Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/01/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out of project scope, user has created page after deleting and has removed twice speedy deletion tag Motopark (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: speedydeleted - Inappropriate use of userpages Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Flickr - law keven - 365 Days - Day 287 - Moi - We Crushed the French - Sunday October 14th 2007.jpg
[edit]I found this while trying to clean up Category:Funny photographs – looks pretty much out of scope if you ask me, especially if you consider the image description. What do you think? El Grafo (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope matanya • talk 16:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Flickr - law keven - 365 Days - Day 288 - Moi - Time for bed - Monday 15th October 2007.jpg
[edit]I found this while trying to clean up Category:Funny photographs – looks pretty much out of scope if you ask me. What do you think? El Grafo (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope matanya • talk 16:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. This one might even be a copyright violation of a third party letter Basvb (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Basvb, the image is the announcement for the first event e-flux hosted—it is critical ephemera that shows the material and communications-based history of the organization. The header is from the Holiday Inn letterhead which the invitation was written on, it is not the intellectual property of the Holiday Inn. Could you please remove the deletion request of let me know what further clarification can be offered? Many thanks, Morelcasares (talk)
- @Morelcasares: I see now that I've indeed misinterpreted the situation surrounding the image (I've been targeting images which were added for advertorial purposes either of company's or individual persons). I see now that my claim that the image is unused is wrong and therefor the out of scope part does not hold. The copyright situation is a bit more difficult. I was mainly concerned with the copyright from the writer of the letter (not the header and footer but the content), as that is also a creative work. I see that "e-flux" is mentioned as the author, is there a specific person (you?) who created the work, and if so, could you please specify this. If this person is not you the permission for the release should be proven in some way (Commons:OTRS explains it better for all sorts of possible situations). Another request from me would be for you to add categories to your images (Category:E-flux, which can be added to relevant categories). I'll revoke my request but would like some clarification on the copyright situation. Basvb (talk) 00:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- PS: One important thing I noticed, you removed the nomination. The idea is that nominations are discussed here, and voicing your opinion here is the way to oppose.
Request revoked. Basvb (talk) 00:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope // Possibly copyvio/no permission of http://ankit-aktproductions.blogspot.se/ Josve05a (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded by sockpuppet engaging in self-promotion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Revent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images in the source photostream are all at this blog., with identical filenames as used on Flickr, and the given 'date' on Flickr is the same as that of the blog entry. The majority of the Flickr user's photos seem to have been taken with a Nikon D40, have complete EXIF information, and have 'camera default' filenames such as 'DSC_0335'. The images in this particular album 'differ', and appear to have been copied. Revent (talk) 23:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Initially hit the wrong 'tool' button, this should probably be a DR. Revent (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep File:Silvia Muñoz 2011.jpg is also from that Flickr user and on the same blog. The Flickr user's collection contains a huge number of pictures of seemingly-local hockey matches and players, often the same subject from several angles. The photo in question appears on page 49 of his collection. Some of those photos also appear on the mentioned blog. I have no doubt that he is the original photographer. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 12:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Fair enough, I admittedly did not go far enough into his photostream to see the large number of similar photos (though I do now), but instead saw mostly photos of what appear to be various trade shows. Looking at where you pointed, it's apparent that these are indeed almost certainly his. (it would be nice if the blog attributed him, but meh) Revent (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by F-5 Reporter (talk · contribs)
[edit]all copyvios ound elsewhere
- File:Estacionados.jpg
- File:En vuelo.jpg
- File:Misil.jpg
- File:Base12.jpg
- File:Vistaaerea.jpg
- File:Asencion.jpg
- File:Tripulacion.jpg
- File:Aterrizando.jpg
- File:Pista bomabrdeada.jpg
· Favalli ⟡ 00:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by F-5 Reporter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook sized images, claimed as own work but unlikely to be so... few people take midair photos of other airplanes.
- File:El nuevo avión tigre del Ala 15 para el Tiger Meet 2016.jpg
- File:Dassault Mirage 2000D - CEAM - EC 05.330 "Côte d'Argent" - Tiger Meet 2016.jpg
- File:E-2 Hawkeye de la Aviation Navale Francesa.jpg
- File:F-16C Turco.jpg
- File:Aérospatiale SA 341 Gazelle.jpg
- File:F-16 Fuerza Aérea de Turquía.jpg
- File:Melilla Torre.jpg
- File:FAU 054.jpg
- File:Brigada Aérea 1 Carrasco.jpg
- File:C.A.S.A C-212 Aviocar FAU.jpg
- File:UB-58 "Baron" FAU.jpg
- File:Cessna U206H Stationair FAU.jpg
- File:FAU 792.jpg
- File:Pc720es.jpg
- File:Fau616y615ernesto.jpg
- File:Frontal museo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by F-5 Reporter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical pictures, obviously not own works, and small images without EXIF data, user with bad history, blocked for copyvios.
- File:Raz'n Hell.jpg
- File:Oppenheimer y Leslie Groves en el sitio de la explosión de Trinity.jpg
- File:Vista desde uno de los aviones acompañantes.jpg
- File:Laggin Dragon.jpg
- File:Valeria campaña.jpg
- File:Valeria campaña2.jpg
- File:Liceo Bauzá.jpg
- File:Bulevares.JPG
- File:Liceo-24.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; cleanup after blocked user. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. According to the uploader this is a hidden camera. It may be a defamation · Favalli ⟡ 01:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope · Favalli ⟡ 01:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete, unknown on w:es:. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Everything uploaded by the user probably are copyvios. He lists the sources correctly, but they were taken from random Internet sites. Except, maybe, File:Собор Алагир.jpg.
- File:Зосима.jpg
- File:Колокольня алагир.jpg
- File:Алагирский Собор.jpeg
- File:Собор Алагир.jpg
- File:В. Коняев.jpg
- File:Виктор Коняев.JPG
- File:ОсТеатр.jpg
- File:Булат Газданов.jpg
- File:Эмилия Цаллагова.jpg
- File:Адырхаева.jpg
- File:ЕленаОбразцова.jpg
- File:ВБаллаев.jpg
- File:Владимир Баллаев.jpg
Trycatch (talk) 13:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Derivative works of modern Soviet / Russian grave sculptures, possible copyright violation, as there is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia.
- File:Мурадели.jpg
- File:Томский.jpg
- File:Утёсов.jpg
- File:Свиридов.jpg
- File:Налбандян.jpg
- File:Свешников.jpg
- File:Малиев Г..jpg
- File:ТугановМ.jpg
A.Savin 17:10, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Unfree images (partially stolen from the web, or reproductions of modern paintings w/o permission by the painter), all claimed as own work by the uploader.
- File:Elena obraztsova.jpg
- File:Bishop Innocenty.jpg
- File:Narechenie Antonia.jpg
- File:Archibishop Antony.jpg
- File:Bishop Antony 1975.jpg
- File:Vladimir bishop of Chita.jpg
- File:Metropolitan Lazar.jpg
- File:Antony bishop of Achtubinsk.jpg
- File:Taytiev May 1945.JPG
- File:Metropolitan Juvenaliy.jpg
- File:Патриарх Алексий I.jpg
- File:Подпись таутиева.jpg
- File:Taytiev Vladimir.jpg
- File:Taytiew pismo.jpg
- File:Taytiew na ucheniyah.jpg
- File:Taytiew v minuty zatishiya.jpg
- File:Taytiew raketny zalp.jpg
- File:Chugaewa Valeriya.jpg
- File:Zosima archibishop.png
- File:Nikogosyan.png
- File:АдырхаеваСв.png
- File:Adyrchaewa.jpg
A.Savin 01:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal messages · Favalli ⟡ 01:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
photo from 人民网 (http://www.people.com.cn/) all rights reserved 太刻薄 (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused, redundant to File:CarProof Logo NEW Color.png (without the transparent background) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of the project scope; see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arahau Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 03:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 03:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 03:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:NOTHOST. Eurodyne (talk) 03:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 03:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki. Also applies to File:JsTune logo.png. DS (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
can be written to some wikipedia if needed Motopark (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Dear Motopark, I do not understand your comment on this file. Can you please clarify? Thank you. Axlsite
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 06:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of license // the website (source) is not the copyright owner(s) Josve05a (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Logo. Not text-only. /St1995 15:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Self-promo? Juggler2005 (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 09:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 09:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be {{GFDL}}. Sourced with http://www.florianopoliscvb.com.br/ (a tourism portal related to Brazilian city Florianópolis ) the file was most likely taken from http://web.archive.org/web/20060504172010/http://www.florianopoliscvb.com.br/hoteis.asp (Copyright 2004 - Todos os direitos reservados), a database of hotels. The related entry showing the "Majestic Palace Hotel" is today available (url changed) via http://floripaconvention.com.br/index.asp?dep=2&categoria=9&associado=93 = http://floripaconvention.com.br/imagens/galeria/associados/93_foto1_large.jpg. Permission needed.
The file is eventually a reupload: File:Floripa2006.jpg was uploaded by same user some months before and deleted per "Copyright violation: http://www.florianopoliscvb.com.br/", the same source as above. See also the related user talk. Gunnex (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Per watermark likely taken from some fan site ("Johor fans"). No evidence of own work or of free license. Lupo 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Porque este escudo es falso. El escudo original de La Llosa de Ranes es otro. 188.119.222.54 10:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Why do you think that this coat of arms is false? --Xavigivax (talk) 15:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: The coats of arms are just an heraldic representation of a blazon. Any variation of the coats of arms are heraldically correct. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Uploads by Gouri.udr
[edit]- File:Beauty Work for Brides.jpg
- File:Gouri Arya Udaipur.jpg
- File:Gouri's Makeover.jpg
- File:Gouri's Makeover & Style Studio's, Udaipur. India.jpg
- File:Gouri Arya.jpg
Promotional photos of non-notable people --Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
empty file Buff (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination -Pete F (talk) 20:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 11.2010 by 1-upload-user Gustavo.sces (talk · contributions · Statistics) the file was previously published at http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=39224126&postcount=105 (= http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8620/portomadeira.jpg) in 07.2009 by "Thilindha" (last edit: 09.2009), sourcing the file with "Fonte: 3D Studio Computação Gráfica - www.3dstudiocg.com" (today 404) and linking to an high res image via http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/8906/portomadeiragrande.jpg. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 11:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PedroApdeGyn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:PedroApdeGyn/logs (+/- 60 copyios). Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. File:Pinturas-rupestres-serranópolis-Goiás.JPG most likely grabbed & cropped from http://de.slideshare.net/EMTIPSA/arte-rupestre (2010, by "Escola Silene de Andrade") = (slide 29) http://image.slidesharecdn.com/arterupestreslides-100623082930-phpapp01/95/arte-rupestre-29-728.jpg, eventually photoshopped from https://www.flickr.com/photos/bevenutophotography/4050602535/ (2009, © All rights reserved by EDSON BEVENUTO)
- File:Construção do palacio das Esmeraldas.jpg
- File:Inauguração de Goiânia.jpg
- File:Pinturas-rupestres-serranópolis-Goiás.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
obsoleted by File:Oxyfluorfen.svg and File:Oxyfluorfen structuur.png Kopiersperre (talk) 12:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: text-only file; copy of da:The NimbWits. Lupo 12:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
very low quality, replaced by File:Tiludronic acid.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- As the uploader, I have no objection to deletion. Ed (Edgar181) 13:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Promo/self-promo? Juggler2005 (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
False license. It's a postcard (see here), not own work. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The picture in higher resolution was published here. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aslı Gagauz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical pictures with unclear copyright status.
Juggler2005 (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The picture in higher resolution was published here. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The video was published here in 2013. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LucasNiterói (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status, faked ptwiki-transfers, considering mostly tagged with "Original uploader was Skyscrapercity at pt.wikipedia" or "Skyscrapercity, Original uploader was Flickr at pt.wikipedia" . There is no ptwiki user pt:Usuário(a):Skyscrapercity or pt:Usuário(a):Flickr. Obviously grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com or Flickr. All files uploaded in 05.2013. Examples:
- File:Centro01, Maringá.jpg ("Original uploader was Skyscrapercity at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1486865 (2012, by Vhb) = http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/5149/40925923763682298805010.jpg
- File:2d11b6d576 b8.jpg ("Skyscrapercity, Original uploader was Flickr at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/28389585@N00/525750184/ (2007, © All rights reserved by Carlos A Merighe)
- File:418ae542d0 b8.jpg ("Skyscrapercity, Original uploader was Flickr at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/28389585@N00/525760398/ (2007, © All rights reserved by Carlos A Merighe)
- File:Iguabinha 2007 RJ.jpg ("Original uploader was Skyscrapercity at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=933310 (2009, by Thambem) = http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd192/Thambem/Araruama/2.jpg
- File:8fa115d1b4 b8.jpg ("Skyscrapercity, Original uploader was Flickr at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from https://www.flickr.com/photos/28389585@N00/525797963/ (2007, © All rights reserved by Carlos A Merighe)
- File:Praça-joao-helio-Araruama.jpg ("Original uploader was Skycrapercity at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=933310 (2009, by Thambem) = http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd192/Thambem/Araruama/69.jpg
- File:Alcantara-rodo,sg.jpg ("Original uploader was Skycrapercity at pt.wikipedia") --> grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=907728 (2009, by vitorsavino, credits: "Fotos realizadas pelo jornalista VAGNER ROSA"/http://grandealcantara.blogspot.de) = http://grandealcantara.blogspot.de/2009/06/fotos_1060.html (2009) = http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_cdk-7d35_wA/Sk2sEYQjc9I/AAAAAAAAATc/djW_gOMQCro/s1600/alcantara63.jpg. At VAGNER ROSA's blog was also published File:Terminal-rodoviario-alcantara-sg.jpg
- File:Araruama Praia-Seca-100 03158.jpg ("Lucas, Original uploader was Google at pt.wikipedia") --> obviously grabbed somewhere from Google
- etc.
- Special cases
- File:Alcântara - São Gonçalo.jpg is configured with "Lucas no my work, Skyscrapercity work" and a {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} (based on what?), indicating that file was grabbed somewhere from http://www.skyscrapercity.com
- File:Praia do Gavião, Araruama.jpg (low res, no exif) is configured with "Lucas Cândido, Original uploader was Gladstone at pt.wikipedia". In fact ptwiki there is an pt:Usuário(a):Gladstone who uploaded some files in 2005 and 2006 which were mostly tranferred to Commons (no similar file founded). Most likely grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/7232287 (2008, © All rights reserved by Erick Aniszewski), available in high res and with exif infos.
- File:2009804 univ lsr lg.jpg needs permission from http://www.jw.org/de/publikationen/zeitschriften/wp20091101/mythos-gott-ist-eine-dreieinigkeit/ (2009, Copyright © 2015 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania) = http://assets.jw.org/assets/m/w09/20091101/w09_20091101.art/2009804_univ_lsr_lg.jpg (2009, last modified: 2012, identical file name).
- Same procedure for File:502012486 univ sqr lg.jpg, grabbed from http://www.jw.org/pt/ensinos-biblicos/perguntas/trindade/ (Copyright © 2015 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania.) = http://assets.jw.org/assets/m/ijw12bq/502012486/ijw12bq_id-502012486.art/502012486_univ_sqr_lg.jpg (last modified: 2012, identical file name)
- File:2009804 univ lsr lg.jpg
- File:502012486 univ sqr lg.jpg
- File:418ae542d0 b8.jpg
- File:2d11b6d576 b8.jpg
- File:8fa115d1b4 b8.jpg
- File:Iguabinha 2007 RJ.jpg
- File:Centro 2007-Araruama-RJ.jpg
- File:Araruama Praia-Seca-100 03158.jpg
- File:Centro-Araruama-RJ.jpg
- File:Igreja-São-Sebastião-Araruama.jpg
- File:Praça-joao-helio-Araruama.jpg
- File:Terminal-rodoviario-alcantara-sg.jpg
- File:Alcantara-rodo,sg.jpg
- File:Centro01, Maringá.jpg
- File:Alcântara - São Gonçalo.jpg
- File:Praia do Gavião, Araruama.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio of http://www.thaibiodiversity.org/Life/LifeDetail.aspx?LifeID=78651. G S Palmer (talk) 13:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
By Israeli license, the photo needs to be 50 years old to be in public domain. As the depicted man was born in 1927, I doubt, whether the photo was made before or after 1965. No date, no author, no correct source. Taivo (talk) 13:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The background picture is widely spreaded over the Net. There is no proof, that this derivative work is correctly licenced, Com:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The background picture is widely spreaded over the Net. There is no proof, that this derivative work correctly licenced, Com:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The background picture is widely spreaded over the Net. There is no proof, that this derivative work correctly licenced, Com:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama in Belarus. This skyscraper was built recently. So i think it's architect is still alive. Should be removed. 178.124.157.86 13:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Not free, my mistake! Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Taken from the website which has a copyright notice. We hope (talk) 14:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Home page-the notice is at bottom of the page. We hope (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Guia Instalación iAtkos S3 V2 en Asus PH755-M LX - Guías de Instalación, Recomendaciones y Tutoriales - InsanelyMac Forum.pdf
[edit]Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, photo of non-notable people. Rodrigolopes (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents which could be replaced with wiki-tables.
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری دوازدهم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری دهم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری یازدهم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری نهم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری هشتم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری هفتم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری ششم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری چهارم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری پنجم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری سوم).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری اول).jpg
- File:افشای اطلاعات و مشخصات عوامل سپاه پاسداران و میروی مقاومت بسیج در سرکوب اعتراضات سال88(سری دوم).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biplobider kotha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of book covers/movie posters. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Biplobider kotha (talk · contribs)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
British film (and trailer), and so is still covered by UK copyright SchroCat (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - per my comments at the English Wikipedia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frédéric Dubar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:PRIVATE COLLECTION MR BERNARD VINOIS 06.jpg
- File:PRIVATE COLLECTION MR BERNARD VINOIS 05.jpg
- File:PRIVATE COLLECTION MR BERNARD VINOIS 04.jpg
- File:PRIVATE COLLECTION MR BERNARD VINOIS 02.jpg
- File:PRIVATE COLLECTION MR BERNARD VINOIS 01.jpg
- File:JEAN CHARLES VINOIS.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Vincent Knapp (http://www.elle.fr/Mode/Les-news-mode/Autres-news/Gustavo-Lins-membre-permanent-de-la-Haute-Couture-1467993) Arroser (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo photos of questionable notability.
- File:MCO "El capo musical".jpg
- File:MCO "El capo musical" MIXTAPE.jpg
- File:MCO "El Capo Musical".jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ImInThatCorner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:13.Prodígio - Influências (Feat. NGA).ogg
- File:12.Prodígio - Só Rimas (Feat. Monsta, Deezy, Vilson & NGA).ogg
- File:11.Prodígio - Rikinho (Feat. Monsta & Deezy).ogg
- File:10.Prodígio - Claro Que Mudei.ogg
- File:06.Prodígio - L In The Air.ogg
- File:04.Prodígio - Cara Preta.ogg
- File:05.Prodígio - TamuNoBoda.ogg
- File:03.Prodígio - 2 Seatter.ogg
- File:01.Prodígio - Versos.ogg
- File:07.Prodígio - Aeroporto.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Flickrreviewed file (related to Brazilian city pt:Aracaju) from https://www.flickr.com/photos/20056540@N00/2332353907/ (uploaded there on 14.03.2008 by "Cidade de Aracaju Sergipe") the file was previously published via http://dedascross.a.lenda.zip.net/arch2008-03-01_2008-03-31.html by "Wendell - Dedascross" on 10.03.2008 = http://dedascross.a.lenda.zip.net/images/Viaduto_Aracaju_Noite.jpg (last modified: 10.03.2008, identical exif and res as on Flickr).
In lower res the file was published also before Flickr upload at Skyscrapercity via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=18735948&postcount=154 (29.02.2008, by "Tito") = http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd59/titogarcez/untitled-6.jpg (last modified: 29.02.2008) or http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=593938 (12.03.2008, by "Joao Manoel") = http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x31/jnoelcarvalho/Viaduto_Aracaju_Noite1.jpg (last modified: 12.03.2008).
The text of "Joao Manoel"'s post on Skyscrapercity is identical to a news entry by Aracaju's official site http://www.aracaju.se.gov.br/index.php?act=leitura&codigo=34249 (no CC or whatever free license available), published 28.02.2008 and giving credits to "Foto: Pedro Leite". The photo itself is downloadable in identical res as available on Flickr via http://www.aracaju.se.gov.br/imagem.php?act=popUp&id=54811&largura=200&altura=133.
Permission via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Update
Checking some more uploads by this Flickr user it appears that some other files are Flickrvios too. Example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/20056540@N00/141295589/, uploaded 05.2006 (no exif) versus http://dedascross.a.lenda.zip.net/arch2006-04-01_2006-04-30.html (04.2006, by "Dedascross") = http://dedascross.a.lenda.zip.net/images/Bairro_13_de_julho___Aracaju.jpg (last modified: 04.2006). Like File:Viaduto em Aracaju.jpg the photo was most likely previously published at http://www.aracaju.se.gov.br. A 2013 version of this file is still available via http://www.aracaju.se.gov.br/galerias/305/13-de-julho-noturna_jorge-henrique.jpg and it might be, considering the file name, that "Jorge Henrique" was the original photographer. His Facebook profile available via https://www.facebook.com/fotografiajorgehenrique confirms this, showing this image as title image via https://www.facebook.com/fotografiajorgehenrique/photos/a.468327883246392.1073741831.467936143285566/468327889913058/?type=1&theater. Another upload by this Flickr user — https://www.flickr.com/photos/20056540@N00/141295587/ — is most likely also a work of "Jorge Henrique", considering https://www.facebook.com/fotografiajorgehenrique/photos/a.468326489913198.1073741830.467936143285566/468326726579841/?type=3&theater. Btw, considering an image site search of www.aracaju.se.gov.br, there a hundreds of photos taken by "Jorge Henrique".
Considering all this, I am nominating too:
by above reasons: most likely Flickrvio, per COM:PRP. Gunnex (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kinkindouiste (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense image used for a nonsense article in the French wiki, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. The French nonsense article should be deleted, too!
Ies (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luciano P-Funk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted image, not "own work", see http://georgeclinton.com/family/richard-kush-griffith/
Ies (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO, still not in public domain as it was published in 2009 Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of project scope, and see COM:NOTHOST.
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Low resolution, missing EXIF … this image has been floating around the web for quite some time before it was uploaded here ([1], [2], [3]), so the claim of "own work" seems implausible to me. El Grafo (talk) 17:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joaquin Galvan Toledo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:Leer nos hace libres(Sitio web sudamericano).jpg
- File:Escritores Uruguayos.jpg
- File:Joaquín Galván Toledo.jpg
- File:Entrevista A Joaquin.jpg
- File:No Renuncies A La Felicidad (Avril Y Elias).jpg
Ies (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lassaad ayari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. This user is trying to make articles about himself, both on en-wiki and fr-wiki, by pasting images containing Arabic text. Same person as user Lasaad ayari (talk · contribs), whose uploads have already been mass-deleted, though he has since uploaded more.
- File:Ayari5.png
- File:Ayari6.png
- File:Ayari4.png
- File:Ayari3.png
- File:Ayari2.png
- File:Ayari1.png
- File:Gmt.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rumenahmedrazu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Selfies by user only here to write about himself
- File:Razu AT Garage.jpg
- File:Rumen Ahmed Razu Wikipedia Profile Picture 01.jpg
- File:Rumen Ahmed Razu 01.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:Moths of India already there. --THA-uzhavan (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope selfies, one used in promotional page deleted at en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rvmsounds/RajStar
JohnCD (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Used in deleted article en:Fahad Lodhi JohnCD (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erelfelcher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GajendraShekhawat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope selfies. Article deleted at en:Gajendra Shekhawat
- File:Gajendra Shekhawat - Smo Specialist India.jpg
- File:Gajendra Shekhawat - Seo Executive Jaipur.jpg
- File:Gajendra Shekhawat.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Poster, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
3D artwork of a Belgian artist dead in 1999. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 18:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Very small, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, not used in any wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia Motopark (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
there are some big painting or poster on the back which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Promotional upload. --XXN, 21:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Роман Осауленко (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal pictures.
- File:Роман Осауленко, один із засновників, лидер громадського руху "Відродження" https---www-facebook-com-romanosako 2013-12-09 01-46.jpeg
- File:Осауленко Роман Николаевич--24-01-1983 года рождения---Образование высшее Ростовский Государственный Строительный Ун 2013-12-09 01-42.jpeg
Lupo 18:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Copy here. Yann (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
File:مهندس سامح محمد ابو شبانه - مواليد ٧-٣ قرية كفر بهوت مركز نبروه ، -الحاله الاجتماعيه - متزوج و يعول -اب لكل من احمد شبا 2013-12-09 02-06.jpg
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 18:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal logo. Lupo 18:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Site this is from has a copyright notice. We hope (talk) 19:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- The logo is in the left column and the copyright notice is at the page bottom.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 19:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Site appears to have a copyright notice at bottom right--there's a small "C" in circle We hope (talk) 19:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
poor photo of baseball game, no educational use Pibwl (talk) 19:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
photo of unnamed person, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Linked article at the English Wikipedia has been deleted. Lupo 19:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
This is a book cover and is probably under copyright. We hope (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Данная картинка представляет собой обложку книжной серии "Элизиум" от издательства "Росмэн". Саму обложку оформила художница Ольга Закис. Я переговаривал и с Ольгой Закис, и с генеральным директором издательства, которым принадлежат авторские права. Оба были не против свободного использования всех обложек (включая "Элизиум"), нарисованных Ольгой Закис. Дмитрий Ткаченко 8 (talk)
- That may be, but policy then requires that the publisher send a free license to OTRS. Unless and until that happens, the image must be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal mini-photo Pibwl (talk) 19:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Logos and drawing, unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:Caricatura Creel.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte logo.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte.jpg.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte.png.jpg
- File:María la del Barrio.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The puma is not text only, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
From Facebook, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
unused photo of an unknown person, sole upload, Pibwl (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope. Same for File:Traveling in chipinque with her friend.JPG (user's only uploads) Pibwl (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Collage of photos and newspaper articles. The photos show Malaysia's first (1963) general of the armed forces; the newspaper articles are about his death. According to COM:CRT, Malaysia has a copyright term of 50 years. The subject was born on 24 November 1919; he died at 75, so the newspaper articles must be from 1994 and thus are still copyrighted. So may be the photos. Lupo 19:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Author - V.Boltishev - is alive. Non Public Domain. Gandvik (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Invalid license, work may be copyrighted. 1989 20:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Purely promotional (invitiation to some seemingly-non-notable college student meeting fails COM:SCOPE) DMacks (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by الجبوري الجبور (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:امن تواضع لله رفعه 2013-12-16 03-07.jpg
- File:اصل التواضع عمرو جاسم الجباره 2013-12-16 03-04.jpg
- File:الشيخ عمرو جاسم الجباره 2013-12-16 03-00.jpg
- File:عمرو جاسم الجباره في احدى المولات في مصر 2013-12-16 02-58.jpg
- File:عمرو جاسم الجباره 2013-12-16 02-57.jpg
- File:عمرو ابن الشيخ جاسم الجباره وهو ايضآ شخصيه مشهوره ومحبوب لدى المجتمع 2013-12-16 02-43.jpg
INeverCry 22:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 08:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by الجبوري الجبور (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal pictures.
- File:عمرو الجباره من محبي الصحراء او البر ويظهر في هذه الصوره وهو يرمي في الصحراء--وهو من عشاق الاسلحه 2013-12-16 03-06.jpg
- File:احد محبي الشيخ جاسم الجباره قدم هذه الصوره وفاءآ له وهذا واحد من الف شخص 2013-12-16 02-45.jpg
- File:الشيخ جاسم الجباره مع ابنه الشيخ الدكتور عمرو 2013-12-16 02-44.jpg
- File:الشيخ جاسم الجباره 2013-12-16 02-42.jpg
- File:الشيخ جاسم الجباره 2013-12-09 23-24.jpg
- File:هذا هو الشيخ جاسم الجباره 2013-12-09 23-21.jpg
Lupo 20:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some logo, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Source states [CC-BY-NC license Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 20:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Apparently it's a copyvio from here Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 20:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope; personal photo 1989 20:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope, same for File:HEAT IS ON-loki.jpg Pibwl (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some artistic photo of doubtful authorship and/or out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Author - Andrew Karashchuk - is alive. Non Public Domain. [4] Gandvik (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture. Lupo 20:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
photo of friends, out of scope Pibwl (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
some political promo. Same for File:ALEX ALVAREZ PROFILE.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
out of scope; personal image 1989 21:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Self-created art of an admittedly made-up creature: without obvious educational value per COM:EDUSE, out of project scope Animalparty (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC) image is also too small and is in the wrong file format(i saved it as JPG instead of PNG)also name contains bad language.obvious delete,unneded,name contains bad language--Regisaurusjacobi (talk) 07:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
None of the compatible licensing claims seems to be true. Finally, although the design of a given coat of arms may be in the public domain, specific realizations needn't Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Eurodyne (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Scaled down (useless in fact) of File:Sede del BOCM Alcobendas.jpg Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Scaled down version of File:Sedes del Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid.jpg Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
So small and with so low resolution that it's not possible to fulfill any educative requirement
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation - cropped copyrighted (other author) content Merlin (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation of [5]. Photo is an obvious promo photo, probably given out by the subject for media events. It's obvious from looking at it that it was taken in the late 1980s, or perhaps the early 1990s, not in 2007 as the uploader at en-wiki claimed. The Master (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. User's other upload of the same person is a blatant copyvio. The Master (talk) 23:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. company registration. Licensing seems an issue as well Basvb (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Wikipedia articles can be added to Wikipedia Basvb (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Some project description without a description Basvb (talk) 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Personal advertisement
- File:El valor de mi pega Rodrigo Castillo.pdf
- File:Critica a la TV Rodrigo Castillo.pdf
- File:Art. Realidad Digital & Publicidad.pdf
- File:Art. Posicionamiento & Estrategia I.pdf
- File:Art. Nociones para una teoria publicitaria.pdf
- File:Art. Fundamentos de la mercadotecnia y la segmentacion.pdf
- File:Art. Branding.pdf
Basvb (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. from cat advertising Basvb (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. from cat advertising Basvb (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category. Looks like homework Basvb (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category looks like homework Basvb (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In marketing category Basvb (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope: low quality table which can be created directly in articles Basvb (talk) 23:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. report of paper Basvb (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. This could better be integrated directly in relevant location on the wikiprojects Basvb (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Maybe this fits on wikibooks, but it's a lot of personal research Basvb (talk) 23:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The file description claims the file to be incorrect and links to a correct version Basvb (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Looks to be from an external source as well Basvb (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Unused low quality version with duplicates (File:Carbon Lewis Structure PNG.png). Basvb (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
As the original uploader of this image, I support this deletion request. As Basvb mentioned, there are larger versions of this image, which are in png, rather than pdf format. Daviewales (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Viola los derechos de autor, esta cubierta no es aceptable por Commons C.Jonel (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Dit is een kaart die werkelijk niks zegt of aangeeft wat als der Holocaust omschreven kan worden, ik zie niet hoe deze geografische kaart een zinvolle bron van informatie kan zijn. Onbruikbare info. Fluitketels (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep used in many wikis. /St1995 15:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
the file I have created and then moved contained the whole work, not the first tome only, so keeping the misleading name and redirecting it creates a false information about a file that does not exist. Please delete this page. --Zyephyrus (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I can't see the rationale behind it "does not contain copyright-eligible parts or visuals of copyrighted software" Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
US copyrights do not apply. Claimed source is Mexican Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Although the coat of arms may be in the public domain, specific realizations aren't. This has been taken from the UAM website and they keep the copyrigh of this realization Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de personne Lassalle Laurence (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de personne Lassalle Laurence (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de personne Lassalle Laurence (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
unnecessary, false and ugly, it was my mistake Nixnubix (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Why? It is a very good, useful image. It may be placed in Category:Graffiti in Germany, for example. /St1995 15:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
You may move it real gladly in the suggested category. However you are justefied for it. But in our opinion it is very misplaced on [[6]]. So you could do me a great favor if you would do that. --Nixnubix (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Flickr page this was taken from shows it as being copyrighted and thus it is not suitably licensed for Commons use. Guinnog (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Unconsistent request. The licence for the file was reviewed on June 2013 and it is still cc-by-2.0. Plus it's unrevokeable SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Though the Flickr license is correct, the graffito itself appears to be a derived work from the court case video of Breivik's trial. This would either have to be shown to be PD, or that this portrait was taken at some other time. The artwork itself appears to be a very faithful reproduction of a video still or photograph, which has not been sourced for verification.
I note that this Commons image is widely used across Wikipedias and other projects. It is significant that this graffito is the only photograph illustrating these articles, indicating that freely released photographs are not currently available. --Fæ (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. You would have to prove that it was from the court case, which you have not yet done. Please find court room footage and post the moment that illustrates this image. Otherwise, the image is absolutely permissible, with the correct license cc-by-2.0. May I remind that a similar request for deleting this file was based on the same premises, and was kept as a result. --Ritsaiph (talk) 23:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. This is bs. According to the PCP if there is reaonable suspicion i needs to be deleted. There does not need to be direct evidence of wrongdoing or copyright violation. We need to err on the side of caution and delete it. Josve05a (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. It is a work of art which has been uploaded to flikr using an appropriate cc-by-2.0 license which was reviewed before in a similar request and kept. No new information has been given as to why this request is different, so if it was upheld previously why would it be wrong now? --Ritsaiph (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment COM:DW. (duck; if it quack like a duck and looks like a duck, then it is a duck. = If it looks like a DW [...]) Josve05a (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. It is a work of art which has been uploaded to flikr using an appropriate cc-by-2.0 license which was reviewed before in a similar request and kept. No new information has been given as to why this request is different, so if it was upheld previously why would it be wrong now? --Ritsaiph (talk) 02:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Image permissions are unclear. It is almost certainly artwork based on a photo. The image is available on Flickr as CC-BY, but the image caption also says "courtesy of Organ Museum, ©2012 www.AbodeofChaos.org". In addition, the value of the photo to Wikimedia is not clear. I literally laughed out loud when I went to the Breivik page and this was the image provided... It looks like Han Solo frozen in carbonite. Laughter is not the desired reaction to the page of a mass murdering terrorist. Surely an actual photograph of Breivik must be available somewhere. Bueller 007 (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted per nom/COM:PRP. INeverCry 01:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I am the uploader. This name is wrong. Please delete the present file. Tangopaso (talk) 17:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. In the Advertising category Basvb (talk) 23:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. personal bio Basvb (talk) 23:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. from cat advertising Basvb (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Basvb (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Spanish paper with link to nature (as source) however I believe nature does not publish in Spanish. Basvb (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused table of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Basvb (talk) 23:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Sort of portfolio Basvb (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Simple, unused and low quality graph Basvb (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Basvb (talk) 23:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Slideshow Basvb (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Basvb (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Should be added directly to wikipedia if relevant Basvb (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Loads of derivates of derivatives (pictures of 3d artwork). All of the authors need to be attributed and have given permission Basvb (talk) 23:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. cv Basvb (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The database from which this is taken is explicitly not public domain: http://protist.i.hosei.ac.jp/PDB/copyright_E.html HYanWong (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. plain text history, should be integrated in relevant articles Basvb (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. essay Basvb (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. personal cv Basvb (talk) 23:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused pdf document of questionable notability. From media needing categories. Basvb (talk) 23:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ibanez_AX125.jpg Nojo13 (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion was given; work released into PD. --Burkhard (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a copyright violation to me. The permission states as reasoning that it was published in El Espectador. The paper is from 1982 Basvb (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhishekchauhantitu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN7.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN6.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN5.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGHCHAUHAN.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN V.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN RAJPUT.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN4.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK SINGH CHAUHAN.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN 2.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN.jpg
- File:ABHISHEK CHAUHAN CHIRAIYAKOT.jpg
- File:Chiraiyakot.jpg
- File:Maunath bhanjan my distic.jpg
INeverCry 04:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. (I double-checked a couple of them, but don't see an easy way to confirm that none are in use.) -Pete F (talk) 20:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bassam Atheeque (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Bassam Atheeque Wonder.jpg
- File:Bassam Atheeque Pose.jpg
- File:Bruce Bassam.jpg
- File:Mini Bassam Atheeque.jpg
- File:BRAK.jpg
- File:BassamAtheeque.jpg
- File:Bassam Atheeque.jpg
INeverCry 05:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 22:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 05:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 05:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harnamsinghmuktsar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Jasveer Singh1111.jpg
- File:Jasveer Singh 7.jpg
- File:Jasveer Singh.jpg
- File:Jasveer Singh1.jpg
- File:Jasveer Singh11.jpg
INeverCry 05:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karan Vadhwani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 05:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
zanikla práva Vbronson123 (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
zanikla práva Vbronson123 (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
není aktuální Vbronson123 (talk) 10:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No valid deletion reason given. Please see COM:D. Green Giant (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
není aktuální Vbronson123 (talk) 11:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No valid deletion reason per COM:D. Green Giant (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
bad quality, low resolution, better files File:Caspar David Friedrich - Hünengrab im Herbst (ca.1820).jpg Oursana (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, according to Commons talk:Superseded images policy, this is not a valid deletion rationale.--Wdwd (talk) 18:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Your upload from 2015-01-06 is of very low quality (37kb), has no source, no detailed artwork description, no detailed, consistent cats. When you uploaded your file on 2015-01-06 we already had 2 older uploads, at least one in excellent quality as File:Caspar David Friedrich - Hünengrab im Herbst (ca.1820).jpg (1.800 × 1.424, 1,32 MB uploaded 2013) and File:Caspar David Friedrich - Hünengrab im Herbst - Galerie Neue Meister Dresden.jpg (1.005 × 780, 249 KB uploaded 2008). Your newly upload therefore had no educational value and was out of the project's scope, please do not take it personally. Commons is no repository of bad images, while we have already better uploads.--Oursana (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- This file was transfered from de.wp with an original upload date 2014-04-06.--Wdwd (talk) 16:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Speedy delete, redundant, low quality. The light is interesting, just try this with one of the bigger files, 37KB vs. 1.31MB doesn't cut it, sorry. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This file already exists: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KochSnowGif16_800x500_2.gif I did not know how to update (upload) new version of this file. Sory. Leofun01 (talk) 06:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep (strong). too different (speed) /St1995 15:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
zanikla práva Vbronson123 (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. Yann (talk) 09:37, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Well-Informed Optimist as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: a screenshot of a copyrighted software. тнояsтеn ⇔ 12:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Objection: the buttons and layout of the software are no problem in my opinion. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 12:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader replaced the screenshot depicting a sample from the software with an own work. --Sargoth (talk) 16:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
No se ha subido correctamente Ivana1166 (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This imahe has been replaced by more current and accurate: Southern flying squirrel Glaucomys volans distribution map.png Darekk2 (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio of http://www.thaibiodiversity.org/Life/LifeDetail.aspx?LifeID=77014. G S Palmer (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This image has been replaced by more current and accurate: Northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus distribution map.png Darekk2 (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.. This image infringes on the sculptor's copyright and cannot be kept on Commons without his permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sommes-nous sérieux ? Il s'agit d'un amoncellement de ballots de paille, installé par un paysan. Les détails de la bouche sont marqués avec un spray de peinture. Si l'on considère cet homme de paille comme une œuvre d'art, il faudra supprimer tous les bonshommes de neige.
- We are serious? It is about a pile of straw bundles, installed by a farmer. The details of the mouth are marked with a spray of paint. If we consider this man of straw as a work of art, it will be necessary to delete all the snowmen.
- Sind wir ernst ? Es handelt sich um eine Anhäufung von Strohpacken, die von einem Bauern untergebracht ist. Die Einzelteile des Mundes sind mit Farbspray gekennzeichnet. Wenn man diesen Strohmann als ein Kunstwerk betrachtet, wird man alle Schneemänner beseitigen müssen.
- Somos serios ? Se trata de un amontonamiento de bultos de paja, instalado por un campesino. Los detalles de la boca son marcados con un pulverizador de pintura. Si se considera a este hombre de paja una obra de arte, habrá que suprimir todos los muñecos de nieve. --François GOGLINS (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC) .
- Yes, I am certainly serious. Snowmen clearly have a copyright in the USA and in most (maybe all) other countries. So do children's daubs and other simple works. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mon dieu ! Dans quel monde vivons-nous ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 12:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC).
- Yes, I am certainly serious. Snowmen clearly have a copyright in the USA and in most (maybe all) other countries. So do children's daubs and other simple works. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- We live in a world where artists create many beautiful things for our enjoyment. Copyright protects creators from those who would steal their art for their own use without payment. Without copyright there would be much less art in the world. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing to copyright really here. Yann (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Alan (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo. --Alan (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ssire as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.gignac-en-quercy.fr/. This image seems to be a Coat of arms of a location, so please discuss if is actually them and if is in the PD. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
moving rest Arnd (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
moving rest Arnd (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Artwork may be copyrighted. 1989 20:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep It is not copyrighted, because this specific artwork is situated permanently in a park. Specifically, the Parc Ceràmic d'Història Valenciana de Manises. Qoan (dis-me!) 20:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: FoP in Spain apply. Please add country in the description. Yann (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Artwork may be copyrighted. 1989 20:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per FoP-Spain. The sculpture was made with author's consent, so there is not a copyright infraction. Works pemanently located in exterior places in Spain fall under Freedom of Panorama, so everything is OK.--Coentor (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: FoP in Spain apply. Yann (talk) 09:53, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
moving rest Arnd (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Everything in the source site seems to be copyrighted Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 21:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just one click further would have led you to http://wiki.wesnoth.org/Wesnoth:Copyrights, which clearly states that the entire game is open source. --Conti|✉ 22:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment Open source != Compatible with commons licensing.
- The entire game is licensed under the GPL license and I don't really know whether it translates into compatibility with our licenses. See Commons:Deletion requests/GPL screenshots. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, {{GPLv2}} is perfectly fine and what I see in my Battle for Wesnoth 1.12.0/COPYING.txt. Over 100,000 uses of GNU licenses on commons are no nonsense. Of course GIMP or Inkscape or ImageMagick screenshots while looking at non-free images might be also non-free, and it's possible to swap free Wesnoth/Freeciv/FreeCol resources against non-free stuff. But I have this image with a black night-sky and stars background in the GPL .../data/core/images/portraits/elves/shyde.png. The ancient DR was closed as delete despite of GPL, because of a hideous watermark. –Be..anyone (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Update: actually I also have .../data/core/images/portraits/elves/transparent/shyde.png (298,709 bytes), exactly the same as here. –Be..anyone (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: GPLv2 sems OK. Yann (talk) 09:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Battle for Wesnoth title screen
[edit]The game website states a clear (c) notice. Nothing seems to support a non-eligibility claim
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 0.6 - fr title.jpg
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 0.8.5 title.png
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.0 main.jpg
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.10-main-pl.png
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.5 main.png
- File:BoW 1.6.5 - Title Screen.png
- File:Menu-wesnoth14.png
- File:Screenshot-韦诺之战 - 1.5.6+svn (31368).png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth 1.12 title screen.png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth-Title Screen-fr.png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth-Title Screen.png
- File:TitleBfW110en.png
- File:TitleBfW110ru.png
- File:Wesnoth-1.0.jpg
- File:Wesnoth-1.6.1-menu-gl.png
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just one click further would have led you to http://wiki.wesnoth.org/Wesnoth:Copyrights, which clearly states that the entire game is open source. --Conti|✉ 22:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- The game is open source so the screenshots too. --MPK100 (talk) 03:21, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Not really, I'm afraid. The entire game is licensed under the GPL license and I don't really know whether it translates into compatibility with our licenses. See, for instance, Commons:Deletion requests/GPL screenshots. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 10:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Wesnoth isn't 3D game, so the player has little control over what is displayed on the screen. I would however agree that in 3D virtual environment, the player can have some creativity, and therefore creates a copyright on his own, but this is not the case here. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, GPL is used for major parts of freesoft, sources, screenshots, etc. Everybody knows that these licenses were not designed for media. FFmpeg, Freeciv, FreeCol, or other GPL screenshots would have the same "problem" (= no problem at all) as Battle for Wesnoth. There are 38,000 "whatlinkshere" to {{GPLv2+}}, 34,000 to {{GPL}}, and still more than 10,000 to each of various GFDL + LGPL license tags. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: GPLv2 seems OK. Yann (talk) 09:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Battle for Wesnoth title screen (nomination #2)
[edit]Missing essential information: Corresponding source code and installation instructions not offered to reproduce these derivative screenshots ({{Dw no source since}}). We know the source of these photographs, but the copyright and conditions of the underlying works must also be considered.
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 0.6 - fr title.jpg
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 0.8.5 title.png
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.0 main.jpg
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.10-main-pl.png
- File:Battle for Wesnoth 1.5 main.png
- File:BoW 1.6.5 - Title Screen.png
- File:Főmenü.jpg
- File:Menu-wesnoth14.png
- File:Screenshot-韦诺之战 - 1.5.6+svn (31368).png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth 1.12 title screen.png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth-Title Screen-fr.png
- File:The Battle for Wesnoth-Title Screen.png
- File:TitleBfW110en.png
- File:TitleBfW110ru.png
- File:Wesnoth-1.0.jpg
- File:Wesnoth-1.6.1-menu-gl.png
2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 18:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC); edited 21:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: In addition, File:Screenshot-韦诺之战 - 1.5.6+svn (31368).png has no permission to relicense under CC BY-SA 3.0. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 18:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Also no permission for File:TitleBfW110ru.png and File:TitleBfW110ru.png, incompatible licenses. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 19:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Info: File:The Battle for Wesnoth-Title Screen.png was overwritten. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 19:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)- Keep You can find the source code here, so I do not see where the problem is. --Conti|✉ 19:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose @Conti: Hi. Screenshots are derivative works too. These photographs are binary distributions of works licensed under the GPL, as such there's conditions on copying: The complete corresponding source code offered for each photograph to the exact version, including any source code changes if made which happens to be a burden on the uploader in lieu of more information. This and other conditions and exceptions are mentioned in GPLv2 section 3 and GPLv3 section 6. The source code is defined as:
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable.
GNU General Public License, version 2One of these other conditions is including the
Installation Information
under GPLv3 or so-to-say the samescripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable
under GPLv2 must also be included. That is, the full instructions how to reproduce the binary (object code), and in case of screenshots also how to reproduce the photograph. Access to the complete corresponding source code is a pre-requisite.If something is missing from the conveyed source code to reproduce the photograph, then it is not in compliance with the GPL and thus unfortunately not considered free under the license. The
death or liberty
clause: If the work is not conveyed under the GPL, then as a consequence it may not be conveyed under the license at all. (GPLv2 section 4, GPLv3 section 8 & 12.)I hope this gives some insight into the issue, and hopefully you can understand why there is little to no possibility of legitimate re-use and (re)distribution for these screenshots without the CCS. If something's still missing or I'm plain wrong, please tell. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 20:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Conti: In case you wanted a TL;DR: The copyright holders did not seem to agree to publish these photographs like this (they are not in the public domain, as shown by the
COPYINGfile in your link), and Commons has no permission from them. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 20:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC); edited 20:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC) - I edited the nomination for additional context, hopefully it's a bit more clear now. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 21:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- I'm no lawyer, so I'm not in a position to argue this to any great detail. But I dare say it is not the intention of the people who wrote this (freely distributable) game that screenshots of it are not freely distributable themselves without some major, unnecessary hassle. This seems like nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking. --Conti|✉ 16:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Bitrot happens. It's just a fact of life on the Internet that stuff disappears, accounts are terminated, service providers don't track changes, and people change their minds and move on. The way we on Commons have dealt with these issues has been to consider the intent of the creative mind behind the work and its copyleft perpetual licensing, whether or not the work and evidence of its licensing are still available from the original source. We have also had to mitigate rampant license laundering through the use of automated and manual license reviews, as well as a blacklist of known license laundering accounts on Flickr. Clickable links to CC, GPL, and other licenses on file description pages have long been accepted here, and there is no good reason for AGPL to be an exception to that. I highly doubt if any court would hold that an author could invalidate the license to its GPLd or AGPLd work by taking down that work's source code and then successfully sue for copyright infringement, therefore I take the perpetual need to have source code available in those licenses to be unconscionable and unenforceable. — Jeff G. ツ 15:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. Correction: These files are not AGPL, but GPL. There is no question about linking to the GPL license being sufficient to display the
Appropriate Legal Notices
in this case, because Commons hosts its own copy of the GPL license- Sorry, I confused the copy of GPL with GFDL's requirements of hosting a copy on Commons. Regardless, this is irrelevant to the case and telling the users how to view a copy of the license does not fulfill all the obligations under that license. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 03:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding legal precedents, Free Software Foundation Europe has a collection of precedents on their wiki: https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL%20Enforcement%20Cases 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 03:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- For a little bit of clarification: I agree with your quote "[consideration of] the intent of the creative mind behind the work and its copyleft perpetual licensing", but that contradicts your vote if you've read the license conditions. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 03:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- For more clarification: The "written offer of complete corresponding source code" by uploader (which is missing from these files) under GPLv2 or GPLv3 is intended to exactly prevent the theoretical situation you're describing, and explicitly a possibility for conveying non-source forms of the work. That's a condition. The downstream licensing process is automatic. You can't pass the offer of source from copyright holders of Battle for Wesnoth, only occassionally and non-commercially (e.g. to your closest friend). 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 03:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC); edited 03:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- You seem to suggest that this is a general issue that affects all screenshots of GFDL/GPL licensed works. If that were the case, wouldn't it be more appropriate to start a general discussion on the issue (say, a request for comment), rather than to nominate a few individual images that will unlikely attract much attention? --Conti|✉ 11:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- What are you suggesting? I've previously commented on self-expression on my talk page, and there is an ongoing COM:VP discussion on license terminations I've started. I'd love to have a discussion; you can help by participating. Regarding hosting local copies of GNU licenses, I already made an RFC for that earlier today. If you have suggestions, you can reach me on my talk page. But in the end, it's not a big deal for the uploader to make a written offer when distributing GPL screenshots. In this case there's no offer and it's a problem, as simple as that. Uploads are deleted all the time for copyright violations. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 17:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- From what I can see, neither your thread on the Village Pump, nor the request for comment actually address the issue presented here: That screenshots of works licensed under the GFDL/GPL require the exact source code attached to them. If that were the case, it would apply to every single GFDL/GPL screenshot on Commons, not just the ones under discussion here. So a proper RfC would be warranted. I'm not sure how I could help you with that, though, considering I disagree with your interpretation of the issue at hand, or that this issue is a copyright violation. --Conti|✉ 17:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Would Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/08#Free screenshots uploaded by User:יוסף אור be an adequate response (specifically, User:Gazebo's reply)? Nevermind it's not an RFC. I don't understand why an RFC would would be needed when it's so explicit in the license text itself, or what there's to disagree about. That's exactly the kind of barrier for creating an RFC. Would you like to help?
I've also asked User:Natuur12 for help on their talk page. See also In what cases is the output of a GPL program covered by the GPL too?, and other literature I posted to User talk:Natuur12. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 18:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- The issue is precisely that the license text is not explicit or blatantly obvious, and so far you are the only one I can see among all the discussions with this particular interpretation of the licenses. Hence an RfC might be helpful to determine community consensus. --Conti|✉ 18:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
❔
Did you really read the literature or the GPL FAQ? What exactly about conveying non-source forms under section 6 of GPLv3 is unclear? What part of applicability of GPL to output is unclear? What question did you not get an answer to?
We could debate for long here, but at the same time I'm not allowed to understand if it's only your opinion on the subject. I'd love to hear exact counter-arguments from you saying this is not so, otherwise it is not constructive. It's my need to also understand what you don't understand, so that I can make a neutral RFC about it. I've shown you precedents too, so I'm not sure what more I could do to help you. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 18:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- There's no need to help me, I've made my opinion clear on the matter. If you want to set a precedent on Commons on how to deal with screenshots under certain licenses, you don't do it through a single deletion request, you do it through a RFC. It's really not that hard, and it's on you to start one. You're the one who wants to change the status quo. --Conti|✉ 19:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
If you're referring to Special:Diff/256868040, that one I have always had opinions about. I have interpreted it is your own opinion, which I would not find as a strong defensive argument in court if one was to be sued over redistribution of these Battle of Wesnoth screenshots under GPLv2+ license terms. Consider the access to corresponding source code via a designated place on the network is more of an exception in GPLv2 anyway, quoting the literature I've referenced. My belief is that the copyright holders would've agreed to a different license than GPL for the artwork if your wishes to distribute screenshots more permissively were true. Have they? General advice: Don't sign into legal agreements that you don't agree to.
If you're referring to Special:Diff/256773668, then I still have no clear argument from you if you're arguing for GPLv2 section 3's designated place, GPLv3 section 6(d) or something else. I still see this as one-sided, or I see you've not made your opinions clear on legal basis to counter my arguments yet. Heck, even Commons:Screenshots broadly interprets the copyright holders of the program must agree to publish the program under a free license – something it isn't if the rights to that license have been automatically terminated as a consequence of a breach of terms. This is not my own theory either: It's related to statutory damages in United States copyright legislation, see the COM:VP discussion.
Once you've argued for legal basis (e.g. GPL designated place) to my arguments, then I can say we are in disagreement and a consensus is required via RFC. Otherwise I'm not sure what an RFC would accomplish, if your opinions are subjective or theoretical without basis. Alternatively if there's no basis to my arguments, I've yet to see why you believe so (which should not been confused with irrelevant things to the subject, like Jeff G.'s vote).
I also question what information Commons:Screenshots doesn't already have, and why Commons – voluntarily following local laws for uploaded media – would need a local precedent over legal precedents around the world.
Commons doesn't need a local precedent for every case via RFC for license violations or questions. We make them in deletion requests too, as seen at Commons:Deletion requests/Screenshots of Inkscape with car.svgz with well-explained rationales. I want to hear reasons for disagreement to find agreement, not unfounded opinions Conti.
While I'm in favor of creating an RFC, such seemingly complex topic to understand for some unfamiliar people is difficult to convey correctly and neutrally to the community, to an unknown result. Would you like to help? 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 20:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, I may actually see some of your arguments again after reading it over again. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 21:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- There's no need to help me, I've made my opinion clear on the matter. If you want to set a precedent on Commons on how to deal with screenshots under certain licenses, you don't do it through a single deletion request, you do it through a RFC. It's really not that hard, and it's on you to start one. You're the one who wants to change the status quo. --Conti|✉ 19:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- The issue is precisely that the license text is not explicit or blatantly obvious, and so far you are the only one I can see among all the discussions with this particular interpretation of the licenses. Hence an RfC might be helpful to determine community consensus. --Conti|✉ 18:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- From what I can see, neither your thread on the Village Pump, nor the request for comment actually address the issue presented here: That screenshots of works licensed under the GFDL/GPL require the exact source code attached to them. If that were the case, it would apply to every single GFDL/GPL screenshot on Commons, not just the ones under discussion here. So a proper RfC would be warranted. I'm not sure how I could help you with that, though, considering I disagree with your interpretation of the issue at hand, or that this issue is a copyright violation. --Conti|✉ 17:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- What are you suggesting? I've previously commented on self-expression on my talk page, and there is an ongoing COM:VP discussion on license terminations I've started. I'd love to have a discussion; you can help by participating. Regarding hosting local copies of GNU licenses, I already made an RFC for that earlier today. If you have suggestions, you can reach me on my talk page. But in the end, it's not a big deal for the uploader to make a written offer when distributing GPL screenshots. In this case there's no offer and it's a problem, as simple as that. Uploads are deleted all the time for copyright violations. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 17:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- You seem to suggest that this is a general issue that affects all screenshots of GFDL/GPL licensed works. If that were the case, wouldn't it be more appropriate to start a general discussion on the issue (say, a request for comment), rather than to nominate a few individual images that will unlikely attract much attention? --Conti|✉ 11:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Open licenses are for proper reuse of documents. Misinterpreting such a license as restriction and deleting documents to troll the project simply wrong.--Praveen:talk 18:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please prove the artwork is not under the GPLv2+, or the GPLv2+ license would not apply otherwise. I believe to have presented every argument here it does. It's unclear where you're trying to say me to be incorrect, apparently votestacking to keep because one of your uploads (File:Cpp in GNU emacs.png) may also be in violation or non-redistributable. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 18:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm reminding you, the reason for these deletion requests is exactly its purpose: No redistribution is available for anyone seriously attempting to comply with the GPLv2+ license on these, if no source is offered at all (such as may be the case with one of your uploads). The uploaders may be long gone and the burden of proof is on the uploader. Deletion remains the only option unless there is a correctable mistake and if the license allows curing violations automatically. GPLv2 doesn't, it terminates instantly. But GPLv2+ allows distribution under GPLv3+ too so that means there's 60 days on notice of the copyright holder.
All I'm apparently getting here is stacking votes to keep with no counter-arguments, while I'm referencing to literature and precedents, and still getting asked to get a consensus from Commons. What are the chances those votes will stack there because it's vastly different from "practices of the house" at Commons, or people (especially those closely associating with proprietary software) have subjective opinions about the GPL as a license? This may be the result of such bias, with no explanation. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 19:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Repeating same argument again and again in different words doesn't make much change. As I said earlier being a literality beast is just an another way to troll. Thanks.--Praveen:talk 02:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Praveen. Ruthven (msg) 05:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
At the very least, the description here is inappropriate. But given that this is the sole upload by this user I'm wondering if we can even reasonably assume that it is that person's own work, etc. Jmabel ! talk 04:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Commons are not Wikipedia Motopark (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, nonsense removed. Some celebrity related to Lady Gaga, if I understood it correctly, let's see if somebody uses the photo this year. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, if you want to salvage it: in the description you left, what is "10 December 1994, New York City"? A birthdate? And isn't paparazzi a plural? Isn't the singular paparazzo? - Jmabel ! talk 17:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Birthdate was my guess, yes. And w:it:Paparazzo is confirmed by w:en:Paparazzi. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, if you want to salvage it: in the description you left, what is "10 December 1994, New York City"? A birthdate? And isn't paparazzi a plural? Isn't the singular paparazzo? - Jmabel ! talk 17:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused image of non-notable person. INeverCry 23:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
fully replaced by File:Methidathion vector.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 11:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Dunno, it was in use for six years until the SVG replaced it on Wikimedia sites, but we can't say who else used it (actually Google finds older sources based on the PNG.) The SVG didn't bother to give credits. Existing categories were removed together with an ancient "check categories". Let's say Keep. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wavering. It's replaced by a better fileformat, but high-quality PNG is one of the two that are blessed by the MOS--would need more explanation of deficiencies in the layout or quality of the PNG itself. User:Be..anyone, it's not obvious that the SVG is based on the PNG in any license-relevant way (the layout and visual styling look different, and the choice of details/layout appear standard and default in many chemical drawing guidelines). The PNG original makes it clear that explicit attribution is not required by the terms of its license. And it's actually probably "freer" than that {{PD-chem}} even if the PNG author thought he could be more restrictive. But instead the SVG appears to be done from scratch based on the same facts-of-nature that make it intrinsically free (again, PD-chem). DMacks (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The resolution is pretty low and the style does not comply with MOS. But most importantly, there is no gap between the phosphorous atom and one bond line. --Leyo 02:16, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded it accidently Reeche123 (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Das Haus steht nicht in der Gröperstraße 13, sondern in der Gleimstraße 13, wie im Text zu dem Foto auch genannt. Es würde auch ausreichen, das Foto entsprechend umzubenennen. 79.221.171.240 14:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Nominator suggests to rename the image as indicated, instead of delete. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Done Keep --Sebari (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, but actually I think we need no redirect from the wrong address ;-) Somebody with a license to kill can delete it and close this request. –Be..anyone (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- (For reference: File:Gleimstraße 13, Halberstadt.jpg.) True, the Keep was more directed to the image as a whole. Delete for the redirect. --Sebari (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- (For reference: File:Gleimstraße 13, Halberstadt.jpg.) True, the
- Thanks, but actually I think we need no redirect from the wrong address ;-) Somebody with a license to kill can delete it and close this request. –Be..anyone (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
The quality is inferior, so much so that it is impossible to see who is on the photo. It is impossible to properly illustrate an article with this image, it incriminates Wikipedia's reputation as well. Teemeah (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Incriminates? Don't be silly. Yes it is of poor quality but it is the only one we have of this player and 10 Wikipedias have decided it is worth using. It would have been on en: too but it was deleted without explanation. JMiall (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep In use (although I don't really understand why ...) --Sebari (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
@Srittau and JMiall: It's in use because there is nothing else, but come on, it's quality is so poor you virtually cannot see the face even remotely, so what does it illustrate, really? It's so pixelated, ANYONE could be on this photo. Teemeah (talk) 12:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- It is not our job to regulate what's used on Wikipedias. If it's in use, it's in-scope. I wish this wasn't. --Sebari (talk) 17:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 23:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- No evidence of publication or copyright registration in the US prior to 1923.
- It has been published on Flickr since 2011 here so if that was first publication it didn't occur more than 70 years ago as required for {{PD-UK-unknown}} leg 2 to be valid. Nthep (talk) 16:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - we have an acceptable replacement, although I think this is splitting hairs. The image is clearly more than 70 years old, since that ship sunk more than 70 years ago. But whatever. Amatulic (talk) 23:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with the age but PD-1923 requires evidence of publication prior to 1923 which is sadly conspicuous by it's absence. Nthep (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- So, did anyone bother to ask the Flickr user for the source of that image? --Sebari (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it was the owner of the negative (that he purchased and uploaded to Flickr) who got in contact via OTRS. Nthep (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete then unfortunately I guess. --Sebari (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Non-free logo. Perhaps OTRS could be done? Hangsna (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I will follow the instructions for OTRS, which I found complicated. I have clearance from the company for their logo. Deryni (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- The same procedure will be taken regarding File:Vandrare omslag i 3d.png. but I find no way to voice this at its entry. Deryni (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Gå till bilden och klicka på "ett skriftligt medgivande" i mallen om OTRS som ligger där. Där får du hjälp med hur ett meddelande bör utformas och sen skickas in. /Hangsna (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- License permission sent to OTRS and one other picture. January 21, 2015. Deryni (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Gå till bilden och klicka på "ett skriftligt medgivande" i mallen om OTRS som ligger där. Där får du hjälp med hur ett meddelande bör utformas och sen skickas in. /Hangsna (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- The same procedure will be taken regarding File:Vandrare omslag i 3d.png. but I find no way to voice this at its entry. Deryni (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Restored through COM:UNDEL per ticket:2015012110011169. Jee 11:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
File:US Navy 100211-N-3066M-378 Midshipman 1st Class Kevin P. Rodrigo, from Sinking Spring, Pa., chooses orders to the guided-missile cruiser USS Lake Champlain (CG 57) during Ship Selection Night at the U.S. Naval Academy.jpg
[edit]Family member has requested that subject page and photo be removed of Midshipman 1st Class Rodrigo. Point of Contact - LCDR John Kanetzky, USN, commercial (410) 293-7009. 136.160.90.131 18:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Noting that the image has been removed from the source Navy site, and the image is not in current use, this seems a good courtesy deletion candidate. --Fæ (talk) 19:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Now Lupo has given the link, I prefer to wait until the Navy change the image or delete. --Fæ (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The Navy has not removed anything. The image is here. It's just that our links to the Navy site are all broken because they changed their URLs. (I've fixed the one at that page.) See Commons:Bots/Work requests#Fixing US Navy VIRIN links. @Fae: you even commented there a week ago. Forgot already? But yeah, I don't care whether we keep or delete this image. I don't think this mass-import of US armed forces images was a good idea anyway. Too many irrelevant, unused images with often non-neutral descriptions. Lupo 19:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Why bother? This image is in the public domain being US government work and the Navy have not removed any of the previous images that were requested removed here and are likely not to remove this one either. I just checked and the previous images nominated are all still available at the Navy webiste with the subject's names clrearly showing (I recall seeing 4 and I think each is linked from the previous deletion nomination). The last one, which was kept but remaned was this one whose deletion nomination decision was to keep it but rename to remove the subject's name from the title. That image, and those we deleted, are still available on the Navy website with the subject's name so I see absolutely no point in us removing it or even renaming it because it will still be out there no matter what we do. Families should get the Navy to remove them first and I am sure we would probably follow suit but I'm pretty sure the individual's Navy contact allows photo to be taken and used for whatever purpose the US Navy wishes. Ww2censor (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete in spite of being a shiplover, I don't see any real educational use of this photo. Not everything, that is free, is worth keeping. Besides, for those interested, the photo won't perish, for it will be available still on Navy page. Pibwl (talk) 19:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused image of non-notable person. INeverCry 23:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hananeh.M.h (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these photos are COM:COPYVIOs, perhaps involuntary license washing by sajed.ir. By now this uploader has had sufficient warnings about uploading copyrighted images. Subject is a cleric who was murdered in 2014 1982; images are credited to sajed.ir , a site claiming that its content is available under the GFDL. However, sajed.ir gives no details as to where the photos came from. The images can be found on other websites, but missing the sajed.ir watermark.
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani7.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani6.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani5.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani4.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani3.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani2.jpg
- File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note that some of these images were previously removed on 10 December 2014 by Yann. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: @Ellin Beltz: @DragonflySixtyseven: According to date of upload photos like this photos at different sites,Sajed.ir was a first site that published these photos in internet. Another sites cropped them and used without permission of sajed.ir. Sajed is an Iranian military and government site that under an agreement has been collecting photos from military photographers. for this reason, the name of photographers not disclose. This is a Persian Site and have not descriptions in English. You can see more description: http://www.sajed.ir/detail/93217 Hananeh.M.h
- For File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani7.jpg I would confirm Hananeh.M.h's objection (well, to be exactly: only the part "Sajed.ir was a first site") considering [7] = apparently indexed since 2007 via http://www.sajed.ir/cat/1728 = http://sajed.ir/upload/Topic/15819.jpg. But see (from the same gallery) the ongoing discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ayatollah Ashrafi Esfehani8.jpg + (so far as I know): does GFDL not requires to get the name of the author? Considering the past discussion about files from sajed.ir here at Commons and elsewhere (enwiki) the question remains: is sajed.ir a reliable source...? Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
@Gunnex: I say this again: Sajed is a military site and it`s photographer are military personnel our have an agreement whit Sajed. So the name of photographers not disclose Hananeh.M.h
- @Hananah.M.h: Okay, to be clear - are you saying that Sajed is run by the Iranian government? DS (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but my "this isn't right" meter just kicked into high gear and I searched out sajed.ir images from the rest of Commons. Among them are a gallery of images known to be taken by Iranian photographer Kaveh Golestan (1950 - 2003) of Kurdish victims of the gas attacks. At the time of Mr. Golestan's death he was working for BBC and these images were published by the BBC and some were later reprinted Time Magazine. Therefore I cannot suspend my disbelief at the statements that sajed.ir has the right to release copyrights on images since I know for a fact that the Kurdish gas attack series was not created by sajed.ir - but claimed license by them. See here for Kurdish gas victims images deletion nomination. I think that sajed.ir - regardless of who owns them - is license-laundering and suggest that none of their images are candidates for inclusion in Commons for that reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Oh dear. Would you advocate deleting everything from sajed.ir, then, on the grounds that they're (inadvertently, I'm sure) license-laundering and screwing up provenance for so many images that we can't trust them as a source for anything? (Hananeh - this is why I put a single, low-res, fair-use image in the article about Esfahani, instead of using the many high-res images you had supplied). DS (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The deletion request is on these images alone. For other sajed.ir images, please see additional DN's I've filed on a case-by-case basis. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 02:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
propagande Aga (d) 22:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep — Glenn Greenwald and Dieudonné are both well-known. Sources in English and French. genium ⟨✉⟩ 22:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Identical to previous File:Jesuisdieudo.png by same uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
propagande Aga (d) 22:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Keep — Glenn Greenwald and Dieudonné are both well-known. Sources in English and French. genium ⟨✉⟩ 22:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Logo is PD-text and it is in use to illustrate an discussion. Could very well be propaganda but that doesn't make it out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Not in scope, no use elswhere. Kumkum (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No point keeping an image of every twitter hashtag. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete +1 --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete --George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & with note: No point keeping an image of every twitter hashtag. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
That photo just infringement for web stealing. Please delete it!!!
INFRINGEMENT PERMISSION: [8] --CRCHF (talk) 23:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 22:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
That photo just obviously for infringement again. The photo source is at [9]. It just for web stealing. --CRCHF (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . JuTa 22:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Although the UN permissions page says that UN maps are "open source material" , it also says:
- "We do not permit posting of our maps into your web site (if the map is not part of a specific publication, book or article) because we revise the maps very often and want to ensure that only an updated map is posted on the Web. You can however create links to our site instead. No permission is required for the link."
That is clearly not a free license because it explicitly prohibits posting a map anywhere including Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- See Template talk:UN map, and Template talk:UN map-2 and Template talk:OCHA map. The UN can't revoke the free image status of maps they released in the past under a free license. See:
|
This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.
The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2006090710013991. If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard.
Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2006090710013991
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![171 File:JoJo Savard on the set of "The Dini Petty Show" with the host Dini Petty.jpg](#File:JoJo_Savard_on_the_set_of_"The_Dini_Petty_Show"_with_the_host_Dini_Petty.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_during_Ship_Selection_Night_at_the_U.S._Naval_Academy.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_Coffee_Palace_Berth..jpg){kind=link}
_during_Ship_Selection_Night_at_the_U.S._Naval_Academy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_during_Ship_Selection_Night_at_the_U.S._Naval_Academy.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
|
|
This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.
The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2014031410007248. If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard.
Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2014031410007248
|
Someone needs to contact the UN map division about that permissions page, and tell them that the info there now may be contradictory. Here are the relevant parts from that page currently (emphasis added):
|
UN maps are open source material and you can use them in your work or for making your own map. We request however that you delete the UN name and reference number upon any modification to the map. Content of your map will be your responsibility. You can state in your publication if you wish something like: based on UN map… If you want to use the UN map (or maps) as a UN document, i.e. without modification in specific publication, book or article we can issue publication permission on behalf of the UN Publication Board. It is free of charge and is conducted via email. Please tell us a few words about your forthcoming publication along with a list of the UN maps you would like to use. ... We do not permit posting of our maps into your web site (if the map is not part of a specific publication, book or article) because we revise the maps very often and want to ensure that only an updated map is posted on the Web. You can however create links to our site instead. No permission is required for the link. |
For past versions of that page see:
I think what they are trying to say is that they don't want their name on most maps since they are revised often. The solution for us may be to interpret this to say that the "UN name and reference number" should be removed from all UN maps on the Commons. Just like we remove most watermarks, etc. from other images.
We should do what they request and post "based on UN map" on the Commons page. We do so anyway in the source section via link to the source, but we can be more clear by including that text. And in addition we can point out that there are often newer maps at the UN site.
Someone should ask the UN map people if removing the UN identifying info from all UN maps on the Commons would satisfy them. That way all UN maps on the Commons would be "modified". --Timeshifter (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no concensus for deletion Krd 08:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)