Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Illustration_de_P.Albuisson.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Aslismoothest (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos about non-notable people are out of project scope
- File:Smoothest Aashu selfie at Louvre Museum.jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (5).JPG
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (6).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (4).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (3).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (1).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu 2015 (2).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu (4).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu at Bigg Boss 9 Promo.jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu (5).JPG
- File:Smoothest Aashu (2).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu (1).jpg
- File:Smoothest Aashu (3).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --Natuur12 (talk) 09:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Old and useless photo Hausofmakeup (talk) 10:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC) It's OK to remover this picture EnSintClopedie (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Old useless photo Hausofmakeup (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what this person is doing, Natuur12. Strange things like this, too. And taking revenge, I think. ErikvanB (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- @ErikvanB: I already gave this person a warning. If he/she continues please let me know. Natuur12 (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- I will. ErikvanB (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- @ErikvanB: I already gave this person a warning. If he/she continues please let me know. Natuur12 (talk) 18:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Images with link Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Images Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Images Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Images Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Images Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Child porn. The image depicts a naked 8 years old as a grown up woman. Accompanying the image, there's a comment in Russian - and on Russian Wikipedia where it's scheduled to appear in Did You Know, that this is titillating.--Victoria (talk) 07:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Child portrait of a future empress w:en:Elizabeth of Russia exhibited in a w:en:Russian Museum (one of main art musea in Russia) is not a child porn. Child nudity depicted in art for centuries (for instance Putti), child nudity is not the synonym of child porn. Sotin (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- It's completely nonsense proposal, this portrait (as its copies) is displayed in main Russian museums and never classified as something inappropriate. Category:Nude children contains hundreds of more explicit images. AndyVolykhov (talk) 14:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion stated, see COM:CENSORSHIP. This image is definitely in scope. --Sealle (talk) 16:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE as an image specifically used on a talk page at en-wiki for the purpose of attacking Islam. Ansh666 (talk) 05:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty obvious soapboxing and the statistics in the image are of questionable accuracy. I'm tired of people using the behaviour of a small minority of deranged fanatics to pursue the "All Muslims are bad" agenda.--Ianmacm (talk) 05:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Completely and obviously fails COM:EDUSE. This is obviously and merely hate-speech and inflammatory racism. It is also an advertisement for TheReligionofPeace.com. -- Softlavender (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment Unfortunately, the image is COM:INUSE (on en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents) and Wikimeida Commons "coniders a media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough." Althoght the definition may be considered to only apply to if the image is in use on mainspace articles/non-talk pages. If the file were removed from the discussion page on enwp, I'd vote delete. Josve05a (talk) 06:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. Josve05a (talk) 06:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Just noting that the way I read COM:INUSE (specifically the phrase "a non talk/user page"), the image would have to be on either an article or a non-discussion projectspace page (e.g. a policy or guideline page, but not a noticeboard or a discussion page) to be "considered automatically to be useful". But I don't frequent Commons much, so I don't know if that's how they do it around here. Ansh666 (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I've removed it from Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents on Wikipedia. Happy now?--Ianmacm (talk) 06:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete? It's marked as owned by "TheReligionofPeace.com", so doesn't that make it a copyright violation unless there's an explicit release from that site? Otherwise, delete for the reasons expressed by others, above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment People have been arrested for stuff like this in the UK.[1] Although it isn't a great surprise when people say things like this, implying that all Muslims whoop with joy when innocent people are killed is simply wrong. See also this BBC News report about the Nice attack.--Ianmacm (talk) 09:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as per the above. I believe there's a clear consensus at enwiki that there is no valid use of this image, and thus if it is posted again (in an attempt to trigger COM:INUSE, perhaps) it will be removed with haste. Thanks. Ultraexactzz (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Advertisement for a website and a failure of COM:SCOPE. There's no legitimate use for this image. clpo13(talk) 17:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Attack image, many Muslims would find this offensive.--100.36.171.168 19:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Attack image. --INeverCry 20:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Was wrong, was suppose to create Category:Naturskyddsföreningen. Saftgurka (talk) 07:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty, should have been a category, author's req. --Achim (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright unklar, Fotograf unbekannt und keine Rechte Ph1schm1 (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
no copyright 130.75.174.201 12:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Автор фото неизвестен, источник-сайт, куда материалы добавляет любой зарегистрировавшийся участник Dogad75 (talk) 21:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, see COM:L. --Sealle (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
suspected copyright violation Brianga (talk) 16:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
COM:TOYS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
unused text file, could be reproduced by typing if ever needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
From facebook.... FBMD... not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
Both pictures here from Facebook, see "FBMD" in meta. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
An unused, over exposed sunset(?) at an unidentified location is out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
Whatever this image is, it's unlikely to be own work and is out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.
ne m'intéresse pas 62.241.96.94 14:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
duplicate File:Anne_Goldthwaite,_Self-portrait,_circa_1906-1913.jpg Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 17:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality dog photos. One is very small, the others are larger but poorly framed and exposed. Out of COM:SCOPE, none in use.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 12:29, 19 July 2016 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Aaa 021.jpg (LTA uploads - Using VisualFileChange.). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Wrong image Wahbecontributor (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Old useless photo Hausofmakeup (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Irrelevant reason given for deletion. Miyagawa (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Having looked into it further, given that the nominator is a commercial entity which had other pictures of Zwarte Piet on Commons, I think there may be an entirely different reason for this nomination. Miyagawa (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense DR. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, I cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 16:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This is more of a touristy snap, and we now have more photos of Atomium than we know what to do with. Videoupload4nice (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--100.36.171.168 22:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope: unused file, private image. Better images of the Atomium exist. BrightRaven (talk) 07:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
manipulated image (actually she never wore a 'hijab') ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Support The file was deleted in id.wp which was totally different image. Bennylin (yes?) 02:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://serbiananimalsvoice.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/serb-sheep-3.jpg.
- File:Live export - sheeps from Serbia on the way to Ramallah.jpg
- File:Live export - cows from australia in Zofar quarantine in Israel.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- All the photos are my own work. The photo of the lambs from Serbia was taken by me in Israel. Serbia exports live lambs to Israel by sea and by air. These lambs came by air and are on the turck to the Arabic town Ramallah.
- I am a member of an Israeli group against live export, this is our web site, and this is our facebook page. A groups for animal rights in Serbia used it on their site, and it's OK by me.
- thank you -Assialls (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- You can see the photos on our facebook:
- The photo of the lambs from Serbia is in this album from September 2015.
- The photo of the cows in Zofar quarantuine is in this album from May 2016.
- Assialls (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- -
- In addition an OTRS letter for these photos was just sent. -Assialls (talk) 15:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission - Ticket:2016072210013732. -- Geagea (talk) 10:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Unclear situation of Uruguayan currency (See Commons:Currency). Wrong license, it isn't an own work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 00:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Ahmmm.. and Category:Banknotes of Uruguay? PS: I already tagged some files... Gunnex (talk) 14:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- PS: Publisher is "Banco Central del Uruguay" --> (+/- upload date) http://web.archive.org/web/20071014194443/http://www.bcu.gub.uy/autoriza/sgoioi/condiciones.htm = "(...) sin someterlo a modificaciones o alteraciones que impliquen menoscabo de su contenido, para uso personal, académico o de su organización, siempre que lleve a cabo tales operaciones sin fines de lucro (...)" = ND/NC. But can't say if the copyright law of Uruguay regulates also governmental works in a more free way... Gunnex (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marxists Internet Archive
[edit]The Marxists.org (Marxist Internet Archive or MIA) image policy states that they think their images are in the public domain because they pulled them from old books or (more likely, based on the pixelation) the Internet. They do not own the rights to the image and therefore they are not under the archive's general Creative Commons license (see home page). The most interesting part of the image policy is, "In no case do we possess the original high resolution versions (or in high-res tiffs or other digital formats) or hard copies of the images displayed on the site which we can provide you with." This is to say that they do not provide information on the provenance of the images because they do not have it. Almost all of the portraits from this site are currently marked as Creative Commons or PD based on the life of the subject, but both cases are wrong. The images should only be marked as PD based on either their publication or the death of the author (read: photographer). And if the author is truly anonymous (which would mean that the image was published anonymously and not just presumed to not exist because their work has been scanned on the Internet), we're looking at something like 120 years from creation, depending on the origin country. In any event, I pulled a batch of images below, mostly portraits from the last 100 years with no research of publication date or authorship. The clear question here is whether a photo/etching/illustration was first published by the time of the subject's death, thus starting the copyright clock. With no clear provenance and not 100 years from creation, we cannot make claims about copyright notices or the author's death nevertheless say that these images are in the public domain. (By the way, there are plenty more images from this website that haven't been tagged for this category. And plenty more to investigate even within the category. I did a number but I need to move on.)
- File:Anna Louise Strong.jpg
- File:Bertrand Louis.png
- File:Hardial Bains with Enver Hoxa, 1981.jpg
- File:Healy.jpg
- File:Iirubinb.jpg
- File:James Burnham2.jpg
- File:Moreno iicongreso.jpg
- File:Nmoreno entierro.jpg
- File:Pashukanis.jpg
- File:Paul Levi.jpg
- File:Pollitt-at-Desk.jpg
- File:Wei-jingsheng.jpg
- File:Workers Action cover issue 9.jpg
- File:Workers Vanguard 860.jpg
- File:Zeidler-frank-1960.jpg
- File:Zimmerman-charles-s-1939.jpg – Added czar 06:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- File:Nmoreno 1940.jpg – Added czar 06:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- File:Comrade-mansoor-hekmat.jpg – Added czar 21:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
czar 00:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- The photos of Anna Louise Stroud, Bertrand Louis, James Burnham, Pashu Kanis, and Paul Levi need more evidence to prove that ther'ye copyvios. Delete the rest, though.--172.56.2.231 14:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Burden of proof is on the uploaders—we have no evidence that these images are from PD sources, even if we assumed that they were published anonymously (which they likely weren't) czar 04:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for notification.
- when Marxists.org says that "in no case do we possess the original high resolution versions (or in high-res tiffs or other digital formats) or hard copies of the images displayed on the site which we can provide you with", it could still be the case that Marxists.org can provide further information on the provenance of the images, if you ask them. They are just saying that they won't be able to provide original high resolution version oder hard copies, if you would ask them.
- Pashukanis.jpg obviously shows a professional potrait picture of en:Evgeny Pashukanis (1891-1937). So we can assume it is a en:Work for hire, which by USA law means the depicted person is the copyright holder. But Pashukanis died more than 70 years ago, so the copyright should have expired by now
Rosenkohl (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- How would you suggest that someone ask? I imagine we'd be unlikely to get a response if I sent them this list. Others are welcome to ask one by one, if they wish. I don't see why we would assume that Pashukanis commissioned a portrait of himself—any other patron or news source is just as likely to have done the same. The copyright is usually from the date of publication or the author's death, which can be well after that of the subject. czar 04:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
I agree there is a lack of data concerning the dates and authors on these photos (some that I have checked). So, it may be copyrighted. As for Wei Jingsheng, I changed the file to File:Wei Jingsheng par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg on concerned articles. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- On commons.wikimedia, the file Pashukanis.jpg was put under CC-BY-SA 3.0 based on the license given by Maxists.org. So the commons.wikimedia license was in no way, as the request for delation claims here, directly "based on the life of the subject", but derived from another license. Of course we hope that Marxists.org has rightly put the file under CC-BY-SA, but I can't see sufficient doubt Marxists.org did wrong.
- It is user:Czar, the author of this request for deletion, who basically accuses Marxists.org here in the public of putting pictures wrongfully under Creative Commons licenses. So it would be the task of user:Czar to ask them about what they did in the first place.
For those who just know a minimum about the subject of Evgeny Pashukanis, it becomes clear that he likely commissioned the picture by himself.
- He was a judge and scholar of law in the just founded Soviet Union. On the picture he wears the white tie of a judge's attire and looks straight into the camera, so it is obiviously a staged representative picture, not a surprise press shot.
- Pashukanis was a publicist who would write own long theory articles; he was not a celebrity hunted by en:paparazzi. The whole idea of the existence of independent "news sources" is anachronistic for the early Soviet Union, where Censorship was prevalent,
Rosenkohl (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- No, the burden is on the uploader to get it right. I could contact Marxists.org as a courtesy. They did not license any of their photos under Creative Commons but as Public Domain—see their photo policy linked above—and my argument is that they have shown no due diligence for claiming that their photos are actually in the public domain. We also have a precautionary principle when there is substantial doubt about the origins of a photo, nevertheless some logic that Pashukanis commissioned the photo on his own. If he did, where was it first published and where did Marxists.org get it? "Somewhere on the Internet" is not good enough for establishing the authorship—it came from print somewhere in the world, and that would dictate its copyright protections. czar 18:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Too bad they aren't selfies of dicks — copyright is such a simple thing in those cases. Carrite (talk) 01:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Stolen from here Sunnya343 (talk) 01:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image Rssäl 01:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - this is not George S. Patton as was claimed - the uniform is British. Therefore, this is an unnamed subject, and isn't used n any articles. MSJapan (talk) 01:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a totally different file to the one that was previously deleted. It's not used in any article, and without a date or author information, there's no way to tell if this is a government photo or not that could be PD, and whether the license is accurate as it stands.. MSJapan (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Description updated, license changed (http://zenithpress.tumblr.com/post/77996635568/patton-and-the-bocage-in-normandy, https://www.quartoknows.com/books/9780760345924/Fighting-Patton.html). --Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 06:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- That's a speedy. Clear copyright notice at the bottom of the page. CSD tagged. MSJapan (talk) 07:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep: No valid reason for deletion. The file is tagged as {tl|PD-USGov-Military-Army}}, so, you should provide strong proof why it is not a work from an officier of the US Army (Zenith Press is very unlikely to be the copyright holder of the photo). Also, the location is France, therefore, if the photographer is not an officier of the US Army, and if he/she is unknown, and if the photo has been published before 1946 (when the WII already ended), then, it is already in the PD anyway. --Amitie 10g (talk) 09:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Barring finding the original, it's difficult to say. Moreover, if this is any indication, the uploader is simply pasting URLs from various places in as sources, and that's not how this works. MSJapan (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete http://www.gettyimages.com/license/50691063 - Image was likely taken by a LIFE photographer. If it was actually an image provided by the military, we need actual evidence. Reventtalk 22:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Now Keep based on actual evidence provided below that this is {{PD-USGov-Military-Army}}. @Amitie 10g: please read COM:PRP again. Reventtalk 23:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Now
- Keep: Image was taken by a US Signal Corps photographer (http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205125361). --Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 22:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above evidence. --INeverCry 01:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
By the age and apparent half-toning of this image, I do not think it represents own work of the uploader." Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
out of scope- unused personal image Rssäl 02:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhimanyuvibhortyagi (talk · contribs)
[edit]low res, two appear to be part of a professional shoot while the third appears to be a promo poster, no exif, should be deleted per COM:PRP
—SpacemanSpiff 02:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal picture of two guys showing off some kind of race medals, over printed "Mountain Ash Studio". Out of COM:SCOPE as personal photos are limited to a few for user's to use on their user page. This one is unused, Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
File is private. Can´t confirm the licensing Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete confirmed—can't confirm the license czar 21:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
out of scope- unused personal image Rssäl 02:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
out of scope- personal image Rssäl 02:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leandro Fernández Avila (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal essays, out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats.
- File:AUTOCONCEPTO Y DESEMPEÑO ESCOLAR EN UN GRUPO DE NIÑOS(AS) DE QUINTO GRADO DE PRIMARIA DEL COLEGIO SAN ALBERTO MAGNO EN SANTIAGO DE CALI.pdf
- File:Descripción del desempeño en flexibilidad cognoscitiva, planeación y memoria de trabajo en niños con diagnóstico de TDAH, en una institución prestadora de servcios de salud, Bogotá 2016.pdf
- File:ALTERACIONES NEUROPSICOLOGICAS EN PACIENTE CON ANTECEDENTE DE HIPOXIA NEONATAL.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--100.36.171.168 18:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [2] SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 03:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mudassir1468 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
--ghouston (talk) 04:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope.--100.36.171.168 18:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Fixertool (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Joke image, used in a speedily deleted article en:Birdification Mike Rosoft (talk) 04:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
All uploads from this contributor are copyright violations. This photo from a library blog licensed as CC-NC-ND. Thuresson (talk) 05:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Moslemulhakim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 19.07.2016. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook, like File:নিঝুম ড্রীম ল্যান্ড রিসোর্ট.jpg = grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/noakhalipage/photos/pcb.1090484271025165/1090484194358506/?type=3&theater (06.2016, identical FBMD...).
Gunnex (talk) 05:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio.--100.36.171.168 20:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
lacks of sources for the photomontage and for the "map"
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 05:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
can't find the photo at the source, no evidence that this was taken before January 1, 1956 which is required for it to be PD-India —SpacemanSpiff 06:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
No proof of free license claim. Image by Jorn Urbain, taken from http://zm-fn.blogspot.be/2014/06/p901-castor-navy-days-2014.html. MKFI (talk) 06:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
I do not want to upload this file Andras962 (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped. Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also File:Tommy Ekman - baryton.jpg + (crop) File:Konsertbild.jpg = taken from (example) https://www.facebook.com/EKTproduktion/photos/a.257201167643371.80548.201001133263375/257201194310035/?type=3&theater (2011)
Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status considering taken from multiple (so far I could check: unfree) sources, needing multiple COM:OTRS-permissions. For tagged "own works" (2x) = unlikely, small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also File:Вожега.jpg (16.07.2016) = grabbed from (false claim of authorship/license/etc.) /http://www.panoramio.com/photo/22503394 (2009, CC BY 3.0 by "Сергей Зубов").
- File:Вандыш.jpg
- File:Станция Фоминская 2.jpg
- File:Станция Фоминская 1.jpg
- File:Станция Мелентьевский.jpg
- File:Подюга Вид на Коношу.jpg
- File:Подюга Вид на Вельск.jpg
- File:Станция Подюга.jpg
- File:Станция Вересово.jpg
- File:Ерцево старая.jpg
- File:Ерцево новая.jpg
- File:Паровоз-памятник Л-1273.jpg
- File:Вожега.jpg
- File:Сухона (станция), Вологодская область, 1.jpg
- File:Станция Коноша 1.jpg
,_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C,_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope, Unused personal file. Please also delete all other files of this user, same reason: Special:ListFiles/Rahul_Raj_Hockey Xgeorg (talk) 07:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahul Raj Hockey Wallpaper.JPG --Xgeorg (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at trwiki. Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Med Ben Marzouk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Med Ben Marzouk (serial copyright violator) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 07:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michał Toczyski (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Michał Toczyski (file cropper), with similar copyvios related to pl:NEO, a Polish band.
Gunnex (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
For some reason, this file was not uploaded correctly (horizontal bars appeared on the photo). I will retry after deletion of this one. Ville de Canet-en-Roussillon (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Il n'est pas nécessaire d'attendre une suppression. Il vous suffit de verser dès maintenant la bonne version de l'image en utilisant la fonction «Importer une nouvelle version de ce fichier», si vous utilisez l'interface en français, ou «Upload a new version of this file», si vous utilisez l'interface en anglais. (Par ailleurs, dans le champ «auteur» de la page de description, il faudrait indiquer le nom de l'auteur, la personne physique qui a créé l'image (ou anonyme, si cette personne ne veut pas être identifiée). Dans presque tous les pays, une ville ne peut pas, juridiquement, être l'auteur, bien qu'une ville puisse dans certains cas posséder des droits d'auteur, ce qui n'est pas la même chose qu'être l'auteur. Aussi, les informations sur l'auteur sont importantes pour le calcul de la durée des droits d'auteur, peu importe qui détient ces droits.) -- Asclepias (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Nous avons tenté de ré-uploader la meme image avant sa suppression (avec un nom different), cela n'a pas été possible sous prétexte.que cette image existait déjà sur WikiCommons. Concernant l'auteur des photos, ces photos sont produites par les différents membres du personnel du service de communication de la ville et les photos sont ainsi toujours créditées au nom de la ville, jamais au profit d'une personne physique (rien ne permet d'ailleurs de savoir quel photographe a pris spécifiquement quelle photo). Comment faudrait-il alors les créditer ? "Anonyme pour la Ville de Canet-en-Roussilon" ? Cordialement, Ville de Canet-en-Roussillon (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Sankoswal (talk) 08:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Sankoswal (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped (2x identical). Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook.
Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharm neha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, uploaded on 16./17.07.2016. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook, like File:Neelum Saran Gour 2016.jpg = grabbed & cropped from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1256396391038372&set=pb.100000040686659.-2207520000.1468916628.&type=3&theater (03.07.2016).
Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, photoshopped, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:AnFritzAn (with similar copyvios)
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-5.png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-4у.png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-21 (2).png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-7ВМ.png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-7.png
- File:Противогаз детский ПДФ.png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-9 с МГУ.png
- File:Противогаз гражданский ГП-9 с МАГ-3.png
- File:ШМП.png
- File:Лицевая часть "Бриз-4301 (ППМ)".png
- File:Бриз-4301 (ППМ).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 08:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
don't think that copyright situation (description is "English: Copyright of the picture: UET Centre") is ok Albinfo (talk) 08:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete... and also File:Partnerët .jpg (reupload). Gunnex (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.preistrend.de/img/art/152429.jpg McZusatz (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Polarlys (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Unknown copyright status; uploader's public domain rationale is too informal. John of Reading (talk) 08:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
description says, that copyright is with Universiteti European i Tiranës Albinfo (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
copyright protected content from http://president.al/?page_id=73 Albinfo (talk) 08:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Movie screenshot —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image 213.87.156.20 09:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license here means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 09:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Wrong name space. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 10:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
1950s isn't old enough for France. Yann (talk) 10:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
1950s isn't old enough for France. Yann (talk) 10:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Postcard, not own work. No permission. Yann (talk) 10:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Mistake please delete Silvia Mesquida (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request on upload date and likely a copyright violation. --JuTa 23:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
The postcard is signed, and is probably more from the 1950s. No permission. Yann (talk) 10:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- The former lighthouse was built in 1860 and destroyed in 1944!--Spendeau (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
"Own work"? Apparent breach of copyright of book publisher/designer. PamD (talk) 10:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
"Own work"? Apparent breach of copyright of book publisher/designer. PamD (talk) 10:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
"Own work"? Apparent breach of copyright of book publisher/designer. PamD (talk) 10:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlike to be own work. According to this, it was taken in 1926. LMLM (talk) 10:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC) Es una imatge que posa l'estat que estava en els anys 1926, i el estat que es troba actualment, per aquest motiu no crec que s'hagi de suprimir, salutacions casimiro Mi non espic Inglis
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The source and validity of license is unclear, given the age of the image and the Flickr user's habit of scanning old postcards etc. --ghouston (talk) 11:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Just text. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted Logo Nahid.rajbd (talk) 11:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Just text. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Not useful. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 11:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dated April 07, 1930 at [3]. I think it would still be in copyright in the US, since it wouldn't have been public domain in the UK in 1996, and even if published in 1930 the US term would be 95 years. If kept, a better version without getty label can be found at [4]. --ghouston (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
![[4]](https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5904/135322351.50/0_80ae5_3cae93ec_XL.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AnnamalIHM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising, unused personal images, no quite notable peoples, promotional content : out of scope (if the file are kept, then delete at least the duplicates)
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 26.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 27.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 25.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 24.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 22.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 23.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 20.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 21.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 19.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 18.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 17.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 16.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 15.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 14.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 13.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 12.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 9.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 11.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 10.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 8.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 6.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 7.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 5.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 4.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 3.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 2.jpg
- File:ANNAMAL INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT 1.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
obviously not own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This is my own work. This is a part of my Engineering Thesis klim5555
- From where comes the aerial photography? who have the copyright on it? Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- http://www.geoportal.gov.pl - It is free for non-commercial educational use. klim5555
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
By Bill Brandt, 1904 - 1983, not public domain and not own work by Flickr user. --ghouston (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The description even helpfully says "This is a Bill Brandt photograph from 1938". (Yes, that's Bill Brandt.) Delete. -- Hoary (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Anthropocene2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]modern artwork, no permissions from the artist(s)
- File:Evariste Richer, Sunday the turtle, 2016.jpg
- File:Claudio Parmiggiani, Senza titolo, 2016.jpg
- File:Hreinn Fridfinnsson, Forever. Yours and Mine, 2014.jpg
- File:Leon Vranken, Continued composition I, 2016.jpg
- File:Chaim Van Luit, 930°c, 2014.jpg
- File:Maarten Vanden Eynde, End game, 2015.jpg
- File:Thu Van Tran, From green to orange, 2014.jpg
- File:José Maria Sicilia, El instante, 2015.jpg
- File:Kelly Schacht, Untitled, 2013.jpg
- File:Fabrice Samyn, Who carries atlas?, 2015.jpg
- File:Tania Pérez Cordova, Untitled (Universe), 2014.jpg
- File:Jorge Méndez Blake, Structure on Ceboruco Volcano III, 2013, Colour pencil on paper 205 x 145 cm (framed).jpg
- File:Benoît Maire, Peinture de nuages, 2015.jpg
- File:Nicolas Lamas, Parallel Worlds, 2016.jpg
- File:Filip Gilissen, Say No To Normal, 2015 Digital print on paper and brass gold frame 110 x 80 cm (framed).jpg
- File:Lieven De Boeck, Meter 5- Knot 1, 2015.jpg
- File:Susan Collis, Try Again, 2013.jpg
- File:Sarah Bostwick, Mayes Lumber, 2013.jpg
- File:Ignasi Aballi, Red Joyce, 2014.jpg
- File:Adam HENRY, View of the exhibition "Repetition (Repetition)", 2015 - 2015.jpg
,_2014.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%22,_2015_-_2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic images, out of scope
- File:81. TA DS.png
- File:80. TA be.png
- File:79. mecha troll.png
- File:78. headHUD Mk 11.png
- File:77. snake.png
- File:76. CZ monkey.png
- File:75. CZ goat.png
- File:74. chloe's fabulous hair.png
- File:73. brain jar.png
- File:72. studded specs gold.png
- File:71. sobek.png
- File:70. robotic chicken.png
- File:69. reality augmentors.png
- File:68. ramses.png
- File:67. pumpkin.png
- File:66. juggernaut helm.png
- File:65. hydro helm.png
- File:64. horus.png
- File:63. grim reaper.png
- File:62 dweller specs.png
- File:61. dancer visor.png
- File:60. cyborg moncole.png
- File:59. anubis.png
- File:58. arm corproal helmet.png
- File:57. xenoplague mask.png
- File:56. visor of the forge.png
- File:55. trertacops.png
- File:54. trex.png
- File:53. techno turbine.png
- File:52. studded specs silver.png
- File:51. starry eyes.png
- File:50. skull full.png
- File:49. shemagh.png
- File:48. robot rancher's hat.png
- File:47. resursive soldier.png
- File:46. raptor.png
- File:45. pterdactyl.png
- File:44. pirate hat.png
- File:43. over 9000.png
- File:42. monocular visor.png
- File:41. metal underbite.png
- File:40. lawful good.png
- File:39. jungle troll.png
- File:38. jungle cap.png
- File:37. jeweler's glasses.png
- File:36. icarus helm.png
- File:35. hood of ghoul.png
- File:34. hockey mask.png
- File:33. headman's axe.png
- File:32. hat and sunglasses.png
- File:31. flight helmet.png
- File:30. desert combat helmet.png
- File:29. cybernetic implant.png
- File:28. crown of kunai.png
- File:27. cooked goose.png
- File:26. chaotic evil.png
- File:25. chuck rogers helm.png
- File:24. bunny hood.png
- File:23. bunny ears.png
- File:22. beacon energy.png
- File:21. zeppelin pilot's glasses.png
- File:20. venetian blinders.png
- File:19. scavenged icarus helm.png
- File:18. safari hat.png
- File:17. recursive android.png
- File:16. ram skull.png
- File:15. powdered water dispenser.png
- File:14. pointed hat.png
- File:13. kat hood.png
- File:12. kat ears.png
- File:10. hater blockers.png
- File:9. halfskull.png
- File:8. german headscarf.png
- File:7. DJ headphones.png
- File:6. digital camo headscarf.png
- File:5. cold turkey.png
- File:4. cleaver.png
- File:3.0 camo headscarf.png
- File:2. brainshield 2000.png
- File:1. Angel's Halo.png
- File:Boonie Cap.png
- File:Scared Bag.png
- File:Knockout Bag.png
- File:Mad Bag.png
- File:Happy Bag.png
- File:Abominable.png
- File:Abominable Snowman flair.png
- File:Gingerbread Head.png
- File:Robotic Chicken.png
- File:Nutcracker flair in GA.png
- File:Crusty the Snowman.png
- File:Nutcracker flair.png
- File:New Years Eve hat.png
- File:Candycane.png
- File:Cooked Goose.png
- File:Cold Turkey flair.png
- File:Santa Hat flair.png
- File:Reindeer Antlers flair.png
- File:Reindeer Antlers.png
- File:Christmas Lights.png
- File:Garland flair.png
- File:Cold Turkey.png
- File:Recursive Data.png
- File:Rainbow trail.png
- File:Pink Storm.png
- File:Storm jetpack trail.png
- File:Techno trail.png
- File:Cubed jeptck trail.png
- File:Rings jetpack trail.png
- File:Patriot trail.png
- File:Flames trail.png
- File:Diesel Exhaust.png
- File:Void jetpack trail.png
- File:Null Void.png
- File:Hearts trail.png
- File:Yellow trail.png
- File:White trail.png
- File:Purple trail.png
- File:Green jetpack trail.png
- File:Aqua trail for jetpack.png
- File:Season 3 Winner Type B.jpg
- File:Season 3 Winner Type A.jpg
- File:Season 3 Runner Up Type B.jpg
- File:Season 3 Runner Up Type A.jpg
- File:Season 2 Winner.jpg
- File:Season 2 Runner Up.jpg
- File:Season 2 NoHolo 2.jpg
- File:Season 2 Noholo 1.jpg
- File:Season 1 Soldier.jpg
- File:Season 1 Officer.jpg
- File:Junker's cap.png
- File:Mirrored sunglasses.png
- File:Sniper hood.png
- File:Sunglasses on robo flair.png
- File:Minotaur flair.png
- File:Metal minotaur.png
- File:Woodstocks.png
- File:Spartan helmet.png
- File:Samurai helmet for recon.png
- File:Gas mask for medic.png
- File:Barbarian helmet.png
- File:Tremor pilot.png
- File:Grim Trophy.png
- File:Elf Mask pic for wiki - Copy.png
- File:Elf Mask pic for wiki.png
- File:Bolster pic for wikipedia.jpg
- File:BurningFashion Holidaylist1.png
- File:Christmas flairs.png
ManniLo (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files by this user are suspected copyright violations taken from different sources. File:P902 Pollux ready duty ship.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/nl/eenheden/p902-pollux, File:Agusta A-109.jpg -> http://www.wingsovereurope.com/belgian%20agusta%20a-109%20gallery%201/Agusta%20A%20109%20H-37%20Ieper%202007%20(5).jpg, File:Scania T144 Heavy Transport Truck.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/fr/materiel/scania-t144-lohr-trailer-heavy-transport#slide-1-field_material_picture-900, File:A960 Godetia support ship.jpg -> https://brusselsdiplomatic.com/2015/06/24/the-belgian-navy-rescues-422-migrants-belgium-begov-italy-immigration/, File:Groundhog military vehicle.jpg -> http://lucdejaeger.smugmug.com/keyword/Light%20Utility%20Vehicle/i-fVMt7LD/A.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Airbus A321.jpg
- File:Agusta A-109.jpg
- File:M915 Aster minehunter.jpg
- File:P902 Pollux ready duty ship.jpg
- File:P901 Castor ready duty ship.jpg
- File:A960 Godetia support ship.jpg
- File:Narcis M923.jpg
- File:Lobelia M921.jpg
- File:Crocus M917.jpg
- File:Louise Marie frigate.jpg
- File:Leopold I frigate.jpg
- File:Unimog 1.9T truck.jpg
- File:Scania T144 Heavy Transport Truck.jpg
- File:Renault Kerax Tow Truck.jpg
- File:Mercedes Actros Truck.jpg
- File:Iveco Autonomous Load Carrier.jpg
- File:Groundhog military vehicle.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these files are suspected copyright violations: File:M6A2 Mine.jpg -> http://www.delcampe.net/page/item/id,0138884259,language,E.html, File:LG1 Mark II Howitzer.jpg -> http://www.canadiansoldiers.com/weapons/ordnance/lg1c1howitzer.htm, File:MILAN anti-tank missile launcher.jpg -> http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12909:fact-file-milan-precision-guided-misile&catid=79:fact-files&Itemid=159, File:Pandur I.jpg -> http://www.strategic-bureau.com/en/modernisation-des-pandur-i-autrichiens-et-belges/, File:Piranha DF90.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/fr/materiel/piranha-df90#slide-3-field_material_picture-8223. File:120 RT Mortar.jpg is watermarked copyright www.armyregocnition.com.
- File:HAFLA weapon.jpg
- File:M6A2 Mine.jpg
- File:M18 smoke grenade.jpg
- File:Mecar M93BG Grenade.jpg
- File:LG1 Mark II Howitzer.jpg
- File:M19 Mortar.jpg
- File:M1 Mortar.jpg
- File:120 RT Mortar belgian army.jpg
- File:120 RT Mortar.jpg
- File:MISTRAL anti-air missile launcher.jpg
- File:Panzerfaust 3 rocket launcher.jpg
- File:M72 LAW anti-tank rocket launcher.jpg
- File:M72 LAW rocket launcher.jpg
- File:Spike-MR.jpg
- File:MILAN anti-tank missile launcher.jpg
- File:FN40GL.png
- File:GL-1 grenade launcher.png
- File:Remington 870 shptgun.jpg
- File:M2HB machine gun.png
- File:MAG machine gun.png
- File:Minimi machine gun.png
- File:Accuracy International AX338.jpg
- File:Accuracy International Arctic Warfare.jpg
- File:SCAR-H PR sniper rifle.png
- File:SCAR-H Rifle.jpg
- File:SCAR-L rifle.jpg
- File:F2000 rifle.jpg
- File:FNC rifle.jpg
- File:P90 submachine gun.jpg
- File:GP 9mm.png
- File:Five Seven.png
- File:Pandur I.jpg
- File:Piranha DF90.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)
[edit]Belgian military official images. No proof of free license claim.
- File:Jankel FOX.png
- File:Pandur I.jpg
- File:Piranha DF90.jpg
- File:P902 Pollux.jpg
- File:A960 Godetia.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo, not in use. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belgium Stefan4 (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: As creator - fair enough, I didn't know about the Belgian FOP rules. Miyagawa (talk) 18:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
This is not placed permanently in a public place, so it is not acceptable under Belgian FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 12:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I thought this had already been deleted. Miyagawa (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not placed permanently in a public place, so it is not acceptable under Belgian FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 12:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This is 'own work' in the sense that the person has probably made the picture himself, but its sole intension is to show the logo, which is copyrighted. This is not a matter of freedom of panorama. Woodcutterty (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- The logo is permanently installed in a public space, and it is shown in its environment (on a wall) which makes it a valid case of Freedom Of Panorama. Zanaq (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Belgium (nl:Wakken) has no freedom of panorama, so I'm afraid that settles the question, regardless of the other considerations. The next move would then be to find a similar sign in The Netherlands, which does have an exemption for works permanently displayed in a public place... Pbech (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of the fact that this was made in Belgium, but that indeed settles the question. About your last remark: it's not only a matter of being permanently in place, the question is also if it is meant to be permanently in place. The freedom of panorama is actually reserved for things like statues and bridges, not for plaquettes. Woodcutterty (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware as well: this does settle the question, no objections to (speedy) delete. And the difference between statues, reliefs, tiles and plaquettes seems a bit arbitrary. Zanaq (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed, that restriction does not seem to be in Dutch law - but I'm not familiar with relevant court rulings here. In this case, it would seem to fall under "graveer- en andere plaatwerken", it would seem to be intended to be put on the wall of a shop in a public space (where else would one put this kind of plaque?) and it would seem to be intended to remain there 'permanently' (which does not mean 'forever'): it's made of metal, not paper, and it's quite permanently affixed to the wall. One might argue whether enough of its surroundings is visible (though there is no requirement that the object cannot be the principal subject of the picture). Anyway, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. Pbech (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware as well: this does settle the question, no objections to (speedy) delete. And the difference between statues, reliefs, tiles and plaquettes seems a bit arbitrary. Zanaq (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of the fact that this was made in Belgium, but that indeed settles the question. About your last remark: it's not only a matter of being permanently in place, the question is also if it is meant to be permanently in place. The freedom of panorama is actually reserved for things like statues and bridges, not for plaquettes. Woodcutterty (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Belgium (nl:Wakken) has no freedom of panorama, so I'm afraid that settles the question, regardless of the other considerations. The next move would then be to find a similar sign in The Netherlands, which does have an exemption for works permanently displayed in a public place... Pbech (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Belgium Lymantria (talk) 07:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
The Belgian FOP requires that the works should be placed in a public place. The uploader wrote that this is in a beverage store ("drankenhandel"). This is probably not a public place. BrightRaven (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- No, the uploader wrote "by", which means "near" and not "in". Romaine (talk) 00:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Bij does not always mean near. See the second definition in this dictionary: "in het huis, het land enz. van: vergaderen bij de voorzitter", which means "in the house, the country, etc. of: to meet at the president's home". (Same in wikt:nl:bij#Voorzetsel: "op de plaats behorende tot" = "in a place belonging to".) So, it is very unclear if this photograph was shot in a public place (and it is also the case even if bij means near). Per COM:PRP, we should delete it. BrightRaven (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Most of the file is corrupt. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 13:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Corrupt and out of scope.--100.36.171.168 22:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete La imagen viola los derechos de la persona fotografiada que solicita expresamente su borrado 213.4.43.124 13:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This picture has been voted as an excellent picture in the WP:EN project plus: This image has been selected as a Selected picture at the Portal Japan on English Wikipedia. The decision is very clear then: KEEP IT! GeoTrinity (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This is not placed permanently in a public place, so it is not acceptable under Belgian FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photograph Oxyman (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
i want to delete this page Dastingrozay (talk) 14:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
i want this delete Dastingrozay (talk) 14:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.5thround.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/UFCDanielCormier.gif. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Looks like modern edition. Will be good idea to use historical one. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Highestever (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:この謄本は、原戸籍の原本と相違ないことを認証する。.pdf
- File:Birth certificate of Chiune Sugihara.jpg
- File:Chiune Sugihara with his son Nobuki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Highestever (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents and photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. Video is wrong format for documents.
- File:Verdict-20161117.ogg
- File:杉原千畝の出生届が受附入籍とある。.png
- File:Chiune visiting his son in Israel in December 1969.jpg
- File:Family Registry of Chiune Sugihara.jpg
- File:SugiharaStreetNetanya.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep They are copies of a family registry which does not satisfy the originality. It should be tagged with {{PD-text}}.
- Keep This is a notarial deed issued by the local government, not a copyrighted work. --さかきばらたいら (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Genuine document. ----2A02:1810:3924:6F00:C48B:78BD:AE07:FB3A 07:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- File:Chiune visiting his son in Israel in December 1969.jpg
- KeepThe photo was taken by the author and belong to the author. No copy right to anybodyelse.
- File:Verdict-20161117.ogg
- Keep It is the Verdict issued in public by the court of Justice, Tokyo district on Novemver 17, 2016.
- Delete It's not just a judgement. It includes explanation that holds copyright. Keep Withdrew vote for deletion; Keep as per Highestever. Darklanlan (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is a judgment sentence issued by the District Court of Japan, not a copyrighted work.--さかきばらたいら (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This file is the same situation with File:東京地方裁判所-平成27年 ワ 第13982号遺言無効確認請求事件判決文.ogg. It contains a nonpublic address. It should be deleted per the privacy violation. Darklanlan (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Darklanlan (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Privacy violation
[edit]Chiura Sugihara is a famous person but his family is not. These images contain names of his family and address. They would violate their offspring's privacy. See the discussion at w:ja:Wikipedia:井戸端/subj/杉原千畝の「手記」原稿を撮影した画像について. Darklanlan (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I agree to the requester. These images are the family register (Japanese "Koseki Touhon") of Chiune Sugihara.There are strict rules on browsing and copying of Japanese family register, and we can not confirm the permission of publication.--Rienzi (talk) 02:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Chiune Sugihara's Families who died already do not have privacy right. On the contrary, there is doubt about birthplaces that infringe publicity rights of celebrities, I understand that there was circumstance to post this image for the purpose of clarifying the fact. --さかきばらたいら (talk) 07:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @さかきばらたいら: Why didn't you participate in the discussion on Wikipedia. You must have received notification in your talk page, but it seems you've never asked it. Darklanlan (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I am the only remaining living son of Chiune Sugihara. I posted it as the proof of my father's birth place since there were many forged stories written in this Wikipedia about my father for some own benefit by the 3rd person. This birth registry would not violate our privacy (it has been shown in TV reportage already), instead it helps to disclose the truth. I care that only the truth of my father is told or informed in public as history. --Highestever (talk) 08:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Highestever: 今一度、w:ja:Wikipedia:井戸端/subj/杉原千畝の「手記」原稿を撮影した画像について#「戸籍謄本」等についてにお越し頂き、これらの画像についてご説明を頂きたいと思います。--Rienzi (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Highestever: これは失礼しました。ですが、この場ではあなたが確実に杉原千畝の権利相続人であることを確認することができません。お手数ですが、Commons:OTRS/jaをお読みになった上でコモンズのボランティアチームとメールでご連絡下さい。 (Excuse me, but we cannot determine you are definitely his son or heir. Please read Commons:OTRS/ja and send an e-mail to volunteer team.) Darklanlan (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment "The problem of Mr. Chiune Sugihara's birthplace" is not officially fixed yet at present. As for this problem, academic conclusion by scholars has not come out yet. In addition, This problem is causing intense controversy between the two groups,"NPO Sugihara" and NPO Sugihara Visas of life. This case is abuse of publicity right. These images are used for the purpose of using one of the parties to the controversy. Wikimedia should not be complicit in the dispute between the two groups. --Rienzi (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete関係者であろうが戸籍謄本をサイトで公開するのは無神経としか言いようが無い。存続は100%無い。--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment See also a related discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:杉原千畝氏の戸籍の出生についての記載.jpg. Darklanlan (talk) 03:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment English: Family register is notarized - that is, it is a system to prove the facts publicly, and it is legitimate right of right holder to disclose it. There is no illegality here.日本語: 日本の戸籍は「公証」―つまり事実を公に証明するための制度であり，それを公開することも権利者の正当な権利です。ここには何の違法性もありません。--さかきばらたいら (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: the family registry -- except for people such as Barak Obama, for whom the birth certificate was of signifigance, we do not keep public birth and family records such as these. We do not keep documents in ogg form. I have kept the two photos. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Video clip. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical struture: there is an extra methyl group on the phenyl ring. Also, buggy display. Alternatives are available in Category:Benzphetamine. Ed (Edgar181) 14:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Belson 303 (talk · contribs)
[edit]What is copyrights status of money in Honduras?
- File:20 Lempiras updated.jpg
- File:50 lempiras updated.jpg
- File:New 50 Lempiras.jpg
- File:50 lempira better.pdf
- File:New 50 lempiraS.jpg
- File:Honduras-50-lempiras.jpg
- File:Honduras20lempiraspolymer.jpg
- File:Lempira-500.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical struture: there is an extra methyl group on the phenyl ring. Alternatives are available in Category:Benzphetamine. Ed (Edgar181) 14:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete unused private artwork Euku:⇄ 14:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Some design made by the author of the file. A better attitude could be first to explain the person how to do things in Commons. If I knew myself (I almost only load my own pictures), I would have done so. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- This does not change anything. Good luck by explaining it to the masses... --Euku:⇄ 15:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, I cast a deletion vote since this is out of scope. This is an individual deletion review and process, pure and simple, I'm sorry. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- * Me too. --E4024 (talk) 06:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete +1. --Rôtkæppchen68 22:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manuelgonzac (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete unused private artwork Euku:⇄ 14:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete total bullshit. --88.64.106.160 15:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep file installs cat drawing 5.46.133.242 19:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I cast a deletion vote. No evidence for cat drawing. And even if ... GeoTrinity (talk) 01:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Ohne projektbezogenen Mehrwert. --Rôtkæppchen68 22:16, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Nan Chiau Girls' High Under Construction 1968.jpg
- File:Nan Chiau Girls' High School 1950s.jpg
- File:Nan Chiau Girls' High 1974.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Rien ne permet d'affirmer que ce document est effectivement sous une licence libre, besoin d'une autorisation de l'entreprise Shev123 (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This template is not useful any more, since Belgium has FOP now. BrightRaven (talk) 15:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Outdated.--100.36.171.168 15:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. According to http://www.eater.com/2015/8/17/9163569/cannoli-recipe-history-boston-sicily this image was taken by Chris Coe. Unclear if uploader has the rights to upload it to Commons under the present license. Takeaway (talk) 15:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We have better images without these personal poses for Churchgate. This serves no educational purpose, uploaded only because it has a compatibe licene l —SpacemanSpiff 15:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
image licensing status is unverifiable; it was copied from one of the subject's own social media profiles, with no indication given there that the image was actually released CC as the uploader claims here. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redirect isn't used anywhere Johamar (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Appears like a resume or a poorly written Article for Wikipedia. Not on commons scope. Reguyla (talk) 16:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
another nonsense contribution by this user - not of any encyclopedic use Denniss (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
It cannot be deleted for this reason because editing is restricted! Go!Mario (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Text only page, no apparent educational utitlity. Date is obviously wrong. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation, the file is not based on the map but is the file itself (with colors edited), used with no license. *original link MaryroseB54 (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also i suspect this file has been deleted multiple times but has simply been uploaded again and again. MaryroseB54 (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MichaelKoddebusch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be copyvio.
- File:Bildschirmfoto 2016-04-13 um 08.36.12.png
- File:PlanetDiscoverer4.jpg
- File:PlanetDiscoverer3.jpg
- File:PlanetDiscoverer2.jpg
- File:PlanetDiscoverer1-1 .jpg
Reguyla (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted logo -- GB fan 17:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Highly distorted version of File:Flag of Greece.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of Greece.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Wrong proportions and colours. SVG available as File:Flag of Italy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of Italy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
SVG available as File:Flag of Russia (1991-1993).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia (1991-1993).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Highly distorted version of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Wrong proportions and colours. SVG available as File:Flag of Belgium.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of Belgium.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Rssäl₰ 17:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Wrong proportions and colours. SVG available as File:Flag of France.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of France.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Wrong proportions and colours. SVG available as File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality duplicate of File:Flag of the Netherlands.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio http://my.clevelandclinic.org/locations_directions/Regional-Locations/marymount-hospital Rssäl₰ 17:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
site de l'auteur encore en vie [5] ; source mentionné dans le fichier: [6] Pour ce site vaut tous droits réservés, copyright 2016. Havang(nl) (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
-2016-07-19T17:46:00.000Z-File:POSTE-1987-19.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
I doubt this is own work; may be below the originality threshold? Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of Arms of the Russian Federation.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of Arms of the Russian Federation.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Plenus Studio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 18:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Pakistani Army.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Le fichier contient la mention source et auteur Société des Amis d'Henri Pourrat ; il me semble que la licence n'est pas correcte ou pas assez prouvée correcte par l'utilisateur qui a télechargé le fichier. Havang(nl) (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
-2016-07-19T18:15:00.000Z-File:LOGO_HP_4.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page. Per res (720px) probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Serious possibility of copyvio, given the other uploads by the user, blocked on en.wp, and the absence of metadata. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Enveloppe éditée pour le centenaire d'Henri Pourrat (1887-1959). Illustration de P.Albuisson.jpg
[edit]._Illustration_de_P.Albuisson.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Illustration_de_P.Albuisson.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo d'un oeuvre d'art d'artiste toujours en vie. Copyvio, sauf si User:Lugi75014 est l'artiste fr:Pierre Albuisson. Havang(nl) (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Better evidence would be required for the claims of authorship and of copyright ownership by the uploader. The National Portrait Gallery attributes the photograph to Camera Press [7]. The claim of a 2016 photograph is also unlikely, given that the subject has been dead since 1986. The NPG suggests circa 1962. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I challenge the eduicational usability. This picture has a bad quality (blur due to a dirty lens), is not the largest by today's standards and does not compare well to other images in Category:Chevrolet Caprice (second generation), e.g. File:1973 Chevrolet Convertible (9310163986).jpg. I don't see a need to actually encourage a careless discharging of shitty pictures in Commons taken without any care to the used devices and without any thinking about making good results. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, as per nom. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The lens haze is actually improvable to a significant- but not complete- extent using a wide-radius unsharp mask filter and level adjustment. Examples of this can be seen here and here. I've fixed quite a few of Bull-Doser's uploads with this problem in the past.
However, I recently came to the conclusion that this was (wrongly) validating the acceptability of uploading images that could- and should- not have had this problem in the first place. A problem that could have been fixed in seconds by the photographer rather than minutes by another user- that's assuming they have the time and inclination to fix the issue in the first place rather than leaving us with the original bunch of hazy uploads.*
@Bull-Doser: 's recent uploads seem to have had an unacceptably high proportion of such images. As far as this user's new uploads are concerned, if I think an image is otherwise valuable enough (i.e. no other examples of subject), I might consider fixing the haze if possible, but I'm otherwise now in favour of deletion of this and similar images.
* I was going to say see my recent comments at the Village Pump for more on this... but I notice Grand-Duc (i.e. the nominator here) has actually replied to that- I don't know if that was coincidence or not! Ubcule (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amy Matysio au Comiccon de Montréal 2016.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bas au Belmont.jpg. Note also the standard of images in user's recent uploads, particularly those of people, which are often blurry, unusably dark (and killed by smartphone NR) or suffer horribly from colour-channel clipping in the highlights. I appreciate this user's efforts, but their (lack of) quality control depositors ridiculous. Ubcule (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- No coincidence, your posting at the VP indeed enticed me to this DR. We truly have a common way of thinking concerning this kind of contributions, I actually successfully proposed for deletion e.g. some badly named images sourced in an Indian WLE project, with a similar rationale as here: while I'm fully enclined to fix nice additions to our media repository (rare subjects, nicely composed stills, unique scenes) using Photoshop, some languages skills to improve the description or the renaming right, I find it dickish to discharge curating tasks on people that aren't in a position of knowledge about the circumstances of the imaging as good as the uploader's. Bad images kind of "dilute" the abundance of the more useful ones, reducing the quality of Commons, which is the background of my frequent usage of the harsh instrument of a deletion request. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- We're in agreement on the descriptions issue as well. I've nominated several images that may well have been useful *if* the background and content had been made clearer... but it hadn't. And it's much harder- if not impossible- for others to figure out what the uploader could- and should- have known, and unreasonable to *expect* them to do that.
- The same reasoning applies to licensing. I've seen images tagged as "own work" that clearly aren't, but are probably public domain due to age. Unfortunately, that's something the uploader should have known, and much harder for others to know for sure. The onus is *not* on others to guess the correct license that the uploader should have specified; but nor is it upon them to leave an image in place if it's obviously not licensed correctly. Ubcule (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- No coincidence, your posting at the VP indeed enticed me to this DR. We truly have a common way of thinking concerning this kind of contributions, I actually successfully proposed for deletion e.g. some badly named images sourced in an Indian WLE project, with a similar rationale as here: while I'm fully enclined to fix nice additions to our media repository (rare subjects, nicely composed stills, unique scenes) using Photoshop, some languages skills to improve the description or the renaming right, I find it dickish to discharge curating tasks on people that aren't in a position of knowledge about the circumstances of the imaging as good as the uploader's. Bad images kind of "dilute" the abundance of the more useful ones, reducing the quality of Commons, which is the background of my frequent usage of the harsh instrument of a deletion request. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amy Matysio au Comiccon de Montréal 2016.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bas au Belmont.jpg. Note also the standard of images in user's recent uploads, particularly those of people, which are often blurry, unusably dark (and killed by smartphone NR) or suffer horribly from colour-channel clipping in the highlights. I appreciate this user's efforts, but their (lack of) quality control depositors ridiculous. Ubcule (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Most likely not own work, but downloaded from http://freestylemaniacs.com/freestyle-maniacs-team/ Take Mirrenberg (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support The uploader doesn't seem to be the same person as mentioned as author in Exif data: Daan van Oossanen. Mbch331 (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Tiny diagrams of no obvious utility, Out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:PLANO DL ELECTROIMAN.png
- File:Filtro ( ioniza el agua y la filtra).png
- File:CULTKIT 3.png
- File:Riego de goteo casero.png
- File:COSTE DE INICIO.xlsx.pdf
- File:Documento 2.1 culki.pdf
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
If this image really is 1963, I question whether the uploader took it or not. Please provide more information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mharfouche (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these portraits. Metadata from multiple cameras, widely varying sizes, titles, etc. Highly unlikely to be own work and more likely COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Aziz Abaza.jpg
- File:Stefan Winter 2.jpg
- File:Stefan Helmut Winter.jpg
- File:Bilal Alaily.jpg
- File:Part of the grant Saadoun Hamada attend the Legion d'honneur ceremony.JPG
- File:Saadoun Hamade'.jpg
- File:Mere Alli Harfush 2.png
- File:Jaafar El- Mohajer.jpg
- File:Abdallah Alayli 03.jpg
- File:Abdallah Alayli 02.jpg
- File:Abdallah Alayli 01.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mharfouche (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claims of own work on these older drawings, which - with proper information - might be able to be kept.
- File:Emir Ali.pdf
- File:Jahjah Harfoush.pdf
- File:Chdid Harfoush.jpg
- File:خنجر حرفوش.pdf
- File:Emir Ahmad& Taymour Pasha.jpg
- File:Emir Ahmad.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, looks like a TV screenshot. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Licence tag does not seem to be propper, see http://www.diblikphoto.com/Pravni-dolozky.html Gumruch (talk) 19:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Misleading data. non-competitive and mixed are synonyms with regards to Double -reciperical plots. missing a plot for uncompetitive inhibition (which has same slopes but different Y-intercepts). 2610:130:105:101:6001:8ED0:AD2D:4736 20:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 613.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 379.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 107.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 407.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Tiny image of the flag of the US. Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplictae of File:Flag of the United States.svg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:Military Flag of the United States.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:United States civil flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:United States civil flag.svg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:United States civil flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The source is a Youtube video, the 1993 music video of "Mr Vain" by eurodisco group Culture Beat who is not freely licensed, nor is this a screen shot from the video. Thuresson (talk) 20:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Unknown painter from an unknown year, despite this public domain status is claimed. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
partial copy of map that was scanned without being unfolded in the work "Last of the Tasmanians". Replaced with alternate version in better file format File:Map of Tasmania (Last of the Tasmanians).png — billinghurst sDrewth 21:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I don't remember uploading this though I remember reading the book on which it is based - the replacement is certainly more detailed if a little fuzzy and as this image isn't used, I have no objection to its deletion. Chris55 (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
El archivo ya existe: NWCROSS Arg SergioCarp (talk) 21:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Portrait painting by Russian-English painter Varvara Neiman who is a very active professional, at least on her Facebook page. Thuresson (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
University logo contributed by an uploader with a user name that is also the name of a known degree mill. English Wikipedia has no listing of a university in California called "California Southwest University", hence out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 21:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Painting by Brazilian expressionist painter Afrânio Pessoa Castelo Branco, born in 1930. Thuresson (talk) 21:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Painting by Brazilian expressionist painter Afrânio Pessoa Castelo Branco, born in 1930. Thuresson (talk) 21:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Painting by Brazilian expressionist painter Afrânio Pessoa Castelo Branco, born in 1930. Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
No verifiable source for the photos used. Based on the extremely low resolution and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations with false authorship claims, including collages consisting entirely of other people's work passed off as the uploader's own work, this is very likely to be a copyright violation. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
I think otrs verification should be made, since it was previously published https://www.foeeurope.org/yfoee/wrap-up-climate-poznan Vera (talk) 22:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Very low resolution. Upload history from this user doesn't inspire confidence
Vera (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Invalid permission: not granted by the copyright holder.
- File:Italy ID 2006 (verso).jpg
- File:Italy ID 2006.jpg
- File:Spain ID 2006 (verso).jpg
- File:Spain ID 2006.jpg
- File:Slovenia ID 1998.jpeg
- File:Slovenia ID 1998 (verso).jpeg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 19:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
These images were uploaded in march 2015 without license review. In present the video is unavailable.
- File:Olga Kefalogianni 2014d cropped.jpg
- File:Olga Kefalogianni 2014d.jpg
- File:Olga Kefalogianni 2014c.jpg
- File:Olga Kefalogianni 2014b.jpg
- File:Olga Kefalogianni 2014a.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:44, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The photograph is indeed by the eminent photographer Rosalind Solomon. A quick glance suggests that it was uploaded by a user named -- whether properly or improperly -- Rosalind Solomon. It wasn't: it was uploaded by User:Mallikavora, who (as far as I can see) presented no evidence of authorization by the actual photographer and copyright holder. Hoary (talk) 22:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Ya que no cuenta con información actualizada Editorial MM (talk) 22:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Wrong image Wahbecontributor (talk) 23:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Wrong image Wahbecontributor (talk) 23:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
File uploaded in June 2015 without license review. In present the licensing is Standard Youtube License. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, I cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence/indication of cc-by license czar 21:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:André Fololo
[edit]Hi,
All André Fololo's picture seems to me out of project scope; And several could be copyright infringements. His collection consist in
- several logos of young and/or small music labels and artists (I do not believe in free corporate logos)
- File:Chathos logo.png
- File:CHATHOS COVER.png
- File:Chathos_Entertainment_logo.png
- File:Chatos&ArtSystemRecords.Logo.png
- File:ART SYSTEM COMPANY LOGO.png
- File:DSP (Digital Seis Pontos) Logo.png (on Facebook)
- File:STALLONE G OFFICIAL LOGO.png (on Facebook)
- File:Feito Pelo Strizzy Stallone logo.png (textlogo)
- File:Beat Box Menongue Logo.png (incoming december event)
- portrait of minor artists out of Wikipedias scopes
- File:STRIZZY STALLONE.jpg (on SoundCloud)
- File:White_t-shirt_strizzy.png (promotional purpose?)
- File:Strizzy.jpg
- Copyvios
- File:Booba GQ.jpg (no authorization from GQ)
- File:Booba.png: Official shot from video clip no authorization from OKLM TV, nor Booba
- File:Booba Pirate.png: Official shot already published elsewhere like on http://www.luimagazine.fr/mode-homme/soin-beaute/booba-bilan-sante/
- File:Booba Boss.jpg: Can be found on several websites like his Google+ account
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with it all and cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Test image, out of scope, and offensive 100.36.171.168 00:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, I cast a deletion vote. GeoTrinity (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 22:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in California INeverCry 23:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - 2004 statue in Ohio INeverCry 23:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in California INeverCry 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in Boston INeverCry 23:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in Boston INeverCry 23:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in Boston INeverCry 23:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in Louisiana INeverCry 23:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in California INeverCry 23:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in California INeverCry 23:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States - modern statue in California INeverCry 23:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rssäl as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://novostroy.spb.ru/company/lenspecstroj/ INeverCry 05:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
This file is practically the same as File:Flag map of Georgia.svg. I think it should be globally replaced and deleted as there is really no need for both of them. Turnless (talk) 05:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use (replace globally before DR). --Wdwd (talk) 20:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
surely this logo is a) not the work of the uploader, b) not created in 2016 for an organisation that originated in 1990 and c) is most likely copyright to the organisation itself. Ww2censor (talk) 09:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm a member of the Ayelet association and I've built their AYELET official site (mentioned at the External Links paragraph). My name is written at the footer of the site as the site builder. You can see their logo at their "NOSON" publication vol. 50-51 (1/12/1998). Therefore, the logo should not be kept and used. Rbarash (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm afraid this photograph of two posters is derived (partly) from a non-free work (i.e. the poster) and is therefore unsuitable for Wikimedia Commons. Mathonius (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- There's also no freedom of panorama in Belgium. Mathonius (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
This is not placed permanently in a public place, so it is not acceptable under Belgian FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 12:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- keep looks permanently affixed in public to me. looks like photographic artwork with text elements to me.
- see also w:Freedom_of_panorama#Two-dimensional_works: " "permanent" typically meaning "for the natural lifetime of the work". In Switzerland, even taking and publishing images of two-dimensional works such as murals or graffiti is permitted, but such images cannot be used for the same purpose as the originals" " Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 01:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete Per the translation quoted at Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Belgium, it's apparently required that "the aim of reproduction or communication to the public is not the work itself". That does not seem to be the case here, where the image is pretty clearly intended as nothing but a replication of the copyrighted works. There is no 'context' that would allow this to be de minimis, so I don't think it's acceptable. Reventtalk 04:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reguyla as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Most of these appear to be Copyright violations that violate the fair use and sophisticated logo policy. I think some of these could be used to reverse engineer functionality of the product and I don't think they belong in Commons. Additionally, since most of these are in another language we would need to ensure the copyright from that country is met and I don't know that information myself so I am looking for additional input on whether these images meet our inclusion policy. Considering that the printer is the main subject, could be considered the Zebra logo considered de minimis? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about that one. I'll let someone else decide on that. That original statement was submitted with a fairly large group of about 85-90 images. Reguyla (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Zebra is de minimis. --Sanandros (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reguyla as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Most of these appear to be Copyright violations that violate the fair use and sophisticated logo policy. I think some of these could be used to reverse engineer functionality of the product and I don't think they belong in Commons. Additionally, since most of these are in another language we would need to ensure the copyright from that country is met and I don't know that information myself so I am looking for additional input on whether these images meet our inclusion policy. The only copyrightable element (the Zebra logo) is very distorted,maybe considered deminimis? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Zebra is de minimis. --Sanandros (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fma12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.ligaportugal.pt/oou/jornada/20162017/liganos INeverCry 05:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO. --Leyo 08:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Leyo. --Sanandros (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
image de DVD, auteur FNAC 2003 , source www.fnac.com , la licence donné pour le fichier ne me semble pas correcte. Havang(nl) (talk) 18:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
-2016-07-19T18:03:00.000Z-File:Gaspard_des_Montagnes.jpg){kind=link}
- Aussi probablement dérivée d'une image de 1965. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: il y a perspective, ce seulment une reason pour deleting. --Sanandros (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reguyla as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Most of these appear to be Copyright violations that violate the fair use and sophisticated logo policy. I think some of these could be used to reverse engineer functionality of the product and I don't think they belong in Commons. Additionally, since most of these are in another language we would need to ensure the copyright from that country is met and I don't know that information myself so I am looking for additional input on whether these images meet our inclusion policy. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if that is de minimis, because it is a pretty huge part of the pic but on the other side if you open it you just need to photograhp it.--Sanandros (talk) 20:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 01:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama for works of art in Belgium (Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Belgium) -- Deadstar (msg) 10:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Missvain (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
The Belgian FOP only covers "plastic, graphic and architectural works". Litterature is not covered. BrightRaven (talk) 12:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - it is a wall of a building, so this falls to me under architecture. Also it is not just a text, but a poem that is placed on a wall, that is not a normal form of literature, and I think that is graphic art as well. Romaine (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- This is a DW of a literary artwork (even if it includes some graphic elements), so it it not covered by Belgian FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
In the summary text, the uploader expressly forbids commercial use, in contravention of Commons licensing practices. Also, there is some doubt as to the provenance of the picture, as I can find images which are unrelated to the uploader and predate the upload by some time. cf this google search, which has images dating back to 2012 or earlier: [8] Jayron32 (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
===============
[edit]
There is no image similar to mine dating back to 2012. This image is mine, in which I can provide the photoshop screenshots. I forbid commercial use because the licensing practices state you have to give credit, if people fail to adhere to the licensing I can revoke it. "Attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)." "The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms." "Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license" Due to the overwhelming amount of people stealing this image and not giving credit, and further copyrighting it as theirs; I am forbidding commercial use of this image. Please show me where you found "similar" images to mine as the ones you reference are nothing like mine. -mrkoww
- Wikimedia Commons does not allow people who upload images to forbid their commercial use. See Commons:Licensing "Media licensed under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted either." You're allowed to license your image however you want, however if you want to license it under non-commercial use, you cannot upload it and host it on WMF sites. --Jayron32 (talk) 23:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the link to the Google Image search turns up several hundered similar images, many of which date back to 2012. --Jayron32 (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
You need to re-read the licenses. Due to the mass amount of people using this image without giving credit and linking back to the licenses I can revoke it. If Wikimedia has a problem with it they can remove the image. It clearly states if people fail to utilize it properly I can revoke; if Wikimedia wants me to change the wording in my description then I will but until that time I am leaving it. Lastly you have no clue what you're talking about. This exact image is mine, hence how I hold the copyright. I don't own the whole thin blue line images, just this exact one. If you went to the pages that had this exact image you would notice they give credit to "mrkoww / wikimedia commons". You're on here stirring up problems without even knowing what you're doing, especially as an admin. -Mrkoww
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 01:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
SVG exists with no errors. Error in a name that cannot be fixed with photoshop (Lyncestae is written as Lyncentsae), various other errors that make it unusable like mixing Slavic era names (Trebenishet, Gevgheli) with ancient names and so on, same in some rivers. MaryroseB54 (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Why we don't keep it as history?--Sanandros (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No indication of license at source (which is below summary template). Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hi! The licence was fixed, it is a photo taken by the user of a gigantography at the museum. Thanks! --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 23:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, Mauricio V. Genta but the way you have it now, you have been dead for 70 years, which doesn't seem possible. You have provided no information about the date of the original photograph, nor who created it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed it, the author is anonymous, the photo in the exposition is part of the museum archive. I changed the licence to "PD-AR-Photo", the hotel closed in 1953 so it is on public domain. --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 01:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of some object or poster, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I'm a member of the cultural society responsible for opening and guarding the byzantine church described here. The photo is from the stand outside the church, it was drawn by the architects of the archaeology department who restored the church. It is in public view and we were given permission to use it in the information flyers we printed as well, which are distributed to visitors of the monument. I have no idea how to site it correctly here as it doesnt come from a book or a copyrighted site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kategiam (talk • contribs)
@Kategiam: could you send an mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so we can approve that fact?--Sanandros (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 01:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather 'professional'-looking small-sized format, but missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content. btw: if interested please also check related uploads, thx for your opinions, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This was provided to me by one of friends which being taken by his friend's mobile cam. Kindly clarify why do you demanding for the deletion Usamuba (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete --> grabbed https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1019527248136668&set=a.501228406633224.1073741826.100002382064673&type=3&theater (06.2016, © by Shameerfaizi Kottoppadam, identical
Original Transmission Reference). Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Usamuba. Gunnex (talk) 18:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Gunnex. --INeverCry 01:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
