Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/01/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_METROPOLITAN_HOTEL_(at)_"(NEW_YORK,_NY)"_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269333-4000000032).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![133 File:Ben CLACY Benthebassman' 'Doll in box' no Batteries included!!".jpg](#File:Ben_CLACY_Benthebassman'_'Doll_in_box'_no_Batteries_included!!".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
It's an exact copy (derivative work) of the coat of arms present here: http://geneall.net/pt/titulo/804/viscondes-de-monforte/ , with unknown copyright status Darwin Ahoy! 12:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy closed, user is a well known copyvio uploader, no need to wait for confirmation. -- Darwin Ahoy! 12:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Category with imperfect name. Porto Mineiro (talk) 02:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad name, remains of a move, req by author. --Achim (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Ich habe leider vergessen die Meta-Daten zu löschen! Es war nicht meine Absicht, mein Geburtsdatum und meine private Email-Adresse zu veröffentlichen! Ich möchte gern, dass dieses Daten restlos(!) entfernt werden und würde dann eine neue Version ohne Meta-Daten hochladen! MK83Wiki (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: first version hidden. --Denniss (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles MOMBAYA.jpg
Non corretta attribuzione del copyright Lcn03 (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
File doesn't meet the threshold of originality. Therefore, this file/logo is a copyright violation. ★ Poké95 07:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)- Delete as a copyright violation. Anarchyte (talk) 12:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, speedy close as so blatantly above the TOO that no other consensus is really plausible, and from a source that makes an explicit copyright claim. --Revent (talk) 23:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Copie de http://asifiwelagrace.skyrock.com/2511317381-marie-misamu.html (juin 2009) Habertix (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
SVG version available Nbgapoisghsjpogjshüpasühogj (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd: Out of project scope: Unsed text logo.
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
I am the author, and I have changed my mind about uploading this photo. Furthermore, I would like to upload this under a license that does not allow unrestricted modification, which Wikimedia Commons does not allow me to do. Mjhench (talk) 21:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obvous copyvio, on top of it being out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: speedydel: derivate work of copyright work (billboard). --Wdwd (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Self-created music; out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started as source "www.filmysphere.com/", as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 22:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Format is incorrect (png) Clivemacd (talk) 11:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution; have file:Salicyl alcohol.svg as high quality, and also larger PNG in Category:Salicylic alcohol if someone wanted raster for some reason. DMacks (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 20:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted material from http://www.gotovimdetkam.com/?attachment_id=2208 (the watermark at the bottom shows this clearly). Off-shell (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by VAZQUEZ BRIAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
- File:Vazquezbrian542634.jpg
- File:Vazquez brian 5432.JPG
- File:Vazquez brian 22.jpg
- File:VAZQUEZBRIAN123.jpg
- File:VAZQUEZBRIAN.jpg
- File:VAZQUEZBRIAN214.jpg
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8319.JPG
- File:VAZQUEZ BRIAN.JPG
- File:VAZQUEZ BRIAN 3.JPG
- File:VAZQUEZ BRIAN (2).JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8255.JPG
- File:Vaquez Brian 100 8222.JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8219.JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8190.JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8185.JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8180.JPG
- File:Vazquez Brian 100 8179.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VAZQUEZ BRIAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Vazquezbrian323.jpg
- File:Vazquezbrian324.jpg
- File:Vazquezbrian23.jpg
- File:Vazquez brian.jpg
- File:Vazquezbriann2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Kokonis Showcased by Alma Matter in Alumni Authors Program.jpg
- File:StairwellSM.png
- File:NDK port.jpg
- File:AUTHOR NDK edit.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Maruf4ik.png
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™.jpg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔0™.jpg
- File:Maruf4ik 001.png
Ies (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (2).jpeg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ 1.jpg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (1).jpeg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 04:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (12).jpeg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (10).jpg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (6).jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 05:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Not uploader's works. Random images copied from the Internet. Unencyclopedic and out of scope.
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (8.jpg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (8).jpeg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (4).jpeg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ 1).png
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ 2).jpg
- File:™✔♡ ℳa'ruf4ik ♛ ♥ ✔™ (1).png
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
XXN, 17:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aldi Achmad Wijaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lincoln Veloso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Кэйтлин1406 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private collection of a children dance school : out of scope (maybe illegal too)
- File:Z 389daadd.jpg
- File:N H 8wfeJns.jpg
- File:Hw-rKyxQi4k.jpg
- File:Z 8f6f36ef.jpg
- File:FRyfEEkcLjA.jpg
- File:Bnbh5sjCmU8.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albertinin Mourato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Could easily be represented with wiki markup.
Gunnex (talk) 12:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lobo do Brasil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Datasede.jpg – https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wUPRTsC3zdk/maxresdefault.jpg
- File:Centro tere.jpg – http://imganuncios.mitula.net/apartamento_no_centro_de_teresopolis_com_2_quartos_5560069439845597349.jpg
- File:Vistaparcialalto.jpg – http://cidadesemfotos.blogspot.com/2013/09/fotos-de-teresopolis-rj.html
- File:Centroteresinha.jpg – http://cidadesemfotos.blogspot.com/2013/09/fotos-de-teresopolis-rj.html
- File:Pracatere.jpg – http://www.cemporcentoskate.com.br/fiksperto.php?id=1670
- File:Lecantontere.jpg – https://www.brasiladentro.com.br/101760/hotel-village-le-canton-swiss-mountain-resort/en
- File:Lecanton.jpg – https://i.ytimg.com/vi/P-qBT0gZhUY/maxresdefault.jpg
- File:Trilhasuspensa.jpg – http://www.caravanadaaventura.com.br/mapa-da-aventura/parques/sudeste/item/parque-nacional-da-serra-dos-orgaos-rj
- File:Feirinha.jpg
- File:Feirinhadearte.jpg
- File:Casamemoriaarthur.jpg
- File:Sesctere.jpg
- File:GRANADO.jpg
- File:Sagrado interior.jpg
- File:Santa tereza.jpg --> https://www.flickr.com/photos/124252692@N08/19165319039 (07.2015, © by "Bruno Cruz")
- File:Zinaugura forum1-RA.jpg
- File:Itaipava serra.jpg
- File:Granja-Comary-cdonsiderada-Selecao-Brasileira ACRIMA20140608 0033 18.jpg
- File:UERJ Teresopolis.jpg – http://niltonsalomao.blogspot.com/2012/02/salomao-anuncia-nucleo-da-uerj-em.html
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all files grabbed from Internet. Gunnex (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg.jpg){kind=link}
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Jimi-jamison.jpg
- File:LongtimeOMT.jpg
- File:Survior.jpg
- File:Survivor84.jpg
- File:Stoohottosleep.jpg
- File:Target (Jimi Jamison).jpg
- File:Manny-Pacquiao-con-Jimi-Jamison.jpg
- File:StarbucksC.jpg
- File:JimiJamison-firefest.jpg
- File:Nevertoolatejj.jpg
- File:Survivorburnigheart.JPG
- File:Live85'.jpg
- File:MusicVJJ.jpg
- File:Jamison cobra.jpg
- File:Jimi jamison.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by THECONOLSEN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like 40.media.tumblr.com/9e1dc2b2256092541c70c2f5b9161008/tumblr_nvkj7fTj501qzbh04o1_500.jpg.
- File:Hollywood Undead live09.jpg
- File:Deuce performing live with Hollywood Undead.jpg
- File:Hollywood Undead after concert.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thejpdstudio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://monthly.chosun.com/upload/0308/0308_044.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://a.cdnmktg.com/p/va-c0Su-kRoYIfSd2kCy9XZ9XFcvELuVxVkTspysp24/600x600.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WAHYU AQUARIUS GERMANY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Spam.
- File:4 kunal 9422219444.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 06.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 05.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 04.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 03.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 94.jpg
- File:Kunal gaud 9.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
No clear scope. Has the website name "Weibo" in title. Josve05a (talk) 16:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete profile picture not used on a user page. Nemo 08:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, low quality image, no indication of user's own work on this author's photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality copy. This is a little jumpy and has a significantly lower video resolution than original. I have uploaded a better quality webm file. Shiftchange (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Uploaded and used to vandalize The Nuggets on enwiki. Uncle Milty (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Only used for obvious vandalism. JIP (talk) 19:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense image, see description and category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Image is way too abstract and featureless to even be able to determine what it represents, let alone be of any use. The filename is useless and does not match the image content. JIP (talk) 19:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kenneth Amanma Wisdom (SDV) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 04:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bipunpatel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Bipun pateli.jpg
- File:Bipun patelg.jpg
- File:Bipun patelh.jpg
- File:Bipun patelf.jpg
- File:Bipun pateld.jpg
- File:Bipun patele.jpg
- File:Bipunpatelb.jpg
- File:Bipunpatelc.jpg
- File:Bipun patel.jpg
- File:Bipunpatel.jpg
- File:Bipunpatela.jpg
- File:Photo bi.jpg
Ies (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Delete. Too low resolution and quality. The way the filename consists over half of special characters and the image's contents makes it look like someone is misusing Commons as a social network site. JIP (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Steinsplitter. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
File:MUNICIPAL DINNER TO CYRUS W. FIELD,ESQ. (held by) METROPOLITAN HOTEL (at) "(NEW YORK, NY)" (HOTEL) (NYPL Hades-269333-4000000032).jpg
[edit]_METROPOLITAN_HOTEL_(at)_%22(NEW_YORK,_NY)%22_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269333-4000000032).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_METROPOLITAN_HOTEL_(at)_%22(NEW_YORK,_NY)%22_(HOTEL)_(NYPL_Hades-269333-4000000032).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
File:MUNICIPAL DINNER TO CYRUS W. FIELD,ESQ. (held by) METROPOLITAN HOTEL (at) "(NEW YORK, NY)" (HOTEL) (NYPL Hades-269333-4000000032).tiff
[edit]Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry "José Ricardo P. Tavares J. R. P. T" speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Could easily be represented with wiki markup. Gunnex (talk) 07:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 08.2011 by Strawberry on Vanilla (talk · contributions · Statistics) seems to be previously published via http://weborganizadas.blogspot.de/2011/05/estaduais-2011-furia-independente.html (05.2011) = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-r_Bzd5Cr1TQ/TcgySOSs3tI/AAAAAAAAA60/Ei9nhEjle6I/s1600/04.jpg Gunnex (talk) 08:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; Very small image (copyvio ?) ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 09:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bianca5793 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bianca5793 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
and File:Оргструктура АИДТ 2016-1.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sibcolombia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Logo pliniancore-01.png
- File:Logo pliniancore-02.png
- File:Logo pliniancore.pdf
- File:Logo pliniancore-02.jpg
- File:Logo pliniancore-01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Lowest quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Note the author Google, the obviously wrong license and the nonsense categories. Ies (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-a4SCxea7NJI/VoCq_htLRyI/AAAAAAAAAxs/e5YIoV4xrfY/s1600/Gambar-Foto-Batang-Kayu-Siwak-kayusiwak-4.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.poesia.fi/kuvat/koski-mari_kuva-kirsi-salo-3-mv.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYsUyHuWYAAT5j4.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Apparent unused personal image from user whose only upload this is. Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Good news; despite the useless description and title, I noticed the category and it turns out this is the lead singer of Korn (i.e. a notable band), which would place it in-scope after all.
- Bad news; reverse image search shows it's a copyvio thumbnail of the documentary "F# Sharp TV - Korn - on business - 1995" as seen here, so it will likely have been already deleted on that basis by the time you read this. Ubcule (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by NahidSultan. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Doubled, older version see File:City BKK logo.svg Nbgapoisghsjpogjshüpasühogj (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Wdwd. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a hoax. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimsa International Airport for details, please. NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Corresponding article deleted as blatant hoax. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This file had been previously deleted as part of an hoax. It should be deleted again - or clearly labeled as being ficticious. NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please delete also the affiliated pictures uploaded by the same author. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Architectural rendering published before this was uploaded to Commons: see http://sunnysideuplady.blogspot.com/2009/05/ground-breaking-jeddah-development.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs and advertising... images not sourced, description promotes business. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Additionally the description seems likely to be a copyvio. Nemo 08:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Realestatejaipur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional/self-promotional uploads which are likely also COM:COPYVIOs.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Support Files were previously deleted - Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ManglamGroup. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anônimous Silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry "Kléber ribeiro cunha" 2x speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pranav3666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional uploads and probably COM:COPYVIOs as well. This series of images promotes real estate and has no indication of uploader's own work.
- File:Trimurti Elina Baner Pune By Trimurti Development.jpg
- File:The Address At Wakad Pune By Adi Group.jpg
- File:R K Lunkad Aromatic Wind At Wakad Pune.jpg
- File:Sonigara Excluzee Wakad Pune By Sonigara Homes.jpg
- File:Chintamani The Almonds In Wakad, Pune.jpg
- File:Homewood Wakad Pune By Kawade Patil Developers.jpg
- File:Oxford Olympia Wakad Pune By Oxford Infra Group.jpg
- File:Safal Oneiro Wakad Pune By Safal Homes.jpg
- File:Icon Windsor Apartments Wakad Pune By Icon Group.jpg
- File:Legacy Bellezza Wakad Pune By Legacy Lifespaces.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepikahelios (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional uploads for apartments, probable COM:COPYVIOs, but out of scope because Commons is not here to promote your business.
- File:Supertech Oxford Square Site Plan.png
- File:Oxford Square Noida Floor plan.jpg
- File:Supertech Oxford Square Noida Extension.jpg
- File:Supertech Oxford Square.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andresdecorus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional uploads and most likely COM:COPYVIOs as well. These images are all advertising Florida condos.
- File:Miami Condo For Sale.jpg
- File:Condos for Sale in Miami.jpg
- File:South Florida Condos for Sale.jpg
- File:Miami Condos For Sale.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arvindgaud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
A copyrighted greek basketball club logo. Glorious 93 (talk) 02:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
user submitted a bunch of pages about fake albums which were allegedly made by a group of schoolfriends, and then never released because they don't actually exist. Images uploaded to iillustrate these nonexistent albums are therefore out of scope. DS (talk) 06:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Also File:Cover 2.png, File:What Freezes Never Ceases.png, and File:The real sauna cover.png. DS (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This image is most likely not the uploader's own work. It appears to be this album cover without the text. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No use on Commons or on wikipedia ; the user has uploaded only 3 photos whose the subject is himself. Civa (talk) 10:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos Civa (talk) 10:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope bulk import from Flickr user. Ubcule (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ismael Britez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ismael Britez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:EDUSE, does not compare well to File:Juvenile Larus argentatus from below.jpg from the same person. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree, not useful without location data - MPF (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:NOTUSED, does not compare well to File:Juvenile Larus argentatus from below.jpg from the same person. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree, not useful without location data - MPF (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:EDUSE, does not compare well to File:Juvenile Larus argentatus from below.jpg from the same person. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree, not useful without location data - MPF (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
No realistic educational usability per COM:EDUSE: main subject blurried to invisibility. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree, not useful with being so blurred - MPF (talk) 23:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 20:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Why are you nominating the same file for deletion twice? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Accidental. Elisfkc (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requested, poor quality. Uploaded the entire album before curating them. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, no educational value Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: delete, out of scope. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:NOTUSED, does not compare well to File:Juvenile Larus argentatus from below.jpg from the same person. Grand-Duc (talk) 00:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jolly Janner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Google reserve all rights. Image from http://deepmind.com/alpha-go.html Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 01:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It may be below the threshold of originality. I'm not an expert on these matters. Is there a way to tag or categorise this deletion review as needing advice on threshold or originality? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Google Chrome 2011 Logo.svg (2nd nomination) (kept) is the most similar one I can see listed on the guideline page. I'm leaning towards keep. Jolly Janner (talk) 05:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Not fri, author not dead in 70 years Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
On request of the uploader: in Inkscape the SVG-file seemed OK, but in Commons it doesn't work, I uploaded a PNG-version file:Dividaĵoj de la Fiĝioj.png which is completely sufficient ThomasPusch (talk) 10:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos Civa (talk) 10:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Preparing new 185.94.5.22 10:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Lower quality of File:Baal Hamon Bardo surrounding.PNG Moumou82 (talk) 11:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: same quality, moreover it is the source file for the derivative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Both COM:TOYS and COM:PACKAGING? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
![12:42, 31 January 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/01/31#c-Tuvalkin-2016-01-31T12:42:00.000Z-File:Ben_CLACY_Benthebassman'_'Doll_in_box'_no_Batteries_included!!".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
![16:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/01/31#c-P199-2016-02-18T16:54:00.000Z-File:Ben_CLACY_Benthebassman'_'Doll_in_box'_no_Batteries_included!!".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Any possible in-scope usefulness this image might have had is rendered null by lack of background detail. Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 13:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Abysmal quality, out of scope, bulk import from Flickr user. Ubcule (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Please see Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2016/01#unesco.org, only files explicitly released by UNESCO can be uploaded to commons. There is no evidence that this set of files has been released. @John Cummings: this one might be of interest to you?
- File:Chovqan azeri game.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game2.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game5.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game4.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game3.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game7.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game6.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game10.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game8.jpg
- File:Chovqan azeri game9.jpg
Basvb (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I misunderstood the words of @John Cummings: in Village pump. After his explanation, I stopped to upload photos from unesco.org. Sorry for this. Delete all of these files.--Shahrux (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, mistakes can happen, thank you for the explanation. Basvb (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
All of these files are claimed own work. They are however clearly older images in different styles making own work unlikely. A lot of them might fall under a public domain license because of their age. You've uploaded quite a lot of images without proper sources and/or attribution. Please clean up these files as it is to the uploader to prove that they are freely available (I've fixed a few but don't know enough about them to fix them all). Please also attribute the correct author.
File:Şəbih.pngfixedFile:Əzimzadənin Şəbeh rəsmi.pngfixed- File:Azərbaycan şairi Saib Təbrizi.JPG
- File:Azerbaijani game chovgan.JPG
- File:Azərbaycan şairi Məsihi.JPG
- File:Aşıq Qurbani.JPG
- File:Aşıq Cümə.JPG
- File:Aşıq Alı.JPG
File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-5.JPGFile:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-4.JPGFile:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem.JPGFile:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-3.JPGFile:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-2.JPGFile:Həqiqətüs-səəda.JPGFile:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-4.JPGFile:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-3.JPGFile:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-2.JPGFile:Riyazül-qüds in azeri.JPGFile:Qarabaği.jpgfixed- File:Urmavi1.png
- File:Urmavi.png
File:Kara Karayev.pngFile:Безымянный (2).pngfixedFile:Безымянныйert5yt6.pngFile:Sultan Yaqub.JPG- File:Zeynalabdin Shirvani.png
- File:West door of Alinja.png
- File:Uzun Hasan.png
- File:Tugra of Uzun Hasan.png
- File:Beylagan in Middle Ages.png
- File:Abu'l-Aswar Shavur ibn Fadl 1051 1.JPG
- File:Abu'l-Aswar Shavur ibn Fadl 1051 2.JPG
.png){kind=link}
Basvb (talk) 13:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, files below are the works of poet lived 500 years ago. How can you delete them?
- File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-5.JPG
- File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-4.JPG
- File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem.JPG
- File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-3.JPG
- File:Qovsi Tabrizi's poem-2.JPG--Shahrux (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you I removed the nomination for these. After little fixes. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, I added the source for this fileː File:Sultan Yaqub.JPG--Shahrux (talk) 14:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you I removed the nomination for these. After little fixes. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, there are plenty of photos of Azim Azimzade uploaded to the wikicommons. See this category Category:Paintings by Azim Azimzade. You cannot delete File:Əzimzadənin Şəbeh rəsmi.png. I added also the source for other file cropped from this one (File:Şəbih.png).--Shahrux (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you I removed the nomination for these. After little fixes. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, The author of this work (File:Qarabaği.jpg) died 100 years ago. You cannot delete it.--Shahrux (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you I removed the nomination for these. After little fixes. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, the files below of this translation work was done 200 years ago.
- File:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-4.JPG
- File:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-3.JPG
- File:Riyazül-qüds in azeri-2.JPG
- File:Riyazül-qüds in azeri.JPG
How you can delete them?--Shahrux (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you I removed the nomination for these. After little fixes. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, coins below are created 1000 years ago.
- File:Abu'l-Aswar Shavur ibn Fadl 1051 1.JPG
- File:Abu'l-Aswar Shavur ibn Fadl 1051 2.JPGHow you can delete them?--Shahrux (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Basvb, files below are cropped files, and source is given.
- File:Безымянный (2).png
- File:Безымянныйert5yt6.png
- File:Kara Karayev.png
- File:Urmavi1.png
- File:Urmavi.png
- File:Həqiqətüs-səəda.JPG
Why do you want to delete them?--Shahrux (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- You've fixed some and I've fixed some. The Urmavi images have a problem that the image you cropped them from also has the wrong author listed. Do you know who is the author of the original drawing? When did they die? Basvb (talk) 15:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Basvb, it is the photo of carpet. User:Amir a57 who uploaded the photo is the real owner of the photo.--Shahrux (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
For remaining files, I don't want to explain anything. Because I don't use any of these files in wikipedia. Delete the files belowː
- File:Azərbaycan şairi Saib Təbrizi.JPG
- File:Azerbaijani game chovgan.JPG
- File:Azərbaycan şairi Məsihi.JPG
- File:Aşıq Qurbani.JPG
- File:Aşıq Cümə.JPG
- File:Aşıq Alı.JPG
- File:Zeynalabdin Shirvani.png
- File:West door of Alinja.png
- File:Uzun Hasan.png
- File:Tugra of Uzun Hasan.png
- File:Beylagan in Middle Ages.png--Shahrux (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Shahrux, The problem is that they say "author= Sharux" and show up as "own work" this is not true. The attribution has to be fixed, if they are old enough and the attribution is fixed we can keep the files. To show what I mean I did this example edit. Can you do similar improvements to the other files? Basvb (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.png&diff=186171735&oldid=186163962){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
No source given for varifying the licensing 178.2.48.21 13:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- So, what Fototeca de la CNMH / DCXX1-89 means? --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep! The source of this image is the Coordinacion Nacional de Monumentos Historicos (CNMH) of Mexico, and the date 1918-20, is sufficient proof that the image is in the Public Domain and no licensing is required. — Ineuw talk 18:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope due to extremely low quality (scissors or crossed swords?) Kopiersperre (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirect to File:Legenda miejsce bitwy.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Witam, zwracam się z prośbą o usunięcie tego zdjęcia (Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.JPG), gdyż zdjęcie to zostało zamieszczone jeszcze raz ciut później , ale po retuszu i w znacznie lepszej jakosci (Malgorzata Jaworska.jpg). Nie ma sensu , żeby oba tutaj sie znajdowały. Jestem włascicielką tej fotografii. Z góry dziękuję. Resap7 (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to delete my photo which was upload by my friend . This photo was upload once more later and this one is much better. Thank you in advance. 109.189.6.203 11:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)--Resap7 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've been in contact with Resap7 and we have agreed that it is fair to delete the older photo that I uploaded earlier (Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.jpg). Resap7 is the owner of the photograph and an improved reupload of the photo (Malgorzata Jaworska.jpg) is currently on the Wikipedia page, so there is no need to keep the other photo. As the uploader, I approve of "Malgorzata jaworska 290511a.jpg" being removed.
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Club del Departamento 10.JPG
- File:Club del Departamento 8.JPG
- File:Santuario de Las Lajas 21.JPG
- File:Santuario de Las Lajas 16.JPG
Ies (talk) 15:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zoológico de Cali 12.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 11.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 9.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 10.JPG
Ies (talk) 15:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Completely out of focus. Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zoológico de Cali 20.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 17.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 19.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 18.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 16.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 14.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 13.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 15.JPG
Ies (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zoológico de Cali 28.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 25.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 27.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 26.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 24.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 23.JPG
Ies (talk) 15:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Krd 13:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Andoke 62.JPG
- File:Andoke 59.JPG
- File:Andoke 58.JPG
- File:Andoke 48.JPG
- File:Andoke 49.JPG
- File:Andoke 47.JPG
- File:Andoke 46.JPG
- File:Andoke 45.JPG
- File:Andoke 44.JPG
- File:Andoke 38.JPG
- File:Andoke 36.JPG
- File:Andoke 33.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 44.JPG
Ies (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Yann (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zoológico de Cali 53.JPG
- File:Andoke 90.JPG
- File:Andoke 89.JPG
- File:Andoke 86.JPG
- File:Andoke 83.JPG
- File:Andoke 84.JPG
- File:Andoke 82.JPG
- File:Andoke 65.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 46.JPG
Ies (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
A series of toy cars, please see COM:TOYS. The cars were not created by the uploader, so cannot be licensed by them for Commons.
- File:Chevrolet C-10.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Camaro 3.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Tahoe 3.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Tahoe 2.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Corvette 5.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Corvette 4.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Corvette 3.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Camaro 2.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Caprice 2.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Sprint.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Luv.JPG
- File:Chevrolet Swift.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Zoológico de Cali 112.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 108.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 104.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 105.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 103.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 102.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 97.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 85.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 84.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 81.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 78.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 76.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 70.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 57.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 49.JPG
- File:Monumento a Cristo Rey (Cali) 10.JPG
_10.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
These all appear to be derivatives of copyrighted, non-free works, which are presumably not the uploader's own.
- File:Primera División de México.svg
- File:Tippeliggaen3.svg
- File:Copa de Noruega2.svg
- File:Copa de Dinamarca.svg
- File:Superliga de Dinamarca.svg
- File:Copa Sudamericana.svg
- File:Copa de Noruega.png
- File:Tippeligaen2.png
- File:Pequeña Copa del Mundo de Clubes.svg
- File:Copa Latina.svg
- File:Zoológico de Cali 115.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 113.JPG
- File:Zoológico de Cali 114.JPG
- File:Sony DSC.JPG
- File:Elasmotherium sibiricum 2.JPG
- File:Ursus spelaeus 2.JPG
- File:Castoroides 3.JPG
- File:Andoke 94.JPG
- File:Andoke 93.JPG
- File:Andoke 92.JPG
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
All instances of this raster graphic have been replaced with the SVG version. Evan.oltmanns (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by File:Navy Cross ribbon.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
unclear license – did Ton Zmali publish it under CC0? Albinfo (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Picture is copied from this blog, clearly marked with (c) at the bottom. --TU-nor (talk) 09:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
unclear license – did Ton Zmali publish it under CC0? Albinfo (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Picture is copied from this blog, clearly marked with (c) at the bottom. --TU-nor (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
unclear license: who painted this? don't think he wrote CC0 on the image Albinfo (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No copyright information. 23 editor (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
unclear license: who painted this? don't think he wrote CC0 on the image Albinfo (talk) 16:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
No idea, i've been trying to find the original author but it seems that its quite widely spread on the internet... --Albanian Historian (talk) 10:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No copyright info; must be assumed to be non-PD. 23 editor (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Criteria for speedy deletion: 7. Author or uploader request deletion / Uploaded a new file of the person File:Yastremska-Svitlana-Oleksandrivna-16017258a.jpg. Please deletion bad file.
Keep Free licenses are irrevocable. The file is big and has EXIF data, it is totally usable. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete my file at the request of the person in the photo. The woman lives and she did not like this photo. I did another photo, old photos please delete.--Mykola Vasylechko 17:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, superseded by File:Yastremska-Svitlana-Oleksandrivna-16017258a.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Better images already exist showing much the same thing in Category:National Stock Exchange of India. Bars in the way would be acceptable if we didn't already have similar images showing the building from that angle (most notably File:NSE.JPG if it was cropped is very similar) Ubcule (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Taken at I-Rock XX festival, but you can't make out what this particular image is supposed to represent, so not usefully in-scope for Commons. Ubcule (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Highly pixelated blog image accompanied by promotional/self-promotional text. Image not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thomasglatte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text only documents that look like power point slides of the uploader. Not in use and outside of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Overview Corporate Real Estate Management.png
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM farbig.png
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM JPEG.jpg
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM.pdf
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (1 kept: in use). P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused image, seems to be out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Info: File uploaded in 2006 and properly categorized. May be still used outside WMF. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
A series of uploaders by a property developer or rental agent, one with his family, one in a vehicle and one next to an award or poster; the last image is the company logo. None of these are own work and the descriptions make clear they were uploaded for promotional/self-promotional reasons.
- File:Logo-mahkota property.jpg
- File:Julizar Family.jpg
- File:Bunga papan dari mahkota property.jpg
- File:Julizar Sayuti.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified, unused logo. No clear scope. Also might be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete the heart seems above TOO. Nemo 08:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Doubtful usefulness per COM:EDUSE and possibly identifiable child, causing problems with COM:PEOPLE / COM:PRP (no country of origin given so no clue about the need of publication consent of the person depicted or his proxy). Grand-Duc (talk) 18:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Delhi airport 04 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Delhi airport 02 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Delhi airport 03 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Delhi airport 01 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Clothes shop in Paharganj 03 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Clothes shop in Paharganj 01 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
- File:Paharganj 09 (Friar's Balsam Flickr).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Endless mass of quantity-over-quality bulk-importation of images with no differentiation between those that might be useful to Commons and those that are obviously personal and/or of very low (and arguably unusable) quality as listed here. This is just a small proportion of such images, I didn't have time to go through them all.
- File:Gagan's Birthday (2005) (39724865).jpg
- File:Striking a pose! (230752796).jpg
- File:Taking a leak (230753971).jpg
- File:Marine Drive (236091664).jpg
- File:The Queen's Necklace (236088182).jpg
- File:Me at Marine Drive (236089351).jpg
- File:Marine Drive (236112336).jpg
- File:Marine Drive (236112978).jpg
- File:Marine Drive (236089883).jpg
- File:Mumbai skyline (236114643).jpg
- File:Marine Drive (236111563).jpg
- File:NCDEX Trading Holidays List (244399912).jpg
- File:Ethiopian Qahwah (262387624).jpg
- File:Bollwood Cinestars (289415445).jpg
- File:A pretty good read... (289443289).jpg
- File:Leopold's (306366478).jpg
- File:Another night (305804645).jpg
- File:No More Beer -( (306365400).jpg
- File:Leopold's (306365066).jpg
- File:Leopold's (306365713).jpg
- File:Leopold's (306366067).jpg
- File:Leopold's (306366862).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346714813).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346715409).jpg
- File:On Campus! (346733064).jpg
_(39724865).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- I kept one photo (Ethiopian coffee). Taivo (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Endless number of Flickr user's personal images (i.e. quite blatantly out of scope for Commons), ones of unacceptably poor quality or those whose lack of background detail renders them useless for Commons' purposes (even assuming they'd otherwise have been acceptable, which is questionable).
Unfortunately, while a number of images that were bulk-imported here are applicable to Commons, an incredibly high proportion blatantly aren't, but have been transferred anyway. Perhaps it would be useful to adopt a quality-over-quantity approach here.
- File:Sunset (116198181).jpg
- File:Paradise (230740218).jpg
- File:NCDEX (236985218).jpg
- File:Tavaa, Bandra (239026771).jpg
- File:My Dismantled Keyboard (244400774).jpg
- File:The Portable Beer Vending Machine! (306364970).jpg
- File:Cheers! (346720429).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346805003).jpg
- File:Schumi? (346807116).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346804224).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346805392).jpg
- File:Mondy (409753069).jpg
- File:Toto's (356694335).jpg
- File:Beer (356696431).jpg
- File:Mondy (409745239).jpg
- File:Good ole Toto's (2688288172).jpg
- File:Nuts and bolts (3008928239).jpg
- File:Mondy (409746340).jpg
- File:Ringo Starr Wall (407817474).jpg
- File:Mondy (409750693).jpg
- File:Mondy (409751277).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only one kept. The others are mostly out of project scope due to bad quality, but Ringo Starr wall and Mondy photos were also derivative work of copyrighted photos or wall painting. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
How many- if any- of these bulk-imported images are likely to be useful to Commons?
- File:River Crossing (Me) (34222544).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34222806).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34222106).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34222702).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34222972).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34223447).jpg
- File:River Crossing (34223281).jpg
_(34222544).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, I think these are quite good examples for a en:Tyrolean traverse and we don't have many alternatives for that. I'm tending towards Keep. --El Grafo (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- That's a very good argument; thanks for categorising these (and hence making them more useful). I
I withdraw my nomination and vote Keep instead. Ubcule (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- That's a very good argument; thanks for categorising these (and hence making them more useful). I
Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope images, personal posed photos that were uploaded to flickr and reuploaded here just because they are on a compatible license. Better quality images without these personal poses are available in the same categories. These serve no educational purpose.
- File:The IT Terrorist (34221892).jpg
- File:Timber Trail, Himachal Pradesh (116194238).jpg
- File:Golden Temple, Amritsar (116197155).jpg
- File:Midhun (230739186).jpg
- File:Goras at the beach (230748274).jpg (if this file is kept it should be renamed; the current title translates to "white people[derogatory] at the beach")
- File:Fun @ Work (243223728).jpg
- File:Outta my way! (244404630).jpg
- File:Ignorance & Harshness (262382680).jpg
- File:R & R at Amoeba (346716030).jpg
- File:Phyllis being entertained (3192199738).jpg
- File:Wayanad 2011 IMG 1817 (6679258513).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 Stairway to heaven (5031801699).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05994 2 3 tonemapped (5032534694).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05977 (5032424766).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05992 (5031915505).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05913 4 5HDRI tonemapped (5032348778).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05916 7 8HDRI tonemapped (5031735495).jpg
- File:Gingee 2010 DSC05898 899 900HDRI tonemapped (5032343782).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—SpacemanSpiff 16:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I see several problems with this image. It uses a random, meaningless file name. The image itself is of somewhat low resolution and low quality, and by the looks of it, is a screenshot of a TV program and therefore does not fall under "own work". The only category it is in is "Kebabs" but I don't see any connection or relation to kebabs. The image is not used anywhere. JIP (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful enough per COM:EDUSE to accept the low quality out of a smartphone or point&shoot cam of this quite easily replaceable scene/subject. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep Image in scope ãnd of good quality. And this is not an "quite easily replaceable scene/subject". Show me an image that has an Grey heron and an Gull interacting in the Tagus River. Tm (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Comment Those quite common birds are visibly not interacting, they happened to sit by chance in a common frame, as they are obviously inhabitants of the same biotope (hence my opinion the ease in replacing the scene). But this does not add anything to the educational usefulness, because biotopical illustrations should better be done in a neutral lighting. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 23:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment First they are interacting as the filename, given by the photographer that saw what was happening, is "Encontro ao fim da tarde" or in english "Encounter in late afternnon". Second this image is of Tagus river at its mouth classified as a Natura 2000 Site of Community Importance and a portuguese Natural Reserve (and one of the most important).
- About this image being common this is not true,[as there are only three images of an heron and gull in the 25 million images in Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns9=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1&search=heron+Gull+] (and not of this two species). So if this image is easily replaceable i ask you again, after you conveniently sideline it:
- Find a image were a Grey heron and an Gull of this species together, in Tagus river ot not (interacting as this image or not) in Wikimedia Commons? Also the light of this image is ok to an image taken in the late afternoon and is not of bad quality. Tm (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Well, OK, we have two dissenting opinions here. As I'm interested in biology, I would use "interaction" only when a specimen of one animal does visibly react to another specimen (of the same species or of another species). That's not true here, so using the term "encounter" is right, but a casual encounter of two people meeting in a street or two birds landing in approximately the same spot is not an interaction. Next point: the gull looks a lot like being a Larus argentatus, a cosmopolite and widely distributed species, the grey heron too has a broad range. All the more, a natural reserve offers protection to animals, so I expect a higher density of population of birds, especially common species, there. That leads to my point of "easily replaceable scene": common birds in an area of higher population density could be seen more often in such a constellation. That does not mean that there is currently an existing image of it, but that it won't be a rare occurence to see it. And of course, the light has some merits from a photographer's point of view. It could carry several kinds of mood, depending of the circumstances where the still is shown. But this is not really Commons's aim as per COM:EDUSE: you cannot clearly see morphological details of the plumage of the birds, as the dull grey lighting makes their sides dark with not much contrast. There's no documentation of a notable behavior (feeding, fighting, learning...) of one of the animal actors shown.
- My last point is that every above mentioned point is not an absolute thing, but must be seen in relation to the technical quality. I wouldn't have filled a deletion request if this had been an image of good technical quality, that is to say, out of something as a DSLR. Digital cameras with small sensors / pixels as build in smartphones or simple point&shoot cameras cannot capture the dynamics of such a lighting situation, making a noisy, blurry shot with a lot of compression artifacts as seen here, already in thumbnail and the more in full res. This made my balance tilting towards a deletion request: little educational usefulness (of something that is looking like an atmospheric picture for Flickr show-off) and good possibility of retaking a similar shot versus technical deficiencies: noise, blurring, low sharpness, little contrast and details. Kind regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- So basicaly what you claim is a not a "rare occurrance" is so normal and frequent that Wikimedia Commons has not one, none, zero images of this two birds together. This is also rare that the category of this natural reserve has 6 images of birds in 33 and yet none is of this two species (there is two of storks and four of ducks). Technical quality is good specialy taking in to account the time of day it was taken and the kind of camera that was used. Or are you saying that the only images that Wikimedia Commons should accept are the ones taken by SLR or other expensive cameras the kind of images you want and not the ones taken by less expensive cameras, specially if they are taken late in the afternoon? This image is highly educational enough as by my previous arguments, so in scope and this image was not taken to show some detail of plumage or any "notable behavior" but instead to show the interactions of this two species of birds and the kind of birds that exists in Tagus river in portugal. Tm (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment "Or are you saying that the only images that Wikimedia Commons should accept are the ones taken by SLR or other expensive cameras" is an illegitimate generalization of my opinion. I am saying that there are photographic scenes which benefit from a camera with a large sensor (that ist most often a DSLR or a SLT [Single-lens translucent] device, true, but some bridge or compact cameras possess APS-C sized CMOS chips, too). But nevertheless, these devices are not expensive anymore: a starter DSLR kit is sold in Germany new for less than 300€ (something alike a Canon EOS 100D or a Nikon D3100), secondhand material for less than 200€.
- I do say that the n-th image of a cat, gull, horse, dog, other pet, fished carp/perch/pike/bass, pidgeon, cock or hen..., that is not shot in a decent quality could, maybe should, be deleted (and nowadays that would most often mean, surely when it comes to photographical difficult lighting situations, "shot with a DSLR"). But let's consult COM:SCOPE#Discussion: "New and existing files of poor or mediocre quality may or may not be realistically useful for an educational purpose depending on what they illustrate and what other files we have of the same subject. Where a subject is rare and/or difficult to capture, even a poor quality file may be of significant educational value, especially if Commons has very few or no similar files already. On the other hand, poor or mediocre files of common and easy to capture subjects may have no realistic educational value, especially if Commons already hosts many similar or better quality examples." You've made your point clear that you do think that the occurrence of a gull and a heron is quite rare. I'm fine with that, even if I think otherwise. As we are working in a collaborative project, we do exchange our views, and if my opinion, that this image is not good enough for Commons, does not win a majority or convince a local admin, it's truly OK. But I was totally right in proposing the deletion to be discussed here. Kind regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 03:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
BTW, 
Question: What kind of "natural reserve" is this area? How much human influence was there or is there? As there is a concrete jetty, I guess that it is a cultivated area, so I'd like (also by my own curiosity) top know the rationale for its protection. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- See en:Tagus Estuary Natural Reserve for its importance. This image, i think, is not exactly taken in Lisbon but up the river in this natural reserve (probably in Póvoa de Santa Iria or Alhandra as in Lisbon the distance between the margins is way bigger and there are no islands), where there are several is a mixed area of man made structures like agricultural field and salt evaporation ponds (so the concrete jetty) and natural areas as wetlands, floodable margins, etc.
- See This page where says "Mapa" to see the area of this reserve and "Aves" to see the birds of this reserve". Tm (talk) 03:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The gull is probably Larus fuscus, though a dark individual of Larus michahellis can't be ruled out from my current expertise (others may be able to tell, though). I'd say weak Keep on its current version, but the image could possibly be improved (and the species identity better determined) by brightening a bit; I'll try to do so tomorrow when I have more time. If that works, I'll revisit here - MPF (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- If this helps i can link of the site above (albeit the site is in portuguese), the webpages of the species of gulls found on this reserve. Also the two species you mention are present in this reserve. Tm (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Brightened the pic a bit (undo if not liked!); enables identification of the gull as Larus fuscus, a 2nd year immature bird. - MPF (talk) 09:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- If this helps i can link of the site above (albeit the site is in portuguese), the webpages of the species of gulls found on this reserve. Also the two species you mention are present in this reserve. Tm (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality: blurry, noisy, really small. So no realistic educational use envisageable per COM:NOTUSED. Grand-Duc (talk) 19:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by many others in Category:Unidentified Larus. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
unused, out of scope, description in romanian states something like "Here you can see the most famous YouTuber the galaxy.", file included in category "sexy nurse outfits". Strakhov (talk) 19:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a photo of an unidentified private individual, uploaded for a vandalism / attack page on en.wiki. Outside of project scope, with no conceivable encyclopedic uses. Diannaa (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This image appears to be out of project scope, specifically COM:SELFIE. Unless there is evidence to the contrary, this titlecard logo for en:United States presidential election, 2016 is user-generated and thus original research, and not an official logo provided by any reliable sources. We cannot have editors create their own homemade logos for every article that does not have one. Zzyzx11 (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Commons is not Wikipedia, so WP:OR and WP:RS does not apply here (as you as sysop should know it well); the only requiriment for files is a valid source (and Own work is a valid one, as a self-made SVG from a trusted user). File currently in use as a free representation of the event (even if unofficial), so inside the Project scope. And finally, very bellow the Threshold of originality in the US, so no copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Above reflect my views as well. I created this for the purpose to which it is presently applied. I never claim it to be an official or otherwise sanctioned logo by any organization. If anything, its design is to serve that purpose on Wikipedia. Spartan7W (talk) 23:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:OR does not apply on Commons, as Commons is not Wikipedia. MB298 (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work, no authors' permissions, dubious licensing. Sealle (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Not useful per COM:EDUSE, does not compare well to File:Juvenile Larus argentatus from below.jpg and two or three other Larus stills from the same person. Grand-Duc (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete agree, not useful without location data - MPF (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Flickrwashing - the Flickr user has the same editor name as the uploader but has only two images on Flickr and this one is a different crop of the same image found on this webpage which looks like a scan of a fashion magazine page. It also has no metadata is is a low resolution image. Ww2censor (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Curayo Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
The background image has ben acquired (stock images), the whole image including title is the official logo/screen image used by the television station and the production company and is uploaded with their permission. User:curayo, 08:37, 1 Feburary 2016 (MET)
The same image is used on the website of the production company, link: http://splashfilm.at/#!/preview User:curayo, 18:55, 1 Feburary 2016 (MET)
- so this is still not own work, as you claimed. the background is license free at [1], the text is simple and not subject to copyright. At least the description has to be changed, and I'm not sure about your claim of CC-by-sa 4.0.
- following [2]
- 9. Immaterialgüterrechte von splashfilm.net
Berggespraeche.com ist Inhaber sämtlicher Rechte am Angebot von Berggespraeche.com (insbesondere aber nicht ausschließlich Marken-/Patent-/Urheber-Leistungsschutz und Lizenzrechte). Diese dürfen nicht ohne vorherige, ausdrückliche und schriftliche Zustimmung von Berggespraeche.com genutzt werden oder Hinweise darauf, dass Berggespraeche.com Rechteinhaberin ist, entfernt werden. Insbesondere darf/dürfen die Website www.splashfilm.net bzw. die auf dieser Seite angebotenen Inhalte nicht verändert, kopiert, wiederveröffentlicht, übertragen, verbreitet oder gespeichert werden. Insbesondere darf auch die Marke Berggespraeche.com und/oder die Marke splashfilm.net ohne vorherige Genehmigung nicht genutzt werden.
- an OTRS release of the logos by the company would help to remove any doubt.
- Leave this to some expert. Sorry to bother you. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket:2016021610008974. --Jcb (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Curayo Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
The background image has ben acquired (stock images), the whole image including title is the official logo/screen image used by the television station and the production company and is uploaded with their permission. User:curayo, 08:39, 1 Feburary 2016 (MET)
The same image is used on the website of the production company, link: http://splashfilm.at/#!/berggespraeche User:curayo, 18:55, 1 Feburary 2016 (MET)
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Preview wikipedia.jpg before deletion --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket:2016021610008965. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Grandcamp-Maisy
[edit]Il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France, et cette statue est moderne
- File:Normandy '12 - Day 3- Grandcamp-Maisy, Statue of World Peace (7467137366).jpg
- File:Normandy '12 - Day 3- Grandcamp-Maisy, Statue of World Peace (7467140776).jpg
- File:Normandy '12 - Day 3- Grandcamp-Maisy, Statue of World Peace (7467142964).jpg
- File:Normandy '12 - Day 3- Grandcamp-Maisy, Statue of World Peace (7467146216).jpg
- File:Normandy '12 - Day 3- Grandcamp-Maisy, Statue of World Peace (7467148716).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smoking Man (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of East Timor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I replaced it where it xas used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of East Timor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 1-2015.jpg, File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 2-2015.jpg and File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 3-2015.jpg, to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, as well as imho potentially non-free content (artwork), Roland zh (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: it need a permission from the artist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 1-2015.jpg, File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 2-2015.jpg and File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 3-2015.jpg, to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, as well as imho potentially non-free content (artwork), Roland zh (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: it need a permission from the artist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 1-2015.jpg, File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 2-2015.jpg and File:Gopakumar R. P.-Unhealed Wounds 3-2015.jpg, to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. missing exif, as well as imho potentially non-free content (artwork), Roland zh (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: it need a permission from the artist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Church of St.Francis - panoramio.jpg, File:Cochin - panoramio.jpg, File:Synagogue,Cochin - panoramio.jpg and File:Cochin - panoramio - yamarhythm.jpg, as imho bad quality uploads from paronamio, and lots of (much) better alternatives within the subcategories of Category:Kochi, Kerala, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no enough bad quality to be deleted, and image show original point of view and contexte. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Church of St.Francis - panoramio.jpg, File:Cochin - panoramio.jpg, File:Synagogue,Cochin - panoramio.jpg and File:Cochin - panoramio - yamarhythm.jpg, as imho bad quality uploads from paronamio, and lots of (much) better alternatives within the subcategories of Category:Kochi, Kerala, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no enough bad quality to be deleted, and image show original point of view and contexte. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:Church of St.Francis - panoramio.jpg, File:Cochin - panoramio.jpg, File:Synagogue,Cochin - panoramio.jpg and File:Cochin - panoramio - yamarhythm.jpg, as imho bad quality uploads from paronamio, and lots of (much) better alternatives within the subcategories of Category:Kochi, Kerala, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no enough bad quality to be deleted, not so many alternative for this point of view. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 20:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per google search. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be user's own work, this is an architectural rendering of a building. Notice small size and poor quality plus overprinting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
"Bibendum" is a copyrighted character owned by the Michelin tire company. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Sales brochure, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Sales brochure, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Logo might be above the COM:TOO. Josve05a (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the arrangement of simple shape makes it look like the result to an eye, then it is not so simple. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Sales brochure, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these architecturals were created by uploader, instead they seem to be from rental/realty sources and are being used promotionally, e.g. "Omshakthy agencies is a real estate agency which provides best residential plots for sale in chennai at your budgets that best suits your needs."
- File:Plots in Chennai.jpg
- File:Plots in Avadi Chennai.jpg
- File:Flats in Avadi chennai.jpg
- File:Apartments For Sale in Avadi.jpg
- File:Flats in Avadi.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also artworks without obvious educational use. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
On #01 of this series, the following is in the description "Cobb Island Maryland courtesy of Southern Maryland Real Estate Konnie Mac." Since it's "courtesy of" there would need to be a COM:OTRS filed by the real photographer of these images since they are all obviously shots of the same sunset views from the same camera.
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunrise 04.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunrise 02.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunrise 03.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunrise 01.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 10.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 08.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 09.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 07.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 06.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 05.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 04.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 03.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 01.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland 02.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 19.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 18.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 17.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 16.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 13.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 14.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 15.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 12.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 10.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 09.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 07.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 08.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 06.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 04.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 05.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 03.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 01.JPG
- File:Cobb Island Maryland Sunset 02.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Nonsense request, because no copyright problems here (no such images in internet). It obviously uploader's own works. Username is promotional, I agree, but no reasons to delete these files. /St1995 13:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: most of the files are coming from http://www.panoramio.com/user/8389222?comment_page=1&photo_page=3 and are not free. If the uploader is the author then it will be easy for him/her to send an OTRS permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
On further research, I believe this school is mis-identified; it is a similar school building, but not Church Hill Grammar School — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kzirkel (talk • contribs) 2016-01-28T03:42:09 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please use the {{Rename}} template to request a change of file name. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Accademia di Belle Arti Bologna, GIARDINO GIUSTI (Verona Storia dell'Arte giardino all'italiana), Tesi di Diploma di Paolo Villa, A.A. 1993-94, relatori Eleonora Frattarolo e Fabia Farneti ed 2013 con immagini.pdf
[edit]The book has been uploaded by User talk:Vuvueffino, but with no OTRS ticket, thus we cannot say that he's the author. Then, the license is not correct. Ruthven (msg) 17:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
A modern painting. No author, no date, no source. 128.68.59.122 17:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
A modern painting. No author, no date, no source. 128.68.59.122 17:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
A modern painting. No author, no date, no source. 128.68.59.122 17:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Small image with no metadata, claimed own work. Source 404s, but then is claimed as own work. In use on uploader's wikipedia page which reads more like a personal advertisement for their real estate business than a personal page. There has been no activity on their wiki contributions since the pages were set up in 2008-2010. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Says "Copyright: Volksbank Weinheim eG" in EXIF-data. Josve05a (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright. Image available on Internet in 2010 at [3] (post #5, last image). EXIF and resolution? GermanJoe (talk) 21:44, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Dubious licensing, no evidence that photographs were first published more than 70 years ago.
- File:Озаровский Николай Юрьевич.jpg
- File:Pliusnin i a.jpg
- File:Юрий (Георгий) Эрастович Озаровский.jpg
_%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%9E%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 22:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hay demasias Pulgarcipe (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Pulgarcipe, please further explain your nomination. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and {{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail (seems to be derived from a painting, not a photographic work). May be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation 82.240.248.8 13:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No proof of permission. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
User (Non-OTRS) added the OTRS ticket, I'm unable to verify that this exact image falls under the ticket. @Kwangmo: could you indicate how exactly this older image falls under the ticket, either here or via OTRS (please indicate the ticket number if you do). Basvb (talk) 13:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Obviously not the uploader's own work. Non-English text on poster, so no copyright notice likely required. Minimal text doesn't quite pin down country of publication, but date is 1954 or later, so European copyright would not have expired. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Claim that this is subject's own work is not credible, especially since they also claimed to have created a 1954 movie poster featuring the same performer. Copyvio. Date and place of publication unknown. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Is this a derivative of copyrightable material? Ubcule (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploaded by a blocked user. Green Giant (talk) 21:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Unauthorized reproduction. Same image http://minimini.in/roku_u/contents/cinecon/new_img/1743.jpg and https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bby2RTPUly4/maxresdefault.jpg 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since). It's a webcam shot from a fixed webcam, with no human intervention, isn't this allowed in Commons, as it has no original authorship ({{PD-ineligible}})? Darwin Ahoy! 12:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Someone owns the camera from which the webcam images are taken. That owner would need to release (c) to here. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Restored, per {{PD-Portugal-photo}} - if a photo is published without authorship, it is void of copyright per Portugal copyright law.-- Darwin Ahoy! 02:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Monumentalno stopnišče v palači Ljubljanske Zbornice za trgovino, obrt in indusirijo 1927.jpg
[edit]
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957) and F. Tomažič (d. 1968). Eleassar (t/p) 13:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is this staircase (visible part) original enough or signifintly different to the rest? --Sporti (talk) 21:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hausratte as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu — billinghurst sDrewth 14:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It don't uses after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. --Vladis13 (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hausratte as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu — billinghurst sDrewth 14:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It don't uses after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. --Vladis13 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hausratte as duplicateand the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Толковый словарь. Том 2 (Даль 1905).djvu — billinghurst sDrewth 14:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It don't uses after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 2 (Даль 1905).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. --Vladis13 (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hausratte as duplicateand the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Толковый словарь. Том 1 (Даль 1903).djvu — billinghurst sDrewth 14:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I have no objection for deletion. 62.252.189.68 16:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It don't uses after was uploaded full version File:Толковый словарь. Том 2 (Даль 1905).djvu. See talk in s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД. --Vladis13 (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Because of low quality (heavy reflections, shadow) unusable file Kopiersperre (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's totally legible. It's "unusable" only in the sense of not being usable in a Wikipedia article. It's totally usable in the sense of someone using online maps from that volume needing to look up the legend. Commons does not exist only in service of Wikipedia. - Jmabel ! talk 18:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- This might make some kind of sense if we had a higher quality image to use instead, but as long as it's all we have, deleting it doesn't serve any purpose. Scans of these maps should be obtainable through the UW photo archive. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
@Dennis Bratland: May you find the right map from here?--Kopiersperre (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm guessing this *might* possibly fall below threshold of originality, but is it useful within Commons' scope? Ubcule (talk) 16:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Out of scope. Riley Huntley (talk) 03:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Joshgwinters (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Desert Flower by Chrisopher Ries.webm
- File:Blue Ginkgo by Christopher Ries.jpg
- File:Desert Flower (detail) by Christopher Ries.jpg
- File:Christopher Ries through Tear Jar.jpg
- File:Sunflower by Christopher Ries.jpg
- File:Sunflower Gilding.jpg
_by_Christopher_Ries.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Permissions all provided and images tagged as such. User:Amortias (T)(C) 23:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Amortias: The OTRS permission itself looks invalid. Permission for the artwork itself is needed, not for the picture. COM:DW. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @Amortias: again. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging @Steinsplitter: I'm still working my way around WikiMedia and I've been trying my best to get all my ducks in a row. Why are my files being deleted when I have documented permission from the author of the file to use it? Recently the Sunflower IV.webm video was deleted but I had the permission explicitly given by the author of the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wepIO_zt6ko. If I really do have to contact the Mr Ries himself, whose works are depicted in the media, I'll do so. (Though I'd appreciate being pointed toward the relevant copyright guidelines that require this.) --Joshgwinters
- @Amortias: The OTRS permission itself looks invalid. Permission for the artwork itself is needed, not for the picture. COM:DW. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes, the author's permission is required to upload his works to Commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
These are all taken from here: http://www.troianka-school.edukit.kr.ua/nashi_vipuskniki/gordistj_shkoli/volodimir_garanin/. The license is not correct.
- File:Мовознавча енциклопедія.jpg
- File:Бібліотеці рідної школи від учня.jpg
- File:Шевченкові присвячується.jpg
- File:Ганна Іванівна Гараніна.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Зображення завантажувала вперше, тому не вказала авторів. Це фото моє книг, подарованих автором. Якщо вважаєте їх недоречними, не буду заперечувати. Спробую завантажити іншим разом згідно правил. --ЧитЛана (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{speedy|Esta imagem já não vai servir para o função que pretendia, para além do que a informação sobre o autor tem um equivoco Vítor Fernandes 18:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Fixed author. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope and risk of vandalim in short term. Sismarinho (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep In scope. And being in risk of being vandalized is not a reason to delete or do you want to delete files about Crimeia, Kosovo, Palestine. or any other risky subject? Tm (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Personal artwork of questionable notability. I precise that is not the principle of "polical satire" and "caricatures" that is a problem for me. But I can no find a visual quality here neither real critical, as this seems to be just a coarse digital manipulation within the reach of all those who are a little initiated in the matter. No real creativity here. There is no difference that with most of personal artworks "out of scope" that we delete usually, IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Christian Ferrer, out of scope and not in use. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sismarinho as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 21:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete This caricature can encourage vandalism on Wikipedia.--Sismarinho (talk) 21:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Might be in scope for "polical satire" and "caricatures". Anything might be used for vandalism, like sexual organs (e.g. penises), but Commons isn't censored. Josve05a (talk) 21:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In scope. And being in risk of being vandalized is not a reason to delete or do you want to delete files about Crimeia, Kosovo, Palestine. or any other risky subject? Tm (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Personal artwork of questionable notability. I precise that is not the principle of "polical satire" and "caricatures" that is a problem for me. But I can no find a visual quality here neither real critical, as this seems to be just a coarse digital manipulation within the reach of all those who are a little initiated in the matter. No real creativity here. There is no difference that with most of personal artworks "out of scope" that we delete usually, IMO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per Christian Ferrer, out of scope. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Modern photo montage of Cornelis Jonson van Ceulen I (London 1593-1661 Utrecht) Portrait of a lady, see http://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/cornelis-jonson-van-ceulen-i-london-1593-1661-ut-231-c-d8a823860a
This portrait is not Christine de France
XIII (talk · contribs) pointed this in 2013 : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Christine_of_France_as_Dowager_Duchess_of_Savoy_by_an_unknown.jpg&diff=93371698&oldid=88692547 Drongou (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & unused. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Modern photo montage of Cornelis Jonson van Ceulen I (London 1593-1661 Utrecht) Portrait of a lady, see http://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/cornelis-jonson-van-ceulen-i-london-1593-1661-ut-231-c-d8a823860a
This portrait is not Christine de France
XIII (talk · contribs) pointed this in 2013 on the file File:Christine of France as Dowager Duchess of Savoy by an unknown.jpg : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Christine_of_France_as_Dowager_Duchess_of_Savoy_by_an_unknown.jpg&diff=93371698&oldid=88692547 Drongou (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Text is clearly readable and it says is authored by the Town of Hiraizumi in 1991 (the third year of the Heisei era) Yasu (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Photograph is of the text, which does not appear to fall under a {{PD-Japan-exempt}} exemption. Also, it is not likely an "architectural" work, so probably not covered by {{FoP-Japan}}. --Storkk (talk) 10:43, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lionel Le Falher
[edit]Artist Lionel Le Falher died in 2008. (2008+70+1=2079) Undelete in 2079.
- File:Abbaye de thelene.JPG
- File:Abbaye de Thélène, huile (55x46), 1996.JPG
- File:Abbaye nouaillemaupertuis.JPG
- File:Agonie de Bagnac.JPG
- File:Commandant Hussard 1er empire.JPG
- File:Cosaque du Tsar.JPG
- File:Délires et délices 1993 huile (61X46).JPG
- This photo was first uploaded by a member of the family of the painter after his death... We should contact her to confirm the proper OTRS authorization (not sure if she's granted exclusive rights on the successsion as she said she's a step-daughter, not a direct daughter, but may be there's no direct descendant, and her rights on the painting may be partly owned by other successors. However we've not received any complaint from other successors about this low-resolution photo). On other photos by the same uploader, it is said the uploader was not a step-daughter but the brother of the painter. Not clear... verdy_p (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Just want to point out that "we've not received any complaint" is not an argument in a DR per COM:PRP. But, if we can get OTRS-prmission for {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-heirs}} that would be great. Josve05a (talk) 19:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- This photo was first uploaded by a member of the family of the painter after his death... We should contact her to confirm the proper OTRS authorization (not sure if she's granted exclusive rights on the successsion as she said she's a step-daughter, not a direct daughter, but may be there's no direct descendant, and her rights on the painting may be partly owned by other successors. However we've not received any complaint from other successors about this low-resolution photo). On other photos by the same uploader, it is said the uploader was not a step-daughter but the brother of the painter. Not clear... verdy_p (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Etalon.JPG
- File:Foretpetrifiee.JPG
- File:Hussard.JPG
- File:La Charge 1993.JPG
- File:La conscience.JPG
- File:La mélée.JPG
- File:Le cuirassier.JPG
- File:Les dames de Morthemer.jpg
- File:Lionel Le Falher et Arnaud d'Hauterives.jpg
- Is a photo, but is missing OTRS-permission. Josve05a (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- File:Naufrage.JPG
- File:Passage du gué (1996).JPG
- File:Vanity.JPG
- File:L'abreuvoir 1990.JPG
- File:Le divin Marquis (Sade).JPG
- File:Manoir imaginaire.JPG
- File:Partie d'une fresque.JPG
,_1996.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment PD review via Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/PD-Art review. Josve05a (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I believe the neice/stepdaughter/brother confusion mentioned above is likely who the photographer was, rather than the uploader. In any case, to keep/restore the files, we will need someone who represents the heirs to the copyrights of the painter to verify the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: heir(s) of the artist should confirm license via COM:OTRS, except for the photograph of the artist, where we will need the photographer's confirmation via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded again on 10 March 2016 (7 days after their deletion)
Several of the photos (in fact most of them) have been reuploaded again, by User:Amispatrimoinelussac (new user created 2016 March 12 09:00, contributions) and are visible in Category:Lionel Le Falher, under different (non descriptive and deceptive) file names such as
- File:Oeuvre 1.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 2.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 3.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 4.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 5.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 6.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 7.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 8.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 9.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 10.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 11.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 12.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 13.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 14.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 15.JPG (former File:Délires et délices 1993 huile (61X46).JPG), or
- File:Oeuvre 16.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 17.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 18.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 19.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 20.jpg
- File:Oeuvre 21.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 22.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 23.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 24.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 25.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 30.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 31.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 32.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 33.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 35.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 36.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 37.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 38.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 39.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 40.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 41.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 42.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 43.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 44.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 45.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 46.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 48.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 49.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 50.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 51.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 52.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 53.JPG
- File:Oeuvre 54.JPG
- File:Son dernier tableau.JPG.
See also (same uploader, in the same batch the same day, not all categorized):
- File:Remise du prix Gustave Courtois à Lionel Le Falher par l académicien A. d'Hauterives.jpg
- File:Lionel Le Falher devant une oeuvre.JPG
- File:Plafond peint par Puvis de Chabanne.JPG
I'm not convinced that you've received any OTRS permission to authorize again these new uploads... I suppose that the new uploading user was in fact the same initial user (see User_talk:Mlefal here, or on Wikipedia fr:Spécial:Contributions/Mlefal, previously also fr:Spécial:Contributions/Plefal) that uploaded the previously deleted files (an admin with "whois" rights could confirm that).
Some of these files are showing again as thumbnails illustrating the same Wikipedia articles to replace the formerly deleted images (notably in fr:Lionel Le Falher where the same User:Amispatrimoinelussac modified this article between 10-17 March 2016 to insert these alternate files, with the same descriptions, and adding some additional new images from this batch).
Several of these files are also posted on external personal websites (owned by the same user and advertized by external URLs such as the former personal web page "http://pascal.lefalher.neuf.fr/" posted in several related Wikipedia articles about that painter, and about Château de Lussac). I'm now convinced that this is just an amateur living near Lussac-les-Châteaux, and that wants to promote that painter without any authorization for these photos (and probably not even by an official local association that would manage the heirs rights).
Once again, if that user ("Pascal Le Falher"? according to his personal page hosted by the French SFR/Neuf ISP, and advertized by him on the Wikipedia article about the painter and the castle) is effectively representing such an association (or is a legal heir), and that association (or he) effectively has an legal right of publication, and is ready to endorse the legal responsability of claiming such rights against other third parties, we still need a signed OTRS certification (with some proof an identity), and not new uploads for the same protected contents.
verdy_p (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
I think, that the design is protected with copyright.
Кажется, что этот дизайн защищен авторскими правами. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- А {{PD-textlogo}} здесь не подходит? -- TarzanASG +1 21:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Нет, это же не текст. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Catherine Middleton did not have any coat of arms prior to her engagement to Prince William. She was given File:Coat of Arms of Kate Middleton.svg after her engagement by the College of Arms. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Technically her father was granted the arms, but you're right that she was not armigerous before 2011. The supporters are quite strange, since in the British tradition, only aristocrats are entitled to display them in a personal coat of arms... AnonMoos (talk) 10:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC
- I believe the coat given to her on that date applies to the years of his life as a single. So I put this coat represents in the years after their marriage.
--Edward Mendes ✉ 23:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- I believe the coat given to her on that date applies to the years of his life as a single. So I put this coat represents in the years after their marriage.
- I'm really not sure what you're trying to say. What does "1982 – 2011" in the file's name mean? From 1982 to 2010 she was not armigerous. After her father was granted arms, but before she married, she was not entitled to supporters. After her marriage, her arms would usually be conjoined with her husband's. AnonMoos (talk) 01:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think the uploader made a guess that since File:Coat of Arms of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.svg is the Duchess' arms since her marriage to the Duke these were her arms prior to it, similar to how after Lady Diana's divorce Her arms removed the royal supporter and royal shield and became just that of her father with her supporters on both sides. It is a forgivable misunderstanding. Fry1989 eh? 03:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Diana was the daughter of an earl before she married, wife of the heir to the throne when she married, and then divorced, while Kate has been none of those, so many things about Diana's heraldic situation can't be directly transferred to Kate. I'm sure it would be "forgivable", but even better would be for people to not mess around with things they don't understand very well, so that there's no need to forgive in the first place. AnonMoos (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, Fry 1989, what is happening is a misunderstanding. Fry1989 appreciate your understanding and ask you to feel the desire to make changes in this image.
- Eduzão88 -- we already have images of Kate's arms as engaged woman in 2011, and of Kate's arms as wife from 2011 to present, so your image doesn't fill any ascertainable "gap", and I'm not sure how it could be fixed without becoming a slight variant of one of the other existing images. It would simplify things if you would consent to its deletion as uploader, since in its current form the image doesn't seem to serve any real purpose here... AnonMoos (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- My contribution could be as a variant of coats of Lady Kate existing?? In categories where there are coats variants as examples: File:Coat of arms of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon as Queen with external ornaments.svg, File:Coat of arms of Mary of Teck as Queen with external ornaments.svg, File:Coat of arms of Alexandra of Denmark as British Queen with external ornaments.svg, File:Personal Coat of arms of Sofia, Queen of Spain.svg, File:Personal Coat of arms of Sofia, Queen of Spain (Order of Carlos III Collar’s Badge Grade versión).svg and File:Coat of Arms of Sofía of Greece and Denmark (1962-1971).svg.
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
They are in the commons and no one questions their usefulness! But, if you want to delete this picture I can not stop them, I do not own the commons! Just used my creativity to make a contribution.
--Edward Mendes ✉ 13:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @Eduzão88: , I am sorry, please don't be upset. This coat of arms was just never granted for Catherine Middleton before her marriage. Please keep contributing. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per consensus in the DR. I can understand why Mendes is frustrated but please understand that it is only this upload that is questioned. Your uploads are highly appriciated. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
DR started for File:Church of St.Francis - panoramio.jpg, File:Cochin - panoramio.jpg, File:Synagogue,Cochin - panoramio.jpg and File:Cochin - panoramio - yamarhythm.jpg, as imho bad quality uploads from paronamio, and lots of (much) better alternatives within the subcategories of Category:Kochi, Kerala, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination but please sum them up vertically and not horizontally since this makes it harder to close the DR ;). --Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
