Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 26th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, non-free logo image Brianga (talk) 00:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below COM:TOO. See {{PD-textlogo}}. --Josve05a (talk) 18:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload of copyrighted logo to commons instead of local wiki because of nescience G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam and obvious copyright violation Jimfbleak (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Missing permisssion. --Josve05a (talk) 18:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-nc not compatible with commons 47.150.68.26 17:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fehlende Quellenangabe Btr 19:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is DR is the consequence of tagging the file twice with "File has no source" by Jcb. I personally found a ref now, howsoever the uploader himself seems not willing to give the source, very high probably it is an original file from the municipality (there are clear indication for format exporting). Howsoever this DR is fully cynic, because the Commons rules. In theory the file should be deleted, in fact the file is PD.[1] User: Perhelion 21:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ich im Cockpit 2.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Tataimundo

[edit]

Non-free Rede Globo logos. Gabriel (talkcontribs) 00:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder: BERND BRUNDERT." No evidence of permission is provided. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Linked source says "Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1965"; no evidence for permission to release it under a free license HaeB (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I somehow doubt that an editor of this wiki with no other commons uploads is the copyright holder of a 1956 Miss Universe promotional photograph. GRuban (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

added by a spammer Andyrom75 (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Teles: created by crosswiki spammer. Not much information on sources

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Product not by the FDA.

Josve05a (talk) 09:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As stated on Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie: "Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work."

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment some of these may be duplicates from Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Jasonanaggie. Elisfkc (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging: the packaging is not a government work.

full list

Elisfkc (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look there is a fundamental disagreement between my view of U.S. Copyright Law in relation to FDA recall law and how they relate and it has caused a huge mass deletion of my import from the FDA, it looks like I have been overruled, so you might as well just go ahead and speedy delete whatever I uploaded from the FDA, while they are all copyright-free and in the public domain including brandmarks and trademarks on packaging. These rights are waved when a health concern requires an FDA recall, but just delete them.Jasonanaggie (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's Own work: professional photo widespread on Intenternet [2] Animalparty (talk) 05:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google map copy: https://www.google.com/maps/place/31%C2%B028'09.5%22N+75%C2%B007'12.6%22E/@31.4650624,75.1282384,1029m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d31.469303!4d75.120165?hl=en Jim1138 (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's last remaining contribution, per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata comes from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image from Facebook - permission via OTRS needed.--Wdwd (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is image is evidently imported from English Wikipedia's 800px thumbnail. (Compare) But now the we know the uploader is not the author and his claim is bogus, there comes a problem: There is no evidence that the actual author has consented its publication. The image is being deleted from English Wikipedia for this problem. (Discussion) Codename Lisa (talk) 09:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

repost of a photo removed after discussion, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jerry_Stiller_and_Maryse_Selit.jpg and user's talk page. Holyoke, mass (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a GLAM 掬茶 (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a BLP violation and not a template at all. Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright status: Copyrighted" and "Copyright holder: dzhiva.ru". No evidence of permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zvonimir Strapajević (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Batch of uploads copy-pasted from around the web, tagged as "own work"

Ariadacapo (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 18:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Display solely of copyrighted covers. Prosfilaes (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Display solely of copyrighed covers Prosfilaes (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, cf. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Londra345#Foto Danyele (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, cf. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Londra345#Foto Danyele (talk) 21:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not so simple to be "ineligible". This version of the Batman logo (used in the "Batman trilogy") is also copyrighted by DC Comics - Fma12 (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentaly uploaded this photo. There is no use for this on wikipedia. Caroline Riggs (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistakenly uploaded the wrong version of this photo. I am the original uploader Shaguftakarim (talk) 13:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 07:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete file, completed file exists at File:Khairpurflag.png Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, spammy description, possibly copyrighted (see watermark), missing permission and EXIF data Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 07:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Wikipedia-Seite wurde gelöscht, da sie nicht den Kriterien entsprach, demzufolge sind die Bilder dazu unnötig. Bitte um löschung Ernst Granzow (talk) 08:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No theme, no rigtht category Niklitov (talk) 08:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. I'll delete also file:GARRETT DWANE.jpg and file:Garrett dwane.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   12:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (+ Non-free logo). (tJosve05a (c) 21:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Will update it Ramses Herodes (talk) 09:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality (user made) SVG of already existing original one: File:Wappen der Stadt Rietberg.svg, so out-of-scope. ↔ User: Perhelion 11:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   12:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small (105×125 pixels) unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo, out of scope. Likely copyvio: uploader and credit don't match. P 1 9 9   12:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused photo without camera data, probably comes from Facebook, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Nurqishah.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privat image, unused, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Not suitable for stock photo due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photo of user Holyoke, mass (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope. Personal photo of user. Holyoke, mass (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by INeverCry as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down file:Polymerisation network.png. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality photo of Ted Cruz with an unknown person (apparently the uploader). Numerous better quality photos of Cruz are available. Holyoke, mass (talk) 19:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category was named incorrectly; correct name is "Androstenediols". All content was recategorized to Category:Androstenediols. -Vaccinationist (talk) 14:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Sayeed A Sayeed is Manager of Pizza hut bangladesh" and is out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Sayeed A Sayeed (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a photo about his pizza hut workers, which is used nowhere, except in the sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork, not in use by the uploader, of no use to anyone else; out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surna sravan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/85982200@N00/4144736237.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Owula kpakpo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana.

Wikicology (talk) 08:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to refer to the copyright laws of Ghana before I make any submission on this issue with that said I do not think this pictures infringes on any rights the building is a public building and permission was sort from the managers before taking them. I do not see the point for the deletion of this article then.--Owula kpakpo (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Owula kpakpo, these are images and not articles. See my response to Flixtey below. However, since you wish to refer to the copyright laws of Ghana, here is an online version of Ghana Copyrights Act, 2005. I belive you will find it helpful. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology, the reason for the nomination is unclear. This is a picture of a structure which was taken by the uploader, can you please point out the copyright infringement in this? Thanks --Flixtey (talk) 10:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Flixtey, as I have clearly stated in my rationale above, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator in most countries. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright of the original work. Thus, we cannot keep such images on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Photographs of buildings are normally allowed if the building is old enough to be public domain (in many countries, where the architect has been dead for at least 70 years). Photographs of more recent buildings may be restricted because of the architect's copyright, though some countries have exceptions that allow photographs to be taken of any building in a public place but Ghana is not one of those countries. See Commons:Freedom of panorama. For the record, article 19(1)(f) of this online version of Ghana Copyrights Act, 2005 restricted panorama freedom to cinema or television or in a broadcast by television. Let me know if you need further clarification. Warm regards. Wikicology (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikicology there are two structures that you have tagged for deletion the independence arch which was built so many years ago and the new presidential library what you have to know is I had permission to take those pcitures since i wasnt using it for any commercial purpose but for a social good like this I do not see where your problem lies where there have been several picture of the same structure on commons already--Owula kpakpo (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Independence arch was constructed in 1960s after Ghana independence on March 6, 1957, which means its copyright has not expired. I am glad you admit that the presidential library is new which is why its eligible for deletion. Places such as Black Star Gate, Independence Square, (and or independence arch) usually allow photography but this does not automatically mean that such photos can be distributed under a public domain dedication or a free content license; the intent of a venue allowing photography may be to facilitate photography for personal usage and/or non-commercial sharing on social networking sites, for example. Wikimedia Commons is not a commercial project, but the project scope requires that every single picture may be used commercially via free licenses. Every image or media file must be free of third-party copyrights. Owula kpakpo, unless you have authorization from the copyright holder, or in situations where this does not apply, do not upload works derived from other non-free works onto Commons, or they will be deleted. I see that you are new here. Please do not be offended that your images were nominated for deletion. There are processes to provide copyright permission and undelete even images which have already been removed. Wikicology (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

uploaded by Owula kpakpo for deletion per the above rationale. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All of these images infringe on the architect's copyright. No one but the architect can give permission for these images on Commons. Note also that Commons and WP require that all images be free for all use, including commercial use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Firstly, there is no COM:FOP for sculptures in the US, so on this basis it is a copyvio. Additionally, the monument is not a work of the US government but of a private foundation, which had to be pay licencing fees for the use of MLK's image and copyrighted quotes on the memorial. Unfortunately, all of the photos in this nomination are not free for hosting on Commons.

russavia (talk) 12:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was a contributor for many of the original images, including photos I had taken myself. All of my photos were deleted, which helped me learn about the rule against publicly displayed works of art. At that point, I added only photos that were included in official U.S. Government websites (primarily, the U.S. Park Service site). I am quick to say I am not an expert, but try to learn, but I did have a conversation with one of the image experts at wikimedia commons who thought that using images from the government sites would be all right. Since then, I do see that some "original" photos by others have been added (including the one in the info box), with the U.S. Government photo I had put there moved to the gallery. I appreciate this editor's efforts to ensure that the photos that remain are allowed. If it turns out that even photos taken from official U.S. government sites are not allowed, then I will learn more.... NearTheZoo (talk) 12:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid that the issue is that you need permission from both the sculptor (or whoever the copyright holder of the sculpture may be) and the photographer. The {{PD-USGov}} template only confirms that you have permission from the photographer, but you still lack permission from the sculptor. I hate it when images are deleted because of lack of FOP, but as I see it, there is nothing that can be done here. At least the US situation is much better than the French situation where you can't even take photos of recent houses... --Stefan4 (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Lack of FOP sucks..... It isn't pre-1978 so we can't use that trick either. I'm afraid nothing can be done here. Multichill (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's my understanding that the memorial is managed by the National Park Service, however, it's not the result of a federal government work. It's a bit of bummer that the memorial is like this. If there are images that are needed for use on articles on WP under non-free criteria, I would suggest grabbing them and uploading them to local projects under the NFCC if they can be use and comply with relevant criterias. russavia (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Quite frankly, I am sick of Wikipedia editors crippling the mission and functionality of Wikipedia by going around and nominating images, such as those listed above, for deletion out of bogus copyright infringement claims. First of all, the entire site and all of it's contents are owned by the Federal Government of the United States, in the context of this memorial, it is not that NPS allowed a private foundation to place their memorial in this location and now acts as its custodian. The memorial was authorized by congress, was paid for with private funding, and upon completion, was turned back over to be managed by the NPS. I have never seen any claims of copyright by the sculpture of the main statue, nor have I seen such claims from the stone masons who carved all the text. The rampant deleting of such images is pathetic, and seem to cripple the encyclopedic functionality of this entire site. Above all else, these images would be considered fair use no matter their resolution as they are not being used for any monetary gain and are used for educational purposes. I would like to know why it is that someone decided to start caring so much about the MLK memorial that they are always deleting images, but conveniently ignore the plethora of other DC Memorial (installed post 1978) pictures throughout Wikipedia. Better get on the case, I see some pictures over on the Korean War Memorial page that Frank Gaylord might want Wikipedia to pay for! </rant> Something Original (talk)

It's juste a plaque. Note a sculpture or art work. TCY (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, but as it is also likely the work of a private foundation, the words on it are copyrighted. If the plaque, and the words on it, are the work of the US federal government, and this can be demonstrated, then we can remove it from this discussion. russavia (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep obama family one, on the border of "incidental use" in the landscape. Slowking4 (talk) 20:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the Obama family seems incidental to that photo. The sculpture is central and more than de minimis. Kelly (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
centrality is irrelevant. we disagree on 'de minimis': wherever the president goes, he is the subject and the rest is backdrop, including statues. see examples at Commons:De minimis. Slowking4 (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vladimir Putin 22 February 2000-4.jpg would disagree with you on this count. russavia (talk) 16:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately delete, although I hope some of them will be moved to en.wiki to be used under fair use. Kaldari (talk) 09:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nuetral -- Having been unable to satisfy myself that commercial use would be legally appropriate, I withdraw my prior recommendation (Fair use on projects that allow it would seem to be a good way to go, in this circumstance. See freely downlodable images by the US NPS at [3] ). Keep - As the owner and operator of the memorial under Commemorative Works Act (40 USC 89) the United States government has widely published noncopyrightable images of portions of the memorial. Such acts being completely contrary to any claim of copyright, especially the assumed, unsubstantiated and inchoate claims that no one with any authority or reference has shown exist, the files are completely in the public domain. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Copyright or not depends on the creator of the memorial, not the owner/operator of it. It has been stated above that the memorial is a creation of a private foundation and not of the US government. See also the similar discussion at COM:VPC#I found it!!!. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • No. The memorial is established pursuant to public law and is public property. Wikimedia has no authority to tell the Federal government it is violating its own copyright laws, and has every right to republish the government's files which are in the public domain. Alanscottwalker (talk) 13:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Keep. This is a quality picture. I honestly don't care if its a public or private project, it is still an important picture. Dudewiththebling (talk)
          • Keep. I can't imagine that the owner of the statue's copyright (who is this, by the way?) would want to suppress photos of this statue which have already been published by the National Park Service. The purpose of the statue is to enhance the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., by erecting a highly visible outdoor monument in a place frequented by tourists. Nobody is going to suffer any revenue loss if this picture appears in a Wikipedia article, and such an article without any picture makes no sense at all. To understand the monument, the Wikipedia reader needs to know what it looks like. HowardMorland (talk) 13:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • See also File:"hewed of the mountain".jpg. Kelly (talk) 15:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added a note discussing Copyright of Images of Memorials in the US. Hopefully this note will help clarify some of the copyright issues surrounding this issue. You also might want to look at Copyright Status Of Images Hosted On US Government Websites. Pholm (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a public monument or a private company grounds monument? Carlos Molina


Deleted: We have this situation with many Federal monuments and other works -- even official White House portraits of presidents and some US stamps and coins. The copyright is held by the creator of the work and both the law and our rules require us to honor it. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See discussion above. The sculptures are under copyright by the designer. The words are under copyright by MLK, Jr., whose heirs are aggressive in defending the copyrights.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This takes FOP-enforcement much too far. This is a national monument for an assassinated hero, for heaven's sake, and no court anywhere in the United States is going to sustain a lawsuit based on publication of these images. We must have some common sense about this. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That line of reasoning is explicitly prohibited by Precautionary Principle #1. Also, it's wrong. The King heirs have been aggressive about the copyright for his writings and speeches -- the builders of this monument had to get licenses. Finally, note that we treat the other national monuments on the Mall that have the same copyright problem exactly the same way. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, entirely the wrong way. Although nothing will probably come of it, I've asked at WMF Legal for someone to come here and explain that the generally overzealous enforcement of FOA for national monuments is unnecessary. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you did not see the cite above to the WMF legal team's commentary on the subject at Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US. Note, by the way, that the leading decision which upheld the creator's copyright is Gaylord, which covers the copyright on the Korean Veterans War Memorial, and which is, as it happens, adjacent to the MLK memorial. Gaylord specifically refutes your assertion that "no court anywhere in the United States is going to sustain a lawsuit based on publication of these images".      Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilegal/Copyright_of_Images_of_Memorials_in_the_US: Note: This page shares the Wikimedia Foundation’s preliminary perspective on a legal issue. This page is not final ... This page may not be accurate, and may fall out of date over time. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Gaylord turned on a specific contractual issue, and is not generally applicable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gaylord's contractual position was the same as most of the monuments and memorials that we have researched -- the creator almost always retains copyright. And note, by the way, that even if the contract transferred copyright to the government, it is still not PD, because Gaylord was not a government employee. The government owns and enforces copyrights on works created for it by others -- the Sacagawea dollar is a prime example. Unless you can prove that the MLK National Memorial contract explicitly transferred copyright to the Federal government and that the Federal government has chosen to put it into the public domain, we can't keep these images. And, as I noted above, the King heirs required that his quotes be licensed specifically for this purpose -- it would be extremely surprising to find that they had allowed those copyrights to become PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, you're contradicting what was said on the Meta page about the Gaylord decision, that an unusual situation prevailed. Gaylord is not generally applicable, especially since it was the decision of a single circuit and have never been reviewed by the Supreme Court.Template:ParabrThe notion that I cannot walk under Federally-owned land -- which means owned in some portion by me -- and take a picture of a Federally-funded monumnet of a national hero without getting the permission of an artist paid by the government *my government} to do the work, is perverse in the extreme, but what's more perverse, is that Commons bends over backwards to interpret the law in the most restrictive way possible, meaning that, potentially, this supposedly useful repository of images won't have a picture of the King Memorial in it for perhaps 100 years, depending on how long the sculptor lives.Template:ParabrSuch idiocies are what make this place so damn frustrating, as there doesn't seem to be a lick of common sense around the place. You, as an admin, are not required to use your powers to do anything at anytime, and yet you choose to use them to make the repository a distinctly less useful place, denying to our users images they can (and will) get from other places that aren't so frigging literal about everything.Template:ParabrThere's the law, and then there's what's right, and what you're doing is just not right - you don't have to do it, and yet you do. That just sucks.Template:ParabrI'm unwatching this page, as I'm sure the images will be deleted by another admin lacking in imagination and concern for how we service our readers, and I can't bear to see yet another memorial deliberately disappeared from the Commons because of overzealous enforcement of FOP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're ranting in the wrong direction. Complain, instead, to MLK's heirs, who aggressively defend the copyrights on his works, to the people overseeing this project who didn't bother to acquire the copyright to the sculpture from the creator, to the government, which rarely releases the copyrights it owns (witness the copyright for the Sacagwea dollar), and Congress, for not enacting broad FOP. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sorry but Jim is correct. We can't hoste this files as he explained. Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.

~Kevin Payravi (talk) 23:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Kevin is entirely correct. The sculptor holds the copyright and these images infringe on it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.

~Kevin Payravi (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial for previous cases/deletions.

~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of a copyrighted sculpture; no freedom of panorama for works of art in the United States. Refer to previous cases/deletions

Discasto talk 22:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptures here are under copyright. King's heirs aggressively defend the copyright to his words.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the need for deletion. I didn't see any that I would consider DM. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the images which don't show King's words, if that's the perceived problem. Have the King family lawyers contacted Wikipedia about any of these? If not, why the need to delete, and just move them to Wikipedia if that's a concern (I don't know why Wikipedia trusts Commons with images which, instead of being deleted, can be moved to the Wikipedia collection). Randy Kryn (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the ones that do not contain words. Reywas92 (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This also involves the following files, which were uncategorized at the time of creation:
BMacZero (🗩) 18:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial in D.C..JPG, File:MLK-Nobel Speech.jpg, File:Part of Martin Luther King memorial, Washington DC- Andy Mabbett - 2012-07-08.jpg and File:SrA Jette Carr, USAF (1) (14508595851).jpg as they do not show the sculpture.
 Delete the rest per nom. --A1Cafel (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FOP in the US. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Benito Eungenio Laren

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Benito Eungenio Laren (talk · contribs):

Artist Benito Eungenio Laren isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Both he and his art are out of project scope. All unused. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Younes21

[edit]

Younes21 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gqpro

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Gqpro (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data. OTRS-permission from copyright holder(s) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Laura Frontini Artista

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Laura Frontini Artista (talk · contribs):

Unused selfies, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Vaidada

[edit]

Vaidada (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Anwarlanaz

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Anwarlanaz (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Preetidipto.21

[edit]

Preetidipto.21 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are small photos without camera data. FBMD in special instructions field of metadata shows, that they probably come from Facebook. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Prince1529

[edit]

Here are all photos of Prince1529 (talk · contribs):

Small photos and (with 2 exceptions) without camera data, different watermarks. 11 photos seem to come from Facebook. Some are found on external sites. One is credited to different person, one collage without saying sources and authors. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MD Rakibul Islam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

~ Nahid Talk 12:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 羅芳晁0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SOMNATH THAKUR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and logos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos1946 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three unused charts which - if ever needed - could be reproduced in text, and two images which have an overprinting in lower right corner which suggests they're not the own work of the author. The charts also have no own work, but as they are unused and non-textural, they are out of COM:SCOPE. The marching birds however appear to be COM:COPYVIO.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality and with in-image caption that makes it difficult to re-use (figure-numbers are relative to a long-ago revision of en:Discovery and development of TRPV1 antagonists, where File:Thiourea SAR.jpg is now used. Great example of why in-image caption text is bad. DMacks (talk) 02:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And likewise File:Thiourea figure-horizontal.jpg that is the same content with the same problems, just a different orientation. DMacks (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused equivalent to File:Clinical development of TRPV1 antagonists.jpg; only difference I see is the large white margins here. DMacks (talk) 02:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krk rajkumarr andaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 19:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krk rajkumarr andaman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images, no educational purpose served, unused in user pages

SpacemanSpiff 03:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

debido a unos cambios asi a la persona Damian Valentin (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author (who died in 2006) does not match Uploader, and image (upladed in 2013) is copyrighted 100 past artist's death. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico Animalparty (talk) 04:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manaskhanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Буриев Шариф (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (France) until January 1, 2026 Coldcreation (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this painting was published before 1923 it may be uploaded to en:wikipedia. Coldcreation (talk) 06:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country until January 1, 2026 Coldcreation (talk) 06:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (France) until January 1, 2026 Coldcreation (talk) 06:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file will not be in the public domain in its home country (France) until January 1, 2026 Coldcreation (talk) 06:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, watermarks, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 07:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. (In scope.) Taivo (talk) 07:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to http://www.president.lv/pk/content/?cat_id=10432 all of the classes of the order for civilian are without any accessories on the ribbon bar, for military with swords, and for honourary medals with star. There is no rosettes and wings on any class of the order. Jakub Kaja () 08:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 08:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to http://www.president.lv/pk/content/?cat_id=10432 all of the classes of the order for civilian are without any accessories on the ribbon bar, for military with swords, and for honourary medals with star. There is no rosettes and wings on any class of the order. Jakub Kaja () 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to http://www.president.lv/pk/content/?cat_id=10432 all of the classes of the order for civilian are without any accessories on the ribbon bar, for military with swords, and for honourary medals with star. There is no rosettes and wings on any class of the order. Jakub Kaja () 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Andrew1924

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Andrew1924 (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana. Wikicology (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Julfercas1

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Julfercas1 (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, violation of pers. rights Nolispanmo 08:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sortilegus

[edit]

Sortilegus (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan.

В Азербайджане нет свободы панорамы. Нужно получить OTRS-разрешение от архитекторов. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taivo эти две фотографии сняты не в Азербайджане, а в Турции. --Sortilegus (talk) 08:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Понятно. В Турции можно. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sargun Singh

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Sargun Singh (talk · contribs):

Out of project scope due to quality. We have much better turban photos. Big watermarks, sometimes even with web address. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ModelEdward

[edit]

Here are both contributions of ModelEdward (talk · contribs):

Uploader seems himself to be depicted and they are not selfies. I suspect copyright violation. Quality is not excellent too. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mathieu parenteau vallee

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Mathieu parenteau vallee (talk · contribs):

Mathieu Parenteau isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki. The photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dwk279

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Dwk279 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, looking like professional photos. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Hazirox

[edit]

Hazirox (talk · contribs) made userpage and sandbox in en.wiki and uploaded two photos about herself. All her other edits were reverted as self-promotion. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 1valkilmer

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of 1valkilmer (talk · contribs):

Small photos, one credited to another person, the other has watermark. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Arunjayantvm

[edit]

Arunjayantvm (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Unused selfies and other family photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Arundirector

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Arundirector (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and (with one exception) without camera data. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Agustin Mendez

[edit]

AGUSTIN MENDEZ, Tubod Founding Hero (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Some photos are credited to different authors, some come from Facebook (deciding per FBMD... in special instructions field of metadata), one small photo without camera data. The last file is added, because no other photo uploaded by Agustin Mendez is taken with Nikon D3. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused .pdf-file with unclear significance. Maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, bandspam, del on DE Nolispanmo 11:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

known spammer, unused, and no evidence at website that artwork is public domain  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational character -- advertising Wieralee (talk) 11:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:The Yogshala Health & Wellness.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Bâtiment moderne non identifié, pas de liberté de panorama en France.
English: Unidentified mordern building, no FOP in France.
VIGNERON (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perchè doveva essere inserito nella pagina del concorso Wiki Loves Monuments del 18.09.2016 ad Albisola Superiore 87.0.199.187 12:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Google translate: Why had to be entered in the contest page Wiki Loves Monuments? I do not know, but this is not a reason to delete. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   12:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently the LOC only checked the authors' rights for the photographs but did not consider possible derivative works. There is no freedom of panorama in the US and Marco Cochrane is a contemporary artist who is still alive. De728631 (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: copyright holder doesn't match uploader, nor author. P 1 9 9   12:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marco Cochrane is a contemporary artist who is still alive. There is no freedom of panorama in the US so we cannot host derivative works of this sculpture. De728631 (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   13:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}} Indrajit Das 13:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 Delete I do not find here educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}} Indrajit Das 13:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is logo for promotional purpose and not relevant for WLM Indrajit Das 13:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 Delete en:Digital page does not mention the company. Probably it is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Image is not relevant for this category and also not clear Indrajit Das 13:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 Delete. "Wrong category" is not a reason to delete anything, because we can always re-categorize files. But I suggest to delete due to quality, because we have much better files in category:Water droplets. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author of this image. en:János Mattis-Teutsch died 1960 Raymond 14:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That case it can be restored in 2031. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C. Jetses died in 1955. He is well known as the author of the illustrations in this book. Tekstman (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That case the file can be restored in 2026. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Tekstman, it was the reason I removed it myself from the Dutch article and deleted the category here. But I hadn't asked to remove the picture (yet). I'm sorry I caused you extra work! Thanks for paying attention! Met groet, Rozemarijn vanL (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Tekstman, it was the reason I removed it myself from the Dutch article and deleted the category here. But I hadn't asked to remove the picture (yet). I'm sorry I caused you extra work! Thanks for paying attention! Met groet, Rozemarijn vanL (talk) 19:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, Tekstman, it was the reason I removed it myself from the Dutch article and deleted the category here. But I hadn't asked to remove the picture (yet). I'm sorry I caused you extra work! Thanks for paying attention! Met groet, Rozemarijn vanL (talk) 19:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, see signature: Mathieu Guthschmidt died in 1958. [4]. Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, C. Jetses died in 1955. Tekstman (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: author of the illustration is nor Jan Ligthart, nor C. Jetses. Signature must of Mathieu Guthschmidt, who died in 1958. Tekstman (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ddoe66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ddoe66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biodiversas1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for scultures. Post-WWII monument. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 15:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jfalkmedia

[edit]

The user uploaded a collection of photos of himself to illustrate his Wikipedia article. None can be his "own work" as claimed, someone else had to have taken the photographs. He does not credit the photographers or give them a chance to license their work. Unless he provides appropriate credits and licenses they should be deleted. The last one might be scanned from a publication, so it may be copyrighted. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Georgia and this architecture was created after 1953 and later. I'm sorry, but apart from FoP issues, some of the photos are Derivative work of photographs and art objects (busts etc.) of unknown origin / without permission, so that they should remain deleted even in case of establishment of FoP in Georgia.

A.Savin 16:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Utter nonsense, but if self-censorship is the way to go on Commons, please continue. I've got better things to do. Braveheart (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: The structure covering the house of Stalin's family was built in 1936, just to get the facts straight. Braveheart (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
en:Joseph Stalin Museum, Gori: main building begun in 1951. For Public Domain, the architect must have died 70 years ago or earlier. --A.Savin 12:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not every picture shows the actual main building. Is 70 years the limit in Georgia? Braveheart (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, it would be interesting to know when Mikhail Neprintsev died, who designed the aforementioned temple-like structure in front of the museum.Braveheart (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
1962 [5] --A.Savin 13:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks - still not quite sure if they same deletion reason applies to structures built before 1953? Braveheart (talk) 13:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According to ths link, Neprintsev is the architect of the pavilion which was built in 1937. So, all photos of the pavilion -> undelete in 2033 (or earlier, should Georgia establish commercial FoP). --A.Savin 15:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, wrong license kovox90      17:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Hi, i was who requested the revision of this picture. I upload it from Instagram, where I explicitly ask the picture´s author to give his permission and he answered by giving it, as it can be checked on this link: https://www.instagram.com/p/BKmnrvOAtAo/?taken-by=logos_de_america
This was the request to the Author both, in english and in spanish:
Hi, do you allow this picture to be uploaded to wikipedia under CC BY SA 4.0 license?
Hola, autorizas a que esta foto sea subida al artículo del Bap Unión en Wikipedia bajo la licencia CC BY SA 4.0?
The response of the author (in spanish) was:
"Sí, úsenla, les doy autorización"
(Yes. Use it. I give my authorization)
Even I have a capture where you can see the authorization: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/0/00/20160924013804%21BAP_Uni%C3%B3n_on_Miami.jpg
--Elelch (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No OTRS authorization. --Taichi (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Bórrese definitivamente Missing EXIF, wrong license and not OTRS authorization. --kovox90      05:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A scan of an unknown publication. Needs evidence of license or copyright. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A private image gallery. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   17:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huguitico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery, unused. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   18:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   18:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 22:51, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Didym; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely non-notable podcaster, out of scope (see previous deletion discussion for what I assume is a picture of the same person) IagoQnsi (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely non-notable podcaster, out of scope (see previous deletion discussion for what I assume is a picture of the same person) IagoQnsi (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also: File:ReP.jpg

Photos of non notorious person. The description is a political slogan ("Death to the state, to the people and to the government "). Stego (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also: File:ReP.jpg

Photos of non notorious person. The description is a political slogan ("Death to the state, to the people and to the government "). Stego (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Étienne Robial is born in 1945. Copyright violation. 90.43.161.12 19:19, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Sturm (talk) 19:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, unused. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: both images cropped and original revisions deleted. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image gallery. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image gallery. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image gallery. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:25, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only private content. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   20:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license. Logo represents Western Michigan University football. See http://sidearm.sites.s3.amazonaws.com/wmich.sidearmsports.com/documents/2016/8/22/WMU_Style_Guide_WEB_2_.pdf. page 13.

Logo can probably be re-uploaded to Wikipedia with a FUR. I assume we have to delete then recreate, as opposed to moving it directly? X96lee15 (talk) 21:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not for deletion, but reclassified. It is not a Reichardia picroides, is one spec. of genus Hieracium. 213.143.48.30 21:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}}. --INeverCry 00:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - private photo. Uploaded by confirmed sock (en-Wiki: AdnanAliAfzal‎). GermanJoe (talk) 21:50, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikicology (talk) 21:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused advertisement image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 22:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Norway - pictures of modern sculptures are non-commercial only Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:10, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

transferred Jckowal (talk) 07:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator and uploader, this is a one-day old misspelled file - there seems no need to keep redirect. File is now at File:Lilie wodne.jpg. --Storkk (talk) 09:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WhatsApp Image 2016-09-26 at 23.31.50 (1).jpg Mariobadillo (talk) 21:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We do not delete talk pages. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Clearly {{PD-textlogo}}, otherwise unused and out of scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:34, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to http://www.president.lv/pk/content/?cat_id=10432 all of the classes of the order for civilian are without any accessories on the ribbon bar, for military with swords, and for honourary medals with star. There is no rosettes and wings on any class of the order. Jakub Kaja () 08:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

  1. This couldn't be the reason for the deletion. Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. At the page you gave a link to, I see nothing related to your statement. Moreover, here I clearly see that "Ширина ленты... для офицеров – 32 мм с розеткой", that is "Ribbon width... for officers is 32 mm with rosette". Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Hoax can be the reason for the deletion. This is false information. Jakub Kaja () 14:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
  2. You can see this on description of the lowest photo on the left ("Miniatures of the Order (All classes)"), and also you can see that any of classes of any Latvian orders has no rosettes on ribbon bars on Digital book "The State Decorations of Latvia". There is a big difference between ribbon (suspension for the medal) and ribbon bar (generally issued for wear in place of medals). We are talking about bar, and you can't have 32 mm in diameter rosette on 32 mm wide by 9 mm high ribbon bar. Jakub Kaja () 14:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
  3. On Types of State Awards on www.president.lv it's very clear:
Miniatures of the Order of Viesturs are the same for all classes of the order:
1) ...
2) ...
3) A piece of the ribbon of the order, measuring 9x32 mm, with crossed 18 mm swords on the ribbon of military personnel.
Jakub Kaja () 14:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fantasy map with South Ossetia and Transdniestria as the parts of Russia. MaxBioHazard (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Это то, как на самом деле есть сейчас по факту, неофициально. Об официальности речь не идет, просто вариант. Здесь нет ни пропаганды каких-то идей, ни предвзятости - только то, что есть на самом деле сейчас, ни больше - ни меньше. Поэтому места для фантазии тут нет. Фантазии - это карты Грузии с Южной Осетией в ее составе и т.п. --Nicolay Sidorov (talk) 03:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Commons needs such map too. The map isn't called official in any way. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It was very likely created by this user for his personal use. There is no ban for creating hypothetical irredentist and fantastical maps. There are quite a lot of such hypothetical irredentist maps in Wikimedia Commomns, vis-à-vis Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia, Republika Srpska etc. Artoxx (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an actual coat of arms: it was not approved by Romanian Government resolution, thus the specified license does not apply. —Andrei S. Talk 10:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file was once nominated for deletion and kept. No new arguments here. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: but without the non applicable license. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add three photos for deletion due to same reason. Alok Prakash Putul isn't mentioned in en.wiki; probably he is non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi, Alok putul is a senior journalist working with BBC.


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we need to keep this? It is a low quality duplicate of File:Elisa Bonaparte with her daughter Napoleona Baciocchi - François Gérard - Google Cultural Institute.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with {superseded} as proposed. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pyraechmes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Too recent in order to fall out of copyrights... See for the dates this link... Person dead in 1947... Converting to DR because of the claim that OTRS has been sent. Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: can be restored if a valid permission arrives at OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это объект 3500245000 (Усадьба купца Белова) Sergeyb (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: change the description instead if you think it's wrong. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

changement de photo Auteur34 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a photo of Christopher Blauvelt, so he should not be credited and it should be removed from his page. 64.60.208.166 21:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. As seen in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa-MH5AX7Xw, the award was accepted on behalf of Blauvelt by director Jeff Preiss. I've corrected the file description. There is no reason to delete the file. LX (talk, contribs) 16:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keine Quellenangabe, kein Urheber Tout (Diskussion) 21:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty obviously traced from File:Wappen der Stadt Weiden in der Oberpfalz.JPG. However, it looks like a very similar version to that JPG was at this page (top right, under a different arms image, no longer available) in late 2005, prior to upload here. Tineye version of that image here. Looks like it's the same as this image, though that would not be the original source either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:49, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Wish of the uploader. Anyway the quality of the drawing seems not better than the File:Wappen der Stadt Weiden in der Oberpfalz.JPG. So if delete, please don't forget to replace (as the uploader itself has begun). --178.24.95.90 16:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb can you please replace the SVG with the other file (as here mentioned) not remove only!? That's pretty destructive. User: Perhelion 19:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]