Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/08/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
![12 File:Promocion "Los Tranco".jpg](#File:Promocion_"Los_Tranco".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Milano_Mr-_Narendar_Pathak_2014-07-23_15-21.jpg){kind=link}
-_2014-07-23_13-58.jpg){kind=link}
-পিতা_-_মাওঃ_মোঃ_ইউনুছ-মাতা_-_মোসাঃ_জোহরা_বেগম-_2014-08-07_10-16.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![125 File:This is a symbol which is believed to represent the name and activities of my company "CHICO GROUP 2014-08-15 13-59.jpg](#File:This_is_a_symbol_which_is_believed_to_represent_the_name_and_activities_of_my_company_"CHICO_GROUP_2014-08-15_13-59.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-11-21_23-14.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - private image collection Magnolia677 (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nominated in error. Sorry and please disregard. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy Close: User retired nomination. File in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
uploder request. I choose wrong file for file:Q54298 Cheonan A02.JPG DangSunM (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Use {{Speedy}} for recent-uploaded deletion requests. — Revicomplaint? 12:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dupe of File:Agasajo Navideño en el Sitio Palo Solo de la parroquia Moromoro (11521626125).jpg Josve05a (talk) 18:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Processed as dupe russavia (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dupe of File:35 naños conchicola (12523218894).jpg Josve05a (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Processed as dupe russavia (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dupe of File:Asfaltado de la calle Ángel Tinoco Ruiz en la Ciudadela 28 de Mayo (11326054826).jpg Josve05a (talk) 18:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Processed as dupe russavia (talk) 18:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
False own work claim, likely a COM:TOO violation from a possibly too complicated design. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c)vio. clearly above TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Furchenstein as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrightverletzung siehe Diskussionseite -- Steinsplitter (talk) 18:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Im ersten Moment erscheint es unverständlich dass eine so alte Karte mit Rechten behaftet ist. Deshalb bitte die Verlinkung auf der Diskussionseite beachten. Grüße vom Chiemsee --Furchenstein (talk) 19:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Es mag zwar sein dass die Karte im Bayernatlas geführt wird, aber der Autor der Karte ist sicher nicht mehr am leben. Die Karte ist über 100 Jahre alt???--PeterC2014 (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept, This map is in the public domain as all rights have expired. h-stt !? 09:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Não usarei no meu artigo. Landerson Pessanha (talk) 16:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request and no license at all. JuTa 22:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [1] Magnolia677 (talk) 00:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [2] Magnolia677 (talk) 00:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [3] Magnolia677 (talk) 00:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see [4] Magnolia677 (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
![00:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/15#c-Magnolia677-2014-08-15T00:36:00.000Z-File:Promocion_"Los_Tranco".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
![16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/15#c-Ellin_Beltz-2014-08-21T16:09:00.000Z-File:Promocion_"Los_Tranco".jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation, see [5] Magnolia677 (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Almost guaranteed to be a copyright violation. A higher-resolution version was previously published here, for example, which itself credits a Twitter account. Huon (talk) 01:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- speedy delete Copy-vio. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Gerónimo Vianna consumiendo Cocucha en 1952, poco antes de asumir su primer periodo como presidente..jpg
[edit]
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The logo on the left part of this image exceeds that of a simple shape. LGA talkedits 04:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Does not consists of simple geometric shapes, they are more complex than that. LGA talkedits 04:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment Probably I thought this logo was less complex that it really is when I uploaded the file. I won't refuse to its deletion. - Fma12 (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete.--Andes (talk) 20:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 05:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file of blocked in enwiki user. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Derlis Hapkido (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chathuranga1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
- File:NICE WEEK END... at Palwehera.JPG
- File:MY CAR...JPG
- File:TENA... triy to eat.JPG
- File:EvininG....JPG
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal files.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of unfree character. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
test upload. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaidisabahat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
test upload. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of unfree content. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture, work by Janez Ronko Jr. (1876-1963). Eleassar (t/p) 07:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
very poor quality; Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
No source, own work claim doubtful. probably fan. Needs OTRS permission.
- File:Masha EXILIA Official 2013.jpg
- File:EXILIA USA Summer Tour 2013.jpg
- File:EXILIA Official Ph MAY 2013.png
- File:US Tour EX DP.jpg
- File:EXILIA US Tour.jpg
- File:EXILIA 2013.jpg
- File:EXILIA.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the church is non-free architecture, work by Janez Ronko Jr. (d. 1963). Eleassar (t/p) 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the church is non-free architecture, work by Janez Ronko Jr. (d. 1963). Eleassar (t/p) 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
very poor quality; Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Self-promotion is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal files. Self-promotion is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal file. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
There are no metadata and other files uploaded by Nemo012 are also deleted: File:제주마.jpg, File:제주흑우.jpg, File:성삼문 영정.jpg File:봉사조선창화시권 제첨, 1450년, 가로 1600cm, 세로 33cm.jpg--Namoroka (talk) 08:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Promo from user with 2 edits. Not in use. Out of SCOPE. Shakko (talk) 08:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC) ^ + File:Temptation Lessons from Trials in the Wilderness.jpg - his second poster. --Shakko (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Фото с выпускного вечера- Это пока единственное фото, где девушки находятся вместе- 2014-07-23 18-50.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
_Milano_Mr-_Narendar_Pathak_2014-07-23_15-21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Milano_Mr-_Narendar_Pathak_2014-07-23_15-21.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Pictured- Sarah Osborne with a goat- Also featuring evil goat (far right)- 2014-07-23 13-58.jpg
[edit]-_2014-07-23_13-58.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-_2014-07-23_13-58.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person.
Lupo 08:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person.
Lupo 08:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable persons. Lupo 08:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Arighi lutfie Bakrie sosok yang dikagumi karena kesungguh sungguhannya 2014-08-06 22-38.jpeg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:This image is of me, Phillip Medina- I was born on March 15 and I am in 7th grade- 2014-08-06 03-37.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:নাম - মুহাম্মদ হাবিবুল্লাহ্ (নেছারী)-পিতা - মাওঃ মোঃ ইউনুছ-মাতা - মোসাঃ জোহরা বেগম- 2014-08-07 10-16.jpg
[edit]-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BE_-_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%93%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%89%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%9B-%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BE_-_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE_%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%97%E0%A6%AE-_2014-08-07_10-16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BE_-_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%93%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%89%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%9B-%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BE_-_%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%83_%E0%A6%9C%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BE_%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%97%E0%A6%AE-_2014-08-07_10-16.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal picture of non-notable person. Lupo 08:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyrights Violation Meysam (talk) 09:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. Therefore, this image infringes the architect's copyright and must be deleted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted map. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio. Vantey (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image, no information, not educational or decorative. Richard Avery (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abd El-Rahman medhat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image, no information apart from image, spam? Richard Avery (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pervaiz1987 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
- File:Sindhi Ajrak in Hyderabad.jpg
- File:On field, Dreamworld, Karachi 2012.jpg
- File:Abu Dhabi, Emirates Palace, Jan 2013.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Standard alligators at the zoo shot. Not educative, little to recommend it. Richard Avery (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
test upload. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable and unknown person (there are many people with this name). Commons is not a family album Richard Avery (talk) 09:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope.
Martin H. (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal files. There is only user contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image. Nothing demonstrated in image that is not shown in several other better images Richard Avery (talk) 10:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image ireas (talk) 10:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused user page image ireas (talk) 10:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Seals of Manipur
[edit]According to w:Manipur, the state was established in 1972, so I'm not sure on what grounds the seal is assumed to have been published more than 60 years ago, as suggested by the copyright tag.
Stefan4 (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image, no educational use ireas (talk) 10:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image (out of scope) ireas (talk) 10:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
According to w:Chandigarh, the subdivision was established in 1966, so I am not sure on what grounds the seal is assumed to have been published more than 60 years ago, as suggested by the copyright tag. Stefan4 (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
There has been some discussion on the users page about this image contravening copyright and saying this file has been deleted! Richard Avery (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyrights Violation Meysam (talk) 11:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Incomplete image, little information, not educational or decorative. Commons is not a family album Richard Avery (talk) 11:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Very poor quality image showing no detail or anything of interest. Not linked Richard Avery (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 13:04, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation - evidently not the uploader's own work. — Yerpo Eh? 13:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation - evidently not the uploader's own work. Will be kept locally under terms of fair use. — Yerpo Eh? 13:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
no information, judging by title it is a test upload. routine hotel lounge (what is going on with the backs of the two people?) Richard Avery (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Nondescript view with no information geographical or contextual. Not high quality, not linked Richard Avery (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only images which should be replaced with wiki-tables.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The description says "Başağaç the photo sharing web space. Used without permission". There are possible copyright issues. The image is unplaced geographically and thus lack usefulness. Richard Avery (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files by Роман Костыренко
[edit]
Both files were uploaded for ru:Роман Витальевич Костыренко, which was deleted as No indication of importance. Alex Spade (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality image, no clear identification of the site. Description says "Başağaç photo sharing web domains town image. Used without permission." Richard Avery (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
No description of the site, Description says "Başağaç photo sharing web domains town image. Used without permission." Richard Avery (talk) 14:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El Armenio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Akcia 4.jpg
- File:Akcia 3.jpg
- File:Akcia 2.jpg
- File:Akcia 1.jpg
- File:Artagna 2.jpg
- File:Artagna 1.jpg
- File:Fan zone.jpg
- File:Handipum 5.jpg
- File:Handipum 4.jpg
- File:Handipum 3.jpg
- File:Handipum 2.jpg
- File:Handipum 1.jpg
- File:Ert 3.jpg
- File:Ert 2.jpg
- File:Ert 1.jpg
- File:Roman Berezovsky-"Sympathy of FAF 2011".jpg
- File:Sympathy of FAF.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Artear logos
[edit]First of all, none of them are "own work" but derivative works of Argentine Canal 13 logo (See official website). Beyond of that, the gradient and 3D effects make those images to be above the threshold of originality so they are more than simple shapes. Therefore, {{PD-textlogo}} would not apply here.
Files afected are:
- File:Wallpapper Canal seis 0.png
- File:Canal 9 Resistencia 2008.png
- File:Canal Diez 2008.png
- File:Logo El Trece.svg
- File:ElTreceARG.png
- File:Logo de Canal Seis.png
- File:Canal 9 Resistencia.png
Fma12 (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Because it is about "{{PD-textlogo}}" images of ARTEAR in Commons, i include these images to the nomination (which could also become part of the company):
--Mega-buses (talk) 02:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I Agree that files added by Mega-buses to the DR be removed. - Fma12 (talk) 12:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an absolute duplicate of File:Bb444.jpg. Richard Avery (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Assumed non-notable person, No description, no visual context. Richard Avery (talk) 14:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This file contains a copyrighted image of "Grumpy Cat" on the final page, and therefore can not be released under a free license 206.29.182.224 00:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ping Mike Peel for help. :) Jee 02:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Done - I've blanked the image in the PDF; please delete the old version only. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Old version deleted. INeverCry 01:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mission San Juan Bautista
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for statues.
- File:Mission San Juan Bautista (SJB, CA) - exterior, John the Baptist statue, John.jpg
- File:Mission San Juan Bautista (SJB, CA) - exterior, John the Baptist statue, locusts and wild honey.jpg
- File:Mission San Juan Bautista (SJB, CA) - exterior, John the Baptist statue, Luke.jpg
- File:Mission San Juan Bautista (SJB, CA) - exterior, John the Baptist statue, Mark.jpg
- File:Mission San Juan Bautista (SJB, CA) - exterior, John the Baptist statue, Matthew.jpg
_-_exterior,_John_the_Baptist_statue,_John.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_exterior,_John_the_Baptist_statue,_locusts_and_wild_honey.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_exterior,_John_the_Baptist_statue,_Luke.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_exterior,_John_the_Baptist_statue,_Mark.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_exterior,_John_the_Baptist_statue,_Matthew.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
File:This is a symbol which is believed to represent the name and activities of my company "CHICO GROUP 2014-08-15 13-59.jpg
[edit]
out of scope: personal doodle; unused. Lupo 15:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
not in use, dw, uploaders request Josve05a (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:M2-minneskort.jpg. Josve05a (talk) 15:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be photograph of a screen, unlikely to be original work Ytoyoda (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Small, poor quality image. Desription means little. Not a notable pair, little or nothing found on web. Name ambiguity a problem. Richard Avery (talk) 15:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The sun sorrounded by the number 5 looks complex enough to be a "simple geometric shape". - (See logo at Canal 5 website). - Fma12 (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
copyvio, the original photo can be seen at http://www.cecile-corbel.com/fr/images-photos-harpe-celtique.html XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
It's a pic of me. Not used anywhere. Uploaders request Josve05a (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The watermark "Denisemilani.com" suggests that the flickr uploader bonez1255 is not the copyright holder and that the licensing on Flickr is worth noting. See {{Flickrvionote}}. Martin H. (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- To tell the truth, I’ve downloaded this image only because it was tagged as "Public" on Flickr. I don’t mind your deleting this file since I consider another image of Denise to be much better. I didn’t know that the user proclaimed without grounds the right of everybody to copy the image. --Mluvka (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The description at the flickr source https://www.flickr.com/photos/37467370@N08/5757114338 says it all: "his cover is a fake I built myself, using a shot of model Denise Milani."... regretably the flickr user is not the photographer who created the photo, therefore the licensing cant apply to the photography. Martin H. (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a screencap ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
SVG version at File:Emblem of the Socialist Party of Chile.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Low-quality, out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 18:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Where to begin? First of all, it's a picture of a (then) nonpublic figure taken in private circumstances, possible even of a minor, and it's not at all clear to me that we have the right to publish it here, even if the photographer's license is valid. Second. the accompanying text doesn't exactlt inspire confidence that the purpose of the image doesn't include ridicule of the subject. Third, there's no real confirmation that this ia actually the article subject. And, fourth, especially in light of the above and the purported subject's documented history of pranking the media, this could very easily be a hoax. I don't see enough value in this image to outweigh the arguments against its use. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Claims "own work" as source, but this appears to be a professional media file from a red carpet event, and would need OTRS to substantiate "own work" credit. AsteriskStarSplat (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. These appear to be derivative works of pre-existing older photographs. If en:File:Hossein Shahshahani.jpeg is transferred here (presumably as File:Hossein Shahshahani.jpeg), it should also be considered part of this discussion, as it is the same photo as File:Hossein Shahshahani 2014-08-09 13-34.jpg.
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution, lack of metadata, nature of the images and the uploader's apparent habit of uploading copyright violations.
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷7.jpg – this one and others like it were probably grabbed from http://www.pololin.ws/fanny/, http://cici.shop.rakuten.tw/200000003647620/ or http://www.tnyn.com/cgi-bin/wmall_p.pl?kind_fn:k04!0=003059&E=
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷6.jpg
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷5.jpg
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷4.jpg
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷3.jpg
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷2.jpg – probably grabbed from http://www.tnyn.com/cgi-bin/wmall_p.pl?kind_fn:k08!0=003059&E=
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷1.jpg
- File:諶媽媽傳家老滷.jpg – probably grabbed from http://cici.shop.rakuten.tw/200000003679556/
- File:白目情人夢.jpg – looks like a screengrab of a video recording with graphics overlaid in the top-left corner which have been chopped off by cropping
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:34, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zdzisio71
[edit]These are four of the five uploads from this user. All are from the early 1970s. While it is perfectly possible that these are actually "own work", as claimed, they are old enough to it's appropriate to ask for explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 2014-08-14T22:25:59 (UTC)
- File:LUBINSKI 71 ZC.jpg
- File:PISZEK ZC.jpg
- File:Płk. Zdzisław Ciesiołkiewicz i Jan J.Więckowski, Warszawa 1971.jpg
- File:Rektor Mieczysław Łubiński, Warzszawa, 1971.jpg
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
User:Zdzisio71 has left a message on my talk page, stating that as a "young photographer" he actually took these images himself. Since they do not appear elsewhere on the web, I am assuming good faith and withdrawing the DR post closure. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
per COM:PORN Magnolia677 (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - personal photo Magnolia677 (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo Magnolia677 (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - "self-created artwork without obvious educational use" Magnolia677 (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted, see [6] Magnolia677 (talk) 20:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Photo has been added to a hoax/attack page on Wikipedia Magnolia677 (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
no OTRS permission from Alexander Mitew. 77.184.180.185 21:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ilovethewikis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not Flickr, Wikipedia is not Facebook. Photographs of himself and family and friends input by another sock of blocked editor, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajvir Singh Randhawa
- File:Randeep Singh Nabha at home.jpg
- File:Honey's behind.JPG
- File:Honey on leptop.JPG
- File:Honey photo shoot 2013.JPG
- File:Honey look 2013.JPG
- File:Honey in car 2013.jpg
- File:Honey in sikh child look 2013.jpg
- File:Honey at shimla.jpg
- File:Honey 2013.jpg
- File:Teenage Girl.jpg
- File:Indian Teenage Punjabi Boy.jpg
- File:Indian baby boy.jpg
- File:Honey singh.jpg
- File:Rajvir and Honey at Shimla tour.jpg
- File:Rajvir and Honey (Shimla tour).jpg
- File:Rajvir Singh Randhawa office.jpg
- File:Rajvir Singh Randhawa 2013.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Randeep Singh Nabha at home.jpg Can be kept. en:Randeep Singh Nabha is a Member of Legislative Assembly (en:WP:NPOL) in Punjab and his photo could be used for his Wikipedia article.--Vigyani (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Barcode on the file indicate copyright violations.--Vigyani (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Punjabpedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not Flickr, Wikipedia is not Facebook. Photographs of himself and family and friends input by another sock of blocked editor, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajvir Singh Randhawa
- File:Kulbir and Rajvir.jpg
- File:Kulbir and Sarbjeet.jpg
- File:Ammy and rajvir.jpg
- File:Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal at gym.jpg
- File:Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal and Ammy Virk.jpg
- File:Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal Ultimate Power.jpg
- File:Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal Gold.jpg
- File:Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal.jpg
- File:Ammy Virk and Sarbjeet Singh Dandiwal.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Accoring these edits the file was created 1957, which makes it not valid for {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. JuTa 21:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfortunately does not appear to be covered by {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. --DAJF (talk) 00:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
unlikely own work as stated. JuTa 21:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As per nom, highly unlikely to be uploader's own work. --DAJF (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
This file is wrong. Tszyantong (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: What is wrong?
- If the file does not that you expected, just upload a new version of them.
- If the filename is incorrect, use the Move file feature.
- If you really want to delete the file, please use {{Speedy}} instead.
- --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request deletion of page. Geagea (talk) 05:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Slavaguava (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Alex Quade at a movie Premiere.jpg
- File:Alex Quade visits Olympic Park.jpg
- File:Alex Quade in Italy.jpg
INeverCry 04:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eulogio diaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:TESIS -PRODUCCION DE PLANTONES DE CAFÉ (Coffea arabica L.) CON DIFERENTES SUSTRATOS Y ENRAIZADORES EN ECHARATI- CUSCO.pdf
- File:ART.CIENTIF. - PRODUCCION DE PLANTONES DE CAFÉ (Coffea arabica L.) CON DIFERENTES SUSTRATOS Y ENRAIZADORES EN ECHARATI- CUSCO.pdf
INeverCry 04:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:54, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kidingroove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 04:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 04:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 06:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, additionally copyright status unclear Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 05:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cecilia Fernandez17 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - watermarks - own work claim doubtful
- File:Municipalidad de El Nochero.jpg
- File:Plaza de El Nochero.jpg
- File:Escudo de Gregoria Pérez de Denis.jpg
- File:Club Social y Deportivo "El Nochero".jpg
- File:Gregoria Pérez de Denis.jpg
- File:El Nochero.jpg
INeverCry 05:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per above - Doubtful "own work" in all cases. Fma12 (talk) 14:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nhumailuan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Combining Clustering with Moving Sequential Patterns Mining.pdf
- File:Chap4 basic classification.pdf
INeverCry 05:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Kevin D Jimison - Studio Booth Sound Proof Wall - Photo Shoot - Sept 22nd, 2013 - God Over Everything Ministries.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 05:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:عمرفاروق.jpg
- File:محمدعمرفاروق.jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq.jpg
- File:WeLcOmE.jpg
- File:Vampire Umer.jpg
INeverCry 05:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not Flickr. Personal photos which were used in deleted autobio en:Muhammad Umer Farooq
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Portrait).png
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Best Friends).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Spirit).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Collage).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq 1.jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Best Friend).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Selfi).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Party).JPG
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Chinab).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Vampire).jpg
- File:Muhammad Umer Farooq (Chiniot).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 05:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: (c)vios Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
_2013-11-21_23-14.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-11-21_23-14.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:57, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
_2013-11-21_23-14.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
_2013-11-21_23-14.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 05:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlos lenza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image/artworks
INeverCry 06:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dianauknow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
INeverCry 06:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amier Blow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
- File:MK LoVeR'z 2013-11-22 21-01.jpg
- File:MK 06 Band 2013-11-22 20-32.jpg
- File:Kenangan 16 agustus 2013-MK 06 Band 2013-11-22 20-31.jpg
INeverCry 06:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks
- File:MN008.jpg
- File:MN009.jpg
- File:MN007.jpg
- File:MN006.jpg
- File:MN004.jpg
- File:MN005.jpg
- File:MN003.jpg
- File:AN002.jpg
- File:AN001.jpg
INeverCry 06:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basel - Roche Tower - Baufortschritt August 2014-9.jpg
[edit]
no more need (was moved) Wladyslaw (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: done Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 06:19, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 06:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope
INeverCry 06:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
This has a wrong title and it was reuploaded under correct title as File:1940 Estonian 1st class badge of Preservation of Nature.jpg, which is pretty much a duplicate, though slightly different shot. 88.196.241.249 09:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. next time use rename please Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Image is considered by some editors to contain sufficient creative content to warrant copyright protection. As an overhead line drawing with no color or shading, I am not certain what about it represents artistic creative choice (other than, perhaps, how much of the bird to draw). It would appear to me that anyone illustrating the same subject would generate almost exactly this same image, meaning it does not pass the threshold of originality. But that is just my opinion.KDS4444 (talk) 01:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted, User:KDS4444 if one was to point a camera at an owl's wing, one would create a new work with all the subsequent rights that would be due to the author, every one else doing the same thing would produce essentially the same image however each would also be due the rights expected of authorship however similar the resulting work is. Here the tool of capture is pen and paper, or whatever, and for that you would deny the author his/her rights.--KTo288 (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted map. No COM:FOP#Japan and copyvio. Vantey (talk) 09:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It may be only usual and useful map by Tokyo Metro. It may be not too close-up shot.--Benzoyl (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Other type map at Iidabashi Station [7] --Benzoyl (talk) 06:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As per nom. as the map is the main subject of the photo, this is not covered by Commons:De minimis either. --DAJF (talk) 00:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted. Derivative work--KTo288 (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Japan Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
FOP does not apply (not permanent) 217.186.193.141 09:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nichts Schützenswertes auf dem Bild. --Ralf Roleček 15:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Com:DW of Schultheiss with beer. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version of this. Tszyantong (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version of this. 84.208.226.169 18:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Accidently uploaded wrong file... Tszyantong (talk) 16:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Mappa errata e imprecisa, sostituita da una corretta in formato svg (File:Mappa ferrovia Brescia-Cremona.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 18:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by INeverCry Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
derivative of deleted photo. deletion log, see other derivative: File:LossyDemonstration-q85.jpg File:LossyDemonstration-92less.jpg File:LossyDemonstration-98less.jpg File:LossyDemonstration-84less.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uziel302 (talk • contribs) 2014-08-15T14:46:07 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
imho potentially non-free content, please see also File:CNR Satakam PDF File.pdf respectively File:Telugu bala Satakam PDF File.pdf, Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:52, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Change in ensign has been uploaded to File:Naval Ensign of India.svg and the older version has been uploaded separately. Fry1989 eh? 18:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Info The files' author now added the attributions and credits to both files. I wish to withdraw my DR. Keep --Martina talk 23:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
See also File:Multimedia Vision 2016.pdf
The video does not show any authors nor the specfic licences of the used images. The descripton page shows a random, incomplete and unspecified list of image authors, abbreviated to "and others", and incorrectly states a multi-license (CC-by-sa and CC-by) for all of them.
If content is licensed under CC-by-sa, authors (and/or a given other party) have to be clearly named with every image; a copy of, or the URI for, the applicable license version has to be included with every copy; the titles of all works (if supplied) have to be displayed; an URI for each licence legalcode has to be provided; all notices that refer to the applicable licenses have to be kept intact; a hint if the image was retouched and a link to the original source are required; the URI, if any, that licensors specify to be associated with the work, has to be shown; a credit identifying the use of the work in the adaptation is required.
These requrements are not met. Thus the files violate the licence terms; the rights granted by the licences terminate; the files are copyright violations. Martina talk 13:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- None of the media used for this clip are attributed which makes this clip a copyright violation. Take the first image for example. It comes from flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pedrosimoes7/6872425924/?rb=1 and the license is CC BY 2.0. Lets quote the license:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Neither in the clip
nor in the info template does this information appearedit: the name of the author appears in the description. But the source says: Wikimedia Foundation which is not correct. I have pointed this out a long time ago and still nearly all media in this category are lacking correct attribution. Of course I could go and fix this in every image but I think as an organization handling millions of creative commons images 'we' should attribute files on our own servers correctly. - Now I am not going to vote for deletion but I want to vote for fixing the attribution. For example the sparrow used in many mock ups for the media viewer is licensed under the CC BY 2.0 license. In the info template all the attribution is missing and below the image it says the image is licensed as cc-by-sa 3.0. (example). This change of license is not permitted. Amada44 talk to me 13:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Of course, if WMF corrects the mistakes and adds all required information and links properly, I would withdraw my deletion request. --Martina talk 14:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded the video but I didn't create it (I converted it to a free video format on behalf of the author). I agree that the credits at the time of the upload were insufficient, and that's why I reached out to the author and his colleagues to ask them to add the required credits. They are in the process of adding them; please just give them a little time. guillom 15:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- As the author already had been pointed to this issue in november: How long is a little time? --Martina talk 15:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd say no more than a few days, since they have already collected most of the credits, but are unlikely to work on the week-end. I've sent them another e-mail pointing to this DR as well. guillom 15:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think every admin can wait a week before making a decision. --Martina talk 17:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC) PS: I had also left a notice at Fabrice's talk page
- I'd say no more than a few days, since they have already collected most of the credits, but are unlikely to work on the week-end. I've sent them another e-mail pointing to this DR as well. guillom 15:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- As the author already had been pointed to this issue in november: How long is a little time? --Martina talk 15:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Martina and Amada44: Thank you so much for pointing out this oversight and for kindly outlining how to fix this error. I sincerely apologize for this mistake, for which I am solely responsible. :( As a relatively new employee at the Foundation, I was not fully aware of the detailed attribution requirements on Wikimedia Commons, particularly for multi-image presentations like this one.
- Now that you and guillom have clarified what needs to be done, I am preparing all the required information now on this spreadsheet and plan to wikify it, then post an update to the file's description, hopefully within an hour or two. Please let us know if you see any errors, and feel free to make any necessary improvements, either on the spreadsheet or in the description, once I post it. I thrive on feedback!
- In the meantime, I would respectfully ask that you not delete this file, which is strategically important to the foundation and to many community members who helped us create this vision. Amada44, I am sorry that I didn't see your request in November, as I was away on vacation when you posted it and it got lost among hundreds of other emails. Once we finalize license info for this WebM video and companion PDF slides, we plan to focus on all the mockups, but this could take us more time, given the number of files involved -- so we would be grateful if you could give us another week or so for those mockups.
- Going forward, our multimedia team is planning to work with Wikidata and the Commons community to build a 'structured data' system so that all this license info could be made 'machine-readable' and automatically cross-posted properly, to reduce the amount of manual labor required to give proper attribution in cases like these. This is a long-term effort, which many community members have been asking for, and which will probably take through the end of 2014, but seems much-needed. This particular incident has sensitized me even more to the importance of this issue, and given me greater clarity on all of the license fields we need to support in this system (note that my spreadsheet already has 18 different fields, and may still be missing a few :).
- Again, I really appreciate your helpful guidance and clear recommendations -- and I am deeply sorry for any inconvenience I may have caused to you and to the photographers who so generously contributed their work to the free culture movement. I will post again in an hour with a link to a proposed solution to this issue and will be available through the weekend to help resolve this effectively. Thanks for your patience and understanding :) Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, Fabrice, for your understanding and all efforts to repair the credits in your publications. Please let me know when it's done so that I can then immediatly withdraw this DR. --Martina talk 18:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Martina: You're very welcome -- and many thanks for so kindly helping me fill in some of the info on the spreadsheet ! It's really fun and informative to work with an experienced user like you -- and you taught me a lot :) And I particularly appreciate that you took so much time to coach me on a Saturday evening.
- I have now posted detailed license information in the video page's description, with links to images, authors and licenses, as well as special notices where appropriate. I would be most grateful if you could take a look at the description -- and recommend or make any edits you think are still needed. I kept the CC-BY-SA-3.0 license for the overall video, audio, design and images other than photos and maps, which seems like the right thing to do, but I will double-check this with our legal team on Monday.
- For now, I would be grateful if you would remove the deletion notice for this file and its companion slides, as any remaining issues can be sorted out collaboratively in coming days. I don't want this to impact our overall discussion about the proposed vision, so that participants can focus on the big picture: how do we want to share knowledge and collaborate through multimedia in coming years?
- Thanks again for being such a gracious collaborator, I am really enjoying working with you on this project :) Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- As regular user (without extended rights) I am afaik not allowed to remove the DR tags from the files. But I asked an administrator to close this DR and remove the tags. It is after midnight in Germany but I am sure that he will do it tomorrow morning. --Martina talk 00:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again for being such a gracious collaborator, I am really enjoying working with you on this project :) Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept, attribution issues have been addressed.Geni (talk) 00:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Multimedia Vision 2016.pdf
This file incorporates the now deleted 'Mrs Nixon meeting with Big Bird' file that was batch deleted on July 19, 2014. WMF staff uploads should be scrutinized since some are unaware of basic Commons policies 172.56.9.221 03:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Please allow me a week or two to deal with this issue. I am currently in London, following the Wikimania conference, and am not in a position to address your concerns right away. But I intend to address them as soon as I can. Please do not delete this file, which is important to us and to the many community members who work with our team. Thanks for your patience and understanding. Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- In order to deal with this issue, I think you will need to secure agreement from the Children's Television Workshop to release any copyright claim on this depiction of Big Bird under a free license; or else delete that image from the PDF and re-upload. @Fabrice Florin (WMF): can you at least state which of those avenues you intend to pursue? -Pete F (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- For convenience of anyone following along, I found where this image is used -- slides #22 to 24 in the slide deck. -Pete F (talk) 22:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: can you work your PDF magic on this one? -Pete F (talk) 03:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've blanked the image out in the PDF, although please note that the PDF isn't 'flattened' and so with the right program (Apple Preview / Adobe Acrobat) the blanking can be easily undone. I can't figure out how to flatten a PDF on a mac without changing the page size at the same time... I can't do anything to help with the video, I'm afraid. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Aha, I think I've found a way to flatten the PDF and keep the page size the same! It required setting up a new 'Paper Size' of 1024x768mm, and then 'printing' to a PDF file. I've uploaded a new version - please can the anon editor check to see whether the blanking/covering can still be removed with Adobe Reader? It does increase the resolution of the file, but this doesn't seem to have an effect on filesize at all. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've blanked the image out in the PDF, although please note that the PDF isn't 'flattened' and so with the right program (Apple Preview / Adobe Acrobat) the blanking can be easily undone. I can't figure out how to flatten a PDF on a mac without changing the page size at the same time... I can't do anything to help with the video, I'm afraid. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Mike Peel: can you work your PDF magic on this one? -Pete F (talk) 03:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- The copyrighted file remains in the file, and can be extracted using Adobe Acrobat. 2607:FB90:220C:3322:9C57:1A6:C9A8:190C 08:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hmm. Just to check: does it now need Adobe Acrobat to do this, or can Adobe Reader still do it? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've downloaded a copy of Adobe Reader to see if I could reproduce this, but can't. If this is still a problem, then please let me know the steps you're taking to extract the blanked image from the file. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Pete and Mike: Thanks as well for addressing this issue on the PDF. Now that I am back in the office, and if the blanked image issue is still a serious problem, I could make a change to the original Google Presentation file to replace the Big Bird image with another image that would *look* like a copyright violation (to illustrate the scenario), but wouldn't actually be a real violation (suggestions welcome).
- Then I could re-export the PDF and overwrite the other file, which can all be done in about 30 mins. Fixing the WebM file is another matter, that would probably take a couple hours, all said and done.
- But before we jump through all these hoops, are we absolutely convinced that all this work is really needed? With all due respect, it seems that we may be going overboard, in a situation that looks like fair use to me. I am quite familiar with licensing issues, having made a living from licensing for much of my career: I personally signed hundreds of licensing agreements with major brands (Garfield, Dilbert, South Park, etc.), negotiating on both sides of the table, often with millions of dollars at stake. Given that professional background, a lot of the current nit-picking seems excessive to me, given that we are not exploiting these properties for commercial gain. I can't imagine the licensing agent for Big Bird seriously coming after us for this minor use of their image for demonstration purposes. I certainly wouldn't if I were in their shoes. I will respect the community's policies and do that work if it is deemed absolutely necessary, but had to express my personal view on this point, for the record.
- Thanks again for all your help in attempting to preserve this important document on Commons. Your generosity is much appreciated. :) Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I note that the pdf file contains two images that are sourced from Flickr, not Commons. This raises two questions.
- First, why did the creators of these files decide that they would be better served by going to our competitor rather than using images from Commons? That seems very strange, particularly since, as I understand it, these are intended to become showpieces for WMF. To be sure, the two could become Commons images, but why didn't anyone bother to do that before using them in an apparently important WMF document?
- Second, although the Flickr images are currently freely licensed, that can change at any time. If the images had been uploaded to Commons, they could have Flickrreview tags, but that doesn't work for constituent images.
- Finally, I am very much surprised and disappointed by the remarks from Fabrice Florin above. Saying
- "I can't imagine the licensing agent for Big Bird seriously coming after us for this minor use of their image"
- goes directly against our core values as expressed at Precautionary Principle #1. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Brief comment - I've copied one of the two flickr images to Commons and updated the link in the attribution. I'm having difficulties moving the other one over for some reason - am out of time at the moment to debug that though. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Done "Kangas portrait" Jee 09:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Finally, I am very much surprised and disappointed by the remarks from Fabrice Florin above. Saying
- @Fabrice Florin (WMF): I do think it is ideal, especially for such an official document, if you could go back to the source file and make the changes that bring this into compliance with Commons policies in whatever way you see fit. I think it's less than optimal that an uninvolved volunteer like @Mike Peel: should have to approximate this, for a few reasons:
- It's an unnecessary drain on volunteer resources
- It projects an image that WMF does not care about its projects' licensing policies
- The judgments Mike makes may differ slightly from yours; @Jdforrester (WMF): recently described a similar case as being dishonest, in that (if I understood him correctly) it resulted in a PDF that didn't accurately reflect what was presented to staff; it's better if the author can determine the best way to walk that line using his own judgment, rather than having somebody else guess.
- As has been discussed on other DRs, it is difficult or maybe impossible to fully remove the copyrighted file from the PDF once the PDF has been generated.
- I see that nobody else has pointed out, "fair use" is not an acceptable rationale for keeping a file on Wikimedia Commons. This is due not merely to the local policy of Wikimedia Commons, but due to a Resolution passed by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees in 2007. -Pete F (talk) 20:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Fabrice Florin (WMF): I do think it is ideal, especially for such an official document, if you could go back to the source file and make the changes that bring this into compliance with Commons policies in whatever way you see fit. I think it's less than optimal that an uninvolved volunteer like @Mike Peel: should have to approximate this, for a few reasons:
- Delete The image has to be replaced or removed, blanking is not sufficient if it's still possible to extract the affected image. This de-facto unlicensed image renders the document's cc-by-sa license invalid. This DR should be kept open until end of August, editing the Video (or trying to get a permission from CTW) may take some time. --Denniss (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unless the big bird image is fully removed from the presentation and the other Flickr images are uploaded to Commons, which point I would change this to keep. Zellfaze (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per discussion and WMF should really start respecting the copyright of our uploaders and they should starting to respect Commons policy. Plenty of time to fix this has been given and Commons simply cannot hoste file which are against Commons Policy because somobody has a busy scedule. 12 days have been given to fix this file and it simply didnot happen properly. "Please do not delete this file, which is important to us and to the many community members who work with our team." if that's really true you would have fixed it in time. Natuur12 (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted the PDF since Mike Peel found a a way to really blur out the image. If anyone can still extract the copyrighted image, please let him know and tell him how you did it. Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Galley fan art 3
[edit]
Same basic problems as with Commons:Deletion requests/Galley fan art and Commons:Deletion requests/Galley fan art 2. No indication that they were made by experts in the field, so that makes them the naval history equivalents of Category:Inaccurate dinosaur restorations. They have no appropriate use.
Peter Isotalo 20:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Each time when I try to draw a dromon, even if it's according with the Nautiko Mouseion ton Ellados of Peiraeus, or the Musée de la marine of Paris, and with Louis Bréhier or Georg Ostrogorski (great byzntinologues), someone find the model "inaccurate", and the models "accurate" according with "A", are "innacurate" according with "B" and vice-versa. If I draw latine sails, someone say : "Oh, no, the sails had right yards", but if I draw right yards, some others said "Oh, no, the sails had inclinate yards". Is it so difficult to write to me and ask : "your sources please ?" or "would you please rectify this point ?" Is it a so great pleasure (enjoying) to criticise and DELETE a WORK ? --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert on the subject, so I believe it is appropriate for us Wikipedians to rely on experts. In this context, you're no more an expert than me or anyone else here. From what I know, the actual appearance of dromons is highly conjectural. The only actual archaeological evidence that has been found is from the ongoing Marmaray excavations in Istanbul,[8] and those are pretty scant. There are academics who have presented interpretations, but you are not one of them.
- If your illustrations are actually based on the works of others you should specify your sources. And why do these two images depict entirely different designs? "Teresa Dromonia" looks very much like an ancient galley, but with the ram above the surface while "DromonMicro" is more akin to a galea sottile. The upper banks of also oars seem implausibly high, and all ships have quite different designs. What is the design on the rigging based on? What's the evidence for a gigantic fighting top on the main mast of the largest vessel? Just like Wikipedia doesn't accept articles on anything, Commons isn't the place to upload speculative historical illustrations.
- Peter Isotalo 21:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- So, I prefer this dialogue. You're right, we're not specialists of dromons and my mistake is to forgot sometimes to cite exactly my sources (scholars or other artists), but please, now think by yourself (and don't let some rules thinking for you) : the dromon (as the dinosaurs and prehistoric men) reconstitutions and interpretations are conjectural, yes, evidently ! but you and me, must we hide or show the different POVs, controversies, versions ? My action (drawing and upload) intented to show, your action (delete) intented to hide. The authoritary deleting of my drawings in all the articles about dromons seems the authoritarian methods of our young times in our "Rodinas", the USSR and in the socialist Romania ! Is it so nasty, so hard to add under my drawings (and in their legends in the articles) the adjective "conjectural", and so pleasant, so easy to delete this conjectural reconstitutions, hmmmm ? Прощай, товарищь... --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's quite simple: you don't appear to be a published historian or archaeologist. As such, your conjecture, while well-meaning, is not appropriate to include in the project. Using illustrations like these is no different from making unreferenced claims in the form of text. This isn't about stamping out a relevant controversy or sweeping a certain POV under the rug, it's just that this image merely conveys your personal vision. And that's not relevant to any project.
- Peter Isotalo 13:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- And again, these are two entirely different types of galleys. What's up with that?
- Peter Isotalo 13:33, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- If I understand you, only the specialists are allowed to contribute ? Only the historians of the byzantine navy are allowed to illustrate themselves their works ? Only the palaeontologists are allowed to draw prehistoric species ? So, if you're right, all the museographers, the scientific documentar-movies makers, the palaeontological painters as Zdenek Burian or Charles R. Knight are wrong and their creations are bullshit. My own creations as this exhibition & book [9], are bullshit. And the institutions, as some french Museums (Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Musée national de la marine, Toulon: Muséum d'histoire naturelle de Toulon et du Var, Musée de la marine de Toulon) are morons when they trust my works... May be you're right... may be they all are morons and I'm one too ? Who knows ? We may be everytime ready to doubt. What's up with that ? Nothing. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Illustrations by published authors are not the problem. It depends on the author, of course, but I don't have anything against Burian, Knight or any other published author specifically. We can't, however, simply copy their illustrations since they are copyrighted. And I assume that making images "inspired" by their work can't be freely licensed either since they are essentially derivative works. I don't know how much is permissible, though, so anyone is free to correct me here.
- The alternative to avoiding derivative works is to make one's own interpretation, but that amounts to a form of original research. It really doesn't matter if you claim to have good sources, since you'd still be, quite literally, drawing your own conclusions.
- Peter Isotalo 18:16, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK with the rules and your post under. When I draw a dromon, as a painter, not as a Naval architect or an historian of the navies, I make logically a derivative work since the predecessors in the domain, and I follow what I read in the sources, helped by the advices of Bruno de La Barre, teacher of naval architecture & history at the IPFM ([www.ipfm.fr/ipfm.php]) and some other colleagues. It's the same thing with the fossil species, with the palaeogeographers and the palaeontologists. So, I don't "draw my conclusions" but their. Sometimes other persons can criticises my images (dinosaurs or dromons, etc), and this is not a problem because I'm everytime ready to correct and modify these images. The deleting is right (on my opinion) even if the drawing is so wrong, than it's impossible or too hard to correct it. Sincerely, I can't definite exactly where is the end of the compilation and the beginning of the original research, but I suppose than when I derivate since another creation, I'm out of the original ? Sorry for my rocky english. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- I understand your argumentation. And this case isn't as problematic as Sven Littowski's iamges (previous galley fan art deletions), since they were obviously very free artistic interpretations. Some input from third parties will probably resolve this.
- Peter Isotalo 11:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK with the rules and your post under. When I draw a dromon, as a painter, not as a Naval architect or an historian of the navies, I make logically a derivative work since the predecessors in the domain, and I follow what I read in the sources, helped by the advices of Bruno de La Barre, teacher of naval architecture & history at the IPFM ([www.ipfm.fr/ipfm.php]) and some other colleagues. It's the same thing with the fossil species, with the palaeogeographers and the palaeontologists. So, I don't "draw my conclusions" but their. Sometimes other persons can criticises my images (dinosaurs or dromons, etc), and this is not a problem because I'm everytime ready to correct and modify these images. The deleting is right (on my opinion) even if the drawing is so wrong, than it's impossible or too hard to correct it. Sincerely, I can't definite exactly where is the end of the compilation and the beginning of the original research, but I suppose than when I derivate since another creation, I'm out of the original ? Sorry for my rocky english. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- If I understand you, only the specialists are allowed to contribute ? Only the historians of the byzantine navy are allowed to illustrate themselves their works ? Only the palaeontologists are allowed to draw prehistoric species ? So, if you're right, all the museographers, the scientific documentar-movies makers, the palaeontological painters as Zdenek Burian or Charles R. Knight are wrong and their creations are bullshit. My own creations as this exhibition & book [9], are bullshit. And the institutions, as some french Museums (Paris: Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Musée national de la marine, Toulon: Muséum d'histoire naturelle de Toulon et du Var, Musée de la marine de Toulon) are morons when they trust my works... May be you're right... may be they all are morons and I'm one too ? Who knows ? We may be everytime ready to doubt. What's up with that ? Nothing. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- So, I prefer this dialogue. You're right, we're not specialists of dromons and my mistake is to forgot sometimes to cite exactly my sources (scholars or other artists), but please, now think by yourself (and don't let some rules thinking for you) : the dromon (as the dinosaurs and prehistoric men) reconstitutions and interpretations are conjectural, yes, evidently ! but you and me, must we hide or show the different POVs, controversies, versions ? My action (drawing and upload) intented to show, your action (delete) intented to hide. The authoritary deleting of my drawings in all the articles about dromons seems the authoritarian methods of our young times in our "Rodinas", the USSR and in the socialist Romania ! Is it so nasty, so hard to add under my drawings (and in their legends in the articles) the adjective "conjectural", and so pleasant, so easy to delete this conjectural reconstitutions, hmmmm ? Прощай, товарищь... --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Kept-In use at fr:wiki, where they are cleared captioned as conjecture. This is a lot less controversial file then for example the ones we have for flags and maps, where policy is we stay out of arguments about accuracy and stick to copyright issues. The previous deletions seem to have been more about copyright then accuracy, they were watermarked with the URL of one particular site. Feel free to add fact disputed to the two nominees.--KTo288 (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Post-closing comment: Not contesting the close per se, but the summary of the previous deletions is really not accurate. Sven Littowski's galley images were deleted because they were deemed to be highly inaccurate and unhistorical "original personal art". The watermarks didn't help, but they don't amount to copyright violations. There might be disagrements, but the issue here is clearly one of COM:EDUSE. Separate discussions on various language versions of Wikipedia is not appropriate in these cases. Peter Isotalo 10:10, 27 August 2014 (UTC)