Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 13th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"they said we could use it for this purpose" is not sufficient for copyright reasons Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this file quality is not too good and these files can not explain or describe an article. As well as this file is not useful for reasons of education and knowledge. Besides this file is not used at all in any Wikipedia. Aldo samulo (talk) 09:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: good enough quality. Self-nomination but file was uploaded many years ago and license can't be revoked. P 1 9 9   14:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In a beam quality is not very good and the quality is very low. In addition, this file can not provide the information or knowledge that is clearly in a Wikipedia article. In addition, as the owner of the file I also ask that this file should be deleted because it is not very helpful, and this file is also not used at all on Wikipedia and other projects. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of unused file. howcheng {chat} 10:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems there is a bit of misinformation on this file. Supposedly this is not a departure lounge or departure area as it is written in the file name, but when observed from the picture on this file is probably the arrival area. This file should be removed only to avoid mistakes on its use in the article. 36.84.229.74 05:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems there is little to fault information at the time I enter this file to Wikimedia Commons. This seems like there should be an area of arrival and not the departure area or the departure lounge of the airport. This file should be removed only to avoid misinformation and usage of this file. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This most likely is actually the arrivals area of the Sultan Syarif Kasim II International Airport and there seemed to be misinforming and the title of the file uploader. This file should be deleted rather than to give the wrong information on Wikipedia article. 36.84.229.21 07:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

VB


Deleted: . --Krd 12:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mexican drug cartels do not have official logos, hence this is out of scope. If drug cartels have logos then the contributor must show that the copyright owner has licensed the logo under a free license. Thuresson (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No license and no official logo. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 16:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and re-uploaded out of process. --INeverCry 18:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Advertisement Reguyla (talk) 19:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam and possible copyvio. --INeverCry 19:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Advertisement Reguyla (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --INeverCry 19:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Advertisement Reguyla (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam and possible copyvio. --INeverCry 19:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong title in image and filename. The image uploader himself wanted to speedy delete the file, cf. Special:Diff/97305198/97305395, with deletion reason “A near-duplicate of this file File:Kyrie_XI,_orbis_factor.png exists. This image has an incorrect title, whereas the other file is correct” (slightly fixed by me). This has been declined by User:INeverCry. The reasoning “This file is in use” is not true anymore, at least for the Wikimedia universe, but for safety it could actually be reverted into a redirect to File:Kyrie_XI,_orbis_factor.png instead of a real deletion. Speravir (Talk) 20:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. It's a fake. It shows the XI. gregorian Kyrie. The heading Kyrie XVII is wrong, and also the mode VI. is wrong, it must be mode I.--Der wahre Jakob (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted and redirected. --INeverCry 22:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image only available as CC-BY-ND which is not a Commons-compatible license. Doesn't appear to be any indication that it was under that license on flickr at any point. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, file uploader here. So first of all I have been paid to help get a picture of LaToya Forever on Commons so it can be added to her website, I have been working with her webmaster on this. Unfortunately it was first posted with the wrong license, I gave him incomplete instructions so that's totally on me. But I have just checked the file again on Flickr and the license has been updated to CC BY-SA 2.0, so attribution and share alike which is an acceptable license for Commons right? I am sorry I caused such confusion, still not well versed in the licenses. So I am hoping that by checking the license now this can be approved and kept?? @Pi.1415926535: MPJ-DK (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy keep by nominator: license has been updated on flickr. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Advertisement Reguyla (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: spam/possible copyvio - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Patent nonsense (see also the other contribution by the same use, in VP.) Additionnaly, the file page includes what seems to be the user’s home phone number. Better expunge that fast before someone calls him up about a bridge that just happens to be for sale. -- Tuválkin 15:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: sockpuppet, blatant spam => speedy deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems appropriate that this file is not credited to me because the actual owner of this file is my sister and when this file she uploaded using my account. This file should be deleted because of an error crediting of the name of the owner of this file. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because these files are of low quality and also this file is also not used in any Wiki project. As well as this file is not very useful and not too be able to explain about an article in Wikipedia. Aldo samulo (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because these files are of low quality and also this file is also not used in any Wiki project. As well as this file is not very useful and not too be able to explain about an article in Wikipedia. Aldo samulo (talk) 02:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not very able to explain about the city of Bukittinggi or to provide better knowledge. Moreover, this file is too hindered by too many cars so it's not feasible for use on Wikipedia. Moreover, this file is not used. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page should be in eswiki... .my error Thelmadatter (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty gallery, req by author. --Achim (talk) 19:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Frankcook0317

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameslwoodward (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Hill School Family Boarding School logo.png

Szm100 (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandal request, no reason to continue this nonsense DR. I don't think Jim would upload a copyvio nor an out of scope image, since he is an admin and a bureaucrat. Poké95 12:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is invented and should not be used. Zoupan (talk) 21:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm sorry for that. Do it as you want. Samhanin (talk) 22:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Created by a globally locked vandal, it was not really created by Zoupan. My sincere apologies to Zoupan and Samhanin for this. Poké95 12:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 17:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a PDF about the uploader. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 18:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This doesn't belong here, sorry... Borikén (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request, no license. --JuTa 07:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement, incorrect license, posted without permission from Nickelodeon or any other organizations. Simply unacceptable. LaG roiL (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like a certain copyvio. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 15:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copright violation. --JuTa 10:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eltinaco20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these sports images, too close to subject, only two have metadata, two are identical, and so on. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping 5 July 2016 Steinsplitter (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Negrito Quintero.jpg (Copyright violation; found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is released as claimed, or that the uploader represents http://allwomeninmedia.org/gracies/ and is allowed to release it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than Advertisement. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 00:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than Advertisement. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 00:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. It's just an advertisement.--100.36.171.168 23:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Experimental upload of useless file by a new user; not own work, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also promotional. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Experimental upload of a useless file by a new user; not own work, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also promotional. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Supermamn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poster, not own work.

Stang 02:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files transferred from arwiki user Amina.alobaid

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2011/2012 by ar:user:Amina.alobaid. Considering also File:DrFahad.jpg (2012) = grabbed & cropped from (example) http://www.alriyadh.com/675390 (2011) = http://www.alriyadh.com/media/cache/88/dc/88dcbaa2303b71e39df3cb6f4c011a0f.jpg and File:AbdullahAlObaid.jpg (2011) = grabbed from (example) http://v.3bir.net/201288/ (2009) = http://v.3bir.net/3bir/2009/10/41241225397-4.jpg

--Gunnex (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete as this is a duplicate of File:Manuel Belgrano Genova.jpg - I am the uploader of both. Shyamal (talk) 09:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping 13:01, 12 July 2016 Wdwd (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Manuel Belgrano Genova 2.jpg (Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Manuel Belgrano Genova.jpg). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from Google Earth, not own HerrAdams (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First sorry for not write in japanese, according to this link 4.b - Content that can not be adaptation and commercial use of translation and deformation , etc. Any japanese speaker can close this DR speedly and review the license of the images if my understanding is wrong.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality unused personal photo, not useful for an educational purpose; out of scope; email address removed from description box Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, it's out of scope.--100.36.171.168 22:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:CONVERTIBLE FLOW

[edit]

Unused personal images not useful for any educational purpose; out of scope --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it, it's out of scope.--100.36.171.168 23:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork, apparently an album cover; not useful for any educational purpose; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source/license wasn't verified and is no longer available to do that —SpacemanSpiff 02:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license John from Idegon (talk) 03:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the licensing portion of this file, only works of the US federal government are automatically public domain, not state, county, city, mucinipal, and others. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 17:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и илицензии. Изображение вырезано, скорее всего отсюда http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/25719371.jpg + логотип внизу "ТАЙМЕР". Dogad75 (talk) 04:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timekeeper007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 04:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Soares de Lima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gabriel Soares de Lima, found elsewhere on the web. Also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 05:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not educationally useful due to its very small size and unclear subject. Rebbing 05:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a selfie, which doesn't fit project scope. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 16:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1.  Delete suite à décision suppression article en PàS Spec 75 (talk) 05:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Delete article correspondant supprimé en PàS Potomack (talk) 07:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Delete idem 2 autres avis Borgeis (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1.  Delete Suite à suppression article en PàS Spec 75 (talk) 05:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Delete idem Spec 75 Borgeis (talk) 09:18, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CRSantillan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:CRSantillan (serial copyright violator)

Gunnex (talk) 06:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without seeing the backside of the card one can not say the creator is unkown Berthold Werner (talk) 06:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deseo eliminar esta imagen subida hace años atrás Intijacinto (talk) 06:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see issues with the quality and a conflict with our project scope. This file lacks a proper ID of the depicted subject, which is likely a common or cultivated flower. Additionally, it seems underexposed. The uploader was already notified (2016-06-30 on his talk page) of problems within his naming of files, it's now up to him IMO for remedying these issues without leaving them to people less knowledgeable about the circumstances of the image shot. Grand-Duc (talk) 07:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see conflict with our project [[[COM:SCOPE|scope]]. This file lacks a proper ID of the depicted subject, which is likely a cultivated flower. Additionally, it seems underexposed. The uploader was already notified (2016-06-30 on his talk page) of problems within his naming of files, it's now up to him IMO for remedying these issues without leaving them to people less knowledgeable about the circumstances of the image shot. Grand-Duc (talk) 07:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 07:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MIRE191 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, a collection of images from different sources including magazine covers and historical photographs. File:Sea Harrier.jpg is credited to Iain Ballantyne in https://acesflyinghigh.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/brief-history-of-vstol-combat-aircraft-part-ii-enter-the-harrier-and-the-soviet-yak/.

MKFI (talk) 07:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely "own work" (missing exif, mysteriously watermarked). Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded by ar:user:Yasmine Al-Samahy on 30.10.2009. Per description appears to be a part of an album cover. Gunnex (talk) 07:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not add significantly to our existing collections of sunset stills and is not useful for illustrating the landscape of this Indian location due to the for this purpose unfavourable lighting situation. Grand-Duc (talk) 07:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files transferred from arwiki user Yemencamera

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2012 by ar:user:Yemencamera. File:Aden Logo(1).jpg grabbed from (example) http://www.tvaden.net/Detail.aspx?secid=23 (جميع الحقوق محفوظة © / All rights reserved)= http://www.tvaden.net/tvdminaden/artImg/Aden%20Logo(1).jpg (last modified: 2011)

--Gunnex (talk) 07:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation Shev123 (talk) 07:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:nudity Pippobuono (talk) 07:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a much better quality file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_van_der_Heyden,_A_Street_Scene_in_Cologne,_Wallace_Collection.jpg 2A02A03F (talk) 08:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

much better quality picture of same at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_van_der_Heyden_-_The_Church_at_Veere.jpg 2A02A03F (talk) 08:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bandspam, out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 08:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paragbahl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I did not propose DR for the photos of this user in the Kali Tiger Reserve (I put the right cat). But for the present ones : unclear descriptions ; unknown locations ; unknown genus and species : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness

Tangopaso (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 09:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinutasalian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear descriptions (ex : Greenland, Sky has no boundary) ; generic file names (ex : Scenary.jpg) ; unknown locations ; unknown genus and species of plants and insects : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness

Tangopaso (talk) 09:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who owns the copyright to this bill? It is not the uploader as he claims. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creo que no es trabajo propio LPfi (talk) 10:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent leftover prototype version of File:Naval battle off Mukah.png. D-M (talk) 10:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JanatAMANNGroup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely all own work of the uploader, COM:OTRS required

Krd 11:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JanatAMANNGroup. Pleased elaborate why the images shall be deleted just to reupload them. Image data can be modified, and the images can be used, anyway they will get deleted as there is no evidence for permission to use them here, which will be needed in any case, even after a reupload. Thank you. --Krd 12:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Krd, the modification of the pictures didn't work although suggested by several admins. I completely changed the file title and description, yet no success. Eventually I tried to delete the pictures from WikiCommons )the only place where they are actually listed and visible), so that these pictures would not be blocked again. But also this didn't work. The best will be to delete them. Then Ill reupload them. But what seems to be more important now: How do I give sufficient evidence that I am allowed to use the images here? There was no such column when I typed in the detail about the images. Of course I have the permission to use the pics - but how to make this clear? Thanks once again --JanatAMANNGroup (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see: COM:OTRS --Krd 13:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright unklar, Fotograf unbekannt und keine Rechte Ph1schm1 (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no copyright 130.75.174.201 12:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright Ph1schm1 (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that cc-zero applies to this image, also there is no information about the photographer Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to check the photographer's death date, and see if it was before 1946.--100.36.171.168 23:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to http:/tolkiengateway.net, this image is public domain. Keep it.--100.36.171.168 23:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/File:J.R.R._Tolkien_-_1911.jpg#Licensing
Rozmador (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete That website provides no information on the image's origins. We can't just trust that the image is "Public domain" because it was tagged on a user-submitted wiki. Happy to reconsider if someone finds the original image. czar 18:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CreativeC38 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Sorry, but this is not how the copyright owner authorizes you to upload images. Please see COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?

Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samm group (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt this image is own work given the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader.

BrightRaven (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the different cameras used, a Canon EOS 5D Mark III and a Mamiya Leaf Credo 50 (!). BrightRaven (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ReadyViews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERTISEMENT, this is advertising cellphones, or some cellphone service.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ReadyViews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Also possibly COM:DW.

Poké95 12:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circa 1960 photograph. The licence is not valid. BrightRaven (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Problem during the upload (horizontal bars appeared on the picture). I will try again. Ville de Canet-en-Roussillon (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Nederlands: Dit is goed fout. Santo Domingo de Guzmán is de hoofdstad van de Dominicaanse Republiek
English: This is very wrong. Santo Domingo de Guzmán is the capital of the Dominican Republic

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 12:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated, better version in File:Renata Abreu.jpg Sturm (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unidentified person. Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no need to convert File:Schmidt-Cassegrain-Telescope.svg; the original SVG can be used directly instead. Fails COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no need to convert File:Newtonian telescope2.svg to PNG; the original SVG can be used directly instead. Fails COM:PS. Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maitreya Willbe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no EXIF, one logo. Some possibly photos of TV screens. Possibly not own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rheadavid123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of diverse images, a car, two people, a tiger a page of a book and some form of artwork.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rheadavid123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are obviously not own works by the uploader. They are possibly old, but we need sources to verify that.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wishtoflyhigh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are plenty of hits for two of these three images on Google, but apparently only in lower resolution. Questionable authorship.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) is still copyrighted, artist Eila Hiltunen died 2003. FOP#Finland is for buildings only. Undelete in 2074. MKFI (talk) 13:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) is still copyrighted, artist Eila Hiltunen died 2003. FOP#Finland is for buildings only. Undelete in 2074. MKFI (talk) 13:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) is still copyrighted, artist Eila Hiltunen died 2003. FOP#Finland is for buildings only. Undelete in 2074. MKFI (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepshika09lunia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One film poster, one logo, one painting, one book title page (?) and some web resolution images. Likely not own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:SCOPE: unidentified subjects, low quality. The file name suggests that this is a cover (in which case it's probably a copyvio), but it doesn't look like a cover to me. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This frame does not appear in the official trailer (seen here); it is part of the copyrighted film itself. — WFinch (talk) 13:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This frame does not appear in the official trailer (seen here); it is part of the copyrighted film itself. — WFinch (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yensiddisney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like two film screenshots and one studio shot. File:Ilene Woods piastra commemorativa Disney Legends.jpg is possibly a photo of something which you can't take photos of per COM:FOP#United States.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly pixellated and generally of poor quality; I don't see why someone would use this image when there are plenty of others showing the "honeydew melon" cultivar of Cucumis melo. Nyttend (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Godhuli band (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lostathomeband (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like album covers. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lastchange2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The descriptions on the file information pages constitute spam, and I'm not convinced that any of the pictures are in scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From offical site. No proof of this free license - official site doesn't contain any remarks of this kind. Bilderling (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgehlsen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope - personal photos used in deleted social-network-type en:User:Mgehlsen/sandbox

JohnCD (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://occidentalentertainment.com/ "© 2016 · OCCIDENTAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP HOLDINGS · ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it to test the Commons app, in order to fix a bug with the camera Misaochan (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i was testing wikimedia Hassanoureddine (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Small file (by an occasional visitor) without camera EXIF; dubious "own work". Not in scope either. As it is an F10 case + uploader request please delete this file immediately. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test photo nominate Shalomie ☮️ (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: CSD F3 - Minecraft. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.alyaoum24.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/RIZ_0585-e1432501489512.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kiyingi.martin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaubovaAnna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Seem to be unused duplicates of File:Půdorys kostela.pdf.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMxwyS0U8AAFOsO.jpg:large. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.awesomelycute.com/gallery/2015/11/black-footed-kitten-4.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.wynnwilliams.co.nz/Images/Newsletters/Wynn-Williams-House_email.aspx. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuevavillanuela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Odt2RtwPXgQ/TH1OMraRhdI/AAAAAAAAAAk/VY-sqASEwgI/s1600/P1010237.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iulius256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barilo009 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s.weltsport.net/bilder/spieler/gross/43800.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Incredibleprogress (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ci55FRLWsAIjlCc.jpg:large.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eunice.ribeiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oscarjdc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art and non-trivial logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.metalocus.es/sites/default/files/styles/sin_estilo/public/file-images/metalocus_ALBERTO-CORAZON_01_680.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mapache fc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and logos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Need permission via OTRS (used on twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CfmCDCZUAAATdDq.jpg) Wdwd (talk) 15:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the link shown above, I think that PBS owns the copyright to this image. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 16:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found on youtube with no CC Dacoucou (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a copyvio. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 16:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC) The youtube Video has a CC Licence. --Ferdi2005 (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Transferred from arwiki by user جار الله (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log (notorious for failed arwiki transfers) and locally uploaded in 2011 by ar:user:ابوحمزة 2 (locally blocked: sockpupperty). Considering also previously published (even in lower res) via (example) http://htoof.net/vb/t161748.html (2010) = http://www3.0zz0.com/2010/08/12/18/371308729.jpg Gunnex (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified subject (the description consists of nothing more than "With a lot of zoom"). Despite its categorisation, the photograph does not appear to depict a school. Whatever it is, it is also (mostly?) out of focus. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 17:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially copyrighted logo, user claims is own work, potential copyvio. Liance (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source shows it's a copyrighted image. Edjoerv (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxios123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, out-of-focus photos of unidentified subjects. No meaningful descriptions or categories. As such, not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sense, User Lê Văn Cặc = bad name, cặc = cock  A l p h a m a  Talk 17:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copywritten work Reguyla (talk) 18:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Reguyla (talk) 18:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Reguyla (talk) 18:49, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Reguyla (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I asked the administrator to delete this file. Because I do not want this file no longer exists in this place. Aldo samulo (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want this file is located in the Commons. And this file is moved to the Commons without my permission and without notice to me. I want this file deleted from Commons. Aldo samulo (talk) 06:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Jcb (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want this file is located in the Commons. And this file is moved to the Commons without my permission and without notice to me. I want this file deleted from Commons. Aldo samulo (talk) 03:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guy, quit trolling: You know you licensed it and you know licenses are irrevokable. Looks like you want this deleted now because you feel (for good of bad reasons, I dunno) wronged by Commons, but this is not how licensing works. -- Tuválkin 20:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, per previous DRs. -- Tuválkin 20:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 3 DRs filed by the same person, none of them with a valid reason. Don't nominate this file again. --Jcb (talk) 16:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file unbeknownst to me, the user Kenrick95 move this file from Indonesian Wikipedia to the Wikimedia Commons. So I ask that this file is immediately deleted from the Wikimedia Commons. In addition I initially knew nothing about the license of this type can be used by anyone and can be moved to Wikimedia Commons because at that time I was still a beginner in Wikipedia. Moreover, these files do not have a description or explanation is sufficient so that it can be used on Wikipedia. And also this file is also not used at all in any Wikipedia. Aldo samulo (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasons are invalid. That is not how licensing works, it works whether you know it or not, whether is has description or not, and whether it is used or not. FYI, Aldo is registered on Indonesian Wikipedia on 6 July 2007. 116.12.221.66 02:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems appropriate that this file is not credited to me because the actual owner of this file is my sister and when this file she uploaded using my account. This file should be deleted because of an error crediting of the name of the owner of this file. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a sloppy version of File:BritishMandatePalestine1920.png and has been replaced by said image across all the wikis. Vadac (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a reason for deletion? Richardprins (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I know there is no mention for Transjordan in en:San Remo conference's (April 1920) documents.
See also (Jordan and Palestine) :
So your variant of map concerns to the next stage of Mandate, no to its initial one what was based at San Remo's decisions.
Igorp_lj (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  1. "Palestinim, Am Behivatsrut," by Kimmerling, Baruch, and Joel S. Migdal - Keter Publishing, ISBN 965-07-0797-2

Kept: maps are not identical Jcb (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is of bad quality, borders are largely inaccurate and better versions exist. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superior version exists of the very same image, File:BritishMandatePalestine1920.png Makeandtoss (talk) 09:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC) ː Also Original research. The map implies that Palestine and Transjordan were under some sort of unified government, which is not true at all. They were just administered under that name and Transjordan was autonomous. The Wikipedia article British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) has several quotations that prove that there is a great distinction between the two states. --Makeandtoss (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vector versions are preferred to raster images. // Liftarn (talk) 09:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep . Point 1 -- The normal thing to do in this situation (SVG of lesser quality, but without disabling flaws) is to fix, not delete. Point 2 -- Wikimedia Commons has no prohibition against original research. Point 3 - Transjordan was quasi-autonomous after Abdullah of the Hashemites was installed in 1921. However, 1920 is before 1921... -- AnonMoos (talk) 04:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. The major problem with this map (which you didn't point out) is that parts of the Golan should be included before 1923. AnonMoos (talk) 04:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." I don't think this map is educational, rather propagandic. This is poor quality; Golan Heights borders are wrong, Aqaba borders are wrong, the Egypt-Palestine border is unrealistically straight (perhaps the other straight lines too), etc.. --Makeandtoss (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This "map" is mostly mythological. To start with, there was no place called "British Mandate of Palestine"; in 1920 there was only a draft document called "British Mandate for Palestine" that came into effect in 1923. Of the borders shown on the map, only the border with Egypt is reasonably accurate for 1920. All of the other borders were determined later. The story behind this map is quite simple: people of a particular political bent like to imagine contrary to historical fact that this whole area was "promised to the Jews" and then later stolen away from them. On Wikipedia we can do better. Zero0000 (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --INeverCry 00:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map doesn't serve any purpose, it just highlights two adjacent territories. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also DR 1 and DR 2 opened by the same user with similar questionable reasons. --Denniss (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Although I created this map I find it a bit embarrassing now. The most glaring problem is that the south border of Transjordan is not correct. Some map that shows the two areas covered by the Mandate for Palestine while it existed (1923-1948 for Palestine, 1923-1946 for Transjordan) is needed. This one is better than the "1920" mytho-map but that's about all it has going for it. Zero0000 (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use as it is incorrect [1] Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. Makeandtoss (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original research. The map implies that Palestine and Transjordan were under some sort of unified government, which is not true at all. They were just administered under that name and Transjordan was autonomous. The Wikipedia article British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) has several quotations that prove that there is a great distinction between the two states. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think that? That you have trouble interpreting a map is not a valid reason for deletion. // Liftarn (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Having trouble interpreting a map? How about you reply to my points instead of initiating personal attacks? --Makeandtoss (talk) 09:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a valid reason for deletion? In the map both Palestine and Transjordan are clearly marked. Please see Commons:Deletion policy and then describe under what reason it should be deleted. // Liftarn (talk) 10:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ːClearly marked "British Mandate" too. Do any historical source use this kind of map? Are you aware that the unified mandate barely lasted months, and barely meant anything, while this map implies otherwise? --Makeandtoss (talk) 14:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Transjordan was quasi-autonomous after Abdullah of the Hashemites was installed in 1921. However, 1920 is before 1921... AnonMoos (talk) 04:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. The major problem with this map (which you didn't point out) is that parts of the Golan should be included before 1923. AnonMoos (talk) 04:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." I don't think this map is educational, rather propagandic. This is poor quality; Golan Heights borders are wrong, Aqaba borders are wrong, the Egypt-Palestine border is unrealistically straight (perhaps the other straight lines too), etc.. --Makeandtoss (talk) 10:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Makeandtoss' original concerns have been addressed. Adding a bunch of new things you don't like about the map makes you seem a bit insincere. In any case, those supposed issues could easily be rectified which I would welcome. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 19:31, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, Wikimedia Commons does not have a prohibition on original research (missed that before). AnonMoos (talk) 02:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. (Why is this listed separately from the svg version?) This "map" is mostly mythological. To start with, there was no place called "British Mandate of Palestine"; in 1920 there was only a draft document called "British Mandate for Palestine" that came into effect in 1923. Of the borders shown on the map, only the border with Egypt is reasonably accurate for 1920. All of the other borders were determined later. The story behind this map is quite simple: people of a particular political bent like to imagine contrary to historical fact that this whole area was "promised to the Jews" and then later stolen away from them. On Wikipedia we can do better. Zero0000 (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to see how things really looked in 1920–1922, check out the Times Atlas of the World published in 1922. A guess at the vague Palestine/Syria-Lebanon border from the 1920 agreement is shown, but Transjordan is not demarcated except on the north. That's how it was at the time; pretending that the east and south boundaries existed already is a big mistake. This deceptive map should be deleted so that it won't be accidentally used in articles. Zero0000 (talk) 09:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: widely used. --INeverCry 00:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont like pics of my house arround the web! 2A02:8071:B282:5600:D4B6:4C2C:2BEF:59F6 13:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Damit wirst Du wohl leben müssen. Hier gilt die Panoramafreiheit! Außerdem, wer sagt, dass Du tatsächlich der Eigentümer bist? --Andreas Schwarzkopf (talk) 06:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Volle Zustimmung. Zudem ist das Haus über 100 Jahre alt, sodass der Architekt sowieso keinen urheberrechtlichen Schutz mehr geltend machen könnte. --Flominator (talk) 06:51, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nach deutschem Recht gilt hier Panoramafreiheit, somit gibt es keine Möglichkeit ein Bild dieses Hauses zu untersagen.

siehe:


Germany

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies. For works of architecture, this provision shall be applicable only to the external appearance."

As with all other “limits of copyright by legally permitted uses”, no changes to the actual work are permitted under § 62 of the German copyright law (UrhG).

See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama for more information.

العربية  Deutsch  English  Esperanto  español  français  한국어  македонски  português  português do Brasil  русский  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Jörgens.Mi Talk 21:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by II. Niveles as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright
Converted to DR by me, as external source is tagged "Christopher Lee 2015-09-07 12:24", whereas this photo was uploaded to Common in 2014 already. Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand yeğenim Yurelio. --II. Niveles (talk) 14:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is going on? A Greek Pontian Peace Activist Yannis Vasilis is still in Kurdistan and said OK for the photograph. Serious contributors can easily contact him thanks to this link https://www.facebook.com/YannisVasilisYaylali?fref=ts Regards Manaviko (talk) 11:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Turelio above. --INeverCry 00:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio (as indicated) via http://www.rionegro.gov.ar/?contID=14053 (2013, "Todos los derechos reservados") = http://www.rionegro.gov.ar/download/images/00006387.jpg Wdwd (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.ga-online.org/#!imprint/cohy "The layout, graphics and pictures used in this website are protected by copyright." - Add: eligible for PD-Textlogo? Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP - looks relatively complex. --INeverCry 00:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author unknown, no permission Krd 12:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.linkedin.com/in/axelneff Dodi 8238 (talk) 16:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the Linkedin page shown above, I think that this is a copyvio. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 16:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This picture does not constitute copyright infringement. I am Axel Neff, the person in whom this page discusses. The image was taken directly from my iphotos account on my person computer. I took this photo while traveling, it was from a cafe in Greece. I am the rightful owner of this picture, and have used it as my profile on several of my social media sites, including linkedin which is referenced in the deletion request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axelneff (talk • contribs) 18:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 10:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission required. --INeverCry 00:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Entirely surpassed by File:CRPD members.svg and is no longer used on any articles. Pointless file at this point. Turnless (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rulo Costas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No confidence that any of these images were created by uploader, they seem to be single subject uploads of children in sports teams, sports teams uniforms, sports team advertisment and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indaluko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on these pictures of stadiums and sports players.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait or alike, non educational value. Stego (talk) 19:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panairi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of photographs and two book covers, all obviously from different creators. Read the file names, look at the lack of metadata and the single topic of the uploads to see COM:COPYVIOs as well as promotional or self-promotional intent.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marinovv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs, copied from visual media like movie or television, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, non-notable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lamunetwork (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE even assuming the copyrights are actually "self". This looks like a series of family snaps and possibly two images of a young woman copied from some other source. Tiny sizes, no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richardthomas1963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images of performers. Probable COM:COPYVIOs, small size, no metadata

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pelopanton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on this gallery of Derivative Works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sgaget (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images of buildings and places. Two cameras, three with no camera data... no apparent connection between the styles, colors, framing of the images and extremely variable sizes lead to the idea that these were gathered from the internet, rather than taken by the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EducationOasis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reverse image source finds these pictures at http://asm.ac.ma/, which page is marked (c).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the creators of the various image in this collage have released permission for its use on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ville de Fougères (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Promotional uploads, notice five photos, four cameras... four sourced to http://www.fougeres.fr/ which is (c) and one to Facebook which is also (c), and none are user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Habibsr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these documents and a photo of a statue/award. Yes they're iPhone photos, but the things depicted are not necessarily free of copyright.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Habibsr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cingraldi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, the article to which they are attached is marked "sounds like an advertisement" and the images look promotional as well.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ionmihaialbu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are two copyrights at issue in these photos: first is the copyright of the artist "Mihai Albu" for two of the images are of 3D sculptural work *and* the photographer of each piece; second is the copyright on a very small photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. The hand and the phone are from http://www.pulsepoint.org/wp-content/uploads/CPRNeededNotificationLockScreen.jpg, without any credit, image is claimed as "own work" which it is not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A non-notable logo of a company not found on en:wiki. It's out of COM:SCOPE even if it might be "simple enough". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images. out of scope. Appears to be for a user from Wikiversity that hasn't edited since 2013 Reguyla (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - useless wikiversity trash. Pibwl (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images. out of scope. Appears to be for a user from Wikiversity that hasn't edited since 2013 Reguyla (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete useless trash Pibwl (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images. out of scope. Appears to be for a user from Wikiversity that hasn't edited since 2013 Reguyla (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Created by a SPA that appears to be the organization itself Reguyla (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page to which this is appended appears to be more self-promotional in nature than intent to create encyclopedia. This appears to be the cover of a book found on Google reverse images search. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality image of a person with bad lighting. No real reason to keep it, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect identification Сарапулов (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect identification Сарапулов (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect identification Сарапулов (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect identification Сарапулов (talk) 19:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect identification Сарапулов (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 19:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. It has been used solely for promotion.--100.36.171.168 20:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personnes présentes sur la photo (droit à l'image) 90.21.107.119 20:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo. Delete it.--100.36.171.168 20:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, small size, no exifs, all other uploads speedy deleted at this time Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image/out of scope Reguyla (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I thing this image is derivative of http://media3d.eu/bagicz/bagicz.htm photo. If the uploder is the photographer we will need COM:OTRS Jarekt (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image/Out of Scope Reguyla (talk) 20:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image/Out of Scope. Also possible copyright vio Reguyla (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This frame is not part of the official trailer, seen here; it is from the copyrighted film itself. — WFinch (talk) 20:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text in the diagram is unreadable even when expanded, rendering the diagram as useless. Oxyman (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it. It's useless.--100.36.171.168 23:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 00:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 12:49, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

immagine in violazione di copyright. Danyele (talk) 21:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Motion-blurred, unused, and no likely educational or historic value. Plenty of better Amfleet images are available on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:57, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional logo, without clear education scope Josve05a (talk) 22:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Luckie Maserati

[edit]

A single-purpose account used only for self-promotion, the images being mostly logos that are not useful for any educational purpose. The screenshot of the interview is probably copyrighted and is not own-work. All out of project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by subject at OTRS 2016071210029413. Taken in Peru, image published without consent COM:IDENT, COM:CSCR#Peru Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The threshold of originality in China is very low, see COM:TOO#China (PRC); literally almost anything other than the plainest of plain fonts and shapes will garner copyright. Wcam (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the characters "柳州快速公交" are apparently from a pre-made font (方正粗倩, oblique), instead of art-related calligraphy as in the "道" case, which should be a weaker match to the scope defined in article 3 of China's copyright law (s:Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (2010)). ——Artoria2e5 emits crap 12:57, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
方正粗倩 is a proprietary font developed by Founder Group. Commons:Licensing#Fonts states that only raster rendering of a font is not subject to copyright in the U.S. For Commons to host this file it has to be PD in both US and China. Considering the low TOO in China and COM:PRP I think this file should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 13:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size, and low quality images, all claimed as own work, and all unlikely to be own work. Three of the photos are very old, with proper information, they might be able to be kept, but the others are apparently (including letterboxing) screencaps or copied from the internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from the talk page --rimshottalk 09:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]
It's true that I have take this on internet but from my site, I have the copyright. I already sent the authorization to use the material present on the website www.palazzoesposizioni.it to Wikipedia and this was accepted. For the quality sorry but they are old photos (and for these there is no copyright for the Italian law) ('800) and there isn't a better quality. So please don't delete this images. There is no reason. Tell me how I can improve the description but don't delete. I'm waiting. Thanks. Michele Manerchia Masarà — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.119.164.38 (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French FOP problems of PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos are derivative of architecture/sculpture/signage in France. They appear too modern to be {{PD-old-70}} and do not appear de minimis to me. France's freedom of panorama exemptions are insufficient for Commons. Some of these files may qualify for transfer to a local wikipedia. Note: I requested in April that this user curate his photos and made him aware of FOP rules, but he seems to have declined to address the problem. Storkk (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly modern
Cette maison aurait été construite par Roger Le Flanchec (1915-1986) --Spendeau (talk) 19:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Epona géant des Près Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg withdrawn per the below Storkk (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mariage Epona - Guillem le contrebandier (2).jpg withdrawn per below Storkk (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Français: Bonjour Storkk je trouve originale votre demande de suppression des fichiers concernant le géant "Epona". Ce géant a été conçu et imaginé par moi-même et mes amis gestionnaires dans une association (le LCR des Prés) de Villeneuve d'Ascq. La réalisation en a été confiée à un plasticien, que nous avons rémunéré, et qui n'a en rien une propriété intellectuelle. J'ai du reste écrit un article concernant ce géant. Epona (géant de procession).

est un montage photographique réalisé par moi même pour en faire un poster destiné à l'association (LCR des Près).- Je l'ai repris pour mon article wiki comme "image-desc Épona", géante du quartier les Près, Cordialement. --Pierre André (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • English: Hello Storkk I find your singular request to delete files on the giant "Epona". This giant was designed and conceived by myself and my friends managers association (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq. The realization was entrusted to a plastic, we paid, and who did nothing intellectual property. I have the rest written an article about this giant. Epona (procession of giant).

is a photographic montage by me to make a poster for the association (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq ". I returned to my wiki article as "picture-desc Epona" giant of the area (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Architects include Valode & Pistre
En 1977 ... rénova l'édifice sur les plans des architectes Foyer Dodat et Villain. [2]
Constructed after 1977 w:Puy du Fou
Vulcania. Architect died in 2014
Patrig Ar Goarnig is still alive
P. de Hainaut died in 1951 - could undelete in 2022, but is out of scope as FOP-defaced
Possibly Alexandre-Mathurin_Pêche, if so Undelete in 2026
François_Cogné, undelete in 2023
Non-trivial signage
Copyright holders unknown - too modern to be {{PD-old-70}}? COM:PRP
Apparent repurposed WWII bunker.
Mills of unknown date
Constructed after 1910 (exact date unknown)
Destroyed in 1917 - but after reconstruction, artwork looks too modern to be PD
Various war memorials
Other
File:Paris Père Lachaise Clement Lebas.JPG -  Keep grave architect Ernest Georges Coquart (1831–1902), PD old. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise François Arago.JPG -  Keep grave architect Félix Duban (1797–1870), PD old. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise Statue d'Anatole de la Forge.JPG -  Keep grave artist Louis-Ernest Barrias (1841–1905), PD old. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise Anatole de la Forge.JPG -  Keep grave artist Louis-Ernest Barrias (1841–1905), PD old. --P 1 9 9   14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pont-Aven Pension Gloanec.jpg withdrawn Storkk (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Storkk (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Havang(nl): you have asserted a number of files depict works that are PD-old, but you have not asserted a single death date or author identity. For a building erected in e.g. 1910, why do you think it is PD-old? Storkk (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know what information User:Havang(nl) has access to, but assuming an average life time of 80 years and assuming that a building can be made at any time during the architect's lifetime, I'd expect that somewhere around half of all buildings from 1910 are PD-old-70. It may be better to nominate photos of such buildings separately so that the discussion is simplified if some architects are identified. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • If more than a couple architects are identified, I will consider splitting the DR. If only a few architects are identified but they are post-1945 deaths, I will add the files to the appropriate Undelete in... categories manually. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close. There are far too many images nominated here, many of which don't need to be deleted IMO (see above, I looked at the first 30 images and already many of them I deem acceptable). These images should be nominated separately or in smaller batches. --P 1 9 9   19:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: FWIW, I strongly disagree with your "DM" arguments above... the photographs are clearly of the architecture, meaning they cannot be COM:DM (see criteria 6/7). Storkk (talk) 08:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, some may be borderline like File:Hautes-Pyrénées, La Mongie.jpg, but others are clearly not (like File:La Mongie.- La Chapelle Notre-Dame de La Mongie.jpg). --P 1 9 9   19:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk · contribs)'s files with other problems (e.g. non-French FOP)

[edit]
Likely modern work from the UK, no COM:FOP#United_Kingdom for 2-D graphic works
Derivative of recently deceased artists' work
No COM:FOP#South_Africa
No COM:FOP#Sri_Lanka
For the below, where the statues might be old, the paint work looks modern, and would also be copyrighted.
No COM:FOP#Romania
No COM:FOP#Lithuania
Note that this church is old, but the painting appears very modern
No COM:FOP#Latvia
COM:FOP#United_States only applies to buildings
No COM:FOP#Estonia
No COM:FOP#Greece
No COM:FOP#Italy
No COM:FOP#Japan for artwork
No COM:FOP#Cambodia
No COM:FOP#Mongolia
Out of scope after removal of copyrighted contents
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (4).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper (see, e.g. [3])
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (2).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (1).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper

Storkk (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#Belgium
Architecture (possibly soon to be OK under new Belgian FOP rules?)
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (3).jpg
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (11).jpg
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (10).jpg
Monuments/statues
File:Zillebeke (3).JPG
File:Hill 60 Zwarteleenstraat Ieper (3).JPG
File:Hill 60 Zwarteleenstraat Ieper (2).jpg
File:La digue de Koksijde-1.jpg


Speedy close. There are far too many images nominated here, that can't be reviewed properly against the various criteria. These images should be nominated separately or in smaller batches. --P 1 9 9   19:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: I find it hard to believe you are seriously suggesting ~400 separate nominations, especially considering that would likely break the uploader's talk page. Secondly, this is obviously not a "speedy" close candidate. Storkk (talk) 08:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Granted, ~400 separate nominations are also overwhelming, but looking at the various comments already posted above, there are numerous files that should not be deleted but now risk being deleted as a part of this mass nomination. OK, I will try to review the list above over the next few days. --P 1 9 9   19:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: files with obvious FoP issues, kept about 125 files. If you feel some of them still should be deleted, please create separate DRs. Next time please don't create an unmanagable DR like this. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tananik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO, uploads by an art gallery of multiple artists work, all claimed as own. Note file names, size of images, appearance of images when viewed together, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin, the user has acknowledged on their talk page on bg:w (in English via Google) that they made a mistake by uploading the reproductions, and that they actually hoped the images to be deleted, with the notable exception of the first and the last three images, i.e. the gallery interior, exterior, logo and the portrait of the woman who apparently is the gallery owner. I guess it's safe to delete (and indeed quite necessary) the rest of the files. Not sure about the logo and the paining of the owner, but I've made clear to them that the license allows rather free use even for commercial purposes and they seem to have understood it. — Luchesar • T/C/U 14:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ellin , Luchesar I admit that I made a mistake by uploading all of the images of the paintings that Art Gallery Largo displays and I hope that the images will be deleted, except the four images, which Luchesar mentioned. I understand the rules of the free license and I spoke to the owner of the gallery, Nelly Valcheva, who owns everything on these four images. She allowed me to use the images, knowing and understanding that the images can be used for other purposes by anyone, without him owing me or her anything. Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience. P.s. I also want to apologize for any grammatical, punctuation or any kind of errors in this paragraph. Tananik (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be really helpful to know who took the photos described as "Nelly Valcheva, who owns everything on these four images". I don't see a photographer's credit on any of those images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also didn't see a good reason to treat File:Nelly Valcheva.jpg differently from the other paintings, all of them being deleted. Permission from painter Lora Marinova is not provided just like in all the rest cases.
File:Art Gallery Largo .jpg was the art gallery's logo and deleted as derivative work of non-free content. The gallery's owner definitely does not want their logo under free license here.
I kept the photos of the gallery itself File:Largo 11.jpg, File:Art Gallery Largo.jpg.
List of today uploads
needs to be reviewed separately. The good thing is that these photos seem to have inspired BG Wikipedia community members to create articles about the painters. Bad thing is that some of the photos are in very low resolution. If User:Tananik claims to be the author, could he/she be so kind to upload the files in full resolutions with EXIF data. Thanks in advance. Spiritia 18:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Spiri, from what I can tell, some of these have been taken from the website of the gallery, e.g. [4], [5], [6], [7], but others seem to have been directly taken from various internet sites, e.g. [8], [9] (search for 'ЗА АРТИСТИТЕ'), highly suspect this one too. While I try hard to assume good faith, it seems to me that in the end Tananik might've not grasped that well the meaning of the CC licences, and probably the very concept of licencing too. — Luchesar • T/C/U 18:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I work with Nelly Valcheva at the gallery, it's a family business and I am part of the family, so I can guarantee you that I spoke to her about all of this, she told me she is okay with uploading the photos I asked you not to delete. The photos of the gallery inside and out, the photo of a fragment of the portrait of the owner and the logo are Nelly Valcheva's creation. Also, the photos that I uploaded to be profile photos of the artists- they are my creation, I took all of the photos (except maybe one or two of them). I took them out of the official site and the facebook page of the gallery, because I did not have access to the gallery server, which storages all of the photos I took on exhibitions with the gallery's camera. But I will soon have access again and will upload them. If you could tell me what kind of permission from Lora Marinova you would like to recieve to let me upload the portrait of the gallery owner (I also want to squeeze in the fact that Nelly Valcheva owns this portrait and can do whatever she wants with it, including giving me permission to upload it on Wikipedia, which she did). I don't understand why you deleted the image of the logo though. I assume you would like some kind of proof that I am part of the family business and that I work at the gallery? Tananik (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you're really mixing up different concepts: even if you've bought a painting, you don't automatically acquire the copyright, unless the painter specifically signed over their copyright to the buyer, or it was done as work for hire, or the copyright has expired (ref. here). So, unless some of these conditions are satisfied, having bought a painting doesn't entitle you to reproduce it and certainly not to re-licence it. — Luchesar • T/C/U 21:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, could you be so kind and tell me what kind of permission you would like? Tananik (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you should follow the procedure described on Commons:OTRS, but better wait for confirmation from Spiritia (or another admin), as I personally haven't handled such cases. — Luchesar • T/C/U 21:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to upload a photo of a drawing of the gallery owner, Nelly, which is my mother if I haven't mentioned already , which I drew two years ago and it's entirely my work, but I can't. You took away my privilege of uploading photos? Is this a temporary or a permanent thing? Tananik (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploads to Commons should be performed via Special:UploadWizard. The upload functionality of the Visual Editor in the Bulgarian Wikipedia has been disabled for everyone, because of the frequent and uncontrollable abuse (I'm referring to other cases; yours just reminded us that we need to do something about it). — Luchesar • T/C/U 22:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete including the new images which are all copied from other sources without attribution. Copyright doesn't mean the same thing as "I own the print of the photo," it doesn't mean "I have access to some servers where I can take other people's content", it doesn't mean "I can up load anything I want because I know or am related to someone else who might maybe have no rights at all to the images on their website." I think we're seeing here a promotional series of uploads by someone who says they work at and are directly connected to the gallery and that all uploads from this uploader be removed because none of them are credibly own work. If valid COM:OTRS was received for any file, it could at that time be restored. This is a serious case where COM:PRP comes first, and everything else comes after. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Without further details and/or permissions, nuke all living uploads, can be found earlier on web, also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook, like (example) File:Художничката Лора Маринова.jpg (15.07.2016) = grabbed & cropped from https://www.facebook.com/ArtGalleryLargo/photos/a.10152965661895588.1073741921.253144985587/10152965664425588/?type=3&theater (2015, © by "Art Gallery Largo", identical FBMD...).Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Ellin and Gunnex. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for base map and no source of the data on the map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's my own work, as listed (appropriated from [commons map]). Falconfly (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:32, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist needs to send permission to COM:OTRS, commissioned art doesn't transfer copyright. And even so, it's not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asked the original artist to confirm permission by email. (talk) 23:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He sent it three hours ago to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. (talk) 01:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I love how both talk and talk are shitting themselves over having no valid grounds to delete this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconfly (talk • contribs)
 Comment Deletion nominations are process, not personal. COM:OTRS permission can take up to two weeks. There is no reason to continue blanking out the DN on the image page to the point where JuTa had to protect the page. Personal attacks have no place on Commons or in these discussions, the issue will be decided on merit even when uploader's actions are detrimental to the process. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Ticket was received - permission insufficient. (OTRS 2016071310027619) We'll have to wait a bit more. Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 09:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustration by Mary Gardiner, published in 1947 is not "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original illustration is indeed by Mary Gardiner (who of course is long dead) - however, I scanned it in and Photoshopped it and saved the JPG myself, so I saw that process as being my own work? However, I have also been in contact with Penguin Random House (who now own the copyright to all Frederick Muller titles) and asked them if I needed permission to use this image (I'm still waiting to hear back from them). I'm assuming that the problem here is because UK copyright doesn't now run out for 70 years (so technically the copyright on this doesn't run out until next year) - if I used an illustration from an older book, would that be OK? Jaycey (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - you may request undeletion after copyright has expired --Jcb (talk) 09:12, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first picture in the slideshow at https://www.glassdoor.com/Photos/Donegal-Insurance-Group-Office-Photos-E1343.htm is the same as this photo but dates from September 2015 which is at variance with the template information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I uploaded the photo to both Glassdoor and Wikipedia. I think it is OK to keep on Wikipedia.

@Jasobugg: May you send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ? Then we are sure that it legally fine.--Sanandros (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page appears to be out of the project scope as it's not an educationally useful collection of files with a small amount of explanatory text and can arguably be described as an advertisement for TED Conferences LLC, a California private limited company. odder (talk) 18:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 09:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. http://www.epeutnaerts.fr/galerie-photos/Festival des Epeutnaerts/Galerie Photos