Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/10/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Files uploaded by Sherman2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of images watermarked by an assortment of websites, some (many) of which appear to be fairly blatant copyright violations.... zhilasadeghi.com, in particular, is explicitly ARR. Bulk delete per the PRP. please.
- File:ژیلا صادقی 77.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 76.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 75.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 74.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 73.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 71.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 72.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 70.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 67.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 66.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 65.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 64.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 62.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 61.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 63.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 59.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 58.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 57.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 56.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 55.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 54.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 53.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 52.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 50.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 51.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 37.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 36.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 34.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 33.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 32.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 31.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 30.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 29.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 28.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 27.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 26.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 25.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 24.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 23.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 22.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 20.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 21.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 19.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 18.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 17.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 16.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 15.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 14.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 13.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 12.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 11.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 10.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 08.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 09.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 07.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 05.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 06.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 04.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 02.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 03.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 01.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 35.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 34.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 33.jpg
- File:روشنک عجمیان 4.jpg
- File:روشنک عجمیان 2.jpg
- File:روشنک عجمیان 3.jpg
- File:روشنک عجمیان 1.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 32.png
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 31.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 30.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 28.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 29.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 27.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 23.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 24.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 25.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 21.png
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 23.png
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 22.png
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 20.png
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 17.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 16.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 15.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 14.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 13.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 12.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 11.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 10.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 9.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 8.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 7.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 5.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 4.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 6.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 1.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 3.jpg
- File:ژیلا امیرشاهی 2.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 45.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 46.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 42.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 43.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 44.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 40.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 41.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 36.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 39.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 38.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 37.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 35.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 34.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 33.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 32.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 31.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 30.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 28.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 29.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 27.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 25.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 26.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 23.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 24.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 21.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 22.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 20.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 16.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 18.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 19.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 15.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 17.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 14.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 13.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 12.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 11.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 9.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 10.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 8.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 7.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 6.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 5.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 4.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 3.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 2.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 47.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده 1.jpg
- File:الهام صفوی زاده.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 9.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 8.jpg
- File:صبا راد ژیلا صادقی.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 4.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 7.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 5.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 6.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 2.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 3.jpg
- File:ژیلا صادقی 1.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 11.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 10.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 9.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 8.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 7.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 6.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 5.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 3.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 4.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 2.jpg
- File:خاله نرگس 1.jpg
- File:سارا روستاپور 3.jpg
- File:سارا روستاپور 4.jpg
- File:سارا روستاپور 2.jpg
- File:سارا روستاپور.jpg
Reventtalk 16:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete I doubt anyone would have objected to a speedy deletion considering there seems to be no rationale as to why any may not be copyright violations. --Fæ (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Fae: Right, it just seemed like a good idea to actually make a single list, and let someone else speedily close it (since it's all the same rationale) instead of spamming 170+ files into the backlog. Reventtalk 16:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: As the both of you wish. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
See exif metadata: Mateusz Włodarczyk, All Rights Reserved - WlodarczykFoto Boston9 (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 05:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Erreur lors de la mise en ligne de cette photo car l'autorisation n'est pas certaine donc il serait souhaitable de retirer cette photo. Musica7m (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright image Mark Marathon (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: please use {{Copyvio}} next time. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In scope: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miraculous:_Tales_of_Ladybug_%26_Cat_Noir. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:16, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
As for me, these are pretty complex shapes, advanced design and a combination of letters with shapes (ladybug motif), therefore certainly not a simple text-logo. Masur (talk) 09:28, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:TOO France. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
"© COPYRIGHT LYNN BAN 2014. All text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, audio clips, digital downloads, and data compilations appearing on the website, as well as the software used to create them, are owned by Lynn Ban and are protected by U.S. and foreign copyright laws. You may electronically copy and/or print “hard copies” from the Website solely for personal, non-commercial purposes related to placing an order or shopping on the Website. Any other use of any content included on the Website, including linking or framing to this Website, are strictly prohibited unless you first obtain our prior written consent." - thus inacceptable on commons. XXN, 14:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb15 October 2016. --Achim (talk) 07:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
False use of creative commons tag, claiming it's free for remix while poster is claiming subsequently that "This image is copyrighted and can not be changed unless the administrator account wikipedia" (translated from Spanish; edit summary) NatGertler (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyright violation unless uploader provides evidence of permission. clpo13(talk) 15:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb 13 October 2016. --Achim (talk) 07:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Was transfered in good faith based on license, but it's seemingly unsourced. No objections to speedy on those grounds. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing legal information Technopat (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: all over the web, permission highly unlikely. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope, virtually the same as File:Benen tijdens de bevalling.png ErikvanB (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
already have same picture 고려 (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Kept this file (#1), killed the other (#2) as the duplicate. Same difference, really. --Reventtalk 02:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mason Loades (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, if the images are in public domain for some reasons so the relevant pd license tags must be added
Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal images in front of monuments, out of scope for any Wikimedia project.
- File:Ancient Well with friends4.jpg
- File:Ancient Well with friends3.jpg
- File:Ancient Well with friends.jpg
- File:Ancient Well with friends1.jpg
- File:Ancient Well with friends2.jpg
- File:Hawa Mahal tour.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends5.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends3.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends4.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends2.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends6.jpg
- File:Red Fort with Friends1.jpg
Kiranravikumar (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal essay. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused wikibook. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Likely additional copyright concerns due to size and lack of metadata. Storkk (talk) 11:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saxenaabhi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope. Personality rights warning.
- File:St. Paul Church Diu.jpg
- File:Khandagiri Caves Bhubaneshwar.jpg
- File:Saint tanpure, Pandharpur.jpg
Kiranravikumar (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sirenetta22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images uploaded by a sock of a user with a significant history of copyright violations and block evasion (e.g. Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lorella800); accordingly there exists significant doubt as to the copyright status of these images and many may also fail COM:SCOPE by virtue of being unreadable or irreparably out of context and mainly unusable.
- File:Giovanna Baglioni, moglie di Ascanio I della Corgna.jpg
- File:Presunto denaro del Regno di Arborea.jpg
- File:Palazzo giudicale di Oristano, 1862.jpg
- File:Giudice mariano IV di arborea.jpg
- File:Mariano II giudice d'Arborea.jpg
- File:Zarina Alessandra Fedorovna2.jpg
- File:Zarina Alessandra Fedorovna.jpg
- File:Firma zarina Aleksandra Fedorovna Romanova.jpg
- File:Mariano IV giudice d'Arborea e il figlio Ugone III.jpg
- File:Mariano IV giudice d'Arborea.jpg
- File:Nitocris regina d'Egitto.jpg
- File:Beatrice d'Este (1268-1334), giudicessa di Gallura, signora di Milano.jpg
- File:Possibile ritratto di Willem Hemans organaro.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VirginRedemption (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworkswithout obvious educational use (might be copyvio too).
- File:Epistory07.png
- File:Epistory06.jpg
- File:Epistory05 (2).jpg
- File:Epistory02.jpg
- File:Epistory04.jpg
- File:Epistory03.jpg
- File:Epistory01.jpg
- File:Epistory plain.png
- File:Epistory trailer.gif
- File:Epistory woods.jpg
- File:Epistory isles.jpg
- File:Epistory mountain.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Restored, see here - Jcb (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VirginRedemption (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion/private images
- File:Fishing Cactus Studio.jpg
- File:Fishing Cactus at Gamescom 2015.jpg
- File:Fishing Cactus Team.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep all. The uploader is a representative of the developer (see ticket:2016101310011807). The images are in scope because they illustrate a notable video game, w:en:Epistory, and other video game concepts depicted in the shots. @BrightRaven, I'm removing the delete tags from the files as I clean up their other fields because I imagine this was a misunderstanding, but let me know if you'd like to restore them and carry this nomination out for another reason. czar 04:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- If the video game is notable and the copyvio problem is OK, I think we can keep them. However, we should not remove the deletion request tags until this DR is closed. BrightRaven (talk) 11:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The video game is indeed notable and there isn't a copyvio issue. It will be handled by OTRS at this point, so this would be the same as withdrawing the nomination, if you are amenable. @BrightRaven And screenshots from a video game can be authored by the developer as a whole—not by a single individual. czar 11:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: two, kept the first one which is somehow in use and leaving it to the OTRS procedure. The other files are out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Probable additional copyright issues. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
All rights reserved; http://www.dougrichardson.com/blog/anger-enemy/ Finavon (talk) 21:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Official photos, maps, documents. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Police.punjab.Dis.Bahawalpur.PNG
- File:Criminal Identification and Sketching System (CISS).JPG
- File:Ciss.png
- File:Vide Area Networking System (VANS).jpg
- File:Elite police bwp.JPG
- File:Elite police bahawalpur.jpg
- File:Elite police.jpg
- File:Imie verification.png
- File:District Police Officer Bahawalpur.jpg
- File:Vehicle Tracking System.jpg
- File:Vide Area Networking System.jpg
- File:Software frequent calls Record.png
- File:Verificationvehicle.jpg
- File:Organogram District Bahawalpur Police.png
- File:VerificationOfVehicle.jpg
- File:Verification Of Vehicles on Road.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Doubtful claims of own work on these official police images and a map.
- File:Csi unit bwp.jpg
- File:Csi wall pic.jpg
- File:Organogram dis bwp.png
- File:Police.punjab.Dis.Bahawalpur.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 05:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charafsaid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ebaub.edu.bd/images/slider/slide_image1.jpg.
- File:Chapainawabganj Government College view.jpg
- File:Permanent Campus Area of EBAUB.jpg
- File:Her Excellency Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Inaugurating EXIM BANK Agricultural University Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Theory Class Room of EBAUB.jpg
- File:EBAUB Reception Desk.jpg
- File:Library of EBAUB.jpg
- File:EBAUB Main Campus.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clarissa Veiga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Delia fischer 5.jpg
- File:Delia Fischer Saudações.png
- File:Delia Fischer 1.jpg
- File:Delia Fischer 2.jpg
- File:Delia Fischer 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Banllywood (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk COM:COPYVIO/COM:SCOPE/COM:NOTHOST upload.
- File:TOP BANLLY ACTRESSES.jpg
- File:MUDKA Muktar Murjan and Osman.jpg
- File:BANLLYWOOD FASHION.jpg
- File:Banllywood New Action Comedy.jpg
- File:Muktar America in the Studio.jpg
- File:Murjay and Abdinaasir.jpg
- File:BANLLYWOOD Top Actors.jpg
- File:Banllywood Entering face.jpg
- File:HAASIT FILM 2015.jpg
- File:DEDAAL MOVIE.jpg
- File:JINI AKARET MOVIE.jpg
- File:Banllywood actors.jpg
- File:Muktar America others Banllywood actors.jpg
- File:BANLLY SBTV.png
- File:BANLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT SBTV INC For Life.jpg
- File:SBTV Face.png
- File:Banllywood Face.png
- File:FULL Banllywood LOGO.png
- File:SBTV LOGO.png
- File:BANLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT SBTV INC LOGO.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE - unused, low quality image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? 
Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Flippin egg (talk) 02:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
A private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.
- File:Actorpmr IMG 1891.jpg
- File:Actorpmr DSC 1260.jpg
- File:Actorpmr Rahul mayil temple up.jpg
- File:ActorPmr & santhanam.jpg
- File:Actorpmr,.jpg
- File:Actorpmr ;.jpg
- File:Actorpmr;.jpg
- File:Actorpmr'.jpg
- File:Actorpmr.jpg
- File:Actorpmr1.jpg
- File:Actorpmr @ birthday celebration on 02march2016.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 17:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (45).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (43).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (13).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (68).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (56).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (58).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (57).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (55).JPG
- File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (54).JPG
Ies (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by me and Túrelio Alan (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Egyptian Museum (353).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (348).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (323).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (319).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (299).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (298).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum (295).jpg
- File:Egyptian Museum000 (6).jpg
Ies (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Fair use images:posters --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- This action is classified as a type of harassment because I, as sysop, rejected some administrative requested moves of this user on Arabic Wikipedia. So, there is no logical reason to delete these photos as he has indicated.--لا روسا (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by SVG. Duplicate of existing file. Uploader requests deletion. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 00:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by SVG. Duplicate of existing file. Uploader requests deletion. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 00:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This image is a screenshot of Internet Explorer and Wikipedia, none of which are the properties of the uploader as he has claimed. Internet Explorer is non-free. Its screenshots cannot appear on Commons. (Wikipedia is free, but it needs proper licensing.) 37.27.99.27 01:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by SVG. Uploader requests deletion. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- I hereby withdraw my deletion request. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Not own work 191.85.47.244 01:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete For sure not own work: https://tineye.com/search/e484dd7ada81ddf2f1ebfd263612d881e87c16a8/?sort=size&order=desc. --jdx Re: 07:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Not free. Picture is warner brothers movie poster and requires least a OTRS permit Zache (talk) 02:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
missing OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing OTRS from what appears to be a paid editor Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
missing OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing OTRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF data, plenty similar images on internet avaialble. Doubtful own-work. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Also including following image from same author. Probably grabbed from internet. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
The window is an artwork of Ernst Günter Hansing who died in 2011. Therefore it's still copyrighted. Interiors are not covered by freedom of panorama in Germany. The picture unfortunately has to be deleted. Code (talk) 04:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- der Löschung des Bildes vom Glasfenster widerspreche ich, weil es als Kunstwerk zu der Kirche gehört und nicht als Einzelkunstwerk vorgestellt wird. Das Bild wird nicht kommerziell verwertet, sondern im Rahmen eines Wettbewerbs eingereicht. Die Kirche in ihrer äußeren Form und Innenausstattung ist Gegenstand des Wettbewerbs. Das Glasfenster gehört zu beiden Ansichten. Klaus Tuch
- @Tuchklaus: Es tut mir leid, aber es kommt auf kommerzielle Absichten nicht an. Das Foto ist eine öffentliche Zugänglichmachung (§ 19a UrhG) des Fensters. Das Fenster selbst ist zweifelsfrei noch urheberrechtlich geschützt. Das Recht der öffentlichen Zugänglichmachung ist dem Urheber vorbehalten (§ 15 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 UrhG). Du benötigst also grundsätzlich dessen Zustimmung, die Du nicht hast. Damit stellt sich dann nur noch die Frage, ob Schranken eingreifen, die eine Veröffentlichung auch ohne Zustimmung des Urhebers erlauben. Eine solche Schranke kann die Panoramafreiheit sein (§ 59 UrhG), die aber ausdrücklich nur für Außenaufnahmen gilt, nicht für Innenansichten. Zu diskutieren wäre vielleicht noch, ob das Fenster hier Beiwerk ist (§ 57 UrhG), was ich aber klar verneinen würde, zumal Du selbst nach der Dateibeschreibung ein Foto des Fensters veröffentlichen wolltest und nicht ein Foto des Innenraums, auf dem nebenbei auch das Fenster zu sehen ist. Sorry, aber das ist eine Urheberrechtsverletzung, die wir hier auf Commons nicht werden behalten können. --Code (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Mistakenly uploaded the same image twice (identical to File:ISR-2013-Avdat-Inscribed tablet 01.jpg) Godot13 (talk) 06:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be copyrighted image Mark Marathon (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no metadata, picture certainly found on the internet. Cjp24 (talk) 07:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright image. Original source http://www.fkknorway.com/program-shihan-collins/ Mark Marathon (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright image. Original source http://www.budokai.se/Web/Board Mark Marathon (talk) 07:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright image. Original source http://www.fkknorway.com/stralende-nyheter-2-nye-8-dan-shihan-howard-m-collins-shihan-brian-fitkin/ Mark Marathon (talk) 07:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright image. Original source http://www.sats.se/traning/grupptraning/jazz/ Mark Marathon (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
small cropped useless image of the Kremlin without usage Stolbovsky (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I doubt the satellite image is own work. BrightRaven (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I doubt the satellite image is own work. BrightRaven (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
we decided not to disclose it before the product is accomplished. Shelleylai1979 (talk) 08:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BrightRaven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.dirkweiler.com/Home.html. Considering the credit and the watermark, it is at least somewhat likely that the uploader is the photographer. So I think a regular DR would be better than a speedy deletion. Karim Khawatmi must follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 08:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Also affected: File:Dirk Weiler, Actor Singer.jpg. BrightRaven (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Description states that it is a "promo photo". Missing EXIF and unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed, or released under a free license that allows for commercial derivative works as we require. Photographer/copyright holder must confirm the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have the permission to upload it. Their official verified Facebook page sent me the picture. Watch this video (it's only 1 minute) where i explain it and show that they gave me the permission to upload it. --Eurofan88 (talk) 09:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- We cannot archive a youtube link. You must use OTRS
- There is no mention of a free license at all. Remember, as linked to above, we only accept photographs that the copyright holder has released under a license that allows for commercial, derivative works. Storkk (talk) 09:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a photoshopped version of the following non-free image: [1]. Permission from the original photographer is required. De728631 (talk) 09:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Per metadata, the copyright holder is 2plus.ch ... who must confirm the license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
poor quality, small Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Poster unlikely to be freely licensed. Poster designer should confirm the free license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Appears to have been uploaded by the subject. License or documentation of transfer of copyright from the photographer is required via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Per tineye, a less garishly colored version was uploaded to www.lakebaikaltravel.com (now defunct and nameparked) in 2014. Actual photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, vaninshingly unlikely to be {{Own work}} of uploader. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, likely uploaded by subject, unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm license or transfer of copyright by following the instructions on COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 10:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be {{Own work}} unless it is out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 10:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing camera metadata, likely corporate/professional shot. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 10:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work or freely licensed. Representative of the film festival should confirm they release their logo under a free license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Owning a copy of a photograph does not confer copyright to it. Original photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Likely studio/professional portrait. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing metadata, NTSC size (720x540): likely still from TV or video. Copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Photo of a photo. Owning a copy of a photograph does not confer copyright to it. Original photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata: unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by SVG, unused. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Credited to Tristan Shu, who should confirm license or transfer of copyright by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Holdenchow.jpg
This photograph was published without permission. It belongs to Revista Estante (Fnac Portugal) | David Clifford/4SEE. 46.189.178.191 10:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing metadata and per tineye, published on https://ioneglobalgrind.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/14254788965631.jpg?w=1024 two months before being uploaded here. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata, likely studio portrait: unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 10:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Likely press photo, unlikely to be released under a free license as claimed. Copyright holder must follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of TV show without permission and poor quality. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Possibly PD for age-related reasons, but not overly likely. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Exif credits Matthew Cohen, who should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata: unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed, possibly a photo-of-a-photo. Original photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, missing camera metadata except credit to Zina AlDamlouji. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no camera metadata: unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Additional COM:SCOPE issues. Storkk (talk) 11:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Log into Micha'el Rowley 72.132.188.222 09:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Likely studio/professional portrait. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello Storkk, I confirm you that I am the author of the portrait of Jean Pierre Winter, and I'm Ok to publish it in Wikemedia under the following licence : CC-BY-SA-NC-ND 4.0 (I don't know how to change the license which is actually : CC-BY -SA-4.0 ) if you can help me this matter, it would be great. Thank you very much, — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.9.104.203 (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC) ←Copied from my talk page. Storkk (talk) 10:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Isabelledel and 109.9.104.203: Since we cannot verify the identity of a username or ip address, you must confirm that you are the copyright holder and agree to the license by following the instructions on →COM:OTRS← as previously stated. Note that we do not accept any license with Non-Commercial or No-Derivatives clauses, please see COM:L. The most restrictive license we allow is CC-BY-SA-4.0 and unless the copyright holder agrees to those terms, this will have to be deleted and there is little point in contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kurichand Roat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal image & self promotion, out of scope, non-WLM submission
Kiranravikumar (talk) 11:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused and not likely useful for an educational purpose: out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
With the 3-dimensional effects and the decorative letter Ö, this appears to be original enough for copyright. De728631 (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Also nominated: File:KösemSultan Sezon 2.jpg. De728631 (talk) 11:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete Per rationale. Kumkum (talk) 15:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
falscher Name, es sollte eine Kategorie erstellt werden Coyote III (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Slam 100.5 Official Logo.png
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Kathiyawari horse with silver decorartion owned by kathi kshatriya of jasdan.jpg
Seems like historical photo, not own work. Who is real photographer? Where the photo has been published? Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Rudi Ferder is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uneducational selfie. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. And instead of commenting on this deletion discussion, the uploader decided to charge ahead with File:Just an image of mortada.jpg, so let's consider that within the scope of this discussion too. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the subject. BrightRaven (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
same file was uploaded under the wanted name without a blank Bocardodarapti (talk) 12:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Ed Yourdon died in January of 2016; I'm his son, Jamie. The mother of the girl in this photo has contacted me and asked that we take it down. 2604:2000:1382:81BA:3C99:DA96:3CA5:EF27 12:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
L'auteur de ce cliché est une photographe professionnelle http://chloevollmerlo.net/photo/ . Il est très peu vraissemblable qu'elle ait publié ce cliché avec une licence compatible avec CC BY-SA 4.0 Cordialement. 6PO 12:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope.
It looks like a duck to me 80.221.159.67 12:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Info Possible sockpuppets:
80.221.159.67 12:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
WRONG NAME Kvenkatesh (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep Comment No valid reason to delete per Commons:Deletion policy. May still be out of Commons:Project scope. Info You can request file names to be renamed with Template:Rename. 80.221.159.67 13:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC) (edited: 13:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC))
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 12:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF metadata for camera information, unlikely to be own work. Needs OTRS permission from copyright holder (usually the photographer).
Also likely out of project scope, not in use. 80.221.159.67 12:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC) (edited: 16:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC))
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Images uploaded by a sock of a user with a significant history of copyright violations and block evasion (e.g. Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lorella800); accordingly there exists significant doubt as to the copyright status of these images and many may also fail COM:SCOPE by virtue of being unreadable or irreparably out of context and mainly unusable.
- File:Motonave Arborea - Tirrenia (1957-1976).jpg
- File:Unico ritratto del marchese di Castiglione del Lago Ascanio II della Corgna.jpg
- File:Porzia Colonna marchesa di Castiglione del Lago.jpg
- File:Unica effigie della marchesa di Massa Ricciarda Malaspina.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gottardo10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images uploaded by a sock of a user with a significant history of copyright violations and block evasion (e.g. Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lorella800); accordingly there exists significant doubt as to the copyright status of these images and many may also fail COM:SCOPE by virtue of being unreadable or irreparably out of context and mainly unusable.
- File:Stemma della famiglia perugina della Corgna.jpg
- File:Diomede della Corgna, marchese di Castiglione del Lago.jpg
- File:Alberico I Cybo Malaspina, principe di Massa.jpg
- File:Unico ritratto di Ricciarda Malaspina, marchesa di Massa.jpg
- File:Vessillo del marchesato di Castiglione del Lago.jpg
- File:Francesca Sforza, marchesa di Castiglione del Lago.jpg
- File:Eleonora de Mendoza, duchessa di Castiglione del Lago.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 12:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF metadata for camera information. Needs OTRS permission from copyright holder (usually the photographer). Also likely out of project scope, not in use. 80.221.159.67 12:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I cannot see any CC license on the pictures depicted in the screenshot. I need some help from an Argentinian user. Please see COM:DW. ★ Poké95 12:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Complex logo. Permission is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete based on editing on en.wikipedia, it is likely this person works for the organization in question. However, we have no provable reason to believe this person is the designated copyright agent for this organization and has authority to release rights to the logo under the specified license. Image is very likely above the threshold of originality. Hammersoft (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Logos of the real oil refineries under free license, it can't be. Spamer's contribution (blocked already), not in use.
Bilderling (talk) 13:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Arnaud_Sussmann.jpg is better, sorry Framawiki (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Correspondence FKP with Russian colleagues, 1990-91.pdf
- File:Correspondence between Fritz Preikschat and Russia colleagues, 1990-1991.pdf
- File:Photo of Boeing team for Technical Paper Award in 1970.pdf
- File:1970 Technical Paper Award for Boeing.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Please see updated source is now listed on each document/photo: "Fritz Karl Preikschat archives, Redmond, WA, USA." File:Correspondence between Fritz Preikschat and Russia colleagues, 1990-1991.pdf can be deleted because it is a duplicate. Preiker1 (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- I think permission from copyrights owner (heirs? archive?) via Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates) is necessary. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/OTRS needed. --lNeverCry 22:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete very likely not the property of the uploader. Actual license is unknown. Source location is unknown, but a Google image search returns this, showing a variety of possibilities. While it is widely available, this does not make it free license. Hammersoft (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tcmorgan34 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1430579.1376904169!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/western-wildfires.jpg.
- File:Beaver Creek Fire Retardant Drop supports FF.jpg
- File:SEAT RetardantDrop 257Fire.jpg
- File:SEAT retardant Drop Beaver Creek Fire ID.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dmr.nosdn.127.net/ZU6Txl6H8klWqVqHdnHWsw==/6896093022305863968.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.scdn.co/image/1cc349b6963af6f41333a41a6efb611d6c3585f9. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Costa Rica. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3131/2403737048_ea6fe3a16d_m.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3765-presscdn-0-77.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Archbishop_Wilton_D_Gregory.jpg.
- File:Wilton D Gregory.jpg
- File:Rogelio Cabrera.jpg
- File:Cardenal Suarez Inda.jpg
- File:Sigifredo Noriega.jpg
- File:Francisco Chavolla.jpg
- File:Silviano Carrillo.gif
- File:Carlos Aguiar.gif
- File:Jorge Patrón.png
- File:José Trinidad Zapata.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://チャチャルガン.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/IMG_9380-e1468213490275.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.vitaminedz.org/photos/86/02-86747-photo.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blsAtwh3NXVSOm9RXnP1YyzrsvNwocdK-g7WyJ7AJy-jqiBpJ1JmCLVzmg-sZ1_DQArLtO6h=s630-fcrop64=1,000021effffffbd4. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
already have same picture 고려 (talk) 15:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: Oh ! my mistake this pic is not the same with that picture 고려 (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
small, unused, no location Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Press photo/siemens with no permission. Higher resolution in PDF: http://www.siemens.com.mx/cms/mam/energy-management/transformadores/Documents/STM-Transformador-de-potencia-Siemens.pdf Wdwd (talk) 15:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
upload by mistake Predator99 (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright information Predator99 (talk) 11:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient for what? The copyright situation is very clear: PD. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
upload by mistake Predator99 (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright information Predator99 (talk) 11:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Karl Féaux de Lacroix died in 1927. I don't see any copyright issue here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
upload by mistake Predator99 (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright information Predator99 (talk) 11:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Feaux de Lacroix - Über den Anteil des Sauerlandes an den grossgeschichtlichen Bewegungen des späteren Mittelalters.pdf
[edit]upload by mistake Predator99 (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep after 5 years this is a non-argument. Why this is a mistake? ↔ User: Perhelion 17:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 22:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private wedding collage, Flickr author is wedding agency page Stolbovsky (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
scope, deleted article Triplecaña (talk) 17:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Fabricated film poster used in uploader's deleted hoax article en:Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Cabin Fever (film) JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
call center phone number is out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Not work of uploader Kamolan (talk) 18:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mufaddalmm.52 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotion, personal images & non-WLM submission. Out of scope.
Kiranravikumar (talk) 18:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This photo is not eligible for Commons. The creator is not Hephaestos but J. Müller, Kgl. Hofphot. Dessau. The licence is wrong since it is a German photograph and we don't know if Müller died before 1946. Ras67 (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 19:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Photos from ITTF. Kelly (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion given. --lNeverCry 22:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
poor quality, persons in the foreground are blurred or out of focus Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. More than adequate quality (it's motion blur, the people are walking). No alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes motion blur. Both people walking and the photographer. 1/40s exposure time isn't fast. And the background is heavily overexposed.
- The image had been uploaded without categories. The category has the same name as this image. It had only been created to find a category for this one. The category is next to be deleted.--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Potentially useful image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 19:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
very small, unused and with the information "Mountain range" (file name) and "river" (file info) not usable at all. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- also probably copyvio, I nominated all files by the same uploader via mass deletion. see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaibkhan36150 --Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork (extremely inaccurate vector version of File:GuentherZ 2012-11-23 00089 Wien Hauptbahnhof Tafel.jpg).
And also:
FDMS 4 19:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Private image gallery. Unused, out of project scope.
GeorgHH • talk 19:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahzaibkhan36150 (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably copyvio, collected from different sources on the web, even from wikipedia... no exif data.
- File:View From Sharda Fort, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan324.jpg
- File:Shangrila-skardu11.jpg
- File:Shangrila-Pakistan.jpg
- File:Satpara-Lake.jpg
- File:Restaurant abbottabad 5.jpg
- File:FCgoMQv.jpg
- File:Ratti-gali-lake.jpg
- File:ImagesJX3MV9Z2.jpg
- File:Green123.jpg
- File:Beautiful-northern-areas-pakistan.jpg
- File:Blue lake of naltar.jpg
- File:Crown-of-neelum-valley.jpg
Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Mountain range.png has been nominated for single deletion by me. but it could also be added to the list (but visualfilechange couldn't...)--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Flickr image is not found to verify the copyright status - other images by the same Flickr user have been uploaded and are using copyright tags we don't accept, such as File:Estación Ruta N - U de A (Metro de Medellín).jpg found at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/97765695@N04/29044373796/in/dateposted/ Ww2censor (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission DAAyanz (talk) 20:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyright violation. Sakhalinio (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio, file can be found via google image search from various sources. File name and description are (deliberately) wrong, this is moraine lake in Canada. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Mistake of mine. I moved this image from Italian Wikipedia where it was indicated as a PD-ITALY screenshot, but the film is actually a French production, so it is inelegible for PD-ITALY. Cavarrone (talk) 20:14, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyvio. 92.147.180.138 20:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete: a derivative image of a newspaper front page featuring a large photo cannot be considered to not meet the threshold of originality per the uploader's claim. The Flickr user has many derivative images that are obvious copyright violations even though they licence their images freely. Ww2censor (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This is not covered by FOP in the US. DAAyanz (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Photo has a copyright logo!! Sakhalinio (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that University of Utah Marriott Library Special Collections have donated their copyright David Biddulph (talk) 21:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
duplicate file (please delete; I am the creator) Preiker1 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
please delete (duplicate page) Preiker1 (talk) 22:45, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
This image is originally from Gent Onuzi – I doubt that user:Kevjassintkevin is Gent Onuzi – especially as the image is mirror-inverted. Albinfo (talk) 23:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Source of image: http://www.oranews.tv/vendi/dasma-e-princit-leka-ii-dhe-elias-permes-fotove-ekskluzive/
- Check also meta data. --Albinfo (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing legal information Technopat (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
la page affecte sur les comportements des enfants 41.137.57.129 16:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Per COM:CENSORSHIP, a file is not deleted solely on the grounds that it may not be "child-friendly" or that it may cause offence to you or others. Betty Logan (talk) 16:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Non-sense DR (and vandalism). Commons is not censored. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
this media file is Not educationall or useful at all it's just a Pornographic video and should be removed Motawer.Dev (talk) 15:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The fact it is pornographic does not come into it. If it were not useful then the media would not be used by the various Wikipedias and at least two language editions use the media file. Whether it is educational or not is subjective, but I would say hosting classic films that have fallen into the public domain is a credible use of the Commons. Betty Logan (talk) 18:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- if anyone uploaded their amateur porn videos which might be free to use (public domain) commons will become a porn site, and yes hosting films that have fallen into the public domain is a good use of commons but only if the file has any educational value, and the reason commons exists is [Educational & Useful].--Motawer.Dev (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The file is useful because it is used as a supporting material on articles about the film. Its presence and purpose on Commons is no different to that of File:Birth of a Nation (1915).webm and File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm. The only reason you have singled it out is because it is pornographic so I suggest you review COM:CENSORSHIP. Betty Logan (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- As for a supporting material a Trailer would be fairly enough File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, Edited Trailer.webm or File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, trailer.webm. As for my reasons, being pornographic is one but not all, I don't see any educational value that this file can add to the community or to the entire world, it's not an illustration of something or has any valuable info, even when considering the broad meaning of "Educational" the file does not provide knowledge nor it is instructional or informative. Motawer.Dev (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The educational value is fairly obvious: readers are able to view the work that is being discussed. In that regard it offers the same value as any other classic film in the public domain hosted on the Commons. Your agenda here is transparent: the fact the film is pornographic isn't "one of" your reasons, it is the sole reason. Betty Logan (talk) 22:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- As for a supporting material a Trailer would be fairly enough File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, Edited Trailer.webm or File:Debbie Does Dallas, 1978, trailer.webm. As for my reasons, being pornographic is one but not all, I don't see any educational value that this file can add to the community or to the entire world, it's not an illustration of something or has any valuable info, even when considering the broad meaning of "Educational" the file does not provide knowledge nor it is instructional or informative. Motawer.Dev (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The file is useful because it is used as a supporting material on articles about the film. Its presence and purpose on Commons is no different to that of File:Birth of a Nation (1915).webm and File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm. The only reason you have singled it out is because it is pornographic so I suggest you review COM:CENSORSHIP. Betty Logan (talk) 23:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Excuse me because I failed to understand your definition of "Educational", the way you describe it seems like a "reference", and if it's only that then a Trailer is super enough, while the meaning I'm referring to is 'Educational', if it was the MakeOf the film then I would say it has some educational value because it show how films of that kind are made. But this case is not the file's not informative nor instructional or even provide any useful knowledge and in addition to all this it's Pornographic -Motawer.Dev (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - as much as I don't love this keep !vote being one of the few deletion discussions I've participated in on commons, this is clearly in scope as a well known film that is the subject of wikipedia articles, etc. No other policy-based reason to delete given. — Rhododendrites talk | 04:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE on fr:Debbie_Does_Dallas. d:Q579826 lists 12 articles about this movie, that meet criteria of notability. The movie should be added to all that do not include it. --Jarekt (talk) 02:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - per COM:INUSE. Wikicology (talk) 21:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I strongly vote for delete, because if we kept them with reasons such COM:INUSE then no body will complain if someone wrote an article on Wikipedia about self cannibalism (or anything disgusting ) and by chance he found a video on commons of someone who cut his arm and ate it or chewed it while it's still connected, so he used the file to support his article, or an article about Self-Nutrition, and of course a file is always ready for the case showing someone eating his feces, or anything disgusting, Sorry for the words but you can imagine. And this case is not different from the above cases: the file is In Use and Commons is not Censored and lastly the file has no Licensing Issues. the point is if there is no law (yet) against killing someone on the moon, it does not mean you can, and if a file is intended for adults, then it should be uploaded where it belongs not here, I never imagined a world famous website intended to teach the world and spread knowledge to host such files, never in a million year, I wonder if people who donate to Wikimedia foundation know about the rules here !!. anyway sorry if crossed the grey line but I think I made myself clear. DroidPedia (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure how seriously this comment should be taken, given its content and the fact that the user has 0 other edits, but Wikipedia is not censored, and neither is Commons. This is a film that has been the subject of a lot of coverage and is therefore an encyclopedic subject. That it contains explicit content is not reason to delete. Nor is what someone might upload in some ridiculous hypothetical. See COM:SCOPE and COM:NOT. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry if I sound rude but you should take my comment very seriously, and about the 0 edits, I've made some edits at Wikipedia but only as visitor I never thought about creating an account as my contributions are very rare, but I created an account just to contribute to the deletion of this file (and similar ones) So I guess this is the only good thing came from it. I work as an IT specialist at the Municipality Public Library in which we provide aside from local books more than 80 computer with free and unlimited access to online libraries and useful websites such as e-mail services and of course can't forget all Wikimedia projects, even in summer we get some visitors and last Saturday I was doing some minor computer maintenance I saw a 13 maybe 12 years old kid watching something, the poor kid just run out of luck because when I turned my eyes toward the screen I saw it clearly (a *** and ***), the kid was playing nothing but this file, I was so angry and gave him a hell of a slap but the kid didn't cry instead he run away with a creepy smile on his face, I could only imagine what was in his little head maybe :"I found a treasure", and when I checked the browser history the kid entered wikimedia.org then commons and searched for "porn video" (I'm sure this is universal in all languages) and I'm also sure the kid did not understand what they said in the film because he barely know French (English has to wait for few other years), the kid didn't saw the film on Wikipedia or any other page but Commons, you get the idea right?. anyway I hope their parent don't sue me because I provided access to digital pornographic content to minor (which is forbidden not only in my country ) and here it's forbidden even for adults, even if it was unintentionally from my side but it is considered lack of responsibility and professionalism, Now I think I should start doing some filtering either search for files and block links one by one (which is really Stupid) or block commons.wikimedia.org (this is also a bad idea) or lastly ask people here reasonably, logically and politely to delete the files. I think this a very long comment so I will end it with: I remember reading about a law project in the USA (about 2003) to criminalize providing pornographic materials to juveniles with prior knowledge of their legal situation this goes also for websites based in the USA and that they should inform the visitor to not enter if he's under 18. DroidPedia (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure how seriously this comment should be taken, given its content and the fact that the user has 0 other edits, but Wikipedia is not censored, and neither is Commons. This is a film that has been the subject of a lot of coverage and is therefore an encyclopedic subject. That it contains explicit content is not reason to delete. Nor is what someone might upload in some ridiculous hypothetical. See COM:SCOPE and COM:NOT. — Rhododendrites talk | 15:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- DroidPedia, I understand it is a problem, but we can not help you with it. Commons is not censored and it does have a lot of material which might not be OK for minors to watch. And if they want to find porn I am dure they will find it, if not here than on other sites. Check out w:Porn 2.0 article for ideas of other sites to either block or ask to delete their content. --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks Jarekt, But the listed websites are intended for adults and they announce it publicly and loudly “we provide adults content only”, and most of them prompt the visitor with a message to either Leave as this is only an Adult place or to enter at his own risk, and some of them use age verification system, all this just to be on the brightest side of the law, and honestly I can't got to a porn site and ask them to erase all the data in their server's hard drives, though I wish if it could work, and for me I'm running a White listed Firewall, The world is blocked except for the good websites, and I had no issues with that list except for two cases, the first with Internet Archive and the last with Commons. the two cases use Educational flag and hide mines in their fields. Look I don't mean to be mean or anything, I really like the whole Idea of Wikimedia and I learned a lot from here, But I think it could be perfect if only they did something about this black spot, In fact I never saw any kind of signs or anything that say "shocking images" at least except for once, it was an image hidden by a sign and I don't even remember whether it said shocking image or pornographic media, and if only they prompt the visitor with a warning message, I wouldn't be angry. and again I think there is a law against providing pornographic materials to minors with prior knowledge of their age. --DroidPedia (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- DroidPedia, I understand it is a problem, but we can not help you with it. Commons is not censored and it does have a lot of material which might not be OK for minors to watch. And if they want to find porn I am dure they will find it, if not here than on other sites. Check out w:Porn 2.0 article for ideas of other sites to either block or ask to delete their content. --Jarekt (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE (used in fr wikipedia main namespace) and no consensus to delete the file. If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider). --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hardcore-Pornography, no educational purpose TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Former nominations for a deletion argued that "Debbie Does Dallas" endanger the well-being of children. That is right, but it is not the a discussion I'd like to start, as far as I know the community's point of view. The primary problem is the law! As you know, the open access to pornography without any check of the legal age is highly forbidden. A second argument is the educational purpose: "Debbie Does Dallas" is a porn video, not a documentary. You could argue about the historical porns you could find here, but a full porn of 1978 hasn't any educational purpose! Some aruge, that the french wikipedia would use it. In fact, the open access of porn is higly forbidden in France. So first: there is a legal ban on porn in the internet, and second: there is no educational purpose. So why retain a porn on wikimedia commons? TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 11:38, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Wikimedia projects are hosted in the United States, not France. Commons is not censored. There is no legal requirement in United States to check age for pornography as far as I'm aware: Such extraordinary claim needs extraordinary references to back it up. The work is in use at Wikimedia projects, so it falls within Commons' project scope per COM:INUSE. These arguments have been previously iterated. 80.221.159.67 12:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Reiterating what was said by User:Steinsplitter in closing the second deletion nomination: If there is evidence that the file has been hosted in violation of US law please contact the Wikimedia Foundation (in his role as hosting provider).
80.221.159.67 12:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment I recommend imposing a 1-year moratorium on deletion nominations. Three nominations in a 2-month period is an abuse of the process and just wastes people's time. If the circumstances change sufficiently then it can be reviewed a year from now, or if the legal context changes the foundation can delete it at its own discretion. Betty Logan (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Keep So TünnesUndSchäl, a user that [:[Category_talk:Females_having_sex|"been irritated of a photograph showing a close-up of a penetration in the german Wikipedia"]] - by the way what kind of articles were you reading to appear this kind of imagery? I ask this as i find odd what kind of article would had this kind of imagery except ones related to sex and pornography? - after your first (and third deletion request about this file) not happy with the closure, you open a new deletion request only 2 months have passed, with the very same arguments and make several wild claims without backing them up with facts and laws. You, that only "contribute" with deletion requests of this kind of files, as you are on a moral crusade per your own words as you asked "Is there any cleanup of this category planned?", should know what the law of the land is, beggining per Miller v. California.
File in use so in scope. This movie has articles on 12 languages in Wikipedia, so educational and " it is regarded as one of the most important releases during the so-called "Golden Age of Porn",[5] and remains one of the best-known pornographic films" per english Wikipedia article.Tm (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: the file has been in used continuously in the article for almost a year, so we don't have to look at the 'scope' question. Laws on child protection may play a role, but this is not handled by our DR procedure. If you think there is a legal problem with the file, please contact legal at wikimedia dot org. --Jcb (talk) 09:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cstevencampbell (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of models, product packaging, and printed materials (e.g. File:AMT57TBird.jpg) See User:Elcobbola/Models for rationale and precedent DRs.
- File:MercurySpeedyFordGT.jpg
- File:MercuryChaparralGasCap.jpg
- File:MercuryChaparral2F.jpg
- File:BritainsHowitzer.jpg
- File:HuskyJaguarFire.jpg
- File:TootsietoySafari.jpg
- File:MPCMonzaFront.jpg
- File:MPC1977MonzaSide.jpg
- File:TootsietoyCheetah.jpg
- File:ClownImage1930s.jpg
- File:FunHoExcavator.jpg
- File:MaistoFerrari550Maranello.jpg
- File:ModelPorsche.jpg
- File:MebetoysPorsche924.jpg
- File:ProgettoKFerrari225interior.jpg
- File:ProgettoKFerrari225front.jpg
- File:ProgettoKFerrari225box.jpg
- File:ProgettoKBirdcage.jpg
- File:GamdaBarracudaRear.jpg
- File:GamdaBarracudaBase.jpg
- File:GamdaChryslersCompared.jpg
- File:GamdaChrysler.jpg
- File:GamdaKoorBarracuda.jpg
- File:RemcoRecyclingTruck.jpg
- File:WinrossWhiteCab.jpg
- File:TraxValiantChargerRear.jpg
- File:TraxValiantCharger.jpg
- File:TopGearHoldenNewspaper.jpg
- File:TraxFalconCobra.jpg
- File:EfsiCommerVan.jpg
- File:KadenTatraT613.jpg
- File:R.W.ModellKommissbrot.jpg
- File:TomicaToyota2000GTbase.jpg
- File:TootsietoyHardbodyGTX.jpg
- File:TootsietoyCountach.jpg
- File:Cigar Box Lola.jpg
- File:MebetoysInnocentiSkis.jpg
- File:TomteLaerdalChassis.jpg
- File:TomteLaerdalPickup.jpg
- File:SafirHK1898Peugeot.jpg
- File:SafirHK1898PeugeotWheel.jpg
- File:Safir1898PanhardChassis.jpg
- File:Safir1898Panhard.jpg
- File:BudgieToysCommerREA.jpg
- File:MorestoneCoach.jpg
- File:MPC1977Dodge.jpg
- File:BarclaySportsCars.jpg
- File:BarclayBeerTruck.jpg
- File:SablonNacoralWheel.jpg
- File:SablonNSUro80front.jpg
- File:SablonNSUro80Side.jpg
- File:FranklinMintMetroEngine.jpg
- File:FranklinMintMetro.jpg
- File:FranklinMintHarleySoftail.jpg
- File:MarxFordJType.jpg
- File:EfsiSafeway.jpg
- File:SikuWhitewall.jpg
- File:SikuSuperMunchenBus.jpg
- File:SikuMiniSign.jpg
- File:SikuVTempoMatador.jpg
- File:SikuVFordTransit.jpg
- File:LledoChevPennzoil.jpg
- File:LledoAustinDrPepper.jpg
- File:MebetoysInnocentiChassis.jpg
- File:LledoDoubleBus2.jpg
- File:DuguCisitaliaFront.jpg
- File:DuguCisitaliaBox.jpg
- File:AuburnPlymouthAirport.jpg
- File:AMT59EdselWarp.jpg
- File:WesternAston.jpg
- File:EfsiFordTow.jpg
- File:ConradFreightlinerDetail.jpg
- File:ConradFreightliner.jpg
- File:RevellMaxwell.jpg
- File:JouefFerrariP41a.jpg
- File:TeknoMonza.jpg
- File:LonestarImpyCorsairFire.jpg
- File:PilenFIATTrunk1.jpg
- File:DinkyDesotoFireflite.jpg
- File:RevellGoggomobilT250deluxe.jpg
- File:RevellGoggomobilT250basic.jpg
- File:KadenWheel.jpg
- File:KovapVWVans.jpg
- File:MinichampsWartburg311a.jpg
- File:CigarboxAurora.jpg
- File:DinkyTank.jpg
- File:MiniluxeBMW1500.jpg
- File:PilenGhibli.jpg
- File:PilenMonteverdiHai.jpg
- File:PilenCitroenDS.jpg
- File:DinkyMonteverdi375L.jpg
- File:SchucoPiccoloMercedesBus.jpg
- File:Bburago57Testarossa.jpg
- File:NorevAtlasSMPresident.jpg
- File:MajoretteLandRover.jpg
- File:EligorChrysler.jpg
- File:BrummW125.jpg
- File:MarxHudsonFire.jpg
- File:PolistilMorgan.jpg
- File:NorevDauphine.jpg
- File:MinialuxeRenault1910.jpg
- File:MinialuxeCitroen.jpg
- File:BburagoDinoNew.jpg
- File:BburagoMaseratiRear.jpg
- File:SpotOnRoverWheel.jpg
- File:SpotOnMGPB.jpg
- File:RIOLincolnDiorama.jpg
- File:DCMTBus.jpg
- File:Bburago300Cockpit.jpg
- File:Bburago300SL.jpg
- File:PMCFordRanchero.jpg
- File:PMCPlymouthChassis.jpg
- File:PMCPlymouthTaxi.jpg
- File:FunmateF1Car.jpg
- File:FunmateTorino.jpg
- File:PlayartPorsche914.jpg
- File:HubleyFordWagon.jpg
- File:BrooklinKaiserWheel.jpg
- File:BrooklinKaiser.jpg
- File:WinrossFordTanker.jpg
- File:Johan66Toronado.jpg
- File:AMT62Ford.jpg
- File:PlayartRoverPolice.jpg
- File:Cursor1923MercedesDiesel.jpg
- File:PolitoysMIsoRivolta.jpg
- File:StahlbergVolvo245detail.jpg
- File:StahlbergVolvo245.jpg
- File:Hubley58Ford2.jpg
- File:Hubley58Ford.jpg
- File:JohanPlymouth.jpg
- File:VeremMaserati.jpg
- File:WinrossQuaker.jpg
- File:GeschaSmallBus.jpg
- File:LoneStarLondonTaxi.jpg
- File:EligorTriumphRear.jpg
- File:EligorTriumphTR5.jpg
- File:AuburnRancheroWindow.jpg
- File:AuburnCunningham.jpg
- File:AuburnRubberIndyRacer.jpg
- File:VitesseAustinHealey.jpg
- File:PolistilAlfasud.jpg
- File:Brumm47Jaguar.jpg
- File:RioCitroen.jpg
- File:AMT57TBird.jpg
- File:AMT59Mercury.jpg
- File:AUTOArtBugatti.jpg
- File:SchabakAudiAvant.jpg
- File:GamaSchucoAudi100.jpg
- File:GamaMinimodFiat.jpg
- File:SchucoBMWTurbo.jpg
- File:NorevRenault17.jpg
- File:Auto Art Saturn.jpg
- File:Mebetoys Innocenti.jpg
- File:Husky Triumph TR7.jpg
- File:Husky Studebaker Lark Wagonaires.jpg
- File:CorgiDaktari.jpg
- File:TomteCars.jpg
- File:StahlSAAB2.jpg
- File:PromoChevrear.jpg
- File:GalaniteSaab.jpg
- File:VitCaddyPanamerica2.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:DinkyTank.jpg and potentially others, on account of their age. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- The Dinky Toys 151a was produced from 1937 to 1941, which is not nearly old enough to presume the author has been dead 70 years (UK is pma + 70). Similarly, an anonymous claim cannot be made without appropriate evidence, as not known to us does not mean not known to anyone. There's no reason this, or others, would be PD due to age. Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Our practice, here and at en:WP, is that when reasonable (and the legal definition of "reasonable" is both the subject of first year law school essays, and met here) efforts to ascertain the designer are fruitless, then that may be considered anonymous. Accordingly the pre-war UK Dinky designs may be considered as PD. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- And what reasonable efforts have been made here? By all means, forward negative correspondence to COM:OTRS and we can certain retain images of the related works. Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- None of the standard histories for Dinky record designers for these models of this era. Dinky themselves may have held records, but most of those were destroyed in the various shrinkages of the Binns Road factory site through the 1970s. I ought to know - it was our family that hauled much of the scrap off that site. I could even check Meccano's own filing cabinets for traces - I still have three of them in the workshop. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- And what reasonable efforts have been made here? By all means, forward negative correspondence to COM:OTRS and we can certain retain images of the related works. Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Our practice, here and at en:WP, is that when reasonable (and the legal definition of "reasonable" is both the subject of first year law school essays, and met here) efforts to ascertain the designer are fruitless, then that may be considered anonymous. Accordingly the pre-war UK Dinky designs may be considered as PD. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- The Dinky Toys 151a was produced from 1937 to 1941, which is not nearly old enough to presume the author has been dead 70 years (UK is pma + 70). Similarly, an anonymous claim cannot be made without appropriate evidence, as not known to us does not mean not known to anyone. There's no reason this, or others, would be PD due to age. Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Considering the copyrighted creation vs. utilitarian subject argument, it just seems that there is no exploitation of creative license by posting a few examples of a toy in a Wikipedia article where no one is making money off of the subject matter. The picture is used for 'illustrative' purposes, not profiteering ones. It makes little sense to have articles on the subject, if the subject cannot be seen. Is there ANY leeway for 'fair use' here at all? --Cstevencampbell (talk) 22:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I understand the law is different in different countries regarding portrayal of toys, so pictures of toys from France may be protected differently for pictures from toys from the United States, etc.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Your first comment is essentially an invocation of notions disallowed by COM:PRP; whether anyone is currently making money is not relevant. Images on the Commons must allow commercial exploitation if so desired. Fair use is also not allowed on the Commons - see COM:FU. All images on the Commons must comply with the laws of the US and the origin country, if different. (Because WMF servers are in the US.) Accordingly, it does not matter how other countries treat a given work if it is copyrightable in the US. Even some of the images here explicitly claim a copyright (see File:BritainsHowitzer.jpg - "copyright model"). Эlcobbola talk 22:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Si c'est des reproductions de modèles de voitures existantes. Supprimer si c'est des modèles originaux.--Classiccardinal (talk) 14:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- How do you reconcile this opinion with the information in this essay? Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Au cas par cas, pas en groupe. Désolé, je parle pas anglais, mais je vois pas comment admettre cette photo
et pas celle là File:MebetoysPorsche924.jpg. Ou alors on vire toute les photos de voitures.--Classiccardinal (talk) 19:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- C'est pas en dessous du Commons:Threshold of originality?--Classiccardinal (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Au cas par cas, pas en groupe. Désolé, je parle pas anglais, mais je vois pas comment admettre cette photo
- How do you reconcile this opinion with the information in this essay? Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Classiccardinal --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Canvassed at Commons:Bistro. Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, c'est interdit?--Classiccardinal (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Canvassed at Commons:Bistro. Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: Please avoid to insult intelligence of others ones. Please try to suppose the good faith of people who don't think like you. It is the minimum we can expect from an administrator. Thank you. --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Benoît Prieur: Please keep patronizing nonsense to yourself. Questioning one's objectivity is not questioning one's intellence. Clearly you believe (albeit wrongly) that these files are not copyvios; I have not said otherwise, which would be a failure of good faith. Read and think critically. Эlcobbola talk 19:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: Please avoid to insult intelligence of others ones. Please try to suppose the good faith of people who don't think like you. It is the minimum we can expect from an administrator. Thank you. --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep to be kept (example File:PromoChevrear.jpg) for the same reason of this discussion: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Scale_model_of_a_police_car_based_on_an_FSO_Warszawa_M20-57_or_200_of_Milicja_Obywatelska.jpg
- The verdict was: "the scale model has nothing added to the original car that meets the threshold of originality - the different overall size doesn't, the use of plastic instead of steel doesn't and the absence of an operational engine isn't even visible at the picture" --Arosio Stefano (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Models, being non-utilitarian, are not exempt from copyright in the same way as the object that they depict. I have tried to err on the side of caution, keeping those that may be PD per Andy Dingley, and those that just might fall under the COM:TOO (although this is very low in some countries, like the UK), or those for which Copyright registration would have had to be renewed (i.e. possible {{PD-US-not renewed}}). They should be re-nominated if I have kept them in error. None of the {{Vk}} arguments other than Andy Dingley's appear to even attempt following law or Commons policy, which elcobbola has summarized thoroughly at User:Elcobbola/Models. Failure to either address those points or argue why they should not apply renders ones {{Vk}} moot, remember that this is not a vote. Note that some of these may be uploadable to local wikis like English Wikipedia that allow for fair use. If assistance or temporary undeletion is needed for this purposes, that can be arranged. Storkk (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
US models that may be PD (or may not be)
[edit]This is a renomination of some that I did not delete when closing the previous DR... These are models, which as non-utilitarian objects are not exempt from copyright in the same way as the objects they represent (see User:Elcobbola/Models). These were made in the US, so may be PD due to copyright lapsing (see {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}) - this would need to be ascertained for each before they can be kept. Storkk (talk) 10:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:RevellMaxwell.jpg
- File:RevellGoggomobilT250deluxe.jpg
- File:CigarboxAurora.jpg
- File:RevellGoggomobilT250basic.jpg
- File:PromoChevrear.jpg
- File:FranklinMintHarleySoftail.jpg
- File:MarxFordJType.jpg
- File:FranklinMintMetro.jpg
File:AMT59EdselWarp.jpg- File:TootsietoySafari.jpg
- File:TootsietoyCheetah.jpg
- File:BarclaySportsCars.jpg
- File:Cigar Box Lola.jpg
- File:BarclayBeerTruck.jpg
- File:FranklinMintMetroEngine.jpg
- File:AuburnRancheroWindow.jpg
- File:AuburnCunningham.jpg
- File:AuburnRubberIndyRacer.jpg
- File:PMCFordRanchero.jpg
- File:MarxHudsonFire.jpg
- File:PMCPlymouthTaxi.jpg
- File:PMCPlymouthChassis.jpg
File:HubleyFordWagon.jpg- File:Johan66Toronado.jpg
- File:AMT62Ford.jpg
- File:JohanPlymouth.jpg
File:Hubley58Ford.jpgFile:Hubley58Ford2.jpg
- Maybe this is not the place, but any suggestions on how to illustrate models in Wikipedia articles if they are copyrighted and cannot be used without permission? The articles seem pretty hollow without the ability to show the vehicles or their packaging - the pictures, even used sparingly, say a lot about the product discussed. They seem to get deleted just as quick in local Wikipedias also. Maybe if I 'draw' a precise picture of the scale model? I'm being facetious. I think it's about time to say that there are types of subjects that really are not appropriate for Wikipedia and are best treated elsewhere (books and other published outlets) where permissions are obtained or fair use is considered more broadly. Such a subject is perhaps all too specialized for Wikipedia anyway.--150.134.234.144 15:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ooops. The above comment was me. --Cstevencampbell (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Cstevencampbell: Local wikipedias have differing rules... English Wikipedia allows Non-free Content under a "Fair Use" argument in a number of different circumstances. The image's description page must include a non-free usage rationale detailing why each specific usage of the image is legally allowable under US law. A relevant example might be File:Vogue_USA_January_2010.jpg. The criteria are relatively stringent, and can be found at W:WP:NFCC, but I do think they might apply to some of the photos that were deleted, hence my offer to temporarily undelete and assist in my closing above. Please use my talk page to request or discuss that.
- Regarding the images in this new DR, they can be kept if it can be shown that either:
- The toy was released before 1978 and its copyright was not declared by a copyright notice (this might be difficult to do unless all the packaging and documentation of the toy can be examined) - this would make the toy {{PD-US-no notice}}
- The toy was released before 1964 and its copyright was not renewed. Copyrights initially registered before 1964 had to be renewed every 28 years (with some grace period). Renewals are found at https://archive.org/details/copyrightrecords but I've never searched for toys before, so am unsure where exactly they would be located. Failure to renew would make the toy {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Storkk (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Any that are of vehicles after 1950 are relatively easy to check for renewals at http://www.copyright.gov/records/ because all records from 1/1/1978 are searchable by title or copyright owner. Any renewal of a model later than 1/1/1950 must show up in the searchable database. I've done four of them for starters. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Thanks! For my own edification (I find searching for copyright renewals difficult), would you mind sharing some search strings you used? I have always be loathe to "certify" I have not found a renewal, since I am often unsure of exactly what I should be searching for, so I'm stymied before I start by the prospect of false-negatives. Storkk (talk) 17:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Any that are of vehicles after 1950 are relatively easy to check for renewals at http://www.copyright.gov/records/ because all records from 1/1/1978 are searchable by title or copyright owner. Any renewal of a model later than 1/1/1950 must show up in the searchable database. I've done four of them for starters. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- First, let's be clear that we are talking about an automated search in the Office's on line searchable database that starts at 1/1/1978. Searching earlier records is harder, particularly because they are in six month chunks and there is a grace period, so you need to search at least three times.
- It's like any other search, except it isn't Google -- it turns up only the exact words you ask for. "Ford" as a title returned 3047 hits (25 to a page), so that was no good. "Hubley", as a name, returned only 94, so that was good. I looked at "Revell " (note the space, which eliminates names like "Revell, John") and it turns up only post 1979 models, but I didn't do anything with it because the Revell models above aren't dated and might be before 1950.
- I agree that models are harder than works that naturally have a title, like books and most paintings. You can search on one or more words, and, using the "other search options" button, search in more than one way at a time. Mostly it's just finding a search term that doesn't turn up thousands of results.
- By the way, are we assuming that all of these models have a copyright notice on the bottom -- I think that assumption is appropriate. Every model I've ever seen has one. If so, then the Franklin Mint examples above are not PD -- the Mint was founded in 1964, so no renewal was needed to keep them under copyright for 95 years from first publication with notice. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice, Jim. Is it a safe assumption that the copyright would be registered in the name of the company? (that's a genuine question, and not implying that I don't think it's safe) It's probably somewhat obviated when the company's name is the same as the founder (and presumed designer?), but I guess the assumption is that they did not as a general rule license designs from a third party. Storkk (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Copyright registrations for corporate works (at least for corporations in the toy business) are virtually always in the name of the company and there is virtually always a work for hire agreement in place (I speak as an expert -- I have both written and signed many of them over the years, although not in the toy business). Even if they licensed a third party design, they would do the registration in order to ensure that it was done correctly. The toy industry is super paranoid about its Intellectual Property. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
- Thanks, that is good to know. Storkk (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Copyright registrations for corporate works (at least for corporations in the toy business) are virtually always in the name of the company and there is virtually always a work for hire agreement in place (I speak as an expert -- I have both written and signed many of them over the years, although not in the toy business). Even if they licensed a third party design, they would do the registration in order to ensure that it was done correctly. The toy industry is super paranoid about its Intellectual Property. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
- Thanks for your advice, Jim. Is it a safe assumption that the copyright would be registered in the name of the company? (that's a genuine question, and not implying that I don't think it's safe) It's probably somewhat obviated when the company's name is the same as the founder (and presumed designer?), but I guess the assumption is that they did not as a general rule license designs from a third party. Storkk (talk) 13:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- By the way, are we assuming that all of these models have a copyright notice on the bottom -- I think that assumption is appropriate. Every model I've ever seen has one. If so, then the Franklin Mint examples above are not PD -- the Mint was founded in 1964, so no renewal was needed to keep them under copyright for 95 years from first publication with notice. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cstevencampbell (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:ToyGamdaBarracuda.jpg
- File:FunHo Caterpillar.jpg
- File:EfsoCommerKLMvan.jpg
- File:ToysBritainsHowitzer.jpg
- File:ToysMercuryChaparral2f.jpg
- File:ToyCigarboxLolaChrome.jpg
- File:ToysBarclaySportsCars.jpg
- File:ToyPontiacSafariWagon.jpg
- File:ToyCheetahChevy.jpg
- File:ProgettoKFerrari225base.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:MEOGLOBAL
[edit]All of the files that uploaded by User:MEOGLOBAL seems to be taken from the web, from here to be specific. Rapsar (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge01.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge02.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge03.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge04.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge05.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge06.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge07.jpg
- File:YavuzSultanSelimBridge08.jpg
Speedy delete copyright here Regards, Sakhalinio (talk) 10:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- These photos sent by this company via sending mail to me after request. No need to discuss anything. MEOGLOBAL (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment MEOGLOBAL, actually you should forward the request to OTRS, in order to confirm the authorization and the license. --Ruthven (msg) 15:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ruthven Does it work with multiple files or do I have to this for each one? MEOGLOBAL (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- @MEOGLOBAL: you can do a single mail for several photos, as long as it is clear to which files you are referring to. --Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ruthven Does it work with multiple files or do I have to this for each one? MEOGLOBAL (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: for now, may be restored by the OTRS team if they process a valid permission. --Jcb (talk) 09:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
due to https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bildrechte-Wikipedianer-unterliegt-vor-Gericht-gegen-Museum-3347391.html Finavon (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The same applies to:
- File:Burg Frankenstein 1908.jpg
- File:Carl Grote Vogelschau Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1787.png
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 5.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 7.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 8.jpg
- File:Ernst-Ludwigsplat 1908.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Ernst-Ludwigsplatz 1901.jpg
- File:Fr ansicht ulb 1902 gross.jpg
- File:Fr darmstadt 1799.jpg
- File:Fr darmstadt 1874 heberer gross.jpg
- File:Fr darmstadt umgebung 1802 gross comp.jpg
- File:Fr karte ulb 1799 gross.jpg
- File:Fr karte ulb 1822 gross.jpg
- File:Fr karte ulb 1866 gross.jpg
- File:Fr plan1846 gross.png
- File:Fr plan1901 gross.jpg
- File:Fr plan1906 gross.jpg
- File:Fr plan1908 gross.jpg
- File:Fr planDa1858 gross.jpg
- File:Fr residenz1836 gross.jpg
- File:Fr stadtansicht1900 gross.jpg
- File:Frame40 suedhessen 1887 gross.jpg
- File:Karte Darmstadt und Umgebung.png
- File:Map Darmstadt 1836.png
- File:Map Darmstadt 1900.png
- File:Map Darmstadt 1905.jpg
- File:Map Darmstadt 1906.jpg
- File:Map Darmstadt 1935.png
- File:Marktplatz Darmstadt 1901.jpg
- File:Marktplatz Darmstadt 1903.jpg
- File:Plan-Darmstadt-1759.jpg
- File:Postcard Mathildenhöhe 1906.jpg
- File:Schloss Stockau 1789.jpg
- File:Friedrich-Freiherr-von-der-Trenck.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Kavaliershaus.jpg
- File:Karschin bild.JPG
- File:Panizza mit hut.jpg
- File:Darmstadt De Merian Hassiae.jpg
- File:Wilhelm-Roentgen's-X-ray-photograph-of-his-wife's-hand.png
- File:Georg-Merck-sen..png
- File:E MERCK PAINT LON.png
- File:ENGEL APHOTHEKE.png
- File:MERCKS INDEX.png
- File:Heinrich-Emanuel-Merck-Lithographie.png
- File:Morphiumherstellung-H.-E.-Mercks-Fabrikationsjournalen.png
- File:Engel-Apothekenoffizin.png
- File:Johann-Heinrich-Merck.png
- File:First-lable-of-Merck.jpg
- File:Gießen-19th-century.jpg
- File:Friedrich-Perlberg-Rome.jpg
- File:Bremer-Rathaus-1837.png
- File:Darmstadt 1840.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1816 (2).jpg
- File:Lautertal 1845.jpg
- File:Höfer, E.- Frankfurt am Main, Börse, Innenraum.png
- File:Hollar, Wenzel- Aschaffenburg, Schloss Johannisberg.png
- File:Lindenfels 1812.png
- File:Veste Otzberg 1908.png
- File:Siegfriedbrunnen.png
- File:Melibocus 1905.png
- File:Schloss Lichtenberg 1900.png
- File:Erbach 1665.png
- File:Theodor Fontane.png
- File:Jacob und Wilhelm Grimm.png
- File:Hans Christian Andersen.png
- File:Die Stadt Kapelle um 1884.jpg
- File:Bank Gebude um 1883.jpg
- File:Ballonplatz um 1884.jpg
- File:Prinz Georg Wilhelm Palais um 1884.jpg
- File:Orangeriegarten in Bessungen um 1884.jpg
- File:Residenz Schloss um 1884.jpg
- File:Alte Post um 1884.jpg
- File:Ernst Ludwig Platz.jpg
- File:Die Neue Realschule um 1884.jpg
- File:Die Neue Synagoge 1884.jpg
- File:Portrait of a man wrongly considered as Georg Büchner.jpg
- File:Dianaburg 1768.jpg
- File:Map Darmstadt 1776.png
- File:Plan Residenzschloss Darmstadt.png
- File:Darmstädter-Exerzierhaus.png
- File:Dar-es-Salam.jpg
- File:Neuguinea.jpg
- File:Togoland.jpg
- File:Windhuk.jpg
- File:Palau-Inseln.jpg
- File:Bismarckburg.jpg
- File:Hafen von Saluafata.jpg
- File:Kilimandscharo von Moschi aus.jpg
- File:Patrouille bei Windhuk.jpg
- File:Tsingtau.jpg
- File:Victoria (Cameroon).jpg
- File:Tinian.jpg
- File:Fort von Bagamono.jpg
- File:Major v. Wissmann.jpg
- File:Bagamono.jpg
- File:Sudanesen-Companie.jpg
- File:Biwak.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1591.png
- File:Darmstadt 1605.png
- File:Ernst-Ludwig-Haus,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Großherzolgiches-Palais,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Künstlerkolonie,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Hauptbahnhof,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Schloß,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Hochzeitsturm-und-Ausstellungsgebäude,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Hoftheater,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Ludwigsplatz-mit-Bismarck-Denkmal,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Marktplatz,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Marktplatz-mit-Stadtkirche,-Darmstadt.png
- File:Paradeplatz,-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Residenzschloß Darmstadt um 1700.jpg
- File:Ernst-ludwig-gross.jpg
- File:Georg Wilhelm von Hessen-Darmstadt.jpg
- File:Map Vienna 1547.jpg
- File:Map Vienna 1547.png
- File:Map Vienna 1710.jpg
- File:Steppenmurmeltier.jpg
- File:Rueckkehr der Quadriga-3.jpg
- File:Phyllium siccifolium.jpg
- File:Bacillus Rossi.jpg
- File:Schwarm Wanderheuschrecke.jpg
- File:Raguenet, La joute des mariniers-3.jpg
- File:Ludwig-freiherr-von-vincke-LSDSL.png
- File:Corday d'Armans.jpg
- File:Map Großherzogliche Residenzstadt Darmstadt.png
- File:Darmstadt 1622 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1633 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1626 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1631 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1676 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1710 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1721 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1725 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1744 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1750 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1753 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1765 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1780 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1791 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Sandhaas 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1800 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1803 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Sandhaas 3.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Sandhaas 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1803 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Prestel 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1807 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1818 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1819 3.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1830 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1830 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1820 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1825 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1840 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Emden 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Sonntag 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt Willmann 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1841 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1843 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1846 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 19.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 20.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 21.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 23.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 4.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1849 7.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 3.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 6.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1871 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1871 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1875 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 19Jh 4.jpg
- File:Kranichstein 1755 1.jpg
- File:Kranichstein 1760 1.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1819 2.jpg
- File:Kranichstein 1850 1.jpg
- File:Kranichstein 1850 2.jpg
- File:Darmstadt 1847 1.jpg
- File:Johann Georg Stockmar Ansicht des Bingenheimer Forsthauses.jpg
- File:Johann Georg Stockmar Anischt des Schlosses Kranichstein und des Jagdzeughauses.jpg
(added from links to this page). --JuTa 16:49, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. As noted the the link above the court desicion is not final. If there is a final decision against the images they will likely come back as an "office action" or similar. --JuTa 16:57, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Wikimedia Commons is based in the USA, not Germany and "the court desicion is not final". Also we have {{PD-Art}} for this kind of copyfraud. The only exception to delete this files. that i can see, is if a german uploader would like to have is upload remove and reuploaded by other user. Tm (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep These media are not related to the museum which is complaining. --Migebert (talk) 21:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I have seen several of these cases at OTRS being forwarded to legal and in all cases legal concluded that our servers are not part of the jurisdiction of the museum and that we are not bound to obey their policies. As for copyright laws, the museum cannot claim copyright on an old work just because the physical work may happen to be located in their building. --Jcb (talk) 09:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
due to https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bildrechte-Wikipedianer-unterliegt-vor-Gericht-gegen-Museum-3347391.html Finavon (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I have seen several of these cases at OTRS being forwarded to legal and in all cases legal concluded that our servers are not part of the jurisdiction of the museum and that we are not bound to obey their policies. As for copyright laws, the museum cannot claim copyright on an old work just because the physical work may happen to be located in their building. --Jcb (talk) 09:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
changement de photo Finavon (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 09:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 04:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope lNeverCry 23:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
The equinox is wrong in my view. This is a correct graph: File:AxialTiltObliquity.png --Alex1011 (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- Please state why, in your view, it is wrong.
- State also why you believe that File:AxialTiltObliquity.png dipicts the equinox, as it does not. It shows the axial tilt.
- Thirdly, I note that you have nominated only the Welsh language version for deletion, yet have not nominated all other 8 language versions. Why? Here's the Eng version. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- For equinox see: Equinox. There it is described as a depiction of the March equinox. --Alex1011 (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- I asked 3 questions, and still await answers to 1 and 3. Regarding 2: please go and fight your battle on the English version of the file, as you are using that language as a defense. Lastly (point 4): I ask you why did you select the Welsh language file, rather than the other 11 languages (see Category:Equinox)? I find it very odd, that you decided to attack a small language. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- My comment to #3 is here.
- I asked 3 questions, and still await answers to 1 and 3. Regarding 2: please go and fight your battle on the English version of the file, as you are using that language as a defense. Lastly (point 4): I ask you why did you select the Welsh language file, rather than the other 11 languages (see Category:Equinox)? I find it very odd, that you decided to attack a small language. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: the file is in use, making the stated deletion reason irrelevant. --Jcb (talk) 09:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation of en:File:Dark Angel Title Card.jpg. Free variant available at File:Darkangel logo.PNG Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, complex logo with no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Images depicted are very unlikely to be in public domain or held in copyright by author; The probable copyright holder is Sony. The images depicted don't seem to qualify for de minimis. Subject blog seems to be unnotable on its own, and may be uploaded for promotional purposes.
Comment The thumbnail at en:Blog should be replaced if this work is deleted. 80.221.159.67 11:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liloonabil_away.jpg MC.Nabil Liloo (talk) 12:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion (specify why this file should be deleted. See COM:D). --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liloonabil_away.jpg MC.Nabil Liloo (talk) 16:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liloonabil_away.jpg MC.Nabil Liloo (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
TITOLO ERRATO Domenico Notarangelo (talk) 13:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Strong support, the author should have used the rename template with #1 reason, but he's a new user so he uploaded several time the same file instead. --Ruthven (msg) 15:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:LETTERA PASOLINI.jpg. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Superseed by File:Superbrands logo - 1.jpg. It is better quality.
The file was originally uploaded to wikipedia in English, but in the process some data was lost. The original description claimed as author "superbrands tv". The logo of superbrandstv.com is different, but the logo of the channel superbrand TV in YouTube is similar (but is a JPEG image). I conclude that it is a derivative work of the original logo by the lower quality, the strange metadatas and the absence of PNG versions of this image in internet (outside Wikimedia projects). Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 20:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, textlogo superseeded by File:Superbrands logo - 1.jpg, not in use. --Wdwd (talk) 10:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by SVG. Duplicate of existing file. Uploader requests deletion. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 00:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Replaced by vector image File:Seal of Los Angeles County, California.svg, uploader request. --Wdwd (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
This is our home, and this picture was taken, and uploaded with our permission. Please remove this picture. 2601:740:8002:D0F0:50AA:A7F4:31BD:74B3 06:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- The photo shows the interesting house as seen from the street (that is about 15 feet in front of the house). No telephoto lens was used. The picture was not taken during the winter just to see through otherwise dense foliage. There is no personal information shown at all: There are no names on a mailbox, political signs in the yard, or flags on the house. The house was built in the early 20th century, so it's not even a case where the owner can claim any sort of creative ownership in the appearance. If there were any reason to feel that this photo intruded on any privacy at all, that would be one thing. But, there isn't. It's a photo of a house that is freely viewable to anyone who walks or drives by.ProfReader (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:291 Sumter.JPG. Nthep (talk) 17:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, and per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. --Wdwd (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Courtesy request on behalf of the property owner via Template:OTRS ticket The reason is the the owner does not wish images of the property to appear on the internet. I would add that the image is used once on en:wp to show examples of development of Wilson's Farm in Charleston. As the house is not a historic location and a nearly adjoining property is included in the gallery I don't think there is any detriment to either Commons or Wikipedia in deleting the image and showing goodwill to the property owner. Nthep (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:291 Sumter St.JPG. Nthep (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- [Same comment about both images of the house] The photo shows the interesting house as seen from the street (that is about 15 feet in front of the house). No telephoto lens was used. The picture was not taken during the winter just to see through otherwise dense foliage. There is no personal information shown at all: There are no names on a mailbox, political signs in the yard, or flags on the house. The house was built in the early 20th century, so it's not even a case where the owner can claim any sort of creative ownership in the appearance. If there were any reason to feel that this photo intruded on any privacy at all, that would be one thing. But, there isn't. It's a photo of a house that is freely viewable to anyone who walks or drives by.ProfReader (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, and per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
TITOLO ERRATO Domenico Notarangelo (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Oppose This is the correct name. Instead move/delete File:LATTERA PASOLINI.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I have deleted both images. Pier Paolo Pasolini died in 1975. Copyright in letters belongs to the writer, not the addressee, so this will be under copyright until 1/1/2046 and in order to keep it on Commons, we will need a free license from Pasolini's heirs using the procedure at OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
same as File:Sade - Les 120 Journées de Sodome, éd. Dühren, 1904 (page 538 crop).jpg Newnewlaw (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- This file is not exactly the same, the first line and the end lines are important as proof of this file is extract of the edition of Duhren.--Cunegonde1 (talk) 06:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kumkum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Contradictious and/or missing fondamental data about licence. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:44, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a 1942 image with no information about prvious publication or the author's death. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW of Rockman statues. LoC license applies only to the photographs, not the subject statues. Statues are not free or PD: still living sculptor (w:WP:Tom Otterness), installed in 2000s, and no FoP in US.
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720743.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720747.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720751.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720752.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720753.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720755.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720757.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720758.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720759.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720760.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720761.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720762.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720763.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720765.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720766.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720767.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720768.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720769.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720770.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720771.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720772.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720774.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720775.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720776.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720778.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720779.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720781.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720782.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720783.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720784.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720786.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720787.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720788.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720789.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720790.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720791.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720793.tif
Эlcobbola talk 17:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW of toys and statues. LoC license applies only to the photographs, not the subject works. No FoP in US.
- File:"Amish" souvenir items are plentiful in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania LCCN2011634069.tif
- File:"Hammering Man" art, Seattle, Washington LCCN2011630311.tif
- DR pending - PD no notice Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:"Personage and Birds," by the Spanish surrealist Joan Miró, stands outside Chase Tower, Houston, Texas LCCN2011631007.tif
- keep - PD no notice Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:"Personage and Birds," by the Spanish surrealist Joan Miró, stands outside Chase Tower, Houston, Texas LCCN2011633353.tif
- keep - PD no notice Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:"Quittin' time," the statue of an oil worker heading home for the day, was placed on a downtown street in Corsicana, Texas, in 2012 LCCN2014633021.tif
- delete - 2012 too late Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:A 1994 statue dedicated to West Virginia coal miners outside the Beckley Exhibition Coal Mine in Beckley, West Virginia LCCN2015634339.tif
- File:A bear carving outside the Weaverville Victorian Inn in Weaverville, a popular tourist destination in the Whiskeytown-Shasta National Recreation Area, northwest of Redding, California LCCN2013630885.tif
Эlcobbola talk 19:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- As an alternative, Category:Photographs by Carol M. Highsmith needing review is a quick way of marking files that need further examination. --Fæ (talk) 20:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- i would caution mass deleting sculpture without checking SIRIS. many are PD US no notice. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Kept two no notice and deleted the rest since the underlying work is under copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Deformed version of File:Giotto di Bondone - No. 17 Scenes from the Life of Christ - 1. Nativity - Birth of Jesus - WGA09193.jpg. What is most serious, is that the user completely substituted this bad image to the exhisting ones in all versions of Wikipedia. He made it for many more files he just uploaded (often overexposed). This is a vandalism and a spam of pesonal images. I hope some bot can revert. --Sailko (talk) 07:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- What? @Sailko: That image is not a "deformed version" of anything. Before you make such acusations, you should try to talk to people. This was an honest mystake during a CROP (you can see the old version here - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/d/df/20161012231749%21Birth_of_Jesus_-_Capella_dei_Scrovegni_-_Padua_2016.jpg). And I still have the original in my camera. I sincerely hope you can talk without offenses. José Luiz disc 21:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- I corrected the perspective (a very, very simple thing to do) and uploaded the new version. José Luiz disc 22:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- For the record. I have uploaded thousands of imagens and very rarely a substitute images. In this case, I did because we're talking about a VERY OLD, 163 Kb picture, versus a new 5 Mb one, much larger. @Sailko: , I really don't know what upset you this way but even if you think "distortion" is something impossible to be correct, I don't believe it is grounds for deletion. On the other side, you called me a vandal and a spammer.... José Luiz disc 22:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
-
Old - WGA09193 (950 × 966 pixels, size: 163 kB) -
New - my donation (corrected - 2 364 × 2 412 pixels, size: 4.58 MB)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![88 File:"Я, ты, он, она - вместе целая страна!".jpg](#File:"Я,_ты,_он,_она_-_вместе_целая_страна!".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![181 File:Флаг движения "Татарский Патриотический Фронт "Алтын Урда".png](#File:Флаг_движения_"Татарский_Патриотический_Фронт_"Алтын_Урда".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_giudicessa_di_Gallura,_signora_di_Milano.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[1]](http://www.araucanie.com/araucania/Philippe.JPG){kind=link}
![10:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/10/13#c-Storkk-2016-10-13T10:02:00.000Z-File:"Я,_ты,_он,_она_-_вместе_целая_страна!".jpg){kind=link}
![21:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/10/13#c-INeverCry-2016-10-19T21:59:00.000Z-File:"Я,_ты,_он,_она_-_вместе_целая_страна!".jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- New version is OK, but you should not massively substitute good old images with yours in order to promote your pictures. This can look like a personal spam. You files are good, but sometimes a little overexposed on the edges (this depends on the illumination of the site, not your skills of course), a couple of them was distorted, so sometimes the WGA file is better IMHO. This file, as anybody can see, is overexposed on the bottom right. I hope we get somebody else opinion before deciding for substitution or not. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- There's another problem with WGA files, specially the old ones: the balance of white is wrong and all of them have this "redish" tone, clearly wrong.
- New version is OK, but you should not massively substitute good old images with yours in order to promote your pictures. This can look like a personal spam. You files are good, but sometimes a little overexposed on the edges (this depends on the illumination of the site, not your skills of course), a couple of them was distorted, so sometimes the WGA file is better IMHO. This file, as anybody can see, is overexposed on the bottom right. I hope we get somebody else opinion before deciding for substitution or not. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
_-_Capella_degli_Scrovegni_-_PAdua_2016.jpg)
Kept: The subject file is much larger than the previous file, and, while the colors are a little different, I see no reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
