Commons:Deletion requests/File:東京地方裁判所-平成27年 ワ 第13982号遺言無効確認請求事件判決文.ogg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Video is wrong format for documents. Also unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep This is a judgment sentence issued by the District Court of Japan, not a copyrighted work.
- There are much better formats for such purposes which allow more convenient reading. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete This is a judgment document of a Japanese civil trial. The problem with this document is not copyright infringement, it is privacy infringement. The address and name of both plaintiff and defendant are written in this document. For this reason, there is a possibility that the plaintiff and the defendant's privacy will be infringed. In Japan, The Code of Civil Procedure has the following provisions. "Article 91 (1) Any person may make a request to a court clerk for the inspection of a case record." However, this Article doesn't permit the disclosure of case records to unspecified majority. Essentially, only admits browsing.--Rienzi (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)- Keep This is a judgment sentence issued by the District Court of Japan, which means it is shown in public at Tokyo district court. There is no restriction disclosing court verdict in Japanese law. --Highestever (talk) 12:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment (For all administrators) The Japanese court deletes the address of the plaintiff and the defendant when uploading the judgment sentence of the civil lawsuit on the Internet. However, this file has not been deleted address. Therefore, it is obvious that this file infringes privacy.--Rienzi (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)- Delete This file ignores the privacy right. You must remove the address and name as in the first page of the file. Under Japanese law, trial records are free to view, but there is no free to copy. That is, there is a problem with uploading as it is.--アルトクール (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Rienzi and アルトクール. It should be deleted as per the privacy violation. The image contains a nonpublic address. It needs to be removed as the privacy information even if it is a judgement and disclosed at the court. Read this page. Darklanlan (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete判決正本は裁判所での閲覧以外の外部への公開が認められていません。個人情報を露出させて掲載すること自体よからぬ意図を感じます。Highestever氏に対しては個人情報漏洩行為を繰り返しているためアップロード禁止措置を検討したほうがよいレベルでしょう。--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 22:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment 判決文など訴訟記録は民事訴訟法91条3項により当事者や利害関係者は謄写を請求できます。そして裁判所の外部に出て（=民事訴訟法92条の制限を受けなかった）しまえば、あとは著作権法13条3項によりPDとなると思います。なのでhyolee2/H.L.LEE氏の指摘は過っていると思われます。もっとも個人情報が含まれる、最適な形式でないなどの理由での削除には反対しません。 -引越センター (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The file is (1) in the wrong format, and (2) unnecessarily revealing personal information of non-notable living persons. --Dwy (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The privacy question is debatable -- prseumably this is a public record. However, we do not keep documents in ogg format. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)