Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_BEIC_6338785.jpg){kind=link}
_(5342033909).jpg){kind=link}
_(5213733297).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960404624).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960399530).jpg){kind=link}
_(4394948186).jpg){kind=link}
_(4262136823).jpg){kind=link}
_(3581611620).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4394180017).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Obvious copyvio
MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not needed. All already deleted as obvious copyvios. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Unneeded duplicate of File:Flaggy Flag.svg with non-neutral title/description and bad license info IagoQnsi (talk) 03:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, it's a slightly different colored variant. I'm withdrawing this nomination; I'll fix the licensing stuff. -IagoQnsi (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept, nomination withdrawn. IagoQnsi (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
He is in connection with Steinsplitter? A socketpuppet? Why they both trying hard to change the same stuff? Please check them --Violetta82 (talk) 15:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Obviously a sockpuppet from the recent dewiki cu causa. Just here to troll. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Not here to troll, just asking you a serious question. You are in connection with Schmitty and trying to delete again other stuffs from Users. I saw already the I.P. Address from Schmitty and I know from where you are. Tell the enwiki the truth about your dark plans. --Violetta82 (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- What is being requested here? The IP talk page does not exist, and we normally don't delete IP talk pages anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
trolling by Category:Sockpuppets of Easter126. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_-_BEIC_6338785.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_BEIC_6338785.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
empty image Amada44 talk to me 08:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_-_BEIC_6338785.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: scanned blank page
Images from facebook Thatonewikiguy (talk) 03:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Images from facebook
This file has been speedily deleted a few times, but there has never been a discussion. Per caption and uploader's user page, uploader may be the producer and director. If he is, he must follow the directions on COM:OTRS to confirm he is the copyright holder and to confirm the license. Storkk (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation: http://pages.rediff.com/photos/preview/tor-bade-pran-kande/1829785/0
Bo jest naruszeniem praw autorskich Madzia29734 (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
Bo jest naruszeniem praw autorskich Madzia29734 (talk) 13:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
Bo jest naruszeniem praw autorskich Madzia29734 (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
Bo jest naruszeniem praw autorskich Madzia29734 (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Erotic_activities_involving_children? contain explicit pedophily picture. Loupeeclair (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
many pictures on the sheet contain explicit sexuality act with children. can you remove this pictures? Loupeeclair (talk) 17:43, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep please:
- This is the Community portal, a widely used page under the Commons: namespace
- Commons is not censored.
- So no reason for deletion this Community page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy kept: No reason for deletin this Community portal (under Commons: namespace). --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
mon travait Abdotec (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:2017 Rally Monte Carlo F123 (talk) 17:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
src = src = http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site568/2015/0529/20150529_065605_spdn0529gold.jpg Wdwd (talk) 19:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio; speedydelete by Storkk (A). --Wdwd (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Bo jest naruszeniem praw autorskich Madzia29734 (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Copyright violation: Non-free logo
Files uploaded by Raj.sukane (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Raj sukane 3.jpg
- File:Raj sukane 2.jpg
- File:Raj sukane +918055885036.jpg
- File:Raj sukane 1.jpg
- File:RAJ sukane 8055885036.jpg
- File:Raj sukane 8055885036.jpg
- File:Raj sukane 8055885036 raj.jpg
- File:Raj sukane.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane.jpg
- File:Raj sukane +918055885036 raj.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 9.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane hussen sagar1.jpg
- File:RAJ LOVE Raj Sukane 8.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 7.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 6.JPG
- File:Raj Sukane 5.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 4.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 2.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 1.jpg
- File:Raj Sukane 3.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete please, speedy deletion ! out of scope, personal gay contact publicity with phone number ! --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)- Delete per nom. I don't see these images as advertisements/promotional content, and out of scope is not a reason for speedy deletion. But since these images are out of scope, delete. --★ Poké95 01:05, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Fait doublon avec Lambda lc.svg. C'était un essai pour vérifier si une légère modification corrigeait un bug d'affichage, ce qui est le cas, du coup j'ai mis à jour l'image originale. S'il est possible, faire de cette page une redirection vers Lambda lc.svg (certaines pages ont déjà un lien vers ce doublon). O.M.H ♦ H.M.O 20:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Has been cropped from a non-free image [1], so it qualifies for speedy deletion as an obvious copyright infringement. --De728631 (talk) 16:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
See COM:DW Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader here, please delete, thanks -FastilyClone (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
please delete Semiviki16 (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete author requests deletion within 7 days + "not mine, please delete". Riley Huntley (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 23 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Nonstandard (or incorrect by standard itself) implications for location of hydrogen atoms on C of triple-bond and on O (see en:Skeletal structure). Unused, and Category:Ethchlorvynol has properly drawn SVG and high-quality PNG. DMacks (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 08:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tsiry Laurent (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dalvin segura (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vent des Forêts (talk · contribs)
[edit]All of these files state in the description that the work is by someone else but the uploader then claims them as "own work" and there is a license below the summary. The uploader has not provided a way of confirming that the authors have indeed licensed these images. It may be that the uploading account has permission from all of them but we need evidence through COM:OTRS. The original request for this DR was made by Havang(nl) (talk · contribs) on my talk page.
- File:2006 128 LORENTINO Cachée.jpg artiste Lorentino, camera Fuji FinePix F810
- File:2003 099 TAV GROUP Hole-Hill.jpg artistes TAV GROUP, photoshop
- File:2000 053 Eunhee Cho Essence-Existance.JPG artiste Eunhee Cho, Adobe Photoshop
- File:Dreaming Rebirth of 9 Dragons.jpg artiste Byoung Moon-Tak, pas de metadata
- File:Exode VdF.JPG artiste Joel Thepault , camera NIKON E995
- File:Backbone VdF.jpg artiste Backbone ,camera NIKON E995
- File:Une Fenetre en Foret.jpg artiste Hiroshi Teshima, ©Marie Clems, Camera Nikon D90
- File:Ego VdF.jpg artiste Daniel Denise, ©Claude Teter, camera NIKON E990
- File:L'Oeil du cyclope.jpg artiste Nicolas Chenard, pas de matadata
- File:Maciej Albrzykowski Par erreur Vdf1997 cr├®dit VdF-2005-05 (3)-retouchée.jpg artiste Maciej Albrzykowski, credit VdF, camera Fuji
- File:2015 01 13 oeuvre seul 186 appriou marie-aubépine vdf2014 ©Hadrien Franceschini (7).JPG artistes Jean-Marie Appriou, Marie-Aubépine ©Hadrien Franceschini camera Canon EOS 600D
- File:2014 05 07 oeuvre seule 155 mauger le théorème... vdf2009 ©marine calamai (3).jpg artiste Vincent Mauger, ©marine calamai, pas de metadata
- File:2015 01 13 oeuvre seul 186 appriou marie-aubépine vdf2014 ©josephine parisot (2).JPG artistes Jean-Marie Appriou, Marie-Aubépine ©josephine parisot , pas de metadata
- File:Damien Deroubaix lilith 02-07-2015 Loup Godé (10).JPG artiste Damien Deroubaix, photographe Loup Godé camera Nikon D90
- File:2015 07 29 169 moss garden fujiko nakaya VdF2011©Loup Godé (153).JPG artiste fujiko nakaya, ©Loup Godé camera Nikon D90
- File:2015 01 13 oeuvre seul 175 Terrain d' occurences vdf2014 ©Hadrien Franceschini (6).JPG artiste Jennifer Caubet, ©Hadrien Franceschini, camera Canon EOS 600D
- File:2003 oeuvre seule 053 Eunhee Cho Essence Existence vdf2000 ©Claude Teter (3).JPG artiste Eunhee Cho, ©Claude Teter, vamera Nikon E995
- File:Christian Lapie Le silence divisé VdF2009 credit Charlene Marchand 2009 07 (10).jpg artiste Christian Lapie, photographe Charlene Marchand , camera NIKON D50
- File:2015 07 10 Nicolas Floc'h bee's bunker VdF2015 © Nicolas Floc'h 2.jpg artiste et © Nicolas Floc'h , camera Canon EOS 5DS R
- File:Sandrine Pelletier & Olivier Ducret - diorama -vdf2014 ©marine calamai.jpg artistes Sandrine Pelletier & Olivier Ducret, ©marine calamai, camera Canon EOS 60D
- File:2014 10 12 installation 190 pelletier ducret glassfabrik diorama vdf2014 ©marine calamai (8).jpg artistes Sandrine Pelletier & Olivier Ducret, ©marine calamai, camera Canon EOS 60D
- File:Aung Ko Padauk tree VdF2015©Loup Godé10.JPG artiste Aung Ko, ©Loup Godé, camera Nikon D90
- File:François Génot Entrelacs 22-10-2015 ©Loup Godé.jpg artiste François Génot, ©Loup Godé, camera Nikon D90
- File:Le silence divisé.JPG artiste Christian Lapie, ©Guillaume Ramon, camera NIKON D800
- File:Renaissance, 025.jpg artiste Ryszard Litwiniuk, ©Comité départemental de tourisme Meuse, camera Fuji FinePixS2Pro
- File:Globe, 184.JPG artiste Maarten Vanden Eynde, ©Morgane Rul , camera Canon EOS 550D
- File:Skin, 149 en chantier.JPG artiste Mehmet Ali Uysal, ©VdF , camera Sony DSC-F828
- File:Neighborhood, 067.jpg artiste Bong-Gi-Park, ©Bruno Lion , sans metadata
- File:Shelter, 079.jpg artistes M.Chivers & Y.Keltz Shelter, ©VdF, camera Sony cybershot
- File:Hole Hill.jpg artistes TAV Group, ©Stephane Harter , photoshop
- File:La migration du rhinoceros.jpg artiste Roger Gaudreau, ©Annick Chrétien , photoshop
- File:Moss Garden Nicey-sur-Aire.jpg artiste Fujiko Nakaya, ©Sébastien Agnetti, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II
- File:Gardien.JPG artiste Marek Borsanyi ©Pascal Ruwet, camera HP PhotoSmart R607
- File:Le Silence Divisé.jpg artiste Christian Lapie, ©VdF, camera Nikon D50
- File:Peuple Migrateur.JPG artiste Katarina Kudelova, ©VdF, camera Nikon E8700
- File:L'oiseau source.jpg artiste Jean-Pierre Brazs, ©Roland Paulet, camera Canon Powershot A85
- File:Salut pour tous....JPG artiste Théodore Fivel, ©Morgane Rul, camera Canon EOS 60D
- File:Entrelacs fratras.JPG artiste François Génot, ©Camille Gresset, camera Canon EOS 60D
- File:Aire 23.jpg artiste Vincent Lamouroux, ©Guillaume Onimus, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II
- File:Cachée.jpg artiste Lorentino, ©Marine Calamai, pas de metadata
- File:7.5m² de frontière.jpg artiste Aï Kitahara, ©Marie-Paule Soncourt, camera SONY CYBERSHOT
- File:Réenchantement - Jean-Luc verna 2010 - crédit Morgane Rul.jpg artiste Jean-Luc Verna, crédit Morgane Rul, camera Canon EOS 550D
-retouch%C3%A9e.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Green Giant (talk) 09:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all files, I verified them all (I added artiste, photographer and camera to the lines): there is nowhere confirmation of the claim own work of User:Vent des Forêts, neither as artiste, nor as photographer. There is no Freedom of Panorama in France and User:Vent des Forêts has to present the necessary OTRS-tickets of permission from each artist and eventually the photographer. That user (an organisation) does since 2014 not respond to demands to present OTRS-tickets. They did also not reply to a e-mail I have send them. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all files : none of them is "own work" and valid authorizations are lacking. --Arcyon (discuter) 11:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FoP in France, so each photos need 2 permissions, one from the photographer and one from the artist/creator of the artwork displayed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(5342033909).jpg){kind=link}
_(5342033909).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_(5342033909).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(5342033909).jpg){kind=link}
_(5213733297).jpg){kind=link}
_(5213733297).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_(5213733297).jpg){kind=link}
- As so far the best of these that I've seen, move this one to WP and use it under fair-use in an article, however brief, on the Pokemon airliners. Delete the rest for the derivative reasons, per nom. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(5213733297).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960404624).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960404624).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4960404624).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, INUSE, there is already a COM:DM tag on the page, and (quote) we can't find a court case of a similar photo in fact being ruled derivative -- we do have rulings where it was not(unquote). –Be..anyone 💩 17:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(4960404624).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960399530).jpg){kind=link}
_(4960399530).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4960399530).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(4960399530).jpg){kind=link}
_(4394948186).jpg){kind=link}
_(4394948186).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted characters; this is not de minimis at all. 1989 18:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
_(4394948186).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Denniss (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
_(4394948186).jpg){kind=link}
_(4394948186).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(4262136823).jpg){kind=link}
_(4262136823).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted characters; this is not de minimis at all. 1989 18:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
_(4262136823).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Denniss (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
_(4262136823).jpg){kind=link}
_(4262136823).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
_(3581611620).jpg){kind=link}
_(3581611620).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted characters; this is not de minimis at all. 1989 18:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
_(3581611620).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Denniss (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
_(3581611620).jpg){kind=link}
_(3581611620).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, mentioning home made unused file, only contribution of uploader. Havang(nl) (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
-2015-07-12T11:08:00.000Z-File:Hsepid_yob.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Whisper designer crazyhavana 2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal work not useful for any educational purpose.
MichaelMaggs (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, and out of scope. Perfect for Facebook or Instagram, not Commons. Dontreader (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Imported from Japanese Wikipedia despite it's not free enough for Commons (COM:FOP#Japan). 本日晴天 (talk) 12:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. --Yasu (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Made up by the uploader; nonsense. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 24 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Photo was now replaced by a copyvio from http://www.kessbike.com/termal-kiyafetler/kask/zozo-kask-mv29-m-siyah-kirmizi#.VyNUB3o-eh4 --Jarekt (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Definitely not a free file - even according to the uploader in the file's details. It is not in use any way. There's no place for it in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 03:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense upload (see description) of a seemingly copyrighted image, uploaded for the nonsense en:Chanel Paige
Ies (talk) 05:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeynal2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely/demonstrably false authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:National-library-of-albania-04.jpg – found in higher resolution at http://agenda.bernerzeitung.ch/kunst/kunst/das-fotobuch-und-seine-autoren-100217888/event/100217888/ and http://wiki.infowiss.net/Datei:Schweizerische_Nationalbibliothek_-_Hauptgeb%C3%A4ude_1.jpg (the latter of which is supposedly under a free license, but there is no source or authorship information). A Google result indicates that it was available at http://buildingdate.com/?page_id=197. That domain has expired, but given the URL http://buildingdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/swiss-national-library.jpg, it was probably there since 2013 and is likely the original source. Google's cached copy of the site shows no sign of any free licensing.
- File:National Library of Albania.jpg.jpg
- File:German Wings hava yollarının təyyarəsi Sarayevo Beynəlxalq hava Limanında.jpg
- File:Türk hava Yolları təyyarəsi Bosniya və Hersoqovinanın paytaxtında.jpg – author: Sabina Dzaferbegovic according to metadata
- File:Beynəlxalq Aeroport Sarayevo.jpg
- File:Sarayevo Beynəlxalq Hava limanı.jpg – patently false authorship claims. This is not User:Zeynal2015's own work, but a needless scaled-down duplicate of File:SarajevoFlughafen-SA.jpg, which is the work of de:User:Eao-be.
- File:Hacı Əhməd Dukatar məscid.jpg – patently false authorship claims. This is not User:Zeynal2015's own work, but a needless-scaled down duplicate of File:Džamija i sahat-kula, Livno00529.JPG, which is the work of User:Quahadi.
- File:Fərhadiyə məscidi.jpg
- File:İmperiya məscidi.jpg – patently false authorship claims. This is not User:Zeynal2015's own work, but a needless scaled-down duplicate of File:Sarajevo Kaisermoschee.JPG, which is the work of Julian Nitzsche.
- File:Monteno.jpg
- File:Kosovo Milli Teatrı.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xpeehdroox (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free album covers and promotional images clearly grabbed from the Internet. The uploader does not appear to understand what "author", "own work" and "copyright holder" mean.
- File:Joelma ai coração.jpg
- File:Joelma não teve amor.jpg
- File:Joelma álbum 2016.jpg
- File:Joelma logo.png
- File:Joelma contra capa.jpeg
- File:Joelma Avante Tour.jpeg
- File:Joelma 2016.jpeg
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 09:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Programme of concert is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
new run, like the last run 2003:4D:2C35:7032:18FC:CC43:B022:961D 11:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per prior nomination: unlikely to be own work. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyfraud. Kyro (talk) 11:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. Photographer must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
altered image of a copyrighted image from a telvision netweork FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Apparently a photo of a photo of somebody who died in 1964. No source / copyright details for original photo. --ghouston (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 12:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope file, unused. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Self-indulgently photoshopped image with Jimmy Wales' face added to an existing photo of a video conferencing device. No suggestion that this is an accurate representation of the resolution and interface of the Tandberg E20. McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- KEEP: Actually, please check Wikimedia's policies/procedures, etc.... and you'll see there's no requirement that a photo need provide an "accurate representation of the resolution and interface" of any device. This file photo represents a de facto reality: that videophones provide real-time audio and video of whomever a person wishes to communicate with. Providing a photoshopped image of Mr. Wales' face is no less contradictory to Wikimedia's policies and requirements, than inserting a photo any other person's face. Kindly disregard the suggestion that the image ought to be deleted on the basis that user:McGeddon doesn't appreciate it for what it is. Best: HarryZilber 02:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- I flagged a similar case earlier in the year that showed a 1990s cellphone superimposed with the same Jimmy Wales photo at a resolution plainly impossible on a device of that time, and it was deleted. Both images were presented on Wikipedia articles without comment, suggesting that they were genuine photos of the device in use, and the Kyocera image has been reused offsite under its CC licence.
- No intrinsic objection to the image being of Jimbo rather than another person, just that it's not an accurate image of the hardware - the actual Tandberg device does not appear to be backlit, but the use of a bright white image here suggests that it is. Is there really no Commons policy about putting misleading photoshops out there for educational reuse? --McGeddon (talk) 11:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose: see COM:INUSE. Whether it accurately represents the capabilities of the phone is an issue for discussion on the Wiki pages where it appears. Wikipedia users may decide to use it or to reject it as being unrealistic and hence non-encyclopedic but that is not an issue for us here. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Octaaf coeckelberghs (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:Deel4kortverhalenblogfilosooftweekolommen362p.pdf
- File:Deelnulbijzondereenergieblogfilosoof78p - kopie.pdf
- File:Deel8theatermonologenblogfilosoof.pdf
- File:Deel6biografieblogfilosoofp77.pdf
- File:Deel7englishtextsblogfilosoofp66.pdf
- File:Deel3blogfilosooffilosofischverzetverkleind380p.pdf
- File:Deel5gedichtenblogfilosoofverkleind - kopie.pdf
- File:Deel2achjadeliefdeBlogfilosoofp230 - kopie.pdf
- File:Deel1filosofischeessaysblogfilosoof70p - kopie.pdf
- File:De blog per titels definitief.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
this is a screenshot of a copyrighted videogame fringio · α†Ω 12:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused invalid file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static1.bigstockphoto.com/thumbs/4/8/3/large1500/3846040.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Indeed. — regards, Revi 07:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader stated on en.wiki that the copyright holder is Syed Mohsin Nawab Rizvi, not own work as he is stating here. Diannaa (talk) 00:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- the holder of this file Syed Mohsin Nawab Rizvi was my late father — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehdinasir (talk • contribs)
uploader by mistake stated that the copyright holder is Syed Mohsin Nawab Rizvi he was my late father and i am the owner of the album of my father so i am the copy right holder of this work.
Deleted: . --Krd 17:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Résuméchapitres.pdf
- File:Dernierjour présentation.pdf
- File:Dernierjour genre.pdf
- File:Dernierjour personnages.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s1.dmcdn.net/HYKYJ.jpg.
- File:Mohamed.PNG
- File:اقبمنم.jpg
- File:لؤنتنتل.jpg
- File:نص قرآني.jpg
- File:الله.jpg
- File:القراءة ىى.jpg
- File:المغرب maroc .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 12:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
As with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adobe ColdFusion 7 icon.png, these all seem far too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. There are simulated 3D effects, highlights, bevels, shadows, reflections etc. Some of the hostile "descriptions" are rather telling – if you need to tell us it's not a copyright violation and order us not to delete it, it's probably a copyright violation that needs to be deleted.
- File:Adobe Captivate 1 icon.png
- File:Adobe Captivate 0.5 logo.png
- File:Adobe ColdFusion 6 logo.png
- File:Adobe Director Project v10 icon.png
- File:Adobe Flash Project v6.0 icon.png
- File:Adobe Flash Project v7.0 icon.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lostrust III (talk · contribs)
[edit]As with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adobe ColdFusion 7 icon.png, these all seem far too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. There are simulated 3D effects, highlights, bevels, shadows, reflections etc.
- File:Adobe Connect 5 icon.png
- File:Adobe Flash Builder 1.png
- File:Adobe Flex 1.png
- File:Adobe Central v1.0 icon.png and redirect File:Adobe Central v7.0 icon.png
- File:Adobe Contribute 2 icon.png
- File:Adobe Flash Remoting icon.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the resolution is the same or worse, but I found this image tilted and cropped in the same way on his Facebook page [2]. I think proof of ownership is required via COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Too small to be original. Likely copyvio from https://www.youtube.com/user/CantoresdelaPasion or another printed publicatrion. Macucal (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Too small to be original. Likely copyvio from https://www.youtube.com/user/CantoresdelaPasion or another printed publicatrion. Macucal (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Angelvcuenca (talk · contribs)
[edit]I have the feeling the uploader has just documented his own student work. In the screenshots of spring and netbeans the uplaoder is not the original autor. The educational value of other files is close to non-existent because of lack of description. For the UML-Diagarams, we have better.
- File:Modelo Darwin.jpg
- File:Conexion.jpg
- File:Prestamo libro.jpg
- File:Model propio.jpg
- File:Json1.jpg
- File:Json.jpg
- File:Framework Spring.jpg
- File:I sesion.jpg
- File:Crearnuevo.jpg
- File:Spring F.jpg
- File:Netbeans.jpg
- File:Modelo Biblioteca.jpg
Avron (talk) 08:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of an xml page. not used, no educational value Avron (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Angelvcuenca
i want to delete this file for privacy concern JMonteagudo (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used. Uploader requests deletion due to privacy concern. WJBscribe (talk) 12:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- A little harsh don't you think? 1) I don't see a copyright notice posted on the marker. 2) It is off parallax and poorly lit for any sort of replication or usage. Its a shot of a sign marking the finish line, not a precious logo. Its representative of what it is, this is the purpose of wiki photos. Trackinfo (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The information marker is mostly text and seems to me {{PD-text}}, trail profile is a geographic data in public domain. --Jarekt (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. WJBscribe (talk) 12:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Union Internationale des Guides et Scouts d'Europe.svg was recently deleted for being non-free here and the same issues with non-freeness probably apply here as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: see outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Union Internationale des Guides et Scouts d'Europe.svg. WJBscribe (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be part of a 'hoax" pair or articles on en.wiki: image is not as stated see http://www.boydellandbrewer.com/store/viewItem.asp?idProduct=9712 Eagleash (talk) 12:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is a manipulated version of File:Knights hospitaller.JPG. Apparently part of a series of uploads made in an attempt to create a hoax on en.wiki, the unsourced and so far unsourceable en:Bartoli family, being discussed at AfD, and the already deleted en:House of Bartoli. Sam Sailor (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image uploaded as component of hoax article. WJBscribe (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be part of pair of hoax articles:the picture is not as stated see http://www.keithrocco.com/inventory/items.php?seriesid=4&categoryid=7 Eagleash (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is a manipulated version of en:Keith Rocco's The French Attack on Marengo. Apparently part of a series of uploads made in an attempt to create a hoax on en.wiki, the unsourced and so far unsourceable en:Bartoli family, being discussed at AfD, and the already deleted en:House of Bartoli. Sam Sailor (talk) 13:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image uploaded as component of hoax article. WJBscribe (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Apparently part of a series of uploads made in an attempt to create a hoax on en.wiki, the unsourced and so far unsourceable en:Bartoli family, being discussed at AfD, and the already deleted en:House of Bartoli. The summary says, that en:Jean Fouquet is the author, as does the summaries of all the other uploads by this user. There is not the slightest evidence that House of Bartoli existed. Sam Sailor (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image uploaded as component of hoax article. WJBscribe (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This is a manipulated version of File:Pepin le Bref.jpg. Apparently part of a series of uploads made in an attempt to create a hoax on en.wiki, the unsourced and so far unsourceable en:Bartoli family, being discussed at AfD, and the already deleted en:House of Bartoli. The summary says, that en:Jean Fouquet is the author, as does the summaries of all the other uploads by this user. There is not the slightest evidence that House of Bartoli existed. Sam Sailor (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image uploaded as component of hoax article. WJBscribe (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The summary says, that en:Jean Fouquet is the author, as does the summaries of all the other uploads by this user, but as Fouquet lived from 1420 to 1481 he must have been way ahead of his time taking this color photograph. In reality this is a manipulated version of https://a1.muscache.com/im/pictures/103698371/6bfc5577_original.jpg?aki_policy=x_large . Apparently part of a series of uploads made in an attempt to create a hoax on en.wiki, the unsourced and so far unsourceable en:Bartoli family, being discussed at AfD, and the already deleted en:House of Bartoli. There is not the slightest evidence that House of Bartoli existed. Sam Sailor (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image uploaded as component of hoax article. WJBscribe (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Marked as non-free on English Wikipedia Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Enwiki is not proper source. Proper source is http://www.kpu.ua/ , which has CC-BY 3.0 license.--Anatoliy (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions (part d of the law) --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Source indicates image is properly the subject of a free license. WJBscribe (talk) 12:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. WJBscribe (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:90...
[edit]شاهو امانی90 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Looks like copyvios passed off as own work.
- File:Kermanshah paleolithic Page 1.jpg
- File:Kermanshah paleolithic Page 2.jpg
- File:Kermanshah paleolithic.pdf
- File:Chogha Gavaneh.jpg
Also calls into question the user's other uploads:
- File:Quri Qaleh entrance.jpg
- File:Quri Qaleh 2009- (4).jpg
- File:Quri Qaleh 2009-inside.jpg
- File:Quri Qaleh 2009-(2).jpg
- File:Quri Qaleh 2009 (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
jonkerz ♠talk 15:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: False authorship and licensing claims - see [3] in relation to other uploads. WJBscribe (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Titanfall sculpture
[edit]Subject of work is unlicensed sculpture (other images in the category are either de minimis of the sculpture or with OTRS permission from the company)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
czar 15:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. My mistake on uploading the SXSW image. -IagoQnsi (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not de minimis and no permission. WJBscribe (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unnecesary, unused and outdated image of extremely low quality. Virtually entirely replaced by File:Map of Russia - Economic regions, 2008-03-01.svg and File:Map of Russia - Economic regions.svg. Turnless (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete in favor of better version, per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: we don't delete files simply because they are out of date, otherwise numerous historical maps could not be hosted on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 03:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating again for the single reason of extremely low quality. The are other maps that convey the same information but in much higher quality. This map is also unused and quite unnecessary in general. Turnless (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep... and this file will be kept again. Uploaded in 2005, and a valid source for the SVG version. Why don't nominated 9 or 10 years ago? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- For the simple reason that I wasn't active on Wikipedia or Commons 9 or 10 years ago and there have been better maps uploaded since then. --Turnless (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - there is no policy on Commons that says we have to delete files just because they are out of date. The quality is a matter of opinion and depends on whether you feel that a file from 12 years ago should have been of a really high quality. Lots of files from the early years of the project were of comparable quality but that doesn't mean we should delete them. Certainly I'd agree if if we were talking about a file that was just 1 or 2 KB but 77 KB is not really that bad. Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- The reason is not just the fact that it is out of date. There is really not much point to this file. It has been replaced by ones of much higher quality. It's out of scope and unused. --Turnless (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete outdated images. Old file that would disiplay when viewing article histories. Please do not keep renominating the same file. WJBscribe (talk) 12:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope 2602:306:CDB2:4AF0:7675:48FF:FE59:9FC5 23:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete COM:SCOPE. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. WJBscribe (talk) 12:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC). )
O arquivo não é usado em nenhuma página VictorVoorhees (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of painting/illustration. Artist should confirm license by contacting COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. It's completely unclear who these people are or why this image is at all educational. IagoQnsi (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Currently this file is unused. I see no reason for keeping it. Not realistically useful for educational purposes. Dontreader (talk) 05:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Google Translate says "Liu Yuting at the Summer Palace". In my opinion that's not enough to keep the picture. An inclusionist might disagree. I guess it depends on the importance of the "Summer Palace". I couldn't care less because I have no heart. Dontreader (talk) 06:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused. Out of project scope. Dontreader (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I just found out that it is legally not permitted to make a close up image of artwork of others. The image should be taken of the work "as is" including the environment. I would like to have this image I took removed because of possible legal claims. Eliane Kemble (talk) 07:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative of unfree artwork. --Storkk (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I just found out that it is legally not permitted to make a close up image of artwork of others. The image should be taken of the work "as is" including the environment. I would like to have this image I took removed because of possible legal claims. Eliane Kemble (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative of unfree artwork. --Storkk (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:AuulNPervOY.jpg
This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 07:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographers should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
not realistically useful for educational purposes per COM:EDUSE. Animalparty (talk) 07:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This 1948 text is maybe still protected with copyright. "Own work" is wrong. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Problem with Danish copyright act § 24, 2 Fnielsen (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Freedom of Panorama in Denmark for sculptures is non-commercial only. --Storkk (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I doubt the elephant drawing is own work Vera (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination... derivative of copyrighted artwork. --Storkk (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Problem with Danish copyright act § 24, 2 Fnielsen (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi. I am the photographer and the uploader of this image. That means there can not be possibly be any Copyright issues. The image was issued under certain regulations by Creative Commons, the details of which can all be read in the image entry. RhinoMind (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of the sunglasses sculpture, and Freedom of Panorama in Denmark for sculptures is non-commercial only. --Storkk (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement of Geo Television Network property FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted, copyright holder: news front Vachovec1 (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted, copyright holder: ČTK/AP Vachovec1 (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted, copyright holder: profimedia Vachovec1 (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Image has been copied from https://insightpakistan.wordpress.com/page/7/ FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted, copyright holder: Associated Press (AP) Vachovec1 (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted, copyright holder: ČTK Vachovec1 (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Coyprighted, copyright holder: Conservative Read Vachovec1 (talk) 11:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Well, there is a license but thats unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed - compare this google search. JuTa 12:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
gemalt von "Alex Ignatius" 1997, der damit noch keine 70 Jahre tot ist. Kein OTRS-Beleg, dass der Veröffentlicher "Pingsjong" mit "Alex Ignatius" ident. Damit wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_100_100/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAZQAAAAJDZkNjVlZmIyLTNhZDYtNGViYS04Y2Q0LWM4Nzk1NzEzM2Q4Mw.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Maler Hecker (1884-1971), damit urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk im Innenraum eines Gebäudes. Keine Freigabe ersichtlich, damit wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Won't be PD until 2042. Artist's heir(s) must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Maler Hecker (1884-1971), damit urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk im Innenraum eines Gebäudes. Keine Freigabe ersichtlich, damit wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Won't be PD until 2042. Artist's heir(s) must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Maler Hecker (1884-1971), damit urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werk im Innenraum eines Gebäudes. Keine Freigabe ersichtlich, damit wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Won't be PD until 2042. Artist's heir(s) must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Maler Hecker (1884-1971), damit urheberrechtlich geschütztes Werkals zentrales Motiv im Innenraum eines Gebäudes. Keine Freigabe ersichtlich, damit wohl URV Jbergner (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Won't be PD until 2042. Artist's heir(s) must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.nacionalenargentina.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/romero_755ff22e6b305316965e8318f3aa3e53.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. Laber□T 15:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Arch-alborz
[edit]Arch-alborz (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Looks like copyvios passed off as own work.
Also calls into question the user's other uploads:
jonkerz ♠talk 15:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
i do not have the rights needed Drjones46 (talk) 15:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - uncredited COM:DW of unfree material. --Storkk (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото скончавшейся персоны (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инкубатор:Плюснин_Геннадий_Павлович) перефотографировано телефогом Samsung G0800H, Dogad75 (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Uncertain licensing. There are two files in this history, this nom is currently for the latest (== original, prior to transient overwriting) item. Uploader claims own, but looks like a promo, album-cover, or similar non-free item. Only use is on a user-talkpage (lb:Benotzer Diskussioun:Heavy metal where someone raised the licensing concern 4 years ago and got no reply. DMacks (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Regarding the other file in the history, User:LtPowers noted "I cannot determine any licensing information from the upload history. It would only end up deleted as lacking license info." (not salvageable by hist-split). Therefore neither actual file at this name has suitable licensing, so I think the whole file is deletable. Along with File:Band.jpg that redirects here (and should possibly be salted as a hopelessly ambiguous filename). DMacks (talk) 17:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I concur with deletion for tall the reasons Dmacks presents. Powers (talk) 00:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Possible attack at individual(s). Unused, uncategorized. Out of scope. DavidIvar (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. See the original trailer: the copyright notice appears on the screen at between 00.12 and 00.14. SchroCat (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright was renewed in 1976 (see p.96 of Jul-Dec 1976 renewals). Storkk (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
No content, unless it's an extreme close-up of some snow, and it's not the only one like it in this series, and we really shouldn't be uploading them just because we can, because they take up unnecessary space on our servers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- it renders for me, and the source is clear. you might want to review Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2014/10#Experimenting_with_using_VIPS_to_render_large_tiff_files https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T54045 and https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64466. historically, large files have had problems rendering, but it is a mediawiki problem. i've stopped uploading files over 20MB for this reason. Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 00:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, it's an issue of usability, then. Thinking of our users (if any), I wonder what reaction they would have to ostensibly finding an image they need, only to find that they cannot view it. I don't think they'd stay. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- oh - they are not staying, because of the toxic atmosphere. has nothing whatever to do with large images that are currently hard to render on some screens. Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 22:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: links to a jpeg version in the file description. --Storkk (talk) 14:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination of low quality Flickr file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1995-1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (CC) GLXi coupe 01.jpg (and other files within Category:Mitsubishi Mirage (1991)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant.
_GLXi_coupe_01.jpg){kind=link}
This file has been nominated because:
- It has major quality issues
- It is overexposed
- It has incorrect wheels fitted, contravening Commons:WikiProject Automobiles#Images
I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX (talk • contributions) 04:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
not realistically useful per COM:EDUSE. Animalparty (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
not realistically useful for educational purposes per COM:EDUSE. Animalparty (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The supposed source page (which only includes a much lower resolution version of the photo) does not contain any information substantiating the claims made in the PD rationale regarding when and where first publication took place. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it does you just don't understand Italian--Danieletorino2 (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Besides that:
- The file states this on the Italian wikipedia page (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Giorgio_Ferrini.jpg)
- Yes it does you just don't understand Italian--Danieletorino2 (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Dopo aver accuratamente verificato la validità della licenza, questa immagine potrà essere ricopiata su Wikimedia Commons, rendendola così disponibile anche a Wikipedia in altre lingue e agli altri progetti Wikimedia. Ma non va né richiesta la cancellazione di questa copia né inserito il template"
- It gives permission to upload it to Wikimedia Commons as the license has been validated so must not be cancelled :-).--Danieletorino2 (talk) 02:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- So you are wrong :-) Please refrain from making further edits to the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danieletorino2 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, I may not know a whole lot of Italian, but that page does not contain any information about when and where the photograph was first published. And no, the template on Italian Wikipedia does not say what you claim it says. What it does say is that you must carefully verify that the license (actually: the PD rationale, as there is no license) is valid before copying the file to Commons. The problem here is exactly that: you're transferring files without verifying the copyright status.
- The instructions regarding deletion only apply to the copy on Italian Wikipedia. A template on Italian Wikipedia obviously can't dictate what can and cannot be done on Commons.
- I'm not planning on editing the file description, but if you keep blanking out problem tags, I will. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Qazafi Ahmad.jpg
Small unused personal photos without metadata, out of project scope. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment OTRS received for duplicate file. ~--Thibaut120094 (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: As there is OTRS on another exact copy of this file, there is no reason to keep the duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
_(4394180017).jpg){kind=link}
_(4394180017).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4394180017).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Of course it can. DM is the exception, where is the violation, see Art.18, if author has placed it in public view. Unfitlouie (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Unfitlouie, you need to read de minimis again. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
_(4394180017).jpg){kind=link}
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete though I see this DR as a part of Yann's disruptive personal campaign. Yann cannot be trusted with admin rights if copyright and file deletions are to be used in his obsessive war against Russavia and anyone he claims is a "friend" of Russavia.
- Go away Yann, you're trolling. --Fæ (talk) 12:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Agree, yet accuse" is a very strange reaction, Fae.
- There are incidentally whole categories of similar aircraft photos (looking by the registration number categories seems quickest). If one has to go, then I guess they all have to. Pick the best and move it to WP under fair use though - the "Pokemon airliner" seems like a notable topic for an article. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have no problem in seeing TOO and DM refined. There is a problem with Yann using this as an excuse to hound me and troll my contributions. --Fæ (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yann has gone after a pageful of these. You have uploaded at least one, so has Russavia. Would you expect him to grant your upload a special exclusion? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I made a clear request that he avoid future DRs for my projects after his personal attack in closing a DR. It is very easy to ask someone else to take a look, especially as Yann seems on IRC most of the time. Please provide a link to the page of images, there is no mention of mass deletions in the nomination. --Fæ (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- At the bottom of this section, and I don't get why you think that this is any way different from your cleanup attempts. –Be..anyone 💩 16:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Come on, please do not connect the Pokémon case to the Russavia case, they are very different. ★ Poké95 10:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I posted a link for Fæ and others interested in Yann's list, what are you talking about? –Be..anyone 💩 10:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: It was meant to be a response to Fæ's delete vote. I should have made it clearer...
★ Poké95 10:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Permission to remove what I wrote if you want to fix the colons, I'm already on record as Flow-supporter ;-) –Be..anyone 💩 10:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: It was meant to be a response to Fæ's delete vote. I should have made it clearer...
- I posted a link for Fæ and others interested in Yann's list, what are you talking about? –Be..anyone 💩 10:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Come on, please do not connect the Pokémon case to the Russavia case, they are very different. ★ Poké95 10:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- At the bottom of this section, and I don't get why you think that this is any way different from your cleanup attempts. –Be..anyone 💩 16:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I made a clear request that he avoid future DRs for my projects after his personal attack in closing a DR. It is very easy to ask someone else to take a look, especially as Yann seems on IRC most of the time. Please provide a link to the page of images, there is no mention of mass deletions in the nomination. --Fæ (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yann has gone after a pageful of these. You have uploaded at least one, so has Russavia. Would you expect him to grant your upload a special exclusion? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have no problem in seeing TOO and DM refined. There is a problem with Yann using this as an excuse to hound me and troll my contributions. --Fæ (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It seems that the Pokémon (plural) are essential to the aircraft, so it cannot be considered as de minimis. Good that there is no any Cyndaquil there, otherwise my Cyndaquil will get angry (especially he is a Fire-type!)... (Let's just hope Yann will not be struck by a Thunderbolt...) --★ Poké95 10:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion consensus. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
autopromo out of scope, as well as File:Collage students.jpg Pibwl (talk) 09:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
unusable quality out of scope promo photo, as well as File:FUNCTION SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF FREE NOTE BOOKS.jpg, File:INAUGURATION OF BILLAWA BHAVAN.jpg and most or all uploads Pibwl (talk) 09:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Not a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government but by a staff photographer of the Pictorial Parade photo agency, as indicated by the metadata. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
At first, here is a scope problem: unused, uncategorized, bad description. At second, some icons bottom of image are copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IagoQnsi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ecosia.org/ The uploader stated on the file talk page that he has permission from Ecosia. What is needed is for the uploader to ask the copyright holder to contact the OTRS service using the template at COM:ET. Once it has been confirmed that the image is licensed, an OTRS tag can be added to the file and this deletion request can be closed. If more time is needed, please communicate that through this DR, because we can leave it open for weeks if needed. Green Giant (talk) 10:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the fact that this photographer clearly has better equipement and a different set of abilities than the one who created File:Beaytiful view of Bhairab Bridge, Islampur.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Problem with Danish copyright act § 24, 2 Fnielsen (talk) 11:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi I am the photographer and the uploader of this image. That means there can not be possibly be any Copyright issues. The image was issued under certain regulations by Creative Commons, the details of which can all be read in the image entry. RhinoMind (talk) 21:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The copyright at issue here belongs to the sculptor, not the photographer of the sculpture. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of unclear copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope : company logo of questionable notability + obvious advertising/promotional content in the file description (google translate used) Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be an accidental creation for File:A. Wagner.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nawal natal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots.Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Video maghreb Book Tutorial AE CS3&CS4.pdf
- File:قانون الأسرة.pdf
- File:1383584632-الحراك القضائي بالمغرب.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bzr4ytiIcAAQfe_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
¨Photo very similar to File:Louvre Museum (7463352206).jpg.The other image is more recognizable because of the background Tangopaso (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination (also this one was more blurry). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo quite identical to File:Louvre Museum (7463393310).jpg and a little bit blurred. No information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 15:24, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo quite identical to File:Louvre Museum (7463408054).jpg. No information about any difference. Tangopaso (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see rather small format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as there are no EXIF data, and also rather small format, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Russian website looks like its content is probably copyrighted, though I could not find an actual copyright notice of any kind on the site. Regardless, author is incorrect. No EXIF data. Delete per precautionary principle. KDS4444 (talk) 18:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted work, no evidence of creator permission czar 18:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Porque creí que era una cámara para tomar fotografías en mi dispositivo 187.131.62.90 18:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ikarus 435 in Moscow
[edit]No reason for having so many photos of a one single bus just with differnt zoom. I left almost half of such photos for which someone could possibly find any reason for leaving it here, but these ones I think should be deleted.
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (15943165013).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16377424557).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16377436657).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16561671141).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16561673651).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16561678601).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16561679401).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16561686761).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16562226262).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16563361645).jpg
- File:Moscow bus Ikarus-435.17 09467 (16563366375).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stolbovsky (talk) 19:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Already used on a lot of websites; maybe wrong author or wrong licence. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- An example with the same size: http://businesscoachingschool.net/Imagenes/Conocimienot.jpg
- Few higher resolution examples:
- --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
cited to a video feed; does uploader own the license for the feed itself? DMacks (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Profil-b.jpg better quality then this file. It has to be redirect Sakhalinio (talk) 20:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very low resolution, better files File:Walter Leistikow - Abendstimmung am Schlachtensee (1895) 2.jpg, File:Leistikow Schlachtensee um 1895.jpg Oursana (talk) 20:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: File uploaded in 2006, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to superior version File:Walter_Leistikow_-_Abendstimmung_am_Schlachtensee_(1895)_2.jpg. Storkk (talk) 11:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Edited version of File:Adam Curry portrait2.jpg with unclear educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 21:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
No evidence this is free of copyright. No information on when and where was this first published SchroCat (talk) 22:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
No evidence this is free of copyright. No information on when and where was this first published SchroCat (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Guan Zilan.jpg, and misidentified as Lan Ping. Zanhe (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I suspect this image was taken from here [4]. It also appears on other sites but with poorer resolution. I think proof of ownership is required via COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Problem with Danish copyright act § 24, 2 Fnielsen (talk) 11:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете до загрузки файа нп Викисклад и в большем разрешении http://www.chepetsk.ru/media-news/2014/kolhoznaya.jpg, http://www.chepetsk.ru/dni/news/2014-04-10-8 Dogad75 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Автор фото неизвестен, дата фотографирования неизвестна, дата обнародования неизвестна. Хлебников Владимир Алексеевич скончалсяв 1982 году Dogad75 (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
See COM:FOP#Malta Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
See COM:FOP#Malta Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: It's an information sign in a public space. If this is eligible for deletion, then so are the majority of files in the subcategories of Category:Signs in Malta. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Neither Japan nor the US have a suitable FOP exception for 2D works. 84.62.193.111 12:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why do we need FOP here, the main object in this image is the aircraft, not the Pokemons ?!? --Denniss (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree; the plane itself is what has been photographed. It is not an illustration of Pikachu, but a plane with his likeness on the side. Scapler (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I also agree, the image is the airplane, not the Pokemon even though they are objects of interest. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree; the plane itself is what has been photographed. It is not an illustration of Pikachu, but a plane with his likeness on the side. Scapler (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just a small comment regarding licensing issues: images of the aircraft as a whole are fine, derivative works focussing on the Pokemons not. --Denniss (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per above comments Jcb (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Pokemon can't be de minimis here. Yann (talk) 09:27, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, INUSE, there is already a COM:DM tag on the page, and (quote) we can't find a court case of a similar photo in fact being ruled derivative -- we do have rulings where it was not(unquote). –Be..anyone 💩 17:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: As explained in the previous deletion nomination discussion, the photo is of the aircraft in general and does not focus on individual Pokemon illustrations, so the de minimis exemption applies here. --DAJF (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused and outdated map. Entirely replaced by File:Same sex marriage map Europe detailed.svg. Turnless (talk) 20:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This is not outdated but historical data. No valid reason for deletion --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- No where does it say that it is historical data. The title and the description demonstrate it as a map showing the current situation. The map was originally used for that, but now it is not used at all. No reason to keep. --Turnless (talk) 03:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: As explained in similar deletion requests, we do not delete files if they are out of date. The file has a date (23 May 2007) which should be enough to tell someone that the file is no longer current. Green Giant (talk) 23:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Denis Guy Boivin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Concernant la contestation de mes photos, je peux vous affirmer qu'elles sont de moi car je les ai prises pour illustrer mon livre La Présentation, un passé, un vécu que j'ai publié en 1981. (Traduction par Google: Regarding the claim of my photos, I can tell you they are of me because I took them to illustrate my book La Présentation , a past, an experience that I published in 1981.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.236.3.233 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
'Deleted: That may be, but in order to have the photos on Commons we will need a free license from the actual publisher of the book via OTRS. Also note that Commons does not keep PDFs of images, so these cannot be restored in this form any case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Je possède aussi les droits d'éditeur (I also own the rights editor). Guy
Files uploaded by Denis Guy Boivin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The church is in Quebec, Canada according to the description & additional line " dans la municipalité québécoise ... Municipalité régionale de comté de Saint-Hyacinthe". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Denis Guy Boivin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello. I talked with the user in question (with the IP adress 205.236.3.233 = Denis Guy Boivin) on fr:Discussion:La Présentation about this problem. He's very upset about his photos always being deleted, and assures me he's the one who took them.
- He said above that he used the photos to illustrate his book, so i told him about the OTRS procedure. Can an OTRS volunteer check if he send any permission email? I don't know if he really did it. He told me last time he would "try", but he seems a bit lost and not at ease with "internet stuff". Maybe he didn't understand correctly. If he didn't send the OTRS email, i'll try to explain it to him once again. Thank you --Titlutin (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Je suis le photographe de cette photo et j'ai les droits d'édition (La Présentation, un passé ..., un vécu ..., livre publié en 1981). J'autorise sa publication sur Wikimedia et Wikipedia et son usage à condition que les usagers en désignent l'auteur (moi, Guy Boivin). (Message written by 205.236.3.233)
- "I am the photographer of these photos and i have the publishing rights (La Présentation, un passé ..., un vécu ..., book published in 1981). I authorize their publication on Wikimedia and Wikipedia, and their use, providing that i am credited as their author (me, Guy Boivin)" Translation by --Titlutin (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- There is valid OTRS permission by Guy Boivin. Cordially. --Gratus (talk) 16:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The OTRS permission is good, but there is still the fact that, as I noted above, these are in PDF format which is not a permitted format for photographs. If M. Boivin wants to upload these as JPGs, fine, but they cannot stay as PDFs. I also note that these have been uploaded twice after deletion, both times in violation of Commons rules. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jim. He uploaded it twice after deletion because he didn't really understand why they were deleted (he doesn't seem to understand english very well) and how the OTRS procedure worked. Is it okay if he uploads the JPG files as "new versions" of these ones, or does he have to upload them as whole new files (and if so, how does it work for the OTRS authorization, does he have to ask again Gratus to put it in the "Permission" field?) Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Although he may or may not be able to physically upload a JPG with the extension PDF, it will create problems, so, yes, he must upload two new files with the jpg extension. Once the files are uploaded, he (or you) can copy and paste the whole file description, including the OTRS template into the new files. If you drop a note on my talk page, I will check to see that it's right. Note that any use of the files on WP will have to be changed from PDF to JPG. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok thank you. I will try to explain all that to him. Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hello again, Jim. Denis Guy Boivin told me he failed to change them into JPG and asked me to do it for him. I hope it's not a problem if I uploaded them in his place? Here are the new files : File:Église de La Présentation.jpg and File:Maison aux quatre silos (La Présentation).jpg. I hope I didn't make a mistake. Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok thank you. I will try to explain all that to him. Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Although he may or may not be able to physically upload a JPG with the extension PDF, it will create problems, so, yes, he must upload two new files with the jpg extension. Once the files are uploaded, he (or you) can copy and paste the whole file description, including the OTRS template into the new files. If you drop a note on my talk page, I will check to see that it's right. Note that any use of the files on WP will have to be changed from PDF to JPG. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jim. He uploaded it twice after deletion because he didn't really understand why they were deleted (he doesn't seem to understand english very well) and how the OTRS procedure worked. Is it okay if he uploads the JPG files as "new versions" of these ones, or does he have to upload them as whole new files (and if so, how does it work for the OTRS authorization, does he have to ask again Gratus to put it in the "Permission" field?) Regards. --Titlutin (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination -- new JPGs provided, see above. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)