Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 6th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name for category Silberrus (talk) 09:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for houskeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ausstatung und preis 93.134.36.172 10:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No deletion rationale whatsoever given. Rosenzweig τ 17:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally created (typo) Arthur Diebold (talk) 18:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for housekeeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising/promotional, out of scope. Achim (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 22:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domy Hod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, small and no EXIF data. This user have other photo as copyvio

Vikoula5 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotes smoking. author Zviad Avaliani (talk) 20:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio as uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 17:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: JuTa 17:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 00:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marceloco's Productions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality nonsense video, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable

Motopark (talk) 20:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swades5551 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Seemingly also copyvio.

Ies (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no realistic educational use, blurred, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 08:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:FC Porto. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:FC Porto. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hello13515 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense images for the nonsense article en:Akhil Sahni. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement banner used for spamming the Czech Wikipedia (cs:Sleva). Michal Bělka (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merajalam24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded, very poor image, out of scope ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nmoreyra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaison19981 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:09, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scott Lincoln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private file hosting. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image / no quite notable people : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified, unused low-quality image; out of scope. Einstein2 (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : very small unused logo of a no quite notable...what is it? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gh. H Blogger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Idris effendi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jack Kaufman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}s; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bakersadiq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}s; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope (unused poor quality wikiversity image?) Pibwl (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, probably copyrighted, used only in sandbox, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no real educational use, and it isn't clear if the person agreed to be on the photo Pibwl (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:26, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE Text only document, if ever needed could be reproduced by typing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fayrothedon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}s; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fayrothedon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fayrothedon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IMHO, as original research. The file name is translated as "Propable solution of the mystery of Last Supper" C messier (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chantefr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos par mort en 2011 - il n'existe aucune preuve que l'ayant-droit a bien donné son accord pour placer son image sous la licence en question.

Habertix (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Admits as much in the summary that the photo came from the subject who is not the copyright holder either. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the tweet from the subject that requested the image be uploaded.[1] Also this image may be have been uploaded due to the same request. File:Jillian Janson 2015.jpg Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/49283984@N05/20354281500/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright ownership given this public tweet by the subject requesting upload [2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio https://www.flickr.com/photos/49283984@N05/20354281500/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purports to be a character image from an animated TV series. Character images are copyrighted by the producers and network. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add - purports to be self-created by uploader. Was used in an article on enwiki that was deleted as a hoax so this image is no longer used. There is no encyclopedic value to this personal image. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: or it is like the original and it is a copyvio (DW) or it is different enough but out of scope as a personal artwork [3]--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 02:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Janowicz RG15 (18) (19120130730).jpg, but at lower resolution and in a less preferred format Mosmof (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This biography belongs on Wikipedia, if it is notable. Certainly not on Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from link, author define facebook as source Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image http://variety.com/2014/film/news/nick-robinson-alex-roe-the-5th-wave-1201253234/ Ebyabe (talk) 23:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 15:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter profile image link Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see also no cropped version : [4] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Seemingly also copyvio. Ies (talk) 08:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from official web de Cannes/zoom/mainPage/image_xs2 link Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name 최광모 (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nasri hanane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to his her own work, Small and no EXIF data.

Vikoula5 (talk) 12:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission for these 2d artworks images --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be his (her) own work, Small and no EXIF data. Vikoula5 (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nomination, also it is so small that it is unusefull for educational content so it is also out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alana Gyemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IvanSalcedo~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (283x227 + 347x231 px) resolutions, missing EXIF. File:Torredecristal.jpg most likely cropped from a version like http://ramonanibaltv.blogspot.de/2006/01/estn-vendiendo-la-torre-de-cristal-de.html (2006) = http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/163/2047/320/Torre%20Banin%20ter.jpg (which itselfs seems also to be cropped)

Gunnex (talk) 16:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several undefined stereocenters; better alternatives linked in File:Diosgenin2.svg. Leyo 23:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn Leyo 13:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is tagged as possibly non-free in its home country on en Wikipedia, from which it was copied. Adam9007 (talk) 01:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: too simple Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional PR photography with no evidence of permission (OTRS) GermanJoe (talk) 04:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work : no permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several undefined stereocenters, low quality/resolution; better alternatives linked in File:Diosgenin2.svg. Leyo 23:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, most likely replaced by better version or TeX. Leyo 23:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With all my pleasure.

There no a better version in Wikimedia.commons and I cannot to do it myself. This file had been used in Ru-wikipedia. Now it is replaced with another figure of better quality. So, I do not mind this deletion. Vtosha (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stereochemistry missing completely; correct alternative available: File:Dammarane.png. Leyo 23:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 20:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eugene.daussy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyrighted http://www.chinccha.com/ces-francais-cartonnent-en-coree-du-sud/

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I was wrong, I mixed the year, the link I provided show a publication from 28/10/2014 (my mistake: I read "2013", my fault) and the file are here since 24/12/2013. I found no other previous publications, so I will say weak  Keep because they have not big size and no EXIF. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope and missing permisison Denniss (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot see any valid permission for the use of this photo. FIVB photos are copyrighted. Source link directed to the main page. MSchnitzler2000 (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced and unused Ottoman flags

[edit]

Some user created graphics, claiming to be Ottoman flags, but don't have any sources indicating they are so, or any uses in any wiki projects. They are just fictional flags without any value to anybody but the creator, and have no realistic educational use.--Orwellianist (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom; personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The NFL holds a copyright on all broadcasts of NFL games. Imzadi 1979  11:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   03:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot, out of scope. Einstein2 (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   03:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted screenshot, out of scope. Einstein2 (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   03:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olga18888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Website screenshots, likely copyvios.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   03:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only. OUt of scope and perhaps the text itself is copyrighted as well. Natuur12 (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   03:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't want it online anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrusso85 (talk • contribs) 2015-12-06T01:12:09‎ (UTC)


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   03:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and replaced by superior File:DEU Landkreis Lueneburg COA.svg; inferior vectorisation based on Stadler version but no official source, that this version was in use; no educational purpose. Fränsmer (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   03:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VORONA63 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, probably derivatives. Author's permission needed.

Sealle (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AAL-DJVU

[edit]

Hi! i'm working with the library (in a partnership between Wikimedia Argentina and the Academy of Letter of Argentina) that is on with the scanning of this books, they requested us to only upload the PDF files, not the Djvu (they want them deleted). This files are already on PDF and some of them in better quality, and now i'm working on the upload of 25 more, reaching 100 at the end of this year. I really need to please them with this :). Thanks you! --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously published http://www.kingsizemagazine.se/karusellen/intervju-futura/ I see no evidence of permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 11:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture can be found on many websites, copyright and license not clear MMFE (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. The file has been transferred to Russian Wikivoyage. Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. The file has been transferred to Russian Wikivoyage. Ymblanter (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely own work.Looks like a cropped image from a card or similar. Ganímedes (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Enoxazin.svg --Kopiersperre (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

right, sorry. --Heino1960 (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablo el mejor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Pablo el mejor

Gunnex (talk) 08:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imranyousafzai39 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very very small images without EXIF, very unlikely to be own work. And they are so small that they can't be useful in an educational content, so they are also out of scope IMO.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

German stamps especially those which were printed since 1995 aren't automatically in the public domain. The pictures shown on these stamps are all works of Erna de Vries who is alive, look here. So all these files are copyrighted and can not be hosted here anymore.

Correlatio (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aadzka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO These appear to be movie screenshots, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klauesteban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Klauesteban (7 uploads = 3x copyvio so far). Uploaded in a row on 29.10.2008 for en:Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo, a university in the Dominican Republic. All files mysteriously tagged by uploader with "OTROS [OTRS] pending". Pending permission from the original photographers?

Gunnex (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arqdom~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also [6] + [7] (no source/no author, most likely grabbed from Internet) + File:Banco Leon.jpg, which is cropped from http://www.pons.com.do/corporativo/index.php?idContenido=300 (official site of the construction involved architect) = http://www.pons.com.do/imagenesData/img_300_1.jpg. All files uploaded in a row on 26.02.2008 to illustrate es:Daniel Pons (http://www.pons.com.do), an Dominican Republic architect.

Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've been unable to find this painting referenced (or depicted) anywhere at the National Art Museum of Ukraine. The actual fragment of the 19th century painting (or mural) can be found here and here without any text. The painting being used as being both 19th century and anonymous looks like relatively recent reinterpretation, and it's also highly likely that the artist is attributed... and very possibly still alive. Suspected COPYVIO. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Це не професійно - "я думаю те, думаю інше але жодних доказів фальсифікації немає". Дана картина: Козак Мамай, ХІХ ст. Боровиця, Чигиринський р-н, Черкаська обл. Полотно, олія. 70 х 155 з чигиринщини зберігається в НХМУ. Це вказано в альманасі "Козак Мамай" Станіслава Бушака на ст. 26 (ISBN 978-966-7845-50-6) --Mr.Rivermen (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Please provide the link to the source if it is copyvio. If not, the file must be saved. Concerning to the links provided, the gallery probably have several painting of similar topic and title (this topic was popular from 16 to 18 centuries). Yuriy Kvach (talk) 21:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not interested in anything other than COPYVIO. The onus is not on me to prove that it is a copyright violation, the onus is on the uploader to prove that it isn't. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No! :) You said it is copyvio! So, You need to provide evidences! The uploader informed, that the source is museum (so, this is a photograph of painting from museum) and this is a painting of 19th century. If it is old, it is free to be upload. If you believe it is modern painting, protected by copyright, you need to provide the source with the related information. You can find this painting in web easy, for example here it is inscribed as: 19 century, Borovytsia village, Chyhyryn Raion.--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 20:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An upload by a user to pininterest with their own OR description in Russian is hardly a reliable source! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Mr.Rivermen has provided a good source (з чигиринщини зберігається в НХМУ here) for determining that this is a 19th century picture to be found in Chyhyryn Raion. The description, however, is not accurate and I've amended it. Per the text "Саме у XVIII ст. під впливом гайдамаччини картина «Козак Мамай» композиційно змінюється, розширюється у своєму змісті: з’являються живописні полотна з «гайдамацькими сценами». «На них подані так звані «сцени розправи» гайдамак зі своїми противниками – суд, який вершить Мамай; на деревах повішені (часто – вниз головою) чоловічі постаті». Є епізоди, де козаки варять страву в казанку, полюють, рибалять. Події відбуваються, як правило, в лісі або біля річки. «Гайдамаччина, яка йшла з нижчих і середніх верств української людності і була не тільки простим розбоєм, але й ідейним протестом проти економічних, соціальних і національних болячок свого часу, відбилась у народній поезії і не могла не зоставити значного сліду на народній картині». Д. Щербаківський вважає, що саме часи гайдамаччини «безіменному козаку-бандуристу, у «якого ім’я було не одно, а єсть їх до ката», добавляє ім’я «Мамай», ім’я, яке перейшло потім і на копії старих картин козака – бандуриста і тепер, не зовсім справедливо, закріплено за всіма взагалі варіантами цієї картини»." [own bolding] I've amended it to reflect a better description as the man hanging upside-down is an arendator. They were usually Jews as, unfortunately for the Jewish community in both the Polish and Russian Empires, their occupations were proscribed by law to the most unpopular occupations. In other words, it was an exploitative measure by the elite to put a Jewish face to oppressors for the illiterate and ignorant masses. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I believe the file description could have some mistakes, which might be corrected. I hope, agree to save the file now! Do you agree it is not copyvio? Yuriy Kvach (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed that it's definitely not a copyright violation. It's 19th century and is by an unknown artist. I've updated the source for the file. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Olaf Kosinsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Schlechtes Bild, da Herr Leidreiter an dem Aufnahmetag krank war Poké95 06:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no deletion reason. P 1 9 9   13:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechtes Foto. Ist aus Versehen hochgeladen worden Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As before. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 12:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wurde versehentlich hochgeladen | Was accidentally uploaded Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo has been uploaded by mistake. It should therefore be deleted.--Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You cannot revoce a cc-license and the request comes from another account than the uploader. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo : no permission http://www.izlesene.com/fussiletkuranmerkezi/galeri --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   13:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

described as "game created by me" = out of scope personal artwork --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   13:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be his (her) own work, Small and no EXIF data. Vikoula5 (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: undue suspicion, user has uploaded similar images, all with watermark that matches username. P 1 9 9   13:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falscher Name. Neu erstellt unter TimedText:Froehliche Weihnacht ueberall - Video.webm.de.srtlewenstein (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   14:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, yet only thumbnail-sized: unlikely that original creator of image would only have thumbnail available. Note also that user's account is now blocked on enwiki. The Anome (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable tiny. P 1 9 9   14:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, yet only thumbnail-sized: unlikely that original creator of image would only have thumbnail available. Note also that user's account is now blocked on enwiki. The Anome (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-notable signature, no educational value. P 1 9 9   14:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been sourced from http://www.gatewaytoreason.com/speakers-page-1.html Unlikely that original creator of image would only have access to image scaled and cropped to this exact size. Note also that submitter's account is now blocked on enwiki. The Anome (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvio. P 1 9 9   14:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mfa88 (4 photo uploads on 19.12.2010 = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked "Natouraventura".  Delete. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   14:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SzondiM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


One was already deleted, one kept because it's in use (so that makes it in scope). --P 1 9 9   14:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by БАМ1952 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by БАМ1952 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly not own work. Missing proper sources and attribution. --P 1 9 9   14:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still copyrighted work of Marjan Drev (1991); unfortunately no FoP in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 07:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


There is FoP in Slowenia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panoramafreiheit#Weitere_L.C3.A4nder --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, there isn't. The article you quote has been updated: "...sofern die Vervielfältigung nicht in dreidimensionaler Form vorgenommen wird und ihre Nutzung weder demselben Zweck wie das Original dient noch mit Gewinnerzielungsabsicht erfolgt." — Yerpo Eh? 07:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Eleassar (t/p) 17:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

serious doubt about the licence. It's look like an instagram picture. mik@ni 13:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed it was, copyvio from http://ink361.com/app/users/ig-260358723/ridsaofficial/photos Darwin Ahoy! 11:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other uploads by this user have camera meta data and are a lot larger than this image which has no metadata, is very small and of poor quality. This one seems to have been cropped from some unsourced image or not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Ellin Beltz,

I’m a French Photographer, like I said in my Bio. You can check my official website here : http://www.francoisdaburon.com/FD/acceuil.html.

You’re right, the quality of the photo is not good because I tried to zoom on one of my picture to make a portrait. I’ve uploaded the original picture File:Mounir Majidi FUS 4.jpg. I just did a bit of photosphop to enlighten the picture and erase the frame we see on the back.

If you have any doubt, I can show you the rest of the photos, taken last year Durant an event organized by The Fus (like the pictures File:Mounir Majidi FUS 1.jpg, File:Mounir Majidi FUS 2.jpg and File:Mounir Majidi FUS 3.jpg).

FDaburon (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2015 (CET)

 I withdraw my nomination ... based on statement by uploader. With apologies. Please see your user talk page for a link & explanation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. Darwin Ahoy! 11:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor C. Jonel [talk] 19:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvio, see here https://vimeo.com/52278047 for instance. Darwin Ahoy! 11:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

facebook screenshot. User images may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author DID NOT authorize the publication of the photo under any CC license — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joao.pimentel.ferreira (talk • contribs) 2015-11-29T00:10:13‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request, file without a valid license. Darwin Ahoy! 23:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be a pure quality duplicate of File:Beckov - židovský cintorýn.JPG LacoR (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dupe, deleted. Darwin Ahoy! 23:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is copied from Twitter (https://twitter.com/KAZKHANSINGER) without permission. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per above. Darwin Ahoy! 23:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Warko as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted by Agencia Uno. (Source: http://www.seleccionchilena.cl/futbol-sebastian-pinera-recibira-en-la-moneda-al-plantel-de-u-de-chile/). Uploader 4 years ago, better to have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User only uploaded another file, a blatant copyvio already deleted. This one is most probably a copyvio as well. Darwin Ahoy! 23:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haripranata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Is this cover art or something?

Stefan2 (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that it's the singer himself who uploaded his own artwork, because he also wrote the article in id-Wikipedia about the singer all alone. Perhaps some kind of self promotion with article and own photos and artwork. He might have the copyright himself, so own work could be right in this case. The only contribs of this user globally are about this singer, here the photos, on id-Wikipedia the article, but nothing else. And this photo really looks like a selfie of the singer. --Bjarlin (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the uploader is the singer, then he is probably not the photographer of these two images, so he is unlikely to be the copyright holder. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess, it's possible that File:Sidzia rebelglad vocalis.jpg could be a selfie, too (also File:Sidzia Yudhistira.jpg could be such a selfie). And he also could have edited the photo with his software later himself to create the artwork File:Sidzia rebelglad quote.jpg himself. Maybe an OTRS permission would be better, I don't know. But it might be no copyright issue, but just self promotion. --Bjarlin (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - this contains substantial vocals - doubtful the track creator is also a vocalist - usually these vocals are sampled from another source INeverCry 03:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - source states: "Vocal sample courtesy of out of eden, Freesound.org" - but no direct link is given showing the vocals, which are prominent, are free or properly attributed/licensed INeverCry 03:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - no source given for the considerable vocals used in this track - where does "Melissa Pixel" release her vocals under a cc-by-3.0 license? INeverCry 04:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This track was an entry for the following contest where it is written that the sample should be remixed and Melissa Pixel is judging for the contest. Morever, this file can be remixed. When there is a copyright issue, the track can be edited to use another source. ftiercel (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per the source above Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike the now outdated source map, this image fails to provide even a minimal explanation for why particular countries are listed. Terrorist attacks are ultimately geographically specific events and must be represented as such for clarity. Compare https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TerroristAttacksAlQaeda.png Carwil (talk) 04:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

map is incorrect, see source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10077373/Graphic-terrorist-attacks-by-al-Qaeda-Islamist-and-Islamic-terrorist-groups-2001-2011.html 82.173.54.93 19:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 18:13, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused since 4 December 2015. Poké95 06:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not out of scope, but it's realistically useful for Wikipedias. It might be used in the Indonesian article id:Sidzia about this singer, for example, and it's also possible that there might be articles in other wikis. Especially, if the other image in the article is going to be deleted because of artwork in the ongoing deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Haripranata. So, if there should be no copyright issues with the picture, it should not be deleted. The only deletion reason could be copyright issue, but it's clearly useful. As long as the article in id-Wikipedia won't be deleted because of not being notable, the picture also is useful for Commons. Not every picture that is not in use, is out of scope. It can be used easily instead of the other file which will be deleted in a few days. --Bjarlin (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar image found in Google search image link Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information in this deletion debate implies that this Daisy Earles image was extracted from the copyrighted 1932 movie Freaks. From what one understands, this means that the image is copyrighted unless it was also released in some other form (i.e. a movie poster or promotional photo) that was published in noncompliance with US copyright formalities. Gazebo (talk) 09:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghizlene.ye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be his (her) own work, Small and no EXIF data.

Vikoula5 (talk) 12:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be his (her) own work, Small and no EXIF data. Vikoula5 (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be his (her) own work, Small and no EXIF data. Vikoula5 (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

similar size of image found in internet link Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject was born in 1981, so Indian 60-year copyright cannot possibly have expired. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netzhering as Copyvio because "No permission for inside photo. It is a "must" in Germany. I did not know at that time". -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see a copyright problem Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Karin Albinsson is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 194.28.225.90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: mariapolis.fr/briser-la-glace/ Yann (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the author of this photo, I am the photographer who took it. I've sent it to the webmaster of the website mariapolis.fr to be showcased on this site. There was no written contract or license (at the time I wasn't aware of copyright and license issues). Can I still upload this photo to commons ? Skimel (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I do believe you. Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ustczhhao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False "own work" - scan or re-photo of an old photo (by age of person - 1970s or 80s) Tatewaki (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be PD due to its age (1911) but false own work - taken from the database http://www.foto.kg/galereya/page,1,156,1776-kirgiziya-nauka-i-obrazovanie-shkola.html Tatewaki (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PEr above Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 2007 by Fotord (talk · contributions · Statistics) ("own work") the photo (derivated from a painting) was grabbed from http://www.oei.es/cultura2/rdominicana/informe1.htm (last modified: 2004) = http://www.oei.es/cultura2/rdominicana/imagenes/historia.JPG (last modified: 2004) and is used for illustrate the en:Dominican War of Independence (1844). Could not identify the painter: may be {{PD-Old}} or not — least of all it is obviously not a work by Fotord. Further details needed. Gunnex (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taken the opportunity, nominating also (per above):

here sourced and authored with "República Dominicana" (whatever this means) and previously published in color via http://www.volcreole.com/forum/impression-21402.html (2005) = http://www.hispaniola.com/dominican_republic/xphotos/history-04-anacaona.jpg (last modified: 2005), crediting the image with http://www.hispaniola.com/dominican_republic/info/history.php. Historical paintings may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILOsafework (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files don't seems to be "own work" and the link provided in the file descriptions don't work. There is no evidence it's free, nor if they are notable enough to be in scope.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that file from 1932 is "own work" by wikimedia user. 2A02:810D:1180:108:D8C6:D443:2851:ECC5 17:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio via https://www.flickr.com/photos/sublime/1145684522/ (17.08.2007, © All rights reserved by "Lidia Camacho")
Converted by me to DR due to procedural reasons, as the image is heavily in use and was uploaded to Commons in 2007. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though the image was uploaded to Commons only 6 days after being shot, to me the authorship-claim by Lidia Camacho seems to be more convincing; thereby  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See also User talk:Siso84~commonswiki#File:Calle Colonial en Santo Domingo.jpg (another Flickrvio by this uploader) — and I have concerns that File:Plazaespana.jpg (uploaded some minutes before the nominated one) may be a Flickr/copyvio too. Gunnex (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is considered a derivative work under French law; see COM:FOP#France. It will require OTRS permission from the sculptors. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is considered a derivative work under US law; see COM:FOP#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is from a non official, its not a text-logo, out of scope. The Photographer (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has been published elswhere. Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has got deprecated statement - the permission was given for WP only (freedom of distribution is missing) - this is not free image. Alex Spade (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is twice in Wikipedia. TJ Britannicus (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: yes, it is a duplicate of File:Gianna Hoschel 2.png but this is the higher resolution version, so File:Gianna Hoschel 2.png is deleted. P 1 9 9   14:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture without article — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Britannicus (talk • contribs) 2015-12-06T13:25:13‎ (UTC)


Kept: no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{delete} TJ Britannicus (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture without article — Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Britannicus (talk • contribs) 2015-12-06T13:26:27‎ (UTC)


Kept: no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Broj 123456789 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of vandalism - fraud Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 15:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It isn't flag of the Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića — Preceding unsigned comment added by Broj 123456789 (talk • contribs) 2015-11-24T17:19:22‎ (UTC)


Kept: no reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a prank. Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića uses Croatian insignia, not Serbian. This very flag posted here (on July 22, 2014) is Serbian. Where did You get the idea that this is "in use"? No source for that.
In the Constitution of this micronation project [10], page 5, article 19, "državnu zastavu čini bijela podloga na kojoj se crvenom bojom u lijevom gornjem kutu nalazi državni grb - šahovnica, a u sredini je plavom bojom označen lik Mijata Tomića." In short: state flag is a white background, in the left upper corner state coat-of-arms - chessboard (note: Croatian coat-of-arms), while in the middle is the portrait of Mijat Tomić marked with the blue color. Kubura (talk) 05:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Kubura as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Vandalism, a prank. Explained here. [11] . Taivo (talk) 07:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fictional flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence in user's own work on this small, unused black and white image of a man assigned to two non-existent categories. Possible COM:COPYVIO due to lack of metadata and source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mounir Majidi FUS 3.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mounir Majidi FUS 3.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing new there about this file. Like I said in my withdrawn comment (see the page history of this DR), initially it looked legitimate to me and I would have suggested to keep the file. However, after looking at the other uploads of the account, there's unfortunately a doubt from the fact that six photographs whose authorship and copyright are claimed by the uploader are marked as authored and copyrighted by another photographer: "Author: Benjamin Boccas. Copyright holder: © Benjamin Boccas". Two of the six files have already been speedy deleted on the request of Ellin Beltz for that reason. Four files have not been nominated. No explanation is offered by the uploader for this situation. It places doubt on the validity of all the uploads. Given this context, it would probably be a safe precaution to request validation (through OTRS or otherwise) that the Commons account is owned by the photographer whose name is being used by the Commons account, and a good explanation about the claims on works marked to another person. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourcing is inadequate; we don't know who the photographer is, so we don't know he's been dead for 70 years. So the photo might not be in the public domain in the source country (Germany). Diannaa (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No photographer has claimed nor attributed authorship of this portrait. I could change the license tag to {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} because the author is unknown, and it has not been known since 1910.  Yo, Jacobo.: 19:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We need a source stating that it is anonymous. Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, besides doubtful authorship - same for File:SPNRCHS 1983 Batch2.jpg, File:SPNRCHS 1983 Batch1.jpg, File:SPNRCHS 1984 Batch1.jpg and other user's photos Pibwl (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only in Tallinn and only 1 concrete square — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 2015-12-01T08:43:55‎ (UTC)


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE Unused, (except for color) same logo as File:Rhp21.jpg which is in use. No reason to keep two when only one gets used. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Havang(nl): why, though? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think, there is no sufficient reason for suppression. --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I've given my reason for delete. To the closing administrator: please note that Havang has not provided any reason for keeping. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: DR's are not votes and yes it seems to be a personal image. At least fail to see the educational value. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small, no metadata black and white image of a male assigned to two non-existent categories. Out of COM:SCOPE and possible copyvio as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor C. Jonel [talk] 19:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work; lower-quality duplicate of File:Logo violetta.png. nyuszika7h (talk) 19:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Прошу удалить так как я не давал согласия на использовании для этого файла двух своих фото:


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan 94.230.234.167 05:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this a photo from a US passport (in which case, it's allowed) or a Saudi or Pakistani passport, in which case it probably isn't? --RoyGoldsmith (talk) 02:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_Pakistan#No_infringement Gaijin42 (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That page says 'certain government works', implying that there are other government works which are subject to copyright protection. Also, passport photographs are not necessarily government works. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking (but don't know for sure) it's most countries. AFAICT, it definitely does apply to most passport photos from the US, so I'm fairly confused (as possibly are you) why it matters if the passport is a work of the US or Pakistani government, as there's no evidence it would make any difference to the photo copyright status. For a US passport as a work of a US federal government employee the passport itself would be in the public domain. But certain elements not produced by the federal government, in particular the photograph, may still be copyrighted by someone else. For the photo, probably the studio or photographer unless it was a work for hire or there was a copyright transfer.

I had a look to see if there was something I'm missing, but can't find any discussions suggesting US passport photos are normally in the public domain. Nearest I found was Commons:Deletion requests/File:Janisjoplin.png which is mostly looking at a different aspect but is based on the assumption the photo isn't intrisicly in the public domain as it was from a US passport. There was also some brief discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Image:ZJarrah.JPG although as here, it was largely a moot point since it may not have been from a US passport. I don't want to take this discussion too offtopic but I think it is important to establish that even if the passport were US, it doesn't mean the photo would be fine.

To make this slightly on topic, I did come across Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2015/06#Passport photos where two or three people suggested many modern passport photos may be ineligible for copyright. But you'd need a wider discussion if you believe the arguments are compelling IMO.

Nil Einne (talk) 01:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We gotten off the track a little. We don't have copyright to this picture because it's a Pakistani passport and, according to this this (Template:PD-Pakistan), the Pakistani government retains copyrights for 50 years. And we certainly don't have permission of the photographer or Malik herself. So, unless I'm missing something, we are stuck with Kelly's solution: Delete or move to Wikipedia and convert to fair use.

I don't know if we can meet all the criteria of fair use. For example, w:WP:NFCCP#4 says the photo must be a work which has been published or publicly displayed outside of WP by the copyright owner. Passports aren't published (in the sense that a letter I write to a friend isn't published) and is only unpublicly displayed, to immigration officials, etc. In this particular case, the copyright holder is either Malik herself or the Pakistani government; not the FBI. Does anyone have a source that either of them has publicly displayed Malik's passport photo? --RoyGoldsmith (talk) 18:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: First of all, fair use material isn’t accepted at Wikimedia Commons. Secondly, for a work to be PD-us-Gov the works needs to be made by an employee of the US federal Gov as a part of their official duties. This hasn’t been proven. A passport photograph could be ineligible for copyright. If this was a Dutch or a French photograph I could even cite case law but until now we don’t have a consensus how to imply this and there is also no evidence that the same applies for US photographs or photographs from Pakistan. Taken all the provided arguments into account, deleted as per com:PCP.

Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its bullshit, because we dont investigate, what origin is materials which are publicated in some work. For example, i will make some news report and i will use some material and ONLY i am responsible that i have right to use it - responsible isnt the person which is using my news report which is for example issued as CC-BY-SA. When the authority issued one document, this document is PD-Gov at all, including photos. Author/owner of the photo is acquainted in advance with fact, that his photo will be used for PD-Gov materials and that this photo will be also PD-Gov. --Palu (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by SVG version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfernflower (talk • contribs) 2015-11-27T06:14:10‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description "Abdaal Bela Picture published on his books" implies that this comes from a book. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata shows this is a scan of an image from 1926, yet it is labelled as "own work". Likely copyright violation. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JustinaZee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are credited to two different photographers: Evan Dion and Yuriko Kubota. The uploader can't be both of them.

Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vikoula5 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://pedagogie.lyceesaviodouala.org/histoire-geographie/app_grande-guerre/images/3_photos_apres_guerre/adamaoua_est_nord/1917_12_22_sultan_ngaoundere.jpg Probably old enough. Yann (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[yes true and remove it please #REDIRECT[ Alid1986]][reply]


Kept: Old enough Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gregorio meza 186.109.210.233 22:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source now dead link, no license review, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 22:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - The other uploads by this user, certified by OTRS, show he was the author or owner of copyright of images from that website. This one seems to have missed the OTRS ticket. Could be worthwhile to check the ticket to see if it applies generally to images from that website, that would definitively resolve this issue.-- Darwin Ahoy! 23:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I checked. No related ticket. Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image which exists on another website. Nepaxt (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note, user has been noted to upload copyrighted images. Nepaxt (talk) 22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be from here: http://tours.tourfactory.com/tours/tour.asp?t=1132697 Ytoyoda (talk) 23:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please, where is educational purpose? The whole category is on an obviously non-notable boy, the photos are very likely blatant violation of personality rights...

A.Savin 01:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) And even if some of these photos are relevant for illustration of war victims of Ukraine, there is surely no need for a series of >100 similar shots! --A.Savin 02:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep some, at least. This DR raises a matter of scope, and yet the nominator concedes the common subject of these photos is «relevant for illustration of war victims» — the problem seems to be one of sheer quantity (and I don’t disagree), something that cannot be dealt with by wholesale deletion. Furthermore these photos are also all we currently have for this particular hospital, and the ones with the ballon-animal-making duo are great and apparently so far lacking in Commons.
I’m trusting Butko for all necessary consent concerns — that should not be a cause for deletion, either.
Culling of near-dupes should be done in this case (one among so many!), so, lets close this DR and work on that. -- Tuválkin 03:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are damaging Commons with your obvious bias towards out-of-scope content. No matter what has been RfD'ed for scope reasons, you vote VK. However, an RfD isn't a poll. --A.Savin 03:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A.Savin, are you trying to intimidate me? Trust me, it is not working. -- Tuválkin 23:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
1) No, I'm not. 2) Intimidation/harrassment is rather your cup of tea than mine. 3) I don't trust you. Any more questions? --A.Savin 02:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot intimidate anyone here as you do (or try to do) because I’m not an admin. You are, and your attempt of silencing my participation in Deletion Request discussions above in this thread is only backed by the fact that you could block me at whim, just like Fastily did those three times listed in the report you linked. Now Fastily is gone, though, and that brings me to one question I do have for you, since you asked so nicely: How well, admin A.Savin, do you think you would fare in a RfdA…? -- Tuválkin 02:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The state Russian TV does not know any personality rights, so your comparison is just - wrong. Detailed photos of minors require consent by the parents, which is very likely not the case here. --A.Savin 13:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files in scope, per victims of the efects of a War, especially the one in the east of Ukraine and per Butko. People are clearly posing for the photos and aware of it being taken. Tm (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, what is the educational purpose of this mass upload of hundreds of same person(s)? Even if the boy had own Wikipedia entry (however he doesn't and is of course far from that), still, what to do with hundreds of same photos of him? It is really poor behaviour 1) by Butko who is trying to boost up his upload count, without any care for meaningful content and order, 2) by you Tuvalkin that you use sockpuppets to "vote" in deletion requests. There is not a single one new argument in this discussion... Is it just me who is feeling dissed? --A.Savin 05:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Socketpuppets? Instead of answering to other peoples concerns and statements, you attack them accusing without evidences in a really classy move. If you, an administrator, "have" "proof" (that doesnst exist) why staying with them in this DR and not persue the conveniente venues. Or do you want me to pursue your false statements above of accusing liably two users of being a puppet master and a socketpuppet? About scope enough said above. Tm (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with A.Savin, there are a lot of similar shots for this event. I don't like such series too. But Butko rights, this material does not violate the rules of Commons. There are notable persons and users may need to certain shots for specific use.  Keep.--sasha (krassotkin) 11:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: with the exception of the images of the Spiderman cake. There are a lot of near duplicate images in this set, perhaps smaller Deletion Nominations could be made for images which are essentially copies of each other, but except for that, there doesn't seem to be a licensing or source issue with these. Some had background television images, but de minimus Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]