Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 5th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim of ineligibility for copyright protection is clearly incorrect. This image has very well passed the threshold of originality. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Two circles and a musical note is above TOO? Really? Gradients don't count under US law and Apple is an American company, this is PD. Fry1989 eh? 03:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need it any more 2601:3C1:4000:1BC0:5470:1821:B917:812D 08:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per COM:SCOPE as it is used on 23 sister projects and its use is well within the criteria of our policy. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author on the bad authors list Scipio83 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paolo Maldini of AC Milan and Richie McCaw of the NZ All Blacks.jpg: author on the bad authors list

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author on the bad authors list Scipio83 (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones: Copyright violation: It is Getty Images ID #83914204 by Getty Images for adidas.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyright violation, this photo can also be found at motorsport.com Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faithful representation of a book cover, which can be easily found by it title (e.g. here: http://ksiegarnia-historyczna.home.pl/pl/p/Niemieckie-szable-i-palasze-paradne/2858); the file uploaded is hard to distinguish from the original cover, so in my opinion does not pass the threshold of originality Felis domestica (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image which is likely out of scope KC-130K (talk) 10:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image which is likely out of scope KC-130K (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No he ofrecido suficiente información. Hemistiquio (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 12:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded to illustrate a deleted article about a person notable only as a candidate in a future political party primary (which is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia under the notability rules for politicians.) No other potential use exists at this time; if he wins the seat in November, then we'll be uploading his official congressional headshot for the infobox, and thus still won't need this. Bearcat (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake 이강철 (talk) 13:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upload said me "help this file delete --이강철 (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this Tesla (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 23:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst: content was: "#REDIRECT ", and the only contributor was "Billinghurst" (talk)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Bild muss ich leider zurückziehen. Anstelle dieser Datei soll im Artikel ein anderes Motiv eingesetzt werden. Der nötige Aufwand tut mir leid, aber ich bitte um Nachsicht. Ein echter Anfängerfehler:–(RnrSchrzbrg (talk) 02:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permision by the artist. --JuTa 23:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 216×275 pixels, passport photos are unlikely to be own work. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear promotions ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, rough translation states that it "is a wallpaper" Liance (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope, I can't find any possible educational use for this. Also might be a copyvio Liance (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an obscure "minecraft server", not in use. Liance (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Completely out of project scope, not used anywhere Liance (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of an obscure "minecraft server", out of project scope, not in use. Liance (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use, file is also unused. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted, out of scope. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saulo poleto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. May be also grabbed somewhere from Facebook

Gunnex (talk) 09:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, hoax Pippobuono (talk) 10:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I3seren (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, can be found earlier on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:I3seren. Uploaded in a row since 11.2015, most likely done by an "all-he-can-get-grabber" for ru:Агинский Бурятский округ (and related ruwiki entries). Historical photos, maps and drawings may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 10:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entries speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos with no description, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 11:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal info of 13-year-old, autobio article deleted on en-wp JohnCD (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jafe anmo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nepalikanxa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, very poor quality, out of scope. Taken in a private place, no evidence of consent for publication.

Yann (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 09:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adevilsonmatos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, can be found earlier on web. Uploaded in a row on 27.11.2015 for pt:Mirante do Paranapanema, Brazilian municipality. Historical photos, satellite/aerial images and maps may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Considering also text copyvios by uploader like this one. The images may be also grabbed from a historic version of (example) http://www.portalmirante.com/historia_mirante/historia.html ("Todos os direitos reservados ao Professor Milton Paulo dos Santos") as well.

Gunnex (talk) 11:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of common object. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://img.youtube.com/vi/yw3sE_X8tfc/0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.afghanhoundpedigrees.com/pics/thumbs/1/img4a537e4b50a3f.jpg_150.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: upoader's request, unused file. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A professionally made promotional image. I can't find it on tineye but I strongly doubt it is cc by-sa Guerillero 01:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file upload Redstar 2015 (talk) 02:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality".

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 03:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the proyect scope. Self promotional Edslov (talk) 04:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the proyect scope. Self promotional. Edslov (talk) 04:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This redirect was make collaterally because it was a old revenge move request by me, "mala calidad" is Spanish for "bad quality". Thymepeekk (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful copyrights. See description: "The photo is a digital copy of newspaper, this specimen was scanned from the paper copy.finally made available for public view". --sasha (krassotkin) 07:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with no description, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 11:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yonathan Spectaqcular.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: an still no license at al. --JuTa 01:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nashpur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Labelled "stock shooting", an unused photo of an unkown person. Richard Avery (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Travellxp898 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Travellxp898. Uploaded in a row on 27.11.2015 for en:Turan ensemble. File:Turan ensemble.jpg grabbed from (example) http://www.ncfta.gov.tw/events/asia_pacific2012_en/p03.asp?p=1 = http://www.ncfta.gov.tw/events/asia_pacific2012_en/gallery/p1/2.jpg (last modified: 2012, identical exif) and the rest of the files are video screenshots, grabbed from (example) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5CQ9WPAsac (2013, © by " ✣ ᵀᵊᵑᴿᶤ • Spirit of the Steppe ✣ "). Example: File:Bauirzhan(冬不拉-dombra-Домбра)2.jpg --> (+/-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5CQ9WPAsac&t=2m2s

Gunnex (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal work, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination also derivative. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern cover books may be copyrighted. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

File:PAMM (2008-2011).jpg. Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal user images are not allowed Appleincguy (talk) 17:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused peronal image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 04:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Coyau (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 09:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal travel photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 09:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, je suis membre de l'association Musimot en train de créer une page Wikipédia. Je ne voulais pas télécharger l'image, ceci est une erreur de la ma part. Merci de la supprimer. Bien cordialement. Isidore Beautrelet (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused image, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}s

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Plenihan2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Considering also:


Gunnex (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Krd 07:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Plenihan2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.lakeargyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Best-Lake-Argyle-Aerial-Image-coutesy-of-David-Bettini.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rufatshkreta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. User's only contribution has been these two images, a deleted image, and a long out of scope personal gallery page which violated COM:ADVERT.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Macitentan synthesis.svg. Leyo 12:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, several better alternatives in Category:Luminol. Leyo 23:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, e.g. pixelated; replaced by File:Mitosan.svg. Leyo 23:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:NK1145.png. Leyo 11:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination--uploader asserted it's truely "own work" from scratch. --DMacks (talk) 03:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Schematic of cocaine ligand structure.png. Leyo 11:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination--uploader asserted it's truely "own work" from scratch. --DMacks (talk) 03:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Cocaine reverse esters.png. Leyo 11:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Common decency (and advice given by some other admins) is to cite that from which one takes actual content--it's en:plagiarism to take actual credit for someone else's work even if not a license violation. But the uploader has asserted it's his de novo work, so it's a moot point. DMacks (talk) 03:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 03:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix: No license since 7 February 2016

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Structure without energy optimization, poor quality, several better alternatives in Category:Luminol. Leyo 23:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Witam, zwracam się z prośbą o usunięcie tego zdjęcia (Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.JPG), gdyż zdjęcie to zostało zamieszczone jeszcze raz ciut później , ale po retuszu i w znacznie lepszej jakosci (Malgorzata Jaworska.jpg). Nie ma sensu , żeby oba tutaj sie znajdowały. Jestem włascicielką tej fotografii. Z góry dziękuję. Resap7 (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to delete my photo which was upload by my friend . This photo was upload once more later and this one is much better. Thank you in advance. 109.189.6.203 11:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)--Resap7 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been in contact with Resap7 and we have agreed that it is fair to delete the older photo that I uploaded earlier (Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.jpg). Resap7 is the owner of the photograph and an improved reupload of the photo (Malgorzata Jaworska.jpg) is currently on the Wikipedia page, so there is no need to keep the other photo. As the uploader, I approve of "Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.jpg" being removed.


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

writing across the whole picture which makes the use impossible = out of scope MMFE (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file name Hibjuronline (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File can be renamed. Fry1989 eh? 23:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, please see COM:RENAME. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Appleincguy: a duplicate of what file ? — Racconish ☎ 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Racconish: this one. Appleincguy (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not the same image, this is a cropped version. — Racconish ☎ 15:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per nom. Appleincguy (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are the nom Clin.— Racconish ☎ 16:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in question is not a duplicate. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in question is not a duplicate. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in question is not a duplicate. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in question is not a duplicate. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File in question is not an duplicate. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available under File:Zeichen 224.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Consensus to keep. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EagleFan3U (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:EagleFan3U. Uploaded since 12.2015 for association football player etc., mostly related to en:Ubon Ratchathani F.C., a Thai professional football club.

Gunnex (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Hystrix. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariyan.tashev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Drone/aerial photos uploaded since 11.2015 which were previously published at 500px.com under "© All rights reserved by Mariyan Tashev". Example: File:Бузлуджа от високо.jpeg + File:BuzludzhaAerial.jpeg (almost identical/color mod.) --> https://500px.com/photo/76813235/buzludzha-historical-monument-by-mariyan-tashev (2014) and File:Starazagorapano.jpeg (+ 2 variants/stretched) --> https://500px.com/photo/121363067/the-city-with-straight-streets-stara-zagora-by-mariyan-tashev (09.2015).

Despite of having a similar username, the 500px user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SALMON COJT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:SALMON COJT. File:LambertFFB.jpg is derived from (stock?) photos like http://smdatwork.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Slider_1-1723x1080.jpg. Uploaded since 11.2015 for fr:Billards Toulet.

Gunnex (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonatangoficial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, previous publications found elsewhere, and watermarks.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 21:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free, copyrighted advertisement. Not covered by any applicable freedom of panorama exemption. LX (talk, contribs) 21:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copiata da http://www.lookatme.ru/flow/posts/fashion-radar/105791-5-new-mens-shoots-2010-09-18 Updown (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation based on photos grabbed from http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g780020-d565939-r120715040-BEST_WESTERN_Osasco-Osasco_State_of_Sao_Paulo.html#photos, http://1.omg.io/wego/image/upload/w_460,h_460,c_fill/v1396464460/hotels/483760/3287300.jpg and https://www.brasiladentro.com.br/103231/solarium-parque-hotel-spa. LX (talk, contribs) 22:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this photo is public domain. English Wikipedia uses it under a claim of fair use. We have no idea who the author is and no basis for believing he/she has been dead for 70 years, as the tag claims. B (talk) 23:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright: w:Pavel Postyshev until 2027 because of rehabilitation, w:Filipp Goloshchyokin until 2032 because of rehabilitation, w:Christian Rakovsky until 2059 because of rehabilitation etc. Political speeches are not included in PD-RU-Exempt.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:XIV съезд ВКП(б) Стенографический отчет. 1925.djvu and ru.wikisource deletion request. Please do not reupload it in ru.wikisource - there's not any fair use for such texts and this file will be deleted. Hausratte (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The WP (en) article on Deepak Arora has been deleted several times, and its creator has been indefinitely blocked. It doesn't seem like this file will ever be used in an article. Ubiquity (talk) 14:51, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"own" photo of non-free 2D picture 194.186.207.107 15:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, advertising Pippobuono (talk) 15:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Appleincguy (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Riley. Green Giant (talk) 21:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by INTERNET 5G (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Video clips. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book is under CC-BY-NC 1.0 license (see http://www.free-culture.cc/freecontent/) which is incompatible with Commons, so the Licensing section is obviously wrong. However, I wonder if {{PD-shape}} applies here so starting DR instead of speedy. Any comments? Ankry (talk) 15:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I don't think this is simple geometry. Green Giant (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.terra.com.br/istoe-temp/ensaios_fotograficos/tesouro_vivo/fotos/foto_58.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not relevant and pulling into different google plus pages not related to this picture Cmkamensky (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand what you mean. This photo was made and published by me and there is no reason to delete it. Lowdown (talk) 16:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No evidence that it is anything other than own work. Green Giant (talk) 21:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue to keep the photo on Wiki. It has ancestral significance. I want to learn more about Lowdown's Drwiega and Nagaj photo from Central Cemetery (and Lowdown's Mielecki Drwiega and Szymański photo from Posada Cemetery). I descend from Tomacz Mielecki (b. 1888) and his wife Catherine/Katarzyna Drwiega (b. 1894). They had 11 children and both immigrated from Sanok separately to the US and became naturalized US citizens. I do not think it is just a coincidence that the family surnames exist together in both the US & in Poland. More information about the photo and family surname history in Sanok would be helpful to understand familial connections. I have a portrait and documents from US archives to be able to help reconnect the families and collaborate from this perspective, though I am new to Wiki. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klm178 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source imdb says "© Jonathan Hession" 88.77.4.191 12:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jonathan Hession was the set photographer for THE GUARD. The copyright belongs to the filmmakers and the photograph can be used for publicity for the filmmakers and the film. Jonathan Hession is NOT the copyright holder.

You wrote that you are the copyright holder, hence one of the filmmakers. Then please use Commons:OTRS to prove that you are the copyright holder and put it under the license. Otherwise there is no way to tell that you didn't just copy the image from Imdb and state you own the copyright. --88.77.4.191 23:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Please note that "publicity use" is not the same as the licences we accept. Green Giant (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On enwiki the uploader claims that the file was "sent to them personally", which raises the question why here on Commons it says "own work" and who owns the copyright & has the auhority to license the image. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely scan of professional photo. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely book cover - copyright holder should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TNTespinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TNTespinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:TNTespinho / logs (serial copyright violator). Uploaded on 18.02.2015. File:Mouriz School.jpg previously published via http://www.cnll.pt/blog/index.php/works/mouriz-pronto/?lang=pt (All content © 2016 by Atelier Nuno Lacerda Lopes ) = http://www.cnll.pt/blog/wp-content/uploads/228.jpg (last modified: 2011), giving credits to "Fotografia: Fernando Guerra | www.ultimasreportagens.com" and File:Multimeios de Espinho.jpg is credited — per http://www.archdaily.com.br/br/772529/centro-multimeios-cnll = http://www.cnll.pt/portfolio/wp-content/uploads/CNL_0026_v3.jpg or http://www.cnll.pt/portfolio/wp-content/uploads/CNL_0026_v3-copy.jpg (last modified: 2014) — to "Fotografias: Luís Ferreira Alves I Jorge Santos". See also http://www.archdaily.com.br/br/772529/centro-multimeios-cnll/55da7367e58ece60850001c0-centro-multimeios-cnll-foto ("© Luís Ferreira Alves I Jorge Santos") = http://images.adsttc.com/media/images/55da/7367/e58e/ce60/8500/01c0/large_jpg/featured_image.jpg (exif available). Permissions needed.

Gunnex (talk) 13:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermarked Arif Siddiqui, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not work of Federal gov of the United States, work of the State of Texas 181.31.185.135 13:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Willi Geiger † 11. Februar 1971 in München, urheberrechtlich geschützt bis 2041 Artmax (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muletom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. This user has made no useful contributions and has vandalized Commons using these images. Since these do not appear to be selfies, the claim that they are "own work" is not correct, and they infringe on the copyright belonging to the actual photographer(s).

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear sybject, IMHO photo without encyclopedic value C messier (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without realist encyclopedic value. C messier (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No OTRS tag as needed for proof of permission / license; also very low quality MPF (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing, no evidence that published before 1923.

Sealle (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UnDR today. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio: the source is not an id-government website and clearly has a copyright sign in the footer. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a still from a video by ANNA news, which on its website carries the © sign. HyperGaruda (talk) 07:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

oh OK Arturedo (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now hang on a minute here. You are correct about the © sign being there. But if you actually click on their © sign, it will say Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported. Therefore he is free to publish the photo as long as he attributes ANNA News with it, which he did. SkoraPobeda (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Non-Commercial licenses are not accepted on Wikimedia Commons. Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: on English Wikipedia uploader credits it to elsewhere. No indication license is correct, also a cross-wiki upload. BethNaught (talk) 08:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that the original uploader from en-wiki was the author and could tak this photo with CC license. Obviously original source/author are missing. Masur (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This collage of three images is missing information on the sources and licenses for the three original component images. Since two of the images are historical, there is doubt that they are actually the work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 09:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 28.11.2015, 11:18 pm, by 2-upload user Cem9068 (talk · contributions · Statistics), the photo showing pt:Liberto Molina Bernabeu (1926—2002, Spanish painter) is a cropped version of hours before published https://www.facebook.com/libertomolinabernabeu/photos/pb.1698243617128699.-2207520000.1454666827./1698247000461694/?type=3&theater (28.11.2015, 7:19 pm), needing further details/permission. The 2nd related upload was deleted (missing license) Gunnex (talk) 10:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tomado de una fuente con derechos restringidos Tramullas (talk) 10:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --ecelan (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The encyclopedia is not the author. We need to know who took this photo and whether they are still alive. If they are dead, when did they die?. Green Giant (talk) 23:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio via grabbed from internet Who is the author of the photo? How old is it? Amitie 10g (talk) 10:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: After a month, we still don't know who took the photo, when they took it and when they died. COM:PRP has to apply but I'm happy to restore if someone can provide the information. Green Giant (talk) 22:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Wayli Hoverboard). MER-C 10:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: It is a high-resolution photograph, so it is probably not "out of scope". Jarble (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Even COM:PENIS? Gbawden (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It isn't a high resolution image. Green Giant (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It isn't a high resolution image. Green Giant (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a plausible redirect. 67.244.58.187 12:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope, del on de Nolispanmo 15:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal work, self promotional, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support delete. - Kareyac (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, replaced by superior File:Serbs in Jasenovac concentration camp.jpg. Zoupan (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the original image File:Prince-Ali-Al-Hussein.jpg this is derived from has been deleted as unacceptably licenced for the commons. Ww2censor (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I have just contested the deletion based on: [[2]] The image is clearly marked public domain and is owned by the subject of the image. PeterWesco (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how we can verify the copyright status despite your keep reasoning, because there is no link to the original nor any information on its source. You provided the other, now deleted image, as the source but no original source which is why it popped up for human review. Maybe it is online but I could not find it anywhere so for now as far as I'm concerned it is essentially unsourced, unless an admin can look at the deleted image and provide real source information. Ww2censor (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please reference my discussions on this matter here:[[3]] and here: [[4]] I have requested the images be changed to CC0 -and- that a release be posted. I am requesting a few days for a response before we start deleting things that are only going to be undeleted in a short span of time. Here is the CC0 source image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/aliforfifa/23474062370/# PeterWesco (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The Flickr posting is now CC-0. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The music has been composed by me, Lothar Freier, with Software Apple GarageBand.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lothar Freier (talk • contribs) 16:57, 5 February 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Also claimed in video at 0:32 - unless EugeneZelenko has reason to doubt that music was composed by uploader. --Storkk (talk) 09:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of non-notable person (Julius Halperin) Richard Avery (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination. subject has article in Russian wiki— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Avery (talk • contribs) 16:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Storkk (talk) 09:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a selfie. Sismarinho (talk) 21:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: unused personal photos are out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the same thing twice! CarinaSohaili (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Merge with superior file File:Serbs in Jasenovac concentration camp.jpg. Zoupan (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New version available under File:SADC road sign IN4.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New version available under File:SADC road sign TIN4.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a user-generated version of File:TWDC Logo.svg. If there was a nomination for merge, I'd do that. Pages using this image should be using the other, as that is from the company directly. Elisfkc (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright information: this looks to have been taken in the 1930s or so, and is therefore still within UK copyright SchroCat (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Trizek from FR 16:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho commercial 'just' a thumbnail, and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', imho commercial advertisements and file not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as missing exif and file not in use in other Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:36, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bezweifle die Gemeinfreiheit des Sandmännchens. Wie auch bei "Archiv DIAF (16).JPG" und "Archiv DIAF (17).JPG". Derbrauni (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urheber der Puppe ist Gerhard Behrendt (1), Behrendt verstarb 2006, die Puppe ist urheberrechtlich geschützt, der Upload stellt eine URV dar. Löschen, es gibt schon einen Grund, warum die einzigen erlaubten Bilder der Figur aus einer Bildspende des Bundesarchivs stammen! --Paulae (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC) PS: LAs für die anderen betroffenen Bilder nachgetragen. --Paulae (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: dos screenshot with such a low resolution which makes it useless Amitie 10g (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de copyright de la marque Swix. Bastenbas (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not all persons wanted to be photographed, please campare with my phots in the same category Sargoth (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably unfree derivative work, main banner of a fan website - no encyclopedic use. Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam page of an ip Appleincguy (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nonsense by an IP. --Achim (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File duplicate Appleincguy (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused file of text only. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Appleincguy (talk) 15:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of user's other upload: File:KeyboardToolbar InterpreterScreenshot copy.png. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross namespace redirect Appleincguy (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cross namespace redirect Appleincguy (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image quite identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 142727 (15762611052).jpg. No information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image which was nominated for deletion was in better foreground focus than the other one. I think the one nominated for deletion was the better of the two, but they are not the same as different elements are in focus in the two images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has been uploaded by someone pretending to do so with my consent a long time ago, I do not want to have this picture in the Wikimedia Commons! Thanks. 193.83.254.181 17:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep If you are indeed Patrick Hahn (public figure / celebrity / adult), then the photo is obviously taken with your permission in a public place in the USA, and where your consent to publish is not needed. Unfitlouie (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the subject unless required by law, which is not the case here. We never do so at the request of anonymous IP editors, who might be the subject and might be his enemy. If youare the subject and believe there is a legal reason to demand deletion, file the request with OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started for File:Kozhencherry marthoma church.jpg and File:Kozhencherry church.jpg to verify claimed 'own work' as missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started for File:Kozhencherry marthoma church.jpg and File:Kozhencherry church.jpg to verify claimed 'own work' as missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license, uploader added a {{PD-author}} later with the source web site as author. There its stated that the image is public domain, but not why. Do we have a fitting license template for such a case? JuTa 22:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The source site states that it is PD and that's probably the case -- it is unlikely that the copyright was renewed for this rather ordinary image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is probably not by Brodowski, or is an exact copy of a painting by Grassi. Several other versions are already in this category. WQUlrich (talk) 23:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for delating, only for rename (unknown person). Maybe somebody will find out the right one. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A painted copy of a painting does not fall under Corel v. Bridegman. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a user-generated version of File:TWDC Logo.svg. If there was a nomination for merge, I'd do that. Pages using this image should be using the other, as that is from the company directly. Combine nomination for deletion with File:The Walt Disney Company.svg. Elisfkc (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It is in use, therefore cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As I said before "Image is a user-generated version of File:TWDC Logo.svg. If there was a nomination for merge, I'd do that. Pages using this image should be using the other, as that is from the company directly." However, I have changed alll global usage of this image over to File:TWDC Logo.svg Elisfkc (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file isn't used anymore. Also, the logo is incorrect (wrong font), the other has correct font. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

information sr Vedaradha (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors. The file is ineligible for speedy deletion, because it survived a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 18:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture has been uploaded by someone pretending to do so with my consent a long time ago, I do not want to have this picture in the Wikimedia Commons! Thanks. 193.83.254.181 17:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the subject unless required by law, which is not the case here. We never do so at the request of anonymous IP editors, who might be the subject and might be his enemy. If youare the subject and believe there is a legal reason to demand deletion, file the request with OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yemen stamps less than 30 years old

[edit]

According to the Yemeni copyright law Article 24 the general copyright period is 30 years; see WIPO Yemen link. The template {{PD-Yemen}} clearly states the copyright periods. --Ww2censor (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


'Kept and deleted per comment. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]