Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
CopyRight Vio. Dr-Taher (talk) 01:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Hedwig in Washington (copyvio) Alan (talk) 03:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
CopyRight Vio Edslov (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio/not confirmable—uploader claims it was taken from fansshare.com, which does not appear to have a matching image. Google image search returns no results. Uploader simultaneously created File:Karen Dotrice.jpg, a demonstrable copyvio and already so nominated. This image is either a copyvio or, because it does not exist anywhere else, it cannot be confirmed authentic. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 03:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
The image is actually licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0; the uploader falsified the review results. It was never actually reviewed. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- ~ Nahid Talk 16:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source is Facebook © 2016
If Rae Threat has given permission, this should have been finalised before upload and the image page marked. Fæ (talk) 10:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Talking to the subject, she assured me that the photographer would e-mail OTRS with the relevant permission right after I uploaded it. However, since that has not been the case, I see no reason to keep it on the site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- This was uploaded 3 months ago, shortly before it became the main image on the English Wikipedia biography you created. In these circumstances it should have been marked as OTRS pending, making it more likely to have been picked up as not done. It would be sensible to review your approach to licensing and the use of Commons templates. --Fæ (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- In a surprise to everyone, I have a life and am human. I have gone ahead and requested for someone to ask her to send over permission if possible, so hopefully this will resolve itself within the next few days. If not, then my support still stands. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- This was uploaded 3 months ago, shortly before it became the main image on the English Wikipedia biography you created. In these circumstances it should have been marked as OTRS pending, making it more likely to have been picked up as not done. It would be sensible to review your approach to licensing and the use of Commons templates. --Fæ (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by request of the uplaoder. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
possibly copyvio, another picture loaded with no metadata (at least not convincing and complete), posted by a Brazilian user (and many copyright violations), which as we know the artist itself is American, preventing the authorship, I did some research and found this image on several other sites Yasméssica (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, beautiful photo, but copyvio. I blocked the uploader for a week. This is his last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 01:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete file:The Testament Logo1.jpg also due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the source, http://www.panoramio.com/photo/96891063 is licensed Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works. Sorry. We can only take Attribution and, optionally, Share alike, but not those last two qualifiers. GRuban (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Source license CC BY-NC-ND confirmed. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
می خواهم مشخصات خودم را حذف نمایم محمدحسن شمس صلوات (talk) 12:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (except for bot-collecting pages on Commons such as User:콩가루/일본철도/2015 November) raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu tama.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (except for bot-collecting pages on Commons such as User:콩가루/일본철도/2015 November) raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu enoshima.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused raster version. Commons has a vector one: File:Odakyu Hakone StaNo.svg. KurodaSho (talk) 10:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
代わりの画像が出来たから Y.WXYZ.S. (talk) 03:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Samothrace, Greece, wind turbines.jpg, except that one is not corrupted. See the user's Wikipedia talk page for more details. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
An older version of this image (from 2013) was deleted for self-promotion: Commons:Deletion requests. The uploader has made no other contributions in Commons, and an IP-only editor on the English-language Wikipedia has made edits exclusively to use this image for promotion without notability: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boiler_Room_(music_project)&diff=685103839&oldid=685103424 Control.valve (talk) 04:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, both versions are out of project scope. I deleted also his userpage due to inappropriate use of userpages. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
No longer use this user page image СССР (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Unused art of non-notable artist is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Needless raster of File:Disney Springs.svg. Should be replaced in all locations Elisfkc (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Probably taken from http://www.yangjingmusic.com/index.php/downloads/category/19-yang-jing --ghouston (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, author Jean-Jacques Ruc, says EXIF. I warned the user and will delete all his/her uploads. Sometimes EXIF says the author (always different), if not, then photos are small and without metadata. One file has even © in bottom. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality images. Found a better replacement at here: file:Pehimi Yusof.jpg. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 119×143 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
dup with file:2015년 4월 22일 서울특별시 중구 서울소방재난본부 현장대응단 사무실 신용호 DSC09490.JPG. 최광모 (talk) 06:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Lacking copyright/license details for scanned item. --ghouston (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, 1946 book cover. Cover artist is David Friedmann (1893–1980). The image can be restored in 2051 (70 years from death). Taivo (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikimedia commons is not the place where you post the profile pics of yoursel. There is a place called Facebook.com Thatonewikiguy (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
promotional, includes web-address and phionenumber
Motopark (talk) 07:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also permission field says "not yet". Taivo (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Got exact duplicate file sources at here: file:Rais AID.jpg. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MeloMeloDesign (talk · contribs)
[edit]Grabbed from Facebook via (example) https://www.facebook.com/Art.Brasil/photos/a.1394482307480224.1073741825.1394481814146940/1619302194998233/?type=3&theater (23.10.2015). Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Female Nikolaevckiy cenobitic monastery in Tashkent47.jpg, Bobyrr (talk) 08:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep I am happy enough with black and white versus colour to remain. They will be from different sources and represent different things. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)- Keep: Different colour, so no duplicate. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept, it is good to have a version with text cropped away. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Another more cleaner version with transparent background is here: Колобок1. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 08:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Uploaded on 29.10.2015. If IN scope, permission needed, considering https://www.facebook.com/jpbiggcartoon/photos/a.518128461656585.1073741841.444780058991426/518128891656542/?type=3&theater (2014) and (example) https://www.facebook.com/bigartsproducoes/photos/a.260015064097673.53090.260003264098853/751326201633221/?type=3&theater (04.2015)
Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata and logo of non-notable company (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in pt.wiki). These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed somewhere from Internet, also previously published (mysteriously watermarked) at Wikimapia, uploaded there 3 years ago via http://wikimapia.org/1226812/pt/Patroc%C3%ADnio = http://photos.wikimapia.org/p/00/03/03/80/98_big.jpg . Wikimapia is {{WikiMapia}} but in this case most likely not own work by the Wikimapia-user. See also Category:WikiMapia related deletion requests.
Another upload by this user some minutes later was File:Patrociniomg.jpg = grabbed from Internet. Gunnex (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lauansoares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 30.10.2015 by Lauansoares (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photos (Brazilian band + album cover) were already circulating on web before. File:Cofo 01.jpeg is — per official Facebook https://www.facebook.com/cofodeparafernalha/photos/a.1398897000435856.1073741827.1398894050436151/1500216760303879/?type=3&theater (01.10.2015) — credited with "Foto: Paula Barros". Further details/permission(s) needed.
Both files may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x (speedy) deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 11:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Most likely screenshotted from the 2003 documentary en:La Petite Morte with en:Raffaëla Anderson, a French former adult film performer. Gunnex (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zrazsolutions (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional, out of project scope
Motopark (talk) 11:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the company is non-notable: ZRAZ and Z Raz are unknown to en.wiki. I will delete also logo file:Zrazsolutions.jpg. These are the user's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
I guess that the shapes of "Darth Vader" and the "Death star" are copyrighted by the movie studios of Star wars. This image here could possibly be seen as a derivative and thus unfree work, hence calling for deletion. Grand-Duc (talk) 11:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
In fact, this is the work of Andriy Yermolenko, from his series of work called (translated from Ukrainian) Star Ukraine. (You can also see/buy this work here http://dobralystivka.com/product/nabir-lystivok-zoryana-ukrayina-vid-andriya-yermolenka). In this work Darth Vader represent as Ukrainian cossack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ігор Пєтков (talk • contribs) 20:50, 9. Feb. 2016 (UTC)
- Well, then the artist is infringing on the postulated studio's copyright, but this won't make the shapes of Darth Vader and the Death Star free, assuming they are copyrighted. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- But according to message on this forum (http://www.copyrightaid.co.uk/forum/topic894.htm)
Hi Almost-Blink, if you have drawn the Darth Vader figure completely yourself, and not traced or copied an actual photograph of the Darth Vader character then you have created an original work, albeit one based on the idea of the character, so that would not infringe copyright. However if you have copied or traced a photograph, that would be seen as a derivative work and so would infringe copyright. Lucasfilm who own the copyright in the StarWars films protect their intellectual property vigorously (there is a court case going on in the UK at present over the design of a stormtrooper's helmet). The words Darth Vader and Lord Darth Vader are registered trade marks in the UK and elsewhere in the world, and should not be used on clothing (including headwear), games, toys, computer products or fridge magnets without authorization.
So you can use Darth Vader or even other characters only if their figure were made completely by yourself!. Andiy Yermolenko draw this digital-art by himself.
Also I tried to rename this image because I can't use name Vader (Otaman Vader) in the title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ігор Пєтков (talk • contribs) 11:56, 10. Feb. 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I do not think that it matters how a derivative is made. Let's take the well-known Utah teapot as example. You could make a model of it using a 3D software (Blender, Maya...), a rapid prototyping 3D printer or without a computer by using clay, wood, metal or something else. The clay model on your table is as much a derivative of the teapot as the polygon model on your screen is. By analogy, the drawn "Vader" is a derivative of the movie "Vader", which has as consequence that the drawing artist cannot grant a free license to this work without permission by Lucasfilms. Well, you could say that eg. in Ukraine, a self-made painting of some movie themed subject is not subject to the studio's copyright, but I am sure with almost absolute certainty that this holds not true in the US (cf. COM:L: the work must be freely licensed in the country of origin and Stateside, the latter cannot be true here). Furthermore, every single movie frame is a photograph, so, to be sure that no actual frame was copied, you'd need to check every Star wars movie with an appearance of Darth Vader frame by frame to be sure that no one has the same angle etc. as your drawing. That could not realistically be done, at least not per COM:PRP. IMO, the deletion is unavoidable. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC) PS. Please remember to sign your comments.
Deleted, uploader Ігор Пєтков (talk · contribs) claimed, that the artist Andriy Yermolenko has published the work under free license. This is incorrect: the file was published in Facebook without traces of any free license. All his uploads violate copyright and are speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Found another duplicates at here: file:Финская стенка12.jpg. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 11:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree sculptures (sculptor unknown to me). Eleassar (t/p) 11:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the left sculpture is apparently made not earlier than 1980, so there is no way, how it can be free in Slovenia. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
It look like just Czech version of this (old image) https://jameskennedymonash.wordpress.com/2013/12/13/infographic-table-of-esters-and-their-smells/ Pavouk (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, recreation of file:Tabulka esterů - zápachy.jpg, the uploader's last remaining contribution. For collages source and license of every used photo is needed. I warned the user. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, likely professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, there are bigger versions and also color versions in the internet. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Likely official product shot. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Small filesize, no metadata, possible crop of professionalportrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of photograph of unknown source and copyright status. Also probable scope issues. Storkk (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. There is watermark "memecreator.org" in bottom right corner. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Widely used online. If uploader is the artist/copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation.. described as part of a "boxset". If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, "Green solar vacuum" is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-free image, as specified in its terms of use: "Commercial uses of the logo are those intended to generate income or profit, either directly or indirectly. Permission for commercial use of the logo is granted by the IYP 2016 Secretariat on an extremely limited, case-by-case basis." The current description asserts that it does not meet the COM:TO, which I don't find convincing. There is obvious artistic effort put in the image. No such user (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is also a JPEG version at File:LOGO_IYP-en-high-horizontal.jpg that should go along. No such user (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, non-free license, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 13:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, but first version of file is kept, because does not surpass threshold of originality. It was used before it was overwritten with second version. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
The file is corrupted. Moreover it is useless, because any infobox can locate the city in a map of France. Borvan53 (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by user:JuTa as corrupted file. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bartolo6968 (talk · contribs)
[edit]From Getty Images: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/spYQXdqSrRK/San+Jose+Sharks+v+Arizona+Coyotes/w5WGxMcOmYP/Brenden+Dillon and http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/spYQXdqSrRK/San+Jose+Sharks+v+Arizona+Coyotes/g4fd6zc5MDY/Brenden+Dillon
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. I delete also copy of this file:Merrion entrance.jpg due to bad quality and bad composition, there are also copyright concerns (uploader and author have different names). Taivo (talk) 09:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosodagakuen (talk · contribs)
[edit]susp. copyvios -small images without metadata
/St1995 21:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, all 320×212 pixels. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
No file exists. Appleincguy (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- withdrawn Appleincguy (talk) 19:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept, withdrawn, file exists. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Potential copyvio, not in project scope Liance (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, my bad. Please close this deletion request. Liance (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept, author and uploader seem to be the same person. The file is used in 2 projects and therefore in scope. The nomination is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This picture shows a dude (based on seen body feature) lazing around without add any significant values to Wikipedia encyclopedia contents. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, maybe I have weird sense of humor, but here I laughed. Also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
With the best will in the world, this picture does not show what it purports to show. An erect penis in a sea of shampoo suds is not the same as the picture's title. It serves no educational purpose, is unused on any project, appears to be here purely for exhibitionsim, has a title and description that are untrue, and is thus out of scope. Timtrent (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 450×338 pixels, no metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The aircraft in this is so tiny that it makes the photo out of reasonable scope. SlurpyMcGurpy (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Well, it's large enough to see that it's a British Airways 747, but let's be realistic: with tons of better alternatives available most likely nobody will ever use this. --El Grafo (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, per El Grafo. There are 983 photos in linked category with all subcategories. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:License review - source http://www.panoramio.com/photo/81027804 says © All Rights Reserved by Chuck Beckon GRuban (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: AGF, the uploader seems to be the same person as the Panoramio account that this picture comes. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Er ... the Panoramio account is named Chuck Beckon, the Wikimedia user is named Chuck Berglund? --GRuban (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Aha. Chuck Berglund has now changed his Panoramio user name to match, and told me about it on my EN user page, where he gave me a barnstar! So I withdraw my nomination. However, the Panoramio license still says All Rights Reserved, so I wouldn't be surprised if someone else who didn't read this exchange were to nominate it for deletion on those grounds later. Chuck, if you're still reading, you really should either change the Panoramio license to match the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on the Wikimedia page (simplest), or, if for whatever reason you don't want to mark it as CC on Panoramio, should send an email to COM:OTRS confirming that it's your picture and you're releasing it this way. --GRuban (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- User:Stas1995's simpler solution of just changing the source tag to "own work" should also suffice. Sometimes I overthink these things. :-) --GRuban (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Aha. Chuck Berglund has now changed his Panoramio user name to match, and told me about it on my EN user page, where he gave me a barnstar! So I withdraw my nomination. However, the Panoramio license still says All Rights Reserved, so I wouldn't be surprised if someone else who didn't read this exchange were to nominate it for deletion on those grounds later. Chuck, if you're still reading, you really should either change the Panoramio license to match the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on the Wikimedia page (simplest), or, if for whatever reason you don't want to mark it as CC on Panoramio, should send an email to COM:OTRS confirming that it's your picture and you're releasing it this way. --GRuban (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Er ... the Panoramio account is named Chuck Beckon, the Wikimedia user is named Chuck Berglund? --GRuban (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept, I think, that the defects are fixed. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The information in the file name is incorrect Lankyrider (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is reason to rename, not to delete a file, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Wanted to overwrite tho old file; not to create a new cropeed version Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, copy of file:01 "نمای پشتی کوچه " در دار.jpg, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Plik posiada błędną nazwę. Koefbac (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Plik posiada błędną nazwę. Koefbac (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
mistake of upload Touzrimounir (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded from Flickr (stored there in 2012 by "Boynton") the drawing of an action figure ("Manufacturer: Macross Onboard Factories") was already circulating before 2012 at the web, like (example) http://www.macross2.net/m3/sdfmacross/destroid-phalanx.htm (wayback to 2010 available, credit: "Submitted by Richard Pollard" + "Images From - Macross Perfect Memory and other macross books"/http://macross.anime.net/wiki/Main_Page, Copyright 1994-2008 Big West & licensees/Egan Loo. All rights reserved. ) = http://www.macross2.net/m3/sdfmacross/destroid-phalanx/destroid-phalanx-blue.jpg. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Weak support Sorry, i am wrong. I am agree with Gunnex. I will not upload drawings of this type (drawings with copyright status that unclear). 
∞DMR.✍ 
(Discusión) 22:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![50 File:The Horrors - photo from the "Higher" boxset.jpg](#File:The_Horrors_-_photo_from_the_"Higher"_boxset.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![65 File:01 "نمای پشتی کوچه " در دار (cropped).jpg](#File:01_"نمای_پشتی_کوچه_"_در_دار_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_NORTH_RIVER_STEAMBOAT_CO._(at)_"HOTEL_ST._GEORGE,_NYACK-ON-HUDSON"_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269743-4000000963).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_and_its_dress_code.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/08#c-Storkk-2016-02-08T14:11:00.000Z-File:The_Horrors_-_photo_from_the_"Higher"_boxset.jpg){kind=link}
![12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/08#c-Taivo-2016-02-11T12:53:00.000Z-File:The_Horrors_-_photo_from_the_"Higher"_boxset.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![16:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/08#c-Sebastian_Wallroth-2016-02-08T16:33:00.000Z-File:01_"نمای_پشتی_کوچه_"_در_دار_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
![11:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/08#c-Taivo-2016-02-12T11:18:00.000Z-File:01_"نمای_پشتی_کوچه_"_در_دار_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 500×375 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Likely TV still. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 640×640 pixels, no metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Also unused and uncategorized, maybe depicted person is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, too bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 280×372 pixels, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Archivo subido erroneamente Naroa21 (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
SVG available under File:Flag of Syria (1932-1958; 1961-1963).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=4583&draftyear=1999&genpos=SS Ytoyoda (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, © Copyright - The Sports Xchange All Rights Reserved. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
File:ANNUAL DINNER (held by) NORTH RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. (at) "HOTEL ST. GEORGE, NYACK-ON-HUDSON" (HOTEL) (NYPL Hades-269743-4000000963).jpg
[edit]_NORTH_RIVER_STEAMBOAT_CO._(at)_%22HOTEL_ST._GEORGE,_NYACK-ON-HUDSON%22_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269743-4000000963).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_NORTH_RIVER_STEAMBOAT_CO._(at)_%22HOTEL_ST._GEORGE,_NYACK-ON-HUDSON%22_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269743-4000000963).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless image of a blank page. Unless this is intended to be a filler for an ebook of sorts it is out of project scope. Also File:ANNUAL DINNER (held by) NORTH RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. (at) "HOTEL ST. GEORGE, NYACK-ON-HUDSON" (HOTEL) (NYPL Hades-269743-4000000963).tiff. De728631 (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I have deleted thousands of scanned blank pages. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in a row on 02.11.2015 by Maxcolnet (talk · contributions · Statistics) all photos (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF) are credited to "Thais Kreimer". Further details/permission needed. Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tacos polo.jpg.
- File:Rodrigo Andrade no Aberto do Helvetia de 22 Gols.jpeg
- File:V Torneio São Jorge La Stronda x UniPolo.jpeg
- File:Torneio São Jorge em Indaiatuba, Potiguar x La Stronda por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
- File:Final 22 Gols São José Polo x Agudo por Thaís Kreimer.jpeg
- File:Rodrigo Andrade no Aberto do Helvetia de 22 Gols por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
- File:V Torneio de Polo São Jorge - Unipolo x São Jorge por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
- File:Polo no Helvetia Polo Country Club por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
- File:Torneio São Jorge Potiguar x La Stronda 2 por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
- File:Torneio São Jorge Potiguar x La Stronda por Thais Kreimer.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Nominating — per above — also:
- File:Oswaldo-Diniz.jpg ("Foto por Thais Kreimer")
here now uploaded on 03.11.2015 by a different user = Antonio Luiz Almeida (talk · contributions · Statistics). Gunnex (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Dubious copyright, uploader's other file is a non-free logo. Used in a spam page on English Wikipedia which I deleted. Out of scope. BethNaught (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, for collages source and license for every used image must be given. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by YeanGonzalez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Wtcmcbo.jpg
- File:Hotelhesperia2.jpg – found at http://s669.photobucket.com/user/Deividtr/media/IMG-20140414-WA0022.jpg.html
- File:Eurobuil.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contributions. I warned him. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The source is a 404, so the license can't be checked. It's obviously not not eligible for copyright protection. Companies tend not to be all that into licensing work as being in the public domain. Vera (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, apparently screenshot of copyrighted computer game. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
copyvio http://mericesener.com/ Laura Fiorucci (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, source site is copyrighted. I delete also copy of this file:Gozde1.jpg. Taivo (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Erykles. Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Gunnex warned Ericles. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Not own works, dubious licensing, no permission.
- File:Editura Paralela 45.jpg
- File:Editura Minerva.gif
- File:Editura ALL.jpg
- File:Sigla Editura Dacia.jpg
- File:Burebista bust, Hermitage Museum in Petrograd.jpg
Sealle (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, but one is kept, because is simple. I will delete also a complex logo file:CS Tractorul Brasov.png. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
no FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Persons of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of Iadaudpot
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Iadaudpota (talk · contribs):
Commons is not repository of personal photos. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of the proyect scope Edslov (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
DVD cover, not own work Cap1000 (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
DVD cover, not own work Cap1000 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Нищекотёнкова Юлия Сергеевна (talk · contribs)
[edit]Found elsewhere on the web and/or unlikely to be own work.
- File:Кубасов.jpg
- File:Grachev201401.jpg
- File:1 -ое место грачев.jpg
- File:2011 фролов.jpg
- File:Фролов.jpg
- File:ЧЕРЕВАНЬ (2).jpg
- File:Митрошкин Сергей Алексеевич.jpg
- File:Митрошкин Сергей Алексеевич (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
McZusatz (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Нищекотёнкова Юлия Сергеевна (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very hard to believe that this is Own work. No EXIF data with images with poor size/resolution.
- File:AMG test drive.jpg
- File:AMG - test drive.jpg
- File:Виталий Ларионов. 3-ий этап РСКГ 2015. Сочи Автодром..jpg
- File:Владислав Кубасов. ВПК СПОРТ. 8 этап РСКГ 2014.jpg
- File:Кубасов 7-ой этап РСКГ, Сочи Автодром.jpg
- File:Митрошкин,Ларионов.jpg
- File:Митрошкин Академия.jpg
- File:Академия Сергея Митрошкина.jpg
- File:Ferrari Moscow 2014.jpg
- File:Ferrari Track day 2014.jpg
- File:Фролов 5-ый этап 2012.jpg
- File:Фролов 2012 победа в сезоне.jpg
- File:Михаил Грачев победа 2014.jpg
- File:Михаил Грачев 2014.jpg
- File:Черевань (1).jpg
- File:Черевань (3).jpg
- File:Фролов 2011.jpg
- File:Черевань 2008.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I only looked at File:Фролов 5-ый этап 2012.jpg but that one clearly bears a carclub.ru watermark. --GRuban (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably not own work. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1996–2007. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1994–99, architect Tom Wright is still living. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Built 1994–99, architect Tom Wright is still living. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Although the filename says "Burj al Arab", it seems to me, that the building is de minimis. It does not seem to me main object and it is not used for illustrating Burj al Arab in other projects. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep As filename says, main object of the photo is Madinat Jumeirah. It is used in 36 projects, but none of them (I am not sure in projects using Arab script) uses it for illustrating Burj al Arab. Madinat Jumeirah is also behind trees and not well seen. I consider the shot de minimis. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Not just the title bit also the composition makes obvious that the Burj Arab plays a minor role in the picture and de minimis does apply here. This pocture is a FP and was Picture of the Day in Commons. Already during the FPC there was discussion about FoP and consensus to keep it. Poco2 06:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Burj al Arab is clearly main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Burj al Arab seems to me main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted art. Burj al Arab was built in 1995–99. Taivo (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This kind of internal architecture must be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted architecture. Taivo (talk) 20:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Sin relevancia Alelapenya (talk) 01:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Above the TOO Josve05a (talk) 01:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Aegon International Eastbourne.jpg
- File:Aegon Open Nottingham.jpg
- File:Katowice Open.jpg
- File:Logo Istanbul Open.png
- File:Logo Katowice Open 2015.jpg
- File:Logo Lublin Airport.pngˇ
- Delete I add for deletion a lot of his other uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Self Promotional Edslov (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Self Promotional Edslov (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also copy file:Juan Lankamp en Genovés .png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Self Promotional Edslov (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Self Promotional Edslov (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Edslov (talk) 03:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Per discussion on User_talk:Domitori#File:C22693-gorbanevskaya02.jpg - basically, it looks like the uploader got permission from the photographer, but won't send it to OTRS, because he is convinced "it does not work". Unfortunately, we need that permission to be verifiable somehow - it can be mailed in to OTRS, it can be put up on the photographer's web site, it can be publically published in some other reliable source that others can see, but we do need something. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 03:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
The file should be kept. It had been loaded according to the rules established for the moment of loading.
As for the OTRS – I cannot help you with this.
I have investigated the problem and my conclusion is that OTRS does not work.
I have observed the failures at the Russian section of Wikisource. One of cases is described in English at http://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php/Kouznetsov,_permission
First, I thought that this is technical error, but after some investigation, I conclude, that the fraud and sabotage takes place at the high level of administration of wikimedia foundation.
I see no reason to expect any different effect for other sections of Wikimedia projects.
I do not want to collaborate with impostors.
I do not want to disturb the copyright owners with vain attempts to keep their works at Wikimedia sites.
Sincerely, Domitori (talk) 09:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
From the copyright holder
[edit]
This is true that in some Russian parts of the project there were and are some significant cases of misuse, as long as Russia as a whole and a good deal of its people are still intrinsically Soviet, i.e. insincere and unreliable. However, it would be sad if this affect the Wiki presence of Natalia Gorbanevskaya, the person that dedicated all her life for struggle against the Soviet. That said, I have changed copyright information at the source page for this picture allowing its usage under free license: [1]. Дмитрий Кузьмин (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Opinions
[edit]
Keep I reviewed license of this photo and confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date. DR can be closed. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, Dmitry! Nomination withdrawn. --GRuban (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO: No information on which YouTube video or what the license on that YouTube license is. Nominating to give uploader a chance to point out the YouTube video. Closeapple (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of 16OverlordB
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of 16OverlordB (talk · contribs):
Small photos without metadata, probably copyvios. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violations. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by وحید باقراسکوئی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions and missing/inconsistent metadata (at least 11 different cameras used). Also, unused photos of groups of unidentified men with no apparent notability in unidentified locations with spammy file descriptions are generally outside of Commons' project scope.
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 4.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 3.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 1.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 2.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 0.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی343.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی342.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheioskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی340.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی341.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی339.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی338.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی337.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی336.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی335.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskoueiوحید باقراسکوئی334.JPG
- File:333 vahid bagheroskouei وحید باقراسکوئی.JPG
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی228.jpg
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی227.jpg
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی225.JPG
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی226.JPG
- File:222وحید باقراسکوئی.JPG
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی223.JPG
- File:وحید باقراسکوئی224.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 115.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 114.jpg
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 112.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 113.JPG
- File:Vahid bagheroskouei 111.JPG
- File:Nesexpo5.JPG
- File:Nesexpo.Co.png
- File:Nesexpo 7.jpg
- File:Nesexpo3.JPG
- File:Nesexpo2.JPG
- File:Nesexpo4.JPG
- File:Nesexpo.JPG
- File:Ankara javaher.JPG
- File:Ankara opaline.JPG
- File:Safir ankara.JPG
- File:Ankara 1.JPG
- File:Iran med 1.JPG
- File:Iran med 2.JPG
- File:Hoteldari.JPG
- File:Tejarat.JPG
- File:Hamayesh.JPG
- File:Bazargani.JPG
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hallisonpatrick (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Both related ptwiki entries speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 03.11.2015 by Abel wi (talk · contributions · Statistics) (high res/exif available, both files identical: 1x color/1x b&w), the file title File:Roberto Donadelli by Five Casting.jpg suggests a work by "Five Casting" which is a Brazilian (actor) casting company (http://www.fivecasting.com.br/ [where he [Roberto Donadelli] is not [more] listed). The colored photo was (even cropped) already published in 2013 on "Roberto Donadelli"'s Facebook via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4600839855225&set=a.1410011766517.120644.1119160462&type=3&theater, so it may be recommendable to obtain a COM:OTRS-connection.
The photos may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry deleted... but... on the other hand the photos maybe useful inside or outside of Wikimedia to illustrate something related to (example) Category:Superman clothing...
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chi-Town Finest Breakers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Chi Town Finest Breakers 2008 logo.jpg
- File:Chi town finest breakers wiki.jpg
- File:Chi town finest breakers.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 03:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
These images are from several sources, none of which are the uploader. Although he claims they are all PD, there is no evidence of that and it seems very unlikely. In any event we cannot keep them without a free license from the photographers via OTRS.
- File:Sepp Wejwar mit Buch.jpg
- File:Biersepp mit einer Palette von Verkostungsgläsern.jpg
- File:Der Biersepp grüßt.gif
- File:Sepp Wejwar.jpg
- File:Der Biersepp nimmt wahr.jpg
- File:Sepp Wejwar mit Füllfeder.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Received permission: 2016020810011976. --DaB. (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Likely professional sports news shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
No FoP in the UAE. 84.62.198.159 13:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I see nothing really copyrightable here. Just the interior of a room. Whoms copyright would be affected here? --PaterMcFly (talk) 07:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with above. Not copyrightable. -- Orionist ★ talk 07:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I suppose, technically, the window view; but that seems very pedantic. I think it is fine. Chzz ► 17:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete "Architecture" is subject to copyright -- not just "exterior architecture", "unusual architecture" or any other modifier -- anything that is architecture is copyrighted. The design of this room and its window is architecture, therefore subject to copyright, therefore must be deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept. - I don't see anything copyrightable - Jcb (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment What is copyrighted here? The painting? The coach? The candelabra imitation? Taivo (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)- FoP has nothing to do with this. This image was clearly taken inside the building and not from a public place. The only thing that might be copyright is the picture on the wall, but as its presence is incidental to the purpose of the image, de minimis should apply. 86.153.133.193 15:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The law calls out a copyright on "architecture". Just as a single page of a copyrighted book has a copyright, so it is not required to show the whole building to infringe on the building's copyright. In this case we see an unusual arrangement of the fenestration, which clearly is covered by the building's copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jim the "fenestration" is clearly "special", is a part of the architecure, and is not de minimis. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
From Commons:License review - first, I can't find the image on the site given as a source; though I can believe it came from there, since other images of the person can be found there. But more importantly, I can't find anything that looks like an Attribution license for any photos - in fact, all pages have a footer saying "© 2016 ЗАО «МСМ-МЕДИМПЭКС». Все права защищены." which means "all rights reserved". GRuban (talk) 03:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the image is not available at the link provided as "source", and we can not verify the copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
EXIF credits Christian Núñez, not the subject Ytoyoda (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, older and bigger versions on the Web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This images is too blurry for the wikipedia usages. There are a lot of substitute images under 40-foot container and K-Line categories Thatonewikiguy (talk) 08:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Probably the uploader is artist himself. As there are a lot of fans and impostors in Commons, OTRS-permission is still needed. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Probably the uploader is artist himself. As there are a lot of fans and impostors in Commons, OTRS-permission is still needed. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Halte à Port au Prince Laurence JENKEL Halte à Port au Prince 2012 plexiglas 40x54x35cm pièce unique.fond blanc 1.web.jpg
[edit]
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Probably the uploader is artist himself. As there are a lot of fans and impostors in Commons, OTRS-permission is still needed.
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Probably the uploader is artist himself. As there are a lot of fans and impostors in Commons, OTRS-permission is still needed.
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
PR-activity of a local politician. Contribution of his support team (see nickname). Bilderling (talk) 09:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: upscaled version of a non free published image http://sovet.babush.ru/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of Hódmezővásárhely
[edit]Hódmezővásárhely (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Dvorci i perivoji Hrvatskoga zagorja.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Anasazi.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Angkor.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Knosos.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Machu Picchu.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Palenque.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Perzepolis.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Piramide.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Tutankhamon.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Uskršnji otok.jpg
- File:Velike tajne arheologije - Vojska od terakote.jpg
- File:Veliki rječnik hrvatskoga standardnog jezika.jpg
First group. Copyrighted book covers. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (publishing company?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Second group. What is own work here? Surely copyright violation!
- File:Zagrebački neboderi.jpg (641×436)
- File:Zagreb iz zraka.jpg (626×314)
- File:VRH.jpg (617×392)
Third group. Small photos without metadata, I suspect copyright violation. Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 09:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: , derivative works of book covers and copyvio, exemple : http://arhiva.nacional.hr/clanak/66100/sip-snizio-kreditni-rejting-grada-zagreba. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of Junaidehrar
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Junaidehrar (talk · contribs):
- File:Baba.jpg (526×466)
- File:DarulRakam.jpg (768×1043)
- File:Ghous-e-azam-.jpg (1000×750, derivative work)
- File:Ghous e pak.jpg (516×260)
- File:Hateem hijr ismail.jpg (1200×717)
- File:Junaid.1.jpg (929 ×600)
- File:Junaid..1.jpg (1200×468) upscalled version of a crop of http://www.greenprophet.com/2012/03/sunshades-hajj-medina/
- File:Junaid.ehrar.jpg (1446×1000)
- File:Junaidehrar.1.jpg (1127×800, text surpasses threshold of originality)
- File:Junaidehrar 2014-04-15 20-31.jpg (144×205)
- File:Junaidehrar mecca masjid.jpg (1200×766)
- File:Kaaba-sharif.jpg (1160×768)
- File:Madain saleh.jpg (4808×2832) upscalled of [2]
- File:Madinah.jpgˇ(1024×768, camera Sony DSC-W180)
- File:Masjid e jinn.jpg (1000×1477)
- File:Ramzan-ki-dua.jpg (400×400, text surpassses threshold of originality)
- File:Residence-of-Imam-Ghazali.jpg (1200×713)
- File:Roza e rasool sallallahualaihiwasallam.jpg (1024×768)
- File:Shaddad.jpg (2736×3648, camera KODAK EASYSHARE V1003 ZOOM)
![[2]](http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://idata.over-blog.com/1/57/40/12/Groupe-d-images/Site-archeologique-de-Al-Hijr/Thamud.jpg&imgrefurl=http://milem.over-blog.fr/article-site-archeologique-de-al-hijr-madain-salih-arabie-saoudite-104575263.html&h=391&w=600&tbnid=5WcTnluYv2cTBM&tbnh=181&tbnw=278&usg=__fjo50HhjINjUg_WZhF0mYjTRzO0=&docid=KAODksrAcHMQIM){kind=link}
The files are usually small and usually without metadata. If camera data exists, then always different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be own works, mstly are upscalled version of images foun on the web (I added 2 links as exemples). Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files of AngeloFull
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of AngeloFull (talk · contribs):
- File:BarlettaCattedrale.jpg (300×200) see [3]
- File:BarlettaPortaSanta.jpg (493×851)
- File:BarlettaStazione.JPG (720×531, also violates sculptor's copyright)
- File:BarlettaTeatro.jpg (1280×847, author is pcasus)
- File:BarlettaTeatroCurci.jpg (550×366) see [4]
Small photos without metadata, probably not own work as claimed, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, some obvious copyvio see links. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No indication that copyright registration was not performed. Storkk (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work of copyrighted character. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Photograph by uploader, derivative of underlying artwork, which is certainly copyrighted. Storkk (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of the proyect scope Edslov (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of the project scope Edslov (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:License review - source http://www.panoramio.com/photo/105248019 says © All Rights Reserved by evance mvula GRuban (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thatonewikiguy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The icons and the shade of blues are the assets file for Facebook Page Bellow the COM:TOO in the US? Amitie 10g (talk) 13:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
In my opinion, the TOO for this case is probably applicable because that shade blue is part of Facebook UX . Plus the flag is possibly original in design ? Thatonewikiguy (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Fake license. Logo can't be free. Fair use is possible, but not here. Bilderling (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Logo of a respectable software vendor under free license - it can't be Bilderling. Contribution of PR department. (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR resolved as Kept. Again, bellow the COM:TOO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Picture inserted on Knowledge page as vandalism. Kevinmon (talk) 03:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio --Stefan2 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. →Nagy 12:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Edslov (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This image was a smaller duplicate of another from same uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Edslov (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & found larger at http://www.acomerselavida.com/loma-linda.html. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Self promotional Edslov (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & metadata contains (c) information. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
No information about whether this text was published anonymously or not - the author could have died less than 70 years ago. Eleassar (t/p) 21:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Source says "© All Rights Reserved by José Ignacio Delgado…" user indefinitely blocked, no way is this a scan... GRuban (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be an image from the Scotland FA: https://twitter.com/ScottishFA/status/691921816902844416 Ytoyoda (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I just realized that it has been published in a web site months ago, I didn't know it before uploading: sorry! Silvia Girometti (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only which should be replace with wiki tables.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Images from movie "Samsara (2011 film)"- copyrighted by Magidson Films, not by uploader aka "I take this photo from de film..."
Cap1000 (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on these images from around the second world war. Proper source is needed.
- File:Soldadod04.JPG
- File:Dragoniante.jpg
- File:Soldadod01.jpg
- File:Soldadod03.jpg
- File:Soldadod02.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but there is no FoP in the UAE. Dura lex, sed lex. 84.61.179.231 11:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - I didn't realise that the UAE doesn't have Freedom of Pandora, when moving this from Wikipedia. --George2001hi (Discussion) 17:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep for me a case of "de minimis", it's a kind of seascape. Jeriby (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: DM Jcb (talk) 18:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I copy what I wrote in the previous DR: for me a case of "de minimis", it's a kind of seascape. Jeriby (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Looking, how the file is named and used, the building is not de minimis, but main object of the photo and should be deleted. Previous decision to keep was wrong. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the only object in the image besides a lot of water is the Burj. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:C22693-gorbanevskaya02.jpg - it looks like the uploader has permission from the photographer, but won't send it in to OTRS, because "it does not work". Unfortunately we do need that permission to be either mailed in or published. GRuban (talk) 03:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
The file should be kept. It had been loaded according to the rules established for the moment of loading.
As for the OTRS – I cannot help you with this.
I have investigated the problem and my conclusion is that OTRS does not work.
I have observed the failures at the Russian section of Wikisource. One of cases is described in English at http://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php/Kouznetsov,_permission
First, I thought that this is technical error, but after some investigation, I conclude, that the fraud and sabotage takes place at the high level of administration of wikimedia foundation.
I see no reason to expect any different effect for other sections of Wikimedia projects.
I do not want to collaborate with impostors.
I do not want to disturb the copyright owners with vain attempts to keep their works at Wikimedia sites.
Sincerely, Domitori (talk) 09:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination no OTRS, and contrary to assertion in the discussion, OTRS does work. Sorry but if you want the image free-hosted by Commons, you have to fulfill the upload requirements. It's not a conspiracy, but a policy. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Needlesss raster image. Should be replaced by File:TWDC Logo.svg in all locations Elisfkc (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Needless raster of File:Walt Disney World Resort logo.svg. Should be replaced in all locations Elisfkc (talk) 05:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Needless raster of File:Walt Disney Animation Studios Logo.svg. Should be replaced in all locations Elisfkc (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It seems to me that Magog and Stefan are correct. The UK has a really low TOO and therefor we just have to assume that they are copyrighted per com:PCP. Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --EEIM (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
This image is of such low quality as not to be realistically useful for educational purposes. It is out of project scope. Secondarywaltz (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support No need to keep this, as file uploader. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not a social media where you post the picture of yourself. Go to Facebook and post it there. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 06:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The photo is used on userpage in zh.wiki, but the user has no edits in zh.wiki, except on userpage. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Hjalmar
[edit]- File:Balder v. Schirach Stammfolge.jpg (Published soon after 1938)
- File:Dr. Zeno Kuziela.jpg (Photo from 1930s or 1940s)
- File:Ewald Ammende 1.jpeg (Depicted person died in 1936, but what about photographer? Citizen of Estonia, died in Peking – where the photo is done?)
- File:Krupnyitzky 1929.jpeg (Book cover. Author died in 1956.)
- File:Max v. Scheubner-Richter, Riga.jpg (1918 photo)
- File:Morello dead.jpg (1935 work)
- File:Revyuk.jpeg (Depicted person was born in 1887, the photo was taken in USA, but was it before 1923?)
- File:Евгений Брант.jpg
- File:Георгий Немирович-Данченко.jpeg (Photo from 1930s or 1940s)
- File:РГАСПИ. Ф. 17, оп. 125, д. 141, л. 49.jpg (1937 work by brothers Kukryniks, copyrighted until 2071 (70 years from death of last living member)
Historical photos and other files. Mostly no photographer data. Most are free, if they are anonymous, but this needs also evidence. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (Commons isn't Flickr). Sismarinho (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Depicted person is borderline notable (twice mentioned in en.wiki, no article). But this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
_and_its_dress_code.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_and_its_dress_code.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Je demande la suppression de cette image car elle n'est pas libre de droits. Cdt RoSWeLL (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Cette œuvre n'est pas libre de droit et appartient à l'artiste Commandant RoSWeLL. Veuillez faire en sorte de modifier l'auteur et de faire pointer sur la page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commandant_Roswell
Merci
Cdtroswell
Deleted: per nomination & http://www.ordredubitard.fr/pages/tradition.html. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a duplicate from the 1st file version of Uranus - GPN-2000-000440.jpg, no need for this uncropped one! Ras67 (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, no metadata, likely professional sports news shot or TV still. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skippedtheclass (talk · contribs)
[edit]University logos.. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Political Science CU Thai Emblem.png
- File:Khon Kaen University Thailand Emblem.png
- File:Faculty of medical science in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of art in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of nursing in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of education in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of medicine in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of engineering in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of agriculture in thai-icon.png
- File:Faculty of science in thai-icon.png
- File:Political Science Education Icon.png
- File:Icon-wikipedia2.png
- File:Science Education Icon.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions/different cameras, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://sputnik-georgia.com/images/21662/61/216626130.jpg.
- File:2009 crowd .jpg
- File:The Fades.jpg
- File:Green room 2014.jpg
- File:417178 original.jpg
- File:Caamps.jpg
- File:Ddt-in-tbilisi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mattia Rossetti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Max040665tres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.flickr.com/photos/ucsh/10848333763.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Not necessary to illustrate article about village/city. Link should be enough. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons is not your personal free web host Sismarinho (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.hobichngoc.com/uploads/4/0/9/3/40933975/2798521_orig.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ak-cache.legacy.net/legacy/images/cobrands/tallahassee/Photos/TAD025745-1_20150708.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Korolev Vladimir
[edit]Korolev Vladimir (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:1-й Всес. съезд гидрогеологов.jpg
- File:Академик Е.М.Сергеев (1914-1997).jpg
- File:Е.М.Сергеев,1966.jpg
- File:И.В.Попов и Е.М.Сергеев,1968.jpg
- File:Попов И.В.,1972.jpg
- File:Профессор Морозов С.С..jpg
- File:Саваренский Ф.П..jpg
- File:С.С.Морозов,1974.jpg
- File:С.С.Морозов и Е.М.Сергеев, 1968.jpg
- File:Филатов-1940.jpg
- File:Филатов М.М., 1940 г..jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
First group. Historical photos, not enough old for public domain. OTRS-permission from photographer (if dead, then from heirs) is needed.
- File:120-летие И.В.Попова.JPG (1632×1224, camera Sony DSC-W40)
- File:Голодковская Г.А..jpg (413×553)
- File:Калинин Э.В..jpg (848×999)
- File:Кафедра инженерной и экологической геологии МГУ,1997.jpg (1291×745)
- File:Королёв В.А..jpg (760×962, camera Sony DSC-W4 – claimed to be a selfie0)
- File:Пущаровский Д.Ю.,2004.jpg (1200×1600, camera Nikon E3100)
- File:Резонансная колонка TSH-100.jpg (too small)
- File:Трофимов В.Т..jpg (1289×1452)
- File:TSH-100.jpg (too small)
Second group. "Personal archive" is not a good source. Photos are mostly small and without metadata. If camera data exists, then always different. Maybe not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from real photographers is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Own work
[edit]This is clear own work:
--Ivan Vtorov (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; obviously not own work, no exif, except when there was - from several cameras. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://lovelace-media.imgix.net/getty/494393922.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Is there any educational value to this? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Sankt Nicolai skola - Storkyrkoskolan - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad B.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-08T16:46:44 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with water colours, but your images are no paintings. They are products of a “Photo shop” program or something like that. Sorry to tell you, but no quality att all! What is the meaning to upload those private experiments to commons? --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
No quality at all! Tell this to Canon Inc. I have no idea about how to use Photoshop. This is a standard pre-set program in Canon 70D, just like a landscape program, sports program etc. So it's not my private experiment, but an "experiment" by Canon corporation.
The watercolor program adds charm to the beautiful scenery of Gamla stan. But not all people like charm. Some feel very discomforted by it. Sorry for them!
Here you can read more about the camera, which you call a "private experience": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_70D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T20:11:06 (UTC)
I feel quite sure I'll leave the Wikimedia and Wikipedia if these images made in Watercolor are deleted. I can't see this standard program is anything different from using a preset black-and-white program in Canon 70D. I find the watercolor program in Canon 70D very adequate for adding charm to this pittoresque townscape.
If you find this program in Canon 70D disturbing you should direct your complaint against Canon Inc. and not me.
I use these beautiful images to illustrate several articles by my own, like this one: http://permaliv.blogspot.no/2015/12/skoleveg-pa-brostein.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T20:28:22 (UTC)
And this one: http://naturkonservativ.blogspot.no/2016/02/veggankrenes-gode-form.html
The wall anchors are so beautiful in watercolors! Like transcendental! I feel a deep inner connection to these images! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T20:45:25 (UTC)
- Keep: There is no reason to exclude alternative styles of photos from Commons. Such a photo can enable to emphasize different aspects of the depicted subject than a basic-style photo. Moreover, such an image can be used as an illustration of such popular photographic effects and processing. --ŠJů (talk) 01:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. Please read COM:SCOPE about processing and overprocessing. There is nothing inherintly "wrong" with the images, but they are out of COM:SCOPE having been changed beyond useability by a painting programme. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Sankt Nicolai skola - Storkyrkoskolan - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad A.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-08T16:47:41 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with water colours, but your images are no paintings in water colour. They are products of a “Photo shop” program or something like that. Sorry to tell you, but no quality att all! What is the meaning to upload those private experiments to commons? --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
No quality at all! Tell this to Canon Inc. I have no idea about how to use Photoshop. This is a standard pre-set program in Canon 70D, just like a landscape program, sports program etc. So it's not my private experiment, but an "experiment" by Canon corporation.
The watercolor program adds charm to the beautiful scenery of Gamla stan. But not all people like charm. Some feel very discomforted by it. Sorry for them!
Here you can read more about the camera, which you call a "private experience": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_70D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs) 2016-02-09T20:08:37 (UTC)
- Yes, taste is always different and criticism is difficult to take. That there is a water colour program in your Canon camera does not mean it is good. Another question: why you upload multiple images of the same scene? Not just your "watercolor pictures" but also here (7x the same scene): File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad A.JPG, File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad B.JPG, File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad C.JPG, File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad D.JPG, File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad E.JPG, File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad F.JPG and File:Pukkelen i Hornsgatan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad G.JPG.
- Øyvind, please take some well-intentioned advice from an old professional photographer: Less is more! Hilsener --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- The 7 images are from the same street but there are not all the same scene. Some of them are from different point. Two or three variants of similar scene with different light or colour balance are also not unwanted generally. No need to admit the most compromise variant only, if the other variants can have some their assets. Then, 3 variants can be optimal: one compromise, one with optimalized foreground (pavement), one with optimalized background (houses). --ŠJů (talk) 02:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sankt Nicolai skola - Storkyrkoskolan - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad B.JPG. --ŠJů (talk) 01:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. Please read COM:SCOPE about processing and overprocessing. There is nothing inherintly "wrong" with the images, but they are out of COM:SCOPE having been changed beyond useability by a painting programme. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice.
File:Sallys Restaurang & Bar - Västerlånggatan - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice.
File:Brostein og kumlokk i Stora Nygatan-Gamla stan-Stockholm-October 2015-Holmstad-akvarell Canon 70D-A.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice.
File:Brostein og kumlokk i Stora Nygatan-Gamla stan-Stockholm-October 2015-Holmstad-akvarell Canon 70D-B.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice.
File:Brostein og kumlokk i Stora Nygatan-Gamla stan-Stockholm-October 2015-Holmstad-akvarell Canon 70D-C.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Kaffekoppen - Chocladkoppen - Stortorget - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad - A.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice.
File:Kaffekoppen - Chocladkoppen - Stortorget - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October 2015 - Holmstad - B.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. File uploaded in 2015, unused but properly categorized. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Stortorget seen from Köpmangatan - Gamla stan - Stockholm - October - 2015 - Holmstad.JPG
[edit]
Probably not useful for encyclopedian purpose Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong with watercolours? Would it be deleted if it was a painting? I think this has to do with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Øyvind Holmstad (talk • contribs)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant, Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for support! If these images of beautiful places are deleted just because I use the watercolor program in Canon, which adds charm to this picturesque town, I might stop uploading for Wikimedia and go to Flickr.
Deleted: per nomination, overprocessed image, not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
This is from the Flickr site of a small film festival. They do not have the right to put movie images under CC. Copyright is Majestic Filmverleih 84.62.82.217 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Then, please provide the source uploaded prior to Flickr. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- What would this have to do with Flickr?? The press site of the movie distributor with the images is at http://www.majestic.de/presse/klitschko.html. There are copyright notes and restriction like the images can only be used "in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz" --88.77.1.43 11:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
This is from the Flickr site of a small film festival. They do not have the right to put movie images under CC. Copyright is Majestic Filmverleih 84.62.82.217 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Logo + spam Bilderling (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Bueu8 8ahYE.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Cover page of a novel, supposedly provided by the author. To keep this, we'd need a written permission from the copyright holder of the artwork (which may or may not be the author of the book). See COM:OTRS for details and instructions. El Grafo (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
It is the author who holds the copyright if the artwork. I will send you his written permission to this intent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftworld (talk • contribs) 17:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Leftworld: thanks for the quick reply. Please do not send the permission to me. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. Feel free to ask here if you have any questions. Thanks, --El Grafo (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete "Personally sent to me by the author" is not a good source. If author sent you a book, then you got a copy of book, not its copyright. Without OTRS-permission from copyright holder (not from you) the file should be deleted. The copyright holder is probably not author, but either publishing house or cover artist. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Photograph of a printed (compare [5]) artwork which is probably not the uploader's own work. May or may not be old enough to be in the public domain, but for that we'd need to know who created it when and where (and if applicable: when did the original author die). El Grafo (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
![[5]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-b5wyIx6WuAA/UpgywAkuCmI/AAAAAAAABiE/GuKB4XYcGZM/s1600/bismil.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status. Part of a photo set, unboxing an action figure designed by figure maker "Kotobukiya" and inspired on en:Horizon in the Middle of Nowhere, a Japanese light novel series. Derivative work, permission needed, see also COM:DW#Casebook.
http://www.tomopop.com itself is configured to be in CC-BY-2.0 but my impression is that they do not know what they are licensing, considering the amount of republished third-party contents (mostly related to toys etc.) Gunnex (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Strakhov (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho rather thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously taken from Facebook, based on the file name Ytoyoda (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Photoshopped from one polo mallet, most likely grabbed from Internet. Gunnex (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Images from www.araldicacivica.it
[edit]- File:Guardialfiera Coat of Arms.png
- File:Viganella-Stemma.png
- File:Cervia-Stemma.png (except for the version from 2007 which seems to be fine)
- File:Monterotondo stemma.gif
- File:Palmanova-Stemma.png
These are all claimed to be from [6] and there is no source of permission, so COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet" would appear to apply here. See also the related discussion at en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 27#File:Varapodio-Stemma.gif. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Araldicacivica was among the first sites granting Wikipedia permission to reproduce their contents. Of course there is no relevant ticket about it, since there was no OTRS back in 2004. The disclaimer on their site says it's ok to republish their pictures as long as they're credited, although on it.wiki we currently seek for a full authorization by municipalities to use the "real", actual insignia. --Elitre (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- All drawings from Araldicacivica.it (ie the arms "ridisegnate" [redrawn], such Palmanova ad Cervia in our case) are under cc-by-sa 3.0 (see disclameir in italian: «Tutti i contenuti sono sotto licenza Common 3. In pratica le immagini possono essere usate liberamente purché si citi sempre la fonte» [All contents are licensed under the Common 3. In practice, the images may be used freely as long as you always refer to the source]), the situation is naturally different for the coats of arms "official" contained on the site, that may be used only as a fair-use.GJo (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- P.s.: sorry for my bad english.GJo (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- It says "Common 3", not "CC-BY-SA 3.0". "Common 3" could mean any of CC-BY 3.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0 or CC-BY.ND 3.0. A non-commercial restriction is unlikely since it is suggested that "le immagini possono essere usate liberamente" without mention any commercial limitation. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, the license has been clarified: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.GJo (talk) 13:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- It says "Common 3", not "CC-BY-SA 3.0". "Common 3" could mean any of CC-BY 3.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0 or CC-BY.ND 3.0. A non-commercial restriction is unlikely since it is suggested that "le immagini possono essere usate liberamente" without mention any commercial limitation. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Ok now it is clearly not ok for Commons (NC and ND). --MGA73 (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per [http://www.araldicacivica.it/disclaimer/ and Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA.--Trixt (talk) 12:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Painful but necessary. Not suitable licence. -- Blackcat (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 02:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Images from www.araldicacivica.it
[edit]Another set of images has been uploaded:
- File:Zafferana Etnea-Stemma.png
- File:Casalediscodosia arms.png
- File:Peschiera del Garda-Stemma.png
- File:Cino-Coat of Arms.jpg
- File:Baldissero d'Alba-Stemma.png
- File:Settala(famiglia)-stemma.png
- File:Cavenago(famiglia)-stemma.png
- File:Riva Valdobbia-Coat-of-Arms.png
- File:Provaglio d'Iseo-Coat-of-Arms.jpg
- File:Breno-Coat of Arms.png
-stemma.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-stemma.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- ____________
- Deleted. As above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Images from www.araldicacivica.it
[edit]The visual style suggests that these originally might come from araldicacivica.it or that they alternatively are scans from books or something. At the very least, the attribution requirement is violated since the author isn't indicated. They just refer to deleted pages on enwiki and itwiki.
- File:StemmaRaveo.jpg
- File:StemmaLauco.jpg
- File:Stemmavillasantina.jpg
- File:StemmaEnemonzo.jpg
- File:StemmaMoggio.jpg
- File:Ovaro-Stemma.gif
- File:Comeglians Stemma.jpg
- File:Rigolato-Stemma.jpg
- File:Claut-Stemma.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Images from www.araldicacivica.it
[edit]Another set has been uploaded:
Stefan2 (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyright infringement see http://fu5.es/gran-logia-de-espana/ for a copyrighted exact image on the background an (C) at the bottom of the page. It does not seem reasonably own work. Bestiasonica (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Fontes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, uploaded in a row on 02.02.2016. Considering also:
- File:RP 150313 CDWS5S 1763-2.jpg (the only file with EXIF) --> copyrighted work by "© RICARDO PINTO"
- File:António Fontes.jpg --> cropped & resized from (example) http://www.massivemov.com/minitransat = http://www.massivemov.com/lib/images/projectos/2119projDesc36ea4vnkp.jpg (last modified: 05.2015)
See also en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Fontes.
- File:Match Racing.jpg
- File:Largada Mini Transat.jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/Antoniofontesminitransat/photos/pb.1458821557694025.-2207520000.1457085204./1676713402571505/?type=3&theater (2015)
- File:RP 150313 CDWS5S 1763-2.jpg
- File:António Fontes.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE 2003:88:6A5D:E257:E05F:7D2C:9B67:E279 00:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Looking how the file is named and used, the building is not de minimis, no way, it is main object of the photo and should be deleted. Previous decision to keep was wrong. Taivo (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The building is de minimis, it is a general cityscape, not depicting only the building which is in background. The picture can be renamed if needed. Jeriby (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the title says the intention. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in UAE - Building is main subject, copyrights restricts photography of buildings in United Arab Emirates. In short Photographer doesn't own the copyright of this, unless the architect is releasing the work on a license accepted by Commons . Please visit FOP in UAE for more details about the provision ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 20:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hello. I didn't know about this law, I think we can just rename it. --Martin2035 (talk) 04:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Renaming the file won't change the fact that building is the main subject of this file.--Canopus Grandiflora 19:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
No clear indications of the purposes of this images serve to illustrate. No sources and no any known permission from model Thatonewikiguy (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of user:Saraah12
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Saraah12 (talk · contribs):
- File:Ankerpharm.png
- File:Inearkopfhoerer-vergleich.de Logo.png
- File:Innocenceescort.jpg
- File:Varioseal.png
- File:Vereinstextilien.png
Unused logos of non-notable companies (no mention neither in de.wiki nor in en.wiki) are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Eresemjot
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Eresemjot (talk · contribs):
- File:27IV.jpg (2816×2112)
- File:Bratysława1.jpg (2048×1536, camera Canon PowerShot A510)
- File:Filharmonia Łódzka im. A. Rubinsteina.JPG (2304×1728, camera Panasonic DMC-FZ10)
- File:Konkurs2.jpg (2048×1360, camera NIKON D2X)
- File:Montreaux 2009.jpg (720×479)
- File:Rutter1.jpg (641×500, camera Canon EOS 40D)
- File:Rutter-Toruń 18II08r.JPG (2988×1992)
- File:Torre konkurs 005.jpg (2800×2000, camera Canon EOS 5D)
- File:WladzeChóru2008.JPG (3264×2448, camera Fujifilm FinePix S5800 S800)
If the files have metadata, then camera is always different, but all are claimed own work. I suspect copyright violation, although files are usually big. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- If somebody uses different cameras, these photos may be his own work. I am using four different, own cameras (two different Panasonic, and two different Nokia) and two different scanners for my old paper-photos or films, which have been made using pre-digital, classic cameras. Additionally, I used my brother's Fuji camera. It means my own photos may have metadats of seven different sources, but all of them are my own work.
Don't use this argument as a evidence, this may be rather very weak suspicion.
In the case of files of Eresemjot you don't have any other circumstances to say "copyvio". Julo (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & obviously promotional images for some musical (?) group. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Mohamed Osama AlNagdy
[edit]Mohamed Osama AlNagdy~commonswiki (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:2007OISGrad.jpg (604×401)
- File:2008OISgrad.jpg (604×402)
- File:2009OISGrad.jpg (453×604)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of LeaPedersen
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of LeaPedersen (talk · contribs):
- File:Anker brink lund tap full.jpg (100×150)
- File:Carsten greve 2008 tap full.jpg (99×150)
- File:CBP huset udefra.jpg (460×345)
- File:Lars bo kaspersen.jpg (100×150)
- File:Susana borras tap full.jpg (100×147)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Vijayraj0126
[edit]Vijayraj0126 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Fruits ganesh.jpg (1600×1200, camera Samsung GT-S5360)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2005.jpeg (500×700)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2007.jpeg (640×480, blurry)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2009.jpeg (640×480, blurry)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2010.jpeg (1600×1200, camera Nokia 7020)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2011.jpeg (370×532)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2013.jpg (3264×2448, camera SEMC X10i)
- File:Fruits ganesh 2014.jpeg (531 × 859, camera Samsyng GT-S5312)
If camera data exists, then camera is always different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of user:Androw saeed
[edit]Androw saeed (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
First group. Per watermarks (partly removed) come from Can stock photo, where license forbids derivative works.
Second group. Unused photos with bad quality, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of user:Albertoaguirretenor
[edit]Albertoaguirretenor (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Alberto Aguirre 3.jpg (1011×1252)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 4.jpg (384×288)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 5.jpg (838×691)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 6.jpg (1139×781)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 7.jpg (885×559)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 8.jpg (845×588)
- File:Alberto Aguirre 9.jpg (794×594)
- File:Alberto Aguirre (cantante).jpg (1799×1373, camera Samsung GT-S5600L)
- File:Alberto Aguirre (tenor).jpg (660×1055)
- File:Tenor Alberto Aguirre.jpg (1055×1285)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
All those files are claimed to be selfies – I do not believe. Small photos and usually without metadata. OTRS-permission from real photographers are needed. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Bestfirestarter). MER-C 11:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Mrdjangola
[edit]Here are last remaining upload of Mrdjangola (talk · contribs):
- File:Alchemycultureshop.jpg (2560×1920, camera Olympus X-2,C-50Z)
- File:Ben River.png (210×273, author Paul @ PDM)
- File:Ben River performing live.jpg (520×390, author JC Kamau)
- File:Lee Harris 2008.jpg (283×213, camera Fujifilm FinePix S5600, author Tony Ishola)
- File:Lee Harris and Allen Ginsberg.jpg (1806×1354, author Steve Teers)
- File:Lee Harris and River Styx.jpg (320×183, author Lars Movin)
- File:River Styx and Lee Harris.jpg (319×239, author Tony Ishola)
- File:River Styx - moonlightconvention2.jpg (198×248, author Tony Ishola)
- File:River Styx poet.jpg (170×252, author Joseph Waters)
Usually small photos and usually without metadata, usually uploader is not author, but all claimed own work. If camera data exists, then always different. Probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Is the author of this 1956 picture still alive or has he been dead for 50-70 years? Who owns the copyright.
Converted to DR, in order to notify uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded the original file from Flickr, so the bot could see the file correctly. I have no idea about original copyright, etc. Just changed the file for the bot, in hopes to help empty Category:Flickr images needing human review. Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Burkinabe copyright term appears to be 70 years pma, so a photo from 1956 cannot qualify. --Storkk (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Mariavallebrizuela
[edit]Mariavallebrizuela (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Examples of chlorophyll in plants 08.jpg
- File:Plants in January 23.jpg
- File:Plants in January 27.jpg
- File:The Jesus Feet 26.jpg
- File:The Jesus Feet 28.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 02.jpg
- File:Tita Merello Sculpture, Carlos Gardel Street.jpg
First group. There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for sculptures, fountains and 2-dimensional art. Some can be too old for copyright protection, but creation year must be given.
- File:Carlos Gardel esfinge.jpg
- File:Christmas Light Tree.jpg
- File:Examples of chlorophyll in plants 09.jpg
- File:Green Plants and evergreen 28.jpg
- File:Juan B Justo Avenue, Buenos AIRES 15.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 18.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 20.jpg
Second group. Too blurry.
- File:Drums, guitars, displays, scuptures of Don Guanella celebration 02.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 01.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 04.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 05.jpg
- File:The light in species natural and artificial 16.jpg
Third group. Small size, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Belgium Lymantria (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Restored: as per [7]. Yann (talk) 19:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=679096160#File:Schaerbeek_-_Avenue_%C3%89mile_Verhaeren_n%C2%B073_-_Maison_De_Jongh_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Files of Nadiaa1995
[edit]Nadiaa1995 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Набережная Ростова-на-Дону.jpg
- File:«Замковое» дерево, ростов-на-дону.jpg
- File:Якорь на набережной, ростов-на-дону.jpg
- File:Новороссийск, провожающая,скульптура.jpg
- File:Набережная Новороссийска. Скульптура «Дельфин и русалка».jpg
- File:Памятник "Морякам революции" Новороссийск.jpg
- File:Памятник "Исход", Новороссийск.jpg
- File:Дарующая воду в Новороссийске.jpg
There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:Набережная Ростова-на-Дону.jpg and File:Якорь на набережной, ростов-на-дону.jpg. Not sculpture. --Insider (talk) 11:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- In my opinion both are sculptures. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- 2 logs and anchor? Sculpture must have creative idea or contribution. Here it is not. --Insider (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- In my opinion both are sculptures. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree with Taivo. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Restored one of the files since it is from 1809 al per my talk page and I would urge Butko not te restore files, especially when you don't have the decentsy to leave a note at the DR and/or my talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Restored a second per UnDR -- an anchor doesn't have a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
File:A catalogue raisonné of the works of the most eminent Dutch, Flemish, and French painters - in which is included a short biographical notice of the artists, with a copious description of their (14775212491).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is a scan through a translucid page ; there exists a scan of the page itself ; this one is not useful. F (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
LQ images of sunsets/sunrises
[edit]- File:04-05-14 - Pela manhã.JPG
- File:Digha Beach Sunset Solarization 1.jpg
- File:Nature form Bhaktapur 07.JPG
- File:DuskofLosAngelesAReaves.jpg
- File:ADIOS AMIGO.JPG
- File:Ain kerma.jpg
- File:Desde la torre.jpg
- File:Mukti.jpg
- File:Sunset in august 02.jpg
- File:Sunset in august 01.jpg
- File:Sunsets.jpg
- File:Dawn scenics image.jpg
- File:Dawn on town beach.jpg
- File:Peep of day.jpg
- File:Morning View.jpg
- File:Sun and Leaves (2670384980).jpg
- File:Sunrias - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sunrise bad weather.jpg
- File:Sunrise.Dawn الفجر 2014.jpg
- File:Sunrise.Dawn الفجر..jpg
- File:الفجر.jpg
- File:A luz de Deus!.jpg
- File:Bairro Cambuci, São Paulo, SP, Brasil..jpg
- File:Sunrise from Dhauladhar.jpg
- File:Schaerbeek.001.jpg
- File:Ago-wan 02.JPG
- File:Nature form Bhaktapur 01.JPG
- File:Pôr-do-sol em Juiz de Fora MG.jpg
- File:Smoking sunset.jpg
- File:Zachód Słońca - Lipnica Mała.JPG
- File:Malecón en el amanecer..jpg
- File:20150216 061843 HDR.jpg
- File:6 Monte Fuji 002.jpg
- File:AerialPhotoECAL2.JPG
- File:AerialPhotoECAL.JPG
- File:Lever de soleil sur la pointe Balthazar dans la Vallée Etroite.jpg
- File:Sunset rays thru clouds on sky.jpg
- File:Tijuana 8.jpg
- File:Cabo Carvoeiro (P), 2011. (5921781984).jpg
- File:Tramonto a Vicopisano.jpeg
- File:Africa sight.png
- File:Samwan0256.jpg
- File:InstagramCapture 97c7d7fa-bd7f-40bd-9007-71d31425dc7a jpg.jpg
- File:Mountains 1-967831241.jpg
- File:Mexico Baja Sunset.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2011._(5921781984).jpg){kind=link}
Poor quality images, unused. Tons of much better images of sunsets and sunrises we have. Out of scope /St1995 20:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- I deleted the ones with obvious bad quality or/and with big composition issues, I'm not sure about the others. I let another administrator(s) take another look to see if others deserve to be deleted and to close this. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Kept the rest. Some are great stock photographs. Natuur12 (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Lacking copyright / license details for scanned photograph. --ghouston (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- I believe the image is ok, only mistakenly licensed. License corrected. image categorised. --Gampe (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hopefully. Do we have any information that it was actually published more than 70 years ago? --ghouston (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- No idea, I have asked the uploader.--Gampe (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Who is František R. Kraus who died in 1967,and how is he connected to this image ? Unfitlouie (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Try Wikipedia: en:František R. Kraus, he's the man in a suit, standing on the right. I wrote repeatedly to the uploader because of wrong descriptions and licenses, but got no response. Bad luck! --Gampe (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)--Gampe
- Who is František R. Kraus who died in 1967,and how is he connected to this image ? Unfitlouie (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- No idea, I have asked the uploader.--Gampe (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hopefully. Do we have any information that it was actually published more than 70 years ago? --ghouston (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Files of Babudo
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Babudo (talk · contribs):
First group. Unused simple logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope.
- File:Actor Peter P. Gudo.png
- File:Kabelo Mabalane Peter P. Gudo and the crew.JPG
- File:Kabelo Mabalane Peter P Gudo and the crew while filming in Maputo.JPG
- File:Langisse Peter P Gudo-penasbugo.jpg
- File:Penasbugo Gudo.jpg
- File:Peter+P+Gudo.jpg
- File:Peter P Gudo as Nico.png
- File:Peter P Gudo,as Tiger.jpg
- File:Peter p. Gudo as Tigre in the childrens republic.41.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo Commercial.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo Founder Nigma.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo Guido.jpg
- File:Peter P Gudo in 2014.png
- File:Peter P Gudo in Nico.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo Kabelo Mabalane with the crew.JPG
- File:Peter P. Gudo Lens Ads.JPG
- File:Peter P. Gudo Nigma Entertainment.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo NPE.jpg
- File:Peter P Gudo on set with Director Flora Gomes.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo Promo.jpg
- File:Peter P. Gudo with former U.S Ambassador on 4th of July.JPG
- File:Young Writer 2014 with Peter P. Gudo.png
- category:Peter P. Gudo
Second group. Babudo has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in en.wiki, and uploading a lot of personal images, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage and sandbox. His other edits in en.wiki were vandalism and reverted. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ha, I bet this guy has done nothing in Wikipedia, either: Better delete them all, Taivo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, at least some: On-scope images of filming crews in Mozambique, even if this particular actor is not “notable” enough. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep especially these for (other) notable people:
- Keep also especially these for yet another notable person:
- Comment: I noticed brown people feature a lot in DRs — maybe there’s a specific reason for that? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I added "
{{delete|reason=out of [[COM:SCOPE|project scope]]|subpage=Files of Babudo|year=2016|month=February|day=08}}", linking here, to the ones that lacked it. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Please hold: I’m in contact with the actor to dispel licensing issues: Either an OTRS process will be initiated, or a public permission will be made available at the official website. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: As described in the nomination, and also when there was metadata it was from a multitude of cameras; the styles of photos were not consistent, the white balances were different, the sizes were all over the place. None of this looked like user's own work. 30 days elapsed since last comment on discussion. When/if any of these are properly licensed, they could be restored. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)