Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 15th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is incorrect - it points to a completely different image - unable to review lNeverCry 00:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nevermind, this is an upload by an LTA sockmaster. --lNeverCry 00:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kunstfan2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

We need to know where at http://www.kunkelfineart.de these pictures can be located to know their copyright statuses.

Poké95 11:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You started a DR for File:Marees Hans von - Figurenstudie .jpg even though the exact path on kunkelfineart was mentioned. --axel (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't noticed that, thanks for pointing it out. But still, the exact path for the other images is needed. Poké95 12:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No exact source/location is necessary, the pictures are public domain.--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Exact sources now given, many thanks to Axel.Mauruszat for adding the sources. Withdrawing this DR now. -- Poké95 13:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 16:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not in use with a wikipedia page anymore and not intended to be uploaded to wikipedia or wikimedia commons. Copyright violation Lesliewtsang (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). NARA at College Park, MD is a valid source (see https://www.archives.gov/research/start/by-format.html#photos) Basvb (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find it weird that a picture taken in Italy from Brittish aircrafts would be an US government work. Do we have any indication that this particular picture is indeed a US government work? Jcb (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
w:51st Troop Carrier Squadron, it looks like the aircraft are US and the troops UK. Basvb (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Ok, let's close this one. Jcb (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). Source info updated Basvb (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). found the original source Basvb (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: user has been warned before in his native language to stop uploading these out of scope files. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE with the kid standing there mimicking the statue lNeverCry 23:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:35, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work (source = "internet"); no valid license DCB (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 15:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no source (No source since). Found the author, died in 1923, making this PD-old if I'm correct. Basvb (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights from: http://www.foititikanea.gr/images/foithtikanea/PANEPISTHMIA/DHMOKRITEIO-PANEPISTHMIO/7.png Texniths (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 15:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical to http://tijuanopolis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/roque.jpg In the 12/2015 uploads section. Main page is https://sites.google.com/site/electionwebsite/democratic-canidates/roque-de-la-fuente No indication of "own work" Jim1138 (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: https://sites.google.com/site/electionwebsite/democratic-canidates/roque-de-la-fuente

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this Jeff Koons bolloon dog is apparently located in Italy as this link indicates but as a derivative image without the artist's permission we cannot retain it. It looks like the same one as pictured in the non-free image on enwiki w:File:Jeff Koons - Balloon Dog (Magenta).jpg and there is also non freedom of panorama exception in Italy. Ww2censor (talk) 10:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Published with a non-commercial licence at Flickr and lack of FoP in Italy. --De728631 (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image used here is of Punjagutta Flyover in Hyderabad, India taken from Somajiguda circle end and not Hyderabad, Sindh's as claimed in the article. Proof: There is a Telugu(Indian language) movie poster in the bottom right corner of the image. And I can even name the buildings shown in the picture. Prince747 (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see watermark down right Pippobuono (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 13:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wurde doppet hochgeladen. (OF Kirchg H O 1894.jp) Johann Malchus (talk) 10:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 13:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. MKFI (talk) 15:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, uploaded from google. kovox90      16:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See: 1 and 2 --kovox90      16:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --tsca (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Image, no use to wikipedia and out of scope. Sankoswal (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Qwe aaw

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FedeQKC Dacoucou (talk) 04:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, http://quilmesaclub.org.ar/ Dacoucou (talk) 04:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with insufficient description Pippobuono (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoldenBots (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent screenshots with no EXIF data. No evidence they are the own work of the uploader as claimed.

DAJF (talk) 14:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Logo is not in use with a wikipedia page anymore and not intended to be uploaded to wikipedia or wikimedia commons Lesliewtsang (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Invalid target of deletion request. Please specify the file you want to be deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tippfehler im Namen Horst Gräbner (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Bad name, not in use, author's request, links adjusted. --Achim (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal photograph uploaded in 2008, never used, the user's only contribution. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 00:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality personal image/artwork, uploaded in 2007 and not used, the uploader's only contribution. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal / out of scope. Sturm (talk) 04:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:02, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no exif data, questionable permission, out of project scope Krd 06:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder www.Joffrey.ca". MKFI (talk) 07:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author © Jena Willard; Copyright holder Copyright © 2013 Jena Willard Photography any use of this image violates the copyright of the photographer and illegalphotographer and illegal". MKFI (talk) 07:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.way4indians.com/articles_n.php?aid=6 51.9.185.43 08:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see copyright down left Pippobuono (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: non-scope image, selfie Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope, selfie Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 09:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Poland. The image infringes on the artist's copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Copy vio.--Fanghong (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Néstor Omar Zuázquita isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Ranjan is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny (80×103) unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with insufficient description Pippobuono (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carlos Adolfo Arenas Rospigliosi isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private selfie; out of project scope DCB (talk) 13:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ParmanandVishwakarma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Singhraushan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images and no-WLM submission. Out of scope.

Kiranravikumar (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uneducational selfie. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristian garcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. MKFI (talk) 07:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pasikopusteliaudamas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright violations: file EXIF shows "Author ARNOLD POESCHL Copyright holder ARNOLD POESCHL".

MKFI (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: H¯YBYE LIV, Copyright holder: H¿ybye Liv Jyllands-Posten." No evidence of permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krtc123321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    20:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking again to delete my photos from wikimedia commons: Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to eliminate my wikimedia commons account.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Just use it where ever you want. Thats no reason to delete it here. --JuTa 16:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:delete2|image=File:Parque Caracol Canela.jpg|reason=The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}.}} Christina flyer (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account in Wikimedia Commons.


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to eliminate my Wikimedia commons account


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account in wikimedia commons.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Free licenses are irrevocable. If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo appears to be in COM:SCOPE and was correctly licensed. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You have asked, and we have refused... which is in our rights, since you used a license which you cannot revoke. You may also use them for your personal project, of course, and they may be licensed there in whatever way you wish. Please stop nominating your files for deletion, or you risk being blocked. Storkk (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 16:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in COM:SCOPE. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:35, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:08, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by {{Autotranslate|1=Template:Speedydelete|base=Project scope}}. JuTa 17:01, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The information template, license and categories were twice deleted by the uploader and replaced by

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Template:Speedydelete, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

. Christina flyer (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to cancel my account at wikimedia commons.


Kept: No valid reason for deletion: If you wish to stop contributing, you may do so... but this photo was and is correctly licensed, and appears to be in scope. Free licenses are irrevocable. --Storkk (talk) 10:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking to delete my photos because I need them to use in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want to use the photos in another project. Christina flyer (talk) 18:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - license is not revocable. --Jcb (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have already asked several times to delete my photos. I have already asked to remove my account too. I need the pictures to compose a personal project. Please do it. Thank you. Christina flyer (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm asking politely for the eighth time to delete my photos. I had inscribed these photos to participate in a contest on this site. As to date I do not know the outcome of it, I´m asking again politely that my photos be deleted so I can use them on a personal project. Thank you again for your attention. Christina flyer (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imsready (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Six of these images are actually two sets of same image... the others are obviously derived from corporate sources. This appears more promotional or advertising than a sample of user's own work. Should any be kept, please only keep one each of the duplicates.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized pdf, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman.smirnov.ext (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused collection of small low quality images taken in a warehouse - also some low-quality related graphs and logos - no indication of company notability

lNeverCry 22:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized *pdf, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prashant.upadhyaya06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    22:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daya Shekhawat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 23:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BossFunkeHarry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE + some possible copyvios

lNeverCry 23:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BossFunkeHarry (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

New uploads of previously deleted images. Not a single one with value IMHO: Special:ListFiles/BossFunkeHarry. --тнояsтеn 14:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete them all speedily and block the user. All tiny files, sometimes very bad quality, some complex logos. Toilet logos are simple, but Commons has a lot of toilet logos in .svg. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vexillographer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mostly very-low to low quality, ambiguous names&descriptions. There are multiple superior versions of the uploaded files and most importantly doubtful Own work claim (the files are Google-able)

TFerenczy (talk) 23:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Singer Nisar Ali Khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/self-promotion

lNeverCry 23:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, poor quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freddycanaviri777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in wiki-text or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“HISTORICAL BIBLICAL TIMELINE”s by Freddycanaviri777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Badjpg}} text-only files with trivial (frivolous, even) styling; should be conveyed in text instead.

-- Tuválkin 07:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freddycanaviri777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused calendars and star charts, probably related to previously deleted content (fringe religious/historical theories).

Omphalographer (talk) 01:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete -- Tuválkin 03:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (no constructive mainspace contribs).    FDMS  4    20:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational use Don-kun (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - tiny 7kb thumb lNeverCry 21:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angela0130 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of source of images used in these demonstration/tutorial images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized *pdf, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sajid.sharma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized *pdf document apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized *pdf, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized *pdf file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and uncategorized *pdf file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 22:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Hensethename

[edit]

The user uploaded several photos of his artwork. The photos themselves, however, are authored and copyrighted by others, according to the metadata. The first two state "Author: Steve Cole - christie & cole studio inc., Copyright holder: Copyright 2012 Steve Cole - All Rights Reserved and Registered." The next 3 images state "Author: Mark Hill, Copyright holder: (c)2014 TBS Inc.All rights reserved". Not sure if there are details about copyrighting photos of other people's art that might apply here. The last one is an obvious copyright violation, a photo of the user that is covered with info about the author, source, and copyright: "Author: Bob Andres, Copyright holder © 2015 Atlanta Journal Constitution". --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation/侵犯著作权 Shwangtianyuan (talk) 01:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded here in 2015, but posted to this website in 2014 where the author is credited as Michael Mercil. Not own work and requires permission from that photographer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't find the original on the web, but this is one of a whole series of soft-porn star images uploaded by a network of sockpuppets (see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Apple Chan) and highly unlikely to be the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 02:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work, you should not attribute other people's problem to me without evidence. Tamiki Nemoto (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These trading cards are protected by Topps trademarking at outlined at their website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These trading cards are protected by Topps trademarking as outlined at their website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A book cover, copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image already circulating on the web and uploaded by suspected copyvio sockpuppet. DAJF (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence for supporting your reasons. Circle Brick (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scan of a magazine article, this is copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was not found at source which is indeed a marines website, but this image was not there. Larger unsourced versions is available here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : http://shamelesspile.blogspot.fr/2015/03/movie-review-aurora-operation-intercept.html Bastenbas (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused, uncategorized, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused, uncategorized, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. If indeed the other person in the picture is notable, then we'd need to be sure the uploader actually took this image, as it is very small and without apparent creation by user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected File:Musharraf.jpg same reasoning, it's not a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, Facebook sized personal image, but there is no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, this image of uploader with someone else is unlikely to be uploader's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    21:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, but claimed as own work. Unlikely to be own work of uploader, as both hands are in view. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 21:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paterjohannes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

obviously not own work, further information needed to determine the copyright status

Didym (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, not own work. kovox90      16:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, not own work kovox90      16:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, not own work. kovox90      16:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its blurry. failed image. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educational, poor quality, basically a random photo of a guy with an offensive filename. This image has not been used for an Wikipedia projects. Bambi spam (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike Blackler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work on photos of one subject, all smaller than facebook size.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta imagen es un pantallazo de Google Maps, sitio que tiene derechos de copia. Soy Juampayo (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE with the additional difficulty that the artwork is by Luis Montiel. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE with the additional difficulty that the artwork is by Luis Montiel. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized, unused and uncategorized image of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely claim of own work on this obviously rephotographed image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of Russia is available in png and svg - no need for this recently uploaded unused jpg version lNeverCry 22:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test or tease upload, solid black, no educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless upload by new user, vandalized caterization Stolbovsky (talk) 22:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to use and there are many superior options—Justin (koavf)TCM 23:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. In use but can easily be substituted for a better one. P 1 9 9   20:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 21:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PetrVietnam1965 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    21:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image within an image. It is doubtful if the framed image being held was taken by the Bureau of Land Management. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of a landscape with a person staring off into the distance. Probably out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   20:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The website of the UK museum, which is currently stated as the source of this image, does not indicate this as a US government work Jcb (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The aircraft was based at the site between September 1944 and February 1945. Four of these aircraft were on loan to RAF 192 squadron for ELINT work. As nobody would have been on the military site during WW2 without official purpose, the photograph would have been taken either by DOD USAAF or MOD RAF personnel during their duties. The MOI in the UK would have had full control over the image due to the government's propaganda legislation, so considering the aircraft were used strictly for covert intelligence, this could only have been published for official purposes. Though the on-line catalogue at the United States Air Force Historical Research Agency does not have the photograph available, there is no reason to make a bad faith presumption that this was not the original source.
The IWM has put its own NC license on the image, but they do that with all of their public domain war archive material and at least it shows there is no other copyright claim as they would have restricted it further if they knew of any.
A PD license applies, I have changed to PD-UK-unknown ({{PD-UKGov}} may also be appropriate, but I'm being cautious), however if it turns out that a USAAF member was the photographer, this would swap to the original license. -- (talk) 22:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep instead of nominating low risk WW2 images, perhaps you could fund some trips to Archives II campus to find the original to find the metadata. there is an ocean of these , let's research rather than delete. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 01:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per discussion. P 1 9 9   20:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized private image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized private image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, unused and uncategorized, probably not educationally useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   20:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and source are given, but no permission. According to the website given, images from there are copyrighted. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - very poor quality lNeverCry 04:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is photo with watermark and low resolution. Probably it is not own work. --sasha (krassotkin) 05:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: webgrab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:アルトクール's reason: "not free file. see this".

However, Notice on Copyright and Other Related Matters Regarding this Website: "The Terms of Use are compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (hereinafter referred to as the CC License). This means that Content based on the Terms of Use may be used under the CC License in lieu of the Terms of Use." - Earth Saver (talk) at 06:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-JAPAN doesn't include video stills. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "Author MRUGANK_KHER". Uploader has the same user name as the subject. MKFI (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work claim = cow cookies. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: plain copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still (screenshot), probable copyvio, anyway, not own work Pippobuono (talk) 08:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) Sony. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

film still (screenshot), probable copyvio, anyway, not own work Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) Sony. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see copyright down left Pippobuono (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photograph http://www.isabelwebster.com/ Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copying someone else's copyrighted work does not make one the author or copyright holder. There is no reason to believe that the original comic is not protected by copyright. LX (talk, contribs) 10:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Totalement flou et inexploitable. N'est vraiment pas une eouvre d'art. KAPour les intimes 11:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

  •  Keep This is a perfect example of just enough subject motion blur relative to a stationary background to make it interesting. This is just about perfect. You get the sense of velocity of the cyclists, without so much blur that it seems like they're just streaks of light or speeding bullets. And with that, the background is properly stationary (though of course, at 100% you can see some motion blur there). Composition is a pleasing diagonal motion. It's not perfect by any measure, but it's well within the minimum standards to be useable and educational. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Totalement flou et inexploitable aucun interet photographique KAPour les intimes 11:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

  •  Keep This is a perfect example of just enough subject motion blur relative to a stationary background to make it interesting. This is just about perfect. You get the sense of velocity of the cyclists, without so much blur that it seems like they're just streaks of light or speeding bullets. And with that, the background is properly stationary (though of course, at 100% you can see some motion blur there). Composition is a pleasing diagonal motion. It's not perfect by any measure, but it's well within the minimum standards to be useable and educational. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucun interet photographique . Totalement flou . KAPour les intimes 11:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

  •  Neutral I'm of two minds here. This is a photo of a significant athletic event, and taken by a pro photog. The photographic effect that was attempted here is sometimes called a "panning shot". It is technically challenging to achieve, and we don't have many examples of a successful one on Commons. The idea is that the background is supposed to be smeared while the subject, the cyclist, looks almost frozen (though a bit of motion blur from the wheels turning is usually a good effect). More recently you do see some of these panning shots where both the subject and background are blurred, though usually it's still easy to pick the subject out from the background (i.e., the subject's motion blurring is less pronounced). I don't think this is one of those cases—usually, those shots are achieved by doing the panning shot successfully, but using an even lower shutter speed, so features of the subject have motion blur, but not from motion with respect to the background (e.g., blurring of the legs pumping up and down would be cool). Here, it's pretty obvious the panning failed. Whether that amounts to a delete, I'm still not sure. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the photo itself is OK, the photo prominently display the album cover of Kraftwerk's 1981 album "Computer world" who is considered fair use at en:File:Kraftwerk - Computer World.png Thuresson (talk) 12:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Crop to head and shoulder. I'm not personally crazy about this style of photo—a still photo at a speaking event—because they tend to capture the subject with strange expressions, and this is no exception. Anyway, this can be cropped to a pleasing composition while excluding the artwork. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 15:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The cover art is clearly a problem. While we could simply crop it down, I think that without the context of 'what he was doing' this image is simple going to look very strange. Reventtalk 22:39, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped. not pretty tho. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently an art installation. No information about the author nor the location (can it be kept thanks to FoP ?) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: leftover spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:50, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: part of deleted promo article. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://yourstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/yourstory-sanjiv-saraf-2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: part of deleted promo article. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improperly licensed, not the work of the uploader(see Eng Wikipedia user talk) 331dot (talk) 10:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why this image is here, probably I've mistakenly uploaded it--1640max (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only PNG whose content fits Wiktionary. Achim (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, possible copyrighted audio kovox90      16:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, uploaded from google. kovox90      16:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image is here: 1 --kovox90      16:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The logo was meant for a deleted wiki page and should be now deleted. Lesliewtsang (talk) 17:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This Logo is not in use with a wikipedia page anymore and not intended to be uploaded to wikipedia or wikimedia commons. Lesliewtsang

Deleted: done by INeverCry. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 17:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. The text is well readable on full resolution. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photograph of television; copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshot of two people, unused, the uploader's only contribution; no potential educational uses. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP for sculptures in the USA. 68.193.210.74 19:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP for sculptures in the USA. 68.193.210.74 19:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    20:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern sculture in Russia, and no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern sculture in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern sculture in Russia, and no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the UAE lNeverCry 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized private image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Also please notice File:S- Nick Barua with H-E Shiro Sadoshima 2013-09-11 10-13.jpg the same image, but with a different uploader, also affected by this nomination.
Also affected File:Shiro Sadoshima, the Japanese Ambassador to Bangladesh.jpg which was derived from the above image. One image cannot have two makers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of some packaging in a store. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this image has metadata, it is also very small and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the uploader is in this picture, and its not a selfie, the claim of own work is doubtful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file deleted after regular DR twice in 2016, but recreated Civa (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the UAE lNeverCry 22:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image, apparently out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a copyright package guerreritoboy (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Component photos are unsourced, and not to be found on Commons. Suspected copyright violations. 89.0.180.18 06:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overly ambitious recording by a non-native speaker Luhgyēm (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overly ambitious recording by a non-native speaker Luhgyēm (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Overly ambitious recording by a non-native speaker Luhgyēm (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an actual coat of arms. Not approved by Romanian Government resolution, thus the license template is not applicable. —Andrei S. Talk 07:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Thoughts? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Best I can work out, it seems to be totally made up, neither notable nor covered by this license. But I'd be perfectly willing to see evidence to the contrary. - Jmabel ! talk 00:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - the website this photograph was taken from expresses copyright over the work Hchc2009 (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your grandiose help! Nobody will miss this photo, because some other documents - like here - https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi%C3%A8ces_en_euro_de_la_France#/media/File:FR_2%E2%82%AC_2014_Sida.png or here - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Frankreich2014AIDS.jpg exist. - Please continue with your helpful and delightful work! VIEX


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Also note the license tag claims this is a banknote. A coin is not a banknote. Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are copyrighted with a non-free license to their country of origin, with few exceptions. France is not one of them. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative 2 euro coins (France). Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, the license and the permission are wrong. kovox90      16:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:LDU Quito.png. --XXN, 16:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of content previously eliminated by the community, see this. kovox90      18:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion - As the photographer of this photo, I am requesting courtesy deletion because, in the best interest of my career, I wish not to be associated with the symbol depicted in this photo. Jonathan Mauer (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Coat of arms of the Brazilian Navy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The other uploads of this uploader had false claims of own work. The user is also blocked indefinitely on en.wikipedia [1] for copyright violations. Couldn't find this photo with a web search, but given the user's record, the odds of validity of this upload are very low. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems redundant with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fluid_dynamics . But I admit I am new around here and am confused about many things. Note that I tried to do this same thing a while ago: Commons:Deletion_requests/Talk:Fluid_dynamics#Talk:Fluid_dynamics but I got the page wrong. I hope this deletion request is better.

Extra detail: all three images on this page are already categorized under (various subcategories of) Category:Fluid_dynamics. So there's nothing else to do but delete this page. Martijnvans (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Moved from COM:AN. Achim (talk) 18:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I`ve replaced this old file with a vector version on Hebrew wiki, so you can delete it. Thanks, Tal (רונאלדיניו המלך, talk) 18:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the author, and the logo is not made of simple shapes or text to be copyright free. Carniolus (talk) 19:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not made of simple shapes to be copyright-free. Carniolus (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP for sculptures in the USA. This appears to be a tourist snapshot. 68.193.210.74 19:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This would appear to be an interior private space of a building with a piece of artwork copied from "The Beatles" in the middle of it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of uploader, no metadata, apparently professional image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this image of King Abdullah II. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this obviously old photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These appear to be works of modern art without COM:OTRS permission from the artist/s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this image which has been cut out of its background. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: the source actually links to another website's page http://relicfinder.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=11001#p11001 and I'm sorry to say there is no evidence that I can see that the image is freely licensed. Ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

San Lorenzo de Almagro files

[edit]

Similar case to previous DR (same uploader in both): scans from magazines or TV shoots, missing permissions in all cases.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:42, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leon Evans (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)}} Taivo (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:43, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no other examples of this kind of historical map-navigational template. The categories are sufficient. Zoupan (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted statuette. MKFI (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I uploaded this: It is something I created, and something I photographed. LMK of questions! Sorry if I am not formatting this comment correctly.

@Saskiawb: the problem is with the award statue and not the photograph. Unless you also created the statue this image can't be uploaded to Commons. MKFI (talk) 08:06, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@MKFI: Ah! I get it. Well: I commissioned it, and own the copyright! Does that count? Thanks for the information!
It does, provided that you actually do own the copyright. Depending on the contract between the artist (who?) and you it might be that you only own the physical statue but not the copyright. If you do actually own the copyright please send OTRS email so we have a confirmation of that. MKFI (talk) 08:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Restoration will require an OTRS license, including evidence that the uploader owns the copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD until 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Megalapteryx.png FunkMonk (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The artist (Lodge) died in 1954. Rothschild is not the artist, but the writer of the book. Most of these batch Flickr uploads have such issues. FunkMonk (talk) 18:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused. I don't see any Lodge credited there. The author is identified as en:Rothschild, Lionel Walter Rothschild, d. in 1937. Ah, I see, the description is wrong as the author is en:George Edward Lodge (d. 1954) yes? In which case you are right. I'd only ask that those files are tagged for auto-undeletion in 2025. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD until 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Megalapteryx.png FunkMonk (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See the other nomination. FunkMonk (talk) 18:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see. In which case I agree with you per [2]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not meet Spanish FOP criteria (indoor work, author dead in 2011). Pic-Sou (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Why? Public place and seems to be permanent. What did I miss? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: "en parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas" -- for FOP the work must be outdoors. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not meet Spanish FOP criteria (indoor work, author dead in 2011). Pic-Sou (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). The main creative elements on the card are postal service stamps. This could make it PDgov, except when the writing of the address is considered creative enough, in that case one could still argue that the writing is de-minimis (it can be blanked). As such I see no non-US-governement elements here which are copyrightable. Basvb (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's clearly a 1962 work, so the stamps are PD. THe SeaWolf badge is also PD. THe address does not have a copyright, so I don't see a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since).Source is available, it is a 1889 book of an author who died in 1900. The gravure has a different author, it has two watermarks, bottom left and right, which I can't decipher. Maybe somebody who understands the swedish language can look into the book and find the artists who created the image. Basvb (talk) 17:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Close call, but 1880 is a little too recent to guess that the artist has been dead for 70 years, which would be required either in Sweden or Germany (Swedish book, but Lubeck is in Germany). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since). Found the source, it is very likely that the permission is NOT ok. Could use some help from somebody speaking Italian to check the source. Basvb (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Looked at the NAtional Museum of Rome website for photo 3723, as specified in source caption. No luck. This is far too recent to assume the author has been dead for 70 years and we have no evidence of publication before 1966. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no source (No source since). there is a source (and higher res image) now. The cover is a 1905 cover, we have to determine whether this is an anonymous work or whether there are copyrightable elements for which we need to know the author's year of death. Basvb (talk) 16:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence that the author of the drawing died before 1946. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP for sculptures in the USA. Even though the photographer released the photo to the PD, this does not extend to the sculpture. 68.193.210.74 19:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the sculpture was finished and published in 1988 [3]. So if there is no copyright notice and it was never registered for copyright it is {{PD-US-1978-89}}. If it was published after 28 Feb. 1989 instead or later, then there is copyright until 2079 (70 years pma). De728631 (talk) 19:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Installed May 9, 1988" and no copyright record for this particular work leaves us with the question if there is a notice somewhere on the sculpture. It should also be noted that Oldenburg's and van Bruggen's office has filed DMCA takedowns in the past: wmf:DMCA_Oldenburg, De728631 (talk) 19:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep use PD-US-1978-89 per the evidence. if the oldenburg office wants to file a DMCA, then take it down. no chilling effects here. there are 700 of these photos of sculptures to review, if you don't want to to the research, then do not nominate. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 00:56, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no evidence that there was no copyright notice - artists have done successful DMCA takedown requests for many comparable files - no need to provoke another takedown request. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source has apparently been taken out of the set of images that were released as CC-BY Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • How do we deal with situations like this? This image was previously released as CC-BY-SA, I can vouch for that. So the image was uploaded here as such. But apparently the Nationaal Archief withdrew the license later. What to do with it now? It's easy to delete it, but is that right? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nationaal Archief is a risky source. They have a history of releasing pictures of which they don't even know where they come from. In this case they list the photographer of this 1981 picture as 'unknown', which is a clear indication that the photographer, possibly still alive, never transfered the copyright to Nationaal Archief, so that they were in no position to do their initial release. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not right. When they released it they named a photographer. Can't remember who, at the moment. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:25, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical file uploaded by same uploader to enwiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_F._Bartlett,_Filmmaker,_Portland_Oregon.jpg . Licensing here contradicts statement there 'Michael F Bartlett handed me a memory stick with the photo and said, "Here- use this one."' "Author: Michael F Bartlett". Untrustworthy uploader. COM:PRP. BethNaught (talk) 20:04, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Lots of people claim to be copyright holder of pictures depicting them. They are mistaken of course. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wegen Nebel sehr verschwommenes Bild Cosal (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: although I understand the nomination reason, the file is currently in use (and has been for the past more than two years) in de:Evangelische Kirche Berndshausen, so that we cannot delete the file for such a reason. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

behalten es ist doch schön, dass es auch mal Bilder mit Nebel gibt. Die Welt ist ja nicht immer klar. :-) Triplec85 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with source and author not same as uploader. COM:OTRS permission is needed to retain the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly faulty license John from Idegon (talk) 21:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what "John from Idegon" finds "faulty" about the license. This photo's author is Stephanie Stuart, the Director of Communications and Community Relations at Unit 4 Schools (Champaign, IL). I have her explicit permission to use the photo as she told me it was in the public domain. You can confirm by contacting her at stuartst -at- u4sd.org or just look at this web page to see that this is a Unit 4 photo: http://www.champaignschools.org/news-room/article/4802

Furthermore, I believe "John from Idegon" is making edits to the Champaign Central High School page which I would classify as vandalism. He has removed the Athletic Accomplishments section and changed the mascot name to an incorrect name and description.


Deleted: per nomination - please ask the photographer to contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While Mexican law permits public photography, there's nothing on this image or the twin File:Arte en la playa (3188833588).jpg to indicate that they were taken in Mexico, or in a public place to satisfy FOP:Mexico. More information is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 'Arte en la playa' means 'art on the beach'. In the Flickr stream there is a series of objects depictured on the beach. A beach is almost always a public place. As far as I understand the Mexican law as quoted at COM:FOP, there is no condition in that country that the installation has to be permanent. It's just 'las obras que sean visibles desde lugares públicos': works visible from public places. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, although I agree this one may be borderline - please drop me a note if you need temporary restauration for a transfer to Wikipedia. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

~Look thing above text. I am not sure, that this is textlogo. And now look below between "az" and "central" – there's also something. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really not sure, I hope it can stay here in any way, shape or form since it was so hard to obtain. If it really doesn't meet the standards, I could just remove those symbols and leave the nameplate as it is. Adrio (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's a possible solution. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Adrio: could you (or somebody else) upload a new version of this file without the logo at the top? I don't think the thing below between az and central is problematic. It's just the upper part that has to be removed. If the new version is uploaded, the old version can be removed. If I find this DR 7 days after now still open without a new upload, I will go ahead and delete the file. (Other admins: please feel free to act on this DR one way or another anyway in the meantime) - Jcb (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Jcb and Taivo: , I removed the star symbol. I hope this deletion request can be closed and the file can stay on Commons now. Adrio (talk)

 Kept, now I can withdraw the nomination. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since).Source now provided, need to determine whether this is old enough for PD Basvb (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The latest possible date for this image is 1891, as the depicted statues were destroyed that year. The 1914 India Copyright Act allowed for a term of "fifty years from the making of the original negative from which the photograph was directly or indirectly derived", and thus this image would have entered the public domain in, at the latest, 1942. --Reventtalk 07:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: Carolina Sanchez, Copyright holder: carolina Sanchez." No evidence of permission to use a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging the uploader. Please keep open for a while. Thx! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]