Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 25th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la personne apparaisant sur cette photo ne désire plus être sur wikipédia Zakuski123 (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Rama (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo prise sans le consentement de la personne Zakuski123 (talk) 13:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Rama (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maxplore Energitama (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement/promotional, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 18:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. INeverCry 22:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low resolution version of File:An ARW team clears the deck of a ship..jpg Someone already uploaded the maximum resolution image per Common's policies for free images. Leoboudv (talk) 01:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict with Yann's close) They aren't really 'duplicates', as this one has been cropped slightly. I overwrote it with a higher resolution version of (hopefully) an identical crop, taken from the full resolution image, and linked the two as {{Extracted image}} and {{Extracted from}}. If my crop doesn't match closely enough, feel free to fix it. As far as deleting this, I don't see any particular reason to not have both the cropped and uncropped version, as long as they can both be at as high a resolution as possible. Revent (talk) 09:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a low resolution version of File:An ARW team clears the deck of a ship - Air Corps helis overhead and Tactical Assault Craft in the Background.jpg which user Sanandros already uploaded. Leoboudv (talk) 01:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone uploaded a higher resolution image here: File:Irish Army Rangers CT Exercise ARW Photos (4478408091) (2).jpg It was not Sanandros I think. Leoboudv (talk) 04:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.olympic.ru/team/olympic-games/baku/media-center/pressa-baku-2015/andrey-belofastov-kak-ia-i-govoril-v-baku-mi-uvideli-buduschee-rossiyskogo-jenskogo-vodnogo/ Petrov Victor (talk) 22:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://ria.ru/sport/20150620/1080062868.html Petrov Victor (talk) 22:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.gazeta.ru/sport/2015/06/20/a_6849025.shtml Petrov Victor (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 10:58, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.olympic.ru/team/olympic-games/baku/media-center/pressa-baku-2015/andrey-belofastov-kak-ia-i-govoril-v-baku-mi-uvideli-buduschee-rossiyskogo-jenskogo-vodnogo/ Petrov Victor (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @User:Petrov Victor, you know the template {{Copyvio}}? JuTa 11:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://news.sportbox.ru/european_games/spbnews_NI543996_Rossijskije_vaterpolistki__pobediteli_Jevropejskih_igr Petrov Victor (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/caterina-banchelli-of-italy-makes-a-safe-against-anastasia-news-photo/477231228 Petrov Victor (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://incity.az/2015/06/21/%D0%B2-%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%83-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BB%D0%BE-%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE/ Petrov Victor (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://incity.az/2015/06/21/%D0%B2-%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%83-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BB%D0%BE-%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE/ Petrov Victor (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 11:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flickr account is not the official account of Erdoğan and the picture has been used several websites before. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete AFP photo in EXIF Dudek1337 (talk) 20:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - Flickrwashing. Tiptoety talk 01:46, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Image metadata specifically attributes AFP PHOTO / OZAN KOSE who is not the Flickr user. In future a speedy for copyright violation would be quicker for those files specifically non-free in Flickr! Ww2censor (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.5.244 10:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his contributions due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is incorrect, showing a wrong border of Poland. It is not "free knowledge", but desinformation. It was uploaded by a user (vandal?) who contributed nothing else. No pages use or link to this file.

 Delete due to very wrong borders. Johan M. Olofsson (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Should be deleted. Does not serve any purpose of satire or humour, and definitely not the purpose of a factual map. --LA2 (talk) 07:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, скриншот из клипа http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK5k4S3OQVM Dogad75 (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, скриншот из клипа http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK5k4S3OQVM Dogad75 (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад и в более высоком качестве https://eireplusalba.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/dean-ambrose-1051.png Dogad75 (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a few of those logos under discussion in undeletion requests. Logo under copyright or not.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. The AUF is copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Скриншот из видео http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1cVyLOH2W8 Dogad75 (talk) 00:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Скриншот из видео http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1cVyLOH2W8 Dogad75 (talk) 00:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве. Авторские права принадлежат фотографу, а не изображённому лицу. Dogad75 (talk) 00:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве. Авторские права принадлежат фотографу, а не изображённому на фото лицу. Dogad75 (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by PereslavlFoto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No proof of license from 1942 photographer Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boteliinternetci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work claim doubtful, all other uploads deleted as copyvios.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution version of File:ARW 30th Anniversary - 4478062407.jpg Uploader should always upload the maximum resolution version of free images. Leoboudv (talk) 02:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But, just as info, has a different greyscale.--Sanandros (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Difference in grayscale is small. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

E uma imagem irrelevante para a wikimedia. Lauro Leal (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject died in 1941, per wiki article, small size, low resolution, highly unlikely to be own work. May be old enough to be retained, but COM:EVID requires the uploader to provide correct information and license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this 1988 party invitation, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


There is a comment by uploader on discussion page which claims fair use. There is no fair use on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion: File is only in use in Team&Team International on the English Wikipedia, an article created by Teamandteam. MJ94 (talk) 02:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The Beatles" as drawn here was first used in 1963, and was registered as a trademark by Apple Corp (not the computer manufacturer), in the 1990s. The designer Ivor Arbiter, died in 2005, see http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ivor-arbiter-314771.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And:

Unclear (c) status. Two different persons claiming ownership Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced collage, each image requires a source. Notice Facebook file size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle, out of COM:SCOPE, Commons is not a personal doodle notebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The iWriter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This group of images are composed of (a) thirteen 2D Certificates, (b) two - 3D awards (c) two pages of newspaper clippings from September 2014, (d) four pictures of groups of poeple and (3) two photographs of a lady in a sari. All this seems to be promotional or self-promotional in nature as well as the COM:COPYVIO problem with all the three dimensional awards, newspaper clippings and unattributed photographs.

  1. File:Certificate of Merit- Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (95-96).png
  2. File:Yuva Pratibha Award - All India Jain Community 1993.png
  3. File:National Award For Best Woman Entrepreneur - Institute Of Marketing and Management (1991).png
  4. File:Top Award for Export Woman Entrepreneur Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2005-06).png
  5. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2004-05).png
  6. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2003-04).png
  7. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2005-06).png
  8. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2002-03).png
  9. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (2000-01).png
  10. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (1999-2000).png
  11. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (98-99).png
  12. File:Certificate of Recognition - Globus 1994.png
  13. File:Certificate of Merit - Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts (93-94).png
  14. File:Best Woman Entrepreneur Award presented by Vice President of India Bhairon Singh Shekhawat.png
  15. File:Best Woman Entrepreneur Award -Federation of Rajasthan Exporters, presented by Vice President of India Bhairon Singh Shekhawat.png
  16. File:Presenting Raja Bhagwantdas Award for the Promotion of Traditional Crafts.png
  17. File:Raja Bhagwantdas Award for the Promotion of Traditional Crafts.png
  18. File:September 2014 News Clipping.jpg
  19. File:Sept 2014 News Clipping.jpg
  20. File:His Excellency the President of India Hon’ble Shri Pranab Mukherjee at Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi, India.png
  21. File:Leela Bordia (Profile).png
  22. File:Leela Bordia.jpg
  23. File:Leela Bordia and President of India Giani Zail Singh.png

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


hello, thanks for previous reply. Let me repeat that message here.

We have recently uploaded number of images with the intention to validate some of our claims in the biographical article we are developing (images to be used as links next to the award listings, etc.) However, we have encountered this deletion request and are interested to learn how we can preserve the images and avoid any potential regulation violations.

With this article we intend to present life and legacy of one, in our view, exceptional lady that has promoted Indian tradition worldwide and provided hundreds of people from rural India with means to earn their living with this traditional craft (blue pottery).

As part of the article, we have listed numerous awards and certificates that we wanted to further authenticate with images, it seems that in this process we have accidentally violated some of the rules. We wish to correct this issues and preserve as many images as possible. Please let us know what are our options.

Thank you for your time. Looking forward to your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The iWriter (talk • contribs) 11:55, 30 June 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
(Adding Uploader's comment from talk page.) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional upload, notice link to Facebook upper right corner. Image was previously in use all over the internet as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kennedeyjk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After individually searching images from this uploader and finding all of them on copyrighted websites older and larger than these uploads, I am nominating the remainder of the user's images for COM:COPYVIO and COM:PRP. Most are of very small size and low quality. There are at least four different cameras shown on metadata, the remainder of the images have no useful metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dthadmin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by living artist and a very small portrait of same artist which is also likely a COM:COPYVIO as it has no metadata. The other images were created by at least three kinds of cameras, although several have no metadata and many are of Facebook or other social media size.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this school portrait, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex nuvoli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of catalog shots, very small size, low quality. Others from this series were found in direct search as in use by the company that manufactures these items. This may be a series of promotional uploads, as well as COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded and unused "chop", not a logo, no educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is some form of 3D modeling image, not an actual image of a bicyclist. Notice the date is 4 years in the future. Unlikely to be user's own work, more likely a screencap from a game or show, and COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Also File:Bernard lors du Tour De France 2019.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It looks like a screenshot from a video game to me. Michael Barera (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elierxd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfredo jimeno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Alfredo jimeno and (example):

Both files (as also the 3 copyvios) related to es:Coliseo Hugo Chávez, a recently inaugurated stadium in Venezuela, and es:Juegos Suramericanos de Playa de 2014, an international multi-sport event held in Vargas, Venezuela, from May 14 – 24, 2014.

Gunnex (talk) 06:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:09, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is marked with a copyright symbol. The uploader says the image is used by permission, which isn't enough for Commons I think. John of Reading (talk) 06:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Fixertool (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merrely promotional upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely promotional upload for www.supremehair.cn . -- Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious licence 37.5.5.244 07:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benjamines (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, uploaded in 2014, considering also (for File:Huracannaranja1.JPG) previously published (even edited) via http://www.fotolog.com/fx9itiv0s_jrs/36394044/ (2009) + File:Huracannaranja.jpg, embedded in a 2013 thread via (example) http://www.taringa.net/posts/deportes/16996067/Cual-es-la-mejor-hinchada-de-Chile-Mito-Revelado.html as https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/1381301_660271117319454_1023757559_n.jpg (today: 404)

Gunnex (talk) 07:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work 37.5.5.244 07:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work 37.5.5.244 07:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work 37.5.5.244 07:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 37.5.5.244 07:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.5.244 07:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.5.244 08:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: The page where this photo origins from, says that all rights are reserved and belong to the author, Michael Dvornikov. No Creative or another free license is mentioned.
Русский: На странице, с которой происходит фотография, сказано, что все права защищены и принадлежат автору, Михаилу Дворникову. Лицензии Creative и другие свободные лицензии не упоминаются.
Gamliel Fishkin 08:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.vietnam-visa-for-vietnam.com/abolition-visa-requirement-vietnam.html Copyright © 2013 by ITI-HOLIDAY Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Uploaded by an account ITI-HOLIDAY, so what is the conclusion? --Itu (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Itu: Who ever is the author, Copyright is incompatible with CC-BY-SA-4.0. Even if your the genuine author, you can say at the same time "free to use and remix" and "all right reserved". --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Of course one can do so. Uploading to commons under a free licence is binding, whatever the author states elsewhere. (And -in the narrow sense- copyrighted does not contradict, as mostly to much wikipedians, emphasize). --Itu (talk) 12:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this flickr account is not the official account of Erdoğan and this picture has been used several websites before. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadSVG}}: just a container for a raster file that I extracted as File:Poly-n-prismane.png. License seemed incorrect, as the image really does appear to be taken from the cited ref (therefore uploader is not the copyright holder) DMacks (talk) 08:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FenderSam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (27 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.5.244 08:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 37.5.5.244 08:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (8 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.5.244 08:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, low-re image, screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:41, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (39 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.5.244 08:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Cidreira (Rio Grande do Sul) emancipated in 1988 (see also http://www.cidreira.rs.gov.br), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government. Note that File:Bandeiracidreira.jpg is unlikely "own" work as it was derivated from File:Brasaocidreira.png (same uploader) and/or grabbed from Internet.

Gunnex (talk) 08:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peveratt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, for File:Cide.png (collage) source(s) missing, considering also the already deleted collages File:Cidreira.png + File:Cidreira2.png, uploaded by this user.

Gunnex (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Image is shown here with under copyright with all rights retained: http://globalcp.in/about-detail.html#our-mission-vision KDS4444 (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tourist picture, not encyclopaedic Edelseider (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work without metadata 37.5.5.244 10:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Colsen1

[edit]

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, since these all appear to be Precision Castparts company images. Would need OTRS confirmation of permission. Conifer (talk) 10:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheusR15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:TheusR15

Gunnex (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not under public domain. Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the monument is work by Ivan Zajc (d. 1952). Eleassar (t/p) 10:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of multiple photos of unknown sources and licenses. Storkk (talk) 10:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a decription 37.5.5.244 10:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, probable crop from professional photo, although I have been unable to find the original: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can find no indication using google translate that this is licensed correctly at the source. Not tagging {{Npd}} since uploader is permabanned. Storkk (talk) 11:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo, maybe out of scope, although not really sure. There is no connection with Chuck Norris. C messier (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possibly a TV still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a photo of unknown source and license. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits "Munjal Gandhi Photography", no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. If the uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am highly suspicious of this image and don't believe this is the work of the uploader unless we get OTRS verification. Several virtually identical images are found by this tineye search. One result in particular appear to indicate it is from a National Geographic essay and the image on one page of the spread found linked on this webpage attributes the image to Robert Clark. And here is that same full image slightly cropped at the bottom. Ww2censor (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright/BLP violations. NQ (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright/BLP violations. NQ (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 37.5.5.244 10:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Célestin Lazi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly scans or photos of photos. Not clear the uploader is the copyright holder, or that they is otherwise freely licensed or in the public domain. If they were anonymous and the identity of the authors have never been disclosed (not just unknown to us here and now), or if the photographers died before 1944, they might be {{PD-France}}, but this is currently unclear.

Storkk (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a fax. Not clear that the uploader is the copyright holder, and either google translate is failing on the stated Source and Author or they need elaboration as well. Storkk (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster/photograph not obviously released under the CC-BY-4.0 claimed. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed, this is unused and therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a TV or music video still. Storkk (talk) 11:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The x-rays on display are most likely copyrighted, as part of an article/survey. C messier (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies for these images too

--C messier (talk) 11:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meme using copyrighted character. Storkk (talk) 11:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.5.244 11:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic edit of File:ArnoldSchwarzeneggerSDJun10.jpg. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 37.5.5.244 11:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an official Mexican government portrait. No indication that the uploader is the copyright holder or that the image is otherwise unencumbered. Storkk (talk) 11:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la photo date de 3 ans. Elle doit être actualisée Untermaier (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoodOil Man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoodOil Man (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.tigermarinecharter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/beach-sunset-4-shanagni-yaht-charter-phuket-700x465.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jiparraguirre00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clint (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Masturbation Ejakulat.ogv.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spunkyj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nuno Daniel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Also[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nuno Daniel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Video is Commons:Derivative works from game.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nuno Daniel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, private image, artworks without obvious educational use

BrightRaven (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MolInstincts does not seem to be freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional poster of the film uploaded under a false license Vensatry (Ping me) 15:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no general Freedom of Panorama exception in Taiwan, which only allows reproduction for non-commercial purposes. The subject is a modern building, which does not seem de minimis in this depiction to me. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Revert.... Long-term disruption by David Horvitz, image previously deleted *twice*. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ocean Beach, San Francisco.JPG. Sockpuppet of Albianmoonlight, all of these operated by David Horvitz for purposeful disruption. Binksternet (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image. OSX (talkcontributions) 15:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image. OSX (talkcontributions) 15:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AmuzyAmuz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative work of a trophy, see http://fortaleza-granate.blogspot.com.ar/2012/02/participaciones-de-lanus-en-la-copa.html for the source photograph acknowledged in the file upload. The uploader did not create the 1969/1970 trophy and cannot license it as given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Despite I rendered the trophy myself, it is under copyright until 2019 as a DR, according to Argentine copyright law, art. 8°, which states that at less 50 years must pass since the work was published to be PD. No objections from my part. - Fma12 (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A soccer trophy from La Liga, derivative work of a 3D trophy. The trophy can be seen in several formats at this search, and specifically here and here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another derivative image of the La Liga trophy, also not sourced, and except for colorization, visually indistinguishable from File:Trofeo Liga.png uploaded by a different user. Probable COM:COPYVIO, derivative work of a 3D trophy. The trophy can be seen in several formats at this search, and specifically here and here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Derivative work of a trophy from here, page marked "http://www.copaargentina.org/es/supercopa.html © 2015 Copa Argentina. Todos los derechos reservados." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be a trophy cup, but labeled as own work and no source for the image. More information about this image is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muqeemkhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This entire gallery is self-promotional in nature. Contents include papers written by the uploader, a television interview, sketches, doodles and calligraphy, apparently uploaded to illustrate [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muqeem_Khan&action=history this entry]. There are several obvious copyvios in this group, including photographs obviously not taken by subject. Two other images were speedied as the metadata gave copyright information inconsistent with gallery claim.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Muqeemkhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unencyclopedic non-historic poetry in image format is not needed. Outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - While I do agree with the rationale, they are in use on enwp, and while I suspect that article should be deleted that's not germane to this discussion. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:12, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--- Deleted, Promotional content --A.Savin 19:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Louis.lei.geg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No link to any source was given which would substantiate the claim of copyright free use on these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Colombia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Commons' SVG version of the FBI seal. Fry1989 eh? 16:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipediaval (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Images of sculpture by living sculptor "https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_%28sculpteur%29", who is pictured in at least four of these images. Thus the sculptor is not the photographer of those four, and quite likely not of the others either, due to small file size, lack of useful metadata, various file formats and naming conventions, white balance, composition and other indications of user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One file restored: {{FoP-Singapore}} and ticket:2015080310005045. Yann (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipediaval (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lack of OTRS.

82.124.27.252 20:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded duplicate of File:SergioMcBrandaophoto.JPG which is larger and of better quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dansanter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads for Higer Bus Company. These images are unlikely to be all own work of uploader, particularly when the locations are as variable as Uzbekistan and Suzhou. More likely like the photo of the Bus Factory, they were taken from company materials.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted FC logo. Fry1989 eh? 05:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted FC logo. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion his other contributions due to same reason:

Deleted. INeverCry 00:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davesidhu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, outside of COM:SCOPE, Commons isn't personal photographic album.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mehrandelparish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these photos of actress, probable COM:COPYVIOs and fan upload.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this one out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of poster or monograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook size and no metadata suggest this is not user's own work. User's other uploads were "no source" and removed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. Not useful for anything. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional photo: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A file of this name uploaded by the same user was speedied last year as a copyvio. Storkk (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Novodevichy cemetery (Moscow) (part two)

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern monuments, sculptures, plaques and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in Russia. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo of user blocked on en:wp for persistent self-promotioon - see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ankur Mazumder/Archive. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uganda visual effects (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel San Lewandovski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and quite unlikely {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} by "Daniel San Lewandovski" = Daniel San Lewandovski (talk · contributions · Statistics) = serial copyright violator. Grabbed from Internet these 2 film logos may be public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Unsure if {{PD-textlogo}}{{Trademarked}}{{PD-shape}} applies here, especially for File:Alice Through the Looking Glass.png (complex text design).

Gunnex (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kristna Saikia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of them grabbed from the web.

Achim (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non rispetta il copyright MilanoRossonera (talk) 19:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused self-promoting image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image of low quality, out of scope. Achim (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose recognizable. Achim (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text is copyrighted. Sreejith K (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Asen89

[edit]

Probably copyvio. New user uploads files found elsewhere on the web. High quality photography, but reduced file sizes only. File:India GSLV SLV.jpg even has a watermark. --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Porto Walter regarding official symbols

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Porto Walter emancipated in 1992 (see also http://www.portowalter.ac.gov.br/novo_site/index.php?nivel=1&exibir=secoes&ID=1). Brazilian trademark law (as indicated by uploader) does not apply here (or is secondary, btw, Lei 9.279, Art. 191 makes it punishable the reproduction or imitations of (among others) coats of arms for (...) economic [commercial] purposes without permission). It fails {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law.

Gunnex (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with Derivative Works on the computer screen and the wall map, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry, small sized image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anne Terri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of artworks, most with words laid on top, all have descriptions urging the reader to visit a website, Hence promotional uploads. I did find any of these in use in article space. Out of COM:SCOPE for promotional or self-promotional nature of uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Placeholder put in place by uploader for a potential speedy delete... waiting to get clarification from artist on FoP before deleting. Please do not delete yet at this time. Thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 23:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing heard from artist... please delete when convenient. Hanyou23 (talk) 21:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:TOYS. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. OSX II (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. OSX II (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. OSX II (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. OSX II (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are 149 photos in category:Citroën CX and I consider this photo out of project scope due to bad quality. OSX II (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not a selfie, this image of a man is unlikely to be user's own work. The image appears to have been copied from a half-toned original and words applied on top. Probable COM:COPYVIO and also promotional upload (read description). Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - modern monuments in Kiev to Stephen Timoshenko who died in 1972

INeverCry 00:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing to do, unfortunately Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This business has hired a new consulting firm that will be changing the logo soon. The logo has not been used in any articles at the moment. If it is used, it will be very inaccurate. They've asked for it to be removed so it won't confuse the public or their patients.

If possible, please remove it as soon as you get a chance. I wouldn't want to cause them any issues by having the wrong logo used once they relaunch their brand. It would also be bad for viewers because if the logo is used in the interim, it will be inaccurate in the near future. Since it was just recently uploaded and has not yet been used, this would be an ideal time to delete it. Nickdumitru (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yahia16 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Shields/crests (blazons) are not own work of uploader, require source.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mithila Mimuna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO. No indication of user's own work in this collection of images of actor and actress. Some are screencaps, others are red carpet photos, only one has any useful metadata and all are claimed as own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Discuss the nomination, do not remove items from the page (see page history). Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Obvious copyvios. Yann (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Beatlespastmastersremastered.jpg which explains why a better copy of this image (not labeled own work) is ineligible to be moved to Commons. This image is unnecessary, the article is illustrated with a larger, properly provenanced copy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Bigger version uploaded. Yann (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A higher resolution image can be found here. No proof that behindwoods holds the actual copyright Vensatry (Ping me) 15:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moviegalleri.net itself does not hold the actual copyright of the file you show. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't be blamed for that. Neither of the notable websites containing higher resolutions of this file have permitted me to use this file on commons. They simply stated that they own no copyright. I tried for other images and it was vain. Visiting this made me contact Behindwoods and after literally "begging" them for more than eight weeks, i got this permission. What can i do? Please tell me. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • First of all you should stop assuming bad faith as no one is blaming you! If neither of these websites had stated that they don't own the copyrights, why did you request them to donate the image to Commons. Don't you think it's a clear copy-vio? Vensatry (Ping me) 09:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either you misunderstood or i wrote it wrong. Neither of the websites have accepted to give me the required permission and instead they replied that they don't own the copyright. I could not understand the latter part of your message. Please explain it briefly. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You used the word neither when I had pointed out "Behindwoods" and "Moviegalleri" in my previous comment. So you clearly meant these two websites did not give you the permission to use it, isn't it? Vensatry (Ping me) 12:50, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I didn't mean behindwoods here. I was saying about the other websites hosting the similar image with a higher resolution. Why would i pester behindwoods if they clearly state that they don't own any copyright? They didn't even reply for those eight mails but attached a carbon copy of the declaration of consent for my reference after eight weeks. I am damn sure Moviegalleri.net does not hold copyright of any file they use in their website. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • We use neither only when we talk of two alternatives. According to your own statement, that implies you were referring to either Behindwoods or Moviegalleri. I'm not saying Moviegalleri is the actual copyright holder, but Behindwoods had snatched the image from some other site (which might be Moviegalleri). Vensatry (Ping me) 16:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to doubt the ticket. moviegalleri.net certainly does not own the copyright. Yann (talk) 15:46, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused since 2013, family coat of arms. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin - This is a very small surname by the scale of things, its never going to be a file that is in big demand. This file might not be used in Wikipedia. But there are links to this file out on the internet in various places, and from time to time, I would imagine people come here to get the file when they need it. John37309 (talk) 06:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 15:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality duplicate. Should be replaced with better version by Google Art Project: File:Ilya Repin - Ceremonial Sitting of the State Council on 7 May 1901 Marking the Centenary of its Foundation - Google Art Project.jpg. But description shall be preserved! vlsergey (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Please replace by the better version, and copy the description, then renominate. Yann (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the painting (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Without attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the artist has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 16:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work P 1 9 9   20:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the painting (so is not realistically de minimis), and there is no information I can discover regarding the artist, and therefore no means of ascertaining whether this is in the PD. Storkk (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work P 1 9 9   20:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork and building (neither seems de minimis to me), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. If the sculpture is PD, the building has a "1959" plaque - meaning it almost certainly is not. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be a video snapshot, but has no link to source. Very small size and low resolution suggests not own work of uploader, but screencap from unnamed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can see where it comes from here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-Zx4bNKjgE I made this video when I attended Kimberley Park State School.- Jayden Kelly


Deleted: out of project scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality edited copy of original artwork uploaded at File:Portrait of Hurshid Pasha 2.jpg. Delete and redirect to File:Portrait of Hurshid Pasha 2.jpg. Zoupan (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: two totally different images. worth to keep the bad quality image Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not a free image. Licence of the textlogo is not correct, because that's logo under the copyright. Einimi (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Maybe borderline. IMHO ok Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 09:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was heißt "out of scope" in diesem Fall? Warum wird das Logo zur Löschung angefordert?


Deleted: out of Com:Scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear how this is uploader's {{Own work}}, or why it is otherwise freely licensed. Uploader, if you own the copyright to the website, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do work for a company which creates this website. As a company does not have company profile on wikipedia, I have used my personal one, like many other people do. Sad is, people on German Wikipedia are really unfriendly and rude, so this image is no more in need. Can be deleted. Patryk Rydlewski (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Patryk, can you please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS, making sure that you indicate that the company releases the screenshot under the license. Does the company understand that the screenshot could, for example, be used for commercial purposes? Best regards, Storkk (talk) 14:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear (c)status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verstoß gegen das Urheberrecht, Bildrechte Susana Benvinda Nobre (talk) 14:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based in imagery from no:Norge digitalt, has the logo of no:Forsvarsbygg on it → obviously not the uploader's own work. Any copyright exceptions for governmental (geo-) data in Norway that I'm not aware of? El Grafo (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BobtheSnowDog I have a written permission from Forsvarsbygg to use, publish, reproduce, etc. that image. Please let me know to whom I can send it.

Hello BobtheSnowDog, that's great! Please refer to COM:OTRS for instructions. Feel free to contact me if you need assistance with that. --El Grafo (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info for admins: Uploader contacted me with what might become a permission on June 27th but I failed to notice this until now. I'm trying to help them with OTRS, now but it might take a bit longer. Please be patient. --El Grafo (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BobtheSnowDog Thanks for your help

I confirmed that an email was delivered to OTRS by Forsvarsbygg which I believe is a government contractor for the Armed Forces. It includes permission to use the image.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Sphilbrick: does that permission include the license used here? Just asking because no license was mentioned in the mail I got in June. --El Grafo (talk) 10:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The permission statement supplied by the copyright holder did not identify a specific license. However the wording was quite broad, essentially covering all usage, so is my view that it was sufficiently free to justify the explicit cc-by-sa-4.0 license added by the uploader.--Sphilbrick (talk) 02:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Yes, license CC 4 mentioned. OTRS confirmed -> keep Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See w:ru:Памятник медицинской сестре (Донецк) 1980 sculpture by w:ru:Порожнюк, Александр Николаевич
Statue made in ca 1980, sculptor still alive. Copyvio according to our rules. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an authentic image of the proclamation (see 2010 conclusions of Professor James Mosley). In particular, 'The Proclamation of' at the top is fake: not on original document. The words "Irish Republic" are also set in a well-known font that didn't exist before 1931, so this may still be within copyright of whoever created it. There's a more authentic image on-site anyway at "Easter Proclamation of 1916.png" (lightly retouched, according to Mosley, but still more authentic than this). (Compare with original held by the Irish Post Office and the differences are actually quite obvious.) Blythwood (talk) 04:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:Easter Proclamation of 1916.png. P 1 9 9   16:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

para sustituirlo por otro mas actual Eljacinto (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid deletion reason. More current photos should not replace older ones. P 1 9 9   13:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trollbackco as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: old logo Very bellow the COM:TOO and no reason for delete company's older logos. But unused. Amitie 10g (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: far below COM:TOO. P 1 9 9   13:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source (No source since) which is correct, this is obviously not own work. However it's in use and it appears old enough, the subject lived in the middle 1800s. WIth proper source information it's possible this image could be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{own}} as I digitalized it form the original that I own YUCAGENITO (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not own, the image is older. Would it be possible to provide the name of the original? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: judging by the info in es:wp, this image is from no later than the 1880s. Unreasonable to assume that any copyright remains. P 1 9 9   13:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did upload these files accidentaly and I won't use them for a wiki. please delete these files, Thanks!

Pusteblume84Pusteblume84 (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per COM:GCSD #7. P 1 9 9   13:44, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. Shall be replaced by higher quality scan by Google Art Project: File:Ilya Repin - Portrait of Jelizaveta Zvantseva - Google Art Project.jpg. vlsergey (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of higher resolution version. P 1 9 9   13:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am on this picture and I can not access this account.i lost my username and password. 92.0.83.23 23:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer want this picture made available here Dragonflyzed (talk) 23:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I want this removed. Dragonflyzed (talk) 23:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   13:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want this remove. Dragonflyzed (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   13:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9   02:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. If I am interpreting the tiny plaque on the bottom left correctly, it was erected in 2002, meaning the artist has certainly not been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 16:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9   02:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the sculpture (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the sculptor has been dead for 70 years. Storkk (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9   02:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the sculpture (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Given that the statue seems to have been erected in 1967, this sculpture is probably not in the public domain. Storkk (talk) 16:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9   02:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since), the image has metadata and is of large size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment its description: "Polski: Dom Wieczności Familii Nowosielskich - zasoby Biblioteki Szymczak-Nowosielskich" means: "Dom Wieczności Familii Nowosielskich - from the resources of Szymczak-Nowosielscy's Library". That's why I doubt that this is a work of an uploader. Masur (talk) 12:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This was uploaded as part of a series that included pages of an old book. It is likely that the description refers to that. Otherwise I can't see anything wrong here. P 1 9 9   14:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no source (No source since) which is correct, but the image is of an old picture book and correctly given as 1866. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Too old to be still copyrighted. P 1 9 9   14:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP-Slovenia Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question You really think we can get away with DM? Well, I'd rather keep the photo anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DM argument seems fair. We have kept plenty of skylines in the past because we believed that the indenvidual buildings are DM. Natuur12 (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The fuzzy nature and blacked out possible source logo or possibly (r) making below and to the right suggest that this is not own work of uploader. It is claimed to be a trophy for a defunct football event, but no source of the image is given. Notice on the image history the evolving nature of the image. It's unlikely to be accurate with that many changes, and has no source. This image needs more information about its source and representation for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The Copa Ibarguren was established in 1913 (more than 100 years ago) and the author of the trophy remains unknown. That's the reason because it can be tagged as {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} or {{PD-Uruguay-anon}} because the competition was played among teams from both countries, Argentina and Uruguay. I suppose this rendition was based on this image, originally from this book by the Argentine Football Association, published in 1935. - Fma12 (talk) 21:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per aboove Natuur12 (talk) 11:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no general Freedom of Panorama exception in Taiwan, which only allows reproduction for non-commercial purposes. The subject is a modern artwork, which does not seem de minimis in this depiction to me. Storkk (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:二二八紀念碑.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taipei 228 Monument. Note that this is was created in the 1990s and the designer was still alive in 1994. Storkk (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author. GFDL means everybody has to name th author, which is impossible in this case. BTW: Its near to "out of scope" without knowing what and where it is. JuTa (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep don't really see a problem, the author is zh:User:台灣少年 (I've updated the description). And BTW it's not nearly "out of scope", the subject was properly described in filename. Trycatch (talk) 00:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thx for completing the description and categories. Well, the (google) translation of the filename gave me just "Monument to August 22". The August 22 I realy didn't interpreded as monument name but just as a date. The author down in th table I've realy overlooked. --JuTa (talk) 00:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Common Good (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has survived a previous DR, but that was related to scope, not copyright. There is no general Freedom of Panorama exception in Taiwan, which only allows reproduction for non-commercial purposes. The subject is a modern artwork, which does not seem de minimis in this depiction to me. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taipei Taiwan 228-Monument-01.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Taipei 228 Monument. Storkk (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that the designer still alive in 1994. Storkk (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:34, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a modern sculpture/monument in Taiwan, where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception, which only allows reproduction for non-commercial purposes. The designer was still alive in 1994. These particular photos have the design as their main element, and it does not seem de minimis to me in any of them.

Storkk (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taipei Taiwan 228-Monument-01.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:二二八紀念碑.JPG. Storkk (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted nintendo character Lazlo 17:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I think we are safe when it comes to com:TOO plus I am not sure that this is a copy of the nintendo character. Could very well be created in the same style. Natuur12 (talk) 11:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a clear derivative of the Nintendo Super Mushroom, which is either fully copyrighted or too simple to copyright (no idea what the threshold of orginality is in Japan). It should either be deleted as a copyright violation, or the licensing tag should be changed to PD-textlogo and proper attribution should be given to Nintendo. Just closing it as KEEP (as was done last time) is not an acceptable resolution. Kaldari (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Japan, for reference – czar 19:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures, reliefs, mosaics and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • They are not protected by copyright.

2. Допускается свободное использование путем воспроизведения и распространения изготовленных экземпляров, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю, доведения до всеобщего сведения в форме изображений произведений архитектуры, градостроительства и произведений садово-паркового искусства, расположенных в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, или видных из этого места.

(Russian Federation Civil codex). AndyVolykhov (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Art in Moscow Metro (part 2)

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures, reliefs, mosaics and other art objects. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose:  Keep File:1905 год на стене метро Ул. 1905 года.JPG — it's just sign for 1905 year, nothing art in this file. Like this file. По-русски: на фотографии изображён лишь металлический знак для 1905 года, ничего художественного в нём нет. Точно также как здесь — --Brateevsky {talk} 14:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    See Commons:Threshold of originality. Obviously, the bas-relief of the figures is not appropriate, it is above the threshold of originality. This is no ordinary font. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose:  Keep some files. A photo have no FoP in Russia and should be deleted only if the copyrighted artwork is the basic object of that reproduction, however, some images contains copyrighted artwork just as small part of image, which isn't a basic object of it, and these files should be kept or partially cut, not fully deleted from Commons. For example:
    • File:Rimskaya_03.jpg — there is a photo of station hall, copyrighted sculpture on this photo occupies VERY small part of it. I think this photo must be fully kept.
    • File:Babushkinskaya_Station_Moscow_2.jpg — relief on this photo occupies smaller part of it and isn't basic object; there is photo of station, which also includes platform, tunnel portals, escalators and ceiling of station.
    • File:Посадочная_платформа_2.JPG — the basic object is entire station hall, which includes platform, walls and ceiling; the copyrighted plane artwork occupies small part of photo and photographed under big angle, so it isn't main object of photo.
    • File:Kievsk APL 27.jpg — plane artworks are located just in left corner and behind lamps and aren't main objects of image.
      Unfortunately, I can not agree with you. Firstly, you do not exactly cite the law. Can not be used without the consent of copyright holders, "where portrayal of the work is used in commercial purposes". That is, there is a ban on commercial use, and this is not dependent on the size, it is the basic object or not. Secondly, some images do not have to know where the basic object. Anyway, it is impossible to apply the principle Commons:De minimis, I think. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And also, copyrighted plane artwork on these files with trains

occupies half of photos, so photos should be cut to keep trains. — Xenotron (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer to ru-wiki pending. Leave open!! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Interiors of buldings and constructions in Russia are architectural objects, by Russian federal law. AndyVolykhov (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    It does not change anything. In the photo we see the sculptures, mosaics, reliefs and other works of art. Of course, they are located in the interiors of the Moscow metro stations. But any painting placed in the interior of the museum, for example. I do not know that he wanted to prove his remark user AndyVolykhov. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    There is the major difference between "placed in the interior" and "is the interior". All elements pictured above are interiors. AndyVolykhov (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree. It's certainly details of the interiors. Interiors have a architectural objects, it is trivial, common knowledge and does not require links to Russian laws. But you forget about the synthesis of the arts [3]. I draw your attention to a few times. We'll have to repeat again.
    The interiors of the stations of the Moscow metro is a synthesis of the arts - architecture, fine arts, decorative and applied arts. The mosaics and stained glass windows are works of decorative art, this is a trivial fact. Sculpture, bas-reliefs, murals are works of fine art, this is a trivial fact. The interior can be decorated with artwork or without it (for example, the style of Constructivism, Bauhaus). In the first case is a synthesis of the arts, in the second case is the architecture interiors in its pure form (it was a feature of the style Constructivism and the Bauhaus - nothing extra).
    Artworks in the photographs made by sculptors, painters, mosaicists, chasers. These things did not make the architects. Architects solve common problems, such as proportions, ratio, materials and finishes, colors. Details solve other specialists. The photographs not only architectural works, although it is details of the interiors. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I continue. However, the synthesis of the arts does not cancel separate copyright in the separate parts of the work. For Example. There is kind of art music, there is kind of art poetry. The synthesis of the arts, for example, a song. Copyright controlled separately on the lyrics and the music of the song. For example, music can be traditional and not protected by copyright. Lyrics will still be protected by copyright. So also in our case. Works of architecture, interior design in general are free from copyright. Interior details - mosaics, sculptures, murals, stained-glass windows, bas-reliefs, are still protected by copyright. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC) All these arguments I have set out in Russian forum and they are not disproved. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First, is is a piece of nearly incomprehensible English. Second, the outcome of the lengthy discussion on the Russian forum is that opinions about art objects in general and architectural objects in particular may vary. So far there is no evidence that the artwork in Moscow subway is copyrighted.
Everyone will likely agree that these photos can be stored on Russian Wikipedia instead of Wikimedia Commons, but I am sure that none of the volunteer editors should be forced to do the hard work of image transfer because of your personal opinion about the interpretation of the Russian law. --Alexander (talk) 09:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
>>So far there is no evidence that the artwork in Moscow subway is copyrighted. — The question is the opposite. Under the rules of the Commons, you have to prove be free from copyright. Refer to the burden of proof. It is your task.
But it is not difficult to prove the protection of copyright works on photos. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1259, paragraph 1: Objects of copyright are works of painting, sculpture, graphics, design, ... other works of fine art, .... works of decorative art. Article 1259, paragraph 4: For occurrence, implement and copyright protection does not require registration of the work or observance of any other formalities. Article 1259, paragraph 7: Copyrights extend to the part of the work ... if by nature it could be recognized as an independent result of the creative work of the author.
>>because of your personal opinion about the interpretation of the Russian law.— you are wrong. See Civil Code, Article 1276, paragraph 1: “Reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable shall be allowed, without the author's or other copyrightholder's consent or payment of royalties, of visual art, or photographic work, that permanently stand in places open for free attendance, except where portrayal of the work by such method is the basic object of that reproduction, or where portrayal of the work is used in commercial purposes.” Unequivocal ban if the basic object, or if commercial use of the work. It is obvious. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am free from copyright, thank you.
The question at stake here is whether an artwork is a separate copyrighted object or an integral part of the subway station, and which copyright regulations should be applied. No existing legislation stipulates this. It remains a matter of opinion, and we have seen that opinions on this matter vary. There is ample evidence that your interpretation of the law is not shared by many other editors. It is a normal situation when no state regulation exists. But it is not normal that a personal and controversial opinion becomes a regulation. --Alexander (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, most, but kept some. There have been whole month for transferring files into ru.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives of 2D and 3D artworks without authors' permissions, no evidence of PD as well.Some demonstrate licence laundering by mos.ru website, which is not proper copyright holder to license the artworks depicted. No FOP in Russia for these.

Quick1984 (talk) 07:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author of Teatralnaya porcelain sculptures is Natalya Danko. She died in 1942. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Teatralnaya (Moscow Metro). Andreykor (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Andreykor, excellent. Please feel free to replace your 'own work' claims and CC licenses by proper data and I'll immediately withdraw nominations for these files. --Quick1984 (talk) 07:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced. Andreykor (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, thanks for co-operation. --Quick1984 (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only my file in this list is File:Medallion Kurskaya-Koltsevaya in Moscow.jpg, shot in 2008. I am outraged by the accusations of license laundering but I just ask to undelete this file in proper time. It's sad to have some of deleted works already overwritten by other users. --Rave (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is claimed to be a trophy cup, however no similar images of the Copa Alumni trophy was found after search. If there is such a 3D trophy, the drawing of it would be a Derivative Work and needs a citation. If this is made up drawing by uploader, it's not encyclopedic as it doesn't represent what it is claimed to be. In either case, this tiny image needs more information for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Copa Alumni" is just one of several names for this trophy. Here is a references to it. I made this image by hand, based on pictures I found on Internet. Regards, Spooler (talk) 13:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The page you link is marked "Copyright © 2013 AFA. Todos los derechos reservados." That includes handdrawings based on the image of their tropy which is a Derivative Work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The "Copa Alumni" o "Copa Campeonato" was firstly played in 1896 according to this source and the Argentine Association itself, and its author remains unknown (in Argentina, anonymous works enter the Pd after 50 years of have been released).
This image seems to be a rendition of this file, taken from this book, published by the AFA in 1935. - Fma12 (talk) 21:25, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Fma. The prize appears to be in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John37309 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of mini-icons claimed source to a medieval manuscript as well as two images with words applied which again are supposed to represent things in the medieval manuscript. Out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational utility, these icons are not medieval in age. No source of photo is given for File:Ard Ri na....

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin - All of the images are my own art work, I drew them myself, and i'm free to give them away to anyone that would like to use them. I didn't claim that the source of any of the images is from a medieval manuscript. I think its blatantly obvious that they are all modern Icons drawn on a modern computer. And all the images have modern dates. I think Icons are very educational, as a picture speaks a thousand words. And they are perfect for small spaces like Infoboxes on Wikipedia. John37309 (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will someone please clarify if my Icons are going to be deleted? Quite frankly, I just can't see how I have violated any copyright laws, or infringed any of the rules of Wikimedia Commons. They are just little computer icons, and they are as basic as they can possibly be. They are 100% all my own work, my own artistic skills on my computer. How could a little picture of a yellow crown, with just one word, "Scythia", or "Egypt", or "Galicia" or "Ard Rí", or "Noah's Ark", or just an icon of a castle, be in violation of any rule if I drew the pictures myself? I have thousands of these little Icons, and I drew them all myself.
And if you still think the icons are in violation of some rule, please tell me how I can modify the icons so they do comply with whatever rule you feel I have broken? I need icons and small tiny little images for my history articles I am writing on Wikipedia, and the family trees I am drawing on Wikipedia. Please tell me how these image violate any rule? John37309 (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, all these files are in use and therefore cannot be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems very unlikely that this work was actually made by an employee of the US Government as part of their official duties. Similar doubts were cast on the talk page long ago. Liliana-60 (talk) 17:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not a work of US government. Unfortunately the file is used 312 times in 75 projects. Taivo (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the artwork (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here. If I am interpreting the plaques correctly, the sculptor died in 1966, which means if deleted, please add Category:Undelete in 2037 Storkk (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note: this has previously survived a DR; it was kept as it was decided that there were too many files to consider as a unit. This particular photo is specifically of the building (so is not realistically de minimis), in a country where there is no general Freedom of Panorama exception. Note that the only minor exception (for current events and news reporting) does not apply here - and in any case requires attribution, of which there is none. Also because there is no attribution, it is impossible to verify whether the architect has been dead for 70 years, which seems unlikely given the architectural style. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FoP in Ukraine Avi (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 19:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]