Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Possible copyvio 47.150.68.26 02:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 07:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
"A photograph from the New York Times". The year is 1970, this is still under copyright. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
This slide was taken from the Smithsonian website. Though a US Government institution, much of the material from the Smithsonian is not in the public domain or under any free licenses; I know that is annoying, I have tried to find good images there myself and have been frustrated upon finding that I can't upload them; copyright/re-use information is located on this page. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a copyrighted image. A version of this photo is used by the politician in his LinkedIn profile (source). Warko (talk) 00:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ovaltine
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING
- File:HK Mid-levels 堅道 Caine Road 新藍塘麵包餐廳 New Blue Pool Bakery Restaurant Tea break bill fork Oct-2010.JPG
- File:HK Mid-levels 堅道 Caine Road 新藍塘麵包餐廳 New Blue Pool Bakery Restaurant Tea break Ovaltine bottle A1024.JPG
- File:Ovalmaltine a tartiner.jpg
- File:Ovaltine-québec-2007.jpg
- File:Ovo Drink - 001.jpg
- File:Ovomaltine claudia.jpg
- File:Ovomaltine crunchy.jpg
- File:Ovomaltine sort 01.JPG
- File:Ovomaltine sort 02.JPG
- File:Ovomaltine sort 03.JPG
Wcam (talk) 01:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 01:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The author is Васил Горанов, who was born in 1972. Maksmilian (talk) 02:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Corrupt image 47.150.68.26 02:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Keep Problem solved. --jdx Re: 10:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)- Delete I was the one who uploaded the image- and I requested speedy deletion as uploader. It was changed by the IP. Xochiztli (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --INeverCry 23:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Encerramento e muitas saudades 02.jpg
- File:Encerramento e muitas saudades 03.jpg
- File:Encerramento e muitas saudades 04.jpg
- File:Encerramento e muitas saudades 05.jpg
- File:Encerramento e muitas saudades 07.jpg
- File:FIM DOS JOGOS OLÍMPICOS DO RIO.jpg
- File:Grafite de Eduardo Kobra (Boulevard Olímpico).jpg
- File:GU OLIMPICO.jpg
- File:Meu pai nas olimpíadas.jpg
- File:MOTORISTA OLÍMPICO FOREVER ALONE.jpg
- File:Olimpíadas Rio 2016.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Photograph of a 1971 painting by Francis Newton Souza. No evidence of copyright release by Souza. FoP-India does not apply. Sourced from a blog that has since been suspended for a violation of terms of service. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted; video uploaded directly from YouTube where it has a standard YouTube license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabarnaparishad (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has been uploading random web grabs including screen shots of tv shows as own work, unless provenance is established, these should be deleted.
- File:Devarshi Roy Choudhury with Chief Minister of West Bengal Mamata Banerjee.jpg
- File:Devarshi Roy Choudhury with Dr. Partha Chatterjee.jpg
- File:Devarshi Roy Choudhury @ Bhutan House.jpg
- File:Devarshi Roy Choudhury.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 06:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Claims own work but the metadata states the author is "Bruno Giovanpietro " and the Copyright holder is "ARTEPURAFOTOGRAFIE". Copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete Advertisement, out of scope. }} --GeorgHH • talk 17:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The metadata lists the author of the photo as "Thongrob Promchin" and the Copyright holder as "NOTTYiMAGES@iCloud.com". Copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 07:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement, out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 17:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope advertisements.
Sunmist (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotional, out of scope. Sunmist (talk) 07:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a photograph of a poster from an art exhibition; the art gallery that issued it probably owns a copyright on it; no evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Not licensed under CC 4.0. It is an image from vokrug.tv. - Rayukk (talk) 08:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
1975 magazine cover, likely still in copyright in whatever country it is from, no evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Here is another one File:Lupita Lara y Porfirio Bas .jpg, same magazine. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Scan of a magazine or newspaper, doesn't look old enough to be out of copyright; no evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I may be totally wrong, but this looks just like advertising. And not historical advertising (which could be interesting for Commons), but recent one. So isn't this either a copyright violation (copyvio) or a missuse of Commons, i.e. an "Out of scope" case? We are no advertising platform :-) Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Additional hint: the weblink given in the description (http://www.supplementoffers.org/slim-phen/) does not work, i.e. the server exists, but no "/slim-phen/" page/path. --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 23:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermakr down right Pippobuono (talk) 12:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Не нужно удалять --Shvarts 007 (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
No licensing given, very probably a copyvio (see the watermark) Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Oops, I see that file has already been deleted -- but now it is there again. So the file has returned? And should be deleted again for the same reasons. --Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
infringement of copyright Bxxiaolin (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Pindamatthes
[edit]
These images are not at the website given, so can't confirm the free license; and at any rate, the website states that its contents are copyrighted, all rights reserved, and I don't see where it says free use. The author of the photos is given, but no permission is included. Cannot confirm license status. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
No evidence for claimed license at the source listed. BethNaught (talk) 09:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Origine di dubbia provenienza - No informations about copyright. Fernando.tassone (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Topgear223 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploading webgrabs including newspaper clippings sourced to "author"
- File:Kshitij at IIM Bangalore for a Residential Training.png
- File:With Evylin Sharma.png
- File:Kshitij with SisterUrmilaKanetkar and Brother-in-law.png
- File:In a discussion with Benny Dayal.png
—SpacemanSpiff 11:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of a TV program, see first version 2003:45:5C77:9B01:84B7:14B8:1E10:B066 12:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
this web resolution image, lacking any metadata, is most unlikely the work of the uploader. This Wayback Machine crawl is dated 6 months previous to the upload here. Ww2censor (talk) 12:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
These images are all found on this webpage without any evidence they were created by the uploader. They are claimed as own work, but they are the exact resolution of the source, have no metadata and the date of the webpage appear to predate these uploads. They are most likely the work of the originator within the university or the university tself. Perhaps the uploader is Professor Martseniuk as shown on this university webpage but the images really would need an OTRS verification, otherwise PCP applies.
- File:Тернопільська університетська лікарня.jpg
- File:Студенти працюють в лабораторії функціональної діагностики системи крові.jpg
- File:Структура тернопільської університетської лікарні.jpg
- File:НОК Червона калина.jpg
- File:Лабораторія функціональної діагностики сенсорних систем.jpg
- File:Динаміка росту кількості іноземних студентів в ТДМУ.jpg
- File:Віварій університету.jpg
Also consider:
- File:MarceniukWiki.JPG which is claimed to be authored by himself, which actually seems rather difficult for such a professional portrait.
Ww2censor (talk) 13:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
non-free logo from new user Papuass (talk) 13:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio / no permission. --GeorgHH • talk 17:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
It has a mistake with licensing. Leopard X (talk) 13:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Event not happening Naveenpf (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vincent29700 (talk · contribs)
[edit]André Bouny is born in1951. Copyright violation.
- File:La mise au monde, par André Bouny.jpg
- File:Prémonition, par André Bouny.jpg
- File:Crayon 3m², par André Bouny.jpg
- File:Paysage vietnamien, par André Bouny.jpg
83.204.231.185 19:00, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vincent29700 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Newspaper/magazine articles, document, promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Revue moderne des arts d'aout-septembre 1974 contenant un article sur le peintre André Bouny.pdf
- File:Programme de l'exposition au Grand Palais 1974, de la Société des artistes français et la Société internationale des Beaux-arts, 320p.pdf
- File:Titres des toiles exposées au Grand Palais, Paris, 1974.pdf
- File:Programme de l'exposition au Grand Palais, 1974, de la Société des artistes français et la Société internationale des Beaux-arts, 320p.pdf
- File:Couverture de la Revue moderne des arts d'aout-septembre 1974 contenant un article sur le peintre André Bouny.pdf
- File:Lettre de Léo Ferré à André Bouny.pdf
- File:Article consacré au peintre André Bouny dans la Revue moderne des arts d'aout-septembre 1974 (1).pdf
- File:Article (suite) consacré au peintre André Bouny dans la Revue moderne des arts d'aout-septembre 1974.pdf
- File:André Bouny.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Recreation of content previously deleted per community, see File:Guillermo Celi Santos.jpg ✎kovox90 14:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Corporate logo, unlikely own work. Above COM:TOO#United Kingdom. January (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Stolen from United Airlines website — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 15:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong person - my fault Victuallers (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
IT´S WRONG.THE PLANT ISN´T Pelargonium graveolens. 90.175.225.132 16:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
User:Uleli rename it [1]--Tocekas (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3APelargonium_odoratissimum.jpg&type=revision&diff=54549502&oldid=51790790){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 23:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation, Quote from dbwv.de: "Darüber hinaus sind grundsätzlich alle Beiträge dieser Präsenz urheberrechtlich geschützt" ΚηœrZupator ☠ 16:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation or incorrect License ΚηœrZupator ☠ 17:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation or incorrect License ΚηœrZupator ☠ 17:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright Violation or incorrect License ΚηœrZupator ☠ 17:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unfree logo Steinsplitter (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Unfree logo Steinsplitter (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of licence Gijón16 (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
This image doesn't have a source, and going to the school's website results in (© 1878 - 2016 Western University). I see that it's used "with permission", I can't find a source or the permission. Author is not same as uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
These pictures of runners were obviously taken by a service. Many of them have the overprinting which shows the source of the image. Others have not this overprinting but they also have no indication of user's own work. If it's the user in the photos, its very obviously not possible to be also the photographer.
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2015-Delhi-Airtel-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2014-Delhi-Airtel-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2013-Delhi-Airtel-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2010-Delhi-Airtel-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2009-Delhi-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2016-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2015-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2014-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2013-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2012-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2009-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2011-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
- File:V-Vaidyanathan-2008-Mumbai-Marathon.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 23:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these two pictures, niether has metadata. Notice the large white band scanner artifact at base of head/shoulders shot.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
This image is in use on the writer's twitter page https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/536824335801937920/w3v3lDN7_bigger.png&imgrefurl=https://twitter.com/hashtag/gendereqaulity&h=73&w=73&tbnid=0iC4caXMaGSm-M&tbnh=70&tbnw=70&usg=__TcsB16ln88Ykj-1tkuaPOmsYFAQ=&docid=MWdDeh-gaEUE-M which makes this being the original unlikely. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 23:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
The V-for-Vendetta Character is copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement (see this page Andycyca (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kajolchugh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claim of own work on these images which include a variety of non-related images, some illustrations, some photos.
- File:The Secret To Life.jpg
- File:Bbc hindi.png
- File:Vyasa amba ambalika.jpg
- File:Dafa 420.jpg
- File:Chanderi durg.jpg
- File:Sarojini.jpg
- File:AEES.jpg
- File:Anwar Ahmed.jpg
- File:Gargi-Vachaknavi.jpg
- File:Vachkanvi Gargi.jpg
- File:Kajol Chugh.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Can't use this image. iFixit's CC (BY-NC-SA) license does not permit it. This upload omits the NC Non Commercial part, and that's not OK. iFixit only permits an identical CC license, and Wikipedia can't use material that hinders commercial use. Henriok (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: image deleted - the deletion request tag goes on the file page and not the talk page. --INeverCry 00:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Image is facebook-size (960x), no indication of uploader's own work, and not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aguanteolimpo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://olimpodeprimeratv.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/olimpoc2.jpg.
- File:Estadio Norberto Tomas.png
- File:Estadio Casanova.jpg
- File:Estadio Carminatti.jpg
- File:Sede-Olimpo.png
- File:Carminatti-aire.jpg
- File:Estadio-Carminatti.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Hinchada Olimpo.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aguanteolimpo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Own work claim highly dubious. Esp. the aerial seems another in a row of copyvios. All other uploads (c)vios, Com:PRP should be applied.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio (see watermark) Jos1950 (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be above TOO. Fair use at best.
- File:FCB (Chernivtsi) Logo 4.gif
- File:FCB (Chernivtsi) Logo 2.gif
- File:FCB (Chernivtsi) Logo 1.gif
- File:FCB (Chernivtsi) Logo 3.gif
_Logo_4.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo_2.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo_1.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo_3.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --INeverCry 00:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Family photo mistakenly uploaded Gillfoto 21:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW of contemporary placards - no COM:FOP in France.
- File:Bornes milliaires Musée Tournon 2016.09.19 (23p).jpg
- File:Bornes milliaires Musée Tournon 2016.09.19 (24p).jpg
- File:Pont sur le Doux Boucieu le Roi 2016.09.19 (13p).jpg
- File:Croix de peste St Alban d'Ay 2016.09.19 (1p).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 21:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:StuartLeefromperrine
[edit]
Copyright violations. The metadata says "Author: Erin Baldassari" and "Copyright© 2011 Erin Baldassari All Rights Reserved". Indeed, you might have guessed from the large watermark on the photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:06, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Faked source. El Siglo Futuro was not published on that date (in fact, in any Saturday) Discasto talk 22:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation of anjoubus. No permission. M0tty (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation, no permission, trademarked logos are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. M0tty (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39556294 Py4nf (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
A photograph of a publication. The name and year are not included, so assume it's copyrighted. No evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
image not found at source INeverCry 21:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: Click the small word "더보기" at the left of source page --Puramyun31 (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Puramyun31: You need to make this kind of thing more clear, otherwise you're not going to have anyone to review your uploads. INeverCry 04:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 04:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
image not found at source INeverCry 21:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: Click the small word "더보기" at the left of source page --Puramyun31 (talk) 02:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 04:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
image not found at source INeverCry 21:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: Click the small word "더보기" at the left of source page --Puramyun31 (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above {sigh}. --INeverCry 04:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
its blurry. there is a better version in commons: 
Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I did a quick delete. No use for blured file. --Amada44 talk to me 10:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
The (c) signature is "P. Neveux" and not the same name as the uploader, and no EXIF... LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and argumentation. --Coyau (talk) 11:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Please see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Tonny.Sullivan
[edit]- File:Tonny Sullivan 6.jpg
- File:Tonny Sullivan 4.jpg
- File:Tonny Sullivan 5.jpg
- File:Tonny Sullivan 2.jpg
- File:Tonny Sullivan 3.jpg
- File:Tonny Sullivan 1.jpg
A youngster's selfie collection. None are in use. None have any potential educational uses. Out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dev raj tiwari (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aomartin86 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are of artworks, they are facebook sized, and they do not appear to be in use. We do not know if the artist is notable, or if the artist is notable. This places the images out of COM:SCOPE and with the additional difficulty that they may also be COM:COPYVIOs as well.
- File:Dibujo, Decada de los 90s, Mi Hermana.jpg
- File:Dibujo de Auto Retrato Realista.jpg
- File:Dibujo a Tinta 2005.jpg
- File:Cartel 1988.jpg
- File:Cartel 1973 Centenario de la abolición de la Esclavitud de Puerto Rico.jpg
- File:Caligrafía, Letra Itálica, siglos XIV y XV y letra unical siglos IV al VIII.jpg
- File:Dibujo a Tinta Y Acuarela los 90s.jpg
- File:Contemplación, pintura al oleo 2005, 40'x84'.jpg
- File:Escultura, Colección Personal.jpg
- File:Escultura en Cemento y Marmolina.jpg
- File:Autoretrato 1992, Dibujo a lápices de colores.jpg
- File:2001, Exhibición Colectiva Titulada Correspondencia..Diálogo con Ramon Frade.jpg
- File:"Ser de Luz", Mujeres Artistas, Plaza las Américas Puerto Rico.jpg
- File:Myrna Arocho Artista Visual.jpg
- File:Myrna Arocho.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prof.abol1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional or self-promotional gallery of artwork, book covers, calligraphy, screencaps, and so on. No apparent own work, artist does not appear to be notable. Deviant Art is a great free webhosting service for this kind of uploads.
- File:Calligraphy 25 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:Colourful2 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Al-Mawared English-Arabic Encyclopedia by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:V7 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:V6 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Horse 9 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Ballerina by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Calligraphy2 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Calligraphy by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Horse head by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Painting 5 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.jpg
- File:Uruk publisher software.jpg
- File:Painting 3 by Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:Ballerina by Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:White horse painting by Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:Freedom by Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:PAINTING 5 BY Abolhassan Al-aabid.png
- File:Professor Abolhassan Al-aabid interview at the Hilton heathrow hotel in london 2005.jpg
- File:Professor Abolhassan Al-aabid at the Hilton heathrow hotel in london 2005.jpg
- File:Self portrait by Professor Abolhassan Al-aabid 2013.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhuwan Guragain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--ghouston (talk) 06:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
There is a difficulty here. Василь Миколайович Березовий (3 березня 1938 - 28 лютого 2015) passed away in 2015, but here we have a gallery of uploads labeled "own work" from 2016. I find this highly unlikely.
Hello. Indeed, Василь Миколайович Березовий has gone in 2015. And I'm his grandson Березовий Влас Романович. My father (Березовий Роман Васильович) and I now are the heirs of thуese arts. That's why I mentioned this files as "my own".
- File:"Мамина вишня" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Наодинці із землею" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Чорно - Біль" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Вечір над Россю" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Миколка - Селянинович" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Крізь віки" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Самотність" Березовий В. М.jpg
- File:"Поле перейти..." Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Харон 33" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Щедрість" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Батько" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Чураївна" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Мить і вічність" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Туман розсіється" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Скорбота" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Косар" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Тут були козацькі села" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Волхви" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Влітку" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Іван Миколайчук" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Господиня" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Поминання" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Чекання Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Пісня Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Теплий сніг Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Ноша Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Невтомність" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Під тучами летючими" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Осінь Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Трудодень Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Сонячно Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Весна 91" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Вдови" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Перервана мелодія (Максим Березовський)" Березовий Василь Микалаєвич.jpg
%22_%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%94%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: please send permission to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Василь Миколайович Березовий (3 березня 1938 - 28 лютого 2015) passed away in 2015, but here we have a gallery of uploads labeled "own work" from 2016.
- File:Гайдамаки Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Сізіф Березовий В М.jpg
- File:А Мамай Живий Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Мамай Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Морок Березовий В М.jpg
- File:А ви коней купали Березовий В М.jpg
- File:КозакМорозенко Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Літо Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Композитор Івасюк Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Засіяне поле 1933 Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Бомж Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Баламаджі Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Земля Годувальниця Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Припять Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Рік народження 1933 Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Волошки Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Герой України Березовий В М.jpg
- File:Стежка Тютюнника Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Засвистали козаченьки" Березовий В. М.jpg
- File:"Вічна загадка. Григір Тютюнник "Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Тепло" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Чорнобривців насіяла мати" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Цвіте терен" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Соловецький в'язень (Петро Калнишевський)" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Шукають броду. Чумаки" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Виростеш ти синку" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Конику - брате" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Не посміють (Іван Богун)" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Майстер Степан Ковнір" Березовий В М.jpg
- File:"Козацькі могили" Березовий В М.jpg
%22_%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92_%D0%9C.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22_%D0%91%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92_%D0%9C.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vantoryshower (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional uploads of shower equipment by "Vantoryshower"... No indication that these were created by individual, they look more like they were lifted from a catalog.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Sista Soul
[edit]- File:Sista Soul - Profile Photo.jpg
- File:Sista-Soul - A Holy Light (The World needs Love).JPG
- File:Sista Soul - Amazing Grace.jpg
- File:Sista Soul - Come into the Night -.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - Killing Me Softly - Unplugged.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - Lamba.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - LOOKING FOR SUNSHINE.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - My Way.jpg
- File:Sista Soul - No Woman No Cry.jpg
- File:Sista Soul - Redemption Song - Unplugged.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - Signed Sealed Delivered.JPG
- File:Sista Soul - Stand By Me.jpg
- File:Siksta Soul - Summertime.jpg
- File:Sista Soul - What a Wonderful World.jpg
- File:1 Sista Soul - Logo.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Personal artwork uploaded only for self-promotion of music recordings. None are in use. They have no potential uses for anyone except the uploader. Out of Project scope; the Commons is not Facebook. The fourth one is probably copyrighted, as well. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image of the user, his only contribution uploaded in 2012, not in use and not likely to ever be in use, no potential value to anyone else. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Obvious advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
This is someone's curriculum vitae. Per Project Scope, raw text pdf files are not to be kept. I am not seeing that this artist has any Wikipedia articles, so probably not worth moving to Wikisource or any other site. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyvio, per COM:Plushies. Fæ (talk) 12:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The rationale you link makes no mention of the Netherlands, so this seems more like this nomination is trying to find a solution to a problem that does not exist. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ktr101: Brussel is the capital of Belgium and Wendy is the mascot of WMBE. Dutch law is irrelevant... But this case seems to suggest that stuffed animals can have a copyright in the Netherlands. Though the one mentioned in the court case doesn't have a own original character and is therefore not protected by copyright law. Perhaps a Flemish court would use the same rational when the stuffed animal is a faithful copy of a real animal but the "toy" needs to be out of copyright as well in the US according to site policy. I believe that the real question is if the stuffed animals are above are below TOO. Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Duly noted, as I wrote that right before bed and confused the countries. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ktr101: Brussel is the capital of Belgium and Wendy is the mascot of WMBE. Dutch law is irrelevant... But this case seems to suggest that stuffed animals can have a copyright in the Netherlands. Though the one mentioned in the court case doesn't have a own original character and is therefore not protected by copyright law. Perhaps a Flemish court would use the same rational when the stuffed animal is a faithful copy of a real animal but the "toy" needs to be out of copyright as well in the US according to site policy. I believe that the real question is if the stuffed animals are above are below TOO. Natuur12 (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Closing administrator please note, the comments made above were shortly before the WMF enacted a global office ban for Kevin Rutherford's account. The evidence for the ban remains unpublished. --Fæ (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please discuss arguments, not people — NickK (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Multichill. Thryduulf (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg and COM:TOYS. This is not a designer toy but a simple toy that is considered an utilitarian object — NickK (talk) 23:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The DR quoted above appears to have failed to take into account copyright rationales and included a personal attack by the closing administrator. As such it cannot be considered to set a precedent for other deletion requests or be thought a neutral closure based on current policy or an understanding of copyright law. The focus of the photograph is on two decorative plushies with sufficient design and artistic elements to be copyrightable, suggestions that these may be legally considered utilitarian objects for copyright purposes are unsupported by cases or existing legal analysis. Were anyone convinced that these designs were uncopyrightable or keen to set a useful precedent for Commons that might add to COM:TOO or COM:UA, they could ask the owning Wikimedia chapters to take photographs of the manufacturer's labels for more information and analysis of the related status intellectual property such as source countries, trade marks and manufacturers. Such a precedent would make the vast majority of soft toy figures fair game for Commons to host any photograph of them, not just photographs taken at Wikimedia related events. --Fæ (talk) 16:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Firstly, AFAIK there are no "owning Wikimedia chapters". Secondly, your reasoning that copyright status depends on the usage of a utilitarian object is clearly wrong, as there should be no difference in copyright status between a toy used by a child and the very same toy used as a decoration. Applying your reasoning to automobiles, all photos in Category:Automobile collections or Category:Automobile museums display utilitarian objects (i.e. automobiles) that are used for decorative and not for utilitarian purposes (e.g. people come to look at those cars and not to ride them). I think that we need a serious proof that once a toy is not used for utilitarian purposes it stops being an utilitarian object from copyright point of view, and I do not see any proof of this. Thus I think that all utilitarian objects, no matter whether it's a toy or an automobile, should be treated equally and fall under COM:UA — NickK (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The idea of PRP is the other way around. The burden of proof is to verify the copyright release, not to verify it is a copyright violation. Toys are not utilitarian objects by default. --Fæ (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- COM:PRP states there should be a significant doubt, not just a random doubt. In a similar DR you asked me to cite a US court case, and I cited you a US court case stating that toys are useful objects. I do not think that something recognised by US courts can still qualify as a significant doubt, otherwise we can use PRP to delete the entire Category:Toys — NickK (talk) 23:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The idea of PRP is the other way around. The burden of proof is to verify the copyright release, not to verify it is a copyright violation. Toys are not utilitarian objects by default. --Fæ (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The previous deletions request was closed on the basis of the closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg, itself closed because "no valid reason for deletion". This appears to ignore the valid concern that the copyright status of the two stuffed toys remains unstated and unproven. After a series of counter-views by experienced Commons contributors at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Interpreting_COM:TOYS_for_photographs_taken_by_established_Wikimedians, I am raising a second request.
This is a breach of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toys are public domain. Commons policies should be applied equitably regardless of who the photographer is, or how the photograph is being used. When closing this request, a closing administrator should take care to put valid copyright concerns and any significant doubt, above popular consensus. Fæ (talk) 08:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Addendum with reference to the 1981 Gay Toys, Inc. v. Buddy L Corp. case quoted in the last deletion request, this was vacated on appeal in 1983 as "toys do not even have an intrinsic function other than the portrayal of the real item".[2] --Fæ (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as being, directly, an image of copyrighted 'stuffed animals'. Please see User:Elcobbola/Stuffed_Animals before saying we should keep this... the legal situation is explained quite well by that essay. Toys are not utilitarian objects under US law, and this fails COM:L on that basis. Reventtalk 03:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyvio, per COM:TOYS. Fæ (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The rationale you link makes no mention of the United Kingdom, so this seems more like this nomination is trying to find a solution to a problem that does not exist. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bizarre, of course toys have copyright in the UK, regardless of whether it is listed in the Commons summary. --Fæ (talk) 07:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Only a small portion of the toy is visible, and no evidence has been provided either here or in the link that such photographs are copyright violations (musings that they might be are not sufficient). Thryduulf (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg and COM:TOYS. This is not a designer toy but a simple toy that is considered an utilitarian object — NickK (talk) 23:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
The previous deletions request was closed as "no valid reason for deletion" on the basis of the closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg, itself closed because the identical "no valid reason for deletion". This appears to ignore the valid concern that the copyright status of the stuffed toy which is the focus of this photograph remains unstated and unproven. After a series of counter-views by experienced Commons contributors at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Interpreting_COM:TOYS for photographs taken by established Wikimedians, I am raising a second request.
This is a breach of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toy is public domain. Commons policies should be applied equitably regardless of who the photographer is, or how the photograph is being used. When closing this request, a closing administrator should take care to put valid copyright concerns and any significant doubt, above popular consensus. Fæ (talk) 08:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately toys like this have been ruled copyrightable in the U.S. on many occasions. Almost certainly fair use and very cute, and aggravating that Commons would have to step on Wikimedia events, but the Wikimedia Foundation has forbidden Commons to keep files under a fair use rationale. So unless they want to add a particular exception for Wikimedia events, by the best guess of the law, photos like this are derivative works of a copyrighted element. If there was a documenting photo of the event which happened to show the toy, those are probably OK, but photos focusing on the toy are almost certainly problematic. Delete Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as being, directly, an image of a copyrighted 'stuffed animal. Please see User:Elcobbola/Stuffed_Animals before saying we should keep this... the legal situation is explained quite well by that essay. Toys are not utilitarian objects under US law, and this fails COM:L on that basis. Reventtalk 03:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Low quality, not in use anywhere, possibly violation of privacy. User has uploaded only this single image -> private photo album? Smial (talk) 10:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
self promotion, advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Logographics786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded for vanity page on English Wikipedia that was deleted. No conceivable educational value. Citobun (talk) 11:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Modern artworks, lacks of permission(s) from the artist(s), see OTRS
- File:Ben Oldenhof wandsculptuur.jpg
- File:Ben Oldenhof Beeld metaal 2008.jpg
- File:Sculptuur Ben Oldenhof metaal en porselein.jpg
- File:Vroegerwerk-028.jpg
- File:Beeld-2008-010.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low resolution COM:NOTUSED image. Mhhossein talk 12:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Should be deleted per COM:NOTUSED. Mhhossein talk 12:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Should be deleted per COM:NOTUSED. Mhhossein talk 12:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Should be deleted per 'not used'. Mhhossein talk 12:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Should be deleted per not used. Mhhossein talk 12:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
personal image not in scoope Saqib (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Also File:101 2254 - no watermark.JPG
out of scope: unknown blury fish Jarekt (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal artwork uploaded for self-promotion, the user's only contribution; the file is not in use and has no potential uses Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 掬茶 (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. --GeorgHH • talk 17:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused and buggy-SVG. Have File:Trithiocarbonic acid.svg DMacks (talk) 05:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotional and out of scope. Sunmist (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
The image is too small to be useful for any educational purpose. Sunmist (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope artwork; this is unlikely to be useful for an educational purpose, and is currently not in use. Sunmist (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 07:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Photographer was likely Kalev Jõgeda, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, permission needed. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:05, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
The files are of an unknown copy right status. There's no way to understand this file is in Public Domain as, by now, "Terms of Use and Privacy Notice" is not available on VOA. How about deletion of this file per COM:PRP. One may see this discussion for further info. --Mhhossein talk 13:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
There are some other similar files such as File:Militaires nigériens Diffa Mars 2015.jpg, File:Militaires nigériens sur le pont Doutchi.jpg, File:CJTFMichika1.jpg, File:AbubakarShekauVOA.JPG, and File:Abubakar Shekau 2 octobre 2014.jpg. --Mhhossein talk 13:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- First of all Ann Look is a journalist of VOA, see here. And if the Terms of Use aren't online then that's not a reason to delete this particular file instead to check again the PD-Template.--Sanandros (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: The only problem is not the availability of the Terms of Use. Please see the final comment here. --Mhhossein talk 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- I still don't get it. There also written that pics before 2013 are PD. Pls quote the critical sentence.--Sanandros (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- The consensus clearly shows that "We cannot use material from any VOA site dated after June 2013." (Pinging the admin who made the comment @Jameslwoodward: ). Except the originally nominated file, which I'd like to withdraw from the nomination, the others are dated after June 2013 and we can't use them. --Mhhossein talk 02:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I can't be more helpful. It is possible that the VOA has changed its terms of use to make them consistent worldwide, but, as noted above, the ToU page is not available on its web site. The last time I was able to look at the VOA Terms of Use, they did not allow free use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- So here comes Mr. COM:PRP!--Mhhossein talk 13:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sry but I uploaded the pic in 2012 and that implies a publication before 2013.--Sanandros (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- And I already said that I'd like to withdraw your file. Other file listed above deserve deletion. --Mhhossein talk 11:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- OK sry. With dyslexia reading isn't that easy.--Sanandros (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- And I already said that I'd like to withdraw your file. Other file listed above deserve deletion. --Mhhossein talk 11:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sry but I uploaded the pic in 2012 and that implies a publication before 2013.--Sanandros (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- So here comes Mr. COM:PRP!--Mhhossein talk 13:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I can't be more helpful. It is possible that the VOA has changed its terms of use to make them consistent worldwide, but, as noted above, the ToU page is not available on its web site. The last time I was able to look at the VOA Terms of Use, they did not allow free use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- The consensus clearly shows that "We cannot use material from any VOA site dated after June 2013." (Pinging the admin who made the comment @Jameslwoodward: ). Except the originally nominated file, which I'd like to withdraw from the nomination, the others are dated after June 2013 and we can't use them. --Mhhossein talk 02:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- I still don't get it. There also written that pics before 2013 are PD. Pls quote the critical sentence.--Sanandros (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: The only problem is not the availability of the Terms of Use. Please see the final comment here. --Mhhossein talk 07:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (all except original file as pre June 2013). --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Restored, post June 2013 files are now considered OK - Jcb (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Jean-Max Albert is born in 1942. No FoP in France. 82.120.166.94 13:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
bad photoshop, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 13:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
probably not own work, unused Pippobuono (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private file storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This church was built in 1938, the architect is presumed to be alive 70 years ago, and there is no FoP in Greece. Sorry Jebulon (talk) 17:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Two of these images are likely COM:COPYVIOs, the others are personal images out of COM:SCOPE even assuming they are own work of uploader.
- File:V Leaders.jpg
- File:V LEADERS 2.jpg
- File:V LEADERS.jpg
- File:V Leaders 1.jpg
- File:HUBLI THE CLEAN CITY.jpg
- File:Hubli the CLEAN CITY.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused diagram, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused image transferred over from Panoramino, no category, not in use, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized and non-educational cartoon diagram, uploaded to promote V! studios. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image with unlikely claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused Facebook sized image, not apparently educationally useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused photograph of school notebook, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused and uncategorized diagram with only description "Copyright reserved by Vantory". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Routine request for small size image with no metadata. Please provide a larger image or some indication that it is your own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Someone's school schedule is out of COM:SCOPE for lack of general educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal vacation image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Not own work, screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused uncategorized, probably non=educational image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Personal image, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
A private party photo of poor quality. Bigbitgnom (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emevepuntonet (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused image of a non-notable event, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image of a non-notable event, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image of a non-notable event, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused image of a non-notable event, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal image of a non-notable team, out of scope. Likely personality right issues as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in Argentina. FunkMonk (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
no direct source given INeverCry 21:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: File was discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/09#File:2011 Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg and it appears it was cropped from File:2011 Milipol Claude Gueant and Abdullah bin Khalifa Al Thani.jpg. The original file, however, was deleted as a copyvio, so I believe that would make this crop also a copyvio. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
A brief installation video, not really useful. See Commons:프로젝트의 범위#교육적으로 유용해야 합니다 (English). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Ohio Historical Markers in Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Ohio
[edit]These images are copyrighted Ohio Historical Markers from 2003; see Commons:Deletion requests/PAHMC for similar precedence.
~Kevin Payravi (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
New York Korean War Veterans Memorial in Battery Park dates only from 1991, and is therefore certainly copyrighted. No Freedom of Panorama in the U.S. Jmabel ! talk 01:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes you are right and it's not a building --The Photographer 02:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright holder A l p h a m a Talk 04:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. {{PD-textlogo}} Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'd also say PD-Textlogo.--Sanandros (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 06:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, per COM:TOYS. Fæ (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The rationale you link makes no mention of France, so this seems more like this nomination is trying to find a solution to a problem that does not exist. This is also the mascot of Wikimedia France, so it is absurd to think they would claim copyright over this, when there are many images up of this plush (I also think they would have gone after the category by now, if they really cared). Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- France is no exception to EU copyright. It does not even have FoP. --Fæ (talk) 07:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Closing administrator please note, the comments made above were shortly before the WMF enacted a global office ban for Kevin Rutherford's account. The evidence for the ban remains unpublished. --Fæ (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please discuss arguments, not people — NickK (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep see Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg. Multichill (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Multichill. Trizek from FR 11:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per Fæ. --★ Poké95 11:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:WikiCon 2015-Maskottchen.jpg and COM:TOYS. This is not a designer toy but a simple toy that is considered an utilitarian object — NickK (talk) 23:45, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The WikiCon DR quoted above appears to have failed to take into account copyright rationales and included a personal attack by the closing administrator. As such it cannot be considered to set a precedent for other deletion requests, or be thought a neutral closure based on current policy or an understanding of copyright law. The focus of the photograph is on a decorative plushie with sufficient design and artistic elements to be copyrightable, suggestions that plushies may be legally considered utilitarian objects for copyright purposes are unsupported by cases or existing legal analysis. Were anyone convinced that the design is uncopyrightable or keen to set a useful precedent for Commons that might add to COM:TOO or COM:UA, they could ask the owning Wikimedia chapter to take photographs of the manufacturer's label for more information and analysis of the related status intellectual property, such as source country, trade mark and manufacturer. Such a precedent would make the vast majority of soft toy figures fair game for Commons to host any photograph of them, not just photographs taken at Wikimedia related events. This would be super useful as an image host, but it would undermine the current scope of Commons, and this project's usefulness as a source of verifiably legally free images for reusers such as journalists and book authors. --Fæ (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Firstly, AFAIK there are no "owning Wikimedia chapters". Secondly, your reasoning that copyright status depends on the usage of a utilitarian object is clearly wrong, as there should be no difference in copyright status between a toy used by a child and the very same toy used as a decoration. Applying your reasoning to automobiles, all photos in Category:Automobile collections or Category:Automobile museums display utilitarian objects (i.e. automobiles) that are used for decorative and not for utilitarian purposes (e.g. people come to look at those cars and not to ride them). I think that we need a serious proof that once a toy is not used for utilitarian purposes it stops being an utilitarian object from copyright point of view, and I do not see any proof of this. Thus I think that all utilitarian objects, no matter whether it's a toy or an automobile, should be treated equally and fall under COM:UA — NickK (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per NickK. --Jcb (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The previous deletion request closure relied on the reasoning from NickK, which was a radical argument based on utilitarian objects which is not reflected in COM:TOYS. Based on a series of strong counter views at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Interpreting_COM:TOYS_for_photographs_taken_by_established_Wikimedians, I am raising a second request as the photograph is a breach of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
At the current time, there has been no evidence presented that the toy is public domain. Commons policies should be applied equitably regardless of who the photographer is, or how the photograph is being used. When closing this request, a closing administrator should take care to put valid copyright concerns and any significant doubt, above popular consensus. Fæ (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Utilitarian object, so as the flag. Trizek from FR 13:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Could you explain how this particular stuffed toy white ermine is not a stuffed toy, designed for children to play with, but a utilitarian object for some other practical purpose and so demonstrably public domain rather than copyrighted? I'm having difficulty seeing that reflected in Commons policies or verifiable copyright law. Please refer to COM:UA which is specific for toys: "...toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the United States (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally considered protected as copyrighted works of art."
- Please keep in mind that the burden of proof is on the uploader to demonstrate that the toy is public domain, no proof has yet been supplied. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Most toys are not utilitarian objects, per many many court cases. That is pretty much rock-solid in the U.S., and I would be surprised if it was any different in Europe. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as being, directly, an image of a copyrighted 'stuffed animal'. Please see User:Elcobbola/Stuffed_Animals before saying we should keep this... the legal situation is explained quite well by that essay. Toys are not utilitarian objects under US law, and this fails COM:L on that basis. Reventtalk 03:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Complete and utter nonsense; misleading Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Info This file have three duplicates, uploaded today by same user:- 1. File:Order of the Canada Cat.gif,
- 2. File:Native speaker of the French Language.gif,
- 3. File:The cat that inspired the international language of Romance.gif.
- Delete All four files: out of scope. --GeorgHH • talk 17:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Image is a selfie flagged as the "own work" of User:Laura200. Needs permission or proof that the singer in the picture is also "Laura200". McGeddon (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No longer needed Worthyhero (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Recent (circa 2000) public art in the US, with no freedom of panorama. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I see it could also be a possible copyright violation of someone else´s photo.--JJBers (talk) 18:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This image makes too many assumptions about the screen resolution, zoom and the user's device. It is 8.5 mm on my screen. File:1cm.PNG has been deleted for the same reason. ErikvanB (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This is not fully true. Howsoever PNG is a completely other fileformat. As we can see this SVG is dynamically and the dimension is on 10 mm. If someone (you) have a screenzoom, this can't be a reason to delete. If something is not fully compatible to all, it is not a reasonably solution to delete the object. On all my screens this image is 10 mm (the SVG dimension is independent to the resolution), except on my smartphone. If so, the fault is on the device, not on this image. This may be described on the file-desc. ↔ User: Perhelion 16:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe Nyttend can say also something about it. ↔ User: Perhelion 17:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Perhelion brings me in because I requested the creation of this image; see Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop/Archive/2016#Centimetre. If something is largely platform-independent, it's not a good idea to delete it because it doesn't comply with smartphones and perhaps one or two other browsers. The zoom is totally irrelevant; we always assume that you're viewing something at 100% resolution. It's no different from holding a physical ruler and claiming that it's unuseful because its length changes when you view it through a magnifying glass. Nyttend (talk) 00:33, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Late reply: I wish I had noticed this discussion earlier this week, but since this may come up again, I'll add my comments now, even though it was closed yesterday. I see significantly different sizes in Safari 10 vs Firefox 49. The Firefox version is ~25% wider than the Safari version. If we're going to keep this because "zoom it totally irrelevant" and because it doesn't display as advertised on smartphones (mobile devices are about half the traffic on Wikipedias) and "perhaps one or two other browsers" (apparently including one of the most popular...), then it needs much bigger disclaimers. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1cm.svg (mobile site) in Firefox gives me a different size than https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1cm.svg (desktop site) in Firefox. (Perhaps one is zoomed in and the other is not? Whatever the cause, one's certainly wrong, and possibly both.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Leider habe ich das falsche Objekt fotografiert und hochgeladen. Gliwi (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely claim of own work, small size, no meta Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Listed as "legislative photo" there is no indication of user's own work on this professional portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Gracia
[edit]- File:Frédéric Gracia a peint une vache sur un château d'eau.JPG
- File:Frédéric Gracia artiste et alpiniste oeuvrant pour l'art monumental.JPG
- File:La fresque du château d'eau du Puy des Ages.JPG
- File:Bruyère et goutte d'eau en trompe l'oeil.JPG
- File:Fresque monumentale au château d'eau de Saint Mesmin.JPG
- File:Chateau d'eau 018.jpg
- File:Cheminées-bagnolet.jpg
- File:Frédéric Gracia peintre alpiniste.jpg
This user uploaded several pictures of himself making art. They cannot be "own work" and he does not credit the photographer or give them a chance to license their photos. I realize new users usually don't know that they need to do this; uploader has been notified. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized image of advertising in a shopping mall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevalkothari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looked at together, it appears that neither of these images is own work. Different styles, etc. but same subject. Looks more like a promotional or self-promotional use of images available elsewhere.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vvnsatishkumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on either of these images, no meta, both are sub-Facebook size.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this Facebook sized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this 1964 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on this route map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unused diagram from a nomination which was kept before, but the diagram is still unused, and doesn't appear to have utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused diagram from a nomination which was kept before, but the diagram is still unused, and doesn't appear to have utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Igor211297 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Illustrative or painted material, highly unlikely to be own work, copied from somewhere without attribution.
- File:BgjiM SALvk.jpg
- File:V8yo0Au2y A2.jpg
- File:V8yo0Au2y A.jpg
- File:27074856508999789281-200x289.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
?selfie; not used anywhere Finavon (talk) 18:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Not a valid/readable TIFF file; Compression Scheme: 34709 (0x8795) is not a standard or common, and is not listed at w:TIFF or other places I looked. Libtiff, basis of (virtually?) all open-source TIFF readers. does not know what to do with this file. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
your opinions are asked: rather thumbnail-format, missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'owned work', as well as imho serious personality rights issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Zahidul009
[edit]- File:Signature official.png
- File:Sign official.png
- File:Sign of RAC.png
- File:Signature of Rakin Anan Chowdhury.png
Personal images, nothing but a hashtag. Not in use. Useless to anyone but the uploader. There is no reason to keep these. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Das Bild wird gerade bearbeitet, da das Projekt sehr kompliziert ist. Ichschreibeneu (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 06:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Third-party image (not taken by uploader) and no evidence provided to support claim of free license. C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Update. I have been corresponding with a connected party on en.wikipedia who says that the photographer has released the image. I've advised him to have the photographer email permissions-commons. I'm not going to withdraw this request, but I defer to any Commons admin who feels that a "speedy keep" is in order and who can make sure that any necessary follow-up gets done or tagged to be done. C.Fred (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS pending (ticket:2016092110017601), and reasonably likely to pan out. Will re-nominate if it falls through. --Storkk (talk) 09:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This image is a liscensed work and is not creative commons. As the content creator I would like it removed. 68.97.67.102 05:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I am voting Delete for several reasons. Firstly, the photo has no permission and EXIF data. This shows that the uploader's claim of own work is dubious and doubtful. Secondly, the photo can be found on numerous websites (one of them being this). We are very unsure if the photo was taken by the uploader himself given all these major issues. As for the IP's claim that he is the 'content creator', we do not know for sure either. I would say that we should delete this photo per COM:PRP. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Usually we require that a purported copyright holder email their complaint via COM:OTRS, but per Jianhui67, there is enough doubt here that the image could have been nominated via a routine patrol (ie without an anonymous IP complaint), so given the absence of mitigating factors, this should be deleted. If the copyright holder wishes to freely license their work, they should confirm that via COM:OTRS and this can be undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 09:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Should be deleted per 'not used'. Mhhossein talk 13:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The photo illustrates, how Boko Haram has influenced life of ordinary children in Nigeria. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Please note that per not used: "an image does not magically become useful by arguing that "it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X", where X happens to be the subject of the file." --Mhhossein talk 07:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not every photo in Commons must be used. Commons is media repository for people outside Wikipedia too. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- And this exception can't be applied here... --Mhhossein talk 10:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not every photo in Commons must be used. Commons is media repository for people outside Wikipedia too. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Please note that per not used: "an image does not magically become useful by arguing that "it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X", where X happens to be the subject of the file." --Mhhossein talk 07:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Images that are "realistically useful for an educational purpose" are in scope, per Taivo. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Should be deleted per 'not used'. Mhhossein talk 13:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The photo illustrates, how Boko Haram has influenced life of ordinary children in Nigeria. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Please note that per not used: "an image does not magically become useful by arguing that "it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X", where X happens to be the subject of the file." --Mhhossein talk 07:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Images that are "realistically useful for an educational purpose" are in scope, per Taivo. --Storkk (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Гамаль Ярослав (talk · contribs)
[edit]large collection of derivative works, paintings, sculptures, photos, etc - these aren't the work of one author - some of the photos look like family pics and may be out of scope - if this is a notable artist, permission would be needed for the sculptures, but permission for the photos would also have to be figured out
- File:Обкладенка книжки О. Вільшина упорядкування Б. І. Мельничука, художнє оформлення А. Гамаля.JPG
- File:ВОЛОДИМИР ГАМАЛЬ.jpg
- File:Син Ярослав (викладач гітари в Чернівецькому музичному училищі).JPG
- File:Фрагмент композиції Літописцям Русі-України, бронза, граніт.JPG
- File:"Час памяті" ,бронза.JPG
- File:Фото із сватом.JPG
- File:Тато Гамаль Ілля Григорович.JPG
- File:Фото з кумом О. Криворучком.JPG
- File:Сторінки із книги Кераміка України.jpg
- File:Сонячна композиція, керамік, бронза , граніт.JPG
- File:Спогади козацької памяті.JPG
- File:Скульптурний портрет художника О. Криворучка.JPG
- File:Скульптурний портрет виконаний у Вижницькому училищі, 1969 р.JPG
- File:Сімпозіум м. Вишгород.JPG
- File:Сімпозіум по каменю м. Вишгород, композиція "Молитва".jpg
- File:Сімейне фото з невісткою.JPG
- File:Сімейне фото на час відкриття памятника Ю. Федьковичу 1995 р. м. Чернівці.JPG
- File:Сестри Ірина і Софія.JPG
- File:Світкування 65-річчя в. Гамаля, бандурист В. Пиндик.JPG
- File:Свати Городиські.JPG
- File:С. Майданська та В. Гамаль.JPG
- File:Родина В. Гамаля і друзі.JPG
- File:Республіканська молодіжна виставка м. Таллінн, кінетична композиція "Цирк", метал.JPG
- File:Республіканська виставка м. Таллінн портрет студентки, гіпс. 1980 р.JPG
- File:Проект памятника С. Бандері у Львові ску. В. Гамаль, арх. Я. Чурилик, м. Цапко, В. Малиш, Р. Гебура 2001 р.JPG
- File:Портрет С. Майданської на обласній виставці м. Чернівці на другому плані композиція Земля.JPG
- File:Портрет В. Гамаля автор О. Криворучко.JPG
- File:Портрет автора.JPG
- File:Погруддя М. Бажанського.JPG
- File:Пасха біля Рогізнянської церкви.JPG
- File:Памятник М. Бажанському м. Снятин, бронза граніт.JPG
- File:О. Маковей кераміка.JPG
- File:"Цвіт папороті".JPG
- File:На персональній виставці з О. Зінченком м. Київ 2000 р.JPG
- File:На відкритті памятника П. Сагайдачному в м. Хотин, Вячеслав Чорновіл, 1991 р.JPG
- File:Сімпозіум по каменю м. Вишгород "Молитва".jpg
- File:Н. Яремчук, кераміка.JPG
- File:Меморіальна дошка, бронза, м. Чернівці.JPG
- File:Меморіальна дошка, бронза, граніт, м. Чернвці.JPG
- File:Меморіальна дошка м. Чернівці.JPG
- File:Меморіальна дошка м. Чернівці, бронза, граніт.JPG
- File:Мати Ольга Іллівна з доньками.JPG
- File:"Материнство", кераміка, граніт.jpg
- File:Мама Гамаль Євгенія Василівна.JPG
- File:М. Лазарук на відкритті памятника О. Вільшині, камінь, с. Рогізна.JPG
- File:Курсова робота в художньому інституті поряд майстер кафедри Келлер 1981 р.JPG
- File:Композиція кераміка.JPG
- File:"Композиція з пташкою", бронза, граніт.jpg
- File:Колекція В. Гамаля.jpg
- File:Колач із трипільською сваргою (сварзі від 5-7 тис. років).JPG
- File:Керамічні козацькі люльки колекція В. Гамаля.jpg
- File:"Карпатська ніч", кераміка.JPG
- File:Карпати.1.JPG
- File:І. Миколайчук кераміка.JPG
- File:І. Мазепа, кераміка.jpg
- File:"Закохані" гіпс поліхромний.jpg
- File:"З молодим місяцем".JPG
- File:З дружиною Іриною.JPG
- File:Ескіз композиції "Пієта".JPG
- File:Естонський портрет, папір, олівець, 1981 р.JPG
- File:Дружина і син Анатолій.JPG
- File:Дипломна робота Наука і людина.JPG
- File:Дружба на весіллі у двоюрідного брата Івоніки.JPG
- File:"Даная".jpg
- File:Господарські справи з сином Анатолієм.JPG
- File:Гамаль з товаришем Іваном Зубакою.JPG
- File:Гамаль В. з тіткою Саветою.JPG
- File:Відкриття памятника Ю. Федьковича в м. Путила, ск. В. Гамаль, бронза.JPG
- File:Відкриття памятника П. К. Сагайдачному 1991 р. м.Хотин.JPG
- File:Відкриття памятника П. Сагайдачному автор ск. В. Гамаль поряд народний артист України А. Кушніренко та заслужений артист України.JPG
- File:Відкриття памятника Д. Загулу, гальванопластика м. Мілієво.JPG
- File:Викладач художнього інституту, народний художник Естонії, скульптор Яаак Соанс м. Таллінн.JPG
- File:Велике сонце, алюміній.JPG
- File:В.Гамаль персональна виставка м. Київ (2000 р.).JPG
- File:В. Гамаль формовочні роботи.JPG
- File:В. Гамаль у майстерні.JPG
- File:В. Гамаль персональна виставка м. Чернівці (2000 р.).JPG
- File:В. Гамаль перша вишиванка.JPG
- File:В. Гамаль і Яаак Соанс.JPG
- File:В. Гамаль в інститутській майстерні м. Таллінн 1977 р.JPG
- File:В. Гамаль і Г. Канторов, скульптурна композиція "Прометей" м. Чернівці, бронза.JPG
- File:В скульптурній майстерні автора.JPG
- File:Бюст С. Бандери.JPG
- File:Бюст Ю. Федьковича подарований автором Путильскій школі.JPG
- File:"Буковинська писанка", кераміка.JPG
- File:Буклет скульптора В. Гамаля.JPG
- File:"Ангел", кераміка, бронза.JPG
- File:Автор за роботою.JPG
- File:"Рідний край".JPG
- File:"Ангел милосердя", камінь, м. Чернівці.JPG
- File:Творча робота червоне дерево, бронза, граніт.JPG
- File:Творча робота червоне дерево.jpg
- File:Пам'ятник Юрію Федьковичу м.Чернівці.JPG
- File:Петро-Конашевич Сагайдачний пам'ятник в м. Хотин.JPG
- File:Спогади червоної осені.JPG
- File:Меморіальна дошка Івану Зарецькому.jpg
- File:Легенда- алюміній,залізо.JPG
- File:Пам'ятний знак літописцям Руси - України м.Чернівці.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 20:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I found out that the uploader Гамаль Ярослав (Yaroslav Hamal) is a son of author of these works, Володимир Гамаль (Volodymyr Hamal). I think that at least he might be an author of all pictures of his father and his works, as he was likely to make these photos and they don't seem to be published before. Regarding works by Volodymyr Hamal we should probably reach the user himself, I think we are likely to get a permission for them. @Krassotkin: , you wrote you will look into this, did you find something more? — NickK (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- I wrote on the his talk page and sent him a letter (through "email this user"). But he did not answer.
- All these images can be divided into three intersecting parts:
- photos by Yaroslav (perhaps some images like this).
- photos from the family archive of different authors (large part of the collection); for example this is Yaroslav: File:Син Ярослав (викладач гітари в Чернівецькому музичному училищі).JPG.
- derivatives photos of works of Volodymyr (second large part).
- We do not know anything about the first part. And if we do not get OTRS-permission we have to remove the second (from authors) and third parts (from Volodymyr).
- In short: without Yaroslav's response Delete everything. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- All these images can be divided into three intersecting parts:
Deleted: per sasha. If OTRS permission is ever confirmed, some of these may be undeleted. (As of now, there is no matching ticket). --Storkk (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Das ist nicht die AIDAprima. Wenn nicht löschen, dann aber den Namen anpassen und richtig zuordnen. 212.23.134.250 11:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion according to Commons:Deletion policy. Wrong file name or desdripion is no reason for deletion.
- Keine gültige Begründung des Löschantrags entsprechend den Löschgrundsätzen unter Commons:Deletion policy, Falsche Wahl des Dateinamens und/oder der Dateibeschreibung sind kein Löschgrund. Alternative: Verschieben der Datei auf einen geeigneteren Namen und/oder Korrektur der Beschreibung.--Gomera-b (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Was it actually made by a Polish photograph or first published in Poland? Discasto talk 13:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: We need some evidence that this image of Franco's cabinet was taken or first published in Poland. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
The link to Gallica does not work. It is a 1937 photograph by an unknown photographer, so it is probably not in the public domain in France (country of the original publication). BrightRaven (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Link is OK - http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6306528/f1 - the template is breaking the link Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is public domain on BNF website, so it should be OK. I have added the link in the source field, but it seems there is a problem in the template. BrightRaven (talk) 08:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per BrightRaven. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
It already exists under the name Category:Tercio de Montserrat
Keep Turn it into a redirection. --Discasto talk 13:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: done per discasto. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Wrong license attributed at Flickr Nidentwiki (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: All rights reserved at Flickr, no Flickrreview. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there any way to assert it was firstly published in Poland? Discasto talk 22:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: We need better evidence that this image of a Spaiard was first published in Poland. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Any source information to assert it was taken less than 80 years ago? Discasto talk 22:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The caption at the source says this is a 1939 image. Spain was, at that time, an 80 year country, so, even if the author was anonymouse this will not be PD until 1/1/2020. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Useless junk 47.150.68.26 02:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The TimedText namespace is used for media captions. This caption is far from complete, but I see no need to delete it, especially as another editor may improve it later. Sunmist (talk) 03:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Sunmist. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. The directive of use of CC licenses in digital platforms of the Chilean Government has not been implemented in Intendencia de O'Higgins' website (http://www.intendenciabohiggins.gov.cl/), source of this image. Therefore, the image is not licensed under CC. Warko (talk) 04:00, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- [3] p.4 thanks --El santacruzano (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- That only means that the directive was distributed to the Intendencia de O'Higgins (as well as the rest of the Government organisms), but the Intendencia never implemented the license. The copyright licenses (as CC) must be explicitly available in the website (i.e. gob.cl). --Warko (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The Intendencia did implement a CC-BY license, during Piñera's government [4]. Since the gov sites changed their design, during Bachelet's goverment, most of them (all intendencias, gobernaciones, et al) have since removed the license, but that does not mean they are no longer licensed that way. --El santacruzano (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- If the license was retired from the website during Bachelet administration (c. 2014), that only confirms that this work (published post 2014) is not under a free license. --Warko (talk) 23:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- We can't assume that, given that the instructivo has not been officially "dumped". --El santacruzano (talk) 22:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- If the license was retired from the website during Bachelet administration (c. 2014), that only confirms that this work (published post 2014) is not under a free license. --Warko (talk) 23:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The Intendencia did implement a CC-BY license, during Piñera's government [4]. Since the gov sites changed their design, during Bachelet's goverment, most of them (all intendencias, gobernaciones, et al) have since removed the license, but that does not mean they are no longer licensed that way. --El santacruzano (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- That only means that the directive was distributed to the Intendencia de O'Higgins (as well as the rest of the Government organisms), but the Intendencia never implemented the license. The copyright licenses (as CC) must be explicitly available in the website (i.e. gob.cl). --Warko (talk) 16:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Kept: license was reviewed by an administrator. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
No indication of being the owner. Another older and closely similar version is found on net (such as this). Mhhossein talk 12:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Я владелец этого файла, так как я снял его видео и данный файл скрин из видео. Как я должен доказать что я автор? Отправить Вам видео целиком?Аль-Гимравий (talk) 12:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Аль-Гимравий: Do you mean that the photo is actually a snapshot from a video? Are you the owner of the video, too? If you are the owner, then it would be beneficial to mention your name here as the author. --Mhhossein talk 07:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Вот видео, которой являюсь автором Аль-Гимравий (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC).
- Who is the author of this video? (could you please answer in English?) --Mhhossein talk 02:07, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Вот видео, которой являюсь автором Аль-Гимравий (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC).
- @Аль-Гимравий: Do you mean that the photo is actually a snapshot from a video? Are you the owner of the video, too? If you are the owner, then it would be beneficial to mention your name here as the author. --Mhhossein talk 07:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Above TOO per Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag#China.2C_People.27s_Republic_of
Wcam (talk) 12:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: although the first one is borderline. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Logo copyrighted, the license and the permission are wrong ✎kovox90 15:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Logo copyrighted, the license and the permission are wrong ✎kovox90 15:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright logo Sakhalinio (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there any way to assert this was first published in Poland? Discasto talk 22:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
OTRS ticket sent (Ticket:2014021610003857), but the uploader does not appear to be the author, and has not responsed to my queries about whether he is the author or not.
- File:Joaquin Bau Nolla drawing.jpg
- File:Jose Zamanillo Gonzales.jpg
- File:Jose Valiente Soriano drawing.jpg
- File:Luis Arellano Dihinx drawing.jpg
- File:Jaime Chicharro Sanchez drawing.jpg
- File:Esteban Bilbao Eguia drawing.jpg
- File:Manuel Senante Martinez drawing.jpg
- File:Jaime del Burgo Torres drawing.jpg
- File:Victor Pradera Larumbe.jpg
- File:José Luis Oriol drawing.jpg
- File:Juan Olazábal Ramery drawing.jpg
- File:Marcelino Oreja Elosegui drawing.jpg
--Mdann52talk to me! 07:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Although the pictures seems to be created by the uploaded, (the subjects are dead long ago) without any statement about the copyright status of the original works. Given the uploader's poor track with regard to copyright I don't really think they can be kept
- File:Antonio Arrue Zarauz drawing.jpg
- File:Manuel Polo Peyrolon drawing.jpg
- File:Joaquin Baleztena Ascarate drawing.jpg
- File:Ignacio Baleztena Ascarate.jpg
- File:Josep Suelves Montagut drawing.jpg
- File:Jose Selva Mergelina drawing.jpg
- File:Matias Barrio Mier drawing.jpg
- File:Enrique de Aguilera drawing.jpg
- File:Joaquin Llorens Fernandez drawing.jpg
- File:Jose Maria Arauz de Robles drawing.jpg
- File:Antonio Iturmendi Banales drawing.jpg
- File:Ramon Masso Tarruella drawing.jpg
- File:Salvador Minguijon Adrian drawing.jpg
- File:Maria Rosa Urraca Pastor drawing.jpg
- File:Jesus Comin Sagues drawing.jpg
- File:Antonio Anoveros Ataun drawing.jpg
- File:Rafael Gambra Ciudad drawing.jpg
- File:Francisco Eljas de Tejada drawing.jpg
- File:Joaquin Bau Nolla drawing.jpg
- File:Jose Zamanillo Gonzales.jpg
- File:Jose Valiente Soriano drawing.jpg
- File:Luis Arellano Dihinx drawing.jpg
- File:Jaime Chicharro Sanchez drawing.jpg
- File:Esteban Bilbao Eguia drawing.jpg
- File:Manuel Senante Martinez drawing.jpg
- File:Jaime del Burgo Torres drawing.jpg
- File:Victor Pradera Larumbe.jpg
- File:José Luis Oriol drawing.jpg
- File:Juan Olazábal Ramery drawing.jpg
- File:Marcelino Oreja Elosegui drawing.jpg
- File:Ramon Altarriba Vilanueva drawing.jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 15:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
totally unfounded claim that "it's obvious that all of them are derivative works". The files uploaded are my personal drawings, using pencil and paper, no computer tricks, no original image processing etc. Yes, I looked at photographs of people in question, but this - according to the wiki definition - does not qualify as "derivatives"; I am also by no means restricted by the copyright status of photos used as models --Dd1495 (talk) 00:07, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it qualifies as derivates works (see, for instance, this. Unless the original works are in the public domain, the results cannot be used here. Furthermore, original authorship must be asserted (moral rights). --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Though some of my drawing are based on photographs and hence they might be considered derivative works, it does not mean they automatically classify for deletion.
Stigmatising a user as allegedly an uploader with “poor record” is not enough reason to get an image deleted, I hope.
Each case should be decided upon its merits, I guess. If someone thinks my drawings are derivates and infringe copyrights, I would expect that he/she should indicate which work served as a basis for derivation and what sort of copyright is allegedly infringed. I think that none, because:
1) Some drawing s are based on old photographs, from 19th century or early 20th century. Copyright to these photos has long expired. The example is here; the photo serving as its model was published in one of the Spanish papers in the 1880s or 1890s. I even do not have links to the corresponding digital archive page any more, since it has never crossed my mind I would have to fight over its copyright laws.
2) Some drawings are not based on any specific photographs but are my own creation, resulting – yes, indeed - from looking at different images (photos, paintings, drawings). The example is here; no photograph, painting or drawing like this has ever existed.
3) Some drawings are based on grossly enlarged cut-offs from photographs presenting larger scenes, not portaits; e.g. here] is based on a photo published here
4) Some drawings are based on hardly legible, massively blown-up cut offs from photos which might – but also might not - be copyrighted. However, as my drawings are very sketchy – example is here, based upon a picture published here, original photo is of very poor quality. Probably the source – actually a collage of photos taken by someone in 1930s and only re-published in a book from 2006 – is copyright free anyway.
To summarise: I think to delete 31 images in one go it takes more than to bundle them together as “obviously derivative works” under one tag, giving as a reason an arbitrarily assigned “poor record” of an uploader and not providing any information what works and why are actually copyright-violated
--Dd1495 (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- So, you acknowledge most of them are derivative works. Therefore, you must provide the information about the original works in order to determine its copyright status. Given that a 80 years pma time is needed in Spain for a work to be in the public domain, early 20th century as creation date (for instance) is far from being safe. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 15:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
No, I do not acknowledge they are derivates. Quite to the contrary, I say that the images in question are my own works.
You claim they are derivates and should be deleted? Fine. But do not expect me to prove your point.
I think it is logical that if you claim they are derivates and should be deleted, it is you who should indicate which work they copyright-violate and why. Stigmatising a user as "poor record uploader" is not enough justificaton for deleting 30-odd images, I think.
--Dd1495 (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Well, it's written down above: Some drawing s are based on old photographs. We have a precautionary principle. Your point seems to be that images are derivative works but you refuse to provide the necessary information to assert whether they're valid or not. Things do not work that way. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 17:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
These are my own works.
Yes, all are drawn when looking at existing images – there is no other option since I have not met any of the persons portayed in real life. Yet it does not qualify them for deletion.
If you want to get them deleted according to your logic, you should prove one by one that each of these 30-odd images:
- 1) is a derivative work
- 2) is a derivative work based on image which is not free
I do not think you can get them deleted by bundling all in one deletion ticket, pointing to “obviously derivate work” status and by quoting “poor uploader record” as justification. I also do not think you can simply get 30-odd images deleted by referring to an ambiguous “precautionary principle”.
==
Let’s discuss the principle you quote, which says that “where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file it should be deleted.”
Now, where is this “significant doubt” in case of images of people who died before 1926, like here, here, here and here?
Also, I invite all users to compare this image and this image and to say whether they have "significant doubt".
Do you have “significant doubt”? Do you have any doubt at all? I think that if there is any, it is probably only very minor.
If you have “significant doubts”, suggest you review 30-odd files one by one as follows:
- 1) I think the file [name of the file] should be deleted because it is a derivative work derived from [this file] located [at this site], which I think is copyrighted because [the reason why copyrighted]
- 2) and so on
- 3) and so on
- ....
- 31) and so on
once you do it, we shall be able to discuss the files on the matter-of-fact basis, not on the basis of stigmatising other users and arbitraily assigned, ambiguous alleged "obvious" labelling, all applied to 30-odd images bundled into one ticket.
--Dd1495 (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:DW/COM:PRP. Words and more words from the uploader, none of which address the issue, which is that he uploaded a bunch of drawings based on photos and failed to indicate original authorship/copyright status. The burden of proof of free license is on the uploader, not Commons. All the rambling above looks like an attempt at confusing the issue to try to get around this basic responsibility. INeverCry 07:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
The licensing status of these pictures is asserted by means of the template {{PD-Polish}}. According to such template, the picture is in the public domain because [..] all photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland.
Most of the pictures are claimed to have been published in Poland (althouth no specific URL has been provided to support such a claim, I can't see any reason to doubt it). However, there is no way to assert the pictures were taken by Polish photographers (dubious, as no Polish photojournalist is recorded in that time in Spain) or first published in Poland (even more dubious). Therefore, according to COM:PRP I can't see any other option that deleting...
- File:ULL.98.43.114.jpg
- File:MFC.36.8.1.JPG 1.jpg
- File:ULL.49.71.38.jpg
- File:ULL.98.76.234.jpg
- File:ULL.98.43.76.112.jpg
- File:ULL.98.37.6.jpg
- File:ULL.98.43.11.43.jpg
- File:ULL.98.43.67.11.jpg
- File:ULL.98.31.76.jpg
- File:ULL.98.43.21.jpg
- File:ULL.54.112.jpg
- File:ULL.98.21.jpg
- File:ULL.98.54.11.42.jpg
- File:ULL.984.31.84.11.jpg
- File:ULL.98.43.12.1.jpg
- File:ULL.76.54.09.jpg
- File:ULL.98.23.44.jpg
- File:ULL.98.12.43.jpg
- File:HJJ.98.23.17.jpg
- File:HJJ.87.31.22.jpg
- File:OPI.98.11.11.2.jpg
- File:VGF.87.12.98.jpg
- File:VGF.87.12.97.jpg
- File:VGF.87.12.93.jpg
- File:VGF.87.12.954.jpg
- File:VGF.87.12.95.jpg
- File:HGG.98.23.2.jpg
- File:HGG.98.23.1.jpg
- File:MFC.36.8.1.JPG
- File:HBVB.36.1.15.JPG
- File:HBVB.36.1.14.JPG
- File:HBVB.36.1.13.JPG
- File:HBVB.36.1.12.JPG
Discasto talk 22:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Y no podrían salvarse mediante {{PD-old}}, como ya ocurre aquí, por ejemplo? Para las pocas fotos que tenemos de esa época, perder estas va a ser un palitrocazo... Manuchansu (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose deletion/borrado. Pedir que se demuestre que estas fotos no fueron publicadas en otro lugar antes de su publicación en Polonia es pedir una prueba diabólica. Es imposible satisfacer tal pretensión. Quien pide el borrado de estas fotos debería demostrar él mismo que fueron publicadas en otro país antes que en Polonia. Entonces se podrá proceder al borrado.--Chamarasca (talk) 09:58, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, @Chamarasca: . Nice to see you again :-) However, I do think your argumentation says actually the oppositte to what you claim. It's the uploader the one that claims that the pictures were published first in Poland. S/he's assigned a template stating that the pictures are in the public domain because they were published in Poland. However, s/he hasn't stated how s/he reached such a conclusion (given the uploader background I guess s/he simply trying to provide a valid license information without any reason). It's the uploader's responsibility to provide the rationale to assigning a given license. S/he hasn't done it. Of course, this is only my oppinion. See you again --Discasto talk 12:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Estimado Discasto Pido disculpas por explicarme en español, pero mi inglés es muy básico (si alguien quiere, puede traducir mis comentarios, por supuesto). Yo me he enterado de la existencia de esta petición de borrado a través del seguimiento de File:MFC.36.8.1.JPG, ya que he utilizado esa imagen en un artículo. Veo que en el apartado "fuente" se indica: Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe, signature 1-E-6427; photo first published in Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny, 1936. Mis conocimientos de polaco son aún inferiores a los de inglés, pero entiendo que dice que se publicó en Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny, que entiendo era una publicación polaca; que se publicó en 1936; que el autor es desconocido y que se ha obtenido a través de un archivo nacional digital. Por supuesto, tal información podría ser falsa. En tal caso habrá que demostrar esa falsedad y pedir el borrado, pero no es eso lo que has hecho tú. Lo que tú dices como motivo para el borrado (si entiendo bien el inglés, que puede que no) es que no se puede confirmar que la fotografía fuera publicada por primera vez en Polonia y por un fotógrafo polaco. Y yo me pregunto dos cosas: 1) Si el autor es realmente desconocido, ¿cómo se puede demostrar que es polaco? 2) ¿Cómo se demuestra que no fue publicada en otro país con anterioridad? No veo forma de hacer tal demostración negativa.
- Otra cosa es que se argumentase que, conforme a la legislación polaca, la imagen no se encuentra en el dominio público. Pero eso no se ha afirmado en ningún momento, creo.
- Por consiguiente, estoy en contra del borrado con la argumentación ofrecida. Porque con similar argumentación se podrían borrar todas las imágenes que yo mismo he subido a Commons.--Chamarasca (talk) 14:30, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Images hosted in Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe come from different sources and archives. See here. They look all pretty Polish to me though.
- "Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny (1910-1939)."
- "Wydawnictwo Prasowe Kraków-Warszawa (1939-1945)"
- "Zbiór fotografii różnego pochodzenia (1840-1998)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Wacława Żdżarskiego (1944-1946)"
- "Zbiór fotografii dotyczących obchodów kościelnych Tysiąclecia Chrztu Polski (1966)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Władysława Miernickiego (1945-1968)", "Ministerstwo Informacji i Dokumentacji Rządu RP na Emigracji (1939-1945)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Denasiewicza (1940-41)"
- "Zbiór fotografii dotyczących archiwów państwowych"
- "Rozgłośnia Polska „Radia Wolna Europa” (1952-1994)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Stefana Bałuka (1939-1945)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Grażyny Rutowskiej (1966-1994)"
- "Archiwum Fotograficzne Edwarda Hartwiga (1950-1970)".
- For Fal Conde's pic, Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe explicitly asserts that "Koncern Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny - Archiwum Ilustracji" is the source (a Polish newspaper, so at least we can say these ones are likely "published", and, also, they were published "in Poland"). Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe —kind of serious institution— stating these pics are free of copyright would be a plus (I saw that in a file description/permission, but I could find it in the webpage). Understanding Polish is not one of my strenghts). Unless someone provides at least an example of one of these photographs being published before, I don't know, in Spain for example?, I suggest to keep, stop this request and start a "more minimalist approach", because the uploader has started a massive and disruptive "retaliation maneuver" tagging for deletion every pic from Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe/Ilustrowany Kurier Codzienny hosted in Commons. Strakhov (talk) 12:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- I totally agree with Strakhov, keep. Now it looks to be the best option. Manuchansu (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hi @Strakhov: , I've clarified the rationale of the deletion request in order to enable a proper discussion. As said, nobody is questioning the pictures were published in Poland. However, the {{PD-Poland}} template (and underlying reasoning) request the images to have been taken by Polish photographs or first published in Poland. Neither of such options seems to be realistic. --Discasto talk 22:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment There are around 33 pics, If it is not realistic these photographs being first published in Poland... it won't be that difficult finding somewhere a single one of them just "published" (not even before) in another country. They belong to an archive of Polish photographers, Polish publishers and Polish stuff. The National Archive of Poland (not kinda creepy webpage) states they belong to the collection of photographs of a Polish periodical published during 1910-1939 period. Just saying "they could have not been published first in Poland" is not enough for me. We could say that of every supposed "pic in the public domain because of age". Every pic could be first published, I don't know, in Mexico (100 p. m .a).
- They all could probably pass under {{Anonymous-EU}} (except in Spain, of course, and his damned 80 p.m.a.). For deleting these photographs (after acknowledging they were at least published in Poland) you are now the one supposing 1) they were published before in another country and 2) that country was precisely Spain. Being honest, I've put many hours of my life researching Spanish periodical press, and I'm not familiar with any of them (the ones with glamourous guys I mean, the others, psst, are 'generic' shots.). Strakhov (talk) 01:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not supposing anything. Just the oppositte. The uploader claims that the pictures were published first in Poland. He hasn't provided any proof of that. The burden of the proof is on the uploader, you know. --Discasto talk 07:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- I know. There would never be any proof of something being published first anywhere. You will never find a periodical or a book stating "This is the first time this photo is published, awesome, isn't it?". This batch of files uploaded by this guy were published in Poland by a Polish periodical in the thirties according to the National Archive of some European country named ...Poland. I do not mean Dd1495 has the cleaniest upload history, but that's not the point here. Probably all images are "{{Anonymous-EU}}-able" too, asides this cool Polish template. Well, yes, in the case they were published 'in Spain' before ...maybe they should get deleted. But no one has found a single one of these photographs published in Spain... (nor in Spain nor anywhere ...but Poland?). I rest my case. Regards. Strakhov (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- No es extraño que al autor de las subidas reaccione así. Se ha cuestionado temerariamente un trabajo que debió llevarle bastante esfuerzo realizar. En vez de agradecérselo, se ha pedido su supresión. Si uno no es bienvenido aquí, es lógico que prefiera irse; y si no se quiere su contribución, pues opta por retirarla.--Chamarasca (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Files s/he has been tagging for deletion are not his/her uploads but everyone else's. Strakhov (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Pues también es una reacción muy humana. Si nos ponemos demasiado exigentes con sus contribuciones, él también puede hacer lo mismo con las de otros. Cosechamos lo que sembramos.--Chamarasca (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- 👽 f*ck humans. Strakhov (talk) 17:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Reacción inmadura, pero humana. En eso te doy la razón :-) --Discasto talk 21:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC) PS: si he cuestionado estas fotos es porque, obviamente, ni las tomaron autores polacos ni se publicaron inicialmente en Polonia. Las nominaciones masivas que está haciendo Dd1495 se refieren, en cambio a fotografías de temas polacos publicadas en Polonia, lo cual hace muy plausibles, y muy obviamente, las pretensiones de validez de la plantilla de dominio público polaco. No todo el mundo es capaz de funcionar en un entorno colaborativo.
Hmm. We have two sets of images here, with the same problem.
First, those published before 1936. For those, even if they were first published in Spain, they are PD now, provided they meet the two tests below.
Second, those published after 1935. If they are Spanish images, as many of these are, then they are under copyright for 80 years after publication if they were first published in Spain. Someone needs to show beyond a significant doubt that first publication was not in Spain. Note that if there were images of Polish people and events, we would not be asking this question -- but they fact that they are images of Spanish people and events coming from a Polish archive raises a significant doubt.
In both cases someone must show that they were actually both "published" and "published anonymously". Merely being in the archives of a newspaper does not satisfy the rule -- newspapers have many images in their archives that they never published. Also remember that the fact that we do not know who the photographer was does not satisfy the rule -- it must be affirmatively shown that the publication concealed the name of the photographer.
I don't think that either of the requirements has been satisfied for any of these, so my opinion is Delete. Note also that several of them have descriptions that are so inadequate as to make them useless, so if these are to be kept, the descriptions and categories must also be filled out. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Several users have expressed doubts about deleting images. By those who had doubts, there have been given reasonable arguments to discuss. But in practice, there was no debate. I find quite arguably how commons has proceed in this question. Probably, many images may have benn saved with another license or with some changes. But there was no interest: just the easy way, I guess. Manuchansu (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)