Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 13th, 2015

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Umair999

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not deletion Tusca~enwiki (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No rationale given for deletion. Jean-Fred (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nasirova K (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Posters/books/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file is actually being used on meta:User:Christophore. I've just "null edited" that page so that it can properly display on the global usage list. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for fixing that Michael. INeverCry 19:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion above. Green Giant (talk) 19:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 092crs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotional pictures, out of project scope

Motopark (talk) 04:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Watermark, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 08:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Yann (talk · contribs) as a copyright violation. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 14:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its my personal pic Umair999 (talk) 12:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's requrest on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

request of the uploader (myself) who made a mistake in uploading it. iopensa (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Didym (talk · contribs) as a uploader requested. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 14:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clear copyright violation, can nt be own work Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not ancient enough to be {{PD-old}}. And it's not simple enough to be {{PD-textlogo}} (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:AIA Logo.svg (same uploader)) Moonian (talk) 17:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, photo of non-notable person Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ACCOR DSI AIR View (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused non-notable logos (private artwork)

George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timo Niskanen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope unused non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 18:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable chart George Chernilevsky talk 18:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (154x166px) resolution, missing EXIF. Higher resolutions like https://yt3.ggpht.com/-r42akk2QlaY/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/Q6TRleZKTAw/s900-c-k-no/photo.jpg (900x900 px) from official Youtube https://www.youtube.com/user/leonardoamuedo available. Gunnex (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanjol56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused private photos

George Chernilevsky talk 18:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abraxas.cehr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, unused non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logos / artwork

George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable artwork George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bx16valve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPAM, out of project scope, unused non-notable logos

George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Political cartoon created by (as indicated) "Storni" = Brazilian artist Alfredo Storni (1881—1966). {{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail (does not apply for artworks, fails by same reason also {{PD-BR-1937}}. Brazil has 70 pma. Copyrighted till the end of 2036. Gunnex (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution, unlikely to be 'own work' Gyrostat (talk) 18:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Logo of a Brazilian football club. {{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail which does not apply for these works. And an alternative license via {{PD-ineligible}} is too optimistic, as this logo is IMHO above COM:TOO. Taken - as indicated - from http://www.brandsoftheworld.com/logo/clube-atletico-ferroviario (Copyright © 2015 Mediabistro Inc., updated 2012, "Designer: CAF" = the related club pt:Clube Atlético Ferroviário (Paraná)). It may be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided. The logo appears to be a quite recent creation. Gunnex (talk) 18:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work' : http://nats.aero/blog/2014/01/tower-tours-edinburgh-iconic-tower-view/#jp-carousel-3158 Gyrostat (talk) 18:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright from NATS: http://nats.aero/blog/2014/01/tower-tours-edinburgh-iconic-tower-view/#jp-carousel-3166 Gyrostat (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': for example Gyrostat (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=120621255 Gyrostat (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=120621255 Gyrostat (talk) 19:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded by 1-upload user Sport Club Jaraguá (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2013 and licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} (on which base?) this is the logo for Brazilian football team pt:Sport Club Jaraguá. Despite of having a similar username, the user is not necessarily a representative of the club. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established. Fails also (as alternative) PD-whatever (above COM:TOO).

Nominating also (per above):

a derivated work. Gunnex (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be 'own work': [1] Gyrostat (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus ticket added by uploader (redlink, not OTRS member) - ticket apparently has history of being used to "forge" permissions - see internal comments. Эlcobbola talk 20:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://angel.co/aneelr // COM:Flickrwash Josve05a (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Brazil. --> considering an indoor shot derivated from several covers of pt:Pif Paf, a political/humoristic magazine published in Brazil in 1964, which may not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, considering the "?" entry for public interiors at the summary table via COM:FOP#Situation in different countries. Additional, it is unclear if these covers were permanently located at the location or only were installed for a temporary exhibition. Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared here in 2014, well before 2015 upload to Commons. OTRS needed. Эlcobbola talk 20:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Brazil. --> considering an indoor shot derivated from icons/pictograms especially created for the 2016 Summer Olympics in Brazil, which may not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, considering the "?" entry for public interiors at the summary table via COM:FOP#Situation in different countries. Additional, it is unclear if these designs were permanently located at the location or only were installed for a temporary exhibition. Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC) )[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Brazil. --> considering an indoor shot derivated from an artwork by living Brazilian artist pt:Raquel Trindade (1936—), which may not be covered by COM:FOP#Brazil, considering the "?" entry for public interiors at the summary table via COM:FOP#Situation in different countries. Additional, it is unclear if this artwork was permanently located at the location or only was installed for a temporary exhibition. Gunnex (talk) 20:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flawed map, uploading a better one Djkeddie (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 23:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv1anNpgXPquqTXrbhcUjoUPJFAc0I6r2ll0oD0C6m3NG3x5KD_1OHFrnsmMnZ60kdcPQMiyDelbFCgPQ-y8-aE4VQ4qAKTcMoXQzSe3BlnMglBFKp34apiSQbVjJh5jYalNldQSGx_1iIFDYpL2bYouQDOLLpXwrnZhGMgTBXVhawwS-dJH3IPjoij9UprSwq2OCaPeSe4w4MUKmMDQYrdtuTIB9NGCBitu1_1PMKp1j6HlZqjskkkAjRtgRzddTzGw5uJYTkjY1YpD_1QmWz2_1B85JMuVIB_1K6OUb-4vmThxuwzITe4JBr7j_11ey_1ACiVpywI6XkpdlyqIs6CDVY8muc3KCy244q4r6XpJAS9qhv9w7DMkFEtWn8NQDu8hCrZfzvgf_1jIQ2LPpoTm8bHCTuDMAR_1rBJgKfQGlDLfQnBTaO8D5bMQKrt99oBR2ozAN5flEuOR04ZOJInbHRmXtOmeVhb-f7MUPtRvYX1D44d75rk0EUcT0eH-9NI9Ha7zQRsYbC836fbrCTMVb43-J_1tXuA7sDOtMU6sHsIrMJwUrKhdnVkCYe5OmKsiPNrRbbhM8_1Rw1K68W87_18dbvhNG_1wOVVBqmoGTjgLp0ZnEKndDOBkByoh38Od_14veIJINzIaZZn9upWgZhCmA6G83ojCLN6hui97Sy9HcyXCSee0lBHL8CPgJP3arvd_1hrHZiRJnO8oziKd8FQ3i7RoN1gyUJj_152Qi8QLjq3srE4v3wNmUfX2y7zbB1wqE3u-zywihj8-ZKMDgSrBtOiTNYrY4LXfDBL4Ukt_1QDEUuj7JgC_1JRSVp_1lLFdV61uqHgnYsdEtCzgaFnsr9XQdjNAK_1iBOGwvrccfS5OAHQABQYSflIE5hISpDsOCprB3cv-Q9cvt71rpE5FAJWX0-0U9kV6HSHlY9vvoEf8qdKFAi7v295wymj7w0C6L6GeWIJqIpYmwl85P8oio3rWZj88XGETyynn85Q0kDEEqchBYdWkVgjvofCHlbkObfpCahgjqkXAEF5YXWESui5XwxDsgCZI4XI64p9fCBMW9_1tFBhqGGDg3fmRjM2W8_1-zqvTPR7Gy7IHr2rw85Q_15287_1rJGWpqQMtjFbF5M4ICGi_1BxItnkHdoluhDQAY96BDNHg37ceM01ZOAmCBzI-OSSU7uHksjMRpb2kEZuLv7ZVRhFL2-EOP_1LmPjrrgklhMasUdEY1gof7liA91RP66QIanzpkz2TYaR1tQt40kNsrtS4Yibn4KJGK_1Al3YNeBJgt4_1cXLp90Is-epX_1hWaSudQj-TU4hcdrq3yQ9wWlSDVHCt0Ya9FqHak6P1SNt-tXIC3d0QGS4oVtZy_1IiCMgu-TlVC7EyQ56Z5z81ObEZZjRCR6xfZ89dv8WEAok3eE7d6dyQkm0M3XgH4OMTium7kEc-wAtr2MroR7qi4wVHsjmdj3DiSvIz0SCSlfn3e7a-YXVmDltApaIdHA5je5GfpyfNQeAyT91Bq8Iafka81ZxfA0c9UD5Gq467GtAzdZzL9J9OIBRlO-q0DXhnzSAmB1ALmwTea25w85bzHOjCAvPqAFiP17R33C4nQ Saqib (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere; unlikely to be own work. Green Giant (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete image not found on Flickr - this Flickr user has few images all of which are ARR and this is not one at this time Ww2censor (talk) 22:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvios. Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:00, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this Flickr user has several copyright violation images from magazines and elsewhere. Ww2censor (talk) 22:28, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete there is no FoP in Japan for artistic works per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Japan Ww2censor (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Logo of a Brazilian football club. Transferred from dewiki, locally most likely tagged with de:Vorlage:Bild-PD-Schöpfungshöhe, which would be in Commons {{PD-ineligible}}.

Licensed by the user who made the transfer with {{PD-Brazil-media}} which does not apply for these works. And a license via {{PD-ineligible}} is too optimistic, as this logo is IMHO above COM:TOO. It may be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided, considering also that the logo appears to be a quite recent creation. Gunnex (talk) 10:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umair999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images. not in scoope

Saqib (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Some already deleted. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused logo; likely not own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 2.0 is not recognized on Commons Jarekt (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from toys. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per request on my talk page. Green Giant (talk) 09:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NgAymará (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gh history (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ranee Narendranath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juliosantoshd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Translate's interpretation of ar:مستخدم:Aref alshanifi/ملعب suggests that this is a non-free logo. Stefan4 (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be out of scope. If useful, it should be converted into wikicode instead. Stefan4 (talk) 14:29, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a screenshot of someone else's comment on Facebook, meaning that it is unfree. I can also not see any foreseeable educational use of this picture. Stefan4 (talk) 14:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graph of unclear notability. Seems to be out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 14:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for signs like this. Stefan4 (talk) 14:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablo091963 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios by sock of Milanopablojavier24 (long term abuse with over 131 accounts). File:Subte-Linea-E-Estacion-Bolivar.jpg is from here, for example. (File:Bolivar subte E.png and File:BOLIVAR.jpg are also derivatives of that image.)

Эlcobbola talk 15:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holderː Roberto Duran 37.5.3.37 15:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holderː Roberto Duran 37.5.3.37 15:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright holderː Roberto Duran 37.5.3.37 15:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable tiny blurry image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiseguard 1

[edit]

Unused promotional images, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 16:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These two images and an advertising user page and gallery are the only contributions of this user. While policy allows users who actually contribute to the success of Commons one or two images for the user page, Commons is not Facebook and these are out of scope.

Note also that this user is blocked indefinitely on WP:EN for abusing multiple accounts.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded 2013. Uploader Auréola (talk · contributions · Statistics) claims to have taken this photo as he was asked by the related actor pt:Daniel Granieri. Per ptwiki user page uploader is "Fernando Alex Graça de Souza", a teenager. So why on official site http://www.danielgranieri.com.br/?page_id=344 the photo is credited with "Foto Carol Beiriz " (see the b&w version with watermark via http://www.danielgranieri.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/998968_10201890607286060_760449304_n.jpg + http://www.danielgranieri.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/image15.jpeg)? The 1st image link is a copy of a photo previously published on his Facebook = https://www.facebook.com/danielgranieriator (which is today 404).

Nominating also (per above):

which was uploaded by same user in 2010, but is in fact a crop from previously published via (example) http://www.leschroniquesdistvan.com/page/891 (2008) = http://a403.idata.over-blog.com/1/75/17/71/Fichier-17/daniel_granieri_01_05.jpg. Per exif the photo was taken in 2006. Per description: "For the request of the actor's accessory, I took this picture for his biography in the wiki pt" --> he waited 4 years to do it? That sounds not plausible, considering also that in 2006 the related ptwiki didn't exit — it was created only in 2010 by the uploader himself. Gunnex (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syed.kareem874 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 01:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadiardz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want that because it s my file Salman elchouli (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and out of project scope. This person remains unknown ten years after the photo was taken. What is the educational use of such a photo? The description even has a wild guess (Pamela Anderson?). No, it is definitely not Pamela Anderson. FredWalsh (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mjthesadprince (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, self-promotion George Chernilevsky talk 04:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halilkayaduman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF data, small size, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Halilkayaduman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused low quality images of non-notable people

INeverCry 01:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pbktheriser (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cold742307 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Korby Bohannon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 03:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jesusgza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotion of non-notable band/band members

INeverCry 03:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - altered photo with large watermark INeverCry 03:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Commons is not Facebook.

Leyo 20:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Denniss. --JuTa 02:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mahadevsapte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotion/big watermarks/altered photos - no educational value

INeverCry 03:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 04:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Szleddownlight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

some homepage material, promotionals

Motopark (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: SPAM George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 12:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The woman in these photos has not been identified in the ten years since the photo was taken. They are small and one is quite poor quality. There is little educational use for these photos.

FredWalsh (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shamshadalibalti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images. not in scoope

Saqib (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 00:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree. Michael Barera (talk) 00:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marica Löwenhjelm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

uploads of blocked sock - possible copyvios - author license info is suspect - File:Friedrich Waismann 1924.jpg, for instance, is actually a portrait of Nietzsche with black scribbling in the background, etc, but the info given indicates a different subject/date and this is sourced to a museum

INeverCry 02:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - low quality photo of random low-ranking Marine INeverCry 02:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a copyright violation of this image: http://www.bio.miami.edu/dana/pix/ham.jpg. That image is copyrighted by Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings. KDS4444 (talk) 00:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 01:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 01:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 01:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (see EXIF) Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, no EXIF, likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.brest.fr/cadre-de-vie-deplacements/amenagements-et-projets-urbains/telepherique.html Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.brest.fr/cadre-de-vie-deplacements/amenagements-et-projets-urbains/telepherique.html Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think, it's a screenshot from this video [2]. Juggler2005 (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality (see the crown). Taivo (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

para cambiar nombre 179.7.77.69 20:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming this nomination was intended to be for File:Caserío de Tarapampa.jpg. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 14:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

para cambiar nombre 179.7.77.69 21:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

porque el imagen no está claro, poreso quisiera borrarlo gracias. 179.7.71.75 21:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, unlikely to be useful to project. OSX II (talk) 23:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - it could just as easily be an inconspicuous corner of somebody's backyard. We have plenty of photos of scenery that far exceed anything this photo gives us. FredWalsh (talk) 07:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader originally stated (on en:File:Ashish-Dhawan-Headshot.jpg, uploaded to enwiki) that the author of the photo was Ashish Dhawan, and that evidence of permission would be provided upon request. In subsequent uploads (en:File:Ashish-Dhawan.jpg and here at the Commons), the uploader is claiming the image is his own work. I have my doubts, as this is a professionally taken studio shot. Diannaa (talk) 01:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Doubtfully own work PierreSelim (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Japan has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures, only for buildings unless the artist died more than 70 years ago. But this is modern art and this exception would not apply here. Leoboudv (talk) 08:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: agree that no FoP exists in Japan even though the image itself is freely licenced by the photographer. Ww2censor (talk) 09:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FOP in Japan PierreSelim (talk) 20:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now with correct name and description, so in scope. Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Flag of non-notable micronation, articles deleted at en:Republic of Catan, en:Kingdom of Catan and various sandbox pages. JohnCD (talk) 07:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is not own work and surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The collage is probably user's own work, but given that all their other uploads are copyright violations we need strong evidence that ecery collage element is their own work. Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beelal777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All files with exif "Canon PowerShot A550" (uploaded in 05.2015) were previously published at Flickr stream https://www.flickr.com/photos/beelal/with/1453150525/ as all rights reserved by "Beelal Awan". Examples:

Despite of having a similar username, the Flickr user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali Sulehri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All files (no exif, uploaded in 05.2015) were previously published at https://www.facebook.com/ZafarwalPunjab/photos_stream. Watermarks were removed by other user. Examples:

A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.


Gunnex (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soikat1996 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Selfies by 19-year-old whose autobiographical articles and user-pages from three different accounts have been repeatedly deleted on en:wp.

JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request deletion of my own file. Redundant and not in use. Optakeover (talk) 10:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyrighted. uploaded by a copyvio guy . Saqib (talk) 12:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose , likely copyvio because uploaded by a copyvio guy Saqib (talk) 12:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not useful for education purpose Saqib (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Hang9417 (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Hang9417 (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Vicks VapoRub 5gm.jpg
File:Vicks VapoRub.jpg

Logo/label probably has enough originality to attract copyright. Thus, this photograph is a non-free derivative of a copyrighted work.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support The whole label probably is just passed the threshold as a whole, although I'd argue about the logo itself having copyright, its rather simple. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 22:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Vicks VapoRub 5gm.jpg
File:Vicks VapoRub.jpg

Logo/label probably has enough originality to attract copyright. Thus, this photograph is a non-free derivative of a copyrighted work.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support The whole label probably is just passed the threshold as a whole, although I'd argue about the logo itself having copyright, its rather simple. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 22:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

フォントが中国語で表示される問題が起こりました Shellfrozen (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 22:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

フォントが中国語で表示される問題が起こりました  Shellfrozen (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 22:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

madrid juventus 80.30.96.89 15:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The work has a solid basis, see at file infobox. Image Reproduction terms and conditions aren't altered. Anonymous request without any reason. Keep please. --Heralder (talk) 16:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Invalid DR. Fry1989 eh? 23:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 22:20, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work, missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not own work, missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Argentine works, published (or sourced with - as indicated) +1971, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Unclear status with File:Oscar-pezzano.jpg, configured with "pre-1980"...

Gunnex (talk) 17:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:L Alan (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Argentine works, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years. Uploaded in 01./02.2014, the uploader already was informed about COM:URAA-issues before. Eventually all files already deleted by previous deletion request and reuploaded.

1975
1982
1983

Gunnex (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete All those files are still copyrighted in the US. - Fma12 (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 06:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus OTRS ticket added my non-OTRS member. Ticket applies to a limited number of images, not these, and apparently has a history of being used to "forge" permissions (see internal notes). Images are low res, often lacking camera EXIF, those that have camera EXIF are from many different models (NIKON D200, Canon PowerShot SX500 IS, NIKON D300S, NIKON D70s, NIKON D3, NIKON D1, etc.) suggesting multiple offers. User has uploaded many unambiguous copyvios. Quack?

Эlcobbola talk 20:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 22:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cazadoroculto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works - image of trophy and newspaper/publication scans

Эlcobbola talk 20:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 22:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. ticket 2009111810076787 is valid, no reason for delete them. The author release all your photos under PD. Ezarateesteban 23:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems copyvio due to, size and quality. the user uploaded several copyvios. Saqib (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image of modified car, better examples at Category:Ford Fiesta MK2. OSX II (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to original source, it seems quite obvious that it must be en:Le Pouce.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to original source, it seems quite obvious that it must be en:Le Pouce.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "probably" for a four year old, unused file; deleted as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to original source, it seems quite obvious that it must be en:Le Pouce.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: An unused picture of some vegetation with a blurry hill in background; deleted as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As nominated, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location, useless name, no category, no description, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete - there are many good quality, educationally useful photos of scenery in Category:Le Pouce. This is not one of them. FredWalsh (talk) 07:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • The question is not whether we already have images some of us consider superior, the question is whether THIS IMAGE is in scope. There are locations like the Statue of Liberty and the Eiffel Tower where we have something like 1000 images. They are all different. Should contributors who consider themselves art critics say, you can't add the 1001st image of the Statue of Liberty, because they consider some images we already have to be superior?

      No.

      We are not art critics. If the image is in scope, we should include it. There are times when someone will choose to use an image self-appointed art critics consider inferior, for some other reason, like what it includes in the background, or what time of day it was taken, or whether it was rainy or cloudy or blue sky. These things are unpredictable, so we should continue to retain all in scope images. If we get lots of image further subcategorization is in order -- not turning away perfectly acceptable in scope images. Geo Swan (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep as above. Geo Swan (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Yann and FredWalsh... it's been unused for years, and there are better images in the category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corporate logo 82.245.172.92 07:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted per nominator's rationale. MBisanz talk 04:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corporate logo 82.245.172.92 07:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted per nominator's rationale. MBisanz talk 04:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corporate logo 82.245.172.92 07:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted per nominator's rationale. MBisanz talk 04:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lagoa da harmonia Vaniamedeiros (talk) 02:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file JuTa 17:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fue un error JMRRuiz (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC) FUE UN ERROR JMRRuiz (talk) 04:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted cover image Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nominated twice, deleted once. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FUE UN ERROR JMRRuiz (talk) 04:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FUE UN ERROR JMRRuiz (talk) 04:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted cover image Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nominated twice, deleted once. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corporate logo 82.245.172.92 07:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Hedwig in Washington. JuTa 17:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yokki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

They are derivative works of copyrighted paintings by Irina Azizyan (1935-2009) those has been uploaded without copyright holders' permission.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantin Karzanov отправил разрешение на адрес: permissions-ru@wikimedia.org 12.04.15 Yokki

Hello. Currently, the permission for the reproduction of works of art. License status of photo is specified. (ticket:2015042410007449) --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission given and executed properly. Painter and photographer - one person. Permission given legal successor of the author.(ticket:2015041110015741) --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket received. BrightRaven (talk) 15:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yokki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that it's in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain... In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader." Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle: "Also, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it", such as the following, are against Commons' aims: "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter."

Juggler2005 (talk) 03:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Juggler2005

В Российской Федерации произведения обычно также переходят в общественное достояние через 70 лет после смерти автора. Но, например, произведения, опубликованные до 1 января 1943 года, также могут находиться в общественном достоянии, если: 1: автор умер до 1 января 1943 года, не участвовал/работал во время Великой Отечественной войны, не был подвергнут репрессиям и реабилитирован посмертно после 1 января 1943 года; 2: они были опубликованы анонимно или под псевдонимом до 1 января 1943 года, и имя автора не стало известным в течение 50 лет, считая с 1 января года, следующего за годом его правомерного обнародования. --Yokki

These works were made by an anonymous photographer in the 1920-1930s. Obviously, the author will never be known. In Russia works published prior to 1 January 1943 may also be in the public domain if: 1: author died before January 1, 1944... 2: they were published anonymously or under a pseudonym before January 1, 1943, and the name of the author did not become known during 50 years. -My case. --Yokki


Deleted: by Ellin Beltz; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yokki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP for sculptures in Russia.

Juggler2005 (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Согласно статье 1276 четвёртой части Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации, 1. Допускаются без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение и распространение изготовленных экземпляров, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю, доведение до всеобщего сведения произведения изобразительного искусства или фотографического произведения, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли. 2. Допускается свободное использование путем воспроизведения и распространения изготовленных экземпляров, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю, доведения до всеобщего сведения в форме изображений произведений архитектуры, градостроительства и произведений садово-паркового искусства, расположенных в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, или видных из этого места.

В законах об авторском праве Азербайджана, Белоруссии[2], Грузии, Казахстана, Киргизии, Латвии, Литвы, Таджикистана, Туркмении, Эстонии, а также Абхазии и НКР (но не Украины, Молдавии и Армении!) содержится аналогичный текст.

Согласно статье 1259 четвёртой части ГК РФ, «произведениями изобразительного искусства» считаются, среди прочего, произведения живописи, скульптуры, графики, дизайна, графические рассказы и комиксы.

В соответствии с этим законом, если произведение изобразительного искусства или фотографическое произведение охраняется авторским правом, постоянно находится в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, и не является основным объектом фотографии (например, оно не занимает её бо́льшую часть), такие свободные фотографии этих объектов можно загружать в русскую Википедию (в том числе с высоким разрешением) и в Викисклад и использовать в статьях без ограничений. Yokki (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reason.

Juggler2005 (talk) 17:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the same reason.

Juggler2005 (talk) 06:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NO FOP for artwork in Russia. The sculptures are the main part of the photographs. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lagoa da harmonia Vaniamedeiros (talk) 02:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept shizhao (talk) 07:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 00:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment We have no rule saying that collections must come from local pictures from Commons. We have a page saying that it is a good way to make collections to do so.
If someone take 4 photos with their own camera and make a collection from those and upload that collection but not the 4 single photos then we can still keep the collection.
If someone make a collection with 4 photos they have not taken themself then we need a link to the source to be able to verify the source. If we can verify the license then we can upload the photos to Commons or add a licensereview. --MGA73 (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While MGA73's comment is correct in general, this does not fit its requirements. The image in the upper right appears in a wide variety of places on the Web -- note the two tiny people at the base of the left corner of the buidling -- see http://choicewallpapers.net/gol-gumbaz-photo/ for a better version. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl 83.17.84.30 08:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1915. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1915. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1915. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1917. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1916. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1916. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is a distorted and poor quality version of this image (car positions and colours are the same). The was posted on this link two years before the upload to commons Peripitus (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1916. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1915. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from my private collection - it was copied from my website and published in wikimedia without my permission, please, cancel it, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl . Ta fotografia pochodzi z mojej prywatnej kolekcji, została skopiowana z mojej strony internetowej i opublikowana w wikimedia bez mojej zgody, proszę o jej usunięcie, Jacek Szulski / www.podbrodzie.info.pl Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This German postcard was created and published in 1917. Moreover, the author of photo is unknown. So according to PD-scan, PD-old-auto-1923 and PD-old-70 it's definitely in a public domain. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my private property (I have an original) and intellectual property - photo described and prepared by me for exposition on my private website www.podbrodzie.info.pl with information about no permission for other publications.--Jacek Szulski (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Jacek Szulski[reply]


Kept: PD old/anonymous Basvb (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the file, Luke Ford, did not create the photo of the model at the left side. We need permission from the copyright holder of that photo. FredWalsh (talk) 14:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative (cropping could be an option). Basvb (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop from file deleted by request Commons:Deletion requests/Files from fotopresidencia.cl Sfs90 (talk) 16:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tambo as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: image quality, uploader Amitie 10g (talk) 17:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amikor feltöltésre került, nem találtam képet Farbaky Istvánról. Most feltöltöttem a File:Farbaky István rektor.jpg képet. Így ez a rossz minőségű kép törlésre kerülhet. Tambo (talk) 04:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per initial request Basvb (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Old photo history no source Amitie 10g (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs proper attribution (and then likely has to be PD) Basvb (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Old photo history no source Amitie 10g (talk) 17:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs proper attribution (and then likely has to be PD) Basvb (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright image at left side needs permission from its copyright owner. FredWalsh (talk) 18:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want it kept, there is noticing stopping you or anyone else from uploading a new version with the unfree parts blurred or cropped. Otherwise it is a copyright violation because Achim Raschka did not create the poster. FredWalsh (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist Beiwerk, da nicht bildbestimmend. (Gerhard Schricker/Martin Vogel, Urheberrecht, 3. Aufl., § 23 KUG Rdnr. 14–15) --Ralf Roleček 19:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep DM. --Krd 20:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: de minimis Basvb (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 00:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can't identify source. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourcepictures missing or deleted Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 00:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can't identify source. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All these licenses are wrong. The author died in 1974, not 70 years ago. And GFDL is obviously incorrect.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Beskid Museum - portrait 02.JPG, the author is anonymous, so a different rationale is needed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: are you sure it didn't list the author at the museum? In any case he does appear advanced in age, very likely over 50, which makes publication 70 years ago pretty unlikely. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I realize this is an old upload, but you might like this template for future reference: Template:Licensed PD-art. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd usually take a pic of the description, and not upload it here if it looked like it was made by some still protected by copyright. In this case, we have an anonymous work of art that we don't know when was created. You are right that he looks older, but I don't know if we have a justification for deletion, without knowing for sure when this was made. There is also Template:Anonymous-EU, through it's of little help. The museum was opened in 1964 (pl:Muzeum Beskidzkie w Wiśle), so the image might have been on public display for 50 years or so, not that I think it counts for much, again. All said, I can't but feel that deletion of this picture, given its unknown author status, is m:copyright paranoia... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is a piece of artwork, with a quite probable author (who you haven't yet identified), and it probably is still in copyright. Not paranoia at all. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Probably, you note. But we cannot be sure. It is not impossible this is out of copyright. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Yes, it is possible that this is out of copyright. But the uploader has to prove that it is. Until then unclear (c) status at best. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lagoa da Harmonia Vaniamedeiros (talk) 03:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear (c) status, sources? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lagoa da harmonia teutônia rio grande do sul Vaniamedeiros (talk) 03:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear (c) status, sources? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di caricamento Capo Ufficio Logistico (talk) 07:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore di caricamento Capo Ufficio Logistico (talk) 07:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong size Roy Cuneng (talk) 07:48, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Size doesn't matter. Here. Out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files all have a notice which states that "Photographs .... taken by Luke Ford" are licensed, yet in all of them he is clearly the subject, so either someone else took them or he used a timer. Whatever the circumstances, we need clarification of authorship. Otherwise these files are not properly licensed and need deleting.

FredWalsh (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. undisclosed author Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemigo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both images are a derivative work of the Estrella Galicia logo. However, it should be assessed whether such a logo goes beyond the threshold of originality (I think so as it's not comprised by mere geometrical shapes)

Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are derivative work of Deportivo de La Coruña logo, too. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 01:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 04:00, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nemigo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Probably replaced with other versions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Football club logos uploaded by Nemigo

[edit]

Spanish football club logos. Even if they were handcrafted by the uploader they are copyrighted by their respective owners. Banjo (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol deseño.svg, File:Escudo Deportivo da Coruña, Riazor vesion.svg and File:Deseño Deportivo Lugo.svg, as per

they are handcrafted drawings of the "definition" of the team logos, not copied from any site. Same as what is done with galician council emblems. Copyright of the logos resides in the original images from those teams posted in their websites/shirts/etc., copyright that applies to the images themselves but not to the definition

 Keep --Elisardojm (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol versión.svg and File:Escudo Racing de Ferrol.png as duplicates. Banjo (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Español:  Delete No es el mismo caso de los escudos de los organismos públicos (como ayuntamientos, etc). Las descripciones heráldicas de los organismos públicos son de dominio público (Artículo 13. Exclusiones: No son objeto de propiedad intelectual las disposiciones legales o reglamentarias y sus correspondientes proyectos, las resoluciones de los órganos jurisdiccionales y los actos, acuerdos, deliberaciones y dictámenes de los organismos públicos, así como las traducciones oficiales de todos los textos anteriores). Los escudos de los clubs deportivos no. Son diseños, propiedad de los diseñadores y de los propios clubs, y están protegidos por las leyes que regulan la propiedad intelectual. Los archivos cargados por el User:Nemigo son obras derivadas (véase Wikimedia:Derivative works)
--. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both arguments have their weight. I'm keeping my initial proposition as it was and abstaining from voting either way (except on duplicated files). I leave the final decision to the more experienced admins here in commons. ☣Banjo tell me 17:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Español: Los blasones de los equipos de fútbol simplemente son definiciones que luego un artista interpreta, por ejemplo uno podría ser: "cruz de Santiago con un escudo azul claro encima, dos C's dentro del mismo y encima una corona real cerrada" (definición "traducida" del blasón del Celta de Vigo: "en campo de azur, doble orla de prata aberta á sinistra que son as iniciais do Club Celta. O escudo leva de fondo a Cruz de Santiago de goles. Ó timbre coroa real pechada.") Las definiciones son tan simples que no llegan al umbral de originalidad, por lo tanto es válido hacer una versión interpretándolos y liberar los ficheros para subirlos a Commons.

Por otra parte, los derechos de autor que tienen los escudos de los equipos de fútbol se mantienen en las "interpretaciones" que hacen sus artistas de estos blasones, por eso no se pueden copiar de sus páginas web ni de otras páginas de internet para subirlos a Commons.

Y la última parte, existen también unos derechos comerciales, la marca comercial, pero que son derechos que no afectan a Commons porque no son derechos de autor. Ejemplos de estos casos los tenemos en los cientos de logotipos de marcas comerciales que están subidos a Commons porque no superan el umbral de originalidad pero que mantienen sus derechos comerciales para los usos en los que se aplica esa legislación. Saludos,
--Elisardojm (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

______________

Deleted not own work, no sources given. If these are indeed logos of these various places, they're not own work of uploader. If someone wishes to upload properly attibuted images with links to the license pages of the website from which they were taken, that permits Commons admins to understand the intention of the property owner. With only own work as source, these do not fulfill the requirements of COM:EVID. Deleted COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Football club logos uploaded by Nemigo

[edit]

Spanish football club logos. Even if they were handcrafted by the uploader they are copyrighted by their respective owner.

 Delete --. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The logos hasn't surpass the threshold of originality and them are in PD, it are only trademarks. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I doesn't make sense to have a non-original logo that does not distinguish the club from other club logos. Uploader claim to be the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The author and date has now been properly supplied. Country of creation is USA but could not be inputted into the pictures page. Kyndcat (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 1953 photograph -> still under copyright. needs OTRS permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep


Deleted: Source / author : Newfound Regional High School. No permission to use the photo. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Es ist mein Paßfoto!!! Dieses Foto ist in meinem Paß seit über 15 Jahren! Was soll den das?--93.196.116.96 07:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sie haben auch meine andere Fotos angegriffen, z.B. File:Тихомиров Леонид Петрович.jpg. Das sind alle Fotos meiner Ältern und meiner Schwester, die sie mir selbst per E-Mail geschickt haben. --93.196.116.96 07:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Info aus Diskussionsseite von Grafboris hinterlassen. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Pretty sure it is not OK to keep. Com:AGF and will discuss on VP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has to be pre-1978 for PD Italia to apply, not simply more than 20 years old (I think!) Målfarlig! (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-Italia yes, US NO: See Not-PD-US-URAA (Upload after 2012) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a forged map, new changes to an old map, and it is from a website which is «Copyright © 2008-2015 The Mbunda Kingdom Research and Advisory Council. All rights reserved.», it is not a free license Spumuq (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recreated the map to emphasize a point, and equally uploaded it on the website referred to as a custodian of the copyright. I offered it as a free license on Wikipedia commons. Therefore, there is no need to delete it.Ndandulalibingi (talk) 21:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The relevant issue here is derivative works. Now we are making a big assumption that the map was published in Angola. According to the current Angolan copyright law, works are protected until 50 years after the death of the author. I don't think the Research and Advisory Council created the map, so I don't think they can claim copyright. If you can demonstrate the identity of the author and assuming they died on or before 31 December 1945, that should make the map public domain in both Angola and the USA, which is a requirement of Commons. Alternatively if the map was published under Portuguese law, the same strictures apply because Portugal only recently moved from a formula of death_of_author+50_years to +70_years. Green Giant (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a forged map, new changes to an old map, and it is from a website which is «Copyright © 2008-2015 The Mbunda Kingdom Research and Advisory Council. All rights reserved.», it is not a free license Spumuq (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recreated the map to emphasize a relevant point, and equally uploaded it on the website referred to as a custodian of the copyright. I offered it as a free license on Wikipedia commons. Therefore, there is no need to delete it. Ndandulalibingi (talk) 21:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The relevant issue here is derivative works. Now we are making a big assumption that the map was published in Angola. According to the current Angolan copyright law, works are protected until 50 years after the death of the author. I don't think the Research and Advisory Council created the map, so I don't think they can claim copyright. If you can demonstrate the identity of the author and assuming they died on or before 31 December 1945, that should make the map public domain in both Angola and the USA, which is a requirement of Commons. Alternatively if the map was published under Portuguese law, the same strictures apply because Portugal only recently moved from a formula of death_of_author+50_years to +70_years. Green Giant (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this image (www.hefeiditie.com) is accused of pretending it self as the official website of Hefei Metro and creating fake logo of Hefei Metro, and the official logo has not been published yet. Therefore this logo is not the genuine Hefei Metro logo. See [3] (in Chinese) for details. Siyuwj (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hefei Metro just started appealing for its logo yesterday, see [4], so this logo cannot be official. Siyuwj (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nima Farid: Comment, please! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 03:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]