Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 07:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYRIGHT, photographer is Laurent Yeghicheyan Revent (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sangamesh kollur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food in a row on 09.06.2015: most likely all files grabbed from Internet.
- File:South indian lunch.jpg
- File:Jolad rotti oota.jpg
- File:Puri sagu.jpg
- File:Alu parotha.jpg
- File:Chitranna.jpg
- File:Chow chow bath.jpg
- File:Onion doas with chutney.jpg
- File:Onion pakoda with coffee.jpg
- File:Mirchi Mandakki.jpg
- File:ಸುಸಲಾ.jpg
- File:Dharawada peda.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete as Commons:Copyright violations. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andycyca.jpg
test Vodnokon4e (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Used for testing the WLE campaign in Bulgaria. →Spiritia 17:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hadzigeorgis Metaxas Bust Kavala.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Rapevids Commons:Deletion requests/User:Ricardo Augusto Diaz Callegari
VIOLACION AL COPYRIGT GFMusicWorld (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
ugihugjhugurjhiugugrtfij 31.61.136.203 18:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Indiafoodlover85 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 03.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food. Living examples: File:Daal Makhni.jpg + File:Paneer Dish.jpg --> http://www.rupaliscookery.com/gallery.html (© 2012 rupaliscookery.com. All Rights Reserved) = (even watermarked) http://www.rupaliscookery.com/images/gallery/54.jpg + http://www.rupaliscookery.com/images/gallery/55.jpg (last modified: 2012, exif available, indicating to copyrighted works by "Anahita*").
- File:Shahi paneer.jpg
- File:Chinese non veg.jpg
- File:Daal Makhni.jpg
- File:Paneer Dish.jpg
- File:Mughlai dish.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as Commons:Copyright violations §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Recent creation that is copyrightable. Permission of the author is necessary. Might be out of scope if the author is not notable. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No licence from creator of artwork MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: an a copyright violation. JuTa 12:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 12:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't hold the rights. The author holds the right to upload. Ambujtiwari17 (talk) 10:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request of recently uploaded unused file. JuTa 12:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Οι 2 μεγάλες επιρροές της Britney Spears.Η Μαντόνα (αριστερά) και η Γουίτνει Χιούστον (δεξιά).jpg
[edit]The right image is File:JanetJacksonTour.jpg which is freely licensed but not properly attributed. The source and copyright status of the left image is unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: grabbed from google. JuTa 12:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sagardave90 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violations. JuTa 12:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Pure advertisement for website www.aasanrasta.com . Achim (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by INeverCry Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Wrong licence: not uploader's own work but simply taken from this website: http://wekorat.com/2014/02/25/central-plaza-korat/ RJFF (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Wrong licence: not uploader's own work but simply taken from this website: http://wekorat.com/2014/02/25/central-plaza-korat/ RJFF (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Because it was uploaded by mistake Мила Гроздановска (talk) 18:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request, recent unused file. Revent (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
ikhlas khan sh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikhlaskhansh1 (talk • contribs) 2015-06-05T14:00:09 (UTC)
- User:Ikhlaskhansh1: What are you trying to do? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
DR for a user page that never existed. Closing as moot. Revent (talk) 03:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
No need in commons
Deleted: by Taivo as a duplicate Revent (talk) 03:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
claimed as own work, but is a non-free professional image. User has multiple copyright violations ThirdWard (talk) 05:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Blatant copyright violation. Image is widely circulating on the web. --DAJF (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation. B&W crop of a widely available 2014 image. Revent (talk) 06:53, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jabulani football on grass.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and mentioned precedent. Image actually includes a copyright symbol. Revent (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
ES UN ERROR Miguel Doménech (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused image. Revent (talk) 07:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Stejný obsah jako: Schweigl podpis.png Ondraness (talk) 20:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused image, in favor of a different crop by same uploader on same day. Revent (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Redundant: the guy uploaded multiple pictures of this girl to Commons for no apparent reason. Csapdani (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Keep Images clearly in scope and not redundant as can be seen by this gallery of the images nominated by Csapdani to deletion:
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
_και_η_Γουίτνει_Χιούστον_(δεξιά).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_(9375623741).jpg){kind=link}
_(9378399166).jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%CE%BA%CE%B1%CE%B9_%CE%B7_%CE%93%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%AF%CF%84%CE%BD%CE%B5%CE%B9_%CE%A7%CE%B9%CE%BF%CF%8D%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%BD_(%CE%B4%CE%B5%CE%BE%CE%B9%CE%AC).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%CE%BA%CE%B1%CE%B9_%CE%B7_%CE%93%CE%BF%CF%85%CE%AF%CF%84%CE%BD%CE%B5%CE%B9_%CE%A7%CE%B9%CE%BF%CF%8D%CF%83%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%BD_(%CE%B4%CE%B5%CE%BE%CE%B9%CE%AC).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Per the arguments of Tuvalkin and Pere prlpz in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Also this images are in scope of professional modeling of beachwear, the Philips multinational (see the files description), and the categories associated with each image
Personal statement about the deletion request: You Csapdani are a riddle. Registered in April 2 2015, you waited exactly 2 months until you made your firsts (and only) edits, nominating 16 images in a row to deletion. So you, a newbie, show a high proficiency in wiki editions and inner workings. So, in reality, who are you? Tm (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aphrodisiacal smile. (6772380395).jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- For the record, that other DR was closed by User:INeverCry as "keep". -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Captivating body. (6772396483).jpg - I thought I'd closed them all. INeverCry 22:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Practically identical to 
, but much more blurry. Superfluous to keep both. Utopiantos (talk) 01:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete If it wasn't blurry I would keep both, but it's not different enough to balance low quality.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Duplicated, from: File:الشيخ_عبد_العزيز_بن_عبد_الله_بن_حسن_ال_الشيخ.jpg Ziad (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- A quicker process is to use {{duplicate}} for these situations. --Fæ (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Uploader seems to have uploaded tons of photos like this as well. Obvious misuse of Commons as Instagram, outside of project scope. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The same photograph with portraits of different people in a lot of places in Internet (example http://www.grupoandroid.com/topic/78939-resuelto-duda-con-flasheo/ ). I haven't checked for one of the same resolution, but it seems obvious that all those images came from the same place and it's not likely a free place.
- Anyway, finding the origin of those images would be interesting. It's probably some kind of program, website or app, and its images might be free.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Seems to be the app "Camera360 Ultimate" by © "PinGuo Inc.". Gunnex (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Uploader seems to have uploaded tons of photos like this as well. Obvious misuse of Commons as Instagram, outside of project scope. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 23:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational use and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value, and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value, and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of non-notable person. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value, and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The window depicted was created by Johann Paulweber, who died in 1975 (see [1]). So it's not in the PD until 2046. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. Rosenzweig τ 02:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of non-notable person. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal vanity photo. No obvious educational value and outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of non-notable person. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal image of non-notable person. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of non-notable person. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No valid license. Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/File:CERN CMS Solenoid schematic.jpg Jarekt (talk) 03:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- These sculptures were made in large quantities in the Soviet Union, therefore, do not represent artistic value. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- You mean, no sculptor was engaged in this process? The copyright covers any creative work regardless of its artistic value. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- These sculptures were made in large quantities in the Soviet Union, therefore, do not represent artistic value. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo with unclear copyright status. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 04:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia (established in 1999 [2]). Juggler2005 (talk) 04:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission/scope. Fry1989 eh? 04:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 04:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ramonne~commonswiki (serial copyright violator for - among others - pt:Arara (Paraíba), a city in Brazil) + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ararapb.JPG. Most likely screenshotted from Youtube. Gunnex (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Recent artwork. No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
This file was created with the single purpose of including it in the "Middle East" article on English Wikipedia, to create the impression that Greece is part of the Middle East. This is completely unsourced, as the name "Greece" is not even mentioned in the article. Secondly, the quality of the map is very bad. The green colouring of Greece is so inexact that it is hardly possible to recognise the shape. TU-nor (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Posters (c) and not DM Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this up. I totally forgot about the copyright nature of the posters. Go ahead with the deletion then. Dllu (talk) 08:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia (established in 2011 [3]). Juggler2005 (talk) 08:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP for sculptures in Russia. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
personal picture of underage person (16y.o.) without any noticeability. Not useful for educational purposes, Commons used as host for personal pics. L736E (talk) 08:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably copyvio. Too small dimensions, no metadata. User has uploaded copivios before. And uses these photos in promotional articles of these persons. Dmitry89 (talk) 09:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joffre Guerrón (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata, and the uploader's history of uploading copyright violations with false authorship claims.
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 07:40, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joffre Guerrón (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Joffre Guerrón. Most likely all grabbed from social media.
- File:Sóbis buen padre.jpg
- File:El paton con la albiceleste.jpg
- File:Piry burbano.jpg
- File:Rafa Sóbis.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork. The left part is impossible to identify (for me), so it is impossible to use. The right part could be used to illustrate "bus stop" if the left part is cropped out, but I am not sure whether it is worth keeping it because of the lack of description (where was it shot?). BrightRaven (talk) 09:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Stolbovsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope Revent (talk) 09:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork. The colours make this picture impossible to use for educational purpose. BrightRaven (talk) 09:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Potential use to illustrate presentations or similar. Not created by the uploader, this is an independent artist and so is not a "self-created artwork". --Fæ (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
If it is a self-portrait, then David Carol's permission is needed. BrightRaven (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Author is said to be David Carol. Then OTRS permission is needed. BrightRaven (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Does not seem to be own work: there is a signature in the bottom of the image. BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, seems a scan of a professional photo with the photographer name at bottom not matching user name. (Note: Not same photo as previously deleted image of same name.) -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
I am Sabrina Weckerlin, and i want this picture not in my wikipedia Profile! SabrinaWeckerlin (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
I am Sabrina Weckerlin and i don´t want this picture in my wikipedia Profile!!! SabrinaWeckerlin (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. INeverCry 00:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably a photo from a photo (EXIF: 2011) 91.64.222.217 10:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.64.222.217 10:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
unused personal file 91.64.222.217 10:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
There is a better version: File:Водіння кози.jpg. Juggler2005 (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Uploader request CFCF (talk) 10:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Clipped from Google Maps https://www.google.com/maps/@40.138379,-77.3627132,436m/data=!3m1!1e3 Mjrmtg (talk) 10:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
dubious "own work". Who is the author of the caricature? 91.64.222.217 10:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
dubious "own work". Who is the author of the caricature? 91.64.222.217 10:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
dubious "own work". Who is the author of the caricature? 91.64.222.217 10:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- ro:Ion C. Pena (died 1944) is mentioned in file name and he appears in one of the files. I think he is not a cartoonist and we still need more information, but I see the issue less clear than some minutes ago.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 00:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, uploaded in 06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
- File:Veg delight! 20.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 19.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 18.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 17.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 16.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 15.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 14.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 13.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 12.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 11.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 10.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 09.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 08.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 07.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 06.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 05.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 04.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 03.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 01.jpg
- File:Veg delight! 02.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 10.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 09.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 08.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 07.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 06.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 05.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 04.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 03.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 01.jpg
- File:Indian Veg Delight 02.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
It looks like a newspaper scan. The user uploaded only copyvio so I don't trust him. Juggler2005 (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Trivial or non-trivial? Juggler2005 (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete I think it's over threshold of originality in any country in the world.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a trivial logo. There is even map on the logo. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Photographer's relatives (niece, nephews, sister). No educational value for commons users
- File:Cheyenne Cantali (5993202799).jpg
- File:Kayleb Cantali (5993256409).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (5993256371).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6087574179).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6087574181).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6087679121).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6087679137).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6088127352).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6088127358).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6225583749).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6225594289).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6225594493).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6225594703).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6225595407).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6226105056).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6226113244).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6226113442).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6226114638).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6226114836).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6271451783).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6272016702).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali (6272016824).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali and Mason (6225584047).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali Taekwondo Championships (6271492009).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali Taekwondo Championships (6271492335).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali Taekwondo Championships (6272017252).jpg
- File:Lui Cantali Taekwondo Championships (6272017486).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6225608521).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6225608945).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6225609227).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6225610007).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6225621593).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6226128330).jpg
- File:Maria and Lui (6226129314).jpg
- File:Maria William and Samuel (6225623621).jpg
- File:Maria William and Samuel (6226142828).jpg
- File:Maria William and Samuel (6226143060).jpg
- File:Maria William and Samuel (6226143238).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
91.64.222.217 09:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, appear to be personal images outside the scope of that photographer's usual work. Revent (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The EXIF data states the copyright holder is Jakob de Zwart, so Eva wouldn't be able to CC licence these.
- File:Adult Swim Golden Bodypaint (10660310634).jpg
- File:Adult Swim Golden Bodypaint (10660318566).jpg
- File:Adult Swim Golden Bodypaint (10660322154).jpg
- File:Adult Swim Golden Bodypaint (10660505373).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Randoming (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Private, unused photo; out of project scope. Ankry (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC) And also:
Ankry (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 07.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
- File:Vada Pav Mumbai.jpg
- File:Dabali.jpg
- File:Kolhapuri misal.jpg
- File:Misal pav.jpg
- File:Kanda bhajiOnion pakoda recipe or kanda bhaji.jpg
- File:Egg bhurji.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
copyviolation CFCF (talk) 12:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
copyvio/out of scope CFCF (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC) --S19DZ (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope. Ankry (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image; out of project scope. Ankry (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vignesh viki11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vignesh viki11 (serial copyright violator for Commons:Wiki Loves Food). Most likely all files grabbed from Internet.
- File:Tulasi soup.jpg
- File:Peanut candy.JPG
- File:Karuvadu gravy.jpg
- File:Aattu ratha poriyal.JPG
- File:Iruttukadai halwa.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vipinkumartvla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vipinkumartvla
Gunnex (talk) 12:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
it is ugly af 92.64.101.150 12:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Lol @ vexatious troll --Nzfauna (talk) 23:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Not ugly. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Fichiers de l'utilisateur Arès98
[edit]- File:Entrée du square du Docteur-Blanche.jpg
- File:Rue Henri-Heine.jpg
- File:Cour Jasmin.jpg
- File:Square Jasmin.jpg
- File:Entrée station de métro Jasmin.jpg
- File:Voie AF 16.jpg
- File:Allée Eugène-Beaudouin.jpg
- File:Clinique Mozart.jpg
- File:Centre culturel du Portugal.jpg
- File:Grenier Goncourt.jpg
- File:Entrée ancien musée Bouchard.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption.jpg
- File:Villa Mozart.jpg
- File:Intérieur de l'Impasse Raffet.jpg
- File:Villa Michel-Ange.jpg
- File:Villa George-Sand.jpg
- File:Rue René-Bazin.jpg
- File:Rue Serge-Prokofiev.jpg
- File:Rue Robert-Turquan.jpg
- File:Rue de la Cure.jpg
- File:Place du Préfet Claude Erignac.jpg
- File:Pont de la rue Raffet.jpg
- File:Lycée Jean-Zay.jpg
Pour des raisons personnelles, je souhaites que mes photos importées soient supprimées. Merci d'avance --Arès98 (talk) 07:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The Creative Commons licenses that you granted when uploading these files are not revocable. 'Recent' uploads are sometimes deleted as a courtesy, but these have all been on Commons for well over a year now, and might be linked to by external websites. Revent (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error. --Hameryko (talk) 22:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error. --Hameryko (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error. --Hameryko (talk) 23:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error.--Hameryko (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error.--Hameryko (talk) 00:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) It's a personal picture that I upload from flickr by error.--Hameryko (talk) 00:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No scope for Wiki Loves Food and not needed in Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saileshpat (talk • contribs) 2015-06-05T08:26:16 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Small/inconsistent resolutions, unidentified location. --Voll (talk) 19:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No scope for Wiki Loves Food and not needed in commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saileshpat (talk • contribs) 2015-06-05T12:37:14 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuFOb8-ZsAE9qOYbtoSM4CbF9R6hfwaEOQ1t7CY0rm02HGBEVigmveCrR6MbFJBcLonW20AHQXJc8GlCOm65adzJaM6dYucMbtE2DbXXWT8fOBTZalZeOwfZuxKCGOgx_1-DlchEemi08Bl1q6HNCU8J8cNcNN5xSkpxrwZhV0w3TYVT-Ji-NvC_1i-PLe4gLxBedtpyXtcni2zXYLStg1o7rNJ6qK4n9jx7JZnabo6Mkc1sK4rOWxw5fVMrdXgYit8Vn3Pdguh0f_1UWiD8JkAXv6DBS_1I9CJIZoDQKLSgGILKIR_1jGkrGp4dOxwb6DZT_1vbc52NHHCVD2puSH-y_1wlzCVYbSMpLoC8v1nV3p0JOUBaW2KX5nVnut_163fmqoh0IlUSmXK3Mvn8zeY4UYxHxGe8o-yHaJf2mRSaCnXQoD1o1mb3kCOG0aTojxXjcHmuyWj-x4LRQP8k6AMCqlhdhm4NmM_1CIVMaor5nXISdZ5YUZuiC45hvklFaFyzm3CeyoHagvsAnuGsK9pjhw81QySuHTB07hpGVXpRTpodnfk5Zk7DXIAYMWAYC31jn-MigKE9z4n2Wd19pMvCXd-YhKo92r62Mx4fL_151VxXwU3jqz4ssipmNOmhuXFNBbp_1x86zkKUdUXMXYt0rAEAQlaUOxIwI5DCsYGMLe_14HcOsK55lZy_1gCJ2vw5sPa1sidZtJEThkRjBOv6oPRWyyqDfzrgVMhF5WLQq8l1k5VFQFXgc7p2zpIQf5quavWsLPu_1_1DEtUB30_1UfE8jRLsgpkhe-x8-QO_1Swr4znW8O2b293-Kq7xLyvqDkl8rl1mtZyCGzgwXDpiXtKs86Ucih-Z0OoJXxddvJSfPJtVv9wUdALSAFvbr1Lx9H7xQwdyH4V1qAigw2f-8BmkP1Bfo909kGQN_1ZMpcozPUfuwWSoOdoNKdMwb9BGkqawAxsWiLlNQWUACKNX7a-0kM620NxBobK2lesdSdTLhcxjrlTVjKhE4mUFtrUdYTHCVI3whPVo5LnSeCmxODfjxQ9_1mRtiSXpbhEvm6FlVIQ6nx28KLsEM7tmWnB85e6SJwpD-wSccLBA1JOi6r9Rwo5fdvk_1tDQx-SLGZ23k0AIxmb89m4g8cI1tmIIhLkVdrtvkEQ2pViwDDdZPmYuNxUW8tZyz17Jo1hKS3k9aa_1BlpCdGmZcOacnRBE3uVJYt-OGqiNnyd5XOqNKfRZCnv8XbWrayiqqnI4Ofm48Okc5A7GrmXvTkTOSchaS4BrFQwfy167t38a_1q_1EWTsM2_1RPZ0zNBZ7THf-CyXUzLK7IpUlQCci8o69h1-HuSt0bScm5ZfvG2_14v6igCp-RwGfd1H9XgEap1jN1Kkeg4AZcVAYh_1jvg9U1_1eLR3Z6Z8nQtnTNBTW62Vppog3DzbcVD9skcfNybfpMVGpHhU-wGrZtKuoR4BNf2AznxZGhAECjPPOD2Pw0tjU0rOgKWzF4s7dXjkFPs2sUp-4E4lQWg Saqib (talk) 10:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that at the above cited external site, [4], the image has lower resolution than our version and carries a visible watermark (lower right corner). So, this can hardly be the source. --Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- You're right. I just checked in detail and the username who uploaded the photo there is same as ours. My mistake. I withdraw this. --Saqib (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- If you see file history. I actually wanted to nominate it for deletion rather than speedy but I think there was some confusion and by mistake I convert it to speedy. I was going through alot of files at once. --Saqib (talk) 12:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- You're right. I just checked in detail and the username who uploaded the photo there is same as ours. My mistake. I withdraw this. --Saqib (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
![[4]](http://www.pakwheels.com/forums/attachments/road-trips-vacations/1417649d1400585743-naraan-sari-pae-meadows-trip-arcadian-khanian.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation, similar map here: http://www.mappery.com/maps/Visayas-Islands-Map.mediumthumb.jpg
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No sculpin in the picture. Uploading this pic was associated with vandalistic inclusion of off-topic material on the page en:Twohorn sculpin on 24 Apr 2015. ( [5], material deals with sea urchins, not with sculpin fishes).
Olaff (talk) 08:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio.[6] --Stefan4 (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Requesting deletion, will be replaced by new one. Wrong pronunciation. --JL 09 (talk) 03:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
includes non-free material, screenshots, pictures
- File:Transforming Video Nine.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Eight.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Seven.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Five.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Four.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Three.jpg
- File:Transforming Video One.jpg
- File:Transforming Video Two.jpg
- File:Transcoding13.jpg
- File:Transcoding10.jpg
- File:Transcoding1.jpg
- File:Transcoding8.jpg
- File:Transcoding7.jpg
- File:Transcoding3.jpg
Motopark (talk) 00:30, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ranak.ignou (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ranak.ignou (serial copyright violator for Commons:Wiki Loves Food )
- File:Sev puri.jpg
- File:Malabar Chicken Curry.jpg
- File:Kerala Fish Biryani.jpg
- File:Kerala duck roast.jpg
- File:Fish curry Also Known As Mean Pollichathu,Chala Pollichathu.jpg
- File:Tasty Dahi puri.jpg
- File:Stuffed Fish Fry.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ikhlaskhansh1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly out of scope.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ikhlaskhansh1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/video album. Not used.
- File:Kuchlak park malak hasham khan kakar by ikhlas khan sh 13 july 2015.webm
- File:Kuchlak park water malak hasham khan kakar by sh 13 july 2015.jpg
- File:Ikhlas khan sh kcuhak .pk.jpg
- File:Ikhlas khan sh kcuhak .pk 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Davidmirasoto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks
- File:El moog arde.jpg
- File:En el 3 tombs-barcelona.jpg
- File:Paseo por la rambla del raval.jpg
- File:EN BARCELONETA.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Likely license washing by eldiario.es (this is the subject's twitter picture, see here) Discasto talk 23:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
EXIF credits Javier Lopez Fabian as photographer. No indication that uploader is this person or otherwise owns the copyright. Storkk (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Shima97 (photoshopper). Files most likely edited & cropped. Uploaded in a row on 05.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
- File:Indian Vegetarian Meal.jpg
- File:Traditional Bengali Ghugni.jpg
- File:Stuffed chilli pakoras.jpg
- File:HyderabadiBiriyani.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Dubious claim of authorship : lores, no metadata and available on internet (e.g. [7]). — Racconish 📥 14:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
![[7]](http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Falhayatgm.files.wordpress.com%2F2014%2F03%2Fjavaidhayat.jpg%253Fw%253D750&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Falhayatgm.wordpress.com%2F&h=877&w=716&tbnid=KUFtUm93X611yM%3A&zoom=1&docid=I5zyrIiYrrD2GM&ei=qeZ6VcL3N4vwUrq4gJgP&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2460&page=1&start=0&ndsp=35&ved=0CCIQrQMwAGoVChMIgvCYkamKxgIVC7gUCh06HADz){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, a pavement, probably in Rio. Difficult to find an educational purpose. BrightRaven (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked with a blog url. Uploaded in a row on 12.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food. File:Parwal ki Mithai.jpg previously published in 2013 via worldofgoodfood.com (today 404)
Gunnex (talk) 14:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Watermark on the files
Divya694 (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fevernova in Berlin.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Copyrightable aspects of the design are virtually identical to the mentioned precedent. Revent (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Jorgmora.jpg
- File:Jorge Mora A..jpg
- File:Jorge Mora Alfaro2.jpg
- File:Jorge Mora Alfaro1.jpg
- File:FLACSO.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adidas tricolore.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. The copyrightable aspects of the design on the ball are identical to the previous deletions. Revent (talk) 07:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adidas Etrusco Unico.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Copyrightable artwork on the ball is identical to that in the previously deleted image. Revent (talk) 07:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adidas Etrusco Unico.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Copyrightable artwork on the ball is identical to that in the previously deleted image. Revent (talk) 07:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of creative non-free artwork on the ball. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adidas Etrusco Unico.jpg. RJaguar3 (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Copyrightable artwork on the ball is identical to that in the previously deleted image. Revent (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erfan loti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Ketabkhaneh dehgan.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 8.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 9.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 7.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 5.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 6.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 4.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 3.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 2.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan audio.ogg
- File:عباسنامه.pdf
- File:Tarikh arak jeld 2.jpg
- File:Abbas nameh.jpg
- File:Tarikh arak jeld 1.jpg
- File:Ebrahim dehgan 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wrapping
[edit]Presented as "wrapping paper design". It is basically coulored circles. Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks without educational purpose.
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111065287).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111065877).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111066527).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111067897).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111898352).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111898558).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111898790).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111899540).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111900190).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111900904).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111901506).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111902244).jpg
- File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111902934).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
ce photo a une erreur BeGasy (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded file. In use on Malagasy Wikipedia in project space, but apparently placed there by the editor currently asking for courtesy deletion. Revent (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, the lack of description makes it impossible to use for an educational purpose BrightRaven (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As the only photo of a Mexican ice hockey team on Commons, I vote to keep it. Michael Barera (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
DW of Yves Klein's work (d. 1962). Not in the public domain. BrightRaven (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Needs permission of artist as there is no freedom of panorama in France. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asdklasdjfbnajshdfb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep The nomination indicates that "unused file, self-created artwork" is part of Scope, but the policy does not state we delete unused files. This image was not created by the uploader, so is not self created. Please stop creating these mass nominations that misstate the context. The file is potentially useful for illustrating clouds or weather in a dramatic way. --Fæ (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep As per the many other DRs you are mass creating for The Photographer's uploads, this is not a self created artwork, please avoid deliberately misleading in deletion nominations. In scope to illustrate Buddha statues, peacefulness, blossom etc. As you already know fully well, being an unused file is never a reason to delete a file from Commons, please avoid putting this in nominations as if it were. --Fæ (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Perfectly good file. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Please do not misuse the scope policy, 'unused file' is definitely not in the policy as a reason to remove files from Commons.
- In scope as useful for illustration of the obvious concept of zero and the figure zero.
- Not self created by the uploader, so this part of the nomination is false. All artwork is created by someone, so this is a bizarre statement for a deletion nomination.
- Keep: Not used but still educationally valuable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: per Amitie --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AS Ashim Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Ashim Khan Album Title.jpg
- File:AS Ashim Khan & Arman Hossen Sohel.jpg
- File:AS Ashim Khan.3.jpg
- File:Ashim Khan.jpg
- File:AS Ashim Khan.2.jpeg
- File:AS Ashim Khan.jpeg
Ies (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, most likely a video screenshot, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Rajnhrr = 2 uploads for Commons:Wiki Loves Food = 1 x copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:EDUSE AntanO 15:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajdeep2002 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Rajdeep2002. Uploaded in a row on 11.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
- File:Coconut and Jaggery Balls ...... Bengali Narkel Naru.jpg
- File:Bengali Peas Pulao with Mutton Masala - Traditional Bengali Style.jpg
- File:Des iLitti Chokha.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination
--AntanO 04:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
I have submitted 4 Photographs which are on the verge of either being deleted or Copyright Violation for no reason ... as all of them are my own created work and I can support the same with RAW files .... I have failed to understand the way you guys are running the contest as there was no instructions of EXIF data requirement. Plz help i request you guys ... I have all the RAW files to support my Verdict but i am unable to understand the way i respond to your query .... If you want i can send all evidence of the Pictures being 100% mine and Mine only with RAW files .
- @Rajdeep2002: If you could convert RAW into JPG with high resolution and re-upload, that would be fine. When you convert, EXIF info will not discard unless you remove it. Feel free to make necessary post processing.--AntanO 04:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: Ok so do u want me to re upload all the images with EXIF info ? YES agreed with you as EXIF was not need i converted the file size with layer resize so the EXIF got washed out.OK all my Images are Ready to be uploaded but how do i Upload them now.
- @Rajdeep2002: Yes, re-upload all the images that nominated for deletion. Normally, EXIF will not discard during RAW to JPG conversion. Could you upload with EXIF info? It would indicate that you are the owner of the images. Open particular image and find and click "Upload a new version of this file", and follow the instruction on the screen. --AntanO 06:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: Thank you so very much for the help extended ... I hope now the Files are perfect and needs not be deleted and can be used by Wiki for both its use as well as the competition use.
- Keep as per user's response/re-upload. @Rajdeep2002: Well done. Good work! --AntanO 09:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Japan. Stefan4 (talk) 15:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment Maybe, This has no concern with that, It's a faded (=blurred, unclear) poster. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unclear author & license on unused image which is likely dated. Many replacements aviable. Jarekt (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably wrong license: Image is taken from a commercial facebook profile. RJFF (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Wrong licence: Obviously not uploder's own work. May be PD-textlogo, not sure though. RJFF (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think this design is too simple to be copyrightable, though obviously not 'own work' It's the logo of an under construction shopping center in Thailand. Revent (talk) 07:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Btw, the only file without exif and low res by uploader Pullak (talk · contribs). Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food. Gunnex (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and no license Jarekt (talk) 16:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No license and unclear copyright status Jarekt (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dayanamurillo2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Producerroonie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EDILSANTAFE82 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Apoorva lakshmi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. The only ones in small size/no exif: rest of user's uploads in high res/consistent exif. Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
Gunnex (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No license and Unclear copyright status Jarekt (talk) 16:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food Gunnex (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food. Gunnex (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Private nonsense image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Info Further details needed, considering uploaded in 2012 the photo was already published (even in small size) via http://www.amisducena.org/others/Villiers/AviationCivileMag_HS0507_60ansCCR.pdf (2007, page 13, credit: "DR" = fr:Droits réservés / [All] rights reserved). Gunnex (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vimalvimal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Vimalvimal (serial copyright violator for Commons:Wiki Loves Food).
Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The WPs have software for presenting family trees, I think this is out of scope because we do not keep PDFs of text that should be ste as Wiki markup. I also wonder whether this family is notable in any way? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food Gunnex (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anwesha bera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked. Uploaded in a row on 11.06.2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food.
- File:Rater dinner.jpg
- File:বাংগালীর বৌভাত এর ভাত কাপড়ের অনুষ্ঠান.jpg
- File:Home made birthday cake.jpg
- File:কুচো চিংড়ি, মটরশুঁটি দিয়ে কাতলা মাছের ঝাল ঝোল.jpg
- File:জন্মদিনের দুপুরের মেনু, birthday special lunch.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Will this be encyclopdic ? I doubt it Pippobuono (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be copyright material with no permission. Mark Marathon (talk) 06:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. INeverCry 01:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No encyclopedia value, promotional Aloneinthewild (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
by uploader request Gabriel (talk • contribs) 20:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Old file, and in use on multiple Wikipedias. Revent (talk) 07:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
out of project scope. Not useful for education George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snoofy goofy (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope. Not useful for education
George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused and not useful for education George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Useless and injurious Pippobuono (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope and possible copyvio. INeverCry 01:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Diferent then the contest subject; Andrelstomazi (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- The scope of Commons is far wider than the Wiki Loves Earth contest. Being out of scope for the contest is not a reason for deletion. Revent (talk) 07:51, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
iferent subjec then the contest. I dnt want this on internet, personal picture. Andrelstomazi (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous DR resolved as kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - unused and not immediately obvious what the encyclopedic value is. Hence, out of scope; previous DR was in my opinion incorrectly premised. Storkk (talk) 11:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep:
- The file is clearly in scope, since it has potential educative uses - please remember that commons:scope is a lot broader than just storing images for Wikipedia articles.
- The author released it under an irrevocable free license three months ago. It seems a too long term to grant the usual courtesy deletion on uploader's request.
- Anyway, a courtesy deletion could still be granted if there was a good reason.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no good reasons given for a courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Personal image, i dont want this on internet. Andrelstomazi (talk) 01:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: At this point user is only spamming the RfD. See also image version history. --Pitke (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
out of project scope, unused fake George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unused buggy SVG (text positioning), replaceable by File:Denmark Cyclosilylbutane.svg from same uploader DMacks (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
out of educational value Pibwl (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: too blurry to be of any use. The passport might also be unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Ossip Zadkine is dead in 1967. No FoP in France. 83.204.224.25 21:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Veniamin Pinchuk, he died 1987. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1998. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:1723 Gruender Jekaterinburg Wassili Tatischtschew u. Georg Wilhelm Hennin anagoria.JPG
- File:1723 Gruender Jekaterinburg Wassili Tatischtschew und Georg Wilhelm Hennin anagoria.JPG
- File:Indian Ocean in Yekaterinburg 2009.jpg
- File:Statue Tatishchev de Gennin Yekaterinburg.jpg
- File:Tatishev de genin yekaterinburg.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for sculptures -- this statue was erected in 1998.
- File:Eketerinbourg wandobel fev2008.jpg
Oppose Copyrighted work is not the main object of the image, so FoP Russia can be applied. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- The sculpture is in the middle of the frame and there are no other dominant subjects -- this excludes possible DM to me. FoP is pointless here. --A.Savin 13:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- The dominant subject is the snowdrift to the right. The sculpture is in the center of the square so you cannot take picture of the square and avoid placing sculpture in the middle. The sculpture is 57 x 73 px or 1,4 % of the whole picture, with pedestal it is 57x111 px or 2,1 %, so it is certainly not the main subject of the picture. The resolution so bad that there is no influence on commercial value at all, no rights violated. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- You really believe the "photographer" wanted to take a picture of the snow and not the monument? --A.Savin 14:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- No. But I'm sure he wanted to take whole picture of the square not the monument itself (right as requred by FoP). I insist the image of such quality cannot be "main subject". --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 10:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, of course the quality of this photo is extremely poor. I don't think that it automatically makes the subject DM; but otherwise the picture is out of COM:SCOPE. So, it has to be deleted anyway. --A.Savin 15:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- No. But I'm sure he wanted to take whole picture of the square not the monument itself (right as requred by FoP). I insist the image of such quality cannot be "main subject". --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 10:42, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- You really believe the "photographer" wanted to take a picture of the snow and not the monument? --A.Savin 14:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- The dominant subject is the snowdrift to the right. The sculpture is in the center of the square so you cannot take picture of the square and avoid placing sculpture in the middle. The sculpture is 57 x 73 px or 1,4 % of the whole picture, with pedestal it is 57x111 px or 2,1 %, so it is certainly not the main subject of the picture. The resolution so bad that there is no influence on commercial value at all, no rights violated. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- The sculpture is in the middle of the frame and there are no other dominant subjects -- this excludes possible DM to me. FoP is pointless here. --A.Savin 13:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Отцы - основатели - panoramio.jpg
- File:Памятник оснавателям Екатеринбурга - panoramio.jpg
- File:Памятник основателям города, В.Н.Татищеву и В.И. де Геннину. Екатеринбург. Ноябрь 2014 - panoramio.jpg
A.Savin 12:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Мне кажется, исключительное право перешло от скульптора государству после оплаты гонорара. На государственную собственность авторское право не распространяется.--Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Факт оплаты не гарантирует передачу прав, а эта номинация вообще не случайна.—Iluvatar (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Номер статьи ГК, пожалуйста. Про нераспространение АП на собственность государства.—Iluvatar (talk) 22:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- А что изменится, если права на памятник уже не у скульптора, а у города? Ничего. Просто письмо в OTRS надо не от скульптора, а от горадминистрации. В общественное достояние памятник перейдёт через 70 лет после смерти автора. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Нет, если автор-скульптор подписал передачу исключительных прав муниципалитету (государству) на изображение. А город создал памятник по чертежам скульптора--Леонид Макаров (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- И каким же образом были отчуждены в этом процессе авторские права? Скажем, вы написали заметку, её опубликовал Екатеринбург.рф — всё, перешло в PD? Можно копипастить на Викиновости? А шаблон {{PD-RU-exempt}} удалить как устаревший? --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 08:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- И? Права в этом случае принадлежат муниципалитету.—Iluvatar (talk) 22:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Нет, если автор-скульптор подписал передачу исключительных прав муниципалитету (государству) на изображение. А город создал памятник по чертежам скульптора--Леонид Макаров (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Info FYI: «Вернули в общественное достояние»: суд разрешил фотографировать памятник основателям Екатеринбурга --Butko (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- User:Butko, не совсем так, суд признал ненадлежащим истцом автора монумента в качестве единоличного обладателя исключительного авторского права. Суд признал обладателем авторского права группу авторов (истцом может выступить вся группа авторов). Но от этого памятник в "общественное достояние не вернулся" --Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:51, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1967. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:TGU-war-memorial.jpg
- File:Памятник ВОВ ТГУ IMG 2030.jpg
- File:Памятник павшим в ВОВ сотрудникам и студентам ТГУ.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Image contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1993. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - this image is derivative works, see COM:DW. Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pushkin Statue in Arts Square
[edit]All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Mikhail Anikushin, he died 1997. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Alexander Pushkin StPetersburg P9180168-1.JPG
- File:Pushkin statue, Square of the Arts.JPG
- File:Pushkin's Monument.jpg
- File:RussanMuseum.jpg
- File:Sankt-Petěrburg 115.jpg
- File:St. Petersburg (8384138290).jpg
- File:St.Petersburg Russia White Night Statue.jpg
- File:Statue of Alexander Puschkin. St Petersburg, Arts Square.jpg
- File:Ансамбль площади Искусств.jpg
- File:Два солнца.jpg
- File:И гений парадоксов друг..jpg
- File:Музей городской скульптуры 003.jpg
- File:Памятник А.С.Пушкину.jpg
- File:Памятник Пушкину на пл. Искусств, 2011-07-13.jpg
- File:Памятник Пушкину, возле Русского музея..jpg
- File:Памятник Пушкину.jpg
- File:Площадь искусств.jpg
- File:Площадь Искусств.jpg
- File:Пушкин Александр Сергеевич.jpg
- File:Пушкин и Русский музей.jpg
- File:Пушкин на площади Искусств.jpg
- File:Санкт-Петербург. Памятник А. С. Пушкину. 1957. Скульптор М. К. Аникушин..jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Vyacheslav Klykov, he died 2006. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Саратов памятник Столыпину 1.jpg
- File:Саратов памятник Столыпину 2.jpg
- File:Саратов памятник Столыпину 3.jpg
- File:Фигура воина, фрагмент памятника Столыпину.jpg
- File:Фигура крестьянина, фрагмент памятника Столыпину.jpg
- File:Фигура кузнеца, фрагмент памятника Столыпину.jpg
- File:Фигура священника, фрагмент памятника Столыпину.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2010. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Nicholas Roerich, St.Petersburg,.jpg
- File:Sankt-Peterburg 2012 4628.jpg
- File:Sankt-Peterburg 2012 4629.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably not own work (small size, low resolution, found on http://www.emanuelamaccarani.it/squadra_nazionale.php) 4ing (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Aleksandr Kibalnikov, he died 1987. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Nikolay Chernyshevsky monument Saratov.JPG
- File:ИзображениеSt 050.jpg
- File:Саратов памятник Чернышевскому 1.jpg
- File:Саратов памятник Чернышевскому и храм.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Pushkin, Petrozavodsk
[edit]All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Gavriil Shulz, he died 1984. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Monument Pushkin in Petrozavodsk.jpg
- File:Пушкин.петрозаводск.jpg
- File:ПушкинА.С(Петрозаводск).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
_(9375623741).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9375623741).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by F. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 22:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
_(9375623741).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
_(9375623741).jpg){kind=link}
_(9378399166).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9378399166).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by the architect J. Plečnik (d. 1957) and the sculptor L. Dolinar (d. 1970). Eleassar (t/p) 22:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
_(9378399166).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
_(9378399166).jpg){kind=link}
not an own work, it is a scanned page without source provide Ezarateesteban 22:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded for Commons:Wiki Loves Food on 12.06.2015. Gunnex (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
It seems as a copyvio of a newspapper of another source, not an own work Ezarateesteban 22:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
It's and old version. I will upload the current version once it has been deleted. OliverAAT (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Deleting it will cause the bot to unlink it. Easier to simply overwrite with the newer version. Revent (talk) 08:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Kein Inhalt mehr --Nixnubix (Diskussion) 17:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: empty category George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Please delete this image. The subject's widow would like the image removed from Wikipedia. Many thanks, - Kllwiki
Deleted: deleted by JuTa as lacking a valid license template. Revent (talk) 07:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
COM:DW. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- This is my own grandfather. I am his heir. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission in OTRS is confirmed, Ticket#2015061210010614. --Dogad75 (talk) 10:34, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission from whom? The author of the original photo? The dead photographer? --Juggler2005 (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission from the author of the original photo.--Dogad75 (talk) 21:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission from whom? The author of the original photo? The dead photographer? --Juggler2005 (talk) 10:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Permission in OTRS is confirmed, Ticket#2015061210010614. --Dogad75 (talk) 10:34, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. INeverCry 23:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
this category was created accidantly and it hinders workflow in the upload wizard
Deleted: INeverCry 23:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Not required anymore. Bhai-istan (talk) 07:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion requests should normally not be deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Not required anymore. Bhai-istan (talk) 07:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Deletion requests should normally not be deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
out of focus, plant unidentifiable, file serves no encyclopedic purpose — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casliber (talk • contribs) 13:28, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
This coat of arms has never existed. It is a fiction. --AlexTref871 (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
This isn't a social networking service — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.6.159.179 (talk • contribs) 2015-06-05T13:14:13 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 23:39, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Buen día;
Soy un trabajador del Ayuntamiento de Sant Feliu de Llobregat y Sant Feliu de Llobregat nunca ha tenido bandera oficial. Deberia ser eliminada de esta web.
Gracias y un saludo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odartsavlisa (talk • contribs)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 23:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Portrait of Cardinal Robert Bellarmine (see http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruralcatholicradio.com%2Fpix%2FStRobertBellarmine.jpeg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ruralcatholicradio.com%2Fshows-aodw.php&h=635&w=365&tbnid=Ecmcz9-wR-4UWM%3A&zoom=1&docid=pF70YN1PJLKowM&ei=8mB6VY2gC8S1UdPxgqgJ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=478&page=2&start=14&ndsp=20&ved=0CGoQrQMwFmoVChMIjeGdzqmJxgIVxFoUCh3TuACV ) Sumenol (talk) 04:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Sumenol: It seems most likely you are correct based on the full image and other uses on the net, but it see seems 'legal' and in scope. Why not just discuss it on the file talk page and fix the info? Revent (talk) 12:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Done. Rename is next. Plus replacement on skwiki. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Slightly reworked picture from this book (changed a car shape). Juggler2005 (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- В BHL разве не размещены книги в общественном достоянии? Боюсь этот файл не удалят. Поэтому даю подсказку для громодянина... Жизнь животных... --Vladlen666 (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- According to http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/10167#/summary and https://archive.org/details/shadowsinseashar00mcco "No known copyright restrictions as determined by scanning institution." Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 01:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- "Copyright (c) 1963 by Chilton Book Company All Rights Reserved" [8] --Juggler2005 (talk) 09:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly! 1963. That's why the Chilton's claim doesn't fall under 1992 Copyright Renewal Act, and so the copyright elapsed in 1992. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 15:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That doesn't give the uploader rights to claim he's the author of the work. The work is obviously not self made. The appropriate information on the authorship and correct license template are to be put. Mithril (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Mithril увжаажемый друг напишите по англйиский правильно, боюсь я ошибусь. Изображение необходимо удалить так ка коно нарисовано не с того которого предполагает Juggler2005, точнее большая часть этого изобаржения нарисована с совесткого издания 80-х годов: Жизнь животных, 4 том (рыбы). Вы знаете надеюсь что это за издание. --Vladlen666 (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- That doesn't give the uploader rights to claim he's the author of the work. The work is obviously not self made. The appropriate information on the authorship and correct license template are to be put. Mithril (talk) 16:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly! 1963. That's why the Chilton's claim doesn't fall under 1992 Copyright Renewal Act, and so the copyright elapsed in 1992. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 15:53, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- "Copyright (c) 1963 by Chilton Book Company All Rights Reserved" [8] --Juggler2005 (talk) 09:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per Vladlen666 (uploader) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Delete=> Commercial abuse. Carolus (talk) 20:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Commercial abuse is hardly applicable. The company is no longer in business. Jane023 (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: 2004 Stadelmaier ceased to exist. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadelmaier Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Has been moved to Category:Thomas Koch (actor, 1984), there are actually two German actors by that name. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – then this page should be made a disambig page. FDMS 4 21:57, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as a redirect for now, actually... the 'other' Thomas Koch doesn't seem to have a category yet. This name needs some other work, though... Category:Thomas Koch (ice hockey) is currently a redirect to Category:Thomas Koch... the latter should probably be a disambiguation location. Revent (talk) 22:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - noone will search for Category:Thomas Koch (actor), therefore it is not needed. Category:Thomas Koch should be the disambiguation page where the third thomas Koch may be mentioned too. Kersti (talk) 06:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Recent category. No need for ambigous redirect Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate: [9] -Vincent Eisfeld (talk) 14:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nordhausen_-_Altendorf_%284%29.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Very similar to File:Nordhausen_-_Altendorf_(4).jpg, but not actually a duplicate. Slightly different crop and rotated. The other is better, though. Revent (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Close enough. (2) has the lower quality, e.g. sharpness... Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 02:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
-2015-05-24T02:50:00.000Z-File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg){kind=link}
File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 02:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
-2015-05-24T02:52:00.000Z-File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg){kind=link}
Keep No reason given for deletion. Photos of cars are OK. 67.87.46.39 22:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given. Common Good (talk) 07:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 14:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Anyway, Administrators can delete file as courtesy, but please provide a valid reason for deleting your own upload. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion given. Courtesy deletions only apply to unused files uploaded less than a week ago, but this one was uploaded last year. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Reason left on talk page: Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Hyundai Grandeur XG250.jpg This photo was used by Kevin Foo's profile photo, it is ready to report a copyright violation. 14:20, 12. Jun. 2015 Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Doesn't make much sense. Other photos of the same car in the same location by uploader on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hyundai_Grandeur_XG250.jpg Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 13:52, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, author's request. There are better photos about the car. Taivo (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Please delete (replaced with the File:Свод законов Российской империи. Том I (1833).djvu). Uploader request. Thanks. Hausratte (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I guess one should better leave it in Wikicommons -- these are completely different books, this one has the separate value. It happens that both books have same name ("Свод законов Российской империи" in Russian), so it's probably better to rename both adding, for example, name of the editor in order to distinguish them, though the current names contain already the year of the edition (1833 and 1912 respectively). No copyright violation (PD-RusEmpire). Some days someone will start working in Wikisource in this book as well. Hinote (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- 1833 book is the original, official edition (ed. by Speransky), see [10]. And 1912 book is just a non-official edition with mistakes and lacunas and not in use; I wouldn't upload it if I knew about this. And there is no sense in keeping this file just because someday someone will start working on it. It's better to keep only one original edition, in order to not to fraction efforts of very few Wikisource users. Hausratte (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Hausratte Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Invalid author listed: this was created by the government of Bangladesh, not by the Flickr uploader as currently stated. There is no evidence that the government of Bangladesh has licensed this under any licence whatsoever. Stefan4 (talk) 15:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Not true, the upload was done through Flickr uploading tool so it was created by the Flickr uploader.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:43, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless of how the file was uploaded, the passport wasn't created by the Flickr user; the passport was created by the government of Bangladesh. See COM:LL. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
OK I would say this does not pass the Commons:Threshold of originality as there is only text and the seal and the seal is right here on Commons as File:Emblem of the Provisional Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.svg under the following license - This file is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship..--Twofortnights (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- When referring to another file, first ensure that the other file has a valid copyright tag. As the other file has a clearly bogus copyright tag, it is now up for deletion, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of the Provisional Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.svg. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:11, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Well until the other request is sorted out please pause this one as they are interconnected.--Twofortnights (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- That file was deleted so this file should be removed then as well.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Government work. No evidence of permission from the government. Stefan4 (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - work of User:Londonwolf.--Twofortnights (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is not a work of User:Londonwolf. It is a work of the government of Palau. Without permission from the government, we can't keep the file. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- First of all it doesn't pass the Commons:Threshold of originality because it's only text and the Palau seal which you may find here File:Palau Seal (coa).svg. Either way it falls under Template:PD-Palau for two reasons, specifics of Palau copyright internationally and if we look locally because it is Government work.--Twofortnights (talk) 13:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- The Palau seal is not below the threshold of originality. Furthermore, the file File:Palau Seal (coa).svg does not appear to have a valid copyright tag, so I have nominated the file for deletion.
- I note that you have added the template {{PD-Palau}}, but you have not provided evidence that any of the situations in the template is satisfied:
- First of all it doesn't pass the Commons:Threshold of originality because it's only text and the Palau seal which you may find here File:Palau Seal (coa).svg. Either way it falls under Template:PD-Palau for two reasons, specifics of Palau copyright internationally and if we look locally because it is Government work.--Twofortnights (talk) 13:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is not a work of User:Londonwolf. It is a work of the government of Palau. Without permission from the government, we can't keep the file. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
It is an anonymous work, pseudonymous work or a work made for hire and 75 years have passed since the date of its publication or 100 years have passed since the date of its creation, whichever expires first
- It is claimed that the file was created in 2013 (but this is more likely the date when the passport was photographed and not the date when the passport was created). There is no evidence that the age requirement is satisfied.
It is an audiovisual or collective work and 75 years have passed since the date of its publication or 100 years have passed since the date of its creation, whichever expires first
- This is not an audiovisual work. It might be a collective work (but this would require verification). There is no evidence that the age requirement is satisfied.
It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author)
- There is no evidence that the age requirement is satisfied. There is also no evidence that this is 'another kind of work'.
It is one of "official public legislative, administrative or legal texts, or any official translations thereof"
- The above only covers text, but this is is not text. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is the part that says "works published by citizens of these countries in these countries are usually not subject to copyright protection outside of these countries. Hence, such works may be in the public domain in most other countries worldwide."
- And in any way we go back to Commons:Threshold of originality - it's just text and a PD seal.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- The part that says 'works published by citizens of these countries in these countries are usually not subject to copyright protection outside of these countries. Hence, such works may be in the public domain in most other countries worldwide' is about the United States and most other countries. Per COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law, you also have to show that the picture is in the public domain in Palau. Besides, there is no evidence that the seal is in the public domain as the seal currently seems to have a bogus copyright tag. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above only covers text, but this is is not text. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear (c) status, COA way above TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
No license and unclear license status Jarekt (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- It's a WHO document and as such is copyright-free. --Akim Dubrow (talk) 19:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Akim Can you point to a law that says that WHO documents are copyright-free? --Jarekt (talk) 02:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no valid license Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Lyon
[edit]Recent murals in Lyon, France. The artist isn't dead since 70 years or more, and there is no FoP in France.
- File:FR lyon mur-canuts-v1997 01.jpg
- File:Fresque-TCL01a.JPG
- File:Fresque-TCL01b.jpg
- File:Fresque-TCL100.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais A. de Jussieu-M.Mérieux-C.Bernard.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Abbé Pierre & Bernard Lacombe.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais B.Tavernier-J.M.Jacquard-P de Lassalle.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais bernard Pivot.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Bocuse & F.Dard.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Claude Martin & Jean-Baptiste Say.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais E.Herriot-Tony Garnier-Frères Lumières.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Emereur Claude.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais J.Récamier & AM Ampère.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Laurent Mourguet - A de St Exupéry.JPG
- File:Mur Lyonnais Puvis de Chavannes & Jean de Verrazane.JPG
JeanBono (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- delete everything I don't care. Dingy (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- pour File:Fresque-TCL01b.jpg, File:Fresque-TCL01a.JPG et File:Fresque-TCL100.JPG,
- sachant que le mur qui reçoit la fresque est celui du Dépôt des Pins voici quelques précisions qui pourraient servir à la discussion.
- La fresque n’est pas un élément architectural mais pictural non conçu par l'architecte et ne relève pas du FoP.
- Le dépôt est un bâtiment privé (appartient à la TCL).
- Le mur sur lequel figure la fresque est visible depuis une voie publique (avenue Lacassagne).
- En résumé – et je n’y avais pas pensé – à mon sens (je ne suis pas du tout juriste) pour la publication de photos de cette oeuvre le droit d’auteur, et la licence sous laquelle sous laquelle CitéCréation a publié cette fresque s’appliquent. Il est peut être nécessaire pour la publication sur Commons de produire une autorisation.
- Cordialement 6PO 12:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Way, way above TOO. No FOP in France. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Bogus authorship claim: This passport was not created by the uploader but by the Government of Rwanda. There is no evidence that the government has licensed the picture under any licence whatsoever. Stefan4 (talk) 20:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Does not pass the Commons:Threshold of originality as there is only text and the coat of arms. The coat of arms File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg is on Commons under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2. You may want to question that if you wish but as things stand right now, it's still valid.--Twofortnights (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the passport front cover under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg appears to be a different representation of the coat of arms, so it may have a different copyright status than the representation used on the passport front cover, per COM:COA#Copyright on the representation. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- As far as I can see it's exactly the same thing, except it's printed in monochrome, but the image itself is absolutely the same.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- If it is exactly the same image, then File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg has an invalid copyright tag as there is no evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed anything. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- That I can't comment on as I am not sure what is the case. You may open a deletion request where the uploader will clarify these issues. But until that file is determined to have an invalid tag we can't assume that, just like innocent until proven guilty, we can't delete this file because that other file might have a wrong license. If it's proven to be the case then it's a different story.--Twofortnights (talk) 18:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is zero evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the coat of arms as depicted on the passport under a free licence. The file information page of File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg contains no such evidence. Unless such evidence is provided, this file must be deleted. Whether other files also have an invalid copyright tag is out of scope for this deletion request, see w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- No you don't understand, this file can only be deleted if the coat of arms cannot be used as the rest clearly falls out of the Commons:Threshold of originality. And as it stands right now everything is OK regarding the coat of arms. So the coat of arms is not an example of w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS at all. It's only you suggesting there might be an issue with it. But for as long as it's not determined that there is an issue with it there is no basis to delete either that file or this file.--Twofortnights (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- As it stands now, nothing is OK regarding the coat of arms. If you claim that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the drawing as presented on the coat of arms under GFDL+CC-BY-SA, then you will have to provide evidence of this. Linking to a statement by someone who is obviously neither the Government of Rwanda nor authorised by the Government of Rwanda to license the coat of arms won't get you anywhere. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am saying purely legally that the Rwandan Coa is OK here because no one contested it yet. If you think there is an argument why it is not OK and should be removed then you can file a deletion request and hopefully someone will analyze the situation and we'll have a verdict. But so far it's all purely theoretical. I will not stand for deleting that file nor for keeping it as I have no idea who is right at the moment, I might comment on evidence provided by others, but I don't have any to give myself.--Twofortnights (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- You are claiming that the coat of arms as shown on this passport has been licensed by the copyright holder (the Government of Rwanda). If you are claiming that the Government of Rwanda has licensed this version of the coat of arms, then you will have to provide evidence of this. So far, you have not done this. File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg is either a different representation of the same coat of arms (in which case its copyright status may be different to that of the representation used on the coat of arms), or it is the same representation (in which case that one also is missing evidence of permission). However, the question of whether File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg is the same or a different representation or not is a different question and out of scope for this deletion discussion. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am sorry but I am not sure I understand what is it that you are claiming now? If there is no problem with the CoA then there is no problem with this file because other than the CoA there is no way blue background with gold text that says Passport can pass the threshold of originality. I don't have to provide any evidence because I didn't start this deletion discussion, you were the one to claim this file should be deleted. So please if you wish to provide evidence about the licensing of the coat of arms do so, or close this request as it doesn't make sense. You opened the deletion request but now you claim there is no evidence that the coat of arms is licensed.--Twofortnights (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- You are claiming that the coat of arms as shown on this passport has been licensed by the copyright holder (the Government of Rwanda). If you are claiming that the Government of Rwanda has licensed this version of the coat of arms, then you will have to provide evidence of this. So far, you have not done this. File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg is either a different representation of the same coat of arms (in which case its copyright status may be different to that of the representation used on the coat of arms), or it is the same representation (in which case that one also is missing evidence of permission). However, the question of whether File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg is the same or a different representation or not is a different question and out of scope for this deletion discussion. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am saying purely legally that the Rwandan Coa is OK here because no one contested it yet. If you think there is an argument why it is not OK and should be removed then you can file a deletion request and hopefully someone will analyze the situation and we'll have a verdict. But so far it's all purely theoretical. I will not stand for deleting that file nor for keeping it as I have no idea who is right at the moment, I might comment on evidence provided by others, but I don't have any to give myself.--Twofortnights (talk) 23:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- As it stands now, nothing is OK regarding the coat of arms. If you claim that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the drawing as presented on the coat of arms under GFDL+CC-BY-SA, then you will have to provide evidence of this. Linking to a statement by someone who is obviously neither the Government of Rwanda nor authorised by the Government of Rwanda to license the coat of arms won't get you anywhere. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- No you don't understand, this file can only be deleted if the coat of arms cannot be used as the rest clearly falls out of the Commons:Threshold of originality. And as it stands right now everything is OK regarding the coat of arms. So the coat of arms is not an example of w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS at all. It's only you suggesting there might be an issue with it. But for as long as it's not determined that there is an issue with it there is no basis to delete either that file or this file.--Twofortnights (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is zero evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the coat of arms as depicted on the passport under a free licence. The file information page of File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg contains no such evidence. Unless such evidence is provided, this file must be deleted. Whether other files also have an invalid copyright tag is out of scope for this deletion request, see w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- That I can't comment on as I am not sure what is the case. You may open a deletion request where the uploader will clarify these issues. But until that file is determined to have an invalid tag we can't assume that, just like innocent until proven guilty, we can't delete this file because that other file might have a wrong license. If it's proven to be the case then it's a different story.--Twofortnights (talk) 18:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- If it is exactly the same image, then File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg has an invalid copyright tag as there is no evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed anything. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- As far as I can see it's exactly the same thing, except it's printed in monochrome, but the image itself is absolutely the same.--Twofortnights (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that the Government of Rwanda has licensed the passport front cover under the GNU Free Documentation Licence. File:Coat of arms of Rwanda.svg appears to be a different representation of the coat of arms, so it may have a different copyright status than the representation used on the passport front cover, per COM:COA#Copyright on the representation. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: COA above TOO. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
This file does not contain any vector elements. It is just a container for a raster image. A vector real File:PapulacadinD Synthesis.svg and a raster File:PapulacadinD Synthesis.png are available. Cwbm (commons) (talk) 09:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Unused buggy SVG (text layout problems). Have File:PapulacadinD Synthesis.png that resolves the SVG-specific problems. In both, the Papulacadin product is misdrawn (the oxygen in the ring adjacent to the benzene ring either is not attached to the sugar ring, or it has three bonds). And even if it were drawn reasonably, it's not visible how the product of the reaction itself (upper-right) relates to it due to so many chemical and orientation differences (COM:SCOPE non-useful aspect). DMacks (talk) 21:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Both the originally-nom'ed SVG and the improved PNG I mentioned have the same product-structure problems, so I also nominate the PNG for deletion. I added File:Hiyama-Denmark Papulacadin D.png that focuses on the reaction (educational value...this is the key aspect of the images that is relevant to use in en:Hiyama coupling). We have File:(+)-Papulacadin D.png if someone wants to use the actual target structure (or as a starting point for making it chemically intelligible). DMacks (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
-Papulacadin_D.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted per DMacks --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Matvey Manizer
[edit]All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monuments and sculpture by Matvey Manizer, he died 1966. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia, COM:FOP#Belarus, COM:FOP#Ukraine. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.
- File:Belarus-Minsk-House of Government and Vladimir Lenin Monument (perspective corrected).jpg
- File:Надгробие Манизер.jpg
- File:Lenin monument in Kiev.jpg
- File:Lenin monument in Petrozavodsk.jpg
- File:Partizanskaya Metro Station (11407572505).jpg
- File:Sankt Petersburg Dmitri Iwanowitsch Mendelejew.jpg
- File:Памятник Мичурину.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Lenin monument in Kiev.jpg. Firstly, this monument is not by Matvey Manizer but by Sergey Merkurov. Secondly, this statue was first published in the USA in 1939 (not just a copy, but this very statue was first installed in the US and moved to Kyiv afterwards) without copyright notice, hence {{PD-US-no notice}} (see Category:Statue of Lenin in Kiev) — NickK (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The statue is probably only published according to the laws of the United States. According to the Berne Convention, which is used in most countries of the world, erecting a statue does not constitute publication, but USA does not use the Berne Convention meaning of publication for statues erected before 1978. The source country of an unpublished statue is the country where the statue is permanently located, which seems to be Ukraine. The 'United States source country' seems to be the United States (the statue was first published there), whereas the 'rest of the world source country' seems to be Ukraine (the statue is unpublished and permanently located there). Commons requires the file to be free in the source country. Does this mean the 'United States source country', the 'rest of the world source country' or both? --Stefan4 (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Just for information, the statue was not just erected, but also publicly displayed in the United States. Ukrainian copyright law has different definitions of publication and promulgation (or diclosure), and source country is defined by first disclosure, not by first publication (Article 3.—1.(b)). Public display is one of the means of disclosure (Article 1, “disclosure (making available to the public) of a work”), which makes that United States is a source country in terms of Ukrainian copyright law. Given that both Ukraine and United States recognize United States as a source country, United States has to be considered the source country of this statue — NickK (talk) 23:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- The statue is probably only published according to the laws of the United States. According to the Berne Convention, which is used in most countries of the world, erecting a statue does not constitute publication, but USA does not use the Berne Convention meaning of publication for statues erected before 1978. The source country of an unpublished statue is the country where the statue is permanently located, which seems to be Ukraine. The 'United States source country' seems to be the United States (the statue was first published there), whereas the 'rest of the world source country' seems to be Ukraine (the statue is unpublished and permanently located there). Commons requires the file to be free in the source country. Does this mean the 'United States source country', the 'rest of the world source country' or both? --Stefan4 (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Lenin monument in Kiev.jpg kept per discussion. other files deleted - no FOP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Bad
- Español: Suitable
- Español: Correctos
Kept: No support for the claim that it is misleading. If so, just upload a new version of this file. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
