Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/06/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 30th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not „own work“ + this logo does meet the threshold of originality: these are not simple geometric shapes DCB (talk) 08:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid claim of free use. Wikipediasecond (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a duplicate Balsupli (talk) 04:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk: Copyright violation; see COM:L. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Titlecard from a YouTube video. Google image search is not a valid source. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 04:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 22 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is free use only for educational purpose, while no one can use it commercial use, modification and redistribution, and I published it in free licence, so I want to delete it and publish it in another section Ambrishseo (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk: Copyright violation; see COM:L. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says "revista", what means "scanned illegaly from a magazine" Yanguas (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have removed the word "honeymooning" from name, if it is still not acceptable then you can remove this photograph.


Deleted: already deleted. --INeverCry 18:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 23:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright infringement (COM:NETCOPYRIGHT). Can be found on multiple websites. e. g. here. --De728631 (talk) 23:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content taken from http://ritesoftheblackmoon.tripod.com/interview_bathory.html - Sabbatino (talk) 05:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley: Media uploaded without a license as of 2016-06 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence of a free license at https://www.codot.gov/. Among the US states, only California and Florida freely license state works -- all others are copyrighted. In order to keep this on Commons, we will need proof that it is properly licensed, or a free license from an authorized official, including a cite to the law permitting giving away Colorado government property. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see uploader's talk page. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use (subject in image is unidentified) Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--RoxGV (talk) 10:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC) This image was posted to add personal information about Elena's Larrauri Pijoan biography (Spanish). This file was taken from flickr account https://www.flickr.com/photos/el_pdi/ which has been posted as public domain Mark 1.0. So, there is no reason for delete this image.[reply]
File was not in use when I opened this request. Withdrawing nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Non-admin close: Withdrawing my nomination Elisfkc (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license here means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 18:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reviewing the flickr account from which this photo was derived doesn't give me any confidence that the flickr user created this image. Most of their pictures are culled from various sites all over the internet. Nominating to gain clarity and consensus on this image. I have nominated both this cropped version and a larger one, but as they had different uploaders, I am nominating them separately for the notification process. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I withdraw the nomination based on Puramyun31's analysis; these same images have been uploaded several times by a sock and it needed review. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Withdrawn nomination. (Non-admin closure) Grand-Duc (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not know that my file where be included immediately to the Wiki Commons. I was doing a test, sorry... This image will not be used for the moment in the article I am writing.

Thank you very much for your kindest help.

Signed, Oswaldo González Sytars (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like the head was added to an existing snapshot of another player. We don't need made-up images that are most likely also copyright infringements. De728631 (talk) 22:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, base photo was http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/26/article-2613813-1D5FEF6B00000578-120_634x460.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by Paul Atkinson, Shutterstock.com Gyrostat (talk) 23:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No licence Bob st3v (talk) 11:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 28 June 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation 62.64.152.154 00:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is on Flickr at https://www.flickr.com/photos/28568192@N06/15110588848 and is (C) All Rights Reserved. XR728 (talk) 02:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused not particularly high quality image of a common subject. Have better ones in Category:NEMA 5–15R DMacks (talk) 02:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Kattenkruid (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo Kattenkruid (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anoojahere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chinaforgingmachinery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chinaforgingmachinery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This is used with full permission from "A-Rod Ricky Roy" and his management who have fully consented and GRANTED full use of this document in part or whole without prejudice.


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purported magazine photo. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS - it's not really a "selfie". Velocitas (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a PR photo that can be found in various crops and sizes in a great many sites, and has been uploaded previously. And the same issue remains. No evidence provided that this publicity photo had been released by the photographer under the stated free license. Confirmation through OTRS would be needed. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:DiploPress2015.jpg where a different uploader claimed OTRS notification was sent but it seems it really wasn't sent at all. Whpq (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Titlecard from a copied YouTube video. Google image search is not a valid source. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 04:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia is not a valid source. The page to which the wiki page links as source "http://www.xebec-inc.co.jp/anime/toloveru/" has Copyright © 2008 XEBEC. All rights reserved. at bottom Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't that lack treshold of originality? It is not more than a simple text-logo. --Don-kun (talk) 11:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: appears to be above TOO to me. --INeverCry 00:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"game for kids" = COM:TOYS Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"game for kids" = COM:TOYS Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:W.B. Woodgate 1921.jpg which is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokostv1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I think all of these are copyvio. Most photos of sport competitions can be found in web, also small dimensions, no metadata (except 2-3 files). Badges are copyrighted and without any permission would violate copyrights. Blue-white flag (File:Тююю.jpg) = File:Flag of Tyumen (Tyumen oblast).png, russian flag in a form of a heart can be found in web and it has signs of artistic contribution/idea.

Dmitry89 (talk) 20:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown country, so unknown FOP status. The sculptor is w:Draft:Walter Noetico who is Italian, but the sculpture might be in another country. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrator Stefan, With regard to the image Sculpture "Lettera s", I have uploaded it, for insertion under "clarification needed" for one of the statements at the beginning of text for Walter Noetico Artist, and while preparing the "inline citations" I thought it a good idea to include a visual image of what it is, this Neoilluminist Alphabet which was invented by this Artist. Having uploaded this image, I then was unable to connect it with the page itself, and it was left "floating" on the Commons section. I also, at that time, was unsure of what Licensing tag to use, and left it blank, but later I believe that I did insert a Licence tag to it. As for the FoP, this sculpture is not in a public place. The image of it was given to me by the Artist himself for the purposes of my working on a page creation (together with other numerous hard paper journals, newspaper cuttings, books and art catalogues etc, since his prime activity was in the years way back from the age of internet). Could you kindly revise this matter and your decision please? If you do need an email from Maestro Noetico to confirm his authorisation and permission to use the material, I can arrange for that to be sent. If I made a mistake, I do apologise, because I am quite new to the Wikipedia and am often quite confused by what is the correct and best way of action. I am, however, all at your disposal to make matters coherent, in good light and in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia. Many thanks for your time and attention. --Robert G Wilson (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Richard F Morris[reply]

 Comment It is very probable that the image has been taken in France, where Noetico lives. No FOP there. --Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard F Morris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown countris, so unknown FOP status. The sculptor is w:Draft:Walter Noetico who is Italian, but the sculptures might be in other countries.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Actually they are fakes made with Gimp or Photoshop: the sculptures in the first two files are not in place they pretend to be (Venice and Paris resp.) --Ruthven (msg) 11:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, scanned from unknown source. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 20:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Video screenshot taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFlUGkBNsFQ which appear to be (considering also the watermark since 15s) a TV transmission by en:Sociedade Independente de Comunicação (SIC), a Portuguese television network and media company, which runs several television channels. Gunnex (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gap5200 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gap5200/logs

Gunnex (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree with Gunnex.--Epsilon Tauri (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gap5200 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© COMITÉ OLÍMPICO DE PORTUGAL

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Podem eliminar, foi erro meu.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gap5200 (talk • contribs)
  • Speedy  Delete Nothing in the source supports that this files are freely licensed. Also per uploader remarks, in this page, the uploader made an mistake in uploading this files. Tm (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 05:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded it by accident. Angelgreat (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now a redirect. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Bilbao - La Salve 02.jpg PA (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work was at English Wikisource, and it has been determined for that community that it was a copyright violation. Discussion at s:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions/Archives/2013-02#Small_Town  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 21:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by נטע ד (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All derivative works from the same source. See File:Rachav Abed Elhalim.JPG.

-- Geagea (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:BxSJ - Tram.jpg PA (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:BxSJ - Façade Ouest.jpg PA (talk) 22:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This symbol is originally from the TV series Stargate SG-1, and User:Mikla's recreation of it as a derivative work doesn't negate the original copyright. — Fourthords | =/\= | 22:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- Under United States copyright law, it would appear to fail the File:Best Western logo.svg originality test... AnonMoos (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep a simple snake in a circle, close to symbols of Anubis in Egyptian mythology. Prométhée (talk) 16:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work by an organisation (財団法人日本漢字能力検定協会). It is not own work by the uploader. Permission is needed from the organisation. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This symbol is originally from the TV series Stargate SG-1, and User:ch1902's recreation of it as a derivative work doesn't negate the original copyright. — Fourthords | =/\= | 22:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep idem Commons:Deletion requests/File:Apophis Symbol (Stargate).svg, simple work, derived from representations in Egyptian mythology (his helmet with horns).

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

forte rischio copyviol. Danyele (talk) 22:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope nonsense. Stats for the 2030-31 season are very hard to obtain unless you can foresee the future. De728631 (talk) 23:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bottom picture copyrighted by Paul Atkinson Gyrostat (talk) 23:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour , le montage photo est faite qu'avec des photos de wikipédia.

Non, la photo du bas est de Paul Atkinson de Shutterstock.com, elle est soumise au droit d'auteur est ne peut être mise en ligne ni sur Wikimedia Commons ni su Wikipédia. Gyrostat (talk) 07:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://nakajimashoart.com/nakajiama-hiroyuki/ OnionRing (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HAMBEY FILMS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, mysteriously watermarked (most likely video screenshots) = official anthem, coat of arrms, flag and 2 shots, uploaded since 29.06.2016 for es:Pradera (Valle del Cauca), a Colombian municipality.

Gunnex (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work. Probably a photo of a photo 2003:45:5C6F:A801:50CF:F7C0:2E96:6C14 06:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Karte wird weder irgendwo verwendet noch wird sie in der Commons korrekt dargestellt. Wird die Karten mit GIMP geöffnet, werden die Umrisse der Kantone sehr unscharf und grob dargestellt. Da gibt es mittlerweile viel bessere Karten... Tschubby (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low quality is a valid deletion reason. See Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose #Examples: "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality.". --INeverCry 00:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Plain text] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope could be replaced by wiki-markup. Gunnex (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album. This photo is out of scope Wikicology (talk) 07:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was used as part of a joke/vandalism on enwiki. Not in scope. This, that and the other (talk) 07:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo, the user's last remaining upload. Special instructios field in metadata begins with "FBMD", probably the photo comes from Facebook. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual; outside project scope DCB (talk) 08:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; see [1] Balsupli (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored this and closed as keep. This looks to be the original, while the web file is taken from this. INeverCry 18:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imagens unhas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (max 178x252 px), missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 08:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not „own work“ + this logo does meet the threshold of originality: these are not simple geometric shapes DCB (talk) 08:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the uploaders's own work. I believe they took it from here Wikicology (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not „own work“ + this logo does meet the threshold of originality: these are not simple geometric shapes DCB (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Copyright holder needs to send permission to COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology: As written at the bottom of Tasnim news agency, all contents is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (a discussion result exists)--Freshman404Talk 09:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{Tasnim}}. --INeverCry 00:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is not clear how this is uploader's own work. They probably copied the image from this website Wikicology (talk) 08:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is not clear how this is uploader's own work. They probably copied the image from this website Wikicology (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João 102030 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works considering grabbed from http://cod.ibge.gov.br/3J06 (© 2016 IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) = (example) for File:GV10.jpg (uploaded 11.04.2016) --> http://www.biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/fotografias/GEBIS%20-%20RJ/ma32274.jpg (last modified: 2013). Source country: Brazil. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anderson Straw is not mentioned in en.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://cirnecobook.ru/?page_id=426 -- Tomasina (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение АП -- Tomasina (talk) 08:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of File:Ffa1.jpg, File:Ffa1.jpg deleted shizhao (talk) 08:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение АП -- Tomasina (talk) 08:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.cirnecodelletna.be/puppys2/colisto-s-luciano-kh-colisto-s-pepita/ -- Tomasina (talk) 08:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://uadog.com.ua/photo/s/sicilijskaja_borzaja/593-2 -- Tomasina (talk) 08:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{speedy|reason for deletion} AjarnRichard (talk) 08:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{speedy AjarnRichard (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why? No reason given! --hdamm (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{speedy|reason for deletion} AjarnRichard (talk) 08:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{speedy AjarnRichard (talk) 08:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why? No reason given! --hdamm (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. It is not clear how it is uploader's own work. They probably obtained the image from this website Wikicology (talk) 08:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File includes encrypted content 31.6.57.215 08:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not questioning the deletion- it's just that I would be interested to know the origin of the encrypted content, i.e. whether it's something my software has added or has been added when it was transferred to Wikimedia. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 17:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an exact duplicate and inferior version of: File:Lane Crawford logo.svg Fayenatic london (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Uploader's claim of {{Own work}} in doubt. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not „own work“ + this logo does meet the threshold of originality: these are not simple geometric shapes DCB (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo does meet the threshold of originality: these are not simple geometric shapes DCB (talk) 09:11, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures of Jyunshichi Tashiro

[edit]
He died 1985.cf:ja:田代順七--hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 08:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has problems with copyright and this makes me ask: why do you think, that the photo is anonymous? It does not come from an archive, but from a blog. If the blog owner does not know the photographer, this does not mean, that it is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in France. Also EXIF says: copyright holder ©THIERRY SUZAN. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lalitgupta isgec (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private holiday snap, outside project scope.

DCB (talk) 09:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong version. Kill it and let me update the correct updatet version Rmir2 (talk) 09:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had wrongly uploaded this file(uploader request) Freshman404Talk 09:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of not notable people, no educational use. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped of File:A.J. Styles Television Champion cropped.jpg, not necessary. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

. I believe this nomination was created based on the fact that the picture and the creator/loader are the same person. It's not a personal album item or part of such type of contents, it's a nomination out of context. It's a light file like profile picture (CV photo) that allows those who might read the article to have a image of the person that it talks about. Although I agree that the reasons evoked for deletion are strong I do not believe they'd truly aplly to this case. Please see the article before considering it's the deletion. Guilherme Noronha (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2016— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.62.13.67 (talk • contribs)

Your autobiography at ptwiki was 5x deleted during in the last years and the photo was due to it's small size and no exif probadly grabbed somewhere from social media. Gunnex (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paulo Martins scout (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 4x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating per above also:

uploaded on same day by Hélder Alexandre Madureira dos Santos (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log with similar files deleted (master, user Paulo Martins scout (talk · contribs) = probadly sock). Gunnex (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personnal photo, no educational. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Test upload] Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 10:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirror World (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Like File:Ismael Moreira Campeão de 1968.jpg probadly all scanned from sports magazines/newspapers.

Gunnex (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this picture is Giulio Rosso who died in 1976. OTRS-permission from the heir is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The painting belongs to my family since 1931. Therefore there is not a copyright problem. The second picture (Fontana della sfera) has been taken in a public space in Rome (Foro Italico). Is it enough? Sorry I'm not proficient in using wikipedia. User:Wikimau60

Unfortunately an owner of a painting does not have the right as a copyright holder. See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#2D art (paintings etc.). Even more unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. It is a splendid painting, but the permission from the heir is necessary to upload on commons.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original source has a CC BY-NC-ND license: http://asianwiki.com/File:Kang_Ha-Neul-PiFan2014.jpg Random86 (talk) 10:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 10:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with copyvio via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154172306833489&set=a.460090508488.222834.588358488&type=3&theater (03.04.2016). Gunnex (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kathirohrer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work of the uploader

DCB (talk) 10:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kathirohrer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are obviously dated wrong, they are not from 2017 and they are also not own work of the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free images: Published before 1918, so free in the US, but at least one author (Marcel Duchamp) lived until 1968. Requested by uploader. Aymatth2 (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/jaymaclever/photos/a.640081822769845.1073741825.640080482769979/856394654471893/?type=3&theater (02.2016) Gunnex (talk) 10:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, collage, probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

issues copyright Capa23 (talk) 10:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: plain text. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a personnal work of the uploader, it's a logo he found on the Web Hercule (talk) 11:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a personnal work of the uploader, it's a logo he found on the Web Hercule (talk) 11:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: text logo. --INeverCry 01:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a personnal work of the uploader, it's a logo he found on the Web Hercule (talk) 11:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

proper date, author, country should be provided to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality due to blur or lack of sharpness, does not add to extant images of lion couples on Commons. And personal POV: moronic anthropomorphization reducing the will to improve the image or filename to zero. Grand-Duc (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DCB as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://i.vimeocdn.com/portrait/12184043_300x300.webp. Uploader's username suggests this may not be blatant enough to be a speedy. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licensing template of these files have been deleted see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:MAV-FMVZ USP-license

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality issues, I challenge the educational usefulness of this minuscule image. It does not add significantly to our lion image collection. Grand-Duc (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the writing on the image, this is a publicity for a Ground penetrating radar equipement company. More than likely copyrighted material. Pierre cb (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Jamesx12345 alll images in this category have been superseded by PNG files in Category:Forth Bridge (1890). (See Commons:Categories for discussion/2014/08/Category:Forth Bridge (1890) old jpgs)

Themightyquill (talk) 13:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously a copyrighted movie still. This user uploaded a lot of copyrighted material. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Opaque private joke (used in a Wikipedia attack article about somebody and the quality of their jokes). McGeddon (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope COM:SELFIE Berthold Werner (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He subido este archivo únicamente como plantilla para que otro usuario crease una version .svg del escudo. Barbudo Barbudo (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: COM:SELFIE Berthold Werner (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have the opinion that an OTRS confirmation of licensing would be needed. This media is already well distributed on various websites, I didn't see clues about any chronological order. // J'estime qu'une confirmation de licence par l'OTRS serait très utile. L'image est déjà plutôt répandue sur le net sans trop d'indices sur un ordre chronologique de publication. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: COM:EDUSE Berthold Werner (talk) 13:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope COM:EDUSE Berthold Werner (talk) 13:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asthanarang96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be derivative works: photos of a computer screen or something. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader, and we have better copies of the Belarusian flag.

Stefan2 (talk) 13:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a website that is copyrighted per this page Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Shamim110

[edit]

Advertising. Also these are screenshots of a website that is copyrighted per this page. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google maps images are copyrighted, and are not available under the CC-by-SA4.0, or any other compatible license. WikiDan61 (talk) 14:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gowtam thakur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gowtam thakur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.hamaraphotos.com/albums300_2012/wpw-20120730/hpse_normal__3510234248_Mahaakshay%20Chakraborty%20at%20the%20making%20shoot%20of%20Paparattzy%20Productions_%20ENEMMY.JPG.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User-created logo for self-promotion and advertising of a non-notable website, not used on any wiki sites; the logo is of limited usefulness in other contexts with that typo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion/advertising, unused file, the user's only upload. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zapotocny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These appear to be attributed to random websites. I checked a few of the websites, but couldn't find any apparent evidence of permission. I'd assume that all of them are lacking evidence of permission.

Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF states that Iberotec is the author, but the uploader is claiming as own work XR728 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Allurehospitality

[edit]

Logos for self-promotion/advertising. Unused files, the only two uploads by the user. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{File:Cenon2.png}} Sytars (talk) 09:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original picture is in fact from: http://www.geothermie-perspectives.fr/image/differents-types-geothermie Illustration not available for commercial use. Triton (talk) 07:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai tiré l'image du site http://eduterre.ens-lyon.fr/ qui a bien la licence creative commons mais si le site geothermie-perspectives.fr ne l'a pas, alors effectivement, il y a un problème. Salsero35 (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:SovanDara

[edit]

Possible copyvios. It is not clear how these are uploader's own work. They probably copied the images from this website --Wikicology (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static1.squarespace.com/static/55dfca85e4b0e924d813c2a2/t/55f606fee4b06780ed69a5f0/1442187011390/. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.jawoon.co.kr/images/page_01_01_01.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.stuff.co.nz/content/dam/images/1/6/s/v/f/f/image.related.StuffLandscapeSixteenByNine.620x349.16si3j.png/1441765868787.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/p0b5NmWFIjY/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClXKQK6VYAImG0p.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cliffordbrownjazzfest.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Lonnie_Smith_900px_900X350.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dino7988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dino7988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work but one is a painting which needs permission, others are taken from the web with no exif and there are 3 OoS images

Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. A version of this photo is on their website here Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arjun shivhare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The file names suggest that these are screenshots, so they might not be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the rationale; they appear to be taken by the same camera, can't be found online, and don't look like copyvio video captures. But I'm not sure these are particularly useful. Maybe a primate expert can say? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Same camera? I don't see any camera EXIF. I suspect that these are screenshots from a film, and it's not always possible to find film screenshots on the Internet. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP and possibly out of scope. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded for self-promotion/advertising, the user's only upload; the file is not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 14:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Infringement Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Valuemailers

[edit]

Obvious advertising, the only two uploads by the user. The files are not useful for any educational purpose. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, likely product shot... photographer must confirm the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wintereu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.tocpress.info/95-de-ani-de-la-unirea-bucovinei-cu-romania/ Could be old enough? Yann (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just did some digging. According to Romanian Law, copyright seems to be +70 years since the date published, but I'm not 100% certain. Maybe Strainu could help us more. In any case, it's clearly not "own work". --Wintereu 17:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. There are no exceptions for press articles, and since Commons requires images to be free in both the origin country and the US, the deadline is the author's death (1962) + 70 years. Undelete in 2033 if deemed relevant for the article (I'm not very sure of that either).--Strainu (talk) 19:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same photo, two different sizes, no EXIF data, two different uploaders both claiming own work. Obviously not own work as claimed.

XR728 (talk) 15:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violationː Compare this googlesearch Offenbacherjung (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violationː compare this googlesearch Offenbacherjung (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized reproduction from http://cdn.liginc.co.jp/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/e4347e4f6d4b52d20f857eecf46e52d91.png 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographie en noir et blanc de cette image : http://www.beatricewarcollier.com/#!diaporama/c1ldr Bastenbas (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright : https://twitter.com/mg_cortex Bastenbas (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fully replaced by File:Alt US 40 Cumberland Narrows.jpg. Kopiersperre (talk) 15:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Carijasa

[edit]

Self-promotion/advertising by single-purpose account; the logos are not useful for any educational purpose. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion/advertising, the uploader's only contribution, the logo is not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright : https://www.whoswho.fr/bio/franck-prazan_45419 Bastenbas (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: ©2014 Katja Kuhl Autumn Windfalls (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.ashwini97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like books and historic pictures. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Proper sources are needed in order to determine the copyright status.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reviewing the flickr account from which this photo was derived doesn't give me any confidence that the flickr user created this image. Most of their pictures are culled from various sites all over the internet. Nominating to gain clarity and consensus on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was used to illustrate a fake in the German wikipedia. Not only is there no Dave J who allegedly won in a German show called "Das SuperTalent", but the date must be wrong because the camera was not out until March 2012. Since the submitter lied to us on two counts, I am not inclined to trust the permission and licensing information either. O.Koslowski (talk) 16:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was used to illustrate a fake in the German wikipedia. There is no indication whatsoever that there is an album called Flying High by an artist called David J. at Vertigo Records, as the article claimed. Since the submitter lied to us on several counts, I am not inclined to trust the permission and licensing information either. O.Koslowski (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dollymonroe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personnal photos, no educational used out of project scope.

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader has uploaded many copyvios, so maybe this is copyvio too, although I can't find any hits on Google. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERTISING, and COM:COPYVIO, each of the images requires attribution and proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, facebook sized photo with no indication of user's own work. We have a large collection of validly sourced Voladores pictures. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:William Daniel Da Paz Ferreira. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Last remaining file (despite a user pic). Gunnex (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio. Picture lifted from a Czech website on football hooligans. No attempt to find the author of the author and obtain permission can be discerned. Malatinszky (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by P.Divya Reddy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. One map with no source, a black and white (historical?) photo of unclear copyright statut, a file obviously grabbed from Facebook (no EXIF but "FBMD" in the metadatas). All other upload speedy deleted at this time.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license for every used image is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Appears to have been created using the virtualtrophies.com wine cup (direct link to image). There is no indication that I can find in the Terms of Use of the site that would suggest the site loses ownership of the underlying trophy design after a user creates a trophy. Nick (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bilal Ahmed Khan Jadoon (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used nowhere, except in the sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'posing' or 'family album' related upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a stained glass window inside a German hospital chapel. It looks rather modern, so unless convincing evidence to the contrary is presented, we must assume that the stained glass artist is not yet dead for at least 70 years - which means the artwork is still protected by copyright.

There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This packaging is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, this belt is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MuhammadAbdulRehman1 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere, except in the sandbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, in my opinion not suitable for stock photo due to bad quality. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather (very) bad quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. The uploader was warned in the past not to upload personal photos and I'll block him for a week. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For collages source and license for every used image is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, no educational use Don-kun (talk) 19:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:15, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

becouse, this is old signature Vrtleska225 (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not in use, no accurate description or file name. ~riley (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

becouse, this is old signature Vrtleska225 (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author requests deletion of unused signature file, no opposition. ~riley (talk) 19:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik heb dit zelf ingesproken en wil uiteindelijk toch liever niet mijn stem op internet. AONHMG (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, privacy issues. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see why this work should be PD-UKGov. Accd. to the source website, it apparently was purchased by the War Artists' Advisory Committee, not commissioned by the state.

The artist Edgar Ainsworth died in 1975, so the artwork is still protected until January 1, 2046. Rosenzweig τ 19:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to the following files:

The

should be deleted as well when empty. --Rosenzweig τ 19:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Focusing only on works with images I see in the Imperial War Museum Collections:
The WAAC purchased a lot of art in order to document the war from a British perspective. Reading about these works, Ainsworth needed permission from the WAAC to be able to access the camps in Germany, and to send his Picture Post artists there. The Imperial War Museum normally take care to only release images on a Fair Use basis when there may be claims of copyright, in these cases they apply their own non-commercial license, which I would take as evidence that the IWM are unaware of any potential claim, including that of the estate of the artist. By 1947 the IWM were solely responsible for all 5,570 works collated and commissioned by the WAAC (then disbanded). As far as I am aware, there has never been any claim by the estates of the artists against the IWM (or later recipient institutions) for either the work itself or its intellectual property. Though there has never been a precedent court case or other legal challenge for WAAC artworks, it seems reasonable to believe that WAAC and the MOI (as they were originally jointly responsible) claimed full ownership of the works under the powers of the MOI and that effectively this then included a transfer of IP. The law in WW2 was specially written to give the MOI sweeping powers to claim property.
Given this background, unless we can find a specific past recognized challenge to copyright for WAAC artwork, I suggest we consider all 5,570 works to be confidently below the "significant doubt" level we expect for deletion to be needed per COM:PRP.  Keep
 Info There was a similar discussion that relied on analysis of copyright for Ministry of Information property at Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Political Personalities 1936-1945 HU49409.jpg, where there was more explanation about why the MOI involvement was important. -- (talk) 10:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are all rather general assumptions, and "it seems reasonable to believe" is not solid proof that this is what actually happened. --Rosenzweig τ 00:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per War Artists' Advisory Committee "was a British government agency established within the Ministry of Information", so its powers were those of the MOI and its scope was to support the war effort with Government propaganda materials (the word "propaganda" has a more negative interpretation in the modern world than it did in the 1940s).
The decision here boils down to whether there is a consensus that sufficient significant doubt exists to require deletion unless more validation is provided, such as a copyright release from the artist (not going to happen, and permission from the artist's estate is irrelevant unless the IWM is breaking copyright law when it claims their equivalent of CC-NC) or the IWM as the source archive makes a clearer statement than they have already on their website (unlikely considering past correspondence with us). My view is that I just do not see a level of significant doubt in the light of the history of the last two decades when expired Crown copyright applies, as there has not been a single challenge to publication/reuse on copyright grounds for any of these works. Specific discussion within the WAAC on their implementation of copyright in the 1940s can be found within the WAAC Archive such as GP/46/10 (A) & (B) Contracts, Copyright and the Issue of Reproductions or GP/46/10 - Copyright. etc. These do not appear available online, but they are held by the Imperial War Museum with copies also available at the National Archives, if anyone would like to go and look at them. The WAAC archive documents are absolutely without doubt Crown copyright, and there is no doubt whatsoever that they are now public domain due to age and so copies could be published on, say, Wikisource if we can get hold of them. -- (talk) 07:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This DR added as an case study to User:Fæ/email/IWM. -- (talk) 09:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep As per - Commission by WAAC is not the only basis for PD:UKGov status, eg if the artist was in military service, government employment or was commissioned by another branch of the UK Government, then the work would also qualify.14GTR (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And that ("artist was in military service, government employment or was commissioned by another branch of the UK Government") was the case with Edgar Ainsworth? I'd like some more specific info for the images at hand, not just general information. --Rosenzweig τ 00:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ainsworth was the Art Editor for Picture Post magazine throughout WW II, but was also a war correspondent accompanying Allied forces across Europe in the final stages of the conflict. The British practice at the time was to give war correspondents a honorary military rank, if they were not already enlisted, so as a member of the UK armed forces his work would have 50 years Crown Copyright then become public domain. I've included some accounts of his activities below.[1][2][3] 14GTR (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  1. Jessica Talarico & Gemma Lawrence. Artists' Response To The Holocaust. Imperial War Museum. Retrieved on 27 June 2015.
  2. Tony Flynn (12 February 2016). 50 years ago in Salford:Harrowing war sketches on show at Monks Hall Museum. SalfordOnline. Retrieved on 2 July 2016.
  3. Holding the Line 2015, The Art of the War Years 1939-1945. Sim Fine Arts (2015). Retrieved on 3 July 2016.

Kept: per Fae and 14GTR, while we may not be 100% certain, it is highly likely these were crown copyright, and are thus now PD. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert G Wilson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in Italy

— Racconish ☎ 14:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. We need COM:OTRS permission from both the sculptors and the photographer. --Storkk (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert G Wilson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings by w:Draft:Walter Noetico. Not own work.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment A mail has been sent to OTRS (ticket:2016062710028835); however the authorisation is incomplete. Meanwhile I add the OTRS received template. --Ruthven (msg) 10:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: pending OTRS confirmation... these can be deleted after a month or so if permission hasn't been confirmed. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Vbwalia" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer (the person is a conman person waking in India). The author did not take the photo. If he/she did take the photo, then the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.142.156 00:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason to suspect that there is anything out of the ordinary here. This, that and the other (talk) 07:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image should be deleted as it looks either modified and looks plagiarized. First, how did the "author named Ravikanthaliya9" get a close clear picture? The author has no public record of being a professional photographer (the person is a conman person waking in India). The author did not take the photo. If he/she did take the photo, then the person should prove a written permission of the same to Wikimedia Commons. Please provide the authentication and official proof of the same. Regards, Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.142.156 00:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author has not provided any written permission or any authority on copyright holding on this photo. The author also seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 122.176.4.90 03:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose hour can one claim this is copyright violation of *Wikimedia and wiki rules and regulations*? Just because someone got a genuinely good snap doesn't mean that the image is not theirs. If the author has not uploaded pictures on Wikimedia, probably he/she has just begun contributing. Not uploading photos anywhere else is also not a valid excuse. What is he/she doesn't want to show off on other websites? Many people get a chance to get close to some well known XYZ. Why can't one of those photos be good qualities? The file has EXIF Data. One can expect that quality from Nikon COOLPIX S8000. We don't provide written permission of each and every image we wish to upload to Commons in CC licence. Of you say the editor is a common man walking in India and has no record of professional photographer, you are discouraging others to contribute as this implies *a good photo they submit would be challenged for deletion as a "common man's" photo can't be that good*. One can be good at photography and not be a professional photographer at the same time. Come up with some valid reason to claim this is copyright infringement. Provide a source on which the media was published before it was uploaded to Commons with a copyright tag.
Compare your lives to mine and then kill yourselves! 🍺💲🚬 06:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason to think this is a copyvio. Reventtalk 05:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: unlikely to be copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems there is a bit of misinformation on this file. Supposedly this is not a departure lounge or departure area as it is written in the file name, but when observed from the picture on this file is probably the arrival area. This file should be removed only to avoid mistakes on its use in the article. 36.84.229.74 05:38, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems there is little to fault information at the time I enter this file to Wikimedia Commons. This seems like there should be an area of arrival and not the departure area or the departure lounge of the airport. This file should be removed only to avoid misinformation and usage of this file. Aldo samulo (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This most likely is actually the arrivals area of the Sultan Syarif Kasim II International Airport and there seemed to be misinforming and the title of the file uploader. This file should be deleted rather than to give the wrong information on Wikipedia article. 36.84.229.21 07:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the Coat of arms (emblem) of People's Republic of Bulgaria from 1948 to 1968. The uploader claimed to be 22 years old. Thus, it is not clear how this would be their own work Wikicology (talk) 08:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i'm 31 years old front end web developer with Photoshop and Illustrator experience, if you check my upload history you will see that i have uploaded many graphical works, all made by me. The current version of the coat of arms is my latest try to vectorize all the bulgarian coat of arms. Please do not decide that this coat is not my work only because in 2007 i was 22 years old. --Scroch (talk) 20:53, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BTW i have just uploaded new version and for 1948 coart, if you want you can list it for deletion too --Scroch (talk) 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Scroch; please, don't be offended. I understand how you feel and I do sincerely apologize for misinterpreting your age. Unfortunately, the information on your userpage doesn't say anything about your birth year. It only says "I am 22 years old." Wikicology (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know this user, we have worked together many times over the years so there is no reason for deletion requests.--Пакко (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fry1989 eh? 23:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep However the uploader is not the author, ie. he is not designer of this COA. He "only" has made vectorization based on a bitmap image and/or a paper publication. So I suggest using something like this: {{author|original|{{author|unknown}}}}<br />{{author|vectorization|{{u|Scroch}}}}. Also the licence does not seem to be proper – I bet that {{PD-BulgarianGov}} is more suitable. --jdx Re: 09:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, It;s not self, at best it would be OGL ( as work of UK GOV/ Crown body). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So what's wrong with adding the correct licence then? Mjroots (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour je souhaiterai la suppression de cette photo car j’apparais sur celle-ci, en effet je suis le garçon sur la droite avec un collier rouge et jaune. Je n'ai pas était consulter pour cette photo et j'apprécierai que le contenue soit supprimer ! Merci d'avance. 5.50.231.81 05:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: taken in public space - no permission from depicted person is needed. --Jcb (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo cant be own or free Bilderling (talk) 09:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Почему же? Логотип вполне может быть собственной работой (его же кто-то нарисовал), ну и, вероятно, он и загрузил. Учитывая тот факт, что статья про этот завод в РВП напоминает рекламу (то есть "о себе"), то надо полагать, что так оно и есть. Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 10:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 10:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nigdy nie było i do tej pory nie ma takich dzielnic w Chełmie, ani oficjalnie, ani historycznie w pamięci powszechnej mieszkańców Chełma - ta grafika jest niesmacznym żartem jej autora kreującym fikcyjną rzeczywistość i historię, nie zawiera żadnych wiarygodnych informacji opartych o wiargodne źródła i z tych powodów proponuję jej kasację z commons, by nie wprowadzała użytkowników w błąc i nie szerzyła zamieszania na temat miasta Chełma Tecra (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PÖ4 PPFFM: Hallo, it was removed a text, which should make the person with 'NSU' in conjunction. This is refuted in addition to the text. In addition, this was linked here as a note of Wiki. Please keep !!(Text was transleted with: ImTranslator 10.10)--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 15:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-ET007_mayfie_G_20140926210035.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I want to make sure that I do this correctly. How can I prove that I have the rights to use this image on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petertrapasso (talk • contribs) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Petertrapasso

@ Petertrapasso, please follow the process at COM:OTRS. Even if the image is removed, if permission is received it is able to be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:13, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of our architectures are subject to FOP and all imagery are copyrighted by our company. We agreed to upload the artworks for creative common. No need to delete. Thank you.



Kept: weird DR. --Jcb (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicates File:Mappa ferr Palermo-Agrigento-Porto Empedocle.png Arbalete (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Arbalete, I don't want to overwrite the files of User Friedrichstrasse. The descriptions of german an italian wikipedia pages are very different, that's why I had created some own maps of the railway networks of sicily. My maps were mainly made for the german version. --Patrick1977 (talk) 20:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Patrick1977, I don't see any difference between your versions and my versions. By the way, all the city names of your version – besides of Fiumetorto – contain mistakes ("Empledocle" should be Empedocle; "Roccapalumpa" should be Roccapalumba, and so on).--Arbalete (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Arbalete, now I understand, "Friedrichstrasse" is your old or second username ;-). Well, the differences are only the mapcutting and more details. Just I had sad I wouldn't like to delete a file of another user. Thanks for the clue about the wrong spellings. I will correct them soon. Greetings from Berlin. --Patrick1977 (talk) 12:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but when the differences are so little, you could (and should) overwrite my files, and in case of doubt you can write me.
Two little mistakes again: "Termini-Imerese" should be "Termini Imerese", and "Palermo" should be "Palermo Centrale", similarly to Agrigento Centrale. --Arbalete (talk) 05:04, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, than we can delete this file and I will replace the double files. I had renamed Palermo an Argigento without the suffix Centrale. But, why Termini Imerese ist writing without hyphen? Italiano è molto complicato è sconcertante ;-) --Patrick1977 (talk) 20:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Termini Imerese is only one city (while Roccapalumba-Alia is a station that serves two towns called Roccapalumba and Alia). In german it shouldn't be very different...--Arbalete (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]