Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 12th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, not a good quality, the same photo already exists in Commons Visuals editor (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Сергей Викторович Пугачев.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution version of the exact same photo already uploaded Visuals editor (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Сергей Викторович Пугачев.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Visuals editor (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Сергей Викторович Пугачев.jpg. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says copyright holder FERNANDA CALFAT. Might be uploader editing image but unspecified. All other images uploaded were fairly blatant copyright violations so this one is suspect as well. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Alan: no license, no permission; likely copyvio as all others Ankry (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Юдин, Александр Игоревич Alexander-Yudin (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant to File:Konstantina Kouneva 2015.jpg PanchoS (talk) 01:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per wikipedia image rules, living person images cannot have any copyright on them regardless of fair use, and the URL where the images are located have no mention of creative commons next to them. Link to the copyright information. Repeat of successful IfD. --Timeshift9 (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the copyright information for the source page (which you have linked to) says "The Commonwealth of Australia owns all the material we produce. All material presented on this website is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence, with the exception of: [etc.]". It then lists some exceptions, however none of these apply to this image I don't think. Shouldn't this mean that the photo is under Creative Commons licence? Liguer (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file is correctly licensed and it has Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia license on source site. Commons is not en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 21:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

getty watermark Victorgrigas (talk) 02:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, clear copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Getty Watermark Victorgrigas (talk) 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, clear copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, low quality image of car taken at night with incorrect wheel trims. Replaced by other files at Category:Mazda 626 (GD). OSX II (talk) 02:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, agree, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination, low quality image of car taken at night with incorrect wheel trims. Replaced by other files at Category:Mazda 626 (GD). OSX II (talk) 02:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, yes, really, weird wheel trims. Taivo (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary png version of File:Judo black belt.svg with a non-transparent background which makes it inferior for use. Original source is not attributed. No educational value alongside the images in Category:SVG Judo belts. Nick (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Logo ist not up to date: www.hilcona.com, but appearing still in every google search -Hilcona AG (talk) 08:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, but maybe deleted. The file has never existed. There exist, for example, file:Hilcona Logo.jpg, but old logos are also useful for showing history of company. Taivo (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG file. Fry1989 eh? 19:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of an old work but so strongly modified that new rights apply to modifier Poco2 22:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: You are very right. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a TV broadcast, unlikely to be own work. Ytoyoda (talk) 23:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture appears in more than one other site ([1], [2]) in articles/pages dated/formed before the day the file was uploaded to the Commons. No OTRS release approval has been received, hence, it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of the modern (1996) magazine. Possible copyright violation. Senapa (talk) 00:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, боже мой, какая сердитая женщина! Taivo (talk) 09:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of the modern (1990s) magazine. Possible copyright violation. Senapa (talk) 00:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, очень странные и смешные рисунки! Taivo (talk) 09:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader is indefinitely blocked for self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Due to multiple big watermarks it's better to delete it. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Uploader and author are different. As depicted person is probably not en:Paul Gruber, out of scope is also possible. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope user. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright as image is from alena's instagram like the last picture this user uploaded 92.237.211.110 03:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, for collages source and license of every image must be given. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Er. Intekhab Alam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, he had done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Academia369 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rvkumar746 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

So sorry for using media that is not my own work, please tell me how to delete it... So sorry...繁犀
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, probably copyright violation like his/her all other uploads. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by User:Kallerna as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Second Life svreenshot, not free shizhao (talk) 02:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It seems to me, that copyright of content, created in Second Life, belongs to creator and is therefore free, if creator publishes it under free license. The file has free license in Flickr, so what's problem? The file is used in zh.wiki and so in project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok shizhao (talk) 09:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Issey Nkanda Olivier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Issey Nkanda Olivier is unknown to en.wiki. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a painting by a living artist. No permission. BrightRaven (talk) 09:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:José Parlá I deleted all the uploader's contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of a paintings by a living artist. No permission.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also look Commons:Deletion requests/File:3 Jose Parla Snohetta Nature of Language.jpg. All his contributions are photographer's copyright violations. Only photos 3 and 9 have camera data (accordingly Canon EOS 5D Mark II and P45). EXIF says:

  • photo 0: author Clint Spaulding, copyright holder Patrick McMullan
  • photo 5: author SJ SWIETER
  • photo 6: author and copyright holder Francis Dzikowski
  • photo 8: author and copyright holder Gavin Ashworth NYC. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebrahim fleep (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Abstract painting of women at a tropical marketplace.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake JaneArt (talk) 10:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I like that picture, but ... uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D artwork, if is in the scope it need an OTRS permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A flyer is a 2d artwork, I see no evidence it is free. At least the logo is not http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/university-solicitors-office/legal/terms-and-conditions.aspx --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, flyers cannot be in Commons without OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo of a university in Vietnam Quenhitran (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark (possible copyvio) Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, such kind of watermark is definitely sign of copyright. I'll delete file:Miss anuska rana.JPG due to same watermark. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architectural and sculptural work.

Eleassar (t/p) 13:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvios as per source non educational file

AntanO 13:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the text is enough long for literary copyright and the files are previously published in Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, undeleted in 2028. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Undeleted in 2028. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not a Category. (Category:Open air stations of the Cross in Máriabesnyő). Thanks. Globetrotter19 (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Wanted to creat a category, but did not use the proper prefix. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope, also surpasses threshold of originality. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Current version is a screenshot of a cracked website, which may or may not be copyrighted, but contains graphic elements which are probably copyrighted. The original version is a screenshot of Microsoft Notepad, which contains Microsoft Windows UI elements, likely over the COM:TOO, but it's close. Storkk (talk) 15:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the logo surpasses threshold of originality and the text is also enough long for literary copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark credits an Efrain Colongallardo, who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, file description says also, that photographer is Efrain Colón-Gallardo in june 2006. Uploader is Frankcg1947. No camera data. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, no metadata, possible news shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 249×165 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely derivative or scan, given embedded legend. If uploader is the original artist, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete it due to out of project scope. Only 190×265 pixels, unused, text is not readable. Maybe is old enough for public domain, but author is unknown and so small version is unusable anyway. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falta de parcialidade Arcanji (talk) 19:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington. Uploader's request on uploading day, the user's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a work of a person who died in 1972: ru:Драгунский, Виктор Юзефович. Unfortunately, 1972 was too recently. Stefan4 (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There exists no other version of spoken word of this file. I read and recorded the story by myself. Didn't know that this is a copyright violation since I read the book in a hospital for children suffering from cancer. The audio file has never been officially released and I have no intention for selling it or earning money with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giffeler (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, after such statement there is no other way than delete. Fair use is prohibited in Commons. But the writer was one of my childhood favorites, I was his fan. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional material, does not clearly fall within scope as is: rendered unusable by the promotional overlays. Storkk (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable artwork/logo. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Will withdraw if notability is reasonably asserted. Storkk (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book front and back cover. No evidence of permission. Stefan4 (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arun kottur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text documents of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused .pdf-files, claimed own work, but actually none is own work. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 3 images (File:Plaza Bolivar El Tigre 2006.jpg, File:Casa Fuerte de Barcelona.jpg and File:Isla paraiso.JPG) used in this collage are missing or are insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Gunnex (talk) 16:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, those 3 files are deleted, making the collage a copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is obviously not own work of uploader, it's a US political party symbol. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Republicanlogo.svg. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No confidence that any of these images were created by uploader. Variable small sizes, poor qualities, no metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the user uploaded random photos from Internet and often confesses that (source is Google). Every photo is marked with template PD-Pakistan, which is wrong, because PD-Pakistan is applicable only for old photos. I warned him and per precautionary principle will delete all his uploads. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted facebook content https://www.facebook.com/Rishikesh/photos/pb.191340817548682.-2207520000.1432611482./1015631685119587/?type=3&theater --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Facebook is not a good source. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted facebook content https://www.facebook.com/Rishikesh/photos/pb.191340817548682.-2207520000.1432610371./1088369174512504/?type=3&theater --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Facebook is not a good source. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La Mou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:La Mou (serial copyright violator for es:Club Atlético Los Andes, an Argentine sports club, files uploaded in a row on 15.02.2015).

Gunnex (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Hausnummer Rainer Kaelcke 17:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 Deleted, this is reason for renaming, not for deleting, but ... uploader's request in uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as this foto of me was released without my permission i want it to be taken from this page, many greetings, gina d`orio 109.45.3.187 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC) Hello, I tried to contact the author of this page, but he does`t react. I want this foo of me deleted on this page 87.151.172.228 14:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as this foto of me was released without my permission i want it to be taken from this page, many greetings, gina d`orio 87.151.172.228 14:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Image is in use in the enwiki article; I see no other high resolution images of the subject in Commons. Ankry (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The person in question starred as one of four actors in a public theater performance in January 2014 in Mannheim. --L.Willms (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


as this foto of me was released without my permission i want it to be taken from this page, many greetings, gina d`orio 109.45.3.187 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. Not in use anymore. JuTa 18:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible image quality, likely to be screenshot of TV broadcast. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader has problems with copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be useful, likely copyvio. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, such shots are not own work. Likely TV screenshot. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also including the following image:

Likely taken from television broadcast. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, likely. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EternaMayoria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 29.09.2015 all files most likely grabbed from social media (Twitter) like File:Banderas en la platea este del Estadio Brigadier López.jpg = grabbed from (example) https://twitter.com/CACesSantaFe/status/645781574353596416/photo/1 (20.09.2015) or File:Banderas en la platea norte del Estadio Brigadier López.jpg (+ crop File:Telón de la platea este del estadio Brigadier López.jpg) = grabbed from (example) https://twitter.com/CACesSantaFe/status/645779052398309376/photo/1 (20.09.2015)

Gunnex (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: innovative architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 19:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Hugoramirezp / logs Gunnex (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexis Ringot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 21:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these were his only contributions. He claimed to be a candidate in municipal elections, but as Alexis Ringot is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki, probably promotion in Wikipedia did not help. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Euricsanti23391.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 12:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Undescribed, uncategorized, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There seem to be at least two voices here, so more than one person has been involved in the creation. Permission from the other co-author(s) may be required. Stefan4 (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rudyramjet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work, some copyvios already deleted.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them can easily be own work, but without knowing, which ones, there is no other way than  Delete all. The button design does not surpass threshold of originality, but as button is 3-dimensional object, permission from photographer is still needed. Maybe category:Cardiac Kidz becomes empty after deletion of the files. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 04:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eabesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. I deleted a collage speedily. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tajultaji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly more complex than "simple geometric shapes and/or text" and therefore does not fall into the public domain as claimed. IllaZilla (talk) 06:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: art logo Alan (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This conceptual art is in all probability copyrighted. Kigsz (talk) 07:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Living artist. No permission. Might be out of scope as well: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use. BrightRaven (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused files, private images

BrightRaven (talk) 08:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all, obviously promotional. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all, as above. --Jonund (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clear consensus Alan (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudio gonçalves dias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 09:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, low quality, blurry, private image. BrightRaven (talk) 09:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jorge Cielo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I consider the files out of project scope due to bad quality. --Taivo (talk) 09:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, low quality, blurry, private image. BrightRaven (talk) 09:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image, low-quality photograph of the sky without accurate location information. BrightRaven (talk) 09:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Radhatanaya

[edit]

These files are uploaded by Radhatanaya (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Commons:IDENT violation Shadak (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is public performing. This is not some private party, but festival. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Taivo and Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany. whym (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Perhaps I should have cited Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Italy, which is more lenient, for the place where it was photographed. (thanks to User:Darkweasel94 for pointing out) --whym (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto wurde ohne Genehmigung von Florian Fesl auf Wikipedia geladen! 2003:63:2D45:6E67:B56C:ACF5:186C:2D85 13:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is public performing. This is not some private party, but festival. Permission is not needed. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Taivo. Alan (talk) 00:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adi5500~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Should be converted into wikitables if the content useful.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and "Corex" kept: in use on 2 projects Alan (talk) 00:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JMRDA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sin permiso evidente Alan (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JMRDA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The user has uploaded a large number of copyvios (which have already been deleted). It seems highly unlikely that these are their own work, considering the number of different cameras (and files with no real metatdata).

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I made a reverse image search in a couple of them, and they showed results on tourism websites. Günther Frager (talk) 14:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fuera del alcance del proyecto y permiso dudoso Alan (talk) 00:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinodhchennu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and cmts Alan (talk) 00:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryo1112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B4ball77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by B4ball77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permissions. File:Abhi.ogg most likely performed by en:Sonu Nigam, Indian singer.

Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also DR above. Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by user:Materialscientist as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:26, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These files are digitally modified. The text in papers is not hand-written. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional photo of socking spammer (blocked on en-Wiki). Unclear copyright, out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 14:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of domesticated dog. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ignatiev23

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Ignatiev23 (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 14:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stephanie Bothor, credited in EXIF, should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep EXIF says, that Stephanie Bothor and the uploader Paradis Sauvage are the same person. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: EXIF states that Stephanie Bothor and Paradis Sauvage represent the same entity. OTRS is needed to can verify that Paradis Sauvage and Paradissauvage (talk · contribs) are the same entity. Storkk (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: account verification is needed Alan (talk) 00:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 15:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JOGDANIELS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Books. No evidence of permission. Possibly out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ps Alan (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a scan of someone else's work. No evidence of permission. Possibly out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly copyright Fred Dufour (cf. [3] ). Copyright holder should confirm license via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 15:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website screenshot. Stefan4 (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are licencing requirements for website screenshots? -Prabodh1987 (talk) 22:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright holder of the website content needs to follow the process described at COM:OTRS. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Stefan4's cmt Alan (talk) 00:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JULIO ALEJANDRO CISTERNA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused PDFs of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Should be changed into wikicode if useful.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, previously published online: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 2001. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 2001. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 2001. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Maximo88

[edit]

Maximo88 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 15:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puede ser porque era el año 2007? Qué culpa tengo yo de la resolución de las cámaras de aquella época. Borra lo que quieras. No dono más dinero a Wikipedia. Hay demasiada gente trabajando para destruir, en vez de para construir.


Deleted: Sin confirmacion evidente de la propiedad de los derechos y según los comentarios dejados por el creador en cada linea. Alan (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Hansdieterlitz

[edit]

Hansdieterlitz (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

At first, they are small photos without metadata, at second, all are unused and educational value is not obvious, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof of permission required via OTRS system MPF (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: User did not create the award in the photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof of permission required via OTRS system MPF (talk) 16:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this group shot of non-notable people. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dominicjosejith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs: No confidence that any of these images are self created. Head-shots of actor/actresses, perfectly plaaced soccer shots and a poster of some sort, do not seem like the creation of a single person, (no metadata on any), also facebook size images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I deleted speedily a poster and add all other files, which Dominicjosejith uploaded after Ellin's deletion request. I warned Dominic. Taivo (talk) 13:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ellin and Taivo Alan (talk) 00:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agentecbf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear source : to old to be an own work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ñuphi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work : far too old images, the source is unclear.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The toys are here exhibition items, look at the panel in the image. In this case toys are artworks, thus copyrighted (COM:TOYS). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jbrpro

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jbrpro (talk · contribs):

They are small photos without metadata, own work is not sure, copyright violation is possible. In addition, they are vacation photos, educational value is rather weak and all are unused, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand at all these poor arguments, and I don' t agree at all : these photographs can be interesting on sociology point of view (by the way, the vacation photos are very interesting for academic study on the way people spend their leisure time). If anyone of the people involved in these pictures (author, etc) claim he want these pictures be erased OK, if not : it's a pure act of vandalism. --Jean Housen 18:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused. Low res. Per Taivo and COM:PRP. Alan (talk) 00:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Trokar

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Trokar (talk · contribs):

Usually the photos have no metadata. If camera data exists, then camera is always different. Some photos have author's name (always different), one has strange watermark. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Taivo's evidences Alan (talk) 00:49, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gianoglio5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gianoglio5. Most likely 2014 uploads from an "all-he-can-get-grabber" for "Club Deportivo Huracán" (Argentine sports club), several times deleted at eswiki, including magazine scans (like File:Tasasfsfasd.jpg), heavily watermarked (Facebook) images (like File:Tancacha guapa.jpg), logos (File:Huracan tancacha escudo.png, btw grabbed from Facebook 2011) and historical images like File:Golazo.jpg (which may in public domain by other reasons, but relevant info must be provided) etc. Nominating also the whole stuff around shirts & uniformes like File:Tancacha 10.png, most likely not "own work" and derivated from copyrighted content.

Gunnex (talk) 18:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nuked Alan (talk) 00:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gianoglio5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gianoglio5, and previous mass DR. Uploaded since 03.2016 by an "all-he-can-get-grabber" for "Club Deportivo Huracán" (Argentine sports club).

Gunnex (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rifat01.mahmud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not used; personal image

~ Nahid Talk 18:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from this concert footage. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malik.223

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Malik.223 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. If camera data exist, then camera is always different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He is an film actors from India. -- Allforrous (talk) 22:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly, Ramkumaar is unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo Alan (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JIGRaza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JIGRaza

Gunnex (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SabaleroBrazil+ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:SabaleroBrazil+

Gunnex (talk) 19:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 00:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Suresh.vinay

[edit]

Suresh.vinay (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 19:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Varunsajeevan

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Varunsajeevan (talk · contribs)

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 19:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know that this picture has a OTRS, however, this look like a TV screenshoot. The Photographer (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Альона Малашина

[edit]

Альона Малашина (talk · contribs) has uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Who is architect/sculptor and when the house/sculpture was erected?
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эти фотографии нарушают авторские права скульптора/архитектора. Когда скульптура/дом построили и кто скульптор/архитектор? Taivo (talk) 10:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:FOP Alan (talk) 01:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by U3097561 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on the trophy being handed from person to person; not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A collage of unattributed images. If this is the sort of thing you like, please put it on your Facebook page, it's not only a COM:COPYVIO but vastly out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof of permission required via OTRS system MPF (talk) 16:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission, image was sent to me by email. what is OTRS system? Proof was provided to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons Ticket#: 2015101210003623


Deleted: OTRS case not closed as valid. Please, read last email sent from OTRS Alan (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable COM:COPYVIOs. Collage of images, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutelly not copyvio. The three pictures are mine and I own the original ones. No metadata because I merged the three pictures into one using Paint. --Kokoo (talk) 18:26, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Upon reading the upload instructions for Commons, you'd find that Commons requests the original images, not collages. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ellin Alan (talk) 00:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Itsmeesathya

[edit]

Itsmeesathya (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

They are small photos and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. But the user claimed in my talkpage, that they are not copyvios. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - derivative work of the sculpture by a living artist h-stt !? 16:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of McLytir

[edit]

McLytir (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

I suspect copyright violation. No copyright message in Max Alexander's site. Taivo (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ciresalertasismica

[edit]

Ciresalertasismica (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Unused files, out of project scope.

Second group. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First of all, it is a nude person. That would be okay if it weren't a bad shot, and if this didn't seem like someone just tried to take a bad naked photo of themselves in a car. No articles use it, and it has no educational value. RayquazaDialgaWeird2210 (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your words can be seen how much you know of nude photography. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
According to german law and law of many other countries this picture is without any doubt not pornographic. It's an nude in artistic meaning, of good photographic quality. There is only one breast belonging to female sexual characteristics to see, accurately seen of female secondary sexual characteristics. My opinion: Not to delete! --Alupus (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per consensus. --ZooFari 00:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

92.246.34.60 18:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept – No delete reason given, kept by unanimous decision! a×pdeHello! 15:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Personally I'm strictly against keeping tons of pornographic pictures, but even if this picture might offend some puritan readers it is definetly no pornography! a×pdeHello! 15:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I understand this has gone through a deletion debate, but it is an unused and unuseful image. I don't know what it would illustrate, but we have other images in Category:Nude women inside automobiles, and they don't cut off the subject's head. There's no artistry or technical skill in the image, and I'm seeing little value besides "hey here's a naked woman". Prosfilaes (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a general principle, I think we should look a little askance at nudes that don't have heads that aren't anatomical illustrations. They're more purient, more amateur, and they indicate that the model wasn't really comfortable with the photography.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there was; there's no educational use, therefore it's out of scope.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Commons no only the source for Wikimedia projects, Commons is a source of fee images. It's no out of scope. --Ralf Roleček 20:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:SCOPE.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Talk page use generally doesn't count. This is not censorship; this is in accordance with COM:PENIS which says "(But this is in no way restricted to files containing nudity or sexual content; anything of poor quality may be deleted in favor of higher-quality replacements.)"--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is not of poor quality, so your penis metaphor does not apply. It's just another example of artistic nude photography, which is in scope. Also, I don't see any Commons regulation that requires nude images to include heads. --Rosenzweig τ 16:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per cmts. Alan (talk) 00:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, we have better images of nude women driving. Only use is buried in an old archive page on German Wikipedia Dronebogus (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (and protect image). This has gone trough several DRs already. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s not a rationale, unless you can point me to a “lots of deletion requests = immunity” policy. And two years-old requests (not counting an invalid one with no rationale) are not “several”. Dronebogus (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – It is amateur porn and fun to see how people do not provide any reasons for why it would be "realistically educationally useful".
I'm fine with a totally unrealistic view of what belongs on WMC – my concern is that it is inappropriately placed into category "Unidentified Volkswagen automobiles" where it does not belong. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment If you have a concern about categorization which you consider inappropriate, you can edit to improve categorization. That is not a reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Not high quality photo, but also not bad nor low quality. Adequate snapshot illustration of a nude woman in an automobile. We only have 4 images in this category, and this is the only one illustrating the concept while not showing a face. Unless one considers a bare breast to be inherently offensive, I'd call this inoffensive. No problem, no need to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If "we have better pictures" were an argument (it isn't), it wouldn't apply. It is the only image in its category that was taken from the top view. Commons is a database of images, from which re-users can choose and use the image that suits them best (in WM, instantcommons, or anywhere else on the web). It is censoring to try to dictate to the re-users what they should use. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We aren’t an indiscriminate collection of everything. Quality control isn’t censorship. Dronebogus (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 08:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyvio taken from HD Stock Photo here: http://www.hdstockphoto.com/photos/detail/raja-udang-2098444.html unless there is any possibility that HD Stock Photo got the pic from here, rather than vice-versa?? MPF (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. hdstockphoto.com makes no specific claim to copyright of this image. Clicking "original website" at http://www.hdstockphoto.com/photos/detail/raja-udang-2098444.html in fact leads back to the Wikipedia page, which was uploaded in 2006, predating the 2013 blanket copyright for the website, which appears to be a content recycler more than a content creator: the terms of service state: "HDStockPhoto.com respects the intellectual property of others. It is HDStockPhoto.com's policy to respond expeditiously to claims of copyright and other intellectual property infringement." Looking at User:Tabdulla's other uploads (e.g. File:Katoq-Borneo.jpg, File:Hipposideros ridleyi Chong Yee Ling.JPG and File:Universiti Malaysia Sarawak bicycle lane and golf course.JPG) I see no reason to doubt Tabdulla's authorship. Animalparty (talk) 22:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Odd, when I clicked on "original website" there I just got taken back to the same HDStockPhoto.com page http://www.hdstockphoto.com/source/raja-udang-2098444 not to wikipedia; if it does for you, that's strong evidence it is as you say. Revise my opinion to Keep in that case. - MPF (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per cmts Alan (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cites the author but no mention about license or source Victorgrigas (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep there is a license. Considering his other uploads, I believe, that the license is valid. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo Alan (talk) 00:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THe uploader mentions author but no source or license given Victorgrigas (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want erase it? I made this file, only me worked in this file. What kind of argument do you use do erase it? Where in the internet you saw a file like this? Font: www.ciceromoraes.com.br/blog/?p=1105

 Keep there is a license. Considering his other uploads, I believe, that the license is valid. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo Alan (talk) 00:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Appears to be cropped. Gunnex (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). The mentioned source link appears to be random. No hits for "1989" and/or "El Gráfico", as indicated by uploader. es:Víctor Vesco died in 2009. Gunnex (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nieaktualny Karolinasar (talk) 21:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete derivative work of a copyright poster with no evidence the Flickr user owns the copyright to anything other than the photo. Ww2censor (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep purpose of this photo is not just using the poster, but more is to show such poster exists as an outdoor advertisement in a populous train station, which could act as a supplementary evidence to the topic's notability and popularity. If cropping is an issue, I would not oppose reverting to the previous version. Lssrn (talk) 08:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but it is still a derivative work so is a non-free image and the commons does not host such images. The enwiki allows some non-free image but only if they pass all 10 non-free media policy guidelines. The reasoning that such an image exists is still a problem because the poster is copyright and it is not a en:de minimis image.. Ww2censor (talk) 22:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The photo is definitely in project scope, but unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Japan for 2-dimensional art. OTRS-permission from artist is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:FOP Alan (talk) 00:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I haven't managed to find this image at president.gov.by (the source information provided), but I do believe that it was published there (as I saw a different version with the same attribution). That website displays a standard copyright notice, with no indication that the images are available under a free license. The photograph doesn't appear to fall under any of the use cases listed at {{PD-BY-exempt}}. —David Levy 22:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exact duplicate of File:Øvre Årdal Norway.jpg, except a one-pixel-wide white line on the right DmitTrix (talk) 23:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The white line should not be present in the picture. Of the two files, the other one does not have the line, so I think it is the file to be kept. Both files were uploaded by the same user, so I guess he noticed the problem, but just didn't know that he can overwrite the original file; so he uploaded it under a new name.
If it's preferrable to keep the older file, then it needs to be overwritten by the newer one, and then the newer one can be deleted (replaced by a redirect). DmitTrix (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: use {{Duplicate}} template Alan (talk) 00:55, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution and no metadata make me suspect a copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The author is given as Donna Rae Kurt and it was uploaded by user Dkurt. I suspect the low res be due to the age of the image rather than copyvio. // Liftarn (talk)
What, 2008? The image is 150 pixels square - even in 2000 cameras did at least 640*480. The user's contribution history shows them to be almost entirely a single purpose account. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per mattbuck Alan (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 09:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This file owns to Nathalie Chiche and i'm responsible to the creation of its wikipedia page. no copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoine-LeHUB (talk • contribs) 09:04, 12 October 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • The photo can't be from 10 october 2015. A fuller version [4] was published in a magazine and on the internet in 2014 [5]. The claim of own work is dubious and the reply from the uploader adds to the doubt. -- Asclepias (talk) 10:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is big, but has no metadata, claimed author Andrés Cepeda is wrong (this is not a selfie) and this is the uploader's only contribution. Maybe this is copyright violation, at least correct author is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo of a university in Vietnam Quenhitran (talk) 11:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image from a media outlet (user falsely claimed their copyright) Quenhitran (talk) 11:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is in my opinion a problem of a website with a specific reuse license providing us with a blanket reuse license. The OTRS ticket is clear that they are allowing us to use these images, but IMO they don't own the images. E.g see [6] or [7] and compare to File:Siddharth-during-shooting.jpg, the other website has the images being the copyright of photographer palPalani. I am not nominating the images that have some sort of Cinefundas link and associated Exif data that shows some sort of ownership.

SpacemanSpiff 14:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS permission. Alan (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Performance. Missing evidence of permission from the 'performing artist'. Missing information about the source and copyright status of the performed material. Stefan4 (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The recording was done at a public concert. The concert did not had any restrictions on video recording. Since this video was recorded by me, does it not become my content? I am distributing it freely under the said licence.- Prabodh1987 (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are several rightsholders:
  • The 'performing artist' (in this case the singer) holds the w:Performer rights. Permission is needed from the performing artist.
  • The person who created the song holds the copyright to the song. Permission is needed from this person. In some cases, there is one composer and another person who wrote the lyrics. If so, permission is needed from both of them.
  • The ones who created the video and sound recordings hold the copyright to these. In this case, you created both recordings.
Unfortunately, we only have permission from you but not from the other rightsholders involved. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kraplak light

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Kraplak light (talk · contribs):

Some of them are small photos without camera data. If camera data exist, then uploader is not author. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 01:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist durch einen unerlaubten Aufstieg meines Quadrocopters entstanden. Ich bitte Sie das Bild zu löschen um mir rechtliche Konsequenzen zu ersparen. RaBaWorx (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keine Gründe für einen Rechtsverstoß erkennbar. Weder aufgrund der Urheberrechte noch aufgrund von Privatsphäreverstößen. In der Regel ist für private Flüge mit kleinen Drohnen auch keine Aufstiegserlaubnis nötig. Von daher ist kein Grund für eine Löschung erkennbar. Indeedous (talk) 07:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is advertising allowed . took my sick brother(he had a stroke) there last month - no doctor would see him Burdensome (talk) 04:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment There is no freedom of panorama in Australia for 2-dimensional works. The question is, does the advertisement surpasses threshold of originality. And also de minimis is possible. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per COM:DM Alan (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Alan. Yann (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsoukalos tiene razón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook/Twitter) resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also:

Permission and/or further details needed.


Gunnex (talk) 21:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took those photos. How can I demonstrate this? I published those photos in many fansites of Rosario Central, the club I support. Too many fans saved this photos and published them in many others social networks and fansites, so they became "popular"... Please, belive me.--Tsoukalos tiene razón (talk) 20:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder about 960x720 (Facebook default resolution) and 960x640 (which appears to be cropped). Do you have higher resolutions (including metadata/EXIF from the digicam in use) and where (and when) did you publish the photos first? COM:GOODFAITH is always available but these files are the only "own works"-uploads by you and COM:PRP (without providing further details) just seems (per above) adequate to apply. Gunnex (talk) 21:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am one of the admin. of canalla.com in twitter. I published that image on twitter [8]. --Tsoukalos tiene razón (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fine for you... but this does not clarify the issues raised above. Gunnex (talk) 22:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please send a permission, and then the files can be undeleted. Yann (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License statement that "All right to this picture belong to me, but it may be used here for specific purposes requested" may not be compatible with Wikimedia commons, which requires that images be licensed in such as way as to allow any use, including commercial. The OTRS tag confirms that proper permission was not received. Ahecht (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There's no hint that this is not a copyvio.. Wait for OTSR process to resolve, per Storkk below. Barte (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment It may well turn out to be a copyvio, but there are hints that it may not be: 1) Splash News is credited both in the EXIF and the file description. Overcredited, you might even say... this is unusual for a straight newspaper photo copyvio. 2) OTRS was used - not to my satisfaction yet, but that is also unusual for a straightforward copyvio. I requested clarification on 11 October for what it's worth. So it is very possibly a copyvio - but there are hints that it might not be. In any case, if deleted and the OTRS clarification does come through, it can easily be restored. Storkk (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Question @Storkk: How long would you typically allow for a satisfactory OTRS clarification? Given your comment, I'm inclined to let the process unfold, if the time is less than infinite. Barte (talk) 05:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Barte: I think a week to 10 days is usually more than enough, and since undeletion is not a big challenge, I don't think it needs to be agonized over. The possibility, however minuscule, that a news desk would freely license celebrity photos might tip the balance to waiting a little longer in order not to jeopardize their good will, but it's admittedly a tiny chance. Storkk (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • One thing to keep in mind is that the uploader, who is claiming to be the photographer Said Elatab (they uploaded as "own work" and linked the name Said Eletab to their userpage), has a history of uploading celebrity photographs by other photographers with fake licensing information (such as File_talk:Justin_Bieber_2015.jpg). --Ahecht (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
            • And another is that even taken at face value, the alleged statement from the photographer is incompatible with a CC license: All right [sic] to this picture belong to me, but it may be used here for specific purposes requested. The only thing we don't have is the OTRS correspondence. But the case for keeping would seem to hang by a thread. Barte (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Likely copyvio. It's a flipped image (original here), which could have been done to avoid detection by reverse image searches. Melonkelon (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good find. This is just the latest in a series of attempts to upload a post-transition image of Jenner that has been cropped and flipped to avoid detection. I would suggest salting the image name File:Caitlyn Jenner.jpg as well, at least for now. --Ahecht (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unsure. It's their only upload. It was uploaded on 29 November and transferred to Commons on the same day, which is suspicious but it's not unusual for editors to check Flickr often to see if any new images have been uploaded. Limited metadata. Melonkelon (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, except that's exactly what I was doing. I really wanted to find a good picture of Caitlyn once and for all, you know... HalloweenNight (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unsure, as well. It does look like an airport fan photo, as opposed to a professional shot. But no info as to which airport or confirmation of the 11/25 date it was purportedly shot. Barte (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is extremely suspicious is that the Flickr username (a new Flickr user that only uploaded this one image) is "Kevin Winter", which is similar to the name of Kevin Winters, the Getty Images photographer that took the widely publicized professional photos of Jenner at the ESPY awards. In fact, a Flickr account named "Kevin Winters Photography" (which has now been removed) was used to flickrwash copyrighted Getty Images photographs of Justin Bieber and Caitlyn Jenner (see File_talk:Justin_Bieber_2015.jpg). Also, I believe that the uploader HalloweenNight tried to upload one of the Kevin Winters Getty Images photographs to Wikipedia here with a claim of fair use that was later speedy deleted (I can't see the deleted file so I'm not sure if it was one of the Kevin Winters images that was deleted). --Ahecht (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody uses their real name on Flickr, though. Too many security breaches to trust their mess lol HalloweenNight (talk) 13:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above link is dead or you need an account, but I see the picture here. Barte (talk) 02:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed above. --Ahecht (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely Flickr washing, unreliable source that has since been removed from Flickr. --P 1 9 9   14:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proof of permission required via OTRS system MPF (talk) 17:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proof was provided to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons Ticket#: 2015101210003623


Deleted: no OTRS permission Krd 11:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is functionally identical to File:Olympic boycotts 1976 1980 1984.PNG; the only visible differences are changes to the colors for Niger, Suriname, and Western Sahara, although the file size difference (60KB for the other image; 74 for this one) suggests that there's some sort of additional difference somewhere. Nyttend (talk) 01:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I do not want to delete a correct file, but I do not know, which file is correct. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The new one seems more correct (See Suriname at the Olympics) Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No official proof that this is indeed the official emblem, badge or seal of the Ministry of State Security of the People's Republic of China (which does not actually have an official presence on the Internet of their own, either independently or otherwise). Does not seem to have originated from a page of an Internet site with the .gov.cn suffix. Quite possibly entirely fictitious indeed. Urquhartnite (talk) 03:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do u mean this or this one?--Sanandros (talk) 14:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Both. -- Urquhartnite (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The logo here looks pretty similar to that one which we have.--Sanandros (talk) 08:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not even remotely close. That one is essentially an enclosed miniature of the Chinese national emblem within another emblem, whereas the one out of the other two contains, in fact, a somewhat stylised, non-standard (tilting somewhat to the right) symbol of the Chinese Communist Party (the modern Chinese version of the hammer-and-sickle). Anyway, that belongs to the Chinese People's Police Force and also that of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security (Gong An ( 公安 )) (and their various provincial or other provincial-level and sub-provincial subsidiary organs) [9], i.e., the Chinese MVD; which are in fact a separate Chinese Government department to the Chinese Ministry of State Security (Guo An; 国安 ; 国家安全部) [10]; i.e., the Chinese NKVD or KGB (but probably run more on the lines of the GPU, the OGPU and the GUGB). -- Urquhartnite (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If it is a fake it isn't a copyright violation and the file is used so it is automaticly in scope. Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Redundant low quality version of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:China_Ministry_of_State_Security_insignia.png Abovfold (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This image is so old that off-wiki pages may be using it and linking back to us, so we need to keep it around for attribution purposes. holly {chat} 19:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flawlessentrprs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings by living artist Gustave Blache III. Permission is necessary.

BrightRaven (talk) 11:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The artist's homepage has direct link to article about him in Wikipedia. I think, that he likes, that these files are used in Wikipedia. But some kind of permission is nevertheless needed. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Needs OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Fotosergio

[edit]

Fotosergio (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Who is architect/sculptor and when the house/sculpture was erected?
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эти фотографии нарушают авторские права скульптора/архитектора. Когда дом построили и кто архитектор/скульптор? Taivo (talk) 11:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am just curious what is copyrighted in this image? Or in this one? --Alexander (talk) 23:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: 2 files, as per [11]. Yann (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tania28

[edit]

Tania28 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Who is architect/sculptor and when the house/sculpture was erected?
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эти фотографии нарушают авторские права скульптора/архитектора. Когда скульптура/дом построили и кто архитектор/скульптор? Taivo (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Юрий Костюк

[edit]

Юрий Костюк (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Who is architect/sculptor and when the house/sculpture was erected?
В Украине нет свободы панорамы. Эти фотографии нарушают авторские права скульптора/архитектора. Когда скульптура/дом построили и кто архитектор/скульптор? Taivo (talk) 14:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Symbols of Arroio do Sal regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Arroio do Sal emancipated in 1988, failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law, here created by municipal law Lei 016/89 in 1989. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government (mostly some years after official federal constitution, see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...). The actual Brazilian copyright law from 1998 makes no exception for government works.

Gunnex (talk) 17:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]