Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Bo obok tego loga jest niepotrzebna litera R w kółku. Madzia29734 (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt, einfaches Textlogo. --Ralf Roleček 18:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)- Keep - according to Google Translate, nominator thinks that the (R) should not be in the logo. However, the company uses it in their logo even on their website. Jcb (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; request to delete the file based on the "unnecassary R with a circle". Riley Huntley (talk) 05:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo jest niepotrzebna litera R. Madzia29734 (talk) 11:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok loga jest niepotrzebna litera R w kółku. 77.254.57.195 16:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep einfaches Textlogo ohne Schöpfungshöhe. --Ralf Roleček 16:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok nazwy nie ma znaczka. Madzia29734 (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: speedy - nonsens reason. --Jcb (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok tego loga jest niepotrzebna litera R w kółku. Madzia29734 (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; request to delete the file based on the "unnecassary R with a circle". Riley Huntley (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo jest niepotrzebna litera R. Madzia29734 (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo obok tego loga jest niepotrzebna litera R w kółku. Madzia29734 (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
@Madzia29734: English, please. Thanks! --Soluvo (talk) 19:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)- This is a multilingual project, not the English Wikipedia. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; request to delete the file based on the "unnecassary R with a circle". Riley Huntley (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo jest niepotrzebna litera R. Madzia29734 (talk) 11:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 19:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
{{tl|Copyvio |1= |source=http://www.panoramio.com/photo/69349260}} Bastenbas (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Replaced by image version (same uploader) File:TheaterAkademieStuttgart.jpg ↔ User: Perhelion 20:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like movie screenshot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
me equivoque Marthian hermoso (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Needs better proof that uploader is copyright holder MPF (talk) 08:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep until the permission is processed at OTRS. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed from both the Environment for the Americas and Lionel Worrell. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Needs OTRS permission. Note that this was previously marked as associated to ticket:2016042810006048, but that was incorrect. The agent made a mistake in processing the ticket, and it was never related to this image. BU Rob13 (talk) 03:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Info: As I remember, the permission is valid. Did you sent message to the author of the artwork (Lionel Worrell)? Have the mailing list an update that questionate the permission that I processed? --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete Ticket is only for File:2016-IMBD-Eng-Poster-Web.jpg - there was an initial muddle as the url of the en-wiki page was quoted, rather than the url of the image, and took 18 e-mails to sort out. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
screenshot not free content MoiraMoira (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional image which is also unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 20:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamranirani (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Sina kordnejhad 2.jpg
- File:Sina kordnejhad va parmis vard.jpg
- File:Sina kordnejhad 1.jpg
- File:Sina kordnejhad.jpg
- File:Sina krd.jpg
- File:FB IMG sina krd.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 20:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Facebook size, no metadata, not in use. Commons isn't a private photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable artist's self-created logo, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Rajputvarvadhu.com). MER-C 07:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:ANWAR SALABAT.jpg
- File:ANWAR KHAN.jpg
- File:ANWAR SALABAT HAN.jpg
- File:ANWAR SALABA KHAN.jpg
- File:ANWAR SALABAT AN.jpg
- File:ANWAR ALABAT KHAN.jpg
- File:ANWAR SALABAT KHAN.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 11:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused watermarked duplicate of File:Jorginho 2005.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Very low quality (out of focus) and lack of identification. There are lots of Pinus bark photos as alternatives. Not used anywhere. -- Ram-Man 14:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, and in my opinion this picture is not realistically useful for educational purposes. Dontreader (talk) 05:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused and out of scope. Dontreader (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused and out of project scope. Dontreader (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, in my humble opinion, but maybe there's a category with "hardcore" women. :D Dontreader (talk) 06:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Dontreader (talk) 06:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused userphoto. Stefan2 (talk) 12:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit content? Low quality anyway. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Text only document. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dariushfarshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by presumably living artist/s but without COM:OTRS permissions.
- File:Safir e Solh.jpg
- File:Ruyesh.jpg
- File:Osture.jpg
- File:Negine Mehr.jpg
- File:MORVARID.jpg
- File:Mavi işık.jpg
- File:Hayat va Rahayi.jpg
- File:ENEKAS.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ehsan.mohtashami (talk · contribs)
[edit]cropped and upscaled from http://www.doroudgah.ir/%D8%B4%D9%87%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D9%85%D9%88%DA%A9%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AF%DA%A9-%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%87.html
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dexternight
[edit]All files have small size, two of them have EXIF showing they were edited manually, the other two have no EXIF. One has a logo, strongly suggesting it is a copyright violation. Most likely, none of the files is own work.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafeezullah2k (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Hafeezullah2k/logs (serial copyright violator: Panoramio grabber, file cropper, etc.). Often with exif FBMD... = probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Plaque of Ayub Bridge Sukkur.jpg
- File:Aerial view of Sukkur Barrage.jpg
- File:Ayub and Lansdowne Bridges Sukkur.jpg
- File:Bridge on Indus at Sukkur.jpg
- File:Ayub bridge Sukkur.jpg
- File:Sukkur Barrage upstream.jpg
- File:Sukkur Barrage outfall.jpg
- File:Library Block, Ghulam Muhammad Maher Medical College.jpg
- File:GMMMC Logo.jpg
- File:GMMMC.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafeezullah2k (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Under construction GMMMC Complex at Sukkur Quetta - Karachi bypass.jpg
- File:Maher Medical College.jpg – the uploader claims to be the author and copyright holder of a medical college's logo
- File:Ghanta ghar chowk Sukkur 1.jpg
- File:Jame'a Masjid sukkur.jpg
- File:Sadhu Bela.jpg
- File:Sardar Ghulam Mohammed Khan.jpg
- File:GMMMC Library.jpg
- File:Ayub bridge Rohri.jpg
- File:Sukkur Barrage.jpg
- File:Ayub Bridge Rohri.jpg – matches a photo from Flickr which has since been deleted
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering exif FBMD... and/or "(c)Suprodip's Photography",
- File:Faridpur Engineering College111.jpg
- File:Boys Residence.jpg
- File:Full Campus.jpg
- File:All building.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vojvoda Živojin Mišić (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ghlasa.com/up/do.php?img=15921.
- File:Palafito..png
- File:Šume..png
- File:Gljiva.png
- File:Gljive.png
- File:Cvit.png
- File:Bjeloglavi.png
- File:Dazdevnjak.1.png
- File:Grcka.png
- File:Mošor.png
- File:Jesovka.png
- File:Klen.1.png
- File:Lipljen.png
- File:Mladica..png
- File:Blatnjača.png
- File:Gusin.png
- File:Prokletije planina.png
- File:Kiskea.jpg
- File:James LBrie.jpg
- File:Crkva na Kalovici.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vojvoda Živojin Mišić (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://neuroscience.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/wfreeman750.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW INeverCry 17:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Subject of image is unlicensed, making this a derivative work czar 07:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably not own work [1]. If I'm wrong, please prove ownership using COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved" Thuresson (talk) 19:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved" Thuresson (talk) 19:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotional advertisement and therefore out of project scope. That said, would we need an OTRS confirmation that the derivative use of Captain Jack Sparrow has been cleared with the Walt Disney Film Studios? De728631 (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Advertise somewhere else please. Green Giant (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
No source given, or evidence that the author released it under this licence Hchc2009 (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment I have updated the file to clearly show the source, and transferred the proper license from the source. Author is en:Aleksandar Deroko, died in 1988 (less than 50 years ago). Riley Huntley (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)- Delete Does not qualify for PD-old in the US or Serbia, and no evidence that the author released it under this license. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 18:45, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 22:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The bottom image on the left is copyrighted [2], and I'm almost sure I already nominated for deletion the picture with the field (under the top picture). The top image was kept by Commons even though I suspect it's a copyright violation because the uploader never provided a version without the watermark: File:MAHESH12.png. Dontreader (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Previously uploaded by the same user and deleted for copyvios. Green Giant (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work, uploader is not copyright holder; actual copyright status undetermined Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved" Thuresson (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved" Thuresson (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
"Dabhi Dynasty" is unverifiable. This looks like a pretty poor manipulation of this image (or similar) found on http://elogedelart.canalblog.com/archives/2009/09/29/15235393.html This image may have been part of a hoax attempt on enwiki, pesky details at en:User talk:Dangarwa#You disappeared? Sam Sailor (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Looks like a pristine and genuinely original piece of computer graphics. This image may have been part of a hoax attempt on enwiki, pesky details at en:User talk:Dangarwa#You disappeared? Sam Sailor (talk) 19:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unverifiable. Maybe ripped off Instagram. Possibly part of a hoax attempt on enwiki, pesky details at en:User talk:Dangarwa#You disappeared? Sam Sailor (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. Green Giant (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unverifiable. This image may have been part of a hoax attempt on enwiki, pesky details at en:User talk:Dangarwa#You disappeared? Sam Sailor (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unverifiable. This image may have been part of a hoax attempt on enwiki, pesky details at en:User talk:Dangarwa#You disappeared? Sam Sailor (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
File already exists: File:Sky Logo seit Dezember 2015.png Malinion (talk) 17:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. "© All rights reserved" Thuresson (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo from http://www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed, "© All rights reserved". Thuresson (talk) 18:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 19:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status .
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.03.09.2015.pdf
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande1 - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 12.09.2015.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - TRABAJO TERMINADO PARA ENVÍO A EDITORIAL M.D. de Casa Grande1 - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 12.09.2015.pdf
- File:POEMARIO - UN HOMENAJE PARA TI CON CARIÑO, VIEJO LINDO - J.Q.A.CH. -SUCRE - MAYO - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.28.02.2016.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Navarrete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Still out of scope.
- File:ÉTICA JUDICIAL - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.29.10.2007.pdf
- File:EL PERFIL DEL DOCENTE UNIVERSITARIO - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - 08.12.2014 - Univ. de La Habana - UNAM - Univ. de Madrid.pdf
- File:APUNTES SOBRE LA TEORÍA DE LA EPISTEMOLOGÍA JURÍDICA-Dr. LUIS NAVARRETE OBANDO-OCTUBRE 2014 - monografias - Milano.pdf
- File:40 AÑOS DESPUÉS DE LA MUERTE DEL CHE GUEVARA-PANORAMA CAJAMARQUINO - 07.10.2007.pdf
- File:LA FIESTA DE LOS TOROS - ARTE O TORTURA - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C.02.04.2015.pdf
- File:LA REVOLUCIÓN CAMPESINA EN EL VALLE DE CHICAMA - Dr. Luis Alberto Navarrete Obando - C. 30.09.2016 - César Hildebrandt.pdf
- File:FUNDAMENTOS TEOLÓGICOS DE LA IGLESIA MISIONERA CRISTIANA, APOSTÓLICA Y CATÓLICA UNIVERSAL - C.27.10.2016.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
probalbe copyvio, not own work... Pippobuono (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
probable copyvio, not own work Pippobuono (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
lacks of source to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
lacks of sources to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
lacks of sources to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
lacks of sources to determine copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Another file File:Waiting (2015-16).jpeg exist on Wikipedia without watermark and is in use. So this File is useless. Musa Raza (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1sqg7i1t88eg2h9w3nqndud1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Hashish__1398023694_94.205.177.37-300x204.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgNw_joWIAA34GX.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
I doubt that this is his own work, see http://orthodoxalbania.org/alb/index.php/en-us/lajme-3/blog/3711-the-church-calendars-for-2016-have-been-issued-2 Albinfo (talk) 14:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://whatsonnetflix.com.au/images/a/lee-wilkof.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.biut.cl/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/pinilla1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://twistedsifter.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/carl-warner-makes-landscapes-out-of-anything-9.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this graphic image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation, possibly out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Painting or portrait unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Text only file, if this text were ever needed, it would be very easy to replicate by just typing out the five words. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
private image 최광모 (talk) 01:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
private image 최광모 (talk) 01:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
private image 최광모 (talk) 01:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
self promotion 82.12.98.242 05:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones: Copyright violation: Elegant smiling mature man portrait wearing a pair of glasses isolated on white background - stock: (generic image) [https://www.google.at/search?q=man+portrait&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmQEJR6i3eVyzMfMajQELEKjU2AQaBggKCBcIPQ...
copyright violation 95.234.247.137 11:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unfree album cover. Please use {{Copyvio}} for obvious violations instead of deletion requests. Green Giant (talk) 02:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Coomus).
MER-C 11:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Cross-wiki spam. Green Giant (talk) 02:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo uploaded from www.mynewsdesk and credited to "Eurosport" and CC-BY. EXIF data reveal that this is a photo from Agence France-Presse photographer Andrew Cowie published non-cropped here. "AFP does not grant any right to the Content other than the right to view said Content". Thuresson (talk) 11:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 02:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion (now in use). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use now so no longer eligible for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.globeuniversity.edu/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ak.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
previously published with a no commercial license http://codult.tistory.com/entry/%ED%99%8D%EC%88%98%EC%95%84-%ED%99%94%EB%B3%B4%EB%9D%BC%EB%8A%94%EB%8D%B0-%ED%99%8D%EC%88%98%EC%95%84-%EC%95%84%EB%8B%8C-%EA%B2%83-%EA%B0%99%EC%9D%8C Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also deleted File:인형-수아 01.jpg uploaded by same user. Both files gave a different name for author in EXIF (Kimsangoo). Green Giant (talk) 01:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete while the image is freely licenced the French artist died in 1966 so as a derivative work this painting is in copyright until 70 years pma., i.e., until 2037. Ww2censor (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep on this site it is with licens CC0 http://www.europeana.eu/portal/record/2063601/_112C80A75AAE11DBA0615254ABDD25F5.html. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment There is virtually nothing to stop people licensing falsely, due to lack of knowledge, ignorance or even fraud. We have to go by the copyright laws of the country of origin and the US, where the servers are based. Unfortunately French artworks are copyright for 70 years after the death of the artist. You might be able to use it as a non-free image in an article about that specific painting, but rarely in the biography of the artist as an example of their work, on the enwiki and any other wiki that allows non-free media but the commons does not allow such images. Ww2censor (talk) 09:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete still in copyright, the cc0 doesn't make sense. Multichill (talk) 10:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: As the coordinator of the Wikidata:Europeana Art History Challenge around which this file was uploaded I am not in a position to comment on whether it should or shouldn't be deleted. However:
- 1) I would suggest that this parallel deletion discussion should be treated as part of this one as they are effectively the same circumstances: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Girl Portrait (Marcel Janco).jpeg
- 2) Europeana is not the creator of the copyright tag that was listed with this artwork on the Europeana website - it is the responsibility of the providing GLAM to indicate what license the artwork carries.
- 3) The METADATA for the artworks on that site is definitely CC0 and in some circumstances the GLAM doesn't differentiate in their upload-form the different license between the metadata and the file/artwork itself. I have asked for clarification in these two artworks' circumstances. It is possibly just a mistakenly tagged license.
- Sincerely Wittylama (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. CC0 is a valid licence on this site. If the institution that owns this artwork has decided to licence it as CC0 then who are we to argue? Or is there something specific in French law that artists keep the copyright on paintings even if they've sold the painting? WereSpielChequers (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment unfortunately, ownership of a painting does not confer any rights to the owner which remains with the artist, so the licence on the site is false, probably due to ignorance of copyright law. Ww2censor (talk) 22:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: To keep this, we will need a license from the artist's heirs or good proof that the museum has the right to freely license the work. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in the United Arab Emirates! Ras67 (talk) 00:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploader requested. New accurate version available as File:SADC road sign W327.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploader requested. New accurate version available as File:SADC road sign TW327.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [3] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 16:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image+photomontage of unclear copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 17:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Collages require that all the images in a collage have a source and permissions; this image is highly unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of the image which is put in front of the person's face Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This documentary uses a heavy amount of fair use footage: archival photos and local news footage, etc. The original interview footage is good, fine, cc-by, but I would think that the fair use stuff is more than Commons should carry. czar 01:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, too much fair use sadly. ~riley (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
On this website [4] there's a gallery with many pictures, including this image. At the top of the gallery it says, "Confira alguns cliques do fotógrafo Daniel Souza" ("Check out a few clicks of photographer Daniel Souza"). If the website is wrong then I think the uploader must prove ownership using COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 02:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The picture is here [5]. The cropping is identical, as far as I can tell. In my opinion if the uploader took this picture then the cropping would not be so similar or identical. Even if this is an uncropped version (which I doubt), I think proof of ownership is required via COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 02:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above, COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Delfinfans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tazertooth (talk · contribs)
[edit]some private album picture, commons are not facebook
- File:Shaun Gladwell LONDON 2016.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell Turin 2010.jpeg
- File:Shaun Gladwell and Paul D Miller AKA DJ SPOOKY 2012.jpeg
- File:Shaun Gladwell and Phillip Glass 2004.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell with HRH Prince Charles and Dutchess of Cornwall 2014.R.A.jpeg
- File:Shaun Gladwell Plank with Kangaroo 2014.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell Leaps from Mike Parr Sculpture 2014.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell Afghanistan 2009.jpg
- File:L-R-Catriona and Simon Mordant Robert Wilson Shaun Gladwell.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell Antwerp 2015.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell winning World Round-Cloverdale Canada 2013.jpg
- File:Inverted self portraiut with Stelarc's third ear, London 2015.tif
- File:Shaun Gladwell at an IMPERIAL SLACKS Party-circa-1999.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell at an IMPERIAL SLACKS Party circa 1999.jpg
- File:Shaun Gladwell with Casey Stoner in Frankfurt 2007.jpg
- File:Shaun-Gladwell-with-Kennith Anger-Sao-Paulo-2007.jpg
- File:Shaun-Gladwell-with-Sir-Elton-John-Sydney-2008.jpg
Motopark (talk) 04:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'd like to Keep planking with kangaroo, interesting shot. Delete others. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: all but File:Shaun Gladwell Plank with Kangaroo 2014.jpg per above. ~riley (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong structure. See for example: Stéréochimie de l'ectocarpène. Cjp24 (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. The structure shown in the image matches what is shown for "Ectocarpene" in w:en:Chemical Abstracts (CAS#33156-93-3), ChemSpider, PubChem, etc. The link you provide merely says that this "appears to be erroneous", which is vague at best. Ed (Edgar181) 19:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as merely the other en:enantiomer, both of which are independently discussed in the literature (for example, JP 2003171320). Reasonable to rename the un-natural one (once someone figures out which it is!), or rename both to include the absolute stereochemistry in their respective names. DMacks (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, rename is required if this file is kept. --Cjp24 (talk) 22:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- See also this discussion: File talk:Ectocarpene-small.png. --Cjp24 (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Consensus to keep, see COM:RENAME to rename file. ~riley (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong structure. Replaced by File:Dictyotene.png Cjp24 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. The structure shown in the image matches what is shown for Dictyopterene C' in w:en:Chemical Abstracts (CAS#33156-91-1), ChemSpider, and PubChem. Ed (Edgar181) 19:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This diagram is the en:enantiomer of the other image. Both independent ones, and the racemic mixture, have multiple literature cites, so it's not just a useless "un-natural" diagram. But rename, either each with its R/S designation, or the un-natural one to indicate that aspect, to avoid ambiguity. DMacks (talk) 20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, rename is required if this file is kept. --Cjp24 (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Consensus to keep, see COM:RENAME to rename file. ~riley (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably captured from another photograph. HR image available at: http://www.cineforest.com/Photos/Vidya%20Pradeep%20Hot%20Tamil%20Actress%20New%20Photos/1.jpg —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright Jack Michael Photography, COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 21:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Not educationally useful. Dontreader (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused. I have no idea if this person is notable or not. And what's the point in rotating the picture? Dontreader (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused image. Not notable. A thumbnail is here (hard to find it) [6]. Out of project scope. Dontreader (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
At last a witty file description! LOL But alas, images on Commons must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Sorry! Dontreader (talk) 06:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion this image is out of scope. You decide, dear Administrator. I'm a heartless person. Dontreader (talk) 06:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. I'm heartless too. ~riley (talk) 21:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sud express media (talk · contribs)
[edit]Montage of photos intended for website or advertising. Out of scope.
- File:Hommage wemba vieux beaucoul 1.jpg
- File:Hommage papa wemba à kinshasa.jpg
- File:Bulletin d'infos les decideurs.jpg
- File:Sud Express International.jpg
- File:Sud Express International 2016.jpg
- File:Sud Expres media rend hommage à Papa Wemba à kinshasa.jpg
- File:Sud Expres information rend hommage à Papa Wemba.jpg
- File:Sud Express rend hommage à Papa Wemba.jpg
- File:Sud Express media rend hommage à Papa Wemba 4.jpg
- File:Sud Express international rend hommage à Papa Wemba.jpg
- File:Sud Express media rend hommage à Papa Wemba 2016.jpg
- File:Sud Express media rend hommage à Papa Wemba.jpg
- File:Sud expres international.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 06:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Good for Facebook or Instagram, not for Commons. Out of project scope. Dontreader (talk) 06:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering file title and exif: FBMD01000a9c0d0000223a00007362000083690000bc6f00006a800000eacc0000add700002de5000033f200007c900100 Gunnex (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The map is not based on facts, there are also no source provided.There are erorrs in map as it shows Azad Kashmir and also many other areas as Punjabis, which is not correct.It should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:16a2:868:d00:8956:5e9a:231f:4710 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- The source is File:Pakistan ethnic map.svg and I replied at its deletion request. Ain92 (talk) 08:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This map is not factual,and also it is not according to the given sources.There are many mistakes for example people living in Azad Kashmir are shown Punjabis whereas they are Dardic people.
- No Dardic people at all in the source: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/pakistan_ethnic_1973.jpg Ain92 (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept, it does not matter, how bad, erroneous and misleading the map is, it is used and cannot be deleted on any other reason than copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Almost identical duplicate of another picture in the series. Braveheart (talk) 22:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering exif: FBMD01000aab030000230800006e1200008f1300005915000029280000c9380000b6390000c23a0000243c000063530000. May be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Author requests deletion[7], unused file that has no educational purpose. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:56, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:João Marcos Landim 2.jpg
- File:João Marcos Landim 3.jpg
- File:João Marcos Landim.jpg
- File:João Marcos Alves Landim.png
Gunnex (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Campojoão. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering also exif FBMD.... Considering also File:Praça Doutor Marcelino Ribeiro e Igreja Matriz, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg (11.03.2016) versus (example) https://www.facebook.com/calbhckebyo/photos/a.592656960803458.1073741825.592652200803934/829570183778800/?type=3&theater (2015). All files (as also the deleted ones) related to Brazilian municipality pt:Campo Alegre de Lourdes
- File:Emblema Oficial da Gestão 2013-2016, da cidade de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.png
- File:Morro Tuiuiú, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Praça Doutor Marcelino Ribeiro e Igreja Matriz, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Noite Comemorativa - 63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Estátua Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes - 64 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Estátua Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes - 63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 04.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 02.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 03.jpg
- File:63 anos - Desfile Indepência do Município de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brasil 01.jpg
- File:Inverno - Vilarejo Barra do Justino, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Espaço de Show - Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Festa da Padroeira Nossa Senhora de Lourdes, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia Brazil.jpg
- File:Semana de Natal - Praça do Banco do Brasil, Av 7 de Setembro, Campo Alegre de Lourdes, Bahia, Brazil.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes Bahia.jpg
- File:Espaço de Show - Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes.jpg
- File:Centro de Lazer de Campo Alegre de Lourdes.jpg
- File:Morro Tuiuiú.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering exif FBMD01000a9e0d00009275000009b00000feb9000001c200003fcb0000a9210100474201003b51010088600100eb210200 Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 07:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
screenshot of Autodesk Maya. Usually screenshots of computers programme is under copyright. See:en:Template:Non-free software screenshot Andriy.v (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This doesn't look like a 2014 photograph to me. It looks more like a scan of a damaged old photograph. The EXIF is also shot: Microsoft Windows didn't exist in 1981. BethNaught (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GallowayCoachTravel (talk · contribs)
[edit]All are logos for a bus company - One probably could be left out but not entirely sure which one so have nominated them all, Thanks,
- File:Galloway Gold with Blacklex03.jpg
- File:Logoblackouter.gif
- File:Galloway Gold with Blackl31.jpg
- File:Galloway Gold with Black.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 08:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The company (w:Galloway European) is based in the UK. COM:TOO doesn't give any logo examples at all below the threshold of originality there, and to me this looks comparable to the Edge logo that was deleted. —Cryptic (talk) 08:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 21:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture shows a piece of art in a German church which was built in the 1960s. Using the usual 70 years pma formula, it's safe to say the artwork is still protected by copyright. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany, and the artwork is also not de minimis (or Beiwerk, which is the corresponding German legal concept). So the file will have to be deleted, unless there is a proper, documented permission by the artist. Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The corresponding wiki article names the artist als Lukas Gastl, who is apparently alive. So the artwork is definitely protected. --Rosenzweig τ 09:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paper products of Heaven Bank
[edit]These are photos of fake "hell money" notes from a fictional bank, sold to be burnt as offerings, they aren't printed by a government. Uploaded as "own work" of the photographer, but presumably these should be considered photos of copyrighted artworks.
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money Heaven Bank Notes offering May-2013.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money Heaven Bank Notes offerings May-2013.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money Hell Bank notes offerings May-2013.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money Hello Bank Notes offerings May-2013.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money offerings May-2013 The Hell Bank Notes.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 冥通銀行 Joss paper money 冥鏹 offerings May-2013 The Hell Bank Co Notes.JPG
- File:HK Chai Wan Cape Collinson Crematorium 天地銀行 Joss paper money The Hell Bank Notes offering May-2013.JPG
McGeddon (talk) 09:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RiotheFixer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claim own work but I doubt it. The tank imge is far too small to believe this, the pistol image is also a very well done image but again small.
Avron (talk) 09:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esskay2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various shots of the same stage magician. File:Mysterion 2015.png has the description "as shot by winsome vintage" (which seems to be a Canadian vintage clothing retailer), the rest can be found on different websites in different contexts. All are simply licenced as the "own work" of the uploader, which seems unlikely.
- File:Mysterion 2015.png
- File:Mysterionat magic tonight !.jpg
- File:Wikiyaaa.jpg
- File:Magic tn 1.jpg
- File:The Sentimentalists.jpg
- File:And now....jpg
McGeddon (talk) 09:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The 1918 fountain shown is by de:Gustav Adolf Bredow, who died in 1950. As Argentina has 70 years pma and freedom of panorama there is only for buildings, not for sculptures, the file will have to be deleted and can be restored in 2021. Rosenzweig τ 09:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- I blocked the uploader for a month due to re-uploading content, deleted as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Uploader added link to source site. Copyright notice of source site http://www.uemg.br/legal.php says, that all content of site belongs to university and all contents of the site can be reused, but does not say anything about commercial reuse and about derivative works. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above., COM:OTRS will be needed to clarify license. ~riley (talk) 22:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Errori compilazione Praiol (talk) 10:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep what errors? fixed parsing errors earlier.--ProfessorX (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Errors or not, courtesy deletion as author requested deletion within 7 days. ~riley (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
1944 photo, not own work. Photographer and publication data is needed to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unfug in einem gelöschten Artikel Regi51 (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
No indication that image is freely licensed. Even if it were, it is out of project scope. KDS4444 (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS needed, in scope though. ~riley (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The image appears be a product image from ADEL [8] [9], for which I have been unable to verify is released under CC0 1.0. The image contains a promotional watermark for dhgate.com in the bottom right corner. A Google image search brings up the same image without watermarks. [10] Gavleson (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong name Mmhaley007 (talk) 12:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
The image quality is too poor to be of any encyclopedic value (such as identifying the tree) Casliber (talk) 12:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jawshallen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some of these look a bit like non-free album covers, and File:Thewonderyears.jpg comes from some random website. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:IClungToYou.jpg
- File:SleepFlatsound.jpg
- File:ScotlandIWishYouHadStayed.jpg
- File:Flatsound.jpg.jpg
- File:The wonder years2015.png
- File:Thewonderyears.jpg
- File:Aaron west.jpg
- File:Aaron West.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 12:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Info One of the files has been renamed by Zhuyifei1999's bot after this deletion request was opened. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Great media though. ~riley (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-free game or something, I presume. Stefan2 (talk) 12:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE. ~riley (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo of too poor quality to identify birds within it and hence of no encyclopedic value Casliber (talk) 12:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo of too poor quality to identify bird within it and hence of no encyclopedic value Casliber (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. ~riley (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, found in multiple sites, for example, with bigger size at http://3d-map.xyz/tr/%C3%87EL%C4%B0K-KONTR%C3%9CKS%C4%B0YON-ANKRAJ-APL%C4%B0KASYONU/ Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Only contribution by user, personal image, no educational value. Sebari (talk) 16:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Template:User page image. ~riley (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Replaced by File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola.svg since i've renamed the Parabola mascot from "Bola cat" to "Bola". Coadde (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parabola logo, GNU and Bola cat.svg. ~riley (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Watermarked, Very small Resolution, Unidentified, Unused -- Ram-Man 17:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
not necessary SamWinchester000 (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 19:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
This page is absolutely useless as there are only those 2 photos already in her cat. Actually, the second one is even a bad one, not worthy for a gallery. SamWinchester000 (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 22:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Francky3762
[edit]- File:Arboretum 26.jpg
- File:Arboretum 22.jpg
- File:Arboretum 20.jpg
- File:Arboretum 21.jpg
- File:Arboretum 19.jpg
- File:Arboretum 17.jpg
- File:Arboretum 16.jpg
- File:Arboretum 18.jpg
- File:Arboretum 13.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Francky3762. I believe they should be deleted because they are low resolution, unidentified species, watermarked, and unused. -- Ram-Man 17:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Decent quality, watermarks will be cropped off, properly categorized. ~riley (talk) 22:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
PSOE logo (fist and rose) is too complex, and a slogan that appeared with that design on election posters from 1982 couldn't be a own work of Fer1997 Sfs90 (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image Tucvbif (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruslan Guliyev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope / unclear copyright status.
FDMS 4 22:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong details provided and lacks authenticity to prove otherwise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.211.57 (talk • contribs) 06:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination created for IP after malformed request at File talk:Division of Syrians.jpg. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Inaccuracies. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The person who have suggested the chart for deletion have not mentioned why it has to be deleted fact wise. The contents of the chart is made in detail with respect to the details specified By Neil , W J Richardson, Juhanon Marthoma in their respective books. The origin of a church in malankara has its origin to a formation of a opinion group with in the church . organic formation of the church is much later . It is strongly recommended to retain the chart without deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iravikorthanan (talk • contribs)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused diagram of questionable notability with faulty and interpretive information, illegible English and non-educational content.117.213.19.149 23:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 20:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Although the old poetry is in PD, it says 2007 book cover of Kadokawa Shoten, modern work of design. seems not safe enough to share on commons, Please see also COM:DW Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Tokorokoko (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: cover of 2007 book is definitely not PD. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The outline of the Burj is copyrighted! Ras67 (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand why this image is here [11]. I'm worried that this could be a copyright violation. I think proof of ownership is necessary even though the uploaded version doesn't have logos. The Facebook date is earlier than the date on the file. At least two other sites have the picture (again with the logos). Dontreader (talk) 03:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes Dontreader, I am an Admin to this Facebook page and here is the original link for all the photos with my name written in the post. Link - AHMED XIV (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, AHMED XIV. I still think it would be a good idea to ask someone at the Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard about this situation. The fact that your username is AHMED XIV doesn't prove that you are the AHMED XIV on that Facebook page. Another problem is that the picture is on at least two websites already. However, those websites have the picture with the logo, and the version you uploaded doesn't have a logo, so that might help your claim of ownership of the picture. I'm not accusing you of stealing the picture. I just think OTRS might want to have proof that you own it. That's why I suggest that you ask about this situation at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard, give them the link to this discussion or just File:ENS Anwar al-Sadat 1020.JPG, and they will tell you what you might need to do. I'm not an expert like them. Best wishes, Dontreader (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I'll upload a newer photo anyway, and yes, I am the AHMED XIV on that page. - AHMED XIV (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 12 May 2016 Rama (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:ENS Anwar al-Sadat 1020.JPG. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Alexandria Shipyard starts cutting metal for the first Gowind 2500 corvette built in Egypt, 16 April 2016.jpg
[edit]I found the image here [12] and also here [13]. On the second site, under the picture, it reads, "By: Mohammed Albalkasy" using Google Translate. I think the uploader should prove ownership via COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 12 May 2016 Rama (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Alexandria Shipyard starts cutting metal for the first Gowind 2500 corvette built in Egypt, 16 April 2016.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
XING-Foto von https://www.xing.com/profile/Georg_MANLIK. Keine Freigabe des Originalfotografen ersichtlich. Jbergner (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Magazine cover. I can't imagine that this copyrighted work was released under a free license unless there is proof. Dontreader (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of image on the subject's official website [14]. Unlikely to be own work. Dontreader (talk) 05:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
While it is clear that Thomas took the picture, who created the underlying work?? This seems like an unauthorized derivative to me. KDS4444 (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Derivative work ??? Inadmissible argument. --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: The picture was of locks engraved with names stuck to a bridge. The names, being text only and short, are not copyrightable, the image was clearly that of the uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Without knowledge of the sculpture's location to assess the possibility of freedom of panorama we have to delete this file, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 11:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
We need the location of this sculpture or the permission of Fernando Botero! Ras67 (talk) 12:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image is in Poland, FOP✓OK
|
The copyright act from February 4, 1994 in article 33 point 1 allows the propagation of works that are permanently exhibited on publicly accessible roads, streets, squares or gardens provided that the propagation is not for the same use. The name of the creator and source should be provided if it is possible by article 34. This use is royalty free, provided that it does not harm the legitimate interests of the creator by article 34.
See Copyright rights in Poland § Freedom of Panorama for more information.
|
bayendia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Never_again,_by_Tizian_Sander_2010.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_-_visit_to_Guttakowski_family_in_Zalesie_Dolne,_ca_1920.JPG){kind=link}
bayendia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
bayendia.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bayendia.jpg){kind=link}
bayendia.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AFUTURA_LOGO_1984.png&type=revision&diff=194393609&oldid=182164956){kind=link}
,_Never_again,_by_Tizian_Sander_2010.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Never_again,_by_Tizian_Sander_2010.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_Never_again,_by_Tizian_Sander_2010.JPG){kind=link}
,_Never_again,_by_Tizian_Sander_2010.JPG){kind=link}
(exterior only) The copyright act from July 4, 1994 in article 33 point 1 allows one to propagate works that are permanently exhibited on the publicly accessible roads, streets, squares or gardens provided that the propagation is not for the same use. The name of the creator and source should be provided if it is possible by article 34. This use is royalty free, provided that it does not harm the legitimate interests of the creator by article 34. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Siri
[edit]Possible non-free works, per COM:Screenshots#Smartphones. I am not sure whether these are acceptable under {{PD-ineligible}}, given that this is mostly just text and trivial shapes.
–Totie (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book (Maya-Spanish dictionary of Quintana Roo). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete, this image is into a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marrovi (talk • contribs) 01:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Mayan Glyph... if it's derivative work it's of an ancient hieroglyphic character. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright sign Konto na chwilę (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: The attribution after the (c) matches the uploader, therefore, is very likely to be the copyright holder. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
On hold - I think the photo is from Flickr. I have sent the Flickr user a message to ask them to confirm if the Wikimedia account is theirs. Please keep the DR OPEN for at least another week. If it is then the file should be kept, even though the Flickr source does not have a license. If the Flickr user is not the Commons user, the file and all the other uploads by the user should be deleted. Green Giant (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The Flickr user said that he did not create the Wikimedia account. Therefore the file cannot be kept here. Green Giant (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too complex image and shapes for the rose logo. And not own work, since Fer1997 it's not the creator of a 1987 logo... Sfs90 (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- The decomposition of the rose (provided that I have done it myself reproducing the originals) results in simple fractals.
- I think the same argument I have used when discussing typographic issues in other appeals for deletion can be used in this case.
- Regards, --Fer1997 (talk) 22:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This photo was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons 31.205.15.47 18:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 18:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This retouched picture is based on a file that was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 18:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 19:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This retouched picture is based on a file that was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 19:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:PalestineRemembered
[edit]Permission for these files is based on a general permission from the owner PalestineRemembered.com back in 2008, see here. Apparently the uploaders did not give permission to PalestineRemembered.com to release their works into a free license, so there is no valid permission.
- File:A gathering of men in Halhul, 1940.jpg
- File:A structure in al-Nahr.jpg
- File:Abu Is'af of Shaab.jpg
- File:Abu Shukheidim-27584.jpg
- File:Abu Snan from Kuwaykat.jpg
- File:Abu Zurayq1.jpg
- File:Abu Zurayq2.jpg
- File:Abu Zurayq3.jpg
- File:Abud Greek Orthodox Church.jpg
- File:Abud-11936.jpg
- File:Abwein.jpg
- File:AhmadElaian86.jpg
- File:Al Arrub Refugee Camp-49017.jpg
- File:Al Dhahiriya-28729.jpg
- File:Al Jab a-89933.jpg
- File:Al Jura ruins.jpg .jpg
- File:Al Nuway imah-83562.jpg
- File:Al Nuway imah-85382.jpg
- File:Al Nuway imah-85383.jpg
- File:Al Shuyukh-19303.jpg
- File:Al Yamun-67518.jpg
- File:Al Zababida-11853.jpg
- File:Al-Birwa, 1944.jpg
- File:Al-Birwa, 1944.png
- File:Al-Dawayima1.jpg
- File:Al-Dawayima2.gif
- File:Al-Fasa'il village.jpg
- File:Al-Ghasibiya Mosque 2006.jpg
- File:Al-Masmiyya al-Kabira.jpg
- File:Al-Masmiyya al-Saghira1.gif
- File:Al-Masmiyya al-Saghira2.jpg
- File:Al-Muharraqa1.jpg
- File:Al-Mujaydil.jpg
- File:AlFawwar.jpg
- File:Alshajara-Palestine-2003.jpg
- File:Alshajara-Palestine.jpg
- File:An-Nahr in 1949.jpg
- File:Aqqaba-19833.jpg
- File:Aqqaba-52788.jpg
- File:Aqraba-19352.jpg
- File:Arabba-410880.jpg
- File:Arrabet Jenin entrance.jpg
- File:Artas ps.jpg
- File:Artuf22.jpg
- File:Ataya Manor at az-Zeeb.jpg
- File:Attil village.jpg
- File:Ayn al-Mansi, 2015.jpg
- File:Ayn Kiniya-14472.jpg
- File:Aynabus-13540.jpg
- File:Az-Zeeb skyline.jpg
- File:Bal'a Municipality Building.jpg
- File:Bani Naim, 2009.jpg
- File:Baqa Sharqiyah minaret.jpg
- File:Barkusya.jpg
- File:Bayt Hanun-63954.jpg
- File:Bayt Lahiya-56325.jpg
- File:Bayt Lahiya-56329.jpg
- File:Bayt Qad-68215.jpg
- File:Beit Dajan Nablus.jpg
- File:Beit Einun, 2010.jpg
- File:Beit Furik old house.jpg
- File:Beit Furik.jpg
- File:Beit Iba skyline.jpg
- File:Beit Lid.jpg
- File:Beit Sira.jpg
- File:Beit Wazan.jpg
- File:Beita-23054.jpg
- File:Beita-57253.jpg
- File:Beitillu.jpg
- File:Beitin.jpg
- File:Beitin2.jpg
- File:Bil in-48481.jpg
- File:Burqa-75771.jpg
- File:Burqin-52796.jpg
- File:Cemetery at al-Ghabisiya.jpg
- File:Cemetery at an-Nahr.jpg
- File:Church of al-Mansura.jpg
- File:Darwish commemorative procession.jpg
- File:Dayr Abu Da if-81072.jpg
- File:Dayr Ammar R C -77973.jpg
- File:Dayr Dibwan-84806.jpg
- File:Dayr Jarir-87122.jpg
- File:Deheishe R C -57648.jpg
- File:Deir al-Ghusun.jpg
- File:Deir Ghassaneh skyline.jpg
- File:Deir Ibzi.jpg
- File:Deir Sudan.jpg
- File:Dhahiriya skyline.jpg
- File:Dr. Anis Sayigh during his interview with palestine remembered.jpg
- File:Dr. Anis Sayigh.jpg
- File:Duma-54264.jpg
- File:Dura, 2007.jpg
- File:Dura-20593.jpg
- File:Ein fara.jpg
- File:Ein Siniya General View.jpg
- File:Ein Siniya's old town.jpg
- File:Esau's tomb, Sa'ir.jpg
- File:Fandaqumiya general view.jpg
- File:Faqqu a-49459.jpg
- File:Fatima Khatun Mosque.jpg
- File:Ghabisiyya Mosque 2015.jpg
- File:Ghabisiyya Mosque.jpg
- File:Graves at Mi'ar.jpg
- File:Halhul-29558.jpg
- File:Halhul-52287.jpg
- File:Hebron-11313.jpg
- File:Ibdis10.jpg
- File:Ibrahim Salih.jpg
- File:Idhna.jpg
- File:Idna-15096.jpg
- File:Idna-78995.jpg
- File:Idna.jpg
- File:Jaba' general view.jpg
- File:Jabal Hureish.jpg
- File:Jamma'in general view.jpg
- File:Janiya.jpg
- File:Jenin skyline.jpg
- File:Jericho-83722.jpg
- File:JezzarPasha.jpg
- File:Jifna church.jpg
- File:Jifna-Araya Masry.jpg
- File:Jinin-33037.jpg
- File:Jinin-51243.jpg
- File:Jinsafut, 2009.jpg
- File:Judeida.jpg
- File:Julis.jpg
- File:Kabri1.jpg
- File:Kafr Dan-23821.jpg
- File:Kafr Kanna-16388.jpg
- File:Kafr Malik-46848.jpg
- File:Kafr Ni'ma general view.jpg
- File:Kafr Qud.jpg
- File:Kafr Rai general view.jpg
- File:Kafr Yasif, 2010-Rouhana.jpg
- File:Kaubar-39497.jpg
- File:Khan younis street.png
- File:Kharbata-95527.jpg
- File:Kharbatha al-Misbah.jpg
- File:Khirbet Abu Falah.jpg
- File:Kuwaykat old house.jpg
- File:Lot's Tomb.jpg
- File:Majd al-Krum general view.jpg
- File:Map6 RefugeesRoutes2.gif
- File:MapOfDestroyedVillages.GIF
- File:Maqam al-Khawwas.jpg
- File:Maqam Qatrawani-Thaer Atary.jpg
- File:Maqam Sheikh Hureish.jpg
- File:Meithalun and Marj Sanur.jpg
- File:Meithalun general view.jpg
- File:Mi'ar skyline.jpg
- File:Mosque of al-Amqa.jpg
- File:Mughayir Ramallah.jpg
- File:Nabi Yunis Mosque, Halhul.jpg
- File:Nahf.jpg
- File:Nazlet Zeid minaret and olive trees.jpg
- File:Neighborhood in Halhul, 2009.jpg
- File:Ni lin-34388.jpg
- File:Old Ajjul.jpg
- File:Old Arraba.jpg
- File:Old cemetery in Kuwaykat.jpg
- File:Old Deir Ghassaneh.jpg
- File:Old Ijnisinya.jpg
- File:Old Mazra'a al-Qibliyah.jpg
- File:Old town of Jamma'in.jpg
- File:Old villa in Deir al-Qasi.jpg
- File:Olive groves in al-Birwa.jpg
- File:Olive Groves in Deir Ghassaneh.jpg
- File:Omari Mosque in Jinsafut.jpg
- File:Palestinians right of return.png
- File:Part of Lubban Gharbi.jpg
- File:Qabalan.jpg
- File:Qarawat Bani Hasan-35931.jpg
- File:Qaryut 1990.jpg
- File:Qasr al-Basha Gaza.jpg
- File:Qibya general view.jpg
- File:Rantis.jpg
- File:Remaining structure in Suhmata.jpg
- File:Remaining structures in Deir al-Qassi.jpg
- File:Ruins in Burham.jpg
- File:Ruins in Zir'in, 2015.jpg
- File:Ruways cemetery.jpg
- File:Sa'ir in the snow.jpg
- File:Sa'ir old town.jpg
- File:Sa'ir skyline.jpg
- File:Saffa entrance.jpg
- File:Sanniriya-35977.jpg
- File:Sanur skyline.jpg
- File:Sanur-47274.jpg
- File:Seasonal lake at Marj Sanur.jpg
- File:Shabtin-524980.jpg
- File:Shaghur.jpg
- File:Sheikh Yarub maqam.jpg
- File:Silat al-Harithiyah.jpg
- File:Simsim1.jpg
- File:Sinjil-75237.jpg
- File:Sir-76445.jpg
- File:Souf R C 2013.jpg
- File:St. Barbara-Abud.jpg
- File:Suhmata, 1950.jpg
- File:Summil1.jpg
- File:Surda-30739.jpg
- File:Surda.jpg
- File:Talluza-18508.jpg
- File:Tammun.jpg
- File:Tarbikha.jpg
- File:The cemetery of al-Damun.jpg
- File:The spring of al-Damun.jpg
- File:Tomb of Sheikh Muhammad al-Zeitawi.jpg
- File:Traces of al-Birwa.jpg
- File:Traces of Deir al-Qassi.jpg
- File:Traces of Suhmata.jpg
- File:Tubas-12636.jpg
- File:Tubas-Shraim.jpg
- File:Tuqu Skyline.jpg
- File:Um al Faraj.jpg
- File:Wadi Fukin.jpg
- File:Wedding at Mi'ar.jpg
- File:Yatma-82986.jpg
- File:Zaernuqa1.jpg
- File:Zalafa-71037.jpg
- File:Zalafa-77365.jpg
- File:Zawiya of Jenin.jpg
- File:Zernuka3.jpg
- File:أبو شوشة.jpg
- File:أشجار الزيتون والرمان والتين في صلحا.jpeg
- File:الظاهرية التحتا.jpg
- File:العلمانية-قضاء صفد.jpg
- File:تليل.jpg
- File:قبر في القبو.jpg
- File:قرية القبو.jpg
- File:مسجد العمري.jpg
- Template:PalestineRemembered
Jcb (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per the linked discussion at OTRS. Kelly (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The site include photos uploaded by various people from unknown sources, books, sites etc. There are a lots of copyvio files and false ownership, incorrect dates and place names. Few examples for copyvio and misleading information (did not checked all):
- File:Khan younis street.png is from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/37476567
- File:Ein fara.jpg uploaded in 7/2008 to https://www.paldf.net/forum/showthread.php?t=166691&page= before it was uploaded to palestineremembered site.
- File:Jericho-83722.jpg is from http://he.danielventura.wikia.com/wiki/%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A5:Synagogue_naaram4.jpg definitely. this is a photo by User:Daniel Ventura.
- File:Al-Dawayima1.jpg from https://www.flickr.com/photos/31383164@N06/5290150457/
- File:JezzarPasha.jpg uploaded in 10/2006 to http://forum.hawaaworld.com/showthread.php?t=451633&page=82
- File:Abu Zurayq1.jpg taken from http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/matpc.06752/ the info is incorrect and ofcourse false claim to ownership. New file: File:Environs of Jerusalem. Mizpah, Nebi Samwil.matpc.06752.jpg
- File:Al Jura ruins.jpg .jpg taken from http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/matpc.09269/ false ownership. New file: File:Ruins at Askalon. June 1921. matpc.09269.jpg
- File:Ibdis10.jpg Probably from google maps
- this file (not in the list) is from the archives of Hartuv published in a Israeli newspaper. -- Geagea (talk) 06:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: From my understanding: by uploading it to PalestineRemembered.com, you give PalestineRemembered.com the rights to that picture. I presume that would also include releasing it into a free license, Huldra (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I understand here, you need to grant the website some usage right, which is not the same as a transfer of copyright. Jcb (talk) 20:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded many of these based on the Palestine Remembered OTRS. Some, particularly those from the 1940s and prior, might be covered by PD-Israel depending on when and where they were published (if such info is available). I request that we wait until the ongoing discussion on the noticeboard (see Here) concludes before we mass delete these photos. If, ultimately, the decision is to delete these images, I could try directly communicating with some of the original uploaders to see if they would release their images to the public domain. --Al Ameer son (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you can get a proper permission by the author for one of the files, or a good explanation why one of them is PD, then we can remove such a file from this DR. Of course it would be great if some of the files could be saved. Jcb (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Several of those nominated for deletion are from before 1948. According to {{PD-Israel-Photo}}, such pictures (from the former British Mandate of Palestine, like this) can be freely used. In addition, some (like this picture) are taken from the Matson-collection, and can also be freely used, under {{PD-Matson}} Huldra (talk) 22:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you can get a proper permission by the author for one of the files, or a good explanation why one of them is PD, then we can remove such a file from this DR. Of course it would be great if some of the files could be saved. Jcb (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- also File Ruins in Zir'in, 2015.jpg is from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/69499846 and File Sanur skyline.jpg it is the village Tayyiba.
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Ellin Beltz: Why did you delete this, as a {{PD-Matson}} could be used? Or this, where a {{PD-Israel-Photo}} could be used? Huldra (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:Ruins at Askalon. June 1921. matpc.09269.jpg is much better duplicate of File:Al_Jura_ruins.jpg and we need beter source to the other files. I tried to find the other files in matson collection but could not find them. -- Geagea (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Several of the files were already present on Commons in much better versions and the sourcing of the files was incorrect. Please respect the closed Nomination now. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:Ruins at Askalon. June 1921. matpc.09269.jpg is much better duplicate of File:Al_Jura_ruins.jpg and we need beter source to the other files. I tried to find the other files in matson collection but could not find them. -- Geagea (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Ellin Beltz: Why did you delete this, as a {{PD-Matson}} could be used? Or this, where a {{PD-Israel-Photo}} could be used? Huldra (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Italy! Ras67 (talk) 12:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Stanisław Masłowski (1853-1926) - visit to Guttakowski family in Zalesie Dolne, ca 1920.JPG
[edit]_-_visit_to_Guttakowski_family_in_Zalesie_Dolne,_ca_1920.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_visit_to_Guttakowski_family_in_Zalesie_Dolne,_ca_1920.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source or copyright details for original image. --ghouston (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Source says clearly Poland (and is very unlikely that Stanisław Masłowski didn't passed his last days elsewhere), and year is also mentioned, 1920. Therefore, we need the date of death of the photographer (if known), or if this photo was first published in Poland before the URAA date. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The Creative Commons license seems bogus. If somebody can show it's in the public domain, that would be fine. --ghouston (talk) 11:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- No one problem with copyright, if necessary could be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by KolosovP (talk • contribs) 13:53, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
- @KolosovP: is there any educational purpose to readers? If so, we can keep it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre, Ofcource, it's perhaps original math. theorem, also doesn't exist in wiki projects at all
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This photo likely released firstly in 1975 in a book titled A szocialista forradalomért: A magyar forradalmi munkásmozgalom kiemelkedő harcosai. This file is from huwiki (hu:Fájl:Kocsis János.png). A few weeks ago I checked this book and I didn't found any source that would prove former releasing of this photo. Regasterios (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
PSOE logo (fist and rose) is too complex, and a slogan that appeared with that design on election posters from 1982 couldn't be a own work of Fer1997 Sfs90 (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- The logo is my own work, made from scratch, hence not a copyvio.
By now there have not been any cases in which the original logo (which is not the file I have uploaded) has been deemed as too complex, which would be a reasonable cause for deletion, were the original logo to be uploaded.
The slogan is just text – text that, by the way, I have composed with the same fonts of the original, respecting the kerning of the original work for fidelity. It is not a digitalisation of the original poster or of party literature, which would be a point for possible deletion.
Regards, --Fer1997 (talk) 18:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was uploaded without consent. The husband sent a complaint to OTRS today and asked to have the image removed. Although it is edited to make it unidentifiable and it's not a legal problem, it is still not a good idea to present this image when the subject does not wish to publish it. We have a few substitutes in the category and deleting this one will not affect the related articles much. Ben.MQ (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Do we actually have a comparable image? I'm not so sure. I agree that the image is not identifiable, and it is widely used. Source is listed as en.wp - do we have any additional information about the image pre-transwikification? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe there are several files in Category:Women_with_breast_implants that can be used instead. I have checked the original uploader on en.wp. He is the doctor who performed the surgery. --Ben.MQ (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- If the closing admin decides to delete, please issue a global replace with one of the substitutes in the a/m category. Regards --Ben.MQ (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- I believe there are several files in Category:Women_with_breast_implants that can be used instead. I have checked the original uploader on en.wp. He is the doctor who performed the surgery. --Ben.MQ (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Commons is full of these type photos already. No educational need for this one. --Hold and wave (talk) 20:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The husband is the subject? Unless there's some legal issue with wives as chattels that I thought went out in the 19th century, I'd pay a lot more heed to a complaint from the person portrayed than from someone else. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep as long as there is no complaint from the woman. Astonishing that a husband should have the right to decide what his wive is allowed to do and what not to. --Saibo (Δ) 00:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please do consider that it is likely that the husband deals with such issues on behalf of the wife - this may be a bit awkward for a lady to ask other people to take down their naked photos (just my personal view). The image is uploaded by their doctor, not the wife.--Ben.MQ (talk) 07:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- And the information provided by the email sender match the profile of the uploader etc. I don't see if it is necessary to email back and say - please let your wife speak to us? This is not a court as we really don't need a distinction between 'I want this image removed' and 'we want this image removed' --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please mention the ticket number - it should be referenced. Well, if the complaint is meant "on behalf" then it is okay. But if it is I do not want my wife to be here then it is not. I think the best (although not that illustrative) replacement would be: File:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't see this comment earlier. The request is at ticket:2011071310011484. I checked the email again and, unfortunately he did use terms such as I instead of mentioning on behalf of her wife. Though I do find it somewhat uncomfortable, I sent an email again to ask for permission from the wife. Hope that will help. --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I received a reply today says wife wishes to take it off --Ben.MQ (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't see this comment earlier. The request is at ticket:2011071310011484. I checked the email again and, unfortunately he did use terms such as I instead of mentioning on behalf of her wife. Though I do find it somewhat uncomfortable, I sent an email again to ask for permission from the wife. Hope that will help. --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please mention the ticket number - it should be referenced. Well, if the complaint is meant "on behalf" then it is okay. But if it is I do not want my wife to be here then it is not. I think the best (although not that illustrative) replacement would be: File:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 17:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- And the information provided by the email sender match the profile of the uploader etc. I don't see if it is necessary to email back and say - please let your wife speak to us? This is not a court as we really don't need a distinction between 'I want this image removed' and 'we want this image removed' --Ben.MQ (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please do consider that it is likely that the husband deals with such issues on behalf of the wife - this may be a bit awkward for a lady to ask other people to take down their naked photos (just my personal view). The image is uploaded by their doctor, not the wife.--Ben.MQ (talk) 07:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The person is not identifiable, the husband is not the subject, the picture is highly in use. I don't see any reason why this photo should be deleted. BTW did the "husband" provided any proof that he indeed is the husband of the subject? It easily can be one more moral troll, abusing trust of our OTRS. Trycatch (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- He did provide some information about the doctor, and I checked the original uploader on enwp (file is now deleted there) and the profile fits what he says. --Ben.MQ (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not identifiable at all and who is this "husband" ? Grim Littlez (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: While I agree with Andy Dingley and Saibo that a complaint from a husband, as opposed to the subject herself, is not particularly compelling, a keep decision on that basis may very well prompt the wife (or the husband claiming to be the wife) to simply file a new complaint with OTRS and we'll be back in the same position. We could go through those motions, but I am not sure what that achieves. At the end of the day, this is a nude photograph of the subject and even though the subject is not identified, this is an image of her breasts and there is reason to believe that hosting it on the Commons unreasonably intrudes into the subject's private life. I think we can all acknowledge that a photo of this kind could be very upsetting to the subject - it is freely licensed and could potentially be used anywhere. While we might be legally entitled to keep it, this is an issue of exercising common decency, as discussed at Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. It's a hard call, but on issues like this we should err on the side of caution. Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I closed this discussion a few minutes ago with the above rationale. Upon further reflection, however, I note that while a closing admin may need to make judgment calls in respect of nominations dealing with legal issues like copyright, a closing admin should generally defer to the community consensus where the issue is one of common decency (as I believe it is here). While I think this image should be deleted, I ought not to have been so hasty to close the discussion in these circumstances when the consensus above is leaning towards a keep. So I am changing my close to a delete, on the same grounds I provided above, and will leave it to someone else to close. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Skeezix, and endorse his original closure. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - unless there is reason to doubt the story (OTRS staff would be in a better position to determine that). GreenReaper (talk) 02:26, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: I globally replaced the usage with [[:Dr. Placik Breast Augmentation .jpg|this] comparable file Jcb (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded by Nordela through Flickr Upload Bot and Nordela also did the license review. Apart from the obvious problem of not having had a second set of eyes on the file to confirm the license, the second problem is the Flickr source says this is a PD-mark which has been causing dissension lately because it seems to not be acceptable for Commons. 31.205.15.47 18:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Notice that the file was reviewed by Flickr upload bot and not by the user who triggered it. The review is valid. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Amitie 10g: since when has Flickr upload bot been a reviewer? I can't see anything in the reviewer archives that shows this bot ever held that status. If it was a reviewer, why not put itself down as reviewer rather than Nordela? The answer is that the bot says that Nordela uploaded and reviewed the file which is not something that is supposed to happen. 90.197.113.98 21:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Dear IP address, see the history closer. Nordela just added
{{User:Flickr upload bot/token}}to the page, that triggers Flickr upload bot to:
- Dear IP address, see the history closer. Nordela just added
- Parse the Token and check if belongs to a valid file page at Flickr (if not found, stops)
- Check the license at Flickr, using the Flickr API (if no valid license accepted in Commons found, stops)
- Select the highest resolution available file and get the license, using the Flickr API
- Upload it to Commons and edit the page, replacing
{{User:Flickr upload bot/token}}with{{User:Flickr upload bot/upload}}and add the license found at the Flcikr page, using the MediaWiki API.
- In that order, everything automated without false positives.
- Still in doubt, IP adress? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: thank you for the technical explanation. Could you answer my question? Neither Nordela nor the bot are or have ever been license reviewers. Yet in the source it says {{User:Flickr upload bot/upload|date=19:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)|reviewer=Nordela}} What part of that tells you that Nordela did not review the license? 92.40.248.95 23:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- The upload bot will not upload to Commons unless it's freely licensed. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- You can twist this round and round all you wish but neither of you has shown that this bot is/was ever a reviewer in the same way that User:FlickreviewR was. Why do these uploads not need the same level of scrutiny that other Flickr photos do? 92.40.249.247 17:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- The upload bot will not upload to Commons unless it's freely licensed. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: thank you for the technical explanation. Could you answer my question? Neither Nordela nor the bot are or have ever been license reviewers. Yet in the source it says {{User:Flickr upload bot/upload|date=19:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)|reviewer=Nordela}} What part of that tells you that Nordela did not review the license? 92.40.248.95 23:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Still in doubt, IP adress? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Doubts stated by IP adress do not hold water as this file was reviewed by Flickr upload bot and this bot was as much as an image reviewer as the FlickreviewR. Also this is true to all other images nominated to deletion request by IP adress. Tm (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: @Mattbuck: @Tm: How about answering the question with a simple yes/no?
- The bot has never been a Commons reviewer and neither has Nordela. Even worse is that the bot was never approved for Commons. I will withdraw this nomination if any of you can show that the bot was a reviewer at the time of upload or that it was even approved. Do you recall a little rule called COMMONS:EVIDENCE? I've shown why there should be concern about this file. Well the onus is on you guys to show why the file should be kept. 92.40.248.251 15:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: @Mattbuck: @Tm: How about answering the question with a simple yes/no?
- Image appears to be unused. what educational purpose does it serve? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Serve the same educational purpose as millions of unused images of trains, cats, dogs, stars, rivers, military, cars. Do you nominate them to deletion as being unused, as Commons does not delete images as being unused (except user page images). Tm (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment below, which came before your comment here, and which is responsive to your criticism. Your comment that "other crap exists" is hardly persuasive. We're talking about this one image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- I wasnt talking to you, but if you insist this image has enough quality and it has not a single personality rights concerns as this image was taken in nudes a poppin, a public event. Also as i said Commons does not, per policy, delete images because they are unused, except in the single case i stated. Care to prove me wrong?Tm (talk) 19:11, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- See my comment below, which came before your comment here, and which is responsive to your criticism. Your comment that "other crap exists" is hardly persuasive. We're talking about this one image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 19:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Serve the same educational purpose as millions of unused images of trains, cats, dogs, stars, rivers, military, cars. Do you nominate them to deletion as being unused, as Commons does not delete images as being unused (except user page images). Tm (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, poor-quality image: obvious smudge on the lens, foreground subjects are inadequately lit, image is badly backlit, somewhat noisy, very soft, probably not reparable. Extraordinarily deep DoF prevents the isolation of any particular subject other than a crowd of people. Facial expressions are distracting. We have many images of crowds of people. There are personality rights concerns with this image as well. Not useable for any realistic educational purpose. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with additional notice of comment by Mendaliv. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Z osobních důvodů Stopka (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In use on hi.wiki. Brianjd (talk) 13:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: The uploader has requested deletion of an image containing nudity. While it is in use, it is very easily replaceable - the hi.wp article already has another photo. While it is not our place to make editorial judgments for other projects, I feel we should make a judgment that if someone regrets their choices to upload their naked body, we should be willing to accommodate a takedown request. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality breasts photo, can be replaced by other options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 02:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 09:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Wrong pic Steff667 (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Nudity#New uploads and G7. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete and Lock forever, Lacks edu value, user req. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lingerie667.jpg Special:ListFiles/Steff667 Taylor 49 (talk) 17:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- It would be absurd to treat breasts in general as lacking educational value, so I oppose locking the name. As for this photo, it's decent and has a pretty good composition, IMO, but since there are so many photos of breasts to choose from and this one is a bit fuzzy in focus, it would be OK to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
It is unknown for Monaco whether the exception of freedom of panorama applies, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 10:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Then why request a deletion if you do not even have the information of whether it is permitted or not to take the picture in that country?
- We have the precautionary principle, the uploader(s) have to prove that their pictures are free in the country of origin! --Ras67 (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I found the source pages to go look... http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/profile.jsp?code=MC Have at it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I could find no FoP exception here. --Jcb (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
It is unknown for Monaco whether the exception of freedom of panorama applies, COM:PCP!
- File:Monaco © DJE 2008.jpg
- File:Sculpture of racing automobile in Monaco 10.2008 009.jpg
- File:Sculpture of racing automobile in Monaco 10.2008 055.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I could find no FoP exception here. --Jcb (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
It is unknown for Monaco whether the exception of freedom of panorama applies, COM:PCP!
- File:100 1644.JPG
- File:100 1645.JPG
- File:Juan Manuel Fangio statue in Monaco.JPG
- File:Street Monte Carlo Monaco.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 10:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I could find no FoP exception here. --Jcb (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Per w:List of public art in Monaco, the sculpture was created Joaquim Ros Sabaté and erected in 2003. See COM:FOP Monaco, no complete freedom of panorama that allows commercial reuses or exploitations of images showing artistic works created by still-alive or recently-dead artists.
- File:Juan Manuel Fangio Statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:Juan Manuel Fangio, Circuit de Monaco - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monaco-Ville, Monaco - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Mónaco - panoramio (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:39, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of François Grimaldi
[edit]It is unknown for Monaco whether the exception of freedom of panorama applies, COM:PCP!
- File:100 0523.JPG
- File:François of Monaco.jpg
- File:Monaco Grimaldi.jpg
- File:Monaco, Grimaldi statue - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monaco-FrancoisGrimaldi.jpg
- File:Socha Francoise Grimaldieho Monako.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 10:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I could find no FoP exception here. --Jcb (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Monaco
[edit]It is unknown for Monaco whether the exception of freedom of panorama applies, COM:PCP!
- File:Bronze statue - Casino de Monte Carlo - Monaco 2014.jpg
- File:E5819-Monaco-Prince-Albert-I-statue.jpg
- File:Grace Kelly statue in Monte Carlo.jpg
- File:Jezero v zahradě princezny Grace Monako.jpg
- File:Le Pecheur - Beach - Monaco 2014.JPG
- File:Monaco (5647471968).jpg
- File:Monaco - Statue Rainier III.jpg
- File:Monaco Prince Albert I statue.jpg
- File:Monaco princeAlbert.jpg
- File:Panoramio - V&A Dudush - 28-08-2009.jpg
- File:Socha Knížete Rainiera III. v Monaku.jpg
- File:Statue at Princely Palace of Monaco.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ras67 (talk) 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- As to File:E5819-Monaco-Prince-Albert-I-statue.jpg, the statue was erected in 1914 (102 years ago), and the sculptor, en:Constant Roux, died in 1942 (74 years ago). So as far as the statue goes, {{PD-old-70-1923|deathyear=1942}} should apply. Some other photos may depict architecture and monuments that are similarly old. -- Vmenkov (talk) 11:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- According to en:List of countries' copyright lengths, in Monaco an object becomes public domain 50 years after the death of the author. -- Vmenkov (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I could find no FoP exception here - kept one of which the sculptor has died more than 50 years ago, see above. --Jcb (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
No more freedom of panorama in Sweden for internet repositories. Ras67 (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This has been discussed for other deletion requests of images of sculptures in Sweden after the ruling from the Supreme Court (see for example Commons:Deletion requests/FoP-Sweden by User:Hangsna). The final verdict is not given and it is currently unclear what the ruling means. WMF's legal department is looking into this and will give advice later on – I talked to their legal counsel last week. There is no hurry to start deletion of images.--Historiker (talk) 17:04, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- When is the decision and how we tag this images for later actions? --Ras67 (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- As User:Historiker has expressed, there will be time later on to consider what should be done and how, when the dust will be settled. A legal process is going on in Sweden, and in due course we will get a ruling of the district court, which hopefully will somewhat clarify matters. As things are now, "the jury is out", as Americans would say. Boberger (talk) 18:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no FoP-Sweden deletions for now. --Jcb (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Fernando Botero
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in the United States/Puerto Rico for sculptures past 1977!
- File:Botero Europa1 Florida 2010.JPG
- File:Botero Europa2 Florida 2010.JPG
- File:Botero sculpture 02.jpg
- File:Botero sculpture 03.jpg
- File:Fernando Botero Liegende1 St-Petersburg 2010.JPG
- File:Fernando Botero Liegende2 Florida 2010.JPG
Ras67 (talk) 12:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sculptures by Fernando Botero
[edit]COM:FOP Colombia does not apply to works of art displayed indoors. These sculptures are still copyrighted-protected.
File:AdamandEve-FernandoBotero-20100414.jpg(sculpture located in Singapore)- File:Barcelona El Prat Airport - panoramio.jpg
- File:BOTERO HAND.JPG
- File:Escultura tauromaquia.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Adam and Eve sculpture (first file) is not located in Colombia but in Singapore, where FOP does exist: ‘Freedom of panorama is granted to several types of artistic works in public spaces by Section 265 of the Copyright Act 2021 (Act 22 of 2021). Subsection 1 of the section enumerates works eligible for the Singaporean freedom of panorama: buildings or models of buildings; sculptures situated "other than temporarily" in public spaces or "premises open to the public"’. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 01:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Jacklee Thanks for pointing that out. I’ll strike the file from this request and remove the DR template. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Adeletron 3030: great! Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 12:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Jacklee Thanks for pointing that out. I’ll strike the file from this request and remove the DR template. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The second one is located in Spain.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep first file, Delete the rest. Spanish FoP and Colombian FoP do not cover uses of artistic works found in public indoors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently old b&w images, unlikely to be own works, dubious licensing.
Sealle (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
These photos are made by my father. What should I do to save photos? Simba16 (talk) 15:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Question @Simba16 Are you your father's only heir or are there others? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have brother and I have his agreemet to put the photos to Wikipedia. Simba16 (talk) 09:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Then please both you and your brother file COM:OTRS. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:54, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Zelimkhan Memorial.jpg
- File:Zelimkhan Memorial 2.jpg
- File:Zelimkhan Memorial 3.jpg
- File:Chechen Republic. Kharachoy. Monument to Zelimkhan PB050207 2200 (cropped).jpg
- File:Grozny dolphinarium 849.jpg
- File:Khanpasha Nuradilov 05.jpg
- File:Khanpasha Nuradilov 25.jpg
- File:Петр Захаров 513.jpg
- File:Петр Захаров 452.jpg
- File:Петр Захаров 145.jpg
- File:Петр Захаров 136.jpg
- File:Петр Захаров 130.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dogad75 (talk) 22:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)