Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 16th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unauthorized upload and needs to be re uploaded correctly LaurenIke (talk) 02:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 04:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a free image; its author obviously never released it into the public domain. Softlavender (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Deleted: not only do we have no indication that the image was released under a free licence, but things uploaded on Facebook belong to Facebook and cannot be freely published. Rama (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Rama (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No utility 78.232.146.30 08:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use and humoristic images about Wikipedia are in scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No utility ! 78.232.146.30 09:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use and humoristic images about Wikipedia are in scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No utility ! 78.232.146.30 09:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use and humoristic images about Wikipedia are in scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the permission of Richard Orlinski is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Claimed as "own work" by uploader, but copyright stamp on image says Richard Orlinski himself. Low web resolution image. Lots of Google Images hits for a two-month old upload, with many claiming dates long before upload h...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader has copyright on this logo as it is taken from twitter The Banner (talk) 18:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence the uploader has permission to add this poster to Commons. Possible copyvio violation The Banner (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - this starts with a National Geographic title screen, but the YouTube account isn't a National Geographic account INeverCry 19:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not copyvio, the author of the account is Servaas Neijens. He is the editor of National Geographic, see http://www.nationalgeographic.nl/auteur/servaas-neijens I always check my sources :) --Hannolans (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --INeverCry 20:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. Regardless of the generic or utilitarian nature of the object represented, this sculpture of it is non-free. DMacks (talk) 20:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

DMacks (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 20:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own mistake: should be a category Tonialsa (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own mistake: should be a category Tonialsa (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image comes from panoramino http://www.panoramio.com/photo/71612326, with an attribution license; however here it is claimed as "own work" by someone completely different. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Mass deletion of pages added by Daniel Rosasssss: Copyright violation

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

закончил работу6 Avatiah (talk) 18:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders reuest, no license. --JuTa 07:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable licensing T.seppelt (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdraw --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:54, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license review failed; Wrong source; (Remark: Author on panoramio (Cherie Clark) licensed other images as cc-nc-sa) Wdwd (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As uploader, support. I was unaware it was a copyvio. MB298 (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom/discussion. For the record: source: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/35313570 license: cc-by-nc-sa-3.0. --Wdwd (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic images, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files by this user are suspected copyright violations taken from different sources. File:P902 Pollux ready duty ship.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/nl/eenheden/p902-pollux, File:Agusta A-109.jpg -> http://www.wingsovereurope.com/belgian%20agusta%20a-109%20gallery%201/Agusta%20A%20109%20H-37%20Ieper%202007%20(5).jpg, File:Scania T144 Heavy Transport Truck.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/fr/materiel/scania-t144-lohr-trailer-heavy-transport#slide-1-field_material_picture-900, File:A960 Godetia support ship.jpg -> https://brusselsdiplomatic.com/2015/06/24/the-belgian-navy-rescues-422-migrants-belgium-begov-italy-immigration/, File:Groundhog military vehicle.jpg -> http://lucdejaeger.smugmug.com/keyword/Light%20Utility%20Vehicle/i-fVMt7LD/A.

MKFI (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files are suspected copyright violations: File:M6A2 Mine.jpg -> http://www.delcampe.net/page/item/id,0138884259,language,E.html, File:LG1 Mark II Howitzer.jpg -> http://www.canadiansoldiers.com/weapons/ordnance/lg1c1howitzer.htm, File:MILAN anti-tank missile launcher.jpg -> http://www.defenceweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12909:fact-file-milan-precision-guided-misile&catid=79:fact-files&Itemid=159, File:Pandur I.jpg -> http://www.strategic-bureau.com/en/modernisation-des-pandur-i-autrichiens-et-belges/, File:Piranha DF90.jpg -> http://www.mil.be/fr/materiel/piranha-df90#slide-3-field_material_picture-8223. File:120 RT Mortar.jpg is watermarked copyright www.armyregocnition.com.

MKFI (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DomeResident (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Belgian military official images. No proof of free license claim.

MKFI (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Francoes1995

[edit]

All of these files were borrowed from the internet and are not creation of the uploader. --Soulreaper (talk) 18:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The designer33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-trivial logos and advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating (per above) also further uploads:

Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "(C) All Rights Reserved". Thuresson (talk) 13:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7lF9es1pKAI/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://a.espncdn.com/combiner/i/?img=/photo/2015/0608/soc_g_copa33_cr__1296x729.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://cnrs-gif.academia.edu/MichelNarcy. 95.27.139.211 17:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from here Diannaa (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simply look previous request Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Bgfg12. I do not believe own work. Small photo without metadata, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. На фото внизу написано "MARIA DROZD fotograf" Dogad75 (talk) 22:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, again. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a graffiti, but a mural. There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 13:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry. Better images do exist (for example File:Mur peint Bruxelle.jpg). BrightRaven (talk) 08:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by Fastily 30 May 2014, it's still a mural. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image seems to be a copyright violation. See, for example, http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article129637573/Islamische-Rebellen-in-Syrien-lehnen-Kalifat-ab.html Gabbe (talk) 09:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted gamebox cover art. MKFI (talk) 09:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Transferred from arwiki and locally uploaded in 08.2008 by ar:user:Sam2ahmad.

Considering also previously published via (examples) http://www.pakwheels.com/forums/spotting-hobbies-other-stuff/50438-worlds-largest-bridge-general-information#post759439 (2007) = http://www.pakwheels.com/forums/attachments/spotting-hobbies-other-stuff/750872d1187669940-worlds-largest-bridge-general-information-image-1-_chg_pakwheels-com-.jpg (last modified: 2007) or http://www.curiousread.com/2008/02/ten-longest-bridges-in-world.html (02.2008) = http://thecontaminated.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/king-fahd-causeway-bridge.jpg or http://s108.photobucket.com/user/iamnotanangel23/media/new%20album/216.jpg.html = http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n15/iamnotanangel23/new%20album/216.jpg~original (last modified: 04.2008) etc. Gunnex (talk) 10:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is own work: no EXIF, can be found on line (http://www.setbyus.com/media/BFlGBgKpXAk/1) BrightRaven (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads. Gts-tg (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copy from http://edgeone.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Financial-Page-1.jpg --C messier (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused autopromo, as well as File:Fallon Lobby.jpg, File:Fallon Elevator and Lobby Entry.jpg, File:We are fallon plaque.jpg Pibwl (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was published here on August 8, 2015. It was used by businessforhome.org on October 1, 2016 and used as cover photo by Forbes Magazine here in the same year. The work was published here on October 19, 2015. Since the image has been published elsewhere prior to uploading it here, the uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder of the work. All the best. (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC) Wikicology (talk) 00:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, please see example: http://cherylspelts.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2008-09-05-marty-casey-2166.jpg Cap1000 (talk) 23:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, please see: http://www.audiomack.com/song/kami-g/epic-house-mix-2015-by-dj-kami-g Cap1000 (talk) 23:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also https://www.facebook.com/ajmubasher/photos/a.163116800367729.44027.125786760767400/1296765480336183/?type=3&theater (04.2016)... Gunnex (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yemeni Civil War.png best image available Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      02:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simoaboud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Freedom of Panorama in Morocco

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in MoroccoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in MoroccoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in MoroccoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in MoroccoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in MoroccoD Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      02:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      12:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The claimed license is not stated at the image source page. Possibly close to COM:TOO, but that would need a good argument and no false claims. --99of9 (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person never mentioned in any Wikipedia, out of project scope. Poké95 02:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata. Same picture used as his official Facebook picture. Real rights unclear. We have multiple confirmed free options, anyway. Victor Lopes (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandipgoswami.nabadwip (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Poké95 03:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this not the reap Map Acidlikeb (talk) 03:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The user Acidlikeb was blocked from Wikipedia for disruptive editing. There is no good reason for deleting this map Guled2016 (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication from the information in the template that the license is correct, as it is dated 2012 and doesn't seem to be an old enough emiage to qualify for the 50 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an unused image and there is no indication that Dr. Abu-Saba gave this a free license at the source indicated, only that he provided the image to that webpage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philbous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two collages of postcards and three images of unknown source and date, all claimed as own work, but unfortunately not.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I received an email from Philbous on this topic where he claims the Postcards File:MiyeouMiyePostcard.jpg &

File:Miye ou Miye Postcard 2.jpg are his. There was no claim on the other photos. The problem is the postcards depict other works of art without any information as to who created it. The uploader has had prior situations where he has been made aware of sculptor's rights to their sculptures, and that the postcards/collage style caused at least one of these same images to be deleted already. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philbous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these small, low quality Scanned images were created by uploader: the subject matter indicates that attendance would be restricted and there is no metadata other than Scan. There is a statement about "personal photographer" and a name listed, but they were uploaded as own work, which they clearly are not.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A larger version of this is on the internet, http://selectaenlinea.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/JLT_9161-e1425709098950-700x325.jpg, http://selectaenlinea.com/2015/03/07/joseph-salterio-recibe-merecida-distincion/ March 2015. As several of user's other uploads were coped from the internet, I question the "own work" here, and note that at source Selecta Magazine ® Copyright 2015, All Rights Reserved. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FFPAAssociate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work. All of user's other uploads were copyright violations copied from the internet, and all uploads pertained to a biography of a single individual. COM:PRP.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a copyright notice that says "All rights reserved". It is clearly not freely licensed. It also is unused and could easily be replaced with a text table. KSFT (talk) 04:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Startarrant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images highly unlikely to be own work of uploader, more likely COM:COPYVIOs copied from elsewhere.

Both images are my own digital work but I may not have listed them correctly or used the wrong wizard -- there seem to be several wizards for uploading images on wiki -- these are images that are fair usage (historically no one made any income publishing or using these photos) and they have been used as the standard images for these individuals in many diverse publications world over for many years, including an e-book to which I have exclusive rights and permissions. The individuals in the photos are both now dead and there are no copyrights or incomes being made on these images. They are for common, universal informational purposes only. I was not given a way to reply prior to the Beltz note (none of the links worked). I've done what I could to correct the matter and discussed this with other wiki editors who did assist. Startarrant (talk) 23:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)startarrant[reply]

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Startarrant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence in own work by uploader for this halftoned photo, religious tract, portrait and group shot.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use, older on twitter, see https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtkP0lACIAIfXd1.jpg:large and https://twitter.com/iammar10/status/493443044503339008 Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 888e8a36 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, outside COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerber 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, small/middle size, no EXIF, all other uploads already speedy deleted

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerber 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebetluce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reproductions of modern art, a license from the artist is needed.

--ghouston (talk) 05:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 05:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ariel Villegas Gonzalez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 05:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image / no quite notable people : out of scope + derivative work issue Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license from original photographer. --ghouston (talk) 05:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private album image by a new user. Out of project scope. Rahul Bott (talk) 06:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion. No educational purpose Fixertool (talk) 06:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я загрузил это изображение по ошибке вместо другого файла Mrkhlopov (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any reason to assume this work is in the public domain 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of a work by Wim Delvoye, who is alive. No FOP in France.

BrightRaven (talk) 08:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph by an unknown photographer. No information about the original publication. Impossible to know if it is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect data (He died in 2006). Incorrect source. Incorrect author. And incorrect license. . HombreDHojalata.talk 09:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now there is FOP in Belgium and File:Grand-Place Bxl, Charles Buls.JPG is restored. BrightRaven (talk) 09:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a derivative; I doubt that this is own work Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now there is FOP in Belgium and File:Schaerbeek Parc Josaphat 805.jpg is restored. BrightRaven (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Now there is FOP in Belgium and File:Schaerbeek Parc Josaphat 805.jpg is restored. BrightRaven (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph by Heikki Tuuli, OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 09:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalbisers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images have been taken from http://kalbis.ac.id/kegiatan-kemahasiswaan/.

MKFI (talk) 09:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dies ist ein Scan aus einer Zeitschrift. Copyright geklärt? Maimaid (talk) 09:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


its ok I agree with the deletion request - best

--Jazzcarolixe (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files transferred from arwiki user Anas MED

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2013 by ar:user:Anas MED. Considering also:

Nominating also (per above) 2 files uploaded by related Commons user Anas MED (talk · contributions · Statistics):


--Gunnex (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small and unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user requested, not in use in any project KDS4444 (talk) 09:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was just a test upload, it is copyrighted by me, and is not free to use by others. Request immediate deletion. Lorenplanes (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a work by a state-level rather than federal government and does assert copyright, not PD-USGov. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Magog. --INeverCry 00:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joëlle Morin is a contemporary French painter. — Racconish ☎ 10:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joëlle Morin is a contemporary French painter.

— Racconish ☎ 10:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio via http://dardaracascade.free.fr/fr/restaurant.htm (Copyright Mahfouz© 2001-2004, wayback to 2006 available) = http://dardaracascade.free.fr/images/restaurant/carte_froid.jpg (last modified: 2004). Old enough to deserve a DR, I think. Storkk (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Related --> uploads by arwiki ar:user:Janoub:
Gunnex (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio via http://www.arabe.cl/cultura/recetas/laban.html ("Pagina creada miercoles 25 de octubre de 2006 ") = http://www.arabe.cl/comida/fotos/shanklish01.jpg (last modified: 2006, identical exif). Old enough to deserve a DR, I think, but nominator's concerns appear well-founded Storkk (talk) 10:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Related --> uploads by arwiki ar:user:Janoub:
Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Quality, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE jdx Re: 10:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the permission of Richard Orlinski is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete on basis of PCP. Even if this is uploader's own photo- and I'm highly sceptical on that count given his/her other uploads- there are limitations on photographing copyrighted works of art like this. If the photograph was taken in France, it's much stricter still. Little background provided by uploader as is often the case with copyvios. Ubcule (talk) 12:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the permission of Richard Orlinski is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Evidence that the image itself was not taken by uploader (Google Images shows widespread use for an image uploaded two months ago with claimed dates before upload here, but no comment on this by uploader). That's on top of the fact that even in countries with relatively lenient freedom of panorama, a copyrighted work of art like this would generally have to be situated permanently in a public place for free photos to be taken of it (and if this was taken in France, the rules on FoP- or lack of it- are much stricter than *that*).
In short, PCP delete unless uploader can fill in background and prove otherwise. Ubcule (talk) 12:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the permission of Richard Orlinski is necessary. BrightRaven (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does not seem to be the photographer: no EXIF, Richard Orlinski mentioned as author. BrightRaven (talk) 12:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image that is more a selfie of the uploader than a picture of the orange. Limited in-scope usage. While I could crop the orange, the resulting resolution would be so low it's not likely to be worth bothering with when we have better images of the same subject. Ubcule (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image of limited use. Inclusion of uploader/photographer limits in-scope usability further. claimed subject (product packaging) arguably copyrighted, but I'd be nominating this regardless. Ubcule (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality photo that doesn't show subject well and has photographer in background as with most of his photos. Ubcule (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arguably a derivative copyvio and generally a poor-quality image with limited usability Ubcule (talk) 12:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this likely to be uploader's "own work" as claimed? Barely-visible writing says "by Square-World.com", so I suspect not. Is this in-scope? Is it below threshold of originality both in US and in country of origin? (Auto-translate: "Ist dies wahrscheinlich Uploaders "eigene Arbeit" zu sein, wie behauptet wird? Kaum sichtbare Schrift sagt "von Square-World.com", so vermute ich, nicht. Ist das in-scope? Ist es unter dem Schwellenwert von Originalität sowohl in den USA und im Herkunftsland ?") Ubcule (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah.

Ras67 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Saudi Arabia, while this building was only completed in 2011, i.e. too new for PD.

HyperGaruda (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia, the copyright belongs to Dar Al-Handasah.


Ras67 (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ocean $hark (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ocean $hark (Panoramio etc. grabber). Uploaded in a row on 28.06.–01.07.2009.

Living examples: File:Al-Safih.jpg --> grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/8822755 (2008, © All rights reserved by loay akhta) or File:Al -drerbassiyeh 1.jpg + File:Al -drerbassiyeh.jpg --> grabbed from http://www.esyria.sy/ehasakeh/index.php?p=stories&category=places&filename=200901291650023 (02.2009, © eSyria 2016 All rights reserved.) = http://esyria.sy/sites/images/hasakeh/086119_2009_01_29_16_53_07.image3.jpg + http://esyria.sy/sites/images/hasakeh/086119_2009_01_29_16_53_07.jpg (both: last modified: 02.2009) or (etc.)

Gunnex (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating (per above) also a transfered local uploads by this user:

Gunnex (talk) 13:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the pictures have EXIF such as File:Beydar 2008.JPG. So it is not the same as pictures without EXIF. Hanay (talk) 09:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvaise taille Sclg22 (talk) 13:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, most likely grabbed from the indicated site. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2013 by ar:user:MOHATION Gunnex (talk) 14:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused modern reprint of book. Will be good idea to find historical prints and proofread them in Wikisource. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2009 by ar:user:Slmcom. Per Google most likely grabbed from http://www.shababonaizah.com/showthread.php?t=43463, a 2007 thread were http://www.shababonaizah.net/uploaded/4_1198882127.jpg (404) is embedded --> note that the file was cropped by uploader (watermarks removed), considering http://web.archive.org/web/20160716140308/http://www.shababonaizah.net/uploaded/4_1198882127.jpg

Nominating also a further transferred local upload by this user:


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peterpham1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://blogs-images.forbes.com/peterpham/files/2015/08/Jim-Rogers-1.png.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SteveON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Q samakura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused texts document of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'm tired to see the "Unused" argument in deletion requests just because a file is not used on a Wikimedia website. For example, the first file is mentionned on a wiki (https://wiki.nuitdebout.fr/wiki/Ressources/Ressources_graphiques_de_la_Nuit_Debout) and is used to print stickers. The others are a logo and a tutorial about how to build a Nuit Debout (the French version of Occupy Wall Street).
Unused and notability are not admissibles arguments to delete files on Commons. Those files are clearly in the scope of Wikimedia Commons. Pyb (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I would disagree about the "unused" statement; as an administrator it is very helpful to know if a file is in use or not as part of the nomination. To complain about data being given to help the nomination is not helpful. Nominations are for talking about the actual files. These do not fit COM:SCOPE even if someone prints stickers from them. The longer document contains embedded photographs without attribution and as such is a Derivative Work of those images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diegocachoeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.sportsrageous.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Fernando_Alonso_070615-1.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diegocachoeira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Exist elsewhere on the web.

~Cybularny Speak? 10:52, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kkzeccola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paul Wang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Csusjhrs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://file102.mafengwo.net/s9/M00/26/2D/wKgBs1ZMQ_eAFYvsAAzNSelKLaI12.jpeg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Congressman22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Congressman22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious licensing. No evidence of PD or free license.

Sealle (talk) 06:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mª del Carmen Garcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF/inconsistent resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-O0722jDyp0E/UwgBgKHS-9I/AAAAAAAAAR0/SF5HlGsG9jw/s1600/LA+CILLA.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality. Was a mistake that I uploaded it. Honymand (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality. Was a mistake that I uploaded it. Honymand (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, in danish and not relevant. Was a mistake that I uploaded it. Honymand (talk) 15:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In danish and not relevant. Was a mistake that I uploaded it. Honymand (talk) 15:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

loading error Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can the author of this image be unknown, and yet carry the CC-BY license and have a valid OTRS ticket? It seems contradictory. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Stefan Slabbekoorn, I missed to add that information during uploading. It has been added now. Edoderoo (talk) 17:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want to be named as author anymore. 109.235.37.42 14:44, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the cc-by-sa declaration is that you can not withdraw the license at a later time. But if you can make yourself known as the original author (and not as an ip-address ;_) I think the image can be made author-less, or the author name can be changed into a nickname instead of your real name. If you have the original mail from the OTRS team, you can do a reply with such a request. Theoretically, deleting the image is not possible. Edoderoo (talk) 15:12, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep as is. No legitimate reason to go through the trouble of removing the name, and this has been stable and properly attributed since 2011. We don't have to jump through hoops for every whim that authors have, if this IP is in fact the author.There's no valid reason for the name/attribution change, which could cause confusion, and which will definitely waste time for Commons volunteers who could be doing productive work instead. lNeverCry 22:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Everything is resolved. See ticket:2016112410014256. Reason provided is reasonable enough to do the author this courtesy. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dntbeatmaker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album cover and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Feanor~enwiki (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mauvais format Sclg22 (talk) 16:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of the scope of the project; used on promotional userpage on enwiki; no encyclopedic value TJH2018talk 17:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo remix from Club Sport Emelec kovox90      17:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FranXBSC. Gunnex (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside the scope of the project; used on promotional userpage on enwiki; no encyclopedic value TJH2018talk 17:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside the scope of the project; used on promotional userpage on enwiki; no encyclopedic value TJH2018talk 17:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a non-free derivative work that is not de minimis. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      17:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      17:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is copyrighted, so it must not be in Wikimedia Commons. kovox90      17:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Canada.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Mupe666 (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. 95.27.139.211 17:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 17:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the United States.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work (see exif), copyvio. No permission for original photo taken 1963, see COM:OTRS Wdwd (talk) 18:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is a work of a US Fed Govt employee. It might very well have been taken by a private individual. 220.253.155.92 18:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom—Flickr account has no known association with US federal government, so there is no basis for this license with the available info czar 06:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains unlicensed derivative works that are not de minimis. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Nepal.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 18:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Spain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Cross of Burgundy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by User:Monti bht

[edit]

The first two are credited to "An Assamese Book", with no further information that would allow us to identify the book, and no evidence that those books or the images were released under CC BY-SA 4.0. I couldn't find a non-Wikipedia source for the third, but it looks highly professional, and given the apparent misunderstandings about copyright shown in the first two I would be reluctant to accept a claim of "own work" for it without some further explanation. --Huon (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the third had previously been deleted as a likely copyright violation, just to be re-uploaded. I don't think an OTRS ticket was supplied as requested. Huon (talk) 18:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

закончил работу6 Avatiah (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Cyril Bradley Rootham.jpg Wintereu 19:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Satharalkaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to use http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-1opC-6w60fQ/VDnthHrac5I/AAAAAAAAAxc/e8Jsn1buOZc/s1600/voip.png as it's base. No evidence of free licence Il96dream (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

private artwork without any meaning Antemister (talk) 09:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful Adsci8 (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Adsci8 (talk) 19:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


There is no FOP in the UAE, and thence these images can't be hosted on Commons.

russavia (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

First of all, thanks for reviewing some articles on wikimedia. To be honest, I have not understood yet the problem with some of my pictures and I haven't got any further explanation on your words (I could see something on the "FOP" link you left)

I guess you mean that there are some policies related to the buildings on UAE that my images don't follow.

I can say that I took some pictures in there and I have't asked anyone on the UAE if he/she mind about using images of his country.

I didn't know I was breaking some rules (I just wanted to contribute with some of my pictures) but in that case, I hardly believe that all of the pictures of the UAE shown on Commons are following that directives

So, if it is possible, I just want to know what's the difference between my pictures and "almost every other" picture of UAE shown on wikicommons

Thanks for your help,

--KeDaO (talk) 23:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • @KeDaO: hello and thanks for your contributions. The answer to your question is COM:De minimis. If no single or prominent building is the chief subject of an image (e.g. a general skyline or cityscape view), it is thus acceptable as "de minimis".
For the FOP, unfortunately the UAE copyright law does not allow free, unrestricted commercial exploitations of images of modern buildings (Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab included), without authorization from the copyright holder of the said architectural works. Usually the copyright holders are the architects or architectural firms who created/designed the appearances of the buildings (e.g. Adrian Smith for the Burj Khalifa and Tony Wright for the Burj al Arab). Per COM:FOP UAE, which is supported by the current copyright law of UAE, there is no sufficient and Commons-acceptable FOP from UAE. A very restricted provision only states that free uses of images of architecture are only allowed in broadcasting programmes (no mention of free uses of photographs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted. MBisanz talk 18:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the UAE

russavia (talk) 16:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the UAE.

russavia (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My comments to the Deletion request of Burj Khalifa March 2013.jpg.
I took the above picture and published it on Commons not being aware of the COM:FOP concept. To get a better understanding what this, and how it is applied in UAE I tried to follow the Commons discussion referred to in the deletion request message. I only to ended up in an endless discussion that seem to conclude that it is not clear that it is allowed to publish picture of architectural work (e.g. buildings) in UAE and consequently these picture should be removed since it could be a violation to the law. The problem I have is why then is not all pictures of buildings in UAE removed from Commons, why only some? Why should the picture I took be deleted while other pictures of the same building are still on Commons since many years and there is no request to remove them? In most countries (including UAE) it is clearly indicated by signs at the place or building when photography is not allowed, and consequently they cannot be published, These signs do exists is shopping malls, airports, harbors, religious places, etc but no such signs does exist for Burj Khalifa. I understand the clear distinction between taking a picture and publish the same, but wouldn't the two go hand in hand for public places? Not to mention the thousands of pictures on Internet already published of the Burj Khalifa.
I simply like to understand what pictures I take that I can publish and which I cannot, so that I do not make the same mistake again. Can someone clarify?/Losttraveller (talk) 03:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
First, please understand the difference between a copyright problem (which this is) and a prohibition against taking pictures for some reason -- military installations, art inside museums, etc. Our concern is copyright. We are not concerned with other restrictions -- while the photographer may get in trouble for taking a picture in violation of the posted signs, that is not a Commons problem. The problem here is that the architect of Burj Khalifa owns the copyright. While it is perfectly legal to take a picture for your own use, such a picture may not be used in ways which would infringe on the copyright, including use on Commons. There is no real relationship between the two types of restrictions.
Second, some pictures of buildings are OK -- usually because the building is old enough so that the copyright has expired, but in some cases because the architect has given a license.
Third, please understand that Commons is not perfect. We have more than 18 million images here. It would not surprise me if 1% of those -- 180,000 -- were problems for one reason or another. So, the fact that there may be other images that should also be deleted is a problem, but it does not affect the question of whether these images should be deleted. If you see other images that are similar, please nominate them for deletion by clicking on the link in the left column of the image page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
First, please believe me that I do understand the differences in copyrights that you describe above, likewise do I understand the rest you explain. Although I still do not have the answer to my question: when can I publish a picture of a building in UAE? Is there any way for me to know which buildings in UAE that have copyrights or when that copyright has expired? There is appr 45 pictures of Burj Khalifa in Commons, four of them has now been tagged for removal. Why only these four and not all 45? Logically if these four violates the rules, so must all 45, or...?
Please understand that I have never objected to have the pictures deleted, I just like to understand when a picture violates the rules and when not../Losttraveller (talk) 19:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I do not know, why the other photos in this category were not presented for deletion, but most of them (and maybe all) should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the UAE

russavia (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 10:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the UAE for buildings.

russavia (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


, Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted building exteriors and interiors. No Freedom of Panorama in UAE.

Themightyquill (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Burj Khalifa and Dubai Metro perfect timing.JPG and Tallest tower vs. the palm trees (5373615733).jpg could be de minimis. I'm not a judge, where is the border between permissibility and copyright violation? --Ras67 (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted four, kept two per DM. --Krd 16:18, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted building in UAE which has no freedom of panorama.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 11:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! None of this buildings are free to photograph!

Ras67 (talk) 19:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building under copyright, no Freedom of Panorama.

Themightyquill (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cropped File:Roger burj dubai promo (web).JPG to comply with the rules. ~nmaia d 14:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say it should be cropped more and the name should be changed. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can we have some clarification as to why these illustrations of a copyrighted building are okay for commons? I don't know how the rules apply here. The copyrighted architecture of the buildings is clearly depicted, but maybe there's some exception I don't understand.

Themightyquill (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: as a derivative of a copyrighted deisgn, it still constitutes copyright violation. --HyperGaruda (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Per previous argument. I only wonder what does it mean copyrighted architecture of the buildings is clearly depicted (especially this clearly as well as copyrighted architecture)? How is threshold of originality actually measured here (for music piece of arts there are some rules, e.g. number of same tones or something, although even here it is relative and some rules say it is e.g. 70% some 80%)? Is it here about pixels being mostly on the same place as in original building blueprints or something else, and again – how is this measured? If one (re)moves one pixel how is exactly new piece of art considered same as or derivative of the original one? --Obsuser (talk) 20:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info On this deletion request the SVG from copyrighted photos was not seen as copyright violation. --Ras67 (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: that discussion involved two copyrights: the copyright on the egg itself and the copyright on a photo (derivative) of said egg. Since the egg's author died in 1920 (>70 years), those copyright restrictions have expired. If the uploader of File:Third imperial Fabergé egg.svg based the file on the egg itself, there is no copyright infringement. If the uploader based the file on a copyrighted photograph, that would indeed be copyvio. However, the uploader argues that they did not use any copyrighted picture in particular. In the case of the Burj Khalifa diagrams, the building's author--Adrian Smith--is still alive, which means that not even the original is in the public domain. Any derivative, even derivatives of derivatives, will have to deal with copyright restrictions until 70 years afther Smith's death. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  'Keep You can't be serious! I know photos are prohibited, but a drawing? Besides, it's not even a static drawing; it's a series of simplified floor plans translated, scaled and rotated together to give the impression of a 3D object. '⎆ 09:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
@Cmglee: I'm very much open to arguments in favour of keeping since these images are in use, but I'm not sure I understand your points. Why would photographs be prohibited, but not a drawing? If a 2D image of a 3D object is copyrighted, why wouldn't an image that gives a 3D impression of a 3D object be prohibited? Thanks - Themightyquill (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Themightyquill. To me, it seems obvious that a photograph is the result of an opto-electronic process: light from the building is captured by the camera and converted via electronics and computing to become an image. Sure there is artistic judgement involved, but the information in the photo is derived directly from the environment.
For my drawing, I composed hundreds of shapes which to my eye resemble the floor plans, then arranged them to make a representation of the building. (I admit that tracing a photo, for example, is a grey area, but this is not in my case.)
Look carefully at my illustration: Is the real building just a collection of planes floating in space? Do these "floors" have colours like mine?
I think that considering a non-grey-area drawing as a violation of FOP is a dangerous slippery slope; where does one draw the line? For example, if I claim that this: /\ is a drawing of Burj Khalifa, does that violate FOP?
Cheers, '⎆ 21:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Sure, /\ is not a violation of copyright (no FoP to speak of here) but wouldn't a super accurate photo-realistic illustration of the building be infringement, even if it's not photograph based? Derivative work doesn't need to be derived directly from the environment. Your illustrations are a floor-by-floor recreation of the buildings. They are far more detailed than, say, me sketching the building on a napkin with pencil. There may be gray area about some illustrations, but I don't see your illustrations as gray area. I like them a lot, they are clearly useful, and if there's a way we can keep them, I'm all for it but we need a clear rationale. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It can be uploaded locally to Wikipedias as fair use in order to represent a building structure (for those Wikipedias that disabled local uploading entirely, I don't know). --Obsuser (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Themightyquill and Obsuser. Can someone tell me how the image can be modified to be acceptable? For example, is it OK if the dimetric view of the tower on the left was removed? Also, can the article have a prominent comment so that editors needn't spend days of work just to see their effort deleted? Cheers, '⎆ 23:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
P.S. Lastly, can someone update Commons:Freedom_of_panorama to make it clear that drawings are treated similarly to photographs? '⎆ 23:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Deleted per above: this is clearly a reproduction of the architectural work. Guanaco (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!

Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination --Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the UAE

Themightyquill (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the UAE

Saqib (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted - per nomination - Jcb (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!

Ras67 (talk) 15:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how and why you can on the same day upload a number of pictures of the skyline of Dubai, including also the Burj Khalifa, and request deletion for similar uploads – what is your endgame? Jürgen Eissink (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, I believe there is no copyright to these public images in the UAE .Category:Burj Khalifa. Is it possible to give us one reason to delete these images which are public photos and there is nothing wrong with posting them here!?.Usamasaad 17:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

There is no endgame, it seems to be consensus that skyline photo of a specific subject are free due to de minimis. A full frame depiction of a building in UAE can not be hosted on Commons due to the lack of panorama of freedom. Every image must be able to use commercially and this is here not the case. --Ras67 (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - per nomination. Kept only File:Fog on Burj Khalifah.Dubai. - panoramio.jpg and File:برج خليفة في دبي2.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 18:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates!

Ras67 (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Majora (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates. Burj Khalifa was designed by Adrian Smith.

Ras67 (talk) 16:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. It is not de minimis if what is being photographed is the main subject of the photograph. The entry way would still be part of the copyright and we cannot keep any of these. --Majora (talk) 20:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in UAE

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some files doesn't necessarily depict Burj Khalifa as the main subject but FOP still applies on other skyscrapers. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Too little carefulness in the files' selection. Many of them were already nominated in a deletion request and were kept. One file has now two deletion requests! A skyline should be free, but only the broad ones.
 Keep for all old nominated and kept files (no new reasons were given).
 Keep for broad skyline photos (almost the whole city).
 Delete What is with CollageDubai.jpg? Was the DR properly closed? IMHO also the new one is not correct, a (cropped out) single part image of the Burj Al Arab and of two other buildings can't be assessed as de minimis!
 Delete for photos of the Burj with fountains etc. and all others. --Ras67 (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: As per Themightyquill, there are various copyrighted buildings in the picture and having all of them as DM doesn't eliminate the copyvio infringement. If you're talking in the POV that Burj Khalifa is the main DR reason, I've mentioned above that "Some files doesn't necessarily depict Burj Khalifa as the main subject but FOP still applies on other skyscrapers." (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that and agree with you, but where is the border? Strictly speaking we have to delete all with copyrighted objects in the UAE. This can not be it. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: I would say that only having a single small enough copyrighted building as DM would be ok. For example, File:Burj Khalifa @ Yellow Boats Tour @ Dubai (15876740342).jpg might probably the threshold of DM as the design of the building is "too small" in the picture to be seen. I wonder why File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg was kept with the reason of "Panoramic view of the city" per Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Category:Burj Khalifa (as File:Burj Khalifa 005.JPG in the DR) when FOP applies to all buildings and not BK only. However, this is only my opinion and this is the problem about DM, there is no benchmark. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with you, it's a difficult matter with blurred borders, the closing admin has to decide it. --Ras67 (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have trouble accepting that the burj khalifa is really de minimis in an image titled "Burj Khalifa" and in the category Category:Burj Khalifa. If it's an image of the skyline of Dubai, it should be renamed as such and it should not be in this category. It should not be used to illustrate articles on the Burj Khalifa. De Minimis is an exception, not a loophole. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept. I commented some files. Taivo (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work from copyrighted photos/buildings/designs what we cannot host here! We need the permission of the actual creators for a free licencing of their work.

Ras67 (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy delete as derivative work copyvios. No permissions or OTRS authorizations from model creators, images uploaded by a problematic user (who has uploaded dozens of DW/no FOP violations, as seen in their talk page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To the 21st one and eternal further, no freedom of panorama in UAE! Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights? It seems to me, that the rest of the world is not interested in this case. IMHO the skylines are copyrighted too.

@JWilz12345: If so, we can change this file name and keep this file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: And we can also undelete deleted file and rename deleted file. Ox1997cow (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The illuminated background is an essential part of the photos and not a casual element. The whole background consists of copyrighted skyscrapers. --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67:  Comment I think main object in this image is the car. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 22:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I read this page carefully. In this page, I found this sentence. "Cityscape, skyline, or vista photos may be acceptable if no single building is the primary subject." It means that both cityscape photos and skyline photos are allowed. And this page contains outdated content. For example, Atomium in Belgium is allowed now because Belgium has freedom of panorama now, but this page explains that Atomium is not allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: slashed my vdel input. While the page is outdated for Atomium, it is still relevant for Burj Khalifa and Burj al Arab, as long as there is no acceptable FOP from UAE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ras67 (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67:  Keep Already in past discussions, it has been concluded that some images were kept covered by DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel:  Comment In my opinion, some of other files you didn't marked maybe to be kept. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: You may also mark those you think can be kept. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections (except those given keep reasons by A1Cafel or Ox1997cow).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel and Jeff G.: I marked whether delete or keep. I will respectfully accept any objection. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the skylines are not {{Deminimis}}. Every building in these images is copyrighted, it's not in the "sense" of the law to "stack" copyrighted objects and so make them free. The "deminimised" objects have to be "nonessential" and "casual" elements, what is not the case in the skyline photographs. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67:  Comment Already in past discussion, it has been concluded that the skylines are DM. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Lack of freedom of panorama does not mean that we cannot create categories of copyrighted buildings or sculptures. So, why does categories of copyrighted games exist? (Such as Category:StarCraft, Category:Overwatch, Category:Call of Duty, etc...) Ox1997cow (talk) 12:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the skyline photo incidentally contains copyrighted buildings, these photos are allowed under de minimis. Categories of buildings or sculptures in countries without freedom of panorama exist for this kind of situation. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: see Category:Sólfar (a copyrighted sculpture in Iceland, with all files deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sólfar). See also Category:SM City San Pedro. For buildings, they can go under Category:Buildings in Dubai or Category:Skyscrapers in Dubai. This category has been abused IMO, and it seems new uploaders ignore warnings on top. Also if the category needs to be nuked, this should be locked until the year the building falls PD or UAE changes their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: That's an extreme case. When uploading to the category of copyrighted things, there is no problem if we follow the warning and upload. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: By the way, why are you taking the extreme case and giving it as an example? In the previous deletion discussion, you used that only examples of misuse of NoFoP templates were taken as examples, and you claimed that all NoFoP templates should be changed with something like {{NoFoP-Japan}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: the simple answer is that the {{NoUploads}} are, in my opinion, ineffective. I doubt most uploaders will understand what the template means in relation to copyrighted FOP-reliant works: works like buildings, sculptures, statues, monuments, memorials, and public murals/frescoes. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: My opinion is different. The reason is that many users don't know that freedom of panorama varies by country. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Soumya-8974:  Oppose Some images were kept due to DM before. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Burj Khalifa should be a trivial landmark (i.e. should not be at the centre of an image) per COM:DM, but it is too prominent in most of the listed images. Apologies for !voting all listed images to delete without seeing them individually. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 08:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Soumya-8974: I and A1Cafel have already marked "deleted" and "kept" on images that are likely to be deleted and images that are likely to be kept. Also, already in the previous deletion discussion, it was concluded that the skyline image is DM as the single buildings might be copyrighted, but the whole panorama is not. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some skyline images are under discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Burj Khalifa-related.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To end all this mess because of limited exception (broadcasting programs only) in UAE copyright law, are there any attempts by Wikipedians in UAE and Arab Wikipedians to have FOP introduced in the desert kingdom? At the very least, FOP for architecture only (similar to US and Russian exceptions)? @A1Cafel, Ox1997cow, Ras67, Botev, Jeff G., and Soumya-8974: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: I'm sorry, but I've never heard of such a thing. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Why we are the sole ones who protect Adrian Smith's rights" note that I do not care about Adrian Smith's right, I do not care about UAE law. If I nominate things for deletion I do it to protect users of Commons. This law is unjust, though if for some reason I would have influence on UAE I would start from far worse laws being present there Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And for this nomination: keep everything, nominate actually problematic ones for a proper review Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as indiscriminate. Cut out any skyline pictures, they are clearly de minimis. Individually nominate the rest. We aren’t here to “right great wrongs” by protecting the copyright of an architect who has low enough ethical standards to work in a country where being gay is illegal. Dronebogus (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: followed remarks of @Ox1997cow and A1Cafel: and many thanks for your efforts. In some case followed arguments of other users. General skylines kept according consensus. Thanks all for your efforts. --Ellywa (talk) 15:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architecture is copyrighted e.g. by Adrian Smith, see COM:TOYS!


Ras67 (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67:  Delete They are clearly {{Copyvio}}. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, COM:FOP UAE, and all the previous sections.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete derivative work copyright violation: appears to be toys or small-scale models. May also fulfill User:Elcobbola/Models. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per COM:TOYS--A1Cafel (talk) 07:56, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

deleted, per nomination and discussion. Elly (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, per COM:FOP UAE. The Burj Khalifa is still copyrighted. Also derivatives (such as lego models) are copyrighted. Reason: the building was completed in 2008.

This image is deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa (Pexels-1537493).jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elly (talk) 21:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree not to delete File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg, because the tower is blackened and details cannot be seen. Elly (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all but File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all except File:Dubai skyline 2010 (censored Burj Khalifa).jpg per Elly SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. Surely most/all those other buildings are subject to copyright as well. Either all buildings in this image (including Burj Khalifa) de minimis or all are subject to copyright restrictions, no? -- Themightyquill (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Themightyquill: Already the decision has been made that the single buildings might be copyrighted but the whole panorama is not. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: That was my understanding as well - so I didn't see the need to black out the tower in that image. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Dubai including the Burj Khalifa would be useful? -- 06:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
@Themightyquill: Not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And we can make a sub-category like Category:Skylines in Seoul including Lotte World Tower. (There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, too.) Ox1997cow (talk) 06:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow and Themightyquill: impractical, and can lead to abuse. The best approach is that all skyline inages must be categorized under Category:Skylines in Dubai and similar categories. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I don't think it's impractical, but I suspect you're right about leading to abuse. Just a thought - I'm not determined. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345 and Themightyquill: However, existing building name categories(For example, Category:Burj Khalifa, Category:Lotte World Tower, etc.) should be kept. It is intended to be used in a photo of the skyline that contains the building. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have marked {{vk}} on images that can obviously applied de minimis. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: I have signed your markings for you. Please sign such markings yourself in the future.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Oh, that's my mistake. Ox1997cow (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Has anyone contacted Adrian Smith to request permission? If so, then I'm assuming he said no? Ixfd64 (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I've not misheard, Adrian Smith is currently in a jail in Saudi Arabia. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 08:22, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Soumya-8974 and Ixfd64: for a more eternal or longterm approach, has anyone including Arab Wikipedians and Wikipedians based in UAE have taken steps to introduce FOP there, at least "for buildings only" (yellow countries)? I expect dozens of more copyvio images to be uploaded here, including: this one. I'm not sure if people aren't aware of no FOP there or just intentionally "testing our no-FOP policy on UAE". I would also want to suggest filtering out exactly the words "Burj Khalifa" so that new users will no longer be able to upload images either containing the said words in their file names or in their file descriptions, at least temporarily (while UAE has no FOP for photos). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Excessive file name restrictions are bad. Suppose someone uploaded a file name of the Dubai Skyline with Burj Khalifa as "Remote view of Burj Khalifa". Skyline photos with Burj Khalifa are allowed even if there is no freedom of panorama in UAE, as last deletion discussion concluded that they were OK. If you ban the use of "Burj Khalifa" in file names, we won't be able to upload acceptable skyline or cityscape photos. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: And many people do not know freedom of panorama. I also mistakenly thought that the copyright of a building or sculpture photo belonged to the person who took it, until I saw numerous photos of the building or sculpture deleted from Wikimedia Commons. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: no, de minimis photos can still be uploaded, thru titles like "Dubai skyline 20211103.JPG", "Skyline of Dubai, UAE as seen from the Marina in 2019.jpg." If images bearing such file names continue to be uploaded, the location filled with millions of deleted files from late-2006 may become "crowded" in the very distant future. Besides files do not get "deleted" in real life, but rather all "deleted" files are still there, just hidden from non-admins (as per Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) on his reply here). See also w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-06-19/Image undeletion on the mechanism of files deleted on Wikipedia (which also applies to all Wiki sites). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: You're thinking too extreme. A lot of users will use the copyrighted building name in the file name, but can we ban the copyrighted building name in the file name? And did you think about typos? (For example, "Bur Kalifa", "Buri Khaljfa", etc.) Ox1997cow (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I've known you're an extreme claimant since you had the deletion discussion related NoFoP templates. Even in that discussion, you brought only cases where NoFoP templates were misused and insisted that use of NoFoP templates should only be used in category namespace. Even if use of NoFoP templates is changed to be used in category namespace, there is no guarantee that it will not be misused. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: I look on longterm solutions and not "band-aid" solutions. Thus it is best to filter out such names. Actually Commons has already did a version of what you call very extreme approach: indefinite protection of file names that is comonly misused. Example: File:Burj Khalifa.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That approach of locking the file name prompted me to suggest such. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Keep that in mind. Such long-term solutions can hurt many users. Even though it is forbidden to use only "Burj Khalifa" in a file name, I know that using a file name containing "Burj Khalifa" is difficult to ban. Ox1997cow (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: and also take note of COM:CARES. The copyright holders include the architects and artists of national monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Soumya-8974: I couldn't find anything about Adrian Smith being incarcerated. His article on the English Wikipedia doesn't say anything either. Could you provide a source? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you! I have probably misheard a piece of news related to the still-unfinished Jeddah Tower, also designed by Adrian Smith. --Soumya-8974 (he) (talkcontribs) 17:53, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Of course I know the copyright holders include the architects and artists of national monuments. Anyway, even though I agree to ban file name containing only "Burj Khalifa", I cannot accept your extreme argument of banning file names containing "Burj Khalifa". Ox1997cow (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As a compromise, how about using the edit filter to just warn the user if they try to upload a picture containing the name? Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ixfd64: It's not bad. Ox1997cow (talk) 06:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burj Khalifa Interpretation Centre.jpg. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep skyline images. De minimis use of the Burj Khalifa, there’s a precedent for this. The freedom of panorama page of English Wikipedia literally shows a skyline in a non-FOP country. I struggle to see why the images that just show the base aren’t de minimis but that’s not my expertise. The blacked-out version is artistically interesting but a ridiculous solution to a nonexistent problem (buildings are not more copyrighted because they’re famous and impossible not to notice in a generic panorama!) Dronebogus (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept General DR like this one is clearly not helpful. Yann (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Tranferred from arwiki) Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Rain lover (Getty images grabber) and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iman al asadi2.jpg (Panoramio grabber).

Nominating (per above) also a further transferred local upload by this user:


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads. Gts-tg (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative from http://edgeone.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Financial-Page-1.jpg . --C messier (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads. Gts-tg (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpvr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(small and without exifs) photo of photo : unlikely to be own work

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arpvr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small photo without exif and almost other uploads speedy deleted at this time: unlikely to be own work

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads. Gts-tg (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in a deleted article en:Alexia Thomas; self-promotion. Unclear copyright status - comes from here (a self-promoting article by the 'Commonwealth Liberation Party', apparently founded by Alexia Thomas herself. Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in a deleted article en:Alexia Thomas; self-promotion. Unclear copyright status - cropped and upscaled version of an image found e.g. here. (Metadata reads "Google" - apparently found using Google image search.) Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely {{PD-Egypt}} (if I interpreted the license correctly) considering (ignoring so far further US copyright issues):

A: Copyright has expired in Egypt if... published prior to 1987 --> ✘ considering (as indicated) "created in 1988 and published in 1989"
B: the author died prior to 1966 --> ✘ well... created (as indicated) in 1988...
C: [anonymous or pseudonymous] published prior to 1966 --> --> ✘ well... published (as indicated) in 1989...obviously also not a photo of a 44 years old man (1921-1965)
D: [e.g. collective works] published prior to 1966 --> per C

Gunnex (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

загружен ошибочно Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: uploader request: uploaded by mistake, unused. --sasha (krassotkin)

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

загружен ошибочно Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

загружен ошибочно Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:43, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and unlikely to be useful, fails COM:SCOPE. nyuszika7h (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in russia for artwork. Wdwd (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no apparent notability, no encyclopedical use Pibwl (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion. No educational purpose Fixertool (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused pdf, no encyclopedical use, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useles pdf, out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf, sole upload, no real encyclopedical use Pibwl (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose Fixertool (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious violation of German personality rights. Person is easily identifiable to friends and associates. Sebari (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf, out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 21:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please indicate reasons for deleting. This is a profound technical information.--ak 13:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Please read Commons:Project scope (in particular: Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats). LX (talk, contribs) 22:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem to be useful, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 22:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear violation of German personality rights. Sebari (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image of unknown person. Sebari (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 22:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

manipulated image (actually she never wore a 'hijab') ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support The file was deleted in id.wp which was totally different image. Bennylin (yes?) 02:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these files are suspect.

The original uploader on en.wp was blocked in 2009 for uploading copyright violations (en:Special:Contributions/Yaminjanjua) but unfortunately the blocking admin (Moonriddengirl) didn't delete all their files and they have over the years made their way to Commons.

All of these files are of low resolution, only one that I could see have EXIF data, which usually indicates they have been snagged from around the net by the uploader.

A review of their en.wp logs add further evidence that something is not quite right with the uploads of that person.

Unfortunately, these files have been on these projects for going on 10 years, but given the above information they really should be deleted.

Il96dream (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indosat is NOT a member of the MNC Group ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indosat is NOT a member of the MNC Group ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indosat is NOT a member of the MNC Group ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indosat is NOT a member of the MNC Group ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license info in source Cap1000 (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken at Disneyworld in Florida, there is no FOP in the US for sculpture artworks and no evidence this piece is in the public domain. Il96dream (talk) 23:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Mohammed Almeahi (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 03.2016 Gunnex (talk) 23:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope, blurred C messier (talk) 08:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, without EXIF, possible copyvio C messier (talk) 08:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 08:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP in Belgium. This text is protected by copyright. BrightRaven (talk) 12:40, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The new Belgian FOP is limited to plastic, graphic or architectural art ("œuvres d’art plastique, graphique ou architectural"/"beeldende, grafische of bouwkundige kunst"). Texts, i.e. litterary works, are not covered imho. BrightRaven (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe this image is in the public domain. It was taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20100805130307/https://www.fotw.info/images/c/ca-ns-ar.gif. And the rose portion of the blazon, which is not stated to derive from other free images, is well above the threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It was not "taken" from FOTW, they are two completely different images. FOTW was simply used as a source that the flag exists. All elements are clearly DW of Sodacan's work except the crest. I was mistaken in listing The Pink Oboe as the author, it was originally uploaded by @Mnmazur: , so I am going to ping them about it, but I see no reason to doubt the authorship. Fry1989 eh? 20:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Inspecting the SVG elements, the leaves and thistle came from File:Crest of Nova Scotia.svg. The only missing part is the roses. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Well, I would say it looks like Mnmazur is occupied with real life. As I have found the attribution of all the elements except the roses, will you accept me just taking them off and replacing with some other SVG rose available on Commons? Fry1989 eh? 20:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely, as long as we follow required attribution for all elements. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the roses. Fry1989 eh? 01:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'll leave the discussion up and I ask the closing administrator to delete only the old version. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would object to the RevDel of the original version. Should Mnmazur come back to Commons some time in the near future and respond to my ping, they may announce they created the roses themselves or provide some source I was unable to find. If that is the case, then we can revert to it. No? Fry1989 eh? 16:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But if it's a copyright violation, we can't host it. I'm sure I or another administrator (if I'm not around) could send it to him privately. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We do not know that at all. That is an assumption. Considering 98% of the image was own work or DW, I would find it strange to think Mnmazur "stole" the roses. Fry1989 eh? 23:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as discussion. Old version revdel - we can always undo the revdel if the occasion arises, it's a simple action. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]