Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/09/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This image seems to be copy pasted from a website without the original photographers copyright permission of the image. This image seems to be taken from a news agency called "Indiatimes" (http://www.indiatimes.com/more-from-india/ranjit-sinha-will-be-new-cbi-director-48158.html). How is the author named "Drsharan" - who posted this image to Wikimedia Commons have such a upclose clear view of senior police official? The author has no previous record of photography of high quality pictures. I request the Wikimedia and Wiki administrators to delete this image as the author violates copyright acts, laws and policies. -Thanks! 116.74.12.105 05:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 07:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
An unwanted image created using copyright violations. Please delete this photo. -Thanks! 116.74.12.105 05:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept - BS Denniss (talk) 07:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
This photo is a copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author has not provided any written permission or any authority on copyright holding on this photo. The author also seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. I doubt that a comman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 122.176.4.90 03:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above, permission even confirmed via OTRS. --Didym (talk) 04:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
This photo is a copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author also seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. The authors name "Sir Nicholas de Missy" is fake, bogus and a made up. There is no website for such a famous person on the internet named "Sir Nicholas".? There is is no website or picture with a fake Sir Nocholas on the web. I believe the written proof that may been passed for this photo is fake. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 182.69.181.45 08:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep per previous DR resolved as Kept. OTRS team, don't forget to add {{Permission OTRS}} if the file actually has permission. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- DELETE as per copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. I doubt that a conman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. ORTS seems to be faked under false name and false email address of the sender. The uploader who calls himself as "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington, Naveenpf" has no verification in the internet of belonging to a royal family or royalty in general. So I do not trust himself being called "Sir" and the name sees to be fake and purely made up for furthering of his/her agenda. Thanks, Varghese Jacob
Kept: Repeatedly placing DRs without new information is not permitted. If you do it again, you will be blocked. Certainly the original uploader of one of these images has a pseudonym -- that proves nothing -- only a minority of us use our actual name. Also, this image is a collage of two Commons images, both of which seem to be OK, so I fail to see why you keep attacking this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
What is the purpose of this comparison pictures? These are two different individuals. They are not gay, not a married couple. Why are two pictures pinned together? Who are the copyright owners of these two different pictures and then combined together to form one single image. The owner of the picture is not the copyright owner of the two images or even one image being made. There is a political vendetta and image falsification. This is against Wikipedia and WIkimedia rules and regulations. Please delete this image if copyright information has not been provided. Thanks. 122.171.16.48 17:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The copyright situation has been clarified multiple times (see above). The image was probably created for the main page of some wikipedia project because the two persons simultaneously where in the news. It may not have been always possible to show two images next to each other otherwise. PaterMcFly (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep derivative work of two images hosted in Commons, already cited on the source section. Both images had the right copyright information (even a VRT ticket). There is no ground to delete based on copyright violations. Günther Frager (talk) 22:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep legit file and copyright info. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 21:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
permission Rahulazm (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request next day after uploading. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
permission Rahulazm (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request next day after uploading. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of previously deleted file under the same name Ameisenigel (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted. Actually not, but I'll delete the file nevertheless. Small unused personal photo without camera data, the user's only upload. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It's a copyvio from https://www.msj.go.cr/informacion_ciudadana/SitePages/vicealcaldia_copia%281%29.aspx Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
promotional information, phone number and see description, out of projecxt scope Motopark (talk) 07:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Denniss. JuTa 02:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
This is my file and I want it removed from here. Siraj Ul Hassan (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Russavia JuTa 03:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Abdennour Bidar souhaiterait avoir une autre photo sur sa page wikipédia. Anne-So7 (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the incorrect image this is 16 Main Road, Kalk Bay, not 18 Main Road, St James Lennon001 (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the incorrect image, please delete Lennon001 (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 09:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the incorrect image this is 16 Main Road, Kalk Bay, not 18 Main Road, St James Lennon001 (talk) 12:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded the incorrect file, please delete Lennon001 (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Krd 09:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- The IP user does not say that he is the person taking a picture. He says that he is the person photographed, that is to say, the person who is visible on this photo. He is not requesting his immediate removal. He is requesting its (the photo) immediate deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Photo piratée. Usage abusif. Vie privée. La police est prévenue 119.62.124.199 09:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Photo piratée, intrusion dans la vie privée. Abus. 81.56.175.105 10:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Photo volée 89.83.75.84 11:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Cette photo a été volée sur une boite mail piratée. A supprimer ! 86.219.90.175 15:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Falk van Gaver en soirée.png. The place on the photo looks like a private place. There is no evidence of consent to publication by the pictured person. In the context, considering the balance of inconvenients and the plausibility of the IP's objections, regardless of the fact that they're not proven and his strange use of different IPs to make the deletion nomination, I suggest speedy deletion. It would always be time to restore if the publication turned out to be legitimate. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Photo volée dans une boîte mail piratée. Usage abusif. Je préviens la police. 81.56.175.105 08:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
"Photo piratée. Usage abusif. Vie privée. La police est prévenue." 119.62.124.199 09:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Abus. Photo piratée. Intrusion de vie privée. 81.56.175.105 10:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Photo volée. 89.83.75.84 11:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Cette photo a été volée sur une boite mail piratée. A supprimer ! 86.219.90.175 15:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Falk Van Gaver.png. The place on the photo looks like a private place. There is no evidence of consent to publication by the pictured person. In the context, considering the balance of inconvenients and the plausibility of the IP's objections, regardless of the fact that they're not proven and his strange use of different IPs to make the deletion nomination, I suggest speedy deletion. It would always be time to restore if the publication turned out to be legitimate. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
lieu erroné Smcg (talk) 10:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope, potitic text, commons are not homepage Motopark (talk) 11:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. Yann (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhorsetrader (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source of the map is missing. Looks more like Google Maps or other such website which would then be copyvio.
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Australia from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Melbourne from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Sydney from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Perth from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Brisbane from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in United States of America from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Frankfurt from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Berlin from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Germany from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Netherlands from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Mauritius from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Germany from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHindu Temples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Canada from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Brazil from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Belgium from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Toronto from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Saskatoon from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Ontario from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Ottawa from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Montreal from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Manitoba from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Alberta from the Hindu Temples Directory at AllHinduTemples.png
- File:Map of Hindu Temples in Singapore.png
- File:A Map of All Hindu Temples in United Kingdom.png
- File:Hindu Temples in Mainland USA.png
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I checked some of them, and those look like Google Maps. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 16:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Why were these files deleted? I'm the creator of all these files, It's not a copyright violation I created the directory.
Photo is uploaded under a pd-sweden-photo tag - However it shows the roll-out of the prototype Boeing 747, which took place in the United States, so this license is inappropriate. In addition, the link given for the source of the photo goes to the login page of the SAS data bank, with a statement that: "The content of the SAS Image Bank is for SAS corporate use only and may not be distributed or used for private purposes". Nigel Ish (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep SAS is the copyright holder of this image, therefore {{PD-Sweden-photo}} is appropriate. The statement on the SAS image bank website is quite irrelevant here. russavia (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- The photo was taken at the roll-out of the Boieng 747 in Seattle in 1968 - here and here are almost identical photos clearly taken at the same event and both explicitly credited to Boeing. The aircraft in question has only ever being owned and operated by Boeing, and SAS didn't receive -100 versions of the 747. Just because an image was apparently found on a SAS website doesn't mean that Swedish copyright law automatically applies to a photo that clearly wasn't taken in Sweden.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The photos are not the same however, they were clearly taken at different times -- note the evident movement in the crowd. The public rollout of the 747 saw media from around the world being present, and representatives of the airlines which ordered were also present. File:Boeing 747 rollout (7).jpg and File:Boeing 747 rollout (6).jpg are clear evidence of that -- these photos show SAS' head flight attendant sitting and standing in one of the engines at the public rollout. SAS was an early order placer of the 747 -- you will see its logo under the "4" in "747". Where the photo was taken is absolutely irrelevant. There is no doubt, in my mind, that this is clearly the work of SAS. russavia (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- The photo was taken at the roll-out of the Boieng 747 in Seattle in 1968 - here and here are almost identical photos clearly taken at the same event and both explicitly credited to Boeing. The aircraft in question has only ever being owned and operated by Boeing, and SAS didn't receive -100 versions of the 747. Just because an image was apparently found on a SAS website doesn't mean that Swedish copyright law automatically applies to a photo that clearly wasn't taken in Sweden.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as per Russavia’s explanations. This file was uploaded as part of a batch of photos from SAS, all of high quality and precise scope, and it is unlikely that they would have snitched somebody else’s work just for that picture. Ariadacapo (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
As stated in the previous deletion request, Swedish origin of the photograph is doubtful. The actual source of the photograph appears to be AFP/Getty, according to NPR (same image, rotated and cropped). Russavia is now banned. Buidhe (talk) 03:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As per above. The NPR photo is a cropped version of the Commons photo, not the other way around. As far as I know, Russavia was blocked for sockpuppetry, not for violating copyright. Vysotsky (talk) 21:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Vysotsky and previous discussion. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above Vysotsky and previous discussion. SAS was one of the many world airlines that contracted with Boeing for the original 747-100, putting its first in the air in 1971 a year after Pan Am being the first. Although it's difficult to make them out from the photo, Boeing had put the logos (looks like 25 of them) of all the airlines that had ordered a 747 on that roll-out model. Mandsford (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above discussions. --Achim (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
File is licensed as pd-sweden-photo, with the source given as the login screen of the Scandanavian Air Services corporate image bank. This license is only appropriate, however, if the photo was originally taken in Sweden. The aircraft was owned and operated by a Danish airline (DDL) prior to the occupation of Denmark by Germany in 1940. If the photo was taken in Denmark, then different copyright rules apply.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Nigel Ish (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep SAS is the copyright holder. SAS is a Swedish incorporated company. {{PD-Sweden-photo}} applies for these images from SAS's image bank. P.S. @Nigel Ish: it matters not where an image was taken, its where copyright is held which is important. russavia (talk) 12:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment, also if Denmark law was to apply here, {{PD-Denmark50}} would apply here. russavia (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Unidentified view. Little of note in the image. Orphaned Richard Avery (talk) 12:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Do some research first! Identified as Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering in Bangalore. In fact, I will now add this image to the article at en.wp. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
No information to determine use or location. Orphaned Richard Avery (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 23:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
no information to determine use or location. Orphaned Richard Avery (talk) 09:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 23:03, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a screengrab from a video display medium cancinoPro, part of Vimeo. May be copyright issues. Non notable person, ?advertising. Not linked Richard Avery (talk) 13:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP Ezarateesteban 23:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused vanity or promotion image for a non notable person Richard Avery (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 23:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused vanity photo of non notable singer. Richard Avery (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, out of scope Ezarateesteban 23:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry I was wrong Maximiliano Mangialavori (talk) 16:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio. JuTa 20:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
This was uploaded in error, this is 4 Main Road Kalkbay, Cape Town and not 4 Main Road, St James, Cape Town. Lennon001 (talk) 06:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I submitted the wrong image in error, please delete Lennon001 (talk) 10:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Renamed. Yann (talk) 07:05, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ziv lenzner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:DYUUOuLEW0 dXmrcij04jZ7Adxl7ImkiOiAiKjU3MzQ0RTY3NzQ5NiIsICJjIjogImltYWdlL2pwZWciLCAidiI6IDEsICJuIjogInppdmFydCJ9.jpg
- File:1.6.2014 dissection.jpg
- File:תיק אישה.jpg
- File:Anatomy posture and body mechanics 08.web.jpg
- File:The bronze Boxer of Quirinal Anatomy.web.jpg
- File:Victor portrait.jpg
- File:Tiki dayan portrait.jpg
- File:Stil life 67.jpg
- File:Portrait 07 oil canvas 70x70 cm.jpg
- File:Ziv lenzner pic 1.jpg
- File:Anatomy page17.jpg
- File:Portrait lenzner 2010.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Answer by Ziv lenzner
I sent To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (aDeclaration of consent for all enquiries)that I agree to publish that work under the free license CC-BY-SA As shown At ttp://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CC BY- SA Of these Files :
- File:DYUUOuLEW0 dXmrcij04jZ7Adxl7ImkiOiAiKjU3MzQ0RTY3NzQ5NiIsICJjIjogImltYWdlL2pwZWciLCAidiI6IDEsICJuIjogInppdmFydCJ9.jpg
- File:1.6.2014 dissection.jpg
- File:תיק אישה.jpg
- File:Anatomy posture and body mechanics 08.web.jpg
- File:The bronze Boxer of Quirinal Anatomy.web.jpg
- File:Victor portrait.jpg
- File:Tiki dayan portrait.jpg
- File:Stil life 67.jpg
- File:Portrait 07 oil canvas 70x70 cm.jpg
- File:Ziv lenzner pic 1.jpg
- File:Anatomy page17.jpg
- File:Portrait lenzner 2010.jpg
in an orderly manner according to your request, thank you for bringing to my attention.Ziv lenzner
Info: The OTRS permission releases have been received. All that needs to be done is finalizing the creative commons version. Mike V • Talk 01:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Info A follow up, the license version has been confirmed through OTRS. Mike V • Talk 15:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received and confirmed. INeverCry 20:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wattle-Grove-Lake.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This scupture was installed in 2005. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
This sculpture was installed in 1993, per COM:PACUSA and COM:FOP Magnolia677 (talk) 01:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
No FoP in South Korea (unless the photographer is the copyright holder of this building). Moonian (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note that some of the photos uploaded by the same user may also cause copyright infringement (Special:ListFiles/Hyolee2) --Moonian (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
not free image, copyright vio:http://rnsinghdeo.com/web/Home.aspx Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope. This is not Facebook.
- File:P1140227 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130862 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130847 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130845 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130817 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130829 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130649 (1024x577) (640x361).jpg
- File:P1130633 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130628 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130630 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130627 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130617 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130626 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130610 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130606 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1130596 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130584 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130575 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130574 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130568 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130566 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130553 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130554 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1130542 (1024x680) (640x425).jpg
- File:P1120985 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
- File:P1120990 (1024x768) (640x480).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment Some of these are nice portraits, but quite small. But they also lack a consent (as minor people, this should come from the parents). Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nice or not, these pictures are clearly of personal nature, better suited on Facebook. And yes, there are also personality rights issues. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
One of the picture was published online back in 2012 in a local forum and credited as 田野(http://www.xinxianwang.com/forum/thread-6406196-1-1.html) Sinopitt (talk) 04:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Unitedstates1239 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal vanity photos, out of scope.
- File:Owen diamond pic.jpg
- File:Owen diamond cool.jpg
- File:Owen diamond at piano.jpg
- File:Owen diamond 1235.jpg
- File:Owen diamond.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
published online back in 2012 in a local forum and credited as 田野(http://www.xinxianwang.com/forum/thread-6406196-1-1.html) Sinopitt (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The images are unsourced, probably copied from some website or such. Plus, these can easily be converted into text rather than using these images.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Tagged as copyvio by Mouh2jijel (for the following reason: http://www.alaoula.ma/index.php?lang=ar), but could be below the TOO, so I think a standard RfD is better. BrightRaven (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.46 10:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
This file was used by paper magazine at 2013 and need to be kept in prove of free licence. --FedorEzeev (talk) 11:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work (Photo from a photo?) 37.5.6.46 10:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 37.5.6.46 10:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.46 09:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
poor photo quality, unidentified species Neitram (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
poor photo quality, unidentified species Neitram (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamza hbfamaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Hamza hbfamaa 6.jpeg
- File:Hamza hbfamaa 4.jpeg
- File:Hamza hbfamaa 5.jpeg
- File:Hamza hbfamaa 3.jpeg
- File:Hamza hbfama2.jpeg
- File:Hamza hbfamaa 1.jpg
- File:Hamza edition.png
- File:Hamza hbfamaa.jpg
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
no educational value, not supported by sources [1], just promotion. Atlasowa (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Its promotional. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic promotional image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Self promotion. No obvious educational use. – Wdchk (discussion) 12:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused file with no realistic educational purpose. – Wdchk (discussion) 12:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal image with no realistic educational purpose. – Wdchk (discussion) 12:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Self-promo. See also w:User:Gibson Torreon C. Juggler2005 (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The text on the plaque is clearly copyrightable, and is from 2011 it would seem. russavia (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- You can go ahead and delete the file. I've contacted the organization that placed the plaque, but they have not responded. If they can tell me what the copyright status is of the text, I will upload the picture again with more information. What email address should they send the status to if it's CC-BY-SA or public domain? (There is also the minor possibility that it's just a quote from the Congressional Record, too)→StaniStani 13:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing permission from signmaker. Stefan4 (talk) 13:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:PS: advertisement. Stefan4 (talk) 13:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing permission from advertiser. Stefan4 (talk) 13:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unidentified soccer field, unexceptional image, Orphaned Richard Avery (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unfocussed image of an unknown place. non notable persons. Unlinked Richard Avery (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and Protect please, filename too generic and abused. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
poor quality imge of an unknown place, allegedly a sports stadium. Not linked Richard Avery (talk) 13:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snooker1953 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of signs. Two of them contain photos which probably are in the public domain, but this doesn't apply to the text.
- File:Prisoner Burials.jpg
- File:Plaque at Andersonville National cemetery.jpg
- File:Stockade branch plaque.jpg
- File:Plaque explaining the Providence Spring.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 13:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Also needs source for the images in the file. Stefan4 (talk) 13:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The artist died in 1950, which is less than 80 years ago. Stefan4 (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- But that drawing is part of front page of 1st number of magazine "Vida Gallega", which was published in 1909, and it appears like "public domain" in Europeana. I have uploaded the first page of the magazine, which contais that picture, so I don't have uploaded only the drawing by Castelao. I think if it's in public domain, it would be able to be uploaded, it isn't? Jorges65 (talk) 15:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- You can't upload the image until the artist has been dead for at least 80 years. This page incorrectly identifies it as anonymous. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- It's OK. I understand it now. Jorges65 (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- You can't upload the image until the artist has been dead for at least 80 years. This page incorrectly identifies it as anonymous. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Software screenshot of unknown copyright status. Stefan4 (talk) 13:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't found any licenses of the software, therefore, it seems to don't have any free license. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Self-promo. See also w:The Black Doves BD. Juggler2005 (talk) 13:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied results from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buddha isi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Also missing evidence of permission.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
fi:Ilmari Vainio died in 1955, which is less than 70 years ago. Stefan4 (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied see other photos from here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a logo or something. Stefan4 (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Probably from Google Maps.
Stefan4 (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused vanity image, unlinked Richard Avery (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
there is an other photo: here Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be the same photograph as this and this. Stefan4 (talk) 14:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
This seems to come from some other source. See for example this which seems to have been taken at the same time. Stefan4 (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (see here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
An "own work" sattelite image is very unlikely. This looks like a copyvio! Ies (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (see here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copied (from here) Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pradyumnas741 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:SardarVallabhBhaiPatelUniversity.jpg
- File:AgraUniversity.jpg
- File:CCSU.jpg
- File:MPMoradabad.jpg
- File:Fareed 0145200b.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pradyumnas741 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Everything else from the user is a copyvios under CC-BY-SA-Self, I haven't been able to find the original sources for these but they are likely not original works.
- File:Manoj Kumar Chauhan Saheb.JPG
- File:IAS postions.jpg
- File:IAS postions.png
- File:ManojChauhan.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 10:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused photo of band of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Benedito F (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dj leandro quiroga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo photos of musician of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jayanandakt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kannada143musiq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos of questionable notability.
- File:143 musiq logo.png
- File:Wisdom computers jagalur.gif
- File:KANNADA143MUSIQ GROUP LOGO.png
- File:Kannada143musiq.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Judge PLR.jpg
- File:Candidate brochure for International Court of Justice - Patrick Lipton Robinson.pdf
- File:Judge Patrick L Robinson.jpg
- File:Judge Robinson at UN.jpg
- File:Judge Robinson.jpg
- File:Judge Robinson at ICTY.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Demetrius Guidry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
No Fop in France, building by Ieoh Ming Pei, still alive.
En France, il n'y a pas de "liberté de panorama" : la loi interdit de diffuser librement des photos d'une oeuvre dont l'auteur est vivant (c'est le cas de Ieoh Ming Pei) ou qui est décédé depuis moins de 70 ans sans son accord ou celui de ses ayant-droits. Trizek from FR 14:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No FoP in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhinand1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Parvathy nair.jpg
- File:Pars1.jpg
- File:Parvathy Nair2.jpg
- File:Parvathykamal.jpg
- File:Abhinand.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Unlikely that the uploader is the actual copyright holder. —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Some images are Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. Not used.
- File:Poster wall2.jpg
- File:Maisie capri madison poster v1.jpg
- File:Liam isitolo poster v1.jpg
- File:Jayden rahira ben poster v1.jpg
- File:Brookeg tamar crystal poster v1.jpg
- File:Nai kellim devlin poster.jpg
- File:Rome jacob poster v1.jpg
- File:Maisie capri madison poster.jpg
- File:Lily isobel paris poster.jpg
- File:Liam isitolo poster.jpg
- File:Katya poster.jpg
- File:Crystal shar poster v1.jpg
- File:Food poster display.jpg
- File:Jayden rahira ben poster.jpg
- File:Brookeg tamar crystal poster.jpg
- File:Brookemc natasha poster.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:身穿漢民族服飾端午節祭祀的人們.jpg
- File:重陽節活動.jpg
- File:重陽節日活動.jpg
- File:重陽節里穿著旗袍馬褂的夫婦.jpg
- File:中秋节月饼.jpg
- File:上巳节活动的人们.jpg
- File:上巳节的学生.jpg
- File:身穿汉族民族服祭祀的学生.jpg
- File:春节的对联.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Author unknown, probably not free. Multichill (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Advertising document uploaded by a global spammer. — TintoMeches, 15:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Advertising document uploaded by a global spammer — TintoMeches, 15:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Advertising document uploaded by a global spammer — TintoMeches, 15:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. — TintoMeches, 15:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.46 15:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused image of an unidentified person Richard Avery (talk) 15:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work". TinEye has found some versions of 2009 37.5.6.46 15:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image, non-notable band. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 15:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Fan-fiction flag with no historical or cultural significance. -DevinCook (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Violation of copyright of album cover Richard Avery (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 37.5.6.46 16:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.46 16:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The copyright owner is Boris Sukhodolskiy not Mikhail Ovchinnikov (see Exif). If you are Boris Sukhodolskiy please send an email to OTRS to prove your rights! Ras67 (talk) 16:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The copyright owner is Boris Sukhodolskiy not Mikhail Ovchinnikov (see Exif). If you are Boris Sukhodolskiy please send an email to OTRS to prove your rights! Ras67 (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Self promo, out of scope. Sealle (talk) 16:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
"own works" by different photographers, acording to EXIF
- File:ET and Georgie.JPG
- File:Patrick DoubleBack.jpg
- File:MOD synchro train.jpg
- File:MOD - Cordova flip.jpg
- File:MOD -synchro(348).jpg
- File:Train sequence.jpg
- File:MOD - Whip (41).tif
- File:MOD -Step up (21).JPG
- File:MOD - 2008 QUAD (3).jpg
- File:Fuel Girls Buggy.jpg
- File:Fuel Girls.jpg
- File:Minibike MOD.JPG
37.5.6.46 16:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.46 16:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete JackPotte (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Original file on en-wiki is fair use. Could it be PD-ineligible? I doubt it. MGA73 (talk) 17:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
No permission, and not a simple textlogo. Lupo 18:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copyright violation Strainu (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. It's an internet bill Strainu (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Per Previous DR. Derivative work of the Copa Libertadores, copyrighted by South American Conmebol. The trophy was designed by Peruvian artist Alberto De Gásperi in 1959 (according to Conmebol official site). Fma12 (talk) 18:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
This image is of such quality as to be useless for anything, Unknown subjects. Unused image Richard Avery (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable people, unused image, Richard Avery (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted image of website: http://oriyaonline.com//content_images/tourism/tribe/harishankar.jpg Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 03:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Croix de Pen-Hir
[edit]- File:Croix de Pen Hir 1.jpg
- File:Croix de Pen Hir 2.jpg
- File:Croix de Pen-Hir de côté.jpg
- File:Croix de Pen-Hir de face.jpg
- File:La croix de Pen-Hir à Camaret-sur-Mer.JPG
VIGNERON (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Bonjour, merci pour ces précisions. Je ne savais pas.
Donc : supprimer File:La croix de Pen-Hir à Camaret-sur-Mer.JPG ! :-(
- Delete Dura lex sed lex. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Lord Mountbatten swears in Jawaharlal Nehru as the first Prime Minister of free India on Aug 15, 1947.jpg BigJolly9 (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 01:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't liked how i appear on this image Frulev (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
files of uploader Vi..Cult...
[edit]- File:Sigmund Freud.ogg
- File:Histoire de la Crête2.ogg
- File:Histoire de la Crête1.ogg
- File:Équipe d'Afrique du Sud de rugby à XV 2.ogg
- File:Équipe d'Afrique du Sud de rugby à XV 1.ogg
- File:Roissy-en-France2.ogg
- File:Roissy-en-France1.ogg
- File:Mons2.ogg
- File:Mons1.ogg
- File:Paris3.ogg
- File:Histoire de la Crète2.ogg
- File:Histoire de la Crète1.ogg
- File:Che_Guevara2.ogg
- File:Che_Guevara1.ogg
- File:Caraquet2.ogg
- File:Caraquet1.ogg
- File:Sokol (mouvement_tchèque).ogg
- File:Massacre de Chios.ogg
- File:Massacre de Psara.ogg
- File:Équipe d'Afrique du Sud de rugby à XV.ogg
- File:Tsunami.ogg
- File:Tramway.ogg
- File:Siège de Tripolizza.ogg
- File:Shining Force III.ogg
- File:Rimogne.ogg
- File:Pièce commémorative de 2 euros.ogg
- File:Pixies.ogg
- File:Paracétamol.ogg
- File:Métro.ogg
- File:Mario Lemieux.ogg
- File:Léonard de Vinci2.ogg
- File:Léonard de Vinci1.ogg
- File:Kinétoscope.ogg
- File:Jean II de France.ogg
- File:Hannibal Barca.ogg
- File:Final Fantasy VII.ogg
- File:Antonio Vivaldi2.ogg
- File:Antonio Vivaldi1.ogg
- File:Étienne Marcel.ogg
- File:Tortue imbriquée.ogg
- File:Sheryl Crow.ogg
- File:Parmain.ogg
- File:Ours noir.ogg
- File:Microscopie électronique à balayage.ogg
- File:Laboratoire de recherche souterrain de Meuse Haute-Marne.ogg
- File:La Roche-Guyon.ogg
- File:Drapeau des États-Unis.ogg
- File:Aix-les-Bains2.ogg
- File:Filikí Etería.ogg
- File:John Cassavetes.ogg
- File:Météorologie.ogg
- File:Ozzy Osbourne.ogg
- File:Raton laveur.ogg
- File:Steve Yzerman.ogg
- File:Toulouse1.ogg
- File:Toulouse2.ogg
- File:Arithmétique modulaire.ogg
- File:Audrey Hepburn.ogg
- File:Bresle.ogg
- File:Caraquet.ogg
- File:Aix-les-Bains1.ogg
Thank you delete these many .ogg uploaded in février 2008 by User:Vi..Cult... because bad quality synthetic voice (bug) and unused. Vi..Cult... (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Book scan. Unlikely own work. Stefan4 (talk) 19:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of an object of unknown age. Stefan4 (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Seems to be a scan of a book or something. Unlikely own work. Stefan4 (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Dubious own work: web resolution with no EXIF, and all other images by this uploader are up for deletion due to suspected copyright problems. Stefan4 (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Personal file not within project scope — Racconish ✉ 20:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Found later an article on Antonio Buehler on WPen which is a perfectly good reason to keep the file. I withdraw my nomination. — Racconish ✉ 05:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:PS. Stefan4 (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:PS. Stefan4 (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader confirmed he did not take the photo. Nemesis III (discuter) 21:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader confirmed he did not take the photo. Nemesis III (discuter) 21:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader confirmed he did not take the photo. Nemesis III (discuter) 21:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
image from 1960s is obviously not "own work" by much younger user. uploader did not respond to my inquiry in more than two weeks despite being active on de.wp JD {æ} 21:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
erreur sur la tombe Touron66 (talk) 21:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
The image appears to be a re-upload of the image File:ErhardHeiden.JPG, which was recently deleted as the result of a deletion discussion. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:ErhardHeiden.JPG. Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused ?promotional shot for non notable band. Orphaned. --Stuchka (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity picture. Out of scope. Stuchka (talk) 22:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
unused short text pdf file, out of scope Holger1959 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
wrong name Plangloi (talk) 23:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Just request the file renaming. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
mauvais nom Plangloi (talk) 23:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Just request the file renaming. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Where can I do that? Plangloi
Kept: Use {{Rename}} instead. INeverCry 01:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Also:
Compare EXIF data of the three files. The uploader is claiming to be at least two different persons. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
2009 building - no FoP in Mongolia INeverCry 05:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in Mongolia Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted Mongolia now has FOP for buildings. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I have a better version Selsong (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Kommetjie Lighthouse 1.jpg]]
Kept: no reason to delete, please upload better version to new file name Krd 17:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 17:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 17:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal artwork INeverCry 17:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 17:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio - collage with doubtful own work claim INeverCry 17:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 17:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 17:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 18:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 18:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, uploaders request Josve05a (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Inferior repeat of File:Combined of two Florida state Plates preserved.JPG – Wdchk (discussion) 12:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Inferior repeat of File:Combined of two Florida state Plates preserved.JPG – Wdchk (discussion) 12:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a book cover or something. Stefan4 (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
(CC BY-SA 4.0)
Website & Vriendenkring 4 Regiment Lansiers
Nelissen.M Webbeheerder
--4lansiers (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What is the source of that statement? How do I verify its validity? --Stefan4 (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Information here. DirkVE (talk) 06:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- There it says "Afbeeldingen: Afbeeldingen, behalve de fotoalbums *, zijn beschikbaar onder CC-BY-SA/GFDL". Is that website the original source of the image?
- In order to satisfy the licensing requirements, you must link to the text of CC-BY-SA, or include the text of the GFDL. I'm not sure how to satisfy this requirement when the version number is unknown, as linking to a different version number than the one chosen by the copyright holder presumably is a copyright violation. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Information here. DirkVE (talk) 06:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per Stefan. Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Uchebafsin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Малая камера спецвагона.jpg
- File:СПУ "Незабудка-Ж".jpg
- File:Кухня караула спецвагона.jpg
- File:Купе НК спецвагона.jpg
- File:Купе караула спецвагона.jpg
- File:Запорные устройства двери спец вагона.jpg
- File:Коридор спецвагона.jpg
INeverCry 17:47, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Wrong license. The club was founded in 1964 (source), therefore {{PD-1923}} does not apply here. Futhermore the TOO for Australia is very low, so this file would be a copyright violation. Fma12 (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
photo by DR / Relaxnews (http://www.liberation.fr/voyages/2014/09/05/a-saisir-ile-a-vendre-sur-l-estuaire-de-la-gironde_1093540) Tiraden (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Where it says that this photo is copyrighted by Relaxnews? I only see a "DR" caption, next to the image, and exif here in Commons (uploaded in 24 September 2012) or in the "Liberation" website (text dated of 5 September 2014) dont state any copyright ownership. Even that doesnt make proof of nothing as the "Liberation" could had downloaded this image from Commons and slapped the "DR" caption. Tm (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The image was uploaded to Commons before it was used at the article. Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
possibly out of scope - Tom Holthe has a stub article on nl.wiki, so perhaps a few of these images are in scope - not sure the entire collection is though, as it's basically a collection of family pics and 2 promo book covers
- File:Tom E. B. Holthe and his family in Mendoza.jpg
- File:Tom E. B. Holthe y D. Fabiana Narvaez juntos en Mendoza.jpg
- File:D. Fabiana Narvaez de Holthe.jpg
- File:Tom E. B. Holthe y su flamante esposa D. Fabiana Narvaez.jpg
- File:Una pareja feliz.jpg
- File:Tom E. B. Holthe y su familia.jpg
- File:Contratapa- Cuál es tu punto de miedo interno?.jpg
- File:D. Fabiana Narvaez ( Janison Cudova).jpg
- File:Tapa- Cuál es tu punto de miedo interno?.jpg
- File:Después.jpg
- File:D. Fabiana Narvaez.jpg
- File:Boda Civil en Mendoza.jpg
- File:Juntos.jpg
- File:Disfrutando de una cena.JPG
- File:Casamiento.JPG
INeverCry 18:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - tiny thumb - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 18:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 18:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 18:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Louis V Standing in the Light.jpg
- File:Louis V Hello.jpg
- File:Louis V Sold Out Show.jpg
- File:Louis V video clip from Give it to Me..jpg
- File:Louis V on stage in Seattle..jpg
INeverCry 18:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Undescribed event of no note. Unlikely to be useful. Not linked Richard Avery (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
The name of the photo is not very good, yes. But the Photo shows 2 Swiss Air Force F-5E on the take off runn, on the runway of Turtmann AFB the runway is paralell to the Street, from the aircraft cavern to the runway the aircrafd had to cross the street. Trurtmann AFB dosent exist anymore and parts of the runway had been removed. Kobel (talk) 21:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Please add this info to the file discription. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
porque es mi auto y yo no subi esta publicacion 190.215.212.14 20:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Can you please prove it, with a URL? JackPotte (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: URL not given. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I request the deletion of this photos, all uploaded by me, because I want to upload all of them again with a different file format, and I don't want to make duplicates.
- File:Carnaúbas no Ceará (1).jpg
- File:Ponte dos Ingleses (3).jpg
- File:Carnaúbas no Ceará.jpg
- File:Guaramiranga (1).jpg
- File:Monólitos em Quixadá (1).jpg
- File:Sertões Cearenses.jpg
- File:Rio Jaguaribe em Fortim (1).jpg
- File:Rio Jaguaribe em Fortim.jpg
- File:Monólitos em Quixadá.jpg
- File:Depressão Sertaneja.jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (8).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (7).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (5).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (6).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (4).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (3).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro (2).jpg
- File:Açude do Cedro.jpg
- File:Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza (5).png.jpg
- File:Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza (4).png.jpg
- File:Centro Dragão do Mar de Arte e Cultura (4).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (7).jpg
- File:Presidente Vargas Stadium (3).jpg
- File:Presidente Vargas Stadium (4).jpg
- File:Presidente Vargas Stadium (2).jpg
- File:Presidente Vargas Stadium.jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (6).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (4).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (3).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (5).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena (2).jpg
- File:Castelão Arena.jpg
- File:José de Alencar Theatre.jpg
- File:Seashore of Fortaleza (3).jpg
- File:Ponte dos Ingleses (2).jpg
- File:Seashore of Fortaleza (2).jpg
- File:Seashore of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Cocó Ecological Park.jpg
- File:Sundown and Seashore of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Castro e Silva Street and Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Vitrals of Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Vitrals of Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza (2).jpg
- File:Vitrals of Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza (3).jpg
- File:Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza (2).jpg
- File:Praia Mansa (2).jpg
- File:Praia Mansa.jpg
- File:Pubs in Praia de Iracema.jpg
- File:Praça do Ferreira (2).jpg
- File:Canoa Quebrada (2).jpg
- File:Mucuripe Port.jpg
- File:10th Military Region in Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Beach Park entrance.jpg
- File:Windsurf at Marina Park.jpg
- File:Christmas decoration at Portugal Square in Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Vitral at Cathedral of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Monument of Iracema.jpg
- File:Fortaleza's International Airport.jpg
- File:Theatro José de Alencar.jpg
- File:Centro Dragão do Mar de Arte e Cultura (3).jpg
- File:Centro Dragão do Mar de Arte e Cultura (2).jpg
- File:Centro Dragão do Mar de Arte e Cultura.jpg
- File:Parque do Cocó.jpg
- File:Kitesurf in Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Estátua de Martim e Iracema.jpg
- File:Jangada na Praia de Iracema.jpg
- File:6th BRICS Summit.jpg
- File:Planetary of Dragão do Mar Center of Art and Culture.jpg
- File:Metropolitan Cathedral of Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Beach in Fortaleza (Mosaic).jpg
- File:Iracema (2).jpg
- File:Sunset in Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Ponte dos Ingleses.jpg
- File:Cultura em Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Skyline de Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Prédios no Centro Cultural Dragão do Mar.jpg
- File:Beach in Fortaleza.jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (9).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (8).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (6).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (7).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (5).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (4).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (3).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil (2).jpg
- File:Fortaleza, Brazil, 2014.jpg
Nakinn (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Photos should be uploaded as JPEGs. If there are problems with thumbnailing JPEGs, that needs to be fixed, not photos reuploaded as PNGs.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
It's impossible to get rid of the compression artifacts, even with all imaginable fixes, and, from what I've read, correct me if I'm wrong, there is no prohibition on the use of photographs in PNG, there is only a recommendation, and I do not want my uploads in JPG anymore, but I want to upload all again. It is possible to reconsider? --Nakinn (talk) 05:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- If you were planning on uploading versions converted from the RAW files, this might be an issue, but some of these photos were from cameras that don't produce RAW files, which means you can't do better then uploading the JPEG files the camera produces. Worse, some of these are from Flickr; it's a huge advantage to upload the original file from Flickr, which can be mechanically checked for licensing--which has already been done--and is the best file we can get from Flickr. It would be a pain in the ass to start loading JPEGs from Flickr as PNGs, and to absolutely no advantage at all.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader requests deletion on recently uploaded images and I assume good faith and can accept deletion here. Most are recent uploads--within 5 weeks. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Most of them are Flickr; I do not believe we should delete Flickr files on uploader's request (though uploader's name could be removed if desired), and particularly not because they want to make Flickreview a pain by uploading the files in a format not the original.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Per Prosfilaes in relation to the files uploaded from Flickr. Tm (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Who can really say, that an image from 1930 has a since 70 years dead photographer? Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Many uploaders, apparently, do not reach the level of cognitive dissonance between stating that they don't know who the author is and stating that they know when he died. However, about this particular photo, the uploader claims that it is an old postcard. It would be much better if he provided evidence of that, but it seems plausible enough that it was first published in Italy before 1976, meeting PD-Italy. This is a sort of situation where I really don't have much motivation to delete a file that is probably in the public domain even if the uploader did not provide proof of the publication. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I've got the proof, and if you want I can put in the description. Or I can put the PD-ITA anyway (I've put the PD-old because I could not find the said template). EDIT: the image is from the book of Daniele Canali, Cartoline di Carrara (1900-1950) anyway, and there is a description that confirm it.--Claudio Dario (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, please mention all the relevant informations in the description page of the file, including the reference to the book (and the page number of the book where this image is found), and the relevant informations that that book (or other sources) provide about this image, such as the identification of the original publisher of the image (or postcard) and the city of publication and the year of the first publication of the image (or postcard), the photographer if known, etc. And yes, unless the identity of the photographer is known and that person is known to have been dead for 70 years, please remove PD-old and, if the image was first published in Italy, use PD-Italy. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The book doesn't cite the author, but I'll provide to replace the PD-old with the PD-Italy.--Claudio Dario talk 15:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Done, now it should be all right.--Claudio Dario talk 16:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It looks good enough to me, but you'll have to wait for an admin to take the decision. The book about the postcards does not even mention the original publishers of the postcards? By the way, it might be a good idea to fix also the description pages of the other uploaded files that have similar problems, before someone nominates them for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! No, it doesn't mention them, but the publischer of the book is the Società Editrice Apuana (SEA). @Marcus Cyron: what do you think of it?--Claudio Dario talk 17:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: According to italian law, pictures that don't relate to documents, technical drawing or similar are considered as "simple photos", and they are protected for a period of 20 years from creation, because it doesn't represent photographer's personality. --Registrato2013 (talk) 14:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! No, it doesn't mention them, but the publischer of the book is the Società Editrice Apuana (SEA). @Marcus Cyron: what do you think of it?--Claudio Dario talk 17:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It looks good enough to me, but you'll have to wait for an admin to take the decision. The book about the postcards does not even mention the original publishers of the postcards? By the way, it might be a good idea to fix also the description pages of the other uploaded files that have similar problems, before someone nominates them for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The book doesn't cite the author, but I'll provide to replace the PD-old with the PD-Italy.--Claudio Dario talk 15:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, please mention all the relevant informations in the description page of the file, including the reference to the book (and the page number of the book where this image is found), and the relevant informations that that book (or other sources) provide about this image, such as the identification of the original publisher of the image (or postcard) and the city of publication and the year of the first publication of the image (or postcard), the photographer if known, etc. And yes, unless the identity of the photographer is known and that person is known to have been dead for 70 years, please remove PD-old and, if the image was first published in Italy, use PD-Italy. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I've got the proof, and if you want I can put in the description. Or I can put the PD-ITA anyway (I've put the PD-old because I could not find the said template). EDIT: the image is from the book of Daniele Canali, Cartoline di Carrara (1900-1950) anyway, and there is a description that confirm it.--Claudio Dario (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![58 File:Translated poem " Revolutionary Poet " by Jaspreet Badhan.jpg](#File:Translated_poem_"_Revolutionary_Poet_"_by_Jaspreet_Badhan.jpg){kind=link}
_The_Black_Doves_BD.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(14477445204).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x361).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x425).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(640x480).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![12:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/09/05#c-Dharmadhyaksha-2014-09-05T12:08:00.000Z-File:Translated_poem_"_Revolutionary_Poet_"_by_Jaspreet_Badhan.jpg){kind=link}
![00:46, 12 September 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/09/05#c-INeverCry-2014-09-12T00:46:00.000Z-File:Translated_poem_"_Revolutionary_Poet_"_by_Jaspreet_Badhan.jpg){kind=link}
_The_Black_Doves_BD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_The_Black_Doves_BD.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_The_Black_Doves_BD.jpg){kind=link}
_The_Black_Doves_BD.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
_Logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(14477445204).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14477445204).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(14477445204).jpg){kind=link}
_(14477445204).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png.jpg){kind=link}
.png.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
So at this point the deletion of the file would be useless, according to the PD-ITA and the law reported by it.--Claudio Dario talk 17:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
The text on this plaque has a literary copyright. This image is a derivative work and therefore infringes the copyright. There is no evidence here of permission. The date on the plaque is 2000, so no copyright notice was required. Unless we get OTRS permission from the author, we cannot keep the image. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Also:
Missing permission from the signmaker. Stefan4 (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Has anyone written to the Ohio Historic Society http://www.ohiohistory.org/about-us/contact/images to ask? I'd do it, but I don't want to be accused of spamming them. Floatjon (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- This image was taken by someone wanting to contribute to Summer of Monuments. Copyright complaints with such low stakes as this one will discourage future contributions. The Ohio Historical Society (a nonprofit public interest group) has been notified of these images. If they have a problem with them, they will say something. They are probably thrilled that someone is paying attention to their work.Lugevas (talk) 00:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Your comments about this are directly addressed by our most basic rule -- the Precautionary Principle, numbers 1 and 3. Although US copyright law has many complications, most people are aware that they cannot copy other people's writings for commercial use without violating the copyright.
- It is unfortunate if a few potential contributors might be discouraged by being forced to obey a rule that is enshrined in the US constitution (Article I, Section 8), but we are here to provide a repository of images that can be freely used for any purpose.
- Floatjon, please do it. See if you can get them to issue a license covering all of their historical markers. Have them send a license using the procedure at OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Following message sent (with thanks to the people whose boilerplate I cribbed from -- but had to modify, since this is a somewhat unusual case):
- Hi - I am a volunteer editor on Wikipedia. One of our other volunteers has taken a photo of one of your historic markers (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_Block_Description_Ohio_Historical_Society_description,_south_facing.jpg), and while they have released this image for our use, it contains text that we believe your organization owns the copyright of. We are looking for permission to use our photo of this marker, and the others your organization is responsible for.
- We can only use our photos of your markers if you are willing to grant permission for this under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License. This means that anyone will have the right to share and, where appropriate, to update your material. You can read this license in full at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License
- The license expressly protects authors "from being considered responsible for modifications made by others" while ensuring that authors get credit for their work. There is more information on our copyright policy at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights
- If you agree, we will credit you for your text in the resulting images' descriptions by stating that they were based on your work and are used with your permission, and by providing a web link back to ohiohistory.org
- Again, for clarity, we are not asking you for permission to use your actual images. We will be photographing the markers; we are only looking for permission to display the text on the markers within those photographs.
- Thank you for your time; I look forward to your response.
- Kindly,
- <my name>
- (me again) -- will update you with the result, and if they say yes, will notify the OTRS people. Floatjon (talk) 06:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
OK, I heard back, and I'm going to need some advice, because they asked some questions I don't have the answers to:
Hello Jon. Your note Friday (below) made the rounds here. Overall, we’re happy that an Ohio Historical Marker would be considered for the Summer of Monuments project. Before going forward, I just have a few quick comments:
· “Update your material” means adding to or updating the commentary about the marker text, not the marker text itself (that’s set in stone - or aluminum in this case). What provisions are there if someone uses Wikipedia to unfairly lambast a marker? Don’t know why they would, but it’s crazy world out there sometimes. If, however, updating material means adding to the story on a marker or clarifying things that a marker doesn’t have room to do, that’s good!
· This isn’t a question, it’s an opportunity: let’s coordinate our efforts. What would be a helpful to the Ohio History Connection and the markers program is if the Wikipedia author writer would share they work and post photographs they take on Remarkable Ohio (RO), and email updated GPS coordinates, and / or make condition reports on the markers they post (all of which are easy to do). If they post marker photographs on RO, the credit line they write could include a link back to Summer of Monument’s project. Just to be up front: by posting photos on Remarkable Ohio, the owner of the image indicates that is not under copyright protection.
(And then there were a couple of other housekeeping paragraphs I don't need advice on.)
My thoughts: I believe that someone would be free to Photoshop in other text on top of what's there, according to our license, and there would be no recourse. However, such an image would have to be marked as "modified". True? And if so, how do we allay their fears?
And we can certainly encourage people to add Ohio markers to their site as well, but if they require images completely free from copyright, we can't do anything outside of the photographers, right? (And for that matter, if the photographer gives the image to Wiki under a license, then they can't then turn around and say it's not copyrighted, right?)
Floatjon (talk) 21:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- IANAL, but I thought that a copyright holder (e. g. photographer) was free to donate their work to the public domain at any time. I wouldn't think that would cause any problem with the license, since "public domain" is always more permissive than any license. But presumably it would make the license unenforceable.
- Ironically, if the photographer donates the image to the public domain, then a modified image wouldn't need to be marked as modified. Although if the marker text itself is covered by CC-BY-SA, then that would still apply.
- If someone wanted to make a derivative work of a marker, in order to criticize the marker, I'm not sure that Ohio could do anything about it in any case, since US copyright law has broad exceptions for parody. But again, IANAL.
- The fundamental problem is here is not the photograph, but the copyrighted text on the marker. Posting a photograph of copyrighted text on Commons or WP:EN requires a free license to the text. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Floatjon. It is certainly possible that someone could use a Commons image of a marker to parody it, but, as Ppelleti points out, there is broad protection for such things under US law, so I don't think the OHS can prevent parody under copyright law whether or not they give us a license. Commons is not going to permit a parody of a marker on Commons because it would be out of scope, and I don't think WP:EN would either.
- As for encouraging our people to post images to their site, as you say, if the image here is CC-BY then it can't go on their site unless they change their rules. As we know, the vast majority -- maybe 95% -- of all images on Commons that are under copyright are licensed CC-BY or CC-BY-SA, with only a very few CC-0 (ie PD). You might suggest to them that if they changed their rules they might get more contributions. Since they provide a credit line there, it sounds like allowing CC-BY would not require any actual change.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Text on recent historical plaques is covered by copyright on the text. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Contains File:Berlin-zentrum-by-RalfR-026.jpg, whose license (GFDL 1.2 only) is mutually incompatible with the licensing of File:Castle Neuschwanstein.jpg and File:Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg (both CC-by-sa), which are also used in the same montage. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- i do not understand. why may i use this files (separated) all over the wikimedia, but not in a montage for my new portal? I thought all the licenses are free so I can use the pictures as I pleased while giving credit, as i did. RhoneDmDery (talk) 22:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Collages. File:Berlin-zentrum-by-RalfR-026.jpg requires all works based on it to be licensed under the exact terms of the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.2 and no other terms. Meanwhile, File:Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg requires all works based it to be licensed under the exact terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license and no other terms. File:GermanyPSkyline-He.jpg cannot be licensed as CC-by-sa, because that would violate the terms of the license that must be complied with to use File:Berlin-zentrum-by-RalfR-026.jpg, nor can it be licensed as GFDL 1.2, because that would violate the terms of the license that must be complied with to use File:Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg. (File:Castle Neuschwanstein.jpg isn't actually a factor, since it gives you a choice.) —LX (talk, contribs) 23:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I don't agree. The reasoning that LX offers would prohibit any work from containing material with GFDL and CC licenses. It suggests that we cannot have WP articles that have both. Clearly that is not the case -- you could set all five of these images on one page with individual credits, as given here. If the five photos all had the same license, the montage would still require five credits. I see no reason why you can't combine them for convenience into one file, provided, of course, that all five credits appear with the appropriate license references. Note that the referenced page, Commons:Collages is not policy and has a rebuttal that supports my line of reasoning at Commons talk:Collages. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:58, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- The claim that my reasoning would prohibit any work from containing material with GFDL and CC licenses is factually incorrect. Far from every derivative work combining GFDL and CC licenses is problematic, since later versions of GFDL allow migration to CC-by-sa, and CC-by licensed works without the copyleft share-alike requirement can be relicensed freely. This particular case is only a potential problem because of the combination of an explicitly version-locked GFDL license and the share-alike requirement of the particular CC licenses involved. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- My objection is not to the specifics here, but to the general proposition that one cannot create a file with works that have incompatible licenses -- your point of view would prohibit any work that had components that were licensed under incompatible licenses, yet that happens all the time with books, software, and other things. There is no difference between putting these five images together on one page, in one article, or in one book, with appropriate credit and license information, and putting them together in one file here, again with appropriate credit and license information.
- As an example, Commons:Deletion requests/File:GermanyPSkyline-He.jpg/Example has three of the images, with "incompatible" licenses, yet I cannot imagine anyone objecting to such a page -- our galleries and categories do it all the time. Yet you would object if I created exactly the same array of images, with the same credits and licenses, as a montage?
- Or, as another example, the version of Firefox that I am using calls out thirty-three different licenses that apply to various components. There is no expectation that all of those are compatible -- each applies to its separate piece of the whole work, just as each of the five licenses in the subject applies to its piece and only its piece. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 18:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- It comes down to the distinction between derivative versus collective works. Closely paraphrasing from the linked page: There is a distinction between a derivative joint work by multiple authors, where the separate elements merge into a unified whole, and a collective work, where they remain unintegrated and disparate. My interpretation is that there is a definite distinction between files referenced from an encyclopedia article and served as separate data files on the one hand and a work based on several works that have been shrunk, deliberately arranged and recast as a single file on the other. For the same reason, the distinction between static linking and dynamic linking is important to free software licenses; your Firefox installation is not a single monolithic binary but rather a set of modules, distinctly separated into files. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Aha. Thank you for your patience and the clear explanation of your position, which I now understand. I still don't agree, though. Copyright law is not concerned with how a page (whether printed or on screen) is produced, but only with what the reader sees. Thus the two examples at Commons:Deletion requests/File:GermanyPSkyline-He.jpg/Example 2 have the same copyright status even though the underlying code is different. The presentations are identical -- as closely as my patience allowed -- and in each case if a reader clicks on one of them, he or she is taken to a page that shows full license and attribution information for that image. That satisfies the needs of all the licenses. The fact that one was put together behind the scenes -- so to speak -- and the other on the fly is not important.
As an example out of old tech -- when images were set for printing on separate blocks called "cuts" alongside type, no one would have cared if the five images here were combined into one cut or made as five separate cuts and set with the necessary leading. The choice would have depended on how frequently they were used together.
Jarvis vs K-2 is interesting, but frustrating, in that we can not see the collages referenced. I suspect that they had a fair degree of creativity in the size and arrangement of the constituent elements, along the lines of File:Aurora Mesia.jpg, so that you could easily claim a separate copyright in the whole. By contrast, I think that the work that went into the subject image doesn't rise to the point of a separate copyright -- it is simply an assembly for convenience.
@RhoneDmDery -- if this discussion ends up as a delete -- which, of course, I think it should not, but it is not my decision -- you can accomplish what you want by using the code in the example. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the code! it is all i wanted to do. i didn't know that i could do such a thing with wiki-code. I agree with Jim. I think the file should be stay for anyone's else use. RhoneDmDery (talk) 08:19, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- To be honest, I wasn't sure I could do it either -- our instructions on how to use tables are not very clear and I usually just copy one. It was a good mental challenge. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 11:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
inkompatible Lizenzen Ralf Roleček 12:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Question - what do you mean? I see no incompatible licenses (like ND or NC or fair use). All involved licenses are compatible with Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Not individually incompatible with Commons:Licensing (although GFDL 1.2 only is really an abomination unto the FSM), but mutually incompatible with each other, as I argued in the previous deletion discussion. I guess this nomination doesn't really bring up any new arguments, but it may be time to see if the community's understanding of the issue has changed. Based on Jim's comments in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tehran Montage.png, it looks like he might have changed his opinion on matters like these. As for myself, I stand by my original opinion until I see an authoritative source stating that image files consisting of multiple images arranged together constitute aggregations rather than a collection or combination as defined in the context of the GFDL. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Die Zusammenstellung ist CC, das mittlere Bild ist GFDL 1.2 only - das ist inkompatibel. --Ralf Roleček 17:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Not individually incompatible with Commons:Licensing (although GFDL 1.2 only is really an abomination unto the FSM), but mutually incompatible with each other, as I argued in the previous deletion discussion. I guess this nomination doesn't really bring up any new arguments, but it may be time to see if the community's understanding of the issue has changed. Based on Jim's comments in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tehran Montage.png, it looks like he might have changed his opinion on matters like these. As for myself, I stand by my original opinion until I see an authoritative source stating that image files consisting of multiple images arranged together constitute aggregations rather than a collection or combination as defined in the context of the GFDL. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, I have learned a lot in the last three and a half years. While I still think it is silly that we can display the assemblage on the fly without copyright problem, but cannot prebuild it as a montage, there is much that is silly about copyright law and our job is to obey it, even while laughing. It can, as I noted in the first DR, be easily replaced with wiki markup using the individual images. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This is an aggregate (defined in section 7) as far as GFDL 1.2 is concerned; a Collection (defined in section 1) as far as CC 3.0 licenses are concerned; and a Collective Work (defined in section 1) as far as CC 2.0 licenses are concerned. Section 7 of GFDL 1.2 and section 4.a. of CC 2.0 and 3.0 licenses all define that there is no requirement for other elements of an aggregate/collection to be compatible with the respective license. The description page should be made clearer though – there shouldn't be any {{Self}} template on it, only the individual license templates for the individual works. darkweasel94 15:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. better to be on the save site. --JuTa 10:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)