapkiewicz isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in pl.wiki. Small unused photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is illustration from non-notable book "Write Quick" (no mention in en.wiki). Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Relatively obvious copyvio:

The image (obviously a professional shot) is used as a cutout on the cover of The Hockey News ([6]). In this issue, the photographer is credited as follows: William Nylander by Graig Abel (page 3, I can provide proof if necessary). Graig Abel in turn is the official photographer of the Toronto Maple Leafs ([7]) and works for Getty Images (see for example [8]). The uploader, User:Symbol96, declared this as "own work", exactly as he did with his other upload File:William Nylander 2014-1.jpg, which was an even more obvious copyvio (Getty Images as well) and which I already got deleted. Even though there is no definite proof, this is highly suspicious and most certainly a copyvio as well. -- Hephaion (talk) 10:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avilesmarco76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   10:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Therockero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images / advertisement. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   10:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   10:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded by news outlet Asia Today here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 10:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally published by Oricon Style on their website here and the picture was taken by Masayuki Kusakari. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 11:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official Twitter of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariokdd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from http://www.youngmarketing.co/tecnologia-asistiva-para-personas-con-discapacidad-motora/ with a CC-NC-ND license. Permission is required to use it here with CC-BY-SA.

GeorgHHtalk   11:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing camera metadata, likely professional shot. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Copyright holder must confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright and scope concerns. Storkk (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, missing camera metadata, likely professional/studio shot. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official Facebook of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but there is no FoP in France. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.61.179.231 16:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: to tiny to be usable as well DieBuche (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPEG version of File:Confederate_LGBT_Flag.svg Storkk (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Commons-compatible Freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka. The statue's age would be needed to ascertain its PD status, and the painting would likely also be copyrighted. Storkk (talk) 11:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is 2012 photo, then depicted person is not en:Frank Silva who died in 1995. Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded by Twitter user sweetstrike_ here and it includes a watermark. Lacks evidence of permission from the author and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 11:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded by Twitter user hope613218 here and it includes a watermark. Lacks evidence of permission from the author and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, published in 2012: https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/india-successfully-test-fires-nuclear-capable-dhanush-missile/ MKFI (talk) 11:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW? COM:FOP? Yann (talk) 12:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The artistic display seems to be the main subject of the photo, and the US does not have FOP for artistic works. In addition, the Give Kids the World Village resort started operating in the 1980s, so the situation where the artistic display was publicly installed before 1978 without a copyright notice seems unlikely to apply. --Gazebo (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation. The original file is from MBC (http://www.imbc.com/broad/tv/drama/golden/news/), the poster can be only used by fair use agreement. Momocalbee (talk) 12:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Commons-compatible Freedom of Panorama in France for scupltures. Sculptor appears to have died in 2004, and so his copyright will last until 2075. Storkk (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing camera metadata, likely studio/professional shot. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taiwanese Freedom of Panorama does not extend to artistic works. Storkk (talk) 13:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif credits a "pierrevolot", who should confirm the license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing Exif, previously uploaded by a different user under File:Olivier_Salandini.jpg. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a copy of http://en.seo.ir/GPage/164/pAVgiC6A8WTr9EwQiKwGMg==/Organizational-Chart Sphilbrick (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is the official image. Not created by the uploader. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 13:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maraj Hossain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images :out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshots of games, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshots of games, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 14:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free, see text Yger (talk) 14:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabian Modrow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xlson137 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course that file can be deleted. That's just a leftover from a test session I neglected to delete. Sorry for that! --Syzygy (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. -- Actually, I can't really delete it myself, right? (I've done a bit of messing with Wikipedia, but Wikimedia is quite new to me.) In which case... Could you please take care of it? Thx! --Syzygy (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be in Commons:OTRS. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... I once more see the errors in my ways. Apparently I misunderstood the way the copyright situation works. Sorry for that again, I'll proceed through OTRS. The current pdf may safely be deleted. --Syzygy (talk) 17:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcosviolist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting and music sheet. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i0.wp.com/media.boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/trump-orange.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.calgaryfilm.com/sites/default/files/blog/1_CIFF16_HeartlandLine_web%202.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allison Maryam Mattar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://fotos.subefotos.com/9a44e1b61ffa4c820ed5d04dfae7fe30o.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en JPG de l'arxiu "Compromís (isotip).svg".
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en JPG del archivo "Compromís (isotip).svg".
English: This image is unused and it is a JPG version of the file "Compromís (isotip).svg".
Pumk (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fahadyk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu "Compromís.svg".
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo "Compromís.svg".
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the file "Compromís.svg".
Pumk (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Araguaaldia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/836467394/ALVARO_BOZA.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ufufcguc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.warsawtour.pl/sites/default/files/panorama_fot.maciej_margas_m._st._warszawa_licencja_do_30.09.2020.mm_6_11.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is extremely blurry, making me believe someone thought that they could get covert the PNG to SVG and have no issues. This image is only being used here on Commons, and should be deleted due to its poor quality. Elisfkc (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 9 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 9 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 9 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 1 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 2 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonathan Callahan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non free graphics imported from http://mazamascience.com/OilExport/. They could be redrawn, as the report documents datasources, freely available, but these graphics aren't freely licensed.

Dereckson (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 3 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 4 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 5 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 6 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 7 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Línia 8 de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a portrait by Keith Breeden [9], permission would be needed from the artist to host this on Commons. January (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió de l'arxiu vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión del archivo vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a version of the vector file File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en GIF de l'arxiu vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en GIF del archivo vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a GIF version of the vector file File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just do it! This is redundant and inferior. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió de l'arxiu vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión del archivo vectorial File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a version of the vector file File:Isotip de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió de l'arxiu vectorial File:Isologo de Metrovalència.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión del archivo vectorial File:Isologo de Metrovalència.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a version of the vector file File:Isologo de Metrovalència.svg.
Víctor (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo uploaded as fair use - no source to copyright claim Nordic Nightfury (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Wiki89london

[edit]

Personal photos and artwork. None are in use. The uploader is no longer active. The last one could potentially be a usable as a stock photo. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising/self-promotion, personal image. The user's only contribution. The file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising of a blog. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder 2013, Spiegel Photography." First time user, probably an awkward experimental upload of a pic found on the internet. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Temnikovapolinas

[edit]

Unused selfies. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssiltane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Empty, blank white images (test images?). Out of COM:Scope.

MKFI (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last upload that was not own work - compare Special:Undelete/File:Travancore_Rupee_-_Front.jpg (admin link only). The colours are different but when you look to the soiling of the coin its the same coin and the same photo, just a bit post processed. JuTa 16:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last upload that was not own work - compare Special:Undelete/File:Travancore_Rupee_-_Reverse.jpg (admin link only). The colours are different but when you look to the soiling of the coin its the same coin and the same photo, just a bit post processed. JuTa 16:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of copyrighted objects as per Commons:Derivative works. NoCitNeed (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and Template:Equestrian statue/ImageNote test

Unused, had been used for some testing 3 years ago. Achim (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of copyrighted objects as per Commons:Derivative works. NoCitNeed (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All changes of this game miniatures are predicted by Games Workshop, including symbols and color schemes. They were created to be changed by every player. Don't reduce to an absurdity.--Віщун (talk) 16:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image looks like the pro-photos the racers sign their names on... Look there's a signature. That doesn't make it own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a NASA image. It's taken from "UFOTV® The Disclosure Network" on YouTube, and the video explicitly describes this picture as the speaker's 3D manipulation of an original NASA image to make it look "correct". McGeddon (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:FaceMars4.jpg
FaceMars4.jpg, the UFOTV screenshot
Libya_Montes_face.png, the NASA image

Not PD-NASA, but screenshot of a manipulated NASA image taken from "UFOTV® The Disclosure Network" on YouTube. It's unclear how heavily the image has been manipulated to push the perspective of "UFOTV", but the centre of the face is a lot brighter than the surrounding area, where the original NASA image (shown right with a minor bump in contrast) has it the same brightness as its surroundings. The UFOTV video is not released under a usable licence. McGeddon (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issue. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OTRS permission needed, Commons:Grandfathered old files does not apply here because uploaded after 8 January 2006. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value; used on promotional user page on enwiki TJH2018talk 18:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only on promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|source is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licensed: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.06.002}} Metacladistics (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where has the graffiti been taken? If in Norway then it can't be hosted on commons per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Norway Steinsplitter (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen dump from external site, delete Jeblad (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen dump of non-free application Jeblad (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment There appears to be permission via OTRS for free use of this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clpo13 (talk • contribs)
Only from the end user. Jeblad (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen dump of non-free application Jeblad (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only from the end user. Jeblad (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable files due to extreme banding in the image.

Takeaway (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject, even at public place Jeblad (talk) 18:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject, even at public place Jeblad (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject, even at public place Jeblad (talk) 18:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Patented product Jeblad (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en JPG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Mapa metrovalencia.svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en JPG del archivo vectorial File:Mapa metrovalencia.svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a JPG version of the vector file File:Mapa metrovalencia.svg.
Víctor (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screendump, the inet icon and the folder are derived work Jeblad (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a performance, artwork, non-free Jeblad (talk) 18:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, non-free Jeblad (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, delete Jeblad (talk) 19:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Provided the graffiti is considered an artwork, the image might indeed violate the copyright of the artist, as the UK has no freedom-of-panorama exception for "graphic works".  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:]]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, delete Jeblad (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Provided the graffiti is considered an artwork, the image might indeed violate the copyright of the artist, as the UK has no freedom-of-panorama exception for "graphic works".  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, delete Jeblad (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Provided the graffiti is considered an artwork, the image might indeed violate the copyright of the artist, as the UK has no freedom-of-panorama exception for "graphic works".  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, delete Jeblad (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Provided the graffiti is considered an artwork, the image might indeed violate the copyright of the artist, as the UK has no freedom-of-panorama exception for "graphic works".  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork, delete Jeblad (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Provided the graffiti is considered an artwork, the image might indeed violate the copyright of the artist, as the UK has no freedom-of-panorama exception for "graphic works".  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:]]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art installation Jeblad (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edison emmanuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Wikimedia is not a webhost for personal images.

Takeaway (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains parts from Android user interface Jeblad (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coins are considered 3D objects in US law and on the wiki; Commons:Currency and Commons:When to use the PD-Art_tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet provides the policy for these, and explains why a suitable licence for the photograph is needed. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coins are considered 3D objects in US law and on the wiki; Commons:Currency and Commons:When to use the PD-Art_tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet provides the policy for these, and explains why a suitable licence for the photograph is needed. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photograph of a 3D silver plate; the photograph is copyrighted under US law, and is not released under licence. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Català: Esta imatge no s'utilitza i és una versió en PNG de l'arxiu vectorial File:Compromís (isotip).svg.
Español: Esta imagen no se utiliza y es una versión en PNG del archivo vectorial File:Compromís (isotip).svg.
English: This image is unused and it is a PNG version of the vector file File:Compromís (isotip).svg.
Víctor (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication this image was released by the candidate under a CC-by-SA 4.0 license. William S. Saturn (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny icon, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tiny graphic, superseded by dozens of better ones at Water molecule. P 1 9 9   20:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure about the authorship and the authorization since it can be found elsewhere : https://tineye.com/search/bd1f0234849c6b76a53199674fb6d2b95f85be13/?pluginver=chrome-1.1.5 TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Maybe I launched that DR too quickly because it appears that the version on Commons is bigger than the other versions. But the metadata doesn't really look good to me. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's just artificially enlarged. Not better resolution. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of non-specified foliage, no educational value. Many better ones already on Commons. P 1 9 9   20:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of band, likely not own work and copyrighted. P 1 9 9   20:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random upload of a 2008 file of rather moderate quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of panoramio streams, small-sized 2008 (!) file of rather moderate quality, not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Roland zh: 1600x1200px is not so small size. And the fact that photo is from 2008 is not a real problem. --XXN, 19:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normal photo of the river. I don't see reason for deletion. --Insider (talk) 12:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrite violation, and not "Own work" source. The figure is from Applied Hydrogeology by C. W. Fetter. +mt 20:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation as a derivative work of the copyrighted figure. Sandstein (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 20:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Piaggio P-180 Avanti, Private JP6226697.jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Russia for modern monuments, The file will be transferred to the Russian Wikivoyage where it is used. Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Russia for modern monuments, Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Дагиров Умар (talk) 21:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted modern artwork (2012). MKFI (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted modern artwork (2012). MKFI (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted modern artwork (2012). MKFI (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo, of a major Israeli television company, cannot be considered too simple to be copyrighted. The Hebrew letters are simple indeed, but the squares next to them are a graphic decision. As no OTRS release note has been accepted, it cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 22:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Vmti

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SS: Screenshot contain non-free elements. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio of https://www.flickr.com/photos/jmarbol/11985761885 Jmabel ! talk 23:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship and licence incredible; true attribution appears to be Pierre Vardy/AFP/Getty Images.
It's claimed here and on Flickr that the picture's author is Alicia Gaudi and the picture is dated 27 November 2011. Pierre Bourdieu, the subject, died in 2002. This picture and others from the same occasion in October 1998 were published by Le Devoir http://www.ledevoir.com/culture/livres/314721/entretiens-avec-pierre-bourdieu-la-sociologie-une-discipline-qui-derange (article dated 15 January 2011), Le Monde http://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2013/10/31/bourdieu-au-miroir-de-manet_3505568_3260.html, Liberation http://next.liberation.fr/livres/2012/01/05/bourdieu-la-chair-de-sa-chaire_786078, der Freitag https://www.freitag.de/autoren/marlen-hobrack/der-blinde-fleck-im-wohlwollenden-blick and Zeit http://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2013/10/31/bourdieu-au-miroir-de-manet_3505568_3260.html. Attributions were to AFP/Pierre Verdy or Pierre Verdy/AFP/Getty Images.
The lower-resolution picture on Commons is taken from a mixed set of six pictures uploaded to Flickr by "Alicia Gaudi". The multiple attributions to Pierre Verdy are more credible. 79.73.240.233 00:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good nomination but the examples are not ideal. Although apparently from the same event, the Le Devoir, Libération and der Freitag photos are all different photos from this one and the Le Monde version is not documented. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry (talk) 09:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - scan of old image INeverCry (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A card of a German bank. I don't think they agreed to GNUFDL?! Sicherlich talk 17:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is deleted please check Category:Debit cards. There are more cards like this one here ...Sicherlich talk 17:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete it, get rid of it. Jeblad (talk) 18:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 02:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification: Even if this was a deletion request by the uploader, the image itself is a derivative work of a non-free portrait photo and as such it is copyright violation. A similar image of the entire arrangement photographed can be seen here. De728631 (talk) 15:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP copyright concern -- 3D art on display in United States Brianhe (talk) 06:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we hold off until a query to OTRS is resolved? Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Category:Tim_Holmes_and_User:Musegaze --GRuban (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the issue is but I am the creator and copyright holder of this work and I choose to share it with the world under creative commons. Timeholmes (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Tim Holmes[reply]

The issue is that we need proof of that; there are, unfortunately, people on the Internet who will pretend to be other people that they are not, and we have to cross all the ts and dot all the is. Can you write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from an email address @timholmesstudio.com and say that you release that work under the specific Creative Commons license? Not just "under creative commons", but "under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license" (there are multiple Creative Commons licenses, and we need one that allows editing and reuse by anyone). Commons:Email templates has boilerplate text you can use. Ideally, if you could say that you release all images uploaded by User:Musegaze under the license that user put them under, that might be most efficient, to avoid having to list each image one at a time. Or, can you put that same statement on a page on your website, that we can link to? That might be faster, as it could take some time for the OTRS folks to read the email (months; really!).--GRuban (talk) 22:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS PENDING as of 11/8/2016 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket 2016110510010492. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-China/en

from [12], is "Agence France-Presse — Getty Images", not applicable copyright laws of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China shizhao (talk) 07:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it up. Disgusting. The copyright owner has long since not gave a DANG about this image. Leave. It. Up. Go. Find. Something. Better. To. Do.

Maybe start a Communist Revolution? And get carried on a Long March like a lazy fat Communist Revolutionary.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-China/en

This image is now in the public domain in China because its term of copyright has expired. According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding Hong Kong and Macao) and the Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in Taiwan, the Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, etc.), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all other applicable works enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-China/en

You history manipulator --184.56.94.124 02:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, it's rather unlikely that the original photo has been shot by a Getty or afp photographer. It's far more likely they licensed it from China, as at that time it probably wouldn't have been easy for newspapers outside of China to obtain this historic image. So, the legal situation depends on whether Getty or afp have obtained exclusive distribution rights outside of China. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many media and agencies had correspondents there. There are many photos online of the series of meetings from August to October. They also covered other things. No reason to think it wasn't easy to have images of this event on this day. The person on the right of the photo in the Commons version looks like the U.S. ambassador, Patrick J. Hurley. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getty Images UK offers the photo at [13] and credits it to contributor "Sovfoto". However, Sovfoto is also an agency, as described here. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the same photo. There were certainly many journalists and photographers. In the link provided by Shizhao, the NY Times attributes the photo to Agence France-Presse. I suppose there's no particular reason to doubt it, in the absence of something to the contrary. I would have more doubt about Getty's attribution of this other photo to Sovfoto, which might have just reproduced it. A better version of this other photo is attributed by LIFE magazine to photographer Jack Wilkes: LIFE, September 24, 1945, photo p. 33 photo credit p. 25. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Getty says that the photo's creator was Sovfoto, and as there was quite likely to be a photographer from the Soviet Union at this historic event there is no reason to doubt the attribution. Individual Wikipedias can use the photo under non-free use rationale, but it is not suitable for Commons. BabelStone (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getty does not say that the photo discussed here was created by Sovfoto. And their mention of Sovfoto as some sort of intermediate source in relation to the other photo is incomplete, to say the least. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD in China because of it's age. PD in the US since it was PD in China before 1996. I fail to see why this image wouldn't be a Chinese image merely because it made a Getty grand world tour. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Edgar Snow, die 1972, not PD shizhao (talk) 08:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:
But according to copyright law of China (both Mainland and Taiwan), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published. Therefore, "PD-China" is appropriate.
然而根据中国大陆和台湾的法律,所有摄影作品,以及所有著作权持有者为法人的作品,在首次发表50年后,或者从创作之日起50年未发表,即进入公有领域。故个人认为已进入公有领域。
Bxxiaolin (talk) 08:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I don't know for sure, but I assume that the photo was first published in Snow's Red Star Over China in UK and USA, and so is not subject to Chinese copyright law. For Chinese copyright law to apply it needs to be shown that the photograph was first published in China. BabelStone (talk) 10:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:PCP and there likely is an US copyright anyways. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author is en:Edgar Snow, die 1972, not PD. see File:Mao.png shizhao (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete See discussion under Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mao.png. BabelStone (talk) 10:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need such a low quality image? I think there are plenty of photos of him. Mhhossein talk 08:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. For reason stated by Mhhossein. Uploader has known pattern of uploading crops of others' images (note all the deletion notices on his/her talk page) rather than creating original works. --Coolcaesar (talk) 13:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as uploader - I specifically uploaded this in order to highlight Barack Obama during this photograph. There are others cropped as well, such as the one of Obama and Biden together. MB298 (talk) 14:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unlike Coolcaesar, I have no issue with someone cropping the photos of others and uploading them for use. I do, however, have an issue with crappy photos being uploaded. This is a crappy photo -- too low-res and just not up to par. Winkelvi (talk) 03:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need both this photo and this one? Mhhossein talk 08:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I put all the frames that are filmed. If you think you have similar pictures to be redundant, you can delete them. But if they do not violate any rules, they may stay.

Star61 (t/p) 22:30, 02 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In one, she's looking straight, and in the other she's looking to her left a bit. The uploader states above that he's OK with deleting duplicates, but this isn't a duplicate. INeverCry (talk) 06:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
INeverCry: I just meant to make more space on the server and you said that nothing changes after deletion. But the question still remains; Do we really need both of them? --Mhhossein talk 11:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If one was deleted, it would simply be hidden on the server. In this case the scope issue is very minor. We have 1000s of images that have no educational value whatsoever, while these are from a WikiConference that is in itself part of the WMF experience, and so is in scope. If you wanted to sort through all the WikiConference photos we have here, you'd have a lot of work on your hands... lNeverCry 22:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per INC. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need all of the following?

Mhhossein talk 09:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I put all the frames that are filmed. If you think you have similar pictures to be redundant, you can delete them. But if they do not violate any rules, they may stay.

Star61 (t/p) 22:25, 02 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

INeverCry: Are they still within our com:scope? I mean, what do we need these closely similar photos for? --Mhhossein talk 15:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Kiev WikiConference is certainly within our scope. As regards closeness of images in a sequence, you could probably afford to lose a few of the images from this WikiConference, and most, if not all, others. But it doesn't save server space, so WikiConferences are usually given some leeway in terms of scope. lNeverCry 22:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per INC. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Yann. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - plain text in a jpg INeverCry (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying this, I was going through my uploads and I missed it because I thought that this was a video with the caption shot showing, but I didn't see the file type mismatch.Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saineko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

INeverCry (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely studio portrait. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original is at [her website --Martina talk 05:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

芸能事務所協会団体のポリシーに違反する写真 58.138.60.12 23:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The expression (in this case, the photograph) is reasonably a matter of interest within the society.
It is of interest to society to have a public figure's likeness shown in Wikipedia.
  • The content and method of expression is not unjust.
Photos were taken in public of an official event, neither of which is unjust. --Puramyun31 (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • 日本タレントの写真をWebで使いたいなら事務所の許可を得るべき。それが日本芸能事務所のルールである。健全にネットを使う人はみんな、このルールを守ってる。

日本芸能事務所のポリシー「タレント、声優は肖像権を持っています(他人に顔写真などを勝手に公開されない権利)。 肖像権は、通常専属契約している所属事務所が委託管理をしています。 芸能事務所の協会団体に於いても、現在、タレントのファンサイトでの写真の公開を一切認めておりません。 タレント固有の肖像は「商品」であるためです。 ホームページなどでタレント写真を扱う場合は、必ず所属事務所に許可を取らなければなりません。」--118.157.74.169 20:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think we have better ones in this category. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No consensus to delete. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anime character in the back (COM:DW). I'm not sure if de minimis applies here. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cropped version ok for sure. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no valid deletion rationale. While eventually taken during a concert, the photo does not show the concert as such, just a portrait. --Túrelio (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Performance, that is "utøvende kunstners fremføring av et verk". It is also not covered by exemptions in Åvl § 45c. And yes, I am the photographer and uploader. Jeblad (talk) 03:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Teater, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo needs a written permission as it is from a performance. No such written permission exist, and it will not be given. In addition there are no written permission to publish photo of this person. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lars Endre Strand som Bør Børson Jr i «Bør Børson Jr».jpg. Jeblad (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just a COM:COSTUME. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no valid deletion rationale. While eventually taken during a concert, the photo does not show the concert as such, just a portrait. --Túrelio (talk) 22:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Performance, that is "utøvende kunstners fremføring av et verk". It is also not covered by exemptions in Åvl § 45c. And yes, I am the photographer and uploader. Jeblad (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no valid deletion rationale. While eventually taken during a concert, the photo does not show the concert as such, just a portrait. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Performance, that is "utøvende kunstners fremføring av et verk". It is also not covered by exemptions in Åvl § 45c. And yes, I am the photographer and uploader. Jeblad (talk) 02:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no valid deletion rationale. While eventually taken during a concert, the photo does not show the concert as such, just a portrait. --Túrelio (talk) 22:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Performance, that is "utøvende kunstners fremføring av et verk". It is also not covered by exemptions in Åvl § 45c. And yes, I am the photographer and uploader. Jeblad (talk) 03:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concert, ie. performance, no permission Jeblad (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - Jeblad, the image is not a copyright violation just because it was at a concert. Audio of the concert could conceivably violate copyright, but a photo you took yourself (as the file claims) would not. Even if the concert did not allow photography, that would not affect the copyright status, as you would still hold the copyright, even if illicitly taken. As this file is in use on multiple projects and there is no copyright issue, I say keep. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a photo at a concert, which is a performance, and as such is an artwork. Jeblad (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Performance, that is "utøvende kunstners fremføring av et verk". It is also not covered by exemptions in Åvl § 45c. And yes, I am the photographer and uploader. Jeblad (talk) 02:58, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as other cases in Category:Japanese FOP cases/deleted/literary works, most likely copyrighted by "台東区教育委員会", it seems not free enough to share on commons. & being the main subject in this shot = not De_minimis. Please see also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle

  • or, if possible, follow the COM:ET for OTRS from the copyright holder
  • It says re-uploading on local jawp as
    屋外美術
    within the restricted resolution and proper tags may be safe, may be not (under disccussion)

Thank you for your time. Sincerely,--Tokorokoko 02:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Removed broken DR. Here we go again: Previously tagged for deletion by Howard61313.I mistakenly uploaded this file. The Taiwanese Central Daily News may have its copyright. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems to me that the PRC copyright should be used, since the Central Daily News is a PRC newspaper and they probably used their staff photographers. On the other hand it doesn't matter (IMHO), because in both PRC and ROC the copyright for anonymous works expires 50 years after first publication. Just a question of picking the correct template. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: According to "en:Central Daily News", it is a ROC media stationing in Taipei, Taiwan, and the file has a Watermark of Taiwanese National Repository of Cultural Heritage (NRCH, Ministry of Culture), which says "Reproduce and commercial use of all NRCH contents displayed through any media way is prohibited... which can only be viewed on this website" (
「國家文化資料庫」內以任何媒體呈現之所有內容-- 不可轉載、不可作為商業用途,僅限於本網站瀏覽
) [14]. --Howard61313 (talk) 03:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm..., I guess we can assume ROC copyright only. Should be PD after 50 years. The newspaper can restrict the use of material, but it doesn't change any active (c)-law. Keeper in my book. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering how to deal with the watermark, if there's anything should be done to it. --Howard61313 (talk) 04:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can ask at Com:GL/P. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hedwig. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP copyright concern -- 3D art on display in United States Brianhe (talk) 06:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we hold off until a query to OTRS is resolved? Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Category:Tim_Holmes_and_User:Musegaze --GRuban (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Added OTRS Permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author can't be Amin Maher because e is on the photo, the source eplaint that the author is Lawrence Diedrich, and at the bottom of the page there is a copyright. Olivier LPB (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Olivier LPB I corrected the author's name. Could you kindly help me to add this picture? I want to add the image of Amin Maher for his wikipedia's page. How should I do that?

Ok for the author, but the licence is not good, in the website it is a copyright, not a public domain. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier LPB Okey, I will correct that one as well. Could you tell me how should I do that?

Olivier LPB I don't know how should I change the licence from public domain to the website? Could you kindly help me in that regard?


Deleted: Requires free license from Lawrence Diedrich via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es liegt keine Erlaubnis vor. Vermutliche URV von hier: https://fm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/startseite/ Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Listed author is the subject, which cannot be correct. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Described as "collection particulière" (i.e. "private collection") - unlikely to be own work or PD. If it is really own work, it is likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, I made a mistake, I want to put on the page of the painter Bernard Damiano.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafricaniste (talk • contribs) 14:11, 2 November 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Lafricaniste: Damiano died in 2000, meaning his works will remain copyrighted until 2071. Storkk (talk) 13:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I own the painting, and I have normally the right to use image of it respecting the moral rights of the painter!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafricaniste (talk • contribs) 14:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages as previously requested. Note that owning a work does not grant you the copyright, unless that was expressly sold as well. Storkk (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Requires a free license from the painter or written evidence that the uploader has the right to license it via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyfraud: Image cut out of a Youtube video ([15]) which was posted with a cc-by license by a fan-made blog/news website called mapleleafshotstove.com ([16]). The original video in turn was uploaded the very same day by the official Maple Leafs account ([17]) with a standard Youtube license, hence copyfraud. Hephaion (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would all screenshots by mapleleafshotstove be subject too? --Jfvoll (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least screenshots taken under the same circumstances I think. I just checked their channel, they have a couple of these post-game interview videos with a cc-by license (which are probably most predestined to being screenshot), and I highly doubt they are the copyright holders for any of the videos... -- Hephaion (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- Hephaion, please note that the term Copyfraud is used to describe claiming a copyright in a PD work. This is simple copyvio -- or "license laundering". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by I99pema as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The logo (the round sign with the coffee bean and text) is a large part of this high resolution image. The logo has not been released under a free license. Also, it is not evident that it is below the threshold of originality.

Not clear enough of a copyvio to be speedied and in fact I'm neutral on the matter. I'd like other opinions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the initial deletion request I have croped the image to make the round sign less visible. --I99pema (talk) 16:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(It was me who placed the speedy deletion tag, not I99pema.) I don't think the logo is below the threshold of originality, and for all we know it is not free. Now, in the cropped version, only about one fourth of the round logo is visible. Of course we could crop the image even harder, so no parts of the logo are included. I think the best solution on a long term would be to get other pictures which can illustrate the Wikipedia article on this particular coffeehouse chain. /NH 11:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see nothing with a copyright here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Af1391 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://liveactionnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Marcha_por_la_Vida_Valpara%C3%ADso-2014.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The second one was took by an acquaintance in a demonstration I organized along with other people. All the pictures were took for and handed over to us, the organizers, and it was first published by me in a Facebook page that I used to administrate at the time: https://www.facebook.com/frentexladefensaporlavida/ I don't know why it has a small resolution, but all the other pictures taken have small resolutions too. It was used by the media when they reported the demonstration, but they got it from Facebook.--Af1391 (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Require free licenses from the actual photographers via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is it cc-by-sa? the source does not state anything about that at al. They state "Alle Urheberrechte des Onlinelexikons „Sächsische Biografie“ liegen beim Institut für Sächsische Geschichte und Volkskunde e.V., Dresden. " Sicherlich talk 17:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

está eliminado de flick por la autora y fué utilizada sin tener en cuenta los derechos de autor y de imagen de los representados en la foto 77.226.215.7 18:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@77.226.215.7: La autora usó una licencia que permitía su uso Wikimedia Commons sin la necesidad de perdir permiso expresamente. Y las licencias Creative Commons son irrevocables. Como indica en la página web de la licencia. Así que no se borrará la foto. --Vivaelcelta {talk  · contributions} 16:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains parts of the Android user interface Jeblad (talk) 19:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 3 simple shapes, no copyrightable elements. P 1 9 9   15:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AbwaanRooble as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was:

No where does it say it's public domain.'Ethnic Groups from Somalia Summary Map, CIA 1992 (119K)' http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/somalia.html Also the map has a lot of inaccuracies for example the following clans do not trace descent from Hawiye.'Gaalje'el Degoodia Hawaadle'Ajuraan For example:The shared partilineal ancestor of Gaaljecel, Degoodia with the surrounding Hawiye is just Samaale. Page 32 [18]So the map is not accurate either

Achim (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The original website (link) says "The following maps were produced by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, unless otherwise indicated." The map in question is "Ethnic Groups from Somalia Summary Map, CIA 2002." The CIA is part of the United States Government and, as such, its works are indeed in the public domain. See also Category:PD US Government, which includes this file. I'm not sure how to address the accuracy or inaccuracy of the map. I do know that, for a time, some users would alter the map (e.g. to include or omit one clan or another), upload that file, and then use it in an article. I figured that at least this one would serve as some sort of baseline. For what it's worth the same website has a newer map (link); this one attributes the ethnic data to I.M. Lewis. It's also a CIA map; actually it's derived from a larger CIA work (link). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This map was made in the 1977's in collaboration with the Darood regime of Siad Barre at that time and his Prime Minister of that time who was a Tumaal minority outcast Mohammad Ali Samatar . ""Ethnic Groups from Somalia and Djibouti Map, CIA 1977 (105K)"" [19]. Which is why you see "Toumal" written on the map, while they hardly inhabit the north. This map is not based on scholarly work. WP:MAINSTREAM on wiki means high quality within a particular field of science or scholarship. The experts in this area are scholars such as I. M. Lewis etc.
Here is I'M Lewis's map from the "The People of the Horn: Saho, Afar and Somalis", which I have added as proof to you guys. [20].
The numbers represent:
4. Represents the Dir clan which the 'Goora' and 'Gerire' also belong to on the map, yet on the 1977 map their territory was represented as Darood inhabited.
7. Associated tribes which the Garre(Gerra), Digoodia(Degoodi), Galjaal(Gaale'el) and Hawaadle belong to. These tribes claim descent from same forefather as Dir and Hawiye so to paint them as Hawiye on a map would be false.
Again as proof:
The shared partilineal ancestor of Gaaljecel, Degoodia with the surrounding Hawiye is just Samaale. Page 32 [21]
Also the Garre are 50% Dir in ancestry. Can you imagine how incorrect this map is Wikipedia is propagating?
"The main Garre groupings descended from Mayle ibn
Samal, and are thus equals to Irir and Saransor as sons of Samal, the original head of the Somali people.
The Garre are a diverse and complex clan consisting of two major
sections, the Tuff and the Quranyo.
The Quranyo section of the Garre claim descent from Dirr, who are born of the Irrir Samal.[22]
To use it as a baseline would be disastrous to other Somali clans.For example this map: Greater Mandera Triangle conflict (January-November 2006) largely propagates that the Hawiye clan inhabites most of the Somali peninsula. [23].
My sincere advise would be to remove this map as it's propaganda. --- AbwaanRooble 21:03, 2 November 2016

Kept: It is very much contrary to policy to remove a widely used file for any reason other than copyvio. In particular, maps are often controversial and Commons does not have the expertise to decide who is right -- we leave that to editors at the WPs, many of whom have decided that this map is educationally useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request refers only to the 18 May 2021 file (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/8b/20210522132213%21Somalia_ethnic_grps_2002.jpg). The file version from 18 May 2021 lacks any licensing and permission information. Heretofore, this page ("File:Somalia ethnic grps 2002.jpg") held a CIA map that is in the public domain, and the licensing/permission info reflects that file version. I have already reverted to that file version (from 2006). Assuming we can keep the 18 May 2021 file, it presumably belongs on its own page (with a different filename) with the applicable licensing/permission information. But even in that case, the map data itself doesn't reflect an authoritative source. Gyrofrog (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I wasn't sure how to nominate a single (and not current) version of a file (as opposed to the entire file/page), so feel free to let me know if/how I should have handled this differently. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - delete3d new version. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : http://avancna.deviantart.com/art/Tarim-Basin-Sharks-629967392 Bastenbas (talk) 21:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copyright violation BECAUSE I UPLOADED IT AT DEVIANTART AS WELL AS WIKIMEDIA.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: That may be, but policy requires that if an image has been uploaded elsewhere that the copyright holder must send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as no source (No source since)

I converted the "no source" tag to a DR because there is a source present. "No source" should not be used when a user doubts that the existing source is appropriate. Poké95 10:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Jcb (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: : I've added the source (backlink to the NowCommons deleted file on de.wikipedia.org) and added the history for the file. Should be all correct now. Cheers, --Jcornelius (talk) 05:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, the question is: Where did it come from before it was uploaded to German Wikipedia? What is e.g. the copyright situation of the underlying base map? Jcb (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Sansculotte created lots of maps for Wikipedia, he definitely had the skills to do so. This is impossible without knowledge of the special copyright situation in mapmaking. I am very sure that Sansculotte was able to create a map without breaking copyright rules. NNW 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many people have very little knowledge/understanding about copyright, even people who have 'skills' to draw. The point is, this route is drawn over an existing base map. Without any information on that base map, we cannot assume that the base map would not be copyrighted. So without more information, we will have to delete the file. Jcb (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really think that Sansculotte was able to create maps like Karte antarktis2.png or Karte baikal2.png but not some simple grey areas and a river without a copyvio? Sansculotte is an urban planner and urban planners do know much about maps and copyrights. He was a founding member of Wikimedia Germany, so I think he knew at least a tiny little bit about copyright. We cannot assume that the base map would not be copyrighted? No: Commons:Assume good faith. NNW 10:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He may or he may not know much about copyright, but that doesn't matter. He did not provide adequat source at upload, so that we are now in a situation that we cannot verify the copyright situation of the underlying source map. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That will be great fun if you start to discuss maps like this, especially files made in 2005 like this when file descriptions (and expectations to them) looked very different from today. I promise you will have to delete very very much, lots of mine, too, which use data that I developed myself as a cartographer and offered the Wikipedia world. I just can say: this is my data. And you can say: that is no adequat source. Delete it and I will re-upload it at de:WP. At least one project won't have a problem with this file. There is no copyvio. NNW 20:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Really, I know user:Sansculotte personally. He studied traffic planning at TU Berlin and definitely has the skills to create such maps.
He did provide the actual source in the German Wikipedia, where the file was deleted after I moved it to Commons. I don't know why you're assuming such a bad faith here. --Jcornelius (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If there was a valid source for the underlying base map at the (now deleted) description page at DE wiki, please copy it here, so that the case may be resolved. It's not about bad faith, it's about missing essential information, just that. Jcb (talk) 22:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If someone is the author of a map how is it possible to prove that it is his map? It isn't. Like all the {{Own work}} or {{Self-photographed}} marked files. NNW 12:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF, as above. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eliminación de Flick por parte de la autora así como la utilización sin permiso de los derechos de autor de la fotógrafa así como derechos de imagen del representado en la fotografia 77.226.215.7 18:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@77.226.215.7: La autora usó una licencia que permitía su uso Wikimedia Commons sin la necesidad de perdir permiso expresamente. Y las licencias Creative Commons son irrevocables. Como indica en la página web de la licencia. Así que no se borrará la foto. --Vivaelcelta {talk  · contributions} 16:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Converting to DR since it might be out of copyright. Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The magazine is from 1919, but the art is surely PD-OLD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistakes ok Tren ligero gdl (talk) 17:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 17:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its so old and its a mistake 96.31.236.74 21:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:PD US FDA asking for deletion of my erroneous uploads

[edit]

I uploaded these files in error. The flickr uploader got out of control and I uploaded Packaging images which I am asking for deletion of without delay.

Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasonanaggie: Sorry - can you describe the error? Many of these seem to be works of the US government and in the public domain. I see many which seem to be correctly mirrored on Commons. Why do you think all of these do not have a Commons compatible license? Also, I uploaded some of these images. Why are you saying that your bot uploaded them all? Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bluerasberry: I largely agree with your sentiment and I believe that when a company voluntarily agrees to recall an item they void their right to the control the product image. However, consensus on Wikimedia Commons seems to be erring on the cautious side. You can read the arguments of the conversation here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Product_recalls
Jasonanaggie (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose
  1. This list includes files not uploaded by Jasonanaggie. That user mistakenly said that they uploaded these files, which is not correct in some cases.
  2. Some of these files are not eligible for copyright.
  3. Some of these files are works of the US government.
I agree with Jasonaggie - the product photos with copyrighted art are mistaken uploads, but that is not all that is here. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:PD US FDA asking for deletion of my erroneous uploads

[edit]

I uploaded these files in error. The flickr uploader got out of control and I uploaded Packaging images which I am asking for deletion of without delay.

Extended content

Jasonanaggie (talk) 18:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete because even though they are photos by the US FDA who as a US government organisation give a blanket government use tag, most of the images are derivative works of packaging many of which are copyright designs to which the FDA has no rights in the first place. Plain text slavish copies are likely ok to keep but may not be useful to the project. Very few seem be be ok. Ww2censor (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ww2censor Here are some examples of images which I think should be kept:
Good images like these are mixed with images which should be deleted. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader wants them all deleted but as I stated I am sure there are some that will be ok but they need individual review and such a blanket deletion is very time consuming to review, so I think if there are any you find and justify as keep, you should probably mark them in the list, so the closing admin can notice them more easily. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I've gone through these 1 by 1 and kept the files that showed simple packaging, labels, and products, and deleted the packaging images with complex graphics and logos. --lNeverCry 00:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]