User talk:Dominikmatus
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Knihy o dřevě a nábytku.JPG was uncategorized on 12 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
File:AleisterCrowleySignature.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 17:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Drawings by Bosch
[edit]Hello, I am re-uploading some of your recent uploads so that the color version of each of these drawings remains a color version. I thought that's better than having two black and white versions of each drawing. Thanks for your understanding, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 06 2012 Chvalcov kaple-Sv-Cyrila-a-Metodeje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Gratuluju, — Jagro (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Přiznám se, že takovéto vytváření "pseudodokumentů" mi na projektu typu Wikimedia Commons připadá krajně problematické, byť by bylo provedeno sebepečlivěji. --Gampe (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Jak to myslíš? Tak je to součást historie. Aproč zrovna Hitlera? Nevím, prostě mě to napadlo, když jsem narazil na jeho stránku. Když to někdo smaže, tak to smaže no. Kolorizovat černobílé fotky slavných je špatný nápad? Dominikmatus (talk) 15:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Vůbec mi nejde o námět. Vytvořil jsi (zcela perfektní) soubor, který vypadá autenticky (tehdy existovaly už i barevné fotky, nejen kolorované), ale autentcký není. Je to fejk, i když vypadá dokonale. --Gampe (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Jako jo, to je pravda no. Dominikmatus (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Adolf Hitler - portrait.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Hatnefer's Chair.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 00:57, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Chair of Reniseneb.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin H. (talk) 00:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
And all other photos of 3D objects taken from various museum websites. The claim that this is PD in egypt is possibly based on the origin of the old artefacts, and sure the "copyright" on that artefacts expired. But the photographer also has a copyright, you can not just grab a photo from a website of an american museum and declare that it is public domain worldwide. It is not. Not in the country of origin - the U.S. in this cases - and not even in egypt. --Martin H. (talk) 01:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token 5ff1fc8d0dec0d91aedc9521500fc633
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Hello Dominikmatus, Sorry for reverting your changes to this file, but the version you uploaded did not match the existing file description. If possible, could you upload your version under a different name. Thank you, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 18:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Adam Eck - Cabinet 1650 (1).jpg
[edit]File:Adam Eck - Cabinet 1650 (1).jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Adam Eck - Cabinet 1650 (1).jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.
|
The same applies to:
- File:Adam Eck - Cabinet 1650 (2).jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 1-obverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 1-reverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 2-obverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 2-reverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 3-obverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 3-reverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 4-obverse.jpg
- File:Backgammon draught in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 4-reverse.jpg
- File:Games box in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 01.jpg
- File:Games box in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 02.jpg
- File:Games box in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 03.jpg
- File:Games box in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 04.jpg
- File:Games box in Birmingham Museums and Art Gallery 05.jpg
--JuTa 17:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Dominikmatus⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Dominikmatus,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 21:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Dominikmatus, please take a look to the talk page of this image. --TheRunnerUp (talk) 17:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Wikimedia UK visit
[edit]Thanks for visiting, it was great to meet you. You can see yourself here. :) Katie Chan (WMUK) (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. I hope I will visit you again some time. :) Dominikmatus (talk) 21:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Anselm_of_Canterbury.jpg: do you know who coloured it?
[edit]It looks like an excerpt from the National Portrait Gallery's woodcut, but that's in black and white. Someone added colour. Do you know who did that? I just want to be sure that the copyright on that is okay, too. 71.41.210.146 16:48, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- I did it as file before. Dominikmatus (talk) 18:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Elysia chlorotica (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
130.182.24.189 23:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Ralf Roleček 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Triptykon-logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
IllaZilla (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Triptykon logo2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
IllaZilla (talk) 23:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit](Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Dominikmatus,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1990-048-29A, Adolf Hitler-colorized.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
K.e.coffman (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Dyatlov Pass incident 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Underlying lk (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Whitefield Green Man by Paul Sivell.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Whitefield Green Man by Paul Sivell.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Smooth O (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili
[edit]Gentile Dominikmatus, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.
Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.
Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!
Grazie, Nemo 16:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!
[edit]
Hi,
You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!
You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.
This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.
If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Franz Anton Mayer - Abbildung des Altars der Gnadenreichen Mütter Gottes bey Canct Thomas nächst Brünn.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Franz Anton Mayer - Abbildung des Altars der Gnadenreichen Mütter Gottes bey Canct Thomas nächst Brünn.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Franz Anton Mayer - Abbildung des Altars der Gnadenreichen Mütter Gottes bey Canct Thomas nächst Brünn.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te
[edit]Gentile Dominikmatus,
oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché le tue foto sono usate in due o più voci di Wikipedia o di un altro progetto Wikimedia.
Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.
Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.
Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.
Grazie ancora e a presto,
Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!
[edit]Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,
každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.
Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.
Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Bohumil Kubišta - Svatý Šebestián (1912).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bohumil Kubišta - Svatý Šebestián (1912).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Runes from Lány - 02.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Runes from Lány - 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fut.Perf. original science paper is under CC-BY. Dominikmatus (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, you're right, sorry. I had looked for a license mark at the bottom of the page and only found the standard copyright notice. Don't know why I missed it at the top. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 02.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 03.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 04.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 05.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 06.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 07.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 08.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 09.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 10.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 11.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 12.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 13.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 14.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 15.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 16.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 17.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 18.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 19.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 20.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 21.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 22.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 23.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 24.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 25.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 26.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 27.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 28.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 29.jpg
- File:Kostel sv. Vavřince, Bystřice nad Pernštejnem - interiér 30.jpg Dominikmatus (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Probošství Litomyšl
[edit]Zdravím. Co se týče tvé kategorizace této a dalších fotek do kategorie litomyšlské diecéze, tato diecéze zanikla za husitských válek (a nedávno byla "obnovena" pouze jako titulární), zatímco dnešní budova proboštství (zde farnosti povýšené nejprve na děkanství a pak na probošství) byla postavena v letech 1758 - 1763 na základech středověkého kláštera. Přímá souvislost mezi zaniklou diecézí a dnešním proboštstvím zde tedy není, historicky se minuly. Nanejvýš zde může být nepřímá souvislost v tom, že tato farnost dostala mimořádný čestný titul právě z důvodu toho, že Litomyšl bývala kdysi (ale relativně krátce) sídlem významné diecéze. Někdejší biskupský palác byl v 15. století přestavěn na hrad a ten v 16. století nahrazen zámkem. ŠJů (talk) 06:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)