Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 1st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peloduro Portada No.99.png

[edit]

This was not yet out of copyright in Uruguay on 1 January 1996, so it became copyrighted retroactively in the US (URAA). De728631 (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That said, any other cover images of Peludoro published after 1945 are also affected and should be deleted from Commons. De728631 (talk) 22:02, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. According to this: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion. Deleted files can be restored after a discussion in COM:UDR. Potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}".--Zeroth (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Zeroth, files affected by URAA should be tagged consequently but not deleted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 22:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK this applies to existing files only, but according to {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}, "images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons. New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted. ... This template should NOT be applied to files uploaded after 1 March 2012." So maybe it's time to change the template? De728631 (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. the resolution passed in 2014 just states that "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion, (...) potentially URAA-affected files should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}". Perhaps it's time to modify the template, I do not know. It's much older than this new resolution. Anyway it seems to me that a resolution voted by the community has more weight than the text of a template. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep several reasons:
  1. URAA itself isn´t reason for delete nothing
  2. Historical newspapper of Uruguay hosted here, creative commons website sponsored by official organizations of that country, so the template {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is enough to solve the problem IMHO Ezarateesteban 23:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the consensus at this page is clear. On the other hand this was entirely about restoring previously deleted files. Commons:URAA-restored copyrights says also that "a mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted". But there is no mere allegation that these cover images are subject to URAA but plain mathematics tell us that 1948 + 50 years = 1998 > 1996. The artwork is original enough for copyright too. Ezarate, please remember that all files at Commons must also be out of copyright or freely licensed in the United States too, so being in the public domain in Uruguay is not sufficient. De728631 (talk) 23:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. According to previous resolutions, URAA itself should not be used as the sole reason for image deletion. What is more, these images are in the public domain in their country of origin (Uruguay) and they are hosted in websites supported by the Government. According to previous resolutions, this kind of content may only be removed after receiving a takedown notice for violation of the DMCA. Please keep in mind that there are thousands of images in Commons from Uruguay and other countries in this situation, and the community has already reached a consensus that it would be disastrous to delete them. So please stop starting deletion requests for this kind of contents.--Pepe piton (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, the Wikimedia Foundation itself, regarding the URAA affected content states (february 2014):

Indeed, to date, we have not received a single takedown notice under the URAA. A valid notice would provide us with the facts necessary to make a determination under the URAA. It requires information that may not be available to a Commons volunteer trying to make a decision without a takedown notice. So WMF does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. If we receive a valid takedown notice or get actual knowledge of infringement, we will do a full legal analysis of the work based on all the relevant information that is presented in that notice and vigorously resist any invalid notices.

So, i think we shouldn't try to be "more Catholic than the Pope", and keep this image as we already did with the thousands others in the same situation.--Zeroth (talk) 20:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You all seem to miss that the big URAA discussion was about the massive restoration of files that had previously been deleted on Commons. It was not about giving anyone a free ticket to upload new content that is affected by URAA. Moreover, a motion to relax the precautionary principle and upload more locally PD images regardless of their URAA status has been rejected by the community. And, for the record, the file(s) we are debating here were uploaded just 2 days ago. De728631 (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. I agree with the point of view that the resolution was not deleting images that are in the public domain in their country of origin. Peloduro is in the public domain in Uruguay and, moreover, there is no any Peloduro copyright holder in the United States. On one side is the actual public interest to access these public domain images. On the other side is a non-existent copyright holder that, even if he/she existed, Wikimedia Foundation is legally protected by the Notice and Takedown mechanism. Not deleting PD images is particularly relevant for countries of the Global South like Uruguay, which in many cases depend on Commons to host their digital heritage. Copyright fundamentalism is especially damaging to Global South heritage. A community project like Commons, based on the public interest, should take this into account.--Señoritaleona (talk) 23:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Peloduro features a significant part of Uruguayan's history that remained unknown to new generations until this year that Julio E. Suárez is in PD in Uruguay. It's not comprhensible that Commons give priority to an inexistent copyright holder over the heritage for the new generation. We're trying to give them a revision of our political and humoristic history not to damage any person or Institution. So please, let's be flexible with the application of URAA in Commons to certain images in order to privilege public access to culture.--Miacara76 (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have sufficient information to determine if this file is affected by URAA, so there isn't sufficient doubt and shouldn't be deleted for that reason. Yann (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peloduro Portada No.99.png

[edit]

The previous DR completely ignored the question of if this file is actually under copyright in the US, and thus a violation of the licensing policy. It was also closed before the required time had elapsed, by an admin who was part of wheel warring about the second URAA DR. Discussion about the actual copyright status of the file, and it's compliance with the licensing policy, is needed. Revent (talk) 00:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep --There is a clear consensus that images should not be removed from Commons only because of URAA. Mechanical application of URAA puts in risk digital heritage from many countries, and moreover, infringes users rights, while the material itself doesn't represent a real threat for Commons. No rights are violated in USA. There is not any Peloduro right holder or licensee in USA. Peloduro was never published in the United States. It is in public domain in its country or origin, and nobody will ever claim rights for it. So, please, apply common sense, like is usual on our community, rather than a tight and biased interpretation of the USA law.--Señoritaleona (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the copyright was restored by URAA - has anyone contested ~that it was - then we can only keep this if there is a free license attached. As noted on COM:PCP and COM:L we can't and won't host files that are non-free in the US. That said, http://autores.uy/ the source site indicated is freely licensed (CC-BY-SA 4.0); does this license apply to the file itself too? This was not analyzed at depth in the first DR, I am kind of uncertain/sceptical myself, the site may be just hosting other people's work but I don't have time for a careful analysis myself.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing comment. Right now, this file appears to be the subject of discussion in two different places: COM:AN and here. Splitting discussions is a really bad idea; let's talk about it in one place. Please don't un-close this discussion or start a third DR until the other discussions are done, but once that happens, feel free to do either one. And please don't interpret my words as taking anyone's side in this situation; I just want to ensure that we don't have two parallel discussions. Nyttend (talk) 07:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peloduro Portada No.99.png

[edit]

Now that the discussion at AN is closed, reopening this with the analysis I stated there. I do not see how this file can possibly be PD in the United States.... if unaffected by the URAA, it's simply 'copyrighted'. Reventtalk 13:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(reposted from AN) WMF legal indicated that we should look at the guidelines given at Commons:Deletion_requests/All_files_copyrighted_in_the_US_under_the_URAA#Legal_team.27s_statement, and the actual statute, when assessing if a file is affected by the URAA. This is an attempt to actually do so. Comments, and debate of the specific points, are welcome, but please take arguments about the URAA itself, or Commons policies, to the above subsection.

  • Points of fact: The work was published in Uruguay on 7 July 1948. The author was Julio Emilio Suárez, a citizen of Uruguay, who died in 1965. Uruguay, and the US, were at that point in time both signatories to the "Buenos Aires Convention", which provided for mutual recognition of copyrights "where the work carries a notice containing a statement of reservation of rights" (this treaty was the source of the phrase 'all rights reserved'). There was at no point in time, prior to of after this date, a 'bilateral copyright treaty' between the two nations.
1. Where is the source country of the work?
  • Per the BAC - The nation of first publication, or in cases of simultaneous publication that which gives the shorter term.
  • Per the URAA - The 'eligible country' in which the work was first published. (Uruguay seems to clearly be an 'eligible country', as it joined the Berne Convention in 1967)
There is no indication, or argument, that the work was ever published outside of Uruguay, so it clearly appears to be the source nation.
2. When was the work originally created?
  • June 1948, or shortly before.
3. Did the work have copyright protection in its source country on the date of restoration?
  • Yes, clearly. The author died in 1965, and the copyright term in Uruguay is 50 years pma. The work did not enter the public domain in Uruguay until 2016, and Uruguay was a member of the Berne Convention long prior to 1 January 1996.
4. Why did the work enter the public domain in the U.S.?
  • There are three potential reasons that would make the work eligible for restoration, and two (lack of subject matter protection, and national ineligibility) clearly do not apply. The remaining one is 'failure to comply with formalities in the U.S.'
This has not, at this point, been demonstrated. We do not know if the work contained a copyright notice, if it was registered, or if it was renewed. Without actually establishing those points, the status remains ambiguous. To establish this would need a check of the Catalog of Copyright Entries. It is unproven that the work ever entered the PD in the US.
The work, if originally published 'in compliance with the formalities', and then not renewed, had a US copyright that expired on 1 January 1977, at which point renewal was not automatic. Entering the PD due to non-renewal would cause the work to have a restored copyright.

However: If point 4 fails, and the work did not enter the PD in the US prior to 1 January 1996, then it has a US copyright, as a 1948 work, that lasts until 1 January 2044. There seems to be no way that this work is PD in the US. Revent (talk)

 Keep I thought this discussion was over. The status of the image has been heavily discussed and the consensus is to keep the image, for the reasons detailed above. I think it is not good practice reopening closed discussions without new evidence, and moving the discussions from one place to another endlessly. For the record, I copy and paste my analysis at the discussion at AN:

"Wikimedia Foundation states in February 2014:

'Indeed, to date, we have not received a single takedown notice under the URAA. A valid notice would provide us with the facts necessary to make a determination under the URAA. It requires information that may not be available to a Commons volunteer trying to make a decision without a takedown notice. So WMF does not see a reason to delete content simply because of general concern about the URAA. If we receive a valid takedown notice or get actual knowledge of infringement, we will do a full legal analysis of the work based on all the relevant information that is presented in that notice and vigorously resist any invalid notices.'

I think it is pretty obvious that we should apply this WMF advice in this situation, since the copyright status of this image is very complex: the image is in public domain in its country of origin and there are not copyright holders nor licensees in the US. The argument in favour of the deletion is abstract and is not based on any concern, but in a mechanical application of URAA, while this case involves much complexity. In cases like this, Commons volunteers should not delete the content until WMF receives a valid takedown notice and they do a full legal analysis
The fact is that the work is in the public domain in its country of origin, there are no copyright holders, it was made available by an officialy supported website in its country of origin and it was never published in the USA. Because of these factors, a mechanical interpretation of URAA does not apply. WMF 2014 statement clearly reaffirms this."--Pepe piton (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pepe piton: Simply saying again that we should just avoid the issue, instead of doing the kind of analysis that we were given specific guidance on how to do, is not particularly helpful. As was discussed (at length) at AN, a restored US copyright would have come into existence on the URAA date, and has nothing to do with the copyright status in the source country after that date... it is a completely separate 'piece of property' from the copyright in the source nation. The owner of that copyright is perfectly able to enforce it in the United States, regardless of where they live, or if it was published in the US. The PRP (and the consensus regarding it at the last RFC) is that we cannot use some 'nobody will ever try to enforce it' argument in cases like this.
Please discuss the actual copyright status of 'this particular work' instead of making blanket statements about the URAA. I'm perfectly fine with it being kept if there is some reasonable chance that it's actually PD in the US, but I don't see, to be honest, how it can be.... an argument that the URAA does not apply seems to be an argument that it was never PD in the US, and we definitely cannot keep it if that is the case.
I am not stating a 'general concern' about the URAA. I am explaining, explicitly, why I don't think this work is in the public domain in the US. We don't need to argue here 'about the URAA', we need to talk about if this specific file is in compliance with the licensing policy, or if it's truly ambiguous. Just 'claiming' it's ambiguous, without actually discussing it, is not what we were instructed to do by legal. Please stop. Reventtalk 20:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Nothing I see seems to indicate that the website that published this image owns, or ever owned, either the Uruguayan or US copyright in this work.... they simply seem to have published it, in Uruguay, after it entered the public domain there. If that is the case, then they can't actually CC-license the image itself. Reventtalk 21:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the magazine hasn't any copyright mark of sorts.--Zeroth (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Zeroth: Thanks. Do you know if it contained the phrase "Todos los derechos reservados" near the publication information? Under the Buenos Aires Convention, that would be sufficient 'notice' if it complied with Uruguayan law, at least to get an initial 28-year US term. Reventtalk 01:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't have any text that could be interpreted as a copyright claim.--Zeroth (talk) 12:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Previous discussions about application of URAA in this case, demonstrate that there is no reason for delete this file from Commons. Mechanical and tight application of URAA in this -and other thousands of cases- annihilates the digital heritage and inhibits the use of works that are in PD. If a non-existent rightholder appears, he or she could invoke "notice and take down" mechanism, which protects Commons from legal threats. The users who were involved in the many threads that you have open in differents places already gave a lot of reasons to keep this specific work. So, please, in the name of good faith and the common sense that guides our community, be reasonable and try to take on account the arguments (and time) from different people who have contributed in this case.--Señoritaleona (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Señoritaleona: The WMF has the exact same protection in the case of any copyvio on Commons... should we just ignore them all? I suggest you read COM:PRP.... the community as a whole emphatically rejected relaxing that policy for URAA cases, after a massive discussion that lasted months, and a DR is not a 'vote'... if you want to change the policy, you should take it back to the community. If this work is copyrighted in the US, then that is 'clearly' a reason to delete it. None of the people who have argued to keep this file seem to have even attempted to claim that it's not copyrighted in the US, instead, it's just the same arguments about ignoring the URAA, and ignoring half of what we were told by Legal, to just 'keep stuff' even if it's copyrighted. We should not be lying to people and telling them a work is PD in the US unless we have made a good faith effort to know if that's actually true.... otherwise, we might as well just give up and keep every single copyvio.
Your claim that it's somehow 'annihilating the digital heritage' is silly. The file is on the Uruguayan website, and on the Internet Archive, visible from Google on both, and will remain there regardless of what happens to it here. The 'only' relevant issue is if it's copyrighted in the US, and you honestly seem to be admitting that it probably is and just 'voting' to keep it anyhow. Reventtalk 02:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The whole issue is whether it was published in the US, when, and with notice or not. All this is quite difficult to determine, and that's why WMF opinion is relevant. Now I won't speculate in one way or the other about this potential US publication. If you are able to get a definitive answer, great, and good luck about that... Regards, Yann (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: As I mentioned on IRC the other day, I'm not just after 'deleting stuff', I just really think that we need to actually decide on a sort of 'best practice' process for looking at the ~6600 files that are actually marked as 'Not-PD-US-URAA', and also re-assessing the ~1100 files that were actually deleted on URAA grounds (hundreds of which were just a single-sentence assertion based on the date). It's really not acceptable to have several thousand files that are actually 'marked' on the file page as policy violations, and probably tens of thousands of others that are 'potentially' URAA-affected and not marked...this is a cleanup task that has been sitting in limbo for years now.
I strongly think, however, that we cannot really 'assume' that, in that absence of any evidence for a US publication, that one occurred.... it seems most likely that 'most' non-US works, especially ones not in English, would never have been published in the US. If we do a best effort search, and find no such evidence, that is a different situation that where the claim that it did not happen is merely an assertion.
I intend to (before this gets closed) actually do a search of the CCE for any relevant entries, though I think this was quite unlikely to have been simultaneously published. The lack of a 'Buenos Aires Convention' reservation of rights (noted above by @Zeroth: ) would indicate that it was 'never' protected in the US, due to a failure to comply with the formalities, and so would have been restored. Worldcat indicates that a book of Suárez's comics, also named Peloduro, was published in Montevideo (Uruguay) in 1969, but all extant copies of that reprinting shown in library catalogs are also shown as having been published in Uruguay... that seems, in my opinion, to make it even less likely that the originals were published anywhere else.
The only way I can see that this work can be PD in the US is if it was actually 'published' in the US in June or July 1948 (completely separately for the Uruguayan publication that did not comply with the formalities) and then not renewed. I'll comment below after I check the CCE. Reventtalk 00:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, You copyright assessment may be right. If we extend that to all files in the same origin, we will have to delete a lot of files. I suggest the Spanish Wikipedia to allow upload locally for such files, like the French Wikipedia does for files affected by the no-FoP French law. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it would be an excellent idea for the Spanish Wikipedia to allow local uploads for URAA-affected works, though I'm not sure if Legal would be okay with it (since the also run from a US-based server). Reventtalk 14:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete User:Revent has made out an exceptionally strong and lucid case for deletion under existing Commons policy. Either somebody produces the evidence to justify a keep, or else it must be deleted under COM:PRP. The WMF has clearly left it to the Commons community and its our solemn role to ensure that only free / PD media is hosted here. Unfitlouie (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in public domain in Uruguay, Suárez's country of origin. Moreover, the magazine has never been published in USA. I think applicating mechanically URAA is nonsense, we shall wait takedown notices, if it is the case, and not being deleting important and useful images.--Miacara76 (talk) 00:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Miacara76: The PRP specifically states that 'nobody has complained', or even 'nobody is likely to complain' are not valid reasons to keep a work. The community emphatically rejected relaxing that with regards to URAA works. The instruction from legal was that we wait for a takedown notice 'if and only if' the status was still ambiguous after we looked at the information we could find, on the grounds that the notice would contain the missing information. If the work was indeed never published in the US (as you state) then it is clearly copyrighted in the US under the URAA, and so this is basically a vote that we either ignore US law (which we cannot do, per the legal status of the WMF as a US-based organization) or that we change policy to let us ignore US law. Neither is 'admissible' at a DR... those are policy issues that the wider community has already decided. Per legal... "there will be cases when a foreign work is in the public domain in the source country, but still under copyright protection in the United States. Unless permission is given by the author or copyright holder, these works should not be posted on Commons pursuant to US law and community policies." (see Wikilegal/Use_of_Foreign_Works_Restored_under_the_URAA_on_Commons) Reventtalk 02:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Miacara76: This DR is about this work (ie. not a generic URAA delete discussion) and the claimed PD status in Uruguay is irrelevant to its URAA restored copyright in US w.e.f 1948. The burden is on you (per COM:EVID) to disprove this proposition. Any file still under US copyright cannot be uploaded to / retained on Commons without permission. Unfitlouie (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Unfitlouie: In fact, the burden is on you because of this. There is sufficient evidence to prove that the image is in PD but you have a vague concern about URAA. So WMF recommendation applies.--Pepe piton (talk) 17:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pepe piton: Per https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Use_of_Foreign_Works_Restored_under_the_URAA_on_Commons and the policy principle that the burden of evidence is on those seeking to keep, you are obliged to counter User:Revent with evidence. User:Revent has clearly stated that diligent searches fail to show up registration. Unfitlouie (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is plenty of evidence that the image is in public domain. Moreover, a clear majority of community members have given their opinion about keeping the image. Besides, this request had been previously closed, and the decision was to keep the image. So, the burden is on you.--Pepe piton (talk) 23:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence that the work became PD in Uruguay ~20 years after the URAA date has nothing to do with the question here. Nobody has shown any reason to believe that the file is not copyrighted in the US, or seems to have even attempted to do so. Why not try to find some reason to believe the work was not actually restored instead of just 'voting'? A DR is not a vote. Reventtalk 14:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of arguments about why the image must be kept. If it was necessary, Zeroth and I shared new evidence about the lack of registration or copyright marks. It's not a vote, it's an opinion based on arguments and evidence, and a lot of people gave their opinion that the image must be kept. In fact, you have reopened a closed discussion twice. --Pepe piton (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If the work was copyrighted in Uruguay when published (a copyright that would not have expired until the end of 2015), and did not have a 'reservation of rights', then it would have been PD in the US due to a 'failure to comply with the formalities' until the URAA restored it's US copyright in 1996, and cannot be on Commons per the licensing policy (and legal) unless the owners of that US copyright freely license it. Restoring copyright in non-US works that were not published with a notice was the main purpose of the stupid law. As far as me 'reopening a closed discussion twice', reread Nyttend's close. Reventtalk 15:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment 'For the record', a check of the scanned copies of the Catalog of Copyright Entries, specifically parts 1B (Pamphlets, Serials, and Contributions to Periodicals) and 2 (Periodicals) for the period 1947 to 1950 shows no registrations under the name "Peloduro", or for the author "Suárez", or anything even remotely similar. Reventtalk 03:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I had access to several numbers of Peloduro magazine and, as User:Zeroth says, thay haven't got copyright mark. I also searched at the official online legal database of Uruguay and I haven't found any copyright registration for Peloduro magazine. Uruguay Copyright Act from 1937 required registration to give copyright protection (see article 6). That provision wasn't changed until 2003. So it is highly probable that Peloduro magazine hasn't ever have copyright.--Pepe piton (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding (from my really bad Spanish, and a translation) is that the 1937 law did not actually require a copyright notice... the 'reservation of rights' statement (Todos los derechos reservados) and compliance with Uruguayan law would would be the requirements for a 1948 copyright in the US under the Buenos Aires Convention... the work would have been considered to have 'complied with the formalities' even without a US-style notice or US registration. If it was actually never copyrighted in Uruguay (and thus PD there on the URAA date) then it would not have a restored US copyright, but... I am dubious, since it was apparently not published in Uruguay 'as PD' until after the 50-year-pma term would have expired. Reventtalk 15:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep You clearly cannot re-open discussions over and over simply because you didn't like the results you got the first time. This is clearly a demonstration of the inaccurate belief that because you feel part of a community, you represent it as a whole. This is not a community-driven decision, this is just a troll reopening a debate that it's clearly consolidated for all the reasons and arguments already stated above, and it should be dismissed ASAP. --Scanno (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This is an example of the page that includes the legal information of Peloduro magazine. It doesn't have any copyright mark. I also searched again more carefully at the IMPO official online legal database of Uruguay and I haven't found any copyright registration for Peloduro magazine. It is almost sure that there was no registration. IMPO database is from 1830 to date, and it includes copyright registrations, so if the magazine was registered anytime, it should be listed there.--Pepe piton (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uruguay signed the Berne Convention in 1967, and earlier conventions also. It is illegal under the Berne convention for any signatory member state to require registration to grant copyright. Your argument is fallacious and your research irrelevant. The issue being discussed here is the extended US copyright under URAA regime post 1996. As we have discussed earlier, the 1937 Act only required registration for copyright enforcement, the subsequent Act belatedly corrected the divergence to ensure TRIPPS compliance. Unfitlouie (talk) 11:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Uruguay law wasn't modified until 2003.--Pepe piton (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, it was not my argument. My argument was stated in previous discussions. But I did the research since Revent mentioned that, and now it's quite clear that Peloduro magazine didn't comply with the registration requirement under US and Uruguay law.--Pepe piton (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
US law never actually 'required' registration, other than as a prerequisite to an infringement claim or a renewal, and non-US works that received a US term under a treaty were usually not registered (or renewed). It was simply worth checking, just in case. As far as the argument that this was never copyrighted un Uruguay, I really don't know (but am dubious). If so, it would not have a restored copyright, obviously. Reventtalk 13:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per prior arguments starting with Zeroth and continuing. If the file is public domain in its country of origin then it seems absurd to assert that technicalities in another country can give it copyright status. --GRuban (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The WMF doesn't agree with your sentiments. See https://torrentfreak.com/u-s-copyright-law-forces-wikimedia-to-remove-public-domain-anne-frank-diary-160211/ Unfitlouie (talk) 01:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: non USA-work - per obvious consensus in 3 DRs. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Masłomiąca

[edit]

pomyłkowo utworzone zamiast kategorii Mcdrwal (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bild 8 - Übergang für Fußgänger, StVO DDR 1964.svg

[edit]

No German sign; from User:Jermboy27 Mediatus (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Deleted by User:Denniss 27 February 2016. --Achim (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Reuploaded by sock. --Achim (talk) 16:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canada - Stop sign old.svg

[edit]

This sign was never used in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 19:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 20:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canada - Stop sign old.svg

[edit]

Again! User:Jermboy27 Mediatus (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Reuploaded by sock. --Achim (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canada - Stop sign old.svg

[edit]

This sign never existed in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: once more. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canada - Stop sign old.svg

[edit]

This sign never existed in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 18:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sock reupload. --Эlcobbola talk 21:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 22 February 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Außenansicht HMZ Lichtwiese.jpg

[edit]

Fehlende Rechte Pathea81 (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NixonPeabody-logo.JPG

[edit]

logo is out of date 208.255.90.221 15:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NixonPeabody-logo.JPG

[edit]

This is old logo for Nixon Peabody LLP; New one available on wikipedia at https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/58/Nixon_Peabody_LLP_Logo_Fair_Use.jpg The problem is that many mailservers use this outdated link resulting in Nixon Peabody emails appearing with incorrect corporate logo. 208.255.90.221 20:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Will Murica make great again.jpg

[edit]

insulting symbols 89.66.66.43 15:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Érico: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RETOX .jpg

[edit]

Out of scope pub (also a copyvio, marked as such afterwards). — Racconish ☎ 17:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted as copyright violation by User:Christian Ferrer. --Riley Huntley (talk) 06:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed ba.jpg

[edit]

copyvio http://www.aljazeera.com/video/middleeast/2014/02/egypt-court-acquits-al-jazeera-cameraman-20142292111554941.html 174.19.159.72 08:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:خانپور نقشہ .jpg

[edit]

Screen shot from Google Maps Imzadi 1979 → 23:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by User:Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Royrizzo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted content - snaps from newspapers etc. --Denniss (talk) 07:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Calebjbaker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.redditmedia.com/UWJf9e8V9ZWbFqifll9cyGdn8eNsawbQh9C8LaEIsDE.jpg?w=320&s=77e05bcb95902eb92b678c49e54fa124.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion, that means, he also agrees to delete the files. Two first files were deleted, because uploader and author were different (author was Tom Baker). Taivo (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Discográfica Agrupación Mimados de Py .jpg

[edit]

No es mio no Alex Urunaga (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed .jpg

[edit]

copyvio http://www.thedailynewsegypt.com/?p=206760 and others 174.19.159.72 08:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by NahidSultan; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Résidence Quai de la Loire

[edit]

Résidence Quai de Loire was built in 2007 by architect Christophe Chaplain. No FOP in France.

— Racconish ☎ 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je me permet de vous signaler que, si cette résidence à bien étée inaugurée en 2007, les batiments de cette résidence ont été établis dans des magasins généraux dont la construction a été faite entre 1845 et 1853 (Cf cet article). D'autre part, je tiens a vous signaler que ma photo concerne plus le pont sur le canal que la résidence qui est au second plan. CaptainHaddock (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This was actually a reconstruction of buildings destroyed by a fire in 1990. See here and here. — Racconish ☎ 16:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Résidence Quai de Loire : this was actually a renovation, not a reconstruction.Thor19 (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Reconstruction and restructuration" are the terms used by Le Moniteur (Monitor of public works and of public buildings), a French reference specialized magazine. COM:PCP should apply. — Racconish ☎ 11:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Vous vous trompez et vous confondez le bâtiment incendié (entrepôt qui a été reconstruit pour faire un hôtel, architectes Chaix et Morel) avec le bâtiment rénové devenu la Résidence Quai de la Loire. Thor19 (talk) 11:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes and no. Yes, this is not the building which was detroyed by a fire, I was wrong : the article I cited says "le pendant". No, this is the building which, according to Le Moniteur, has been "reconstructed and restructured" [1]. — Racconish ☎ 11:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non, trois fois non ! L'article que vous citez date de 2003 et parle d'une restructuration (qui a été terminée en 2007). L'article parle aussi d'un projet de reconstruction d'un autre magasin incendié en 1990 qui n'est pas la Résidence Quai de la Loire. This is not the building which, (not according to Le Moniteur,) has been "reconstructed and restructured". Thor19 (talk) 13:43, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "not according to Le Moniteur". In any case, I digged a little bit further in the matter. According to an article published in Le Monde, "le projet ... prévoit une restauration fidèle des façades et la conservation de la structure en bois" [2]. Based on this article, I agree we can safely consider there is no architectural creation on the outside appearance. As all the nominated pictures show only the outside,  I withdraw my nomination. — Racconish ☎ 15:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Thor19 (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC) -- Withdrawn. — Racconish ☎ 17:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kanishkasinghal,singhal,parul singhal-kanishka-photo kanishka-images-kanishka-.jpg + other

[edit]

Family photo; Out of scope. Also meaningless title and description.

+ all (7) files uploaded by user Kanishka_Singhal https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Kanishka_Singhal

XXN, 01:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IJCU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Academic papers by a non-notable startup journal. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Historia de la parroquia san pablo apóstol.pdf

[edit]

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Los Oscar a la mexicana.pdf

[edit]

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikhil Tawade.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of likely non-notable person, obviously uploaded with promotional intent. Note: Commons is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julio uñon toro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qué es la ciencia Asimov(3) (1).pdf

[edit]

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zizovirus.jpg

[edit]

Fun/attack image + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ZIKA BOY.jpg

[edit]

Fun/attack image + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zizovirus.jpg Gunnex (talk) 08:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zaqueu.png

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope needs permission via https://plus.google.com/108605436080336659877/posts/csqHrf4nQ89 (10.2015). Gunnex (talk) 08:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseany de Oliveira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works (mysteriously watermarked by the photographers) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 09:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wicked Brasil.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:An eveaning alone.JPG

[edit]

Personal, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Ravensburger Platz 3 Wohnstallhaus eines Bauernhofes III.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben --NoRud (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 17 Dreiseithof Seitengebäude II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 17 Dreiseithof III.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 17 Dreiseithof Wohnstallhaus I.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Kötitzer Straße 7 Wein-Großhandlung und Kelterei Otto Streller III.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Kötitzer Straße 7 Wein-Großhandlung und Kelterei Otto Streller II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Fährweg 2 Fährgut Kötitz (ehem.) Wohnhaus II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Fährweg 2 Fährgut Kötitz (ehem.) Wohnhaus III.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coswig Hauptstraße 25 Wohnstallhaus und Scheune eines ehemaligen Dreiseithofes II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.--NoRud (talk) 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)-[reply]

File:Coswig Hauptstraße 25 Wohnstallhaus und Scheune eines ehemaligen Dreiseithofes I.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 8 Zweiseithof II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 8 Zweiseithof I.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Batta in overtreding.jpg

[edit]

This image occurs all over the internet including on a meme generator. The source file leads to the wordpress blog, but I don't see the image credited there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Don Felder.jpg

[edit]

No proof of permission Mlpearc (open channel) 03:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Plushophilia sex with stuffed animal.jpeg

[edit]

Exactly what encyclopedic purpose is this supposed to serve? This image is just obscenity for the sake of obscenity. Electricburst1996 (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RIAN 868589.jpg

[edit]

This file clearly does not belong to the uploader. It is watermarked, and the website linked to as a source states that users "need to pass authentication to download files". Ilzolende (talk) 06:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

If these are the work of the uploader, then they are personal art and are out of scope. If they are not the work of the uploader, then they infringe on the copyright of the creator and require a free license from him.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

These are apparently two outdoor plaques. Even if they are in a location that would qualify for Czech FOP, the text has a copyright and is not covered by Czech FOP. Also, the qulity is very bad and they are probably not usable for any purpose.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment/Very weak keep the first one: Those are apparently not outdoor plaques, but both sides of a paper invitation to a border guard ceremony for the soldiers’ parents. I seriously doubt any copyrightability of such a simple factual text. (“Dear parents, there will be a ceremony where/when, you are invited.”) It

might have some historical value, even the quality is far from perfect. The second one has a bit more of the copyvio claim with the photograph. --Mormegil (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

These are scans from printed works. They are both unusably poor quality and copyvios.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Extremely low quality&resolution (mostly old Nokia phone photos taken in late/early hours or inside - too dark to be useful)

TFerenczy (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

False dates, scans from a book, any reason it's public domain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The dates and the licences at the file pages are completely wrong.
  • The images are from several sources, sources are properly mentioned but the first one whithout the year of publication.
    • Havlíčkobrodsko v národním odboji 1914-1918, 1938-1945 : sborník, published in 1946 [3] → anonymous works are free under PD-anon-70. However, it is needed to check whether authors of the photos are really not mentioned in the book.
    • The images related to Czechoslovak Legions are from paperbacks from 1928. As seems, they were published already in 1922–1926 in books. [4] If the photos where published really as anonymous, they can be free under PD-anon-70. --ŠJů (talk) 13:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legionáři. Datum zde na první stránce. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Březen 1928 - Čís 24. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Červen 1928 - Čís 28 29. Legionářská literatura - publikace v sešitovém vydání z roku 1928. ZA SVOBODU.Obrázková kronika ČS. Revoluční hnutí na Rusi (1914 - 1920). Sešit Duben 1928 - Čís 25 - 26. Oprava File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 07.jpg File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 02.jpg File:Sešity ZA SVOBODU (obrázková kronika ČS z Rusi) 08.jpg Datum 1928 a měsíc je na obálce sešitu březen,červen a duben. Zde je datum. Jiné nemám. Kompletní skupinově opravu datumu a licence nedokáži udělat. A licence pořádně neznám našel jsem je pod stejným dílem. Ale legionáře budit nebudu.Jak poznat zda je dílo volné nepoznám. Asi jen podle datumu. Když můžeš Šjů datum a licenci předělat já to nedokáži(skupinovou opravu). Datum sborníku File:Vydáno v Havlíčkově Brodě 1946.jpg S pozdravem pohled 111 Mám rád týmovou práci jako ve skautu. Nabyl jsem dojmu že je to tu skupinové dílo, ale asi ne. Děkuji Ti za pomoc Šjů. S pozdravem pohled 111 ŠJů, Patrick RogelPohled 111--Pohled 111 (diskuse) 14:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination - Creative Commons licenses are bogus licenses here. Unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pohled 111 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

Photographs of product packages. I have only went through the most recent 1000 uploads, there can be more. I kept some photographs of the backs with no intricate design that have only products' contents which I don't think is copyrightable. There are some simplistic designs among the nominated files that may be below Czech TOO. But I believe the bulk falls under Commons:PACKAGING.

TFerenczy (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (except 3 kept). --Tomer T (talk) 10:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kniha pro Pohraničníka základní služby.jpg

[edit]

There is no evidence that the uploader owns the copyright to this book cover. Owing a copy of a book does not give you the right to sell copies. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos William C. da S. Leite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work (self created book cover, most likely derived from copyrighted content) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 12:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erg nis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://alashainasy.kz/userdata/news/2015/news_60340/thumb_b/photo_63260.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cartoons Serbia Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cartoons Serbia Official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes, no EXIFS, + the uploader already uploaded copyvios

Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JMannBearPig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Song and promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anahospitaler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC) Hi these files are from my great great great granfather.[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Everbesmile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern arts, books, non-trivial logos, promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billiva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Creamy app (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. File:O Grande Hotel Budapeste .jpg + File:CI Fox-Searchlight-Pictures-Mendls.jpg (identical) need permission from "Martin Scali".

Gunnex (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sharmin Ali performing in Chutzpah.jpeg

[edit]

DR started to verify source/author "Sharmin Ali", Roland zh (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TwitterLogo123.png

[edit]

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 22:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear copyvio Fma12 (talk) 12:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francisco Aragão (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work (album covers, watermarks, etc.): small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Francisco Aragão

Gunnex (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Book In Line (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Per aspra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images appear to depict works by Josef Picker who died in 1984. The uploader named himself in the "Author" field, permissions are not documented. This collection could only be saved when we would receive a permission through OTRS by the heirs of the artist. Some of the images could be case of a FOP. However, it remains unclear whether any of these photographs was taken by the uploader. The uploader appears to be a sockpuppet of Sendker (see this CU case at de:wp).

AFBorchert (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMO at least for the images in Category:Josef Picker Grabmal {{FoP-Germany}} can be applied. --Magnus (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Of these File:Grabmal-Picker.jpg and File:Picker Bilder (5).jpg appear to be scans, the other three have EXIF data (Panasonic DMC-FZ100). The problem is that we do not know anything about the photographer's identity. In general, you cannot trust Sendker's claims of own work. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sandyport Development Company.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio of http://www.sandyport.com/ —teb728 t c 23:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caiubi Oliveira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 23:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BahamasLocal.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio of http://www.bahamaslocal.com/ —teb728 t c 23:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IPBS.png

[edit]

Copyvio of http://www.ipbs.com/ —teb728 t c 23:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cearacom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User blocked at ptwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Professor of Physics, UMC, Columbia, USA.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Harsha A Director.jpg

[edit]

DR started for the reason as EXIF data is missing, and to verify claimed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 23:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VinayakJoshi.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as EXIF data are missing, Roland zh (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comunicacaomuseu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Promo shots for a Cachaça product (a Brazilian spirit distilled from sugarcane). Permission needed for File:Cachacamazzaropi.jpg via COM:PACKAGING and the rest previously published via manufacture site http://www.cachacamazzaropi.com.br (© 2016 - Cachaça Mazzaropi - todos os direitos reservados.)

Gunnex (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Angie Alzate , amiga de Isabella Obregon!.jpg

[edit]

non encyclopedic usage Triplecaña (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skyline Properties.jpg

[edit]

Spam, useful for promotion only Uncle Milty (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: also copyvio. --Didym (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pondicherry Mayors.JPG

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as date '1 March 2016' imho may not be correct, rather years before 1979 (Mr. Édouard Goubert died in 1979), Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clement Ngissah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files

2003:45:5C6F:1201:EC8E:FF5E:D8C3:8A24 18:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clement Ngissah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 01:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1424100125-DORE201417-o.jpg

[edit]

this is a vandalism Nullzero (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ag7TxRdoBDu5oDl8keszKluMuMo2RtPoNN0JAM4tYdIj.jpg

[edit]

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:EC8E:FF5E:D8C3:8A24 18:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jim Moriarty.jpg

[edit]

No proof of permissions Mlpearc (open channel) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata confirms copyright. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:การเย็ดกันของเกย์ด้วยวิธีที่ถูกต้อง.jpg

[edit]

this is a vandalism Nullzero (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A real life angel .jpg

[edit]

Personal photo outside project scope Ytoyoda (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Libya.svg.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Banner-facebook-2.png

[edit]

Out of scope ? XXN, 20:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tony Hristov (1).jpg

[edit]

No permission (newspaper). XXN, 20:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Facebook picture.jpg

[edit]

+File:Toni_Hristov.jpg
Unused personal photos.

--XXN, 20:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Archiv DIAF (16).JPG

[edit]
Urheber der Puppe ist Gerhard Behrendt (1), Behrendt verstarb erst 2006 --> die Puppe ist noch urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Upload stellt eine URV dar. Löschen, es gibt schon einen Grund, warum die einzigen erlaubten Bilder der Figur aus einer Bildspende des Bundesarchivs stammen! Paulae (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sandmännchen im Archiv DIAF (17) (cropped) 02.JPG

[edit]
Urheber der Puppe ist Gerhard Behrendt (1), Behrendt verstarb erst 2006 --> die Puppe ist noch urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Upload stellt eine URV dar. Löschen, es gibt schon einen Grund, warum die einzigen erlaubten Bilder der Figur aus einer Bildspende des Bundesarchivs stammen! Paulae (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sandmännchen im Archiv DIAF (17) (cropped).JPG

[edit]
Urheber der Puppe ist Gerhard Behrendt (1), Behrendt verstarb erst 2006 --> die Puppe ist noch urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Upload stellt eine URV dar. Löschen, es gibt schon einen Grund, warum die einzigen erlaubten Bilder der Figur aus einer Bildspende des Bundesarchivs stammen! Paulae (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:George harrison rickenbacker 64.jpg

[edit]

Clear copyvio, definitely not the uploader's work. Laser brain (talk) 20:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portada-facebook-justin-bieber01.jpg

[edit]

Non-free derivative work? See watermark. Not sure if is 100% own work (including JB's photo). XXN, 20:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:O-LOIS-DEBERRY-DEAD-facebook.jpg

[edit]

AP Photo. "All contents © copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved." XXN, 20:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yurizinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GiriDevanur.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:تجار الكويت في الهند.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: scan - not own work Amitie 10g (talk) 21:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Binu Nanu, Expo Summit.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bernardo lima mendes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chutzpah.jpeg

[edit]

DR started to verify source/author "Sharmin Ali", Roland zh (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bruno henrique.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alvoco das Várzeas.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:MHKrazy Gunnex (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anderson Henrique.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 16:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yameeindia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam images uploaded for a spam page on English Wikipedia.

BethNaught (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andressa Nunes.png

[edit]

Unlikely own work + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. If IN scope needs permission via https://www.facebook.com/630506567083082/photos/a.680625088737896.1073741825.630506567083082/766920900108314/?type=3&theater (29.01.2016) Gunnex (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:True Life Design (TLD).jpg

[edit]

Spam image. BethNaught (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ADIBOSS123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lowest quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Takeaway (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ADIBOSS123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload

Takeaway (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Яблоков - лого золото.png

[edit]

+ File:A e083b0f7.jpg

Non-free logo and/or Out of scope (unused logo of a non-notable lawyers association). XXN, 17:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Яблоков - лого золото.png

[edit]

Out of scope Mitte27 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ginsberg performing 'Howl'.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader Ahecht (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antonio Gilberto.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Index 1.jpg

[edit]

Low-resolution image. Does not seems to be own work; probably is copied from some website (image title also suggests this). XXN, 17:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AparicioRibeiro.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 18:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:يحيى ادريس2.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work (seems to be a screen/TV capture)? XXN, 18:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A view from Andhra University during International Fleet review 2016.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Volleyball court and cricket nets at ANDHRA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING(A).jpg

[edit]

DR started as per File:A view from Andhra University during International Fleet review 2016.jpg to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Front view of Main block.jpg

[edit]

DR started as per File:A view from Andhra University during International Fleet review 2016.jpg etc to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ANDHRA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MAIN CAMPUS.jpg

[edit]

DR started as per File:A view from Andhra University during International Fleet review 2016.jpg etc to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A view from Main Block from Andhra University College Of Engineering Main Block to the college ground.jpg

[edit]

DR started as per File:A view from Andhra University during International Fleet review 2016.jpg etc to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jyothi Circle.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo ALAIREWEB www.jpg

[edit]

Original logo - no explicit permission/copyright violation. Out of scope. XXN, 18:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:12788737 950850331673011 1119975495 o.jpg.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Bernard (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kambala Race.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' for the reason of missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skyline City Center Mall.png

[edit]

DR as per File:Jyothi Circle.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Infosys Mangalore.jpg

[edit]

DR as per File:Jyothi Circle.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kambala Racing.jpg

[edit]

DR as per File:Kambala Race.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Planet SKS Building.jpg

[edit]

DR as per File:Skyline City Center Mall.png et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mangalore Skyline PVS Circle.jpg

[edit]

DR as per File:Planet SKS Building.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sultan Battery.jpg

[edit]

DR as per File:Planet SKS Building.jpg, and others, Roland zh (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B2PQxJYCMAE9sLt (1).jpg

[edit]

this is a vandalism Nullzero (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lady in blousee.jpg

[edit]

Low quality destroyed image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adamko sipos.jpg

[edit]

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:EC8E:FF5E:D8C3:8A24 18:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Маршрутное такси аэропорта Минск.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fumarase mechanism.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mary sister.jpg

[edit]

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MicroPenis.jpg

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cisco-Logo.jpg

[edit]

SVG available under File:Cisco logo.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SPb.png

[edit]

Blurry small image. Better version available under File:Coat of Arms of St Petersburg (1780).png. Fry1989 eh? 19:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad Junction.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/47023258@N08/8748068726. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad Bird Eye View.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio http://friendsatpalakkad.blogspot.fr/2013/11/sky-view-of-palakkad-fort.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magnificient FortMaidan.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio http://palakkadwalks.blogspot.fr/2014_05_21_archive.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad .jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio http://palakkadwalks.blogspot.fr/2014/05/amazing-aerial-views-of-city.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Victoria College Palakkad.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio http://www.panoramio.com/photo/110192564. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LOGO000.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho commercial advertisements and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 00:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Valery Durov.PNG

[edit]

While a template on this page says this image can be used for any purpose, going to the source page shows (C) at the bottom of the page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arfasound.jpg

[edit]

Promo picture of a not notable music band. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kudde Battas.jpg

[edit]

This unused, uncategorized Facebook size, no metadata image has been used previously for a meme and occurs widely on the internet, as http://amazightimes.nl/marokkaanse-raad-breng-uw-kinderen-tolerantie-bij/, larger than this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Archaeornithoides.jpg

[edit]

No info at all. FunkMonk (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I notice all this uploader's images either lack a source or an author. This is not acceptable. There has to be at least a source so that we can validate that the image depicts the subject correctly. They may be possible copyvios. I suggest the possibility of deleting all or most of them. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Missing essential source information; tagged all the user's uploads with {{No source}}. –Tryphon☂ 09:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Archaeornithoides.jpg

[edit]

Author request, inferior version and file type of File:Archaeornithoides skull.png IJReid (talk) 02:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elizavetapetr.jpg

[edit]

It's copyrighted, - mentioned in section Metadata. In addition there is no FOP in Russia. --Dimetr (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meatspin.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be a vandalism upload. Unlikely to be own work. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 07:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed badr.jpg

[edit]

copyvio http://www.aljazeera.com/video/middleeast/2014/02/egypt-court-acquits-al-jazeera-cameraman-20142292111554941.html 174.19.159.72 08:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Modher Teresa square.jpg

[edit]

grabbed from web: http://www.rallyalbania.org/ra_11/race_01/ats-sld-00000.htm – source unclear Albinfo (talk) 11:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Veliki Ugankarski Priročnik.jpg

[edit]

Derivative of a copyrighted cover, unfree. — Yerpo Eh? 11:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shoaib-Ahmed PresidentTally.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', becaus of missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio http://pn.ispirt.in/start-of-the-product-journey-shoaib-ahmed-tally-solutions/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mucsi Sándor ifjúkori képe.jpg

[edit]

The age of this picture would seem to be older than 16 January 2015, and appears to be a publicity photo of a musician not own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, scan of an old photo,lacks informations about author, date, publication. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was made in a studio many years ago. The photo is mine, the actor on it was my step father. His belongings, rights were inherited by my mother. She let me published this photo.Dudva vitalap 17:25, 9 March 2016 (CET)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:경인지방식품의약안전청2.PNG

[edit]

It will be uploaded again 경인지방식품의약품안전청 2.PNG -- 메이 `토론 02:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: duplicate. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:경인지방식품의약안전청.PNG

[edit]

It will be uploaded again 경인지방식품의약품안전청.PNG -- 메이 `토론 02:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: duplicate. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Factorin logo.png

[edit]

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Far beyond the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by சிவ. தினகரன் (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multi issues such as book covers, online images, etc

AntanO 15:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deivative works and other copyvios, exemple http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Coimbatore/tn-villages-to-get-energyefficient-lights/article4286238.ece. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Road signs in East Germany

[edit]

User:Jermboy27 -- Mediatus (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by LTA sock, now empty. --Achim (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorisvanmeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:51, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahalia ayurveda hospital.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 19:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahalia.png

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as per File:Ahalia ayurveda hospital.png, see also date/upload, Roland zh (talk) 19:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Ahalia ayurveda hospital.png et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad Roads.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad NH 544 Four Lane.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palakkad NH 544.jpg

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as there are no EXIF data, see also File:Chandranagar Palakkad NH.jpg, File:Palakkad Roads.jpg et al, Roland zh (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:53, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:阿華田攜帶包.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING front view of a sealed drink package. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well all people use iphone. Then someone want to upload her/his own iphone need to do that(trademark), too?I didn't said the copyright owned by me. I had just want to explain what the package looks like, OK?look likeBeer_bottles#/media/File:Flasche_Tannenzäpfle,_2010.jpgor more at[5]They all be kept by cc-sa-by2.0 or 3.0--Cjackh (talk) 09:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HenriParmentier MySon.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. This is actually correct. However, I found [6] that the image dates from 1902. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. 1902 self-portrait by a person who died in 1904. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Who clicked the camera ? A monkey, or an apprentice who died in 1980 ? Unfitlouie (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It's a self-portrait with a cable release or timer by a gent who died in 1904. The image was taken in 1902. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  CommentI have carefully examined this image. There is no discernible evidence that a release cable or timer was used. Considering the composition it is very likely that this photograph was taken by a third person. The present image is at a resolution of 3,648 × 2,736 pixels (created with a Canon DIGITAL IXUS 870 IS) whereas the image at the tumblr site is much inferior. I suspect this image is copied from resources like [7] or from [8]. BTW Henri Parmentier and Charles Carpeaux are different individuals. Unfitlouie (talk) 03:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You're right, it came from the book, page 169. Les ruines d'Angkor, de Duong-Duong et de My-son (Cambodge et Annam) : lettres, journal de route et cliches photographiques/​ publies par Mme. J-B. Carpeaux. Paris, A.Challamel, 1908. illus., Carpeaux, Charles, 1870-1904, the illustrator has been dead sufficiently long to be in PD and the book predates 1923. The "MySon" in the title is a location, not a family relationship. The photograph is of Henri Parmentier, at MySon in Angkor, as published posthumously in a 1908 book by Charles Carpeaux's (1870-1904) widow, making this not a copyvio, but by a known author. The book is available to read entirely at http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6207975p ... The image caption "devant le Dvarapala" means "in front of the Dvarapala statue" and is not a location. You can see the statue Dvarapala above the subjects on the stairs. The gent in the pith helmet is "https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Parmentier", the other men are unidentified. Good job on the book! Now can we update the file template and keep the image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep OK that is a keep now for me Unfitlouie (talk) 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, and as the photo show only, and in full frame, a 2d free artwork, the same rights apply for the new photo then the file is ok for us. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maryland Bar Volleyball.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Riley Huntley as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.umterps.com/ Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 03:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, the thing underneath the letter M make this logo a bit above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RIAN 428978.jpg

[edit]

This image is probably not Nico Delano's original work, given that it, like many of his uploads, is watermarked and can also be found on websites like http://visualrian.ru/ru/site/lightbox/716/ this. The vast majority (if not all) of Delano's images appear to not be his to release into the Creative Commons. Ilzolende (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Golden Misabiko.jpg

[edit]

URV von http://images.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nuclear-free-future.com/uploads/tx_templavoila/Golden-Misabiko_nuclear-free-future.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nuclear-free-future.com/en/laureates/laureates/golden-misabiko/&h=1200&w=777&tbnid=LtstWvvRVSqseM:&tbnh=100&tbnw=65&docid=ElQEwX17E6R5SM&usg=__ae6vn4KTPc6zKbrGVglrmgHLFMM=&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiW4e-P9Z7LAhWGDQ8KHcfCA6cQ9QEIKDAB. (http://www.nuclear-free-future.com/typo3temp/GB/a0f532c4cf.png). Copyrighted Foto, "Nuclear Free Future Award" ist keine Person, kann kein Urheber (=Fotograf) sein. Jbergner (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by One100ton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete #1 is simply a version of File:Linck Group Corporation logo.png (which is in use on enwiki, though in an unreviewed article of dubious notability) with a bunch of gray around the edges. and thus eligible for speedy as a duplicate. #2 is just a redundant color-reversed version, not in use, and of very dubious 'educational value'. Revent (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Eugene and Revent. Green Giant (talk) 16:50, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by One100ton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:One100ton (Facebook/Twitter grabber). All files (including 4x identical File:Tiagofernandesjersey10.jpg) related to en:Miami Dade FC, an American soccer team based in Miami.

Gunnex (talk) 08:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by One100ton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:One100ton (Facebook/Twitter etc. grabber + per previous DR)

Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vijayingarsal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable COM:COPYVIOs. Images are located on pages given as source, however, source pages are marked "Copyright © 2013 STEM Center USA" making these not user's own work on which to release copyright. Entire gallery is also promotional of that website, as all images taken from same place, pages and subpages of http://www.stemcenterusa.com/.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vijayingarsal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

prob. copyvios, bad quality, no exif

/St1995 08:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, almost very blurred. One was maybe good enough and with EXIF (File:Temple tower2.jpg) however there was also obvious copyvio (exemple:[9]). Then I deleted all, include the one in big size with EXIF as PCP. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:075 Nöbdenitz (Teich mit Rittergut).jpg

[edit]

fast identische Datei vorhanden, Seite "076 Nöbdenitz (Teich am Rittergut).jpg" Gerd Michael Langenhessen 1 (talk) 09:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ok, almost identical. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vue Akbou.jpg

[edit]

The file was uploaded into Commons in 2012, but can be found in Youtube in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dh_B4ZRQBYI from 13th of November 2011 at circa 4.42. That case OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrao80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also File:Negretti Jogador.JPG, copyrighted by "Jornal da Cidade de Bauru Ltda." and File:Negretti Neve.JPG (+ others) = grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/878912988895942/photos/pb.878912988895942.-2207520000.1456838998./881284665325441/?type=3&theater (01.2016). Uploaded since 19.02.2016 for a Brazilian association footballer.

Gunnex (talk) 13:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Conan et Valeria.jpg

[edit]

The Flickr uploader is a book-seller. He has no right to publish this image under a free license. BrightRaven (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2011년 일본지진 대한민국 국제구조대 활동

[edit]

dup with 2011년 3월 일본 동북지역 태평양지진 중앙119구조단 구조 활동 최광모 (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BanksyPulpFiction.jpg

[edit]

The Flickr uploader has no right to publish this artwork by Banksy (which is also a derivative work of copyrighted material) under a free license. BrightRaven (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meththawalokanaya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Magazine covers and non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belstead Population time series 1801-2011.pdf

[edit]

and File:Belstead Population series 1800-2011.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cernder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper/magazine pages. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Andy Trilogy Soundtrack Cover.jpg

[edit]

Not in a high enough resolution for the intended use. Doofusthedoofus (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also likely a copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Résidence Lila

[edit]

Residence Lila was designed in 2005 by Atelier Jade et Sami Tabet. No FOP in France.

— Racconish ☎ 16:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Maison de l'Inde

[edit]

Designed in 1968 by JM Benjamin and HR Laroya. No FOP in France

— Racconish ☎ 16:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maison du liban.jpg

[edit]

Designed in 1963 by Jean Vernon and Bruno Philippe. No FOP in France. — Racconish ☎ 16:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maison du bresil.jpg

[edit]

Designed in 1959 by Le Corbusier and Lucio Costa. No FOP in France — Racconish ☎ 16:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille

[edit]

No FOP in France

— Racconish ☎ 16:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, built by Le Corbusier. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille

[edit]

The building was completed in 1952 by Le Corbusier (1887–1965). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright length is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2036.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille

[edit]

No FoP in France, and Le Corbusier, the architect of the building died in 1965. France knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2065

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK with the deletion. Sorry. Triplecaña (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkthora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, per User talk:Mkthora (with similar files already deleted) and unlikely "own works", considering derived from artworks by living Portuguese artist pt:António Macedo (artista plástico) (1955—). Permission(s) needed.

Gunnex (talk) 16:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sirs,

Please note that all the fotos with the name Antonio Macedo are the property of the author himself and we have authorization to use them; in fact we are the representatives os the author to manage the Wikipedia pages and all sort of materials, as for example LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, Webpage, etc:

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant%C3%B3nio_Macedo_%28artista_pl%C3%A1stico%29 https://twitter.com/AntonioMacedoAP https://www.linkedin.com/in/ant%C3%B3nio-macedo-51b08a50?trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile_pic http://antoniomacedo.pt/

Please do not remove any of the fotos we have inserted

Best Regards— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkthora (talk • contribs)

If that is indeed the case, please send an email in this form to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (COM:OTRS) and explain your situation to them, providing evidence that the copyright holder "António Macedo" has given permission to publish these files under a free license. When the email has been sent, please apply {{subst:OP}} ({{OTRS pending}}) on the image page (in the "permission" field) to tell us so (and to prevent the file from being deleted within the next 30 days). If everything checks out, they will also restore the file, if deleted in the meantime. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers and is understaffed and may take several weeks to process the license.Gunnex (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: , they need a permission from the artist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cannon and Ball.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cannon and Ball.jpg

[edit]

Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cannon and Ball.jpg

[edit]

Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Ball.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: See related DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Ball.jpg

[edit]

Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Ball.jpg

[edit]

Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Ball.jpg

[edit]

Uploader request JL45 (talk) 14:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nonsense request like last time. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaun Wallace.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. CB2288 has previously nominated these images when they were hosted on the English Wikipedia for deletion with the above rationale (or none at all). The user has not provided any evidence to the contrary of the uploader's claim—despite a reverse Google image search, larger resolutions of this image do not exist, there is no evidence that this was published elsewhere prior to the original upload date (May 5, 2013), and there is no evidence that this is cropped from any other photo. SolomanMcKenzie's other uploads, both free and non-free, are perfectly fine, so I have no reason to believe that this image and the ones linked above by Diannaa are a different case. — ξxplicit 20:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaun Wallace.jpg

[edit]

Media missing permission CB2288 (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaun Wallace.jpg

[edit]

Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaun Wallace.jpg

[edit]

Author request SolomanMcKenzie (talk) 10:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Soldatene er norske.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Within Commons project scope: 'educational media content': example of interesting machine-user intelligence. Calebjbaker (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Master of the Universe- The Soundtrack.jpg

[edit]

I am not content with the work represented here. Doofusthedoofus (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio. --Riley Huntley (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coswig Brockwitzer Straße 17 Dreiseithof Seitengebäude II.jpg

[edit]

Eigentümer möchte die Datei nicht veröffentlicht haben. NoRud (talk) 11:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No, of course. There are likely no legal concerns but the uploader might have trouble with the house owner. Therefor deleting it as a courtesy. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MacArth primary logo stacked.jpg

[edit]

JPEG version of vector image Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 04:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We do not delete JPG version once an SVG is available. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Сергей_Николаевич_Олешня.JPG

[edit]

File is not own work and taken from official academy page [10] hence must be deleted. --Dimetr (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZhihongShen226 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible COM:COPYVIOs: small size, low resolution, no EXIF metadata, uploader has bad history. Unlikely to be own work.

KurodaSho (talk) 12:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musette & Swing Manouche.jpg

[edit]

spam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 12:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:النشر الالكتروني.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oulahlou.jpg

[edit]

The file was uploaded into Commons during 2011, but is found in http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x645l7_oulahlou-vive-la-liberte_music at circa 2.11 from 13th of July 2008. That case OTRS-permission from video copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Japanservis.jpg

[edit]

license doesn't really match … grabbed from the web Albinfo (talk) 11:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright may not be the problem for this simple textlogo, but seems out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AntiX.png

[edit]

Seite gelöscht, deleted page Ext4 (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brigerionegro 2015.jpg

[edit]

Doubt whether it's "own work" by uploader, as image was published 3 years earlier at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=87780386&postcount=89. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericneosg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Ericneosg/sandbox).

MER-C 11:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kevin reilly.jpg

[edit]

Small photo without metadata, can be found on external sites, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and COM:EVID. Unfitlouie (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richaardo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In all these uploads the uploader names himself as author and claims at the same time that the pictures are in the public domain as the author has died more than 70 years ago. No serious attempt has been made to identity the authors. As source is always "alte Postkarte" given (old postcard) without any attempt to provide any info about the other side of the postcard (which could help in identifying the author). The uploader is a sockpuppet of Sendker (see CU case at de:wp).

AFBorchert (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all these per nom Unfitlouie (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smail Medjeber.jpg

[edit]

The file was in Commons from June 2011, but at http://socialgerie.net/spip.php?article359 from February 2011. That case OTRS-permission from copyright holder (photographer) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AlisondosSantos.jpg

[edit]

[Most likely grabbed from Facebook] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Weathernews logo.svg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use in article, so not out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:XrB-vAkg8cM.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isabella Obregon.jpg

[edit]

used in a non-encyclopedic article, commons is not a repository Triplecaña (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donga Nick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Donga Nick

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. Donga Nick (talk) 02:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo of Nick and Joan Gorshenin was taken at the Sydney Trocadero in 1966. It was the property of Nick Gorshenin, now deceased, is now in my possession and hence not subject to any copyright restrictions. I have scanned the photo for our family library, and in this case for use in Wikipedia Donga Nick (talk) 02:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you only heir? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request apparently meant for COM:UDR - Jcb (talk) 16:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amanecer Campesino.jpg

[edit]

It is unclear, what is depicted. No description, no meaningful categories. Quality is not excellent. That way the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this is the municipality of El Carmen de Viboral (the one with the code 05148)--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: description has been fixed. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Loanstreet logo.png

[edit]

Outdated image Loanstreet (talk) 10:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anime pictures freehand ART by Nina 2.jpg

[edit]

Low quality image, not very useful for educational purposes, see COM:EDUSE.  deerstop (*•̀ᴗ•́*). 14:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anime pictures freehand ART by Nina 3.jpg

[edit]

Low quality image, not very useful for educational purposes, see COM:EDUSE.  deerstop (*•̀ᴗ•́*). 14:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K1822 prototyp.jpg

[edit]

Ich, procolotor bin nicht der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieses Werkes Procolotor (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K1820 mem msc20.jpg

[edit]

Ich, procolotor bin nicht der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieses Werkes Procolotor (talk) 22:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K1820 zve kac20.jpg

[edit]

Ich, procolotor bin nicht der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieses Werkes Procolotor (talk) 22:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K1822 prototyp inside.jpg

[edit]

Ich, procolotor bin nicht der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieses Werkes Procolotor (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Z9001 HC Prototyp 02 TSD-2.jpg

[edit]

Ich, procolotor bin nicht der Urheberrechtsinhaber dieses Werkes Procolotor (talk) 22:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dance Door by Robert Graham-7388567026.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama for art in us? This public sculpture was installed in 1978. Judithcomm (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:22, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dance Door by Robert Graham-3160357431.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama for art in us? This public sculpture was installed in 1978. Judithcomm (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mch Ferry Boat.jpg

[edit]

Image is clearly taken where this boat belongs, in British Columbia, Canada, but the title and description claim that it is in Bangladesh. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image published in 2015 there: [11]. Makes you wonder about all the other uploads of the uploader. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that two other images by the same uploader are also nominated for deletion: Mch Mosque Ghat.jpg as seemingly intended to cause offence, and Map of moju chowdhury hat.jpg as a copyright violation. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La maison de lIran (CIUP) (8010172375).jpg

[edit]

No FOP in France — Racconish ☎ 16:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:L-OBLIQUE, le nouvel espace d'interprétation de la CIUP (8939718073).jpg

[edit]

No Fop in France — Racconish ☎ 16:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CiteUniversitaire.jpg

[edit]

No FOP in France — Racconish ☎ 16:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Residence andre de gouveia.jpg

[edit]

José Sommer-Ribeiro, the architect, died in 2006. No FOP in France — Racconish ☎ 16:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:27 Провал. Ося.JPG

[edit]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. This is a sculpture of a character in a 1928 novel. It is unlikely that it was made before 1946. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 02:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oghuzlanguages5.png

[edit]

Erroneous map, unusued, see alternative map File:Oghuzlanguages6.png. Zoupan (talk) 08:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to this map, no one speaks Azerbaijani (an Oghuz language) in towns like Shaki, Zaqatala and Oghuz. Yes, Oghuz. The town is literaly named after Oghuz Turks and this map claims that no one speaks Oghuz there? Give me a brake. --Мурад 97 (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Мурад 97: Didn't see that until now - i can fix that. But the other map is much worse [12] - according to the map, the Turks are a majority in provinces such as Mazandaran, Gilan, and Lorestan, which both you and I know is wrong[13][14][15][16]. By the way, the comment of Zoupan was written when this map [17] was the same as this one. Furthermore, this map [[18]] states that the Turks are a majority in Iraqi Kurdistan, which is ridiclious. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss improvements of other maps at their talk pages, and tag {{Inaccurate-map-disputed}}.--Zoupan (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:HistoryofIran: Half of the sources you used are invalid, as wikimedia projects can't be used as sources for each other. --Мурад 97 (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Мурад 97: Actually they are maps made by either the CIA or from a academy, but has been uploaded on this site :P. Are you saying that the Turks are a majority in provinces such as Mazandaran or what? --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apparently no consensus for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vista área de la construcción de la Central Térmica Costanera, circa 1960.jpg

[edit]

Photo from circa 1960, not own work, but photo of photo. Argentinian photos need 25 years from photographing plus 20 years from publishing. When and where the photo was published? Taivo (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ´ Hello, I am Hernán Cataneo. My grand grand father was Zenon Arienti. I have a hundreds of pictures of this type. This photos belong me. I dont have scanner, that is the reason that it was a photo of photo. This picture never was published. It was private photos for business use . Soon I will have a scanner. Greetings. Hernán[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foreplay Leads to Real Play.jpg

[edit]

ohne jegliche aussage 217.255.144.32 13:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leonard Courtney.jpg

[edit]

Low resolution duplicate of File:Leonard Henry Courtney, Vanity Fair, 1880-09-25.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not exact duplicates - this version is in use. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leonard Courtney.jpg

[edit]

Globally orphaned low resolution duplicate of File:Leonard Henry Courtney, Vanity Fair, 1880-09-25.jpg The Traditionalist (talk) 00:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it is truly globally orphaned, then, yes, delete it. Its replacement at w:Leonard Courtney, 1st Baron Courtney of Penwith is good. DavidBrooks (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diego-vites-ser-xesta-cidade-da-cultura-de-galicia-2014.jpg

[edit]

Sculptures situated temporarily at open spaces are out of freedom of panorama in Spain. Elisardojm (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is a person, not a sculpture. --Jcb (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:施伯谟 Singapore.jpg

[edit]

I doubt user:Qvrikuduo is the original photographer as the description seem to suggest. Jarekt (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I’m not the studio photographer who took the photo nearly a century ago, but I have the possession of the only copy remaining, which was uploaded as a webpage reference. Thank you!
Moved from talk page by --Jarekt (talk) 11:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CC license is not right for this image. For the image to stay you will need to figure out if it is in Public Domain based on research about the photographer. Please check requirements of {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-anon-70}} and templates related to the country of origin. --Jarekt (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per com:UNDEL. Evidence why this file is pd hasbeen provided there. Natuur12 (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drdhaval2785 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Much more likely to by publish in India then USA. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Burgett Steamer.pdf

[edit]

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gdynia 1939.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license (No license since). The license was wrapped in a tl-wrapper but I can't find any evidence that this photo meets all of the conditions of {{PD-Polish}}, namely that it was published or distributed in Poland before May 23, 1994, and that either the photographer is Polish or the photograph was first published in Poland. Hence I think this qualifies for a full DR. Green Giant (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless more information supporting license is provided. Source=www.muzeumgdynia.pl does not meet the requirement to prove publication in Poland before 1994 as required by {{PD-Polish}}. The file could have been {{PD-anon-70-EU}}, if it was published before 1945 without naming the photographer. --Jarekt (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tommy Cannon.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission CB2288 (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: See related DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you say this? In all the years you have been trying to get these photos deleted, you've never said why. Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tommy Cannon.jpg

[edit]

Unused image with personality right issues CB2288 (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense request. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donna che sventra il pesce, bronzo, 1950, Akademie der Künste, Berlin.jpg

[edit]

Artist it:Giuseppe Mazzullo died 1988. Its still copyrighted. Undelete 2059. JuTa 19:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine tratta dal catalogo della mostra antologica di Giuseppe Mazzullo, presentazione di Stefano D'Arrigo, Assemblea regionale siciliana, Palermo, Palazzo dei Normanni, maggio - luglio 1977. Immagine tav. 10

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CanadianRailwayAheadSign.png

[edit]

This sign does not exist in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 19:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Archiv DIAF (17).JPG

[edit]
Urheber der Puppe ist Gerhard Behrendt (1), Behrendt verstarb erst 2006 --> die Puppe ist noch urheberrechtlich geschützt. Der Upload stellt eine URV dar. Löschen, es gibt schon einen Grund, warum die einzigen erlaubten Bilder der Figur aus einer Bildspende des Bundesarchivs stammen! Paulae (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Paulae: Verstehe. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, dass es via dem Museumsinstitut, das die Puppe beheimatet, eine Sondererlaubnis in irgendeiner Form gibt? Das wäre ja auch für viele zukünftige fotografierte Objekte sinnvoll zu wissen, wenn es da einen Weg gäbe. --Jensbest (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Das Museum kann keine Freigabe der Figur erteilen, die Puppe wird hochgradig vermarktet, es ist schlichtweg ausgeschlossen. --Paulae (talk) 22:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parche del Escuadrón Alacrán - GNA.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Loco085 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From http://www.gendarmeria.gob.ar/, site says: "COPYRIGHT© 2016"|source=http://www.gendarmeria.gob.ar/ Does {{PD-AR-Gov}} apply? Amitie 10g (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Палац архієпископів (Оброшине).jpg

[edit]

This file cannot be transfered on Commons. It writed on Ukrainian file page uk:Файл:Палац архієпископів (Оброшине).jpg Andriy.v (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No FOP in Ukraine. However, XVI century building, already in the PD. Please research before nominating. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It XVIII sentry building not XVI, however the building was rebuilded on XX sentry by pl:Bronisław Wiktor, who dead in 1961 so the building will be in PD on 1932.--Andriy.v (talk) 08:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Building a new copy of the work does not create new copyright. --Jcb (talk) 23:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dairy Queen Bahamas.png

[edit]

Obvious derivative of Dairy Queen US logo. See e.g. w:File:Dairy Queen logo.svg —teb728 t c 23:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Jcb (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Monfort-Théâtre

[edit]

No FOP in France (Architect is Claude Parent).

— Racconish ☎ 16:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Maison Heinrich Heine

[edit]

Built in 1958 by architects Johannes Krahn and Paul Maitre. No FOP in France

— Racconish ☎ 16:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: very simple square building, freely licenced, complies with TOO. Ww2censor (talk) 22:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Johannes Krehn is a notable German architect with dedicated pages on the German and the English Wikipedia [19] [20]. A characteristic of his architectural style is its simplicity [21], but simplicity does not imply lack of originality. This is one of his notable works, with dedicated litterature [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]. An exhibition in Paris in 2015 was dedicated to the architecture of this building [27]. Per COM:PCP it is not up to us to decide such a notable work is below the threshold of originality. — Racconish ☎ 19:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've previously nominated simple French buildings and they were kept because of their simple design. Ww2censor (talk) 23:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is called "simplicity" here is the creative application of some design principles, described here as : "Vorrang der Funktion, Konstruktions- und Materialgerechtigkeit, Verzicht auf Ornament und vorgeblendete Fassade sowie Liebe zum Detail" (Primacy of doing justice to function, design and material ; renunciation to ornament and over-complicated facade ; attention to detail). This approach of architectural design, inheritated from the Bauhaus and the New Objectivity cannot be described as "simple" if we understand simplicity as a lack of originality of artistic creation, but rather as sobriety [28]. This building is actually considered as a characteristic creation of an original modern architect (see the sources I gave, e.g. here), not as a reproduction of solutions existing at the time. — Racconish ☎ 07:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, original enough to be copyrighted, the artistic touch of the artist is visible, it's enough in France to be protected. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Chooz nuclear power plant

[edit]

Built by French architect Claude Parent in France. No Fop in France.

— Racconish ☎ 16:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/03/01&oldid=448859241"