Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 27th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - useless blurred image lNeverCry 01:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - blurry, very poor-quality lNeverCry 01:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. הפרת זכויות ציון הלוי (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Babylonian Talmud 2.jpg: Copyright infringement. הפרת זכויות

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking again to delete my photos from wikimedia commons: Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to eliminate my wikimedia commons account.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Just use it where ever you want. Thats no reason to delete it here. --JuTa 16:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:delete2|image=File:Parque Caracol Canela.jpg|reason=The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}.}} Christina flyer (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account in Wikimedia Commons.


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to eliminate my Wikimedia commons account


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account in wikimedia commons.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo appears to be in COM:SCOPE and was correctly licensed. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You have asked, and we have refused... which is in our rights, since you used a license which you cannot revoke. You may also use them for your personal project, of course, and they may be licensed there in whatever way you wish. Please stop nominating your files for deletion, or you risk being blocked. Storkk (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 50.79.180.61 11:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 21:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete no evidence of permission on the source page and no author, so likely copyright Ww2censor (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: promo photo - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete source website has posted a magazine page or cover for which they have no provided any copyright information. It is most likely copyright to the publisher or photographer and certainly not the website. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 13:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: promo photo - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete professional image of an actress posted to a copyright wiki http://asianwiki.com/Park_Han-Byul with no evidence it is freely licenced. PCP apples. Ww2censor (talk) 13:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: promo photo - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete professional image of a Korean actress from a website page http://star.koreandrama.org/min-ji-hye/ which does not claim to own any of the images posted per http://www.koreandrama.org/about-us/ Most likely copyright to an unknown photographer. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 13:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: promo photo - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drapso12345678910 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these obviously television/movie related images .... small sizes, no metadata, and subject.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Deleted: obvious copyvio. -- Geagea (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains the Nazi flag. 84.61.138.217 19:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fourth ball is based on the Nazi flag. 84.61.138.217 19:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unable to complete the task intended 75.88.206.144 21:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 07:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality images Quinn7 (talk) 22:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Low-quality images

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary image. Quinn7 (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: unnecessary image.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary image Quinn7 (talk) 22:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: unnecessary image

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecessary image. Quinn7 (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: unnecessary image.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused COM:PENIS photo, no educational value A1Cafel (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No evidence that this is the official insignia. If such evidence cannot be provided, the license does not apply. Jcb (talk) 15:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the official insignia as depicted in official bulletins of the German government and thus subject to §5 UrhG, cf.:
--TUBS 11:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC):[reply]
Thanks! I have added one of the links to the source field. Jcb (talk) 16:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work (source = "Google Images"); no valid license, no permission DCB (talk) 13:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 12:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absence du nom du photographe. Lack of photographer name or other element to identify them. Dereckson (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also for File:Christian Jacq (9638212342).jpg.
the website that owns this flickr account, Actualitte is attributing their CC pictures to the website and not to a specific author (ex. on their articles : https://www.actualitte.com/article/monde-edition/les-ideas-box-de-bibliotheques-sans-frontieres-a-calais-stains-et-sarcelles/65892 ). I was thinking it was enough to replicate what they were doing, if not just delete as I am not sure there is an easy way to find the person who has taken the photograph as they seem to be using this collective name, even on their website. Symac (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What we could do is to contact the site and ask them how they negotiate contracts with the photographers, ie if they explicitely have a licensing clause where the photohraphier transfers all rights (and the right to relicense) to them, or accepts a CC-BY-SA license. If they do, we can forward their answer to create an OTRS ticket, as a general permission to use their photographies. If they don't, we can ask to them the photographer mail to ask directly a permission. --Dereckson (talk) 12:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Bistro#Photographies_du_site_https:.2F.2Fwww.actualitte.com. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I very much doubt the uploader is actually the copyright holder of this image. William S. Saturn (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending|year=2016|month=October|day=27}}

I am the copyright holder and I believe I have submitted this file with the proper copyright release. I have emailed you directly. I am new to contributing to wikimedia but surprised that your unnamed doubts is enough to have my file deleted. Please keep this file. --Jovialwaffle (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn - I trust OTRS to sort this out.--William S. Saturn (talk) 18:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --JuTa 22:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a posed professional photo, available at several places on the Internet (use Google Images search by image), likely a press photo released by the subject. Many of those places are dated before 26 October 2016, as the uploader says the date of this photo is. There is a much higher resolution version of this very picture at http://cdn.weeklystandard.biz/cache/r960-c6a136e102873c25b00f869294117601.jpg I have read the other nomination of this photo for deletion, and realize the uploader has an email in to OTRS, but these two factors have me very skeptical. If Jovialwaffle really is an employee of Ms. Finn or the McMullin campaign, and did take this photo, or even only marked "Own work" in error, and has the right to release the photo, they would know the date it was taken - not October 26 - and would they really upload a low resolution version when a higher resolution version was available to them? These two factors imply that Jovialwaffle did not know the date the photo was taken, and did not have access to the higher resolution version. Photo subject is a candidate for Vice President of the United States, the election for which is in under two weeks, so time is an issue. GRuban (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 20:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already proven myself and the validitiy of my ownership to other members of the wikimedia editorail staff. Is there a reason why you have the right to dismiss their work and present your own flawed and circumstantial argument? Do you not trust the other people who have investigated this less than 4 days ago? That same baseless argument can be made questioning your right to even reflag this for deletion? How do we know who you are. This is way out of line and undermines the entire review process? How many other people can come along and decide this isn't good enough for them? Why do you not respect the work of your fellow wikimedia staff? How can any item ever be considered legit? I will raise this issue with the people I have already fully satisfied. Is there a reason why I should need to go through this again for you? I hope that after this is quickly resolved in my favor that you appologize to the other wikimedia staff members with the same vigor and resolve to make things right.

--98.204.49.110 00:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You - assuming you're User:Jovialwaffle; signing in helps clarify this - actually haven't proven the validity of your ownership; you've sent mail, but it hasn't convinced OTRS enough for them to mark the file as such. Not to say they won't, sometimes they take their time. I would be only too happy if you convinced OTRS that you did own the file so you could release it, it's a fine picture. That is what answers your question, by the way if the OTRS team stamps the file, then it would be "considered legit". Meanwhile, though, could you explain the two points I brought up? --GRuban (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The OTRS-ticket is from another person than the person credited here for example. I will be working on the ticket but since this photograph can go viral soon I deleted it untill I am done. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images were uploaded as "own work" but seem copied from the internet.

Takeaway (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur and game images copied from the internet, not own wokr.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some files have source and sourced files are usually published under CC-BY-SA, so they do not violate copyright. But  Delete all as out of project scope. These animals are fictional, they have never existed. They come from website of fictional animals. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright and scope issues, per Taivo. Note - some were in use and therefore in scope, but except the last two, they appear to be copyright violations. The last two have had their license fixed and are in scope, so were kept. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO and COM:HOAX. There are different kinds of images in this gallery. Type one: Amateurish sketches, claimed to be animals but looking nothing like anything real. Type two: Professional images copied from a variety of websites - all without permission of their original creators.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the obvious copyvios for now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parhamofficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove the image uploaded by mistake thanks Inderjeet kaushik (talk) 06:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - small and badly tilted lNeverCry 01:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - small (56kb) blurry image of sky/clouds lNeverCry 01:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - small blurry image lNeverCry 01:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - tiny poor quality image lNeverCry 01:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS - low quality lNeverCry 01:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a social media site. Poké95 02:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a private place. Per COM:PEOPLE, permission from the subjects is needed. Also, the metadata of this image seems to suggest that this image was from another website, so delete too per COM:PRP. Poké95 03:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, also uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDEL: --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, unused image of a man, doubtfully own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO from Facebook "FBMD" and size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This text only image seems out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Not a selfie, but uploader name and subject name same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized and not totally sure this is user's own image anyway. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjali1388 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

lNeverCry 01:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VoltDriver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

CC-0 license. Same problem as we have with Flickr. :(

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why would those files be deleted if they are under free use? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoltDriver (talk • contribs)
Commons policy requires that all image licenses non-expiring and non-revocable. The Public Domain Mark can be revoked at any time. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted after review, except for File:Graph For Morality.png. These are CC0 (not PDM) images from Pixabay from before 9 January 2019, so license-wise, they're okay per {{Pixabay}}. File:Joueurs.jpg has since been overwritten with a different image, so it was re-uploaded as File:Video-games-1557358.jpg. File:Graph For Morality.png is from http://gamescriticism.org/articles/lange-1-1/, which doesn't bear a free license or CC0 mark. clpo13(talk) 17:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PENIS - low quality (644x531- 201kb) lNeverCry 06:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parrothead BC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS - low quality

lNeverCry 06:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parrothead BC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PORN and unused

SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 19:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Exilebleu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS - low quality 132kb 630x480 and 120kb (778x675)

lNeverCry 06:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is not the author. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Timi phoenix

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Everkton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, the user's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katiamartinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Katiamartinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.otempo.com.br/polopoly_fs/1.871127.1403654006!image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/main-single-horizontal-img-article-fit_620/image.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably (c)vio of PT-wiki sockmaster. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A gallery of material obviously gathered from other places and not own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This metal badge is unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This older image is dubiously claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awaz genco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal inages out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A text document of no apparent educational utility,. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete This looks also like it was edited afterwards. The "US Person" font looks too clear and is slightly too large compared to the other letters. De728631 (talk) 12:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Moved (by me) from en-wiki some time ago. Originally uploaded by en:Rd232 at 2005-05-19 14:29, and added (bu same user) at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Galloway&oldid=13929826. The whole point of the image can be summed up by the text Socialist Worker Online [19] reported what they say is evidence that the documents, used by the Senate committee and the Duelfer report, have been altered, with George Galloway's name being added in a different font and at a different angle. However in the intervening time, the image has been removed from the article, with that whole section has been re-written. Therefore no real need to keep. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry unused and uncategorized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Backinthedaybuffet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional or self-promotional uploads, read descriptions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doguete (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 04:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1.  Delete très mauvaise définition, photo floue, remplacée par une de meilleure qualité Naporedac (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Delete D'accord avec le proposant Spec 75 (talk) 14:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Dj.acidic

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:ATHLEATZ

[edit]

Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Krdemarco

[edit]

Advertising for a gym by a single-purpose account. The first image at least is a copyright violation according to the copyright information in the metadata. The next two are also professional photos that may be copyrighted and are missing credits to the photographer. The fourth is the company's logo, part of their advertising package. As its title suggests, it belongs on Facebook and not here. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nerd59070503496 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These logos does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes.

DCB (talk) 10:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. The user's only contribution. The file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NAVEMIC BROS. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Musée des Confluences

[edit]

Recent architecture (exterior or interior views). No FoP in France. Not de minimis in those files. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe de minimis ? (to be discussed) :

Maybe lack of originality ? (to be discussed) :


Deleted: per nomination - althought the last 3 may be borderline. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   12:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is most likely the copyright of the artist and even though the photo itself is freely licenced, the artist's permission is needed for a derivative image. Ww2censor (talk) 12:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phill Straker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist died in 1948. These artworks will enter the public domain in 2019 in Germany. In the meanwhile, we need the permission of his legal successors.

BrightRaven (talk) 13:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the grandson of Alfred Schwarzschild and have permission from his two surviving daughters, one of whom is my mother, to use these images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phill Straker (talk • contribs)
Hello. The permission should be sent following this procedure: COM:OTRS. BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Phill Straker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1909 and 1940's photographs. Not own work. We need more information about the photographer and/or the publication history to check if they might be in the public domain.

BrightRaven (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am the grandson of Alfred Schwarzschild and have permission from his two surviving daughters, one of whom is my mother, to use these images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phill Straker (talk • contribs)
Hello. The permission should be sent following this procedure: COM:OTRS. Please note that the permission of the legal successors of the photographers are necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Geraldinemejia

[edit]

Copyrighted media from the brand's website, including here and a Spanish-language version of the same. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: two, kept one with {PD-textlogo}. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sravanbaddi (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sravanbaddi (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason specified for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly named image Sravanbaddi (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Tomer T (talk) 13:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 100% Globo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images taken from the web and reposted as own work / CC license

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 100% Globo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own: low or medium resolution, no camera info in EXIF or no EXIF at all. Likely stolen from various websites like few files already deleted after copyvio report in ticket:2016092410000159. User is already blocke, but they can respond to this DR on their talk page.

Ankry (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 100% Globo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lots of different images, some with external source and no permissions, other COM:DW of old photographs without author and data information, and some more photographs unlikely own work of the uploader. Delete all per COM:PCP. See also: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/100% Globo

Krd 17:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same logo already have been uploaded in png format. Kkairri (talk) 18:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: link to the png version was not provided. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This jpeg file is converted to png file (File:Ishimaru logo.png), so it is no longer needed. 新幹線 (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uncategorized image of a building with a tree, a car and a garbage can in front. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --INeverCry (talk) 23:49, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of a sky with a very small helicopter in the middle. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't aircraft require tail numbers? Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They almost always do. In this case the tail number (registration) is M-SRNE. Ra-65662 (talk) 04:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, very small image of man, probably out of COM:SCOPE even assuming it's own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of a train with tarps on top. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The way the "author" field is configured, it would apprear this image was "released" by someone... but the uploader's name bears no resemblance to the other names. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this portrait painting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader appears to be the subject in the photo. Lacks evidence of permission from the photographer. In any case, appears to be non-notable, and is therefore out of project scope. — ξxplicit 04:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the Kazakhstan parliament building, modern, and unfortunately there is not freedom of panorama in that country. UAwiki (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Not "own work", not CC licensed. Taken from copyrighted site http://mulpix.com/post/1338157769626299751.html Yintan (talk) 05:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Jenny Nyström died in 1946. Dubious licensing.

Sealle (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, now PD-old. Jcb (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free sculptural work - models. Eleassar (t/p) 07:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of a published book uploaded by the author; likely copyrighted by the publisher and the author gives no evidence of permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded only for the purpose of advertising. It is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Gayandusmantha

[edit]

Logos uploaded for advertising purposes; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid licence Alinea (talk) 09:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review failed: the file is gone from Flickr. The text is probably protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know for sure that the document is CC BY. I have ordered and paid in order to be able to publish it with such a licence. The text of the Manifesto is here : https://tcp.hypotheses.org/411 The official page of the Manifesto poster is : https://tcp.hypotheses.org/443 and we provide a link to FlickR : https://www.flickr.com/photos/revuesorg/4752155318/ And the official list of posters in all languages : https://issuu.com/openedition/stacks/ee242f911de045639b8db78b9d8a6bc6 --Marind (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Flickr link you provided gives inappropriate license CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0. The Issuu copyright page https://issuu.com/legal/terms chapter 14 says more-less: all rights reserved. Commons still needs evidence for free license. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid licence Alinea (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valid licence Alinea (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valid licence, there is no OTRS ticket Alinea (talk) 09:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:53, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, only republished by SciNews. FunkMonk (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unicorn56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private snaps of non-notable individual; out of project scope

DCB (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:HealthdirectAUS

[edit]

Graphics from Healthdirect Australia which states terms of use as "You may access and download the material... but may not, subject to a use for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), modify, publish, transmit, distribute, participate in the transfer or sale, create derivative works, or in any way exploit, any of the Online Services content in whole or in part without the prior written permission of the owner of the material," which is unfortunately not compatible with Commons licenses. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Banda LDS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of non-notable musicians. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   12:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too recent. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Detail of recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Detail of recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Detail of recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent architecture. No FoP in France. Not sure if it can be considered as de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Detail of recent architecture. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material or no proof that it's not copyrighted. Not sure if it can be considered as de minimis here. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Creative Commons. This file doesn't look how a creative commons file. The account who uploaded it has the same name as the distributing label in Germany. So, it could be that it is the company themselves who uploaded it. Christian Bolz (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The calligraphic text is a complex and protected element. The logo is therefore beyond TOO. Mhhossein talk 12:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual; out of scope DCB (talk) 12:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; the metadata states "Author: Amy Tierney, Copyright holder 2015 Amy Tierney" and it is in getty images. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising/self-promotion. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry image that is not really useful for educational purposes. There are better photos in Category:RhB Ge 4/4 II. De728631 (talk) 12:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low resolution, no EXIF and same work can be easily found via Google. Unlikely to be an original work of the uploading user.  Marcus Hsu  talk  12:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Mytruebalance

[edit]

Copyrighted per the metadata information. The first photo says "Author: Mayurachat(Bo) Poomsean, Copyright holder: Bo Poomsean Photography." The other photos say "Copyright holder: foto-vogt-bisingen" and "Copyright status: Copyrighted." No indication that the uploader is any of those people or that they have permission to license the pictures. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright of this photograph is not in the Imperial Household Agency. Also, the photos of Imperial Household aren't be licensed with CC-BY 4.0(See Terms of the Household Agency 1.2.イ), so we can't use this photo under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Puntti ja (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright of this photograph is not in the Imperial Household Agency. Also, the photos of Imperial Household aren't be licensed with CC-BY 4.0(See Terms of the Household Agency 1.2.イ), so we can't use this photo under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Puntti ja (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non photo inferior to File:45 ОДШБр (2016).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, no linked-in pages. Unknown object, no valuable clue/info and only advert of travel agency in description and filename.  Marcus Hsu  talk  13:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use, no linked-in pages. Unknown object, no valuable clue/info and only advert of travel agency in description and filename.  Marcus Hsu  talk  13:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope DCB (talk) 13:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither of the conditions in {{PD-Canada}} seem to be met David Biddulph (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David - this screenshot image is owned by the Government of Canada (which I work for) and we do not impose any restrictions on its reproduction. Let me know if you have any other concerns. Also, I see that you have removed the paragraph I inserted on "Applications" because it was unsourced. I will try to re-insert the paragraph with appropriate citations soon. Thank you.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 13:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope DCB (talk) 13:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bijyu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://greatnepaltreks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IMG_8811.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher res version available here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/486248090988659285/ Based on upload history, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Centered on copyrighted material. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be ripped from Instagram, unlikely to be original work Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smiless--xo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images and game artwork. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ap.rdcpix.com/1509081717/1d7bb6a9d91abc1ff276660e39f24a7al-m21xd-w640_h480_q80.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:07, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katkuta15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.tfsportsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/Katya-Gokhman3-mxu2q2e1f6t2ah7epw9qxqhnw493o89f1ehnlozkdc.png.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As this is the uploader's only contribution, I think, that OTRS-permission from author USSY COW is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep if bigger version can be uploaded. --47.150.68.26 21:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a selfie - copyright belongs to the subject, not the Wikipedia uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright situation. Apparently a US work, but stated to have been published after 1923. Jcb (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from team website, no evidence that it's self created Ytoyoda (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Who took the picture of this 3D object? Probably not own work, rather grabbed from the web. Jcb (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image too blurred to be useful Chris j wood (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality, Complaints from other users Jeazz (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content/bad quality Jeazz (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complaints from other users/inappropriate content Jeazz (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license for every used image is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OSYGOD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 16:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual; out of project scope DCB (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pechenya321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not permission from the copyright holder, the image is copyrighted GAndy (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not permission from the copyright holder, the image is copyrighted GAndy (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to meet either of the conditions in {{PD-Canada}}. David Biddulph (talk) 17:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete imaqe doesnot fett pd-canada --47.150.68.26 21:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mighty Bela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poster without educational content. Edited with unsourced images of Flavour, 2Baba. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   17:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded from flickr

[edit]

As same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude 02.jpg, Model depicted in photo is now deceased and her next of kin requested all images of her be removed from all internet sources. --Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 17:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, has watermark, not taken by me BengaliHindu (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The entire set of Langcha related images are not taken by me. If I remember correctly, I once collected these images from the Internet. In 2014, I visited Shaktigarh and took the images of all the Langcha restaurants there. But I didn't upload them in Commons. Recently, I wanted to try the Commonist tool. I selected the directory which I thought contained the images taken by me. But mistakenly I chose the directory containing the images downloaded from Internet. So I request that all these langcha images be deleted immediately. BengaliHindu (talk) 08:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work as claimed, due to tiny size, lack of EXIF, and identical version available on the web ([1], etc.). —RP88 (talk) 01:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • 1. That photo was taken march 2013 that just over 13 years ago with non professional low cost digital camera since then the photo has been sent to many people in Indonesia, Australia USA. sent around i small as 13 years ago internet was slow.
  • 2. The website with this photo does not even state the name of the third subject in the photo; (Maurice) who is stated in Agnez Mo's article as the supporting actor hence bringing into question where that site may have gotten the photo.
  • 3. The mentioned website is Indonesian this photo was taken in Melbourne on South bank then uploaded to wikimedia by this account with IP address in Melbourne.. I am based in Melbourne.
  • 4. It's obvious neither of the 3 subjects took the photo themselves.
  • 5. The company that produced bought over the film crew from Jakarta was Prima they have not existed for nearly a decade.
  • 6. The whole film crew from Prima including Agnez and Roger stayed at Mantra hotel located on 333 Exhibition St, Melbourne. Without having to name anymore people not mentioned in the Agnez Mo article. I the person whom took the photo watched the footage of Cewekku Jutek in the hotel room with the crew. I wish to maintain my account's anonymity.
  • 7. If need be I can name crew members of the shoot as well as many many other details no longer available anywhere on the internet.
  • 8. The TV show Cewekkujutek has been deleted from all sources but remains relevant and encyclopedic for Wikipedia as a part of the career of the subject Agnez Mo.

If you are the original photographer, do you still have the larger original image rather than just the small preview that you uploaded? It would be nice, but not required, if you could upload the original. As this photo has been previously published on the web without a free license, Commons will need permission from the copyright holder via COM:OTRS to keep this photo. OTRS has a policy of honoring the privacy of their correspondents, if that is your concern. If this photo is deleted, but subsequently approved by OTRS it can be undeleted. —RP88 (talk) 09:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:CreativeC38

[edit]

I forgot to add the deletetion request at the bottom of the page so I add it today.

Demand of the author --CreativeC38 (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
It looks like you are the author of the first and last picture but not the others (in particular File:Армавир 2011 (0005).jpg, which is in use in Wikipedia articles).
Orlodrim (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry I forgot to mention that they were derivate of pictures on Commons (under CC0 I think). Anyway, could you please remove them ?
CreativeC38 (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep "File:Армавир 2011 (0005).jpg" because 1. no valid reason provided for this nomination, the nominator is not the author, 2. the author has not been notified of the nomination and 3. the file is in use. Keep "File:" 12 - ITALY - FIAT - Girls at Bologna Motorshow 2012 04.jpg" and "File:" 12 - ITALY - FIAT - Girls at Bologna Motorshow 2012 06.jpg" because 1. no valid reason provided for this nomination, the nominator is not the author and 2. the author has not been notified of the nomination. Keep "File:Cassie Cage Cosplay.jpg" because 1. no real explanation is provided for the nomination and 2. the file is in use. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --INeverCry (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Beschriftung ist veraltet. Es wurde ein aktuelles Bild hochgeladen. Rarotonga2 (talk) 06:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Read the ticket, no permission for text. foto could be cropped, but would fail scope/eduse due to bad quality. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There IS permission for text from Christian Campiche in the ticket 2016102610008538. However, it is only sufficient for current version, and version from October 25th should be deleted. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:28, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

très mauvaise définition, photo floue, remplacée par une de meilleure qualité Naporedac (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehlende Angaben die nachvollziehbar wahrscheinlich diese Zeichnung zum Porträt des Johann VI. v. d. Leyen machen. Siehe dazu auch die Diskussionsseite. Dieter rogge (talk) 07:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)--Dieter rogge (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which discussion page do we have to look at? Basvb (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was taken from [2] where it says the original source was a 1937 book. One could speculate that the portrait is contemporary, but frankly it doesn't look like a 16th century portrait, but rather like a more modern image perhaps painted after an older painting or a statue or something. And such a 20th century painting could perfectly well still be copyrighted in both Germany and the US. Unless we get some solid evidence that this portrait file is really in the public domain or under a free license, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)

Signatures are normally considered copyright ineligible. (talk) 09:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Fae. --INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since)

These globes are made from open source data. Compare to File:South America (orthographic projection).svg. No copyright issue, it just needs better explanation. (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Fae. --INeverCry (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schema of Architects (No FOP in france, and main element is the Schemas) Architects info are visible on the photo if needed. 90.63.161.96 10:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose- the publisher is the département and as such the government. The governments intention is to disseminate information- ie to have this made freely available. There is no counter copyright statement so as such is pd. If it helps I will multilicense the image as CC-0 or/and pd-France.--ClemRutter (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which French law are you quoting? Or is that just a POV? Citation needed?--ClemRutter (talk) 08:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not like the background picture Easybuild (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: broken redirect. --INeverCry (talk) 00:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, probably not taken by me BengaliHindu (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, probably not taken by me BengaliHindu (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake BengaliHindu (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low educational interest, com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random image of rather personal interest, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random image of rather personal interest, potentially personality rights isssued (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random image of rather personal interest, rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conflicting licensing, tagged {{PD-self}} and with a custom statement that "It is a photo put out by the artist himself for press use". Unclear if the uploader is the copyright holder of either the photo or the sculpture. January (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linho gt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images. Unused, out of project scope.

GeorgHHtalk   18:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image , rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement - Copyright for the Mermaid has not expired Pugilist (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of "Ashwin Kumar" flickr content, original file without description/name, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

once again, mass upload of Aswin Kumar flickr streams, rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinons? Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RoyalsOfUnknown

[edit]

The uploader is a sock puppet of User:Qais13, who is indefinitely blocked on the English wikipedia for creating hoaxes[3]. It is simply not credible to suppose that the files were all the work of the uploader, because of the range of dates, artistic styles and persons depicted. --DrKay (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the photograph itself has a free licence, this sculpture of an elephant is separately copyrighted and non-free. There is no freedom of panorama in the US, so we cannot keep this derivative work. De728631 (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE for being unusable image. It claims to show a dog, but really doesn't. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serious doubt about the uploader's claim that he is the author of this photograph published in the 1960s on the cover of a music album. Would at least require convincing evidence. Asclepias (talk) 20:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are perfectly right Asclepias. I'm not the author of this photo. It's a mistake and I don't know this music group neither the album. I'm ok you to delete the file. Regards Spec 75 (talk) 18:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unused --47.150.68.26 21:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text was translated by an application and therefore it makes no sense. Actually there was never such a state as "Hungarian Democratic Republic". Oppashi talk 11:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass upload of random image of rather personal interest (repeatedly the same car, in Karnataka & Kerala), or potentially personality rights isssues (licence plate), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - other opinions? Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, not own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

le contributeur qui a importé l'image n'est pas l'auteur de la photo Cymbella (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


C'est exact, c'est à la demande de l'auteur qui ne sait pas comment proceder que j'ai chargé cette photo--Breugelius (talk) 18:22, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dans ce cas, il y a une procédure à suivre : Commons:OTRS. - Cymbella (talk) 20:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 21:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple screenshots of copyrighted newspapers. De minimis may be in play here which is why I brought it here instead of just taking it {{Copyvio}}. Majora (talk) 21:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with watermark Pippobuono (talk) 21:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of photographs on a CD cover/box. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (No source since) which is correct... However we have a category of media related to the notable composer Chiquinha Gonzaga, who died in 1935, see Category:Chiquinha Gonzaga, so would this sheet music not be able to be licensed since the composer has been dead for more than 70 years? I realize and of course it is not own work of the uploader, but in the interest of saving this interesting historical work by an early female composer, I thought I'd ask for help from the community with this one. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Public domain in the United States --47.150.68.26 20:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See Chiquinhagonzaga4.jpg copyright tags. --47.150.68.26 21:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I uploaded a better, cleaner version with valid source. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep All four votes are for keeping this image! I surely understand how a democracy works! --47.150.68.26 05:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Hedwig. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a website, a huge cluttered fashion website that I do not want to dig through, but material from said website is copyrighted, so can assume this is a copyright violation. The user's only upload, from several years ago. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I see the big green box under permission, I do not see any indication of how that got there, or the release of copyright by copyright holder. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ieprstudent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work on these facebook and smaller images without metadata, of notable people from short distances, one of them in half-toned black and white.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A page of newspaper/magazine dated to 1979 cannot be own work of uploader in 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. C'est la photo qui est mon "propre travail" : c'est ma propre photo d'un magazine qui m'appartient. Bien à vous. dlb Dileborn

"My own picture in a magazine which belongs to me" is a violation of copyright. Please read COM:L before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dileborn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of users own work on any of these, images, crests or photos

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment left on discussion: "Bonjour.

Toutes ces photos sont mes propres photos. J'en suis l'auteur. Même celle de Didier LE BORNEC : puisque je suis Didier LE BORNEC (je ne le cache pas, Dileborn est l'un de mes pseudonymes). La photo de la couverture de "Je sais tout" également.

J'ai dû oublier de remplir une case quelque chose en les téléchargeant. Mais où ? Et comment réparer cela ?

Bien à vous. dlb Dileborn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dileborn (talk • contribs) 10:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)"

How do you come to own those crests by taking a photo of them? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turbo decoder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

ADVERTISING... "our company..." and probably all taken from their catalog as well.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mcattaneo1966 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion or self promotion, all image are about 'Pausa' your italian break, with no indication of user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploadr has not the right to copy the photo. Its ripped from a video at youtube. There's no hint that the video is under cc. Srvban (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states the author's name; a version of the photo is at Vogue, where it credits the same author. There is no evidence that the uploader is that author. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor resolutin, we have 3 other images of this particular person, so his likeness is well represented here Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]