Commons:Deletion requests/Images of money of the Netherlands

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of money of the Netherlands

[edit]

First printed on or after 1999

First printed on or after 1990

First printed on or after 1980

First printed on or after 1970

First printed on or after 1950


Not Yet determined


Discussion

[edit]

See COM:MONEY#Netherlands. Per w:List of countries' copyright length, any of these items that was created before January 1, 1941 remains in copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom and COM:MONEY#The Netherlands. These are clearly copyrighted coins.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 15:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete looks like it's so: no law is cited in the section on Dutch currency copyright, but the government was asked about euros. (I assume you mean "after" the start of 1941; you notified me though I don't think I uploaded any, if so, I only moved them from enwiki, and I don't think I've done that without looking at the copyright status of the coin.) —innotata 18:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep up this work. A mass deletion is hilarious and there's no valid reason for a deletion. --Saviour1981 (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Please provide a reason for your stance. See w:WP:ILIKEIT. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I have seen the link you've just posted but the Tesselaar which i have submitted is not part of valid dutch currency. Another thing: we are here on Wiukimedia, NOT Wikipedia. For me the rules of Wikimedia are primary, the rules of Wikipedia are secondary --Saviour1981 12:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough. I was just making a statement that simply saying "this is a bad deletion request" doesn't address the issue at hand, and will likely not be factored into the decision made by the mods. The rules on Wikimedia Commons state we must prove why they are not copyrighted, or it will be deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Images of Dutch coins and money bills are clearly in the public domain and should not be deleted. Let's not exaggerate, don't damage our project. These images were never contested before on Dutch wikipedia, which is quite rigid on copyright. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 11:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    You say they are "clearly in the public domain", how? COM:MONEY#The_Netherlands clearly says " Not OK Guilders are subject to copyright 70 years after the first publication. De Nederlandsche Bank has been contacted and they state that the introduction of the Euro does not change this." I don't see any ambiguity in that. Dutch coins and money are copyrighted.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep My upload is from back when I didn't realize this could be copyrighted. But ARTEST4ECHO, Dutch coins have been around for a long while (see the Dutch article about the subject). Before we delete the real copyrighted items, we should try and find out the first publication date of the money. With each new queen we got, the money changed. Our queen today, Beatrix, was installed in 1980, so in my opinion her coins have to go. Juliana before her was installed in 1948, so also her money is not old enough yet. The coins and notes with Wilhelmina could be okay though. Our Royal Dutch Institute for Coins could have more clear information on this.
FYI: I am not the nominator, Magog the Ogre is. Every one of these coins has a publication date on them and they are all after 1941. However, you do make an interesting argument, so in the interest of completeness I have started to do just what you suggested. I have used the following pages to help find when (excluding the date changing) the coin/banknote was first printed. [1], [2]], [3]. [4] --ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing so ARTEST4ECHO (and yes, I do realize you're not the nominator, but you seem to keep the nomination going atm ;-). The russian article is very interesting! The thing with the dates is, that, the way I recall, the date on the note is the printing date - the same kind of note got printed serveral times, they went in batches when there wheren't enough around anymore. I'm not totally sure about this though. I'll try and see if I have the time to contact the former printing factory... Ciell (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Euro coins can be deleted in my opinion, there's no exception in Dutch law for these coins, afaik. Ciell (talk) 07:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't know anything about copyright on Netherland coins. This is a public dictionary. Why shouldn't it be possible to show pictures of these coins? I contributed the 2 Euro commemorative myself. I don't want it to be deleted and I don't see a reason for it. If you look up information about Dutch coins, why shouldn't you be able to see pictures - especially if you have the copyright on the picture? DO NOT DELETE COINS PICTURES! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nozoomii (talk • contribs) 09:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipida has rules against haveing copyrighted image on commons. COM:MONEY#The_Netherlands clearly spells out the Dutch coins are copyrighted. Even though it would be nice to see an image of a Euro, doesn’t make it ok per COM:L. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARTEST4ECHO (talk • contribs) 12:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Jcb (talk) 20:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]