Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/01/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 26th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file and want to delete it --Farukacan (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source web page http://shiftdelete.net/ most probably does not own the copyright for this logo of en:Türk Telekom, so there's no way they could release it as public domain. Might be simple enough to qualify for something like {{PD-shape}}. On the other hand, arrangement and coloring of those triangles may well be above COM:TOO. Tending towards [[Template:|v]] --El Grafo (talk) 09:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 10:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 00:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme: Out of project scope

Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:IAGHS coat of arms.jpeg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copy vio. No email to OTRS exist as of this moment Mlpearc (open channel) 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2016011410010654. Yann (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

개인정보 보호 및 실수로 올린 게시글입니다 Wonjh0409 (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User requested deletion of own userpage. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This account was hacked. So somebody posted that i don't want post. And i can't this account. Because this account's password is change everyday.My honor is hurt by this account's activity history. So I hope that you decide delete this page.Thank you.


 Kept, Commons usually does not delete user talk pages. Also, there is no strange messages on the talk page (except a deletion request, which you created yourself). Taivo (talk) 11:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사용하지 않는 계정이며 사용중인 계정이 해킹당한 것으로 사료되어 이 계정과 관련된 모든 정보를 지울 것을 요청합니다 Wonjh0409 (talk) 17:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

사용하지 않는 계정이며 본 계정이 해킹당한 것같아 모든 정보를 지우고자 함 Wonjh0409 (talk) 17:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

해킹당한 것으로 보이며 사용하지 않는 계정이므로 Wonjh0409 (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We won't delete your talk page. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

해킹 된 계정이므로 삭제 요청함 39.118.203.188 18:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

해킹당한 계정의 활동이므로 삭제를 요청함 Wonjh0409 (talk) 17:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: You can't delete a deletion request. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful and Self-promotion or vandalism/attack (this user is a vandal on en.wikipedia.org). Sismarinho (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dereckson: Mass deletion of pages added by Cwgm

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is a low quality photo, and we have plenty S7 A320 photos from Frankfurt Airport Avenue of Stars (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Just another non-free image from the Internet. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. Uploaded in 2013, a proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. According to the file description prior to the uploader blanking out the source information, it was grabbed from http://www.rsa-geotechnics.co.uk/Uploads/OxfordBrookesUniversityNewLibraryandTeachingFacility.png and the "permission" to publish it under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license was supposedly found at http://www.rsa-geotechnics.co.uk/case_study_detail.asp?fld_case_ID=20. There is, unsurprisingly, no mention of that license on that site, nor was there any mention of it in 2013. Commons having hosted a copyright violation for 2½ years doesn't makes it any less of a copyright violation. LX (talk, contribs) 22:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously Nazi spam. Gereon K. (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sockpuppet spam. Deleted. --Courcelles 21:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinivinigon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. File:Sergio Xavier.jpeg grabbed & cropped from Internet. File:Breiller Pires.jpg, uploaded 07.2014, previously published via http://www.portalimprensa.com.br/noticias/brasil/66307/focas+de+copa+profissionais+que+vao+cobrir+o+primeiro+mundial+falam+de+suas+expectativas (06.2014), giving credits to "Crédito:Alexandre Battibugli/Placar"

Gunnex (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyrighted logo. Antigng (talk) 07:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mys 721tx: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal touristy photo Avenue of Stars (talk) 22:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal touristy photograph Avenue of Stars (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is a selfie so Commons:SELFIE. - Sismarinho (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Dereckson; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Collages and maybe copyvio.--Sismarinho (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Yann; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is copied from Burke's Online Peerage and depicts the arms of Sir Alasdair Workman MacRobert, Baronet. Jkudlick (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it as I was not made aware of it. I'm terribly sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.136.15.249 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 26 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 01:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 03:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is a Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused facebook screenshot of new user, personal image of facebook profile. If it's not a copyvio, it may be out of scope. Bjarlin (talk) 00:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Calacas187 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious resolution, uploaded by sockpuppeteer with history of copyvios, unlikely to be own work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. and per [1] Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TachiraEsVzla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious resolution, uploaded by sockpuppeteer with history of copyvios, unlikely to be own work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Kosovo map-en.svg. Zoupan (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted and redirect created. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nolicense at all. --JuTa 01:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 01:32, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 01:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Chile.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Andre Engels (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Sweden.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Selfie of non-notable person. Ahecht (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Picture of uploader. Ahecht (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Andre Engels (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.  Delete

Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is last remaining contribution of Hensyuuyou (talk · contribs) (most of them I deleted speedily due to wrong license). Small photo without metadata, own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. Also maybe the photo violates our TOYS policy. Taivo (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio -- screenshot of this YouTube video under standard YouTube license. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 11:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

although I have no proof, I doubt that this picture is free. The user, obviously account promotional has uploaded two pictures, the other being a deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais - entrée principale.jpg) , and which was taken with the same camera.

Apart from that it is a new building photo and France does not allow the freedom of panorama. Tiraden (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in France. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bogus license, Windows XP is obviously not licensed under the GPL Liliana-60 (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of Windows XP artowrk. Cannot be free. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bleierbega (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bleierbega (skyscrapercity/Twitter etc. grabber)

Gunnex (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contestación sobre derecho de autor de las fotos

No soy un usuario cotidiano a la plataforma, perdon si no he seguido las reglas correctamente, pero estas fotos fueron tomadas y creadas por mi. Son de mi autoria. Si las fotos deben ser eliminadas, que sean eliminadas. Perdon por las molestias causadas.

Saludos!--bleierbega 15:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Regarding the 2 logos of a political party in Uruguay: unlikely own works: there were most likely (as also File:Movimientodeintegracionalternativo.jpg) taken from a historic version of official http://www.mia642.org (today 404) and may be in public domain by other resons but relevant info must be provided. Regarding File:Godin Rordrigo.jpg (288 × 301 px) and File:Zizu Rodrigo.jpg (373 × 306 px), see above: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Considering the logs = 9x uploads = 5x copyvios + 2 questionable logos nominated above = +/- 80 % not own works = COM:PRP. If you are able to upload the 2 photos in significant higher resolutions with consistent EXIF information from the used digicam, I would reconsider the nomination. Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unlikely own work. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 16:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: lacks of info regarding the images used here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Logo. Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 16:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: when in scope complex logo need a permission or an evidence they are free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Logo. Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 16:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, complex logos need permissions. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yrlmz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, can be found earlier on web.

Gunnex (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yrlmz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cafedeparis-suadiye.com/upload/gal2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 17:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a picture, more info needed. Yann (talk) 17:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, dervative work, unclear copyright statut of the subject. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Non-notable picture of uploader. Ahecht (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Hydroxytropacocaine.svg. Leyo 22:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done and redirect created. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:M-Hydroxybenzoylecgonine.svg. Leyo 22:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+redirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Cocaine N-oxide.svg. Leyo 22:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+redirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Phyllalbine.svg. Leyo 22:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+erdirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Convolamine.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Cocaine analog GNC.svg. Leyo 22:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+redirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:C3benzyloxycocaine.svg. Leyo 22:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+redirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Spirocyclic cocaine analog.svg. Leyo 22:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done+redirect. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New version available under File:SADC road sign R216.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done and redirect created. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New version available under File:SADC road sign TR216.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done and redirect created. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of low quality that does not seem to be in scope. Tom-L (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused logo of questionable notability. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Most likely grabbed from social media = stolen selfies made by https://www.facebook.com/fernanda.sotili/photos_albums / https://www.instagram.com/feeer_sotili/?hl=en / etc.

Gunnex (talk) 23:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyvio. Dozens of copies of this image all over the web, including the Miss Universe page itself, http://www.missuniverse.com/missusa/news/view/532#.VqeWi_krKUk GRuban (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader's other upload, File:PorNak.jpg similarly nominated as a clear copyvio. :-(. --GRuban (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyvio. Dozens of copies of this image on the web, including http://www.foroelitebeauties.com/t395-preguntas-finales-y-respuestas-de-las-ganadoras-de-miss-universe. Uploader's other upload also nominated as a clear copyvio. Closing admin may want to consider ... having a talk with ... the uploader. GRuban (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New version available as File:SADC road sign R5.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused, replaced. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res screenshot, likely web image Ytoyoda (talk) 03:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ValeLopez31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All from http://www1.mydaily.co.kr/new_yk/html/read.php?newsid=201504171126111125

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Laventerllc/sandbox). MER-C 05:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, better alternatives available in Category:Carbon monoxide. Leyo 01:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ed (Edgar181) 20:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Synteza sildenafilu.png. Leyo 01:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Note that the replcement is assertedd as a derivative work of this one, andthis one is asserted as CC that would seem to require retaining this one as part of attribution, but both are actually intrinsically PD by virtue of their content. I have re-tagged each as {{PD-chem}}. DMacks (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ed (Edgar181) 20:50, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image clearly has an "All rights reserved" copyright statement at the bottom Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded on 29.12.2015. File:Boxador Cachorro.jpeg grabbed from (example) http://acabreederskennels.com.au/puppy-gallery/boxador/ or http://www.101dogbreeds.com/boxador.asp = http://acabreederskennels.com.au/wp-content/gallery/boxador/boxador0_20061008_1147871717.jpg + http://www.101dogbreeds.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Boxador-Puppy.jpg (last modified: 2014, identical exif)

Gunnex (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional photo for promotional article on English Wiki that will no doubt be deleted. No educational use. Citobun (talk) 12:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable company, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Used in deleted attack page on en:wp JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this spam. shizhao (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 23:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio if the author is dead after 1946 and it's possible because Salvatore Calabrese (1903-1973). Sismarinho (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather small format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 00:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

从图片左下角被截断的文字看,这张照片很可能来自于视频截图或者其他宣传性材料的裁剪得到,并非自己的作品 shizhao (talk) 01:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, out of scope. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albatalad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User uploaded various photos stolen from other websites with false claims of own work. I doubt that the photos listed here are self-created, most likely they are also from the web, i.e. from panoramio.com or other websites.

Martin H. (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albatalad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

So many copyvios in the upload, hard to believe much, if any, here is freely licensed.

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Albatalad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=42647266&postcount=3, another from the user that's taken from elsewhere.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikunj odhadviya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SELFIE... collection of personal images, by a contributor with no history on other Wikimedia projects. The contributor does not appear to be either a celebrity or a notable artist. "No selfies" notice left.

Revent (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Commons don't host selphies.--Sismarinho (talk) 12:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Coats of arms. Proper source information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bettyreategui (serial copyright violator). All files most likely grabbed from Facebook (or elsewhere). Example: File:Laguna de Caballococha.jpg (10.2015) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/311388375614192/photos/a.311398365613193.74088.311388375614192/468080796611615/?type=3&theater (2013) or File:Restaurante en Santa Rosa.jpg (11.2015) --> grabbed from (example) https://goleticiacolombia.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/visit-santa-rosa-peru/ (2013) = https://goleticiacolombia.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/p52201371.jpg (exif available) or File:Bus-Taxi en la carretera que lleva al mar sahauri.jpg (12.2015) --> grabbed from (example) http://marocco.evolutiontravel.it/it_IT/tab/25833_hotel-bab-al-bahar-4-stelle.html (© 2000/2016 All rights reserved) = http://marocco.evolutiontravel.it/schede/25833/it-marocco-hotel-bab-al-bahar-4-stelle-speciale-luglio-1a260.jpg etc. etc. etc.

Gunnex (talk) 16:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bettyreategui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. If you follow the rule, the date of the first publication of the image is unknown.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • La Imagen sí cuenta con libre derecho de autor, ya que, fue tomada en 1960, cuando estudiaba en la PUCP. Cuenta con licencia libre: {{PD-Peru-photo}}.

(Rolo Mai (talk) 18:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 04:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of magazine cover. Doubtful license. KartikMistry (talk) 11:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adriel ricardo morales (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Adriel ricardo morales. Most likely all screenshots derived from TV/video with unknown copyright status, considering also File:Miguel Zavaleta en vivo (1985).png (live in 1985) versus eswiki user page (born in 1991) and files like File:X - Telefono.jpg + File:Fernando Berazategui.jpg + File:Guillermo Novellis en Mendoza.jpg + etc..

Gunnex (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, it is not clear that the art or photos shown in these is actually "own work" as claimed. Second, putting art together with text creates "personal art" which is out of scope. I have looked in detail at only half of these, but none were in use on WMF.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe someone wants to use them to illustrate articles about bible books? Then that would be in scope. Many of them are below the threshold of originality (basically only text), so that's not an issue either. However, they're currently unused, it seems. So I don't know whether they serve any purpose. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ist was falsch Sokolin asllani (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Sokolin Asllani Biograf[reply]


Deleted: copyvio and out of scope. --Krd 13:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2A00:79E0:15:6:BD6F:3DE4:D314:40E3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.amcmusic.com/artisti/general-management/mario-brunello/%7C1=The explicitly provided source doesn't indicate any licensing compatible with Commons. Yann (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:08, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2A00:79E0:15:6:BD6F:3DE4:D314:40E3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.amcmusic.com/artisti/general-management/mario-brunello/%7C1=The explicitly provided source doesn't indicate any licensing compatible with Commons. Yann (talk) 21:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2A00:79E0:15:6:BD6F:3DE4:D314:40E3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.amcmusic.com/artisti/general-management/mario-brunello/%7C1=The explicitly provided source doesn't indicate any licensing compatible with Commons. User not warned. Yann (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist has not been dead for 70 years. (1998+70+1=2069) Undelete in 2069. Josve05a (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author/source "www.parava.com", Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 11:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sikenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 03:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


vsetky uvedene fotky boli vyfotografovane pre moju osobu alebo mojim fotoaparatom pripadne telefonom a nie pre komercne ucely . starsie fotky taktiez neboli vyfotografovane pre profesionalne ucely ale len ako spomienkove fotografie zo zapasov a turnajov. este raz opakujem ze na ziadnu z tychto fotiek sa nevztahuju autorske prava a neboli vyfotografovane pre komercne ucely. na niektore fotky bol najaty profesionalny fotograf . za tuto pracu mu bolo riadne zaplatene a fotograf ma ubezpecil ze ich predajom sa vzdava autorskych prav. takze nevidim ziaden dovod pre ich zmazanie a ziadam opatovne nahratie uz zmazanej fotografie TLM.JPG dakujem

All the above photos were captured for my person or my camera or the phone and not for commercial purposes. starsie photos also been photographed for professional purposes but only as a commemorative photo of matches and tournaments. I repeat once more from to any of these photos are covered by copyright and was not captured for commercial purposes. On some photos she was hired a professional photographer. For this work he was duly paid and photographer assured me that their sales disclaims copyright. so I see no reason for their deletion and if you can reupload the deleted photos TLM.JPG well thank you --Sikenko (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Some of these are very small, some have watermarks, some have appeared elsewhere without free licenses, none are full camera resolution. All of these images have copyrights. Transferring or licensing a copyright requires a formal written agreement -- an oral discussion with the photographer is meaningless. I think this is a case of an enthusiastic fan who does not understand copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep For this photos File:285akns.jpg, File:Dresmikulas.jpg, File:Fotkarepre.jpg i think they are realy uploaders own work - the last one in a very poor quality.--LacoR (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral File:Image-turnaj-V(1).jpg, File:Image-deti-V.jpg, File:Pohar.jpg are perhaps also uploaders own work. --LacoR (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Based on the discussion with the uploader in slovak language it seems, that the uploader is a close person to the sk:Martin Kubena. She stated, that the following photos are realy her own work:

  1. File:Image-deti-V.jpg
  2. File:Image-turnaj-V(1).jpg
  3. File:Pohar.jpg
  4. File:Dresmikulas.jpg
  5. File:285akns.jpg

Following photos are from a family album of Martin Kubena: (File:Repre+ľ.jpg, File:Fotkarepre.jpg , File:Zapas niigata.jpg, File:Svk national team .jpg)

Photos with an attemp with OTRS-mail: File:Mikulas1.jpg (Author fixed via OTRS) and File:Tatranmikulas.jpg

This photos should be deleted (licensing problem or poor quality):

After decission about this deletion request I will help the user properly rename, describe and categorize the files.--LacoR (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I have deleted the images immediately above and those from the family album. Note that family album photos are rarely usable on Commons because owning a paper copy of a photograph does not give you any right to license it. The rights are owned by the photographer or his heirs and it is usually impossible to trace him.

I have also deleted the five numbered images above: (1) and (2) are out of scope school pix. (3) Shows a copyrighted trophy. (4) and (5) are unidentified. Since the remaining two are not, by his or her admission, the uploader's own work, and one has a watermark attribution, I have also deleted them. . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is the official logo, I doubt it's own work. Even if the user recreated it, it's still derived work and needs permission from EBU. Mbch331 (talk) 08:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Obviously copyrighted by SVT and Eurovision. --Warko (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Yasu (talk) 14:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I unfortunatley made a wrong description. I would like to correct this mistake and re upload this file. thank you! Bailaohu (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vote ammended to  Delete, per User:Zirze. -- Tuválkin 06:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by NahidSultan. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify upload, as source "chiloka.com/celebrity/mani-sharma/photos", Roland zh (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roland zh , the image was uploaded from http://chiloka.com/i/i/m/a/n/mani-sharma-12.jpg (precise address of image) and I have mentioned the details about the website in the summary too. KingDiggi (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, you have no right to upload the photo into Commons, because it is protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JSJModelYGKPLUS! Emepl (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: more detailed info is needed. --Yasu (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And possibly not own work. Uploader tried to nominated their own image for deletion after upload (but probably didn't understand how) and changed the author and source from "own work" to something else. P 1 9 9   14:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 17:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request Narek75 (talk) 07:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan Bobyrr Bobyrr (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Не возражаю -- Шухрат Саъдиев 13:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan слева современное здание построенное в 1950 году на него нужно особое разрешение на фотографирование. Bobyrr (talk) 08:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

По ракурсу здания, который изображен на снимке трудно определить, каким по назначению является это здание и представляет-ли оно, какую-либо художественную ценность в таком виде? -- Шухрат Саъдиев 12:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Это заброшенная гостиница "Самарканд" или "Интурист" построена в 1950 году. --Bobyrr (talk) 16:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan здание построено в 1970 году нужно особое разрешение на фотографирование Bobyrr (talk) 08:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Не возражаю -- Шухрат Саъдиев 13:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фото современный памятник установлен в 2000 году нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Не возражаю-- Шухрат Саъдиев 13:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фото памятник установлен в 2000 нужно особое рарешение на фотографирование Bobyrr (talk) 08:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Не возражаю -- Шухрат Саъдиев 13:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Что это такой не пойму????? Bobyrr (talk) 08:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок и современных зданий нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок и зданий нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников и зданий нужно особое разрешение крометого фото не очень хорошого качества Bobyrr (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятнок нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 08:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aimé-Gustave Blaise is dead in 1961. No FoP in France. 82.120.164.162 10:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist has not been dead for 70 years. (1954+70+1=2025) Undelete in 2025. Josve05a (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when undeleting images of Frida Kahlo, because the duration of copyright under Mexican law is famously 100 (one hundred!) years, the longest in the world, see COM:Mexico. --Gnom (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a work by Frida Kahlo, but a 2012 work by Fabian Ciralao showing her [2]. --Rosenzweig τ 18:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frida kahlo.jpg Josve05a (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Az OTRS-engedély a személyt ábrázoló fotók használatát teszi lehetővé. – The OTRS permission allows to use photos by the author which portray people. Regasterios (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedydelete. Tambo (talk) 13:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The license does not include authorization landscapes. The license applies to images of persons whom the Hungarian Wikipedia has articles. This picture is not the person depicted.  Delete. (Google translator reverse reasoning). Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 01:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK the image has been removed. Thank you! --grin 11:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:TOYS. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brezovica, Kosovo already has map. Unused. Zoupan (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

europe map austria 80.123.106.225 20:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. More detailed explanation would be helpful -Justass (talk) 20:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Replaced by File:Kosovo-europe locator.png or other files in category. Zoupan (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:507-й навчальний ремонтно-відновлювальний батальйон.png. Kwasura (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:345-й навчальний механізований полк.png. Kwasura (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

now the chart is in more appropriate format (SVG) - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bubble_Bobble_Series_chart.svg Lowtrucks (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

now the chart is in more appropriate format (SVG) - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bubble_Bobble_WTF_chart.svg Lowtrucks (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

now the chart is in more appropriate format (SVG) - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wonder_Boy_-_Adventure_Island_Series_chart.svg Lowtrucks (talk) 04:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Source web site is no longer available, unable to verify if it contains any language supporting the {{Attribution}} license tag. No OTRS ticket referenced. — Ipoellet (talk) 05:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems unlikely that this logo is freely licensed. According to the official website there's a 2016 copyright at the bottom of the page. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poltavski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake and laundered {{PD-because|copyright status for this file is Public Domain. See [3]this}} license. They are scanned pages from books.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read the polish(?) text in the link, but images from 1944 and 1945 can be PD, either if the creator died in 1945 or before or because they're anonymous works. That the images are scanned from a book doesn't change anything. --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's a Serbian text. But images can be published after 1945. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure they can. I'm not saying that these pictures are in PD, but I'm saying that your assumption is wrong, that they cannot be PD because they're scanned from a book. What does the given link say about the license? --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: For now they fail com:EVIDENCE. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. There is no proof of {{PD-China}}. Takabeg (talk) 06:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. There is no proof of {{PD-China}}. Takabeg (talk) 06:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been nice if you had included something useful in your edit summary, so that those with the image on our watchlists would know that you're nominating it for deletion... AnonMoos (talk) 12:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the user is blocked and the image is invalid Nino Marakot (talk) 06:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unsourced/authored, and lesser quality image of same stamp shown in File:Zachary Taylor2 1938 Issue-12c.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep; All details now added. An unused image is no reason to delete, besides this is a different version of stamp mentioned above. The colour is more accurate and it has a margin tab attached, so it NOT a lesser quality of the same stamp it is a different version of the same issue. We have instances where different versions of the same or similar stamp exist. Ww2censor (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good point on the edging! Thanks for adding the details. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded from po.org.ar

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. It seems that es:Partido Obrero (Argentina), an Argentine political party, is quite exaggerating in licensing all contents available at official site http://www.po.org.ar under CC-BY 4.0, considering also cover of American TV serie Breaking Bad, Star Wars film cover, etc. and etc. (full of copyrighted content).

Link search reveals more files taken from po.org.ar (mostly no credits given), all in small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. These photos show mostly political activities by Partido Obrero and they may be indeed in CC — but the origin remains dountful. Anyway, I ignored these, nominating only the IMHO obvious CC-fails below.

Gunnex (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, the cc license does not apply in contents that are not property of the organisation or it's members. All this links show images in which important politicians and artists related with te Party appears, and were taken by acredited photographers in the most cases. --Mr. Moonlight (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
" All this links show images in which important politicians and artists related with te Party" You are guessing, no? Rolling Stones? Star Wars? Super Bowl? (here grabbed from [4], image 4, copyrighted work by "© Harry How/Getty Images/AFP"), film cover I? film cover II?, Albert Einstein?, film cover III? Günter Grass? Albert Einstein [again]? Kurt Cobain? Barach Obama? Angela Merkel? etc.etc.etc?
All photos are uncredited, grabbed from Internet/social media. No chance to differ between supposed works by po.org.ar and third-party contents. In other words: they do not know what there are licensing and with this clearly a candidate for Commons:Bad sources. Gunnex (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We need to difference between the files that the organisation made and these which they took from Internet. The license apply only in the firs situation.--Mr. Moonlight (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not the creation of the uploader. Riley Huntley (talk) 11:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned map. The uploader is very unlikely to be the copyright holder Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sale as File:Un batteur de blé.jpg but lower resolution Ancalagon (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlos Pequi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF. Uploaded in 12.2015 mostly by an "all-he-can-get" uploader for es:Jorge Gnecco Cerchar, considering multiple exif and authors involved, like File:Jorge Camilo Gnecco espinosa Empresario.jpg etc. (copyrighted works by "Ivan Trujillo "), File:Jorge Camilo Gnecco Espinosa, equipo.JPG etc. (copyrighted works by "PH: @JonaOrle"), grabs from Internet like File:Jorge camilo gnecco Morano Mare.jpg, taken from (example) http://moranogruppo.com/moranomare/contactenos (© Todos los derechos reservados - 2016) = http://moranogruppo.com/moranomare/img/proyecto.jpg (last modified: 11.2015) or obviously somewhere from Facebook, like File:Jorge Camilo Gnecco Espinosa Coffee.jpg. Multiple permissions and/or further details needed. File:Morano Bloque.png already deleted (no permission).

Gunnex (talk) 14:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: obviously not original work; original image available online on copyrighted sites http://fr.kpopstarz.com/articles/11457/20141209/ravi-vixx-répond-à-la-provocation-de-bobby-ikon.htm

http://wwwbig5.hinews.cn/pic/0/16/57/66/16576667_999043.gif Lssrn (talk) 14:15, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong spelling title — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-01-25T21:17:41‎ (UTC)

  •  Keep as a valid Taxonomy synonym. (Cat. page includes the warning «Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time.») -- Tuválkin 02:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong twin upload — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philmarin (talk • contribs) 2016-01-26T10:39:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[UPCH-80403] "LUV -Japanese Ver.-" (CD single) promo pic. Copyright: EMI Records Japan Ssantochow (talk) 14:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work but it is obviously derived from an aerial photo. No source is provided so there is no way to determine what the original copyright/licensing status is. Whpq (talk) 14:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like TV screenshot. The logo of the channel can be seen Vensatry (Ping me) 14:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Halton Arp wasn't an officer or employee of the United States Government when producing this work so as to apply PD-US-GOV. C messier (talk) 15:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Logos are main object of the photo and most of them surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless. Wiki isn't a hosting provider. Vandal's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://webnews.bg/uploads/images/83/2183/52183/240x135.jpg?_=1447015270. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Advertising. Bilderling (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://c.shld.net/rpx/i/s/i/spin/image/spin_prod_231600801. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, likely copyvio 106.68.55.251 15:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logos, doesn't seem in scope, as well as other uploads File:Логотип гн неу.PNG, File:Index2.png, File:IndexSgls.png ("Hot news", "Gminasist FM") Pibwl (talk) 15:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robotaki2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spamer's contribution of unknown origin. Not in use.

Bilderling (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, likely copyvio 106.68.55.251 15:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gustavo Ignacio Peralta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gustavo Ignacio Peralta / logs

Gunnex (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, likely copyvio 106.68.55.251 15:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Margerie jean claude (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.interdiario.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/IMG_1680.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.petitebiblioronde.com/var/pbrenfant/storage/images/media/images/cultures-du-monde/goroka-sourire-diabolos/1129-1-fre-FR/Goroka-sourire-diabolos_reference.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 16:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to me, that this is not a textlogo and OTRS-permission from organization representative is needed. The organization was founded in 1870 and the logo can be somehow in public domain due to age, but the logo is probably younger. Organization de:Blaue Funken is notable. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - turktelekom.com.tr Reality006 (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: copyvio. Takabeg (talk) 03:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Türk Telekom logo.svg Cobija (talk) 17:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data states David McIntosh is the (C) ARR copyright holder, so BAH wouldn't be able to CC this it would seem Avenue of Stars (talk) 17:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[5]. Own work? Yann (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubt it. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer's watermark is present on the photo itself and also copyright is claimed in the EXIF, so BAH might not be able to CC license this. Avenue of Stars (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer's watermark is present on the photo itself and also copyright is claimed in the EXIF, so BAH might not be able to CC license this. Avenue of Stars (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, low quality photo which is unlikely going to find any scope Avenue of Stars (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader, who is a sockpuppet, claims to be the author and also claims to have been dead for 70 years. DrKay (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is presumably copyrighted, and seems to be the focus of the image. Andre Engels (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of presumably copyrighted material Andre Engels (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality Andre Engels (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the room of a Wikipedian who has no edits outside his own user page Andre Engels (talk) 20:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus description and file name. This is teacher Phebe J. Dunn who appeared in P. T. Barnum's circus show in 1860s. See this page. Apparently this carte de visite was published during her lifetime which would make it PD-1923. De728631 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given what we know about the threshold of originality in the UK, {{PD-textlogo}} does not seem to apply here. LX (talk, contribs) 20:54, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like derivative work. Who is author of these things? Does (s)he give OTRS-permission? But maybe (s)he has been dead for long time? Taivo (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is derivative work of painting. Who is the artist? In my opinion de minimis does not apply. Snoop Dogg is, of course, famous person. Taivo (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from http://www.intersectionmagazine.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/1010streetart-2.jpg Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in France Liliana-60 (talk) 21:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheTuppi

[edit]

Out of project scope.

MarcoAurelio 22:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter that you feel the image can be replaced. To quote COM:SCOPE: "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." —Mr. Granger (talk  · contribs) 13:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es solo una prueba Alaystudio (talk) 05:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does this pic infringe copyright Ronincmc (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yes 2004 is too modern, this is not ok in USA. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to vandalise page. Reverse search shows is commonly found online, modified from a fat kid wearing a Barcelona equipment Threeohsix (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://sobory.ru/photo/180078. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://sobory.ru/photo/179657. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unaipl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, considering also (both files uploaded on 01.11.2015) File:XabiIrureta.jpg (mysterioulsy photoshopped and watermarked, most likely by the original photographer, see also https://www.flickr.com/photos/54989697@N02/15642681503/, a similar shot and identical watermark) and File:AsierRiesgo.jpg, grabbed from (example) http://barcaclub.ru/player/aser-riesgo/ (ITTAK © Copyright 2015 | Barcaclub.ru ) = http://barcaclub.ru/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/28-de-Julio-2.jpg (last modified: 09.2015, identical exif)

Gunnex (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, one is an obvious copyvio, delete the other upload by precaution. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination http://sobory.ru/photo/180076. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this a wrong format what I uploaded Copyright weissanna.jalbum.net 11:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is not big and it has no metadata, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is not big and it has no metadata, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sous droits d'auteurs, d'après les métadonnées (copyright : Clic and Clac) Shev123 (talk) 15:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

несвободный файл Pustov (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, newspaper articles are probably copyrighted by newspaper. Taivo (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

laut Metadaten ist der Fotograf Tres Camenzind, nicht Sabine Rohrmoser Alnilam (talk) 20:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dave Budd would own this photo, as per the description, so permission needs to come from Dave. Avenue of Stars (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This man is not H. Sheffer. This man is Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer Alexzhiv (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, please look en:L. E. J. Brouwer. The file is in en.wiki only as fair use and the author is claimed unknown. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio Shev123 (talk) 12:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Vue du château de Soucelles (Louis Boudan, 1699).jpg but very lower resolution. Ancalagon (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down copy. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was created by Walt Disney Company, not user. User has no right to publish or give license. Elisfkc (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [6] Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [7] Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only uploaded photo. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted by The Walt Disney Company. Copyright registration number VA0001749180

Actually bellow the COM:TOO in the US? Amitie 10g (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, because it is registered, meaning that the US Copyright Office has ruled that it is above the threshold and have given it a registration number. Elisfkc (talk) 21:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, it seems to me too, that the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GerardGalbete (talk · contribs)

[edit]

IMHO logos above Com:TOO

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that the globe is to simple and common of a picture to be considered as copyrightable in the US, like the fleur de lis, crown and ying-yang Com:TOO. A common representation using relative to one another and same color continents overlaid with latitude and longitude. Per http://www.funiber.org/terminos-y-condiciones/ the company is based in Spain. As a civil law country, its originality standard requires “imprint of the author’s personality”. IMHO this does not satisfy the requirement. Rybkovich (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, IMPO (in my proud opinion) the globe is not simple. Taivo (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from http://www.dreuz.info/wp-content/uploads/er-riadh-village-street-art-djerbahood-tunisia-40.jpg Yann (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from http://www.studinano.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/obey-street-art-paris-13e.jpg Yann (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reefer Madness article says image created in 1972 rerelease of film, not 1936 as stated here, so license incorrect Deanlaw (talk) 22:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this your own work? MikaelF (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unlikely. Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki. I'll delete also file:Kutlu-dogum-diyarbakir 1429597524.jpg and file:ZAfg.jpg due to same reason (small unused photos without metadata). These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MrCharro as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL: EDICIONES EL PAIS por sí o como cesionaria, es propietaria de todos los derechos de propiedad intelectual e industrial de sus páginas webs, así como de los elementos contenidos en ellas (a título enunciativo, imágenes, sonido, audio, vídeo, software o textos; marcas o logotipos, combinaciones de colores, estructura y diseño, selección de materiales usados, programas de ordenador necesarios para su funcionamiento, acceso y uso, etc.), titularidad de EDICIONES EL PAIS o bien de sus licenciantes. Todos los derechos reservados. En virtud de lo dispuesto en los artículos 8 y 32.1, párrafo segundo, de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, quedan expresamente prohibidas la reproducción, la distribución y la comunicación pública, incluida su modalidad de puesta a disposición, de la totalidad o parte de los contenidos de esta página web, con fines comerciales, en cualquier soporte y por cualquier medio técnico, sin la autorización de EDICIONES EL PAIS. El USUARIO se compromete a respetar los derechos de Propiedad Intelectual e Industrial titularidad de EDICIONES EL PAIS. Podrá visualizar los elementos del Site e incluso imprimirlos, copiarlos y almacenarlos en el disco duro de su ordenador o en cualquier otro soporte físico siempre y cuando sea, única y exclusivamente, para su uso personal y privado. El USUARIO deberá abstenerse de suprimir, alterar, eludir o manipular cualquier dispositivo de protección o sistema de seguridad que estuviera instalado en el las páginas de EDICIONES EL PAIS|source=El País Ineligible for copytight? Amitie 10g (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not own work. However this map is a very simple representation of basic facts and is not copyrightable in the US. As a civil law country, Spain's concept of originality requires that a work can be considered to be an “imprint of the author’s personality”. Such a basic map does not meet this requirement. There for this is also not copyrightable in Spain. It represents important categories - number of members of each party in congress, so it should be kept and appropriately categorized. Rybkovich (talk) 02:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Rybkovich. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, can be found earlier on web May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per nomination, non-notable person. Also the uploader's only contribution, the file is not big and it has no metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 23:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very blurry. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's digit appears in frame, grainy photo, plenty of other suitable pictures exist. Brianhe (talk) 12:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not big and it has no metadata, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyvio here also. But the file is in scope, because is used in id.wiki on userpage. Taivo (talk) 12:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

чужое авторство Парамонова Виктория Дмитриевна (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Krd 12:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The guy's 5 year old would own copyright to this photo. Otherwise, it's not a photo which could realistically be used to illustrate anything Avenue of Stars (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 500×375 pixels, bad composition, bad quality. The plane is not fully on photo, black borders must be cropped. Instead, choose a better photo from category:Aircraft spotting. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: taken from http://itinerrance.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/pont-des-arts-itinerrance-17.jpg Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously published, COM:OTRS required. --Krd 12:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Proposed coat of arms of Serbia, 1992.jpg Shumokuzame33 (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason given. --Krd 12:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This design wasn't proposed in 1992 DarkoRatic (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I don't know if it has or not been proposed but it wasn't adopted => not actual, not in use => not useful. Kathisma (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alternate Seal of the Republika Srpska Shumokuzame33 (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Krd 12:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seal of Republike Srpske(Fictional) Shumokuzame33 (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Krd 12:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]