User talk:Tuareg50
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:18j Barcelona.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Poco2 21:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Albert Rivera Barcelona.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Rivera Barcelona.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albert Rivera Barcelona.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
McZusatz (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Muerte de un ciclista.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Muerte de un ciclista.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:José María de Areilza.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:José María de Areilza.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:José María de Areilza.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
File:DivisionAzul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discasto 17:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Picasso Guernica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discasto 17:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Martin de Riquer.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Martin de Riquer.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Martin de Riquer.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Cuando hablamos de fuente nos referimos al autor. El que la subió a flickr obviamente no lo es... --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Molestia ninguna. Nadie nace enseñado. A tu disposición --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Categorización de imágenes de flickr
[edit]Hola Tuareg, aunque no es en modo alguno obligatorio, muchos miembros de commons consideran que las imágenes tomadas de cuentas de flickr deberían ser categorizadas según su autor. Yo estoy de acuerdo, porque una fracción ingente de las imágenes de commons vienen de flickr y creo que es de justicia reconocerlo. En el caso de las últimas imágenes que has subido, su autor tiene categoría en commons y puedes reconocer el esfuerzo de Jaume Meneses insertando la categoría Category:Photographs by Jaume Meneses. Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC) PD: y, por supuesto, también hay que darles categorías "regulares" apropiadas. En este caso, Category:Casa Garriga Nogués
- Bueno, ya la he recortado yo :-) (aquí). Para hacer recortados, te recomiendo que uses herramientas automatizadas como CropTool, que puedes activar desde Preferences > Gadgets > Interface. Te aparecerá, en el menú de la izquierda, un enlace que dice CropTool. Y voilà! Te puedes olvidar de licencias, autorías y demás. CropTool se encarga de todo. Solo te pido que leas COM:OVERWRITE, que, en resumidas cuentas, te dice que no sobreescribas imágenes que recortes, salvo en casos muy concretos. En general, tienes que salvarlo como una nueva imagen. Un saludo --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Lidia Falcon.jpg
[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Los Chichos 1974.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discasto talk 16:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Re: Semana Trágica
[edit]Uff, mal ejemplo me has ido a traer. Hay que contar ochenta (no setenta) años. Y las fotos de este fotógrafo, por tanto, no valdrán hasta el año que viene :-( Lo siento --Discasto talk 22:24, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Acritud ninguna :-P
- A ver, la cuestión es que lo que me citas es cierto, pero tiene truco (está aquí). Efectivamente, actualmente, el periodo es de 70 años, que fue establecido en la ley de 1987. Sin embargo, muy ladinamente, la ley establece que el plazo anterior (que era de 80 años) sigue rigiendo para los autores muertos antes de la entrada en vigor de la ley de 1987. En la práctica, eso significa que lo de los 70 años es un brindis al sol y que solo a partir de 2057 habrá algún efecto práctico (es dudoso que yo esté por aquí para entonces :-P). Saludos --Discasto talk 08:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Ensaimadas
[edit]Hola Tuareg50, no he podido evitar ver esto. A mí me parece perfecto que se pongan en castellano los títulos de películas que se han estrenado con un nombre en castellano. En este caso, sin embargo, parece que el título no es correcto: véase aquí, por poner un ejemplo. Lo cambiaría yo más... you know :-) Un cordial saludo --Discasto talk 17:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Happy Public Domain Day 2017
[edit]I have restored File:Semana Trágica en Torrente de la Olla y Travesera de Gracia.jpg. Enjoy! Reventtalk 10:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Josep Irla Generalidad.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
BevinKacon (talk) 12:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 16:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)