Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 28th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work → wrong source! Photo seems to be under copyright. Compare watermark in foto and http://www.theveterinaryexpert.com/nose-and-throat/brachycephalic-dog/ Anka (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Nussbaumer vom Naturhistorischen Museum der Burgergemeinde Bern ist der Fotograf dieser drei zu einem Bild verbundenen Aufnahmen. Ich hatte ihn per Email angeschrieben und er hat seine persönliche Genehmigung mit dem Standardtext an Permissions(at)Wikimedia.org geschickt. Er hat großes Interesse daran, dass das diese Fotos zur Aufklärung über Brachycephalie bei Hunden beitragen und hat sie vorher auch schon für eine veterinärmedizinische Website zur Verfügung gestellt. Ich habe sie aber nicht dort entnommen, sondern er hat sie mir in höherer Auflösung zugeschickt. Ich habe sie etwas zugeschnitten und dann hochgeladen. Die Fotos sind von ihm freigegeben. Geo-Science-International.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A PNG version of this file is now available HerrAdams (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy as duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bastardised version of File:Antisovjet russian partisan hunters 1942.jpg with false authorship claims. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 13:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Shameful picture, I believe this is for speedy deletion. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 14:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: notable person. --Krd 11:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad wuality photoshop, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality photoshop, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality photoshop, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality photoshop, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatsoever. Nationalistic garbage. Zoupan (talk) 21:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatosever, nationalistic garbage. Zoupan (talk) 21:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatosever, nationalistic garbage. Zoupan (talk) 21:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatosever, print screen from nationalistic forum Zoupan (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatosever, nationalistic piece. Zoupan (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use whatosever, nationalistic garbage quote. Zoupan (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 22:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 22:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal image with no educational content Florn (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture out of scope Thatonewikiguy (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image, com:nudity Pippobuono (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 11:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly out of scope‎. Personal photo. ~ Moheen (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elaine Lima Consultor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Larberger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused envelopes and address labels. Unclear source of photos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:nudity, out of scope, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 16:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but I feel, that the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. 95.27.139.211 14:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use, used in vandalism on an article NottNott|talk 17:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Europe.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be useful Blue Elf (talk) 18:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own upload, non-free Zoupan (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, EXIF shows 'Google'. This is also out of project scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in any case, out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope, text-only document, should be transferred to a project in wikitext if notable Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, see source (zimbio) Ebyabe (talk) 06:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems well over COM:TOO to me. Was previously used on enwiki under a non-free use claim at w:Clube Atlético Mineiro (as w:File:Galo Volpi.svg). —Cryptic (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmad azizi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 similar files of Iranian actors (not in this DR) I checked were copyvios. Unlikeky these professional lores/no exif images are self authored.

— Racconish ☎ 13:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 16:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios (see talk page), unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 23:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing by Ellin Beltz. DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 21:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, image not found. Thuresson (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "(C) All Rights Reserved". Thuresson (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "All rights reserved". Thuresson (talk) 09:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related frwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Michael.Krombo

[edit]

Files uploaded by Michael.Krombo (talk · contribs):

Possible copyright violations (game icons/avatars); in any case no encyclopedic use - out of scope. Uploaded for a deleted article en:‎Burno CS:GO. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonio48PA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes, no EXIF. Unlikely to be own works, almost other sport pictures uploaded by the user have been speedy deleted

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://eurasian-defence.ru/?q=node/29529. 95.27.139.211 14:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.interchangebrokers.com/images/1082/ibc/images/class-action.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PolycreteBigBlock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.panoramio.com/photo/87513685. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.micahalbert.com/info/. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.esplanade.com/~/media/images/events/n/noah-gallery01.jpg?mw=1200&w=1200&hash=34BE9AB4D34997D5C6D4751911B177A410DFF778. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ec/e0/a5/ece0a54e80b1832d64680feddf39dac5.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied check from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved". Thuresson (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamira toufik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In view of the large number of possible copyvios from this uploader, I find it unlikely these 2 low red/no exif files would be self authored.

— Racconish ☎ 16:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by ~riley as copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cozislander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cozislander (serial copyright violator for es:Cozumel related entries). Also per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martirosyan584 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai versé deux fois le même fichier. En doublon avec File:Marguerite-Gerard-Portrait-architecte-famille.jpg DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 16:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, duplicate file. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to clear it Osmmuha (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, EXIF shows 'Google'. Likely to be taken from the web. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://graphicprofile.blogspot.fr/2015/03/graphic-arts-institute-mohammadpur.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio cf ref to magazine, and http://hot1041stl.com/2396684/stormm-styles-tiffany-foxx-on-the-cover-of-be-magazine-via-princessstormm/ Pippobuono (talk) 06:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyrighted image TAnthony (talk) 21:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyrighted image TAnthony (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyrighted image TAnthony (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyrighted image TAnthony (talk) 21:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD-ineligible. 77.6.12.186 21:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, packaging. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a personal web host Elisfkc (talk) 21:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. These are all derivatives of modern architecture (and a sign) in France. France's Freedom of Panorama exemption is non-commercial only, which is not compatible with our licensing policy. --Storkk (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

More images that violate France's lack of FOP

Elisfkc (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This in no way is the extent of all of this user's violations of FOP, nor did I check for who designed each building/bridge/sign. This is merely the extent of the structures that look to be too modern to be in the public domain in France that the user has uploaded from 2016-05-17 through the time of the nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I could see a de minimis argument for keeping a bunch of these... I'll look more in detail when I have some time. Storkk (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Êtes-vous sérieux ? je vois qu'une cabine téléphonique de type "France Télécom" est considérée comme soumise à copyright. Demandez l'avis d'administrateurs français avant de vous lancer dans ces suppressions (Are you serious? I see that a phone box of type(chap) "France Télécom" is considered as subjected(submitted) to copyright. Ask for the opinion(notice) of French administrators(directors) before throwing(launching) to you in these abolitions(deletions)). --François GOGLINS (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for so many files in one nomination, especially with nothing better than suspicion of age. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France, sculptor's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, minus 2. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France (again). When user will understand?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted work by Édouard Manchuelle (d. 1984), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Who is the sculptor? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France. Who are the sculptors? Permission of their heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The author of the war memorial of Resistance is unknown and it is the municipality of Nogent-sur-Marne. Hence, it can't be deleted. Besides, the war memorial was made by Charles Billon in 1926 and died before 1950.
The request was made without any check and I am a bit circumspect about that. Chabe01 (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To my knowledge there's no architect or sculptor named Charles billon who worked for the City of Nogent-sur-Marne. May uploader disclose his source? The same way it's very unlikely that the author of a 1950's work paid by a municipality is anonym. Besides it's up to the uploader to provide accurate informations proving that the work is public domain, not to the nominator. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Derivative works of non-free signs/posters. Some files have had blurring applied, but the extent of the blurring is not sufficient to remove the non-free copyrightable authorship. The copyrighted works form a significant portion of the derivative works and are intentionally included in the images, so COM:DM France does not apply. There is no FoP in France.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source image File:Huygens-banknote-55k.jpg was deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of the Netherlands. Therefore this image should be deleted as well. Diannaa (talk) 23:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a spoiled file Machli jal (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, nonsense, normal quality. The nominator is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 14:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the orignal uploader's request. Machli jal (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not see good reason to delete. This is uploader's request one month after uploading, which is too late for courtesy deletion. In addition, the uploader is indefinitely blocked as sockpuppet. The file can be useful. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. Machli jal (talk) 09:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader request. Jhony jhony yes papa (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not see clear reason. Uploader's request is valid reason only one week after uploading. In addition, both nominators are indefinitely blocked as sockpuppets. The file can be useful. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ये फाइल फालतू है। Jhony jhony yes papa (talk) 09:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, redundant to file:Indian states according to party of their chief minister 17.png. Taivo (talk) 14:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.zedcorner.com/meet-zambias-self-made-computer-programmer-joseph-mulenga-chipimo/ OnionRing (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete the image it's with great respect to Joseph Mulenga Chipimo and Zambia, we have the right to upload it Soulmwandi (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, if a proper permission from the copyright owner is sent to OTRS, then the file will be undeleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://chishimbakasanga.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/joseph-chipimo-zambias-next-big-thing/ OnionRing (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete we received the rights to upload the image from the owner and its beneficial to him and zambia. Soulmwandi (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, if a proper permission from the copyright owner is sent to OTRS, then the file will be undeleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mirna N.1988. Probadly grabbed from Facebook. Last remaining file by uploader. Gunnex (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shorin Angels by Dmitry Shorin. uploaded by Birulik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of a sculpture protected by copyright

Vera (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 95.27.139.211 14:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio image, same as other one this user uploaded Ebyabe (talk) 06:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:nudity, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 09:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a personal web host Elisfkc (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: userpageimage. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable cpyvio : magazine Pippobuono (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Brunei as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It is CC-BY-NC-ND Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snippet from the file talk page:

-- The file was originally uploaded on en.wiki by en:User:Boston and tagged as CC-BY-SA license. The declared source is Tolweb @Brunei: The file is no more available on the original source so where have you found that is released with CC-BY-NC-ND license ?! --Esculapio (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC) --[reply]

@Esculapio and Brunei: --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There was also a link to Tree of Life website, where majority of pictures are NC-ND. But there is no such picture there now, so I dismiss my suspicion.--Brunei (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: revoked. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution highly artifacted version of File:2015 MSN logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 03:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a pixelly, inaccurate (look at the bag's handles) recreation of File:Windows Store.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 03:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jonathan Jafari.png Elisfkc (talk) 04:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright belongs to Mozambique government and lasts 70 years. See Commons:Currency#Mozambique AHeneen (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Ariadacapo (talk) 05:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality file of car, replaced by File:1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 CE (W 114) coupe (27117724592).jpg. OSX II (talk) 06:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1970 Mercedes-Benz 250 CE (W 114) coupe (27117724592).jpg. The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is obscured by a roof
  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr file replaced by File:1993 Saab 900 Turbo convertible (27185244482).jpg. OSX II (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly out of scope‎. ~ Moheen (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, so in scope. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata states copyright I99pema (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, replaced by identical car: File:Holden Commodore VL Sedan.jpg. OSX II (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:Holden Commodore VL Sedan.jpg (and other files within Category:Holden Commodore (VL) SL). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is low resolution
  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a self nomination, file was upload by different user account.--Wdwd (talk) 07:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:TOYS. OSX II (talk) 07:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have another better file to replace Tfm1234 (talk) 11:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have another better file to replace Tfm1234 (talk) 11:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have another better file to replace / want to change file Tfm1234 (talk) 11:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is a version without the translucid paper, so this one is not useful F (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: link to that better version was not provided. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main focus of this photo is clearly the giant TV screen showing Kim Jong-un. It is a well-established principle of Commons that you cannot circumvent copyright by taking a photo of a photo or a photo of a TV screen. Copyright of the TV screen image in this photo belongs to NK TV, not the photographer. BabelStone (talk) 21:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note, File:0921 - Nordkorea 2015 - Pjöngjang - Public Viewing am Bahnhofsplatz (22584958809).jpg which also shows the giant TV screen with Kim Jong-un is probably OK as the main focus is on the people watching the screen rather than the screen itself. BabelStone (talk) 22:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr file, replaced by File:1998-2000 BMW 735i (E38) sedan (2010-07-19) 02.jpg. OSX II (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1998-2000 BMW 735i (E38) sedan (2010-07-19) 02.jpg (and other files within Category:BMW E38 (1998)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr file, replaced by File:1998-2000 BMW 735i (E38) sedan (2010-07-19) 01.jpg. OSX II (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1998-2000 BMW 735i (E38) sedan (2010-07-19) 01.jpg (and other files within Category:BMW E38 (1998)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally on enwiki by en:User:WRE451 in 2010 the photo was previously published via http://www.city-data.com/picfilesv/picv15675.php (credit: "Picture by colin holloway Submitted on 10/13/2005") = http://pics4.city-data.com/cpicv/vfiles15675.jpg (last modified: 2008, identical exif). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[Transfered from trwiki in 2010] The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 08:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not wikipedia. Achim (talk) 08:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree music. Eleassar (t/p) 08:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Music title is Cylinder Eight, created by Chris Zabriskie and published under CC Attribution 4.0. See http://chriszabriskie.com/cylinders/ and http://chriszabriskie.com/licensing/ . Check original video for more info. MZaplotnik (edits) 15:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not wikipedia. Achim (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree music; also no evidence that Lipinsky is the holder of the copyrights on the shooting. Eleassar (t/p) 08:25, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:CNN Vine Story Slovenia.webm. --Sporti (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of dubious origin, watermarked, with a wrong license on all probability Phso2 (talk) 08:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author head shot from http://kashmirreader.com/2016/02/maqbool-is-a-creator-and-afzal-is-the-creation/ MKFI (talk) 08:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from http://sims.ess.ucla.edu/eyoung/Young_panorama.htm. This image might be {{PD-USGov}}, but proper sourcing is needed to confirm that. Note also that there is a duplicate en-wiki local file: en:File:Panorama fresh.jpg, uploaded by the same user. MKFI (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with just one line of plain text. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation, fake licensing Svkov2 (talk) 11:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Awkward angle that cannot be realistically fixed (edited). Much better photos of this car at Category:Renault 12. OSX (talkcontributions) 10:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is not a reason for deletion. the photograph is a reasonable image of the car showing different detail and angle to the other images Oxyman (talk) 11:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to know how you would reasonably expect this image to be used? This is not a typical angle, and the photo was only framed as such due to the constraints of getting the full car into the frame. OSX (talkcontributions) 11:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to know what harm you perceive hosting this file does to anyone? It appears not to be a copyvio or anything else that would legitimately mean it should be deleted. just because you don't like it doesn't mean someone else won't like it, users should not seek to impose their preferences on everyone else Oxyman (talk) 11:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Users shouldn't insist we keep junk files either—this makes finding good images harder. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:Redundant and COM:NOTUSED. OSX (talkcontributions) 12:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately many irresponsible users misuse commons policies to delete images out of personal dislike, Commons is not supposed to be censored if you want images that are easy to find, Commons with its multiple categories is not the place you should use. Commons should not be dumbed down and left with a restrictive choice of images even if you think they are of better quality. This particular file is in a category that has at present 61 files in it, this is hardly overwhelming, The file is not bad quality just because you dislike the angle so your DR is not supported by COM:Redundant and COM:NOTUSED applies to files where we have many of the subject such as "Photographic portraiture" not just 61 files Oxyman (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr upload, replaced by File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026711250).jpg. OSX II (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026711250).jpg (and other files within Category:Renault 12). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr upload, replaced by File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026679720).jpg. OSX II (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026679720).jpg (and other files within Category:Renault 12). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nom, low quality Flickr upload, replaced by File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026679720).jpg. OSX II (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1971-1976 Renault 12 TL sedan (27026679720).jpg (and other files within Category:Renault 12). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.

This file has been nominated because:

  • It is grainy/blurry

I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX II (talk) 02:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Ripped from https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/dibe/relict/73518 Henxter (talk) 11:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely own work. Uploaded locally on enwiki by en:User:Lephilippe (see also local logs) in 2007 the photo was previously published via (examples) http://www.yemi-adisa2.8m.net/photo6.html = http://www.yemi-adisa2.8m.net/images/Navy%20headqter.jpg (last modified: 2004) or http://www.nairaland.com/8874/abuja-skyline-day-night-time (2006).

Affected collage (will receive separate DR)


Gunnex (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meisam.esalat.jpg Ertebatno (talk) 09:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by 1-upload user BalintBiermann (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 08.03.2016 the photo was previously published via http://memim.com/bakony.html (memim.com 2016 All rights reserved) = http://pctrs.network.hu/clubpicture/5/9/4/_/bakony-001_594265_29023.jpg (last modified: 2010, identical exif), needing further details/COM:OTRS-permission. Gunnex (talk) 10:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privatperson, siehe de:DeveloperArts. Der Hochlader äußert sogar, es sei nicht klar, welche Person dort abgebildet sei. Erlaubnis/Freigabe dieser Person ist damit ohnehin nicht möglich. H7 (talk) 10:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyright violation, fake licensing Svkov2 (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysterioulsy black bordered. Gunnex (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also (even cropped) previously published via https://gp1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/802892/production_public/Photo/22152396/image/1427997445_artist_2991246-1427997419.jpg (last modified: 2015). Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All Rights Reserved isn't compatible with a free license --ghouston (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of Panorama in the US (Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States), this installation dates from 2015. KTo288 (talk) 12:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature claimed to be of person named but no proof provided Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This signature is used by Kira Kosarin, in which there are many autographed material with it, you can see it here, here, here here, here, here, and here

Yasméssica (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we have any actual proof this is her signature ?, I can only find this image however this image is only available on Ebay (it's not hard to duplicate Ebay listings nor is it hard to photoshop!), I've managed to find this image but again it's not hard to photoshop,

Another concern is that it states "own work" which would be incorrect - I believe the image was illegally taken from this image and obviously photoshopped,

If proof can be found that it's actually hers then I'd be happy to withdraw, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Jcb. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif = not own work. 95.27.139.211 14:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deonette (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene,, This content is public information and the files are filed in open Court. Please do not delete. The file numbers are on the Court documents and have been filed in the Western Cape high Court South Africa


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.geocities.jp/qot117117/main_img01.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rami.koussa82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CY0SWxYUMAAbHgj.png:large.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Everschr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status:

and


Gunnex (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear coppyright status and unlikely own work, mysteriously text-edited and watermarked, appears to be a re-colored post card. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, no date of production, no evidence that the subject is really Nurbanu Phso2 (talk) 17:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source on the original website about original author, title of the painting or copyright status Phso2 (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missleding titel: This is not liber floridus but a 12th c. french bibel 89.13.177.157 17:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, see also deleted uploads

Didym (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grudzien.adam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

License, date, source, and author must be fixed.

Yann (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and deleted per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 08.03.2016 by 1-upload user Delightful caprese (talk · contributions · Statistics) the file is a cropped version of a photo shared on social media since 10.2015 via (example) https://twitter.com/tswiftpr/status/649701537955086336 or https://twitter.com/tswiftnz/status/649611872635875329 or http://celeb-daily2.tk/index.php?newsid=15598 = http://swiftworld.com.br/galeria/albums/userpics/10019/tumblr_nvjrl2v3lj1qb86xno1_1280.jpg or Facebook etc. Gunnex (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation) Blue Elf (talk) 18:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copied from http://21500.vgb.no/2010/01/08/flotte-motiver-i-vinterkulden-frk_meg/ Blue Elf (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from https://www.flickr.com/photos/petterphoto/5315590121/ Blue Elf (talk) 18:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from http://www.rambollvisualisering.com/#!e39-gartnerlokka-meieriet/c1wvz Blue Elf (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Considering also https://www.facebook.com/471871392850648/photos/a.471871426183978.95352.471871392850648/471871429517311/?type=3&theater (2013) Gunnex (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

> request for speedydelete, Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tagged "C Stéphane Marchetti", 'own work' claimed by Caravelle-prod, Roland zh (talk) 19:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is not from a Bollywood party or event and not taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer as required by the license, - Managerarc talk 19:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': single-file upload, missing exif and rather small format imho may point to a non-free work, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-promoting-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 19:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced, wrong license, identification very dubious given the extreme obscurity of the subject Phso2 (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader other photos are copyright violation!!! Sakhalinio (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:World wrestling day juniors.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spj1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Spj1234 (copyvios, no-permissions from multiple authors). Uploaded for en:Nitish Jain (an Indian educationist, philanthropist) since 02.2016. Also previously (for File:Mr. Nitish Jain received the Award for Education Excellence from the Hon'ble Julie Bishop.jpg and 2 crops) published via https://www.facebook.com/spjainschoolofglobalmanagement/photos/pb.210263255735396.-2207520000.1464467450./683545568407160/?type=3&theater (2014)

Gunnex (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infrige derechos de autor. Anak-tij (talk) 20:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Se le pide a el usuario, bot o bibliotecario la remocion de esta fotografia por infrigir mis derechos de autor. Ya que soy el original autor de tal imagen, la cual el usuario User:Gipsdile hace uso indebido e ilegal segun las normativas de Wikipedia Commons, Flickr y de las normas correspondientes en Territorio Mexicano de Copyright. Ya que yo autor, expreso que esta ha sido tomada de manera ilegal, sin pedir mi consulta de divulgarse en un sitio libre, sin dar creditos al autor y la impostora autoria del usuario User:Gipsdile.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/anakes/8410468096/in/dateposted-public/ Anak-tij (talk) 20:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wonderful image but the artist Pascal Coupot is alive, and there is no FoP in France. The scuplture, even if small, is not De Minimis, and is the main subject. It is the only thing in the focus and without the sculpture, the image have no reason to exist Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Je vous remercie pour ce compliment, et l'artiste est en effet vivant. (Thanks for your positive view. Yes, the artist is alive.) Toutefois, il faut savoir que cette statue se trouve sur l'espace public, (this sculpture is into the public space) et qu'il s'agit d'un "attribut" de la Ville de Besançon (it's one of the big symbols of Besançon) avec lequel le grand public a toujours joué, et joue toujours (the public always plays with, with pictures too). Vous trouverez des milliers de photos de cette statue, (you will find thousands of pictures) qui n'ont jamais posé le moindre problème (without any problem). De plus, une statue en bronze avec autant de détail est la représentation la plus "détaillée" que je connaisse du visage de Jouffroy d'Abbans, (a sculture as Besançon sculpture is the most precise representation of Jouffroy d'Abbans' face...) ce pourquoi j'ai ajouté cette image (that's why i've taken this pic and added it). SpeedyBoo (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Korean text states the source for the image was Google Search, and the author is probably a newspaper. Tineye finds 297 hits for this image, and we can safely assume the uploader to Korean Wikipedia does not own copyright to this image, so it does not belong on Commons. BabelStone (talk) 21:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no permission (No permission since) (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Fae. --INeverCry 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no permission (No permission since) (talk) 22:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Fae. --INeverCry 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo was almost definitely been published elsewhere before (it is an official logo of a church campaign) and the uploader should therefore provide explicit proof that he/she is the owner of the copyright and releases it under a free license here. Otherwise I would suspect this to be a copyright violation. Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of Panorama in the US (Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States), this installation dates from 2011. KTo288 (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in public domain Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work: can be found there: http://www.lecharlevoisien.com/upload/14/diaporama/18402121102009.JPG Florn (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find it sad what you are doing. I knew the Captain in La Malbaie who built this ship from money from Phyllis Lambert, sister of Charles Bronfman. She paid 25 million dollars to have the replica of this ship built, which unfortunately ended up at the bottom of the Mississippi river. I took photos while it was being built as many others did.--Captain Morgan (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you are the photographer, please contact OTRS - Jcb (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]