Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
![19 File:Встреча активистов правозащитного проекта "ГейБеларусь" со студентами БГУ.jpg](#File:Встреча_активистов_правозащитного_проекта_"ГейБеларусь"_со_студентами_БГУ.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
{{subst:Sakujo}} Eses1026 (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
C'est gênant pour regarder mes pages internet 83.152.160.5 14:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour, j’avoue ne pas comprendre la raison de cette demande de suppression d’une page utilisateur. Je clos la demande. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion Jean-Fred (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
The toys are copyrighted, making this a derivative work. See COM:TOYS. I eat bananas 101 (talk) 21:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- But these are electronic devices (gaming consoles and computers), rather than toys. Electronic devices are “useful articles”, and “there are special provisions in the US copyright law to exempt utility articles to a wide degree from copyright protection”. There’s a whole chapter about such cases: “Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?”. The page also says that: “On the other hand, ordinary alarm clocks, dinner plates, gaming consoles— as well as actual, full-scale planes— are not generally copyrightable...” I agree that, theoretically, a few simple handhelds (e.g. Game & Watch and Microvision) could be considered as toys, but the most devices listed in the gallery surely aren’t “toys”. Therefore, there’s no need to delete the whole gallery. Mr r0ckers (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. These are electronic devices with utility, essentially special-use computers. Even fixed-software hardware like a Game & Watch has the utility of enabling use of its software, similar to a DVD player or television. They aren't aesthetic objects, with value derived from form, like paintings, sculptures, or toy figurines. I imagine these devices would generally be protected by a combination of patent and trademark, not copyright. For what it's worth, Nintendo corporate's own website does not list hardware among the categories covered by their copyrights: https://www.nintendo.com/corp/legal.jsp#copyrights 173.239.228.25 08:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep Sock nomination. Denied. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Sock nomination of a user page. If there is a concern about particular uploads, a legitimate user is free to nominate the relevant images. --Эlcobbola talk 19:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Spam, no permission, x-times del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam, no permission, x-times del. on DE Raymond 16:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
spam, x-times del. on de, same user as Special:Contributions/Tfk2001 Nolispanmo 16:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Spam, no permission, x-times del. on DE Raymond 16:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upload Wizard broken. I'm the uploader. Elvey (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
unused plain text file, no author given Basvb (talk) 10:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I've added an author. The file is used - it's used by Wikimedia movement entities in newsletters and graphic designs - but it's just not used directly on Wikimedia projects. I moved it to COmmons a few years ago to ensure that more people could access it than just Wikimedia UK :-). Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Suggest you put a note to that effect in the description, Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per the above. Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: withdraw nomination per in use Basvb (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
No useful content. Seems to be some kind of personal file. There out of Commons:Project scope Wiki13 talk 12:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per nom. Uploader's description: "fgujhfj". -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Has no educational value. Seems to be some kind of personal file. There out of Commons:Project scope Wiki13 talk 12:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deleted, private joke, troll, or insult image. -- 19:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beyond grief.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - fychu - Harry Tupan.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - hajeka - Harry Tupan.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2007 Harry Tupan.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - petertf2 - Harry Tupan, Annemarie Busschers (2007).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - E V E - Annemarie Busschers Harry Tupan.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2007 Harry Tupan - detail.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scream.tif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacob witzenhausen.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tia, dad.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - petertf2 - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers (2006).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stroke II.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - hajeka - Zelfportret.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - hajeka - Zelfportret (1).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2006 Zelfportret.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - fychu - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Marjolein Benard - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers (2006) detail.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2006 Zelfportret - detail.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_detail.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Failed flickrreview, license has not been verified czar 20:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Карпов 922 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 18:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Related ruwiki article 2x recently deleted. Photo taken from https://vk.com/id58337404?z=albums58337404. Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works. Also probably out of scope.
Yann (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rehan Khan2050. Note - I do not know if this image is the same as the previous one(s) that shared this title, but I'm highly confident the uploader is the same person who uploaded the other image(s) but using a new account to do so. Davidwr (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Update I also just nominated this account's only other upload, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rehan K.jpg. Davidwr (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Sock, out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Summarily delete and block uploader - Suspected sock of other similar-named accounts, see Category:Sockpuppets of Rehan Khan2050. Davidwr (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC) Update Uploader blocked as a sock on the English Wikipedia.[1]. Davidwr (talk) 02:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, by Herbythyme due to out of scope. Taivo (talk) 21:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Formica rufa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Self-evident copyvio Seems to be an old flyer for an old performing. Amitie 10g (talk) 04:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: You are probably right. I didn't notice that movie was released in 1919. I withdraw the request--Formica rufa 08:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Withdraw, old flyer, already in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 08:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Film poster, so most likely non-free content. Steel1943 (talk) 13:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 128.68.57.72 19:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
low resolution image, not very useful for pedagogic use, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
low resolution image, not useful for pedagogics, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 21:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on non-permanent display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on non-permanent display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on non-permanent display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on non-permanent display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art (by W. Scheffel) on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art (by Peter Pöppelmann, died in 1947) on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright protected work of art on display within a building --> copyright violation, no FOP given. Paulae (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Georgene.adm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Georgene.adm (serial copyright violator for hr:Đurđenovac, municipality in Croatia).
- File:Gradska glazba djurdjenovac.jpeg
- File:Činovnički dom Đurđenovac.jpeg
- File:Đurđenovac, osnovna škola.jpg
- File:Đurđenovac zimi.jpg
- File:Villa Neuschloß.jpg
- File:Fenrich Wappe.jpg
- File:Fenrich Wappe Miniatur.png
- File:Fenrich full crest.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by October252 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:小琉球民宿 - 杉板灣 Villa.jpg
- File:安心居高級磁磚名品館.jpg
- File:德泰彈簧床墊.jpg
- File:Oasistek 李洲科技.png
- File:安迪富股份有限公司.jpg
- File:大漢家具.jpg
- File:英群廣告裝修公司.jpg
- File:萬泰科技股份有限公司.jpg
- File:倉明商務中心.jpg
- File:立大輪胎.jpg
- File:大戶屋日式料理.jpg
- File:英代外語國際認證機構.jpg
- File:助聽器,兒童助聽器,助聽器聽力保健專家-升音實業有限公司.png
- File:丘子宏眼科 & 優視眼科.jpg
- File:長虹磁鐵有限公司 Magruba Flexible Magnets.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private audio hosting. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I have to integrate this file as a pdf on an intern Wiki-page. The file have a big educational value, because it's a part of our survey "Arzneimittelkonsum an der HSG". Don't deleet this file, it's my own work. thx. Aktiveslernen HSG (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aktiveslernen HSG (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Empirie Frage 3.pdf
- File:Auswertung Empirie Frage 3.jpg
- File:Auswertung Empirie Frage 2.png
- File:Auswertung Empirie.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I have to integrate this file as a pdf, jpg or png on an intern Wiki-page. The files have a big educational value, because it's a part of our survey "Arzneimittelkonsum an der HSG". Don't delete this file, it's my own work! And I use it for a writing exam that I have to hand in. thx. Aktiveslernen HSG (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me. What is the problem with this? I created it. I wrote it. I posted it. Don't be so ridiculous. Or is it that you feel like you own the internet?
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Donsmartz Jamez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as imho screenshot of the related website, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Bazj (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Turkishathlete (3 related copyvios) Gunnex (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from this site, do not have a free license. Stang 17:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: I can't find any free licence on the source wepbage either. Ww2censor (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. Florn (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. Florn (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Small, without EXIF, already in the internet at the same size, copyright violation C messier (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope Florn (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Private image / nonsense upload, see nonsense description and nonsense category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope image from user blocked on Wikipedia: poor quality personal photo, no realistic educational value. McGeddon (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Salowk Sengupta (talk · contribs) has not made a single edit, except self-promotion in Commons, en.wiki and Wikidata. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
derivative, photographer is not copyright holder -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Metadata credits "Jessone Morillon / Alca Films". If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS MMFE (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Low res, no exif, unlikely to be own work. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Low res, no exif, unlikely to be own work. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Images uploaded by User Cydets
[edit]Three Cydets logos that look the same:
Non-free logos of Cydets, a cyber-security company founded in 2015. The new article about Cydets of yesterday in tr-Wikipedia has a speedy deletion template because of being not notable. It seems to be just advertising, only edits of that user globally are about that company. So also out of scope. Bjarlin (talk) 14:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free logo, and we also do not need three copies of the logo. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
User has uploaded several copyrighted images as self-created, no evidence to believe these are any different.
- File:Pipi 2001.jpg
- File:Romagnoli vs Newells.jpg
- File:Sporting campeon Copa de Portugal.jpg
- File:Romagnoli levantando copa sudamericana.jpg
- File:Romagnoli against Van Bommel.jpg
- File:N san lorenzo leandro romagnoli-4927321.jpg
- File:Romagnoli2014.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal award, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyvio: uploader is likely not the photographer of the image on this bookcover. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as imho potentially non-free media (xxx maps?), Roland zh (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
no offense, but DR started as watermarked "aju" and source "ROHITH KRISHNAN PHOTOGRAPHY", pls see also File:Pallipuram sunil.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 15:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 2-upload user Cadraba223 (talk · contributions · Statistics) (= 1x copyvio: file cropper/watermark remover). Gunnex (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted CD cover. Also present at http://www.prodiaspora.de/V5/index.php/interviuri/470-ethno-symphonika-interviu-cu-marius-g-dragomir-realizat-de-adrian-vladimir-costea-pentru-radio-pro-diaspora —Andrei S. Talk 09:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked Gunnex (talk) 09:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 4-upload user Linnunrata89 (talk · contributions · Statistics) = 3x copyvio Gunnex (talk) 09:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Clarence is here (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of COM:SCOPE
INeverCry 09:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, incorrect nasa license Basvb (talk) 10:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Technically defect image, sadly in this form not useful/Out of scope Basvb (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of a book - Not "own work" as claimed Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Retro-redakteur.u12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images are not own work by the uploader.
- File:Leadership-1-potra 1765960f.jpg
- File:159524 image large.jpg
- File:VentureJul1958.jpg
- File:19380615-parents 1973191i.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:37, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MALIK JUSTICE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Has no educational value for Commons, as they seem personal. Therefore out of Commons:Project scope
- File:MALIK.jpg
- File:MALIKJUSTIN.jpg
- File:MALIKJUSTICE.jpg
- File:2go 896875868.jpg
- File:2go 896876145.jpg
- File:2go 896875909.jpg
Wiki13 talk 12:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be out of Commons:Project scope as they look like to promote something Wiki13 talk 12:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be out of Commons:Project scope as they look like to promote something Wiki13 talk 12:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makeyourchoice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Has no educational value for Commons. Therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Sämi.pdf
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Matthias 2.pdf
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Matthias.pdf
- File:Selbstversuche Wartezeiten 1.pdf
- File:Mobile Learning 10.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 9.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 8.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 6.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 5.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 4.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 3.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 2.PNG
- File:Mobile Learning 1.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 8.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 7.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 6.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 5.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 4.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 3.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 2.PNG
- File:Wartezeiten 1.PNG
- File:Smartphone 4.PNG
- File:Smartphone 3.PNG
- File:Smartphone 1.PNG
- File:Smartphone 2.PNG
- File:Smartphone 22.png
- File:Smartphone 21.png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (21).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (20).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (15).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (12).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (16).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (15).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (14).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (13).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (12).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (11).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (10).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (10).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (9).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (7).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (6).png
- File:Smartphone neu (6).png
- File:Smartphone neu (5).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (5).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (3).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (2).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu (1).png
- File:Mobile Learning neu.png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (5).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (4).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (3).png
- File:Smartphone (3).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (2).png
- File:Wartezeiten neu (1).png
- File:Smartphone neu (2).png
- File:Smartphone neu (1).png
- File:Smartphone neu.png
- File:App (3).png
- File:App (4).png
- File:Mobile Learning (2).png
- File:App (2).png
- File:App (1).png
- File:Wartezeiten (4).png
- File:Mobile Learning (1).png
- File:Wartezeiten (1).png
- File:Wartezeiten (3).png
- File:Wartezeiten (2).png
- File:Smartphone (1).png
- File:Smartphone (2).png
- File:Geschlechtliche Partizipation.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wiki13 talk 12:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makeyourchoice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Has no educational value for Commons. Therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Chinesisch 3.png
- File:Chinesisch 8.png
- File:Chinesisch 12.png
- File:Chinesisch 1.png
- File:Wörterbuch 2.png
- File:Sprachstudio 2.png
- File:Funktionen 1.png
- File:Sprachstudio 1.png
- File:Wörterbuch 1.png
- File:Sprachstudio Nemo.png
- File:Wörterbuch Nemo.png
- File:Funktionen Nemo.png
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Sämi.PNG
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Andreas 2.PNG
- File:Selbstversuch Wartezeiten Matthias.PNG
- File:Selbstversuche Wartezeiten Andreas 2.pdf
Wiki13 talk 16:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kannadacinema (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering b&w photos of several Kannada/Indian actresses and also File:ಹರಿಣಿ ರಾವ್.jpg + File:ಹರಿಣಿ.jpg = File:Harini Kannada Actress.jpg = most likely film/video screenshots. Historical photos may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Mynavathi.jpg
- File:ಪ್ರತಿಮಾದೇವಿ.jpg
- File:ಹರಿಣಿ ರಾವ್.jpg
- File:ಹರಿಣಿ.jpg
- File:ವಿಜಯರಾಧ.jpg
- File:Harini Kannada Actress.jpg
- File:Prathima Devi1.jpg
- File:Prathima Devi.jpg
- File:Chandra Kala.jpg
- File:Bharathi Actess.png
- File:Shailashree.jpg
- File:Vandana YesterYear Actress.jpg
- File:Vijaya Radha.jpg
- File:Vandana 60s.jpeg
- File:Udaya Chandrika.jpg
- File:B. V. Radha.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominating also further uploads:
Gunnex (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kannadacinema (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kannadacinema, these are two more of same series.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Аппарат Боброва.png ПростоУчастник (talk) 08:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Volkanikizer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Volkanikizer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Low quality nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Wrong chart. My own work. Denis Krivosheev (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
The watermark and the file name suggest that this is a screenshot of an unknown source, possibly a TV programme. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. TV show aired October 14, 2015. Can be found on the net. Not linking here because viewing is not free at the original source. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
See COM:TOYS: you can't upload photos of toys without permission from the toymaker. The filename and watermark also suggest that the uploader isn't the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CarlyGarcia (talk · contribs)
[edit]The colour image seems to have been taken from a map website and is probably unfree. The other one has probably also been taken from somewhere, considering the filename.
Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Does the source file being free/unfree influence our violation analysis? I would say that the dorm floor plan is not copyrightable in US based on Sparaco v. Lawler 303 f.3d 460 (2nd cir. 2002). "To the extent that the site plan sets forth the existing physical characteristics of the site, including its shape and dimensions, the grade contours, and the location of existing elements, it sets forth facts; copyright does not bar the copying of such facts." Its one of the most relied on cases in this area technical drawings/maps of copyright law. Here's from a text book chapter re this. Based on the map, this is a University of Iowa site plan of a dorm room in the Courrier Hall Rybkovich (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted the Google Maps as derivative, kept the floor plan as per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright stamp on the photo suggests this was taken from the web Ytoyoda (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Hashtag stamped on the image suggests this is a web photo Ytoyoda (talk) 00:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Likely from here: http://www.beat100.com/photo-gallery/mike-zubi_39327/2718/40645/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
No EXIF data, low resolution, would indicate possible copyright violation Bea Smith (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
The watermark just screams copyright violation Bea Smith (talk) 01:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Which watermark? I can't see anything other than the subbed text, which is in common with the editor's name here.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: If you see the watermark closer, you can see that the uploader is very likely to be the author. Please AGF. --Amitie 10g (talk) 08:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal photo. Commons is not a private photo album. ★ Poké95 01:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
the pic from [2], is video screenshot(視頻截圖), not by VOA shizhao (talk) 01:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete：I have asked VOA, it was really not their work. Sorry for my mistake.--Hang9417 (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Personal essay; see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
screenshot of tv 186.135.139.199 04:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, as it violates COM:SS and COM:DW. --★ Poké95 05:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --petrohs (gracias) 23:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation Dr. Coal (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
As Yann correctly pointed out, the logo is ineligible for copyright. But Parelma Teknoloji is unknown to en.wiki and tr.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Porto de Rinlo (talk · contribs)
[edit]All seem to be out of project scope. It looks they were uploaded only to being used to promote something.
- File:Hotel y Restaurante Porto de Rinlo.jpg
- File:Rinloo 04.jpg
- File:Rinloo 01.jpg
- File:Rinloo 02.jpg
- File:Rinloo 03.jpg
- File:Rinlo 10.jpg
- File:Rinlo 07.jpg
- File:Rinlo 09.jpg
- File:Rinlo 08.jpg
- File:Rinlo 06.jpg
- File:Rinlo 05.jpg
- File:Rinlo 04.jpg
- File:Rinlo 01.jpg
- File:Rinlo 02.jpg
- File:Rinlo 03.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 22.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 23.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 21.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 20.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 19.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 18.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 17.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 16.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 12.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 14.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 15.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 13.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 11.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 10.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 09.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 08.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 07.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 06.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 05.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 04.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 01.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 03.jpg
- File:Hotel y restaurante 02.jpg
Wiki13 talk 12:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept most: mostly just images of Rinlo, not promotional. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
After consideration, we do not intend the use this picture in the article Barbara Harrisson. ! Bikkit ! (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 19:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
After consideration, we do not intend the use this picture in the article Barbara Harrisson. ! Bikkit ! (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 19:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
After consideration, we do not intend the use this picture in the article Barbara Harrisson. ! Bikkit ! ! Bikkit ! (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 19:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for sculptures. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 19:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:04, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
wrong name (uploader error) Exagren (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, name can be corrected Krd 14:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Uzbekistan. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure, why not to delete files of the user, even if he especially spent all day and the money traveling to this village very far avay from his city... --Ochilov (diskuto) 18:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Try to upload in ruwiki as fair use. Carpodacus (talk) 04:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Uzbekistan. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
No FOP in Uzbekistan. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see anything, that can have copyright. The statue is a State Symbol of Uzbekistan, Humo bird (it is drawn in the centre of Uzbekistan's coat of arms). Architecture of building is absolutely trivial, it is a rectangle box with windows. Carpodacus (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review: The designers of this stamp, Jens Müller and Karen Weiland are still alive, so this file is unfree and has to be deleted. Correlatio (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Photo is taken from http://www.azvi.es/azvi-finaliza-la-rehabilitacion-de-pista-del-aeropuerto-internacional-de-craiova-en-rumania/ VH-MIN (talk) 02:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This watermarked version should be deleted. There is still a non-watermarked version at File:Colombian Air Force Boeing 767-200ER PAOC.jpg. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality image (blurred) and quite identical to File:Palais du Louvre 82 2012-06-29.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 10:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The image is not trivial Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Paintings by Annemarie Busschers
[edit]
- File:WLANL - ngc981 - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busscher, 2006, 20704.jpg
- File:Beyond grief.jpg
- File:WLANL - fychu - Harry Tupan.jpg
- File:WLANL - hajeka - Harry Tupan.jpg
- File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2007 Harry Tupan.jpg
- File:WLANL - petertf2 - Harry Tupan, Annemarie Busschers (2007).jpg
- File:WLANL - E V E - Annemarie Busschers Harry Tupan.jpg
- File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2007 Harry Tupan - detail.jpg
- File:Scream.tif
- File:Jacob witzenhausen.jpg
- File:Tia, dad.jpg
- File:WLANL - petertf2 - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers (2006).jpg
- File:Stroke II.jpg
- File:WLANL - hajeka - Zelfportret.jpg
- File:WLANL - hajeka - Zelfportret (1).jpg
- File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2006 Zelfportret.jpg
- File:WLANL - fychu - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers.jpg
- File:WLANL - Marjolein Benard - Zelfportret, Annemarie Busschers (2006) detail.jpg
- File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2006 Zelfportret - detail.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_detail.jpg){kind=link}
because I am the painter and I want it removed from the web Annemariebusschers (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep in 2009 we got a written release from the artist licensing this work under the {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} as part of Wiki Loves Art Netherlands. This release is dated 7 aug 2009 and signed by the artist (see OTRS #2009101510030547). You can't revoke this license. Multichill (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete I'm always very happy if contemporary artists make their work available under free licenses. And legally Multichill is correct: a Creative Commons license can't be revoked. However, I also think we should respect artists' wishes to remove their work. So with sadness I'd plead for deletion. Maybe, @Annemariebusschers: would you be willing to let us replace your images with better ones / newer images from current work? Spinster (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Annemariebusschers: perhaps you could explain why exactly it is you want these removed from Commons? As Multichill points out, in 2009 you released these freely under a licence which cannot be revoked - what has changed your mind? -mattbuck (Talk) 01:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Can I just check - did the OTRS actually come from Anne-Marie Busschers herself? The reason I ask is that many of the files don't seem to correctly list her as the artist under the author, giving another person's Flickr account as the author instead - which at best, looks odd; at worst, contravenes the attribution rules on the license. File:WLANL - Minke Wagenaar - Annemarie Busschers 2006 Zelfportret - detail.jpg, for example, claims it was authored by "Minke Wagenaar from Amsterdam, NL". Hchc2009 (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Checked the ticket, the ticket contains a scan of a written letter signed by the artist releasing the work. Akoopal (talk) 10:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- nb: "work" or "works"? Hchc2009 (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- (not a legal translation)'give permission for publication of pictures of my works created during wiki loves art/nl under the terms of cc-by-sa-3.0'. Akoopal (talk) 00:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Akoopal. In which case, I'd go for keep for those images where Busschers has been correctly and clearly identified in the file description as the author of the original work, but delete where she hasn't been, as we're in legal breach of the attribution terms of the licence for those. Many of the uploads were done badly, and are in breach of the license - an example of the latter is File:WLANL - hajeka - Harry Tupan.jpg, where Henk-Jan Kooiman is listed as the author, rather than Busschers. My only other thought would be that if the email chain could imply that Busschers didn't understand the terms of the cc-by-sa.3.0 licence (i.e. there wasn't clarity as to what she thought she was agreeing to), she might have a valid argument for retracting the licensing, as it wouldn't have been informed consent. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- (not a legal translation)'give permission for publication of pictures of my works created during wiki loves art/nl under the terms of cc-by-sa-3.0'. Akoopal (talk) 00:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- nb: "work" or "works"? Hchc2009 (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Checked the ticket, the ticket contains a scan of a written letter signed by the artist releasing the work. Akoopal (talk) 10:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The ticket contains a letter signed by the artist. The license is not revocable. Yann (talk) 21:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Photo quite identical to File:Palais du Louvre 95 2012-06-29.jpg + low quality image (blurred) + many other images of the medieval louvre exist Tangopaso (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Princess Diana, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, Scotland.JPG
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by DrKay as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: artwork by living artist (Richard Foster) https://www.rcpsg.ac.uk/library/archive-and-heritage/college-art-collection/diana-princess-of-wales.aspx?cookieCheck=true
Covered by FOP? Didym (talk) 19:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom and Commons:Freedom of panorama#United States: freedom of panorama does not apply to paintings in either the country of origin or the country hosting the servers. DrKay (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
inferior duplicate of File:Wappen Graefendorf.png MaxxL - talk 20:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Infereior duplicate of File:Patch of Kharkiv Patrol Police.png. Kwasura (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Distinct, copyrighted costume czar 21:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, it's a Coplay. --Clodion (talk) 07:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Distinct, copyrighted costume without permission czar 21:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as uploader: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The layout would be copyrighted, so this will require permission I believe. Bea Smith (talk) 01:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- If this one is deleted then all the other uploads of the user are of the same kind:
- File:Overview Corporate Real Estate Management.png
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM farbig.png
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM JPEG.jpg
- File:20130101 Präsentation Übersicht CREM.pdf PDF
Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
redundant, Serbia and Montenegro ended years ago. Zoupan (talk) 01:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Maps don't become obsolete when depicted entities disappear. They just become historical maps. For example, File:Achaemenid Empire En.svg shows a polity that ended about 2300 years ago, and it's still a useful historical map.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you understood me, this is not a map of a historical entity, but a location in a historical entity. It is unused, and has no educational value whatsoever.
- FYI, the proper historical entity map is here.--Zoupan (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you understood me, this is not a map of a historical entity, but a location in a historical entity. It is unused, and has no educational value whatsoever.
Kept: per discussion Krd 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
This files has a file name which indicates it is from either Facebook or Flickr. 99.99% likelihood of being a copyvio Bea Smith (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of the CC-BY 1.0 licence. Bea Smith (talk) 01:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission at the source provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
50-year-old photograph is not likely "own work" of the uploader, see also his talk page. Bjarlin (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:28-а механізована бригада.jpg Kwasura (talk) 02:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Been featured in very humiliating and damaging Memes that the photographer, Lara Schneider, did not intend. Image is no longer available publicly on Flickr either. Crookedtail604 (talk) 21:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Used in 5 articles, and passed Flickr review upon upload. Free licenses are irrevocable, and I don't see what deleting this image from Commons would do as regards memes that've already been created and circulated. INeverCry 08:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Irrevocable free license. If uses of the file are causing troubles somewhere else, that uses should be adressed there. Deleting the image from Commons don't solve them. Furthermore, I see a lot of usage of it in Internet just to illustrate pages on angry woman, which is what a successful free licensed image is expected to be used - but it prevents us to stop this image to circulate just by deleting it here.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Krd 17:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Too dark and watermarked, not useful for education. Far better alternatives exist in relevant categories. Out of project scope
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 29.jpg
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 28.jpg
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 27.jpg
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 25.jpg
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 23.jpg
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 24.JPG
- File:Assumption church and Kornyakt tower 22.JPG
- File:Kornyakt tower 1.jpg
- File:Палац Корнякта 2.JPG
George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep 27, 28: these might be useful for illustrating articles about Kornyakt tower, not excellent shots but decent ones, and I do not see any far better alternative from this angle. Probably also keep 22, as I don't see any other shot from this angle. Delete the remaining, especially those turned at 45 degrees that cannot be used — NickK (talk) 02:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted those turned at 45 degrees +1 dark/blurred, keep the rest as they are not so bad Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Needs to be cropped; title (wrong year) has to be changed. Will then be uploaded again. ! Bikkit ! ! Bikkit ! (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 17:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, as there is no EXIF data present. OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 01:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work - found in online AntanO 05:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Not own work - found in online AntanO 05:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image Natuur12 (talk) 22:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Known people. Yann (talk) 20:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
The people are known, but the picture should be tried for copyright violation. Small photo without metadata, the uploader called it a selfie – does not look like that. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Terani Fashion Brand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Has no educational value for Commons, as they seem clearly to be uploaded for promotional purposes. Therefore also out of Commons:Project scope
Wiki13 talk 12:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Info: File:Terani1.svg is currently in use, and article is not tagged for speedy. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: We certainly don't need more than one of these and I doubt that the WP:EN advertising piece will last long. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but no FoP in Italy, it is contemporary architecture of 2015. A.Savin 15:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Yes that's unfortunately right... no FoP in Italy... But that would mean that most of the pictures found on Category:Pavilions of Expo 2015 should be deleted ? Couldn't we argue that the pavilions belong to their "owners" ? Poland in this case, and there is FoP in Poland :-)) --Gzzz (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The location is actually essential. But, even in the unlikely case that the Poles will disassemble the pavilion and transport it to Poland after the end of the exhibition, it is then to be considered as temporary installment and so the FoP is irrelevant anyway. --A.Savin 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per COM:TOO. I don't see any element here that's original or creative enough to be copyrightable. This structure is a repetition of simple rectangles with 3-boarded sides. INeverCry 20:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this facade is surely anything else but trivial... --A.Savin 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- These are rectangles crossed by boards. There's a lot of them, but what's original or creative about it? INeverCry 03:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Fact is, that there is no building with similar facade anywhere. So, it is an individual project by an architect. It may be ugly, but the architect nonetheless has the right to reserve their copyright. --A.Savin 11:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- These are rectangles crossed by boards. There's a lot of them, but what's original or creative about it? INeverCry 03:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but this facade is surely anything else but trivial... --A.Savin 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I think that was an international area, nothing from Italy. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- The location of this building is: Italy. Period. I'm curious what should be to discuss here. --A.Savin 15:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- But the owner of this was and is: Poland! No Italy person is a copyright holder of this. It is a polish ownership. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. So what? It is still violating Commons policy. Because, theoretically, even a Polish architect may enforce his copyright in Italy if their copyrighted object is in Italy. Or take a current example: Burj Khalifa was built by a U.S. architect and the U.S. has FoP for architecture; nonetheless the photos have been deleted from Commons, because the location is what counts - it's only logical. --A.Savin 16:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- But this was build temporary only for a representation of Poland, not for Italy. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. So, refering to your statement, it is a temporary work. Could you tell me then, what does it have to do with FoP whatsoever, as FoP (deutsch Panoramafreiheit) is an exception for permanent installments only? --A.Savin 22:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I think only a question for this: [3] can give us an answer. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. So, refering to your statement, it is a temporary work. Could you tell me then, what does it have to do with FoP whatsoever, as FoP (deutsch Panoramafreiheit) is an exception for permanent installments only? --A.Savin 22:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- But this was build temporary only for a representation of Poland, not for Italy. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. So what? It is still violating Commons policy. Because, theoretically, even a Polish architect may enforce his copyright in Italy if their copyrighted object is in Italy. Or take a current example: Burj Khalifa was built by a U.S. architect and the U.S. has FoP for architecture; nonetheless the photos have been deleted from Commons, because the location is what counts - it's only logical. --A.Savin 16:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- But the owner of this was and is: Poland! No Italy person is a copyright holder of this. It is a polish ownership. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- The location of this building is: Italy. Period. I'm curious what should be to discuss here. --A.Savin 15:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. --Krd 17:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly infringes on the architect's copyright. It is in Italy, so the nationality of the architect is completely irrelevant. I fond it hard to see how it is not original -- it may be repititious, but I have never seen anything like it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Looks like the PeoplesBank logo was pasted onto an existing photograph. What is the source for the photograph? Ytoyoda (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I work for the team and we just changed over naming rights. We wanted to get the old photo with the former stadium name out of there so the new naming rights sponsor gets full coverage. The new sign has not been put up yet, so we photoshopped the new logo onto the top of our stadium. This was the release art. What do you want me to send you as proof? - Gnome8910 Dec. 18, 2:29 pm EST
- Thanks for your response. I think the most surefire way would be to upload the original photograph, as long as the team is fine with releasing it to the public domain. Then you or someone in the team's marketing office can contact the OTRS team and specify a compatible license (i.e. {{PD}} or {{tl|Cc-by-sa-3.0})) that allows commercial use and modification for the image. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original file here. Will that work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnome8910 (talk • contribs) 09:59, December 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was expecting the original original photo, but I think this is fine. I'm going to withdraw the nomination. Withdrawn Ytoyoda (talk) 18:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you!
- Thanks. I was expecting the original original photo, but I think this is fine. I'm going to withdraw the nomination. Withdrawn Ytoyoda (talk) 18:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original file here. Will that work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnome8910 (talk • contribs) 09:59, December 21, 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I think the most surefire way would be to upload the original photograph, as long as the team is fine with releasing it to the public domain. Then you or someone in the team's marketing office can contact the OTRS team and specify a compatible license (i.e. {{PD}} or {{tl|Cc-by-sa-3.0})) that allows commercial use and modification for the image. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a fake and misleading. When the sign is actually changed, then someone will take a photo of it. Until then we must go without. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Future Perfect at Sunrise as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted painting by en:František Viktor Podolay Could apply {{PD-Slovenia}} Amitie 10g (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The painter was Slovak, not Slovene. Slovakia seems to have 70 ypma. (Plus, PD-Slovenia wouldn't apply either, as it only works for works of known authorship if "the author died before 1 January 1945", while Podolay died in 1958.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops, my mistake. Then, Delete this and all files tagged for speedy. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops, my mistake. Then,
Deleted: This is a painting, not applied art, so it is 70 pma in either case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Future Perfect at Sunrise as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted painting by sk:František Viktor Podolay Could apply {{PD-Slovenia}} Amitie 10g (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The painter was Slovak, not Slovene. Slovakia seems to have 70 ypma. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Future Perfect at Sunrise as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted painting by sk:František Viktor Podolay Could apply {{PD-Slovenia}} Amitie 10g (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The painter was Slovak, not Slovene. Slovakia seems to have 70 ypma. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of copyrighted, private 3D artwork (copyright violation of sculpture author) czar 19:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama neither in France nor in Italy. OTRS-permission from sculptor is needed (if (s)he is dead, then from heir(s)). Taivo (talk) 20:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for highlighting this concern. I am preparing a letter to the Courmayeur Town Council, the Mountain Guides Office, and possibly also the Tourist Office of Courmayeur in Italy to investigate who commissioned the statue and who now owns copyright of its image. As I do not speak Italian, and as it is just before Christmas, this may take a little time to investigate. Please indicate the usual timescale in which this deletion process takes place. Does it help for me or others to leave updates on progress with investigating this matter here on this page? Parkywiki (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Usually deletion requests last one week, not much longer. If you know the sculptor and his/her death year, then this is usually enough. If you leave updates on progress with investigating on this page, then this will be also helpful. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm afraid one week is insufficient and an unreasonably short amount of time to research information and rely on help from strangers in institutions in another country that one does not know, to ask them to investigate who they commissioned a sculpture from some years before, then to make contact with that person, receive a reply, and act upon it. Would it be best to remove the image from the Wikipedia page as a stop-gap?. Here is the text of an email I sent yesterday to the current owners of the house in Italy where Emile Rey lived 120 years ago, and is still owned and promoted as the place where this famous alpine guide once lived. Before contacting the Town Council and the Guides Office, I wanted to seek their assistance, as being members of the local community they are quite likely to know the relevant senior council officials or civic dignitaries to approach. As I said - it is approaching Christmas, and I would have thought that a minimum of one month would not be an unreasonable amount of time to investigate such matters unless, of course, you can advise that a formal complaint had been lodged by the town council or by the artist in question? First email sent:
- Hello. I am writing with a very unusual request: I need your help to stop the deletion of a photograph of your town's statue of Émile Rey from Wikipedia! There are three different language pages about Rey - one of Courmayeur's most famous sons - which use a photograph of the sculpture on his statue.in the Piazza. I am proud to have honoured him recently by creating a new and very detailed page about him on English Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Rey (This page also includes an external link to your holiday residence website!)
- Thank you. I'm afraid one week is insufficient and an unreasonably short amount of time to research information and rely on help from strangers in institutions in another country that one does not know, to ask them to investigate who they commissioned a sculpture from some years before, then to make contact with that person, receive a reply, and act upon it. Would it be best to remove the image from the Wikipedia page as a stop-gap?. Here is the text of an email I sent yesterday to the current owners of the house in Italy where Emile Rey lived 120 years ago, and is still owned and promoted as the place where this famous alpine guide once lived. Before contacting the Town Council and the Guides Office, I wanted to seek their assistance, as being members of the local community they are quite likely to know the relevant senior council officials or civic dignitaries to approach. As I said - it is approaching Christmas, and I would have thought that a minimum of one month would not be an unreasonable amount of time to investigate such matters unless, of course, you can advise that a formal complaint had been lodged by the town council or by the artist in question? First email sent:
- Usually deletion requests last one week, not much longer. If you know the sculptor and his/her death year, then this is usually enough. If you leave updates on progress with investigating on this page, then this will be also helpful. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Because of Italian copyright law, Wikipedia cannot use any photo of the statue unless it has permission from either
- a) the sculptor,
- b) their heirs,
- or c) any other legal owner of the statue's copyright (possibly the Comune di Courmayeur?)
- I think this is a terrible shame, but these are Italian laws, it seems. Permission to use the photograph is not a problem - the problem is the legal ability to use any image of the statue of Emile Rey, and this needs the permission from the artist or copyright owner.
- So, can you help me resolve this problem? Can you help me discover who owns copyright of the town's sculpture of Rey, or suggest who I should contact for help? Or can you do this on my behalf?
- I might also write to both the Comune di Courmayeur and the Guides Office for help. But I thought it might be a sensible if I asked for your help to find individuals who might be able to help find this information. Perhaps you know of local people who care about local history and the sharing of knowledge? I have climbed many times amongst your highest mountains, but sadly speak no Italian, though I recognise the great contribution that Rey made to mountaineering history.
- Unfortunately, Wikipedia moves quickly to delete photographs which do not have the correct legal permissions, so any help you can quickly give would be very welcome. Many thanks etc.(Parkywiki)
- I sent the above email to infoATresidencecourmayeur.com on Saturday 19/12/2015 at 13:05GMT. As soon as I get a reply back I will then contact the town council (segreteriaATcomune.courmayeur.ao.it) and mountain guides office (infoATguidecourmayeur.com) and possibly the local tourist office (courmayeurATturismo.vda.it). I hope this demonstrates I am taking this deletion request seriously, but it really cannot be dealt with in just seven days. Parkywiki (talk) 14:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- I have now also emailed the Courmayeur Tourist Office (courmayeurATturismo.vda.it) and the website owner of http://www.angeloelli.it for any assistance (an Italian mountaineering historian). If there is no response after the first week of the New Year, I will then email the Courmayeur Town Council and the Guides Office directly. Parkywiki (talk) 02:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Comment The bust could be the monument to Émile Rey mentioned in this 1975 guide. I've found a reference from 1937, and that monument wasn't there, as only the 1928 Petigax bust and the 1903 Ollier monuments are mentioned there. It's amazing how little information exists about it in the net, in what is supposed to be a very well known touristic place! -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This can be restored when and if a license is received. Note please, that it is very likely that the town officials will claim they own the copyright. Since that is almost always not the actual case, we will need proof -- a scan of the document transferring the copyright from the creator to the town. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Distinct, copyrighted costume without permission czar 21:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as uploader: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Photo is primarily of the mask with a specific expression czar 18:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."
Deleted: In general, costumes cannot have copyrights in the USA because clothing is utilitarian. Masks, however, are a different matter -- they always have copyrights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Distinct, copyrighted costume without permission; plenty more at fr:Liste des personnages de Star Wars after these test cases czar 21:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as uploader: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Photo is primarily of the mask with a specific expression czar 18:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Сомнения в авторстве и лицении, см https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Tereschenko,Barcelona_01.11.2015.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, фото 1945 года Dogad75 (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Very unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. Probably not PD either. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Violation du droit d'auteur Supporterhéninois (talk) 23:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Peut-on avoir plus de détails? Est-ce que c'est la photo qui a été téléversée contre l'accord du photographe? Et ce bien qu'on ait un original avec données EXIF. Ou parle-t-on du train en arrière-plan? (Auquel cas les logos sont à mon sens De Minimis et n'entrainent pas de violation du droit d'auteur car les sujets principaux de la photos sont Wendy Bouchard et le train, et non les logos apposés au train). Jeriby (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Of course the advertisement on the train is important to the image -- Bouchard was photographed there because that is her ad behind her on the train. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
duplicate with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patung_Lembuswana-Pesut_Mahakam_di_Samarinda-Kukar.jpg Exagren (talk) 10:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate Avi (talk) 16:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Is the file actually from NASA? Amitie 10g (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Looking at the provenance of the file, it is probably from the Keck Observatory (as per [4] and [5]. Keck Observatory photos, absent any other information, are not solely NASA and may have commercial restrictions as per [6]. Therefore, this picture is being deleted until such time as it can be proven to be either solely NASA, or otherwise under an acceptable Commons license. Avi (talk) 16:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Distinct, copyrighted costume czar 21:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, Wikimedia's ex-legal-person, Mike Godwin, stated that photographs of people wearing costumes are not copyright infringements. (e.g. in this e-mail). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Photo is primarily of the mask with a specific expression czar 18:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume, e.g. focusing on the expression inherent in the mask distinct from that of the general character."
- Keep: Per COM:COSTUME, it's a Coplay. --Clodion (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Photo not of mask costume per se, but of Cosplay participant. Although, Godwin's concerns about the potential tenuousness of this argument should be kept in mind if case law develops further. Avi (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
The Yoda character is still under a copyright. Sorry I am. Yann (talk) 21:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per my original request and follow-up. Mask is the subject of the photo and we do not have the permission of its copyright holder. czar 22:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Per, Mask + man = Cosplay. Mask only = Copyright. Image of a man with Nike shoes = Man with shoes. Nike shoes only = Copyright. --Volupnich (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Yann Natuur12 (talk) 20:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculpture. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image quasi identical to File:Le Louvre IMG 20141107 130441 (15575932907).jpg . And in the other image there is more a bird (top center) and a flag (top left) Tangopaso (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 17:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Romanzazvorka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.kladnominule.cz/front.page/photos/90?gallery=114&photo=1502 Is that reproduction of a painting or a photo? What is the date of the creation? Amitie 10g (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no own work, copyvio Krd 17:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a duplicate and there is a better quality version of this logo uploaded already. WikiFabes (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused trivial logo Krd 17:09, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Patch of Kiev Patrol Police.png. Kwasura (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Not same image, therefore not possible to be an "inferior" duplicate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
The kanji does not meet the requirment of PD-textlogo GY Fan★ 13:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
add:
- File:NCHS CREST COLOUR.png
- File:Nan Chiau High School Crest 2013.PNG--shizhao (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see why this shall not meet the requirements of PD-textlogo. --Krd 17:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- We have this example from China where a drawing of the character 道, as shown on one image, was ruled to be copyrighted calligraphy. Under that originality criterion, these characters would clearly be copyrighted. No idea if Singapore uses the same originality criterion, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, the files were previously deleted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
