Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 7th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. This file was already deleted about ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 16:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, of project scope. This file was already deleted about ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I strongly suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No SPAM les future inovation technology uploaded again by selfie no sock puppet. and not's the IP the behind alla the malevolent suck puppets! [User:El elbuna|El elbuna]] (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of multi-deleted advertisement — Racconish ☎ 17:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Thibaut120094 [1] Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, of project scope. This file was already deleted more that ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I strongly suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 16:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Эlcobbola talk 16:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multi deleted — Racconish ☎ 05:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --JuTa 07:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

03002038230aliunnin 39.37.24.165 10:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsensical deletion reason. —RP88 (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. Image is not taken by uploader. Mavrikant (talk) 16:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.ankahaber.com.tr/haber/9807/bahceli-akp-chp-koalisyon-hukumeti-bu-hafta-icinde-mutlaka-kurulmali.html Yann (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: image taken by Veronika Pinke. Colin (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Oo39ULUAAAAJ&hl=en) Sismarinho (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems fictional, out of project scope. If not fictional, then probably copyright violation: not own work, no permission, no source. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: cartoon screenshot. Yann (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Also no permission. Yann (talk) 13:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With a nonsense description, this image is unlikely to be user's own work. Very small, blurry and promotional in nature. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected photo. Kigsz (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Closed: Changed to Copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected photo. Kigsz (talk) 16:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Closed: Changed to Copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistakes (or graphical details/3D perspective chosen in a way that obscures/misleads about key facts). The sulfur (yellow) should bond to the nitrogen (blue) not the hydrogen (white) in front of it...that hydrogen bonds to the nitrogen. And the other (right-hand) nitrogen should have two hydrogens on it (at best, the perspective is chosen such that the other one is exactly hidden behind the N or H there, for no reason. DMacks (talk) 10:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, agree. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted content and one of them even private information.

-- M\A 10:35, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


the work belongs to me, not anyone els!

hi, this is my work, i have got if from screenshot. its not belonging to anyone. and there is not any kind of private information in it.

pzl remove that deletion tag from it.

The work contains Microsoft Windows UI, which is copyrighted and COM:DM does not apply. COM:SS is clear about this. Private data is exposed since the first linked screenshot contains an IP address. If it is yours, it's up to you if you want to show it, I'd recomend not to. Aditionaly, the work is wrongly licensed, since the MW interface is not CC-BY-SA-4.0, it's GNU GPL. -- M\A 09:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted because of the Microsoft UI. Basvb (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by عثمان منصور انصاري (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the files are useful for! these files which are named in Pashto are about use of Narcotics, Drugs addicts in Afghanistan. --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old pictures + small files without EXIF data, user with bad history, unlilely to be own works + out of scope screenshots of Wikipedia.

Yann (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

these rare pictures are old, small size as you mentioned. most of them are our Family pictures, I have got scan of them like:

bellow pictures are athorized by its owners to be published in wiki projects.

you may delete this pictures as bellow:

--عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@عثمان منصور انصاري: Hi,
For recent pictures not taken by you, the copyright owner (usually the photographer) needs to send a permission for a free license (see COM:OTRS for the procedure). For old pictures, you need to provide at least the source and the date. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as follows:
1) "these rare pictures are old, small size as you mentioned. most of them are our Family pictures, I have got scan of them like:"

Owning a photograph does not make you the owner of the copyright. The copyright owner is almost always the photographer or his heirs, so in order to keep these on Commons, you would have to get a free license from each photographer or prove that each of them is actually Public Domain in both Afghanistan and the USA.

2) "bellow pictures are athorized by its owners to be published in wiki projects."

"to be published in wiki projects" is not enough permission for Commons. We require that images be free for any use anywhere by anyone. In order to restore these, each photographer must send a free license to OTRS.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a non-free image from Getty Images (it says so in the source given by the uploader). Littlecarmen (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is used in this article (http://www.allure.com/beauty-trends/how-to/2015/august-2015-allure-magazine-beauty-tips#slide=10) and although that article cites no commercial source for this image, I question whether this is really the uploader's own work since they also uploaded another non-free image of Del Rey from Getty Images. Littlecarmen (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 19:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per les Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per les Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssn321882417 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO. License of images incompatible with Commons license on these images of paintings, old advertisements, photos and political cartoons all from same source. License at source reads "...FREE to view any image and any image as many times you want as long as you don use a file image for commercial purposes. "

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality distorted image. Much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Low quality distorted image. Much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all in this subsection per nomination. Add unclear copyright status to the rationale. De728631 (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Inappropriately cropped images of poor quality that mostly leave out entire parts of the advertisements which renders them useless for educational purposes. Out of project scope.

De728631 (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General discussion

[edit]

Keep all and review individually except for the "distorted images" nominated by Ies. This sort of mass deletion request is prone to missing valid uploads that qualify for PD-art. Faithful reproductions of public domain 2D-artwork are also out of copyright no matter what the source may claim. Examples include

De728631 (talk) 14:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We already have these in PD-art in much better quality. There is no need to keep any of these halftoned, black and white images because we already have the originals in Commons. Should we ever need cropped, blurry versions of our good images, I'm sure it would be possible to reduce the quality of the large size, high quality images in our collections well below this level of triple-jpeggery and half-toning; probably "remove color" and "blur more" would achieve this same effect in a couple key clicks. I see no reason to keep these images when we have the better ones, and these swiped from an unattributed website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You've got a point there. Quality is in fact a common issue of these uploads. De728631 (talk) 16:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Reupload, user warned. There's no use for this unstructured mass upload. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file history includes my real name, which allows linking it to my Wikipedia account. I like working with Wikipedia, but I do not like to be found here under my real name. Michi1308 (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: personal info removed Denniss (talk) 00:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MWillder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Matiia (talk) 03:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas Garcete (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aryan Khan(singer) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rcom207 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The football image is copyvio and can be found in on the web [2], the other is out of scope and can't be useful for educational purpose.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aryan Khan(singer) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image / unknow people : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faizal168 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, lower quality (flash-reflection or sun-glare?) but otherwise nearly same as File:038246 Camp Kinser, Okinawa. Operation Red Hat, Retrograde Chemicals.JPG DMacks (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was probably my mistake in uploading and it is not being used. However, the photo could be important because it shows two controversial subjects: Operation Red Hat and the retrograde waste material from Vietnam in the background. If the material in the background is of acceptable quality/focus (I'm not saying it is) then keep it and maybe zoom in on the background. If that portion is of poor quality, it should be deleted. If you are on the fence or it's not worth evaluating further, delete.Johnvr4 (talk) 17:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The images are nearly identical, the stuff in the background is identical. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, facebook sized image of woman with no metadata, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears be copytight image. Widely distributed on Web. Mark Marathon (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image 26/34 at http://www.ilgiorno.it/milano/milan-sassuolo-risultato-1.1421775 Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olaniyan Olushola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olaniyan Olushola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely flickrwashing -flickr account has these and one or two others. Unlikely to be taken by the flickr user

Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. All the files had different camera in EXIF, so own work is doubtful. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unknow software / company --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image / artwork --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload to vandalize in en:Cesare Alexandre di Curitiba. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope

Ies (talk) 07:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imrankhanworld Akshay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal photo of 14-year-old, used in deleted en:User:Nurhasnisha/sandbox JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:EMİR ÇİÇEK 2.jpg


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:Chrome-72.jpg


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 13:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dadyarushi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope - Commons is not Flickr. Personal/family photographs used in deleted Facebook-style pages en:User:Dadyarushi and en:User:Dadyarushi/sandbox.

JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valerya.korelova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two unused images of same person. One appears to be a close crop of the other. Out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actress.sheetal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All out of project scope except one in use George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the last remaining image, because the user had no remaining contributions except the small personal photo without metadata, which was used on her userpage. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. Sunyat TV is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Till (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 04:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Alan (talk) 01:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christian Sossa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadia Sikder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable thing is out of project scope. Vingadores MC is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sono Soomro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A non-notable person with a gratuitous album shot Richard Avery (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test upload Liangent (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test- out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test upload Liangent (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test - out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, picture booth headshot of non-notable male. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused headshot of male claimed to be "famous public figure," out of COM:SCOPE and possible hoaxing at work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional headshot, no indication of user's own work, unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaopan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three duplicated unused files of the same head shot of a man. Out of COM:SCOPE, one other was in use and was not nominated. No indication of user's own work on any of the four images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of a young male with no metadata, no useful description, and out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional text document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valerrio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three unused blurry images of a guy playing a guitar, categorized as pop music. Out of COM:SCOPE images must be realistically useful for educational purposes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NIKHIL0743 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three unused private images, none taken by uploader (see both hands and photos are not selfies), despite own work claims.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Army coat of arms. Are they in public domain?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOS: Series of photos of military men, all claimed "self", but the images appear too old, too halftoned, too reproduced, too variable to be the work of a single individual. User's other uploads were sent to Deletion or "no source."

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications. Massive pile of uploads in only a couple days.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hoàng Đình Thảo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these headshots of men are own work of uploader. Quality and size are too variable, no camera data, several look as if they were copied from half-toned publications.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hauptteil des Bildes kopiert von [3] Alnilam (talk) 00:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Sacar a luca (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use Basvb (talk) 12:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main image is an artwork depicting Madonna, and according to the source, it is a video on Flickr of a succession of artworks, very likely to be copyrighted. I don't think de minimis applies here. UAwiki (talk) 01:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no es de minimis la imagen de Madona es el motivo principal y no de forma cirscuntacial. Posiblemente violación de copyright. --Jcfidy (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be copied from a webplace Yger (talk) 01:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is from my own web page /Mia


Deleted: out of scope, low quality Basvb (talk) 12:22, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but the uploader has failed to provide evidence for these assertions. (1) How do we know that it was published without copyright notice? The National Register nomination documents cited as the source do not include one, but such simple documentation doesn't get released by itself: it could easily have been submitted with similar documents in a compilation bearing a copyright notice. And how do we know that it was first published in the National Register documentation? It could easily have been published elsewhere, e.g. a local newspaper article about the community's preservation efforts. (2) Uploader asserts that there was no copyright claim within five years. How can we be sure? No explanation is provided. Nyttend (talk) 04:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS, this nomination also applies to five other files, Ontario State Bank Block nom2/3/4/5/6. They're clearly in an identical situation: like nom1 (uploaded from the same source document), we can't know that they weren't published through the National Register with notice, and we can't know that this was their first publication. Nyttend (talk) 04:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. (1) Nom raises doubts about the PD status of these photos that do not rise to the level of significant doubt as understood in the precautionary principle. Nom concedes that the source document bears no copyright notice, then hypothesizes, with no suggestive evidence, a larger bundle of documents that might conceivably have had a notice. We can always come up with unlikely scenarios under which any file may not be free, but unless there's a significant reason to consider a scenario then we're acting beyond reason. Similarly, the source document gives no attribution or other suggestion of a prior publication. The photos themselves are not highly refined and do not appear useful for other publication purposes. The photos were taken only 2 years before the source document was produced, offering only limited opportunities for prior publication. There is no significant reason to think they were previously published. (2) Before uploading, I did search, using a variety of search terms, for registrations in the US Copyright Office's database as linked in the {{PD-US-1978-89}} tag. I found no records that related to these photos. I invite the nom or anyone else to search the database as well. If something is found, I'm all on board with deletion. (3) In addition, {{PD-CAGov}} likely also applies to these images: the photographer was working for CalTrans. — Ipoellet (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Changing the license to {{PD-CAGov}} would seem to meet the needs of the uploader and the obviate need to pursue to nom's issue any further. The photographer was a Caltrans employee and the images have been retained by Caltrans. Generic1139 (talk) 16:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No significant doubt. If the other license fits better then please opt to use it Basvb (talk) 12:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published in a copyrighted web site, there is no permission http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://www.baareq.com.sa/contents/myuppic/04fb8a59b86a24.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.baareq.com.sa/?p=39981&h=377&w=554&tbnid=Oi9HxKZN9h0suM&tbnh=185&tbnw=272&usg=__fwGkl938YzBgcPrlnbCzKh-g8lw=&docid=dtj0oocsEWIVNM --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, can be found previously published, exemple http://www.252cc.be/four-aces-guitar-quartet --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, I do however have some doubts whether this might actually be the actor. If it is not renominate please. Basvb (talk) 12:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission http://www.imoontechnologies.net/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no permission http://www.imoontechnologies.net/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC) Double nomination: too many window open at the same time --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope "Netmaster Smart App" is unknow https://www.google.fr/search?sclient=psy-ab&site=&source=hp&q=NetMaster+Smart+App+&oq=NetMaster+Smart+App+&gs_l=hp.12...2285.2285.0.3629.1.1.0.0.0.0.87.87.1.1.0....0...1c..64.psy-ab..1.0.0.N4pVrTkjtdI&pbx=1&biw=1920&bih=1054&dpr=1&cad=cbv&sei=5qI9VtS-Gsz0UsWds7gN --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 12:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private sign, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 12:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a logo, (albiet PD-TEXT) and not own work as claimed necessrily. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zayani1951 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata and previous publications.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ces images sont mon mon oeuvre ,elle ont été publiées sur le et notamment Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayani1951 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 07 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Hadraj Said/SaidHadraj/Zayani1951! If I understand the Google translation correctly, you are repeating the assertion that you made when you uploaded these images, which is that you personally created all the photos listed above. The thing is, although you had done your best to crop out Nazih Chihab's watermark from the lower right-hand corner of photos like File:نهر أم الربيع بمنطقة تانفنيت خنيفرة.jpg, File:Lactiguelmamine.jpg and File:Tiguelmamine3.jpg to conceal your copyright infringements, I was able to find the original files, so we know your claims are false. If this is you, then this is not. LX (talk, contribs) 21:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Everything was already deleted. Basvb (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

個人情報(個人の自動車ナンバー)を消去し忘れ、位置情報が若干ズレがある。 水瀬悠志 (talk) 11:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate of File:日本タクシー 忠節駅前営業所(個人自動車ナンバー消しの修正版).jpg Basvb (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be a non-free logo. No evidence on their homepage at http://aford.be/ that the uploader has the right ot re-release it under Creative Commons. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs permission or proper licensing Basvb (talk) 12:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of public domain status sourced to a broken Google search. Kolbasz (talk) 11:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no info no cats, no use, improper attribution. If somebody wants to use this logo reuploading is easier Basvb (talk) 12:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jalalpayab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook ) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Jalalpayab (Facebook grabber).

Gunnex (talk) 12:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned image, looks professional publicity portrait. Claimed own work, needs OTRS confirmation. MKFI (talk) 12:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kruusamägi as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: spam Yann (talk) 12:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is spam as it is submitted to science photo competition.
I'm not also sure that if this image is even made by the uploader. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: incorrect licenses unused. Out of scope currently. Basvb (talk) 12:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused screenshot, probably coptright Sakhalinio (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image chosen - owner unclear Nomis88 (talk) 14:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kszapsza as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot out of the program Yann (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Source is [4] (direct link). Yann (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of non-free content displayed on the screen, which is not de minimis. LX (talk, contribs) 15:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Abu Dhabi 2003:88:6A44:3555:C8AF:7C86:D5FC:797F 15:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2006 statue (Kikonai Tourist Association). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't cover statues. Yasu (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Mohamed Rouicha died in 2012 (see [5]). Yann (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own work. See also File:ROUICHAM.jpg. Yann (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Nelly Bodenheim died in 1951 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photo of an unidentified subject with no meaningful description. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 16:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Nelly Bodenheim died in 1951 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Nelly Bodenheim died in 1951 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Nelly Bodenheim died in 1951 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Nelly Bodenheim died in 1951 Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

defnitely chemically incorrect in multiple geometric ways. One of the major biochemical and synthetic aspects of this molecule is the Atropisomerism of several rings, and there are ordinary stereocenters too. DMacks (talk) 21:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Incorrect structure. Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source where the picture is taken from states as license CC BY-ND 3.0 (no derivatives). Drahreg01 (talk) 16:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source where the picture is taken from states as license CC BY-ND 3.0 (no derivatives). Drahreg01 (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted material. Kigsz (talk) 16:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Look like screen capture - suspect of copy vio Deror avi (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete file talk page! Sakhalinio (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done Basvb (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Currently in use (warranting in scope), but I doubt the use is correct on en-wiki. Basvb (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It can't be used on any WP because it has no cites. We do not keep PDF text from non-notable people. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of public domain. Date seems unlikely, De Jong seems much older. Even if from 1922, it still should be public domain in The Neterland (70 years after death of creator or unknown creator or copyright owner is an institution) Tekstman (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

born 1888, 34 is not impossible. The author dying pre 1944 or it being an unknown authors work are also not impossible. Basvb (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1922 is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. The Netherlands rule is 70 years after publication if the author was never disclosed. We don't have any proof of publication and the author being unknown to us is very different from proving that the author was never disclosed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to [6] this is Meijers around 1950, so certainly no public domain. Tekstman (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your link shows another image which is clearly of a much older person. Basvb (talk) 12:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The file description says 1922 -- that is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. The Netherlands rule is 70 years after publication if the author was never disclosed. We don't have any proof of publication and the author being unknown to us is very different from proving that the author was never disclosed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was published on a site with no Creative Commons or Public Domain expressed license. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark image out of Commons scope Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


hello the picture does not come from you I know the author of the image that says yes to my posted if you do not read Sawai ... Elianhen

Image is in use and thus in scope, might however have permission issues. Basvb (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Biplab Anand -- Watermarks are discouraged on Commons, but they are not a reason to delete. However, this image appears at http://www.alsacemaginot.com/pages/racine-decouverte-alpes-croupereservoir with an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was one supreme court election with 7 candidates for 3 seats. A voter could pick any of those 7 candidates; none was running explicitly against the other. Thus it makes no sense to have more than one map (File:Pennsylvania Supreme Court election results, 2015 (1).svg) for this election.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted two blank maps, kept one with results .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Microsoft Copyrighted. Should be uploaded locally. - Alex00728 (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creating Commons:Deletion request/User:Floggingchamp.


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

files uploaded by Sono Soomro

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! Sorry my mistake. In the meantime the other files I were supposed to list have been nominated by someone else Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted earlier today by other admin Basvb (talk) 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contrary to the initial information this is not a work by the uploader but a painting by Oscar E. Berninghaus (see here) The copyright situation is unclear: was this painting published before 1923, and if not, was it ever registered for copyright? De728631 (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted Basvb (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:44, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused, personal photo out of scope. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 20:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a personal photo, in use -> in scope Basvb (talk) 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a contemporary World War I cartoon. Unless the original artist can be determined and the copyright term has expired, this image needs to be removed. De728631 (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Hedwig in Washington Basvb (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (450x337) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded locally in 02.2006 by en:User talk:Fast track = Fast track~commonswiki (both: serial copyright violator) the file was transferred in 2011 already indicating that at world66.com the source was "(NOT FOUND ON LINK!!)". Source and author are needed to verify license status via {{Cc-world66}}. See also File talk:Rawalpindi cricket.jpg (local comment from 03.2006: may be this user made the objection regarding the missing source...)

The photo is circulating since 2000 via gallery http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-new-zealand-2012/content/image/index.html?year=2000;month=10;filter=1;page=2 (" Oct 31, 2000, A night view of the floodlit Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium © ESPNcricinfo Ltd") = http://p.imgci.com/db/PICTURES/DB/102000/017583.jpg (last modified: 2000) or http://www.angelfire.com/blues/awaisahmad/cricket.htm = http://www.angelfire.com/blues/awaisahmad/ground24.jpg (last modified: 2004).

Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gadaffibuilding in Lahore.gif Gunnex (talk) 21:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs permission Basvb (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cut out head shot of male with promotional text in the description field, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Arno Mohr died in 2001, so his works won't come into public domain before 2072. Correlatio (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Arno Mohr died in 2001, so his works won't come into public domain before 2072. Correlatio (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Arno Mohr died in 2001, so his works won't come into public domain before 2072. Correlatio (talk) 21:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of background image which is from http://www.bjzhaoyi.com/show-70-240-1.html, http://www.bjzhaoyi.com/uploadfile/2015/0906/20150906113912120.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also found at https://plus.google.com/105467109827492921609/posts . Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zehrara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably taken from https://plus.google.com/105467109827492921609/posts, as were three other images uploaded by this uploader. All of same model.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps de:Otto Nagel died in 1967, so his works won't come into public domain before 2038.

Correlatio (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All over the internet but funny, not a single one says that this uploader painted this painting! Needs more information than "own work" to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: might be pd-old but per nom Basvb (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster or cover, not own work, derivative of two photographs on cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional upload, no indication of user's own photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the subject depicted claims to have also taken this image, one look at the photo shows that is not possible. COM:COPYVIO without photographer's release via COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works on the images on this poster, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of photos and illustrations on this page; not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever this is, it's highly unlikely to be own work from November 7, 2015, possible COM:COPYVIO or older & needs more information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate of Basvb (talk) 13:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large, dark B&W image of a man, unused, and no categories. Out of COM:SCOPE we have lots of photos of men. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by Jan de Winter (born 1939, Vlaardingen) who has not been dead even a minute yet, let alone the 70 years required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I talked to Jan de Winter on the phone for more then 30 minutes. He was very happy to see the piece of art being exposed on the wiki. The one comment he made was that the genre of the work is not a vermurail but a combination of emaille and opaline.

He will need to file a COM:OTRS for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: needs COM:OTRS Basvb (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the pictures shown on these stamps en:James Rizzi died in 2011, so his works won't come into public domain before 2082. Correlatio (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed khushal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ahmed khushal

Gunnex (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2008 book - non-free Anatoliy (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For 1930s postcards, PD-US license does not apply. Maybe PD-US-no notice or smth like that. Author is missing, maybe anonymous? Taivo (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Basvb (talk) 13:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i created it but won't use it Yakamashi (talk) 18:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope/author request Basvb (talk) 13:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author, Jonathan David Latimer (1964 – 4 January 2009) has not been dead seventy years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is apparently that Latimer is not the author of this photo, so his dates are not relvant. Anyway the license claims that the photo is work of British Government, but without any proof.--Avron (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentThe copyright of a book belongs to the author who has not yet been dead 70 years. The source of the image is given as the book, so I do believe the author's dates are relevant. There is no proof the image is British Government. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: evidence for british governement work is required Basvb (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! No, I've not. Cheers. ChoumX (talk) 10:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artikel nach WP:Löschkandidaten:31. Oktober 2015/ple gelöscht da nicht relevant. Da dies eh ein logo von einer ehemaligen Zeitschrift ist wird dieses nicht mehr verwendet und daher nicht mehr benötigt. Benutzer der es verwendet wird Bescheid gesagt! 2003:6A:6D70:8DC1:D5DC:B746:17A2:4943 19:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen - auch wg. einer möglichen Copyrights-Verletzung einer ehemaligen Firma! --2003:6A:6D26:5A20:C832:A9E4:666C:CDE6 06:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Ukraine: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 19:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Ukraine: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 19:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Ukraine: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 19:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm afraid that with no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Romania this is a copyright problem: building is too new to be out of copyright (unless there is some notion of a building exterior being so simple as to be as not to be eligible for copyright; may need an expert opinion on that). Jmabel ! talk 19:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm afraid that with no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Romania this is a copyright problem: building is too new to be out of copyright (unless there is some notion of a building exterior being so simple as to be as not to be eligible for copyright; may need an expert opinion on that). Jmabel ! talk 19:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, uploader is not author, external source. I could not verify license. OTRS-permission from Alexey Korolkov is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly copyrighted images. See watermarks.

Ies (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 13:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from sculptor Edris Eckhart is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This piece of art is owned by the New Bedford Museum of Glass, of which I am president and executive director. The photograph was taken by me and is licensed to the museum. The artist is deceased.

 Comment en:Edris Eckhart died in 1998. His heirs must send OIRS-permission. If the museum is copyright holder to this sculpture, then you as president and executive director must send the permission. Otherways the photo can be restored in 2069, when the copyright expires. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okno2011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrights infringement, RTS's property. Edjoerv (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio; website watermark cropped on bottom-right ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the painter of the picture shown on this stamp de:Harald Metzkes is still alive, so his works are not in public domain. Correlatio (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Mikebender

[edit]

This is Marcello Daciano. i didn't gave you the permission to use or post my photo online. please remove it. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkwayne2015 (talk • contribs) 2015-11-06T04:18:58‎ (UTC)


Kept Italian law allows publishing of images of notable people taken in places where there is no expectation of privacy. Therefore the subject has no right to demand that Commons remove the image. We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and almost never when the request come from a third party. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For 1932 and 1935 buildings OTRS-permission from architects' heirs is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There is no US copyright in buildings erected before 1990. There is a copyright in the architectural drawings, but this image was drawn from the buildings themselves. Also, FOP allows drawings as well as photographs of all US buildings. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP in South Korea for buildings, so this file will need to go KoreaCleanup (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With no Freedom of Panorama for buildings in Romania, I think the still-copyrighted Samsung building is prominent enough in this photo to make it a copyright violation. Jmabel ! talk 19:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JunaydAnwar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JunaydAnwar (serial copyright violator, Flickr/Panoramio grabber, file cropper, watermark remover). All files uploaded in 11.2011 and are mostly related to en:Sahiwal Division, an administrative division of Pakistan. Nominating also a set of 6 photos taken with a Sony DSC-W30 in 2006 (uploaded in a row on 04.11.2011) which - considering the whole criminal behaviour demonstrated by the uploader - may be taken in a row from a copyrighted source.

File:Sahiwal breed cow.jpg (used also in the collage File:Nili ravi and cow of sahiwal.jpg) is curculating since 2009 via (example) https://cisaruafarm.wordpress.com/category/1-peternakan-sapi/ (2009) = (thumb) https://cisaruafarm.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/sahiwal-4.jpeg or http://www.akhbarona.com/files/sahiwal_cow_378540379.jpg (with Adobe exif from 04.2011)

Spezial case: File:Great migration into pakistan.jpg (author: unknown, licensed with {{FAL}} = ??) sourced with http://www.oldindianphotos.in/2010/01/mass-migration-during-independence-of_26.html, credited with "These photographs are taken in 1947 during the period of independence of India and Pakistan by the [American] photographer en:Margaret Bourke-White. These photographs are collected from Life Archive hosted by Google." --> certainly renewed and copyrighted +95 years publication.

Gunnex (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No single was released for this song, so this image is not an official representation of the song. No possible use for this image. Binksternet (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (300x134) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering uploaded locally by en:User talk:Fast track = Fast track~commonswiki = both serial copyright violator and considering also cropped from (example) http://archnet.org/sites/1445/media_contents/11117 = http://archnet.org/system/media_contents/contents/11117/medium/IAA1936.jpg (higher res), taken in 1998 and credited with "Has-saan Gardezi (photographer)". Gunnex (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Also appears at https://reverseswing.wordpress.com/tag/cricket-and-me/ My early editing and accepted the source and license stated on en.wiki. Finavon (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geometric nonsense. The atoms are definitely not all planar DMacks (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to correct spacial conformation Originalwana (talk) 13:28, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: changed. Please renominate if still incorrect. Basvb (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geometric nonsense. The atoms are definitely not all planar. DMacks (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to correct spacial conformation Originalwana (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: changed. Please renominate if still incorrect. Basvb (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the United States, per COM:PACUSA. This painting was installed after March 1989. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photograph is most likely the work of the uploader, the photograph on the airplane isn't. The flickr license was reviewed, but I do not think the flickr photographer has the rights to give away the photo advert on the airplane, making this a possible COM:DW, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider Com:De minimis, the derivate image is not the main subject of the image. Basvb (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's arguable that it is the main subject, but the law does not require that -- for de minimis to apply, the copyrighted work must so small that it would not be noticed if it were removed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that any of these images were created by uploader. Patches from various entities, some video game logos and two photos of armed men, none have metadata, all claimed as own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The four images in this composite appear all over the internet older and larger than this upload, example this search. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, фото 1937 года, а это скан старой фотографии, автор, скорее всего, неизвестен Dogad75 (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Certainly not "own work" as claimed. Piossibly PD-Old, but that would have to be proven. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ONLY VERSIONS:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/44/20151104161020%21Pi%C5%82sudski_pomnik_Wawer_2.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/44/20151104155351%21Pi%C5%82sudski_pomnik_Wawer_2.jpg
and maybe:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/4/44/20151104155128%21Pi%C5%82sudski_pomnik_Wawer_2.jpg
if possible. Because they unnecessarily occupy space.
Darekk2 (talk) 17:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: space issues on servers are not a problem. Basvb (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license or permission defined Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Avron as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: File:US Navy 010924-N-6234S-002 USS Carl Vinson Battle Group.jpg


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WewengC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No confidence that any of these logos was created by the uploader, they are from colleges, tourism, events and ?? They do have the appearance of being created by a single artist.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what in particular is unique compared with the other images? I do not see it, but am not familiar with the topic. Also this en-wiki file is uploaded as a replacement, can this one be transfered to commons and the current file deleted? Basvb (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Upon a second review of the other images, I change my vote to  Delete, as there are better alternatives. Nominator should however refrain from bogus accusations of off-scopeness: If we didn't have better images, this one would have to do, and that’s the epitome of scope: We need this matter covered, no matter how poorly. (As opposed to — this photo is so good we want to keep it, even though it pertains a well-covered or trivial subject.) -- Tuválkin 19:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevinfwy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:DW, the board can't be de minimis.

Yann (talk) 14:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sakhalinio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.ru/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivREH7InbADQ_1cb6OFObeMAchzpDnOoQJj_1eqmPpO6eyevp3D8c98ZgBkW2Gw4uZBtBm3GwDykkAo8Uj18otEZZx8tYj7da5BekuY0PrNFIDL9EOwVJag05WWCb3Bqv1kBufWbQ8T1kzFHoK5TDuDPaEnO-tNutLHrXQty6R7SeTHDdb0jUwWzNcCY-g-XHEoOZEqZzh8eZDNz-wUTK12cITMy2JOxOoDcGX40qghqjDRIY3_15vuwQAYHGb1SqBzLDmInJhvYJr9XlacKBZhg_19PQwxtbeNhTFcB7ClISDxui6eAPHPExk_15fcg48tGR2Sc68powTGav9BEX1K4mMdEg83uvmx4lArbtBL9CJz4GgWAGUikU4i_1w9iWWwWaLI-OcBo6yuyvjpfZWW3uQwNJS9YcbhfRS1HJf9A6g7boy98BzCipV5YKqqtkY71aPq0Y2u9hVLDs_14GfibOtgD4ia9csk2Q6iUcXDfPGR3xlR7fIwqOAGn7ufOZOfQzPM4Diy0jPRGvio1_1YO1a_1tRqflqK25iRvLA9aIf06CgQOzuEhMfCYV4qNMpBijpP-zP2P41QHhx8rswcs7qv2tK_1fSWL-Khw-F6luFIgWP6qPKcw1zzkr1xXbGy6QSJKEOTh0nrysAINAoaDOU_100bcrN28m4cT7uJpyhn5FuZ15cCFrpKtoXJReozrLFbEyG75qFgQea3KqbYxPORnakknSH-i1HssyLUOiPVMazPPCBDkDRLOyqn-4KX0sY1Df7LlEjVZaIVQQWzRQa5qmvLjjI3LZ-nLCm2byzxsktp-rWe5j5ZEvDVhdCTAk5Ii73dMCJUKp-1SwR4LB5r1D6_1NsAMjzVAypzQeHiy0MRTIlq2XDoNlE5FuCykljgzUHr3ez2yLRwmKvX4wbfzuszRAKPBb3oV4h2S7lV3zaabsR-MiqpndQeH4CU5Xim1r2EbMyZCQKf69OhvI95DOetP8I7DxjCA4ZrLdbfT5xsmG6_1BbbJHBjpa7qz9UgIrwGw5dBZLjmAXsubNfIL7AYhgj_1wqhWkqXJPRRE4aqbHHyPtaR-LqH8WrHw8CRV0Eo9P_1u0599W4Hy40qPt4QJn7q47NYKhB26BEv6r2KV3vYkoG3rkWZk5mZg9rrikfKWs9UkgkYpu24_10Duz8B_1B7QSW21tAU1QJrCXuJKYbtOKYo8sZlFnPfUrs47Y0AH0wF5mj_1ye7rsV4FkCWO-chUtD2eVeZIZZOz82l6w4Az38Cgo8Kk8HOdBAG7kp2cUaQ9PMmLapc9hphVWXiksAPuBARP0UzdO777F78_1o05naX8h0Me1H1GAXMSY4Q1wTk6nDYZJ0cylnUf09TL8JhyRpaJ1RU4fv4XpWOXUSPYS0xYmnrP3095voxxH1aIKixeHlGucC9pcyXMqij2sSpRso6XG-Yb4GVF-sfhFqGM5X5H3ITngdXN8&btnG=G%C3%B6rselle%20ara&hl=tr-RU This seems to be old enough. Yann (talk) 16:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Yann Alan (talk) 16:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement would be copyrighted to the Ulsan Metropolitan City authority, not KOCIS KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyrighted to the Andong Festival Tourism Foundation, not KOCIS KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear that KOCIS is not the copyright holder for this advertisement KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is unlikely KOCIS is the copyright holder of these Expo related artists impressions KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear that smrt.co.kr is the copyright holder of this map, not KOCIS KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear that smrt.co.kr is the copyright holder of this map, not KOCIS KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear that smrt.co.kr is the copyright holder of this map, not KOCIS KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear the Sancheong County Office, not KOCIS is the copyright holder of this photo KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It would appear the Sancheong County Office, not KOCIS is the copyright holder of this photo KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I asked Korea.net on Flickr to relicence, this was included in the file. It is unlikely they would have CC licenced this logo, so best to stay on safe side and delete it. KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I asked Korea.net on Flickr to relicence, this was included in the file. It is unlikely they would have CC licenced this logo, so best to stay on safe side and delete it. KoreaCleanup (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 06:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader. I was incorrect about copyright. Copyright still held by Virginia Tech and is unusable Jwalte04 (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks PD as it was created in 1894. Why would it not be PD? Basvb (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in PD Alan (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque subí otro diseño mejorado. Vihuquisbert (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Subí otro mejor diseño Vihuquisbert (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Existe una nueva versión Vihuquisbert (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probably a copyvio Sacar a luca (talk) 00:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't look like a file where it is unlikely that it is own work given the content of the file. Should we delete every file without metadata and a small size? Basvb (talk) 12:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I, myself have some of my images without EXIF (File:Théatre de la Mer à Sète 03.jpg), as I found no previous publication, small size is here a not enough rationale --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is too similar to the original, which is patented. Muri (talk) 12:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might be below COM:TOO, any reason why pd-textlogo+trademarket might not be applicable? Basvb (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Since it's an image, I believe you meant "registered [trademark]", not "patented". Please provide sources of the claims that this trademark is in fact registered in any jurisdiction AND Wikimedia Commons prohibits uploading trademarks. As far as I know it's perfectly fine to do so and Commons currently hosts nearly 70 thousands of files that contain a trademark.The copyright law and the trademark law are not the same.
Also, assuming that this work is infringing copyright, please explain: how PNG version, which you have accepted, is not doing so? Not only the differences are minor (size of the rim and its distance from "M"), but they're irrelevant — it would be an unauthorized derived work too, if the SVG version is one.
I have sent a request to Metro Warszawskie to clarify the issue. They should respond in 60 days.
Wikimpan (talk) 01:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Logo of Metro Warszawskie is not registered trademark, it is patented trademark. Here is a search engine of Urząd Patentowy RP (Polish Patent Office) in English - http://grab.uprp.pl/PropertiesProtection/Site%20pages/Quick%20search.aspx?wersja=english. Please check TMV - Trade marks (national) on the left, then Application number on the right and search Z.281191. You will get MW logo. It is legally protected since 2007. SVG uploaded to Commons is too similiar to it, probably extracted from PDF flie. This is better one - dimensions and colours are not the same. Muri (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to be rude, but I really have to insist: please make sure that you know what we're talking about here, because — judging from what you have said to this point — you're misunderstanding intellectual property laws and completly mixing copyright law, patent law and trademark law, quite liberally applying rules and requirements of each of them to a topic covered by another. One can't patent a trademark. A trademark can only be registered. And trademark - be it registered or not registered — gives some exclusive rights to the trademark owner, but neither of them prevents the use of a trademark in Wikipedia. What matters here is **copyright** law, but it has nothing to do with trademarks or their registration, and in case of the "Metro" emblem it's truly doubtful it actually can even fall under copyright law. And if it would, **both** images would violate it. So please be clear on that thing.
Metro Warszawskie has sent a partial response to me today. The trademark is in fact a registered trademark in Poland under the number 191378. I have added a trademarks template to the image, so we're clear on that issue now. The fact that this is a trademark or even a registered trademark doesn't prevent its publication on Wikipedia. What matters here is copyright. I still don't have an answer on that issue, but if Metro Warszawskie owns an exclusive rights on the symbol, *both* images need to be nominated for deletion and the decision has to be equal for both of them. That is: if it's decided the emblem is not a sumbject of copyright, both of the images are staying. If it's decided the other way, both of them are deleted.
Wikimpan (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Metro Warszawskie also claims they have copyright on the image itself and they prohibit redistribution of it. Hence I'm also marking the other copy for the deletion. Note that I do this only for formal reasons. Personally I truly believe that this emblem can not be a subject of copyright and the claim isn't legal. For this reason I'll vote for not deleting the files. Wikimpan (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For reference (in polish):

Szanowny Panie,

w nawiązaniu do korespondencji mailowej dotyczącej logo metra informujemy, iż Spółka Metro Warszawskie jest wyłącznym właścicielem znaku i posiada autorskie prawo majątkowe do jego wykorzystywania na następujących polach eksploatacji:
- wprowadzenie do obrotu
- utrwalenie
- najem
- dzierżawa
- powielenie
- publiczne odtworzenie oraz na wszystkich innych polach eksploatacji.

W związku z powyższym osoby trzecie nie mogą rozpowszechniać znaku metra bez zgody Metra Warszawskiego Sp. z o.o.

Z poważaniem

--
METRO WARSZAWSKIE Sp. z o.o.
ul.Wilczy Dół 5, 02-798 Warszawa

NIP 526-26-73-576, KRS 0000146121
Wysokość kapitału zakładowego 328.917.500,00 zł
Sąd Rejonowy dla Miasta Stołecznego Warszawy XIII Wydział Gospodarczy KRS

— An e-mail received from M.W. on 2015/11/20 14:03:26 +0100 as a response to my query about the legal status (trademark and copyright) of their logo, from 2015/11/16 (my case id 20151116-1, my document id 20151116-1-1)

Wikimpan (talk) 05:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Quite unlikely to be over the threshold of originality in Poland, but then also cannot be marked as CC+GFDL, either. I'm keeping it as PD-simple and marking it as such. odder (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use image WillC 06:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer back to en.wikipedia, as it was originally uploaded. Should never have been transferred to commons, but is appropriately fair use on the article regarding the championship in question. Oknazevad (talk) 06:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Still not uploaded to en:. Thuresson (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Everyone had enough time for the transfer Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 0x010C as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This castle has been rebuild in 2012, but there is not FoP in France Yann (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture réalisée par les architectes Bona et Lemercier et le scénographe Alexis Bertrand, toujours vivants - Pas de FOP en France - --Lomita (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ce fichier doit être déplacé sur Wikipédia en français et/ou en anglais. Yann (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ouais, mais il faut bien expliquer alors que la photo du château prise en 2008 ne correspond plus à la réalité. Et quid de la propriété intellectuelle de l'architecte du 18e siècle dénaturée par les architectes de 2012 ? Je ne connaissais pas le château, mais vu de loin, il avait l'air encore à peu près en bon état. --Parisette (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Digitized Sky Survey image, not PD-NASA, or PD-Hubble. Though released on hubblesite.org, this is copyrighted by either STScI/AURA, Palomar/Caltech, or UKSTU/AAO. (It is hard to tell on DSS images, without significant research). See https://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_form and https://archive.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html for relevant copyright notices. Revent (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images provided from STScI follow the public domain copyright disclaimer provided when the image was originally uploaded. This comment, and flagging, doesn't seem to provide anything whatsoever to suggest that the original copyright assessment, that the image is from STScI and therefore PD, is incorrect. ScottHW (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STScI stands for "Space Telescope Science Institute", located on the campus of The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, and operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) for NASA. According to the image description this photo was taken by The Anglo-Australian Observatory (AAO) UK Schmidt telescope, in Australia. The AAO publish its photos under Crown copyright (copyright info. Thuresson (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Thuresson: The "Digitized Sky Survey" was created from the original glass photographic plates by STScI... the original photos from the AAO were not published by them in an electronic form, they were scanned about a decade later. They are indeed under Crown Copyright, but this particular image was not published by the AAO on their website, or by them under a compatible license. It was published by STScI on the DSS server, and then later in this form on hubblesite. This is also colorized (the plates were B&W, taken through filters) and severely cropped (the original plates had an extremely wide FOV). The NASA contract quoted in the description has nothing to do with the DSS material.. it applies to Hubble images, mainly. Revent (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StefaniaBC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salve! I file video sono di mia proprietà in quanto realizzati da me. La canzone "Le risorse della tecnica" fa parte di un album (Canzoni per adulti) di mia proprietà in quanto Produttrice del disco. Come devo fare a rendere chiara l'autorizzazione? Grazie Cordiali Saluti StefaniaBC (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dovresti confermare l'autorizzazione inviando una e-mail. Vedi Commons:OTRS/it. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fatto. Grazie --StefaniaBC (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See: ticket:2015110810002738. --Krd 18:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 1 deleted + 1 kept per ticket:2015110810002738 Alan (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Which kind of agreement? Show text of the agreement! Taivo (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think, there will still come other opinons. Let`s wait a little while. Belfried (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC) alias Gordito1869 (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, one could argue that this files are okay per the same logic as applied in Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc.. Natuur12 (talk) 18:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per com:DW Alan (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 17:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Now the photo is used in uk.wiki. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This was apparently deleted by Jianhui67 (talk · contribs) although without closing this discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]