Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![218 File:Broadway cast performing "When I Grow Up".jpg](#File:Broadway_cast_performing_"When_I_Grow_Up".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
not wanted 87.102.103.187 08:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep DR not wanted, file in scope. Tm (talk) 11:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
not wanted 87.102.103.187 08:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Second nomination by same IP as vandalism, that cant articulate nothing more that three words. File in scope --Tm (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Posted incorrectly. Reollun (talk) 13:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. No license. Green Giant (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Clear copyvio - copyright owner stated in scanned text DGtal (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I removed the text. The picture is from 15 century. Hanay (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep as PD-art. The copyright claim is irrelevant since this is just a faithful reproduction of an out-of copyright work and does not constitute anything new and creative. De728631 (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Quite old. PD-art. -- Geagea (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find this image in the net, but given the uploader's history I believe it is a TV screenshot. MKFI (talk) 12:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Mass deletion of pages added by SUKA SUKA K-VISION.TV
porno spam :/ Mboro (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Watermark for Associated Press in bottom right corner. (Images aren't PD or prepared by Dept of State just because they appear on their website.) czar 00:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio. ~riley (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Seem Adverting of URL — Preceding unsigned comment added by امین اکبر (talk • contribs) 2016-05-13T14:09:24 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fahimlinkon (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs: No confidence that these images were created by uploader, who variously has claimed to be the author of works by at least 4 other photographers so far (including panoramino, and watermarked images). No metadata, facebook or smaller size.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fahimlinkon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering previous mass DR, User talk:Fahimlinkon/logs (serial copyright violator). Mysteriously watermarked. Per FBMD... or * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Ignoring uploads taken with a Nokia 206. Uploaded since 02.2016.
Example:
- File:Mirzapuruhc.jpg --> grabbed from (example) http://facilityregistry.dghs.gov.bd/org_profile.php?org_code=10000619 (last update: "2015-12-10") = http://app.dghs.gov.bd/hrm-old-data/uploads/mirzapur@uhfpo.dghs.gov.bd.jpg (last modified: 2014) or http://app.dghs.gov.bd/dghshrm/uploads/mirzapur@uhfpo.dghs.gov.bd.jpg (last modified: 2013, exif available)
- File:Mirpur06.jpg
- File:Wazadalikhanponni.jpg
- File:Karatia2.jpg
- File:Policetraningcentre.jpg
- File:Maingatebtec.jpg
- File:Mirzapuruhc.jpg
- File:Slmbd1.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Ambedkar tv). MER-C 08:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In the future, please tag using COM:CSD and request block. ~riley (talk) 03:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yog4rt
[edit]Promotional or self-promotional uploads with no indication of true artist of logos, likely COM:COPYVIOs as they appear to rip off the Anonymous logo and other sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellin Beltz (talk • contribs) 2016-05-10T18:04:04 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyright violation, upoade does not provide any glue he/she is holder of any rights Andy king50 (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios qualify for COM:CSD. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyvio. Uploder witgh muliple copyright violations, he/she certainly is not copyright holder of this book cover, but rather the bok publisher Andy king50 (talk) 10:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyvios qualify for COM:CSD. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
falsche dabei hochgeladen. sorry. Tyros.andi (talk) 11:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dawna Dziewczyno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Book covers, need permission of publisher/authors. Separating nomination from Commons:Deletion requests/File:ShOObh Photography Contest-2015 launch-1.JPG.
- File:Экстрасистолы любви.jpg
- File:Сто сорок жизненных мгновений.jpg
- File:Я играю не по правилам….jpg
- File:Книга вторая. Волшебный свет любви.jpg
- File:Миг бесконечности. Том первый и второй.jpg
- File:Миг бесконечности. Том первый.jpg
- File:Миг бесконечности. Том второй.jpg
- File:Книга первая. Миг бесконечности.jpg
- File:Площадь согласия. Книга первая и вторая.jpg
- File:Площадь согласия. Книга вторая.jpg
- File:Книга вторая. Навстречу счастью.jpg
- File:Площадь согласия. Книга первая.jpg
- File:Книга первая. Площадь согласия.jpg
- File:Книга первая. Территория души.jpg
- File:Книга вторая. Возвращение любви.jpg
- File:Территория души. Книга вторая.jpg
- File:Территория души. Книга первая и вторая.jpg
- File:Книга "Wiosenne odurzenie".jpg
Basvb (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
detected exact matched img, on a website says "Copyright© 2015 FIVB - All rights reserved" [1] Please see COM:DW: copyvio, not free enough to share on commons , or see also {{No permission since}}
Tokorokoko (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. ~riley (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Umso.jpg Grupo de TCE (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; logo of non-significant YouTube channel IagoQnsi (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete Logo above the threshold of originality. --★ Poké95 00:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
O arquivo não é usado em nenhuma página VictorVoorhees (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of painting/illustration. Artist should confirm license by contacting COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope –Davey2010Talk 22:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment Since when portraits of persons with proven notability according to WP rules (scientist with membership of Russian Academy of Sciences) are out of scope? On the other hand, it's very likely copyvio/unlikely own work here - http://www.ras.ru/win/db/show_per.asp?P=.id-58673.ln-ru - but please nominate more specifically.
- Tatewaki - At the time of sending the file here the file wasn't being used anywhere .... and not being Russian I obviously had no idea who he was (and I still don't), The reason at the time was valid and was specific, Anyway the image is a copyvio but I'll leave it be incase the uploader could be the owner of the image, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted: by Jcb as copyvio. –Davey2010Talk 16:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mahboubim21. This is getting tedious. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by WJBscribe: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing
This is a copyrighted material 46.139.245.182 21:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I seem to have been misled by a false license. Copyvio should be deleted. --Jonund (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nejedná se o hráče na flétnu a především není žádný důvod domnívat se, že na obrázku je J. J. I. Brentner, zdroj obrázku není specifikován, jedná se o výřez z této anonymní malby: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TrioSonata.jpg zdroj je zde http://alb.thomas.free.fr/orgue/icono/affichage.php3 popsán jako anonymní malba anglického původu. Brentnerova podoba není známa, nikdy nebyl v Anglii, není známo, že by hrál právě na hoboj a není nijak zdůvodněno a ani zdůvodnitelné, proč by právě toto měl být on. Wikipedie šířením tohoto obrázku a jeho nepodloženým spojením s Brentnerem vytváří další fámu, kterou půjde jen velmi těžko vysvětlovat a uvést na pravou míru (viz omyl s portrétem Fuxe označeným za podobiznu J. D. Zelenky)! Verichnare8 (talk) 23:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion. Probably really copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a copyrighted material 46.139.245.182 21:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already speedy deleted as copyvio (see ticket:2016051910014751), obvious COM:LL. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Accidentally added while demonstrating to a student. Efissend (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, author's req. --Achim (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Article on EN's up for deletion so there's not much point keeping this around (plus it's out of scope anyway) –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: It's copied from here Diannaa (talk) 00:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyvio (Thanks Diannaa). –Davey2010Talk 14:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
OTRS ticket is from an unrelated party to the copyright holder, purporting to represent one of the subjects. Related discussion.
- Also affected:
Storkk (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal type photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Efremov Andrey Grigorievich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Currently nominated images are mostly frames from movies, in several cases - previously published images, but definitely not "own work". I haven't nominated a number of other uploads of this user (buildings, landscapes, people from Slovakia - just didn't have time to check all of them) that could possibly be his own work, however due his obvious lack of attention to rules recommend to check them anyway.
- File:В Тени .jpg
- File:Михал Сланы.jpg
- File:Спасенные дети.jpg
- File:Семья Никки .jpg
- File:Кандидат, Марек Майески.jpg
- File:Кандидат, актёр Михал Кубовчик.jpg
- File:Кандидат словацкий фильм 2013.jpg
- File:Кандидат .jpg
- File:Кандидат фильм производства Словакия.jpg
- File:Кандидат словацкий фильм.jpg
- File:Кандидат фильм .jpg
- File:Счастье приходит по воскресеньям 6.jpg
- File:Счастье приходит по воскресеньям 4.jpg
- File:Счастье приходит по воскресеньям 3.jpg
- File:Счастье приходит по воскресеньям 2.jpg
- File:Счастье приходи по воскресеньям .jpg
- File:Кронер 3.jpg
- File:Кронер актёр.jpg
- File:Кронер 4.jpg
- File:Йозеф Кронер актёр.jpg
- File:Йозеф Кронер .jpg
- File:Моника Хилмерова .jpg
- File:Марош Гечко.jpg
Tatewaki (talk) 00:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos and usually without metadata, probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo non libre : voir la description qui mentionne AFP et Samuel Kubani. Habertix (talk) 00:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bouldercoready (talk · contribs)
[edit]A list of events. Not in scope. See COM:SCOPE.
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (688) englewood aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (687) greenwood village aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (686) lakewood aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (685) longmont aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (684) aurora aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (683) lakewood aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (682) aurora aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (681) denver aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (680) denver aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (679) westminster aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Alcoholics anonymous meetings in Boulder and Denver Colorado 2016 - 2017.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (677) boulder aa meetings 80205.pdf
- File:Denver colorado aa meetings (678) greenwood village aa meetings 80205.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems to have been lifted from the candidate's website http://spears2016.com/ No proof is provided that the uploader is the author. William S. Saturn (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality penis image. Out of scope. Antigng (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Also File:Proyecto Tecnologico.jpg.
Image taken from https://www.fayerwayer.com/2008/08/chile-9na-competencia-de-proyectos-tecnologicos/ , a competition by INACAP, and its website, http://www.inacap.cl/tportalvp/portal/acerca-de/contenido-acerca-de/politicas-de-privacidad , point 3, says that commercial use is forbidden. UAwiki (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 02:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Nudity. No educational purpose Elisfkc (talk) 02:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Given the small size and lack of EXIF data, it is also doubtful that this is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed. --DAJF (talk) 03:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and DAJF. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Own work? I do not think so. --Gereon K. (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Santiago 1902 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality selfies of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.
DAJF (talk) 03:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie/holiday photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused tiny passport photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. --DAJF (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EngineerAbuzar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private vanity photos of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.
DAJF (talk) 03:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
own mistake Borikén (talk) 03:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
mistake made by me Borikén (talk) 04:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, also per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded in a row on 08.03.2016. Considering also (examples):
- File:Logoprojeteauconnexion.jpg --> (tagged with copyvio) taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/a.257062227706460.60583.177635608982456/896234127122597/?type=1&theater (2015)
- File:Logo-LesAirsSolidairesEdition9.jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/a.177637508982266.44412.177635608982456/940290272716982/?type=3&theater (02.2016)
- File:Affiche Les Airs Solidaires 9.jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375388./945058912240118/?type=3&theater (02.2016)
- File:LogoLesAirsSolidaires.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked and taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375484./660851667327512/?type=3&theater (2014)
- File:DjconnexionLesAirsSolidaires.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked and taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375553./660455910700421/?type=3&theater (2014)
- File:Tablemixageetlesairssolidaires.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked and taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375692./177703135642370/?type=3&theater (2011)
- File:Conférences les airs so.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked and taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375663./278333115579371/?type=3&theater (2012)
- File:Affiche Les Airs Solidaires 8.jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos/pb.177635608982456.-2207520000.1463375449./777979808948030/?type=3&theater (2015)
- etc.
= most likely all grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/LesAirsSolidaires/photos (most likely several photographers involved). Multiple permission(s) needed.
- File:Affiche Les Airs Solidaires 9.jpg
- File:Affiche Les Airs Solidaires 8.jpg
- File:LogoLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:DjconnexionLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:StickerLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:PotagerLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:2013graffitiLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:FestivalLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:DiscosoupLesAirsSolidaires.jpg
- File:Conférences les airs so.jpg
- File:Tablemixageetlesairssolidaires.jpg
- File:GraffitiDelaGraineALAssiette.jpg
- File:Logo-LesAirsSolidairesEdition9.jpg
- File:Scene2013LesAirSo.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 05:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This is a post-2013 material from VOA child site VOA Cantonese, which no longer applies PD license, and does not meet the threshold of Commons license polices. @assanges ‧ (talk | cont | uploads) 06:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Armando Coatl (talk · contribs)
[edit]Grabbed from social media Facebook, as FBMD was written in the metadatas by Facebook when the images went there
Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Il y a une erreur dans le schéma PIerre.Lescanne (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of CC licence at source A5-BAC (talk) 06:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster, copied from http://nwfindia.com/home/content/right-hijab. MKFI (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashif International Consultancy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality marketing images from http://ashifinternational.com/business-consulting/. Commons is not for advertising.
- File:Graphics Designs.jpg
- File:Graphics Design.jpg
- File:Online web service.jpg
- File:Documentation Services.jpg
- File:GIS services.jpg
- File:Business Writing services.jpg
- File:Data analysis.jpg
- File:Market research-220x90.png
- File:Office support services-220x90.jpg
- File:Small business Consultancy.jpg
- File:Ashif Internation Logo.png
MKFI (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Imran Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:MHF 7619 - Copy.jpg
- File:Our In-house.jpg
- File:2011 Award Photo.jpg
- File:Mohamed Jahir Hussain.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rbanner92498 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Considering also (IMHO better version) File:MidMedsLogo.png. User indef blocked at enwiki via en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rbanner92498/Archive.
Gunnex (talk) 08:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, probadly grabbed from social media (Twitter). Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emily Donovan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of a not notable rock band from California.
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sana Amjad Kiyani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Considering also File:MBRSC Headquarter.jpg, copyrighted work by "Oliver Jackson Photography" and File:Majarat Edition 1.jpg, derived from magazine covers. Uploaded since 02.2016 for en:Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre where (btw) we have Eiast (talk · contributions · Statistics) with similar uploads.
- File:Mars Hope Probe.png
- File:Majarat Edition 1.jpg
- File:MBRSC Headquarter.jpg
- File:Design Model of KhalifaSat.jpg
- File:Nayif-1.jpg
- File:KhalifaSat.jpg
- File:DubaiSat-2, UAE's Second Earth Observation Satellite.jpg
- File:DubaiSat-1 - Earth Observation Satellite.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leon Heesterbeek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. INeverCry 18:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope.Érico Wouters msg 22:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 23:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: self-created "artwork". Takeaway (talk) 09:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This collage was created using copyright unfree images, which have already been eliminated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by P4K1T0 (talk • contribs) 2016-05-13T10:39:39 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyrigth violation, uploader does noch prove he/She ist holder of rights Andy king50 (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- the photograph of emperor Karl, Carl Pietzner, died in 1927, the rest of the poster is below the Threshold of Origin, IMO. So the descr. is not correct, but for me it is not a Copyvio. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I would AGF that User:VK.Kid is the heir of or related to Viktor Kabelka. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
it ist highly questiionable uploader is holder of copyright, considering multiple copyright issues by same uploder an age of original picture Andy king50 (talk) 10:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NananiNanana5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work.
Storkk (talk) 10:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 17:45, 21 May 2016 Ronhjones (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:MALENA RATNER.jpg (Copyright violation:. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
No metadata, likely news shot. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 10:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The source Youtube video is from a channel run by patrika.com and gives a compatible CC license. But the video itself shows logo of en:Asian News International (ANI) and no evidence is seen that the news agency ANI actually gave away their work under said license. Thats quite contrary to how the news agencies usually work. I think patrika is wrongly licensing work of ANI over here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Lets put this in context. Patrika is a well established major media group and it has been in business for 60 years. Its showing a video without first linking to the legal contracts that allowed them to use this video. That is normal practice. I watch the BBC and it shows CNN and ABC reports and films made by George Lucas. It doesn't explain how the BBC got those rights. You could not mount a court case based on the presumption that the BBC doesnt have those rights or request that said channel was taken off the air because they had failed to substantiate their rights. Now I concede that we do not allow anonymous people to claim the copyright of Star Wars..... but if the BBC publish Star Wars with a CC-by-SA logo in the corner then its George Lucas and not us who needs to worry if they have failed to get the correct contract this time. The case in point follows from that argument.
- IMO this is a reputable company saying that they choose to use a cc-by-sa licence.... Well Done! This is the same as NDaniTV use in Nigeria. The argument so far put for deleting this image is IMO unconvincing, supposition and unsubstantiated. If there is any evidence that Patrika are pirates then fair enough. If not then we are slandering Patrika if we assume that they are doing something illegal. Victuallers (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, no source given (claimed own work). MKFI (talk) 11:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bodies of water in Moscow
[edit]Almost the same images, I left 2 of 5 very similar, but these are out of scope: nothing educationally new for project
- File:Novogorska urbarbaro.66.201105.orienta lagparto.dsne.avrs-1.jpg
- File:Novogorska urbarbaro.66.201105.orienta lagparto.dsne.avrs-2.jpg
- File:Novogorska urbarbaro.66.201105.orienta lagparto.dsne.avrs-3.jpg
Stolbovsky (talk) 11:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't care. I think I uploaded multiple versions because of the different exposure time. --AVRS (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ramesh chatrapur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. commons is not a photo album
- File:True friends.png
- File:Ramesh chatrapur.jpg
- File:Ramesh ctp.jpg
- File:Ramesh redy.jpg
- File:I miss u.jpg
- File:Ramesh reddy.jpg
- File:Ramesh reddyy.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, since it seems that this file was taken from another website without permission, according to the filename. COM:PRP. ★ Poké95 11:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, since it seems that this was taken from another website without permission, according to the filename. COM:PRP. ★ Poké95 11:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Вася525252 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, since there is no EXIF data, and the resolution is low. Also out of project scope.
★ Poké95 11:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Own work is very unlikely, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bardosgabor (talk · contribs)
[edit]I suspect all images uploaded by Bardosgabor are copyvios: different styles, small size, often no EXIF. File:Salanki-Hedi.jpg is a blatant copyvio from http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Salanki-Hedi.htm. File:Agonás Krisztina, Aki 1.jpg and File:Agonás Gyuri 5.jpg are scanned images from advertisement or covers.
- File:Agonás Gyuri 5.jpg
- File:Akkó és Agonás Gyuri.jpg
- File:Gyuri, Akkó és Édesapja.jpg
- File:Agonás Gyuri zongorázik.jpg
- File:Agonás Gyuri 4.jpg
- File:Agonás Gyuri 0.jpg
- File:2015 Agonás Péter 2.jpg
- File:Agonás Krisztina, Aki 01.jpg
- File:Agonás Krisztina, Aki 1.jpg
- File:Akkó 1.jpg
- File:Marschalkó család leszármazás.jpg
- File:Salanki-Hedi.jpg
- File:Agonás György.jpg
- File:Agonás Győrgy.png
MKFI (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Almost totally black, out of project scope due to quality. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
upload error of mine, need to remove for reupload Ivan for wikipedia (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Looks like not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Carlos de Guzman is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Tarandeep Hora, a philosophical and factual writer is B. Tech. in MEchanical Engineering, and moreover a poet, psychologist, visionary-person..jpg
[edit]
Personal photo, out of scope. Used for self promotion Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tariq bhat director (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:Tariq bhat.jpeg
- File:TARIQ BHAT & vandana.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT DIRECTOR.jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT & SALOONI.jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT on set.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT & amritaa.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT & anu.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT (49).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (46).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (05).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (04).JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT & Amrita chabbria.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT 222.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT (director).JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT 0111.jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT director.JPG
- File:TARIQ BHAT (28).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (27).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (24).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (23).jpg
- File:TARIQ BHAT (Director).jpg
- File:Tariq bhat Director & Super Star Shahrukh khan.JPG
- File:Director Tariq Bhat.JPG
- File:Profile photo of Tariq bhat Director.JPG
- File:Tariq bhat & alka yagnik.JPG
- File:Tariq bhat Director & Actor Ranbir Kapoor.JPG
- File:Tariq bhat director.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Nothing can be seen, unclear Brunei (talk) 14:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely useless. Stas (talk) 14:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Private holiday photo of a non-notable individual. We already have plenty of quality images of the Taj Mahal, so this is outside the project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.robertocarloscujia.com/wp-content/themes/InStyle/images/roberto_back3.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, photo of inidentifiable person, likely the uploader himself, with poor description ''fb/bdzahibd". Martin H. (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MrCarota&Margot (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused photo of a musician out of scope.
- File:AlessioMiraglia&JohnClinebell.jpg
- File:LADG-sito.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-ukulele-sito.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-piano-sito.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-chitarra2-sito.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia&GiorgioPerugini-sito.jpg
- File:LADG.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-ukulele.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-piano.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-chitarra2.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia&AntonioPantaneschi.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia-chitarra.jpg
- File:Alessio1Tastiera.jpg
- File:AlessioMiraglia&GiorgioPerugini.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julia Nastasi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personnal photos
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personnal photo Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This file is a cover of the book which is not in the public domain. OTRS-permission from the author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: chopped from http://www.markmckenzie.org/new-soundtrack-coming-2/ Copyright Mark McKenzie - All Rights Reserved. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Antigng (talk) 15:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Similarly to this file, the image does not cite any sources save for those used better in this higher quality file and "national censuses" as first presented by the artist Jonathan Hagos (see his website here. National censuses certainly do not register skin colour in countries like the Netherlands where it would be unconstitutional and even in countries where skin colour and other similar (racial) concepts are accepted like the USA and Brazil all the cencuses do is ask for self-identification. Therefore the additional "source" provided is more likely to be the creativity of the author and certainly not WP:RS. Furthermore the image is not used anywhere save for old talk and archive pages, yet it is still one of the top results on google. This does not work well for the status of Wikipedia. Additionally the term "modern" is not defined, the map does not have an indication of which year it shows. It also seems factually wrong since it is unclear how the artist who created the image first could ever have summed averages from the work by Biasutti (see the higher quality file) and arrive at this map. In short this image ought to be on Imgur or something not on wikipedia. Misinformation like this is fine somewhere else but it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. AlwaysUnite (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (at the other nomination. Please limit deletion nominations to one per file. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; photo of non-significant individual with no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This photo is published in an online at [2] as well as being part of the Kenyan Fashion Awards web site [3]. Jbhunley (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; an unnecessary sloppy hand-drawn version of File:New youtube logo.png IagoQnsi (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (also, appears to be made from a create-your-own-avatar tool, so it's probably copyrighted) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of text that would be better served as just text (also, not being used anywhere and purpose is not really clear) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. At the time it was a good and useful illustration for a Wikipedia topic that had no images. Now I have no interest in keeping it. Thank you for the deletion request. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; non-notable individual, photo only used on a Wikipedia sandbox page that has virtually no chance of being accepted as an article IagoQnsi (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope; non-notable individual, photo only used on a Wikipedia sandbox page that has virtually no chance of being accepted as an article IagoQnsi (talk) 17:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, not in use anywhere IagoQnsi (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (not sure what it's even supposed to be) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; tiny photo of non-significant individual that isn't being used anywhere IagoQnsi (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; not being used anywhere and serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blatantly out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope; serves no educational purpose and isn't being used anywhere IagoQnsi (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; serves no education purpose and not being used anywhere IagoQnsi (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; unclear why this photo might serve any educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; logo of non-significant YouTube channel, serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; no indication of who this is or how this photo might serve any educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; serves no education purpose and isn't used anywhere IagoQnsi (talk) 17:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (and probably copyrighted) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; serves no educational purpose (and it's literally just "LokosHD" typed in Calibri on a black background) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (and appears to be made with some create-your-own-avatar app, so probably copyrighted) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Blatantly out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
cueroro hum filme pronografico de gapones 177.36.4.245 17:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; this is a prize-winning image. False DN. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, not in use somewhere, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation (© All rights reserved) [4] Skivsamlare (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as own works, but some have no metadata, some are derivatives, some have low resolution. Made by 7 different cameras. See user's talk page as well.
- File:RenJJ.jpg
- File:Lavrenchuk, Evgeny.jpg
- File:Lavrenchuk, Evgeny (theater).JPG
- File:Lavrenchuk, Evgeny (school).jpg
- File:Гордина Любовь Сергеевна.jpg
- File:Bichev.jpg
- File:AslanAhmadov.jpg
- File:KraskoVV.jpg
- File:PIPKC S.jpg
- File:Venedikt foto.png
- File:Krasko v pryzhke.JPG
- File:Прокофьев.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:크로스모바일2.png
- File:크로스업.png
- File:크로스모바일.png
- File:123계급.PNG
- File:팝업1.PNG
- File:팝업 모바일2.png
- File:팝업모바일.png
- File:팝업 최종본2.png
- File:팝업 최종본.png
FDMS 4 18:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:계좌변경!.png
- File:계좌변경.png
- File:크로스1.png (deleted because it is a duplicate of File:크로스업.png which was previously deleted. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC))
- File:강력제재.png
FDMS 4 13:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam spam spam spam! Lovely spam! Wonderful spam!. — regards, Revi 02:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Also indef'ed. — regards, Revi 02:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope (no mainspace contributions). FDMS 4 18:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader did not provide actual source and actual author but claimed it as its own. Somehow, we are seeing higher level of illiteracy. Therefore, we should declare this image non-free and deletable. George Ho (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I found the source; the credit goes to AFP and/or Hezbollah Media Office. --George Ho (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
file is equal to File:Volbeat 2013.jpg fringio · α†Ω 18:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping. 18 May 2016 Taivo (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Volbeat live 2013.jp. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
test file for course, duplicate of File:Czech-2013-Prague-Astronomical clock face.jpg Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Crop from this copyright photo: http://transphoto.ru/photo/864931/ Lyubeckiy yav (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Actually, this is not "own work" of the uploader as he admitted here. He claims to have "permission from Asllani family" but it is not provided. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- It was just found out that the photos are actually taken from here and here. Pure copyright violation. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The same picture in higher quality https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vihorlat_008.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The same picture in higher quality https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vihorlat_008.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 16:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Source for the picture is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1ZHLcBYS3o which is licensed under "Standard YouTube License", not under "cc-by-sa-4.0". CyberXRef☎ 19:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Press photo, OTRS needed. MKFI (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files on skin colour
[edit]We apparently have a large number of files of (very) low quality on human skin colour distributions. Possibly they are left overs from The Troubles but in any case they are superseded by this image. Most do not cite sources, the ones that do, cite non existent "national censuses" although most are in some fashion based on the superior image linked above. Legends are missing, layout, cell size, factual accuracy all of these are pretty much awful. Most are just sitting here linking only to old talk and user pages or archives. Several are copies of one another with only minimal changes. And yet they do turn up on Google when we have better material available. All in all more than enough reasons to get rid of them.
| File | Not educational | Not licensed | Duplicate | Low quality | No Reliable source | Not factually accurate | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File:Human displacement map of the world.jpg | x | x | x | x | |||
| File:World map by skin tone for modern populations.jpg | x | x | x | x | x | ||
| File:Mapa de los colores de la piel humana.png | x | x | x | One link remains, awaiting edit request on the Spanish Negro_persona page. | |||
| File:Map of skin hue equi.png | x | x | x | ||||
| File:Map of skin hue equi heb.png | x | x | x | ||||
| File:Map of skin hue equi3 2.png | x | x | x | ||||
| File:RBiasutti1940.png | x | x | |||||
| File:RBiasutti1940mercator.png | x | x | |||||
| File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.png | x | Svg version exists. Svg can be improved, original data is available. | |||||
| File:Map of Indigenous Skin Colors.png | x | x | x | x | |||
| File:Human Skin Colour.png | x | x | x | ||||
| File:Africa_skin_color.png | x | x | x | Up for CSD on Eng wiki. Crop of File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.png | |||
| File:Skin_shade_map.gif | x | x | x | Up for CSD on Eng wiki. |
The images have been replaced with the superior svg on all articles and active talk pages save for the open edit request on the Spanish wiki at the designated page. The only pages linking to these files now are talk archives, user pages and the other image pages listed here. All relevant sources and the summary info from the png file have been transcluded with the svg file. AlwaysUnite (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- While some of these are certainly useless and Commons could gain from getting rid of them, the nominatio is problematic and shows lack of basic understanding about what Commons’ scope is. Some points:
- 1. Geographic data academically published in the 1940s is in scope, no matter how flawed its methodology was, how problematic its premisses, and how fallacious its conclusions.
- 2. The work of random guys on the internet overwriting and/or forking such data is usually not in scope.
- 3. von Luschan’s 19th cent.scale ≠ Biasutti’s 1940s map data.
- 4. when filing a DR, please make sure you’re not judging a current version of a file as recently overwritten by a troll.
- 5. Categories may be worth keeping even if all or most their content gets deleted.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- 1. I completely agree that the actual data is within the scope wiki commons (I've read the mission statement ;) ). That's why we ought to keep these two File:Unlabeled_Renatto_Luschan_Skin_color_map.svg, File:PSM_V50_D780_Global_map_of_skin_color_distribution.jpg
- 2. & 4. Trolls overwriting things? What trolls? Save for Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map (both png/svg) these files haven't had activity in years.
- 3. This is a very good point. I think we ought to move the svg file to something like "Unlabeled_R._Biasutti_Skin_color_map_Luschan_scale.svg". At the very least the summary of the svg ought to reflect this distinction.
- 5. Yes, working categories like this one. But Thesetwo? Nah. We can't have categories with only one or two files in them. The mess would be impossible to patrol right?
- -- AlwaysUnite (talk) 00:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @User:Tuvalkin, also "some"? Are you proposing we keep these? You are right in undo those category changes btw. That ought to wait on the files being deleted. AlwaysUnite (talk) 00:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- An aside note, User:AlwaysUnite, please: Can you link to other Commons’ pages via internal links and not though http urls? I have trouble in taking you seriously if you don’t. Not trying to be snob or smug here, it’s just that this discussion is useless and might as well be closed now if you, the nominator, have no idea what you’re doing. And linking to http irls is a great way to show you don’t. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- That is laziness not incompetence I'm afraid. I tend to work across wiki boundaries quite often. It gets tedious really quickly if I have to check for each link if it belongs to either English, Dutch, Commons or Afrikaans. Certainly since a lot of the talk and user pages on the smaller projects are still in English so I can't immediately pick up the correct ones by glancing at the text. It may look a little messy but it saves me time. It even saves keystrokes. Honestly don't know why there isn't a bot automatically converting local http links to local links.. Can't be that hard to script right? But if it annoys you I'll gladly change them. There. AlwaysUnite (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- An aside note, User:AlwaysUnite, please: Can you link to other Commons’ pages via internal links and not though http urls? I have trouble in taking you seriously if you don’t. Not trying to be snob or smug here, it’s just that this discussion is useless and might as well be closed now if you, the nominator, have no idea what you’re doing. And linking to http irls is a great way to show you don’t. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- do not delete, re-submit on a case-by-case basis. This is a non-starter, imho, we cannot sweepingly delete images about some topic. The only thing these files have in common, apparently, is their relation to "skin colour". File:Map of skin hue equi.png, which I drew and uploaded in 2005, may be superseded by better quality images, but should not be deleted until it is clear that there are indeed no further derived versions hanging around. I would hope that this quick hack from 2005 has been "superseded" in the sense that there are better images on the same topic now, but this alone is no grounds for deletion. File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg (2011), which is not nominated for deletion, cites File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.png (2006) file as its source, which is in turn derived from the 2005 image. Otoh, File:Human displacement map of the world.jpg is an independent thing, and its source is Jonathan Hagos (2008). This is not a scholarly work, to be sure, but since when has this been necessary for inclusion of an image? At first glance, the Hagos map is plausible but dodgy, as it isn't clear what it is based on, but I fail to see in what sense we "we have better material available" for this particular item. --Dbachmann (talk) 10:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- I applaud you for attempting to clean up the complicated history of the Biasutti map on commons, but it isn't entirely clear to me what you are trying to do.
- What we should try to do is get an representation as close as possible to the original 1940 map, and if possible, clearly labelled alternative images representing later emendations such as Jablonski 2000. This isn't easy because we do not seem to have the original map available for reference.
- But your argument that this image is "superseding" any others doesn't make sense to me. It isn't "superseding" anything just because it is in svg format. For one thing, it is immedietely derived from the preceding images, and relies on them possibly already for licensing reasons, but much more because it is a manual copy of their content, not informed by the original map, so if anything it introduces further inaccuracies but it cannot possibly be an improvement.
- For use in articles, it is also next to unusable because it chooses the Mercator projection, and about half of the map is taken up by Greenland. This is a graphical problem, not one of licencing or data content, but it's still preferable to use this one simply because it conveys more information per unit area when transcluded as a thumbnail.
- There is another problem, as the current svg was simply posted on top of the preceding svg which was a direct conversion, not a manual redrawing. This is already bad form on commons, if you redraw a map, you should upload it under a separate filename. Neither of these maps was "unlabelled" so there is that problem with the filename too. It's a mess, and I agree we should untangle it, but not by throwing stuff out before figuring out what was based on what, because the only thing you will achieve is make the situation even more opaque for people trying to figure it out in the future.
- If you really want to improve this, you should come up with a scan of the original 1940 publication and then redraw the map from scratch based on that directly. --User:Dbachmann (𒁳) 10:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- I moved Dbachmann's second message they left on my talk page here. It starts after the first signature. AlwaysUnite (talk) 13:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
A quick update, I managed to find the original Biasutti map [5] and I'll digitize it as per Dbachmann's suggestion. It has much more detail than the current svg we have so I think I'll just upload it as a new file. At least then the naming issues of the svg discussed above are dealt with. I've also found quite a number of maps which accurately depict the exact extent of current scientific knowledge on the subject (e.g. Jablonski but also a number of others, in general less broad but much more accurate on the smaller scale). The next two days or so I'll upload the images and summarize the discussion above in a to-do list for the remaining changes. AlwaysUnite (talk) 22:41, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Mixed close: ... Deleted three images without sources. Kept images with sources and/or in use. These could be renominated, but one by one instead of a mass Deletion Nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The image is an obvious forgery in which a photograph of Ivan Grujić, a living person, is simply superimposed on an UDBA (Yugoslav Secret Police) ID card. Grujić's (born c. 1960) appearance in the photo is incompatible with the supposed dating of the ID card ("FNRJ" suggests 1963 at the latest). The source is unreliable (a blog). GregorB (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Licence incapatibility: http://duceppe.com/metteur-en-scene/michel-poirier/ http://duceppe.com/conditions-dutilisation-2/ § DROITS D’AUTEUR ET MARQUE DE COMMERCE "licence […] non-transférable" (opposite of share-alike) "n’en modifiez pas le Contenu" (opposite of remix) Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
_be_one_thoran,_ask_one.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nsubuga Ronnie (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Training Models 5.jpg
- File:Training Models 4.jpg
- File:Training Models 3.jpg
- File:Training Models 1.jpg
- File:Training Models 2.jpg
- File:Greeting the Little ones.jpg
- File:Giving Back To Community.jpg
- File:Talking to one of the KIDS.jpg
- File:At the Ice Cream Festival.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 20:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Aperto 322.gif
- File:Two (to) be one thoran, ask one.png
- File:Thôran.png
- File:Co-signa linguistico.png
- File:Templo Thorp.png
Very doubtful educational contents and adherence to COM:SCOPE. All are images supposedly related to a "Thorp Society" badly described in a en:WP:PROMO article in PT wikipedia. Stego (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
seems to be a copyright violation, no exif, low file resolution Queryzo (talk) 20:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 21:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 21:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image of doubtful educational value. All other uploads by this user have been deleted as copyright violations. Green Giant (talk) 21:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope: personal image Florn (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
No source, per deletion of File:Die Uniformen der Allgemeinen SS.jpg and File:1930 pattern Schutzstaffel uniform with shoulder board.png. Trijnsteltalk 22:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploader did not indicate copyright of the underlying work. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Image described as "own work" but already appears at http://www.bestmasterofscienceinnursing.com/faq/how-do-you-become-an-emergency-room-nurse/ EricEnfermero (talk) 07:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Taken from another website. The watermark on the image is taken from the website "Military Today" Ominae (talk) 07:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
copyright issue - described as own work, but appears at http://www.simpletuition.com/student-loans/forgiveness-for-nurses/ EricEnfermero (talk) 07:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
copyright problem - image taken from https://www.anmfvic.asn.au/news-and-publications/news/2014/11/26/violence-increasing-in-victorian-hospitals EricEnfermero (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 07:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajay thakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:AjayThakar.jpg.jpg
- File:299769e06d41b53e8aeadc9127175b85.jpg.jpg
- File:227.jpg.jpg
- File:921.jpg.jpg
- File:87.jpg.jpg
- File:Ajay Thakar At An Event.jpg
- File:Ajay Thakar.jpg
- File:AjayThakar.jpg
FDMS 4 07:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Cpoyright violation Wikifido (talk) 07:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 07:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raymondohora (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 07:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:SmallPartiesLatvia.png
- File:PartiesLatvia.png
- File:LatvianParties2018.jpg
- File:Spanish OPolling Averages.png
- File:Danichgraph.png
- File:Eureff.png
- File:8thpolishsejmseats.jpg
- File:11thspanishcongressseats.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charankumar022 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Modern management3.jpg
- File:Ef0fcfa3d67f41d2fafb65fc038fbf3a-6.jpg
- File:Modern management1.jpg
- File:Modern management2.jpg
- File:Modern management.jpg
- File:Ef0fcfa3d67f41d2fafb65fc038fbf3a-1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChpgzvDUYAAqM_W.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
File:IBAMOS A SER REINAS. Mentiras y complicidades que sustentan la violencia hacia las mujeres.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status .
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.03.09.2015.pdf
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande1 - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 12.09.2015.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande1 - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 12.09.2015.pdf
- File:POEMARIO - UN HOMENAJE PARA TI CON CARIÑO, VIEJO LINDO - J.Q.A.CH. -SUCRE - MAYO - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.28.02.2016.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Still out of scope.
- File:ÉTICA JUDICIAL - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.29.10.2007.pdf
- File:EL PERFIL DEL DOCENTE UNIVERSITARIO - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - 08.12.2014 - Univ. de La Habana - UNAM - Univ. de Madrid.pdf
- File:APUNTES SOBRE LA TEORÍA DE LA EPISTEMOLOGÍA JURÍDICA-Dr. LUIS NAVARRETE OBANDO-OCTUBRE 2014 - monografias - Milano.pdf
- File:40 AÑOS DESPUÉS DE LA MUERTE DEL CHE GUEVARA-PANORAMA CAJAMARQUINO - 07.10.2007.pdf
- File:LA FIESTA DE LOS TOROS - ARTE O TORTURA - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.02.04.2015.pdf
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 30.09.2016 - César Hildebrandt.pdf
- File:FUNDAMENTOS TEOLÓGICOS DE LA IGLESIA MISIONERA CRISTIANA, APOSTÓLICA Y CATÓLICA UNIVERSAL - C.27.10.2016.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Books. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:ELLIS, Havelock. Psicologia do Sexo.pdf
- File:Chalmers - O que e ciencia afinal (I ao IV).pdf
- File:JASPERS, Karl. Introdução ao Pensamento Filosófico.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.\ EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Image déformée lors de son utilisation dans Wikisource. Merci. *j*jac (talk) 14:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Image is taken from a website / PDF where no free license is stated, uploader isn't author ("unknown") Gestumblindi (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones: Copyright violation: http://www.bahnonline.ch/wp/19006/stadler-weltrekord-lok-mrs-logistica-brasilien.htm
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.gicn.in/gicn/wp-content/uploads/jay-vijayan.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www13.0zz0.com/2011/08/05/14/238595747.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.wixstatic.com/media/b4bdc0_d653388d65464a11b1b68f6c8fd215ca.jpg/v1/fill/w_416,h_417,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/b4bdc0_d653388d65464a11b1b68f6c8fd215ca.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
PD in Italy is not enough for commons 2003:45:5C6F:A801:C91B:2875:D66:2F16 09:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Right, but it is also in PD in the U.S. because it was created before 1976, see COM:URAA (a frivolous DR). Materialscientist (talk) 10:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep PD in the U.S., created before 1976. --★ Poké95 11:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file was in public domain in Italy on URAA date. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Logo under free license, can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo, no permission for cc license. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Naruszenie praw autorskich firmy. Jest podane źródło, lecz logo firmy nie jest na licencji Creative Commons, w Wikipedii jednak jest. Tom790 (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adblock logo.png 78.49.253.154 01:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as the file itself is included in the GPL licensed source files of AdBlock, and is not excluded from the license. Searingjet (talk)
Kept: {{PD-trivial}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
More than a textmark. JTCEPB (talk) 22:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The image is not from a Bollywood party or event and not taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer as required by the license. See also image available elsewhere without watermarking [6][7] - Managerarc talk 13:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Borderline COM:SCOPE. ~riley (talk) 02:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
It's an "own work", but there is no metadata Yanguas (talk) 04:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: missing EXIF data is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "©2013 Joan Marcus", most likely web grab, lower res example here: http://www.broadtickets.com/media/wysiwyg/shows/matil9-1.jpg. MKFI (talk) 07:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
![07:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/16#c-MKFI-2016-05-16T07:09:00.000Z-File:Broadway_cast_performing_"When_I_Grow_Up".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
![16:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/16#c-P199-2016-06-02T16:51:00.000Z-File:Broadway_cast_performing_"When_I_Grow_Up".jpg){kind=link}
Trademarked logo used for spam page on English Wikipedia that has since been deleted. Citobun (talk) 07:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Claim to self-authorship doubtful. Used by single-purpose account that created a promotional page on English Wikipedia that was later deleted. Citobun (talk) 07:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio, many identical but higher resolution images can be found easily: https://www.tineye.com/search/d0a95f754fd04259ec465a5adbc2953533be51cc/ Domdomegg (talk) 07:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- On closer investigation it seems I can't find an actual source for this image, and perhaps it is original content. However it seems strange being such a small image with no camera exif details, it would be good to check Domdomegg (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: missing EXIF data is no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status (Bangladesh has 60 years pma). FDMS 4 07:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence that was released under a compatible license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. FDMS 4 07:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
from uploader: all links fixed, no redirection needed any more Chenyijia001 (talk) 09:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as solely sourced "photo by me...", but missing EXIF data etc, Roland zh (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: missing EXIF data is no valid reason for deletion; moreover, ownership asserted at User talk:Kokkarani#File:Kadamattom Church Pallimeda.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started as imho doubtful claimed 'own work', missing EXIF data, and see also user talk, Roland zh (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- hi Roland zh, This file is my own work and it is cropped version of a photograph clicked by me. I have cropped this photo using Photoshop and removed EXIT data. I am a copyright holder of this file because it is clicked by me during the film shooting.--Amanrajveer (talk) 21:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Amanrajveer, requests for deletion of Wikimedia Commons content usually are treated at the entry they started. I.e. please no user talk feedbacks because these are no 'personal' issues of even harassments, from my side just questions of copyright issues, but sometimes there are exceptions because usually I check the uploader's talk before starting such DR's (found some similar issues, that's why mentioned). No offence, have patient until other Wikimedians discussed this request. Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 22:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Amanrajveer: ownership asserted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. This image is from huwiki (hu:Fájl:Janus2.jpg) but there the uploader is not identical with the photographer. The coin is old but age of the photo is unknown. Regasterios (talk) 00:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of first publication, no authorship information included at source. Source is ptwp, which uses the image under fair use, and links to this site, which has no info on the photo. Without having any information/investigation into the first publication and photographer identity, we don't have the info to say this is PD. czar 00:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sir, this picture can also be found at https://www.flickr.com/photos/kelisli/8280764839/in/photolist-dBK5Tz where the PRO Flickr user states that it is is courtesy of Mr. Ibrahim Amr. Besides, this young picture of Fathia Fuad (1930–1976) was published prior to 1966, and is therefore appropriate for PD-Egypt (type C, if not type B):
- Type of work
- A Non-creative photographic or audiovisual works
- B Other works with an identifiable author
- C Other works that are either anonymous or pseudonymous
- D Other works (e.g. collective works) whose copyright is held by a legal person
- Type of work
- Copyright has expired in Egypt if...
- A published prior to 1987
- B the author died prior to 1966
- C published prior to 1966
- D published prior to 1966
- Copyright has expired in Egypt if...
- Copyright has expired in the U.S. if...
- A published prior to 1981
- B the author died prior to 1946 or published prior to 1923
- C published prior to 1946
- D published prior to 1946
- Copyright has expired in the U.S. if...
- Sincerely Listofpeople (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note that publication is different from creation. We don't have evidence that this was published before 1966 without a better source. Perhaps you can use the Flickr contact to get more info. czar 17:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sincerely Listofpeople (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- You mean this photograph, although evidently created before 1966, might have been published after 1966? That is indeed possible, but unlikely, isn't it? I have seen many other photographs of the Princess; she cannot even be older than 35s (even 30s) in this particular one. Yet, I will look for more sources, sir. I do not know if I can, but will try to contact the Flickr user now. Sincerely Listofpeople (talk) 10:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Czar, I contacted the website "faroukmisr.net" where the picture has been found. However, I have not received a reply yet. By the way, what exactly do we need to know? Is it the name of the photographer only? It seems to be type C (anonymous or pseudonymous) for now, and more importantly, since the photograph has been taken and printed before 1966, we therefore can have this image on Wikimedia Commons under the license PD-Egypt Type C. Please correct me if this is not true. Meanwhile, I updated the description and source information, replacing the Portuguese Wikipedia with a proper source. Sincerely, Listofpeople (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- The most important thing to know is where they got the image from—when it was first published. For the definition of "published", see Commons:Publication. Did they get it from a loose photograph or was it printed in a book. If you are able to find the photographer, you can follow-up with them to secure the rights to relicense on Commons. czar 15:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Dear Czar, I contacted the website "faroukmisr.net" where the picture has been found. However, I have not received a reply yet. By the way, what exactly do we need to know? Is it the name of the photographer only? It seems to be type C (anonymous or pseudonymous) for now, and more importantly, since the photograph has been taken and printed before 1966, we therefore can have this image on Wikimedia Commons under the license PD-Egypt Type C. Please correct me if this is not true. Meanwhile, I updated the description and source information, replacing the Portuguese Wikipedia with a proper source. Sincerely, Listofpeople (talk) 13:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lack of information to determine copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is superceded by File:Tamina at WrestleMania 32 Axxess.jpg. I was the one who uploaded this through CropTool, and I consent for it to be deleted. wL <speak> 01:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. In use. —howcheng {chat} 21:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status and not own work (uploaded on 08.03.2016 and grabbed from Internet. see also fair use image en:File:Grand Orient de France (emblem).png) considering logo of en:Grand Orient de France (the largest of several Masonic organizations in France). May be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Gunnex (talk) 05:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Mikhail Shemyakin (still alive). Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Children are victims of adults vices 1 (1).JPG
- File:Children are victims of adults vices 1 (2).JPG
- File:Children are victims of adults vices 1 (5).JPG
- File:Children are victims of adults vices 1 (6).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Moder sculptures, no FoP for sculptures in Russia. And two other images containt copyrighted text of discription in differnt languages
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 01.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 02.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 03.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 04.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 05.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 06.JPG
- File:Children Are the Victims of Adult Vices 07.JPG
- File:Children are victims of adults vices 1 (1)2.jpg
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stolbovsky (talk) 11:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Moscow FOP cases
[edit]Moder sculptures. No FoP for scultures in Russia
- File:Tchaikovsky statue Moscow Conservatory.jpg this one was built by Vera Moukhina died in 1953 and can be undeleted in 2024 Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- File:Мемориал - panoramio - Александр Спиридонов (1).jpg
- File:Мемориал - panoramio - Александр Спиридонов.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Stolbovsky (talk) 11:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
http://chimay.com/us/ Triplecaña (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
This a studio photo taken in 1970 according to en.wiki. It's unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
License review failed. Source doesn't say anything about a Mozilla or any other kind of license (nor did it at the time of upload). We asked for clarification and haven't heard back. Do note that the image has gone through several revisions recently. czar 08:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Platonides (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trash category for Moscow
[edit]Out of Scope: images were uploaded automatically by bot. They have nothing educationally new anf useful/no usage/some of them have absolutely the same dublicates here on commons/poor quality.
- File:Березы ночью - panoramio.jpg
- File:Городская трущоба - panoramio.jpg
- File:Дальняя перспектива 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Останкинская башня - panoramio - Александр Спиридонов.jpg
- File:Розовое небо 1 - panoramio.jpg
Stolbovsky (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from other photos. Should be cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'posing/profiling', or potentially copyright issues, file also not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 16:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, file is all over the web, COM:OTRS permission needed. OTRS complaint as well: Ticket#2016051610017735 Steinsplitter (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image which was the largest of three mentioned in previous DN. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. We need OTRS permission from the person who made this sculpture. ★ Poké95 02:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message and Good Afternoon; The statue of Our Lady, Virgin Mary has been restored or repainted due to destruction by time; this image apparently has new paint but if one looks at the very very old chapel, then, one can see that this image is very old or more than 40 or even 60 years old; at any rate, We Catholics by virtue of our Religion do own all these images even if others did the sculpture, and irrevocably it belongs to all of us; also, I asked permission from the Leaders or Laity thereat for Photography since our Pope Francis said Proclaim Jesus Christ in the Internet; hence, I just use the Upload Wizzard and it automatically put there the License, at any rate, I have no objection to the deletion, and I respectfully submit to the discretion of the editors or admins, very sincerely Sincerely --Judgefloro 09:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC) (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately copyright law doesn't work by association but by original authorship. Green Giant (talk) 02:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Errore di caricamento. Il giocatore non è Radunovic, ma Turrin, portiere della primavera Ago76 (talk) 11:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of copyrighted software. Champion (talk) 03:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- What about {{PD-ineligible}}? --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
The People's Republic of China (mainland China) declared its mere language copyrightable. However, this image might be subject to jurisdiction of the Republic of China (Taiwan). Even so, this image is an autograph of Fei Yu-ching with his message in Chinese. Shall it be deleted regardless of jurisdiction? George Ho (talk) 07:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 18:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 07:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, this is a full-size photo with EXIF info, and the uploader's username is Accordéon1512 (talk · contribs). The subject of the photo is an accordionist, so the likely explanation is that the uploader is the subject herself, and she received the photo from her photographer. That would make it a copyright violation unless the photographer releases it under a free license. —howcheng {chat} 21:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Nominating based on COM:DW; is this COM:DM? The focus of the image is on the Apple Watch, and Apple Maps I can only assume is copyrighted. ~riley (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The map is ancillary to the photograph subject, even though in focus. The map could be blanked out, pixellated or replaced with another illustrative application without changing the illustrative purpose of the photograph. --Fæ (talk) 08:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the same thing could we apply to screenshots as wll, but we do not accept non-free elements in screenshots, since they are non accidental, same with this image. The focus of this image if the watch PLUS the map. Pleas eremove the map form the image and Delete the old revision when done. Josve05a (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Anyway... Do you think the trivial rough outlines of states (as on this image) meet originality threshold? I think not. Therefore, this view of map is not protected by copyright. The other elements are COM:DM. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no infringement. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
This is the logo of the IME-USP (Instituto de Matemática e Estatística da Universidade de São Paulo), so it isn't eligible for re-licensing by the Competence Centre for Free Software - IME / USP suborganization. We would need permission or release from IME-USP directly. This said, the other logos on the CCS page should be fine for cc-by-3.0. It's just the graphic that has an issue.
- A example is the images.usp or scs.usp, this departament work to solve this type of problem, in level of usp. For ime, is CCSL. -- Webysther (talk)
- The logo can not be placed only as an image in simple format? Because it is a logo vector? She has no originality content no, it is a simple font and the coat of Archimedes, taken from a book over 200 years old. -- Webysther (talk)
- If you can confirm that it's a simple vectorization of an image 200 years old (public domain), we can close this request. All the info I had before was that a suborganization (is that incorrect?) of the IME-USP was relicensing its parent organization's logo without any additional explanation. Alternatively, if there is some kind of IME-USP administration that owns the copyright to the logo, they can send permissions to Commons:OTRS. czar 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- The logo can not be placed only as an image in simple format? Because it is a logo vector? She has no originality content no, it is a simple font and the coat of Archimedes, taken from a book over 200 years old. -- Webysther (talk)
- Definitely, see in this book here, here (item 6), here. The real author of this version [8] is unknow. -- Webysther (talk)
- The links I was able to access had a similar depiction but I didn't see a source credited (no author listed doesn't entail that the work is in the public domain). I should note that many of the images were similar but different, meaning that this logo's vectorization may be sufficiently new as to have its own copyright. czar 14:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- I do not believe that using a tool to trace an old bust is reason to credit originality and thus be in copyright.
- The links I was able to access had a similar depiction but I didn't see a source credited (no author listed doesn't entail that the work is in the public domain). I should note that many of the images were similar but different, meaning that this logo's vectorization may be sufficiently new as to have its own copyright. czar 14:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Definitely, see in this book here, here (item 6), here. The real author of this version [8] is unknow. -- Webysther (talk)
Oppose Just the fact of being the vector format of an old image, without any additional visual information that features originality, should be considered simple forms, at least. That is why I vote for it to be maintained and the information discussed here are inserted into the page as the original image used. -- Webysther (talk)
Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Redundanz/Schlechte Qualität/URV? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnstange (talk • contribs) 2016-05-16T02:17:29 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
vermutlich URV Xocolatl (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
{{subst:dd}} Svkov2 (talk) 12:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
{{subst:dd}} В сети в СМИ раньше, чем в Вики. Авторство под сомнением. Svkov2 (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
ko co chu thich 123.27.93.12 13:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is a revision of File:St Thomas Christians divisions.svg, better in appearance. As EugeneZelenko says, it should be converted to SVG. A negative aspect is the use of completely different colours for derivatives of a single liturgical rite. This gives the impression of a complete break of continuity. File:St Thomas Christians divisions.svg instead uses different shades of the same colour, thus indicating basic identity, while also pointing to the relatively minor variations. If this were fixed, I would favour keeping the new image. Theodoxa (talk) 18:36, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Image does not cite any sources, the image is not used anywhere save for one archive page, it displays arbitrary detailed class boundaries which are probably second level administrative boundaries, the term "indigenous" is not defined at all, the map does not have an indication of which year it shows, it also seems factually wrong on several counts. Of the latter it is worth pointing out that South Korea gets a darker skin category than North Korea does despite the two only being separated for 70 years and being very genetically homogenuous (i.e. the difference does not exist and could not exist because evolution works on vastly larger time scales than a couple of decades). In short This image ought to be on Imgur or something not on wikipedia. This is relevant because this image is one of the first to pop up on a google search for "human skin colour world map". Misinformation like this is fine somewhere else but it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. AlwaysUnite (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Mynewsdesk.com is now under discussion and the short is that it is a site for marketers that defaults to cc-by-sa licensing, leading many marketers who do not have the rights to inadvertently relicense images that don't belong to them. This looks like one of those cases. The source credits a website (snspix.com) that (1) does not appear to have a copy of the image in question, and (2) gives no indication that the image would be licensed under Creative Commons even if it were there. czar 15:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Czar: Hi there and thanks for being patient. This situation has happened before with another photo from Hitachi that I uploaded. I think it fair to assume from the last conversation that Hitachi know what CC is and aren't just blindly placing them on; however I have also emailed them again to confirm:
"Hi, Sorry to trouble you guys again, but could you confirm which license this image: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/hitachirail-eu/images/launch-of-class-385-at-edinburgh-waverley-526958 is under again and whether the author owns the copyright, or you do, like last time? Is it under Creative Commons? Thanks again!"
"Hi ....
I confirm the image you referred to is licensed to Creative Commons.
Thank you for your enquiry.
Susan Lawson Media Relations and Public Affairs Manager"
The reply was a bit vague, unlike last time, so I've sent off another email asking for more clarification.
Thanks, Jcc (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Now confirmed:
"Could I just have confirmation that the Creative Commons license you allude to is indeed CC-BY-3.0?
Thanks and sorry for troubling you again!"
"Hi again.
Yes.
Thank you.
Susan Lawson Media Relations and Public Affairs Manager"
Thank you, Jcc (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks @Jcc—could you please forward that permission to Commons for archiving and include the ticket number here? Commons:OTRS czar 14:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Czar: ticket:2016052910007721. Best wishes, Jcc (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Waiting for OTRS verification czar 17:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Czar: ticket:2016052910007721. Best wishes, Jcc (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
NoFoP-Russia Ray Garraty (talk) 17:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: DM. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
