Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
No evidence on source page of claimed release MilborneOne (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep Of course there is, at this link Ziguinchor1992 (talk) 09:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Odder saw the license, the uploader saw the license, I saw the license. I think we can safely speedy close this. --Natuur12 (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
For collages source and license of every used image is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, sorry, there is no freedom of panorama in France anyway. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Text book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Clearly copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb as copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
All of this uploaders other files have been copyvios, this is unlikely to be the work of the uploader Ahecht (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mustaqillik.jpg: All of this uploaders other files have been copyvios, this is unlikely to be the work of the uploader
http://www.salondupolar.com/Salon-2015/Les-auteurs-presents "Manon Fargetton © J-N Portmann" https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manon_Fargetton&diff=prev&oldid=124507872 "© Jean-Noël Portmann" Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 10:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
empty (On behalf of B20180, by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC))
- Empty categories should simply be tagged with {{Emptypage}}. User:Jo-Jo Eumerus, please add deletion requests to the daily log in the future. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 21:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
empty; not needed by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:38, 19 March 2016 (UTC) on behalf of Llywelyn2000
- Empty categories should just be tagged with {{Emptypage}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 21:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: Clearly in scope as a notable company, and in use at Fujifilm (local file transferred to Commons). --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: File in use. Marked the image for conversion to SVG. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Used in w:KBOO, a notable radio station. I'll add the "should be SVG" tag to image. MB298 (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: File in use; wikipedia article proves notability. --Riley Huntley (talk) 05:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Unused and out of scope image. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
´
Deleted, depicted person is notable, but the image has overall bad quality plus 3 sentences in poor English are written on photo (I even do not understand, what does he want to say). Taivo (talk) 16:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CharlesHannah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Despite the large file size of one image, the pixelation seems to show it was rephotographed from another source; the black and white is halftoned... both have no metadata and are claimed as own work, but more likely COM:COPYVIOs.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
From apparent age of photograph, the date of 15 March 2016 and the claim of own work are dubious. Proper source & author is required, please see COM:EVID. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, looks like a copy of a celebrity selfie, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Text only document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these images is the own work of the uploader, two album covers, two headshots.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Ellin, For the files :
The covers of the albums are scanned that I did of the cover of the albums of the artist Emeric Imre. I am working for him as PR representing his interests and I am fully entitled to use his pictures and albums covers on wikipedia articles.
For the file:
I am helping the widow of the deceased actor Matei Alexandru to create her husband's page and she supplied me with this image in order to use it on Wikipedia.
Regards, (Liancu (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC))
Deleted: "For use on Wikipedia" is not sufficient -- WP:EN and Commons both require that images be free for use by anyone anywhere for any pupose. Unless the image is the actual work of the uploader, or PD, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, who is usually the photographer, not the subject, must send a free license to OTRS. It is highly unlikely that Matei Alexandru's widow owns the copyright toimages of him -- that is almost always held by the photographer or his heirs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
This image is watermarked as property of one Bodi Edgar Gabriel, who contributes images to Photo.net and Instagram. Since there is no OTRS permission and the copyright owner took the time to watermark it, I don't think the image is free.
—Andrei S. Talk 15:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Delete Unused and out of scope image. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Depicted man is notable, but this is small photo without metadata, claimed to be a selfie – does not look like that. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Unused and out of scope image. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Depicted man is notable, but this is small photo without metadata, claimed to be a selfie – does not look like that. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
No permission from photographer, see discussion on talk page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Question: So, who is the photographer? --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- I was the photographer, I work in the theatre for the Marketing Department. It is a free image, no copyright, no ownership, simply a current shot of our main auditorium. Swansea Grand Theatre
Comment User's deleted upload was also marked own work, unfortunately it also had a freelance photographer's watermark on it, causing this image to also become doubtful under COM:PRP. I think considering user's name is same as the name of the item depicted that there is a problem here that needs to be solved by COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: With a few exceptions, none of which are applicable here, all created works have copyrights until they expire. Because there is a question of who owns this one, you need to get the actual copyright holder to send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Looks more like a screen capture than an own work, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these variably sized images, of various quality, of notable people facing cameras, with no meta data is own work of uploader. Some look as if they were cut out of other backgrounds and three of this user's other images were speedied.
- File:Juan Manuel Carreras López - San Luis Potosí.jpg
- File:Jaime Heliodoro Rodríguez Calderón.jpeg
- File:Roberto Sandoval Castañeda - Nayarit.jpg
- File:Silvano Aureoles Conejo - Michoacán.jpg
- File:José Francisco Olvera Ruiz.jpg
- File:Héctor Antonio Astudillo Flores.jpg
- File:Jorge Herrera Caldera - Durango.png
- File:César Horacio Duarte Jáquez.jpeg
- File:Manuel Velasco Coello - Chiapas.jpg
- File:Rafael Alejandro Moreno Cárdenas.jpg
- File:Francisco Arturo Vega de Lamadrid.jpg
- File:Carlos Lozano de la Torre - Aguascalientes.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Jonathunder (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- The image was copied from this page on the website of The Episcopal Church. Jonathunder (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The source is the Kansas Historical Society, with no link and an unknown author, yet the file is tagged as PD-USGov. The uploader is a serial copyright violator, so while I couldn't find the original source for this image it's likely to be a copyvio as well. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 02:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Unused and out of scope image. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
"Own work" probably only applies to the photograph of the photograph. There is no source or copyright information for the original picture.
- File:President Ayub Khan.jpeg
- File:Ayub Khan with Nawab Of Kalabagh and Abdul Waheed Khan.jpeg
- File:AbdulwaheedKhan.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 03:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete Unused and out of scope image. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 11:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Photographer is unknown and time&place of first publication too. If this photo taken in 1920s was not been published before 1940s and publication at http://www.retrofoto.ru/photo/5902/ is a first publication, this image may be copyrighted. Alexander Roumega (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
This "David Okey" seems to be unknown to google 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 06:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Gallery without sources = copyright violation 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 06:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Per above, nominating too:
- File:@Insta Ternopil .jpg (almost identical)
Gunnex (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Evan Fenadrez Neuer. (talk · contribs)
[edit]user art - out of scope
- File:This Year For Evan..jpg
- File:2011 Evan Fevold..jpg
- File:Wolfburg prison..jpg
- File:The Escape(หน้าปก.).png
- File:Evan 22.jpg
- File:1000 ivan.png
2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 06:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 07:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Extacyradio (talk · contribs)
[edit]OTRS tickets required
2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 07:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antoni monteiro (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 07:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Do not look like own work. Look like screenshots, no EXIF. The uploader committed other copyvios.
- File:Rónald González - Saprissa.jpg
- File:Christian Montero.jpg
- File:Jeaustin Campos 2015.jpg
- File:Francisco Calvo Saprissa 2015.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Diego Calvo - Valerenga.jpg
- File:Carlos Watson 2016.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodríguez Bangkok Glass.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodríguez 04032015.jpg
- File:Danny Carvajal Agosto 2015 - Saprissa.jpg
- File:Erick Cabalceta 2015 Saprissa.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodríguez Agosto 2015.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodríguez Final Invierno 2014.jpg
- File:Jeaustin Campos - Septiembre 2015 Saprissa.jpg
- File:Diego Calvo Saprissa 2016.jpg
- File:Francisco Calvo Quesada 2015.jpg
- File:Ariel Rodríguez 2015 Saprissa.jpg
Didym (talk) 08:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Discountsgyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spammy spam uploaded for spamming in deleted spam articles on English Wikipedia by a spammer who is indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia for spamming. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Flickr washing. From a Flickr user who claims that the photo was taken on May 20, 2013. In fact the photo is of actress Glenn Close at the 2012 Palm Springs International Film Festival on January 12, 2012. Copyright photo agency Bauer Griffin, source here. Thuresson (talk) 23:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as Flickrwashed copyvio. Rrburke (talk) 14:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Christan Ferrer. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
It's not Francis Hauksbee but File:James Gregory.jpg, better quality pictures are available Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 07:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Google actually thinks that this man is Francis Hauksbee, but the source for the other version has three portraits of the same man, one of which is identified in the corner. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joojoioioi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Photo unlikely to have been taken by the subject, need proper source and license verification. BethNaught (talk) 09:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Grabbed from (example) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10207414650598604&set=pb.1657425408.-2207520000.1458780267.&type=3&theater (02.2016). Permission from the original photographer needed. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Uploader blocked indef at enwiki.Gunnex (talk) 00:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1944. Own photo is unlikely. Real photographer and his/her death year must be given to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- this is my photo of a family photo. Please would you correct the tag if it is wrong which is what other editors have done for me who are more expert. Thanks Fivebills (talk) 11:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This is obviously a fromal portrait, so it is very unlikely that the family owns the copyright. Keeping it here will require a free license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear what the educational value of this file is supposed to be. Takeaway (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope -- personal art. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only upload. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Candy apple red j30-2.jpg
Bad quality. Used in 2 categories, both have better photos. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jürgen Oetting (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is not the original author of the files, therefore COM:OTRS permission is not needed.
- File:Wolfgang Dittmann.JPG (c) Thomas Brand in exif
- File:Hans Gruber (Pädagoge).JPG
- File:Jürgen Oetting 2013.jpg Photographer: Bodo Kremmin per exif
- File:Wolfgang Hinte.jpg
- File:Gerd Peter Werner.jpg Author = Gerd Peter Werner ?
Steinsplitter (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
1934 photo, not own work. Real photographer and his/her death year must be given to determine copyright status. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep It is a Government work, or alternatively was published as a govt work. Andhra University was constituted in the year 1926 by the Madras Act of 1926. So (c) was then probably 50 years from publication, which expired in 1985. Unfitlouie (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Is there evidence, that the photo was published more than 50 years ago? Taivo (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is either a Govt work or a work commissioned by Govt. The usage of the archaic term "Waltair" for Vishakapatinam in the included text indicates it was published before 1947. Unfitlouie (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It is a photograph from India and is more than 50 years old, therefore it is PD. However, there is no evidence that it is in scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, unused personal photo. Per text, seems to be just promotional Threeohsix (talk) 11:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal phoro, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
File is all over the web, unlikely to be own work. COM:OTRS permission is needed here. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed own work: i'm in doubt, honestly, although there are EXIF data, if the images and the related WN-WP are rather 'profiling' or not? Hence, your opponions, txh, Roland zh (talk) 12:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: re-upload of deleted content. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Personal & unused photo. Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 11:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Even if the Burj Khalifa is de minimis, are the Falcon Tower and pool not subject to copyright? I'm not sure. Themightyquill (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Published in 1962, as mentioned in the colophon page (Page 5). This is Vol. 4 of Complete Stories of Rabindranath Tagore; individual stories originally published in various magazines in Tagore's lifetime and therefore PD-India; but this compilation is non-PD, being a fresh publication of 1962. Also, fresh copyright of this compilation is vested with the publishers (Visvabharati University), as also mentioned in the colophon. Hrishikes (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This is, apparently, a collection of works by an author who died in 1941. While the individual stories were not PD in 1962, they are now. If there were a new introduction, new illustrations, or a new cover, the 1962 work might have its own copyright, but I see none of that here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Post closing comment copied from my talk page:
- "Hi! About your rationale of keeping this file because of lack of additional material. The work does contain addl. material. The exhaustive appendix (p. 226 to p. 266) about the background history of the stories was written by Pulin Bihari Sen (1908-1984) as mentioned in the colophon. The work was edited by Kanai Samanta (1904-1995) (also mentioned in the colophon). Best, Hrishikes (talk) 03:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)"
Therefore changed this to Deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Manchuria 1933.jpg
- File:Japanese Army Unit Photo, 1933.jpg
- File:Kintai Bridge, 1920s.jpg
- File:Ben Aspen.jpg
- File:Sinking of the Princess Kathleen, 1952 at Lena Point near Juneau, Alaska.jpg
- File:SS Princess Kathleen, 1952 Lena Point near Juneau, Alaska.jpg
- File:Denver, Colorado, City and County Building, 1946.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- For the Princess Kathleen images, born1945 specifically states it was his father that took them. MB298 (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: , but I think it is safe to assume that the Flickr user is his or her father's heir. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Protest signs, paper mache and metal cut out statues, containing either original artwork or derivative works. These were uploaded from Flickr as part of a group, and do not appear to able to be retained by Commons due to COM:DW and COM:FOP.
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136333017).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40297957564).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136335637).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (41007100421).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136339617).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40297936634).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136342487).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965231212).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (41007105271).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965232852).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (41007109561).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (41007110081).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965236062).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (27136335408).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 177.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 180.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 148.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 137.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 143.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 145.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 133.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 136.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 118.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 123.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (27136331488).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136369037).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136372617).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965248192).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136376657).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965250802).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40965262132).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (39198008510).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (39198014900).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (39198017740).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (27136420398).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (39198022140).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 082.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 070.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 097.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 099.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 047.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 042.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 029.jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136321267).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40297937714).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (40297938654).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4546) (26130971417).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4542) (27130889898).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4463) (27137420388).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4316) (40959791632).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4089) (41001591471).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (4055) (27130814448).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3944) (41001574821).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3884) (40959738122).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3687).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3572) (27130685778).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40131660615).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (39216211340).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (41025294701).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40316353944).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40131573665).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40316310274).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40131552775).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (40131557955).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (39216038080).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (39216042260).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (27189368228).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (26190059527).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352108824).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352108754).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (27189346158).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (26190058667).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352108644).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (41018887342).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352099374).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40167556475).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352110054).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (26190060017).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40352109984).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives San Francisco 3 24 2018 (40167570415).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (39253210450).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives (26191180847).jpg
- File:March for Our Lives Newseum Front (40311026924).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives (40329222724).jpg
- File:March For Our Lives (41037612211).jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(27130685778).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(26130971417).jpg){kind=link}
_(27130889898).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(27137420388).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(40959791632).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(41001591471).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(27130814448).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(41001574821).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(40959738122).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(27130889898).jpg){kind=link}
_(27137420388).jpg){kind=link}
_(40959791632).jpg){kind=link}
_(41001591471).jpg){kind=link}
_(27130814448).jpg){kind=link}
_(41001574821).jpg){kind=link}
_(40959738122).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep Looking at those protest signs. They do not seem, kind of creations one would claim copyrights for, that was not the intend. They were indented to be copied, shared and spread. Many would be {{PD-rext}} and most would fall under case #1 of Commons:De_minimis#United_States. To me the main copyright is the photographers copyright and that one is clearly OK. --Jarekt (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: File:March For Our Lives 2018 - San Francisco (3687).jpg was not uploaded by User:MB298 from a Flickr set. It was uploaded by me from a set of photos I took at that event. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 19:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- I, as uploader, support the deletion, but not for the reasons said – I transferred all Boston images before realizing they had been transferred already, so they are duplicates. MB298 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- MB298, I do not see any duplicated Boston images. But I see duplicates in San Francisco data set. How did that happen? I thought the software prevented us from uploading duplicates. --Jarekt (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: for example File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 (26136333017).jpg is a duplicate of File:March for Our Lives Boston 2018 - 201.jpg. MB298 (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- MB298, I do not see any duplicated Boston images. But I see duplicates in San Francisco data set. How did that happen? I thought the software prevented us from uploading duplicates. --Jarekt (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- I, as uploader, support the deletion, but not for the reasons said – I transferred all Boston images before realizing they had been transferred already, so they are duplicates. MB298 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree that the photographer has copyright to hand made signs by a multitude of people, and particularly not to the signs which incorporate images derived from other sources. I do not think that the intent of the COM:DW is to permit anyone to go outside in the US and take photos of personal artworks on temporary display, or being held on temporary display. I am pointing out the display factor as some of these signs were placed against a fence prior to being photographed. This is no different than an art show by students (which we've deleted), or other groups of artwork photographed without permission by photographers who happened to be there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep we are responsible administrators thus I want to believe that we are able to distinguish between 'aim of a protest' and 'copyright issue'. It's a demonstration, not an art vernissage, and historically demonstrations have been held just because press and public talked about them and spread them: the demonstration is a fact and a piece of news itself (meaning that it's held just because it becomes a piece of news, if there were no press and cameras to portrait it there wouldn't be any demonstration). On the (questionable, in these cases) ground of copyright issues almost every demonstration photograph should be banned here. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Remind everyone that copyright has nothing to do with protest, its validity or lack there of. The problem here is images copied from other places and messages to which the photographer does not hold copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- yes, but nearly all the signs you point out are not protected by copyright – they are either much too simple or fall under de minimis. MB298 (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: All of the photos were clearly focussed on the protest signs. Most of those signs had either photos or drawings on them that exceed the threshold of originality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Sendai Daikannon
[edit]
1990 statue (cf ja:大観密寺). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Japan allows only images of buildings and perhaps bridges but not statues. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Obvious COPYVIOs... all military equipment, mostly professional class photos, various sizes, no metadata, variable cameras, all claimed as own work.
- File:Fidae012.jpg
- File:CASA C-212 Aviocar.jpg
- File:Cessna 172 Skyhawk.jpg
- File:E-133 08SEP11.jpg
- File:330 Puma.jpg
- File:S200 LRG.jpg
- File:Mini SAF.jpg
- File:Iveco-m-250-11.jpg
- File:E67.jpg
- File:49C.jpg
- File:UAV X-02 .jpg
- File:Lascar E-4.jpg
- File:EE4.jpg
- File:EED.jpg
- File:E84.jpg
- File:Ejercito4.jpg
- File:Cuatrimoto Rancher.jpg
- File:Moto XR250.jpg
- File:VBCL TANQUE.jpg
- File:Honda Rancher.jpg
- File:Honda XR 250.jpg
- File:5E7.jpg
- File:MB-3650.jpg
- File:Lanza Tubo.jpg
- File:Thump 4435253tmg.jpg
- File:0ebe35e9.jpg
- File:DE0.jpg
- File:RayoFamae.jpg
- File:Piraña TCM-20.jpg
- File:CASA C-101CC FACH.jpg
- File:A-29-Super-Tucano-do-Chile-foto-FACh.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that these selected images by uploader are uploader's own work as claimed. No metadata, small and variable file sizes, all of a single topic (football/soccer). Probable COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Hinchada de Barcelona SC en el Estadio Los Chirijos.jpg
- File:Tribuna del Estadio Los Chirijos.jpg
- File:Estadio Los chirijos.jpg
- File:Vista Aérea Estadio Los Chirijos.jpg
- File:Estadio Rumiñahui.jpg
- File:Hinchada de Barcelona SC en el Estadio Rumiñahui.jpg
- File:Panoramica Estadio Rumiñahui.jpg
- File:Grada Visitante del Estadio Rumiñahui.jpg
- File:Grada Local del Estadio Rumiñahui.jpg
- File:Panoramica Estadio Christian Benitez.jpg
- File:Panoramica Estadio Bellavista.JPG
- File:Estadio monumental.jpg
- File:Estadio Folke Anderson.jpg
- File:Hinchada de Barcelona SC en el Estadio Christian Benitez.JPG
- File:Estadio Olimpico Atahualpa.jpg
- File:Bandera Gigante Zona Norte.JPG
- File:Estadio Monumental Noche.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Apparent derivative works of pre-existing, printed photographs, which are presumably not the uploader's own work.
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro Pombal Viegas (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs and derivative works, this series of images intended to be used as some form of facebook project, are derivative works of the photograph beneath the text, which is unattributed. There is no metadata on any of these images.
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 10.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 11.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 8.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 9.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 7.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 6.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 5.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 4.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 1.png
- File:ISUTIC TURMA A ENG INFO 2016 2.png
- File:Arqfisica1.PNG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
If this was published in 1989, how could the author possibly have been dead for more than 70 years, as the uploader claims? —LX (talk, contribs) 18:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhonatan2301 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIOs. Commons isn't facebook, this isn't a social media site, self-promotion is fine on Facebook and not allowed on Commons.
- File:Jhonatan.jpg.png
- File:Congreso.jpg.jpg
- File:Jhonatan m.v.jpg
- File:Jhoto.jpg
- File:Totoo.jpg
- File:Marquez.jpg.png
- File:Jhonatan.png
- File:Jhonatan Márquez Valencia.png
- File:Facebook-Jhonatan.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diego Jiménez Barajas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Television stars, screen caps and promotional pictures, unlikely to have been taken by the uploader due to lack of metadata, variable sizes, and obvious professional imagery, perhaps copied from High Definition television, or websites. Likely COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Llimoo en Sinvergüenzas.jpg
- File:Llimoo president pronosticó el triplete del Barça.jpg
- File:Llimoo en SV.jpg
- File:Llimoo saltando en paracaidas.jpg
- File:Llimoo en plató.jpg
- File:Llimoo en los premios Goya.jpg
- File:Llimoo en los Premios Goya.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilha Ronaldo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional gallery all on one person, including at least one CD cover and various sized images all claimed as own work, but with no apparent educational utility other than an nice view of a young man who wears hats and teeshirts and has a full set of fingers on each hand.
- File:GCMEsQJv.jpg
- File:Wilha Ronaldo.jpg
- File:Wilha Ronaldo .jpg
- File:Se Esforce Pelos Teus Sonhos.jpg
- File:Wilha Ronaldo - Passeando De Skate Single.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Closing admin please notice this page was mostly blanked and restored, as well as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Produçãoeqp. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
It's unclear where the copyright tag comes from. Maybe it was on Italian Wikipedia, but the upload to English Wikipedia was earlier. English Wikipedia marks this as {{PD-old-100}} and {{PD-art}}, but this appears to be a colour photograph, so neither copyright tag seems to be correct. Presumably unfree, source given as 'Clare Priory' on enwiki. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. See [1]. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:07, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adriano Fumagalli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, small size self-promotional images are out of COM:SCOPE. This gallery is a series of "standups" all claimed as own work, and all very obviously not, no metadata, variable sizes, compositions and so on show that these are culled from at least three photographers, perhaps more.
- File:Paolo Limiti e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli e Paolo Limiti.jpg
- File:Giacomo con Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli con Giacomo.jpg
- File:Giovanni e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Giacomo e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Giovanni con Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli e Barbara D'Urso.jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli intervista "Giovanni".jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli e "Mabilia".jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli e "Teresa".jpg
- File:Adriano Fumagalli e "Giovanni".jpg
- File:Teresa e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Mabilia.jpg
- File:Umberto Smaila e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Massimo Ranieri con Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Massimo Ranieri e Adriano Fumagalli.jpg
- File:Grande Sandro Mazzola.jpg
- File:Sandro Mazzola.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
No metadata, red carpet show, small size, unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. "LAS VEGAS, NV - MAY 18: Web personality Bart Baker attends the 2014 Billboard Music Awards at the MGM Grand Garden Arena on May 18, 2014 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)" (gettyimages.com). Thuresson (talk) 00:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yazar fatihcandan (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence user created any of these files, all of which are within Facebook size, some appear to be posters, or derivative works, likely [{COM:COPYVIO]]s.
- File:Fatih Candan kitap.jpg
- File:Fatih candan.jpg
- File:Fatih Candan Tabi ya o gün kar yağıyordu.jpg
- File:Fatih candan haberler.jpg
- File:Fatifcandan.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LAODE TAUVIK (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO, one is labled "official cover art" and the other two are obviously promotional images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused blurry doodle-art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
If there is anything on these four images, it's too faint to be seen. Out of COM:SCOPE lack of educational utility.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Doodle art by non-notable artist on top of a PD-image by Leonardo DaVinci. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
File:A MUSICA COMO INSTRUMENTO FACILITADOR NO DESENVOLVIMENTO E NA APRENDIZAGEM DA EDUCAÇAÕ INFANTIL (1).pdf
[edit]Text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of illustratoin and photograph on this poster. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- This comment was left on the discussion page and moved here: Cette affiche est une des plus connues du trimestriel Batia moûrt soû dont il est question dans l'article Serge Poliart, et elle permet de comprendre un peu l'esprit satirique tant de l'artiste que de ce trimestriel. C'est une affiche qui offre à réfléchir sur la politique et les politiciens. J'apprécierais qu'elle soit acceptée. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brassor11 (talk • contribs) (moved by Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC))
Deleted: That may be all true, but it is a copyirght violation, so we cannot keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Screencap from Ecuadorian television show, read the Wikipedia article to which it's attached. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Doodle art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
no source of basemap Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Max Beerbohm
[edit]Max Beerbohm, UK author, died in 1956, non-free until 2027.
- File:Max-coleridge.jpg
- File:Rossetti-15.jpg
- File:Rossetti-14.jpg
- File:Rossetti-10.jpg
- File:Rossetti-9.jpg
- File:Rossetti-11.jpg
- File:Max-beerbohm-25.jpg
- File:Rossetti and His Circle cover.gif
- File:Rossetti-12.jpg
- File:Beerbohm-Beardsley.jpg
- File:Enoch-soames-max.jpg
- File:A-survey-carson.jpg
- File:Rossetti-1.jpg
- File:Beardsley-max-1896.jpg
- File:Rossetti-19.jpg
- File:Rossetti-16.jpg
- File:A-survey-gordon-craig.jpg
- File:Rossetti-17.jpg
- File:Rossetti-Frontis.jpg
- File:Rossetti-5.jpg
- File:A-survey-lloyd-george.jpg
- File:A-survey-gwynn.jpg
- File:Florence-beerbohm-c1918.jpg
- File:Rossetti-13.jpg
- File:Rossetti-18.jpg
- File:A-survey-gosse.jpg
- File:Max-arnold.jpg
- File:A-survey-king-spain.jpg
- File:Rossetti-2.jpg
- File:Rossetti-20.jpg
- File:Rossetti-6.jpg
- File:Rossetti-4.jpg
- File:A-survey-lord-spencer.jpg
- File:Rossetti-7.jpg
- File:Rossetti-3.jpg
- File:Poets-corner.jpg
- File:Rossetti-8.jpg
- File:A-survey-hewlett.jpg
Reasons for deletion request --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:Rossetti and His Circle cover.gif: Typography is only protected for 25 years from publication. Delete the rest: the files should not be on Commons until 2027. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, this animation is a derivative work of Way Out West, a 1937 Laurel and Hardy film that, to my knowledge, is still under copyright. Psychonaut (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's a lot of assumptions. Quite hard to verify. This file was created way back in 2002 by Art Unbound. If I remember correctly it had also had to do with the weirdness of copyright. It says Dennis Hopper, but I recognize it as a painting by Edward Hopper. Took a bit of digging and found it in the Phillips Collection. Forget the dancing guys, this painting is still in copyright (made 1946, only the ones before 1926 are good to use). So I'm afraid we have to Delete this one. Good catch @Psychonaut: . Multichill (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
If it's Jung's work, I can't see any reason not to be under copyright Discasto talk 23:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Christiana Morgan
[edit]Why are not these pictures under copyright?
- File:Christiana Morgan (2758698152).jpg
- File:Christiana's Visions (2762628309).jpg
- File:Christiana's Visions (2763471388).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 23:17, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: These might be PD, but we need more information. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Lack of source information (where these pictures are displayed) makes it difficult to know whether FoP applies
- File:( C ) Leonora Carrington - La artista viaje de Incognito (The artist traveling incognito) (1949) (6952303090).jpg
- File:( C ) Leonora Carrington - La artista viaje de Incognito (The artist traveling incognito) (1949) - Detail (6952303224).jpg
- File:Leonora Carrington (9369107885).jpg
- File:Leonora Carrington, self-portrait (15806339639).jpg
- File:Detail from "La Huida" Remedios Varo 1961 (18813895620).jpg
- File:( V ) Remedios Varo - Ascensin Al Monte Anlogo (5579572452).jpg
- File:Varo Remedios (6857423303).jpg
_Leonora_Carrington_-_La_artista_viaje_de_Incognito_(The_artist_traveling_incognito)_(1949)_(6952303090).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Leonora_Carrington_-_La_artista_viaje_de_Incognito_(The_artist_traveling_incognito)_(1949)_-_Detail_(6952303224).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Remedios_Varo_-_Ascensin_Al_Monte_Anlogo_(5579572452).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Discasto talk 23:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Carrington -- She's English and there is no FOP for flat works there. On the other I hand, I kept the Varo works -- she lived in Mexico City and the works are said to be in the Museo de Arte Moderno there. Mexico has very broad FOP -- all works in any public place, including indoors. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Armand Langlois is born in 1947. Copyright violation. 83.204.177.144 19:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Le fichier File:Clussais la Pommeraie-La légende-Armand Langlois.jpg a été mis sur Wikipédia par moi-même Armand Langlois, auteur de la fresque et de la Photo. D'autres photos de cette fresque circulent sur le net et j'estimais préférable de diffuser cette œuvre par moi-même. Selon la page wikimédia communs : OTRS: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS, j'ai le droit en tant qu'auteur des œuvres de les proposer à la diffusion sur wikimédia en libres-droits.
- Comment OTRS received. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS confirmed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Armand Langlois is born in 1947. Copyright violation. 83.204.177.144 19:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Le fichier File:Clussais la Pommeraie-La légende-Armand Langlois.jpg a été mis sur Wikipédia par moi-même Armand Langlois, auteur de la fresque et de la Photo. D'autres photos de cette fresque circulent sur le net et j'estimais préférable de diffuser cette œuvre par moi-même. Selon la page wikimédia communs : OTRS: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS, j'ai le droit en tant qu'auteur des œuvres de les proposer à la diffusion sur wikimédia en libres de droits.
Kept: OTRS confirmed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Corporate logo uploaded for spam purposes BethNaught (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Цукенгшщ.png
Out of project scope, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal & unused photo. Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 11:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal & unused photo. Out of COM:SCOPE Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Although the photo is tagged with de minimis, the Dubai Mall is clearly the central focus of the photo, and it's a copyrighted work of architecture in a country without Freedom of Panorama. Themightyquill (talk) 11:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, the main subject is indeed the architecture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
There is no COM:FOP in the UAE. funplussmart (talk) 02:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Billingshurst with reason "CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)". Taivo (talk) 07:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, bigger version http://igbox.co/mariannanessi/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 86.81.11.20 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Reason:No consent from subject, photograph taken in private place. Also, uploader does not hold copyright. I do not want to delete speedily, when the nominator is anonymous. But this is small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Also file:Reed Business Adam - Dynamisch werken.jpg has the same problems. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be own work, both can be found in severals advertising for sport (e.g. http://www.worktrainer.nl/Deskbike.html). Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hopefully I am not missing anything here, but it seems fairly unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder of a logo like this one, and I am not seeing evidence of such. The logo also appears copyrightable and the website of the group says "All rights reserved". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Seems as if a non-free version of the same file was deleted from Wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 22#File:Peterborough Saxons Logo.png), and this one appears to me to be a non-free logo as pointed out by nominator. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal logos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
BFMTV copyvio Kimdime (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i0.wp.com/www.cpmbr.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/untitled.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
The copyright of this photograph is holded by other people. http://www.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ja/communication/innovation/nakamura/02.html 221.254.52.177 13:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --XXN, 13:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
No date given here or on the linked source; quite possibly this is a modern icon painting still under copyright. Psychonaut (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- I think that a stronger reason for deletion should exist beyond someone wondering ... It would be worthwhile someone looking to identify the artist and see if the signature block on the bottom right can be expanded for legibility. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Burden of proof, especially once reasonable suspicion is raised (it does look very modern), should be on those in favor of keeping the image. In any case, while this may be based on an earlier work, the "signature block" on the bottom right appears to read I. M. Evangelismos, Patmos, 1983 (αϠπΓ = 1983 according to Greek_numerals#Table). --Storkk (talk) 12:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WinTakeAll as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No value in keeping this never-used screen capture of a primitive home-made game for a historic computer. The uploader even admits this is *crap* submitted to the non-notable "Comp Sys Sinclair Crap Games Competition".. I am not totally sure, that the screenshot is out of scope. What do you think? Uploader is retired. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment As the original uploader, I can say that the image was used for a few years in the very first ever article I created on en Wikipedia, namely Comp.sys.sinclair Crap Games Competition. Understandably this article has since been redirected, hence this image is now no longer in use. I now agree the original article is more suited to a Sinclair-specific wiki rather than Wikipedia. As for the image itself, I now remain neutral on whether it is deleted or kept. It's quite a rare screnshot of characters generated by the Commodore VIC 20 ROM being displayed on the ZX Spectrum due to an embedded emulator. So I am pretty sure there are no similar images on Commons. Whether it will now realistically be used here or elsewhere however is certainly debatable. I notice four of the other images from that prior article have already been deleted (presumably speedy as I did not see any notifications - even though they are all freely licensed), so it doesn't really matter much either way now. Thanks anyway for the notification of the deletion discussion for this image. Rept0n1x (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In scope as an example of the ZX Spectrum computer's graphical output and style. Most programs for the computer are not licensed as free use so we are lucky to have what we do. This image has potential use for replacing commercial images in Wikipedia articles that want to show the graphical output without using a commercial image. Depending on the quality, I would also look at undoing the speedy deletes on: File:Benkid77 GoldenEgg.png, File:Benkid77 SpaceWhale.png, File:Smiler in Arrowe Land.png, File:Turbo Rubber Ducky Shootout.png. czar 16:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WinTakeAll as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No value in keeping this never-used screen capture of a primitive home-made retrocomputing game. The uploader even admits this is *crap* submitted to the non-notable "Comp Sys Sinclair Crap Games Competition".. I am not totally sure, that the image is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am the original uploader. Please see the comment I wrote at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Benkid77 CNPD.png as it is somewhat relevant to this image as well. Except that the uniqueness of this image is that it shows the only known software for the ZX Spectrum computer which deliberately exploits the hidden Z80 MEMPTR register. However this is not an argument in favour of keeping or deleting the image as I remain neutral on this point. Regardless of the outcome, thanks to Taivo for the deletion notification. Rept0n1x (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In scope as an example of the ZX Spectrum computer's graphical output and style. Most programs for the computer are not licensed as free use so we are lucky to have what we do. This image has potential use for replacing commercial images in Wikipedia articles that want to show the graphical output without using a commercial image. Depending on the quality, I would also look at undoing the speedy deletes on: File:Benkid77 GoldenEgg.png, File:Benkid77 SpaceWhale.png, File:Smiler in Arrowe Land.png, File:Turbo Rubber Ducky Shootout.png. czar 16:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: some reason for in scope. --Basvb (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have better appropriate SVGs or PNGs! Ras67 (talk) 13:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file -mattbuck (Talk) 13:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have a better appropriate PNG! Ras67 (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Urheberecht; Autor erst 1969 gestorben, nich wie angenommen vor 45 Ulrich Kaden (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have better appropriate SVGs or PNGs! Ras67 (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have better appropriate SVGs or PNGs! Ras67 (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have a better appropriate PNG! Ras67 (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have a better appropriate PNG! Ras67 (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:East Anglia railway electrification 1949.pdf
- File:East Anglia Railway Electrification- a diagrammatic history.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Megafmfrance (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TeleTrade Cyprus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:EN TT Corporate remake 2015.webm
- File:Best Trading Platform Southern Europe 2014.png
- File:Best Forex Customer Service Broker Southern Europe 2014.png
- File:Best Educational Trading Program 2014.png
- File:Best Forex Broker in Europe 2014.png
- File:Best Trading Education Provider Europe 2014.png
- File:Quality of Brokerage Services 2014.jpg
- File:Broker of the Year 2014.jpg
- File:Best Forex Broker Analytics 2014.jpg
- File:Best Forex Customer Service Broker Europe 2015 а.jpg
- File:Best CFD Broker Europe 2015 а.jpg
- File:Best Affiliate Program Europe 2015 а.jpg
- File:A new representative office in Warsaw, Poland.jpg
- File:TeleTrade Office in Warsaw, Poland.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Mass cross wiki transfers by uploader. Wrong licence, Uploader unlikely to be author as claimed. Even if PD for old photos, the original source is to be specified in licence. These should probably remain on '.fa' wiki. Unfitlouie (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Basvb (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:BrainMobi). MER-C 09:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
It's already on the Commons and I uploaded the duplicate. Digitaleffie (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I think it's useless anyway. AceDouble (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Clearly usable, in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly not. It is fictional. Note that it is the uploader that requests that it be deleted.--Zoupan (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: It is currently in use in a valid article. --Basvb (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Image lacks credible source Kj1595 (talk) 11:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: image consists of PD elements and can therefore be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 19:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naperovskom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.
- File:835-p 29 08 2014 Postanovlenie prpavitelstva.pdf
- File:Рекогносцировка.jpg
- File:Изменение проекта.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also some doubts on the own work claim. --Basvb (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No need for this lossy JPG. We have a better appropriate PNG! Ras67 (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Former town logo. Small version. Better evidence would be required for the uploader's claim that he is the creator and the owner of the copyright. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: pd-textlogo and in use. --Basvb (talk) 16:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:AVL(-08).png
- File:AVL(CN2).png
- File:AVL(CSB).png
- File:AVL(CN4).png
- File:AVL(CN3).png
- File:AVL(CN1).png
- File:AVL(30).png
- File:AVL(29).png
- File:AVL(28).png
- File:AVL(27).png
- File:AVL(26).png
- File:AVL(25).png
- File:AVL(24).png
- File:AVL(23).png
- File:AVL(22).png
- File:AVL(21).png
- File:AVL(20).png
- File:AVL(19).png
- File:AVL(18).png
- File:AVL(17).png
- File:AVL(16).png
- File:AVL(15).png
- File:AVL(14).png
- File:AVL(13).png
- File:AVL(12).png
- File:AVL(10).png
- File:AVL(11).png
- File:AVL(09).png
- File:AVL(08).png
- File:AVL(06).png
- File:AVL(05).png
- File:AVL(03).png
- File:AVL(02).png
- File:AVL(04).png
- File:AVL(01).png
- File:AVL(07).png
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand why these files should be deleted? --GilPe (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Most of these are redirects, which I have deleted. Their targets, and the rest of these, are in use,. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Luxembourg. In order to keep these, we will need a license from the architect.
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (1).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (3).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Bonnevoie (2).JPG
- File:Luxembourg, water tower Grund (4).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Luxembourg.
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (109).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (108).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (107).jpg
- File:Remerschen, The Princess of Schengen (106).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Luxembourg.
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (09 ADR).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (08 LSAP).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (07 Déi Gréng).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (05 Déi Lénk).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (04 KPL).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (02 Piraten).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (01 DP).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (10 CSV).jpg
- File:Election posters for European Parliament election in Luxembourg, 2019 (101).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Already been replaced by a same picture File:ÖDP_Hamburg.png. Stang 14:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and nominating the other one as out of scope as unofficial logo. --Basvb (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE --Stefan2 (talk) 10:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- now it is used on Chinese Wikipedia, the one on English Wikipedia hasn't been deleted yet. See no difference with other png text logo of American universities.--淺藍雪❉ 23:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FastilyClone (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- User:EugeneZelenko: Both are in use on English Wikipedia, but the requests to delete the local files have not yet been processed. Please check this before nominating files for deletion. File:Aegis Media logo.jpg is British, and Britain grants copyright protection for creating rather simple fonts, as seen at COM:SIG#United Kingdom and COM:TOO#United Kingdom, so that logo may be unfree in the source country. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Second one is in use, other is in scope (company has page on wiki). Proper attribution. There are thousands of logos needing deletion because they have issues with one of those criteria, but these are not amongst them. Basvb (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, incorrect attribution. --Basvb (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sreejithk2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:AAISP logo.png
- File:973wenj.jpg
- File:975WABD-FM.jpg
- File:9TV Philippines.png
- File:La Sicilia logo.png
- File:L1 logo.png
- File:Krxi 2008.png
- File:Kokomotribune.JPG
- File:Jmweston.png
- File:Itembase company logo.png
- File:IBI logo 2006.png
- File:HSJ logo.png
- File:Honda Formula One logo 1960s.jpg
- File:HM Inspectorate of Education in Scotland logo.png
- File:GoodSAM (app) logo.png
- File:Freshrfmfirstlogo.jpg
- File:Blueunderground.jpg
- File:CPU-Z icon.png
- File:Chicago College of Performing Arts logo.jpg
- File:CBBC 2002 logo.jpg
- File:CAT logo 2010.png
- File:Capitollogo1969.jpg
- File:CAANZ logo.jpg
- File:Broken Sword 2012on logo.png
- File:British Gynaecological Cancer Society (logo).png
- File:Bristol Bucs.png
- File:Bristol Bucs cap.png
- File:Bpmtv original logo.PNG
- File:Bramley Line Logo.png
- File:Brampton zum logo.png
- File:Bakersoven logo.png
- File:CAAFootball.png
- File:Boomtown reno logo.jpg
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment a lot of these are probably in use on English Wikipedia until the local file is deleted. For example, File:Bakersoven logo.png is in use now that its shadow is removed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Also, File:British Gynaecological Cancer Society (logo).png is not a trivial logo per COM:TOO#United Kingdom. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep any trivial logos and nominate separately if they aren't in use. Non-trivial logos should be deleted, obviously. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Unused argument is not correct since I have transferred only images that are used in English Wikipedia. Fr images that does not fall under TOO, we will need seperate deletion requests for each. For now, I recommend closing this DR until the English Wikipedia images are deleted. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete these two as copyvios: File:British Gynaecological Cancer Society (logo).png, File:CBBC 2002 logo.jpg. I'm open to any others. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am a little unsure about the copyright claim for File:British Gynaecological Cancer Society (logo).png. Apart from the text, all I see is File:Female symbol.svg and a picture of Crab (like File:Cancerb.jpg) inside it. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Britain protects everything from signatures to minor font variations. Definitely copyrighted in Britain. Also, the crab is probably copyrighted in many countries. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Several of these are from the United States and Canada, and are clearly in scope. Keep those, delete the British ones. Fry1989 eh? 01:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I've the deleted the two pointed out British ones as too complex, per the discussion. If there are any more of those please nominate seperatly. I've kept everything else because the files being in use makes them in scope (and if they are not in use they can also be in scope). --Basvb (talk) 16:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
porque el autor verdadero pidio que la foto deveria ser eliminada Frank Sanchez(El Franky Style) (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
-2016-03-19T14:56:00.000Z-File:El_Franky_Style.png){kind=link}
porque el autor verdadero pidio que la foto deveria ser eliminada Frank Sanchez(El Franky Style) (talk) 14:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Basvb (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Basvb (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 122.90.85.5 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free use because it's a logo of a company. Didym (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Improper attribution, although pd-textlogo it is unused and I think we have other versions, otherwise reuploading with proper attribution is easy,. --Basvb (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pericle Fazzini
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Italy. The sculptor, Pericle Fazzini, died in 1987, so we cannot keep these without a license from his heirs.
- File:Ancona - Resistenza 1.jpeg
- File:Ancona - Resistenza 2.jpeg
- File:Aurelio - S. Gregorio VII 8.JPG
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted two per UDR because the artwork is {{PD-ItalyGov}} and {{PD-1996}}. Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
ZBBV iu cs shha b ay ujuauia bav v a YYIABGAABMBV HBREUYEBAB 74.254.73.226 16:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The motivation looks gibberish, and I see no reason to delete. --Basvb (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: it was in use, but that use seems to be unrelated (in a dictionary article on a random word). --Basvb (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Both versions are likely historical images, not own work of 2010s. Low res, no metadata. Sealle (talk) 16:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Although a bit on the border, too much doubt to keep. --Basvb (talk) 18:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
and File:MakingIt cover 2cm RGB.jpg
copyright cover Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
This doesn't appear to be self-created Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:38, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a copyvio of https://co.fotolia.com/id/85614696?by=serie Ancalagon (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Excuse me. This photograph was sent to me by email by a chef of Cevennes as its own and can be reproduced on Commons --Marianne Casamance (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Marianne Casamance: you should ask this chef to release it under CC-BY-SA and send his agreement to OTRS. — Racconish ☎ 06:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- The chef probably used a stock photo for his menus or whatever and took a photo of it. He can't license it, only the original author can. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Crop of stock photo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted according to source. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:21, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Smaller duplicate of File:Mount magazine 01.png. Nomination is for housekeeping only. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The file is in use and looks a tight bit brighter (could be wrong on that one), the cropping also seems slightly different,. --Basvb (talk) 18:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No source of base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: looks like google maps. --Basvb (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused, lower quality crop and mangled x/y dimensional duplicate of File:Ouachita Trail sign.jpg. Nomination is housekeeping only. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: lower quality. --Basvb (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these images was created by uploader. There are diagrams and images of military material. Likely COM:COPYVIOs due to variable sizes, and lack of camera metadata - as well as the single subject focus of all the uploads.
- File:Infantry-t14.jpg
- File:CRPA-GPS.png
- File:Tower4-T14.png
- File:Al-sel-ball.jpg
- File:Kurg-KAZ.png
- File:LTCC Bluetooth из смартфона.png
- File:Tower3-T14.jpg
- File:Tower2-T-14.jpg
- File:Tower-T14.jpg
- File:Линза из кристаллического Германия на ИК-камере Армата Т-14.jpg
- File:Инфракрасная линза из кристаллического Германия.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
All military pictures created from Vitaly V. Kuzmin original photos under Creative Commons license
"Except where otherwise noted, all photos and videos by Vitaly V. Kuzmin are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." http://www.vitalykuzmin.net/
I get this pictures from T-14 and Armata articles (Vitaly V. Kuzmin uploaded photos himself)
Another pictures my own work or reloaded from Ukrainian Wiki under "No Copyright" declaration of the Author. Additional info on my personal page.
If you have additional questions ask me without any problem.
Thanks. --EPC2016 (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
DeleteEPC2016, you admit that you took these images from http://www.vitalykuzmin.net/, which has a CC-BY license. That makes them all copyright violations because you did not give him credit. In order to keep these you must change them all from "own work" to "Author = Vitaly Kuzmin" and "Source=http://www.vitalykuzmin.net/". You must then get an Admin or License Reviewer to verify the license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Just moment, please! I will place credits to authors on photos under CC-BY. --EPC2016 (talk) 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- PROBLEM WITH CREDITS FIXED. All pictures reloaded with credits to V.Kuzmin name and site. Summary changed to "|source=original photo from vitalykuzmin.net under CC-BY license |author=EPC2016 (schema and crop)". Photos from Ukrainian Wikimedia reloaded with credits too and summary fixed to the Ukrainian author. I think problem resolved. If need I can link modified photos to original V.Kuzmin photos in Wikimedia but I don't know. If it is critical explain by how to link modified photos to original photos in Wikimedia. --EPC2016 (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Ok I've looked into it. Are the following 3 files completely your own work?
- File:LTCC Bluetooth из смартфона.png
- File:Инфракрасная линза из кристаллического Германия.jpg
- File:CRPA-GPS.png
Or did somebody else take these images, if this is the case, what is the source?
For the Vitaly Kuzmin files, you added the credits into the file itself, this is not necessary, I removed those. And in the author field I also added V. Kuzmin next to your name.
For the File:Al-sel-ball.jpg file, normally we move the original to commons, now we have two versions of 1 image, one on Ukrainian wiki and one on Commons.
Kept: The main issues have been resolved, the uploader was very helpful once he realised what was wrong. If there are further issues with these image please discuss with the uploader and if no resolution is found renominate. --Basvb (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Image in use on web prior to this upload, requires COM:OTRS, see here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that this small size headshot of a man is user's own work; more likely COM:COPYVIO like the other uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also given other uploads from user. --Basvb (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Potential copyvio of "agar.io" Liance (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a user avatar, out of project scope, not in use anywhere, potential copyvio due to assets of copyrighted works used. Liance (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyvio of the work "agar.io". Liance (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Esta foto es tomada de un streaming ilegal, no deberia de estar bajo los derechos de creative commons ya que la foto ha sido tomada a un streaming y el autor no tendria los derechos desde RCS Sport para transmitirla en Wikipedia Douglasfugazi (talk) 20:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: tv screenshot. --Basvb (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation Poor gedaliah (talk) 20:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Not in the US, too simple. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Maybe time to use it on Riteway_Bus_Service?. --Basvb (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Den är tagen från Socialdemokraternas hemsida och verkar inte vara CC-märkt. Uppladdades där 2015. http://socialdemokraternamalmo.se/carina-nilssons-anforande-i-budgetdebatten/
På denna sida sägs t.ex. att bilden är copyrightad av Socialdemokraterna i Malmö: http://whotalking.com/flickr/Carina+Nilsson Matanb (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Basvb (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Argentina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Russian Air Force roundel 2010-2013.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:49, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Author: Fritz von Rieger (1903–1987). See source 2003:4D:2C35:70C3:B09B:199E:7EE:E308 21:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Antonia Werr died 1868. So, it seemed to be an old painting. Due to a hint from another user it turned out that the painting has been created much later by Fritz von Rieger (1903-1987). Sorry, I didn't check thoroughly the copyright. --Ulwald (talk) 09:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, difficult to notice that one, good catch from the anonymous contributer. --Basvb (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Comm-sys-MSL v0.1 luxembourgish2.svg seems to be an improved version of that (typo corrected) and I think that one version is enough. Torsch (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Hidakagawa Wakayama chapter black version.png
- File:Hidakagawa Wakayama chapter green version.png
- File:Hidakagawa Wakayama chapter bule version.png
- File:Takamizu Yamaguchi chapter.png
- File:Kawahigashi Niigata chapter.png
- File:Tonda Yamaguchi chapter.png
- File:Symbol of Jushiyama, Aichi.png
- File:Flag of Jushiyama, Aichi.png
- File:Flag of Kawanishi, Niigata.png
- File:Takamori Yamaguchi chapter.png
- File:Former Yanaguchi Yamaguchi chapter.png
- File:Flag of Yamanashi Shizuoka.png
- File:Naka Gifu chapter.png
- File:Symbol of Kurotaki Nara.png
- File:Flag of Tsuma Shimane ohter version.png
- File:Flag of Yamabe Hokkaido.png
- File:Toyohira Fukushima chapter.png
- File:Flag of Higashi, Fukushima.png
- File:Symbol of Higashi Fukushima.png
- File:Nayoro Hokkaido chapter black version.png
- File:Symbol of Shinwa Kumamoto.png
- File:Kawanishi Nagano chapter.png
- File:Matsuo Nagano chapter.png
- File:Nagareyama Chiba chapter.png
- File:Flag of Kujukuri, Chiba.png
- File:Flag of Iioka, Chiba.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- 初めましてMtiです。申し訳ございませんが、私はsvg化にする技術を持っていませんのでご了承願えますか?--Mti (talk) 00:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://forums.airbase.ru/2004/02/t24667--kh-22-k-10s-ksr-5-protiv-ekzoset.html but it doesn't seem likely that a Russian site is the original source of a photo of an American airplane part. I found it http://defencyclopedia.com/2015/04/18/f-22-raptor-the-story-of-the-worlds-deadliest-fighter/ there instead, and now convert the speedy tag to Deletion Nomination for discussion and closure. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- The second link also doesn't look like the original source. I think it is likely that this could be a US government photo (and thus PD). It is widely used so some searching to find the proper source would be very nice in this case. If this source is not found I think this file should be deleted. Basvb (talk) 16:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep till we find a source before 2007. BTW, the 2nd link's image is an embed from https://i2.wp.com/doctrine.vavyskov.cz/_casopis/2011_1/obr_4a_4.png. Unfitlouie (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Ok, keeping it for now, although more source info (going either way) for certainty is welcome. --Basvb (talk) 17:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Alhafedh2.jpg
Per license, evidence of publishing before 1999 is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is clear that the two images are old and there is no problem in their presence --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- No, there is a problem. License PD-Iraq has 7 criteria. The file is free, if it matches any of these. Four first criterias and the last demand publishing data, the fifth demands author death year and the sixth is for official documents. I think, that the files violate author's copyright, because no one of the seven criteria is fulfilled. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I sincerely doubt that "learn-english.cc" is the author of one of these images. Green Giant (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
See COM:FOP#Ireland or COM:FOP#United_Kingdom. Murals are not covered. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Perinaldo - Libre interpretation d'une peinture d'Henri Testelin où Colbert présente à Louis XIV les membres de l'académie des Sciences.jpg
[edit]
Il quadro dipinto sul muro non è una copia, ma una libera interpretazione, dove sono stati introdotti simboli massonici ed esoterici, non presenti sull'originale 95.237.193.31 17:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This image includes details that are not present on the other file, such as the text at the bottom. You can change the description and request a {{Rename}} but as it stands the file is not eligible for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 08:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded in 2005, it is a copy from Flickr uploaded in 2003 with "all rights reserved." https://www.flickr.com/photos/anwar_hossain/4729387734/in/album-72157624344485602/, The event was in 1924 so not an obvious PD-US case. The artist could be Nandlal Bose who died in 1966 (so India life + 60) (c) till 2026. Unfitlouie (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- It has a China PD tag, is the file from India or China? Also what makes you think the artist could be "Nandlal Bose"? The flickr source is not that interesting (as the uploader there is not the author). Only the question whether this is PD or not is of concern here, and I like some more facts on that. Basvb (talk) 18:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- There are many scholarly online sources which confirm that the major Indian artist, Nandalal Bose accompanied Tagore to China in 1924 eg. Unfitlouie (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: picture was taken in China - license seems correct - file was uploaded to Flickr in 2010, not 2003, so probably copied from here. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
After reading this Op-ed in the Signpost I have had a change of heart, or at the very least am uncertain enough, on the matter of the monkey-selfie issue to request that the photograph I took of me brandishing the image in question is objectionable enough for me to request it be deleted. Therefore as the author of this image I request that it be deleted from commons. -Discott (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This is currently in use outside Commons, so per COM:INUSE, we may need permission from metawiki in order to delete this. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2, as the author or co-author of this image's use on Meta I am happy to remove it so it does not conflict with COM:INUSE.--Discott (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep Once licensed under a CC-BY-SA it can't be withdrawn simply because you've changed your mind. This will open the floodgates, set a terrible precedent and undermine the Creative Commons licence regime as we know it. AFAIK the original monkey selfies on Commons has survived 2 community DRs, so your personal objections must be subordinated to the community consensus. Sorry ! Unfitlouie (talk) 12:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The entire category has also survived a controversial deletion request which ended in 'Keep' with the proviso One should consider to gain consensus to remove the images from the respective pages and renominate for scope afterwards. Unfitlouie (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
'STRONG Delete. After studying this case, I observe Discott's license consent was obtained by fraud for this image committed on him and other members of Commons carried out 2 UK based users - Commons Admin ODDER and Andrea Faulds just 1 or 2 days before WIKIMEDIA 2014. The archive logs for original File:Macaca nigra self-portrait.jpg were deceitfully tampered on 7 Aug 2014 and 8 Aug 2014 to remove the INVISIBLE DIGITAL WATERMARK (watermark) stating the UK photographer David Slater's copyright notice. Their illegal collusive action was in flagrant contravention of WMF's legal opinion contained at COM:WATERMARK.
"Opinion from the Wikimedia Foundation legal staff indicates the removal of watermarks may place the remover at legal risk given the provisions of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act regarding "copyright management information" (such as the title, author's name, copyright notice, etc.). The DMCA makes it illegal to "intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information [...] having reasonable grounds to know, that it will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of any right under this title", without permission from the copyright holder. Commons is subject to the DMCA because it is hosted in the United States. It is unclear whether these provisions of the DMCA apply only to the information itself, or the information and how it is presented. This conflicts with Creative Commons licenses where they specify the display of attribution can be "implemented in any reasonable manner". However, there are competing elements of these licenses that could be construed as to restrict the removal of copyright notices. According to WMF, due to this lack of clarity, individual editors who are considering removing watermarks "should seriously consider the legal issues involved and consider consulting an attorney before doing so".
- In 2014, a 3rd-level court in Germany ruled that the removal of a watermark, which contained copyright information, violated the provision "You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work" of the CC license (in this case CC BY-NC-2.0)[3].
If a specific user after coming to know the true facts expressed by a ARBCOM member and advocate does not wish to be a continuing participant in this copyright deceit whereby they were collectively induced to photograph themselves with a copyright stripped monkey selfie printout mischievously provided to them by WIKIMANIA 2014 organizers, then the image should be deleted under copyright law and moral rights. The monkey selfies should also be deleted. 61.157.122.25 09:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC) B
- User:61.157.122.25, as far as I can tell, no copyright holder to the monkey picture has affixed a copyright notice to it. You noted that David Slater has affixed a copyright notice to some copies of the picture, but he does not seem to be the copyright holder to the picture as he is not the photographer. Therefore, your statements are irrelevant here. Which German court ruling are you talking about? It would have been useful to have a link to it. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The anon User:61.157.122.25 has copy-pasted from COM:WATERMARK,and the German court ruling is at [2]. The defendant Radio Germany (a public service broadcaster) was ordered to pay heavy damages to a photographer for disagreeing with photographer's notified copyright and publishing a photo by removing the photographer's applied authorship notice and licence. WMF legal has also strongly discouraged editors from removing watermarks containing copyright notice from uploaded works [3] indicating that the individual editors would be liable for their action. Unfitlouie (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Did the original image file of David Slat linked by anon User:61.157.122.25 uploaded on 7 August 2014 from NBC News contain EXIF (digital watermark) asserting copyright of David Slater ? Because 17 U.S.C. § 1202(b). Section 1202(b) of the DMCA states [n]o person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law [...] intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information [...] having reasonable grounds to know, that it will induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal an infringement of any right under this title. It is improbable that the 1.38 MB file of 7 August can be compressed to 1/3rd size on 8 August 2014 only by removing EXIF meta data. Unfitlouie (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
I've located the working link to the NBC News image [4] uploaded by User:Ajfweb on 7 August 2014. It contains an EXIF with copyright notice of "Caters News Agency Ltd" and stating that the "Artist" is David Slater. The image date in this notice is "September 25, 2008 1:58:56PM (timezone is GMT)" On 2011:07:04 it was digitally altered with Adobe and a new EXIF "Creator:David J Slater | Rights" Caters News Agency Ltd | Rights:David J Slater" was inserted. On 2013:11:01 it was again modified (presumably by NBC News for their story) with the Artist / Creator credited as "David Slater" and a copyright notice "Copyright Notice David J Slater". The removal of the November 2013 EXIF copyright notice and the wrong dates for this image (it actually dates from 25 Sept 2008) is very awkward. Unfitlouie (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
![[4]](http://web.archive.org/web/20140810045846im_/http://media4.s-nbcnews.com/i/streams/2013/November/131102/8C9562987-131101-monkey-vlg-5p.jpg){kind=link}
- Moral rights (such as 17 U.S.C. § 1202) only cover information about the author or rights holder, so if Slater isn't the author and doesn't hold any copyright to the image in the first place, then there is no need to attribute him for anything. There is a document from the copyright office suggesting that photos taken by monkeys aren't copyrighted in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Although I have voted for a "keep", I am disturbed that any person entrusted with bits by the Community would endanger the Commons project by ignoring Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC, McClatchey v. The Associated Press, etc. rulings by US courts on this issue. The issue for this deletion by its undisputed author Discott is clearly only for the reason that he subsequently is not convinced by the public domain status of the monkey selfie and now wants his derivative deleted. In these circumstances, the deletion of this image would cast very substantial doubt on the copyright status of the original monkey selfies and the legitimacy of CC licenses. The wording of 17 U.S.C. § 1202) is explicit that CMI can only be removed or altered by authority of the copyright owner or the law. So even assuming hypothetically that David Slater is not the copyright holder, Odder removed those embedded digital copyright notices without the authority of the law (which means following due legal process). The suggestion of the monkey being the copyright holder is ludicrous (ie. a strawman argument) and nobody has suggested it here. Unfitlouie (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hm. On the one hand, the law says that No person shall knowingly and with the intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal infringement— [...] (2) distribute or import for distribution copyright management information that is false. so if Slater isn't the copyright holder, then the law seems to state that it is a copyright violation to retain the copyright notice. On the other hand, the law also says that No person shall, without the authority of the copyright owner or the law— (1) intentionally remove or alter any copyright management information, so if Slater is the copyright holder, then it seems that it is a copyright violation to remove the copyright notice. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Although I have voted for a "keep", I am disturbed that any person entrusted with bits by the Community would endanger the Commons project by ignoring Murphy v. Millennium Radio Group LLC, McClatchey v. The Associated Press, etc. rulings by US courts on this issue. The issue for this deletion by its undisputed author Discott is clearly only for the reason that he subsequently is not convinced by the public domain status of the monkey selfie and now wants his derivative deleted. In these circumstances, the deletion of this image would cast very substantial doubt on the copyright status of the original monkey selfies and the legitimacy of CC licenses. The wording of 17 U.S.C. § 1202) is explicit that CMI can only be removed or altered by authority of the copyright owner or the law. So even assuming hypothetically that David Slater is not the copyright holder, Odder removed those embedded digital copyright notices without the authority of the law (which means following due legal process). The suggestion of the monkey being the copyright holder is ludicrous (ie. a strawman argument) and nobody has suggested it here. Unfitlouie (talk) 09:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment On a personal level I have requested that this photograph be removed due to my own change of heart with regards to this particular photograph. Which is a pity as I think it is a good picture of me. However, on a boarder level, I do not intend for this request to be in any way a commentary or advocacy for the deletion of other such images (with the Monkey Selfie) on Commons. My views on the Monkey Selfie issue more generally on Commons is more complex/uncertain and it seems to me that a better place to have broader conversations about the legality of all such images would likely be on a discussion page on that particular issue such as the one we had in January. At the time I recall voting to 'keep' the images. This is just a personal request, whether it is granted or denied I am okay with either.--Discott (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Discott: Thanks for articulating your position. However, your Deletion Request specifically revolved on your change of heart after reading New York Brad's OpEd in the Signpost concerning the legality /legitimacy of hosting the monkey selfies on Commons. So whereas I am in favor of a keep based on the assumption that the license for the monkey image you used was valid, I am equally concerned by the allegation from anon User:61.157.122.25 of deliberate stripping of Copyright Management Information by Odder on 8 August 2014 to facilitate mass copyright infringement at WIKIMANIA 2014 the next day by innocent persons like yourself and their consequent liabilities. Nothing has changed which requires the Jan 2016 community DR decision to be revisited. Since Commons media can be used by anyone anywhere, your upload also creates issues for any reuse outside of Wikimedia's projects. As User:Stefan2 had mentioned earlier the issue of the copyrights, if any, of photographer David Slater are central to the issue here, and since your upload was attributed as being derived from a work personally cropped and rotated by Slater whose copyrights you denied then but now have had a change of heart about. Unfitlouie (talk) 06:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - strictly as a courtesy, and because the image is not in use. Everything Unfitlouie says is perfectly correct, and if we needed this image to illustrate some real or even likely articles we'd apologize politely and keep it. I argued for keeping a whole bunch of such monkeyselfie wikimania photos very recently, in direct opposition to Newyorkbrad, despite the great respect I hold for him, and would again. But in this case, it's not likely we'll need this particular one, since we have similar ones, and in this particular one the contributor and subject changed his mind. We can be courteous to a contributor with minimal cost, and the only principle we'll be establishing is that we will try to be nice to people in such cases. --GRuban (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As this image and discussion has been reported to WIKIMEDIA LEGAL TEAM and attorney for David Slater, IMO its deletion is subject to Wikimedia Office directions. See this link. Simi chamo (talk) 09:53, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
DELETE (Delete all images of money selfie) Is it not clear why for the legal department of Wikipedia ARBCOM is running so scared after California final judgement in David Slater matter they want these monkey selfie files remove at all cost. Here is what hon'ble California judge rules and agree with David Slater's arguments $$ Monkey is not human and cannot create copyrightable work $$ Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra, 114 F.3d 955, 958 (9th Cir. 1997) (“For copyright purposes, however, a work is copyrightable if copyrightability is claimed by the first human beings who compiled, selected, coordinated, and arranged [the work].”) (emphasis added); Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 737 (1989) (“As a general rule, the author is the party who actually creates the work, that is the person who translates an idea in a fixed, tangible expression entitled to copyright protection.”) (emphasis added). $$ By this reasoned judgement only David Slater is copyright holder. Advocate Raghav Kumar Kaushik.
COMMENT: Slater has won a motion in a California USA court (same jurisdiction as WMF) which was a direct challenge to his copyright and authorship of these works - "The Next Friends allege that Slater has repeatedly infringed on Naruto’s copyright on the Monkey Selfies by “falsely claiming to be the photographs’ authors and by selling copies of the images” for profit. Id. ¶35. They claim that defendants have violated sections 106 and 501 of the Copyright Act of 1976, by displaying, advertising, reproducing, distributing, offering for sale, and selling copies of the Monkey Selfies. Id. ¶¶ 43, 44. They allege that Naruto is entitled to defendants’ profits from the infringement and seek to permanently enjoin defendants from copying, licensing, or “otherwise exploiting” the Monkey Selfies and to permit Next Friends to “administer and protect” Naruto’s authorship of and copyright in the Monkey Selfies.". Slater has won his copyright battle. Now Wikimedia Foundation must appeal this to keep their images. Advocate Raghav Kumar Kaushik.
- Heh. Naruto is the monkey (and even that debatable, some say PETA or whoever confused which monkey was involved). Slater won to the extent that the court confirmed the monkey doesn't own the copyright. Slater didn't convince the court that he does. --GRuban (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Please read the preceding discussion and the final judgment cited by Adv.Kaushik. I cannot locate that PETA has appealed this order in time, so it may be deemed as final. You are under the mistaken notion that Slater was required to convince the court that he is the copyright holder. It is settled law that anybody disputing an author's claim is required to challenge it. Furthermore, under the Berne Convention formal registration is not required to enforce copyright.
- Nonetheless, this judgment does the following things to firmly buttress Slater's claim to a copyrightable authorship (on the lines of ... (a) That David J. Slater is the human person who superintended and exercised creative control over the this work by setting up its creation, or (b) That in the alternative Slater is the first human being who compiled, selected, coordinated, and arranged the work ...).
- Records that a copyright infringement claim was filed against David Slater alleging he was "falsely"" claiming to be the copyright holder and was deriving profits from it.
- Records that David Slater contested the claim by citing the US Copyright Act 1976 and the claim was dismissed.
- Finds as follows :-
- (i) That a copyrightable "original works of authorship" must be fixed in a tangible form "by or under the authority of the author",
- (ii) That the Copyright Act, and settled law of the US Supreme Court does not envisage an animal from being the author of such works, and The Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit have repeatedly referred to “persons” or “human beings” when analyzing authorship under the Act.
- (iii) That the Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit while analyzing authorship under the Act envisage “An author superintends the work by exercising control. This will likely be a person who has actually formed the picture by putting the persons in position, and arranging the place where the people are to be.” ( See, e.g., Aalmuhammed v. Lee, 202 F.3d 1227, 1234 (9th Cir. 2000)
- (iv) That for copyright purposes a work is copyrightable if copyrightability is claimed by the first human beings who compiled, selected, coordinated, and arranged [the work].”) ; Urantia Foundation v. Maaherra, 114 F.3d 955, 958 (9th Cir. 1997)
- Considering all these things, in the State of California (USA), David J. Slater is presently the author for these works, and his copyright EXIF assertion /notice should be restored immediately. I concur that this image should not be removed except by WMF Office. Any community removal may be deemed as a sign of weakness for the WMF's Public Domain stand mentioned in the WMF's annual report. Unfitlouie (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monkey selfie at Wikimania 2014, in which this same file was kept 29 January 2016. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stefan2 as no permission. Uploader seems to need more than 7 days time - see here. JuTa 21:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- That's why I changed {{No permission since|month=March|day=19|year=2016}} into {{No permission since|month=May|day=19|year=2016}}. This would have provided a slight extension of the 7-day period. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
The file was uploaded to enWP in 2008, based on a verbal permission. I will try to get confirmation of the permission by emailing the organisation (see discussion on my Talk page for details). I stopped volunteering there in 2012, but I suppose they remember me. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Charles Matthews: . Any updates? Basvb (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it is going quite well. All the formalities are completed, I believe, so I need only get them to send a mail confirming that. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I can't find anything in OTRS. File can be restored if a valid permission arrives. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
