User talk:Radhatanaya

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(() 13:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)) Dear Sir, I do agree that it was my mistake of uploading others photos. When I entered Wikipedia(Kn) they had less than 10,000 articles. The local authorities were inviting us to work for kannada language. Then, I retired just then, in 2004. Started working in that zeal. Hundreds of articles I wrote. The main issue was there was no one to guide me. Being an aged man (now 76) I did not worry much except adding articles to the kannada repository. The violation as you are mentioning is being done by unintentionally, not deliberately. So, I request you to condone the mistake and you can delete all the photos I uploaded earlier. Now a new camera is with me And I will place the photos taken by me. Now I'm realizing how the over sincerity, and enthusiasm, can harm a person of my caliber. Even the murderers can get mercy at some time. I have done a mistake no doubt, but not a crime. Please give ma a choice. The problem is I have greater zeal and zest for contributing the articles in kannada. Without the right pictures the articles look crippled. so, the greater providence will bestow upon you and give me a choice to make a nice beginning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radhatanaya (talk • contribs) 13:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC) (() 03:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)) Please delete my earlier uploaded pictures. Now I will upload latest ones with my camera. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radhatanaya (talk • contribs) 03:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC) (() 13:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)) Sir, I'm making my fresh request to pardon me for the mistakes committed by me. I will not violate the rules in future. I'm interested to take part in the photographic contest. I have purchased a new camera Nikon D3400 for that. Please lift the ban and oblige me sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radhatanaya (talk • contribs) 13:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Radhatanaya 14:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)) Sir I'm not able to follow so many rules amd sub rules. I feel they are not user friendly for a person like me (74years) I want to edit and write a few articles in kannda and add the pictures taken by my camera. But no one is helping me. I'm frustrated. In spite of contributing hundreds of articles in kannada language, I have been discouraged. Really your rules are very complicated and I'm sick of the elaborative system just to discourage. I don't think I get any justice. Bye good bye.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Radhatanaya!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:(GPO) ಜನರಲ್ ಪೋಸ್ಟ್ ಆಫೀಸ್, ಮುಂಬಯಿ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Radhatanaya (talk) 04:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)) ಈ ಚಿತ್ರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ನಾನು ಒಂದು ದಿನಪೂರ್ತಿ ಕಷ್ಟಪಡಬೇಕಾಯಿತು. ನನ್ನ ಕಾಲುನೋವಿನ ನಡುವೆ ಮಾಡಿದ ಶ್ರಮ ವ್ಯರ್ಥವಾಯಿತು.ಏಕೆ ತೆಗೆದಿರಿ ?[reply]

File:ಜನರಲ್ ಪೋಸ್ಟ್ ಆಫೀಸ್ ನ ಒಳನೋಟ.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Radhatanaya (talk) 04:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)) ಈ ಚಿತ್ರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ನಾನು ಒಂದು ದಿನಪೂರ್ತಿ ಕಷ್ಟಪಡಬೇಕಾಯಿತು. ನನ್ನ ಕಾಲುನೋವಿನ ನಡುವೆ ಮಾಡಿದ ಶ್ರಮ ವ್ಯರ್ಥವಾಯಿತು.ಏಕೆ ತೆಗೆದಿರಿ ?[reply]

File:ಬಿ.ವಿ.ಎಸ್. ಅಯ್ಯಂಗಾರ್ ಒಂದು ಪಾರ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ಶ್ಯಾಮಲಾ ಮಾಧವ, ಬರಹಗಾರ್ತಿ,.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Radhatanaya (talk) 04:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)) ಚಿತ್ರವನ್ನು ತೆಗೆದದ್ದು ಏಕೆ ತಿಳಿಸಿ.[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:31, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pt.Vinayak ram, Gata player.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 02:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 03:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vinayak ram, Ghatam player.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 08:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Radhatanaya.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

INeverCry 21:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sadhana Shikhara Prashasti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 15:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

[edit]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Previously I was using Rangakuvara. Because I did not knew I can use single account in multiple projects I had created two accounts. Also, from that account I had uploaded copyrighted images. (They got deleted) Now I have understood about the copyright issues. Kannada Wikimedia editor Gopala Krishna A helped me to understand the license parameters. Now I will use only this account (Radhatanaya) for future works. I assure you that I will not use User:Rangakuvara in future. I kindly request admins to give permission to upload files to commons."
Decline reason: "No answers for questions during one week. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

--Radhatanaya (talk) 12:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose - COM:BLOCK requires requests to demonstrate an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. 1) "Because I did not knew I can use single account in multiple projects I had created two accounts." This is disingenuous at best. If it were true that you believed you needed a separate account for each project, we would not see the two accounts editing within hours of each other (e.g., 16 July 2016 - [1], [2]; 4 August 2016 - [3]9, [4]; etc.) or, for example, the use of both accounts to upload a combined six copyvios on 12 May 2016 ([5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11])--all prior to your block for sockpuppetry; and 2) "Now I have understood about the copyright issues. Kannada Wikimedia editor Gopala Krishna A helped me to understand the license parameters." What are the issues that you now understand? Why did you ignore all of the warnings above? Why do you characterise falsely claiming someone else's work to be your own as merely not understanding license parameters (i.e., you didn't just add bogus licenses, you actually claimed yourself to be the author of even non-derivative works (!!!))? You need to explain and acknowledge honestly the issues; you have not even come close to doing that. Эlcobbola talk 15:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeals

[edit]

Please, add a new {{Unblock}} template (not replacing or removing the existing one) to the bottom of the page to appeal your block.--GZWDer (talk) 14:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]