Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 1st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – uploaded to vandalize "Islamic State" and "Muslim world" articles on enwiki as seen in uploader's global contribs. TFerenczy (talk) 02:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, vandalism only image unusable in actual articles. Low quality too. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 07:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by Maurice Sendak (died in 2012), most likely protected by copyright and certainly not uploader's own work. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 01:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request by upload author because NoFoP Andriy.v (talk) 12:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a hoax on English Wikipedia of "Dakota Hey-Wa". Needs deleting too, the article has been create protected Fences and windows (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy G3. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a hoax on English Wikipedia of "Dakota Hey-Wa". Needs deleting too, the article has been create protected Fences and windows (talk) 22:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy G3. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DIPOLEON-ALF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope – photographs of low-quality drawings of¨ symbols and diagrams for "Greek pantheon", accompanied by mostly cryptic descriptions

TFerenczy (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DIPOLEON-ALF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DIPOLEON-ALF

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I made an error with the VFC, and nominated these over again when what I was trying to do was to delete them per their prior deletion request. Sorry for the error!. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because 72.251.53.245 20:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Nominator did not provide a reason. I don't see any obvious problem with this image. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy closed as kept, per Dcoetzee; pass by anon deletion request with no reason for deletion offered. Infrogmation (talk) 23:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr account no longer exists, so the required record keeping chain is broken. That also raises the likelihood that it's a flickrwashing copyvio. Also no statement of consent of both parties to publish (which in my view is an important principle). 99of9 (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'd assume you know better. This is exactly why we have the {{flickrreview|Cirt|2010-06-14}} templates. --DieBuche (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment That means the file was originally marked with a free license. It doesn't mean that the US pornography record keeping has been checked or passed on to Cirt. There used to be a document trackback path, but that no longer exists. And I gave two other reasons. --99of9 (talk) 12:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep recordkeeping: so what? So we can keep flickrimages here only as long as the image is up on flickr? Crazy idea for our repository. Fwashing: I guess you will not bring up this concern on all images which are from deleted flickr accounts. So: why for this one? I do not see a special reason why exactly this picture should be a Fwashing image just be cause it is from a deleted account. Last concern: The image is pretty anon. Probably they were it who published it on flickr. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC) altered --Saibo (Δ) 13:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment No, not all images should disappear when they disappear from Flickr. But those in a category with special legal additional record keeping requirements need to be thought through properly. If we claim that we are not secondary publishers (and are therefore exempt from keeping the records ourselves), we at least need to be able to point to who IS the publisher (who can show the records). That is now no longer possible. --99of9 (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then keeping here images with recordkeeping need is useless and a waste of time if they automatically have to be deleted when they vanish from flickr. That is not our aim to be a flickr mirror. But I have a question: who says we need to be able to point to a record keeper? Where is it written? Btw: we should move our servers out of the US. Their laws are not useful. --Saibo (Δ) 13:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentFwashing: Play the ball, not the man, please don't attack my integrity if your evidence is based on a guess. Deleted accounts always raise the suspicion level in my mind. However, to be honest I don't see them that often. Occasionally, they are deleted after I notice them as likely copyvios Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elizabeth - 29yearold Nudist.jpg. In other cases my good faith assumptions about deleted streams turn out to be over generous, and they are once again blatant copyviolators Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy Sam.jpg. 99of9 (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my comment above - that was what I meant. Sorry for the wrong words. If you had any hint that this is a copyvio then I will be among the first to vote for deletion. --Saibo (Δ) 13:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentAnonymity. I agree that so far this image is fairly anonymous. But it's possible that any anonymous image is cropped from an identifiable image, which could ultimately be used to expose the identities and cause major problems if it has already been widely used by our project and reusers. Therefore consent to freely publish should have been obtained, and should be asserted. --99of9 (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And how should the consent be asserted in your view? The image was put on flickr and it is up to the uploader here to check that consent could be assumed. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:08, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep We had consent to freely publish on Flikr.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I'm on the fence. License laundering is a concern here, and without access to the source account, there's no way to check for it. I've started noting on image talk pages when I review an image for laundering, just in case, but there's no systematic scheme set up for this right now, and I'm not sure we have the manpower for it. It's a troubling issue. Dcoetzee (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yep - it is an issue. Maybe we need another parameter in the flickr template |launderingcheckX=--~~~~|launderingcheckXconfidence=50 So flickr reviewers can put their name and confidence in. But who, which scale, and so on... And: AFAIK we also cannot check all files uploaded here. So... sad - but the reality. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 22:39, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. - copyright is not the main concern, deletions of the Flickr-account doesn't automatically cause deletion at Commons, but now we have no way to check other things, this is a high risk file - Jcb (talk) 16:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted. - Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2011-05#File:Coital_Play.png 18 May 2011. --Saibo (Δ) 20:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose, pornography TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 23:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use so therefore has educational use. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ljbsc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Source information was provided. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Grafik "https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Studentenclub_Karzer_der_Hochschule_Nordhausen.jpg" kann nicht angezeigt werden, weil sie Fehler enthält. Lutz Jödicke (talk) 09:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose, no usage TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Leyo 22:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No medical or academic value. Pornographic material. If needed for legitimate record of human sexual activity, should be removed from medical sections and those relating purely to the human penis. 49.197.107.232 12:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per previous deletion request and in use in ms:Pelancapan. Tm (talk) 14:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porn 194.233.96.65 07:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. Yes, it is, but this is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What do you think, is the photo in project scope? Taivo (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd: created by abuser

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation because of missing freedom of panorama (covers only architectural work in US) and Sendak died recently (public domain first after 70 years after death). Micha (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:16 05 001 sendak.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation because of missing freedom of panorama (covers only architectural work in US) and Sendak died recently (public domain first after 70 years after death). Micha (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:16 05 001 sendak.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajay2057 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal/family images + a few PDFs

INeverCry 01:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio - looks like a professional portrait rather than a self-taken photo as claimed INeverCry 00:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UNnecessary EEIM (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat file:DirecTVnew.svg .--EEIM (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arunrulzzz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE

INeverCry 00:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privatsphäre! Das Foto zeigt ein Privatgrundstück bzw. die Einfahrt! Dauerhaft zu löschen! 78.47.168.108 01:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

mini
mini
There is no need for the deletion of this picture. According to German law it doesn’t violate “Panoramafreiheit” somehow and doesn’t show any items which can be used to find out personal things. The green fence and the private ground is no reason so far. For me this sounds more as another example of the Streisand-Effect. --188.174.128.125 05:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meant as "upload new version", definitive version at File:Drapeau Latislavia 2 - Copie2.png TFerenczy (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect version, definitive version at File:Drapeau Latislavia 2 - Copie2.png TFerenczy (talk) 01:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncropped version of File:Bellingham City Flag (cropped).png TFerenczy (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says it's copyrighted in Exif metadata MB298 (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ksureshkhanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:EDUSE ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, was in use at deleted Wikipedia article. The license is also questionable, source makes no mention of CC license: http://www.an-mag.com/jae-joseph-curating-for-the-unconventional/ Jujutacular (talk) 02:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Was used at deleted Wikipedia article: w:Olaolu Akorede Olabode Jujutacular (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non cc-by-sa. unknown license image ChongDae (talk) 04:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non cc-by-sa. unknown license image ChongDae (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not their picture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Umais_Bin_Sajjad#More_issues Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per here much of what they upload is not theres https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Umais_Bin_Sajjad#More_issues Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SaiyansOnSegways (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, other similar uploads speedy deleted because they have been previously published on the web

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On its face, this would appear to be a copyright violation. However, the web-link that is in the file's description page indicates that it may not be under copyright. I don't read French so I had to rely on a Google translation, which isn't crystal-clear. The original French legal case is here: http://www.legalis.net/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4612 . This was brought to my attention by the recent edits listed in Special:Contributions/81.157.29.226. Basically, this discussion can probably be quickly closed one way or the other as soon as someone who understands French well enough to know if that legal case puts this picture in the public domain or not. NOTE: This picture is used on at least 4 other projects. If it is deleted, I recommend that it be uploaded to those projects as a non-free image, provided of course that it meets the non-free-image criteria of those projects. Davidwr (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Davidwr for opening this RfD ; I didn't see the IP edits.
My understanding of the legal case is that this picture is not in the public domain (which is inside french copyright, through the fr:Droit moral), this picture is outside all copyrights protection because the plaintiff failed to prove originality (this is the core of the case, found at the end of the point 2 in the Discussion part). Of course, I'd like to hear other understandings (Asclepias, Thibaut120094 ?). I particular, I've put the {{PD-ineligible}} template which seems the closest to me but it doesn't exactly fit ().
This case is quite unusual (maybe a new turn in French IP jurisprudence...) and made some buzz, you can see a legal opinion here (in english but by a French IP lawyer).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 07:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is its copyright status in France relevant though? Commons would require it to be public domain in its source country (which seems to be the UK) and the USA. --ghouston (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ghouston: true, but as I said, there is no copyright status on this file, the Court held that this is not an creative artwork and thus not eligible to any copyright (basically the judge said that COM:TOO applied here) and AFAIK there was no appeal (so I guessed that the author wouldn't say anything against publication on Commons). It seems dubious to me that the US or the UK would recognize a right, but I we can't know for sure until a US and a UK court judge the case... Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IANAL, so take this with an appropriate grain of salt, but:
  • As far a I understand the comment, the court did not rule that it was below TOO: "Since the High Court of Paris could not rule that Mankovitz's obviously original photograph is not original, it disingenuously ruled that the plaintiff did not present the case as it should have been presented." But even if it did, that would only be relevant if you were using the image in France (or maybe upload it to fr.wikipedia locally, depending on how they handle stuff there).
  • As Ghouston points out, what matters to us at Commons is the copyright status in the source country and in the US. As long as there is no proof that it would be considered to be in the public domain in both of these countries, we have to consider it copyrighted and  Delete it.
Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What Ghouston said. I commented on that point last year there. (In French. Translation of what I wrote there: Of course, the threshold of originality required for a photograph to be copyrightable is different in different countries. This threshold is not the same in France and in the United States. For example, this photo in the public domain in France, like the court said. But Commons is not ruled by the law of France, to the exclusion of U.S. law.) -- Asclepias (talk) 12:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Usually, the French IP is well-known for being more protective and the threshold is lower ; that's why I found dubious that US and UK would be more protective (especially when a judge - even foreign - already stated, it's kind of non bis in idem). And if the plaintiff didn't appeal, shouldn't we consider that he accept the ruling? The sentence you extract is a bit biased (since the judge did rule that the photo is not original « la photographie litigieuse ne présente pas ’originalité ») but it pointed a good flaw in the process: the judge ruled the photo original mainly because the plaintiff did a bad a job at proving the originality (which make even stranger the absence of appeal!).
Indeed we have a proof that it's more than public domain for France but nothing for US and UK. I guess we're going for a precautionary deletion...
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is that the photo is original because of choices who's author can be the photograph or Jimi Hendrix and the photograph failed to prove the he is the author of those choices, subject dress code, attitude and position. In other words, if this photo can be copyrighted, it could be by Jimi Hendrix. --Cqui (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is Jimi Hendrix's work copyright status? --Cqui (talk) 13:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@VIGNERON: Yes, normally France is a lot more protective -- but the UK historically had the lowest of thresholds of originality of basically any country (they have been overruled by EU courts to force it to be higher recently). Photographs are obviously very difficult to judge using the new EU directives; Germany has gone the complete other way, where basically any photograph is now a "work" -- it's just things like X-Rays which get "simple photograph" protection there now. Many EU countries still have protection (though shorter) for photographs which do not meet the "work" qualification, but Frances does not -- it's a "work" or bust there. The U.S. has had a number of photographic court case rulings -- there is really no doubt it would be copyrightable there. It was something like a straight-on photograph of a painting which was not -- in that case the angle was not creative, the framing was not creative (already chosen by the painting), there is no creative lighting (just want to duplicate the painting). But for photographs where some of those aspects still exist in a photo (and done by a human), the U.S. has generally considered it a valid copyright. So, I don't think there is a reasonable case we can make to keep it based on U.S. thresholds. It's a very interesting ruling though, but it's also possible that if the photographer provided more details (if he posed Hendrix, etc.) he might have gotten a different ruling. It's still instructive though, but... it wades right into an area which still has wide variance between countries and we'd need to know some of those country details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clindberg (talk • contribs) 21:42, 1 September 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]
For ordinary photographs, French law has a high threshold, judging from the court cases about photographs discussed over the years. That may be different for types of works other than photographs. (When I spot my photos reused in France without the mentions required by the license, I usually don't note such reuse as a copyvio, because they may not be copyrightable in France. I'm happy that courts protect the public domain.) There is no autorité de la chose jugée when the law is not the same. Each country has its own laws. Many countries distinguish between ordinary photographs and photographic works. Depending on the countries, ordinary photographs may get a short protection or may not be copyrightable. On Commons, sometimes we tend to forget that, because Commons applies the law of the United States. That the plaintiff didn't appeal may mean that he accepts that this ruling is final in France, but it doesn't tell anything about his intentions in other countries. I think you are replying to El Grafo when you refer to an extracted sentence. The ruling reminds that a plaintiff must prove his claim. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete on the basis of U.S. copyright, at least. It is undoubtedly copyrightable in the United States, so we would need to discover pretty ironclad evidence of publication without notice before 1989. The threshold of originality varies by country; some countries do in fact not protect many photographs, or some consider them below the Berne (and EU) threshold as "works" but still protect them as simple photographs for a shorter term, etc. Things like posed portrait photographs had historically been considered "works", but snapshots often weren't. In some countries (Germany) that changed with the EU directive (now virtually any photograph is copyrightable there). The EU was supposed to go to a "shows the personality of the author" standard, which may be a bit hard to define for photographs, meaning each country often has a different treatment. The UK has historically had a *very* different version of "original", which does not translate to the rest of the EU, so the ruling is not all that surprising, though I would certainly have guessed that these photos would have been found protectable in most of the EU to be honest.
However, Commons specifically uses the law in the country of origin (generally the country of first publication), as well as the law of the U.S. Each country's law applies within its own borders, so the French ruling (which may have been based on inappropriate evidence provided) does not apply anywhere other than France. I'm not exactly sure where the photo was first published (UK?), but no matter where it was, this is virtually certain to still be under copyright in the United States, so we should delete based on that alone. And we would also need to figure out what the country of origin is -- right now the PD-ineligible is based on France, but no evidence was provided to give that the country of origin is France. The court ruling should be linked from Commons:Threshold of originality#France, but I don't think we can use it as the basis for keeping this image. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Under copyright both in the country of origin and in the USA. The french rulling is irrelevant for commons in this case. --Latebird (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support To my understanding, the French court didn't declare it was any kind of public Domain, only that the photograph could not prove that he was more than a worker to the service of the artist who created this work of art, if we keep this picture, we could have problem with Jimmy Hendrix copyrights owners or any one who would have been setting the jacket, the subject attitude, suggested the smoke... --Cqui (talk) 07:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted as an office action due to DMCA takedown. This closure does not take in to account the discussion above. Please see wmf:DMCA_Jimi_Hendrix_by_Gered_Mankowitz_1967. --Josve05a (talk) 21:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musa haule (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bonjour2010 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

it can be found previously published on the web, if it is in PD for some reason then a valid PD tag must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal art : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xaf1/t51.2885-15/s320x320/e35/11910000_1638454593101413_1649549195_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 04:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio via https://pslpdunesa.wordpress.com/ (gallery) https://pslpdunesa.wordpress.com/about/sejarah-singkat/img_7186/ (2015) = https://pslpdunesa.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/img_7186.jpg (exif available)

Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batch error, tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Jcb. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Adysetia1

Gunnex (talk) 08:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nommination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adysetia1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful own work. High-res but poor quality, possibly upscaled or scanned images. No EXIF.

MKFI (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camilla Giacometti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Interior design images taken from various sources, all claimed as own work. Some sources (I have not checked all):

MKFI (talk) 08:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement. The uploader has claimed (edit summary) to be employed by the company. OTRS permission is needed. MKFI (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, image by Hannu Lindroos. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a destra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Luketomlinson99 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except now-deleted article and user talkpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a destra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a sinistra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teatro Municipale Romolo Valli Reggio Emilia 04.jpg, the same would apply to all images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filigrana in basso a destra Lorenzo Gaudenzi (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-valid reason for deletion, unless more information changes something. User Lorenzo Gaudenzi has his name in the metadata as well as in the watermark, and is now asking for deletion based on watermark. Upload license is irrevocable, it's not hard to remove a watermark. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - It is not quite clear what the intention of the nominator is here. Revoking the license is not strictly legal, but may be honored out of courtesy by Commons within a short timeframe (as given here) if the uploader finds he made a mistake. If he just wants to upload the images without the watermark, then that can be done in place (via "Upload a new version of this file"), without the need to delete the first version. --Latebird (talk) 03:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we have a long standing practice of deleting files on user request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 23:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright : http://studiodesacacias.com/fr/ Bastenbas (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Macha van Beusekom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ustadrafiquekhan.com/data/images/rafique_khan_3.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Platinum! (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.lacostaricaverde.com/img/alcalde-20.png.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iranibonsai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear descriptions (example of translation from iranian : Mother bonsai or Iranian bonsai) ; Unidentified species and too small images to identifiy (so no encyclopedic value); Watermarks with Iranibonsai (indirect advertisement) ; Small images, no EXIF or metadata, probably copyvio ; Photos directly from their web site or from Instagram. Example : File:Anaar.jpg comes from http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FCKbMkuCWUAAyG75.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Firanibonsai&h=600&w=600&tbnid=ZlqW514kERS-jM%3A&docid=XKdQkq-r3sx8UM&itg=1&ei=6_ekV8zbEczzaPHpvsAJ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=1080&page=1&start=0&ndsp=33&ved=0ahUKEwiM_ce_j6vOAhXMORoKHfG0D5gQMwgmKAMwAw&bih=793&biw=1600

Civa (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tayloe.cook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings, documents and photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrohilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, certainly not own work and incorrectly licensed, even if some of them may be below TOO

Didym (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vrohilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramarjuna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File size, EXIF and GIF file seem that they are not own work. Admin has to inform his/her copyvio issues.

~AntanO4task (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot. Flight simulators are usually not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, fully user interpreted coa of several existing one after heraldic ref (File:Wappen Abtswind.svg, File:DEU Abtswind COA.svg, File:Wappen Abtswind.png): The ref is [1], the file is never used and never categorized. ↔ User: Perhelion 15:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license of every used photo is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hardly a self-made image by this one-purpose-account. Damiens.rf 16:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:БЕ ВДВ (2016).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maik10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not.

Wikicology (talk) 16:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maik10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos without permission. The rest of th files are probably PD-textlogo.

Yann (talk) 08:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author requests deletion, was part of a page deleted in January 2012 Oscarlondon (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 16:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's "own work" - he's in the picture. It's also used here which means it's probably actually a professional publicity photo copyright to someone else, but that's a PRP assumption without seeing the books. MSJapan (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikicology (talk) 16:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful 1989 (talk) 16:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of a school president and in use on the school's webpage https://www.bankstreet.edu/events/details/465/ from prior to this upload. This upload has "photoshop" as metadata. Unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 17:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image 1989 (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarakrolewski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo, newsletter, and a pile of historical pictures (from the 1930s to 1950s(?)) of things that pertain to "Bank Street School." User's other uploads were speedied as they were copied directly from the school's website. All these images are claimed as 'own work'.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These two blurry images are claimed as own work but appear to be copied from publication/s (see border and scan artifacts). Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image 1989 (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mani.ghavi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these sports-related images. Small sizes, no camera data, other images speedied, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use prior to the upload here to commons at http://fsspversailles.org/2014/11/10/veillee-de-prieres-dimanche-16-novembre-a-17h30-pour-labbe-coiffet/. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value 1989 (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use in 2010 at http://perepiscopus.over-blog.com/article-mgr-philippe-breton-benit-les-pelerins-non-marcheurs-49945464.html, although smaller than this version, shows that the image was already available years prior to this uplod. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in use from 2013, "© Copyright 2014 - www.nd-chretiente.com" at http://www.nd-chretiente.com/dotclear/index.php?post/2013/05/22/Sermon-du-P%C3%A8re-de-Saint-Laumer Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no camera EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios of this person. Duck copyvio. Эlcobbola talk 17:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ND de Chrétienté (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work. About eight cameras for 22 images covering a single topic. Many other uploads were nominated and/or speedied being copied from priest's blogs, church websites, etc. Many of these images are of a size which could be from Facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Oppose this procedure, for example there is a part which indicate the template {{Own}}, it os probably that a part must be delete, but not in a global procedure. 18:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivier LPB (talk • contribs)
After so many images were found to be copied from others without attribution COM:PRP makes those "own work" claims dubious. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjomanhiphop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, two are identical (but for size). One looks like an album or media cover. Only one camera metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity photos by user who has not made any edits other than to upload these. Largely out of scope, and questionable copyright as well since the uploader is not the the photographer. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value 1989 (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality and no supporting information. Rcbutcher (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Topideal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - this doesn't seem to be a logo in use, or with any context. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of Rockman statues. LoC license applies only to the photographs, not the subject statues. Statues are not free or PD: still living sculptor (w:WP:Tom Otterness), installed in 2000s, and no FoP in US.

Эlcobbola talk 17:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of toys and statues. LoC license applies only to the photographs, not the subject works. No FoP in US.

Эlcobbola talk 19:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an alternative, Category:Photographs by Carol M. Highsmith needing review is a quick way of marking files that need further examination. -- (talk) 20:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
i would caution mass deleting sculpture without checking SIRIS. many are PD US no notice. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept two no notice and deleted the rest since the underlying work is under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value 1989 (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value 1989 (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value 1989 (talk) 17:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text logo; out of scope as far as I can tell. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request that (if these images are found to be own work of uploader) that only this one or the other one File:Tarah Chan 陳意嵐.JPG be kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful 1989 (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False EXIF info; includes images that may not be free. 1989 (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This unsourced image is only half of File:1909 Detroit Tigers.jpg. I don't think we need to keep the 1/2 when Commons has the whole image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Buckingham Palace (16299400762).jpg 1989 (talk) 18:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. также файл https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Хлудневский_карьер.jpg. Фото сделаны на разные фотоаппараты, загружены в одно время, источник не открывается, уточнить автора нельзя Dogad75 (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lebanon has no freedom of panorama. OTRS-permission from architect is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AleksanderKoko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are questionably the own work of uploader, due to lack of metadata, various sizes, strange titles, lack of description, and so on. They look like a gallery of images perhaps test uploads? The only really great photo here has no information about it, and is categorized in "screenshots" bringing the likelihood of "own work" down even farther.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing in COM:CURRENCY covering Zimbabwean banknotes. The file carries a "fair use" arguement and there is no fair use on Commons. There are dozens more of these in no source, perhaps we could decide the outcome of one, and then settle the others which I have temporarily categorized as Category:Banknotes of Zimbabwe without source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image needs more sources as it is a composite and none of the images are sourced. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RATWIK AK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images was indeed created by uploader. No metadata and fairly obvious scans.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Natalie stanley 27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence in own work claims on these images, no metadata, small sizes, various colors, styles, ages, etc all lead to the idea that these are internet culls and not own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.Hari Om Prakash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Two-up portraits, publicity material, various photographs obviously not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by S.Hari Om Prakash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melwyn cena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these files are own work of uploader as claimed. No metadata, variable qualities, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was published in 2012 at http://www.skepticalcommunity.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=35100, but uploaded here four years later claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image found at http://plzensky.denik.cz/galerie/noc-kostelu-v-plzni.html?mm=5278526, Autor: Miroslav Kubička Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this statue's present whereabouts are unknown as claimed, how did the user get an alleged "own work" photo of it in July 2016? This image looks like it was copied from somewhere else, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thorvaldsensarkiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are two parts to this nomination: Part One: Images of "Christ by Bertel Thorvaldsen" in black and white as details of the statue. These images are given information as follows:Source Thorvaldsens Museum, Author Jens Frederiksen, 1996. These photographs are too recent to be in public domain and they are not own work of uploader. Part Two: Four images of various sizes, white balance and so on. One image from Denmark the others from Isle of Bute in Scotland. Unlikely to be own work because none of the other images by this uploader were own work and due to the wide separation of image locations highly unlikely to be taken by this uploader (Bute was 07/01/16 and Denmark was 07/05/16). No metadata on group two either.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author unknown - Radio courtoisie is not an author Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Need authorization of radio producer, and all the participants Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization of the author (the subject of a photo haven't the rights) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, as well as File:Promo Direct Logo.jpg - autopromotion Pibwl (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubt its own work, name on the watermark different to the uploader Dudek1337 (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused autopromo, as well as other uploads File:Financier top negoce.jpg, File:Réclamation.jpg, File:Notre equipe.jpg, File:Logo top negoce.jpg Pibwl (talk) 19:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author unknown ; photo delete on https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaizdas:Evola2.jpg Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 19:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data does not match Flickr Uploader, presuming Flickr Washing Elisfkc (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment looking at the account, it actually looks like it may have been accidentally marked PD instead of ARR. Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image is in the public domain on Flickr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rr4748 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 2 September 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Rr4748: But the question is also if the Flickr uploader is the same as the photographer, or is authorized by the photographer to release the image under whatever rights. Elisfkc (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertizing/spam - only use is in self-created Wikidata page Denniss (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertizing/spam - only use is in self-created Wikidata page Denniss (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertizing/spam - only use is in self-created Wikidata page Denniss (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertizing/spam - only use is in self-created Wikidata page Denniss (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains GPS data that I would like to remove and the filename is syntactically wrong, so I have uploaded the image with the correct name and without the GPS data. Pumk (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, possible copyvio Denniss (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

listed at PUF this low web resolution image is found by Google on other sites, including this one whose posting is older than this image. With just this one upload I doubt the copyright belongs to the uploader besides which the image is orphaned and the subject has no articles. Ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is an official logo, it cannot be the uploader's own work; it's a work of the school and likely under the school's copyright. C.Fred (talk) 21:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from hereSunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 21:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building from the 1950s, so the architect can't have been dead for 70 years yet.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Panorama Freedom in Latvia, built by V.V.Shnitnikov who died in 1996.

A.Savin 21:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Согласно статье 1276 четвёртой части Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации — в России и других государствах бывшего СССР:

пункт 2. Допускается свободное использование путем воспроизведения и распространения изготовленных экземпляров, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю, доведения до всеобщего сведения в форме изображений произведений архитектуры, градостроительства и произведений садово-паркового искусства, расположенных в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, или видных из этого места.[1]

Kalnroze (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Latvian FOP disallows commercial uses of images of architecture and public art like sculptures and monuments still in copyright, not OK per Commons:Licensing. The building according to w:Latvian Academy of Sciences was designed by architects Osvalds Tīlmanis (d. 1980), Vaidelotis Apsītis (d. 2007), and Kārlis Plūksne (d. 1973), so still within the 70 years posthumous copyright term.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Triplecaña (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from Soviet Historical Encyclopedia [2]. 89.178.1.95 21:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 89.178.1.95 21:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is credited as coming from Ted.com Elisfkc (talk) 21:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Извините, но нужно не удалить, а переименовать в "Памятник Мосину в Туле", я не поняла как Елена Ч. (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adair wielopolski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adair wielopolski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Personal photso used in deleted en:User:Adair wielopolski

JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. KDS4444 (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From COM:SCOPE: "A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use ... falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." From COM:D: "Not educationally useful: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Examples of files that are not realistically useful include... Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Lastly: COM:PORN: "Commons is not an amateur porn site". Can you tell me why you feel this image is within scope? KDS4444 (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:NUDITY and COM:PORN are ultimately the policies that are going to the deciding factors of requests like this. COM:PORN leads with "Low-quality pornographic images", this file is not low quality. I see no violation of COM:NUDITY. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Not very clear what's going on. The sex position could be explained with a vector style pictogram... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Per the comments of other contributors, apparently images like this are in scope and within "policy." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, no usage on any wikipedia TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense DR (see above). --Leyo 22:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has been twice blocked for copyvios and this makes me ask: this is small photo without metadata and last remaining uploaded photo. Maybe this is not own work, but copyright violation. Can you upload bigger version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 06:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially non free logo Saqib (talk) 07:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially copyvio.. taken from web but unknown from where Saqib (talk) 07:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Muqtadir Mamoon (talk · contribs) made a userpage in en.wiki and uploaded 4 personal photos (3 now deleted). All his other edits were reverted. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Internet. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 07:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 07:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Infringement (저작권 침해). http://www.poyu.kg.kr/skin_default/bbs_list_layer.php?idx=4579&unsingcode1=1181635161&unsingcode2=1377564081&unsingcode3= , http://www.poyu.kg.kr/data/bbsData/1378100469&&BBSFILEevent001.jpg -- 메이 `토론 07:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the internet. Without additionnal information about the source and the author it is impossible to check if the image is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP in Ukraine. The building was builded in 1960 (as you can see on the picture). Andriy.v (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of identifiable minor with no indication of consent to being photographed or having photograph published - as is required in Japan even in public locations. (See Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Japan) DAJF (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file; originally uploaded here in 2011, in its correct resolution. Aero777 (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진을 잘 못 올린 것 같아요 Cri87 (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.af-duplain.ch/biographie/. The subject of the photograph died 1966 so this is unlikely to be old enough for PD-Old. MKFI (talk) 08:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MoraJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from http://www.af-duplain.ch/parcours-de-lartiste/. The artist died in 1966.

MKFI (talk) 08:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://www.stylepark.com/en/fiam-italia/ray-plus?nr=3, slightly re-colored. MKFI (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a syndicated news image, I haven't yet found a copy predating local upload, but Indian express etc credit the images to Commons if taken from here. —SpacemanSpiff 10:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:ІПЗ лого (чб).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:ІПЗ лого (чб).png PsichoPuzo (talk) 10:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:СТЕ анг лого.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 11:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:СТЕ укр лого.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Spellcast as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Incorrectly labelled PD. USHMM image link: "Copyright: Agency Agreement (No Fees)". I do not know copyright law of former Yugoslavia, maybe the file is somehow free. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Many images from the USHMM are explicitly identified as "Public Domain", but this is not one of them (at least not yet). Link says: "Copyright: Agency Agreement (No Fees)". While it was uploaded in good faith, the PD tag is simply incorrect. Spellcast (talk) 11:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I found, that copyright lasted in Yugoslavia 25 years from publishing. If the photo was published before 1971, then it is free in source country and in USA. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I take it that's based on {{PD-Yugoslavia}}? Maybe the publication is why they haven't labelled it PD. I noticed the USHMM doesn't just tag all WWII Balkans images as PD. It depends on things like the author, publication, and the institution they got it from. This nuance in their copyright assertions suggest that what they claim is accurate. The Commons description says it's PD, courtesy of the Yugoslav National Revolution Museum. But the USHMM link says the copyright is under an agency agreement with the Jasenovac Memorial Museum. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to assert that it's even PD in the US. Spellcast (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reporicelo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be transferred to content wiki in plain wikitext if useful

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elisauer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP).

In Germany, in order for FOP to apply, the work pictured must be both visible from a public street and permanently installed. According to a caption, these are part of a festival, so it is unlikely that they are permanent. Most of them appear to be in private places, not visible from a street.

O.K. I´ll ask the creators to give them free ....the building will be destroyed soon - it´s a lost place...--Elisauer (talk) 13:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I talked with Initiator if IBUg and he told me, that it would be too much work to ask all creators in all countrys....- so I think it´s better to delete the pics here. There are enough pictures in the Internet that shows the works...I´ve tried to delete them on my side, but it´s impossible....so : Just do it ! :-( (sorry, my english is not so good....)--Elisauer (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Significantly inferior to File:Computer and monitor (2-bit palette).png, with which it has been replaced on all other projects. Its only use is here at Commons, User:Hgrobe/gallery, but the setup of that page and the existence of numerous broken file links makes me guess that it's a gallery-formatted image log, the sort of thing at which we normally don't remove deleted images or replace them when they're being deleted, so I think we can consider this to be orphaned. Nyttend (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright change Cristinacassiago (talk) 11:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "Copyright change"? Wikicology (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced this image by an identical one with free copyright Cristinacassiago (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Flag of Albania.svg and File:Flag of Albania.png TFerenczy (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unclef8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works despite big sizes. Uploaders already have obvious copyvios speedy deleted, and all the file can be found previously published with google search (just one exemple http://fightnights.ru/about/company/). Though I agree I did no find similar sizes on the web.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Conceptual image, unreliable source //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 1 September 2016 11:37 (UTC) 11:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Fontenay F PM 048137.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skovaleva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are not own work: they were taken from a website that does not exist any more. There is no evidence that they were published under a free licence by their author.

BrightRaven (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by accident Dma-art (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photographer did not give permission for uploading Dma-art (talk) 12:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I am struggling to see how this is a PD work. Recently, there was a concern about the copyright status of this image at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/08#File:Saturnino Urios.jpg. I asked the uploader about the copyright status here and they responded here that ":Its our group project. So we paint Fr. Urios as our group activity." 5 days later they slam the image with PD license tag claiming it's in PD. This is oustragious which makes me to doubt the copyright status of this image. The uploader has been blocked indefinitely from en:Wiki as a Sock. Wikicology (talk) 12:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad svg quality, file is not in use, a better jpg version of the file was uploaded last year: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_International_Violin_Competition_Henri_Marteau.jpg Ulphilos (talk) 12:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, fair use ~AntanO4task (talk) 12:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. There is no evidence that this is in public domain. The image was uploaded by a problematic user who was previously blocked on en:Wiki as a sockpuppetry. This page should be deleted per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. There is no evidence that this is in public domain. The image was uploaded by a problematic user who was previously blocked on en:Wiki as a sockpuppetry. This page should be deleted per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. McGeddon (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

McGeddon, I have no objection. The image is not being used, hence it can be deleted.-Adesh31 (talk) 13:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. There is no evidence that this is in public domain. The image was uploaded by a problematic user who was previously blocked on en:Wiki as a sockpuppetry. This page should be deleted per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 13:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. There is no evidence that this is in public domain. The image was uploaded by a problematic user who was previously blocked on en:Wiki as a sockpuppetry. This page should be deleted per COM:PRP. Wikicology (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False licence, missing copiright permission. Pascal Z (talk) 13:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. According to the press release from the Canadian Army, they kept the old army flag until adopting the new red one this year. I was mistaken. Fry1989 eh? 14:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed. Sodacan (talk) 02:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It may be obsolete now, but it's still useful to keep it for historical and archival purposes. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But it didn't exist? Fry1989 eh? 15:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand: did this flag was used by the Canadian Army? If so, even on a temporary basis, it should be kept for historical purpose. --Superbenjamin (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When the Army changed their badge, it was my assumption they would just change it on the flag too, so I uploaded this image. But it doesn't show up in the press release and I can't find any photos of it at all, so it appears the Army kept using this flag until they adopted the new red flag. Fry1989 eh? 17:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Fry1989: Oops, didn't know that it was a made-up flag. My bad. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 19:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It did show up in an Army release a few years ago when they adopted the new badge, but I can't find any photos of a real one anywhere. It seems to have not been made. Fry1989 eh? 23:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment So it was official, but no actual copies were ever made? Hmmm, shouldn't it be kept then? – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if it was official, but if it was surely we could find photos of a real one. I haven't seen any indication it was real. Fry1989 eh? 21:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright change Cristinacassiago (talk) 11:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "Copyright change"? Wikicology (talk) 15:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced this image by an identical one with free copyright Cristinacassiago (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Wikicology (talk) 16:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 00:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. I doubt the copyright holder granted the permission for its uploader. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Delete per COM:PRP. We take copyright very seriously even if the copyright holder does not. Wikicology (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am now in the process of getting formal consent from the image owner, this will be forwarded to OTRS. Atwhiteley (talk) 14:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikicology (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this was marked as "out of scope" since it was not in use anywhere. I uploaded the file so it could be used on https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiitu_Takalo and now it is in use on said page. --MSuniala (talk) 05:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use in 2 articles. --INeverCry 00:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description ; Historic monument ? which one ? ; and the file name annulé124 means canceled 124 Tangopaso (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Tangopaso: Je pense que ce contributeur qui débute a eu un problème au cours de l'importation (l'interface n'est pas forcément évidente au premier abord). Je lui avais déjà laissé un message pour savoir quoi faire de ces fichiers. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 06:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 21:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 21:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 21:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 21:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 21:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:41, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CS Chandan Kumar Bhagat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Auto promotion, out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ifejazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio - small/no EXIF - own work doubtful INeverCry 22:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darrell Brown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hafiz512 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT INeverCry 22:44, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yokochutima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - simple text in a jpg INeverCry 23:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minaeljokar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

likely copyvios - small/no EXIF

INeverCry 23:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - tiny thumb w/ no EXIF INeverCry 23:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:33, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio - tiny 5kb thumb INeverCry 23:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jalandharavishal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JntuKaBaap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 03:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Гражданский кодекс Российской Федерации от 18 декабря 2006 г. N 230-ФЗ Часть четвёртая (ред. от 12.03.2014) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 01.01.2015)