Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 14th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aeonlightingtech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. Out of scope.

Wcam (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blaccode (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, out of scope Threecharlie (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sv:Wikipedia:Månadens nyuppladdade bilder/2010-07 image contained only in a gallery without any illustrative purposes in support of an article, useless to the purposes in any wikimedia project and unusable outside of them.--Threecharlie (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Project scope is clear, file in use, and therefore in scope, regardless its quality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Unusable photograph, too blurred. Out of scope. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license (No license since). Image from flickr without any solid information. We do not know the photographer, the time when the photo was taken, or if it was published before. I am OK with reuploding the image if we learn more about this photograph. Jarekt (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jarekt: , Photo Marie Galmiche

the photo File:Général Marie-Olivier Galmiche.jpg, is on Flickr in CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0)Public Domain Dedication. Regards, --Marcroux (d) 12:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes it was but Béatrice Humbert is not the photographer of any of the photos in her account, and she can not release them under any license. For File:Général Marie-Olivier Galmiche.jpg she wrote "Photo famille D.Galmiche". Flickr does not care, about licenses, but on commons we need to know more to assess validity of the license. --Jarekt (talk) 12:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Jarekt: ,Thank you, you can delete the file, it was removed from the page where I had put the photo.
--Marcroux (talk) 12:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Jarekt (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Free software screenshot under several free licenses, but too small resolution. Amitie 10g (talk) 08:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: File history-- 09:24, 14 September 2015 HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Within Mint17.1 on Ubuntu 14.04.png (Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing) Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned copyrighted bookcovers, not own works.

Sealle (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. PD-textlogo imho. Natuur12 (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly PD-textlogo case, rasterized (JPG) image. --Scoopfinder(d) 19:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster artwork, not necessarily uploaders. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A quick google image search makes me think this isn't the uploaders own work. Kethrus (talk) 00:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Black Kite as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not the logo of the company (which would be copyrighted) but a self-made (or, indeed, made-up) version (which even if the logo existed would be derivative. User has a history of doing this and is now indefblocked at en.wiki Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: either copyrighted or out of scope or both Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for non-architectural work in Russia A.Savin 10:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - gettyimages Austriantraveler (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Hekerui (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La qualité de l'image est très basse Némésis45 (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 22:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aarna Gupta Ludhiana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: photographs of minor children used in deleted Facebook-style page of sockpuppet en:User:Aarna Gupta Ludhiana. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aarna Gupta from the same person.

JohnCD (talk) 13:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong adress, no Cultural heritage monument Jbergner (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was uploaded over 2 years ago, way longer than the uploader’s “grace period”. -- Tuválkin 20:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image is renamed - there's no cause for deleting. Image could be usable. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear if it is a open content screenshot, unclear educational use. JesseW (talk) 05:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   13:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boxinzzz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Out of Commons:Project scope.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boxinzzz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seeing Commons:Office_actions/DMCA_notices#BR-5972_LAjandrive16_MG_a02.jpg, we should question the authorship and license of these files. Probably out of scope anyway. Regards,

Yann (talk) 01:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete at least as out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above; few clear copyvio nominated as speedy. Ankry (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 19:37, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Louis.bataille (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 14:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope software manual – uploaded for spam/advertising purposes. The uploader inserted 150KB of text on unrelated Bitcoin wallet software to the description. The manual is almost certainly NOT his own work or Creative Commons licensed as he claimed.

It is an outdated manual for a bibliographic database management tool. (It may be free software but it is of little use here.)

Please also delete the redirect to this file that he created: File:Development.pdf84.92.129.87 21:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drsnjhalbs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Drsnjhalbs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EGMike95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goodjd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three more images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh. Doodles are non-encyclopedic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madeline Amos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sforza Monument in Nagoya, Japan (RECONSTRUCTION) after Leonardo da Vinci - panoramio

[edit]

No FoP in Japan on commons.--Tokorokoko (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration/replica in 1989 by Japanese living artists, based on da Vinci's drawings
It says uploading on jawp within the restricted resolution may be safe.

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esasowsky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Four images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoelkejm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doodle art, renderings and washes related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: creations by students in/for his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abush9527 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three more images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boomurph (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Six more Doodle art, renderings and modeling related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: creations by students in/for his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miguel Reyes-Martinez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more doodle art images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:ParkviewManor.png and File:Parkview Manor Sketch.png from same uploader, same situation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Petersak8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albahrah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another image related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Sektch1.1 9152014.jpg same situation, same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lauren Beckett (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emma Wilhelmus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One of the things Commons is not, is a place to put homework assignments for school or college. These images relate to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: where students were encouraged up upload assignments from class to Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chelsea Leonardi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joe Frees (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One sketch, two related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes, and what seems to be a scan from a book. Despite it's large size it's very blurry and has no metadata. From the formats of the other students' uploads, the assignment was to get/find/take a photo of a building and then try to doodle out the structure of the building. In this case, the uploader didn't use their cellphone, or any recognizable camera to create the base image.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laura Lenarduzzi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amanda Karling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deborah.Zamora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kristin McArthur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yokachaty13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more student doodle art and one architectural animated gif file related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicholas Kibler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chamodi Wijetunga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmood Alharthi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djaray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ethan Lozano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David James Moore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kelly Cooper44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two more related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Previously used at en:User:Anil jinwal. Jujutacular (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedical use Austriantraveler (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nos licensed under Creative Commons. Logo of CSN. http://www.sismologia.cl/ Warko (talk) 05:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivettesanth1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : not used personal images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent encyclopedic use. JesseW (talk) 05:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Duke of Alba is not even aged 70 (he is 66 years old), so the uploader can not claim that the image is in the public domain in countries with a copyright term of "life of the author plus 70 years" Iñaki Salazar (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete The image has no correct, valid and detailed Source information. --Молох (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)--[reply]

 Keep Yes it does. Read. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Where? There is no Source information that we could proof.--Молох (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Picture showing Armenians killed during the Armenian Genocide. Image taken from Ambassador Morgenthau's Story, written by Henry Morgenthau, Sr. and published in 1918. This is not correct source information? --Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The nominator doesn't know what is clearly sourced information. Secondly, the nominator is not neutral: he is Turkish and the Turks and Armenians have had nationalist clashes over the Armenian genocide of WWI. --Korman (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Bad faith nomination. Turkish user is nominating Armenian Genocide pictures for deletion en masse, claiming that there is no source, while the source is provided in the infobox. VartanM (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Eusebius (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture should be deleted due to unproven accusation 212.174.225.76 10:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Just because you don't like the fact that he openly accused the Turkish government of the Armenian Genocide, does not mean this picture should be deleted. EtienneDolet (talk) 18:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep historical document. The deletion request seems to be just vandalism. --Don-kun (talk) 09:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunvender kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 12:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aashuakasinger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Commons talk:Deletion requests: -mattbuck (Talk) 13:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AIM-9_Sidewinder is sitting on the same link as the AIM-9 Sidewinder category, which has all of those images and many more. This means that links to the common from the Wiki point to the wrong thing. There seems to be no reason to have the page, I suspect its simply historical. Remove? Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Migatomais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos, cartoons and video. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Eugene, he considerado su sugerencia y puede que tenga razón pero me gustaría que fuera más explicito ya que realmente son fotografías proporcionadas por el sr. Bibiloni del que he escrito una wiki(en mi taller) y que al ser una persona muy popular en Mallorca creo que es ilustrar de una manera seria su biografía. Algunas otras fotos están puestas para que se pueda ver la evolución de su obra. Mi intención es que cuando esta wiki reúna los requisitos, traducirla al catalán, así que de todas maneras me interesa su opinión. Muchas gracias --Migatomais (talk) 20:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. I deleted some files speedily. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JosephGallo11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three more images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh. Doodles are non-encyclopedic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JosephGallo11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three more images related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh. Doodles are non-encyclopedic.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete at first the uploader gave a source as http://handa.en.pedeall.com/sell/show/143936871896275.html but after placing a {{No permission since}} tag on the image the source was change to "own work" but the image is still available at a much high resolution at the same original source (image 7/7) but with a company logo superimposed. This image has no metadata but the uploader's name implies some connection to the manufacturing company and his image has no logo. It would be best to get an OTRS ticket for it to be kept. The same issue appear to apply to all the uploader's other images, some of which have also been nominated for deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Krd 15:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from software screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Granny64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is "own work", what's this? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The uploader claims to be a different person than the one currently credited with it. Kusma (talk) 19:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is on Flickr as CC-BY-2.0, but the EXIF information is missing and I found it published on [1]. I discovered this issue after I began the transfer but before it was verified. Mackensen (talk) 00:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: flickr washing Alan (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files were made by individuals that were not the US government and were first published in Pakistan. Whilst the US government regularly seizes property and declares it to be their own, unfortunately Commons operates on the rule that files must be public domain in the source country, in this case Pakistan, and the United States. Any US government claims over the copyright in Pakistan would be dubious, and inline with COM:PRP the files need to be deleted. A couple of the files have been previously nominated, and the closing admin has not taken this into account in their close.

VQ-BSK (talk) 01:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Nominator is arguing the intellectual property rights to these images belong to some anonyous al Qaeda underling, who actually took the image. Weren't these image transmitted anonymously? How would anyone prove they took the image? What do we do about the copyright of anonymous graffiti? Isn't that what this situation resembles? Geo Swan (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To answer your questions in order:
  • Possibly. Pakistani copyright law doesn't seem to have any separate rules for anonymous photographs, though; all photographs enter the public domain fifty years after they were created according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Pakistan.
  • Possession of a higher-resolution version would be a good indicator. Possession of a camera whose unique noise pattern matches that of the works in question would be a very strong indicator.
  • We are highly inconsistent, as noted by {{Non-free graffiti}}.
  • That could be argued, but in both cases, arguments in favour of keeping such content pretty much always bear a striking resemblance to the arguments listed as invalid in Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
LX (talk, contribs) 15:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Was used at en:Draft:Qrator Ltd. -- (declined article for lack of notibility). Jujutacular (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Jujutacular (talk) 01:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : not used / no quite notable peoples --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Illumin8te (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works. And 2 old pictures with incomplete source and no evidence that the mentioned license is valid.

Yann (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de création KA 09:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Used in deleted attack page on en:wp. JohnCD (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size. No source. Is it own work? BrightRaven (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laszlo french (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused banners. Out of scope.

BrightRaven (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Previously used at en:User:Anil jinwal. Jujutacular (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lua Cid

[edit]

It is the first time I propose a mass deletion in Commons; I hope to make it right. The main reason for the deletion is that these pictures have a clear promotional use. These are all the reasons that I gathered.

  1. An article page about Liuba Cid has been deleted from Spanish Wikipedia for promotional reasons and for including a CV of the author. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liuba_Cid (June 2014)
  2. A user page of Luacid has been deleted from Spanish Wikipedia for the same set of reasons. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuaria:Luacid (9 September 2014)
  3. The secondary User page (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuaria:Luacid/Taller) escaped deletion. It includes a CV of Liuba Cid, with no formatting. That page has been marked as "possible promotion". The page has been created on the 8th September 2014.
  4. All files proposed for deletion by me have been uploaded by Commons user Luacid, which are her(his) only contribution to Commons.
  5. These files include theatre plays and also portraits. If Luacid and Liuba Cid are the same person, as it looks likely, author cannot be the same in all these pictures.
  6. Files come from 4 different photography machines, 1 scanner and 2 other unknown sources.
  7. In the case of theatre plays it is dubious that all of them belong to the same copyright owner, as the theatre hall or the theatre company could have been the owner of all or part of the rights. We have no information about the country where that happened or what company performed the shows; therefore it is difficult to be 100% of a copyright infraction, but it is likely.
  8. In most pictures, the file's name includes the name of the play director and play writer Liuba Cid, in which it looks like a promotional procedure.
  9. All the files, coming from a span of two years, were uploaded at the same time (8th September 2014).
  10. None of these files has been used in any article at Commons or any other wikipedia project.
  11. User Luacid only made contributions on this topic.
  12. There is another picture at Commons depicting Liuba Cid, by user LC performance (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liuba_cid.jpg). LC Performance is a company owned by Liuba Cid. http://www.redescena.net/compania/13176/lc-performance/ I did not add this file to the deletion list because I think it could be deffended as a single issue if we not consider the full list.
  13. LC Performance has uploaded only two files to Commons, that of Liuba Cid and one of Pilar Ordóñez Mesa.
  14. LC Performance (LC could stand for Liuba Cid) has contributed also in two more articles at Spanish Wikipedia, that deleted of Liuba Cid, and one more, also deleted, about Pilar Ordóñez Mesa. Deletion or marking's reasons in those cases have been "lack of relevance". https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:LC_PERFORMANCE

--Xabier Cid (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have also found that some of these pictures are clear violations of copyright. I would change the marks of those, but keep the mark for the others, as the main purpose of the mass deletion is still right. --Xabier Cid (talk) 20:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not an "own work". Check http://www.khayyamexhibition.com/images/other/Khayyam-Tomb.JPG LilyOfTheWest (talk) 20:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Not the own work of the photographer, missing permission.--CennoxX (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal picture Austriantraveler (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marion Janssen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All used on the page nl:Huub Janssen (ruiter), which is nominated for deletion on nlWP. Unsure whether the uploader (his daughter Marion) or Huub himself are the author and/or copyright holder. The copyright holder should give permission via OTRS; if not, then the photos cannot be uploaded on Commons under a free license.

Trijnsteltalk 22:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo used in several websites (like this one) before it was uploaded here. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 16:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image attributed to DigitalGlobe, not US State Department, thus not public domain Samuell (talk) 03:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 10:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reuploaded without explation several months after deletion. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fire in the Vicinity of an Oil Pipeline in Homs, Syria.jpg Samuell (talk) 02:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As above. BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Font errato, sostituita da quella corretta (File:Strada Statale 693 Italia.svg). Arbalete (talk) 02:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Superseded file. BrightRaven (talk) 14:04, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa scorretta, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 20.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 02:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Incorrect map. BrightRaven (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable people or/and not used personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Warko as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not licensed under Creative Commons. Logo of CSN. http://www.sismologia.cl/ Could be PD-Textlogo? Amitie 10g (talk) 08:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo BrightRaven (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a drawing that is under Spanish Copyright law (living people) Kippelboy (talk) 08:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work" (see user name), no evidence of permission from photographer, private photo, unlikely educational usage GermanJoe (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Movie screenshot. Yann (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably not own work as claimed, but copyright violation as his all other uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, its a photomontage : what are the source of the used artworks? are they all free? I don't think --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear authorship. BrightRaven (talk) 14:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 14:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 14:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pure text PNG. Out of scope as representative merely of raw text, thus not a media file. Storkk (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 14:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 14:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused artwork by uploader. This file would be better at a DeviantArt page or Facebook, Commons is not a place to host personal artworks. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 14:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Check the account from which this image was uploaded. Flickrwashing purely. IndianBio (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded by mistake Uoaei1 (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a duplicate --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File:Stift Seitenstetten Westtrakt 01.JPG Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, "thumbsized" copy of File:Catedral of Salvador of ZaragozaFullRes.jpg. The system creates thumbnails, there's no reason to upload duplicates. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hobingj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Swishesh: doodle art by students in his classes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho advertising, see also en:User:Siddharthbalachandran: "deleted page User:Siddharthbalachandran (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)", Roland zh (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred in good faith, but if you think it's blatent advertising. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9   20:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, artwork without obvious educational use BrightRaven (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: artwork without obvious educational use. In use only on a user page of someone with no useful contribution to the project. BrightRaven (talk) 14:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why would this be GNU or CC? 92.213.15.247 15:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Wrong license - "Robert L" (?) is the "supposed" author continuously cited by the uploader in all the photos he has been posted on Commons. - Fma12 (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong licence in source picture are CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, in uploaded are CC BY-SA 4.0 Motopark (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image (better exist). Uploaders request. Josve05a (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, not rilevant Threecharlie (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

en:Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.--Threecharlie (talk) 01:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Commons is not Wikipedia. According to the Project Scope, when a file is in use (and illustrates properly the subject), is automatically in scope, regardless its quality. Also, file already kept (courtesy deletion rejected), so no reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In scope per local policies. Commons != Wikipedia. Wikipedia policies are irrelevant here. Alan (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built by famous architect => under copyright and there is no freedom of panorama in France 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 17:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France. BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Built by famous architect => under copyright and there is no freedom of panorama in France 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 17:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in France BrightRaven (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete it's highly unlikely that the Flickr user with only 3 images, 2 of which are this actress, are their own copyright. No camera details or metadata for any of their images. Ww2censor (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About the photo, the actress has given me permission to use it as shown in the photo here and that Flickr was made exclusively to store the file itself. Is there any law that myself be the author to hold rights and that the own person authorized me? Minzinha5991 (talk) 09:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are not the author of the photo so you do not hold any rights to it and unless Kyla Marie Deaver actually took the photo (it does not look like a selfie but a more professional photo) the copyright of that photo is owned by the photographer, so Deaver's permission is not proper either. You really need to make contact and ask that the copyright holder verify their permission by following the procedure found at COM:OTRS. Even her "permission" image you linked to does not specify under what licence the image is being released. We need more specifics and it must be from the copyright holder. Ww2censor (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission of the photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is copyrighted original two-dimensional art Brianhe (talk) 18:08, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW by Flickr-uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 14:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Organisational logo, not necessarily own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in use in an out of wmf wikis Alan (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acianthera_saurocephala_%28as_Pleurothallis_saurocephalus%29_-_Curtis'_57_%28N.S._4%29_pl._3030_%281830%29.jpg Richard Avery (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please use {{Duplicate}} for these, rather than DRs. A close look at these finds something odd about the very slightly larger and earlier version, it appears to have odd fringe lines introduced, possibly by being extracted from the PDF download. I suspect the slightly smaller version I uploaded from BHL is the better archive copy, but I'll leave that choice for anyone that wants to merge these images. -- (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fae Alan (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF. Is it own work? BrightRaven (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file exist in Wikimedia Commons. Nyl520 (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As this was published previously, an OTRS permission would be necessary. However, I think it is out of scope (advertising for a non notable organization). BrightRaven (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the photographs in this banner are own work. BrightRaven (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is named on the postcard ("Pitter"). Without any information about the photographer or the publication date, it is not possible to check if it is in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the author, FosseTheCat? Why is this picture in the public domain? BrightRaven (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Can you upload bigger and uncropped version? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image lost the sharpness of the original while being copied from its source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JohnBakerHouse.jpg There is a process for migrating the original images, but I don't see a need for a larger size, lower quality copy of this image with a prominant white band at the bottom to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A version of File:Bishop's Place Front View.JPG which has lost all sharpness and architectural detail. No need for two when the other one is so superior. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meller171 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two files of copyrighted, proprietary software uploaded. I'm not entirely clear whether these fall under the threshold of originality or not, but the fact that the GFDL is invoked in the rationale when it doesn't apply makes me suspicious that the user chose that whether it applied or not. (That sort of mislicensing fairly typical for users like this that register, upload one or two files, then never do anything else).

(Either images are below threshold of originality, in which case they're PD, or they're not. Either way, the uploader doesn't own anything approaching copyright in them and hence has no right to apply GFDL to them).

Ubcule (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image seems to belong to a personal repository as it is not providing knowledge, instructional or informative information. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image seems to belong to a personal repository as it is not providing knowledge, instructional or informative information. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image seems to belong to a personal repository as it is not providing knowledge, instructional or informative information. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not an "own work". Seems to be copied from here: http://www.tebyan-zn.ir/images/288fb1e1-7cca-446d-8386-8d3c7234d798.jpg If you are the owner of this picture, please upload a higher resolution of this picture. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo of not quite notable people. out of project scope. if a reupload from the monument is desired, please upload the monument itself without a focus on the people. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 22:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo of not quite notable people. out of project scope. if a reupload from the monument is desired, please upload the monument itself without a focus on the people. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken in 1930s. The uploader is not the original creator of the file as it claimed. Rapsar (talk) 23:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Previously in use at en:Morgan International. Jujutacular (talk) 23:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Previously in use at en:Mohr Davidow Ventures Jujutacular (talk) 23:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no way this falls under PD-text. It is far more elaborate than "simple geometric shapes and/or text" and clearly passes the threshold of originality. IllaZilla (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This too elaborate to qualify as "simple geometric shapes and/or text", and therefore does not fall into the public domain. IllaZilla (talk) 23:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, my mistake. I don't know how could I think that. Propably because here was also logos of bands like Iron Maiden etc with no problem. Dominikmatus (talk) 23:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a copyvio Diego Grez return fire 23:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Копия, к удалению! Frutti-mytti (talk) 14 September 2015


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, author and uploader are different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear deleter, you are a bit too suspicious. Jerzy Szymura is Bożena's husband. He took this photo, Jerzy is not at Wiki, so he had asked me to place the photo, passing the rights he do not cares about. So stay suspicious and do what you wish to do. I am bored to death by idiots like you. You waste your time destroying instead of building. Wiki will die because of morons like you. Just to recall personal remarks should not have influence on the decision. Fugiel (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your anger, Fugiel, I really do. That doesn’t mean that your comments above are not themselves moronic and idiotic. You see, if the kind of cavalier approach to copyright you defend above were enforced, Wikimedia projects would be instantly flooded with lawsuits from photographers — as some may change their minds about verbal private permissions, and others may have been falsely quoted for such permissions. I suggest that, if you really care for Wikipedia and other projects, you educate yourself more about copyright issues. As to personal remarks — no, they do not influence this deletion request (you’d still be wrong even if you hadn’t been a jerk), but they do influence a new blocking of your account. -- Tuválkin 13:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that the creator of the image has explicitly licensed it. 'Third party' statements of licensing are not acceptable. OTRS clearance is needed. Revent (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source site has clear copyright notice, so I think, that Commons needs OTRS-permission from Adam Woodall. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Nom. No evidence that the creator of the image has explicitly licensed it. 'Third party' statements of licensing are not acceptable. OTRS clearance is needed. Revent (talk) 04:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think it should be deleted but how can it be created in 1817 and fail by the revolution? Which revolution? the Russian Revolution? 50.206.29.67 18:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete this photo without a policy based reason, especially since it is a photo of a place listed on the NRHP and used in historical lists. I believe the problem you mention is in typing, perhaps a typo as simple as switching 1817 for 1718. The related article on Wikipedia might help you. I believe the uploader does have some specific problem related to typing. He also doesn't watch his user talk page as often as he should. I quite commonly help him in particular areas, so please just drop me a line on my talk page if you are tempted to delete anything. Sincerely,
Smallbones (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There appears to be no reason to doubt that is image is the uploaders own work, and thus validly licensed. Revent (talk) 05:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renato Ongania scanned/photographed this, however the artist is unknown. If it was created in 1953, it will be copyrighted until at least 2024. This OTRS ticket concerns this file, and establishes that the original artist is unknown.. Storkk (talk) 13:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you wrote is right: I scanned it from a postcard created in 1953. The artist is unknown and seems a photo of a painting. The postcard was written in 1953, but probably the copyright itself is much earlier and I can estimate 1940 (It is my estimate).--Renatoongania (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I personally would need more convincing that this is an anonymous work under the EU definition, and not just that we don't know who the author is. I also would need more convincing of the validity of the 1940 estimate. Storkk (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyrighted till 1.1.2024 unless we know author or earlier publishing date Ankry (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, multiple personalities, considering uploaded by 2-uploads-user Maclau7 (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 27.03.2012 (author = "Jose Antonio Ocampo") versus http://jaocampo.net/ (official site of "Jose Antonio Ocampo") = https://jaocampodotnet.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/ocampopic1.jpg (last modified: 26.03.2012, identical exif) which is cropped from http://jaocampo.net/photos/ = https://jaocampodotnet.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/08_02_con-jes.jpg (last modified: 26.03.2012, identical exif) and File:CeciliaLopez.jpg (tagged with no-permission), here authored by uploader with "Maclau7 Cecilia Lopez". Gunnex (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: published elsewhere before upload to Commons: http://jaocampo.net/ Ankry (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @Motopark: : you are wrong; read carefully the header of the page you pointed. However, uploader's responsibility is to provide a proof that either the collage itself or all the images used are available on a CC-BY-SA-compatible license. They failed as no response to this DR for over a month. Ankry (talk) 12:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph taken in London in 1944, by a photographer who died in 1951, with the earliest date of publication that we happened to know of being in 1989 in Poland. The uncertainty here is huge; if it was published in London, it will get a full life+70 in its source nation (and in copyright in the US for a while), and if it was published on or after March 1st, 1989, it's copyrighted in the US, as that's when the US became a full Berne Convention country without the Rule of the Shorter Term. Prosfilaes (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite likely that it was published before 1989 in Poland, would that solve the problem for now (if we find the reference)? The problem is that w:PZPR-run government didn't allow publications about emigrant leaders.  « Saper // @talk »  12:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:HIRTLE Alan (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is described as a poster and on the template as a poster trailer screenshot. The trailer is in the PD-this may not be. We hope (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title of the file calls this a film poster, but the template description says it was taken from the film's trailer.

  • Trailer can be viewed here. There are no copyright marks.

While there are scenes of the band in the PD trailer, I'm not sure this exact shot is one of them, thus I've nominated the photo for DR. We hope (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello We hope! This work is in the public domain because it was published in the US between 1923 and 1977. Therefore, it is possible to leave here. In addition, for such an old film, there are very few photos. If I now want to put forward the example of an article on Wikipedia on the status of the selected articles, I have to be at least 5-6 pictures from the Commons. Keete 37

Kept: Seems to be from the trailer. [2] Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]