Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 18th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tropicalkitty as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: vandalism Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure that this is vandalism. The current revision of the file looks like a userphoto. The first upload has a strange watermark which suggests that it could be a copyright violation. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OoS, copyvio, etc Denniss (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the member in this photo, Jacob Hayes, and I would like this removed from your site for security reasons pertaining to my occupation. Thank you very much. 69.254.222.182 05:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy kept - you may restart DR if it has been deleted from navy source Denniss (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove 69.254.222.182 04:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the Navy still has the photo online. Kelly (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy kept per previous closure --Denniss (talk) 10:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This upload is my mistake. I want delete my file. Bkbck (talk) 05:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm uploader of this file. This file is uploaded by my mistake. please Delete immediately. Bkbck (talk) 05:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sure, Per uploder's request Jarekt (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Jesus pico rebollo

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo from off. site. Can't be free Bilderling (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Кажется, я нарушил авторские права. Хочу удалить. DeletedUser (talk) 18:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. Amada44  talk to me 19:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://ru.elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80 ложные сведения о файле, нарушение АП Иван Дулин (talk) 05:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image, has no ounce of any credibility, new user crap as always IndianBio (talk) 20:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 23:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fanwen619 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright © www.flowersview.com. All copyrights reserved. (usage only for non commercial) http://www.flowersview.com/page/policy

Amada44  talk to me 10:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have just seen the talk page of the user. There it reads:

Hi Fanwen619, what do you by writing in the source-entry of all your uploads "own work" and http://www.flowersview.com.... ? What is you relation to flowersview.com? Did you really shoot all these photos by yourself or did you just take them from flowersview.com? --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Túrelio. I own the web www.flowersview.com. All the photos I uploads are shoot by myself. One editor(I am a fresh man using Wiki. I do not know how to find the message left by him,or I will show you the name) told me that I can write the link in the source-entry to help user to find more information of the image. I am sorry to trouble you so much.

Images need OTRS because the source page says All rights reserved. I have written an Email to the homepage owner: Ticket#2015111810010853 Amada44  talk to me 10:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, OTRS Confirmed. Amada44  talk to me 14:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double of File:WalterTrujillo10.jpg Pippobuono (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy delete as duplicate. Please use {{Duplicate}}. P 1 9 9   17:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple Google search proves that the file is not free MYS77 22:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by a blocked user to promote his family in Wikipedia. This has no purpose to remain in Wiki projects as this won't be used to build an encyclopedia. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:DW JuTa 00:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Chile.svg. Fry1989 eh? 00:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for advertising only. Not usable for educational purposes. - Hoo man (talk) 01:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with the gallry 2003년 김두관 행정자치부 장관 서울종합방재센터 방문 최광모 (talk) 04:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the photographer B-5448 (talk) 04:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: this don't seems to be free "This photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission" --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the photographer B-5448 (talk) 04:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: statment at the source :" This photo is copyright protected and may not be used in any way without proper permission" --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 07:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as it is also a close up out of focus of an unknow people, I see no problem --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 07:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as it is also a close up out of focus of an unknow people, I see no problem --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 07:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as it is also a close up out of focus of an unknow people, I see no problem --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Amada44 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.hammihan.com/post/136536
Converted by me to DR, as the external image is smaller (cropped) than our image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However, the image is presented in full size here: http://tabriz.ir/?PageID=279&GID=9. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And uploader has uploaded files with about 9 different exifs, many without and small sizes. Doesn't seem know much about copyright. Amada44  talk to me 09:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously published here http://www.hammihan.com/post/136536 "- تمام حقوق این سایت " = All right reserved. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 08:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will


Deleted: also unused personal image / close up on no quite notable people : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality file, not useful, appears to be a joke as opoosed to an attempt to provide a quality image of a subject. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Beeblebrox. I uploaded the image 5 years ago to add to an en-Wikipedia article, Angel Delight, where another image has since been substituted. I see now from the article history that someone removed it and substituted a much less clear photo of the dessert, commenting on this image as resembling a vulva. To be honest, I never noticed until you posted it for deletion and I saw the 2012 editor's comment in the en-Wiki article history. I guess I'm an innocent at large: I just thought it was a clear photo example of a British dessert. All in all, it seems rather mild compared to many photos of human anatomy posted all over Commons. Is it really necessary to trash this because some see odd shapes in a spoonful of dessert? After all, as Dr. Freud said, "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." Geoff Who, me? 03:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is of course quite mild compared to some, a great many if fact, images hosted here. But many of those images are intended to portray anatomy, sexual acts etc, and it can be argued they serve a legitimate educational purpose in doing so. In the case of this specifc image, regardless of your original intent, the only way it is being used anywhere on any WMF project currently seems to be due solely to said resemblance. I would think, this being an apparently popular desert in the UK, that a quality image which does not resemble anything but a desert could be produced. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uh, pornographic. Duh. Please remove from a public page. Thank you. 208.75.100.148 03:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esto no tiene nada que ver con el juego es pornografia 181.115.140.105 14:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It could probably do with being renamed to, for instance "Naked Fruit Ninja", but there's nothing wrong with the file. We host all sorts of images here. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Razón no válida para el borrado. Alan (talk) 13:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False file name and description according to source Kattenkruid (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a cropped version of non-free image. See http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/yzNairAZuhe/Philadelphia+Flyers+v+Boston+Bruins/0hIjVzu8mUt/Simon+Gagne Parkfly20 (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Alan. Yann (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayur Balasaheb Hole (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional/self-promotional uploads including contact information. Commons is not social media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The parents are not happy having her pic on this site. Kindly remove. Ms Crumpet (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Recent picture, not used. Courtesy deletion. We have better anyway. Yann (talk) 19:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless personal photo NickK (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo with no explanation, pout of scope Pippobuono (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On request of Birgitta Ekvall, next of kin of Åke Andersson //Rotsee (talk) 08:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, file unused Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published here: http://bodybuilders.glambase.com/2013/03/hasan-rahnamaeian-2.html?m=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Christian Ferrer. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for another category. Farzana Ahmad Awan (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, file unused Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artemka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of the non-free maps from w:Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 1950's edition.

Sealle (talk) 04:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Category:Church of Saints Peter and Paul (Hněvošice) Gampe (talk) 07:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no dubble dedication, it is the mistake in MonumNet database. The only thing, which is connected with The Holy Trinity, is the Altarpiece. Please see: Bohumil Samek: Umělecké památky Moravy a Slezska, ISBN 80-200-0474-2, volume 1, page 488. Thank you --Gampe (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: redirected Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Wrong format anyway. Yann (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this very small halftoned image, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, small, blurry faceshot of non-notable male, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wilde163 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of screenshots from games, not own work, includes (c) images and screen contents.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional images/spam promotional ManniLo (talk) 08:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Spam. Copyvio? Alan (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 10:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 10:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Image only used in an promotional article that has been deleted on Chinese Wikipedia. Lakokat (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Image only used in an promotional article that has been deleted on Chinese Wikipedia. Lakokat (talk) 12:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 14:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yineiri scalett (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of scope

ManniLo (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an unused userphoto. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own promotion; article deleted from bnwp. ~ Nahid Talk 15:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused head shot of man, claimed own work, not selfie. Out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIO as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:48, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope Pibwl (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, along with other upload File:Reyjuancarlos.jpg Pibwl (talk) 18:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, unused, no cat., Pibwl (talk) 18:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, as well as the other user's upload File:عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه 2.png Pibwl (talk) 18:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope - unused, probably autopromo, unusable quality, as well as remaining uploads File:片岡のりお 演歌に挑戦.jpg, File:作曲家 片岡のりお.JPG, File:作曲・編曲家 片岡のりお.jpeg Pibwl (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Paterm (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope,not used The Photographer (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope e-book, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 22:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but imho potentially non-free content (poster), hence DR started to verify, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poster, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trata-se de uma falsificação e por conter informações pessoais. Cgan (talk) 07:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

transl: "it is a fake and contain personal information."
Nominating by this user also the following (cheque) falsifications:
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cheque.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahunt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Google Chrome is software released under Google Terms of Service, which is a proprietary licence. Screenshots cannot be released under a Creative Commons licence as it violates the copyright. I converted this image to DN for discussion by the community as we have a few other images in this situation, see Category:Screenshots of Google Chrome. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See this thread at the Village Pump for further discussion --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Thank you User:Ellin Beltz for bringing this here for discussion. I recently found a Google Chrome screenshot here on Commons that a user had uploaded under a CC licence. Google Chrome is proprietary software issued under Google's Terms of Service, so screenshots cannot be uploaded under free licences. I tagged it as a copyright vio and it was deleted. I checked Category:Screenshots of Google Chrome and found many more screenshots of Chrome that had been uploaded under the wrong licences. As a test I tagged three of them as copyright vios and another user removed the tags and indicated they were under BSD licenses. I reinstated the tags and left the other user a note to please let an admin assess these for deletion. A lot of people confuse Google Chrome with Chromium. Chromium is the base project for Chrome and is under a series of free licences, including BSD. Google takes the Chromium code, adds proprietary components, such as Adobe Flash, and copyrighted logos and produces Chrome under the Google Terms of Service, a proprietary licence. This means that all screenshots of Chrome are proprietary and none are eligible for any free licences. Basically all the screenshots at Category:Screenshots of Google Chrome, need to be removed from Commons as they are all copyright violations. This particular file has been uploaded under a myriad of free licences, none of which are correct. It looks like an attempt to "shotgun" it. - Ahunt (talk) 18:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep: File is properly licensed: Google Chrome UI is licensed under the same license as Chromium, the {{BSD}}; the Wikipedia and the picture depicted in the screenshot are properly credited and licensed, too. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: that is a commonly held, but erroneous belief. The Chrome UI is part of Chrome is under Google's terms of service and not a free licence. You can see this in the software licence itself. Chromium's licence is free, but Chrome adds other logos and components that are not free, like Adobe Flash and so screenshots cannot be freely licenced. - Ahunt (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Just to save time the "about" page on Google Chrome 46.0.2490.86 explains this issue very clearly. It says "Google Chrome, copyright 2015 Google Inc, All rights reserved. Google Chrome is made possible by the Chromium open source project and open source software. Google Terms of Service". So plainly the whole of Google Chrome, while based on some free software is "all rights reserved". - Ahunt (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, as I mentioned in your Talk page, and already discussed in the Google Chrome-related DRs. Google Chrome is just a compilation of Chromium with the addition of propietary elements; the Google Chrome EULA covers only the binaries and propietary elements included in these binaries, but not the UI, that is part of Chromium. In doubt, see the Chromium source code and you will found the same UI elements.
Comment: Where is your proof of that claim? Section 9 of the Google terms of Service details the licensing agreement and it says in part "9.1 Google gives you a personal, worldwide, royalty-free, non-assignable and non-exclusive license to use the software provided to you by Google as part of the Services as provided to you by Google (referred to as the “Software” below). This license is for the sole purpose of enabling you to use and enjoy the benefit of the Services as provided by Google, in the manner permitted by the Terms." If you claim that the UI is free software then you are going to have to show that Google is wrong. - Ahunt (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The proof is in the Chromium Source code. The copyright holder of the Chromium UI (where Google builds Chrome) is The Chromium Projects, and Google must follow the BSD license, that include even making free software non-free, but keeping the copyright notices of the code that them compiled Google Chrome, that includes, again, the UI. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sorry but once again what you have said is not correct. The BSD licence permits anyone to use the software for any purpose and specifically does not require derivatives to be licensed under the same licence. It is the BSD licence that specifically allows Google to develop Chromium under a free licence and then issue Chrome as "all rights reserved". For proof of this see BSD licenses which explains this. It specifically says, "The BSD License allows proprietary use and allows the software released under the license to be incorporated into proprietary products. Works based on the material may be released under a proprietary license as closed source software." You are confusing the BSD license with copyleft licences, like the GPL. - Ahunt (talk) 18:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, unless you are going to also nominate Chromium screenshots (e.g., File:Chromium-Linux-preAlpha.png), because Chrome and Chromium use the same UI. --AVRS (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: That is a fallacious argument as, no, actually they don't have the same UI, although they may look similar. Chromium is licenced under free licences and its screenshots can be used here on Commons. On the other hand Chrome uses proprietary components, Like Adobe Flash, mixed with components taken from free software projects and all licensed under a proprietary licence as explained above. This means that Chromium screenshots are freely licenced and can stay on Commons, whereas all Chrome screenshots are under an "all rights reserved" licence and must be removed. It doesn't matter whether the UIs look similar, it is the licensing that matters. - Ahunt (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But Windows 9x and Windows 8 screenshots are allowed because the appearance is simple, not because Windows itself is simple (not related to de-minimis, which is claimed for Windows 7 screenshots)? --AVRS (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The whole image of the Google Chrome browser cannot be deminimis as that legal principle only deals with "trifles"! As far as how Windows and other screenshots are treated, that is really a case of Other stuff exists. In other words just because something else may be licenced wrong is no reason that this Chrome image should be also licenced wrong. Basically Windows screenshot problems need to be taken up there, not here. - Ahunt (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Not sure which interface you are looking at, but the image we are discussing here shows the whole Chrome browser window. Aside from the web content displayed, I am seeing tabs, control buttons for navigation and reloading, menu buttons, input (URL) fields, maximize/minimize and close controls, a scroll bar, in addition to the surrounding browser chrome (the box that borders it). If you consider all that "simple, mostly functional shapes. I doubt this is above the threshold of originality" then no software would be, as this is about as complex an interface as most proprietary software and certainly not just simple shapes. - Ahunt (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All of these elements that you mentioned are effectively bellow the TOO in the US, and again, all of these propietary elements are actually free elements (compare the Google Chrome with Chromium screenshots and seems exactly the same). This is the reason why OS X and Microsoft Edge screenshots-related DRs were kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Actually they are not free elements, no matter how much they look like Chromium, as the licence on the interface specifies "all rights reserved", as noted above. The DR that you noted above on Microsoft Edge had no discussion and was kept by default, although I believe that the decision was incorrect that it does not meet the threshold of originality. As far as screenshots of free software being run on proprietary operating systems goes, as long as the screenshot is cropped to not show key proprietary components then of course it would not meet the TOO for the individual image. But that is an "apples and oranges" comparison as we are dealing here with whole screenshots of just proprietary software. You can also note that en.wikipedia has refused to use Commons screenshots of Chrome even though Commons has lots of them, because editors on that page consider them improperly licensed. The current screenshot on the Google Chrome article is a "fair use" one hosted on en.wikipedia, exactly because you can't licence screenshots of proprietary software under free licences. - Ahunt (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It seems that Amitie 10g's post on the Chromium Forum about this topic resulted in an indication that the published licences on the software are the governing document. This supports my contention that all Google Chrome screenshots are "all rights reserved" under Google's Terms of Service.
This discussion is now ten days old and there have been no new posts in the past four days. I think this can be safely closed now by an admin. - Ahunt (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The discussion seems to be a stale. I cropped the file and this way it shouldn't show anything that might or might be not be copyrighted without being releaed under a free license.. Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work from Shutterstock may not be own work ManniLo (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, originally by Ilja Mašík. --Achim (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work from Shutterstock may not be own work ManniLo (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, originally by Ilja Mašík. --Achim (talk) 21:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work from Shutterstock may not be own work ManniLo (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, originally by Ilja Mašík. --Achim (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen Ytoyoda (talk) 15:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No! This photo was taken from the stadium Geregen29 (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there a black bar going through his chest? How does he play football like that? Ytoyoda (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Obviously taken in a TV screen. Violates COM:DW. -- Poké95 01:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 08:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is obviously not "own work", the uploader needs to clarify Biwom (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is obviously not "own work", the uploader needs to clarify Biwom (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rise of de-evil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some personal snaps, outside the scope of the project.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rise of de-evil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FCParaguay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that uploader created all these team logos, more likely COM:COPYVIOs without more information.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, except 3 which are {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 15:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent book cover: does not appear to be PD-US or PD-100. (If this cover design has entered the public domain, someone in the know should explain how old it is and stuff). Hop on Bananas (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page shown is in the public domain, but the iPad header and the Google Books page at the top are copyrighted. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mejorar su diseño Doisoniano (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no es un motivo de borrado Alan (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a film still, could be old enough to be in PD? http://hawkmenblues.blogspot.com/2013/11/chand-kilo-khorma-baraye-marassem-e.html?m=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Giampietrino - Maria met kind.jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Winterheart (talk) 07:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused Alan (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date stated as 1956, hence this fails all three criteria of the PD-India licence tag given. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Bulletin Board at the Japanese Wikipedia project." - No such user on jawp, I think the uploader was trying to say they found it on a bulletin board. Probable copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Download for free but copyrighted work from "wallpapersbq" may not be own work ManniLo (talk) 08:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and uploader are different. OTRS-permission from Alexandre Severo is needed. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Copied from http://klubrp.ru/products/sp_urbech_iz_temnogo_lna_500gr (cleary seen in watermarks "Klub RP") Off-shell (talk) 09:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect title Tfitzp (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} Alan (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eric De America (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpages in Commons (now deleted) and es.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused Alan (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file Bogotar (talk) 10:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark in bottom left corner makes me suspect copyright violation. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark in bottom left corner makes me suspect copyright violation. No camera data. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chingachkuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be movie publicity images that can be found elsewhere on the Web. Lacking information about source and evidence of free license.

--ghouston (talk) 11:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anthonydeleon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. All files uploaded in 2012. File:Facade shot of Fars Shopping Complex.jpg quite similar to http://www.panoramio.com/photo/51329338 (2011)

Gunnex (talk) 13:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license: "You can use the two photos mentioned for an editorial purpose only." Ronn (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license: "You can use the two photos mentioned for an editorial purpose only." Ronn (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not appear to be an actual logo -- there are no Google hits other than WMF. Therefore it is out of scope as personal art. If it is an actual logo, then this is a copyvio. Either way, we cannot keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Everything in this image has a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio?[1] Stefan2 (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque o arquivo está assinado em meu nome e não tenho mais responsabilidade sobre ele. Wekslley santos machado (talk) 15:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Andorra. According this database that´s a 1938-1948 building. Delete and categorize in Category:Undelete in 2018 (1948+70).

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting is unlikely to be own work, it looks halftoned, probable COM:COPYVIO without additional information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting is unlikely to be own work, it looks halftoned, probable COM:COPYVIO without additional information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Andorra. According this database that´s a 1948 building. Delete and categorize in Category:Undelete in 2018 (1948+70).

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: According to this page, the creator of this building is Agustí Borrell Sensat (Barcelona 1910-1970) (source: [2]). These pictures will have to wait for 2041 to be restored. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:10, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been in use on the internet for some time. See Gluglu: sucesso (Foto: Divulgação) ©2014 Editora Escala. Todos os direitos reservados. http://contamais.com.br/entrevistas/vinicius-vieira-fala-sobre-briga-judicial-com-luan-santana/9492 where the photo is not credited to Zefofinho, but to the photographer, "Foto: Divulgação" Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and, without context, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this blurry, small, low quality image of a man holding an award (also not own work). Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A slide show of some kind, completely out of COM:SCOPE not to mention derivative image heaven. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely crop of video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photograph of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is from 2013, http://www.irishcentral.com/sports/number-8-running-back-elijah-hood-commits-to-notre-dame-video-205764091-237586171.html?section=1909741, but there is no indication that the uploader took the image which is about 6 times larger at that source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photograph of unknown origin and copyright status (watermarked link unhelpful). Storkk (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the blocked suckpuppet Writingmonk is the photographer or copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don't like the way i published TALIGUNGA (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Dale Stine, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low quality image with nonsense description. No metadata, not in use, out of COM:SCOPE and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by a blocked user to promote his family in Wikipedia. This has no purpose to remain in Wiki projects as this won't be used to build an encyclopedia Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by a blocked user to promote his family in Wikipedia. This has no purpose to remain in Wiki projects as this won't be used to build an encyclopedia Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by George C Alan (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Sergio Frias, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible crop of professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChDiiego (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of users own work on this gallery of fossil hominid images, drawings and maps.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Safety14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Personal/family photos uploaded by user since blocked on en:wp as a sockpuppet. All have been removed from articles where they were placed.

JohnCD (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by George C Alan (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as part of this series http://www.shijuew.com/content-42-6204-1.html, older than this upload Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Negipradeep66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional/self-promotional uploads out of COM:SCOPE even assuming they're not all COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal snap, out of COM:SCOPE, not used image of two children. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abusyeed.bph (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal snaps, out of COM:SCOPE. The shrine would have been a very interesting photo without the guy in front.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tamara de Lempicka (1898-1980) has not been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused magazines and book cover, likely copyvio and promotional.

P 1 9 9   18:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again, no offence, but DR as per File:Vilakudy.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status of a painting, anonymous uploader, source page is copyrighted - probably as well as remaining user's uploads Pibwl (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently CD cover, unclear copyright status Pibwl (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete This is a logo for a school founded in 2010. It was therefore automatically copyrighted at creation. There is no release statement on the source page indicating this is released under a license compatible with Commons requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 18:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope & unclear copyright status Pibwl (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bk16omar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a fake file (per Ticket:2015111110021318) --Mdann52talk to me! 20:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have a feeling that copyright permission has not been received, this should probably be uploaded directly to English Wikipedia. Kiwi128 (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have a feeling that copyright permission has not been received, this should probably be uploaded directly to English Wikipedia. Kiwi128 (talk) 20:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsable small size, doubtful authorship - smae for the other upload File:الجميرا.jpg. Both are used only on user's page, which is his only activity. Pibwl (talk) 20:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - used only on user's page (2013), which is his only contribution. Looks like a proffessional work. Pibwl (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 21:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Woman on image is not the creator. And it's used for a cover. Can't belive, the uploader really had the rights. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work. May be {{PD-US not renewed}}? Yann (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Andorra. According this database that´s a 1938-1949 building. Delete and categorize in Category:Undelete in 2019 (1949+70).

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DAJF as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image widely circulating on the web in larger resolution versions (e.g. http://www.favore.pl/galeria/99688_firma-akwarystyczna-studioaquarium-warszawa-mazowieckie,6.html). No evidence it is provided under a free license as claimed.
Converted to DR by me for procedural reasons, as this image is on Commons since 2011. However, no obvious evidence for free license at source site. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Speedy (speedy-delete) and the most recent rationale was: Logo de la société Réservoir Publicité Conseil Inc. - voir http://www.reservoir.ca/. The file is ineligible to copyright as textlogo. But maybe we can delete it nevertheless as unused logo of non-notable thing? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark in bottom left corner makes me suspect copyright violation. small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from copyright holder Magyar Távirati Iroda Rt. is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not copyright holder. OTRS-permission from copyright holder Magyar Távirati Iroda Rt. is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Mashhademrooz (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 01.04.2013 but previously published (even in lower res) via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=101668349&postcount=1004 (27.03.2013, by "siavashpopmusic") = http://mlarchitect.persiangig.com/aq%20razavi/aq1.jpg (last modified: 25.03.2013, hosted on http://mlarchitect.persiangig.com/aq%20razavi/) Gunnex (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/no use of the picture in Ahron Daum's articles. Nickmitil (talk) 11:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing OTRS evidence of permission. Also includes derivative work File:Guillotinemodels-left.jpg. Kelly (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 14:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the bursted files in Category:Die Klimate der geologischen Vorzeit Kopiersperre (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the bursted files in Category:Die Klimate der geologischen Vorzeit Kopiersperre (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of the bursted files in Category:Die Klimate der geologischen Vorzeit Kopiersperre (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неиспользуемый несвободный файл Kglive (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I unintentionally uploaded this file, thinking it was taken by me, but it was taken by a friend. My friend asked me to delete the file so that he can upload it again under his own name. Please delete. Thank you. Lärchenholz (talk) 11:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from this page (older than this upload, same dimensions). Kumkum (talk) 12:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Image was ripped from https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/dibe/relict/46950/beelden and converted to PNG. Henxter (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gestaltung weit aufwendiger als "einfache geometrische Formen und Text", klare Schöpfungshöhe Nobody perfect (talk) 14:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of map which is obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for base map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture is old enough, but it's unlikely this image was taken by uploader, small size, no metadata, part of a gallery of collected images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence this image was created by uploader, strange format, overly sharpened, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image which was a photographic print and rephotographed or scanned. Notice the dust in the image, that is not a digital dust! No confidence in own work, no metadata, low quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image, where subject has both hands holding unattributed artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evgeny Karpushkin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These two images seem to be composites containing part of http://surmach.net.ua/istoriya/zagadka-pugovic.html with English and American coins swapped into the Photoshop file to create the two different images. I'm not 100% sure this is own work on any level and am seeking consensus.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice overprinting at bottom and right corner make this highly unlikely to be user's own work, and instead probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small, bordered, low resolution image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image without sources of the oversharpened, but yet still blurry images. Entire image is facebook size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farzana Ahmad Awan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these smaller than Facebook images are own work of uploader. Series on fruit and vegetables have been re-jpg'd so many times the edges are fuzzy, and while the plumeria photos are sharp, nothing else in this gallery is, leading to the belief that they are not own work of uploader either. No metadata on any image.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I rolled back an edit on this page which obliterated the Deletion Nomination reason at the top of the list of files. Blanking-out parts of the DN is not a valid way to comment on DN. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I again rolled back another blanking of the deletion reason and comment. Blanking the page isn't a valid comment. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Absolutely no confidence this widely distributed commercial portrait is own work of this uploader. Probable COM:COPYVIO, see facebook size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice overprinting upper right corner, small size and lack of useful metadata, unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given as own work but is a Getty Images work found at http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/ciara-gibson-byrne-poses-for-a-photograph-during-the-news-photo/147125276 Egghead06 (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this same image, rotated correctly, see File:Trent Somes, III.jpeg no reason to keep both. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation against Experian, no permission to reproduce their letter, and not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation against Experian, no permission to reproduce their letter, and not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused PDF file of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Should be converted to a wikitable if the information is useful. Stefan2 (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The front cover has a cc-by-nc-sa symbol, but it is listed as cc-by-sa on Commons. Commons doesn't accept cc-by-nc-sa files. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to contain photos from unknown sources. Information about their copyright status is needed. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to contain photos from unknown sources. Information about their copyright status is needed. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of "V for Vendetta" mask in style of Obama "Hope" Painting, see here

for other, prior uses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two images derivative works, neither one is attributed, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a publication. No evidence of permission. The last photograph was not created by the person who wrote the text, so the text and that picture presumably have different copyright holders. It is unclear by whom the other pictures were created. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Limengnan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional material (catalog screenshots), out of scope. Not likely salvageable for an educational purpose.

Storkk (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to Tim Bommel in {{Information}}'s author field. Tim Bommel should confirm license via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable news shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a book. Not own work by the uploader. The book needs to be identified so that its copyright status can be determined. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. Published less than 50 years ago, so still subject to Canadian Crown Copyright. See COM:L and COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WorldMilitaryFirepower (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these team logos or images of team jerseys were created by uploader, more likely COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:COPYVIO images --Aftab (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegal copy of File:Cerastes cerastes Morocco.JPG

Vogelfreund (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please cancel this Deletion request. See Disk. The File which has to be deleted is File:Cerastes cerastes Morocco.JPG
--Vogelfreund (talk) 08:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nom Alan (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm a file uploader. This file is uploded by my mistake. Please delete immediately — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkbck (talk • contribs) 2015-11-18T05:36:09‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WorldMilitaryFirepower (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these team logos or images of team jerseys were created by uploader, more likely COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:COPYVIO images --Aftab (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OTRS-permission via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/28736336 (2009, © All rights reserved by "binoyejohn") needed. Gunnex (talk) 08:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have a feeling that copyright permission has not been received, this should probably be uploaded directly to English Wikipedia. Kiwi128 (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC) This is out of date so feel free to delete it - I made it myself so no worries about copyright. We should have a new one up and running soon, watch this space :-)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational selfie. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:

De728631 (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, digitally altered:

  • intentionally blurred (compare file name)
  • artificial, unrealistic (!) moon insert, much too big
  • inscription insert

Looks to me more like an work of art intention.

Speravir (Talk) 22:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyrighted work El Funcionario (talk) 23:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No OTRS permission while in use in at least one site ([4]). Not in use anyway. It has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible COM:DW of professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing photo, see the similar image on subject's facebook page. Thuresson (talk) 21:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, digitally altered:

  • The Parthenon looks not like a photograph, more like painted
  • artificial, unrealistic (!) moon insert, much too big
  • inscription insert

Looks to me more like an work of art intention. Speravir (Talk) 22:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 20:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a promotional picture from the company behind the bottle. For example, here it appears in an advertisement. There is also no evidence of permission from the bottle label designer. Stefan2 (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely official state portrait of a Missouri representative. Missouri does not appear to be a state that considers works by its employees to be uncopyrightable. Storkk (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Each image requires sourcing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Each image is my own work. Skirtick (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Commons:Collages. Each image needs to be on Commons first before the creation of collage. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the statment "own". On the same day as the upload here, this pic but with an higher resolution was published here. It looks very much like an offical photo. ...Sicherlich talk 16:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC) |s[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorship is plausibly claimed by another editor at Talk:National Steel Corporation; all related uploads by editor Prince denison are copyvios. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - besides, doubtful authorship of uploader. Same for File:SPNRCHS 2001 Batch.jpg, File:SPNRCHS 1988 Batch.jpg, File:SPNRCHS 1986 Batch1.jpg and probably most or all of other user's uploads. Pibwl (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Pibwl (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free image 79.198.224.191 00:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amitie 10g, sorry, not up to date with this discussion, can you point me to it? Thx! --Elya (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First, Is the picture actually your Own work as you claimed? If not, please provide a valid source if is actually licensed under a free license. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Amitie 10g, are you kidding? Please have a look at my upload history and the exif data (I'll try not to take it personally though ;-) – If there's a derivative problem (I had a glance into the original deletion request in the meantime, so I see the point), the image must be deleted, of course (I could do it by myself, actually). Thanks. --Elya (talk) 07:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A wide variety of Wp editors think it is the Jean Julliens image, which is, of course, copyirghted. I don't see any way we can keep it without a free license from Jean Julliens. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

enthält rechts ein falsches Bild (Chemiker Eugen Bamberger). Das linke Bild ist bereits vorhanden bei Commons Drdoht (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proposed at 18 November 2015 by Insider to speedy deletion as "{copyvio|Screenshot of television program}". This may be public domain as work of Russian Goverment. A5b (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Russian Goverment. See image: ОАО "ЦКБ МТ "Рубин" (OJSC Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering). Also this frame protected copyright by TV-channel. --Insider (talk) 06:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Головной исполнитель - ОАО "ЦКБ МТ "Рубин"" - it looks like official (goverment) plans for "НИОКР" ("Этапы выполнения НИОКР") - kind of en:Government procurement. `A5b (talk) 13:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear collegues, check LAW (http://www.zakonrf.info/gk/1274/). Article 1274. Free use of works in the informational, research, educational or cultural purposes...5) reproduction, distribution, communication over the air and via cable, available to the public in reviews of current events (in particular, by means of photography, cinematography, television and radio) works that are seen or heard in the course of such events, to the extent justified informational purposes; Also Artice 1274 in 1.1 statement allow to use part of materials in polemic, critical, informational, educational purposes. So TV channel do not have copyright under Russin (and same EU laws).--Madnessgenius (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also main info is not TV chanell information. Main info of picture is arrows and lables. I'm author of this "pice of art" (based on information from another experts). I will replace part of TV picture in my own work in next version of schema. Just moment! )))--Madnessgenius (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Created new scheama without usage TV screenshot. I added some additional graphics about reactor and so on. So this is new image completly different from it. This image can be deleted. But I think it is legal.--Madnessgenius (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is not free use for all cases. Only informational, scientific, educational or cultural purposes (в информационных, научных, учебных или культурных целях). --Insider (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of drawing of church given, the upper drawing with words might be user's own work, but the bottom part has to be credited. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Le dessin est un travail personnel fait d'un montage d'une gravure retouchée du domaine public: Arcisse de Caumont, Statistique monumentale du Calvados, tome 3, page: 225, édition de 1857 et d'une reproduction du cadastre napoléonien. Ces sources sont sur la page Plessis-Grimoult de wikipédia en français. Jchancerel
  • * Drawing is a personal work, a retouched montage of a public domain engraving (from?): Arcisse de Caumont, Statistique monumentale du Calvados, Volume 3, page 225, 1857 edition and reproduction of the Napoleonic cadastre (general land surveys). These sources are the Grimoult Plessis-page wikipedia in French. Jchancerel
  • The book you cite is a multi-volume work, but I am sure it is on the internet at the Internet Archive, perhaps you could link to the correct page in the book, if this is the right one? Then we have the source of the actual original engraving and the PD statement for your work and all problems are solved. Could you also take time to put sources (including internet links whenever possible) to other composites of this type? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • La source est exacte, mais sur votre référence, seul le titre de la gravure apparait. J'ai utilisé books google sur un exemplaire où la gravure est présente. Jchancerel
Please add the source to the file template, at present the file template still shows "own work". Please also include a link to the Internet Archive version, including page number. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work again from http://www.nasa.gov/content/kepler-22b-closer-to-finding-an-earth (See file history) @Natuur12: , thanks The Photographer (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Natuur12: and @The Photographer: , the NASA's pic is royalty-free [5] (like all the NASA's images of their website) and it's a Commons archive. There's no reason to delete this file, which is part of a tutorial for good article's evaluations. Ph03nix1986 (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and its a derivate work from NASA picture. You could add the author and source image. Please, take a look to Template:PD-USGov-NASA --The Photographer (talk) 19:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, because its a Commons archive and its already deffined. Also, the pic is a capture from my own computer, so I don't have to give more information. @The Photographer: , you're trying to destroy an important graphic information of a global Wikipedia tutorial. Ph03nix1986 (talk) 19:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: License was "self" picture might have been NASA, but license was wrong. Tutorial images must be correctly licensed just like every other file on the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not Own work The Photographer (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's your problem, The Photographer??? OF COURSE IT'S MY OWN JOB. Look at those pics: 1 and 2. They're screenshots of my own PC using Photoshop. I made the original. Why do u try to destroy my job? Last time, you deleted a file that I uploaded without any advice, in spite of I tried to explain that hasn't any rights and was a screenshot of my computer. But now, THE ORIGINAL PIC IS MINE. How can I move the text if the image wasnt mine? If you need more proofs, tell me what change do u want me to make and I'll do it.
I advice you: It's the last time u try to broke my job without proofs. Next time, I denounce u. For now, I will delete your ad. Don't put it again. Ph03nix1986 (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Aside from any copyright issues, this small, illegible image is not useful for any educational purpose. Ph03nix1986, please remember that threatening other editors and removing {{Delete}} templates before a DR is closed are both serious violations of Commons rules. If you do either one again, you will be blocked from editing here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source indicated as "Скріншот" (screenshot in ukrainian language), picture was taken 1948 at a place we do not know by a person we do not know. Can be found on various webpages, for example [6] dated to 2013 in slightly different quality. Very unlikely that it is not a copyvio. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Я б не видаляв. Дуже сумніваюсь, що фотограф з 1940х років стане пред'являти авторські права на фото --Usik64 (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is a official guideline on commons called Превентивний принцип that also applies here (or for everybody else in english: Precautionary principle). Not even interesting who is the author - he can not be dead for 70 years (needed in Russia to have pd), when the photo was taken 1948. --Druschba 4 (talk) 19:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Seems to have gone Herby talk thyme 13:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Been deleted Herby talk thyme 13:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]