Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/01/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 16th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Help:Nominate for deletion

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want my personal pictures show here in public because of my privacy. Please help me out to delete all my pictures. Subrata shuvro (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Astroginger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in

Ies (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism/attack image. INeverCry 18:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseable due to bad quality, blurred heavily. Other more usable versions exist, for exmp: File:RichardStallmanenArgentina2012-11.JPG. I See no reason for this image to have any future use. Michael F. Schönitzer 14:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Michael F. Schönitzer 14:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I am the uploader and I agree with nominator Ezarateesteban 20:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Atomium is in Belgium and thus is not covered by FoP; this file is a derivative of a non-free object. Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — This photo was taken in Austria, not Belgium. Austrian FoP permits photos of copyrighted works if the works are on permanent public display. —RP88 (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the original is in Belgium. Sorry, Belgium law, derivative of a non-free object. Sir Statler (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FoP doesn't mean that the sculpture isn't copyrighted. It means that photos don't infringe the copyright. So as long as it meets the Austrian FoP requirements, I think it's OK. --ghouston (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK in countries that respect FoP on sculptures at least. It's still unusable in Belgium (and the USA). --ghouston (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's ok. I know it's not ok. FoP doesn't mean that the sculpture isn't copyrighted What do you mean? I don't understand you. A copy is a copy. Ghoustoni is right. Sir Statler (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it your argument that this outdoor model of the Atomium in Austria (at Minimundus park) was constructed without the permission of the Atomium's rights holder (SABAM/Atomium asbl)? That is a separate issue, see earlier DR at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minimundus117.jpg (the file from which this image was cropped). It appears that the source photo of this photo of the Atomium model Minimundus was previously kept based on Austrian FoP and on the assumption that the owner of the Minimundus park (the charity Rettet das Kind), where the model is permanently installed, has obtained permission from the Atomium copyright holder. The more interesting question is what to do if the charity Rettet das Kind built their model without permission. A discussion of how FoP interacts with public works put on display without authorization of the copyright holder can be found at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2014/09#Does_FoP_washes_copyright_violations.3FRP88 (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It means you can't photograph the original in Belgium (due to lack of local FoP laws) but it's perfectly valid to photograph the model/reproduction in a FoP-enabled country. Judging from the DR of the source image this should be speedy kept. --Denniss (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Denniss, and previous discussion of the same case. Yann (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced photograph. {{PD-Art}} does not apply; see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art. LX (talk, contribs) 18:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Even if PD-art does not ably it shouldn't matter - this coin is from 1522. I can not se this photograph as being at artistic level. I will try and recall the book i taken it from, but it should be printed before 1969, whatever the name of that PD-tag is. I will get back when i find it.--FBQ (talk) 21:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm guessing you're thinking of {{PD-Sweden-photo}}. If you can provide evidence to support that, it'd be great. LX (talk, contribs) 08:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thats the one, Thanks :-) Found the book again.FBQ (talk) 10:23, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I pasted this tag in the description page and stated the book where i found it, not sure i did it the right way. FBQ (talk) 10:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, fixed and withdrawn. Thanks, LX (talk, contribs) 11:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La imagen no es la oficialBananga (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertisement Basvb (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like advertisement Basvb (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found elsewhere · Favalli00:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Coming from a Facebook page, no evidence that it's free-licensed. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree PDF, so therefore, I am doubtful of the uploader crafting it himself. DLindsley Need something? 00:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo image Basvb (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the name and incorrect redirection is not needed. 0 Noctis 0 (talk) 00:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file uploaded Piercedcock (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article on English Wikipedia deleted; see COM:PS. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Draxou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artwork; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chocomalo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fue destruída la página de Wikipedia en que fueron usadas estas imágenes: es:Denis Chirinos. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli01:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Gaff (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shortnthick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sohailmirza143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All out of the project scope, I think. The essay at very least.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanoop robert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAMAN KUMAR SANURIA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photo album.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unnikrishnankwa2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 02:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I don't think it is a good idea to elete the article and I will find someone to rewrite it in the nearets future


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File (Image) not currect Nijokk (talk) 04:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a marketing image, used elsewhere e.g., http://www.sangyug.com/products/Glue-Gun-G%252d250.html --ghouston (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 06:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused; very blurry picture of a watermelon on a chair. Not educationally useful. Lupo 06:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright claim incompatible with Commons licence Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a website, no reason to think it's freely licensed. --ghouston (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 29.11.2009 by Zeferino vaz (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo was previously published by several media via (examples) http://www.medimagem.com.br/novo/noticias_impressao.php?id=3703&sec=2 (2007) = (lower res) http://arquivo.medplan.com.br/site/imagens/geral/img_20071022_105257.jpg or (crop) https://www.flickr.com/photos/7354891@N03/1916361944/ (2007, © All rights reserved by grazielaraujo) or http://baraodemaua.br/comunicacao/publicacoes/jornal/2006/junho/saude1.htm (2006) = (b&w) http://baraodemaua.br/comunicacao/publicacoes/jornal/2006/junho/images/saude1.jpg.

A higher res version than the upload were posterior published via official hospital site http://www.hcrp.fmrp.usp.br/sitehc/home-galeria.aspx?ref=1&refV=12 (© Copyright Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo.) = http://www.hcrp.fmrp.usp.br/sitehc/upload/hc.jpg Gunnex (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tio Budiman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos.

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Fernando TJS/logs = 6 uploads on 20./21.09.2009 --> 5x copyvios. Gunnex (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free album cover Florn (talk) 11:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes big logo, need OTRS-permission to Commons Motopark (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded as own work, but the name of the user on their userpage differs from the photographer's name in EXIF data. A.Savin 11:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you're right A.Savin! I have to confirm though I discovered this pic in a WP-article and nominated it for QI - and it was QI-promoted because it's of good quality IMO. I didn't check the difference between EXIF data and user's name as own-work-uploader, sorry! It's a real shame with this great picture ... I agree: it has to be deleted. --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes plenty of pictures with unknown copyright Motopark (talk) 11:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from Soviet film "Strictly Business" (1962) and cannot be licensed under Public Domain. Winterheart (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zephynelsson Von (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, multiple copyright issues (different authors/sources) involved, buggy "self"-licenses. Examples:

The rest of the nominated files ("own works") are authored with "Nelson Santos" and were taken from his blog available via http://paroquianossasenhoradaconceicaotingua.blogspot.de/2008/06/fotos-das-runas-da-freguesia-de-nossa.html from where I can't retrieve any CC or whatever free license.

Multiple permissions needed.

Gunnex (talk) 12:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was in Category:Nonsense, looks like a private image someone took in their garden – Out of scope? El Grafo (talk) 12:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"empty pixel, needed to fill some 2x2 galleries": unused, categorized in Category:Nonsense – I guess that's not needed for anything (anymore)? El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, not needed anymore, may be disposed of.--Ratzer (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Category:Nonsense, description doesn't seem to make much sense (GDP = en:Gross domestic product?) El Grafo (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by សីលាបាភ្នំ (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too big collection for user page.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks very much like a derivative work of the Dönertier (en: Kebap-animal, sv: Kebapdjuret) invented by the german comedy duo de:Erkan und Stefan in the 2000s. It was used in a joke article on sv.wp that was deleted (see deletion log and sv:Patented nonsense that has been deleted). Sooo … what to do with this? El Grafo (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused out of scope file (only content: "blablabla […]") El Grafo (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in Category:Nonsense, looks like an unused personal out of scope image to me that came here through a batch upload from Flickr. El Grafo (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr-user is not the original author of this widespread image. Seems like the real author is a certain Mr. David MacDonald [1], who is actually mentioned in the file description. His [2] Website says: All images strictly copyright of the artist. El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier portant un marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 01:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Analyticmate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, copyvio.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier portant un marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier portant un marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat. Jean espirat (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 14:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marquage inadéquat Jean espirat (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suffit de téléverser une nouvelle version sans le watermark. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No need to be deleted for a watermark, an unmarked version can be uploaded in place of this one. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 15:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

marquage inaproprié Jean espirat (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Avez-vous lu ce qu'on vous a écrit ? Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Uploader's request, his first request being within a few days from the upload. If he wants this file deleted, not much would be gained by arguing with him about it, especially as he has uploaded other similar images of the same subject. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized copy from a magazine. Yanguas (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized copy from a magazine. Yanguas (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized copy from a magazine. Yanguas (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized copy from a magazine. Yanguas (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non authorized copy from a magazine. Yanguas (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luís joăo Mangumbo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Luís joăo Mangumbo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a personal photo album, out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope (en:Owen Norton). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has clearly stated that the files is non-commercial use only which is not allowed on commons EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No model release was obtained therefore they cannot be used for commercial (advertising and endorsement) purposes and are for editorial and educational use only.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielteolijr (talk • contribs) 05:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.  Comment The user uploaded his photo under CC BY SA 4.0 [3]. "Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license, etc. [4]" --Juggler2005 (talk) 09:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danielteolijr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Not licensed for commercial use." say the uploader on his user page and on the Permission field.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For commercial use you have to get model and location releases. I am a social documentary photographer and not a commercial photographer. My images are for educational and editorial purposes only. If they are not appropriate to the scope then delete it. All my contributions fall under this same licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielteolijr (talk • contribs) 15:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Danielteolijr: I don't understand, you licensed your photos with a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license which allow commercial use. CC licenses are not revocable. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not much for computers. I am an old film photographer. I was offering these photos for educational and editorial use as I do not obtain model, property or location releases as I am a documentary photographer and not a commercial photographer. If the images I offered are not useable for educational and editorial purposes then please delete them. That is all the licensing I can offer Wiki Commons.

I apologize if this caused any problems. But, as I said I don't know all the ins and out of using this venue. I had listed on my user page from the beginning that images were for educational purposes. I just recently learned how to add that licensing note to each image page. No use wasting more time on it. If they are not useable just delete them all. Best Regards, Dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielteolijr (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 January 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

No problems caused, "free" incl. commercial uses is only a rule here, there are many other places including Wikipedias (for "fair use") and maybe Flickr with no objections to your NC limitation. Thanks for offering. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? no educational value Avron (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover art, no evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 15:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality artwork of non important artist The Photographer (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My comments: I am a member of the management of Farmakunde, and as a professor involved in its curriculum. I herewith declare again that the text as written by myself is true and based on existing data avalaible within our organization. So in my opinion there is no reason to question notability. If necessary I am willing to discuss this further (ad.vandooren@hu.nl)

If document is really useful, it should be replaced with wiki-text on relevant project and SVG images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roger Urbina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved to Wikibooks as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Roger Urbina (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved to Wikibooks as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emre2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used# Avron (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippe Casanova is born in 1965. Copyright violation. 86.217.78.74 16:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippe Casanova is born in 1965. Copyright violation. 86.217.78.74 16:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Philippe Casanova is born in 1965. Copyright violation. 86.217.78.74 16:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value, poor quality image of fecal matter Gaff (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion Edslov (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barelyhere (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No description/unused personal photos.

Buxtehude (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown place, no description, no cat., single upload Pibwl (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Button68 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope:unused personal pictures.

Lupo 16:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope:unused personal logo; advertisement. Lupo 16:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cathy Rodriguez J. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work, but no evidence for this (book covers, publicity photos).

Buxtehude (talk) 16:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value identified Gaff (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Obviously a nonsense image. -- Ies (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Felipe1993 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos.

Buxtehude (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zarshah khalid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Zarshah khalid (talk · contribs)

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superior version uploaded as File:Gibraltar Football Association.svg.png. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superior copy available as File:Skype t.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Telefone.png. Fry1989 eh? 18:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional/self-promotional image no indication of user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIO and out of scope for lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional/self-promotional image no indication of user's own work, possible COM:COPYVIO and out of scope for lack of educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it's someone else's signature, it can't be own work of uploader, see https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma_%28rapper%29 for it's use on the project... Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

François Turenne des Pres (1907-1990) has not been dead for 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image, small size, probably not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be reasonably useful for anything, out of scope must be realistically useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apiday (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional or self-promotional images are out of COM:SCOPE

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not found at source, not TOO, see skyline Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by "Hector.carvalho" = Chronus (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 11.2007 and taken from (as indicated) the official site of Brazilian city Santa Bárbara d'Oeste via http://www.santabarbara.sp.gov.br (no direct link provided), the photo (author: unknown), is licensed with an unreviewed {{GFDL}} license. Looking at a wayback version from 10.2007 the site does not specify the copyright so file is most likely copyrighted. Permission needed.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Automóvel Clube de Bauru.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Nominating also:

presenting the same problems as above. The file was also previously published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/11522470 (06.2008, © All rights reserved by R.JR )Gunnex (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Derivative work of recent pictures.

Yann (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Derivative works of recent pictures and/or texts.

Yann (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ronald Skirth, the author of this journal, died in 1977; it remains in copyright in the UK and US. No evidence is given here of this copyright being released by his next of kin. Hchc2009 (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy or Greece. Yann (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and most likely grabbed from the Internet per the numerous google images hits, thus not "own work". -- M\A 20:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UK for 2D works. Yann (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UK for 2D works. Yann (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused bad quality photo of some person, no category Pibwl (talk) 21:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Derivative work of a recent picture. Yann (talk) 21:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no category, unknown subject (some game map?) Pibwl (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused (some game map?) Pibwl (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation - the author is given as Robert Kirkman. Same for File:Negan Comic.png (user's only uploads) Pibwl (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal or kid's photo, unused. Same for File:Victor canoi.jpg, File:Victoor cano.jpg (only uploads of the user) Pibwl (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UK for 2D works. Derivative works of recent pictures and/or texts.

Yann (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, out of scope. Same for File:Patśniadecki2.jpg, File:Patrykśniadecki1.jpeg and File:Ręczna.jpeg (not much value, description: "he thinks he can play in anything") - user's only uploads Pibwl (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UK for 2D works. Derivative works of recent pictures and/or texts.

Yann (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, same for File:Vedasandur m.thambidurai.jpg (user's only uploads) Pibwl (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted scan?, out of scope. Same for user's second upload: File:Victor Martinez Parada Book 1.jpg Pibwl (talk) 21:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some advert, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Derivative work of the map. Yann (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jdedecker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope (if it's actually good new math, a professional publication is the way to go). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny JPEG of File:Flag of Kurdistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior PNG of File:Flag of Kurdistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hardly visible unnamed peson, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the Republic of Macedonia for 2D works. Derivative works of recent maps and/or texts. Some may be cropped to remove the board.

Yann (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I think for FoP in Macedonia for 2D works is allowed.--Rašo 13:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so, based on FoP in Macedonia, and the law available here. Only architectural or sculptural works are mentioned. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undated photo. Argument that this must be from 2005 or earlier is specious. If he was a brigadier general in 2005 then this picture could have been taken then or after. If the Wikileaks cable had called him a Major General, then that would have been valid. Geogene (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work of art by Agnes Denes (1931-) who does not appear to have ever worked for the US government but who has works on display in the Smithsonian. I don't think that means that the Smithsonian necessarily owns the copyright. Source says "copyright status undetermined". Geogene (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for architectural works. The bridge is the main subject. 67.87.46.39 02:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for architectural works. The bridge is the main subject. 67.87.46.39 02:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#France for architectural works. The bridge is the main subject. 67.87.46.39 02:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible wrong license. File is also used at facebook on Raif Badawi page ( https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007775286890 ) at his profilpic. No trace that User1500 is actually Raif Badawi. Shadak (talk) 14:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a delicate matter. I urge contributors to this discussion to take a look at the articles on the various projects on Raif Badawi or to google him to understand the context. I have emailed the contact person at Pen International indicated here to ask for a permission to use this picture... But if anybody has a better idea how to handle this, please don't hesitate. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 21:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I have started to exchange by email on the subject. The status should be clarified quickly. Thanks, — Racconish 📥 15:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I have uploaded File:Raif Badawi.jpeg and forwarded the permission to OTRS. I see therefore no need to keep this lower quality and unauthorized picture at Commons. Thanks for the patience, — Racconish 📥 17:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Racconish. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete thanks Racconish -- Shadak (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture shows a sculpture (and nothing else) created by artist Henry Heerup. Mr Heerup died in 1993. Pugilist (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted 3d object, I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder Avron (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I checked the en.wikipedia and I think, the uploader is the copyright holder. Please close the DR.--Avron (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ras67 (talk) 12:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 18:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I agree Italian copyright law is a mess, however if in doubt for ancient buildings, then {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} may be appropriate and sufficient in law per the description at Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in Italy/MiBAC. -- (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Runningtotheroar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work in official portraits, probable COM:COPYVIOs unless a free source is found.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentUser left message on my talk page, and I urged them to reply here, but so far - not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Airflow (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given of the research into the author's identity, required for the UK license; no US licensing is given either (an unpublished, anonymous photograph in the US is protected for 120 years after the date of creation, which would make this still under copyright in the US). Hchc2009 (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:1989: I don't get it. Who is supposed to have copyright on these ancient ruins? I think these ought to be public domain even in Britain! Wnt (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given of the research into the author's identity, required for the UK license; no US licensing is given either (an unpublished, anonymous photograph in the US is protected for 120 years after the date of creation, which would make this image still under copyright in the US). Hchc2009 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given of the research into the author's identity, required for the UK license; no US licensing is given either (an unpublished, anonymous photograph in the US is protected for 120 years after the date of creation, which would make this image still under copyright in the US). Hchc2009 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence is given of the research into the author's identity, required for the UK license; no US licensing is given either (an unpublished, anonymous photograph in the US is protected for 120 years after the date of creation, which would make this image still under copyright in the US). Hchc2009 (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Umasnayak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logo in my opinion. Not too simple for PD. No evidence of permission granted.

-- M\A 20:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright claim is incompatible with Creative Commons Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is Hadrian gonna sue us? I see the nominations by Yann are all of posters basically photocopied by camera; but yours, User:1989, are fresh photos of ancient relics. Keep All Wnt (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 20:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Mausoleum of Hadrian was built in 123 - 139 AD. It is already in public domain --Butko (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Calidad de la imagen Fer gallegos (talk) 20:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scope, not identified people, no real educational use (there's a series of other photos) Pibwl (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es personal Nachyelli Buitrón (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused Pibwl (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque me equivoqué de archivo Rumandujano (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in the Republic of Macedonia for 2D works. Derivative work of recent maps and/or texts. Yann (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I think for FoP in Macedonia for 2D works is allow.--Rašo 13:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment is such a plan a work of art at all? Pibwl (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In most countries, plans and maps are covered by copyright. So unless this is specifically excluded in Macedonian copyright law, we need a permission from the author. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality image of non-descript dog. We have plenty. Gaff (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random pet pics, we have plenty Gaff (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnamed person, unused image, doubtful own work, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

child's photo, unused, out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused, unclear if the uploader is author, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of a person (father), not known notability, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyighted poster? Pibwl (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of a person, one of user's two uploads Pibwl (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 23:30, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Yann (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Yann (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Derivative work of recent drawings and/or texts. Yann (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UK for 2D works. Derivative work of the recent map. Yann (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Greece. Recent map. Yann (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Derivated work of a 1943 (?) painting by (as indicated) "Autor: Raymond P. R. Nelson" who might be (I can't confirm this exactly) "Raymond Perry Rodgers Neilson", per [5] and [6] a "New York City portraitist, still life painter, and art instructor" (1881 — 1964).

If "Raymond Perry Rodgers Neilson" is indeed the painter (presuming: US work), unclear if published & renewed before 1964. Eventually copyrighted +95 years after (unknown) publication.

Nominating also:

derivated by {{Agência Brasil}} (source links: 404, no wayback), who unlikely owns the related copyright. Gunnex (talk) 23:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong file Jdburgess (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture in the upper left seems to be one of the illustrations terry Gilliam did for Monty Python. Unless this is (like the famous Monty Python foot) derived from an old public domain image (which I'd tend to doubt), we need to either delete the file or (if we think it's worth keeping) edit out the image and delete the old version. El Grafo (talk) 11:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nude of not indigenous.... probably under 18, with a modern arch, not tribe tools... 100% fake 2001:983:B2D0:1:1CDE:F5CD:180:7E53 19:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason given for deletion. INeverCry 20:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing educational about this. It just shows that the uploader can use imaging software. This kind of file is appropriate in DeviantArt but doesn't belong here because of the lack of educational uses. 92.40.249.29 15:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I don't care much about unused images, the original (2009) and the intermediate (transparent BG) are okay, but this 19MB derivate is, as you said, not especially "educational" (excl. the uploader, who presumably learned some things.) DeleteBe..anyone (talk) 09:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Not licensed for commercial use." per uploader. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


For commercial use you have to get model and location releases. I am a social documentary photographer and not a commercial photographer. My images are for educational and editorial purposes only. If they are not appropriate to the scope then delete it. All my contributions fall under this same licensing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielteolijr (talk • contribs) 15:17, 16 January 2015‎ (CET) (UTC)

@Danielteolijr: I don't understand, you licensed your photos with a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license which allow commercial use. CC licenses are not revocable. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing educational about this. It just shows that the uploader can use imaging software. What educational uses does this photo present? 92.40.249.29 15:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, unused. Keep for original+intermediate. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maurice Flesier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted packaging

Ies (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted packaging?? The photo copyrights belong to me and I took the photo with Galaxy Note 4. Check the other my uploads matadata.. Maurice Flesier (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted packaging

Ies (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Italy 1989 18:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please read COM:DM. Yann (talk) 11:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very low quality crop of an otherwise decent photo. Please redirect it to the larger file or upload a better crop. FredWalsh (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very low quality crop of an otherwise decent photo. Please redirect it to the larger file or upload a better crop. FredWalsh (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very low quality crop of an otherwise decent photo. Please redirect it to the larger file or upload a better crop. FredWalsh (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old file dont need it Denobili (talk) 18:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I did something wrong with the copyright of this photograph. All I can say is that I contacted the owner of the copyright beforehand (The National Portrait Gallery, London) to ask them if I could use it on Wikipedia, and which license was to be considered. This is the reply I got:

Dear François,

Thank you for your enquiry. The Academic Licence would not cover use on a website like Wikipedia.

However, the Creative Commons licence will, and this is also free-of-charge: http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image.php?mkey=mw68491

Kind regards,

Matthew


Matthew Bailey Manager, Rights & Images National Portrait Gallery St Martin's Place London WC2H 0HE

So I thought there wouldn't be any problem with entering the photograph under a Creative Commons licence. I have to avow that I usually avoid to import documents, because---although relatively at ease when I write or modifiy Wikipedia articles---I feel terribly awkward with these rights management.

Best wishes, Pepys (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pepys, unfortunately they use the CC BY-NC-ND license, this license doesn't allow commercial use and derivative works, this license is not allowed on Commons, see Commons:Licensing. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Thibaut, but I don't know how to solve this issue, since what you state contradicts what says Matthew Bailey at the NPG. Could you or anybody help in this matter? Pepys (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can ask the NPG to change the license to CC-BY or CC-BY-SA. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I made the request today at the NPG. Pepys (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Simply to say that, two weeks after I have made this request, I still haven't got any answer from NPG. But since the photograph seems to have been finally kept, I suppose all is well... Pepys (talk) 12:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Art. Yann (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the reply I've just got from Matthew Bailey at the National Portrait Gallery, London:

Dear François,
Thank you for your reply, but we can't release images under a less restrictive CC licence at present.
The image currently on Wikipedia is there without our permission, and any use beyond terms which we have permitted (CC-BY-NC-ND) would potentially be an infringement.
Unfortunately, we don't have the resources to pursue Wikimedia for all the infringements we find on there (there are other NPG images on the site without our permission).
Kind regards,
Matthew



Matthew Bailey
Manager, Rights & Images
National Portrait Gallery St Martin's Place London WC2H 0HE

in response to my request dated 21 January 2015: To: Rights and Images
Subject: c/o Matthew Bailey Re: NPG D18073
Dear Matthew,
Thank you for your reply concerning the use of the referenced picture on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, after I downloaded the file and uploaded it on Wikimedia Commons, it was considered by them unappropriate, because the Creative Commons licence granted by NPG (and stated as such on the link below) is "CC BY-NC-ND":
http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image.php?mkey=mw68491
while they request it be "CC-BY" or "CC-BY-SA".
Do you have any mean to change this at all? At the moment, the picture is used in the Samuel Pepys Club page on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Pepys_Club
where I believe it is in its right place. (And I do not expect it can be used in many other places!)

I don't know what to think of all this, since, in a first stage, Matthew Bailey told me that using this image on Wikipedia was appropriate (see over)... Pepys (talk) 11:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BORGIAS BUNDI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

INeverCry 20:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 20:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hacker-amitsharma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 20:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 21:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 21:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thesefactsaretrue (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

INeverCry 21:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel.mauad1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images and artworks

INeverCry 21:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no real educational use of this photo Pibwl (talk) 21:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Can be used to give an example of this specific government program (mock EU debate). I fail to see what sort of an image could do a better job than this one.

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drijfmonsteronderzoeker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 21:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armburroughs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promo images of non-notable band

INeverCry 21:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SArmen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Every single last one of these files is lifted from a third party website without permission.

Added source and {{PD-Armenia}}

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vahram Mekhitarian:: please see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you truly believe File:Հավերժախաչ.gif is a copyright violation? The rest can go. Fry1989 eh? 17:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where you see "PD-Art" tag or art photographers? Is File:«Հայաստանի երկրապահ» հուշամեդալ.jpg really an art work? Vahram Mekhitarian (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Vahram Mekhitarian: I was pointing out that your application of PD-Armenia doesn't apply because it's of a 3D item. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are you see the phrase:
  • It is one of "official documents, legal acts, treaties and the official translations thereof, state emblems and signs (flags, coats of arms, medals, monetary signs)"
Public domain
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in Armenia because its copyright protection has expired or it is exempted from copyright by virtue of the Law on Copyright and Related Rights of June 15, 2006 (details). The work meets one of the following criteria:
  • It is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 70 years have passed since the date of its creation
  • It is another kind of work, and 70 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author)
  • It is an "expressions of traditional folklore and art" or "political speeches, speeches delivered in the court"
  • It is one of "official documents, legal acts, treaties and the official translations thereof, state emblems and signs (flags, coats of arms, medals, monetary signs)"

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

العربيَّة | English | русский | +/−


Armenia

According to article 25 of the Armenian Law on Copyright and Related Rights it shall be lawful to reproduce or to communicate to the public, without authorization of the author and without remuneration, a work of architecture or the fine arts, a work of applied arts or a photographic work that is situated on streets, parks, squares and other places open for attendance. See COM:CRT/Armenia#Freedom of panorama for more information.

English | français | русский | 中文 | +/−


Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 23:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SArmen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of medals. Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Арутюнян, Арам Суренович. Photos are not the work of the uploader and are not free (e.g., File:Ծնողական փառքի մեդալ.gif is CC-by-ND per the source)

Эlcobbola talk 23:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SArmen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly not uploader's own work - see this image lining the street in File:Ճանապարհ-Ռ․Ե.jpg, for example. Uploader is serial copyvio uploader (see talk/deleted contribs)

Эlcobbola talk 23:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SArmen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See image descriptions - random images from the internet (e.g. [[:File:Սեյդո Պողոս.jpg] is sourced to Facebook); certainly not own work as claimed. Images appear old, but sources provide no authorship/date information to determine copyright status.

Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. These files could be restored if proper information is provided. Yann (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:ICESCR-members.png Louperivois Ψ @ 17:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not henri Legarda !!!!! Please delete this picture. Henri Legarda is my uncle, and the man on this picture isn't, for sure, my uncle 77.202.214.19 18:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Google Images, there is a certain resemblance, especially in the hair style and facial hair, the subject matter (soccer), and the choice of clothing. On the other hand his hair looks a bit different (more curly on our image) and his build doesn't seem to match, even considering the image is five years old. A cautious  Delete. --Sebari (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 23:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very low resolution version of File:Backtowel.jpg which should be used instead. Yeah I know this one is in use in umpteen websites but why shouldn't they use a decent sized photo instead of a thumbnail? 92.40.249.29 18:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Je_suis_Karim_512px.png Cisseba (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So what is the reason for deletion? --Sebari (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader request. INeverCry 23:23, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a simple logo. TO ? Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only creative part seems the bottom of the right object (what's that thing called again?). Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Logo is copyrighted. Not counted as simple. 1989 03:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you motivate your opinion, 1989? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, PD-ineligible. –Be..anyone (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Simple enough for the United States. Fry1989 eh? 16:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Simple enough to be treated as ineligible. rubin16 (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Equityelite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promo images

INeverCry 21:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope rubin16 (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded from Flickr by Chronus (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 06.2012 but without {{Flickrreview}}. Flickr user Rafael Kage is not more a member of Flickr and an actual license review would obviously fail.

Same problem (nominating too) with:

Note that some other uploads by different users from this Flickr user passed the Flickrreview. Examples:

Quite near to the upload date of the problematic files above (2-3 days earlier: on 14.06.2012 ), File:Planador no Aeroclube de Bauru SP.jpg and File:Estação Ferroviária de Bauru SP.jpg were transferred to Commons and they also passed the review... Gunnex (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex E daí? Na época a licença valia. Que culpa tenho eu se nenhum bot avaliou a imagem ou se o usuário parou de postar fotos? A licença se mantém igual a época em que a imagem foi carregada no commons. Portando,  Disagree desta proposta de eliminção descabida. Chronus (talk) 10:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please check my recent contribuitions (yesterday) where I added +/- 10 missing {{Flickrreview}} on your Flickr-transfers from 2012. And I remember that I did the "dirty job" for you several times before, like here (uploaded 05.2012, flickrreviewed 03.2013). Luckily, all files were still available on Flickr but most of them under a different license, as indicated by you... Gunnex (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gunnex - Pois guarde o seu "dirty job" para si, pois não preciso e não pedi desse tipo de "ajuda". Quem você pensa que é para criticar as minhas contribuições para o Commons? Você não fez mais do que a sua obrigação como voluntário do projeto, portanto nem tente esfregar esse seu "trabalho" na minha cara. As licenças das imagens que indiquei eram as que estavam disponíveis no momento em que fiz os carregamentos. Se o autor da fotografia saiu do Flickr, mudou a licença depois ou se o link deixou de funcionar, não é problema meu e nem do Commons, visto que o que vale é a licença que estava no momento do carregamento. Você deveria saber disso antes de sair por aí me enchendo o saco! E meça suas palavras quando for falar comigo novamente! Chronus (talk) 01:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is one of the reasons we have license reviews. However, the responsibility to initiate a review lies solely with the uploader per COM:EVID. Green Giant (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, text document Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which policy precisely would preclude keeping this file here? The letter was sent in support of a research proposal prepared by WikiProject Wikidata for research on Wikidata. More about the project in this Signpost article. I'm planning to add the full proposal later tonight - already available from doi:10.5281/zenodo.13906. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please see COM:SCOPE, particularly Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text. Purely textual material such as plain-text versions of recipes, lists of instructions, poetry, fiction, quotations, dictionary definitions, lesson plans or classroom material, and the like are better hosted elsewhere, for example at Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiversity or Wikisource. Hence out of scope as stated in the nomination. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I try to avoid Wikidata when possible, but I see letterhead, I see signatures, and I'd hazard a guess those things might be the main point of the upload. Not plain text. Wnt (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also see not in use so out of scope, but you're right, letterhead with no permissions also. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Wikipedia:Signpost does not trump Commons policies. If you are going to send a letter, just send it rather than posting it here. Green Giant (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goesgil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable team

INeverCry 20:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for the one image left. Fairly good quality of a football team in an unusual location. I doubt we have many other similar photos. --Sebari (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. The football team isn't really in an unusual location given that football is often played on grass fields without spectator stands. Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What exactly is educational about a nude woman holding a bow? If she was showing us how to use a bow, that would be educational, but this is just nudity for the sake of it. 92.40.249.29 15:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beats me, but with all those ancient Dianas in the category commons actually needs more modern incarnations. This otherwise unused version inspired one (or two?) derivative also unused versions. Good quality (or at least big files, I didn't bother to download and examine the images.) All nude archers (female) also in nude women with armors is some category mess waiting for a male nude archer as explanation. KeepBe..anyone (talk) 09:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope - no educational value beyond the original File:Nude female archer.jpg. INeverCry 06:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing educational about this. It just shows that the uploader can use imaging software. We have plenty of "extracted images" so that angle is hardly unique. What educational uses does this photo present? 92.40.249.29 15:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, useful as demonstrated by the derivative, where I'll go for DEL as not educational. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope - no educational value beyond the original File:Nude at Waterfront.png. INeverCry 06:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]