Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong, the word "front side." Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 06:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files of User:Jcpag2012
[edit]User:Jcpag2012 seems to be a prolific uploader of copyrighted astronomical images. Many of the images are taken from the "Astronomy Picture of the Day" [APOD] pages on the NASA site, but are not NASA-created images but have been created by various individuals, in which case Jcpag2012 has released the image into the public domain on behalf of the copyright holder! I have been through his most recent 50 uploads, and listed below some obvious copyright violations, but someone experienced in astronomical images needs to review all of this user's uploads, as I am certain that many more of his uploads are copyright violations. BabelStone (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Thad K. V'Soske" but source specifies "©2001 Thad K. V'Soske"
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Norman Appleton" but source specifies "©2000 Norman Appleton"
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Tom Bailey" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Paulo Raymundo" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Fred Espenak" but source specifies "©2001 F. Espenak".
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, A. Dimai" but source is APOD so this is highly unlikely.
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, David A. Hardy" but source specifies "All art is ©David A. Hardy/AstroArt, and may not be used without written permission".
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Joe Tucciarone" but the source specifies "All of Joe Tucciarone's space and dinosaur illustrations are protected by copyright; none of them are in the public domain".
- License for these three specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Mark A. Garlick" but the source specifies "Any usage of my work for which I did not grant permission, even if it's a personal site, is an infringement of my copyright and is therefore against the law".
- File:Artist impression of Mu Arae e.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Tau Ceti e.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Tau Ceti f.jpg
- File:Artist impression of HD 40307 b.jpg
- File:Artist impression of HD 40307 g.jpg
- No sources are given for these artist's impressions, but uploader specifies that they are his own work. This is extremely unlikely, and given his history it is safe to assume they have been lifted from some random site on the internet.
- Licensed under PD NASA but source specifies "Copyright 2008 Calvin J. Hamilton".
- Licensed under PD NASA but source specifies "Copyright 2008 Calvin J. Hamilton".
- File:Comet Shoemaker-Levy and Jupiter.jpg
- File:Artist impression of Voyager 2 at Uranus.jpg
- File:Artwork of Voyager 2 Encounter with Uranus.jpg
- File:Artwork of the Solar System.jpg
- File:Big Bang Artwork.jpg
- File:Artwork of Solar Prominence.jpg
- File:Artwork of First Comet Impacts on Jupiter in 1994.jpg
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Julian Baum" but source does not suggest that it is PD
- License specifies "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Lynette Cook" but source specifies "Copyright © 1998-2015 Lynette R. Cook".
- "own work" -- implausible
- "own work" -- implausible
Deleted: Per nomination. Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files of User:Jcpag2012
[edit]- File:Kepler-61 b.jpg
- File:HD 40307 g.jpg
- File:Gliese 777 c.jpg
- File:Kepler-11f.jpg
- File:Kepler-20c.jpg
- File:Kepler-40 b.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Jcpag2012. I believe they should be deleted because this is crap. Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 06:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Problème de copyright du photographe Medishh (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: ticket:2015042210024817 - we speedy delete files like this from time to time anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Problème de copyright du photographe Medishh (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: ticket:2015042210024817 - we speedy delete files like this from time to time anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Problème de copyright du photographe Medishh (talk) 20:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: ticket:2015042210024817 - we speedy delete files like this from time to time anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
It appears that this piece is NOT an original work by the artist (J.L. Forain), but a print; it could be an enhanced lithography, but by now there is no evidence that it is an original one by Forain (and not a later print, even possibly a recent one). To avoid mistakes or misunderstandings, it is preferable to cancel this file. If it appears later that the basis is an original lithography by Forain (and it's probably not the case), the file will be uploaded again. J'aimelart (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Advertising/self-promotion per Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism.2Fattack. Dontreader (talk) 00:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be the poster for a movie: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lora-di-religione-il-sorriso-di-mia-madre-the-religion-hour-my-mothers-smile/ It cannot be used without permission from the owner of the image. Dontreader (talk) 00:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The image is here: https://www.facebook.com/175519945857537/photos/a.434824266593769.1073741826.175519945857537/576265995782928/?type=1&theater There is no certainty that this picture has been released under a free license. Proof is needed using COM:CONSENT. Dontreader (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Looks to be an official product photo, not a user-authored image. Numerous sites have the identical image or one that was obviously created with the same blank. [1] is the same photo, just a different screen, and is dated the day before this one was uploaded. I B (talk) 05:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Looks to be an official product photo, not a user-authored image. See http://zoom.cnews.ru/goods_card/test/217144/olt-on-tab-1012l about 2/3 of the way down. B (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Uncertain educational value or meaning. Image of text from a website, apparently a data-dump of some physical constants (or calculations of them, or uses of them). But it's unused. If wanted to discuss the math or values, could just write them directly in text; if wanted to verify the value from the website whose watermark is here, could just cite it. DMacks (talk) 07:34, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Website gorillagrow.org = Harmony World Wide shows some numbers games not worth mentioning. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Info Google searches: "plancks constant" OR "planck's constant": ~520000 hits, "seekins constant" OR "seekins' constant": 0 hits. @Chris: Don't take it amiss, your theory won't survive you. You'd better leave it at your website. --Achim (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Uncertain provenance. Looks like a scan from a textbook? Uploader declined to respond to my request for more source details (on his talkpage). Identified as "most recent" and "electron orientation" but this thing is so confusingly organized I can't figure out what it's supposed to represent or map it to standard representations of electron shell or elemental organization. Unused in any article space. DMacks (talk) 07:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Taken from a website (per watermark in lower-left) but claimed as own-work. Uploader did not respond to my request for clarification of the provenance (on his talkpage). DMacks (talk) 07:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Delete to dev nul. --Achim (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chanh tin123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional material
- File:SHEICO NUOC THAI.png
- File:RENDER ECLAT.png
- File:BO XU LY NUOC THAI 18 MET KHOI NGAY.png
- File:ECLAT GD 02 PNG.png
- File:ECLAT GD 01 PNG.png
- File:ECLAT GD 01 NUOC CAP PNG.png
- File:BAOSTEEL NUOC THAI.png
- File:BAOSTEEL NUOC CAP.png
Motopark (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete --Achim (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chanh tin123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos and logos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:LOGO NCTMECHANICAL.jpg
- File:LOGO DANG LEN MANG.jpg
- File:LIÊN HOAN CUỐI BUỔI HỌC THỰC HÀNH PHAY.JPG
- File:SINH VIÊN CƠ KHÍ.JPG
- File:HỌC NHÓM INVENTOR.jpg
- File:CA NHAN.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:31, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Test image. This file should be deleted and upload-protected. The single usage of this file is also a test. This, that and the other (talk) 09:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused, undescribed photo. Possibly personal or promotional, judging by user name. This, that and the other (talk) 09:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unidentified people receiving an unidentified award. Description (in Persian) translates to "National Student Film Festival premiere of Electrical Engineering". This, that and the other (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo This, that and the other (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of no value, possibly a copyvio. This, that and the other (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Not own work - appears to be taken from a game called goat simulator! https://www.twitch.tv/directory/game/Goat%20Simulator Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused image. Subject's consent for posting of image not clear HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 20:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Gbawden (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software; unused; out of scope This, that and the other (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company This, that and the other (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Advertising This, that and the other (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unexplained animated GIF of an electrical circuit. This, that and the other (talk) 09:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Likely out of scope, horribly low resolution, may be copied from the Web (shadow) This, that and the other (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
non cadré flou aucun interet Kagaoua (talk) 10:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination: out of scope und not educational. De728631 (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal photo, out of scope. Buxtehude (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Buxtehude (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Uploader is not author, copyright problem. Les Meloures (talk) 11:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Questionable 'own work'. Buxtehude (talk) 11:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Test photo, no description. Buxtehude (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Blurry icon, no meaningful description. Buxtehude (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No description, possible copyvio. Buxtehude (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 11:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Buxtehude (talk) 11:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation (http://www.football.fr/football/joueurs/5/stephane-dumont-2645.html) Supporterhéninois (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Ce fichier n'est pas la photo de Robert Durand mais Bernard Laroche personne décédé dans une affaire de meutre en France dans les années 80 Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
http://www.13emerue.fr/dossier/bernard-laroche-coupable
- Delete more importantly, it's also a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I do not believe own work. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright AFP. And the subject is not Robert Durand, but Bernard Laroche. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per Thibaut120094, for the two same reasons. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:42, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 05:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work, no permission. Sealle (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
La imagen está sacada de aquí: http://www.congreso.es/portal/page/portal/Congreso/Congreso/Diputados/BusqForm?_piref73_1333155_73_1333154_1333154.next_page=/wc/fichaDiputado?idDiputado=89&idLegislatura=1 Tuareg50 (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete The link is a dynamic one, but a Google search shows it as first option. --Discasto talk 23:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Coordinates in article should be better solution. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot which included Microsoft icons. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope.(w:Carl Ludwig Sherburne) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko ( talk) 14:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. (w:Carl Ludwig Sherburne) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope (no context for who this guy is). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. (en:H singh) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Image also found here at the same resolution: http://vk.com/tiestofanclub Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Milvik1978 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Véase el alcance del proyecto.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
대한민국 소방본부에서 이것을 자유 라이선스로 배포했는지가 불명확합니다. 콩가루 (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: needs permission Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I deleted the uploader's all other contributions speedily, because they were found in the net and. This is the last contribution. Beautiful, but small file without metadata. Maybe this is also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: possible copyvio Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Personal photo used only in deleted Facebook-style page en:User:Hardik Titiya JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Judithjoni (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal photos used only in deleted autobio pages such as en:Judithjoni
JohnCD (talk) 18:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This is an unused personal photo with little foreseeable educational uses per COM:EDUSE. We have plenty of photos of bosoms, so it isn't filling a niche somewhere. FredWalsh (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
no offense please, but looks like a 'studio shot' as imho other media uplooded, missing exif etc, that's why imho do disucss within a DR, Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
as per File:Mallesh Balast in Amaravathi Telugu Movie.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Selfie used in deleted promotional pages en:Ahtsham Khan Qazi and en:User:Qazi Ahtsham. JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Identity photo, highly unlikely to be user's own work, see crest lower right corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Han-Jun Cho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal text files, and photo of certificates, awards and diplomas, out of COM:SCOPE for lack of educational purpose. Commons isn't a gallery of personal documents.
- File:Lost list.jpg
- File:20020506글라이더.jpg
- File:20001204컴퓨터타자급수증.jpg
- File:20000529타자장려.jpg
- File:19991108타자경시대회.jpg
- File:19980427고무동력기대회.jpg
- File:19951016그림경시대회.jpg
- File:수료증05.jpg
- File:수료증04.jpg
- File:수료증03.jpg
- File:수료증02.jpg
- File:수료증01.jpg
- File:수료증00.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a 13-year-old, used in deleted article en:Faizan Ali Laghari and other pages which have been suppressed JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete en:Faizan Ali Laghari has already been deleted twice. --Achim (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license since 18.4. JuTa 08:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This image of currency is not user's own work, as the currencty was drawn by whatever country produced the money. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: http://pcscn.free.fr/Le_Choeur_dHommes_de_Paris/Le_Chef.html Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ivanovichh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons isn't a personal photographic album, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Ivan Luis Jimenez (Ivanovich).jpg
- File:Ivan Luis Jimenez en la acción.jpg
- File:Iván Luis Jiménez.jpg
- File:Ivanovih en la acción.jpg
- File:IvanovicHacker Luis.jpg
- File:IvanovicHacker.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Text only document, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackfamilyrecords (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images are out of the scope of Commons. These images are all unused, and more suitable for Facebook or something.
- File:Bladimir Vásquez Baloncesto.jpg
- File:Bladimir Vásquez Inicios.jpg
- File:Bladimir Vásquez 2014.jpg
- File:Los Kamikazes.jpg
- File:Sonatic Music.jpg
- File:Bladimir Vásquez.jpg
- File:Lady Petya.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackfamilyrecords (talk · contribs)
[edit]non-notable individual, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The photo violates sculptor's copyright.
В Украине нет свободы панорамы и эта фотография нарушает авторские права скульптора. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not social media. This group of four uploads of same person are more suitable for Facebook, or something, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Esta fotografia pertenece al primer trabajo de Benitez.jpg
- File:Esta fotografia tambien fue tomada en su segundo trabajo.jpg
- File:Esta Fotografia Pertenece al segundo trabajo de ella.jpg
- File:Delfina Benitez.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Veronicamojica (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO, no indication of user's own work on this series of promotional or self-promotional uploads without metadata, additionally one of the images is some form of advertisement.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
NSFW::> COM:PENIS, COM:PENIS, COM:ANUS and COM:ANUS.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This image looks like a rephotograph from a half-toned original, not own work. Found as an instagram user icon, but smaller and OLDER. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this oddly titled and described file, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work in this composite image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work Discasto talk 21:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The newspaper is big enough that de minimis does not apply here Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
License is CC-BY-NC-DN Discasto talk 21:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:15, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of permission or compatible license Discasto talk 21:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
License in the site is Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Discasto talk 21:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work in this fuzzy identification photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 21:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This is not the Spanish inquisition and I don care a rat's ass about the subject matter, but this is a potential copvio because the work has been published on Tumblr before with the credit to one 'Nude Beach Voyeur' http://teen-beach-voyeur.tumblr.com/post/114918417958/more-nudism-pics Hnapel (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto. (es:Usuario:Sgleis, File:Sueños Encantados.jpg) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
While 'prior art' is a designation most effective in squashing bogus patent applications, in this case I like to refer to http://nubebeachlover.tumblr.com/image/114221851822 and mark this a potential copvio Hnapel (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Véase el alcance del proyecto. (es:Usuario:Sueños Encantados, File:Sgleis.jpg) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Website http://bushwickdaily.com/2012/12/working-hard-can-make-you-sexier-angela-washko/ says: 'all photos by courtesy of Angela' so a potential copvio Hnapel (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio Antero de Quintal (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Taivo Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Web d media (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, apparently only used for self-advertising
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No interest. Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
A series of paintings by Lincoln Townley, with no apparent connection to uploader - as contemporary art by living artist, they're all COM:COPYVIOs without OTRS.
- File:National 4.JPG
- File:Charlie Sheen portrait by Lincoln Townley.jpg
- File:National Gallery Exhibition, March '15.jpg
- File:Mickey Rourke by Lincoln Townley.jpg
- File:National Gallery Exhibition in March 2015.jpg
- File:National Gallery Exhibition - March 2015.jpg
- File:National Gallery Exhibition.jpg
- File:Lincoln Townley and Harry Dean Stanton in LA.jpg
- File:Lincoln Townley and Mickey Rourke in LA.JPG
- File:Lincoln Townley with Charlie Sheen & portrait.jpg
- File:Framers Gallery 4, Fitzrovia.jpg
- File:Framers Gallery 1, Fitzrovia.JPG
- File:Framers Gallery 3, Fitzrovia.JPG
- File:Framers Gallery 2, Fitzrovia.JPG
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
All are clearly artworks, therefore cannot be accepted without OTRS clearance.
Deleted as copyvio, DW:
- File:Marriott - Lincoln Townley & Bertrand Dijoux with Jack Nicholson portrait.jpg
- File:Marriott 4.JPG
- File:Marriott 3.JPG
- File:Marriott 2.JPG
- File:Marriott 1.JPG
- File:Harry Dean Stanton by Lincoln Townley.jpg
- File:Nick Nolte by Lincoln Townley.jpg
- File:Robert Downey Jnr by LT.jpg
- File:Lincoln Townley Portrait.png
Kept, OTRS from author, artwork DM:
--Mdann52talk to me! 11:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is OTRS-permission for the last two pictures (but from the photographer I understood). Does this OTRS-permission extend to the others? The File:Lincoln Townley Official.png could be considered de minimis. Basvb (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / kept as stated above. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this 1953 groupshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sumesh1994 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User's other uploads were copied from a variety of websites, delete these as well under COM:PRP.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
pas de licence Ettalkus65 (talk) 01:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hisarchive (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, dubious license, no permission.
- File:Здание 1968г.jpg
- File:Здание 1934-1965 гг.jpg
- File:Пермская ученая архивная комиссия.jpg
- File:Пристрой к зданию архива Пермского края.jpg
Sealle (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license, but thats unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 18:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
写真のファイル名が誤っていたため Waka77 (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: ファイル名は変更が可能なため、正当な削除理由とは認められません。 Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, low resolution image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, low resolution image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Re
[edit]
Image of Evelyn Morataya Portillo, first lady of Guatemala,Screenshot of this user, the former first lady of Guatemala in the inauguration of Alfonso Portillo Cabrera, on January 14, 2000. Because there is no official recording by the Government of Guatemala , as in other governments , the image does not have good resolution. --GuatExp (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, low resolution image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
With unknown author and no source, it's unlikely this license is correct, and more likely a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
This photograph is tagged with a statement that it's not considered to be a photographic work, however at source, the image is labeled " Fotograf: Steen Jacobsen"... Therefore it is a photograph and copyright by Steen Jacobsen. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos of some kind. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:العلامة الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 3.JPG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 2.JPG
- File:شيخ محمد خلفي.jpg
- File:العلامة المختار بن الشيخ.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش 2.jpg
- File:الشيخ عبد الرحمان بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد الصديق بن الطيب حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ القريشي مدني.jpg
- File:الإمام الشهيد عبد الحميد حمادوش.jpg
- File:الشيخ محمد صالح حمر العين.jpg
- File:رسالة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني الى شيوخ زاوية قجال.JPG
- File:الشيخ محمد العربي التباني.jpg
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي وقفية لعائلة حمادوش.JPG
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد قجال الجديد.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش قجال.png
- File:وثيقة تحدد أراضي حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:زاوية بن حمادوش ڤجال.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)2.jpg
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود (رضي الله عنه)1.jpg
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images with no EXIF data, not own work, some are derivatives with no informations about permissions
- File:مقام سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:Guidjel.19DZ.png
- File:Guidjel.19ALG.png
- File:ضريح سيدي مسعود الحسني.jpg
- File:العلامة الشيخ محمد العربي التباني ،رضي الله عنه.jpg
- File:Daïra de Guidjel 19 DZ.PNG
- File:Daïra de Guidjel.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لزاوية قجال -202.jpg
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري بنطيوس , طولقة , بسكرة , الجزائر.jpg
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي.PNG
- File:حمام أولاد يلس , مزلوق , عين آرنات , سطيف , الجزائر.PNG
- File:وثيقة تخص عائلة حمادوش وزاوية قجال 4.JPG
- File:36.092230°N 5.487371°E بلدية ڤجال - احداثيات.PNG
- File:DZ - 19 - Guidjel - Guidjel - بلدية ڤجال - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف - الجزائر.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjel - دائرة ڤجال - ولاية سطيف.jpg
- File:Dz - 19 - Guidjelدائرة ڤجال.png
- File:ضريح الشيخ عبد الرحمن الأخضري.PNG
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]probably also not own work
- File:الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي (19).jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien3.PNG
- File:كتيبة الشهداء (الملعب الإفريقي السطايفي) سطيف.PNG
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف 19.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 23.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 22.PNG
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien 2.jpg
- File:Stade Africain Sétifien.jpg
- File:الوثيقة 4 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 3 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 2 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:الوثيقة 1 جامع قجال.JPG
- File:Httpswww.google.commapssearch-D8-B2-D8-A7-D9-88-D9-8A-D8-A9+-D8-A8-D9-86+-D8-AD-D9-85-D8-A7-D8-AF-D9-88-D8-B4-E2-80-AD@36.0922225,5.4859385,17zdata=!3m1!4b1.jpg
- File:شعار قجال.jpg
- File:قجال.jpg
- File:مسجد زاوية قجال القديم.jpg
- File:سطيف.png
- File:ڤجال ,سطيف ,الجزائر.png
- File:ڤجال 3.PNG
- File:ڤجال 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%B3%D8%B7%D9%8A%D9%81.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, per nom. Green Giant (talk) 23:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed19dz (talk · contribs)
[edit]False authorship claims by serial copyright violator and sockpuppeteer. Non-free sports logos and low-resolution photos grabbed from the Internet.
- File:الشعار الحالي لإتحاد سطيف.jpg
- File:صورة لفريق اتحاد سطيف في نهائي ، كأس الجزائر 2005.jpg – http://usms-setif-1933.blogspot.com/2013/05/usmsetif.html
- File:الملعب الإفريقي سطيف.jpg
- File:تشكيلة الوفاق السطايفي2.jpg – http://sport.echoroukonline.com/articles/22947.html
- File:الشعار الرسمي الحالي لنادي وفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار السابق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:الشعار الأسبق لوفاق سطيف.jpg
- File:USMS.gif
- File:S,A,Setif.PNG
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Per Nomination: Files deleted, account blocked. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Logo G7-Brussels.jpg Onghai1929 (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 23:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Photographic artwork or installation art, not covered by the (mysterious) 1994 transitional law of Sweden (version before my edits to the template). FDMS 4 15:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's not installation art, just documentation of an iron work. I cannot detect any distinctive originality, which constitutes works of art. Årvasbåo (talk) 19:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I disagree – if it was created to serve documentation purposes, wouldn't there be a different focus, better lighting and also a series of photographs of the other steps? Also, I don't think steel mills hire well-known artists to document their workflow. FDMS 4 19:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- The image was published in Svenska turistföreningens årsbok (Year Book of the Swedish Tourist Association), which documents various things and places in Sweden. The steel mill was only one of the many topics they chose to cover. The image suited their purpose – to document Sweden in 1967 – the way it was done. The photographer was hired by the year book, not by the steel mill. --Årvasbåo (talk) 12:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- I disagree – if it was created to serve documentation purposes, wouldn't there be a different focus, better lighting and also a series of photographs of the other steps? Also, I don't think steel mills hire well-known artists to document their workflow. FDMS 4 19:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn – thanks for your explanation (and sorry for overlooking it). FDMS 4 20:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
These images depict a public map in Hong Kong. FOP in Hong Kong does not cover maps and diagrams (see description at {{FoP-Hong Kong}}).
- File:HK Central Chater Garden Trees Mp a.jpg
- File:HKU Campus James Hsioung Lee Science Building floors usage sign.JPG
- File:HKU campus 香港大學 map directory 001 March-2012 Ip4.jpg
- File:HKU campus 香港大學 map directory 002 March-2012 Ip4.jpg
- File:HKU Stephen Hui Museum 3 許士芬地質博物館 Map n Floors.JPG
- File:HKU 香港大學 map with building name March-2012 Ip4.jpg
Wylve (talk) 00:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 18:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Not work of uploader VH-OJA (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- This logo is a my own work. Please, go to the official web page of Midnight Hawks and watch the logo.--Maxperot (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per reaction Basvb (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Article has been deleted Mercur (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I do not see the "article has been deleted" as a valid reason for deletion. Basvb (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 08:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
it is a duplication Julierosalind (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as duplicate Basvb (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Contradictory source, authorship and copyright claims. "Own work" (created in 1904), but grabbed from a website? "I, the copyright holder" publish it under a copyright license, but "this work is in the public domain"? None of this makes any sense. To determine whether there's an appropriate PD rationale, we need accurate information on who created the photo, and when and where it was first published. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Is already deleted by someone. Basvb (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Cover art/packaging. Buxtehude (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo at the left is part of an advertisement board, for which the Flickr-user is very unlikely to hold the copyright. Green Giant (talk) 11:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep I can appreciate the argument, it's not wrong, but I'll suggest that less than half of the advertisement board shows, there is no reasonable injury to the copyright owner there, and there is something haunting about the juxtaposition. --Abd (talk) 02:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- It isn't a question of reasonable injury; even though it is half of an advertisement, it is still part of a copyright-protected work. Clearly the Flickr-user didn't create the advertisement, so he has no business publishing it under his own license. I agree it is haunting but without a license from the actual copyright holder it has to be deleted. Before nominating, I cropped out the face on my computer but then it is just a slightly blurry photo of a car with little possibility of educational use. Green Giant (talk) 07:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The poster should be cropped of, then the question is how this file is in scope. Basvb (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of printed matter. Permission needs to obtained from original copyright holder. Wcam (talk) 12:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination (see old version of file) Basvb (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nina Pandolfo
[edit]This is a derived work of the depicted mural which was created by the Brazilian artist Nina Pandolfo. This is not covered by freedom of panorama, see COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Hence, we would need a permission through OTRS to keep this image.
- File:Kelburn Castle Ayrshire.jpg
- File:Kelburn Castle.jpg
- File:KelburnCastle.jpg
- File:KelburnCastle01.jpg
- File:KelburnGraffit3.jpg
- File:KelburnGraffiti.jpg
- File:KelburnGraffiti2.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- a) Zumindest dieses Bild zeigt das gesamte Castle und hebt nicht auf das Wandbild ab. Damit müsste es nach dem Hinweis If the mural is truly a "de minimis" element of the photo then the photo will not function as a depiction of the mural and should not be categorized here. Copyright violations should be deleted. zu behalten sein.
- b) Verstehe ich an der ganzen Sache nicht, wieseo Unmengen weiterer Mural-Bilder in der entsprechenden United-Kingdom-Category behalten werden können, wie beispielsweise dieses Bild, das (US-amerikanisch) lizenziert ist (??). --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- C) Greift bei brasilianischen Künstlern nicht möglicherweise das brasilianische Urheberrecht? (Ich kenne mich in dem Bereich leider nicht aus). --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Normalerweise ist das Land relevant, in dem ein Bild veröffentlicht wird (Schutzlandprinzip). Auf Commons halten wir uns aber bei der Panoramafreiheit an das Land, in dem das jeweilige Objekt steht, siehe COM:FOP. Das brasilianische Urheberrecht würde also nur bei einer Veröffentlichung in Brasilien greifen. Dass andere Problemfälle auf Commons existieren, ändert nichts an diesem Fall hier. Es werden auch jeden Tag solche Verletzungen hier routinemäßig gelöscht. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Was ist mit dem Punkt a)? --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Das ist schwierig bzw. grenzwertig. Leider bin ich nicht vertraut mit der Rechtsprechung zu COM:DM#United Kingdom. Ich bitte mal User:MichaelMaggs um einen Kommentar. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Was ist mit dem Punkt a)? --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 04:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Normalerweise ist das Land relevant, in dem ein Bild veröffentlicht wird (Schutzlandprinzip). Auf Commons halten wir uns aber bei der Panoramafreiheit an das Land, in dem das jeweilige Objekt steht, siehe COM:FOP. Das brasilianische Urheberrecht würde also nur bei einer Veröffentlichung in Brasilien greifen. Dass andere Problemfälle auf Commons existieren, ändert nichts an diesem Fall hier. Es werden auch jeden Tag solche Verletzungen hier routinemäßig gelöscht. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
@MichaelMaggs: Could you please comment whether COM:DM#United Kingdom could be applied in case of File:KelburnCastle01.jpg or not? Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I do not think that any of these images can be kept without permission from the artist via OTRS. Freedom of panorama in the UK does not extend to paintings or murals, and the artwork in none of the images is de minimis in the context of the entire image. The fact that File:KelburnCastle01.jpg shows the whole castle does not make the inclusion of the artwork de minimis; nor does it help that it would be impossible to show the whole of the castle without including a substantial part of the artwork. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Isn't it copyrighted art? Taivo (talk) 16:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for sculpture. I'm afraid, that the photo violates sculptor's copyright. OTRS-permission from sculptor is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I do not think, that this is textlogo. Probably surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Published here (with another, larger version) and deletion requested in ticket:2015041910012078. Per other RFDs, uploader lacks a basic understanding of copyright. FDMS 4 18:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. Uploader added a PD-because later, but it seems not clear why this image is in the public domain. JuTa 18:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Better reasoning on why this is in PD should be given Basvb (talk) 15:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Uğurkent as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but thats unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 18:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 15:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution and missing/inconsistent metadata.
- File:2851 N714 webview.jpg – photo by Kevin G Reeves according to the file's metadata, so we would need e-mail confirmation from an @kevinreevesphotographer.com address to show that IArici18 is indeed Kevin G Reeves
- File:Seidman.Cancer.Center.jpg – low-resolution duplicate of the above file
- File:Henry J Carter.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. Basvb (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MrX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Claim of public domain unsupported by age of image. However, it might fit under {{PD-Afghanistan}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: might be ok is not good enough, publication date will be needed here. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Esta foto está escaneada de una revista/diario. Claramente no es un trabajo propio y no se indica fuentes donde haya sido publicada hace más de 25 años Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work of original unlikely. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Nirjal sign.png Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, low resolution image. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Image of Hellen Lossi, First Lady of Guatemala, This image is a screenshot of a report in which the Kings of Spain visited Guatemala during the government of Kjell García. Because the government of Guatemala and news of that time did not have good resolution and definition , the image is small.--GuatExp (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Thus it is not "own work" Basvb (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitormanuelvieirafernandes (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on any of these black and white, sepia toned, or color images all marked with "CC-by-SA" licenses.
- File:Bernardino António de Barros Gomes.jpg
- File:Ministro barros e sa.png
- File:Bernardino António Gomes médico da Real Câmara.png
- File:Doutor Bernardino António Gomes.png
- File:Brasão da Família Graça.png
- File:Barros e Sá assinatura.png
- File:Vitor Manuel Vieira Fernandes oasrn5714 arquiteto.jpg
- File:Rafael José da Cunha (1792-1869).png
- File:Henrique de Barros Gomes 1879.png
- File:Amadeu Teles da Silva de Afonseca Mesquita de Castro Pereira e Sola - 2º conde de Castro e Solla.jpg
- File:Conselheiro Henrique de Barros Gomes 1897.jpg
- File:Henrique de Barros Gomes 1886.jpg
- File:Castro e Solla condes.jpg
- File:Antonio jose de barros e sa.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Own work does not seem to be the case. You have to provide the source where you got the image from, who is the author (or whether the author is unknown) and a date of publication for those to be Public domain. Basvb (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Can it be watched from outside? If it isn't, it is not covered by Freedom of Panorama Discasto talk 21:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: It's a painting which can be removed, thus not permanent in the open space, also on private space bit like watching through a window. Might be an edge case. Basvb (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dman41689 as no permission. But I cant fin an external source to doubt own work a claimed. JuTa 21:21, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Unclear reasons for nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg){kind=link}
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Dman41689 as no permission. But I cant fin an external source to doubt own work as claimed. JuTa 21:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg){kind=link}
This is complete nonsense: I am the author of the work, I have uploaded it and placed it into PD. Is Dman41689 a Wikitroll or what has lead him/her to this ridiculous claim? (Thanks to JuTa for alerting me to this.) --Iakub (talk) 01:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Unclear reasons for nomination. Basvb (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Legacy_of_Joseph_Wagenbach_01b-Archivist.jpg){kind=link}
Image from https://hi-tech.mail.ru/review/windows_10_beta_preview.html - there is "(c) hi-tech.mail.ru" mark on the image. Policy of the site https://hi-tech.mail.ru/policy/ says that it should be CC-BY-SA 3, but there are copyrighted icons/interface elements on the photo. A5b (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Совсем наоборот: файлы, не помеченные как "hi-tech.mail.ru" (к примеру, это третье изображение на указанной странице с изображением семейства виндовс), являются несвободными. Согласно условиям, несвободными являются файлы, где "указано имя автора или правообладателя, иное, нежели hi-tech.mail.ru" (в данном случае всё наоборот), более того, свободны "все материалы сайта Hi-Tech.Mail.Ru (...), авторские права на которые принадлежат Интернет-холдингу Mail.Ru". Копирайт я с изображения удалил. --Alpunin (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Спасибо, я увидел https://hi-tech.mail.ru/policy. Вопрос в иконках (и в фоновом изображении) - screenshot-ы удаляют даже за малые фрагменты. `A5b (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Данное изображение не скриншот, а сама ОС не является основным объектом фото. --Alpunin (talk) 06:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Спасибо, я увидел https://hi-tech.mail.ru/policy. Вопрос в иконках (и в фоновом изображении) - screenshot-ы удаляют даже за малые фрагменты. `A5b (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Captura de pantalla de software privativo. De minimis no aplica, ya que el foco de la imagen es el sistema operativo. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- На самом деле на викискладе есть и более детальное изображение ОС, к примеру раз, два, три. --Alpunin (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Aquí estamos discutiendo sobre la pertinencia de esta imagen y no de otra. Y esta imagen no pareciera ser pertinente para Commons. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- На самом деле на викискладе есть и более детальное изображение ОС, к примеру раз, два, три. --Alpunin (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Derivative Basvb (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Sostituita da una versione svg (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 34.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Friedrichstrasse (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Sostituita da una versione svg (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 434.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Friedrichstrasse (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fylgia Fock (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these is properly licensed, and many are copyright violations.
- File:Coleen G.jpg
- File:Friedrich Waismann.jpg
- File:ISH april 1950.jpg
- File:Sveriges landslag 1950.jpg
- File:Alma Söderhjelm 1942.jpg
- File:DIF 1955.jpg
- File:Narvavägen 8 Stockholm.jpg
- File:Strandvägen 7 1962.jpg
- File:Birger Stenman DIF.jpg
- File:Sveriges Landslag 1949.jpg
- File:Hans Reichenbach.jpg
- File:Henry Maurice Sheffer.jpg
- File:E Zylinski.jpg
- File:Coleen Gray 1944.jpg
- File:Lizabeth Scott 1944.jpg
- File:C Gray 1944.jpg
- File:Lyubov Kozyreva 1956.jpg
- File:Flickan från Backafall.jpg
- File:Viola Sundberg Stockholm.jpg
- File:Ombyte av tåg..jpg
- File:Halmstads BK 1955.jpg
- File:Carl-Erik Sandberg MFF.jpg
- File:Åke Larsson MFF 1954.jpg
- File:AIK Stockholm 1950.jpg
- File:Malmö FF 1944.jpg
- File:Åke Hansson Malmö FF.jpg
- File:Malmö FF 1953.jpg
- File:MFF 1951.jpg
- File:Alonzo Church Princeton.jpg
- File:Strandvägen 7 1914.jpg
- File:Ingegärd Fredin 1945.jpg
- File:I Fredin och M Lundquist.JPG
- File:Fredin och Lundquist.JPG
- File:Ingegärd Fredin SK Neptun.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Could you please give some more explanations for non-license-issue-experts? Looking e.g. at the Reichenbach and at the Waismann page, I see a license tag on each of them - what's wrong with them? Thanks in advance! - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Jochen Burghardt: given the wide variety of sources for the images, I find it doubtful that the creators all agreed to the various CC licenses. Some of the images are probably public domain due to expiration, but they are not CC. Other images are probably not public domain, and as such shouldn't be kept here without following the OTRS process. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'd be particularly interested to save the mathematician portraits. In order to check which are PD due to expiration, here are the portraits of persons that already have died: File:Friedrich Waismann.jpg (died 1959), File:Alma Söderhjelm 1942.jpg (1949), File:Hans Reichenbach.jpg (1953), File:Henry Maurice Sheffer.jpg (1964), File:E Zylinski.jpg (1954), File:Lizabeth Scott 1944.jpg (2015), File:Alonzo Church Princeton.jpg (1995). I guess, except for the two actresses, the photographers are unknown; however it is difficult to find out when no source url is given. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Copies of some of the questioned images have recently been uploaded with new file-names by Special:Contributions/Marica_Löwenhjelm and Special:Contributions/Vera_Cardinale--I99pema (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete all of them. This is another sockpuppet of User:PeggyCummins. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Claudia_Day. The user registers new accounts from time to time named after famous actresses and uploads either copyvios or images with expired copyrights with false cc tags. User is not trustworthy. /grillo (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment from a CU: Fylgia Fock, Vera Cardinale and Marica Löwenhjelm are all 
Confirmed socks of PeggyCummins. Trijnsteltalk 12:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- BTW, note that not all uploads of Fylgia Fock are nominated for deletion, for example File:UB Eklund I Fredin.jpg is not nominated while it probably should. It might also be wise to check the uploads of the other accounts mentioned, both the confirmed socks and other older accounts. Trijnsteltalk 12:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 木の枝 as duplicate (Dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Bundeswehrfahrzeuge (23.06.2012 122238).jpg
But theire ratios are sligtly diffrent so an expert should once chekc that file. Sanandros (talk) 08:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep but delete File:Bundeswehrfahrzeuge (23.06.2012 122238).jpg instead which has a lower resolution. De728631 (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- The lighting in both files is slightly different, but the nomination one seems to have the better lighting. Basvb (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Comment I put also the DR tag on the other file, so the people are informed.--Sanandros (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept, and the other is deleted. Taivo (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
The stated author is not the uploader. There is no evidence of permission. The image has a black border on the right, so was probably cropped from somewhere. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
The author has asked me to post the file on his behalf as I am responsible for the management of his websites and social media pages. This image was taken by Daniel Catt who is a colleague and this image has been used in a number of public documents and press releasaes. I have gone through the appropriate steps on wikimedia commons and have done so with while in contact via phone with Mark Angelo himself. If additional information is required, please provide direction vs a deletion request. --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Danny Catt, the owner of this image has sent an email with his permission. I can forward the email to whomever would like to see it. If further evidence is required, please advise.
Hi Mark / Laurie, I most certainly agree. Any photo of mine that you need Mark … you are welcome to use! Thanks again for coming in and sharing your time with the students. It was fabulous! Hope to see you soon. Cheers Danny --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please send permission to the OTRS team. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file is restored. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
The stated author is not the uploader. There is no evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
This image was posted with full permission and while in contact via phone with the author of the image, Mark Angelo. I am responsible for Mark's wikimedia page and both monitor and regularly update the page on his request. Please provide instructions or questions for me on permissions for this image vs a request for deletion. Mark or myself are happy to provide the required documentation. If this is an issue, than I request that the more instructions be given during the upload of images. It seems that it is supported to upload images that do not belong to you as there is an option given to do so. Clearly, there are individuals who have their images here but may not be able to upload them on their own or be comfortable doing so. If the uploader has to be the author, then why does the option to upload another's work exist? --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Sun 19/04/2015 18:50 Hi Laurie, In terms of the 3 images now on the Britannia Creek wiki site, I am the photographer of two of them and have been given the other because it was taken of me. I hereby grant you the right to use all 3 of them. Let me know whatever Wiki needs and I’ll gladly provide. Cheers, Mark Angelo --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC) --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file is restored. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- OTRS permission now processed.--Sphilbrick (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The stated author is not the uploader. There is no evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
I have the same response to this request as to the other two posted by James Woodward for the Britannia Creek wiki. This image was posted with full permission and while in contact via phone with the author of the image, Mark Angelo. I am responsible for Mark's wikimedia page and both monitor and regularly update the page on his request. Please provide instructions or questions for me on permissions for this image vs a request for deletion. Mark or myself are happy to provide the required documentation. If this is an issue, than I request that the more instructions be given during the upload of images. It seems that it is supported to upload images that do not belong to you as there is an option given to do so. Clearly, there are individuals who have their images here but may not be able to upload them on their own or be comfortable doing so. If the uploader has to be the author, then why does the option to upload another's work exist? --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I have copied an email from Mark Angelo and I am happy to forward this to a contact at wikimedia commons if further permission is needed.
Sun 19/04/2015 18:50 Hi Laurie, In terms of the 3 images now on the Britannia Creek wiki site, I am the photographer of two of them and have been given the other because it was taken of me. I hereby grant you the right to use all 3 of them. Let me know whatever Wiki needs and I’ll gladly provide. Cheers, Mark Angelo --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file is restored. Taivo (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Update
[edit]
I have sent an email using the OTRS format suggested in your deletion file. I have copied the two copyright holders and listed their images by ownership, attached the iamges for reference and copied them on the email sent to wikipedia. Please let me know if there are any additional steps needed. --Evolve Multimedia (talk) 22:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- this picture is my own personal picture found on my own website and on social networks. I am the owner of this picture . This picture is a picture of my self.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.123.222 (talk • contribs)
- Could you confirm this using the steps at Commons:OTRS please? Basvb (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, if OTRS-permission arrives, then the file is restored. Taivo (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Please delete (I've uploaded this file by mistake). Hausratte (talk) 16:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Why not upload a new version? --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Already uploaded: 1936 edition. Hausratte (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The file is in use in two projects.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Wikisource's indexes replaced by new ones — s:la:Liber:Петрушевский Д.М. Великая хартия вольностей. 1918.pdf replaced by s:la:Liber:Петрушевский Д.М. (ред.). Памятники истории Англии XI-XIII вв. 1936.djvu and s:ru:Индекс:Петрушевский Д.М. Великая хартия вольностей. 1918.pdf replaced by s:ru:Индекс:Петрушевский Д.М. (ред.). Памятники истории Англии XI-XIII вв. 1936.djvu. Hausratte (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- The file is in use in two projects.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, not in use anymore. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
cette photos ne pourais pas contenir sufisament de droit Bachounda (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
There is no indication this was first published as stated in license. Some of user's other uploads were speedied for being culled from Life Magazine and this same source. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi!.This image was published by the magazine in March 1945 , Guatemalans who owned the magazine they scanned the images appeared where the inauguration of Dr. Juan José Arévalo Bermejo.--ElisonSeg (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, apparently the photo is still protected with copyright. The file will be restored, when its copyright in USA ends – per URAA 95 years after first publishing, in January 2036. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this poster, please see overprinting lower right corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- It's the description of the painting in Hindi. The text on the painting is, 'मुनि श्री ऋषभदेव का प्रथम आहार' which means- "Tirthankara (मुनि श्री) Rishabha's (ऋषभदेव) first 'ahara (food)' (प्रथम आहार), which is why the festival of Akshaya Tritiya is celebrated. जैन (talk) 05:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- You need to indicate who is the painter, and when he died. If it is a recent painting, a permission from the painter is necessary. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sir, these paintings are common in Jain temples. They are for informatory purposes. The painter draw them on the order of the temple authorities for money. Therefore, anyone can click photo of them & can use it freely. जैन (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The name of the painter and the date of the painting are required for copyright reasons. There are millions of paintings on display all over the world - on sidewalks, in museums, temples, restaurants and private homes - snapping a photo of one of them doesn't give the photographer copyright. Please read COM:L before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC
- But, these paintings are in public domain. The painter doesn't own the painting. He just draw them on request of temple authorities and temple authorities allow anyone to click the photo. There's no copyright thing on these paintings. जैन (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Public display or availability does not imply public domain. Even if we assume that the rights-holder (be it the artist or the temple administration) intends the work to be freely distributed, this doesn’t necessarily include the other conditions of licences that are acceptable here: allowing reuse for any purpose and in derivative works. In this case we don‘t know that the owners would allow the image to be used e.g. to illustrate a text that criticizes Hinduism, in a mash-up without instructive context, or perhaps even in the packaging of a beef product … such are the possible implications of a free licence, so we can’t take their permission to do anything like that for granted without an explicit statement.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sir, but "the making or publishing of a painting, drawing, engraving, if such work is permanently situate in a public place or any premises to which the public has access" is explicitly permitted under the Indian Copyright Act of 1957. जैन (talk) 03:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Public display or availability does not imply public domain. Even if we assume that the rights-holder (be it the artist or the temple administration) intends the work to be freely distributed, this doesn’t necessarily include the other conditions of licences that are acceptable here: allowing reuse for any purpose and in derivative works. In this case we don‘t know that the owners would allow the image to be used e.g. to illustrate a text that criticizes Hinduism, in a mash-up without instructive context, or perhaps even in the packaging of a beef product … such are the possible implications of a free licence, so we can’t take their permission to do anything like that for granted without an explicit statement.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- But, these paintings are in public domain. The painter doesn't own the painting. He just draw them on request of temple authorities and temple authorities allow anyone to click the photo. There's no copyright thing on these paintings. जैन (talk) 17:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The name of the painter and the date of the painting are required for copyright reasons. There are millions of paintings on display all over the world - on sidewalks, in museums, temples, restaurants and private homes - snapping a photo of one of them doesn't give the photographer copyright. Please read COM:L before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC
- Sir, these paintings are common in Jain temples. They are for informatory purposes. The painter draw them on the order of the temple authorities for money. Therefore, anyone can click photo of them & can use it freely. जैन (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- You need to indicate who is the painter, and when he died. If it is a recent painting, a permission from the painter is necessary. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Since you're continuing this argument on my talk page as well, let me copy here what you were told there to save time: "You quoted only half of the text. You are allowed that for a sculpture or a work of architecture, not for a painting. Regards, Yann 07:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)" It's a painting, not architecture or sculpture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Just read "Not OK for 2D (paintings, drawings, maps, pictures, engravings, etc.)". I didn't read "of sculpture". Yes, you're right. So, how can I upload these type of images? Also, most Jain temples are centuries old, so does copyright act apply on the paintings in these temples? Thank you.जैन (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- If the painting is old enough, then it is OK. If the author is known, s/he should be dead for more than 60 years. If unknown, it is OK 60 years after publication (assuming than painting on a wall constitutes publication). Regards, Yann (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- While, I think that painting is old enough. I will have to contact temple administration for right details. Thank you, जैन (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- If the painting is old enough, then it is OK. If the author is known, s/he should be dead for more than 60 years. If unknown, it is OK 60 years after publication (assuming than painting on a wall constitutes publication). Regards, Yann (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, there is freedom of panorama in India only for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional works. I believe, that the painting is not very old. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Per section 9 of the Finnish Copyright Act referred in {{PD-FinlandGov}} independent works [such as this photograph] contained in the documents are not excluded from protection. 88.196.245.83 06:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Stifle (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adelbrecht as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from Flags of the World, which has a license incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. |source=http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/be_at.html ~ Nahid Talk 08:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- @NahidSultan: Can I ask why this file doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, as you stated on the file page? I though a copyright violation was the prime reason. Have I misunderstood something? Lemmens, Tom (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Stifle (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ignatus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: incorrectly attributed, taken probably from http://acceleratingscience.com/mining/technology-focus-silicon-drift-detectors with just translating texts ~ Nahid Talk 13:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
There are more old sources http://sci.esa.int/ixo/44001-single-drift-diode-x-ray-spectrometer/ and then the picture http://www.nucleide.org/images/Solex_SSD02.gif
my picture is similar to these but not the sameSergius1983 (talk) 14:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Technical solutions are the subject of patent , not copyright. From the point of view of the right drawing consists of well-known elements of trivial. Sergius1983 (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
I once again redraw this picture soon. Sergius1983 (talk) 10:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep But ... maybe the file does not surpass threshold of originality? Only a lot of concentric sectors of ellipses, some text and some straight lines. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: It is clear that the image is a derivative work of the cited image -- the positioning of the text, the colors, and the size are all too similar. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
