Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/10/31

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 31st, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentaly Uploaded Tfpo (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:The Future Planet Cover Photo.jpg]]


Deleted: Uploader request 1 day after upload, unused image. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied, apparently without permission, from http://www.nffinc.com/data-center-virtualization/virtual-desktop-infrastructure-vdi Jojalozzo (talk) 02:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied, apparently without permission, from http://www.v-rooms.com/document-repository.php Jojalozzo (talk) 02:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for vandalism [1]. Juggler2005 (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bandspam, del. on de Nolispanmo 14:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation JuTa 20:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio Tournesol (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio Tournesol (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio Tournesol (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant copyvio Tournesol (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is not in the public domain. OTRS-permission from Justin Ide via gettyimages is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is not in the public domain. OTRS-permission from AFP via getty images is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 20:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 20:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowres without any EXIF but many searchbyimage hits, therefore unlikely to be Self-photographed.    FDMS  4    21:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid rationale, speculation. Image was uploaded on de.wp in 2004.--Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, misread that. Thought about withdrawing, but have some doubts this has enough quality to get reused.    FDMS  4    21:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Unfortunately couldn't find any replacements.    FDMS  4    21:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LightStar3801 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-31T10:22:12‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Well, speedy kept. Clear PD-textlogo. In fact, his Korean is really bad that I suspect that is machine translation, but not relevant here. — revimsg 04:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Зимой, у древних стен.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:На высоком берегу.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:42:04‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy kept. Nonsense DR, even I cannot understand what he is saying.... — revimsg 13:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny136 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:34:02‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy kept: Obvious PD-textlogo — revimsg 07:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page is no longer used because the image was replaced by a more suitable Rounet (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page is no longer used because the image was replaced by a more suitable Rounet (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file shows parts of Kashmir as not belonging to India. This image hurts the sentiments of all Indians and gives a wrong image of India to the world.

This is an incorrect map of India.


Deleted: The region is disputed and this is shown accurately. Green Giant (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Unknown copyright situation. Where does this map come from? Jcb (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At filepage: source : Nataraja and User Nataraja on fr.wikipedia. --Insider (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw. But where did Nataraja take the base map from? Jcb (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It can be own work (very simple map) or based on map in public domain (from Commons). --Insider (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is own work, but it may indeed be based on a PD map, e.g. from Commons. But then we have to try to find that source map. Jcb (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not see any reason not to trust an experienced user of French Wikipedia. Especially since a lot of similar maps in public domain (e. g.). --Insider (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The map seems to be DW rather than own work, so AGF or not, we need to know where it comes from. Jcb (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to doubt the uploader's claim of own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope / unclear copyright status.    FDMS  4    00:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex drawings, not a textlogo.    FDMS  4    00:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nahuelosores (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    00:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete They may be out of scope, but even more importantly, there is no indication of sufficient consent by the subject of these photos (a minor) or his guardians for widespread publication of the photos. See COM:IDENT. -Pete F (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be Own work / out of scope.    FDMS  4    00:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7nujoom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshot of copyrighted content.

   FDMS  4    00:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sumanrsb2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    00:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sumanrsb2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims. Most of these are watermarked by Apna Nawada, a commercial website. The ones that aren't watermarked can be traced back to the website's other social media accounts, like File:Prajatantra chowk by s shekhar.jpg being available on Facebook prior to the Commons upload date. The uploade's talk page is filled with deletion notices, which does not provide much confidence. COM:PCP applies.

plicit 13:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boby Indrawan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    00:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    00:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emanpa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    00:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Balwinder Thakur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal picture without educational use.

· Favalli01:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:06, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied, apparently without permission, from http://www.skyrme.com/kmbriefings/2virtorg.htm Jojalozzo (talk) 02:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied, apparently without permission, from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Tr-Z/Virtual-Organizations.html Jojalozzo (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied, apparently without permission, from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Tr-Z/Virtual-Organizations.html Jojalozzo (talk) 02:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is on Sharon Farrell's official website but there's no CC license information there. We hope (talk) 02:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything about permitting use with a Creative Commons license, but I also don't see any copyright information on the site either. We hope (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy, and, by extension, Vatican City. Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Vatican_City_.28Holy_See.29.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, photos of any cultural heritage asset are subject to pre-emptive authorisation, a fee and other restriction due to the cultural heritage and landscape law. I have the authorisation.And more "Note: Italian law permits to publish for free pictures of panorama on websites for "teaching or scientific purpose", but only "no profit". --LivioAndronico talk 17:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted Accidentaly Tfpo (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not the own work. OTRS-permission from Kevin Winter via Getty Images for NARAS is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 06:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kravtz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, no source, no date of first publication, no permission, fake licenses.

Sealle (talk) 06:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad print screen capture, I request the deletion of this picture uploaded by myself. Iaaasi (talk) 06:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is one scene of the movie which is not the public domain. Y.haruo (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
document sous droit d'auteur tiré du site officiel de l'artiste. Thesupermat (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete copyvio Silvy Nouchy (talk) 21:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The starship model is likely copyrighted. Gazebo (talk) 09:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portrait fantasy from some modern artist. No valid license + no source. Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a modern picture without a source. Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the source, a social network, nor the uploader can be trusted that the file is public domain. There is no evidence for this license and the user has uploaded severl copyvios before. Avron (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:11, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of any use. Takeaway (talk) 10:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy, no FOP in US. FunkMonk (talk) 10:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy, no FOP in US. FunkMonk (talk) 10:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in US. FunkMonk (talk) 10:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toy. FunkMonk (talk) 10:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art. FunkMonk (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art. FunkMonk (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art. FunkMonk (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art. FunkMonk (talk) 10:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation possible des droits d'auteur, aucune information sur l'origine de la photo. Ertezoute (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This work is not the own work. OTRS-permission from AP is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo / self-promo (see w:es:Alfonso terán, w:es:Usuario:Alfonsoteran). Juggler2005 (talk) 11:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thichpv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope / unclear copyright status.

   FDMS  4    11:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:13, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keete 37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be film footage.

   FDMS  4    11:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Keete 37 (talk · contribs)

Undeclared derivative work of File:Jan_Nepomucky_na_Karlove_moste_detail.jpg and other, possible non-free files. Also unused.

   FDMS  4    12:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be Flickrwashing.    FDMS  4    11:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small copy of file:Grigorii Semenovich Musikiiskii - Portrait Medallion of Peter the Great and Family - Walters 44326.jpg Shakko (talk) 11:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination, redundant. -Pete F (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, above TOO.    FDMS  4    11:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowres professional photograph without any EXIF, uploader has a history of copyviolating.    FDMS  4    11:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots of searchbyimage hits (f. ex. http://www.lostart.ru/de/), unlikely to be Own work (or PD-old).    FDMS  4    11:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    11:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence PD-old applies (= photographer died during WWII; certainly hasn't been registered with U.S. Copyright Office before 1923).    FDMS  4    11:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo? Juggler2005 (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, likely under copyright, permission via COM:OTRS needed if it's not. -Pete F (talk) 23:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant / very unlikely to be Own work.    FDMS  4    11:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be Own work.    FDMS  4    12:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

это я сделал, не трогай мои фотографии. User:Keete 37
If this is a photo, please see COM:DW.    FDMS  4    15:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, uploader has a history of copyviolating.    FDMS  4    12:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Cristian_Chivu_2011.jpg Strainu (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. INeverCry 02:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.hollywoodtuna.com/?id=extra_celeb_6_goodness_5&loc=3&page_id=65069&title=Celebrity%20Pictures EXIF on this image credits Dominic Chan/WENN.com Dudek1337 (talk) 12:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due the historic of the uploader, i assume that is not owm work. Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due the historic of the uploader, i assume that is not owm work. Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no exif, probably not own work Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teddybearlike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo shots, no permission.

Yann (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kofler Gianluca Boris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of the book cover. Beside, it is not clear these are in scope.

Yann (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller copy of File:Каравакк - Портрет царевен Анны Петровны и Елизаветы Петровны.jpg Shakko (talk) 13:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status of this image needs confirmation as no valid source has been provided and also due to the statement in the EXIF data: "This image and data related to the image may be reproduced for non-commercial research and private study purposes.For ALL other uses other than those outlined above, including commercial uses, users should contact, in the first instance, the contributing collection using the contact information provided on the Your Paintings website. Where the underlying painting is in copyright, further permissions will also be needed." -- Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a valid permission. This image was first claimed to be "own work" by the uploader, but also put under a PD-Italy license. After it had been tagged as no-source, an IP claimed that the author is unknown and provided a useless source-entry. Still it is claimed to be from 2014, which contradicts the terms of PD-Italy. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability. Wikipedia article is likely out of scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:RESUMEN DEL LIBRO DE RAFAEL BARAJAS DURAN TITULADO"COMO SOBREVIR AL NEOLIBERALISMO SIN DEJAR DE SER MEXICANO".pdf.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Florcervantes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos and book covers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is obviously a screenshot and not the user's own work. Image is apparently from a music video of the artist. Middayexpress (talk) 14:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Alan (talk) 14:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not useful SushilRShukla (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in SVG anyway. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work form book cover. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine article. No evidence of permissions for text and images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Todos los artículos e imagenes han sido creados por nosotros, no necesitamos permiso de nadie para publicarlos más que de nosotros mismos.[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from song and album covers/promo images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is a downscaled version of File:Rahul Kumar.jpg – JBarta (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, personal shot of likely non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 02:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Same reason as above two deletion requests... Perhaps we should create-protect this file name. This, that and the other (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. --Krd 18:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The depicted promotional poster is copyrightable, but unlikely permanently installed. Thereby, terms for FOP exception aren't met. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to be copy/reproduction from a magazine, per image-quality and per uploader's own description. No evidence of a permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lowres professional promotional photograph, unlikely to be Own work.    FDMS  4    16:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG dupliate of File:Flag of Spain (1785-1873 and 1875-1931).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no exif, probably not own work Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The image even has a copyright symbol in the drawing! See http://www.mamievandoren.com/ for artist's name. No free license is stated. Dismas (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HAFxTTB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promo.

Juggler2005 (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission for artwork. No FOP (indoor). Artist Fritz Körner died 1955. Wdwd (talk) 18:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

understand. is there a possiblity to undo the deletion at dewiki to not loose the pic? --Arnd (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This applies also to the german wikipedia. We would need a permission from the artist, respective in this case from the legal successors or heirs, otherwise we could not use this picture on de.wp (until year 2026, I made a remark on de:WP:CZG).--Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ok, then let it vanish. --Arnd (talk) 20:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santiagosime (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promo.

Juggler2005 (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern unfree monument in Russia, no FoP for sculptures in Russia A.Savin 18:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern unfree monument in Russia, no FoP for sculptures in Russia A.Savin 18:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждение разрешения правообладателя на передачу фото в общественное достояние Dogad75 (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора на передачу изображения в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia Dogad75 (talk) 19:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора и правообладателя на передачу в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia Dogad75 (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора и правообладателя Марии Тихоновой на передачу в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia Dogad75 (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора и правообладателя Марии Тихоновой на передачу в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia Dogad75 (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора и правообладателя памятника Марии Тихоновой на передачу в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia, нет разрешения и правообладателя фотографии Dogad75 (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения автора и правообладателя Марии Тихоновой на передачу в общественное достояние, FoP-Russia Dogad75 (talk) 19:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry , but this is not covered by Commons:FOP#France. JuTa 19:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ça devient un véritable fléau ! Serait ce trop de vous demander de lire la description, en trois langues, pour être sur d'être compris !
cette notice sert a justfier un changement de nom de catégorie et il est explecitement demandé de la détruire ensuite ! Alors faites le boulot !

Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per the file description, this is a photograph of a copyrighted 2D notice board, not covered by the Right of Panorama in the UK Hchc2009 (talk) 19:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of an unknown musician, low quality, blurry. No benefit. Achim (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edit: Self promotion, see w:pt:Usuário(a):Demonsthrash/Conde Baterista --Achim (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio (photo from facebook), very small, no benefit, typical grabbed by fan-club... Achim (talk) 20:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, new user, no educational value. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol Ciaurlec (talk) 21:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, apparently used to attack somebody — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T05:48:58‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have a perfectly usable logo already here File:ASGlogolarger.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T05:54:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also:

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:31, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have a perfectly usable logo already here File:ASGlogolarger.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T05:54:46‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Candice Cooper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope (no mainspace usage or contribs by the uploader).

   FDMS  4    22:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content / out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (no articlespace usage or user contribs) / unclear copyright status.    FDMS  4    22:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an album cover, not Own work.    FDMS  4    22:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Belarus 195.50.31.213 22:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, no exif. На вашей фотографии стоит значок копирайта на другое имя. Ymblanter (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:33, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, not Own work. OTRS permission required.    FDMS  4    22:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    22:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    22:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope / unclear copyright status (missing source).    FDMS  4    22:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turtlepowerninja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots of copyrighted content. OTRS permission required.

   FDMS  4    22:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyrighted commercial promotional poster.    FDMS  4    23:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of a spamblocked (fr.WP) user.    FDMS  4    23:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:34, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Витя Лимонов (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    23:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and poor quality shot of mine and of a subject that is available at Commons with much higher quality. Me, als author, request its deletion. Poco2 18:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by INeverCry.  revimsg 07:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:45:18‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no comment. :p  revimsg 07:23, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company 1989 15:53, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9   16:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by LightStar3801 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-31T10:21:18‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-28T13:31:34‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:36:16‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:42:33‎ (UTC)


Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:41:35‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:39:56‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:35:23‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:34:48‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:40:27‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:40:58‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:46:55‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:39:09‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:43:37‎ (UTC)


Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:27, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:42:46‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for DR.  revimsg 07:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is completely and utterly innaccurate. The uploader claims a source that is 404, but even a cursory check shows it's wrong. He shows only a tiny area with a density above 500, but the entirety of seoul is over 10000 with some areas approaching 40,000. Even other cities like daegu have a density of 2900 which is well above what is on this map. It serves no purpose, shouldn't be in use anywhere, and is simply factually wrong. 211.215.156.184 02:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. The site I had the data from has moved, I changed the link. I found it quite difficult to find data concerning South Korea, and I agree with you that the exact population density may not be accurate concerning Seoul (as I already mentioned in the description). However, since the general pattern seems to be accurate, and since the source can be considered to be reliable (it appears to be an academic project), I have no choice but to accept the data set as it is. What is more, I really don't know how I am to correct it.
A word on the methodology: it seems that the researchers are using satellite images, with a blend of "expert-opinion manual satellite imagery interpretation" and automatic extraction via regression (source). It could be that the population density figures ground on estimates. That does not necessarily make them "completely and utterly innaccurate" as you say. I guess the general question is whether a map giving a more or less reasonable image of population distribution is better than no data at all. I would answer with yes, but now that you have started the debate it is up to the community to decide. --Adbar (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May not be accurate? It's holy inaccurate by orders of magnitude. Let's not mince words here. It doesn't really matter what your methodology is, the map is simply and purely wrong. That's more than verifiable with reliable sources. The fact that you'd show anywhere in Seoul or the surrounding area under 500 is pretty ridiculous. The same with any of the other major cities. As far as finding data goes, every single area in Korea reports their population statistics. Right down to the neighbourhood level. That should be more than accurate to build a population density map out of. Here is a map from 2005 [2] which shows plenty of areas over 10,000 That was 10 years ago. It's grown quite a bit since then, not shrank. The average for the country is almost 500, don't you think it's strange that the top of your list is only 500? The korean word for population density is "인구 밀도" I suggest you start there after removing this image.--211.215.156.184 00:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is too inaccurate. My source from Government of South Korea (here (mobile view)) says density of Seoul is +10,000. 500 is really wrong data.  revimsg 07:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is outdated and is not needed anymore. Navy2004 (talk) 05:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 12:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 07:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional image INeverCry 08:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sizar halabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

private image, out of scope

Indeedous (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sizar halabi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - plain text in a jpg - unused INeverCry 08:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anuj.priyadarshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonicdacityboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 08:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dipak kumar thakur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 08:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 08:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 09:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corresponding article deleted on de-WP; copyvio WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aidan Layne.jpg 91.134.65.79 14:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that this artwork is out of copyright. The poster is signed "E. Vicente" (?) so Solidarid Internacional Antifacistica is not the author in the first place as claimed on the file page. If this was created by Esteban Vicente who was known to oppose the Spanish falangists, this is not yet public domain as Vicente died in 2001. De728631 (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, 1000 excuses pour le manque d'attention... --Noelbabar (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-28T18:59:59‎ (UTC)


Deleted: spam Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por que ele é um erro 179.157.77.113 11:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No legitimate reason given for deletion. Green Giant (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: London Fashion Week 2014, not in India, so not covered by this permission. Yann (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or is it en:Lakme Fashion Week, which would be OK? Yann (talk) 14:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Isnt it Lakme Fashion Week than London Fashion Week? Shaphiu (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Other photos in the series show the model in front of signs for Lakme Fashion Week. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author information incorrect; photographer not credited. Tove Dahlberg's website [3] states "You are free to use the downloadable images. Please credit photographer Maria Lindvall." Strictly speaking "Attribution" would thus be sufficient. However the uploader (with username 'Tove Dahlberg' but likely the same person as [4]) claims the image as "own work" and crucially does not attribute the photo to Maria Lindvall. An OTRS-ticket confirming permission (and a different username) would be the best solution. Buxtehude (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Buxtehude, you are right that the photo "Tove Dahlberg opera singer.jpg" was taken by Maria Lindvall. When the photo was deleted from Wikipedia some time ago, I contacted Maria Lindvall and asked her if she would mind uploading it for me. She thought it as was too complicated to do herself, so she suggested I do it under my own name, but stating her as make-up artist (unfortunately, I didn't find a way to include make-up in the form you fill in when you upload the photo). After the photo shoot in 2007, Maria sold me the photo giving me permission to use it as I like, so I do own it. Only to be fair to her, I asked my web master to write "Please credit photographer Maria Lindvall" on my web site. I would be more than happy to credit Maria on Wikipedia too, so if there is another way of uploading the photo to Wikipedia where I can do that, please let me know. Unfortunately, I am not aware of what an OTRS-ticket is. Would you mind helping me? Best wishes, Tove Dahlberg

  • Just an aside: you should not say something is your "own work" if it is actually someone else's work.
  • I assume that this can all be sorted out. As you probably know, the copyright of a portrait photo belongs to the photographer, not the subject. OTRS is a system for us to keep track of rights having been properly granted when someone uploads someone else's work (or their own work that was previously published without a sufficiently open license). See COM:OTRS. Basically, we need an email from the photographer, preferably explicitly referencing the URL of the relevant file page where the photo resides so it can easily be seen what photo it applies to.
  • Given that it is apparently your intention to license it as Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license, that is the license that should be stated in the email.
  • I hope that's clear; if not, feel free to continue discussing here. The OTRS process takes a bit of time, so assuming you are pursuing it, you will probably want to tag the file page with {{OTRS pending}}.
  • I know this is all a bit annoying, but I presume you understand that we need to take this sort of precaution so that people do not continually release photographers' work without the photographers' permission. - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Tove Dahlberg, at [5] you will find an email-template (also in Swedish). If Maria Lindvall would be so kind to send this to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, the process can be concluded. It is a bit of a hassle, but it is essential for the image to be licensed correctly. (I have already made the required changes to File:Tove Dahlberg opera singer.jpg.) Buxtehude (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jmabel and Buxtehude, thank you both so much for your help! I am all new at this, and I'm finding it quite difficult to figure all this out! I have sent a message to the photographer with the e-mail template in Swedish - I can only hope she does send it. Right now, I'm failing tagging the photo as you recommended, Jmabel. Is there some kind of tutorial for Wikipedia for people like me? If there is, where do I find it? Best wishes, Tove

I have already tagged the photo for you. At your talk page you will find a first steps tutorial and other useful information to get started. By the way: an elegant way to avoid the hassle of providing permission by email would be to use a Creative Commons license for the photos at your own website. See [6] for information on how to do this. Buxtehude (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since you addressed me directly: nothing really to add to what Buxtehude said. - Jmabel ! talk 00:12, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is now an OTRS matter. Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidently uploaded under the wrong licence. It is a fair-use file and has been uploaded to the English Wikipedia as such. CambridgeBayWeather Talk 19:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo designed by myself using Adobe Illustrator for use by Kincardine Municipal Airport. I allow allow its creative commons use for anyone.


Deleted: Per CBW's request. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.museum19401945.nl/ ErikvanB (talk) 19:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source suggests image is not under a free license. Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce personage n'existe pas ; il existe "Antoine Apponyi" (Fichier=Anton Apponyi) et "Rodolphe Apponyi" (Fichier=Rudolph Apponyi). La representation de ce dernier fait discuter par les conservateurs de musées le prénom : Antoine ou Rodolphe ? 6PO 20:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: Already deleted on 1 November 2014. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use for commons due to watermark Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 21:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment My request refers to this watermarked picture. If the picture can be replaced by a non-watermark version, you may consider this request obsolete. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 22:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Version with no watermark now uploaded. Green Giant (talk) 23:48, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T17:26:46‎ (UTC)

 Keep Extremely simple, PD-textlogo. Fma12 (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Me The Money (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:27:14‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per Fry. Green Giant (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszny1367 (talk • contribs) 2014-10-02T17:25:54‎ (UTC)


Kept: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

쓸모없는 파일 외 되 돌릴수 없는 파일 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Me The Money (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T09:28:14‎ (UTC)

 Keep PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 04:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per Fry. Green Giant (talk) 23:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pointless redirect created by mistake. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 11:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request. Green Giant (talk) 23:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

I transferred the entire album (including this photograph) from Flickr via Flickr2commons. Although this file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license, we do not have the personal permission for it to be here. Besides, it is not a useful file to be in Wikmedia commons. Msanta20 (talk) 00:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hate to do this, but see Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures of the Louvre Pyramid and Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests: The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I.M. Pei (still alive). France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is the main subject of the image, so unfortunately there's no exception like De minimis. There may be more problematic images in this category, I just picked the ones that seemed to be more or less clear cases for now.

El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion of File:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg. The main object is the old Louvre, seen through some glas. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No Fop in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, except those where the pyramid is not the main object. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}}.

* File:Louvre at dusk.JPG * File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG already kept in previous DR --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg per comment below --Denniss (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons 2.jpg not main object --Denniss (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josve05a (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most are not DM. The pyramid is to prominent, captured intentionally or the images was even used to illustrate the pyramid. Doesn't fit DM. According to the Frech FOP-template "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject". Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pyramid is still covered by copyright (the architect, Ieoh Ming Pei, is alive), there is no FOP in France and COM:De minimis is not applicable for these files. Per archives, see Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests.

VIGNERON (talk) 14:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} Some of these (~3-5) may have already been kept in an earlier DR, but under a false premise, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louvre at dusk.JPG. I feellike it would be benificial to have a new and 'clean' disussion about these files.

Josve05a (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As two pictures of mine are affected - with one even serving as the prime example for alleged false premises - I'd like to maintain that the principle of de minimis should be applied at least to File:Louvre at dusk.JPG and File:Louvre at dusk2.JPG. They are in fact very similar to the images used to illustrate De Minimis in France --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore  Keep, also per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Same for my picture which was not even nominated for deletion in the last round where 5 others were removed. I find this repeated request is itself under false premises and object strongly. Dfg13 (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Louvre Museum - entrance.jpg, as I already wrote in March: the pyramid is an "accessory to the main handled subject" - the entrance. It also has been discussed and excepted here and obove. --Euku: 07:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after consulting Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests/kept I decided to delete all the photos. Object under construction can also be protected with copyright, if enough copyrightable details are seen. General views about museum can also be protected with copyright, if the museum is protected with copyright, that means, if enough copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-France}} As earlier DRs (above).

Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: but kept one. From the perspeĉtive it becomes quite clear that the pyramid is there intentional and is indeed one of the main subjects. Natuur12 (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --The Photographer (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blacked-out version kept, others deleted: none of these images complies with de minimis. For re-upload, please black out or crop. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pitke (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This building has been designed by Ieoh Ming Pei (b. 1917), an architect who is still alive. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, this picture should be removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 09:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I deleted all files where the pyramid is the central element. For the rest, it could be argued that the pyramid is unavoidable (cf. the Terreaux case), or a secondary element. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept, because not enough copyrightable details can be seen. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Louvre pyramid is a copyrighted artwork by I. M. Pei. France has no freedom of panorama. In these pictures, the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis.

Ras67 (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Ras67, the rationale for deletion you placed on ALL these images was "the pyramid is one of the main subjects of the images, so there is no exception like De minimis."
Frankly, I have found the closures of discussions that revolve around FOP and de minimis, in France, to be pretty inconsistent, and unpredictable. Some discussions where I thought the images were sure to be deleted ended up being kept because the closing administrator concluded the questionable element was merely "one of" the elements of those images.
I uploaded one of these images, one that shows the square in front of the Louvre, including the pyramid. The Pyramid takes up less than ten percent of that image's real estate, less than one third of the horizontal span of the image.
Did you intend everyone weighing in here to take a meaningful look at all two dozen images? Do you think it might have made sense for you to have further broken them down, separating the few where most of the image was of the pyramid, from those where the image was really of the square in front of the Louvre?
How about going back and adding your estimate of how much of each images' real estate is taken up the pyramid?
In my opinion, these two dozen images should not have been the subject of a single nomination, because they are not sufficiently alike. Geo Swan (talk) 21:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You want a nomination for each picture alone? IMHO all pictures have the same problem. The question is, where is de minimis exceeded and where not. May the closing admin decide, therefor is this discusion. But you have right, this procedure is inconsistent and unpredictable like the whole subject. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have a guideline, but how tight is the commentary. The pyramid as central element of the place is in almost every image unavoidable. To "freeing" a picture you have to photograph the whole place? Where is the threshold? To my nomination i've included the pyramid's space and in relation the space of all other (non copyrighted) elements. I don't know if this proceeding is correct.--Ras67 (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
IANA, but I think our interpretation of French is too strict. As it is said on the FOP page, a picture is not a derivative work if the work of art is a mere element blended into an architectural ensemble. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, apparently nobody wants to close the request and I must close it again. I keep all the photos previously kept or undeleted. File:January Mon Dieu Palais Louvre Paris - Master Earth Photography 2014 - series France saphir pictures - panoramio.jpg is de minimis.

I explain keeping file:Parisienne2002-1.jpg. Pyramid is simple geometrical figure and not copyrightable. Louvre Pyramid is not a simple geometrical figure and it is copyrightable. It's not allowed to use non-trivial details of copyrighted objects. But under some circumstances the photo has no copyrightable details, only simple geometrical figure, which isn't copyrightable. These photos can be in Commons. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Thesupermat (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thesupermat: Half of these are already nominated. There is no need to do it again. Then images are acceptable if the pyramid is an unavoidable element in the whole composition (decision of the Cour de Cassation regarding the Terreaux case). Regards, Yann (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: are you sure? "Paris Musée du Louvre - panoramio - Nikolai Karaneschev.jpg" is the only file I see already nominated (nothing on this page and nothing on the talk page of these file). I've put a gallery to show that in most of these photos the Pyramid is the main subject and not really an unavoidable element.
At least for the Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 09 to 16 and for Paris, France (Unsplash QrpX-2tPmNY), I would say  Delete.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am sure. I nominated them myself. I think File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 03.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 04.jpg, File:Paris Louvre Cour d'Honneur Pyramide 05.jpg and File:Louvre Palace (5986775507).jpg could be kept. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of them. Kept the four mentioned by Yann and one additional that has already been deemed fine in two previous DRs on this page. --Majora (talk) 00:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP France

Roy17 (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Even the last one has the pyramid as a very prominent feature. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@D-Kuru: pd ineligible is possible, but only if the object is really simple, like a flagpole or an obelisk.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: And what is so special about a simple tetrahedron / pyramid? The general shape is ineligible for copyriht in my opinion. Close up images of the roof construction may be not. --D-Kuru (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Automatic window cleaner, Louvre 11 December 2007.jpg.  Delete everything else since the pyramid is the primary subject.--Roy17 (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, except those Darwin pointed out. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 14:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear cases. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ahmadtalk 18:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

 Keep --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader. OK for suppression of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg. But for File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the main subjects of the photo are the strike and the Louvre. Not the pyramid. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I cropped the file above to remove most of the pyramid. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? On File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg, the pyramid is not totally visible. The bottom of the pyramid is hidden by people. It shows that the pyramid is not the main subject. This is a case of COM:DM. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: Are you willing to crop out the top of each photo, down to the top of the head of the tallest depicted person? I would accept that.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I uploaded a new version. I hope it will please you. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: I think you did not crop enough from 1, and you didn't crop 2 at all. Pinging @Minorax as nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I said OK to delete the #1 picture. I cropped again File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg to preserve and save my photo. But I disagree, the precedent cropping was enough. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: Did you mean  Keep #1 and  Delete #2? I share your view. IMO image #1 is cropped enough to make the Louvre Pyramid in de minimis. Admins should delete the first two verson of File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg if you keep it. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Oops... I meant  Keep #1 (cropped with the pyramid in de minimis) and  Delete #2 (with the whole pyramid). --Tangopaso (talk) 18:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep First and  Delete second per above, the copyrighted parts should be cropped as like the first one to avoid FOP problems. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Yann (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, thus the Louvre Pyramid is still protected by copyright. Don't think these can be considered as COM:DM

Minoraxtalk 11:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yann (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed by architect I. M. Pei (1917–2019) in 1989. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2090.

A1Cafel (talk) 14:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for File:Palais du Louvre 003.jpg due to de minimis.
 Delete for all other --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, above sections.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 13:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pyramid too big (main subject of the photo) to be a FoP exception

— Draceane talkcontrib. 08:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)--[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in France. COM:FOP France. Creator was Ieoh Ming Pei. He died 2019. The files can be restored in 2090.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Beck, I think that before you propose this massive request, you should at least check if it was kept as File talk:South facade of the Richelieu Wing (162242079).jpg or if broke any rule...
All that I opened should be kept as the protected monument is not the main object or occupy a significant area of the photo.
Read the previous discussion before this propostions. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 23:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep for all, see quotation below. --Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“One has to understand the decision of the Cour de cassation in the Terreaux case to decide what is OK and what is not, which is a bit complex. In short, it says that if a copyrighted work appears unavoidable in a general picture, then it is acceptable.
I am surprised we don't have an article about this. In 2005, the Cour de cassation said that general pictures of the Terreaux square in Lyon, including the work of art by Daniel Buren are not violation of the author's copyright. Regards, Yann

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images should be assessed, but it seems that the outside of the vehicle has elements that are more artistic than utilitarian.

Gazebo (talk) 09:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3D models are prominently shown; see COM:Image_casebook#Models.

Gazebo (talk) 09:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted packaging is likely copyrighted; there is already the file File:01-karaoke-mikro.JPG that shows the product without any packaging copyright issues. Gazebo (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for a new image without package, and  Delete for an original image with package. --Clusternote (talk) 08:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file is fixed, deleted the older version. Natuur12 (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article Portal Deutsche Länder in der Entwicklungspolitik deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article de:Portal Deutsche Länder in der Entwicklungspolitik deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article de:Portal Deutsche Länder in der Entwicklungspolitik deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article de:Portal Deutsche Länder in der Entwicklungspolitik deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

article de:Portal Deutsche Länder in der Entwicklungspolitik deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 11:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears to promote a radio station, company, brand, etc. DLindsley (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears to promote a radio station, company, brand, etc. DLindsley (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D art. FunkMonk (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose DR as being a just an information poster permanently installed in the public room nearby the entrance outside the Museum, i.e. Template:Fop-Switzerland, Roland zh (talk) 11:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But it is the main subject, not just part of a larger photo. Therefore it fails. FunkMonk (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose

Switzerland

According to article 27 of the Copyright Act (en/de/fr/it), works installed at or on publicly accessible places or ground may be pictured, and such pictures may be offered for sale, sold, transmitted, or otherwise published. The image must not be three-dimensional and it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original.

The works must be permanently installed, but for the purposes of the law, "permanent" means a fixed installation which may be temporary -- time limited -- but not "accidental", e.g. due to transport of the work.

For more information, see COM:CRT/Switzerland#Freedom of panorama.

Deutsch  English  español  sicilianu  македонски  русский  Nederlands  français  italiano  +/−

--Schofför (talk) 01:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original". It is quite possible to use this image for the same purpose as the original, a commercial poster. FunkMonk (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This image shows only an image of the commercial poster, but is itself not a poster. It can be used as such even just after machining (cut off the edge of the picture with the wall and after high magnification). On the other hand, the museum would be very happy if this image would be used as an advertising medium ;-) . --Schofför (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: IMHO covered by {{FoP-Switzerland}}. JuTa 23:39, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A better version at File:Bilayer OLEDS.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-28T19:34:56‎ (UTC)


Deleted: unused nearly duplicate. JuTa 23:41, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a superior image at File:Blason Quiévrechain.png: The file format is better ditto the colors, compare e.g. with [7]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-29T17:20:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version at File:La Brise du Desert2.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-27T13:47:22‎ (UTC)


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 03:26, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also nominated:

These maps have been replaced with the new File:Rensselaer County New York incorporated and unincorporated areas.svg and its variants which is the U.S. standard. Therefore these older files are redundant and may be deleted. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 12:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no license by ÖNB Mehlauge (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harminder Singh may be useful for a description 91.65.49.111 14:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil ich sie unter diesem Titel nicht hochladen kann D689K (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kein gültiger Löschgrund Krd 16:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Rodrigolopes as no source (No source since). -- Tuválkin 23:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, strike that: This image is only used a single time in article space, at he.wikisource (also there in a user’s page). All other usage is template transclusion (a template made by me, so no excuse). -- Tuválkin 23:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: no source, no author, no permission Krd 17:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Comedy Nights with Kapil" is a TV show. Screenshot? Yann (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Comedy nights with Kapil' is one of the most popular TV shows and many bollywood actors appear on this show. Obviously photographers follow these actors and take pics during live performances. You can see hundreds of pics taken during such performances on BH here in 'events' section. See another pic File:KapilSharma.jpg in which host of TV show is posing for photo. Abhi (talk) 19:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, pictures could be taken (staged) just before or after the show (during the show itself, I have some doubt). Since this picture has no EXIF data, how could we know that it is really a picture, and not a screenshot? The quite awkward pose lends me to think that it is a screenshot, not a picture, but I could be wrong. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license review passed by User:Yann. JuTa 21:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since)... which is absolutely correct, but this looks like some kind of template problem, more than a no source... I see a claim of own work by a member of Chinese Wikipedia. This may be some kind of mangled move over file, hoping someone in the community can help. I'm nominating this one for "probably ok, but needs help to keep". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Shizhao: , who transferred the file. Green Giant (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no fix, no reaction for 20 days now. JuTa 21:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license (No license since) ... which is technically correct. However we have a new user here, with only three uploads. The other two were tagged correctly, this one has a typo in the License template... I think it should be {{self|cc-by-4.0}} as that is what it seems was the intent of the uploader. No reason at all to disbelieve user's own work. Seeking help of community to keep this image, nominating it as "needs work, but most likely ok." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well the Uploader set CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0. Which intent strongly that he/she doesn't like the commercial use o that image. This is not compatible with the commons rules. --JuTa 19:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
With the gallery of their uploads, I see one at 3.0 and two at 4.0, so perhaps confusion? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have emailed the user asking them to comment since they haven't responded here. If there is no response in the next couple of days, we should go by what they have put as the license, and delete the file unfortunately. Green Giant (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is a shame that they have not responded, GG, but I agree with you. A couple more days and poof!. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no reaction, no valid license. JuTa 21:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not a proper photo about the composer, I would like to download the kind of pictures would match with the artistic level of Sandor Szokolay. I am his daughter so I have lots of photos about him. Szokyorsi (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's really not a good picture. It can be deleted, if you upload other photo(s) about Sandor Szokolay. Thank you --Rlevente (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no license problems, still in use. JuTa 21:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image / unclear copyright status. No source.    FDMS  4    21:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Ksp figure stated. (see e.g. w:Calcium_carbonate#Solubility) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-10-31T19:03:33‎ (UTC)


Deleted: unused and easily replaceable by pure text. JuTa 21:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears to be a scan from a book. Uploaded under cc-4 licence, but states that source and author are unknown. If the author is unknown, how can we say that the copyright owner has released it under a cc 4.0 license? If the source is unknown, how can we be sure that it has been PUBLISHED anonymously prior to 1944 - which is required for template:Anonymous-EU (and prior to 1926, which would be required to get past the URAA as well). Note that the same issues also seem to be applicable to several of the uploaders other recent uploads of aircraft photos. Nigel Ish (talk) 00:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The plane (its true name is Levasseur-Biche LB.2) was designed in the 1920s. This official image, of more than 70 years old, is widely published without claim. It can be tagged at least {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. There is no evidence this image was copyrighted in the US before 1996. A1AA1A (talk) 09:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While the image may date from the 1920s, there is still no evidence presented about when it was first published - which would need to be pre-1944 for {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} - (i.e 70 years post publication, not creation) to be applicable. Just because the image is widely available on the internet, doesn't mean that it is public domain or otherwise useable on Commons. Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright status. JuTa 21:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]