Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 17th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author claimed is in image. BaseSat (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat Hello, yes, this is a picture of me. Can you please link to a discussion which says why this could be a problem? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@63.116.201.2: Was it you who actually made the image? --BaseSat (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BaseSat Yes, I made the picture. I assert that the copyright has never been owned by anyone other than me. If you show me a more clear tag for this then I will apply it to my picture. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Bluerasberry: Could you explain how did you manage to make it? Both of your hands seems to be in the picture. --BaseSat (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
+1 russavia (talk) 20:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Russavia BaseSat It was work for hire at my direction with money having exchanged hands before execution of the work. Please both of you suggest the appropriate template to indicate this, or otherwise tell me that I am mistaken about the assignment of copyright. I am not a lawyer and copyright is confusing. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentPlease see OTRS for an easy way to get this issue solved. Your photographer merely emails (follow their directions!) and the file can be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Despite being in use, the uploader says it was taken by another and OTRS was not received despite extra time being allowed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader send an ticket to OTRS claiming that he is the copyrightholder. No reason not to believe him so I restored the file based on this ticket. Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

karl dou mdu kou lu ga 41.102.236.158 21:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Asking for this to be deleted as it's currently not in use and was uploaded by me. Thanks. Notwist (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 03:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Asking for this to be deleted as it's currently not in use and was uploaded by me. Thanks. Notwist (talk) 01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 03:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: in use. czar 06:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo UWG Waldkraiburg.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright notice at the source doesn't look like a free license. Commercial use and derivatives are not mentioned. 217.65.221.174 10:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnvendexter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaded by sock, spam. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EllistandarBros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Game cover, violates COM:PACKAGING

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark indicates this isn't the work of the uploader. No permission from original author indicated. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley: Mass deletion of pages added by Lppanapat

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked Kompas/Arbain Rambey (ARB), who should confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, it is my foto and I want to delete it from here. I could not find any delete button on your website. PLEASE REMOVE THIS SITE/FOTO from wikimedia. Thank you and best regard, Oleg Teryaev Olegchen (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, User:Olegchen, here is no deletion buttons for non-admins. And usually you can request deletion of your own files during first week after uploading. But I decided to delete the file anyway, because it is really unused personal photo, educational value is not big. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a more recent version of the photo has already been uploaded Laurenrobertson1 (talk) 03:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded by file:010912 - Justin Eveson - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (02).jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark copyright Dacoucou (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, watermark "© onlinekhabar" on bottom of photo. I delete also file:Prakanda.jpg and file:Speech at Shanti Batika.jpg: small photos without metadata. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal snapshot that adds nothing to our collection of images with similar content: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal snapshot of nonnotable individual; The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality selfie of nonnotable individual; The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il file va cancellato perchè la persona rappresentata non ha acconsentito alla sua pubblicazione Danny75~commonswiki (talk) 06:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request 8 years after uploading. Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains deleted image File:Mount Everest (topgold).jpg. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unfortunately that's true. It was a beautiful banner. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains deleted image File:Mount Everest (topgold).jpg. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is not the uploader's work. It is a press photo which is widely spread in the internet (also on YouTube). Thus it is not free nor there is a valid evidence for a free release. 88.64.113.139 08:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is not the uploader's work. It is a press photo which is widely spread in the internet (also on YouTube). Thus it is not free nor there is a valid evidence for a free release. 88.64.113.139 08:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is not own work. For example, author is claimed to be Otokar Aselsan, but no permission exists. I delete also file:Leopardng.jpg, which is also claimed to be work of Otokar Aselsan. Both are small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is not the uploader's work. It is a press photo which is widely spread in the internet (also on YouTube). Thus it is not free nor there is a valid evidence for a free release. 88.64.113.139 08:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate Sus222 (talk) 08:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate Sus222 (talk) 08:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate Sus222 (talk) 08:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate content Kaizer22 (talk) 15:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: harassment. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not appropriate Sus222 (talk) 08:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subcategories and files about "National futsal teams by country" should to be allocated in category "National futsal teams"


 Deleted, empty category. Redirect is not created, because name is incorrect (must be "teams", not "team"). Taivo (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subcategories and files about "National futsal teams by country" should to be allocated in category "National futsal teams"— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jh0an1 Uzca73gu1 (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, creator's request on creation week. Taivo (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user uploaded pictures of his friends with the intention of defamation (calling one "an autist", other "a pigeon"), spoiling Wikimedia Commons in the process Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this qualifies even for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user uploaded pictures of his friends with the intention of defamation (calling one "an autist", other "a pigeon"), spoiling Wikimedia Commons in the process Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this qualifies even for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Almost the same images, I left 2 of 4 very similar, but these are out of scope: nothing educationally new for project

Stolbovsky (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Удаляйте, что считаете нужным. Dmitry Markevich (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the files are very similar to files number 01 and 03 respectively. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User talk:Dnyaneshwar Ambre). MER-C 12:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is banned due to promoting own business. I'll delete also his other uploads (file:Dnyaneshwar Ambre.jpg and file:Dnyaneshwar ambre.jpg) due to spamming. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je ne souhaite pas mettre cette photo Agence A2 (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta imagen no se utiliza y existe una versión del archivo en formato SVG. Mabema1 (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, superseded by file:Madrid-MetroZonaA.svg. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

逆光で不鮮明な画像のため IMZANIROH (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These image are not own work. The permissions of the photographers are necessary. Moreover, this is out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all these files are claimed to be selfies, but in my opinion none of them is. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, filename looks like personal attack, so I'll delete the file speedily. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The spiders can't be identified, low quality Brunei (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file was used in en.wiki on talk page archive. 11 years ago somebody asked "Can anybody identify the spider?" and got no answer. I think, that this does not count as real using. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is not in the public domain. Please remove it from Commons. We will be uploading a version of it to Wikipedia with a respective copyright note. Universität Tübingen (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, nobody has reviewed the license. Now the source site is dead. That's what happens, if you try to review license 11½ years after uploading. There's nothing to do now. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all uploads of the user have the same problem and I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, (s)he has uploaded also file:日月行館的黃金船桅.JPG and file:日月行館觀景台:透明的空中步道.JPG. I'll delete them all. Two first files are not photos, but photo-like images. All files have different resolution, two last files have (different) camera data. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 00:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; private image collection. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of private university, above the threshold of originality. Unlikely to be "own work" and no sign of a free use license. czar 01:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Asking for this to be deleted as it's currently not in use and was uploaded by me. Thanks. Notwist (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Small photo, quality is quite bad. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request, unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no proper demonstration of authorship/source - "google" would not be free source (probably not even a source itself); ipl is vague authorship; same image appears via fansite https://twitter.com/yuviworld Dl2000 (talk) 03:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use Elisfkc (talk) 03:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfies, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is from de.wiki and a quasi duplicate of the Commons one. All German versions are archived there, no need for this extra one. German wiki had denied the complete movement to Commons due to URAA concerns. Ras67 (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{DeletionFooter|DELETED|the other file is deleted instead. 1) The nominated file has better name. 2) The nominated file is used, the other isn't. 3) They have same resolution and quality. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Taivo: is don't see that "the other file is deleted instead". Which one do you mean? --тнояsтеn 08:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I tried to delete file:Двойной портрет (Автопортрет с женой Мартой). 1913 г.jpg, but got error message "Exception encountered, of type Wikibase\Client\Usage\UsageTrackerException". Everybody is allowed to delete this file. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo to 1) Commons is multilingual, there exist no reason to prefer English, to 2) yes, i wanted to move them later, to 3) no, this was not the case. All file versions and the original upload log from de.wiki were missed! --Ras67 (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your speedy request was reverted. --тнояsтеn 18:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Having two identical files is stupid, even more stupid: adding new file-versions to both files. --
Unfortunately simple REDIRECT doesent work... --Itu (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your efforts, but i am bewildered, now we have concurrently the redirect and the file. I didn't know, that this is possible, i guess this is an issue with the Cyrillic letters. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 11:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cyrillic is not the problem. The file has to be deleted before it is redirected. Otherwise the redirect isn't working. --тнояsтеn 12:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In fact there is a problem (even) with Cyrillic letters ... just try download that file with wget as i did right now and you will see a significant problem. Filename is only a handle and filename should ideally only consist of ascii letters ... --Itu (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Exists a solution for that problem? "the file has to be deleted before it is redirected. Otherwise the redirect isn't working" Can the sequencing of this actions be fixed? The redirection would be sufficient. --Ras67 (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully an admin may be be able to delete File:Двойной портрет (Автопортрет с женой Мартой). 1913 г.jpg, then Redirects to File:Robert Genin Selbstbildnis.jpg may be created or not. --Itu (talk) 10:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe gerade festgestellt, dass wir hier mit Ausnahme von Taivo alles Deutsche sind und niemand Administrator ist. Wir unterhalten uns also um Dinge, die von uns nicht korrigierbar sind. ): Ich weiß nicht, ob es sich lohnt, einen Admin zu überzeugen, hier noch viel Mühe zu investieren, da ja Taivo mit dem Löschen von Двойной портрет (Автопортрет с женой Мартой). 1913 г.jpg schon nicht erfolgreich war. Ob er da irgendwie einen Fehler gemacht hat, kann ich nicht einschätzen. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 13:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, es war nun möglich zu löschen die Datei. (About language preferences ... Country of creation was Germany. The painting is situated in Germany. So German filename is more appropriate than Russian filename.) Taivo (talk) 13:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ncanik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romeo Williams (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The squirrel is likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo seems to be above the threshold of originality. If not, then out of project scope. Poké95 05:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not usable 65.190.80.232 05:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Usable, but likely copyright violation. For collages source and license of every used image is needed. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on the artwork depicted in the photo, even assuming the photo is own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Main object of the photo is (probably copyrighted) drawing. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recent building in France JeanBono (talk) 09:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

transfer it to fr wikipédia if the building is not "quite common" for commons. Prométhée (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ciklus

[edit]

Ciklus (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Own work means here probably own photo. Who is author of depicted objects and does (s)he allow free publication of their art? There is no freedom of panorama in Bosnia. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Spiritia 07:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, online in many places at higher resolutions. Copyright violations.

Storkk (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Also own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art (here is a plan of building). Taivo (talk) 11:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That case please  Delete also file:PSYCORE 2016 schwarz.png. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Gardenersmelbourne). MER-C 12:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio web grab, and the copyright status of individual images in this montage is unclear. MKFI (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from http://www.cogumglobal.org/about-us/. Proper source and OTRS permission is needed if uploader is allowed to upload this. MKFI (talk) 13:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add her last remaining uploads for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by ~riley. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fernanda.st (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max Tronconi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, http://www.columbusmagazine.nl/images/user_images/c9a4d/460x460_crop/c9a4d.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s2.dmcdn.net/MuL4y/1280x720-Ho2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the image metadata states "Staff, Sean Gallup" as the author and "2006 Getty Images" as the copyright holder. Apalsola tc 14:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.illigconstruct.com/files/cache/8fcdcb1a982c5a12179bc1bfb432c1dc_f199.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.famousbirthdays.com/faces/kidd-dre-image.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://uploads.socialspirit.com.br/categorias/visualizar/felipe-z-felps-8785,080720151126.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.istok.net/images/P/le-102-mens-belt.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadikedis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nictoria.bernier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously defamatory content. Peter SamFan (talk) 14:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DeejayQasim14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 16:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maleasart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These pictures are IMHO out of project scope. I see no educational value of the "normal" pictures of this man, the "artistic" versions are the uploader's own art and also out of scope!

Ras67 (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maleasart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    21:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be found at other locations online: see google Basvb (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope –Davey2010Talk 17:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found in higher resolution elsewhere Basvb (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcsphotovideo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Wcam (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A doodle by non-notable artist claimed to be an Egyptian hieroglyph, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, user's other uploads were speedied. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Although a very good image, all the text makes it plain advertisement, maybe some crop? Basvb (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fun with Photoshop is outside of COM:SCOPE, here we have an unattributed historical image, superimposed over another unattributed building. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mikel Molina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size no exif and file nr. 2 can be found here in 4000x4000 pixels from proffessional photographer. Copyvios.

Basvb (talk) 19:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with heavy editing and unused mainly featuring the uploader: promotional content.

Basvb (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per What Wikimedia Commons is not this files are out of project scope COM:PS. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I can find nothing on this name in Google, other than website of uploader. Therefore: Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for all files at Category:Camaal Mustafa Sikander, which I propose we delete too. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    12:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Visibly all out of scope, as discussed in the previous debates above. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dj brocksky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's only other upload was a copyvio pic of another footballer that he also claimed was his own work. Image is widely available on the web: [1]. Should be deleted in accordance with the precautionary principle. Rrburke (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo out of project scope. Rrburke (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexis Damian Araujo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hekare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped and copied from copyrighted website Triplecaña (talk) 21:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non libre : oeuvre de fr:Luc Tuymans Habertix (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 21:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RetroJoe18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Weltkriegsinteressent 45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE/possible copyvios - tiny thumbs - some with Getty watermarks - source/author info missing for old B&W images

INeverCry 22:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DHAARNARAMESH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original upload is a copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=910462045676865 and the second upload is possibly a photoshopped copy of the first upload. Additionally, there's no FOP in Ukraine, and I don't know how old the building is. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Facebook. Possibly the same user due to similar user names, but the picture seems to be out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality Karsten11 (talk) 20:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user uploaded selfie, not notable Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 21:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be an author. http://www.amazon.com/Muhammad-Zubair-Shabbir/e/B00IZZJCZG Delphi234 (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Add to article en:Iqbal Hussain Delphi234 (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 22:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyrighted file, appears to belong to Animation Factory (see [2]) and doesn't seem to be the user's own work. Liance (talk) 22:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of photograph. COM:DW. -- Geagea (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Solidd24

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Solidd24 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, depicted person Celia Gomez is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. The photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Todarthropod

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Todarthropod (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, Facebook filenames. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, can be found in the web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jérémy labourel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uncredited derivative of copyrighted photos--possible product shots.

Storkk (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — at least some of these use official Peugeot photographs. OSX (talkcontributions) 11:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is cited in [3] and [4] as part of the United Nations archive, making it highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Conifer (talk) 23:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work – image is sourced to Arthur Leipzig per [5], [6]. Conifer (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO - This photograph is the property of People magazine and can be viewed here [7]. It is the work of ALESSANDRO GRASSANI, and not the "own work" of the original uploader, Timo118. The fact that the image has made its way to Commons and on other Wikis is a clear copyright violation. Request deletion. This is the second request for deletion; IPs continue to add this image to the Emma Morano article. Thanks. --Seduisant (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Seduisant (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyright violation. Tyseria (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Clear case of copyright violation. //Vätte (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Indeed, remove quickly. --Marbe166 (talk) 00:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per i giusti motivi di apertura della procedura.--Anima della notte (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 10:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dco44

[edit]

Dco44 (talk · contribs) uploaded these logos:

In my opinion they all surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, OTRS necessary Frze > talk 23:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I suspect, that this is textlogo. That case permission is not needed. The logo is used in de.wiki and so in scope. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PEr Taivo. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Different versions of the same image are in use all over the web (pay close attention to the cloud formation on the different photos): [8], [9]. This image doesn't have any exif data, so unless we have some evidence of the provenance of the image it ought to be deleted. —SpacemanSpiff 15:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Georgemohan88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has been claiming own work on other images. After an earlier DR reg the exifs, he has now manipulated other images with copyright claims in exif. A case in point is File:Subiksha Actress.jpg where he wrote over the exif of a professional photoshoot from Seny Photography.

SpacemanSpiff 16:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Also adding the following now as they have the same problem:[reply]

Above added. —SpacemanSpiff 16:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

George Mohan (talk) 08:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Then can you explain:
  • I can't change exif data, but i resize the file because its huge file size and image resolution rate, also add the name in authors and copyright portion because above three files are my own work.
  • Sorry its my editing mistake because i forget to mention "Keep" in first statement. if you want old statement i can add its again.
  • No, File:Kaillash-actor.jpg i only resize its because the file size is above 20Mb and the file is given actor kaillash via email
  • old file File:Subiksha Actress.jpg its not a copyright file of seny because its a paid photo shoot all right in this file is Actress Subiksha. She give me a photos master copy via mail for update her photo in wiki.

Georgemohan88 (talk) 19:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying you haven't changed the Exif but Seny is the photographer but that in the large images Seny shows up in the exif and that miraculously changed to your name? I'd just like to note that you and your sockpuppets have been blocked on en.wiki too. —SpacemanSpiff 08:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nominationa and COM:PCP especially given the history of manipulating Exif Data and sockpuppeting on en wiki. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cristianherrerasalcedo

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Cristianherrerasalcedo (talk · contribs):

The files are called selfies, but none of them actually is. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal snapshot that illustrates nothing in particular and adds nothing to categories of images with similar content: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also redirect file:85 iI 127 - Kopia.JPG. Taivo (talk) 18:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudioboyd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personnal photos out of project scope

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this page is not needed. Quark Logo (talk) 09:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty page. P 1 9 9   18:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, plus unlikely to be own work, since the resolution is low and there is no EXIF data. COM:PRP. Poké95 09:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bijay chaurasia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: out of commons scope Storkk (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work like they have claimed in the upload summary. Expressive101 (talk) 09:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep : this is targeted edit 1 . Nomination must be go through deletions policy.(note: There is no any dublicate of this image)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; we assume good faith until given a reason why we shouldn't. holly {chat} 19:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It might be in the PD, but there is no information about the original publication. BrightRaven (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:Ridiculous reason for deletion request, what is the relationship between "no EXIF info" and "unlikely to be own work" ?--M940504 (talk) 03:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:M940504, no EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion; additional reasons needed. P 1 9 9   19:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free movie poster Morfph (talk) 16:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Big photo, uploader has a lot of other contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: missing EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Big photo, uploader has a lot of other contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: missing EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Big photo, uploader has a lot of other contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: missing EXIF info is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   19:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcheigl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P199, thank you for handling the request, a notification that the fourth file still has a deletion template on it. Basvb (talk) 10:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notice. Done. --P 1 9 9   12:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong picture CrystalLTL (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: self nomination of recent upload; moreover, out of scope personal photo. P 1 9 9   19:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination of low quality Flickr file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1996 Ford Fairlane (NF II) Ghia sedan, with Tickford options (23842369881).jpg (and other files within Category:Ford Fairlane (NF)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather a 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 00:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hashim-afc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Release on website does not include commercial use and therefore the images are not under a CC license we can use. Also, it says © Copyright 2010-2016. Can't have it both ways.

Majora (talk) 03:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and kept per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlanDonald (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on apparently historical images and a map of a golf course.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of You92ssef

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of You92ssef (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violations. 09:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ХристинаЛіп'яніна

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of ХристинаЛіп'яніна (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exists, then mostly different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Younakwon

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Younakwon (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UCP6160 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of artist Dudley Carter (deceased 1992), and his artwork. To retain artwork by Mr. Carter, COM:OTRS is required. Additional images are maps and diagrams without attribution and a series of outdoor art, when there is no COM:FOP "freedom of Panorama" in the U.S. The final group of images are architecturals of small size and no metadata which all relate to "Edgemar"

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, for both image-versions. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per Commons:Deletion requests/Teodor Daniel Dinca.jpg. Taivo (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source to verify 1919 date Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights once lasted 56 years (talk) 20:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. I own the photo 2. It is date stamped on the back "1919" 3. It is a public domain image, from a collection that dates from the same pre-1920 era. 4. Studio publicity photos- from the pre-1960 or so era- are all public domain by US Court decision.

So, kindly tell me what tag is needed to keep the image from being deleted, or better still, please fix it yourselves. You are the assumed experts in this field, and given the info I've supplied you, could remedy any problems in a matter of seconds 20:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 Kept, I usually trust people. But, user:Copyrights once lasted 56 years, it would be good to upload backside of the postcard also into Commons, so that everybody can see stamp with 1919. Taivo (talk) 22:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong licence for this movie poster. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation. howcheng {chat} 21:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shireen Kabout's portrait is a derivative of the photograph used as her profile picture at http://www.stars-portraits.com/en/community/shireen.kabbout.html ... Not only would Shireen Kabout need to confirm the license of her drawing, but the original photographer would need to confirm also. Instructions for doing this are at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 21:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission at source Basvb (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader added fair use rationale. As fair use is not allowed in Commons, this is clear sign of deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission at source Basvb (talk) 16:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader added fair use rationale. As fair use is not allowed in Commons, this is clear sign of deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission at source Basvb (talk) 16:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader added fair use rationale. As fair use is not allowed in Commons, this is clear sign of deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of file and permission at source. Basvb (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently not own work and no evidence of permission at source. Basvb (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teniskunas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

We need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo which is claimed to be own work. Logos with an own work claim and which are unused generally should be deleted per one of the following reasons. The logo is either of a non notable subject or company and could thus be considered out of scope as advertising content. On the other hand: if the logo is of a notable subject, and might thus be in scope, than the own work claim is almost surely incorrect and as such the author and source information are likely false. Incorrect sources mean that essential information is missing. It would be possible, but hard, to fix this information as I do not know the original source. For potential usage of a logo downloading the logo and uploading it with correct information is very easy. Making reuploading when needed easier than finding already uploaded unused logos with incorrect information. Note that I do not make any arguments about whether this logo is above or below the threshold of originality as I believe that this logo should be deleted either way per the reasoning given. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) and the attribution information is correct (or has been corrected) please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no mention in en.wiki, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jayacsuvarna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence in own work of uploader on this gallery of images (some include text). Sizes are variable, no camera metadata and no consistency of "view" all lead to the conclusion these were gathered from the internet rather than created by the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonardbourgoisbeaulieu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images by w:fr:Léonard Bourgois-Beaulieu, we need to verify identity: We need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the files can be restored after receiving permission. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nie wyrażam zgody na publikacje mojego wizerunku. Dodatkwo jest to prywatne zdjęcie z mojej galerii. Żądam natychmiastowego usunięcia. 79.185.117.208 18:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is user:Paulina, uploader is Hsjpsd. OTRS-permission from Paulina is needed. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of Panorama in France Basvb (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative from an older image and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. The file could fall within the public domain because of its age. If this is the case information about the source, author and date of the original work should be given to verify this. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no response, no source, no author. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No question that this photo was taken by uploader, but the artwork depicted, by Dudley Carter is still copyright as he passed away in 1992. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ping @Chrismiceli: There is no "fair use" on Commons, but it could be uploaded to en:wiki with "fair use". Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
ping @Ellin Beltz: I have uploaded a fair user version to wikipedia and replaced it in the article in which it appeared. It can be found here: en:file:Dudle C. Carter - High Mountain Companions (1962).jpg.

 Deleted, transferred into en.wiki as fair use. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, journal covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is Peter Martin Publication 1968, but en:Peter Martin does not mention anything similar. Probably the Peter Martin and his publication are non-notable. Also, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diamondsandpearls (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is always stated Avid Music Inc. No OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks to be a derivative from an older image (1950) and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. The file could fall within the public domain because of its age. If this is the case information about the source, author and date of the original work should be given to verify this. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is in public domain, if first published in Italy (or Argentina). Please give evidence, that the photo was ever published in Italy (or Argentina) more than 20 years ago and I'll restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no OTRS-permission from author Benedicte van der Maar. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this historical image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1945 photos are unlikely to be own work. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely "own work", previously published at university/academy websites - http://www.nsc.ru/win/elbib/data/show_page.dhtml?76+251+35, http://ras.ru/win/db/show_per.asp?P=.id-1033.ln-ru 147.134.100.54 19:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is out of date and no longer used in any Wiki page Breakingspell (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, big photo with EXIF data, our only photo about model 4420. Not every photo in Commons must be used. The photo can be useful in future articles. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless the uploader is an employee of the production company, this is unlikely to be an "own work". howcheng {chat} 22:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of non-renewal of copyright for this particular image -- also a british work so us non-renewal rules don't apply Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is 1930 British book cover. It was surely copyrighted in UK at least until 2000 (probably longer). That means: it was not free on source country on URAA date 1996. The book cover is copyrighted in USA until January 2026 (95 years from publishing). But without knowing, who is cover artist (maybe this is written somewhere in the book?), there is no known restore date: British copyright can last longer, but also shorter than US copyright. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel.aragu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files uploaded by this user are suspected copyvios. Most are clear violations of copyrighted posters or advertisements while File:Gabriel Aragu.jpg looks professional publicity photo.

MKFI (talk) 11:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MAHL

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of MAHL (talk · contribs):

The photos have different resolution and different camera data, some have no EXIF at all. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, with no clear context. Not really educational and likely out of scope. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebinrt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I find the metadata for three of these five pictures improbable especially when compared with the other two photos. Let's start with those two: One has metadata (Canon EOS 6D), the other has nothing except a UNICEF watermark to show where it came from. Now for the Improbable Three: All are of the same group shot: one is with a Canon EOS-1D X, the next one with NIKON D3100 and the third one with Nikon D4. It seems highly unlikely to me that anyone would shoot the exact same photo with three different cameras, upload them at three different sizes and claim all as own work. So there are four cameras and a watermark, or a claim of own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, dubious indeed. No response from uploader. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died 1946, see https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A1ry_Gyula. Undelete 2017 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elnézést, hogy magyarul és nem gépi fordítású angollal írom, de talán így érthetőbb lesz annak aki lefordítja majd angolra. Először is köszönöm, hogy kiírtad a törlési megbeszélést. Erről az a véleményem, hogy természetesen törlendő a kép, ahogy törlendő volt és törölve lett a szerző másik alkotása (File:Madách szülei 1897-49.jpg) is. Nem világos, hogy ha az megfelelt az azonnali törlés kritériumainak, akkor ez miért nem felelt meg ugyanúgy? Jcb-től erre vonatkozó választ nem kaptam, csak annak ismételgetését, hogy a törlési megbeszélésnek felel meg a kép. Ha annak felel meg, akkor a másik miért nem annak felelt meg? Erre sem kaptam választ. Kaptam viszont fenyegetést, hogy ha vissza merem vonni egy adminisztrátor eljárását (konkrétan Jcb eljárását) akkor blokkolni fog. A magyar Wikipédián én magam is adminisztrátor vagyok. Nem tudom, itt hogyan működik, de nálunk tilos és etikátlan saját ügyben blokkal eljárni a velünk vitázó féllel szemben. Ha ez itt nem így működik, akkor félő, visszaélésekre adhat lehetőséget.

A lényeg, hogy  Strong support Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died 1946, see https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A1ry_Gyula. Undelete 2017 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Strong support See you here! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, no source given for this and all (probably) other files uploaded by Astrojan. The structure is obviously generated from atom coordinates taken from somewhere (PDB?) but it is not disclosed and acknowledged. The uploader ignores requests for corrections in descriptions. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naturlich, the source are the PDB database, labeled in title of every image files, here is the example: 1jyn

If anybody can help me what should I concretely include into pages, please take it and no delete files instead.

If you take an example, I will use it.

Astrojan, you have to add an "information" template and categories, here is an example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3A1jyn.jpg&type=revision&diff=196833287&oldid=196496644 Michał Sobkowski (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for help.
Since the licenses are corrected, my deletion request can be withdrawn. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 11:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File contains Merc photography watermark and EXIF has author: Merc Photography - Paul Garcia. OTRS permission from photographer is required. MKFI (talk) 07:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Farsizabon

[edit]

Farsizabon (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small files without metadata, found on external sites. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Не так. На других сайтах эти фотографии были раньше чем в Викискладе. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: , Посмотрите начиная с пятой минуты, я вырезал фото отсюда, но не украл с того сайта которого Вы указали. --Farsizabon (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image sous copyright Olivier Tanguy (talk) 09:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, French DVD cover of the movie "Der Untergang" (2004). Thuresson (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieser Flaggenentwurf ist Blödsinn. In der dänischen Minderheit gibt es eine solche Flagge nicht ! Und es kann wohl kaum Aufgabe der WIkipedia sein, ständig neue Flaggen zu entwerfen und diese als angeblich "inoffizielle Flagge" auszugeben... This flag is nonsens and has no real basis ! Kanti (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is nevertheless used in de.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The alleged "flag" is nonsens! There is not such a "flag" in reality ! The Danish minority in Southern Schleswig fly the Dannebrog or a flag with the two Schleswig lions, as you can see here and here. Think of No original research. --Kanti (talk) 10:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As a probably fictional flag the flag is not suitable for use in articles. --Nordmensch (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Flags of the world does not know anything about the flag, but before the flag is deleted, the flag can also be classified in the Category:Special or fictional flags. --Nordmensch (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Uploader has been notified of this request but has not provided any information. A Google image search show that only Wikipedia mirror sites use this flag, hence out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 23:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mezinov Alexey Viktorovich

[edit]

Mezinov Alexey Viktorovich (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. If I by error nominated old objects (architector/sculptor is dead more than 70 years or object is erected before 1917), please show correct author and death year. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manzosaba

[edit]

Manzosaba (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Pardeep

[edit]

Pardeep (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files od Edwin41

[edit]

Edwin41 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 09:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kulmer182

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Kulmer182 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violations. 09:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Befipeter

[edit]

Befipeter (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Historical photos, not own work. Correct photographer and his/her death year should be given to determine copyright status of each photo. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammed Han Albayrak

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of MUHAMMED HAN ALBAYRAK (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. They are called selfies, but they aren't. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No compatible licence clearly specified in http://bullyboyskartel.skyrock.com/3275071594-NUTELLA-production-BBK.html Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please  Delete also bigger version of this file:Nutella "Bully Boys Kartel".jpg. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Тілеуберді Ғани

[edit]

here are last remaining contributions of Тілеуберді Ғани (talk · contribs):

Small photos. If camera data exists, then always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Doctor Kan

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Doctor Kan (talk · contribs):

The photos are not selfies as claimed, probably copyright violations. Camera data is different. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is the second time this file has been deleted. Returnal (talk) 08:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Графическая работа. Авторство загружающего сомнительно. Svkov2 (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

probably copyright violation, fake licensing Svkov2 (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images are from a Canadian reprint of the British first edition of the work. Compare [10]. While they're out of copyright in Canada, the art originates with a British edition, and is by Harry Rountree, a British artist who died in 1950. Britain uses Life+70, so this won't be out of copyright in the source country until the end of 2020. This also affects:

All of which have been tagged. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Unfortunately, I have to agree. Once in a while I confuse the author's copyright with that of the illustrator. I'm sorry for that. I've removed all references to the file in the transcription at Wikisource, so there won't be any problems there. —Akme (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Akme: Do note that these are out of copyright in America, and I believe Wikisource allows such on a s:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad licence, so there's that. These can be hosted there, though I'd suggest looking for better scans - the images were originally colour from what I can tell. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: Thank you for the information. I do know that Wikisource allows the usage of such files, though I did not know the name of the relevant template. They don't encourage such uploads, though. As far as I can make out, the original images are b/w: even the version at PG Australia has them. I believe (though I've not confirmed it) the illustrations are from The Strand Magazine, where the story was first published in serial form. In which case they are almost sure to be b/w. Thank you again —Akme (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, the user claiming the copyright appears on the picture: unlikely to be 'Own work' Gyrostat (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:51, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zviad Avaliani

[edit]

Zviad Avaliani (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

from these

were built 70 and more years ago and now as far as I know are free from copyright. --Zviad Avaliani (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright lasts 70 years after architect's or sculptor's death. For each photo architect's or sculptor's name and death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong author and/or licence ("Source" field seems to be the real author); can be found with the same dimensions on http://golf-mediterranee.com/actualites/merci-jean-claude-novaro/ Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:16, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to a "A. Uciechowska" who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. No indication that uploader is that person. Storkk (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: all the uploads from the users I checked (at least 5 files checked) were taken with the same camera, I thinks it's ok until an obvious evidence. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first time/situation having any contact with Wiki procedure. I am trying to familiarize myself with protocols, layouts, guidelines and rules but it is a lot to take in - particularly while wrapping up semester's teaching and preparing departure. Really trying to NOT infuriate or frustrate and can well-imagine complexity of navigating this enterprise.

I am unclear as to what this deletion is: the screenshot/correspondence -or- of the WAC entry as proposed by Taylor Kuhn (not a member of WAC who only interviewed me for her entry? (apologies for this inconvenience!)

Kuhn's entry was written summer of 2015 so I believe it pre-dates the entry now in WIKI and it was far better researched, written, details and cited. Her article was apparently rejected for insufficient citation which is why I reached out to WikiTimTrent (the only contact supplied)and forwarded to me. I wrote providing links assuring the relevance of WAC and its appearance in international media for over two years. I am only trying to see that the WAC entry be adequate and accurate as it is historically significant and archived in New York Public Library's Activist Archive.

WAC - the Women's Action Coalition which was an activist, direct action group that worked with ACT-UP, the Guerrilla Girls and reached a membership of 30,000 people in two years (without internet or mobile devices) based on extraordinary graphics & media strategy. Laurie Anderson produced the soundtrack of our Houston three-day presence at the Republican Convention in Houston. Cindy Sherman, Elizabeth Murray, Lorraine O'Grady, Bethany Johns ... were among the women artists who contributed to our visual high impact presence. Anne Pasternak (former director of Creative Time & now director of Brooklyn Museum, Catherine Morris (head of The Sackler Collection), Ellen Saltpeter (Jewish Museum) were all participants -- ALL this as a way of again, only trying to substantiate the relevance which is what prevented Kuhn's entry from being accepted last year.

I am apparently not able to contribute due to a conflict of interest. I understand but I am also unsure as to how to proceed since the only people able to correct would have been similarly part of WAC? Is Kuhn's entry still in the WIKIworks or has it been deleted?

Happy to assist any way I can. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tracy ann essoglou (talk • contribs)

@Tracy ann essoglou: This is a deletion request for the screenshot of Timtrent's user talk page. Any discussion of WAC or Taylor Kuhn is outside this scope. Basically, we didn't really see a point to keeping this screenshot around, since it's not being used anywhere and it doesn't appear to be useful for any real purpose. Thus, the deletion request. If you do indeed have plans for this image, please let us know. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 21:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. No evidence that the YouTube uploader has the rights to the archival footage, nevertheless to relicense it. czar 19:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: very small resolution, file EXIF includes "Photographer: Henrik Kettunen". MKFI (talk) 07:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is not an illegal copy. The picture was taken by Henrik Kettunen at the Tax2013 event which was organised by the Taxpayers Association of Finland. The association owns the copyright to the picture and the picture was added by the association.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lkurkinen (talk • contribs) 12:32, 17 May 2016‎ (UTC+03:00)
@Lkurkinen, you should fix the file information: currently the file is dated to 2016 which can't be correct for an event in 2013. Henrik Kettunen should be changed as the author and Veronmaksajain Keskusliitto as source. You should also send OTRS permission since the image was not taken by you. MKFI (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Info it seems OTRS has been sent. MKFI (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted - just closing. --INeverCry 18:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Herren im Vordergrund des Bildes haben sich gemeldet. Das Bild wurde ohne deren Erlaubnis hochgeladen und wünschen, dass das Bild aus Wikipedia entfernt wird. Rhellik (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Removed (crop) identifiable peoples on the right side of the picture. Keep this last file version. Version deletion of older versions seems to be appropriate.--Wdwd (talk) 08:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. --Leyo 10:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Old revs deleted. --INeverCry 18:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Almost-copy of this file:Magnetite Hopkinson peak.pdf is used. Maybe the other file should be deleted instead. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer available at Flickr (source), are we sure a 1977 was released by the proper author on Flickr? Basvb (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 18:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, scanned from a 1941 Latvian newspaper, is claimed to be an official work according to German law. That is wrong, newspapers are not official works in Germany. So the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 15:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well. My attempts at making it look better failed anyway. Here's how that studio portrait looked like before the newspaper raster damage: stock photo. Except, that the photograph wasn't taken in Germany (probably not), but in Latvia, when Lohse was stationing there in 1941. Poeticbent talk 17:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which makes it all the less likely that it is an official German work as claimed. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Maybe {{Anonymous-EU}} applies? Taivo (talk) 08:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Likely so, because the photo came from Latvia. We already know who published it. Poeticbent talk 14:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with Anonymous-EU. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Book author is the uploader, but OTRS-permission would be good. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1946 paper is not in public domain. But maybe there are no creative elements which were not published in earlier (PD) papers and as such this could be PD-old Basvb (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 19:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taken in July 1972 and published in 1973? No copyright notice? [11] Could it be PD-US-no notice? -- Asclepias (talk) 23:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of non-renewal of copyright for this particular image Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1. I own the photo 2. It is a public domain image. Studio publicity photos- from the pre-1960 or so era- are all public domain by US Court decision.

So, kindly tell me what tag is needed to keep the image from being deleted, or better still, please fix it yourselves. You are the assumed experts in this field, and given the info I've supplied you, could remedy any problems in a matter of seconds Copyrights once lasted 56 years (talk) 20:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe {{PD-US-no notice}} applies. User:Copyrights once lasted 56 years, can you upload backside of the photo, so that everybody can see: the photo was published without copyright notice? Taivo (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights once lasted 56 years (talk)Image Never Was CopyrightedCopyrights once lasted 56 years (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of non-renewal of copyright for this particular image Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]