Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 6th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saint-brains jc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope and unused. Commons is not a venue to publish unpublished philosophical considerations.

— Racconish 📥 06:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC) modified 15:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. These non-image format files does not match to the project scope [1]. About PDF : "a user-created original-research article that is making use of Commons as a free web-host may not be [relevant]". And this copyrighted original research is not realistically useful for an educational purpose.--La femme de menage (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Je demande le maintien de ces documents dont la teneur est certes originale mais correspond à des travaux personnels développés depuis plus de 20 ans. dont enseignement universitaire sur le "management de la qualité" à L'UBS de LOrient Je n'accepterais que des contributions objective et pertinentes de personnes justifiant de réelles competences - en Psychologie : "dynamique humaine","attentes" ; - en management et sociologie : "modes relationnels"; - en philosophie & sociologie : "ethiques", "univers d'activité". J'ai note que Presque toutes ces contributions ont été citées comme "notables"... sans doute par un inconsequent ?

J'ai compris tardivement que le format PD F posait (poserait) probleme sur sa difficulté de transposition traduite ou l'emploi par outils de projection pédagogique. Je n'ai pas les moyens de les convertir en format plus universel que je vais tenter de trouver. Or j'ai constaté que de nombreux documents De Wiki common étaient en format PDF.

J'ai la faiblesse de penser que cette contribution est juste et fondée et adhere totalement à une libre exploitation ce qui a motive mon adhesion sans faille à l'esprit de gratuité et de partage de Wikipedia. Indiquez-moi où j'ai commis une erreur d'appréciation. Saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Saint-brains[reply]

J'ai tenté de convertir certains fichiers en .jpg ou .gif avec des résultats déplorables. J'ai pu constater que les fichiers .pdf incorporés au (feu) texte que j'avais inséré avaient une qualité remarquable dans le plus fort grossisement possible. Je suppose que PDF fonctionne en mode "vectorisé" et donc que toute donnée graphique, texte compris, était régénéré en affichage avec donc une resolution optimisée. Je pense que là est l'essentiel !

Je suis depuis plus de quinze ans le genie d'Adope et de son procédé d'"encapsulage" des objets graphiques, l'Etat communique ses documents en format PDF comme mon la boratoire d'analyses médicales ...

Je ne comprend donc pas pourquoi ce format est interdit. WIkipédia est'elle une idée d'avant garde empétrée dans des formalismes handicapant ?; Le format PDF que je sache est reconnu par tous les types de conversions graphiques. Saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. The key point here is not the format but the content: original unpublished research with no perspective of being used in a project of the Wikimedia Foundation. — Racconish 📥 15:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mille excuse mais alors pourquoi PDF ne figure-t-il pas en liste préconisée. Tous les themes auxquels j'ai rattaché les documents existent bien !

Je ne comprends pas que des inédits soient refusés alors que l'importation demande si l'intervenant est bien l'auteur. Peut-être cela veut-il dire que le sujet ne peut être que la vue sous un angle nouveau d'une idée, expression ou representation "officialisée" ... par qui ?

Wikipedia - media ne sont-ils que des bachotages étriqués ou des Musées ... ou cimetières où on s'incline devant la mémoire des illustres anciens et ...on se tait !!! Le schema "Ethiques" que je proposais avait la vocation de structurer les arguments des divers chapîtres qui, en l'état, sont redondants et sans ossature, voire contradictoires. saint-brains --Saint-brains jc (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai compris - car le système de gestion me semble encore adolescent que les themes que j'avais indiqués avaient le défaut d'être en français et non retenus. Victime de l'intendance ! Saint-brains--Saint-brains jc (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same as previous DR

— Racconish 📥 06:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saint-brains jc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope and unused. Commons is not a venue to publish unpublished philosophical considerations

— Racconish 📥 06:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Recreation of previous deleted files. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte meine Familie und mich nicht mehr in Wiki öffentlich sehen Ökologix (talk) 04:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ökologix: Bitte entferne vorgängig die Einbindung des Fotos unter de:Benutzer:Ökologix/Vorlagen/Treue Seele. --Leyo 08:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Habe ich gemacht ... und danke schonmal! --Ökologix (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User request: unused private picture. Leyo 16:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a wrong name of this functional group, which is derived from p-cymene. See also Cumyl group.png. Wikiwerner (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC) [reply]

I have pointed the redirect to the right file: Cumyl group.png. Therefore I canceled the deletion request. Wikiwerner (talk) 11:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw. Next time, try to fix it instead of nominating for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure) [reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is uploaded by a user with the same accountname as the name of the YouTube channel the image is also used. So it looks like it's uploaded by the person in the photo, however this isn't a selfie, because both hands are visible and not holding a camera. Also it's clear it's a posed image and not a spontaneous photo. Mbch331 (talk) 11:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giacomo Jacobetti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING

— Racconish 📥 11:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and clear copright violations. JuTa 19:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apologize for the wrong upload (should not upload to wikimedia) Gaosong2101 (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . JuTa 19:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

owner request i am the one who uploaded this image, and decided to remove it and add to deletion NikeThyrsus (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . JuTa 19:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

owner request i am the one who uploaded this image, and decided to remove it and add to deletion NikeThyrsus (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . JuTa 19:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader said, that main object of the photo is the appletree, but I do not think so. Unused personal photos are out of project scope.
Загрузчик сказал, что главный объект этой фотографии яблоня, но мне так не кажется. Неиспользованные личные фотографии Викискладу не нужны. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

прошу удалить загружен по ошибке TantNatafoto (talk) 10:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees with deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image Bazj (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Materialscientist (talk) 13:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Europe Balkans Macedonia geo.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; image has been posted online and has no OTRS ticket https://www.pinterest.com/pin/332914597430392676/ Taketa (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious copyvio, the pinterest pages has a link to a 2011 website. Martin H. (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Advitamaeternam19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these images or signatures are own work of uploader, the variable sizes, lack of metadata on all but one image, monotypic subject matter, etc. all combine to suggest these are COM:COPYVIO, culled from the internet and not any form of users own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Advitamaeternam19 (talk · contribs)

Likeky copyvios (User hasuploaded a bunch of copyvios on the same subject)

— Racconish 📥 14:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 00:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful image uploaded as own work by known copyright violator Taketa (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I do not believe own work. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's contain my country map. 115.178.26.105 14:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's contain my country map. 42.115.80.51 16:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you (as an user from two different IP address) have evidences than you are the copyright holder of the map? If yes, please request an OTRS ticket. If not,  speedy keep. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
because it shows unreal information about the world map. there is another country inside the map called cambodia. you know??? fuck! who created this? it needs to sentence that person because he is showing that Vietnam is planning or going to do something over Cambodia. Delete is as soon as possible and tell that person, the owner, not to do it again or we will meet each other on the court. 42.115.21.242 18:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you really are the copyright holder, please use the OTRS process and stop nominating this file more than once and stop assuming bad faith. An administrator or OTRS should decide the future of the file. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator obviously is not concerned about copyright, but rather shocked to see this map of Vietnam+Laos+Camboja subsumed to a greater version of the former and under its flag design. There’s no place for offended sensibilities in Commons, of course, and this image is legal where relevant, but deliberately misunderstanding the nominator’s reasons does nobody a good service. -- Tuválkin 19:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict)

  •  Comment It's illegal modification of country map which WRONGLY claims that Cambodia is in Vietnam! Please delete this immediately... 150.107.4.132, 01:57, 28 August 2014
Guy, everybody with half a brain and basic geography skills knows this is not the map of Vietnam, but a coumpound of Vietnam+Laos+Cambodia, but so what? This is an illustration of the concept of a “Greater Vietnam”, a view that this country should in some way absorb these two neighbours. The fact that this map conveys neither the current political geography nor a serious claim by any relevant party or movement may be grounds to have this image deleted for irrelevancy (although that’s unlikely since Commons has developed a culture of lenience to this kind of fanciful imagery when it is not photographic or otherwise manipulated or mislieading), but your argumentation so far has been far from convincing.
The fact that you fail to even notice that also Laos, not only Cambodia, was added to this bloated Vietnam, and the fact that you tried to have deleted the deletion request you yourself initiated suggests you are not more serious nor worth attention than people who create bogus maps with flags and splatter them all over Commons. -- Tuválkin 03:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: No valid reason given for deletion. INeverCry 03:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused flag-map with borders not corresponding to any existing country; not suitable for educational use as defined by COM:SCOPE. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept No valid reason was provided for a relation. We have plenty of nationalist images with very creative and controversial redrawing of borders. That however is not a valid reason for deletion. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 00:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

COM:SCOPE ("must be realistically useful for an educational purpose") and COM:NOTHOST are valid reasons for deletion. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rashel denisse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julenb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 00:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused crop of File:MitsuoFuchida.jpg which latter file is in use on multiple wikis. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Unlikely to be user's own work, no source, no author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already published online, no OTRS ticket: http://www.revista2010.com.ar/politica-nacional/un--botin--de-oro.php Taketa (talk) 02:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs permission Basvb (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France 37.221.160.114 02:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation http://www.eldiaonline.com/de-angeli-pidio-mas-inversion/ previously published, no OTRS ticket, uploader is a known copyright violator Taketa (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was originally going to tag this for speedy deletion as a blatant copyvio of http://www.photoreflect.com/store/Orderpage.aspx?pi=02LF0060200001&po=1&pc=16, but I'm not so sure given that the nom's only uploads are these Lipofsky pictures, and the username matches the e-mail in the description. Would prefer someone look into it rather than just speedying it, since we would know how to proceed then for all the other images. Wizardman 03:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ID confirmed at OTRS ticket:2010033010055495. I have posted this on his talk page for future reference. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 04:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS is there now Basvb (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from [2] LudwigSK (talk) 04:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 10:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo from some Art Noise band, user with 2 edits. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 12:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by نواره علي (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Movie stills, promo photos. Strongly doubt own work and/or free license.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talkpage: السلام عليكم هذه الصور كلها تعتبر من ملكية العامة بحيث أنها من المواد المشهورة و في متناول الجميع وقد قمت أنا شخصياً بتصويرها عن طريقة شاشة الكمبيوتر و هي عبارة عن لقطات — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) نواره علي (UTC)

Machine translation (Google Translate): Peace be upon you all of these images is one of public ownership so that it is one of the famous and materials accessible to everyone you I have personally photographed all the way computer screen and is a footage


Deleted: Deleted all but one given the reaction and the files these don't seem to be own work but derivatives. I've kept the Northwestern University file as this was not claimed to be own work and could well be pd-old or below TOO, anyway I feel a separate discussion would be needed for that file. Basvb (talk) 11:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

270 px square with borders left on right? Doesn't look like own work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like license washing. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Looks like made out of the audience, bad quality because of the darkness in the studio and the impossibility to use a flash. Marcus Cyron (talk) 06:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader has other photos from the same event, which seem to be of the same quality. My Internet is slow at the moment, so I can't really go through their albums. Melonkelon (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, looked like a screenshot to me.  I withdraw my nomination and  speedy keep --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. Basvb (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and Not Used Bryant2000 (talk) 05:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keepthese are not valid reasons for deletion Oxyman (talk) 09:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion Basvb (talk) 11:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry night time pic, not in use, does not provide any value. Mippzon (talk) 05:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope Mippzon (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused desktop wallpaper screenshot. No added value. Mippzon (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, blurry, seems out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope Mippzon (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality image with logo. Mippzon (talk) 06:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality image of unknown singer Mippzon (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality image of unknown singer Mippzon (talk) 06:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bboy Nick Scott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image of screenshot of Wikipedia, unused also. Mippzon (talk) 06:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality image Mippzon (talk) 06:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted company logo from http://www.grupazpr.pl Pnapora (talk) 06:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image Bazj (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 11:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahant008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality user created work that is not in use. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality user created work that is not in use. Out of scope Mippzon (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pic. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 07:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have created this one inspired by other templates like {{Indiamonthyear}}, but later i noticed the existing (but not always used) {{Monthbyyearmalaysia}}, that is better anyway. This template isn't used any longer. I have fixed all categories. DerFussi 08:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect could be a second option. -- DerFussi 08:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per author request, made it a redirect Basvb (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 08:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pic, out of scope Mippzon (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion, not used. Out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 09:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry picture, not used, no added value to Commons. Mippzon (talk) 09:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple user created work (self portrait?) that seems out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 09:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a book. Photo might be {{PD-US-no notice}} (although we have no evidence of that), but caption was written some time after 1995. Storkk (talk) 09:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality logo, not used, does not add any value to commons. Mippzon (talk) 09:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible professional photo or video still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional/promotional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, OTRS needed Basvb (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of movie intro, not used, no value added. Mippzon (talk) 09:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple user created work (black triangle and purple triangle), no added value, not in use. Mippzon (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Basvb (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Basvb (talk) 11:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 11:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. EXIF says, that author is Blancarte, so maybe it is not own work as claimed. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As likely copyvio Basvb (talk) 11:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran. Note: the underlying photos might be {{PD-Iran}} if they were published 30 years ago, but the poster itself is more doubtful. Storkk (talk) 10:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely video stills, so {{Own work}} in doubt. Additional possible scope issues. Storkk (talk) 10:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits a "KillerRu", however uploader is a Fleurtje12jasmijn (talk · contribs). If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and scope issues Basvb (talk) 11:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states copyright holder is "Seattle University". No indication this photo is freely licensed or that the uploader is the copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS-permission needed Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Closing admin, please look discussion page of the request. Uploader, please send OTRS-permission, otherways it is difficult to believe, that you have right to publish the logo under free license. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, please contact Commons:OTRS if you are the creator of the file. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. Probably also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, please contact Commons:OTRS if you are the creator of the file. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seiho watanabe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portraits. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Additional possible copyright issues given it's a screenshot of a web browser's view of a pdf file. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, poor quality version of File:Furryfeetlogo 1024f.jpg. Given the existence of the other file, this one is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Low quality duplicate Basvb (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poster. Poor quality, contributors only upload. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, user created logo. Not in use, contributors only upload. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, single line of text on black background. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, single line of text on black background. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Curayo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright not likely held by uploader. In case uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS.

Storkk (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of likely unfree photo. Storkk (talk) 11:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source for original file needed. Basvb (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo or TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-portrait (ugly) from user with 9 edits. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 11:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

plus his other 8 files. Some bad quality exercises in multimedia. Commons is not for publishing own art work:

Deleted: Per nomination, there are also issues with the footage and music in the videos being copyright violations. Basvb (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait, not in use, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait, not in use, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 11:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional headshot. License should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bigger version here. Yann (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here. Yann (talk) 11:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a visible copyright notice, contradicting the anonymous uploader's claim that it is free. Evidence of a suitable licence from the copyright holder is required. Zero0000 (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination, Commons:OTRS-permission needed. Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bigger version here. Yann (talk) 11:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.google.fr/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuuZQkT-63rqJo34SKs9eKt--2Rbyht1gFlLv-juArjITgAzWbl0UmXqvJX1mqZCYdMHy3yaA5BW9NpN5HOiyubv4P-stqp-7iqYpY_1WGk0BPOa_1SUpUL1XY5DXZkws4_16JtXZserv45krLOCnSw2qSf5jluzll_1GxJ6C2nvsH2JZNGcqibLuLtlPdo40rP3LTgGaNa2BkkxZ83PN6QmmqRBGwvlbivCl3jA0EBeyw0dDnyVcS9YqR92Qb7SLGfGd5bvZCgpUCgyFdN4GxGqaRkbpNTV8W-irqGWFLYrz8zRobD2YpSWi92FnOltVxnM6iBwUBzHg5kx9KYfQZ316XWeJHb059TeDAGUfdJDRGHBENnxFZHznq_18ciSuTQBKXhIabMR5nAfLOiT_1Z8t4Qe8t521x1s_1mk3ak7Bx2JUC8o2fVFmnpcwAkua5agudVYcUQ3rOE8thV08-jBH0ZDECMUK2XFgysmJRcUXzsNc758dPnGPbJvx1uLtYgcDAq5xH71GsTo8HQRQmihqJhF61MunB5R3yxk21PpBtEB5d4LTVgS_17H6s17qodT2ex5un7CRNEyrnbqAyiUMufcgGfzCX8gqIl5CD8dZybhNPS7V3xvTH9RelkZvzX79oE4Tx1Q6nf023WTsLPp1-qemEdBntMUChMM3EtoprpYDJQKDJ6kCkHCdewcAiMuR5jxJqpr4aUGZGl9UH-P98cjrO8HV14Jadps7zSV6axY5HOR5NYiMtlfSsdH3rT43_1bbOdQDDJgUduQVpjUvGuLmaMkHYmyFsp2JDmaKVaJyRKDjocQ_18Iw081S8BRDPko2EozIbidjH4Uq_14VHiYAc95jtC3HP_1ZTOscnRcPTYEOXU9sbYr4g34w1nkuGmTzxsjKE7mW1CrAijwJU0M2gZX48l4bp5YLK6WaIZSawF_1feYtURPYBeG4Bxq34oBgYbXD5VgIO_1dfMd_1uudV0oDUzPAFP-1YBDmAHy5z2iKlAq-RZ4bjVuWctgxB0tuJ4LYwV508pMx8ItLy6k7jhq7sPSwXcfg5Rm-9m07xhbglp-bRffZdSjJQfofsisB5etuxBaLPP3CJB7Jw2edWTCjnw4l3KlIN14-diANwQe9XXeXgx_1G-AvdkTcwdKcJOmxo-ofUlA-JvmFuytkscIFzGiIhMshtMLZPTSD4LMQ-AuXT3zK2h_1EI-U4dyTj6U-X_1IOOWbCQxnU4ICl6MlG9e24MhelLHRqvw8xdyBw2mG-fHxeU9T_1Gm4ABRRePSjZNXK7VRlwhoBGPB_1_1d_1IF3bbf4e_1sumatXIsWg8JDu3OU3srRmO58-iC9O96d3HXC5eS4LufN8ZbaUQaAfhAe0eBVZ3PzJx52rjwZnKphR1exKbeR_18QJmo&gws_rd=cr&ei=_GyaVculBMnaU8CmgKgP Yann (talk) 11:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Basvb (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Manuel Salazar's heirs needed. Yann (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Manuel Salazar's heirs needed. Yann (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted Facebook-style user page en:User:Nitesh Jogade JohnCD (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (not in use anymore) Basvb (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo, disk cover. From user with 3 uploads. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

same file other size File:Nicolas Chalhoub Cover pic.jpg --Shakko (talk) 13:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keverzot14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The top half of the logo is certainly over the threshold of originality. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO Basvb (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to Wiktionary if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Correia Cavombo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Video clip and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Also whether in scope is questionable Basvb (talk) 11:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncropped version credits a different organization: http://cdn.mmaweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/David-Gomez-Monstro.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billcarson9999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravi.dhami.234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laptev15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted page en:User:Aarif-Mohammad-Khan. JohnCD (talk) 14:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are very, very similar. And most of them are blurried. I keep File:Fale - Giardini Botanici Hanbury in Ventimiglia - 584.jpg which is the better photo.

Tangopaso (talk) 14:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marco Slinckaert is dead in 2009. No FoP inFrance. 90.2.26.145 14:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue EVDiam (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Sorry I was not precise. This image is considered a "digital image of 3D objects". So, I had to add a copyright for the object itself (which is in public domain), but I need also a copyright for the image (photographer/text) (see an example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Altamura_Painter_-_Red-Figure_Calyx_Krater_-_Walters_48262_-_Side_B.jpg). I uploaded it as a test, and then I released that it needs two types of copyright. Thank you very much!EVDiam (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright EVDiam (talk) 15:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Amitie 10g. Sorry I was not precise. This image is considered a "digital image of 3D objects". So, I had to add a copyright for the object itself (which is in public domain), but I need also a copyright for the image (photographer/text) (see an example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Altamura_Painter_-_Red-Figure_Calyx_Krater_-_Walters_48262_-_Side_B.jpg). I uploaded it as a test, and then I released that it needs two types of copyright. What do you think? Thank you very much!EVDiam (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh you're right, 3D object. OTRS permission is needed if you really want to keep these pictures. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Amitie 10g, Unfortunately, right now I don't have the permission to send the OTRS letter, that is why I request for Deletion.EVDiam (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Basvb (talk) 11:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatih Su (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Source is [http:// www.r10.net/off-topic/960549-osmanlica-ceviri-yardimi.html here] (spam black list).

Yann (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatih Su (talk · contribs)

[edit]

10 files of the user have been deleted already, most as copyvio. All of these are also likely copyright violations, with no real exif data. The flag could be an exception, but is not in use and could be considered out of scope.

Basvb (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatih Su (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"FBMD" in metadata means the files were in and out of Facebook before uploading here.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here. Yann (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "T-Hana Photography", but uploader is a Movinesh (talk · contribs). If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, freedom of panorama in Morocco does not apply if the work is the subject of the photo. Storkk (talk) 12:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, letterboxed: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie from user with 1 edit. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 12:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie from user with 3 edits, not in use. And I believe - provo of web page. Shakko (talk) 12:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some "grandma" portrait with bad photoshop. From user with 2 uploads. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not in use, out of scope. Basvb (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Selfie from page deleted at en:WP:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stephen.Mayes. User edited only on a single day in 2008. JohnCD (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book published in Japan in 1962. No evidence that the author is the uploader or died before 1965. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination - enwiki article states author died in 1963, so this is {{PD-Japan}}. Storkk (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion, please feel free to self-keep-close the request next time as nominator. Basvb (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as no permission (No permission since) Natuur12 (talk) 12:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline case, could be below com:TOO, could be above TOO so it should face a regular DR. Natuur12 (talk) 12:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely incorrect attribution information, TOO doubtful Basvb (talk) 12:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description (and filename) suggest photographer is J.B. Millot, however uploader is a MelissetteLesnie (talk · contribs). Confirmation of copyright status should be sent to COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Basvb (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock image. Copyright unlikely held by uploader. Storkk (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of user, no in use anywhere. Out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:44, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Novodevichy cemetery (Moscow) (part two)

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in Russia. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. While the uploading of small numbers of images... for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; not in COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 12:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 12:34, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original is here. Yann (talk) 12:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie from user with 2 edits. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Not pretty! Shakko (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. On a sidenote @Shakko I want to ask you to refrain from remarks such as "not pretty" and "self-portrait (ugly)" and even remarks such as "bad photoshop". Although you are correct that these images do not belong on commons as they are out of scope this is not a reason to insult the creators of these work, we should respectfully handle these cases and not insult people for how they look or draw. Basvb (talk) 12:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, Not a work of US Govt ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no valid licesne Basvb (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No creation date, publication date or author given; license and date of 2007 is clearly incorrect. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No creation date, publication date or author given; license and date of 2007 is clearly incorrect. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No creation date, publication date or author given; license and date of 2007 is clearly incorrect. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit at the top doesn't match uploader information. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akbasnet13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Akbasnet13 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pandiconita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magalink96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cele vazquez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheMimut (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 17:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriela mahaila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 17:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 17:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unencylopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kefren Eduardo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencylopedic personal image outside our scope §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 17:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damián Cacharrón Gesto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 17:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damián Cacharrón Gesto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Damián Cacharrón Gesto has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a lot of personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leshe012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 19:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license. Well there is a {{PD-USGov-Army}}, but the given souce gives me currently an internal server error. It seems its unclear why this is a US-army work. JuTa 19:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: License seems incorrect Basvb (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

becuse iwant my picture no avilable for all people Kawakeb55 (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Basvb (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 19:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i am the owner and i am the one who uploaded this image, and decided to remove it and add it to deletion NikeThyrsus (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright situation Basvb (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dantheman552 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - most w/ no EXIF - 2 with EXIF from different cameras but small sizes - also some graphs, diagrams, and maps - own work claim doubtful for all of these works

INeverCry 19:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. Basvb (talk) 12:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work from (Copyright) Olivar de Segura Didym (talk) 19:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: derivative work Basvb (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable club INeverCry 19:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name that is us ed for the Sirvan river in the map in Iran ara is not correct. the Sirvan River is the name for Iran part. 2Free2 (talk) 19:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the reason for deleting the map? instead of that you can just add the name Sirvan for the iranian part of the river.--KureCewlik81 (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Will juliam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

INeverCry 19:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hotelmarjo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 19:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OscarGH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - no educational value

INeverCry 20:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 20:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 0000https (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity image, no educational purpose, outside of project scope. Used on now-deleted en.wp pages spamming for this user. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - underlying brain drawing likely isn't own work of uploader INeverCry 20:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs proper sourcing Basvb (talk) 12:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - drawing likely isn't own work of uploader INeverCry 20:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs proper sourcing/permission for drawing Basvb (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aida200101 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 20:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lighthouse was constructed in 1950. Even if the architect died the same year, the work would still be copyrighted, and freedom of panorama does not exist in France. De728631 (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Very simple industrial building, no copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lighthouse in the background was constructed in 1950, and the transmitter is obviously even younger. Both designs are still copyrighted, and freedom of panorama does not exist in France. De728631 (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Industrial building, no copyright. Yann (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The lighthouse was constructed in 1959, so the design is still copyrighted. Freedom of panorama does not exist in France, so derivatives of this tower cannot be kept at Commons. De728631 (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Industrial / utility building, no copyright. Yann (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blank page with only one name in it. Not used. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current Roches Douvres lighthouse was designed in the late 1940s and finished in 1954. Even if the architect died that same year, the design is still copyrighted, and freedom of panorama does not exist in France. De728631 (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated:

De728631 (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Industrial / utility building, no copyright. Yann (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but watermarked "inni Singh", hence DR started to verify claimed own work, Roland zh (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality and unused picture that I uploaded some years ago. Then I uploaded better quality pictures, here and here. Krepideia judica causam tuam 21:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Other versions clearly better Basvb (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - http://www.gregormcewan.com/media/pictures/105_high.jpg diba (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio? http://www.gregormcewan.com/media/pictures/063_high.jpg diba (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Jean11 (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Jean11 (talk) 22:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 22:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)\ Fry1989 eh? 22:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO Basvb (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not seems own work. Elisardojm (talk) 23:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of scope personal image? --ghouston (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license, Image (c), see gradient. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to know how to fix the license. Thanks! הללג (talk) 06:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hedwig in Washington, could you expand on the reasoning (I don't directly see what you mean) and help answer the question above? Thank you. Basvb (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Basvb: There's a gradient / shadow in the background. This is an (c) photo, not self|CC 1.0. Blatant copyright violation. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Aah ok, I was searching for an actual "c" in there. Basvb (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination, copyvio Basvb (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free mosaics - the same as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Videm Dobrepolje Slovenia - church.JPG. Eleassar (t/p) 05:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no FoP in Slovenia Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:(DHQ)2PHAL.png Revent (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not an exact duplicate (so not a speedy), but the other version is cleaner, so we might want to get rid of this in favor of the other one. Revent (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:(DHQD)2PHAL.png Revent (talk) 22:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, not an exact duplicate (and so not a speedy) but the other ones is a significantly better rendering, so we might want to get rid of this one in it's favor. Revent (talk) 22:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that the person is an actor I would consider the image as in scope (although the editing makes any other image preferable), I do however have some doubts on the authorship of the uploader. Thus might be considered as likely copyvio. Basvb (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unusable photoshopping, doubtful copyright status. P 1 9 9   15:10, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits "Ciuk Milos" and states "Tutti i diritti riservati" - if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the US for such 2D works 37.221.160.114 02:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, No FoP for billboards.Wdwd (talk) 08:12, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very dark night time pic, no value added. Mippzon (talk) 06:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, No rationale for deletion.Wdwd (talk) 08:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the relief seems pretty modern. Eleassar (t/p) 08:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Per nom.Wdwd (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable professional headshot: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} dubious. If uploader (who appears to be the subject) is the copyright holder or can get copyright holder to license the file as stated, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Image used on twitter and other web-sites. No consent via OTRS.Wdwd (talk) 08:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong typographie of substituent numbering, corrected and replaced by File:„Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons-Mechanism“V1.svg Mabschaaf (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:„Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons-Mechanism“V1.svg. P 1 9 9   14:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong "NEF3", file corrected and replaced by File:Loxapine synthesis01.svg Mabschaaf (talk) 08:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:Loxapine synthesis01.svg. P 1 9 9   14:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong subtitution pattern in product; corrected and replaced by File:Polybenzimidazole synthesis0 1.svg Mabschaaf (talk) 08:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:Polybenzimidazole synthesis0 1.svg. P 1 9 9   14:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mala calidad Juana I Castilla (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: good high quality. P 1 9 9   14:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nie chce tego pliku 2A02:810D:8800:1024:A8EE:3158:67F5:B5B7 14:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? That's not a valid reason to request a deletion of a user page. - 上村七美 (talk) 04:18, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no deletion reason. P 1 9 9   14:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cometí un error subiendo el archivo equivocado. EddieBurciaga (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9   14:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. see logo on Chivas official web- Fma12 (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Blatant copyvio. Fma12 (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PORFAVOR ESTA IMAGEN ES CON EL FIN DE CONTRIBUIR NO CON EL FIN DE DAÑAR GRACIAS

 Delete Obviously, not "ineligible" logo, copyrighted by Dorados de Sinaloa. If the uploader wants to contribute, please read Com:TOO. Fma12 (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC) PORFAVOR ESTA IMAGEN ES CON EL FIN DE CONTRIBUIR NO CON EL FIN DE DAÑAR GRACIAS[reply]

 Delete Copyvio of Mexican club Pachuca logo. If the uploader wants to contribute as he stated, he could upload it under a fair-use license. - Fma12 (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 22:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicion of copyright infringement. Consistent with this file,from official site.--Mizuboshi (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:53, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: small size, poor quality, no exif /St1995 00:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9   16:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, various personalities, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 23:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the artist.

Yann (talk) 23:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NB: All uploads by this user are suspicious. More investigation needed. Yann (talk) 23:31, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:-) I found the source [3] for the part of this image (File:Hacı Həsənov.jpg). --Ray Garraty (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Montage/photoshopped. Ties and suits are available here, and elsewhere.

Yann (talk) 09:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own works. P 1 9 9   16:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More suspicious uploads: official portraits, maps, old photos, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Skith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering [[User talk:Skith]/logs. See also below. Ignoring two files with short time between taken and upload date.

Gunnex (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist José Suárez Olvera died in 1969 (2015-1969=46). Not PD. Also, works are tagged as own work. THose which are photos are uploaded by the same person who claims own work on the paintings, as well is the source for the free license on Flickr.

Josve05a (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom - Fma12 (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: P 1 9 9   16:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

exifdata is present. Basvb (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Storkk. Needs OTRS. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Storkk, needs OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThiênĐế98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, can I get it? In Việt Nam, Bishop Wikipedia not have pictures, so this pictures may help readers can see the bishop.ThiênĐế98 (talk) 12:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you photograph these images ThiênĐế98? It looks like they come from other websites. Basvb (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, Basv, but I have been involved in where to post this picture, and ask about the license photo, and they gave me to use them for public purposes via e-mail --ThiênĐế98 (talk) 06:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ThiênĐế98: Then you need to forward this email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Be aware that the requirement is very strict, and that the permission should include a free license. See COM:OTRS for the details. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here - Vietnamese. They permitted me to cut/ copy all picture from Conggiao.info, in public domain ^^ Yann --ThiênĐế98 (talk) 10:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)-[reply]

Deleted: Please send the information to OTRS! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ThiênĐế98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© Copyright 2015 CGvDT, All rights reserved.

® CGvDT giữ bản quyền nội dung trên website này.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Per the original source: "Với mục đích để Lời Chúa được loan truyền và thông tin Giáo hội được lan tỏa, tòa soạn sẵn lòng để các tổ chức và cá nhân sử dụng lại tin bài đã đăng trên báo giấy và báo mạng cgvdt.vn của mình. Tuy nhiên, vì đức công bằng và sự bác ái, xin quý vị vui lòng ghi đầy đủ nguồn như sau: “Theo Báo Công giáo và Dân tộc, website: cgvdt.vn”. Rough and summary translation: "For Church's information to be spread, the newsroom is willing to allow organizations and individuals to general reuse information published on cgvdt.vn, with the attribution required that those are taken from Báo Công giáo và Dân tộc, website: cgvdt.vn". Before that, an OTRS ticket (#2020042010008007) already included the statement about the image on their website, allow the community "re-use freely, just need specify attribution". --minhhuy (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy: What Google translates is "to allow to reuse articles published on their paper and online newspapers" and I'm not sure it's enough for Commons. Besides if there's an OTRS permission, {{subst:OP}} must be added to the file description pages. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 21:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%93%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D1%8A%D0%BC_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE_%D0%A2%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%89%D0%B0.JPG Yann (talk) 12:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann, the nominated image has a wider crop on the left side, and based on the people on the street also a slightly different angle, thus the images are different though very close to each other. The difference in lighting is also a bit weird. What is the reason for nomination for this one? And why does that reason not apply to the other image. Basvb (talk) 12:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is not own work. Yann (talk) 12:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Long history of (c)vios, Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agree with Storkk, it's a little odd. Needs OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the doors are work by the architect J. Valentinčič (d. 1994). Eleassar (t/p) 15:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No FOP in Slovenia Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear why this should be PD as it was likely published post-1923 and is Mexican. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not PD Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the user's other uploads (which includes images clearly from other photographers marked as self-made) and otherwise low-quality point-and-shoot shots, I have a hard time believing this high-quality editorial photo is from the same user. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) Massimiliano Serini Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative elemennt in respect of the Met Police crest , which as I understood was still protected. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: flickr wash Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nude image of unknown source, posted as own work by known copyright violator Taketa (talk) 02:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete probably not free as all other uploads have been copyvios. COM:PCP --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work. I have the original. Where should I post it?

Please contact Commons:OTRS. Basvb (talk) 10:56, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of permission Pitke (talk) 20:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP may apply, no specify place where the photo was taken Ezarateesteban 19:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ezarate What does FOP have to do with this? This image does not seem to depict a copyrightable work to begin with. Brianjd (talk) 10:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 11:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not good quality modern painting. Not in use. From user with 1 edit. Commons is not for publishing own art work. Out of SCOPE Shakko (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see some more discussion on this one. The painting quality is a matter of taste, there is OTRS permission. The main question thus boils down to how notable is the painter/how usable is the painting for an educational purpose. Basvb (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO in scope and notable, see [4] --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Artist is not unnotable. They may not have an article on any Wikipedia, but this file can be potentially useful for other parties. Pitke (talk) 16:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Jean11 (talk) 22:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean11: More info please. :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion. Pitke (talk) 16:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged PD-old, no rationale why. What is the age of this note? What is the (c) for currency in Syria. Why is this currency of Lebanon? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's from before 1948, when the currency was common to Syria and Lebanon both. --Pitke (talk) 07:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! There are no provision for currency listed for both countries. We only have: Syria: PD 10 years after publication and Lebanon: PD 50 years after the author's death and 50 years after publication for anonymous works. Should we transfer this DR to Com:VP/C? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Seconding that idea most heartily. --Pitke (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred to Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Syrian-Old-Pound.jpg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing because we can't decide with the little information we have right now, Keeping the file so we can discuss properly on Com:VP/C. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]