User talk:Utopiantos

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Utopiantos!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 16:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Girl in maid costume twerking.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Girl in maid costume twerking.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Revent (talk) 06:24, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Twerking at McGill University.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Twerking at McGill University.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Revent (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anders Peter Sandströmer.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anders Peter Sandströmer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

It says on Flickr that it has no known copyright restrictions, but I don't know how to tag it better than I already have. I did not take the photo, I just found it on Flickr. Utopiantos (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Skåne län och landskapet Skåne har inte samma utsträckning

Skåne län och landskapet Skåne har inte samma utsträckning. Detta gör att deras respektive underkategorier bör finnas parallellt med varandra. / Achird (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Achird, så vi måste lista båda kategorierna varje gång? Många kommer att missa det, och därför kommer vi att få två halvbra kategorier, när vi annars hade kunnat få en mycket bra. På vilket sätt skiljer sig deras utsträckningar? Utopiantos (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Ja, jag kommer hur som helst att lista båda kategorierna varje gång jag laddar upp bilder på fornlämningar. Att många användare missar att ange rätt kategorier är ju inget hållbart argument för att förenkla kategorisystemet så länge det finns andra användare som ser till att kategorisera bilderna rätt. Wikimedia bygger ju på samarbete där t.ex. någon laddar upp en bild, någon annan förbättrar bildbeskrivningen och någon tredje ser till att bilden hamnar i rätt kategorier. Att förenkla kategorisystemet så att det inte längre är lika användbart för professionella användare ser jag inte som någon vinst. Landskapen och länen delas ju upp på olika sätt. En länskategori delas ju främst upp i kommunkategorier t.ex. Category:Archaeological monuments in Helsingborg Municipality, medan en arkeologisk landskapskategori vanligen delas upp på fornlämningstyper t.ex. Category:Dolmens in Skåne eller kända fornlämningar. Laddade jag exempelvis upp en egen bild tagen igår på Grantoftadösen (RAÄ-nr Kvistofta 14:1) så skulle jag ju se till att den fanns med i alla relevanta kategorier: Category:Archaeological monuments in Helsingborg Municipality, Category:Dolmens in Skåne, Category:Kvistofta socken (om den finns), Category:Gantofta, någon kategori för dösar med rektangulära kammare (när sådan finns i framtiden), Category:Photographs taken on 2015-09-15, Category:September 2015 in Sweden, Category:2015 in Helsingborg Municipality, Category:Taken with Canon Digital IXUS 135 (eller vad det nu är för kamera jag använt), samt min egen Category:Photos of prehistoric archaeology by User:Achird. Min tumregel är att man kan skapa en ny kategori om det finns minst tre bilder att lägga i den, så när det väl finns tre bilder på Grantoftadösen så skulle jag skapa Category:Grantoftadösen och då kunna flytta över en del kategorier från bilderna till kategorin.

Vad gäller Skåne så är skillnaden mellan landskapet och länet ganska liten och utgörs av Östra Karups socken som ligger i Skåne län, men i landskapet Halland. Skillnaden är dock såpass stor att jag skulle tycka det vore obekvämt att slå samman kategorierna. De enda län, som till utbredningen är identiska med motsvarande landskap, är Blekinge och Gotland. Gotlands län och Gotlands kommun är därtill exakt samma sak. / Achird (talk) 23:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Helsingborg, fornlämning 183-1.jpg

File:Helsingborg, fornlämning 183-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abbe98 (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Helsingborg, fornlämning 183-1 (2).jpg

File:Helsingborg, fornlämning 183-1 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abbe98 (talk) 09:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)