Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_e_a_costa_do_México.png){kind=link}
_-_6.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Fait double emploi avec la photo "Cléder-09.JPG" (télécharger 2 fois par erreur) Wayne77 (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presenaion of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presenaion of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pesenaons of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Movie VETERAN.jpg MicCamera (talk) 14:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete Commons:Fair use. --KurodaSho (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copright violation. JuTa 19:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Not own work: User did not design the uniform or the logo of the team. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Not own work: User did not design the uniform or the logo of the team. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
(Requested by the author of the scans) Discussed with the neapolitan wikisource community. Even if this is a verified 1887 text, it has been suggested to remove it since we would be exposed to account the intellectual property binded to the creative work of page configuration (1983). — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.R. (talk • contribs) 2015-08-27T18:44:55 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Ankry (talk) 16:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
(Requested by the author of the scans) Discussed with the neapolitan wikisource community. Even if this is a verified 1888 text, it has been suggested to remove it since we would be exposed to account the intellectual property binded to the creative work of page configuration (1992). — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.R. (talk • contribs) 2015-08-27T18:37:27 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Ankry (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nebotičnik
[edit]Work by V. Šubic (d. 1946). Per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons until 2017.
- File:Le gratte-ciel art déco (Ljubljana) (9408095285).jpg
- File:Le gratte-ciel art déco (Ljubljana) (9409504289).jpg - undelete in 2055; it prominently depicts the upper part, work by Marjan Mušič (d. 1984)
_(9408095285).jpg){kind=link}
_(9409504289).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 09:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Nebotičnik
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture (work by V. Šubic, d. 1946).
- File:4.4.13 Ljubljana 03 (8619505275).jpg
- File:Nebotičnik staircase Ljubljana (14611397842).jpg
- File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg
- File:Stairway to Heaven (18301217880).png
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 15:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Its 70 years +, should be free in 2016 not 2017 ?! --Mile (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's always 70+1 years (70 years after the year following the architect's death). --Eleassar (t/p) 16:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Spiral stairs shouldn't be copyvio, they are not invention of author. Freedom of Panorama shouldn't be case here. Other would be foto of building itself...--Mile (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as per Mile. The last is just some chairs and tables on a terrasse. Yann (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nebotičnik
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree modern architecture.
- File:Nebotičnik staircase Ljubljana (14611397842).jpg
- File:Spiral stairs (Art Deco, Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg
- File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg
- File:Stairway to Heaven (18301217880).png
- File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana) croped.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_croped.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 12:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Three of these were previouly kept. Spiral staris, while superbly photographed from nice angles, are not above COM:TOO to be copyrightable by the architect (if it even is the architect who "designed" these normal spiral stairs).
Keep all. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
There was discussion with stairs in end of last year, Eleassar said 70+, i though 70, but it was at end of the year... so we kept. Now i see its 70+, so one more year needed. But since one was finalist of year. 2 others can or are FP, suppose we can skip for a month and a half to 2017. I thought its free since end of 2015-start 2016 (70 years). --Mile (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Since its Withdrawn i removed Deletation templates from my pictures. --Mile (talk) 17:30, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Enters public domain in 2017 in any case. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Jee 03:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
small and blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 18:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Logos, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Useless title, no description, no category, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Useless title, no description, no category, not used, out of scope. Also uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 19:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Useless title, no description, no category, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Useless title, no description, no useful category, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Personal promotional photo for webdesign services - out of scope (userpage speedy nominated on en-Wiki) GermanJoe (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal promotional photo for webdesign services - out of scope GermanJoe (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 23:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Mys_721tx (talk) 04:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
not used personal image, out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Friedman.jpg
- File:אמיר ועדנה.jpg
- File:אמיר וטדק כרטיסי ביקור דוקומנטציה.jpg
- File:אמיר ואילנה בברית.jpg
- File:אמיר ואביחי 6.jpg
- File:אמיר ואופיר אקוניס בברית.jpg
- File:אמיר ואביחי 5.jpg
- File:אמיר ואביחי12.jpg
- File:אמיר ואביחי11.jpg
- File:אמיר ואביחי10.jpg
- File:Amir meisels.jpg
- File:Amir meisels4.jpg
- File:Amir meisels5.jpg
- File:Amir kangun.jpg
- File:Amir meisels3.jpg
- File:Amir meisels2.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
not used personal image, out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
SPAM, out of scope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HombreDHojalata (talk • contribs) 2015-09-09T18:04:18 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Sealle (talk) 11:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Scuba14623 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to collection of explicit materials?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
This tiny image of a codex is not possibly user's own work... and it's too small to be of any educational use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]private images, out of project scope
- File:Benin city.JPG
- File:CONVO 7.jpg
- File:Ope award night.jpg
- File:CONVOcation.jpg
- File:Award two.jpg
Krd 15:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:ATABA OPEYEMI WEDDING.jpg
- File:ATABA OPEYEMI MY WONDERFUL PARENTS.jpg
- File:Ataba Opeyemi.jpg
- File:CEO mowit kulture.jpg
- File:Ataba Opeyemi pdf.pdf
- File:Ataba Opeyemi Award Night.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios. Copyright holders are Peter Adams and David Sacks
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 13:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
unuseful without a more accurate description, where is it taken? curently out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope logo. Mys_721tx (talk) 02:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope logo. Mys_721tx (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
not used on any pages Inkiw (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Nomination doesn’t stat a valid reason to delete. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason to delete. -- Geagea (talk) 22:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially nominated for deletion by Inkiw. The DR closed by me as no valid reason for deletion. I am nominated this file again as author request in my talk page. More reason for deletion mention by Inkiw:
- The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose.
- This file adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images the Commons already holds covering the same subject
- This file is of mediocre quality
-- Geagea (talk) 03:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2007, and resolution is enoug (quality is just a subjective). Maybe still usefull for the Canis lupus familiaris articles or anything else. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Mediocre quality compared to what? We have 4 images in Category:Cavachon. This one, apart for having way higher pixel count than any of the other three (more than them all combined!), is also the best of the four, in terms of subject framing and absence of distracting backgrounds. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept. Alan (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de ma part / Sorry, I mistake; this name is erroneus ("Catégorie" instead of "Category"). Moreover, it is unnecessary, the correct full name is category:Famille Daru. Regards, Kertraon (talk) 01:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio: Unneeded redirect. -- Geagea (talk) 22:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Je souhaiterais modifier le titre JMroulien63 (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: Please use {{Rename}}. -- Geagea (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
image insatisfaisante 2A01:CB14:816C:C100:5043:9E9B:C2E9:184 17:18, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most likely a copyright violation: screenshot from Google Earth or something similar. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
VETERAN.jpg MicCamera (talk) 13:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Commons:Fair use. --KurodaSho (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Movie poster. -- Geagea (talk) 22:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO: unlikely to be own work. Similar images can be found on the web: [1] ([2]). KurodaSho (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
![[2]](https://yt3.ggpht.com/--uEv3_nalq8/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/PhHB6cpN3Ro/s100-c-k-no/photo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: plus.google.com from 7.5.2015. the same photo used in youtube. -- Geagea (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alex Spade as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author is Л. Стенберг (1902—1982), sister of en:Stenberg brothers Amitie 10g (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Proof for authorship [3],[4]. Proof for death year [5]. So, this poster will be free in 2053 or later (depend on her work during GPW). Alex Spade (talk) 19:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per num. -- Geagea (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Bonny Lot Olem With Apio Mary Resty taken off a scene from "The Kampala Story".jpg - Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation: http://38.mostra.org/en/filme/7795-The-Kampala-Story
- File:Olot Bonny Olem.jpg - Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation: https://myspace.com/lotawitong
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Hedwig in Washington. -- Geagea (talk) 23:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
This picture or painting is highly unlikely to be user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: According to this the author is José Vivar y Valderrama (18th century). -- Geagea (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
_e_a_costa_do_M%C3%A9xico.png){kind=link}
_e_a_costa_do_M%C3%A9xico.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Definately not user's own work on this pair of antique map and modern satellite photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
_e_a_costa_do_México.png){kind=link}
It is own work in a composition of standard map info, and ancient map in wikipedia.
Could you please specify your doubts. 05:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)AlvoMaia (talk) 05:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
_e_a_costa_do_México.png){kind=link}
- Looks fixed now, closing admin please review! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. -- Geagea (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
_e_a_costa_do_México.png){kind=link}
No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is mentioned below where it is originated from (in Portuguese). Could you please specify your doubts. 06:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)AlvoMaia (talk)
- Thank you for changing this from own work to a sourced file, please if you could make that a linkable file so that the closing administrator has an easier time of clicking through? Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now, closing admin please review! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: The source was mentioned Tradução por via Alcides_Pinto/Peninsula_Iberica#/media/File:Iberia_409-429.svg. -- Geagea (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
According to the information mentioned in the file's details, the photographer was Shlomo Shtanzel, while the uploader wasn't him and no OTRS release approval has been received. Ldorfman (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: We need permission from הרב שלמה שטנצל. -- Geagea (talk) 00:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM_TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 21:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 00:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 21:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 00:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 21:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 21:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 21:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete derivative work of a copyright sculpture made in 1997 without permission from the artist Ww2censor (talk) 15:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: The sculpture has not a recognized artist, there are lots of images of this statue in commons, i don't know what is the problem with this one --Mirluls (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Where are the "lots of images of this statue"? If there are some they too should be deleted as derivative works unless they are de minimis. Ww2censor (talk) 22:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- OK thanks. I now see the few image you have linked but because they are of a copyright memorial which is the central subject of the images these are probably in the same position as this one and should also be nominated for deletion. Normally for an article about the actual memorial, where it is not old enough to be in the public domain, on the enwiki like Mirador de la Flor one non-free image is acceptable to identify the memorial/sculpture such as Mega-Gem. Ww2censor (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. Materialscientist (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted logo http://www.slpl.lk/teams/ruhuna-royal/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-free image, check Google. MYS77 ✉ 18:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work in this possibly promotional/self-promotional gallery. Multiple cameras, or no camer adata, various sizes, resolutions, styles, white balances, rounded corners, overprinting, etc.
- File:Dr. Pt. Narasimhalu Vadavati, Chairman, KSA.jpg
- File:Vadavati powel jugalbadni.JPG
- File:Vadavati jasraj in inugaration.JPG
- File:Vadavati, Gangu Bai Hangal, Enagi Balappa.JPG
- File:Vadavati with Nittur Sreenivasa Rao.jpg
- File:Film Actor Raj kumar with Vadavati.jpg
- File:Ambrish puri with vadavati.jpg
- File:Vadavati with Jafar Sharief.jpg
- File:Vadavati and chennaveera Kanavi.jpg
- File:Vadavati with governer Ramaa devi.jpg
- File:Vadavati with Rajan And Sajan Mishra.jpg
- File:Vadavati with Pt. mallikarjuna mansur.jpg
- File:Vadavati with Film Director GV Iyyar.jpg
- File:Vadavati with chidananda Murthy.jpg
- File:Vadavati Pt. Ala Rakha father of Jhakir hussain.jpg
- File:Vadavati in USA.jpg
- File:Vadavati in Landon with Eligebath.jpg
- File:Vadavati honoured with Surmani.jpg
- File:Vadavati honoured by Jnaana Pita awardee Ananth Murthya.jpg
- File:Raichur swara sangama sangeetha vidyalaya.jpg
- File:Vadavati and Santhoor Shivkumar Sharma.jpg
- File:Artist's day celebration 2.JPG
- File:Dr. Pt. Narasimhalu vadavati.jpg
- File:Artist's day celebration 1.JPG
- File:Artist's day celebration.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted logo, not simple text http://www.sunprideflora.com/home.aspx?lang=en-us --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted logo http://wojskogedeona.pl/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Seems the photos have been published. I doubt there was a copyright notice attached. IMHO {{PD-US-no notice}} applies.
- File:Bobby Plump.jpg
- File:Red Murrell.jpg
- File:William Evans basketball.jpg
- File:Gary Thompson.jpg
- File:Arnold Short.jpg
- File:Ray Steiner.jpg
- File:Lonnie Eggleston.jpg
- File:Johnny Stanich.jpg
- File:Lester Lane.jpg
- File:Bud Browning.jpg
- File:RC Pitts.jpg
- File:Bill Hougland.jpg
- File:Dan Swartz.jpg
- File:Bob Mattick.jpg
- File:Swede Halbrook.jpg
- File:Jim Walsh.jpg
- File:Burdette Haldorson.jpg
- File:Ken Pryor.jpg
- File:Jesse Renick.jpg
- File:Paul Courty.jpg
- File:Scotty Steagall.jpg
- File:Gerald Tucker.jpg
- File:Fred Pralle 66ers.jpg
- File:Paul Lindemann 66ers.jpg
- File:Bobby Speight.jpg
- File:Gordon Carpenter.jpg
- File:Allie Paine.jpg
- File:AL Bennett.jpg
- File:Lew Beck.jpg
- File:Bob Kurland Phillips 66.jpg
- File:Ed Beisser.jpg
- File:Grady Lewis.jpg
- File:Joe Fortenberry.jpg
- File:Wayne Glasgow.jpg
- File:Chuck Darling.jpg
- File:Bus Whitehead.jpg
- File:McBurney.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- For every one of these photos (with the exception of McBurney.jpg) I own the source material (industrial league basketball programs from the 40s and 50s) and I scoured them for copyright notices and there were none. With McBurney, I believe there is fair-use rationale (long deceased person, doubtful copyright license, no alternative for historically significant person) to keep, I just didn't know how to code it. As an aside, it might be worth looking at copyright instructions and process and streamlining some tags. This is a very complex process (and I'm really not a stupid guy) Rikster2 (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Also, if it is being suggested that {{PD-US-no notice}} applies, I'd like to point out that all but McBurney have that tag already in place. Rikster2 (talk) 00:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- IMHO the photograph of McBurney has been published as well, should be tagged wit US-no-notice as well. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept, per PD-US-no notice. Materialscientist (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucyspears (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these photos/ files were created by uploader: Inconsistent sizes, no metadata, various licenses. One of the titles implies it's a screenshot, etc. Probable COM:COPYVIOs, user's other uploads were nominated and deleted.
- File:Thu Phương's handwriting.jpg
- File:17 musicspace.jpg
- File:16 westminster.jpg
- File:15 licornewyork.jpg
- File:12 DDVN19.jpg
- File:08 likewevenostart.jpg
- File:Phuong in Unbreak my heart 1997.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: A.Savin 22:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucyspears (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these images of singers, one looks to be an album cover. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Thu Phương The Voice 2015.jpg
- File:Toni braxton sad love song.jpg
- File:Thu Phương 1995.jpg
- File:TP LSX 1998 2.jpg
- File:Thu Phương at Dongdao.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Наталья Видович (talk · contribs)
[edit]mmost likely not own work, different cameras, images can be found e.g. here (http://irene-nelson.com), looks like "fan upload"
- File:Irene at concert.jpg
- File:Irene N.jpg
- File:Vlad Tyurin.jpg
- File:Reflex 1.jpg
- File:RM project.jpg
- File:Logo ReflexMusic.jpg
- File:RD-LAD090.jpg
- File:Ntmglogo.jpg
- File:NTMG.jpg
- File:Ирина Нельсон 36.jpg
- File:Сольный концерт Ирины.jpg
- File:Ирина Нельсон1.JPG
- File:Фотография11.JPG
- File:Фотография 3.JPG
- File:Группа Reflex.jpg
- File:Reflex.png
- File:Группа Reflex.JPG
- File:Рефлекс.JPG
- File:Irina Nelson at yoga festival.JPG
- File:Irene Nelson.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson6.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson4.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson1.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson5.jpg
- File:Ирина Нельсон в международном йога-центре.JPG
Polarlys (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Наталья Видович (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images are from http://en.irene-nelson.com/ Not own work.
- File:For-wiki1.jpg
- File:For-wiki2.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson 5.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson 4.jpg
- File:Irene Nelson 1.JPG
- File:Irene yoga.jpg
Sealle (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Brouwer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of artwork by living artist. One image includes the artist and it is obviously not a selfie. I searched the artists name and did not find a wiki page about him. Out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not for the purposes of promotion or self-promotion.
- File:Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:Juan Brouwer - Oil on Canvas - 2003.jpg
- File:JUAN BROUWER Acrilico 150 X 150 cm, Nothing is 4 ever.Series Samsara (2).jpg
- File:Life Acrilic on Canvas 150 x 150 cm.jpg
- File:Flight of shadows.jpg
- File:Own Design No33.jpg
- File:Own Design No19.jpg
- File:Personal Cloud.jpg
- File:Own Design No 7.jpg
- File:Own Design No3.jpg
- File:Poliptico.jpg
- File:Boceto No 4.jpg
- File:Design No 4.gif
- File:Diptico2.jpg
- File:Diptico 1.jpg
- File:Triptico 1.jpg
- File:Lagrimas Negras147 x 113.jpg
- File:Opalescente.jpg
- File:HOC ÉRAT IN VOTIS.JPG
- File:Image of juan brouwer and one of his work.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan Brouwer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE Self-promotional or promotional uploads of artwork by "Juan Brouwer" who does not have a Wiki page. Additionally some may be COM:COPYVIO: Some of these images may not even be own work, as they show the artist and the work and are obviously not selfies.
- File:Un Bizcochito,,,100 X 130 CM.jpg
- File:Un Bizcochito,,100 X 130 CM.jpg
- File:Alphabet City Series 4.jpg
- File:Alphabet City Series 3.jpg
- File:Alphabet City, Series2.jpg
- File:Alphabet City Series 1.jpg
- File:Un Bizcochito,100 X 130 CM.jpg
- File:Own Design frame No 12.jpg
- File:Juan Brouwer at Studio 50.jpg
- File:HOC ERAT IN VOTIS ' Acrilic on Canvas 150 x 150 cm.jpg
- File:Own Design No 12.jpg
- File:Own Design No 99.jpg
- File:Own Design No 60.jpg
- File:HOC ERAT IN VOTIS, From the Series The Numb Graphics.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-29.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-27.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-25.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-21.jpg
- File:Own Design No1.jpg
- File:Own Design No5.jpg
- File:Own Design No19.jpg
- File:Lagrimas Negras147 x 113 cm.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-12.jpg
- File:No 15 Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:Sketch No 7 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:Sketch No 30.jpg
- File:Sketch No 3.jpg
- File:Sketch No 11 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:Sketch No 2 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:Sketch No 20.jpg
- File:Sketch No 12 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:No 11 from the Series Pentimento 45 x 45 cm.jpg
- File:No 33 from the Series Pentimento 45 x 45 cm.jpg
- File:No 9 from the Series Pentimento 45 x 45 cm.jpg
- File:No 24 from the Series Pentimento 45 x 45 cm.jpg
- File:Sketch No 10 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:SketchNo 3 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:Sketch No 5 from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
- File:No 9 Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:Falling Leaves.jpg
- File:No 3 Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:No 4 Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:No 7 Acrilic on Canvas 57 x 46 cm - Series - Bajo Presion.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-10.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-6.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-20.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-14.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-3,3.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-8.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-11.jpg
- File:PHOTO Untitled-15.jpg
- File:Own Design No 108.jpg
- File:Own Design No 606.jpg
- File:Own Design No 22.jpg
- File:Own Design No 357.jpg
- File:Own Design No 703.jpg
- File:Own Design No 1005.jpg
- File:La Clepsidra de Tales.jpg
- File:Espada, Capa, Torero y Toro.jpg
- File:La Casa en las Estrellas.jpg
- File:Geometric Conversation with the Sun.jpg
- File:One plus One plus One.jpg
- File:Superlativo Absoluto, From the Series, The Numb Graphics.jpg
- File:Sketch from the Series Essential 39 x 36 cm.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frau Daria (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
- File:Tannat.jpg
- File:Kokoko.jpg
- File:Trrrr.jpg
- File:Arrrrrr.jpg
- File:Ananiev.jpg
- File:DSHVA.jpg
- File:Ananyev.jpg
Sealle (talk) 11:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aarna Gupta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: photographs of minor children. Some were used in deleted en: User:Aarna Gupta from which is seems one of them is the uploader. We should not host pictures of minors without parental consent, and in any case Commons is not a family photo album.
- File:Aarna Gupta15.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta16.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta14.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta13.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta11.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta12.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta (2).jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta8.jpg
- File:Aarna aarav.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta6.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta3.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta4.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta5.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta2.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta1.jpg
- File:Aarna Gupta.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JohnCD (talk) 14:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChrisGinosyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably copyrighted images without EXIF: book covers, movie frames, behind-the-scenes photos etc.
- File:Book cover 1111.jpg
- File:Book cover111.jpg
- File:1350065-edward scissorhand.jpg
- File:Carrie Praying Scene.jpg
- File:Carrie Bathroom Scene.jpg
- File:Carrie Car Crush Scene.jpg
- File:Carry Deleted Scene.jpg
- File:5th wave.jpg
- File:Chloe Moretz and Nick Robinson.jpg
- File:Chloe Moretz, Rick Yancey, Alex Roe.jpg
- File:Instagram Pic.jpg
- File:Carrie 2013.jpg
- File:5th Wave.jpg
Einstein2 (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio of press photo previously published, including http://www.movienewz.com/hailee-steinfeld-joins-pitch-perfect-2/ —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 02:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: preveiously published including http://toto0309.tistory.com/m/post/610 (see watermark) —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 03:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. --ChoHyeri (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
US Government work PD does not apply. Thomas Hart Benton made this under a commission from Abbott Laboratories, a private corporation, who later gave it to the US Navy. Copyrighted works which are acquired by the US Government are not subject to the US Govt work exception. See http://wayback.archive.org/web/20150111110400/http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/benton/benton1.htm for the gift by Abbott to the Navy and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Transfers re the status of copyrighted works acquired by the US Government. If no proper PD justification can be given, image should be deleted. TransporterMan (talk) 00:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, this seems to be one of the Abbott Lab paintings. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Non notable person. Outside project scope Mark Marathon (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Wrong and wronger: Non-notable people may be in scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- My mistake, Whoever uploaded it placed it into the Goodenia category with no description. Having looked around the web, the image should in fact be deleted because it is a copyright violation. Appears to have been copied from http://www.snk.com.bd/?page=gallery, although it appears widely in various promotional material. No evidence this is open source. Mark Marathon (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused file. COM:COPY and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, small size, and please see "author" field. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this illustration. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted https://www.facebook.com/Jandtheaholes/photos/pb.104965309669177.-2207520000.1442038296./119330844899290/?type=3&theater --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
copivio http://artofwar.ru/p/pamyatniki/text_0480-1.shtml Dima st bk (talk) 07:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio Alan (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free drawings on street signs. Eleassar (t/p) 09:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Subject of this photo are graffiti on a wall and on street signs. Street signs symbols are de minimis and hardly noticable. M★Zaplotnik (edits) 09:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. I withdraw my nomination --Eleassar (t/p) 19:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ok.
Kept: Alan (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
private document, no permission to publish 93.202.70.166 09:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: 1952 Alan (talk) 15:03, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
private document, no permission to publish 93.202.70.166 09:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
private document, no permission to publish 93.202.70.166 09:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
private document, no permission to publish 93.202.70.166 09:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
_-_6.jpg){kind=link}
_-_6.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
obvious wrong name Bestiasonica (talk) 11:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
_-_6.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: use {{Rename}}. Deletion request not valid Alan (talk) 15:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
_-_6.jpg){kind=link}
Very low resolution, no EXIF data, this is possibly not own work. Needs further permission Curtiss HS-2L (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- This file uploaded to www.ecured.cu in 22.9.2011. According to the same page the source (Fuente=source?) was www.radionuevitas.icrt.cu. see also Commons:Village pump/Copyright#File:Aeropuerto internacional ignacio agramonte camaguey.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 23:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Source is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 [6]. Uploader there has a very different username. Very likely copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Actually the terms and conditions only refer to the text part of the EcuRed website while there is no default licence for images. That said, the image is also being used by the Cuban Tourist Information, © Copyright 2000-2015 National Tourist Information Office. De728631 (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
uncategorized, unable to assign category (uploader) Naltar (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Category added. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted https://www.facebook.com/RubiconContest/photos/pb.183756016397.-2207520000.1442074272./10151817139011398/?type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xap1%2Ft31.0-8%2F1502732_10151817139011398_1893450867_o.jpg&smallsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xpa1%2Fv%2Ft1.0-9%2F1470231_10151817139011398_1893450867_n.jpg%3Foh%3D4cb277fc72337a1989b482f473dd0067%26oe%3D56655481&size=600%2C1000&fbid=10151817139011398 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Singularity Explosive Intelligence Art.png
- File:Post-Scarcity.png
- File:Singularity Eclectic Brains.png
- File:Singularity Dance.png
- File:SINGULARITY 2045.png
- File:Futurism.png
- File:Singularity Deniers Dystopia Holocaust Denial LOW RESOLUTION.png
- File:Singularity Utopia.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-Symbol-Square-Colour.PNG
- File:POST-SCARCITY-blackNwhite-square.PNG
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-BnW-Circle.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-colour-circle-cropped.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-colour-circle.png
Educational purpose not recognizable to me. Commons seems to be used for spreading the user's self-generated "art" images to illustrate his strange ideas. My 2 cents, maybe your opinion is a different one... User page images may stay but have to be recategorized then.
- File:Singularity Explosive Intelligence Art.png
- File:Post-Scarcity.png
- File:Singularity Eclectic Brains.png
- File:Singularity Dance.png
- File:SINGULARITY 2045.png
- File:Futurism.png
- File:Singularity Deniers Dystopia Holocaust Denial LOW RESOLUTION.png
- File:Singularity Utopia.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-Symbol-Square-Colour.PNG
- File:POST-SCARCITY-blackNwhite-square.PNG
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-BnW-Circle.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-colour-circle-cropped.png
- File:Post-Scarcity-colour-circle.png
Achim (talk) 16:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- KEEP: Seems you are abusing the deletion process because I left my offensive 2 cents worth on your page [correction: a fellow admin's page] regarding your previous unjust deletion (which I am currently blocked for until 14 September 2015, which makes it somewhat difficult to respond to your mass delete abuse). Not sure what you mean by "educational" purposes, but my images, perhaps not these specific ones, have been published in various online technology magazines regarding Transhumaism/Singularity. I don't claim to be a famous artist, and was unaware the category of "art" was regarding famous "art". At least one person found one of my images useful, which you can see here on this site (the image was sourced from Wikimedia Commons): http://www.cbc-network.org/2011/08/the-trouble-with-transhumanism-2/#.UAfIfHhLIdk
"Education" regarding project scope states:
The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"
In some circles my words and images are deemed very educational, information, thus providing knowledge; but it is subjective. Here is a random Commons cat image I just found, which could be educational and informative to some people but not to everyone.
Here are a few other articles I have published, proof of my educational and informative status, including one article where I was interviewed. My ideas are not strange in Transhuman circles:
- http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/pellissier20120625
- https://www.singularityweblog.com/utopia-is-inevitable/
- http://hplusmagazine.com/2011/11/17/itsy-bitsy-teeny-weeny-singularities/
- http://hplusmagazine.com/2014/06/20/can-singularity-critics-pass-the-turing-test/
- http://transhumanity.net/vital-risky-rebellious-artificial-intelligence/
- http://wavechronicle.com/wave/?p=5780
- http://futuristech.info/posts/opinion-singularity-utopia-delves-into-future-biological-machines
- http://www.proton4.com/artificial-intelligence/vital-risky-rebellious-artificial-intelligence/
--149.254.183.254 19:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- I partially changed my vote, see below. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. Those images has no indication of significance. It has no educational purpose. I don't even understand those arts. 01:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pokéfan95 (talk • contribs)
- @Pokéfan95: , your sig seems to be lacking your name and the usual user page links: In your comment above only the date was added.
- Whoops, sorry about that. It seems I typed five tildes, not four tildes. Pokéfan95 (talk) 06:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Pokéfan95: , your sig seems to be lacking your name and the usual user page links: In your comment above only the date was added.
Info see also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Abuse of deletion request. --Achim (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)- Info see also https://twitter.com/2045singularity/status/643174973293600768 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.254.186.51 (talk)
- Keep The user has been blocked for a week and was clearly very upset. "Strange ideas" is not a deletion reason. The images have an appeal. The user is block-evading because the user is naive and does not understand how to proceed otherwise. I will attempt to stop that. All pages are now in use on another wiki, Commons policy is to allow local wikis to decide about usage.
- Already in use before my intervention:
- File:Singularity Eclectic Brains.png on fr. wiki.
- File:Singularity Dance.png --Abd also on fr. wiki. (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- All files are now in use on en.wikiversity. This represents a judgment on my part as a Wikiversity user that there is educational purpose there, and there is other material on Wikiversity on w:Technological singularity. That some people don't know about this topic is simply normal, but it is a notable topic. That the user is paranoid we will attempt to address. Paranoia is sometimes an affliction of intelligence. --Abd (talk) 23:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Info see also wikiversity:User talk:Abd#Problems, deletion of images Ps2045.--Achim (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I stroke having said strange ideas above as it is irrelevant here. I personally had no problems with these images being kept even though I cannot imagine how they could be used to illustrate any topics of an encyclopedia except "modern art". If I painted an image of say a rock and called that image "artificial intelligence" I wouldn't expect it to be categorized there. So I think our discussion should deal with the art aspect as Taivo did above. And many thanks to Ps2045 for providing the weblink to CBC for the linked article is indeed worth reading.--Achim (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Achim55. Perhaps it's appropriate to point out that Commons is a repository of "freely usable media files," and that it is not solely for images "to illustrate any topics of an encyclopedia." That's not the case even within the WMF. Wikiversity hosts "educational resources," which includes studies, essays, opinions, explorations. If the user has "strange ideas," he is welcome to express them on Wikiversity, such that overall presentation is neutral. Others can discuss or debate them, it they want. Wikiversity is not just about class handouts... we are also about "learning by doing," which includes learning how to express yourself. Ps2045 obviously overreacted to the deletion request. Hopefully, he is calming down and I personally hope he will contribute to the educational resource there. If not, then no harm done. Someone else may come along. --Abd (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Abd, there are limits to the assumption of good faith: From this user’ tweeter feed, his last words about this matter mentioned that «Admin Wiki twats are shit-heads», and «mindless cunts, utter pieces of shit». Great to know you support learning by doing, because there’s a lot to learn here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- So, the user lost his mind seeing the nomination, having no understanding of the process, which is not all that uncommon. And then what he says elsewhere in that state of mind is brought here? That is disruptive. The user has actually acknowledged that his on-wiki comments -- which were revision-deleted, were intemperate. That twitter comment is completely irrelevant to a proper keep/delete decision. What assumption of good faith? The assumption I make, from the files and from what he posted above as his published work, is that he is sincerely interested in the w:en:Technological singularity. The topic is notable, in fact. Yes, the Wikiversity mission includes learning about wikis, and the user will not be allowed to call anyone, there, a cunt or shit-head or anything like that. He will be, as the occasion arises, educated in dispute resolution process. If he is willing to learn. Some aren't, but these generally go away. Wikiversity rarely finds it necessary to block users. --Abd (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Abd, there are limits to the assumption of good faith: From this user’ tweeter feed, his last words about this matter mentioned that «Admin Wiki twats are shit-heads», and «mindless cunts, utter pieces of shit». Great to know you support learning by doing, because there’s a lot to learn here. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Achim55. Perhaps it's appropriate to point out that Commons is a repository of "freely usable media files," and that it is not solely for images "to illustrate any topics of an encyclopedia." That's not the case even within the WMF. Wikiversity hosts "educational resources," which includes studies, essays, opinions, explorations. If the user has "strange ideas," he is welcome to express them on Wikiversity, such that overall presentation is neutral. Others can discuss or debate them, it they want. Wikiversity is not just about class handouts... we are also about "learning by doing," which includes learning how to express yourself. Ps2045 obviously overreacted to the deletion request. Hopefully, he is calming down and I personally hope he will contribute to the educational resource there. If not, then no harm done. Someone else may come along. --Abd (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all. COM:SCOPE includes A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. However, two sentences earlier, we read In the sections below, any use that is not made in good faith does not count. It looks like Abd has just dumped all of these images onto v:Technological singularity solely to prevent their deletion: this doesn't look like a good-faith action, and it's not something that we're here to support. These images are not going to be useful for educational purposes. Nyttend (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Here is the actual history, and the issue here, then, is my good faith, not that of the user. I had no communication from the user until after I created the Wikiversity resource. I found this DR because of [7]. I knew about the Singularity, so I knew that the comments here about the non-notability of the topic were incorrect. The Singularity already had mention on Wikiversity (I intended to cross-link those, eventually, but created the educational resource as a stub, yes, to save the files from deletion because they may be useful on Wikiversity. I would rather the simplicity of files hosted here, for use everywhere, than merely a local upload. I have been a major contributor to Wikiversity, working to develop the site as a place where education can be freely explored, and the idea that I would create that resource merely to ... what, disrupt a deletion process here? ... I find insulting. I have never created a useless resource on Wikiversity, and have been actively cleaning the place up. I have about a thousand deleted edits there, from placing speedy deletion templates. The nominator here has responded positively and I am convinced that the nomination was in good faith. The user who was so offended by the deletion nomination has calmed down (and I do have email from him now). My intervention has apparently stopped the socking, which is a common outcome of what I've done in the past. There is no problem. If Commons deletes these files, it will cause more work for others in the future, as Marshall points out below. So I find the desirable outcome here clear, and, I hope, a counter-example to the silly, angry comments the user twittered. --Abd (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - whether you keep these or not is of course up to you. They have educational value from three points of view:
- as art perhaps with social commentary as art often does,
- as philosophy in dealing with any form of Utopia, realistic or otherwise, and
- as economics by presenting some futuristic gift economy.
- They have been uploaded to Wikiversity so I believe they will survive if deleted here. Please let me know if that is not true with commonsdelinker. The resource v:Technological singularity can remain as is for now. If the artist wishes to develop it further along any of the above three lines, the artist is welcome to do so. If not right away we can move this resource to a subpage of v:Gift economy for example or to the artist's user page if there is one.
- Just FYI but in reading COM:SCOPE I believe these media are well within it. But, if you don't want them here and we have them as "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license." someone sooner or later is going to try to upload them here. We don't have a notability requirement for artists, philosophers, or economists. --Marshallsumter (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- FYI, the files have not been uploaded to Wikiversity. They could be, possibly would be, if deleted here. Wikiversity would definitely allow these files, by precedent. Thanks for commenting, Marshall, as a Wikiversity administrator, your comments are worthy of note. --Abd (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: No obvious educational use. The addition of the images to a page on Wikiversity appears to have been done in bad faith, solely in an attempt to circumvent the deletion process. --Carnildo (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Then surely they will be deleted there. It's not like they have not been noticed. See the comment of Marshallsumter, a Wikiversity administrator, above, and also see the discussion started on Wikiversity by Nyytend.[8] For information, the page has been tagged with "proposed deletion," which gives 90 days for the resource to be improved, though any user may remove that tag, in which case there will be a deletion discussion if someone still wants to delete it. I have high Wikiversity experience, and the normal outcome, with what this resource will be by the time that happens, will be keep, though the page might be moved. There is a clear educational use, the topic is notable, but whether or not the specific images remain is another issue, that's an editorial decision; however, Wikiversity has devices for keeping almost anything that any user wants to study. What's missed here is that a Wikiversity user, not the artist, actually wants to study the topic that these images were designed to illustrate. So the denial of educational purpose is parochial and narrow-minded. The comments here (and at least one on Wikiversity) showed no knowledge of what "Singularity" meant. This is not an art form. It's a Futurist prediction, and one heavily discussed in some circles. --Abd (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- I am changing my opinion. I think some files needs to be keeped, and here is the list:
- File:Singularity Explosive Intelligence Art.png
- File:Singularity Dance.png
They need to be keeped for me because it is an artist's imagination of a theory. Look at File:Red Giant Earth.jpg. The images I want to keep and that picture both shows an artist's imagination of a theory. So they must be keeped in my opinion.
The rest are still needed to be deleted. Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Abd — the technological singularity (Kurzweilian or other), Transhumanism, and post-scarcity are well known concepts; please do not feel that all supporters of the deletion of these images are ignorant fools (name calling is fun, heh?). I would however make the case about how do these trite and cabotine illustrations further in any way one’s knowledge of those topics.
- Besides, there’s more to them than appreciating Ps2045’s work: Judging from the little I skeemed online, this author seems to bask in the bliss of ignorance to delude himself into juvenile “optimism”: «By 2045 everyone can print their own starship and go colonize a new planet and found their own utopia» (not an exact quote). Were I a trans-humanist, I’d be embarassed at such “ally”…
- I am ready, though to change my vote, as after all it is in scope to document the trend that people who believe in stupid shit is likely to create crappy art. Threfore, here’s my new vote:
- File:Singularity Explosive Intelligence Art.png - Keep: Good eample of how you can double the size of your already-made abstract art when your client suddenly finds out there’s more canvas/wall than previously measured.
- File:Singularity Eclectic Brains.png - Keep; okay, but is it badly cropped from a bigger original?
- File:Singularity Dance.png - Keep, not bad.
- File:SINGULARITY 2045.png - Keep: one more for Category:Time 20:45…
- File:Futurism.png - Keep; meh.
- File:Singularity Deniers Dystopia Holocaust Denial LOW RESOLUTION.png - Delete, unless the caduceus artwork is free for derivative works; also a less inflammatory filename would be good.
- File:Singularity Utopia.png - Keep, it is kinda interesting. Is the author aware of the licensing implications? Someone could use this for a book cover — My bad acid trips and the wet nightmares they induce…
- File:Post-Scarcity-Symbol-Square-Colour.PNG - Delete: Ugly, clumsy (square elements by also diagonals?), unimaginative, no real-world usage.
- File:POST-SCARCITY-blackNwhite-square.PNG - Delete: as above.
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-BnW-Circle.png - Delete: Ugly, boring, bad logo construction, illegible, no real-world usage.
- File:Post-Scarcity-International-colour-circle-cropped.png - Delete: as above.
- File:Post-Scarcity-colour-circle.png - Delete: as above.
- File:Post-Scarcity.png - Delete: as above.
- File:Singularity Explosive Intelligence Art.png -
- All these, regardless of deletion, should be categorized in a sensible way. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Spoken well, Tuválkin, I fully agree. --Achim (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- This, then, is obviously a complex DR. There is another user now on wikiversity who intends to develop the resource. Some of the images may not be used, that is an editorial judgment that will likely take time. This DR should be closed without prejudice. If, after a decent period -- I'd give it a year, myself -- usage has declined, then renom of what is not used could be in order. What Tuvalkin classifies as to be deleted seems to especially include what might be called "advocacy buttons." They would be used in political polemic. The writing of such on Wikiversity is allowed, under some conditions. The writing of polemic is educational! We won't allow it at the top level in mainspace, but it can be done as an attributed essay, as a subpage, or it can be done in user space. I see at least one image that appears redundant, but I'd rather keep this DR simple. There is very little harm in delay for a redundant image. However, if it is truly redundant, as it seems at first glance to me, obviously, no harm in deleting the extra.
- Spoken well, Tuválkin, I fully agree. --Achim (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- As to "ignorant fools," I certainly never said that, but there are comments here that showed no knowledge that the topic was notable, and, remember, the original nomination talked about the creator's "strange ideas," now shown with strike-through, and other comments showed no indication of knowledge. This is what I wrote:
- That some people don't know about this topic is simply normal, but it is a notable topic.
- Now, his personal ideas may indeed be strange. This will then come out in the exploration that the Wikiversity resource facilitates. Strange means unusual, unfamiliar, not "bad." My understanding, however, is that Commons does not second-guess WMF wikis about educational use. One of my goals is to educate the user in wiki process. It can be a steep learning curve. Another is to learn about the Singularity and about the user's ideas.
- There is no doubt that some of the images will be useful, and, remember, "educational use" includes images that develop a "feel" of a page, that make the page more interesting. It's not narrow as some might think. The presence of images, then, has educational value. Images are used on Wikiquote without being really "educational," other than developing some sort of page ambiance. I see, here, a sense of limitation of Commons and "education" to "encyclopedic values," which are very restricted. None of these images would be useful in an encyclopedia, at this point! However, the world of education is far larger than what is found in an encyclopedia! --Abd (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Just another FYI. Of the files showing on the right from the top down the first, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and eight have been uploaded to Wikiversity with slightly changed names as Fair Use. When I upload the seventh I'll change its name. If you decide to keep any of these, let me know or anyone is free to change them to the Commons version. I'll be using one of the Post Scarcity logos for Post Scarcity. I don't know if there's any special significance to the variation. --Marshallsumter (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Image two down on the right and seven down on the right are in resources. Gift economy/Utopia is using number seven. --Marshallsumter (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Here is a page where two of the images flagged for deletion were recently used, which seems to give validity to the educational "Scope" criteria, to impart knowledge: http://hplusmagazine.com/2015/09/16/understanding-scarcity-and-post-scarcity/ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.254.218.46 (talk)
- Keep, excepted the ones with proof of derivative work issues. These image convey information to illustrate a topic and so are informational. I don't see why we would like to express esthetical judgement about the pictures. Clearly, the author prepared them to be used as illustration for a specific communication goal, which falls under educative use as they convey information, and that use is so in scope of Commons. --Dereckson (talk) 12:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept and Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Only textlogos are allowed into Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Only textlogos are allowed into Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Uploader added {{PD-Bangladesh}} later, but thats likely not valid here. JuTa 18:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Uploader added {{PD-Bangladesh}} later, but thats likely not valid here. JuTa 18:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Uploader added GFDL/CC license later, but thats likely not valid here. JuTa 18:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Uploader added GFDL/CC license later, but thats likely not valid here. JuTa 18:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a scan from a newspaper or magazine. Yann (talk) 18:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grazianoguiducci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam and/or copyvios. The QR code images themselves simply point towards the specified website.
- File:Smarty-Tag.jpg - Pre-existing versions of this tag with different text exist online before the upload date
- File:Smartytag System.jpg - Spam, simply points towards specified website
- File:Funzionamento smartytag qrcode.jpg - Looks like badly edited and cropped version of image found here [9], dated before this upload
- File:Etichetta anticontraffazione made in Italy.png - No obvious reverse search results; seems to have come from same source as "Sistema anticontraffazione univoco Smartytag.it.png" below
- File:Smartytag.it tracciabilità prodotti.jpg - No idea if this is a copyvio or not, but it doesn't look in-scope to me
- File:Sistema anticontraffazione univoco Smartytag.it.png - Looks like basis of image used in "Etichetta anticontraffazione made in Italy.png", no obvious reverse search results
- File:Smartytag.png - Same as QR image above
Not all these images are proven copyvios, but the fact that some almost certainly are and the general low value of the images (as they currently are) with that spam QR code may warrant deletion when the precautionary principle is considered alongside their potential utility.
Ubcule (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Певица с 1926 года рождения, а дата создания файла 2010 года. Скорее всего фото опубликовано не авторм фото, а это скан. Dogad75 (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Should be deleted. Picture of 1950-ies (the sitter was born in 1926), could not be own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Певица с 1926 года рождения, а дата создания файла 2010 года. Скорее всего фото опубликовано не авторм фото, а это скан. Dogad75 (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Should be deleted. Picture of 1950-ies (the sitter was born in 1926), could not be own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
I doubt this could be educationally useful. Diego Grez return fire 20:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. No metadata available. File was delete in previous. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Basic map is the tourist map of Poland, no evidence this map is free Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. No metadata available. Mayb taken from facebook. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose; private photo of identifyable people. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: In use, and therefore in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- I just noticed that. So someone takes a random photo of two women on vacation, then adds it to an article about bad fashion. This is the worst of Wikipedia in my opinion, but yes, the photo is protected from deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- It’s a wiki, Magnolia677. Go there, remove the photo (that has been there since November 2013, surviving multiple edits), maybe ask for the deletion of the article (as bad fashion is so non-encyclopedic), rant in the talk page, edit-war, have a ball. But… while it is in use to illustrate an article in Wikipedia, this photo is in scope and that fully neutralizes your nomination. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- The suggestion that the use of this photo was a vanity plant («someone takes a »« photo »«, then adds it to an article») is patently false, too: It was taken in 2007 by Glen Bowman, a Flicker user, uploaded to Commons in 2012 as part of a huge grab-all batch by Tm, and then picked up and integrated in 2013 into this article by en:wp user Meganesia. Not really a hasty sneaky addition into some random artcle done to sabotage a DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- That wasn't what I suggested. I just felt sorry for these two women on vacation. Some random person snaps their photo, then a few years later they end up on a Wiki article about bad fashion. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- I just noticed that. So someone takes a random photo of two women on vacation, then adds it to an article about bad fashion. This is the worst of Wikipedia in my opinion, but yes, the photo is protected from deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Alan (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
very small Hiddenhauser (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio, looks like the preview thumbnail from [10]. MKFI (talk) 08:54, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:24, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The file has a copyright logo. The message in Persian for the uploader is: فایل بارگذاریشده علامت حق نشر محفوظ دارد و از این جهت نمیتواند در ویکیانبار بارگذاری شود. LilyOfTheWest (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- File:Bullet Stunts by Bhupinder Singh Thind.JPG
- File:National Geographic Channel in Thind Dastar Academy.JPG
- File:National Geographic Channel Coverage.JPG
- File:During Natioanl Geo Coverage of Bhupinder Singh Thind.JPG
- File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg
- File:One style with different shapes by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Both sides layers of morni turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:New patiala shahi turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Bhupinder Singh Thind new Turban Style.jpg
- File:Bhupinder S Thind.jpg
- File:Amritsar Shahi Patiala Touch Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Two side Layers Morni Turban Style By Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Both Side Layers Morni Turban Style by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Morni 3D Style Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Morni Style Turban with thin layers by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Different Look Patiala Shahi Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Amritsar Shahi Turban with Different Shape by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Simple Patiala Shahi Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Morni Style Turban in 3d Shape by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:3D Touch in Morni Style Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:New 3d Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Different style of Patiala Shahi Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Morni Style Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.JPG
- File:New Turban Styles of Bhupinder Singh Thind.JPG
- File:New Amritsar Shahi Turban By Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:Different turban style by Bhupinder Singh Thind.JPG
- File:New Turban Style by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:This is a my favorite picture during my world record 2013.jpg
- File:Creations of New Patiala Shahi Turban by Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
- File:National Geographic Channel covered my talent in My Thind Dastar Academy.jpg
- File:During Bullet Stunts.jpg
- File:Amritsar Shahi Turban.jpg
- File:During My Bullet Stunts.jpg
- File:Multiple Layers Turban.jpg
- File:36 Layers of Turban.jpg
- File:This is my own creativity.jpg
- File:Bhupinder Singh Thind.jpg
Self-promotional images, out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Probably is better to Delete all. Some files qualified for speedy deletion and I deleted them (collages without source and license for every image used, promotional phone numbers on image, images taken from Facebook). Taivo (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bertobarc90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Five heavily photoshopped images of a church. We don't need all five, they're nearly the same size and resolution, plus the photoshopping of a halo around the entire building vastly reduces the encyclopedic utility of the images.
- File:Iglesia-del-carmen.jpg
- File:Iglesia-del-carmen-barrio-del-carmen-murcia.jpg
- File:Carmenchurch2.jpg
- File:Iglesia-del-carmen-barrio-del-carmen-murcia-regin-de-murcia-espaa 20342613568 o.jpg
- File:Barrio del Carmen.jpg
- File:El Carmen en Murcia.jpg
- File:Iglesia del Carmen en Murcia.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bertobarc90 (talk · contribs)
Six copies of the same small size, low resolution image in various stages of photoshopping. We don't need six the same, perhaps one could be selected and retained.
- File:Puente de los Peligros de Murcia.jpg
- File:Puente-de-los-peligros4 21307267675 o.jpg
- File:Puente de los Peligros4.jpg
- File:Puente de los Peligros3.jpg
- File:Puente de los Peligros2.jpg
- File:Puente de los Peligros1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bertobarc90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art on temporary display.
- File:Catafalco Sardina 2023.jpg
- File:Sardina 2022.jpg
- File:Dragón de Conte.jpg
- File:Carroza sardina.jpg
- File:Sardina2019.jpg
- File:Catafalco de la Sardina 2018.jpg
- File:Catafalco Entierro de la Sardina 2017.jpg
- File:Entierro de la Sardina 2017.jpg
- File:Dragón de Conte (Murcia).jpg
- File:Dragón de Conte, Entierro de la Sardina Murcia.jpg
- File:Catafalco 2016 (Murcia).jpg
- File:Catafalco de la Sardina 2016 (Murcia).jpg
- File:Agua. Bando de la Huerta de Murcia.jpg
- File:Catafalco 2014.jpg
- File:Entierro de la Sardina Murcia.jpg
- File:Catafalco de la sardina 2015 (Murcia).jpg
- File:Fiestas de Primavera de Murcia.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
This picture has been taken without consent. The poster of this image is not the original owner. The original owner can be contacted at liambailliephotography@gmail.com 79.64.79.106 20:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
There's no information regarding the picture in the file's details, as no details were left while it was uploaded. The file isn't even in use, so in this situation, I suggest deleting it would be the best way to handle it. The Commons isn't a repository for just EVERYTHING without any limit (bye the way, the uploader is not reachable as this and another not-in-use file are his only contributions to the Wikimedia projects). Ldorfman (talk) 20:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Web resolution, no metadata, likely copyvio. Kelly (talk) 21:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, Paul Landowski, who is the author of this monument, died in 1961. There is no FoP in France. Jebulon (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 05:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Uploaded added a {{PD-self}} later, but thats unlikely own work of the uploader. JuTa 18:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
It is my own photo --Ivan Vtorov (talk) 11:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the photographer who made the photo, contact OTRS to prove it. If they confirm, the photo will be restored. Ankry (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Unused user created artwork, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I feel honored by your request at the same time I find ironic that you chose these files. Anyway, the usage of images on wikipedia (from wikimedia) needs a separate topic (:
Wishing you all the best with your assumed role.
geq --geq 21:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC) aka unuplusunu (talk)
Deleted: unused image, no informative desctiption; author provided no reason to keep it. Out of scope Ankry (talk) 19:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Hebrew name of the file doesn't give any information regarding what is shows (in translation from Hebrew, it's simply "Nature 2.jpg"). There's no information regarding the picture in the file's details, as no details were left while it was uploaded. The file isn't even in use, so in this situation, I suggest deleting it would be the best way to handle it. The Commons isn't a repository for just EVERYTHING without any limit (bye the way, the uploader is not reachable since this and another not-in-use file are his only contributions to the Wikimedia projects). Ldorfman (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, no description; deleted as out of scope Ankry (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I erroneously assumed this would be covered by German Freedom of Panorama rules, but it is not so. Admission to the Berlin Botanical Garden is contingent on payment of a fee and compliance with a set of written rules; consequently it is not a “public area” (for purposes of copyright law). Since the sculpture was created in the 1960s, it is still copyrighted. Sebastian Koppehel (talk) 21:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per request Ankry (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Since the sculpture was created in the 1960s, it is still a copyrighted work of plastic art. Freedom of Panorama rules do not apply because admission to the Berlin Botanical Garden is contingent on payment of a fee and compliance with a set of written rules; consequently it is not a “public area” (for purposes of copyright law). Sebastian Koppehel (talk) 21:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per request Ankry (talk) 18:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This is not obviously a recent photograph. It is not well attributted the original authorship and the proper date of exposure. Therephore does not reach ther requirements to be published under self-atribution license and doubtously having falled into public domain, because this lack of data. Bestiasonica (talk) 22:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per request Ankry (talk) 18:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This is a possible unattributed copyright violation of https://media2.wnyc.org/i/800/0/l/80/1/IMG_0937.JPG. The source is copyrighted on the bottom, with a notice saying "© 2015 New York Public Radio". Epic Genius (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: published elsewhere same day or few days earlier; OTRS permission required. Ankry (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
kunabi brother GmbH is not Unity Technologies, thus they do not have the authority to license screenshots of its presumed proprietary IDE under an open content license. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yep, I put it up for speedy. Feel free to just drop a note on my talk page next time. – czar 01:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per above Ankry (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted promotional photo; OTRS permission required Ankry (talk) 19:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jmax as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|found elsewhere on web. This is quite unclear statement. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: publishet here in March 2015, no evidence of free license, no OTRS permission provided Ankry (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: published elsewhere in 2009; likely copyvio Ankry (talk) 19:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 01:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of copyrighted work: http://www.clubederegatasguara.com.br/ Ankry (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
redundant with File:LO - Plage Kayoc.jpg PA (talk) 07:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Images merged Ankry (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
painting of Jan van Heel, died in 1990, copyrighted painting. probably de minimis but don't think so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannolans (talk • contribs) 2015-09-10T19:23:40 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted image Ankry (talk) 19:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. This is not how Support Requests work; I have already answered the Support Request at mw:Support Desk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.130.123.213 (talk • contribs) 2015-08-30T14:15:50 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ankry (talk) 19:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Used. So in scope. Ankry (talk) 19:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Ankry (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeeperezar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra lanzamiento de un dado n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra grafico de frecuencia Relativa Lanzamiento de una moneda n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra grafico de frecuencia Absoluta Lanzamiento de una moneda n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra lanzamiento de una moneda n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Introducción del software Geogebra.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra Probabilidad de las no coincidencias de los Sombreros de Euler.pdf
- File:Instructivo las coincidencias de los Sombreros de Euler con n=4.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra las coincidencias de los sombreros de Euler con n=3.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra grafica frecuencia relativa Lanzamiento de dos dados n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra lanzamiento de dos dados n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra Grafica frecuencia relativa Lanzamiento de dos monedas n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra Lanzamiento dos monedas n veces.pdf
- File:Instructivo Applet en Geogebra gráfico de frecuencia Relativa Lanzamiento de un dado n veces.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Cordial Saludo Hago referencia a lo expuesto en la edición Applets de los grandes números son de mi propiedad. es un trabajo académico de un conjunto de experimentos aleatorios con eventos equiprobables y no equiprobables como el lanzamientos de monedas, dados, situación problema sombreos de Euler. realizados con el programa de Geogebra que es de libre uso y con la ayuda del enlace externo de http://www.geogebratube.org/
Por lo anterior solicito no me borren la pagina. ya que es una contribución académica para los interesados en conocer la aplicación de la ley de los grandes números observando directamente como se comprueban los resultados.
cordialmente
Jeeperezar: Jesús Evenson Perez Arenas
Ingeniero de Sistemas. Universidad Católica de Oriente.( Rionegro Antioquia Colombia)
Especialista en Estadística. Universidad Nacional De Colombia (Sede Medellin)
Magister en la enseñanza de las Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad Nacional De Colombia (Sede Medellin)
Correo: jeeperezar@unal.edu.co (para alguna contribucción o discusión del tema)
muchas gracias.
- Info IMO, they might be stored here if they are in scope of Spanish Wikisource. Unsure. Moreover, CC-BY-SA 4.0 license is not compatible with WMF requirements for texts in Wikimedia projects (should be 3.0). Ankry (talk) 19:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: After request, CC 4.0 licenses are valid. In scope for es projects. Alan (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
No source for basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per above: unused Ankry (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- Source has been added, along with the source for the color (blue). The states highlighted are based on what the the article and website says. Corkythehornetfan 17:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above Ankry (talk) 20:03, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Photography is banned inside the Jewel House, I absolutely wasn't informed about that before. Sorry! I've uploaded this file a few days ago and nominated it for VI. In the discussion about that matter I was informed by Japalina about the fact that photography is banned inside the Jewel House of the Tower of London. I really didn't know that before! I'm very sorry about my missing information! I immediately have withdrawn my VI-nomination and requested a speedydeletion first. I cancelled all usings of this image in different Wikipedias too. Yann told me a speedydeletion isn't possible, but recommended to make a deletion request. I'm really convinced about the importance to delete this picture, because I took it though it was forbidden, but I didn't know that it was. I know that I've made a big mistake and I want the picture to be deleted as soon as possible. Dn@lor_01 (talk) 15:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I'd like to keep this with all personal information removed (partial done). EXIF data still needs removal. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I reverted it out of Imperial State Crown at English Wikipedia because it didn't fit the caption and the odd angle obscured the surmounted cross. However, it's a quality photo that portrays the crown in an interesting way. If it's absolutely illegal to keep it, so be it; but if the rule against Jewel House photography is mere rent-seeking or excess officiousness, I'd like to explore the possibility of keeping such a photo, and finding an appropriate use for it. Dhtwiki (talk) 20:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - to comply with the wishes of the creator and uploader. Japalina (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment EXIF data removed. --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 06:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above; made some history cleaning; renominate if not satisfied Ankry (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
smaller copy of File:Anastasia and Paraskeva (Novgorod).jpg. Not in use Shakko (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate Ankry (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Smaller copy of File:Saint Paraskeva (1600, Clinton).jpg, not in use. Shakko (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate Ankry (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
No source on this drawing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: published elsewhere in 2006 Ankry (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
No source on this drawing, no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: used elsewhere in March 2013; not own Ankry (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Satellite image and old map are obviously not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is own work in a composition of standard map info, and ancient map in wikipedia.Could you please specify your doubts. 05:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)AlvoMaia (talk)
- Please give a direct link to both images used to make the composite! Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now, closing admin please review! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above Ankry (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
I have a user page created at meta.wikimedia.org. Thank you. RaboKarbakian (talk) 01:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted Ankry (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Wrong indication Сарапулов (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: fix indication instead of requesting deletion :) Ankry (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Mappa errata, sostituita da File:Italia - mappa strada statale 21.svg. Sono l'autore di entrambe. Arbalete (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
we would need a license for the foto an not only for the depicted atwork. JuTa 18:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- No problem, of course, but what should I do ? I uploaded this picture as I usualy do for artworks...--Velvet (talk) 11:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Velvet, {{PD-art}} is for two-dimensional works of art only (paintings etc), and should be used when someone else has taken a photograph of a public domain artwork (see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag). If this is your own photograph then you own the copyright for it and can choose any free license accepted in Commons such as CC-BY-SA or CC0. MKFI (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, it's done--Velvet (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep license fixed. MKFI (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, it's done--Velvet (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Velvet, {{PD-art}} is for two-dimensional works of art only (paintings etc), and should be used when someone else has taken a photograph of a public domain artwork (see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag). If this is your own photograph then you own the copyright for it and can choose any free license accepted in Commons such as CC-BY-SA or CC0. MKFI (talk) 09:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per above Ankry (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
PD-old doesn't apply for 1925-photographs when the author is unknown. There is not sufficiant evidence that this work is anonymous either. Natuur12 (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
please delete this file, too many errors: Canada, Iran and many other counbtries show in the map were never part of Portugal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monart (talk • contribs) 2015-09-06T08:43:23 (UTC)
Deleted: unused; misleading Ankry (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be a complete Wikipedia article? Does it exist on Spanish Wikipedia or English Wikipedia and can it be copy/pasted to be an article? The photo is suitable for Commons. WayneRay (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: unclear photo deletion reason in this request Ankry (talk) 20:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, needs source. This image is too small to be realistically useful for education. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: grabbed from here: http://html.rincondelvago.com/historia-de-la-tributacion-en-mexico.html - not own Ankry (talk) 20:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
image used only by page deleted off enwiki for being totally unverifiable DS (talk) 15:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unused; OoS Ankry (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
detail of old header for the filmportal in deWP, it will be rebuild soon with free images, see [11]. Queryzo (talk) 08:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No source of basemap or data. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
DWs in this unsourced collage of four images, overprinted in right corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
No source of basemap or data for this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
US Government work PD does not apply. Thomas Hart Benton made this under a commission from Abbott Laboratories, a private corporation, who later gave it to the US Navy. Copyrighted works which are acquired by the US Government are not subject to the US Govt work exception. See http://wayback.archive.org/web/20150111110400/http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/benton/benton1.htm for the gift by Abbott to the Navy and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Transfers re the status of copyrighted works acquired by the US Government. If no proper PD justification can be given, image should be deleted. TransporterMan (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Note that the archive of the page this is from [12] give some info about Benton, including mentioning " "The Year of Peril," a series of grim and powerful war paintings financed by Abbott Laboratories." This image is NOT one of "The Year of Peril" series. (Google: Examples of "The Year of Peril" series. More about "The Year of Peril" series, which again I point out this image is not a part of .) The source website does NOT say the images on the Navy mil page were commissioned by Abbot Laboratories. (It simply states they are from the "Navy Art Collection".) If you have info that this image and the one in a related deletion request were a private commission rather than US Navy, present it and I will support deletion. However I find no such info in careful reading of the source page. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- But that page, which lists this image, says that it was "Gift of Abbott Laboratories" which means that it was not done for the government by a government employee, so there's no evidence that it is PD. It's the uploader's obligation to prove that the underlying artwork is PD, not the community's obligation to prove it was not. Regards, TransporterMan (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Doing a bit of hunting, I found a reference on Google Books (Fiddles, Harmonicas, and Banjos: Thomas Hart Benton and His Role in Constructing Popular Notions of American Folk Music and Musicians) that discusses this work. The full citation listed at the top of page 171 seems to make it rather clear that the physical object itself was donated, but that the copyright to the artwork remains with the 'T. H. Benton and R. P. Benton Testamentary Trusts'. Revent (talk) 01:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 15:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
US Government work PD does not apply. Thomas Hart Benton made this under a commission from Abbott Laboratories, a private corporation, who later gave it to the US Navy. Copyrighted works which are acquired by the US Government are not subject to the US Govt work exception. See http://wayback.archive.org/web/20150111110400/http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/benton/benton1.htm for the gift by Abbott to the Navy and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government#Transfers re the status of copyrighted works acquired by the US Government. If no proper PD justification can be given, image should be deleted. TransporterMan (talk) 00:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Note that the archive of the page this is from [13] give some info about Benton, including mentioning " "The Year of Peril," a series of grim and powerful war paintings financed by Abbott Laboratories." This image is NOT one of "The Year of Peril" series. Google: Examples of "The Year of Peril" series. The source website does NOT say these images were commissioned by Abbot Laboratories. (It simply states they are from the "Navy Art Collection".) If you have info that this image and the one in a related deletion request were a private commission rather than US Navy, present it and I will support deletion. However I find no such info in careful reading of the source page. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- But that page, which lists this image, says that it was "Gift of Abbott Laboratories" which means that it was not done for the government by a government employee, so there's no evidence that it is PD. It's the uploader's obligation to prove that the underlying artwork is PD, not the community's obligation to prove it was not. Regards, TransporterMan (talk) 13:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As I commented at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Preliminary Shake Down New Orleans Benton.jpg, there is a book about Benton visible on Google Books that gives information on many of his works. This particular one does not seem to be specifically listed, but his works seem to be uniformly described as "Art copyright T. H. Benton and R. P. Benton Testamentary Trusts", including multiple works that are held by the Naval Historical Center. It appears that the copyrights were not transferred when the works were donated, making these not ok. (Though, as a side note, it is correct that the US Government can own copyrights transferred to it.) Revent (talk) 03:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 15:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete obvious scan from a book. It appears Grazia Neri is still alive and I cannot find any verifiable information about Giovanni Giovannetti (which one actually took the photo?) but any image taken of Plath who died in 1963 aged 30 is still in copyright even if she were in her teens for this photo. The original size at Flickr clearly attributed the photo. Ww2censor (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per {{PD-Italy}} as Sylvia Plath died in 1963. Both Giovanni Giovannetti and [14] [15] Grazia Neri are professional Italian photographers. It is quite common to mention two photographers when the image comes from a photo agency (they assign two people for a job and sometimes don't know who took which photo). It is unclear which agency it was, but given the Neri's bios on the web, it is should be Italian. The scanned (U.S., copyrighted) book merely borrowed their photo, with a proper credit. Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are probably correct but this template Template:PD-Italy/US may be of interest because it requires a publication date to determine its copyright status. Of course it does not answer the question of whether we know when and where the image was first published. As I understand it the commons also requires that the image must be PD in the US as well as Italy but I'm not entirely sure about that due to the prose in the above linked template. Ww2censor (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: Yes, explicitly... "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media: that are explicitly freely licensed, or; that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." (COM:L) Revent (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- The image is automatically free in the US if it was first published in Italy (to apply PD-Italy) and the publication occurred in 1975 or earlier (to comply with URAA). Both are highly likely. Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Materialscientist: Indeed, I was just answering the specific policy question. Revent (talk) 07:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: Yes, explicitly... "Wikimedia Commons only accepts media: that are explicitly freely licensed, or; that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work." (COM:L) Revent (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are probably correct but this template Template:PD-Italy/US may be of interest because it requires a publication date to determine its copyright status. Of course it does not answer the question of whether we know when and where the image was first published. As I understand it the commons also requires that the image must be PD in the US as well as Italy but I'm not entirely sure about that due to the prose in the above linked template. Ww2censor (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per cmts Alan (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
This photo of Sylvia Plath is by Giovanni Giovannetti of the Grazia Neri photo agency. The small print in the right half of the Flickr source image says "Photo © Giovanni Giovannetti/Grazia Neri". There is no indication that Flickr user Victor Soto has permission to release the image under a CC-BY-2.0 license. While it is unlikely that this image is CC-BY-2.0, as claimed, It's possible that the image qualifies for {{PD-Italy}}. —RP88 (talk) 01:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the earlier nomination. I'm going to self-close this nomination and update the license on the file. —RP88 (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —RP88 (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
High-pitch audio files uploaded by Whitecane17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:En-us-millers.ogg. Usage in several wiktionaries (mostly added by bots) needs to be undone before deleting. One file seems to be in scope and is not in this DR; two other files have separate DRs. (Also: block user?)
- File:En-us-concussion.ogg
- File:En-us-nicole.ogg
- File:En-us-Nichole.ogg
- File:En-us-sovereignty.ogg
- File:En-us-Sixteen Going on Seventeen.ogg
- File:En-us-carillon.ogg
- File:E17500.ogg
- File:Ē17500.ogg
- File:Number 17500.ogg
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Ē17500.ogg is a redirect to File:E17500.ogg; this is a semantic duplicate of File:Number 17500.ogg. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: File:En-us-nicole.ogg and File:En-us-Nichole.ogg are duplicates (though probably legitimate, if the contents were okay). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
A useless campaign. The sole need of it is to have category preset which is easily done with just categories http parameter of Upload Wizard. --Base (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Is there any requirement or guideline on what a useful campaign should be? If it is used and helps us get more freely-licensed images, it is probably useful — NickK (talk) 23:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- But it might as well not be used and the images would still be obtained just as finely. What is the point in the campaign? It helps with nothing. --Base (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)